<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BrightShadows</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BrightShadows"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/BrightShadows"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T23:35:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_Bible_Project&amp;diff=729965</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative Bible Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_Bible_Project&amp;diff=729965"/>
		<updated>2009-12-12T17:00:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BrightShadows: .('_')d&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For older discussion, see [[Talk:Conservative Bible Project/Archive 1|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(continuing from archive)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comment Here ==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals would have to read the Bible?  As a pagan moderate, I've actually schooled conservatives in their knowledge of the Bible.  The accusation should be made as a whole.  I talked to someone that considered themselves a Christian conservative who once told me he needed to read the Bible.  Go to Bass Pro Shops and hang out for a bit.  Those people carry camo bibles but don't know what it says in it, other than homosexuals being wrong.  This accusation that anyone, liberals, moderates, or conservatives as a whole haven't read the Christian bible should be taken out. - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed, from a Christian who sees enough other Christians at church to know the above person is largely correct.  -Jones&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BrightShadows</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=729961</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=729961"/>
		<updated>2009-12-12T16:54:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BrightShadows: Addtition of fact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Stem Cells are thankfully a non-issue now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, President Bush was proven right.  He drew a line...no federal funds for questionable results but with verified embryo death.  &lt;br /&gt;
Now, without federal funding, stem cells can be extracted from the placenta and amniotic fluid (discovered by an NC team) and of course, the recent &amp;quot;de-differentiation&amp;quot; of cells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of yet, said cells do not have the same potential for transformation or use as others, but they are certainly better than nothing.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BrightShadows</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>