<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=C12Elliot</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=C12Elliot"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/C12Elliot"/>
	<updated>2026-09-12T00:22:44Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oklahoma&amp;diff=1022449</id>
		<title>Oklahoma</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oklahoma&amp;diff=1022449"/>
		<updated>2012-12-08T19:39:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: /* Politics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{USState&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Oklahoma&lt;br /&gt;
|flag=Oklahoma_State_Flag.gif&lt;br /&gt;
|motto=Labor omnia vincit&lt;br /&gt;
|nick=The Sooner State&lt;br /&gt;
|capital=Oklahoma City  &lt;br /&gt;
|language=None&lt;br /&gt;
|governor=Mary Fallin&lt;br /&gt;
|gparty=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|senator2=Tom Coburn &lt;br /&gt;
|s2party=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|s2phone=(202) 224-5754&lt;br /&gt;
|s2email=http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCoburn.Home Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|senator1=James Inhofe&lt;br /&gt;
|s1party=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|s1phone=(202) 224-4721&lt;br /&gt;
|s1email=http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|population=&lt;br /&gt;
|date=November 16, 1907 (46th)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Oklahoma''' is located in the Southern region of the [[United States]] and on November 16th, 1907 became the forty-sixth state to enter into the union. The capital of Oklahoma is [[Oklahoma City]], which is also its largest city.  According to the 2000 Census, the state's population was 3,450,654 people.[http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/40000.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most famous personality was [[Will Rogers]], a cowboy celebrity and humorist of the 1920s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Elected Officials==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Federal===&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[James Inhofe]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Tom Coburn]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[John Sullivan]] [R, OK-01]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Dan Boren]] [D, OK-02]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Frank Lucas]] [R, OK-03]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Tom Cole]] [R, OK-04]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[James Lankford]] [R, OK-05]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statewide===&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor [[Marry Fallin]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lt. Governor [[Todd Lamb]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Attorney General [[Scott Pruitt]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Insurance Commissioner [[John Doak]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Corporation Commissioner [[Dana Murphy]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Superintendent of Public Instruction [[Janet Barresi]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Auditor Inspector [[Gary Jones]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Labor Commissioner [[Mark Costello]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*State Treasurer Ken Miller (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
===Early visits===&lt;br /&gt;
The written history of Oklahoma began in 1541 with the Spanish travel journals of the Coronado expedition). Two groups of Native Americans lived in the region: the nomadic, bison-hunting Plains groups (Kiowas, Comanches, and Kiowa-Apaches) and the sedentary, agricultural Caddoan-speaking groups (Wichitas and the Caddos). In 1803 [[Thomas Jefferson]] purchased the the region from France in the [[Louisiana Purchase]]. A few U.S. Army officers, naturalists, adventurers, traders, and missionaries visited the area.&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
===Relocation===&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in 1820, the federal government started using the region to resettle tribes relocated from the Southeast. The tribes received federal subsidies in terms of food and supplies.  Named the '''Indian Territory''', it became home to over sixty tribes.  The largest were the &amp;quot;Five Civilized Tribes,&amp;quot; ([[Cherokee]], [[Choctaw]], [[Chickasaw]], [[Creek]], and [[Seminole]]).  Intermarriage with whites had produced a modernizing leadership class that adopted American ways, often in the face of resistance from traditionalists. Christian missionaries were active with all the tribes, and were increasingly successful in converting them.  In 1830, [[Andrew Jackson]] had Congress pass the the [[Indian Removal Act]] giving the Army power to forcibly remove the tribes to their new territory.  Exposed to disease, lack of supplies, and emotional distress, there was great suffering during the removal; the ordeal is called the [[Trail of Tears]].  Apart from missionaries and a few federal agents, the population was entirely native American at this point. &lt;br /&gt;
===Civil War===&lt;br /&gt;
At the outbreak of the [[American Civil War|Civil War]] in 1861, federal agents abandoned Indian Territory.  The [[Confederate States of America|Confederacy]] moved in and negotiated treaties with the Five Civilized Tribes.   The tribes owned black slaves, which they fought to keep.  The Confederacy paid the subsidies the U.S. government had paid, permanently guarantee their lands and their right to tribal self-government, and provide military protection and guns. The Cherokees and Choctaws were authorized to send a delegate to the Confederate Congress, with the prospect of eventually become a Confederate state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Dale and Wardell, ''History of Oklahoma'' (1948) p. 164&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the Confederacy secured alliances with most of the tribes, some tried to remain neutral or pro-U.S., which led to violent conflict with the Confederate Indians.  The first battle in occurred at Round Mountain, where Confederates defeated Unionist Creek and Seminoles led by Opothleyahola.  The Confederates dominated the territory until early 1862, as Union forces returned and won battles at Pea Ridge, Fort Gibson, and Honey Springs.  The Confederate Indians were the last to surrender, three months after Robert E. Lee surrendered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baird and Goble, ''The Story of Oklahoma'', (1994) p. 179&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reconstruction===&lt;br /&gt;
Going to war against the United States proved to be the downfall of Indian independence.  The Five Tribes were punished and forced to cede their lands in western Oklahoma to new tribes that were moved in, including the Arapahoe, Kiowa, Apache, Wichita, Caddo and Osage. By 1885, 45 new tribes had relocated to Indian Territory.  Cattle drives brought large herds from Oklahoma and Texas across the state to railheads in Kansas, making Oklahoma synonymous with the [[cowboy]]. &lt;br /&gt;
The new treaties granted the railroads the right to lay track across Indian Territory and by 1905, 5,231 miles of track had been laid and the cattle drives had ended.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baird and Goble, ''The Story of Oklahoma'', (1994) p.191&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
===Railroads and white settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
Railroads brought new economic opportunities, and for the first time led to an influx of white settlers; soon the the Indians were outnumbered.  Hunters (both white and Indian) slaughtered the buffalo (bison)  herds, a primary food source of  some tribes.  Crime and lawlessness became rampant.  The tribes appealed to the federal government for help, which was granted in 1871 with the establishment of a federal court to deal with issues in the territory.  This new court usurped the power of less powerful Indian courts.  The [[Dawes Act of 1887]] gave Indians title to land individually (rather than tribally), and they started to sell it off.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the 1880's many Americans were looking for a new start and sought to use the [[Homestead Act]] as the legal right to settle the unassigned lands in Oklahoma.  The federal government unsuccessfully attempted to disallow this.  Eventually the government relented and the Land Run of 1889 opened the lands of Oklahoma to white settlement on April 22, 1889. Over 50,000 homesteaders arrived and at noon raced to claim 160 acre homesteads.  Those settlers who made an illegal head start were called &amp;quot;sooners&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Edward Everett Dale and Morris L. Wardell, ''History of Oklahoma'' (1948), 249-250 explain their actions were highly illegal. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually more reservations were opened up as whites bought parcels of lands from Indian owners and formed farm and ranching settlements. The western part was separated and named '''Oklahoma Territory'''; a territorial government was formed by Congress in 1890. Cities sprang up overnight, including Oklahoma City, Stillwater, Kingfisher, Edmond, and Guthrie.  Guthrie became the new capital of Oklahoma Territory, in the west, with Indian Territory in the east. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statehood===&lt;br /&gt;
The combined population reached 1 million, but they resisted being joined together and desired to be admitted to the United States as separate states.  Indian Territory had even gone to the lengths of creating a constitution to form a new state named Sequoyah.  The Roosevelt administration had no desire to see this happen, as he was a Republican and Indian Territory would have almost certainly been a Democratic stronghold.  Congress in 1906 authorized a constitutional convention to merge the two territories.  The convention and early government was dominated by Democrats. The '''State of Oklahoma''' was officially admitted to the Union on November 16, 1907, with a democratic constitution that prohibited liquor, established [[Jim Crow]] laws, provided for the initiative and referendum, created strong county governments, regulated railroad rates, and limited the governor to one elected term.  &lt;br /&gt;
===Politics===&lt;br /&gt;
The early years of statehood were marked with political activity.  In 1910, the Democrats moved the capital to Oklahoma City, three years before the Oklahoma Organic Act allowed, in order to move away from the Republican hotbed of Guthrie.  Socialism became a growing force among struggling farmers, and Oklahoma grew to have the largest Socialist vote in the United States at the time, with the Socialist vote doubling in every election until the outbreak of [[World War I]] in 1914.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baird and Goble, ''The Story of Oklahoma'', (1994) p. 346&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  However, the war drove food prices up, allowing the farmers to prosper, and the movement faded away.  By the 1920's, the Republican Party, taking advantage of rifts within the Democratic Party, gained control in the state.  The economy continued to improve,in the areas of cattle ranching, cotton, wheat, and especially, oil. Since 1968 Oklahoma has voted for the [[Republican Party]] in Presidential elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the 1920s, new oil fields were continually discovered and Oklahoma produced over 1.8 billion barrels of petroleum, valued at over 3.5 million dollars for the decade.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baird and Goble, ''The Story of Oklahoma'', (1994) p. 366&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1920 the spectacular Osage County oil field was opened, followed in 1926 by the Greater Seminole Oil Field. When the [[Great Depression]] Oklahoma and texas oil was flooding the market and prices fell to pennies a gallon. In 1931 Governor William H. Murray, acting with characteristic decisiveness, used the National Guard to shut down all of Oklahoma's oil wells in an effort to stabilize prices. National policy became using the [[Texas Railroad Commission]] to set allotments in Texas, which raised prices as well for Oklahoma crude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Depression===&lt;br /&gt;
The combination of the [[Great Depression]] and the [[Dust Bowl]] put an end to economic prosperity in the 1930s.  Farmers were hit the hardest and many relocated to the cities. Others, called &amp;quot;Okies&amp;quot;,  began a mass migration of to [[California]] in search of a better life, an image that would be popularized in American culture by [[John Steinbeck]]'s novel, ''[[The Grapes of Wrath]]'' and Henry Fonda's movie.   The economy recovered during World War II, when conservative Governor [[Robert S. Kerr]] utilized friendships in Washington to secure federal money to help the state recover.  Oklahoma built and expanded numerous army and navy installations and air bases, which in turn brought thousands of jobs to out of work citizens. By the 1950s Oklahoma was prosperous and growing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/toc.html ''Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture'' from Oklahoma Historical Society]], highly recomended online resource&lt;br /&gt;
*  Baird, W. David, and Danney Goble. ''The Story of Oklahoma'' (2nd ed. 1994), 511 pages, survey by leading scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Dale, Edward Everett, and Morris L. Wardell. ''History of Oklahoma'' (1948), 574 pp; standard scholarly history [http://www.questia.com/library/book/history-of-oklahoma-by-edward-everett-dale-morris-l-wardell.jsp online edition from [[Questia]]] &lt;br /&gt;
* Gibson, Arrell Morgan. ''Oklahoma: A History of Five Centuries'' (1981) [http://www.amazon.com/Oklahoma-Centuries-Arrell-Morgan-Gibson/dp/0806117583/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1199768836&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Goble, Danny. ''Progressive Oklahoma: The Making of a New Kind of State'' (1979)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Goins, Charles Robert  et al. ''Historical Atlas of Oklahoma'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Historical-Atlas-Oklahoma-Charles-Robert/dp/0806134828/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1199768836&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory, James N. ''American Exodus: The Dust Bowl Migration and Okie Culture'' (1991) [http://www.amazon.com/American-Exodus-Migration-Culture-California/dp/0195071360/ref=sid_av_dp excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reese, Linda Williams. ''Women of Oklahoma, 1890-1920,'' (1997) [http://www.amazon.com/Women-Oklahoma-1890-1920-Linda-Williams/dp/0806129999/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1199769187&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wickett, Murray R. ''Contested Territory: Whites, Native Americans, and African Americans in Oklahoma 1865-1907'' (2000)  [http://www.amazon.com/Contested-Territory-Americans-Oklahoma-18651907/dp/0807126470/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1199769187&amp;amp;sr=8-5 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:States of the United States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021678</id>
		<title>Family Ties</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021678"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T15:36:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Family Ties was a sitcom drama series that ran from 1982-1989 on NBC. [It was one of the first of family comedies that emerged in the 1980's. With a rocky start in the ratings, Family Ties rose to number 2 after it was placed in the prized time-slot right after The Cosby Show and remained there from 1984 until 1987.&amp;lt;citiation needed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The synopsis is centered on the Keaton family, where ex-hippy liberals Steve (Michael Gross)  and Elyse (Meredith Baxter Birney) who four children, Alex (Michael J Fox), Mallory (Justine Bateman), Jennifer (Tina Yothers) and Andrew (Brian Bonsall), who was born in 1985. What was unique about Family Ties was that it blended family comedy with politics. The 1960s flower children, Steven and Elyse clashed with the 1980s conservative, Alex. The show, in a way, showed the changing values during the Reagan era. Besides political views, Family Ties covered a number of controversial topics ranging from suicide to racism to drug dependency. Skippy was a neighbor who had a never-ending crush on Mallory. Ellen was Alex's first serious girlfriend. After breaking up with her, he became seriously involved with Lauren, a psychology student and Nick Moore was Mallory's serious boyfriend. Many episodes promote conservative and other positive values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Season 1 (1982/83): This list includes episodes and their plots&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Pilot: Alex wins a date with a pretty rich girl, but the dates involves him attending a privileged club which does not amuse his liberal father. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2)Not with my Sister you don't: When his parents are away, Alex throws a party in the house where many classmates attend. But when Mallory runs off with the high school Romeo he is filled with anguish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) I Know Jennifer's Boyfriend: Jennifer faces peer ridicule for her interest in a boy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Summer of '82: Seduced by a woman four years older than he, inexperienced Alex becomes heartbroken when he sees their relationship as casual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) I Never Killed for my Father: Sensitive liberal Steve clashes with his macho conservative father during his visit. In this episode we learn the tragic truth that Steve's father is dying. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Give Uncle Arthur A Kiss: Mallory is shocked when a close family friend Arthur makes a pass at her.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7) Big Brother is Watching: As new editor of the school paper, Alex reports a scandal where a list of students are cheating. He doesn't realize that he's hurting Mallory at the same time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8) No Nukes is Good Nukes: To the dismay of the Keaton children and their equally conservative grandparents, Steve and Elyse take time out from Thanksgiving and attend an Anti-Nuclear Demonstration. They spend the holiday weekend in jail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9) Death of A Grocer: Alex is indispensable to Sy Adler and they enjoy a close relationship. But when the budding teenage entrepreneur hears of a better opportunity he takes it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10) Have Gun, Will Unravel: When the house is burgled, Steve and Elyse have a debate on whether to buy a gun for protection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11) A Christmas Story: When a blizzard forces the Keatons to spend Christmas at home, Elyse's gift to Steven, an album filled with some fascinating old photos, sparks flashbacks to the birth of their three children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12) Oops:Unable to face her own mother, Mallory's pregnant friend Cindy Sullivan confides in Elyse, whose advice to the teenager seems to backfire - and causes a rift between Mallory and Elyse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13)Sherry Baby: &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:TV shows]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021676</id>
		<title>Family Ties</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021676"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T15:07:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Family Ties was a sitcom drama series that ran from 1982-1989 on NBC. [It was one of the first of family comedies that emerged in the 1980's. With a rocky start in the ratings, Family Ties rose to number 2 after it was placed in the prized time-slot right after The Cosby Show and remained there from 1984 until 1987.&amp;lt;citiation needed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The synopsis is centered on the Keaton family, where ex-hippy liberals Steve (Michael Gross)  and Elyse (Meredith Baxter Birney) who four children, Alex (Michael J Fox), Mallory (Justine Bateman), Jennifer (Tina Yothers) and Andrew (Brian Bonsall), who was born in 1985. What was unique about Family Ties was that it blended family comedy with politics. The 1960s flower children, Steven and Elyse clashed with the 1980s conservative, Alex. The show, in a way, showed the changing values during the Reagan era. Besides political views, Family Ties covered a number of controversial topics ranging from suicide to racism to drug dependency. Skippy was a neighbor who had a never-ending crush on Mallory. Ellen was Alex's first serious girlfriend. After breaking up with her, he became seriously involved with Lauren, a psychology student and Nick Moore was Mallory's serious boyfriend. Many episodes promote conservative and other positive values.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021675</id>
		<title>Family Ties</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021675"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T14:47:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Family Ties was a sitcom drama series that ran from 1982-1989 on NBC. [It was one of the first of family comedies that emerged in the 1980's. With a rocky start in the ratings, Family Ties rose to number 2 after it was placed in the prized time-slot right after The Cosby Show and remained there from 1984 until 1987.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;http://www.tv.com/shows/family-ties//&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021674</id>
		<title>Family Ties</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Ties&amp;diff=1021674"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T14:46:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: Created page with &amp;quot; Family Ties was a sitcom drama series that ran from 1982-1989 on NBC. [It was one of the first of family comedies that emerged in the 1980's. With a rocky start in the ratings, ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Family Ties was a sitcom drama series that ran from 1982-1989 on NBC. [It was one of the first of family comedies that emerged in the 1980's. With a rocky start in the ratings, Family Ties rose to number 2 after it was placed in the prized time-slot right after The Cosby Show and remained there from 1984 until 1987./[www.tv.com/shows/family-ties/]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_TV_Shows&amp;diff=1021673</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative TV Shows</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_TV_Shows&amp;diff=1021673"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T14:35:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The greatest conservative television shows==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Original run&lt;br /&gt;
!Network&lt;br /&gt;
!TV rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Description&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Family Ties]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982-1989&lt;br /&gt;
|[[NBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Drama series about how a hardworking [[conservative]] teenager, played by Michael J. Fox, outsmarts his [[liberal]], ex-hippie, underachieving parents. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Broken Arrow (TV series)|Broken Arrow]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1956-1958&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ABC]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A compassionate Indian agent, Tom Jeffords, played by John Lupton, forges a friendship with the [[Apache]] [[Indian]] Cochise, portrayed by Michael Ansara; set in [[Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sugarfoot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1957-1961&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Will Hutchins plays young &amp;quot;do-gooder&amp;quot; Tom &amp;quot;Sugarfoot&amp;quot; Brewster, a novice lawyer who roams the Old West &amp;quot;on the side of law and order,&amp;quot; according to the theme song of the [[Warner Brothers]] series; Sugarfoot eschews guns until pushed to the brink and even refuses alcohol and instead orders &amp;quot;sarsparialla with a dash of cherry&amp;quot; when he enters a saloon.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Death Valley Days''&lt;br /&gt;
|1952-1973&lt;br /&gt;
|Syndicated&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Historically-based dramatic western presentations hosted at different times by Robert Taylor, Ray Milland, Rory Calhoun, [[Ronald Reagan]], and Dale Robertson &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Faye Emerson's Wonderful Town]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1951-1952&lt;br /&gt;
|[[CBS]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Once a daughter-in-law of [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and a wife of Skitch Henderson, Faye Emerson presents the most memorable songs associated with various cities, mostly in the United States; in its day, this was one of the most expensive programs to present to the public.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lawman''&lt;br /&gt;
|1958-1962&lt;br /&gt;
| ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|John Russell as Marshal Dan Troop; Peter Brown as deputy Johnny McKay, and Peggie Castle as Lily; this Warner Brothers series sought to maintain highest script quality so as not to be &amp;quot;just another western.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Black Saddle''&lt;br /&gt;
|1959-1960 &lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Peter Breck plays Clay Culhane, a gunfighter-turned-lawyer who seeks to help those in need of legal representation; co-starring Russell Johnson as Marshal Gib Scott&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Laramie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1959-1963&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|John Smith and Robert Fuller portray ranch partners Slim Sherman and Jess Harper; many episodes focus on their close friendship, which also extended off the set; Hoagy Carmichael appeared the first season as their housekeeper; Spring Byington filled that role in the last two seasons.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''State Trooper''&lt;br /&gt;
|1956-1959&lt;br /&gt;
|Syndicated&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Rod Cameron adventure/drama anthology series based on case files of the [[Nevada]] state troopers; law and justice always prevail. Many episodes have surprise endings and unusual titles.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Our Man Higgins''&lt;br /&gt;
|1962-1963&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Stanley Holloway plays an English butler for an American family in a situation comedy with a dose of &amp;quot;culture clash&amp;quot;. Frank Maxwell and Audrey Totter played the parents, and [[Ricky Kelman]] was the son, Tommy MacRoberts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Office'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Mockery of liberal ideology and [[political correctness]] in an office setting, without a liberal [[laugh track]]. The main character repeatedly encounters contradictions and absurdities as he tries to conform to liberal expectations. The show was most popular when its humor was conservative, and has declined in quality and popularity as its conservative humor has been diluted. Steve Carell played the main character for six years and was denied an Emmy Award by liberals every time despite being by far the funniest actor on television.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Apprentice'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals stopped watching when they realized that [[Donald Trump]] might be conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The ''Six Million Dollar Man'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1974-1978 &lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Capitalism at its finest - technological advances improving life; starring Lee Majors&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cosby Show'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1984-1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|NBC &lt;br /&gt;
|TV G&lt;br /&gt;
|Promoting good family values.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Bonanza'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1959-1973&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Western  promoting good neighborliness and the pursuit of just causes &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Rifleman''&lt;br /&gt;
|1958-1963&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Western with emphasis on fair play and giving people a second chance; starring Chuck Connors, Johnny Crawford, and Paul Fix. [http://www.amctv.com/videos#type=all&amp;amp;filter=rb-video-browser-num_items%3D10%26module_id_base%3Drb-video-browser%26rb-video-browser-show%3D4182%26rb-video-browser-content_type%3D&amp;amp;page=1&amp;amp;post_id=71306 The Rifleman] &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1952-1966&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Long running comedy show epitomizing 1950s stable families and family values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Idol''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Fox Network|Fox]] &lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Allows the best of the public to come to the fore musically&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dog the Bounty Hunter''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A public prayer to [[Jesus]] launches each new bounty mission; good guys enforcing law and order. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[24]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2001-2010&lt;br /&gt;
|Fox&lt;br /&gt;
|TV 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack Bauer protects America at all costs against all terrorists, whether Muslim, European, Chinese, African, and even American.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1966-1969&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Emphasized morality, honor, abiding by a strict code of conduct, and problem solving in a science fiction setting that inspired real world innovations; a strong cultural celebration of excellence. Portrayed the [[Cold War]] struggle as a conflict between the democratic Federation (USA) and the authoritarian, collectivist Klingons (the Soviet Union), correctly forecast the eventual winner. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''The Waltons''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972-1981&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A family with strong Christian values overcomes hardship in rural America and extends charity to strangers while also honoring military service; starring Richard Thomas, Ralph Waite, and Michael Learned &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| ''The Lawrence Welk Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1955-1982 &lt;br /&gt;
|ABC; Syndicated&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A family oriented variety show that appealed to Midwestern values&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Chuck''&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Emphasizes family values, honor, and a respect for our nation's servicemen. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Little House on the Prairie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974-1983 &lt;br /&gt;
|NBC &lt;br /&gt;
|TV G &lt;br /&gt;
|A show that celebrates family values and the courage of the pioneers, starring Michael Landon&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Touched by an Angel'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994-2003 &lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A popular drama about an angel in human form who visited troubled people in crisis. It was highly ranked for four seasons and ran for nine seasons. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Life is Worth Living'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Syndicated&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Emmy Award winning show dealing with moral issues hosted by Archbishop [[Fulton J. Sheen]]; from 10 to 30 million people watched the show weekly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''7th Heaven''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Warner Brothers]]&lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The family of a Christian minister deals with moral and controversial themes, approached from a socially and politically conservative Protestant viewpoint. It has the distinction of having been the longest-running family drama in U.S. television history; starring Stephen Collins.[http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1028153,00.html]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Life Goes On'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1989-1993&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Follows the experiences of a young man with Down Syndrome and recognizes the dignity of people with developmental disabilities and the joy and love they give to their families and others.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dragnet'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Starring Jack Webb as Sgt. Joe Friday and his partner(s) solving actual cases from the files of the Los Angeles Police Department. Great use of law enforcement jargon by the officers while educating the public on the Rule of Law. Showed fine examples of moral conduct, honor of self/others and sacrifice for the good of the public. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Parking Wars''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Demonstrates the offensiveness of overbearing government bureaucracy while maintaining a respect for law officers.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pawn Stars'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows how two parties can **mutually and fairly benefit** from a negotiated free-market transaction, independent of any government &amp;quot;assistance&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bob Newhart Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972-1978&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|TV G&lt;br /&gt;
|A mockery of how crazy people may become in a secular world &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Hawaii-Five-O'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1968-1980&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Even in what might be expected to be a lazy, hazy paradise, the law is still the law, with Jack Lord and James MacArthur. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Daniel Boone''&lt;br /&gt;
|1964-1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title music sang, &amp;quot;he fought for America, to make all Americans free&amp;quot;, with Fess Parker in the starring role&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''MacGyver'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1985-1992&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The main character played by Richard Dean Anderson uses Yankee ingenuity to solve various problems and escape the clutches of his enemies; the series eschews violence until absolutely necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Walker, Texas Ranger''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993-2001&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Starring [[Chuck Norris]] and Noble Willingham &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''NCIS'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003-&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS &lt;br /&gt;
|TV 14 &lt;br /&gt;
|Show about U.S. Navy investigators, voted ''America's favorite program in 2011''; starring Mark Harmon and David McCallum&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mission: Impossible''&lt;br /&gt;
|1966-1973; 1988-1990&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS, ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Emphasizes teamwork, friendship, professionalism, and American ingenuity and exceptionalism, which can overcome any obstacle, with Peter Graves, Martin Landau, and Barbara  Bain &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Storage Wars''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Emphasizes [[capitalism|capitalist]] and [[free market]] values. Plus on another level, it illustrates the importance of [[conservative values|personal responsibility]]; the lockers that are being auctioned off belonged to people who decided not to pay their bills.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Prisoner'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1967-1968&lt;br /&gt;
| [[BBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|Classic British TV show about a secret agent who is sent to a strange &amp;quot;village&amp;quot; in order to determine the reasons for his resignation. The Prisoner is a metaphor for the Individual against the Collective. The series ran for only seventeen episodes.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Yes, Minister!''''Yes, Prime Minister!''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|BBC &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Classic British sit-com about the political machinations of being a cabinet member in the British government, and then eventually as Prime Minister. A recurring theme is that of the struggle of politicians to make the desired changes despite the resistence of the bureaucracy. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Storm Chasers''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The Weather Channel &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Demonstrates core conservative values such as courage and a thirst for practical, scientific knowledge &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Pretender''&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-life and with a message of charity and self-sacrifice as personal responsibility &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dick Van Dyke Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1961-1966&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-marriage and pro-religion, this series launched the career of Mary Tyler Moore. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Donna Reed Show'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1958-1966&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|Situation comedy of an upper middle-class family in Hillsdale (state not given), with Donna Reed in the role of Donna Stone, wife of a pediatrician, played by Carl Betz. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Wagon Train'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1957-1965&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC/ABC &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
||Western with conservatives Ward Bond and John McIntire playing trailmasters Seth Adams and Chris Hale, respectively; the struggle of pioneers seeking a fresh start in the American West. Robert Horton and Robert Fuller also starred in the series.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Wanted: Dead or Alive''&lt;br /&gt;
|1958-1961 &lt;br /&gt;
|CBS&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Steve McQueen as a kind-hearted bounty hunter, Josh Randall, dedicated to the enforcement of the law; numerous episodes have spiritual themes; a spinoff of ''Dick Powell's Zane Grey Theatre'' &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Who Do You Think You Are?''&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|NBC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|NBC in USA (in other countries also) with famous people showing how to research relationships and histories of our ancestors. We owe them so much, whether horse thieves or royalty, they gave us our lives, and in some cases fought in the [[American Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Coming Home''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
||ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows American war veterans coming home to their families &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Legends of the Hidden Temple''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993-1995&lt;br /&gt;
|Nickelodeon &lt;br /&gt;
|TV Y &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Game show]] that uses a conservative elimination format (ensuring only the most meritorious players survive to play the final round) and is unyielding in difficulty.  Also, it refuses to succumb to [[liberal]] beliefs in archeology that keep historical sites and artifacts off limits, instead promoting the conservative ''Indiana Jones'' persona &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999-2002&lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|TV G&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Game show]], uses a conservative elimination format (ensuring only the most meritorious players survive to play the final round) and is unyielding in difficulty. The format for qualifying to be on the hot seat entirely depends on knowledge, not having the stereotypical game show contestant persona. The show unashamedly rewards people who know the most. Host Regis Philbin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pope John Paul II''&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|ABC&lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|In this biographical miniseries, conservative actor [[Jon Voight]] portrayed Pope [[John Paul II]], who was influential in bringing down the communist dictatorship of the [[Soviet Union]] in eastern Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Glenn Beck Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Fox News]]| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|Public affairs program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Hannity (TV show)|Hannity]]'' (formerly ''Hannity and Colmes'')&lt;br /&gt;
|2009-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fox News&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Sean Hannity's television public affairs program&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debatable whether conservative==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Original run&lt;br /&gt;
!Network&lt;br /&gt;
!TV rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Description&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Twilight Zone'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1959-1964 (original run)&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A recurring theme is that the selfish and the self-centered eventually lose what they sought to gain; hosted by Rod Serling.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Beverly Hillbillies'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1962-1971&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Though silly, the show is powerful in illustrating how material possessions are not what define a person. Buddy Ebsen stars as Jed Clampbett.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''King of the Hill''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Fox &lt;br /&gt;
|TV PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite cartoonish nature, shows the struggle of a hardworking, traditional American family against &amp;quot;alternative&amp;quot; modern cultural movements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Antiques Roadshow'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[PBS]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows the real value (financial and historical) of handcrafts and traditional, old-fashioned things and memorabilia &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Larry Sanders Show'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A dark comedy based around the background of a [[Hollywood]] talk show, showing a great deal of liberal and celebrity hypocrisy and mocking them for their behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Breaking Bad'' &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|American Movie Classic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A previously law-abiding chemistry teacher gets involved in the drug trade and destroys himself and his family. Each immoral decision leads him further along the path of destruction. The evildoers all suffer for their actions. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The O'Reilly Factor]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|Fox News &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|While it appeals to conservative viewers, [[Bill O'Reilly]]'s talk show also occasionally defends liberals on certain social issues. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Cops''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fox&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The good guys protecting the public from criminals, yet arguably promotes police state and big government&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Songs]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Greatest Conservative TV Shows}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Television]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatism]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Greatest Conservative TV Shows]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1021672</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1021672"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T14:20:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my [[conservative]] qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a [[Christian]]. And I believe [[atheism]] is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe [[science]] is a gift from [[God]] and I believe it should never be tainted by [[evolution]]. I have no doubt that evolution is an [[irrational]] belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify [[racism]] and [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love [[capitalism]]! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that [[liberals]] are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, [[anti-Christian]], insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All[[ taxation]] is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since I trust this website so much, I have decided to announce my wonderful ambition in life to nail those pesky liberals, I plan to write fictional stories that would erase liberal thinking. If you have ever wondered what liberalism would be like on Halloween, my stories will be the ones to read. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In them you'll step into an adventure of a stylish conservative athlete and his delightful girlfriend, a wise devoutly Christian English gent and many other brave people who will face an epidemic of monster creating atheists, demonic communist gangsters, zombie drug users, pantheistic environmentalists, feminist witches, ghoulish liberal judges, brainwashing public schools, murdering pick pocketing leprechaun socialists, barbaric futuristic totalitarian states and many more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being conservative, my stories shall be funny, uplifting, educational, exciting, creative, romantic and a perfect antidote to your troubles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, wish me luck as I write these stories and let me know if you want me to write anything specific. Keep up the good work Conservapedia, and God bless!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{UB:Christian 1}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1021670</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1021670"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T14:18:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my [[conservative]] qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a [[Christian]]. And I believe [[atheism]] is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe [[science]] is a gift from [[God]] and I believe it should never be tainted by [[evolution]]. I have no doubt that evolution is an [[irrational]] belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify [[racism]] and [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love [[capitalism]]! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that [[liberals]] are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, [[anti-Christian]], insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All[[ taxation]] is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since I trust this website so much, I have decided to announce my wonderful ambition in life to nail those pesky liberals, I plan to write fictional stories that would erase liberal thinking. If you have ever wondered what liberalism would be like on Halloween, my stories will be the ones to read. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In them you'll step into an adventure of a stylish conservative athlete and his delightful girlfriend, a wise devoutly Christian English gent and many other brave people who will face an epidemic of monster creating atheists, demonic communist gangsters, zombie drug users, pantheistic environmentalists, feminist witches, ghoulish liberal judges, brainwashing public schools, murdering pick pocketing leprechaun socialists, barbaric futuristic totalitarian states and many more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being conservative, my stories shall be funny, uplifting, educational, exciting, creative, romantic and a perfect antidote to your troubles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, wish me luck as I write these stories and let me know if you want me to write anything specific. Keep up the good work Conservapedia, and God bless!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Christian 1}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1021669</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1021669"/>
		<updated>2012-12-02T14:17:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my [[conservative]] qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a [[Christian]]. And I believe [[atheism]] is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe [[science]] is a gift from [[God]] and I believe it should never be tainted by [[evolution]]. I have no doubt that evolution is an [[irrational]] belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify [[racism]] and [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love [[capitalism]]! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that [[liberals]] are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, [[anti-Christian]], insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All[[ taxation]] is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since I trust this website so much, I have decided to announce my wonderful ambition in life to nail those pesky liberals, I plan to write fictional stories that would erase liberal thinking. If you have ever wondered what liberalism would be like on Halloween, my stories will be the ones to read. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In them you'll step into an adventure of a stylish conservative athlete and his delightful girlfriend, a wise devoutly Christian English gent and many other brave people who will face an epidemic of monster creating atheists, demonic communist gangsters, zombie drug users, pantheistic environmentalists, feminist witches, ghoulish liberal judges, brainwashing public schools, murdering pick pocketing leprechaun socialists, barbaric futuristic totalitarian states and many more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being conservative, my stories shall be funny, uplifting, educational, exciting, creative, romantic and a perfect antidote to your troubles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, wish me luck as I write these stories and let me know if you want me to write anything specific. Keep up the good work Conservapedia, and God bless!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Christain1}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1016611</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1016611"/>
		<updated>2012-11-03T20:24:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my [[conservative]] qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a [[Christian]]. And I believe [[atheism]] is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe [[science]] is a gift from [[God]] and I believe it should never be tainted by [[evolution]]. I have no doubt that evolution is an [[irrational]] belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify [[racism]] and [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love [[capitalism]]! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that [[liberals]] are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, [[anti-Christian]], insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All[[ taxation]] is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since I trust this website so much, I have decided to announce my wonderful ambition in life to nail those pesky liberals, I plan to write fictional stories that would erase liberal thinking. If you have ever wondered what liberalism would be like on Halloween, my stories will be the ones to read. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In them you'll step into an adventure of a stylish conservative athlete and his delightful girlfriend, a wise devoutly Christian English gent and many other brave people who will face an epidemic of monster creating atheists, demonic communist gangsters, zombie drug users, pantheistic environmentalists, feminist witches, ghoulish liberal judges, brainwashing public schools, murdering pick pocketing leprechaun socialists, barbaric futuristic totalitarian states and many more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being conservative, my stories shall be funny, uplifting, educational, exciting, creative, romantic and a perfect antidote to your troubles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, wish me luck as I write these stories and let me know if you want me to write anything specific. Keep up the good work Conservapedia, and God bless!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1016608</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1016608"/>
		<updated>2012-11-03T20:09:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my [[conservative]] qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a [[Christian]]. And I believe [[atheism]] is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe [[science]] is a gift from [[God]] and I believe it should never be tainted by [[evolution]]. I have no doubt that evolution is an [[irrational]] belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify [[racism]] and [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love [[capitalism]]! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that [[liberals]] are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, [[anti-Christian]], insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All[[ taxation]] is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since I trust this website so much, I have decided to announce my wonderful ambition in life to nail those pesky liberals, I plan to write fictional stories that would erase liberal thinking. If you have ever wondered what liberalism would be like on Halloween, my stories will be the ones to read. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In them you'll step into an adventure of a stylish conservative athlete and his delightful girlfriend, a wise devoutly Christian English gent and many other brave people who will face an epidemic of demonic communist gangsters, zombie drug users, pagan environmentalists, feminist witches, ghoulish liberal judges, brainwashing public schools, barbaric futuristic totalitarian states and many more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being conservative, my stories shall be funny, uplifting, educational, exciting, creative, romantic and a perfect antidote to your troubles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, wish me luck as I write these stories and let me know if you want me to write anything specific. Keep up the good work Conservapedia, and God bless!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:_Should_we_criminalize_homosexuality%3F&amp;diff=1016561</id>
		<title>Debate: Should we criminalize homosexuality?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:_Should_we_criminalize_homosexuality%3F&amp;diff=1016561"/>
		<updated>2012-11-03T16:28:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
I believe homosexuals are causing our economy to decline.  Just look at India, a country that barely tolerates [[homosexuality]], and it's GDP is steadily increasing and becoming an economic.  Many other countries like Portugal, Greece, Netherlands, Sweden, and Spain are suffering economically and they have either legalized same-sex marriage or have more liberal &amp;quot;gay rights.&amp;quot;  And many empires have collapsed due to the acceptance of homosexuality (Roman Empire, Mongol Empire, and the British Empire).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to save our economy, we must criminalize homosexuality.  Punishing them by death is a bit too extreme, as we Americans need to show that we are more moral than those who punish homosexuality through death.  Instead, I suggest we ''deport'' them any communist/socialist state (Cuba, Venezuela, China, and North Korea).  These countries are definitely more tolerant towards their gay population since there is never any communist state that criminalizes homosexuality.  Or maybe we should send the entire gay population in America to Japan.  Since many anime portray homosexuals in a more positive light and Japan happens to be the gay friendliest country in the world, we deport homosexuals there instead.--[[User:JacobMS|JacobMS]] 23:42, 5 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am afraid to say that unfortunately JacobMS, you seem to not understand the difference between correlation and causation.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:22, 6 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Homosexuality wasn't legalised until well into the 1970s in Britain, the empire was crumbling well before then [[User:TonyB|TonyB]] 21:48, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christianity clearly prohibits homosexuality, and since America is a CHRISTIAN country, we need to outlaw homosexuality to protect the country from sin.  ---[[User:DennisRifkin|DennisR]] 07:32, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::According to the Treaty of Tripoli of 1796, America is not a Christian nation. See: http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/treaty_tripoli.html. And I quote: &amp;quot;Art. 11. The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;&amp;quot; From the founding fathers themselves, practically. John Adams was president at the time and proudly signed and announced it, and it, along with the rest of the treaty of course, was unanimously agreed upon by the senate. I needed to point that out. --[[NSmyth|NSmyth]] 19:28, 28 August, 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.  After Roe v. Wade, Lawrence v. Texas is the worst Supreme Court Decision in the history of the United States.  It needs to be overturned and a federal anti-Homosexuality law passed.  --[[User:OliviaB|OliviaB]] 17:02, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. Please see: [[Homosexuality and murders]], [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence]] and [[Homosexuality and health]].  When one looks at the [[homosexuality and health]] article, it is really not that surprising that [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=undP3-0yEn8 Indian lady Christian dancers are far more graceful] than the [[Lesbianism and obesity|obesity infested lesbian population.]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KH4ZTSUZQWM&amp;amp;list=PLFD5B143F743EB6B1]  :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:18, 28 August 2011 (EDT)  &lt;br /&gt;
:There's also [[Mental Health and Homosexuality]] and [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] --[[User:OliviaB|OliviaB]] 17:28, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OliviaB, you are being redundant.  Is that not covered under [[Homosexuality and health]]? (you are probably not the first parodist guilty of being redundant) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:36, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4444ff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I believe homosexuals are causing our economy to decline.  Just look at India, a country that barely tolerates [[homosexuality]], and it's GDP is steadily increasing and becoming an economic.  Many other countries like Portugal, Greece, Netherlands, Sweden, and Spain are suffering economically and they have either legalized same-sex marriage or have more liberal &amp;quot;gay rights.&amp;quot;  And many empires have collapsed due to the acceptance of homosexuality (Roman Empire, Mongol Empire, and the British Empire).&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe ''white people'' are causing our economy to decline.  Just look at India, a country that ''doesn't have many white people'', and it's GDP is steadily increasing and becoming an economic.  Many other countries like Portugal, Greece, Netherlands, Sweden, and Spain are suffering economically and they have either legalized ''being white'' or have more liberal &amp;quot;white folks.&amp;quot;  And many empires have collapsed due to the acceptance of ''white people'' (Every place colonized by Spain and England before 1900).&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you're onto something. [[User:SEdwin|SEdwin]] 01:55, 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last thing we need in this country are more liberal, nanny state policies like this. The only thing criminalization of homosexuality would accomplish is more spending on law enforcement and increased governmental control of our lives. There would also be no way to enforce it, since making love in the street is already illegal, and homosexuals could just claim public displays of affection as political statements protected by the first amendment, which would clog our court systems even worse than they already are. There is no objective way to prove homosexuality outside the bedroom, so that throws a giant wrench into any possibility of enforcement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government control is a slippery slope. It starts with the criminalization of deviant sexual practices, and before you know it, the government is controlling who breeds with who and when. Homosexuality may be sinful and immoral, but it is the lesser of two evils. [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 00:19, 6 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technically, Homosexuality is not in major violation of the majority of the country's morals, and so there's not reason to criminalize it. What happens in the bedrooms of a loving, consensual couple should not be of any concern to anyone else. [[User:Geosurgeon|Geosurgeon]] 16:19 PM August 28, 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Even if I did agree that homosexuality is wrong(which I don't), I don't think it could make it through the house or senate. Evidence from both sides is way too shaky, and the religious motive behind it would be dangerously close to being unconstitutional. It would also bring up many comparisons to Nazi Germany, where they criminalized homosexuality, by punishment of death, and while I'm fully aware that even if such legislation was to be written up, it wouldn't be nearly as terrible as Nazi Germany, the comparison would stick the moment it became public. Furthermore, the amount of money such legislation would cost(sinking money into already overzealous law enforcement, and the prison system for a completely ridiculous piece of legislation would be a terrible idea no matter how you look at it) in the end would be enormous and a terribly unnecessary and unaffordable burden on America and Americans in today's economic climate. [[NSmyth|NSmyth]] 19:37 28 August, 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We should prevent homosexual marriage, but while America was founded a Christian nation (see [http://creationwiki.org/William_Penn William Penn]), it was founded on the understanding that other views should be allowed to coexist. As Thomas Jefferson said in the [http://creationwiki.org/Virginia_statute_for_religious_freedom Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom], &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;Whereas, Almighty God hath created the mind free; &lt;br /&gt;
That all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, or by civil incapacitations tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and therefore are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being Lord, both of body and mind yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, That the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavouring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time...&lt;br /&gt;
That to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own;&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Jefferson believed that while government should imitate the style of the Bible, God did not force others to believe through coercion, and neither should we. So long as their lifestyles don't affect the rights of others to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, they should be allowed to live as they please. Marriage should not be allowed because it affects the public sphere but what they do in the privacy of their own homes ought to be their business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you look at what the Bible says, it says we can't justly judge others according to the Mosaic Law because by it, we ourselves are guilty. Only God can judge by such a Law, because we ourselves are all guilty of death before God, and cannot expect God to forgive us if we can't forgive others. We cannot cast the first stone without being sinless ourselves.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Romans 2:1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romans 7:12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.&lt;br /&gt;
20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthew 6:12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.&lt;br /&gt;
13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:&lt;br /&gt;
15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homosexuality is just one of a number of sexual sins that include divorce, adultery, and lusting after the wives of others in one's heart. All are guilty of death before God, and cannot cast the first stone if not sinless themselves. Those who judge others according to the Law will not be forgiven by God their own guilt; and all are guilty. --[[User:Jzy|Jzy]] 02:45, 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although I do not approve of homosexuality, I believe criminalizing it won't work in practice. It will lead to unnecessary spending, and if the offenders are imprisoned they could still perform homosexual acts in prison. A better way to reduce the extent of homosexuality is by teaching its dangers to our children (See [[homosexuality and health]]), and show just how magnificent it is to be attracted to the opposite sex. That way the future generations will have little if any awareness of homosexuality. We can also act against the root causes of homosexuality (e.g. the liberal media, sex education) and without these homosexuality will become even rarer. [[C12Elliot]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kip_kinkle&amp;diff=1014660</id>
		<title>Kip kinkle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kip_kinkle&amp;diff=1014660"/>
		<updated>2012-10-25T13:25:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Kip Kinkle'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 21st 1998, 15 year old Kip Kinkle, a [[public school]] student at Thurston High School, Oregon allegedly entered the school's cafeteria and was responsible for a shootout which wounded 26 people and killed another 2. Later the bodies of Kip's parents were found dead in his home. He also attempted to murder a detective during his initial questioning. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Kip is another example of how devastating [[public school culture]] is to children as well as how destructive atheistic beliefs as he professed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If there was a God, he wouldn't let me feel the way I do. There is no God, only hate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism and Mass Murder]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:School Shootings]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kip_kinkle&amp;diff=1014659</id>
		<title>Kip kinkle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kip_kinkle&amp;diff=1014659"/>
		<updated>2012-10-25T13:24:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Kip Kinkle'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 21st 1998, 15 year old Kip Kinkle, a [[public school]] student at Thurston High School allegedly entered the school's cafeteria and was responsible for a shootout which wounded 26 people and killed another 2. Later the bodies of Kip's parents were found dead in his home. He also attempted to murder a detective during his initial questioning. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Kip is another example of how devastating [[public school culture]] is to children as well as how destructive atheistic beliefs as he professed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If there was a God, he wouldn't let me feel the way I do. There is no God, only hate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism and Mass Murder]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:School Shootings]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kip_kinkle&amp;diff=1014657</id>
		<title>Kip kinkle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kip_kinkle&amp;diff=1014657"/>
		<updated>2012-10-25T13:19:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: Created page with &amp;quot;'''Kip Kinkle'''  On May 21st 1998, 15 year old Kip Kinkle, a public school student at Thurston High School allegedly entered the school's cafeteria and was responsible for a...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Kip Kinkle'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 21st 1998, 15 year old Kip Kinkle, a [[public school]] student at Thurston High School allegedly entered the school's cafeteria and was responsible for a shootout which wounded 26 people and killed another 2. Later the bodies of Kip's parents were found dead in his home. He also attempted to murder a detective during his initial questioning. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Kip is another example of how devastating [[public school culture]] is to children as well as how destructive atheistic beliefs as he professed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If there was a God, he wouldn't let me feel the way I do. There is no God, only hate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism and Mass Murder]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_In_Name_Only&amp;diff=1014482</id>
		<title>Christian In Name Only</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_In_Name_Only&amp;diff=1014482"/>
		<updated>2012-10-24T16:41:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: /* List of XINOs */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''Christian in Name Only'''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.ucg.org/doctrinal-beliefs/christians-name-only/ Christians in Name Only?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (abbreviated '''XINO'''), also called a '''cultural Christian''',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.equip.org/perspectives/cultural-christian Are you a Cultural Christian?] from the Christian Research Institute&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''nominal Christian''',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.comprehensivechristian.com/The-Nominal-Christian-comprehensivechristian.com.asp The Nominal Christian]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or more often, a [[Liberal Christianity|liberal Christian]], is someone who professes to be a [[Christian]] in public, but has a considerable lack of knowledge about their professed faith, including not being able to name the 4 Gospels, the 10 Commandments or even that [[Jesus]] gave the [[Sermon on the Mount]]. They also hold beliefs contrary to what Jesus did and taught. Such beliefs include considering such things as [[abortion]]s, [[special rights]] for [[homosexual]]s, and cohabitation between unmarried people to be morally acceptable.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; They also might believe there are other ways to attain salvation rather than accepting Jesus as Savior.  When challenged on their views with quotations from Scripture, Christians in name only, if they believe in [[God]] at all, often respond with [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|unsupported assertions]] as to what God really wants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Opposition to the term==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22 even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; 25 whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith. This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; 26 for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. Romans 3:21-26 NASB&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be taken to mean that there is no such thing as a deal breaker. If you are a [[Paul|Paulian]] Christian and accept the book of Romans as canonical then the one true standard for receiving eternal salvation can be viewed as solely the result of the personal relationship with Jesus, something that cannot be measured from the outside by other people.  The counterargument is that Christ said that we will know every tree by its fruit (Matthew 7:15-20&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Matthew_1-9_%28Translated%29#Chapter_7|Matthew ch. 7, Conservative Bible]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Luke 6:43-45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Luke_1-8_%28Translated%29#Chapter_6|Luke ch. 6, Conservative Bible]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of XINOs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anders Breivik]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bill Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ted Haggard]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eddie Long]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barack Obama may be a special case.  There is [[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage|much evidence]] that he may be a [[Muslim]] who is practicing ''[[taqiyya]],'' an Islamic custom which allows a Muslim to conceal his true religion if the adherent [[deceit|feels it would be beneficial to do so.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Albert Odulele]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jeremiah Wright]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al Sharpton]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Timothy McVeigh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jim Jones]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oprah Winfrey]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; a liberal so-called &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; and a [[New-Age]]ist [[occult]]ist.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Helen Keller]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Who was a rather radical Socialist, founding member of the anti-[[Christian]] [[ACLU]], and personal friend of [[Planned Parenthood]] founder [[Margaret Sanger]]. Most don't know this about her and only know about her from ''The Miracle Worker''. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al Gore]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; To be precise, he's the head of the Church of [[Global Warming]], that insists that man-made global warming is real, and you must give tithes to it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry Reid]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Kerry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fred Phelps]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The leader of radical Hyper-Calvinist church that protests the funerals of soldiers killed on duty. Due to the indecent and Un-American nature of this activity, it likely he is a liberal and therefore Un-Christian.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Despite being raised [[Roman Catholic]] and claiming that [[Jesus]] was his inspiration, Hitler was only using Christianity to gain favor with the German people. His true beliefs were based off of his [[social darwinism|social darwinistic]] views.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Any practitioner of [[liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
''(Add more)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cafeteria Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Churchian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fast Food Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fluffy bunny]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011353</id>
		<title>Liberal tricks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011353"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T15:09:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Here are some common [[liberal]] tricks that many people fall for:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# When a liberal theory of pseudo-science is disproved or discredited, then simply change the name (or definition) of the theory to render it impossible to test, as in &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;climate change.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Another example is the redefinition of &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;change over time,&amp;quot; which could mean anything.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim a candidate is a racist if his campaign received a small donation (amid thousands of other donations) from someone who might be called a racist.&lt;br /&gt;
# Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage.&lt;br /&gt;
# Making pseudo-religious arguments even though the person making the arguments does not adhere to the [[Bible]], such as &amp;quot;judge ye not!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Try to draw a [[conservative]] in to saying or doing something which can then be dishonestly twisted to cast him in a bad light.&lt;br /&gt;
# So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting a [[liberal]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic &amp;quot;When did you stop beating your wife?!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Exaggerating praise for fellow liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, liberal praise by law professors for [[Barack Obama]] borders on the absurd.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that atheism equals intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
# In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?)&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;live and let live!&amp;quot; except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue.&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try!&amp;quot; (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping other gods/many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that because everyone else supposedly believes in something, therefore it must be right.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that your [[parent]]s aren't cool; that [[Hollywood values]] are cool; that [[professor values]] are brilliant; and that you must blindly follow your government.&lt;br /&gt;
# There is a shortage of everything we want.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Prayer]] is for dummies, or is antiquated.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[children|Kids]] are getting smarter than old folks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a someone who happens to have a different skin color.&lt;br /&gt;
# Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people.&lt;br /&gt;
# If you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed'').&lt;br /&gt;
# Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything.&lt;br /&gt;
# Accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.&lt;br /&gt;
# In discounting other point of views, [[liberals]] use comparisons of other known &amp;quot;wrong actions&amp;quot; to justify their supposed correct stance. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a &amp;quot;Dr.&amp;quot; or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberals often cited physicists who had no training or expertise in engineering for their baseless, illogical criticisms of [[SDI]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called &amp;quot;Doctor&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Saying &amp;quot;If you believe that abortion is murder, don't have one!&amp;quot; as if abortion isn't undisputably the murder of a human being.&lt;br /&gt;
# Supporting classlessness while pretending to care about the preservation of world culture.&lt;br /&gt;
# Finding a diverse individual to be appealing or “cool” until they learn that the individual does not conform to their liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming open-mindedness as a disguise for immorality. Such is a typical liberal claim regarding drug/alcohol abuse, promiscuity, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the lives of heinous criminals (by opposing capital punishment) while encouraging murder of unborn children (by supporting infanticide, known today as abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Justifying sinful [[lie|lying]] by saying &amp;quot;what they don't know can't hurt them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that there exists a [[Separation of Church and State]] in the United States (and citing biased Supreme Court decisions to back themselves up) when in reality there exists no such Separation of Church and state in the constitution, and that the Founding Fathers were mostly Christian themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stereotyping Christians as aggresive nutjubs unless they conform to liberal policies. &lt;br /&gt;
# Reveal celebrities supporting a dangerous liberal reform, such as introducing [[same sex marriage]] which implies that it is the right thing to do.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Portray [[feminism]] and women's rights as the same thing. (History reveals the early [[suffragists]] being incredibly different to modern feminism).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that Nazism is an example of right wing extremism, when in fact the Nazis cared very little about individual freedom and were not fiscally conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberal policies should be pushed even further after a disaster e.g. more gun control after the [[Columbine Massacre]]. This leads people into conforming more to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that history began with a &amp;quot;Golden Age of Faith&amp;quot; and the future will become fully secular. Studies actually reveal Christianity growing around the world. &lt;br /&gt;
# Use comments such as &amp;quot;racist!&amp;quot; to silence criticism from Conservatives, regardless of its logic. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that no relationship is loving without casual sex.&lt;br /&gt;
# If any crime victim is homosexual, then its automatically a[[ hate crime.]] For example, the [[Matthew Shepard]] murder was portrayed as a hate crime by the [[mainstream media]]. But the trial of his killers actually revealed them to be drug addicts. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that an act is not sinful if the act is legal under civil law.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that in order for God to exist there has to be someone who created him. Since people are unable to explain this it leads them into conforming to [[Humanist]] belief that the universe is self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
# Justify immodest dressing or deviant activities by saying &amp;quot;it's the 21st century!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Put people off [[marriage]]by revealing the high divorce rates, without showing the groups most likely to divorce such as those who were married before or cohabited before marriage. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that it is impossible to believe in God without being 'religious' and vice versa.   &lt;br /&gt;
# Appeal to people's emotions rather than there reason. (Hitler practiced throughout his political career)&lt;br /&gt;
# Use mockery of conservatives as a way to distract people from conservative values rather than logic. &lt;br /&gt;
# Label evolution science and creation faith. When in fact evolution also a a faith as its aspects cannot be tested, observed or demonstrated unlike actual science.&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is an example of an actual attempt at [[liberal tricks]] that was posted on this very page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by [[Barack Obama]] (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of [[affirmative action]] in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a [[conservative]] by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting '''liberal trick''' #17 above.  To someone unfamiliar with '''liberal tricks''', this can be upsetting and intimidating.  But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the [[liberal]] playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious.  The [[liberal]]'s foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011352</id>
		<title>Liberal tricks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011352"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T15:00:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Here are some common [[liberal]] tricks that many people fall for:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# When a liberal theory of pseudo-science is disproved or discredited, then simply change the name (or definition) of the theory to render it impossible to test, as in &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;climate change.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Another example is the redefinition of &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;change over time,&amp;quot; which could mean anything.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim a candidate is a racist if his campaign received a small donation (amid thousands of other donations) from someone who might be called a racist.&lt;br /&gt;
# Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage.&lt;br /&gt;
# Making pseudo-religious arguments even though the person making the arguments does not adhere to the [[Bible]], such as &amp;quot;judge ye not!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Try to draw a [[conservative]] in to saying or doing something which can then be dishonestly twisted to cast him in a bad light.&lt;br /&gt;
# So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting a [[liberal]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic &amp;quot;When did you stop beating your wife?!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Exaggerating praise for fellow liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, liberal praise by law professors for [[Barack Obama]] borders on the absurd.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that atheism equals intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
# In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?)&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;live and let live!&amp;quot; except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue.&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try!&amp;quot; (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping other gods/many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that because everyone else supposedly believes in something, therefore it must be right.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that your [[parent]]s aren't cool; that [[Hollywood values]] are cool; that [[professor values]] are brilliant; and that you must blindly follow your government.&lt;br /&gt;
# There is a shortage of everything we want.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Prayer]] is for dummies, or is antiquated.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[children|Kids]] are getting smarter than old folks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a someone who happens to have a different skin color.&lt;br /&gt;
# Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people.&lt;br /&gt;
# If you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed'').&lt;br /&gt;
# Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything.&lt;br /&gt;
# Accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.&lt;br /&gt;
# In discounting other point of views, [[liberals]] use comparisons of other known &amp;quot;wrong actions&amp;quot; to justify their supposed correct stance. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a &amp;quot;Dr.&amp;quot; or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberals often cited physicists who had no training or expertise in engineering for their baseless, illogical criticisms of [[SDI]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called &amp;quot;Doctor&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Saying &amp;quot;If you believe that abortion is murder, don't have one!&amp;quot; as if abortion isn't undisputably the murder of a human being.&lt;br /&gt;
# Supporting classlessness while pretending to care about the preservation of world culture.&lt;br /&gt;
# Finding a diverse individual to be appealing or “cool” until they learn that the individual does not conform to their liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming open-mindedness as a disguise for immorality. Such is a typical liberal claim regarding drug/alcohol abuse, promiscuity, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the lives of heinous criminals (by opposing capital punishment) while encouraging murder of unborn children (by supporting infanticide, known today as abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Justifying sinful [[lie|lying]] by saying &amp;quot;what they don't know can't hurt them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that there exists a [[Separation of Church and State]] in the United States (and citing biased Supreme Court decisions to back themselves up) when in reality there exists no such Separation of Church and state in the constitution, and that the Founding Fathers were mostly Christian themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stereotyping Christians as aggresive nutjubs unless they conform to liberal policies. &lt;br /&gt;
# Reveal celebrities supporting a dangerous liberal reform, such as introducing [[same sex marriage]] which implies that it is the right thing to do.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Portray [[feminism]] and women's rights as the same thing. (History reveals the early [[suffragists]] being incredibly different to modern feminism).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that Nazism is an example of right wing extremism, when in fact the Nazis cared very little about individual freedom and were not fiscally conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberal policies should be pushed even further after a disaster e.g. more gun control after the [[Columbine Massacre]]. This leads people into conforming more to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that history began with a &amp;quot;Golden Age of Faith&amp;quot; and the future will become fully secular. Studies actually reveal Christianity growing around the world. &lt;br /&gt;
# Use comments such as &amp;quot;racist!&amp;quot; to silence criticism from Conservatives, regardless of its logic. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that no relationship is loving without casual sex.&lt;br /&gt;
# If any crime victim is homosexual, then its automatically a[[ hate crime.]] For example, the [[Matthew Shepard]] murder was portrayed as a hate crime by the [[mainstream media]]. But the trial of his killers actually revealed them to be drug addicts. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that an act is not sinful if the act is legal under civil law.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that in order for God to exist there has to be someone who created him. Since people are unable to explain this it leads them into conforming to [[Humanist]] belief that the universe is self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
# Justify immodest dressing or deviant activities by saying &amp;quot;it's the 21st century!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Put people off [[marriage]]by revealing the high divorce rates, without showing the groups most likely to divorce such as those who were married before or cohabited before marriage. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that it is impossible to believe in God without being 'religious' and vice versa.   &lt;br /&gt;
# Appeal to people's emotions rather than there reason. (Hitler practiced throughout his political career)&lt;br /&gt;
#  &lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is an example of an actual attempt at [[liberal tricks]] that was posted on this very page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by [[Barack Obama]] (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of [[affirmative action]] in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a [[conservative]] by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting '''liberal trick''' #17 above.  To someone unfamiliar with '''liberal tricks''', this can be upsetting and intimidating.  But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the [[liberal]] playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious.  The [[liberal]]'s foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011349</id>
		<title>Liberal tricks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011349"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T14:49:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Here are some common [[liberal]] tricks that many people fall for:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# When a liberal theory of pseudo-science is disproved or discredited, then simply change the name (or definition) of the theory to render it impossible to test, as in &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;climate change.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Another example is the redefinition of &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;change over time,&amp;quot; which could mean anything.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim a candidate is a racist if his campaign received a small donation (amid thousands of other donations) from someone who might be called a racist.&lt;br /&gt;
# Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage.&lt;br /&gt;
# Making pseudo-religious arguments even though the person making the arguments does not adhere to the [[Bible]], such as &amp;quot;judge ye not!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Try to draw a [[conservative]] in to saying or doing something which can then be dishonestly twisted to cast him in a bad light.&lt;br /&gt;
# So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting a [[liberal]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic &amp;quot;When did you stop beating your wife?!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Exaggerating praise for fellow liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, liberal praise by law professors for [[Barack Obama]] borders on the absurd.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that atheism equals intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
# In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?)&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;live and let live!&amp;quot; except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue.&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try!&amp;quot; (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping other gods/many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that because everyone else supposedly believes in something, therefore it must be right.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that your [[parent]]s aren't cool; that [[Hollywood values]] are cool; that [[professor values]] are brilliant; and that you must blindly follow your government.&lt;br /&gt;
# There is a shortage of everything we want.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Prayer]] is for dummies, or is antiquated.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[children|Kids]] are getting smarter than old folks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a someone who happens to have a different skin color.&lt;br /&gt;
# Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people.&lt;br /&gt;
# If you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed'').&lt;br /&gt;
# Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything.&lt;br /&gt;
# Accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.&lt;br /&gt;
# In discounting other point of views, [[liberals]] use comparisons of other known &amp;quot;wrong actions&amp;quot; to justify their supposed correct stance. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a &amp;quot;Dr.&amp;quot; or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberals often cited physicists who had no training or expertise in engineering for their baseless, illogical criticisms of [[SDI]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called &amp;quot;Doctor&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Saying &amp;quot;If you believe that abortion is murder, don't have one!&amp;quot; as if abortion isn't undisputably the murder of a human being.&lt;br /&gt;
# Supporting classlessness while pretending to care about the preservation of world culture.&lt;br /&gt;
# Finding a diverse individual to be appealing or “cool” until they learn that the individual does not conform to their liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming open-mindedness as a disguise for immorality. Such is a typical liberal claim regarding drug/alcohol abuse, promiscuity, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the lives of heinous criminals (by opposing capital punishment) while encouraging murder of unborn children (by supporting infanticide, known today as abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Justifying sinful [[lie|lying]] by saying &amp;quot;what they don't know can't hurt them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that there exists a [[Separation of Church and State]] in the United States (and citing biased Supreme Court decisions to back themselves up) when in reality there exists no such Separation of Church and state in the constitution, and that the Founding Fathers were mostly Christian themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stereotyping Christians as aggresive nutjubs unless they conform to liberal policies. &lt;br /&gt;
# Reveal celebrities supporting a dangerous liberal reform, such as introducing [[same sex marriage]] which implies that it is the right thing to do.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Portray [[feminism]] and women's rights as the same thing. (History reveals the early [[suffragists]] being incredibly different to modern feminism).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that Nazism is an example of right wing extremism, when in fact the Nazis cared very little about individual freedom and were not fiscally conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberal policies should be pushed even further after a disaster e.g. more gun control after the [[Columbine Massacre]]. This leads people into conforming more to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that history began with a &amp;quot;Golden Age of Faith&amp;quot; and the future will become fully secular. Studies actually reveal Christianity growing around the world. &lt;br /&gt;
# Use comments such as &amp;quot;racist!&amp;quot; to silence criticism from Conservatives, regardless of its logic. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that no relationship is loving without casual sex.&lt;br /&gt;
# If any crime victim is homosexual, then its automatically a[[ hate crime.]] For example, the [[Matthew Shepard]] murder was portrayed as a hate crime by the [[mainstream media]]. But the trial of his killers actually revealed them to be drug addicts. &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that an act is not sinful if the act is legal under civil law.&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is an example of an actual attempt at [[liberal tricks]] that was posted on this very page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by [[Barack Obama]] (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of [[affirmative action]] in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a [[conservative]] by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting '''liberal trick''' #17 above.  To someone unfamiliar with '''liberal tricks''', this can be upsetting and intimidating.  But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the [[liberal]] playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious.  The [[liberal]]'s foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011347</id>
		<title>Liberal tricks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011347"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T14:00:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Here are some common [[liberal]] tricks that many people fall for:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# When a liberal theory of pseudo-science is disproved or discredited, then simply change the name (or definition) of the theory to render it impossible to test, as in &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;climate change.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Another example is the redefinition of &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;change over time,&amp;quot; which could mean anything.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim a candidate is a racist if his campaign received a small donation (amid thousands of other donations) from someone who might be called a racist.&lt;br /&gt;
# Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage.&lt;br /&gt;
# Making pseudo-religious arguments even though the person making the arguments does not adhere to the [[Bible]], such as &amp;quot;judge ye not!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Try to draw a [[conservative]] in to saying or doing something which can then be dishonestly twisted to cast him in a bad light.&lt;br /&gt;
# So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting a [[liberal]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic &amp;quot;When did you stop beating your wife?!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Exaggerating praise for fellow liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, liberal praise by law professors for [[Barack Obama]] borders on the absurd.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that atheism equals intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
# In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?)&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;live and let live!&amp;quot; except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue.&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try!&amp;quot; (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping other gods/many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that because everyone else supposedly believes in something, therefore it must be right.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that your [[parent]]s aren't cool; that [[Hollywood values]] are cool; that [[professor values]] are brilliant; and that you must blindly follow your government.&lt;br /&gt;
# There is a shortage of everything we want.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Prayer]] is for dummies, or is antiquated.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[children|Kids]] are getting smarter than old folks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a someone who happens to have a different skin color.&lt;br /&gt;
# Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people.&lt;br /&gt;
# If you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed'').&lt;br /&gt;
# Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything.&lt;br /&gt;
# Accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.&lt;br /&gt;
# In discounting other point of views, [[liberals]] use comparisons of other known &amp;quot;wrong actions&amp;quot; to justify their supposed correct stance. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a &amp;quot;Dr.&amp;quot; or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberals often cited physicists who had no training or expertise in engineering for their baseless, illogical criticisms of [[SDI]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called &amp;quot;Doctor&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Saying &amp;quot;If you believe that abortion is murder, don't have one!&amp;quot; as if abortion isn't undisputably the murder of a human being.&lt;br /&gt;
# Supporting classlessness while pretending to care about the preservation of world culture.&lt;br /&gt;
# Finding a diverse individual to be appealing or “cool” until they learn that the individual does not conform to their liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming open-mindedness as a disguise for immorality. Such is a typical liberal claim regarding drug/alcohol abuse, promiscuity, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the lives of heinous criminals (by opposing capital punishment) while encouraging murder of unborn children (by supporting infanticide, known today as abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Justifying sinful [[lie|lying]] by saying &amp;quot;what they don't know can't hurt them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that there exists a [[Separation of Church and State]] in the United States (and citing biased Supreme Court decisions to back themselves up) when in reality there exists no such Separation of Church and state in the constitution, and that the Founding Fathers were mostly Christian themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stereotyping Christians as aggresive nutjubs unless they conform to liberal policies. &lt;br /&gt;
# Reveal celebrities supporting a dangerous liberal reform, such as introducing [[same sex marriage]] which implies that it is the right thing to do.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Portray [[feminism]] and women's rights as the same thing. (History reveals the early [[suffragists]] being incredibly different to modern feminism).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that Nazism is an example of right wing extremism, when in fact the Nazis cared very little about individual freedom and were not fiscally conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberal policies should be pushed even further after a disaster e.g. more gun control after the [[Columbine Massacre]]. This leads people into conforming more to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that history began with a &amp;quot;Golden Age of Faith&amp;quot; and the future will become fully secular. Studies actually reveal Christianity growing around the world. &lt;br /&gt;
# Use comments such as &amp;quot;racist!&amp;quot; to silence criticism from Conservatives, regardless of its logic. &lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is an example of an actual attempt at [[liberal tricks]] that was posted on this very page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by [[Barack Obama]] (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of [[affirmative action]] in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a [[conservative]] by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting '''liberal trick''' #17 above.  To someone unfamiliar with '''liberal tricks''', this can be upsetting and intimidating.  But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the [[liberal]] playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious.  The [[liberal]]'s foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011346</id>
		<title>Liberal tricks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_tricks&amp;diff=1011346"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T13:56:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Here are some common [[liberal]] tricks that many people fall for:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# When a liberal theory of pseudo-science is disproved or discredited, then simply change the name (or definition) of the theory to render it impossible to test, as in &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;climate change.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Another example is the redefinition of &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;change over time,&amp;quot; which could mean anything.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim a candidate is a racist if his campaign received a small donation (amid thousands of other donations) from someone who might be called a racist.&lt;br /&gt;
# Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage.&lt;br /&gt;
# Making pseudo-religious arguments even though the person making the arguments does not adhere to the [[Bible]], such as &amp;quot;judge ye not!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Try to draw a [[conservative]] in to saying or doing something which can then be dishonestly twisted to cast him in a bad light.&lt;br /&gt;
# So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting a [[liberal]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic &amp;quot;When did you stop beating your wife?!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Exaggerating praise for fellow liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, liberal praise by law professors for [[Barack Obama]] borders on the absurd.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending that atheism equals intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
# In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?)&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;live and let live!&amp;quot; except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue.&lt;br /&gt;
# Citing &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try!&amp;quot; (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping other gods/many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that because everyone else supposedly believes in something, therefore it must be right.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that your [[parent]]s aren't cool; that [[Hollywood values]] are cool; that [[professor values]] are brilliant; and that you must blindly follow your government.&lt;br /&gt;
# There is a shortage of everything we want.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Prayer]] is for dummies, or is antiquated.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[children|Kids]] are getting smarter than old folks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a someone who happens to have a different skin color.&lt;br /&gt;
# Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people.&lt;br /&gt;
# If you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed'').&lt;br /&gt;
# Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything.&lt;br /&gt;
# Accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.&lt;br /&gt;
# In discounting other point of views, [[liberals]] use comparisons of other known &amp;quot;wrong actions&amp;quot; to justify their supposed correct stance. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a &amp;quot;Dr.&amp;quot; or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberals often cited physicists who had no training or expertise in engineering for their baseless, illogical criticisms of [[SDI]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called &amp;quot;Doctor&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Saying &amp;quot;If you believe that abortion is murder, don't have one!&amp;quot; as if abortion isn't undisputably the murder of a human being.&lt;br /&gt;
# Supporting classlessness while pretending to care about the preservation of world culture.&lt;br /&gt;
# Finding a diverse individual to be appealing or “cool” until they learn that the individual does not conform to their liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming open-mindedness as a disguise for immorality. Such is a typical liberal claim regarding drug/alcohol abuse, promiscuity, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Defending the lives of heinous criminals (by opposing capital punishment) while encouraging murder of unborn children (by supporting infanticide, known today as abortion).&lt;br /&gt;
# Justifying sinful [[lie|lying]] by saying &amp;quot;what they don't know can't hurt them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that there exists a [[Separation of Church and State]] in the United States (and citing biased Supreme Court decisions to back themselves up) when in reality there exists no such Separation of Church and state in the constitution, and that the Founding Fathers were mostly Christian themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stereotyping Christians as aggresive nutjubs unless they conform to liberal policies. &lt;br /&gt;
# Reveal celebrities supporting a dangerous liberal reform, such as introducing [[same sex marriage]] which implies that it is the right thing to do.  &lt;br /&gt;
# Portray [[feminism]] and women's rights as the same thing. (History reveals the early [[suffragists]] being incredibly different to modern feminism).&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that Nazism is an example of right wing extremism, when in fact the Nazis cared very little about individual freedom and were not fiscally conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberal policies should be pushed even further after a disaster e.g. more gun control after the [[Columbine Massacre]]. This leads people into conforming more to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that history began with a &amp;quot;Golden Age of Faith&amp;quot; and the future will become fully secular. Studies actually reveal Christianity growing around the world. &lt;br /&gt;
# &lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is an example of an actual attempt at [[liberal tricks]] that was posted on this very page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by [[Barack Obama]] (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of [[affirmative action]] in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a [[conservative]] by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting '''liberal trick''' #17 above.  To someone unfamiliar with '''liberal tricks''', this can be upsetting and intimidating.  But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the [[liberal]] playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious.  The [[liberal]]'s foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011345</id>
		<title>Liberal denial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011345"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T13:00:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Obama messiah.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Cover of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' Magazine, one of many published &amp;quot;halo-effect&amp;quot; photos of Barack Obama; the emphasis is on the claims that he is a &amp;quot;messiah,&amp;quot; and is an example of liberal deification of a government official in accordance with line #6.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberal denial''' is the tendency of [[liberals]] to conceal, [[denial|deny]] or [[Censorship|censor]] the truth for ideological reasons.  A list of the top ''common'' instances of [[liberal denial]] are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that human intelligence inevitably and demonstrably declines from generation to generation, and that if there were another 100 generations into the future the people would not be able to understand simple concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[fetal pain]] during [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[Hell]].  [[Jesus]] talked about Hell more than Heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they censor the [[Bible]] from their daily activities, and encourage the censorship for others too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Fidel Castro]], who has not been seen in public since his intestinal surgery 3.5 years ago, is likely to be deceased.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the [[Nobel Prize]] is an award given by liberals to other liberals, and sometimes even granted in an awkward manner designed to punish a critic of liberal falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g., the granting of the Nobel Prize to an understudy of [[Fred Hoyle]] to punish him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they deify government officials, similar to how communists deified Stalin and Lenin and still deify Castro.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., liberal adulation of [[Ted Kennedy]] despite his paucity of achievements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how fellow travelers engage in [[deceit]], or at least refuse to admit it.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny they are [[liberal]], and that most of the media are [[liberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hollywood values]], [[professor values]] and general [[liberal]] values have consequences for those who believe in them, and also for innocent victims.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that they have censored [[prayer]] in [[public school]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A [[public school]] student who once &amp;quot;tape recorded a teacher making religious remarks to his students&amp;quot; to complain about it then later objected to a textbook explaining how prayer is censored from [[public school]] schools by court decisions. [http://abcnews.go.com/US/WireStory?id=4614012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that a woman significantly reduces her risk of [[breast cancer]] by having children rather than [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and those STDs cause infertility&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Among those who admitted having sex, the rate was even more disturbing -- 40 percent had an STD.&amp;quot;[http://www.tulsaworld.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=20080312_1_C12_hUShe15125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the strident promoters of [[evolution]] generally have weaker credentials than advocates of [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that College faculties at nearly every American school are completely dominated by [[liberals]], and have virtually no [[conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Homosexuality]] shortens lifespan for a wide variety of reasons&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that reducing the number of guns, which are primarily defensive weapons, results in an increase in crime&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the war in [[Iraq]] was needed and also deny that the surge has worked&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hitler]] and the [[Nazi]] party were in fact [[Liberals]] (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of [[Liberal Christianity]] as is the [[PETA]]-like Green wing of the Third Reich&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html Fascist Ecology: &lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Green Wing&amp;quot; of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally Liberals deny &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Obama]] ran the dirtiest campaign since [[Lyndon Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That more than 80% of child molesters are [[pornography]] addicts&lt;br /&gt;
# That people like [[young mass murderers]] who take [[atheistic]] beliefs to their logical conclusions are not &amp;quot;crazy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;insane&amp;quot;, but are true believers. &lt;br /&gt;
# That [[young mass murderers]] fit the profile of [[public school]]-trained [[atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the intellectual justification for [[Hitler]]'s attempt to build a master Aryan race was the [[theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[feminists]] censor discussion about differences between men and women, and boys and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Lawrence Summers]] was fired as President of [[Harvard]] for making a [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] suggestion about women and [[math]] aptitude&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Socialized_medicine|state run health care]] has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMu6wCqdeyQ ''FOX News analyzes the new terror in state healthcare.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That obesity is a bigger problem than hunger in the Western world&lt;br /&gt;
# That a school having virtually no [[conservative]] teachers and many [[atheists]] and [[liberals]] is a [[liberal]] school&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] attempt to intimidate and ostracize [[conservatives]], particularly in school environments and some occupations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[liberals and friendship]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That girls and women in sports have debilitating ACL knee injuries at 3-4 times the rate of men,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Compare'' [http://www.universityhealthmatters.com/article.php?artid=50] (with an explanation of why there is a big difference) ''with'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/health/18knee.html?ex=1204088400&amp;amp;en=3a5abfaa6104ac63&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1 New York Times] (downplaying the difference and pretending that no one knows why).  The New York Times denies overwhelming evidence, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Female athletes, particularly basketball players, are far more likely than their male counterparts to suffer ACL [Anterior Cruciate Ligament] injuries.&amp;quot; Stephen Hargis, &amp;quot;Girls have more torn ACLs,&amp;quot; Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee), D1 (Feb. 4, 2005). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the risk of women tearing their ACL is 1 in 100. This number drops significantly to only 1 in 500 for men. See Nikki Usher, &amp;quot;Knee injury takes toll on girls playing soccer five times more likely than males to suffer a torn ACL,&amp;quot; Philadelphia Inquirer, A01 (Nov. 29, 2004). &amp;quot;Compared with guys, female athletes run an eight-times-greater risk of tearing the ACL, a fibrous band that connects the shinbone (tibia) to the thighbone (femur). Basketball, soccer and other sports that require cutting moves or jump shots can put athletes at risk.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls face higher knee injury risk,&amp;quot; USA Today, 15B (Aug. 24, 2004). Timothy Hewett, PhD, the lead researcher on a definitive study at the Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center at the University of Cincinnati, says this is &amp;quot;close to a billion-dollar problem in girls and women in the USA. ... Even after girls have recovered from the acute injury, the changes in the joint may set the stage for osteoarthritis of the knee ....&amp;quot; ''Id.'' That obvious suspicion was quickly confirmed: a study subsequently published in Arthritis &amp;amp; Rheumatism demonstrated that &amp;quot;more than half of ... 103 soccer players, who were ages 14 to 28 at the time of the ACL injury, suffered osteoarthritis of the knee at the time of the study -- about 12 years later.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls' knee injuries have later consequences,&amp;quot; USA Today, 9D (Oct. 7, 2004). &amp;quot;Many of the women, who were about 31 by that time, also said they had pain or some other disability that made it hard to conduct daily activities.&amp;quot; ''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are vulnerable to other injuries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Amber Scull ruptured her spleen after she was tackled during a practice drill at Nature Coast Tech in Brooksville 2 1/2 months ago. Had she [not] arrived at the hospital 30 minutes later, doctors told her mother, she might have died.&amp;quot; [http://www.sptimes.com/2004/01/06/news_pf/Sports/Girls_face_dangers_on.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That the numerous premature deaths of [[Hollywood]] stars are the result of [[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberal [[Wikipedia]] lists numerous [[actor]]s who died of drug overdoses, but will not acknowledge the role played by [[Hollywood values]], for which Wikipedia does not even have an entry. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drug-related_deaths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[homeschoolers]] often do better than those who attend [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[culture]] affects [[politics]], and people's views and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
# That successful [[democracy]], both historically and logically, is the result of [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/cultural_apologetics/snyder-democracy1.html Calvinism and the Success of Liberal Democracy, by John Snyder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Ronald Reagan]]'s public exhortation, &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev|Mr. Gorbachev]], tear down this wall,&amp;quot; helped cause the nearly 30-year-old [[Berlin Wall]] later be torn down&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[gun control]] increases [[crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That reducing [[tax rates]] stimulates the [[economy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That choosing [[abortion]] over childbirth increases the risk of [[breast cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[mainstream media]] is [[bias]]ed&lt;br /&gt;
# That privately-run [[transport]] is more efficient than government-run transport&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[universal health care]] is inferior medical care&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Labor union|union]]s interfere with [[employment]] opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberal]] leaders engage in shocking wrongdoing, [[Liberal hypocrisy|hypocrisy]], and abuse of power&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., leading [[liberal]] [[Eliot Spitzer]] and how fellow [[liberals]] downplayed or were silent about his misconduct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That ideas do matter, and can cause great harm, including liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Islam]]ic extremism is a threat to the [[Western civilization]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leftist [[Sam Harris]] admitted and complained about this liberal denial [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061009/REPOSITORY/610090301/1028/OPINION02 here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That banning [[same-sex marriage]] is analogous to banning [[polygamy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That aggressive interrogation is often the only way to obtain answers from [[terrorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[liberal]] ideology is pushed on unsuspecting others, particularly youngsters&lt;br /&gt;
# That free trade strengthens global democracies&lt;br /&gt;
# That a child in a mother's womb has rights established by the [[Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That a [[vote]] for (yea) or a vote against (nea) is an absolute position&lt;br /&gt;
# That you can be held accountable for the statements uttered&lt;br /&gt;
# That climate forecasts 50 years from now are as inaccurate as 15 days from now&lt;br /&gt;
# That politicians that proclaim 'Change' actually do not break with policies of the past&lt;br /&gt;
# That removing [[Saddam Hussein]] from power was a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
# That eating [[meat]] and [[dairy]] is important for physical and mental health.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[marijuana]] use has lasting psychological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
# That illegal immigrants contribute to crime and poverty in the towns and cities they occupy.&lt;br /&gt;
# That English will cease being the language of the United States in 20 years unless it is protected as the [[official language]] (and that this would be a loss if it happened).&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Bush didn't cause Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Clinton was responsible for Rwanda inaction.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the Democratic party discriminates against African-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
# That restricting free speech by the [[Fairness Doctrine]] is actually not fair nor democratic.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can drill oil our way out of high gas prices.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can't replace our dependence on oil with green technologies, when in fact we need both oil and green technologies to solve our energy crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
# That opposing same-sex [[marriage]] is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they are [[intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints and then try to stifle further discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[socialism]] and liberalism have the same political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[God]] should have a place in government&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern drilling methods result in minimal environmental impact, even if they were implemented in uninhabited lands such as the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That companies like [[Exxon]] should pay billions of dollars in damages to the general public, ''in addition'' to the money they spend to clean up industrial accidents and to recompense those directly affected&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[selective logging]] keeps forests healthier by reducing the risk of wildfire&lt;br /&gt;
# That high food prices are not caused by [[ethanol]] production, but rather by the million acres of crop- and pastureland that have been taken out of production in the interest of wildlife conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the life of a human is more important than the life of an animal or plant.&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern technology can make [[coal]] clean&lt;br /&gt;
# That a fence is the most effective and ultimately, the most peaceful way to protect our large border from illegal immigrants trying to get in&lt;br /&gt;
# That socially dangerous people exhibit a well-documented pattern of reading habits&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[heavy metal]] music is generally anti-Christian and promotes themes such as drugs, sex and [[Satan]] worship.&lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of God and Jesus, our Lord and Savior.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they make sweeping generalizations about Conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
# That Wikipedia has a systematic bias.&lt;br /&gt;
# That homosexuals can be switched back into heterosexuals. (See [[ex-homosexuals]])&lt;br /&gt;
# That morality is objective.&lt;br /&gt;
# That it is logical to disapprove of abortion and homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
# That liberal media tycoons such as [[Ted Turner]] support population control.&lt;br /&gt;
# That atheism is a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# That legalizing drugs will increase crime (many thieves and murderers are drug addicts).&lt;br /&gt;
# That men and women are by nature different. &lt;br /&gt;
# That Liberals support [[Totalitarianism]]. &lt;br /&gt;
# That faith and logic are compatible.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[same sex adoption]] is harmful to children.&lt;br /&gt;
# That evolution, global warming and [[big bang astronomy]] are refutable.&lt;br /&gt;
# That Clinton was known for his adulterous behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
# The scientific accuracy contained in the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
# That America's [[founding fathers]] were devout Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
# That virtually all fossil evidence for evolution has been proven wrong. &lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[nuclear family]] is beneficial to children. &lt;br /&gt;
# That liberals suppress any criticism rather acknowledge it. &lt;br /&gt;
Often [[liberal]]s refuse to admit that they are [[liberal]]s, in the hope of appearing more reasonable.  [[Hillary Clinton]] refused to admit in a presidential debate in 2007 that she is a [[liberal]]. Similarly, [[Michael Dukakis]] refused for a while to admit that he was a [[liberal]] during the 1988 presidential campaign.  Only out of desperation did Dukakis admit that he was a [[liberal]], and even then he admitted only that was a liberal like President [[Harry Truman]], who served 40 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals like to bash President Bush as a war monger and cite [[President Clinton]] for his eight years of peace and prosperity. Liberals will deny record low unemployment, more people owning their homes and President Bush going after [[terrorists]] while protecting Americans from further attacks. Liberals will selectively forget that during Clinton's term: the [[Rwanda]] massacre occurred, the bombing of the USS Cole, the war in the [[Balkans]], the two US embassies bombed in [[Africa]], the Kobar tower bombing in Saudi Arabia, the [[Somalia]] conflict, the missile strike against [[Afghanistan]] and the bombing campaign against Iraq. Also, [[liberals]] will deny that Clinton's economic policy ignored a series of high profile companies that eventually collapsed due to fraud: Enron, Tyco, Worldcom and Qwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of their denial, liberals often use the word &amp;quot;denial&amp;quot; pejoratively against conservatives. Alleging that conservatives are [[racist]] and reject [[science]], they use terms like &amp;quot;[[global warming]] deniers&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[climate change]] deniers&amp;quot; in an attempt to link conservative viewpoints with [[Holocaust denial]], [[Nazism]], [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], and [[pseudoscience]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Longest liberal denials]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Turner&amp;diff=1011338</id>
		<title>Ted Turner</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Turner&amp;diff=1011338"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T12:32:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ted Turner''' is a [[liberal]] [[media]] magnate, best known for founding [[CNN]] and Turner Broadcasting, and for making many insulting comments towards [[Christians]] and [[Republicans]]. He has publicly described himself as a [[socialism|socialist]] and declared admiration for [[Fidel Castro]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was previously married to [[Jane Fonda]] but their marriage ended when Fonda became a Christian.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''My Life So Far'', Jane Fonda, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Turner had previously gone on record stating that Christianity was &amp;quot;a religion for losers&amp;quot;, a comment that outside of the Christian community was generally deemed to be unimportant by the press and appeared to have no negative impact on his standing in the eyes of the media or his place as a businessman.  Turner is also well known for his pledge to give a large chunk of his money to the [[United Nations]] and his encouragement for other people of wealth to do the same.  He sponsored a United Nations religious program that brought up speakers to talk about the 'many paths to God', but did not invite Evangelical Christians to express their view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years Turner's view has mellowed.  In 2008 while announcing a $200 million anti-malaria partnership with [[Lutheran]] and [[Methodist]] denominations, he had this to say:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Religion is one of the bright spots as far as I'm concerned, even though there are some areas, like everything else, where they've gone over the top a little, in my opinion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christianity Today, June 2008, Pg. 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turner also says he now prays for sick friends, explaining, &amp;quot;It doesn't hurt.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turner also supports [[population control]], an pseudoscience based on economic assumptions with unethical consequences for humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
In ... he said&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Turner, Ted}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Broadcasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberal Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Turner&amp;diff=1011336</id>
		<title>Ted Turner</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Turner&amp;diff=1011336"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T12:30:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ted Turner''' is a [[liberal]] [[media]] magnate, best known for founding [[CNN]] and Turner Broadcasting, and for making many insulting comments towards [[Christians]] and [[Republicans]]. He has publicly described himself as a [[socialism|socialist]] and declared admiration for [[Fidel Castro]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was previously married to [[Jane Fonda]] but their marriage ended when Fonda became a Christian.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''My Life So Far'', Jane Fonda, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Turner had previously gone on record stating that Christianity was &amp;quot;a religion for losers&amp;quot;, a comment that outside of the Christian community was generally deemed to be unimportant by the press and appeared to have no negative impact on his standing in the eyes of the media or his place as a businessman.  Turner is also well known for his pledge to give a large chunk of his money to the [[United Nations]] and his encouragement for other people of wealth to do the same.  He sponsored a United Nations religious program that brought up speakers to talk about the 'many paths to God', but did not invite Evangelical Christians to express their view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years Turner's view has mellowed.  In 2008 while announcing a $200 million anti-malaria partnership with [[Lutheran]] and [[Methodist]] denominations, he had this to say:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Religion is one of the bright spots as far as I'm concerned, even though there are some areas, like everything else, where they've gone over the top a little, in my opinion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christianity Today, June 2008, Pg. 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turner also says he now prays for sick friends, explaining, &amp;quot;It doesn't hurt.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turner also supports [[population control]], an pseudoscience based on economic assumptions with unethical consequences for humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Turner, Ted}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Broadcasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberal Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011335</id>
		<title>Liberal denial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011335"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T12:28:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Obama messiah.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Cover of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' Magazine, one of many published &amp;quot;halo-effect&amp;quot; photos of Barack Obama; the emphasis is on the claims that he is a &amp;quot;messiah,&amp;quot; and is an example of liberal deification of a government official in accordance with line #6.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberal denial''' is the tendency of [[liberals]] to conceal, [[denial|deny]] or [[Censorship|censor]] the truth for ideological reasons.  A list of the top ''common'' instances of [[liberal denial]] are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that human intelligence inevitably and demonstrably declines from generation to generation, and that if there were another 100 generations into the future the people would not be able to understand simple concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[fetal pain]] during [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[Hell]].  [[Jesus]] talked about Hell more than Heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they censor the [[Bible]] from their daily activities, and encourage the censorship for others too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Fidel Castro]], who has not been seen in public since his intestinal surgery 3.5 years ago, is likely to be deceased.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the [[Nobel Prize]] is an award given by liberals to other liberals, and sometimes even granted in an awkward manner designed to punish a critic of liberal falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g., the granting of the Nobel Prize to an understudy of [[Fred Hoyle]] to punish him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they deify government officials, similar to how communists deified Stalin and Lenin and still deify Castro.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., liberal adulation of [[Ted Kennedy]] despite his paucity of achievements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how fellow travelers engage in [[deceit]], or at least refuse to admit it.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny they are [[liberal]], and that most of the media are [[liberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hollywood values]], [[professor values]] and general [[liberal]] values have consequences for those who believe in them, and also for innocent victims.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that they have censored [[prayer]] in [[public school]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A [[public school]] student who once &amp;quot;tape recorded a teacher making religious remarks to his students&amp;quot; to complain about it then later objected to a textbook explaining how prayer is censored from [[public school]] schools by court decisions. [http://abcnews.go.com/US/WireStory?id=4614012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that a woman significantly reduces her risk of [[breast cancer]] by having children rather than [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and those STDs cause infertility&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Among those who admitted having sex, the rate was even more disturbing -- 40 percent had an STD.&amp;quot;[http://www.tulsaworld.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=20080312_1_C12_hUShe15125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the strident promoters of [[evolution]] generally have weaker credentials than advocates of [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that College faculties at nearly every American school are completely dominated by [[liberals]], and have virtually no [[conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Homosexuality]] shortens lifespan for a wide variety of reasons&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that reducing the number of guns, which are primarily defensive weapons, results in an increase in crime&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the war in [[Iraq]] was needed and also deny that the surge has worked&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hitler]] and the [[Nazi]] party were in fact [[Liberals]] (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of [[Liberal Christianity]] as is the [[PETA]]-like Green wing of the Third Reich&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html Fascist Ecology: &lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Green Wing&amp;quot; of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally Liberals deny &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Obama]] ran the dirtiest campaign since [[Lyndon Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That more than 80% of child molesters are [[pornography]] addicts&lt;br /&gt;
# That people like [[young mass murderers]] who take [[atheistic]] beliefs to their logical conclusions are not &amp;quot;crazy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;insane&amp;quot;, but are true believers. &lt;br /&gt;
# That [[young mass murderers]] fit the profile of [[public school]]-trained [[atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the intellectual justification for [[Hitler]]'s attempt to build a master Aryan race was the [[theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[feminists]] censor discussion about differences between men and women, and boys and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Lawrence Summers]] was fired as President of [[Harvard]] for making a [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] suggestion about women and [[math]] aptitude&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Socialized_medicine|state run health care]] has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMu6wCqdeyQ ''FOX News analyzes the new terror in state healthcare.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That obesity is a bigger problem than hunger in the Western world&lt;br /&gt;
# That a school having virtually no [[conservative]] teachers and many [[atheists]] and [[liberals]] is a [[liberal]] school&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] attempt to intimidate and ostracize [[conservatives]], particularly in school environments and some occupations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[liberals and friendship]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That girls and women in sports have debilitating ACL knee injuries at 3-4 times the rate of men,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Compare'' [http://www.universityhealthmatters.com/article.php?artid=50] (with an explanation of why there is a big difference) ''with'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/health/18knee.html?ex=1204088400&amp;amp;en=3a5abfaa6104ac63&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1 New York Times] (downplaying the difference and pretending that no one knows why).  The New York Times denies overwhelming evidence, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Female athletes, particularly basketball players, are far more likely than their male counterparts to suffer ACL [Anterior Cruciate Ligament] injuries.&amp;quot; Stephen Hargis, &amp;quot;Girls have more torn ACLs,&amp;quot; Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee), D1 (Feb. 4, 2005). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the risk of women tearing their ACL is 1 in 100. This number drops significantly to only 1 in 500 for men. See Nikki Usher, &amp;quot;Knee injury takes toll on girls playing soccer five times more likely than males to suffer a torn ACL,&amp;quot; Philadelphia Inquirer, A01 (Nov. 29, 2004). &amp;quot;Compared with guys, female athletes run an eight-times-greater risk of tearing the ACL, a fibrous band that connects the shinbone (tibia) to the thighbone (femur). Basketball, soccer and other sports that require cutting moves or jump shots can put athletes at risk.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls face higher knee injury risk,&amp;quot; USA Today, 15B (Aug. 24, 2004). Timothy Hewett, PhD, the lead researcher on a definitive study at the Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center at the University of Cincinnati, says this is &amp;quot;close to a billion-dollar problem in girls and women in the USA. ... Even after girls have recovered from the acute injury, the changes in the joint may set the stage for osteoarthritis of the knee ....&amp;quot; ''Id.'' That obvious suspicion was quickly confirmed: a study subsequently published in Arthritis &amp;amp; Rheumatism demonstrated that &amp;quot;more than half of ... 103 soccer players, who were ages 14 to 28 at the time of the ACL injury, suffered osteoarthritis of the knee at the time of the study -- about 12 years later.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls' knee injuries have later consequences,&amp;quot; USA Today, 9D (Oct. 7, 2004). &amp;quot;Many of the women, who were about 31 by that time, also said they had pain or some other disability that made it hard to conduct daily activities.&amp;quot; ''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are vulnerable to other injuries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Amber Scull ruptured her spleen after she was tackled during a practice drill at Nature Coast Tech in Brooksville 2 1/2 months ago. Had she [not] arrived at the hospital 30 minutes later, doctors told her mother, she might have died.&amp;quot; [http://www.sptimes.com/2004/01/06/news_pf/Sports/Girls_face_dangers_on.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That the numerous premature deaths of [[Hollywood]] stars are the result of [[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberal [[Wikipedia]] lists numerous [[actor]]s who died of drug overdoses, but will not acknowledge the role played by [[Hollywood values]], for which Wikipedia does not even have an entry. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drug-related_deaths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[homeschoolers]] often do better than those who attend [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[culture]] affects [[politics]], and people's views and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
# That successful [[democracy]], both historically and logically, is the result of [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/cultural_apologetics/snyder-democracy1.html Calvinism and the Success of Liberal Democracy, by John Snyder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Ronald Reagan]]'s public exhortation, &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev|Mr. Gorbachev]], tear down this wall,&amp;quot; helped cause the nearly 30-year-old [[Berlin Wall]] later be torn down&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[gun control]] increases [[crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That reducing [[tax rates]] stimulates the [[economy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That choosing [[abortion]] over childbirth increases the risk of [[breast cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[mainstream media]] is [[bias]]ed&lt;br /&gt;
# That privately-run [[transport]] is more efficient than government-run transport&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[universal health care]] is inferior medical care&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Labor union|union]]s interfere with [[employment]] opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberal]] leaders engage in shocking wrongdoing, [[Liberal hypocrisy|hypocrisy]], and abuse of power&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., leading [[liberal]] [[Eliot Spitzer]] and how fellow [[liberals]] downplayed or were silent about his misconduct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That ideas do matter, and can cause great harm, including liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Islam]]ic extremism is a threat to the [[Western civilization]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leftist [[Sam Harris]] admitted and complained about this liberal denial [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061009/REPOSITORY/610090301/1028/OPINION02 here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That banning [[same-sex marriage]] is analogous to banning [[polygamy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That aggressive interrogation is often the only way to obtain answers from [[terrorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[liberal]] ideology is pushed on unsuspecting others, particularly youngsters&lt;br /&gt;
# That free trade strengthens global democracies&lt;br /&gt;
# That a child in a mother's womb has rights established by the [[Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That a [[vote]] for (yea) or a vote against (nea) is an absolute position&lt;br /&gt;
# That you can be held accountable for the statements uttered&lt;br /&gt;
# That climate forecasts 50 years from now are as inaccurate as 15 days from now&lt;br /&gt;
# That politicians that proclaim 'Change' actually do not break with policies of the past&lt;br /&gt;
# That removing [[Saddam Hussein]] from power was a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
# That eating [[meat]] and [[dairy]] is important for physical and mental health.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[marijuana]] use has lasting psychological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
# That illegal immigrants contribute to crime and poverty in the towns and cities they occupy.&lt;br /&gt;
# That English will cease being the language of the United States in 20 years unless it is protected as the [[official language]] (and that this would be a loss if it happened).&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Bush didn't cause Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Clinton was responsible for Rwanda inaction.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the Democratic party discriminates against African-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
# That restricting free speech by the [[Fairness Doctrine]] is actually not fair nor democratic.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can drill oil our way out of high gas prices.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can't replace our dependence on oil with green technologies, when in fact we need both oil and green technologies to solve our energy crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
# That opposing same-sex [[marriage]] is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they are [[intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints and then try to stifle further discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[socialism]] and liberalism have the same political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[God]] should have a place in government&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern drilling methods result in minimal environmental impact, even if they were implemented in uninhabited lands such as the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That companies like [[Exxon]] should pay billions of dollars in damages to the general public, ''in addition'' to the money they spend to clean up industrial accidents and to recompense those directly affected&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[selective logging]] keeps forests healthier by reducing the risk of wildfire&lt;br /&gt;
# That high food prices are not caused by [[ethanol]] production, but rather by the million acres of crop- and pastureland that have been taken out of production in the interest of wildlife conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the life of a human is more important than the life of an animal or plant.&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern technology can make [[coal]] clean&lt;br /&gt;
# That a fence is the most effective and ultimately, the most peaceful way to protect our large border from illegal immigrants trying to get in&lt;br /&gt;
# That socially dangerous people exhibit a well-documented pattern of reading habits&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[heavy metal]] music is generally anti-Christian and promotes themes such as drugs, sex and [[Satan]] worship.&lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of God and Jesus, our Lord and Savior.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they make sweeping generalizations about Conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
# That Wikipedia has a systematic bias.&lt;br /&gt;
# That homosexuals can be switched back into heterosexuals. (See [[ex-homosexuals]])&lt;br /&gt;
# That morality is objective.&lt;br /&gt;
# That it is logical to disapprove of abortion and homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
# That liberal media tycoons such as [[Ted Turner]] support population control.&lt;br /&gt;
# That atheism is a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
Often [[liberal]]s refuse to admit that they are [[liberal]]s, in the hope of appearing more reasonable.  [[Hillary Clinton]] refused to admit in a presidential debate in 2007 that she is a [[liberal]]. Similarly, [[Michael Dukakis]] refused for a while to admit that he was a [[liberal]] during the 1988 presidential campaign.  Only out of desperation did Dukakis admit that he was a [[liberal]], and even then he admitted only that was a liberal like President [[Harry Truman]], who served 40 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals like to bash President Bush as a war monger and cite [[President Clinton]] for his eight years of peace and prosperity. Liberals will deny record low unemployment, more people owning their homes and President Bush going after [[terrorists]] while protecting Americans from further attacks. Liberals will selectively forget that during Clinton's term: the [[Rwanda]] massacre occurred, the bombing of the USS Cole, the war in the [[Balkans]], the two US embassies bombed in [[Africa]], the Kobar tower bombing in Saudi Arabia, the [[Somalia]] conflict, the missile strike against [[Afghanistan]] and the bombing campaign against Iraq. Also, [[liberals]] will deny that Clinton's economic policy ignored a series of high profile companies that eventually collapsed due to fraud: Enron, Tyco, Worldcom and Qwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of their denial, liberals often use the word &amp;quot;denial&amp;quot; pejoratively against conservatives. Alleging that conservatives are [[racist]] and reject [[science]], they use terms like &amp;quot;[[global warming]] deniers&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[climate change]] deniers&amp;quot; in an attempt to link conservative viewpoints with [[Holocaust denial]], [[Nazism]], [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], and [[pseudoscience]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Longest liberal denials]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011328</id>
		<title>Liberal denial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011328"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T12:18:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Obama messiah.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Cover of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' Magazine, one of many published &amp;quot;halo-effect&amp;quot; photos of Barack Obama; the emphasis is on the claims that he is a &amp;quot;messiah,&amp;quot; and is an example of liberal deification of a government official in accordance with line #6.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberal denial''' is the tendency of [[liberals]] to conceal, [[denial|deny]] or [[Censorship|censor]] the truth for ideological reasons.  A list of the top ''common'' instances of [[liberal denial]] are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that human intelligence inevitably and demonstrably declines from generation to generation, and that if there were another 100 generations into the future the people would not be able to understand simple concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[fetal pain]] during [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[Hell]].  [[Jesus]] talked about Hell more than Heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they censor the [[Bible]] from their daily activities, and encourage the censorship for others too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Fidel Castro]], who has not been seen in public since his intestinal surgery 3.5 years ago, is likely to be deceased.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the [[Nobel Prize]] is an award given by liberals to other liberals, and sometimes even granted in an awkward manner designed to punish a critic of liberal falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g., the granting of the Nobel Prize to an understudy of [[Fred Hoyle]] to punish him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they deify government officials, similar to how communists deified Stalin and Lenin and still deify Castro.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., liberal adulation of [[Ted Kennedy]] despite his paucity of achievements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how fellow travelers engage in [[deceit]], or at least refuse to admit it.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny they are [[liberal]], and that most of the media are [[liberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hollywood values]], [[professor values]] and general [[liberal]] values have consequences for those who believe in them, and also for innocent victims.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that they have censored [[prayer]] in [[public school]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A [[public school]] student who once &amp;quot;tape recorded a teacher making religious remarks to his students&amp;quot; to complain about it then later objected to a textbook explaining how prayer is censored from [[public school]] schools by court decisions. [http://abcnews.go.com/US/WireStory?id=4614012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that a woman significantly reduces her risk of [[breast cancer]] by having children rather than [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and those STDs cause infertility&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Among those who admitted having sex, the rate was even more disturbing -- 40 percent had an STD.&amp;quot;[http://www.tulsaworld.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=20080312_1_C12_hUShe15125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the strident promoters of [[evolution]] generally have weaker credentials than advocates of [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that College faculties at nearly every American school are completely dominated by [[liberals]], and have virtually no [[conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Homosexuality]] shortens lifespan for a wide variety of reasons&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that reducing the number of guns, which are primarily defensive weapons, results in an increase in crime&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the war in [[Iraq]] was needed and also deny that the surge has worked&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hitler]] and the [[Nazi]] party were in fact [[Liberals]] (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of [[Liberal Christianity]] as is the [[PETA]]-like Green wing of the Third Reich&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html Fascist Ecology: &lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Green Wing&amp;quot; of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally Liberals deny &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Obama]] ran the dirtiest campaign since [[Lyndon Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That more than 80% of child molesters are [[pornography]] addicts&lt;br /&gt;
# That people like [[young mass murderers]] who take [[atheistic]] beliefs to their logical conclusions are not &amp;quot;crazy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;insane&amp;quot;, but are true believers. &lt;br /&gt;
# That [[young mass murderers]] fit the profile of [[public school]]-trained [[atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the intellectual justification for [[Hitler]]'s attempt to build a master Aryan race was the [[theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[feminists]] censor discussion about differences between men and women, and boys and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Lawrence Summers]] was fired as President of [[Harvard]] for making a [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] suggestion about women and [[math]] aptitude&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Socialized_medicine|state run health care]] has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMu6wCqdeyQ ''FOX News analyzes the new terror in state healthcare.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That obesity is a bigger problem than hunger in the Western world&lt;br /&gt;
# That a school having virtually no [[conservative]] teachers and many [[atheists]] and [[liberals]] is a [[liberal]] school&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] attempt to intimidate and ostracize [[conservatives]], particularly in school environments and some occupations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[liberals and friendship]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That girls and women in sports have debilitating ACL knee injuries at 3-4 times the rate of men,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Compare'' [http://www.universityhealthmatters.com/article.php?artid=50] (with an explanation of why there is a big difference) ''with'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/health/18knee.html?ex=1204088400&amp;amp;en=3a5abfaa6104ac63&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1 New York Times] (downplaying the difference and pretending that no one knows why).  The New York Times denies overwhelming evidence, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Female athletes, particularly basketball players, are far more likely than their male counterparts to suffer ACL [Anterior Cruciate Ligament] injuries.&amp;quot; Stephen Hargis, &amp;quot;Girls have more torn ACLs,&amp;quot; Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee), D1 (Feb. 4, 2005). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the risk of women tearing their ACL is 1 in 100. This number drops significantly to only 1 in 500 for men. See Nikki Usher, &amp;quot;Knee injury takes toll on girls playing soccer five times more likely than males to suffer a torn ACL,&amp;quot; Philadelphia Inquirer, A01 (Nov. 29, 2004). &amp;quot;Compared with guys, female athletes run an eight-times-greater risk of tearing the ACL, a fibrous band that connects the shinbone (tibia) to the thighbone (femur). Basketball, soccer and other sports that require cutting moves or jump shots can put athletes at risk.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls face higher knee injury risk,&amp;quot; USA Today, 15B (Aug. 24, 2004). Timothy Hewett, PhD, the lead researcher on a definitive study at the Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center at the University of Cincinnati, says this is &amp;quot;close to a billion-dollar problem in girls and women in the USA. ... Even after girls have recovered from the acute injury, the changes in the joint may set the stage for osteoarthritis of the knee ....&amp;quot; ''Id.'' That obvious suspicion was quickly confirmed: a study subsequently published in Arthritis &amp;amp; Rheumatism demonstrated that &amp;quot;more than half of ... 103 soccer players, who were ages 14 to 28 at the time of the ACL injury, suffered osteoarthritis of the knee at the time of the study -- about 12 years later.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls' knee injuries have later consequences,&amp;quot; USA Today, 9D (Oct. 7, 2004). &amp;quot;Many of the women, who were about 31 by that time, also said they had pain or some other disability that made it hard to conduct daily activities.&amp;quot; ''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are vulnerable to other injuries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Amber Scull ruptured her spleen after she was tackled during a practice drill at Nature Coast Tech in Brooksville 2 1/2 months ago. Had she [not] arrived at the hospital 30 minutes later, doctors told her mother, she might have died.&amp;quot; [http://www.sptimes.com/2004/01/06/news_pf/Sports/Girls_face_dangers_on.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That the numerous premature deaths of [[Hollywood]] stars are the result of [[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberal [[Wikipedia]] lists numerous [[actor]]s who died of drug overdoses, but will not acknowledge the role played by [[Hollywood values]], for which Wikipedia does not even have an entry. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drug-related_deaths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[homeschoolers]] often do better than those who attend [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[culture]] affects [[politics]], and people's views and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
# That successful [[democracy]], both historically and logically, is the result of [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/cultural_apologetics/snyder-democracy1.html Calvinism and the Success of Liberal Democracy, by John Snyder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Ronald Reagan]]'s public exhortation, &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev|Mr. Gorbachev]], tear down this wall,&amp;quot; helped cause the nearly 30-year-old [[Berlin Wall]] later be torn down&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[gun control]] increases [[crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That reducing [[tax rates]] stimulates the [[economy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That choosing [[abortion]] over childbirth increases the risk of [[breast cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[mainstream media]] is [[bias]]ed&lt;br /&gt;
# That privately-run [[transport]] is more efficient than government-run transport&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[universal health care]] is inferior medical care&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Labor union|union]]s interfere with [[employment]] opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberal]] leaders engage in shocking wrongdoing, [[Liberal hypocrisy|hypocrisy]], and abuse of power&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., leading [[liberal]] [[Eliot Spitzer]] and how fellow [[liberals]] downplayed or were silent about his misconduct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That ideas do matter, and can cause great harm, including liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Islam]]ic extremism is a threat to the [[Western civilization]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leftist [[Sam Harris]] admitted and complained about this liberal denial [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061009/REPOSITORY/610090301/1028/OPINION02 here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That banning [[same-sex marriage]] is analogous to banning [[polygamy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That aggressive interrogation is often the only way to obtain answers from [[terrorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[liberal]] ideology is pushed on unsuspecting others, particularly youngsters&lt;br /&gt;
# That free trade strengthens global democracies&lt;br /&gt;
# That a child in a mother's womb has rights established by the [[Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That a [[vote]] for (yea) or a vote against (nea) is an absolute position&lt;br /&gt;
# That you can be held accountable for the statements uttered&lt;br /&gt;
# That climate forecasts 50 years from now are as inaccurate as 15 days from now&lt;br /&gt;
# That politicians that proclaim 'Change' actually do not break with policies of the past&lt;br /&gt;
# That removing [[Saddam Hussein]] from power was a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
# That eating [[meat]] and [[dairy]] is important for physical and mental health.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[marijuana]] use has lasting psychological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
# That illegal immigrants contribute to crime and poverty in the towns and cities they occupy.&lt;br /&gt;
# That English will cease being the language of the United States in 20 years unless it is protected as the [[official language]] (and that this would be a loss if it happened).&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Bush didn't cause Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Clinton was responsible for Rwanda inaction.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the Democratic party discriminates against African-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
# That restricting free speech by the [[Fairness Doctrine]] is actually not fair nor democratic.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can drill oil our way out of high gas prices.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can't replace our dependence on oil with green technologies, when in fact we need both oil and green technologies to solve our energy crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
# That opposing same-sex [[marriage]] is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they are [[intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints and then try to stifle further discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[socialism]] and liberalism have the same political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[God]] should have a place in government&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern drilling methods result in minimal environmental impact, even if they were implemented in uninhabited lands such as the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That companies like [[Exxon]] should pay billions of dollars in damages to the general public, ''in addition'' to the money they spend to clean up industrial accidents and to recompense those directly affected&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[selective logging]] keeps forests healthier by reducing the risk of wildfire&lt;br /&gt;
# That high food prices are not caused by [[ethanol]] production, but rather by the million acres of crop- and pastureland that have been taken out of production in the interest of wildlife conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the life of a human is more important than the life of an animal or plant.&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern technology can make [[coal]] clean&lt;br /&gt;
# That a fence is the most effective and ultimately, the most peaceful way to protect our large border from illegal immigrants trying to get in&lt;br /&gt;
# That socially dangerous people exhibit a well-documented pattern of reading habits&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[heavy metal]] music is generally anti-Christian and promotes themes such as drugs, sex and [[Satan]] worship.&lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of God and Jesus, our Lord and Savior.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they make sweeping generalizations about Conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
# That Wikipedia has a systematic bias.&lt;br /&gt;
Often [[liberal]]s refuse to admit that they are [[liberal]]s, in the hope of appearing more reasonable.  [[Hillary Clinton]] refused to admit in a presidential debate in 2007 that she is a [[liberal]]. Similarly, [[Michael Dukakis]] refused for a while to admit that he was a [[liberal]] during the 1988 presidential campaign.  Only out of desperation did Dukakis admit that he was a [[liberal]], and even then he admitted only that was a liberal like President [[Harry Truman]], who served 40 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals like to bash President Bush as a war monger and cite [[President Clinton]] for his eight years of peace and prosperity. Liberals will deny record low unemployment, more people owning their homes and President Bush going after [[terrorists]] while protecting Americans from further attacks. Liberals will selectively forget that during Clinton's term: the [[Rwanda]] massacre occurred, the bombing of the USS Cole, the war in the [[Balkans]], the two US embassies bombed in [[Africa]], the Kobar tower bombing in Saudi Arabia, the [[Somalia]] conflict, the missile strike against [[Afghanistan]] and the bombing campaign against Iraq. Also, [[liberals]] will deny that Clinton's economic policy ignored a series of high profile companies that eventually collapsed due to fraud: Enron, Tyco, Worldcom and Qwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of their denial, liberals often use the word &amp;quot;denial&amp;quot; pejoratively against conservatives. Alleging that conservatives are [[racist]] and reject [[science]], they use terms like &amp;quot;[[global warming]] deniers&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[climate change]] deniers&amp;quot; in an attempt to link conservative viewpoints with [[Holocaust denial]], [[Nazism]], [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], and [[pseudoscience]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Longest liberal denials]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011327</id>
		<title>Liberal denial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1011327"/>
		<updated>2012-10-10T12:16:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Obama messiah.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Cover of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' Magazine, one of many published &amp;quot;halo-effect&amp;quot; photos of Barack Obama; the emphasis is on the claims that he is a &amp;quot;messiah,&amp;quot; and is an example of liberal deification of a government official in accordance with line #6.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberal denial''' is the tendency of [[liberals]] to conceal, [[denial|deny]] or [[Censorship|censor]] the truth for ideological reasons.  A list of the top ''common'' instances of [[liberal denial]] are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that human intelligence inevitably and demonstrably declines from generation to generation, and that if there were another 100 generations into the future the people would not be able to understand simple concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[fetal pain]] during [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[Hell]].  [[Jesus]] talked about Hell more than Heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they censor the [[Bible]] from their daily activities, and encourage the censorship for others too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Fidel Castro]], who has not been seen in public since his intestinal surgery 3.5 years ago, is likely to be deceased.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the [[Nobel Prize]] is an award given by liberals to other liberals, and sometimes even granted in an awkward manner designed to punish a critic of liberal falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g., the granting of the Nobel Prize to an understudy of [[Fred Hoyle]] to punish him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they deify government officials, similar to how communists deified Stalin and Lenin and still deify Castro.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., liberal adulation of [[Ted Kennedy]] despite his paucity of achievements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how fellow travelers engage in [[deceit]], or at least refuse to admit it.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny they are [[liberal]], and that most of the media are [[liberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hollywood values]], [[professor values]] and general [[liberal]] values have consequences for those who believe in them, and also for innocent victims.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that they have censored [[prayer]] in [[public school]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A [[public school]] student who once &amp;quot;tape recorded a teacher making religious remarks to his students&amp;quot; to complain about it then later objected to a textbook explaining how prayer is censored from [[public school]] schools by court decisions. [http://abcnews.go.com/US/WireStory?id=4614012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that a woman significantly reduces her risk of [[breast cancer]] by having children rather than [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and those STDs cause infertility&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Among those who admitted having sex, the rate was even more disturbing -- 40 percent had an STD.&amp;quot;[http://www.tulsaworld.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=20080312_1_C12_hUShe15125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the strident promoters of [[evolution]] generally have weaker credentials than advocates of [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that College faculties at nearly every American school are completely dominated by [[liberals]], and have virtually no [[conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Homosexuality]] shortens lifespan for a wide variety of reasons&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that reducing the number of guns, which are primarily defensive weapons, results in an increase in crime&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the war in [[Iraq]] was needed and also deny that the surge has worked&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hitler]] and the [[Nazi]] party were in fact [[Liberals]] (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of [[Liberal Christianity]] as is the [[PETA]]-like Green wing of the Third Reich&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html Fascist Ecology: &lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Green Wing&amp;quot; of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Obama]] ran the dirtiest campaign since [[Lyndon Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That more than 80% of child molesters are [[pornography]] addicts&lt;br /&gt;
# That people like [[young mass murderers]] who take [[atheistic]] beliefs to their logical conclusions are not &amp;quot;crazy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;insane&amp;quot;, but are true believers. &lt;br /&gt;
# That [[young mass murderers]] fit the profile of [[public school]]-trained [[atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the intellectual justification for [[Hitler]]'s attempt to build a master Aryan race was the [[theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[feminists]] censor discussion about differences between men and women, and boys and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Lawrence Summers]] was fired as President of [[Harvard]] for making a [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] suggestion about women and [[math]] aptitude&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Socialized_medicine|state run health care]] has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMu6wCqdeyQ ''FOX News analyzes the new terror in state healthcare.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That obesity is a bigger problem than hunger in the Western world&lt;br /&gt;
# That a school having virtually no [[conservative]] teachers and many [[atheists]] and [[liberals]] is a [[liberal]] school&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] attempt to intimidate and ostracize [[conservatives]], particularly in school environments and some occupations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[liberals and friendship]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That girls and women in sports have debilitating ACL knee injuries at 3-4 times the rate of men,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Compare'' [http://www.universityhealthmatters.com/article.php?artid=50] (with an explanation of why there is a big difference) ''with'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/health/18knee.html?ex=1204088400&amp;amp;en=3a5abfaa6104ac63&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1 New York Times] (downplaying the difference and pretending that no one knows why).  The New York Times denies overwhelming evidence, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Female athletes, particularly basketball players, are far more likely than their male counterparts to suffer ACL [Anterior Cruciate Ligament] injuries.&amp;quot; Stephen Hargis, &amp;quot;Girls have more torn ACLs,&amp;quot; Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee), D1 (Feb. 4, 2005). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the risk of women tearing their ACL is 1 in 100. This number drops significantly to only 1 in 500 for men. See Nikki Usher, &amp;quot;Knee injury takes toll on girls playing soccer five times more likely than males to suffer a torn ACL,&amp;quot; Philadelphia Inquirer, A01 (Nov. 29, 2004). &amp;quot;Compared with guys, female athletes run an eight-times-greater risk of tearing the ACL, a fibrous band that connects the shinbone (tibia) to the thighbone (femur). Basketball, soccer and other sports that require cutting moves or jump shots can put athletes at risk.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls face higher knee injury risk,&amp;quot; USA Today, 15B (Aug. 24, 2004). Timothy Hewett, PhD, the lead researcher on a definitive study at the Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center at the University of Cincinnati, says this is &amp;quot;close to a billion-dollar problem in girls and women in the USA. ... Even after girls have recovered from the acute injury, the changes in the joint may set the stage for osteoarthritis of the knee ....&amp;quot; ''Id.'' That obvious suspicion was quickly confirmed: a study subsequently published in Arthritis &amp;amp; Rheumatism demonstrated that &amp;quot;more than half of ... 103 soccer players, who were ages 14 to 28 at the time of the ACL injury, suffered osteoarthritis of the knee at the time of the study -- about 12 years later.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls' knee injuries have later consequences,&amp;quot; USA Today, 9D (Oct. 7, 2004). &amp;quot;Many of the women, who were about 31 by that time, also said they had pain or some other disability that made it hard to conduct daily activities.&amp;quot; ''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are vulnerable to other injuries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Amber Scull ruptured her spleen after she was tackled during a practice drill at Nature Coast Tech in Brooksville 2 1/2 months ago. Had she [not] arrived at the hospital 30 minutes later, doctors told her mother, she might have died.&amp;quot; [http://www.sptimes.com/2004/01/06/news_pf/Sports/Girls_face_dangers_on.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That the numerous premature deaths of [[Hollywood]] stars are the result of [[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberal [[Wikipedia]] lists numerous [[actor]]s who died of drug overdoses, but will not acknowledge the role played by [[Hollywood values]], for which Wikipedia does not even have an entry. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drug-related_deaths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[homeschoolers]] often do better than those who attend [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[culture]] affects [[politics]], and people's views and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
# That successful [[democracy]], both historically and logically, is the result of [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/cultural_apologetics/snyder-democracy1.html Calvinism and the Success of Liberal Democracy, by John Snyder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Ronald Reagan]]'s public exhortation, &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev|Mr. Gorbachev]], tear down this wall,&amp;quot; helped cause the nearly 30-year-old [[Berlin Wall]] later be torn down&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[gun control]] increases [[crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That reducing [[tax rates]] stimulates the [[economy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That choosing [[abortion]] over childbirth increases the risk of [[breast cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[mainstream media]] is [[bias]]ed&lt;br /&gt;
# That privately-run [[transport]] is more efficient than government-run transport&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[universal health care]] is inferior medical care&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Labor union|union]]s interfere with [[employment]] opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberal]] leaders engage in shocking wrongdoing, [[Liberal hypocrisy|hypocrisy]], and abuse of power&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., leading [[liberal]] [[Eliot Spitzer]] and how fellow [[liberals]] downplayed or were silent about his misconduct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That ideas do matter, and can cause great harm, including liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Islam]]ic extremism is a threat to the [[Western civilization]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leftist [[Sam Harris]] admitted and complained about this liberal denial [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061009/REPOSITORY/610090301/1028/OPINION02 here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That banning [[same-sex marriage]] is analogous to banning [[polygamy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That aggressive interrogation is often the only way to obtain answers from [[terrorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[liberal]] ideology is pushed on unsuspecting others, particularly youngsters&lt;br /&gt;
# That free trade strengthens global democracies&lt;br /&gt;
# That a child in a mother's womb has rights established by the [[Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That a [[vote]] for (yea) or a vote against (nea) is an absolute position&lt;br /&gt;
# That you can be held accountable for the statements uttered&lt;br /&gt;
# That climate forecasts 50 years from now are as inaccurate as 15 days from now&lt;br /&gt;
# That politicians that proclaim 'Change' actually do not break with policies of the past&lt;br /&gt;
# That removing [[Saddam Hussein]] from power was a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
# That eating [[meat]] and [[dairy]] is important for physical and mental health.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[marijuana]] use has lasting psychological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
# That illegal immigrants contribute to crime and poverty in the towns and cities they occupy.&lt;br /&gt;
# That English will cease being the language of the United States in 20 years unless it is protected as the [[official language]] (and that this would be a loss if it happened).&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Bush didn't cause Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br /&gt;
# That President Clinton was responsible for Rwanda inaction.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the Democratic party discriminates against African-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
# That restricting free speech by the [[Fairness Doctrine]] is actually not fair nor democratic.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can drill oil our way out of high gas prices.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can't replace our dependence on oil with green technologies, when in fact we need both oil and green technologies to solve our energy crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
# That opposing same-sex [[marriage]] is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they are [[intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints and then try to stifle further discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[socialism]] and liberalism have the same political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[God]] should have a place in government&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern drilling methods result in minimal environmental impact, even if they were implemented in uninhabited lands such as the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That companies like [[Exxon]] should pay billions of dollars in damages to the general public, ''in addition'' to the money they spend to clean up industrial accidents and to recompense those directly affected&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[selective logging]] keeps forests healthier by reducing the risk of wildfire&lt;br /&gt;
# That high food prices are not caused by [[ethanol]] production, but rather by the million acres of crop- and pastureland that have been taken out of production in the interest of wildlife conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the life of a human is more important than the life of an animal or plant.&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern technology can make [[coal]] clean&lt;br /&gt;
# That a fence is the most effective and ultimately, the most peaceful way to protect our large border from illegal immigrants trying to get in&lt;br /&gt;
# That socially dangerous people exhibit a well-documented pattern of reading habits&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[heavy metal]] music is generally anti-Christian and promotes themes such as drugs, sex and [[Satan]] worship.&lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of God and Jesus, our Lord and Savior.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they make sweeping generalizations about Conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
# That Wikipedia has a systematic bias.&lt;br /&gt;
Often [[liberal]]s refuse to admit that they are [[liberal]]s, in the hope of appearing more reasonable.  [[Hillary Clinton]] refused to admit in a presidential debate in 2007 that she is a [[liberal]]. Similarly, [[Michael Dukakis]] refused for a while to admit that he was a [[liberal]] during the 1988 presidential campaign.  Only out of desperation did Dukakis admit that he was a [[liberal]], and even then he admitted only that was a liberal like President [[Harry Truman]], who served 40 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals like to bash President Bush as a war monger and cite [[President Clinton]] for his eight years of peace and prosperity. Liberals will deny record low unemployment, more people owning their homes and President Bush going after [[terrorists]] while protecting Americans from further attacks. Liberals will selectively forget that during Clinton's term: the [[Rwanda]] massacre occurred, the bombing of the USS Cole, the war in the [[Balkans]], the two US embassies bombed in [[Africa]], the Kobar tower bombing in Saudi Arabia, the [[Somalia]] conflict, the missile strike against [[Afghanistan]] and the bombing campaign against Iraq. Also, [[liberals]] will deny that Clinton's economic policy ignored a series of high profile companies that eventually collapsed due to fraud: Enron, Tyco, Worldcom and Qwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of their denial, liberals often use the word &amp;quot;denial&amp;quot; pejoratively against conservatives. Alleging that conservatives are [[racist]] and reject [[science]], they use terms like &amp;quot;[[global warming]] deniers&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[climate change]] deniers&amp;quot; in an attempt to link conservative viewpoints with [[Holocaust denial]], [[Nazism]], [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], and [[pseudoscience]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Longest liberal denials]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007983</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007983"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T18:21:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are 100 examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label evolution scientific and creationism as faith. When in fact both evolution and creation are beliefs as they require the person to believe in one or the other. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label Christians as bigoted whilst ignoring the sheer intolerance homosexuals and pro-abortionists have to Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming atheists are somehow more intelligent than theists.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that the Iraq War was all George Bush's idea whilst denying the fact that 111 Democrats voted in favor of the Iraq War. &lt;br /&gt;
#Condemn hunters for shooting defenseless animals whilst encouraging pregnant women to have their even more defenseless children murdered by abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
#Declaring satire against Islam and homosexuality as outrageous. Whilst ignoring or even tolerating satire against Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying the harm associated with participating in Black Magic. &lt;br /&gt;
#Exaggerate the numbers of homosexuals and atheists, whilst understate or completely ignore the respectable number of Christians throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that natural gender roles and gender differences are 'socially constructed.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that humans are related to animals and plants instead of being created in the image of the Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberalism is democratic but in practice referendums on same-sex marriage and capital punishment are prohibited as it is widely known that the opinion of majority disagrees with the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Believe that the opinion of a 'persecuted' minority such as homosexuals or drug-addicts are more important than the opinions of the majority.&lt;br /&gt;
#Whenever crime increases, the laws need to be softened rather than hardened or maintained as they are. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that evolution in the modern world is only opposed by a minority of 'christian fundamentalists'. In fact, poll after poll has found that over 40% of Americans believe in Young Earth Creationism. &lt;br /&gt;
#When there are terrorist attacks, America's foreign policy is to blame rather than the terrorists themselves &lt;br /&gt;
#Declare all military violence outrageous, whilst proclaiming that civilian rioting and violence from 'pacifists' is their right. &lt;br /&gt;
#Dismiss social campaigners such as Mary Whitehouse as lunatics, despite their arguments for acting against the problems being reasonable. &lt;br /&gt;
#Dismiss wealth made by a conservative shameful, whilst tolerating wealth made by liberals regardless of whether or not it was done legally. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus purely on rehabilitating criminals, whilst neglecting the rights of the victims.&lt;br /&gt;
#Dismiss mainstream religion as 'superstitious', but the same label is not applied to easily refutable theories such as evolution or even beliefs in UFOs.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denial the scientific value contained in the Bible (Such as the Bible claiming the Earth is round before man discovered the fact). &lt;br /&gt;
#Throw a severe tantrum whenever conservatives contradict liberalism with strong logical arguments, rather than use a calm logical argument in reply or accept the conservative's evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that conservatives and Christians are 'sexist' just for standing up for traditional womanhood, without admitting clearly offensive sexism made towards women who disagree with liberalism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Use unnecessarily complex language to make liberals appear more intelligent than conservatives or to avoid admitting errors.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that people who did not vote for Obama were racist, when in fact there are wide range of factors for not voting for Obama nor the party he represents. &lt;br /&gt;
#Rejection of familiar language for the sake of liberal ideology, for example removal of the words mom and dad for sake of homosexual foster parents.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that religion and science are supposed to be two separate realities, but in fact there continues to be many scientific arguments for God's existence and many great scientists had a devout faith in the Lord God. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that Christmas and Easter Sunday are just random days for wild parties rather than a special dedication to Jesus Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberals and secularists have a better tendency to liberate society more, when in fact the worse crimes against humanity were committed by atheist socialists and great events of liberation such as the abolition of slavery were led by Christian conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that labeling terrorists as evil is 'down to their opinion', whilst labeling Christianity as evil is absolutely correct.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that population control is needed to settle down the growing population worldwide, but in fact this is plain propaganda and the twice the amount of the population of 6 billion can fit into Jacksonville, Floridaas it contains over 25 billion square feet.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007981</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007981"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T17:01:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label evolution scientific and creationism as faith. When in fact both evolution and creation are beliefs as they require the person to believe in one or the other. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label Christians as bigoted whilst ignoring the sheer intolerance homosexuals and pro-abortionists have to Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming atheists are somehow more intelligent than theists.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that the Iraq War was all George Bush's idea whilst denying the fact that 111 Democrats voted in favor of the Iraq War. &lt;br /&gt;
#Condemn hunters for shooting defenseless animals whilst encouraging pregnant women to have their even more defenseless children murdered by abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
#Declaring satire against Islam and homosexuality as outrageous. Whilst ignoring or even tolerating satire against Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying the harm associated with participating in Black Magic. &lt;br /&gt;
#Exaggerate the numbers of homosexuals and atheists, whilst understate or completely ignore the respectable number of Christians throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that natural gender roles and gender differences are 'socially constructed.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that humans are related to animals and plants instead of being created in the image of the Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberalism is democratic but in practice referendums on same-sex marriage and capital punishment are prohibited as it is widely known that the opinion of majority disagrees with the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Believe that the opinion of a 'persecuted' minority such as homosexuals or drug-addicts are more important than the opinions of the majority.&lt;br /&gt;
#Whenever crime increases, the laws need to be softened rather than hardened or maintained as they are. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that evolution in the modern world is only opposed by a minority of 'christian fundamentalists'. In fact, poll after poll has found that over 40% of Americans believe in Young Earth Creationism. &lt;br /&gt;
#When there are terrorist attacks, America's foreign policy is to blame rather than the terrorists themselves &lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007976</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007976"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T16:43:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label evolution scientific and creationism as faith. When in fact both evolution and creation are beliefs as they require the person to believe in one or the other. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label Christians as bigoted whilst ignoring the sheer intolerance homosexuals and pro-abortionists have to Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming atheists are somehow more intelligent than theists.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that the Iraq War was all George Bush's idea whilst denying the fact that 111 Democrats voted in favor of the Iraq War. &lt;br /&gt;
#Condemn hunters for shooting defenseless animals whilst encouraging pregnant women to have their even more defenseless children murdered by abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
#Declaring satire against Islam and homosexuality as outrageous. Whilst ignoring or even tolerating satire against Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying the harm associated with participating in Black Magic. &lt;br /&gt;
#Exaggerate the numbers of homosexuals and atheists, whilst understate or completely ignore the respectable number of Christians throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that natural gender roles and gender differences are 'socially constructed.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that humans are related to animals and plants instead of being created in the image of the Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberalism is democratic but in practice referendums on same-sex marriage and capital punishment are prohibited as it is widely known that the opinion of majority disagrees with the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Believe that the opinion of a 'persecuted' minority such as homosexuals or drug-addicts are more important than the opinions of the majority.&lt;br /&gt;
#Whenever crime increases, the laws need to be softened rather than hardened or maintained as they are. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that evolution in the modern world is only opposed by a minority of 'christian fundamentalists'. In fact, poll after poll has found that over 40% of Americans believe in Young Earth Creationism. &lt;br /&gt;
#When there are terrorist attacks, America's foreign policy is to blame rather than the terrorists themselves     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007966</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007966"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T16:13:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label evolution scientific and creationism as faith. When in fact both evolution and creation are beliefs as they require the person to believe in one or the other. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label Christians as bigoted whilst ignoring the sheer intolerance homosexuals and pro-abortionists have to Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming atheists are somehow more intelligent than theists.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that the Iraq War was all George Bush's idea whilst denying the fact that 111 Democrats voted in favor of the Iraq War. &lt;br /&gt;
#Condemn hunters for shooting defenseless animals whilst encouraging pregnant women to have their even more defenseless children murdered by abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
#Declaring satire against Islam and homosexuality as outrageous. Whilst ignoring or even tolerating satire against Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying the harm associated with participating in Black Magic. &lt;br /&gt;
#Exaggerate the numbers of homosexuals and atheists, whilst understate or completely ignore the respectable number of Christians throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that natural gender roles and gender differences are 'socially constructed.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that humans are related to animals and plants instead of being created in the image of the Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberalism is democratic but in practice referendums on same-sex marriage and capital punishment are prohibited as it is widely known that the opinion of majority disagrees with the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Believe that the opinion of a 'persecuted' minority such as homosexuals or drug-addicts are more important than the opinions of the majority.&lt;br /&gt;
#Whenever crime increases, the laws need to be softened rather than hardened or maintained as they are. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that evolution in the modern world is only opposed by a minority of 'christian fundamentalists'. In fact, poll after poll has found that over 40% of Americans believe in Young Earth Creationism. &lt;br /&gt;
#     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007961</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007961"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T15:48:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label evolution scientific and creationism as faith. When in fact both evolution and creation are beliefs as they require the person to believe in one or the other. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label Christians as bigoted whilst ignoring the sheer intolerance homosexuals and pro-abortionists have to Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming atheists are somehow more intelligent than theists.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that the Iraq War was all George Bush's idea whilst denying the fact that 111 Democrats voted in favor of the Iraq War. &lt;br /&gt;
#Condemn hunters for shooting defenseless animals whilst encouraging pregnant women to have their even more defenseless children murdered by abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
#Declaring satire against Islam and homosexuality as outrageous. Whilst ignoring or even tolerating satire against Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying the harm associated with participating in Black Magic. &lt;br /&gt;
#Exaggerate the numbers of homosexuals and atheists, whilst understate or completely ignore the respectable number of Christians throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that natural gender roles and gender differences are 'socially constructed.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that humans are related to animals and plants instead of being created in the image of the Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberalism is democratic but in practice referendums on same-sex marriage and capital punishment are prohibited as it is widely known that the opinion of majority disagrees with the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Believe that the opinion of a 'persecuted' minority such as homosexuals or drug-addicts are more important than the opinions of the majority.&lt;br /&gt;
#Whenever crime increases, the laws need to be softened rather than hardened or maintained as they are.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007941</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007941"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T15:09:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label evolution scientific and creationism as faith. When in fact both evolution and creation are beliefs as they require the person to believe in one or the other. &lt;br /&gt;
#Label Christians as bigoted whilst ignoring the sheer intolerance homosexuals and pro-abortionists have to Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming atheists are somehow more intelligent than theists.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that the Iraq War was all George Bush's idea whilst denying the fact that 111 Democrats voted in favor of the Iraq War. &lt;br /&gt;
#Condemn hunters for shooting defenseless animals whilst encouraging pregnant women to have their even more defenseless children murdered by abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
#Declaring satire against Islam and homosexuality as outrageous. Whilst ignoring or even tolerating satire against Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying the harm associated with participating in Black Magic. &lt;br /&gt;
#Exaggerate the numbers of homosexuals and atheists, whilst understate or completely ignore the respectable number of Christians throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that natural gender roles and gender differences are 'socially constructed.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that humans are related to animals and plants instead of being created in the image of the Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberalism is democratic but in practice referendums on same-sex marriage and capital punishment are prohibited as it is widely known that the opinion of majority disagrees with the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Believe that the opinion of a 'persecuted' minority such as homosexuals or drug-addicts are more important than the opinions of the majority.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007922</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007922"/>
		<updated>2012-09-21T14:31:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that crime is caused by poverty and social injustice, rather than bad parenting or the choice of the criminal. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the idea of happy marriages is naive, without mentioning the same idea to homosexuals. &lt;br /&gt;
#  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007762</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007762"/>
		<updated>2012-09-20T16:46:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that liberal secular bias in the media is a right-wing conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that atheism is not a religion&lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that the Bible and prayer should be banned in within education in the name of [['Seperation of Church and State']] whilst preaching for state-sanctioned atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claims that Seperation of Church and State is found in the constitution. When in fact it is only found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1802. &lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that homosexuality is genetically inherited. &lt;br /&gt;
#Believe fervently in bogus homosexual statistics e.g. 'out of every two men, three were gay.'&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that domestic violence is due to patriarchy rather than drunkenness or simple anger. &lt;br /&gt;
#Focus entirely on child abuse within private homes, whilst ignoring child abuse and severe neglect in state-funded orphanages. &lt;br /&gt;
#Argue that illegal immigrants deserve more rights than locals.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007754</id>
		<title>Liberal logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_logic&amp;diff=1007754"/>
		<updated>2012-09-20T16:26:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist on &amp;quot;tolerance&amp;quot; for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
# If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a Christian while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was not &lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents&lt;br /&gt;
# Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible&lt;br /&gt;
# Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: &amp;quot;There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes.&amp;quot; which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: &amp;quot;Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to:&lt;br /&gt;
*jumping off the Empire State Building&lt;br /&gt;
*anorexia&lt;br /&gt;
*drunk driving&lt;br /&gt;
*smoking crack or meth&lt;br /&gt;
*child molestation&lt;br /&gt;
*Shall I keep going?...&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but not only is your drug-induced logic utterly flawed, but you don't exactly exude intelligence. Forgive me if I don't join your crusade.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pretend to base their opinion on an unverifiable or unusual personal experience, when real [[logic]] would be a better guide&lt;br /&gt;
# Criticize [[Christians]] for literal interpretations of [[Genesis]], but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the [[liberal]] ideology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, [[liberals]] here insist that [[homeschooling]] can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane)&lt;br /&gt;
# Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in &amp;quot;but I like it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Americans]] should &amp;quot;move on&amp;quot; past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
# Highly implausible assumptions in &amp;quot;if ... then&amp;quot; arguments, such as &amp;quot;if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?&amp;quot; (without any consideration of superior alternatives)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;scp=2&amp;amp;pagewanted=print]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Insisting that the [[Bible]] literally prohibits judging anything.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed&lt;br /&gt;
# The belief that, although carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk.&lt;br /&gt;
# Requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that premarital sex is acceptable and normal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when often people just work less and revenues then decline.&lt;br /&gt;
# Denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that [[Roe v. Wade]] ''cannot'' be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that &amp;quot;secret opinion&amp;quot; was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Doing away with traditional language (such as &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; to refer to men '''and''' women), despite centuries of previous use.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not. &lt;br /&gt;
# Believing/claiming that the [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.&lt;br /&gt;
# It is a right to dissent against [[American]] policy but never take a stand if that [[logic]] moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.&lt;br /&gt;
# Stating &amp;quot;God of the gaps&amp;quot; to justify atheism   &lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the &amp;quot;wondrous, pristine national park of [[ANWR]] needs protection to keep its beauty!&amp;quot; (In reality, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/MaryFallin/2008/07/24/anwrs_place_in_our_energy_picture ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture] Townhall.com, July 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it's not fair to the world that [[America]] keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13459 Freedom and the View From Obamaland] American Spectator, July 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Using a double-standard for racism and sexism when the target person is conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that it is extremely offensive to call any culture primitive or barbaric, except when they are talking about the writers of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Many liberals claim that even if Obama wasn't born in America then he should still be president.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that divine creation is “illogical” but creation from a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing at all “makes perfect sense.”&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing to respect (and sometimes utterly disrespecting, such as in flag desecration) the United States of America in general while continuing their residency herein and actively demanding the benefits and liberties that come with being a citizen.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that Christianity is not a form of diversity while praising Islam for this same reason. Later (whenever it benefits them), liberals will compare the two, claiming that few differences exist between them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dodging statistics when doing so will favor the liberal agenda. A clear example of this is claiming that capital punishment is too expensive to taxpayers while they allow illegal immigrants to fly under the radar.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Cherry picking]] [[democracy]]: Liberals will laud the wisdom of the people when democracy produces a liberal result, but when it produces a conservative result, liberals will complain about [[mobocracy]] and demand [[judicial activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Assuming that any book espousing a liberal position is automatically authoritative and unquestionable.&lt;br /&gt;
# Misplacing the [[burden of proof]]: Liberals insist that things like [[UFO|reports of extraterrestrial visitors]] have to be true until they have been conclusively disproved.&lt;br /&gt;
# Claiming that the [[First Amendment]] protects only expression that they like, whereas any expression that [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends]] them is subject to [[politically correct]] censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing that an opponent is inconsistent because he does not take silly extreme views, such as complaining that people are pro-life without preserving life in all circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
# Tacitly assuming that their preconceived notions must be true and then dismissing all other explanations as [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong|contradicting their preconceived notions]].&lt;br /&gt;
#That a nation can borrow its way out of debt and spend its way out of a recession.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that economy is a [[zero-sum game]] (see [[false zero-sum game]])&lt;br /&gt;
#Defending evolutionism by attacking a [[straw man fallacy|straw-man]] version of creationism rather than addressing what creationists actually say.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals claim that they value freedom and at the same time want to [[gun control|restrict freedom to own weapons]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that if God exists he demands a designer. Yet at the same time claim that the universe can be self-existing.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claim that the [[AIDS]] epidemic is due to prejudice against homosexuals, rather than the dangers associated with the homosexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
#Paying full attention to [[pedophiles]] in the Catholic Church, whilst completely ignoring pedophiles in the homosexual community.&lt;br /&gt;
#Claiming that legalization of [[recreational drugs]] will reduce crime. &lt;br /&gt;
#Denying that Hitler's [[evolutionary belief]] played a part in the [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Ranting about racism in the Republican party whilst ignoring the more prominent racism made by Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oxymoron]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007476</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007476"/>
		<updated>2012-09-19T22:12:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my [[conservative]] qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a [[Christian]]. And I believe [[atheism]] is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe [[science]] is a gift from [[God]] and I believe it should never be tainted by [[evolution]]. I have no doubt that evolution is an [[irrational]] belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify [[racism]] and [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love [[capitalism]]! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that [[liberals]] are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, [[anti-Christian]], insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All[[ taxation]] is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007239</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007239"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T19:46:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my conservative qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Everyday I'm glad to be a Christian. And I believe atheism is the most miserable and unpatriotic religion in existence today. And those are the nice things to say about it!&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* I am so fanatical about creation science. I believe science is a gift from God and I believe it should never be tainted by evolution. I have no doubt that evolution is an irrational belief closed to criticism and one of the worse ways to justify racism and tyranny&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I love capitalism! &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that liberals are arrogant, argumentative, illogical, delusional, anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-happiness, anti-moral, anti-Christian, insulting, heartless and plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe girls are naturally cute, sweet, sympathetic and a huge value to the men who love them. I believe feminism is full of witches and is a great threat to women. Also I believe that nothing is more superior than romantic heterosexual love.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All taxation is theft! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The US Constitution is timeless.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007203</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007203"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T15:14:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my conservative qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(faith, creation science, capitalism, sentimental, cute girls, life, constitution, anti-tax, patriotism,&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007201</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007201"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T15:12:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my conservative qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(faith, creation science, capitalism, sentimental, cute girls, life, constitution, anti-tax, patriotism, &lt;br /&gt;
.jpeg&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007200</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007200"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T15:11:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my conservative qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(faith, creation science, capitalism, sentimental, cute girls, life, constitution, anti-tax, patriotism, &lt;br /&gt;
http://cdn.okcimg.com/php/load_okc_image.php/images/0x0/0x0/0/8734980752637574876.jpeg&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007190</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007190"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T13:44:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my conservative qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(faith, creation science, capitalism, sentimental, cute girls, life, constitution, anti-tax,&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007188</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007188"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T13:30:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, and here's a list of my conservative qualities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007053</id>
		<title>User:C12Elliot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:C12Elliot&amp;diff=1007053"/>
		<updated>2012-09-17T18:24:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: Created page with &amp;quot;My name is Elliot,  I am a proud conservative and will oppose liberalism with all my might!&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My name is Elliot, &lt;br /&gt;
I am a proud conservative and will oppose liberalism with all my might!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vladimir_Lenin&amp;diff=1007028</id>
		<title>Vladimir Lenin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vladimir_Lenin&amp;diff=1007028"/>
		<updated>2012-09-17T14:12:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: /* Quotes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Khvhkgfiy.jpg|right|thumb|Vladimir Lenin]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Vladimir Lenin''' (born Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Vladimir Ilyich Lenin&amp;quot; (Russian: Владимир Ильич Улянов, Ленин) was the pseudonym he used after 1900 to disguise his identity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) (1870-1924) was the leader of Russian Communism and an important theoretician of Marxism. Coming to power in 1917 he became dictator of the [[Soviet Union]].  All over the Soviet Union there were statues and paintings honoring his memory; some were removed when Communism collapsed in 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin was born on April 22, 1870 (later to be celebrated as [[Earth Day]]) to a middle class Russian family; his parents were school teachers.  In 1889, he became a [[Marxist]] after his older brother was hanged for the murder of Tsar Aleksandr II.  Lenin obtained a law degree shortly afterwards, and by 1895 was a [[subversion (political)|subversive]] who was arrested and sent to a prison in [[Siberia]] as punishment.  He was in exile 1900-1917. He collaborated with Georgy Plekhanov and others to set up the clandestine newspaper ''Iskra'' (The Spark), designed to &amp;quot;ignite&amp;quot; radical consciousness.  In the pages of ''Iskra'', Lenin denounced any alliance with liberals or other elements of the bourgeoisie because they would keep power in the hands of the middle class. He emphasized social democracy--equality of condition, rather than political democracy, as the basis for individual freedom.  His major theoretical publication was the pamphlet &amp;quot;What Is to Be Done?&amp;quot;  (1902). In 1903 he organized and controlled the '''&amp;quot;Bolshevik&amp;quot;''' wing of the Russian Social Democratic Labor party, fighting the opposition &amp;quot;Mensheviks.&amp;quot; Lenin, like his populist predecessors in the Russian radical movement, stressed the need for a small elite vanguard to lead the revolution&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite disapproval of the Mensheviks, Lenin's followers continued to raise money through a mixture of bank robberies, kidnapping, extortion, terrorism, and murder. Unlike the leaders of other Marxist organizations, Lenin did not spent the money on his own lifestyle and carefully strengthened his movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With German help he returned to Russia after the [[Tsar]] abdicated in March 1917 and a short-lived liberal democracy allowed for free elections.  At the time, most Bolsheviks were more interested in using the ballot box to gain political power. Lenin rejected elections,and declared, &amp;quot;History will not forgive us if we do not take power now.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Revolution==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1917 Lenin opposed Russia's continued participation in World War I and advocated proceeding directly to a socialist revolution, bypassing bourgeois rule. He rejected cooperation with the Provisional Government and drove some old Bolsheviks out of the party, while coopting many younger, more radical members. [[Joseph Stalin]], [[Grigori Zinoviev]], and others rallied to Lenin's side during the elections to the party's Central Committee during the 7th Party Conference in April 1917 and became the new leadership. The Bolsheviks were allowed free expression of disagreements until a decision by the Central Committee was reached, and then no opposition or disagreement was permitted. Lenin now ruled the Bolsheviks from his base in Petrograd (St. Petersburg).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 1917, Lenin masterminded a [[coup d'etat]] which overthrew the [[Provisional Government]] which had replaced the [[Russian Empire]]. In what historian [[Simon Sebag Montefiore]] has described as a comedy of errors, the Winter Palace was shelled and the Provisional Cabinet was placed under arrest by a mixture of Red Guards and radical sailors from the Kronstadt Naval Base. &lt;br /&gt;
==Dictator==&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin ruled the [[Soviet Union]] under Marxism-Leninism, until 1922, when he had a debilitating stroke and retired.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|A wide campaign of &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; was undertaken to show the people why &amp;quot;workers' rule&amp;quot; meant, in practice, [[Nomenklatura|managers]]' rule. Where necessary, the education by the word was supplemented with education by [[firing squad]] or [[concentration camp]] or forced labour battalion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Burnham, ''The Managerial Revolution'', (1940).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin, a workaholic who avoided vacations and downtime, died in 1924 following a series of progressively more serious strokes.   [[Joseph Stalin]] was his even more brutal successor.&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations==&lt;br /&gt;
===Lenin on revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1917, Lenin thought that revolution was more likely to break out in Russia than in any other country on the continent, and he expected the outbreak of other revolutions in Europe, or at least in Central Europe, after the Russian Revolution. During the Civil War he considered a short period of War Communism as an extension of the revolutionary situation from which a direct path might open toward socialism. However, after the failure of War Communism he returned to his earlier viewpoint, that is, to the necessity of a transition period. This was reflected in the New Economic Policy (NEP) - which meant a transition including both private enterprise and a market economy. Stalin deemed the transition favored by Lenin to be too dangerous, because it carried with it the threat of a defeat and an eventual restoration of capitalism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Dictatorship of the proletariat===	&lt;br /&gt;
see also [[Dictatorship of the proletariat]]&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin saw the Marxist concept of the &amp;quot;Dictatorship of the proletariat&amp;quot; in terms of a dictatorship exercised not by a democratically chosen majority but by a [[Revolutionary Vanguard|vanguard minority revolutionary party]], ruthlessly controlled by a few leaders like himself. He eventually accepted the need for a state bureaucracy, and his more extreme opposition to the bourgeoisie led him to favor their exclusion and disenfranchisement to the benefit of the urban working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leninism as a religion==&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin's utopian design of a revolutionary community of virtuosi was a typical political religion of an intelligentsia longing for an inner-worldly salvation, a socialist paradise without exploitation and alienation, to be implanted in the backward Russian society at the outskirts of the industrialized and modernized Western Europe. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 accomplished the institutionalization of a political religion combining a political and sacral monopoly of power and belief. Consequently, the Leninist policy of social extermination of political opponents, ideological rivals, and stigmatized social classes became a sacral obligation to be fulfilled by the new ideological orthodoxy. The beginning iconography of a Leninist sacral tradition praised Lenin as a messianic and numinous leader. This process of iconographic work in progress culminated after Lenin's death in the sacral Lenin cult. The Lenin mausoleum served as the monumental centerpiece of sacral rites and practices to be enacted by the Stalinist orthodoxy. Joseph Stalin's invention of a sacral tradition of Marxism-Leninism qualified him as the only true disciple of Lenin. Therefore, Stalin claimed the monopoly of the infallible interpretation of the holy scriptures, summarized in his own dogmatic performances. In this sense, Stalin's Leninism became itself the religion of the Soviet state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klaus-Georg Riegel, &amp;quot;Marxism-Leninism as a Political Religion,&amp;quot; ''Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions'' 2005 6(1): 97-126 in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Image and memory==&lt;br /&gt;
After his death in 1924 Stalin portrayed Lenin as an infallible humanitarian; his writings were viewed as gospel. Museums were devoted to his life and work, cities were named for him, and huge statues and monuments honored his memory. Beginning in 1985, however, the Lenin cult began to crumble. Party chairman [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] was a faithful disciple of Lenin, but he now faced the reality that the economically bankrupt Communist state was rapidly decaying. As the Communist nation unraveled, so did the Lenin personality cult. Leningrad residents voted to restore the St. Petersburg name; the once-crowded museums attracted few visitors; and Lenin's philosophy and actions were found less than perfect. In 1991 as Communism fell, the statues and paintings went into cold storage.  By 1995 plans were being made to bury Lenin's corpse, which was finally acknowledged to be putrefying just as the remains of any other mortal, as the cult itself fell into &amp;quot;the dustbin of history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Trevor J. Smith, &amp;quot;The Collapse of the Lenin Personality Cult in Soviet Russia, 1985-1995,&amp;quot; ''Historian'' 1998 60(2): 325-343, in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
*“The way to crush the middle class is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The best revolutionary is youth devoid of morals.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;A lie told often enough becomes the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The goal of socialism is communism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There are no morals in politics there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a Bolshevik forever.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Biography===&lt;br /&gt;
* Clark, Ronald W. ''Lenin'' (1988). 570 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''Lenin: A Biography'' (2002), 561pp; standard scholarly biography; a short version of his 3 vol detailed biography&lt;br /&gt;
* Volkogonov, Dmitri. ''Lenin: Life and Legacy'' (1994). 600 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
===Specialized scholarly studies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Anderson, Kevin. ''Lenin, Hegel, and Western Marxism: A Critical Study'' (1995) 311 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Copleston, Frederick Charles. ''Philosophy in Russia: From Herzen to Lenin and Berdyaev'' (1986). 445pp. by a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Debo, Richard K. ''Survival and Consolidation: The Foreign Policy of Soviet Russia, 1918-1921'' (1992).&lt;br /&gt;
* Marples, David R. ''Lenin's Revolution: Russia, 1917-1921'' (2000) 156pp. short survey&lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''A Concise History of the Russian Revolution'' (1996) [http://www.amazon.com/Concise-History-Russian-Revolution/dp/0679745440/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232393501&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search], by a leading conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Russia under the Bolshevik Regime.'' (1994). 608 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pomper, Philip. ''Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin: The Intelligentsia and Power.'' (1990). 446 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Schapiro, Leonard and Reddaway, Peter, eds. ''Lenin: The Man, the Theorist, the Leader - a Reappraisal'' (1987). 317 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* White, James D. ''Lenin: The Practice and Theory of Revolution'' (2001) 262pp.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Desai, Meghnad, ed. ''Lenin's Economic Writings.'' (1989). 363 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard, ed. ''The Unknown Lenin: From the Secret Archive.'' (1996). 185 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Lenin, Vladimir}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mass Murderers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lunatics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Leaders]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faith&amp;diff=1007006</id>
		<title>Faith</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faith&amp;diff=1007006"/>
		<updated>2012-09-17T13:32:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Faith.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Faith''' (1200–50; Middle English feith  &amp;lt; Anglo-French fed,  Old French feid, feit  &amp;lt; Latin fidem,  accusative of fidēs  trust, akin to fīdere  to trust.) is a confidence or trust in a person or thing. It is a confidence or trust in the achievement of God's will, even though unseen and unexpected by  non-believers.  It can be a belief that is not based on proof. A belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion. It is also a belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc. It can also mean a system of religious belief : ''the Christian faith; the Jewish faith''.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith embodies more than belief.  Faith elevates one's being, while belief is limited to a mental state or emotion.  Faith implies a [[causation|causal]] role by the believer in an outcome&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the Biblical [[Peter]]'s walking on water based on his faith.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or in overcoming a personal fear.  Faith also implies advancement or accomplishment rather than wrongdoing, while belief implies neither.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberals]] and non-believers in general (see [[Atheism]]) will often try to use common descriptions of faith against faith in God the Lord. Dictionaries and other blasphemous publications, almost always with a strong [[liberal bias]], describe faith as the blind belief in something for which there is no evidence. This, however, is wrong. Faith can also describe the true, benevolent belief in our Lord God, for which there are literally oceans of evidence, but mainstream publications simply won't admit that, probably due to deceit. One should mind, however, that the true, transcedental definition of faith is *completely* different from any other, as [[Christianity]] is superior to any other form of belief.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faith in God vs. secular psychology for solving addictions and other personal problems ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Ineffectivness of counseling psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian group [[Teen Challenge]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Teen Challenge claims of a 70% cure rate for the drug addicts graduating from their program attracted the attention of the U.S. Federal Government in 1973. Most secular drug rehabilitation programs only experienced a cure rate of 1-15% of their graduates. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), part of the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, funded the first year of this study to evaluate the long term results of the Teen Challenge program.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://teenchallengeusa.com/studies2.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Teen Challenge has a number of studies that indicate the high effectiveness of their drug treatment program compared to other programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://teenchallengeusa.com/studies.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies indicate that consumers of secular counseling [[psychology]] for [[alcoholism]] receive hardly any benefit at all.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spring.org.uk/2005/07/psychological-treatments-for-alcoholism.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/75/abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Apostle Paul]] in a letter to the church of [[Corinth]] indicated that [[Christianity|Christians]] were able to overcome being drunkards through the power of [[Jesus Christ]] (I Corinthians 6:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:St Paul Preaching.jpg|right|thumb|200px|St. [[Paul]] defends his preaching (Giovanni Ricco)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Apostle Paul]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.  And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were [[Justification (theology)|justified]] in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the [[Holy Spirit|Spirit of our God]].&amp;quot; - I Corinthians 6:9-11 (NIV)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The website ''The Berean Call'' has a number of articles on various false claims and unbiblical notions that many practioners counseling psychology promote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebereancall.org/topic/psychology&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith plays a central role in overcoming [[addiction]].  Virtually everyone is plagued by one or more addictions, and faith enables overcoming those weaknesses. Similar to this is faith's key role in overcoming [[recidivism]].  This role is unique to Christian faith and has not been shown with regard to other religions' belief systems or to secular humanist ideologies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is also helpful in overcoming fear, such as fear of public speaking,  appearing on [[television]], or standing up to a [[bully]] or unpleasant situations.  Jesus reprimanded the [[Apostles]] for their [[faithless]] fear:  &amp;quot;The disciples went and woke him, saying, 'Lord, save us! We're going to drown!'  He replied, 'You of little faith, why are you so afraid?' Then he got up and rebuked the winds and the waves, and it was completely calm.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mt 8:25-26 (NIV)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of faith can lead to fear, anxiety, depression, lack of confidence and sometimes death.  A lack of faith can be very harmful, leading to self-destructive behavior.  Faith can be described as the power to ignore the [[devil]] and all his antics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often faith inspires extra initiative or effort, adding confidence that it will yield the desired good result.  &amp;quot;Since they could not get him to Jesus because of the crowd, they made an opening in the roof above Jesus and, after digging through it, lowered the mat the paralyzed man was lying on,&amp;quot; and Jesus cured him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark 2:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Frequency==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Belief-god.jpg|thumb|550px|Financial Times (FT)/Harris Poll among adults in 5 countries in 2006]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expression==&lt;br /&gt;
A classic statement of faith in the [[Bible]] was by the [[Roman Empire|Roman]] centurion of [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew%208:5-10;&amp;amp;version=49; Matthew 8:5-10], who expressed his confidence that [[Jesus]] could cure his beloved servant from a distance without even seeing him.  [[Jesus]] repeatedly emphasized the importance and value of faith to his disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is expressed in [[Greek language|Greek]] using the term ''pistis'', and in [[Latin]] using the term ''fides''.  Faith is mentioned in 229 verses in the [[New Testament]] ([[KJV]]), but only twice in the much larger [[Old Testament]] ([[KJV]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.crosswalk.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In attempt to convert [[Jews]] to [[Christianity]], [[Paul]] described [[Abraham]]'s willingness to sacrifice his beloved son [[Isaac]] to [[God]] as an act of faith, though the [[Old Testament]] did not describe it with that term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is strengthened by prayer ([http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=jude%2020;&amp;amp;version=9; Jude 20]). For those who strengthen their faith, [[Jesus]] promised &amp;quot;I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing. He will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John 14:12 (NIV).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life itself may be the manifestation of God's faith.  Decay and death may be the manifestation of a lack or denial of faith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biblical examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the greatest description of faith is Hebrews 11:1. It states: &amp;quot;Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hebrews 11:1 (NIV).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The King James Version expresses this passage as: &amp;quot;Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.&amp;quot;  The Greek word translated as &amp;quot;substance&amp;quot; is `hupostasis', meaning setting under (support).  The Greek word for &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot;`elegchos' meaning proof.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Strong, 1890, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Abingdon Press, Nashville, TN.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Bible thus distinguishes clearly between the &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;leap of faith&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; of Kirkegaard and a faith based on acknowledgement of the evidence presented by God within our own experiences in this world.  Paul, in Romans 1:17-20 explains that faith has its basis in the observed expression of God's existence in this universe: &amp;quot;For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paul]] indicated that exceptional faith may be a gift of the [[Holy Spirit]].  1 Corinthians 12:8-9 &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As discussed above, a potential reference to faith is [[Genesis]] 22 where [[God]] tested [[Abraham]] by commanding him to sacrifice his only son [[Isaac]]. As Abraham prepared to do what God commanded -he was stopped. &lt;br /&gt;
Genesis 22:12&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Do not lay a hand on the boy,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Martin Luther on Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Luther in his Table Talk papers writes this thought provoking and rather difficult passage on faith:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is the acme of faith, to believe that God, who saves so few and condemns so many, is merciful; that he is just who, at his own pleasure, has made us necessarily doomed to damnation, so that he seems to delight in the torture of the wretched and is more deserving of hate than of love.  If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, who shows so much anger and harshness, could be merciful and just, there would be no need of faith.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Moral Basis of Biblical Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biblical expression of faith is belief in what God reveals to man to be so. Since New Testament times, that means belief in what God reveals to be so concerning Jesus Christ. There is a steady progression through time of what God reveals  and so belief also finds expression in progessive content and emphasis. What God reveals to Adam, to Noah, to Moses (and through them), to the prophets, to the Ninevites, to Simeon  and Anna,  Mary, to the Apostles, differ in content and in emphasis, but the culmination of the content of faith is the person of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moral basis of faith is the positive response of belief, and the obedience of one's life to the requirement implied by the revelation. That is why Adam (and his generation) was not required to believe what Noah was required to believe, why Noah was not required to believe what Abraham was required to believe, and why Abraham was not required to believe what Moses was required to believe. Moses, and his generation, was not required to believe what Isaiah was required to believe, until the time of Jesus. Nor were they each allowed to believe less than what was required of them to believe, as if they were of a previous generation and a previous revelation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moral basis of Faith continues on in effect, content and emphasis, since the time of the Son of God on earth.  That is why the &amp;quot;good man&amp;quot;  is required to believe in the Son of God preached to him, as He, the Son of God, is the source of his goodness, and the forgiver of his badness, through His  sacrifice on the cross; the &amp;quot;bad man&amp;quot; required to believe in Him who bore his sin, through His sacrifice on the cross; the &amp;quot;gentile&amp;quot;, wherever found, of whatever stage, required to live up to what is given him by his conscience and whatever good has come to him through his culture, and believe in the light God is actually giving him, and in  the Jesus being preached to him, but not required to believe in and practice the Law of Moses; the Jew required to keep the Law given him, and then to despair at not having fulfilled it, and believe in the Son of God being revealed to him; the infant respond, as infants can, and not as adolescents and adults are required, each in his own order, until the greater revelation comes, and separation from the dominance and protection of the elders; and why an embryo  aborted is required to respond as only an embryo can, which God alone knows, and not be required to be at the level of response he would have been moments and days and months and years later, if he would have been let live - saved - though the embryo would never have known how - by the Cross of the sin bearing Savior, who knew him well and loved him. &amp;quot;to him whom much has been given, of him much will be required.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The natural and the supernatural aspects of Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is a gift from God that may be viewed two ways. One is clearly an intrusion or at least and introjection into our ordinary lives. Under this aspect, we see it as pure grace. &amp;quot;For by grace are you saved through faith, and this is not as a result of your deeds, It is God's gift and not something from ourselves&amp;quot;. Our response, is from the extremity of our situation and as a clear product of something outside ourselves - the new word of God, the message concerning Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord. Even the ability to hear and understand is given to us from above, &amp;quot;Faith comes by hearing, and &amp;quot;hearing&amp;quot; itself, comes by the Word of God&amp;quot;. And thus we call out, from the depth and from consiousness, for salvation. &amp;quot; Whoever shall call on the name of the Lord, will be saved/&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other aspect of Faith is not by intrusion or introjection, but by infusion and irradiation. This too is of the grace of God. Whereas the first aspect had come to us at our extremity from without, this aspect comes to us from within and around, pervading the so-called natural structures that we experience every day, that are so supportive of stability, confidence, trust and hope. Good parenting, solidity of home and provision, loving faithfulness among friends as we grow, continual exposure to the truth of the Word of God  (and truth is always therapeutic), strengthens our faith, and our expectation for the continuing faithfulness and involvment of a loving and good God.  Faith seems so natural, so in accord, with our experience, that we could even be surprised that it could have been otherwise. Here we experience, most often, not a crisis of faith, but the need to give ourselves more fully to Him in whom we are believing. Under this aspect, God is to be appreciated and acknowledged for being our good and heavenly Father. The Old Testament presents us with the reality of this aspect of faith. Amidst even the miraculous events as the parting of the &amp;quot;Red&amp;quot; Sea, and the many deliverences Israel experience so beyond their natural ability to effect, little is said, is acknowledged consciously, of the quality of faith itself. It is air that a fish is most conscious of, not his home in the  water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faith: the Access to Reality==&lt;br /&gt;
Christianity demands Faith and insists that Faith be turned into sight. &amp;quot;Do you believe, Thomas, because you have seen. Blessed are those who do not see and yet believe.&amp;quot; Throughout the New Testament, this theme occurs, belief in Jesus, belief in the Heavenly Father, belief in the readiness of God to still waves, cause you too to walk on water, to return a dead girl back to her grieving, believing mother, to see small insignificant things as a seed grow, as if miraculously of itself, into a startling display of fruit to eat and protection for birds, all of this, with only the sky to limit, comes into our lives, according to Jesus, if we have Faith. Reality is gained by the exercise of Faith, a reality unattainable by the ordinary means frequented by men.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But this reality attained, so extraordinary in this sordid and marred sin-infested world, is seen to be the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; reality of the Kingdom of Heaven, just waiting to enter in. Entirely right in the presence of the Kingdom of God and the King Himself for the dead boy to get up from his bier to run to his mother, entirely right that that adultress be pardoned, strengthened, challenged, and hold her head up high once again, entirely right the demons come out of the tormented boy to be commanded to go to the place that God has prepared for them, all entirely right at the entrance of this new reality of the Kingdom of Heaven among us, and the King Himself, Jesus. The overwhelming of reality, by Reality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As God is palpable in Jesus, so the Reality of the Kingdom of God is palpable, and can be seen, on this earth. The entrance to the Garden was by faith, but the reality of the garden is as tangible as was Jesus eating fish with his disciples after he got up from the dead. As much as the New Testament presents Faith as the entrance to the Kingdom, so does it insist that Faith, perhaps not fully in this world, shall turn to sight in the end... and on the way. &amp;quot;It is not apparent what we who are called the children of God shall yet be, but we know that we shall be like Him for we shall see Him as He really is.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faith as a virtue==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Konrad Witz – Petri fiskafänge.jpg|thumb|right|210px|The 'walking on water' episode, which both showed and tested St Peter's faith (painting by Konrad Witz).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[St Paul]] identified faith, [[hope]] and [[love]] (or [[charity]]) as the three greatest [[virtue]]s that are central to Christianity, and this idea is repeated and elaborated upon throughout Christian tradition. Faith is put first because it provides the foundation upon which the other two are built: a faithful heart and mind cause one to have hope, and hope causes one to have love for God and one's fellow man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Dante]]'s [[Divine Comedy]], [[St Peter]] is most identified with faith. This is appropriate, since he was the 'rock' on which the Church was built, just as a Christian life must be rooted in faith. Peter's great faith is shown in Matthew 14:28-31, when he is briefly able to walk on water until doubt enters his mind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christian philosopher [[Robert Merrihew Adams]] wrote a book, ''The Virtue of Faith'', to defend the idea of faith as virtuous. Consider the case of a loved one accused of some wrongdoing, but who protests their innocence - our relationship with them creates a special ethical obligation to believe what they say, which does not apply to the protestations of innocence of strangers; at the same time, that obligation is not absolute, but can be overturned by the evidence. Adams uses this example to argue that some beliefs we are ethically obliged to hold, and argues that the existence of God could be such a belief for the believer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to Adams' view is that favored by many atheists, classically expressed by William Kingdon Clifford, in his 1877 essay ''The Ethics of Belief'', which states &amp;quot;it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.&amp;quot; However, while Clifford can point to individual cases where believing things without evidence is unethical, those cases fail to demonstrate that his principle is true in every case, and he ignores valid cases such as those which Adams cites which lead to the opposite conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uniqueness to Christianity ==&lt;br /&gt;
Christianity is unique among religions in that its followers are defined by faith rather than by adherence to a prescribed code. St Paul makes this distinction clear in Galatians 3:24-25:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The law was a kind of tutor in charge of us until Christ should come, when we should be justified through faith; and now that faith has come, the tutor's charge is at an end.}}&lt;br /&gt;
That is to say, whereas [[Judaism]] required (and still requires) its followers to obey the law, Christianity begins with faith, and any moral or ethical decisions must follow from that. In this regard, Islam has much more in common with Judaism than it does with Christianity: the word 'Islam' itself means 'submission to God'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Definitions and Religions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside of [[Christianity]], faith is misused as a synonym for &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot;. The [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary, for example, includes this definition of faith:  &amp;quot;a system of religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/faith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, faith often refers to a &amp;quot;firm belief in something for which there is no proof&amp;quot; or evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Koran]], the concept of submission to [[Allah]] is mentioned 11 times, while the concept of faith in Allah is mentioned only once.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Etymologically, the word 'faith' is closely linked to the concept of &amp;quot;fidelity,&amp;quot; which emphasizes commitment to something or someone, specifically [[Christ]]. Thus, faith is often understood to mean 'loyalty' to a particular view of [[divinity]]. Yet, faith can also be envisioned more broadly as a trust in [[providence]], as it entails an active role for the believer himself for advancing good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The literary critic Harold Bloom distinguishes Christianity from the other two dominant monotheistic religions in his book Agon by contrasting them with Gnosticism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gnosticism polemically is decidedly not a faith, whether in the Christian sense, pisits, a believing that something was, is, and will be so; or in the Hebraic sense, emunah, a trusting in the Covenant.  If religion is a binding, then Gnosticism is an unbinding, but not for the sake of things or persons merely as they are.  Gnostic freedom is a freedom for knowledge, knowledge of what in the self, not in the psyche or soul, is Godlike, and knowledge of God beyond the cosmos.  But also it is a freedom to be known, to be known by God, by what is alien to everything created, by what is alien to and beyond the stars and the cosmic system and our earth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is emphasized in Christianity but is unrecognized by the worldview of [[Philosophical Skepticism|philosophical skepticism]].&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Holding, James Patrick, [http://tektonics.org/whatis/whatfaith.html Fallacious Faith]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jesuschrist.lds.org/SonOfGod/eng/finding-faith-in-christ/video/finding-faith-in-christ Finding Faith in Christ], video at ''JesusChrist.lds.org''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Virtues}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Big_Bang_theory&amp;diff=1006771</id>
		<title>Big Bang theory</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Big_Bang_theory&amp;diff=1006771"/>
		<updated>2012-09-16T14:44:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Universe expansion.png|right|thumb|250px|According to the Big Bang theory, the universe originated by expanding into space from an extremely dense and hot state called the ''original singularity''.]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:End of universe.jpg|right|thumb|250px|According to the Big Bang theory, the three possible geometries of the universe depend on the value of the ''[[cosmological constant]]''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Big Bang theory''' is a scientific theory used to account for the acceleration of matter throughout the Universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Big bang theories are actually a ''class'' of scientific models that describe the Universe as expanding from a very hot, dense state approximately 13.7 billion years ago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101age.html WMAP Cosmology 101: Age of the Universe]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (although this number has been revised several times throughout recent history). It was first proposed by the Catholic priest [[Georges-Henri Lemaitre]] and evidence for the expansion was observed by [[Edwin Hubble]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hubble, E. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 168-173.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Later [[George Gamow]] predicted that the Big Bang would leave an observable [[cosmic microwave background|microwave background radiation (or CMBR)]]. This radiation was discovered by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at [[Bell Labs]]; it was found to be close to that predicted by Gamow (Gamow predicted a background radiation level equivalent to a roughly 3&amp;amp;nbsp;K black body object, and the observed level is that of a 2.725&amp;amp;nbsp;K body).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name &amp;quot;Big Bang Theory&amp;quot;, first coined by steady state theorists is often mistakenly thought to imply an explosion of matter into pre-existing space, but the theory actually indicates that time began at that point and space expanded from then on, and more space is constantly created in the interstices between particles as the density of the universe falls.  In other words, the Big Bang describes the expansion of space and time.  Big Bang theorists state that the Hubble [[redshift]] is a consequence of this stretching of the fabric of space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observations of distant supernovae indicate that the Universe is actually undergoing accelerated expansion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Riess, A. G., et al. The Astronomical Journal, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp. 1009-1038.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Perlmutter, S., et al. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 517, Issue 2, pp. 565-586.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and galaxy surveys&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sdss.org/dr5/ Sloan Digital Sky Survey]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tegmark, M., et al. Physical Review D, vol. 74, Issue 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and recent observations of the microwave background&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, for example, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603449&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have allegedly corroborated these claims. Atheists claim that the acceleration is caused by something called '[[dark energy]]', for which there is only observational evidence but no experimental evidence. There is no viable naturalistic explanation of what dark energy is, which even a few atheists admit, yet they insist that dark energy is a naturalistic phenomenon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists refer to the theoretical exact moment the Big Bang supposedly began as t=0 (&amp;quot;t&amp;quot; standing for &amp;quot;time&amp;quot;). At this time, according to their theory all of the matter in the universe - in fact, the universe itself - was contained within a single point (a single point in mathematics is infinitesimally small). A burst of energy known as the Big Bang is claimed to have issued forth, and the universe began.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.umich.edu/~gs265/bigbang.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 1.0×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-43&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; seconds later, the force of gravity separated from the other forces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ccsf.edu/Departments/History_of_Time_and_Life/content/BigBang.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, researchers used the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (launched by NASA in 2001) to measure variations in the cosmic microwave background (a &amp;quot;faint glow which permeates the universe&amp;quot;). According to these measurements, the universe is estimated to be about 13.7 billion years old, &amp;quot;give or take a few hundred-thousand years&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188142,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Creationist and Theistic Evolutionary Views==&lt;br /&gt;
The universe appears to be [[Fine tuned universe | fine tuned]] for life to some contrary to more than 99.99...% of the universe having no life, suggesting that God set the laws of physics that allow the universe, complexity, and life to exist. Scientists have been baffled by these &amp;quot;coincidences&amp;quot; as they examine the parameters of the big bang and other physical constants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some creationists argue that the '''Big Bang theory''' is part of an effort to deny [[God's]] creation of all of existence.  Christian physicists, such as Dr. John Hartnett,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/starlight-and-time-a-further-breakthrough&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have claimed that the Big Bang theory was constructed to account for serious pitfalls to the [[theory of evolution]], particularly the needed timescale of billions of years, amply contradicted by terrestrial and astronomical evidence.  Thus, the big bang is trotted out by [[atheist]] evolutionists to silence [[creationist]] opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young earth creationist scientists contest the Big Bang Theory stating that it is scientifically unsound.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;BB Critique&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Thompson, Bert, Harrub, Brad, and May, Branyon [http://www.apologeticspress.org/modules.php?name=Read&amp;amp;cat=1&amp;amp;itemid=22 The Big Bang Theory—A Scientific Critique] ''Apologetics Press'', May 2003 - 23[5]:32-34,36-47.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brown, Walt, 2001, [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences16.html Big Bang?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2047&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/article/343/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, [[young earth creationism]] holds that the book of Genesis is historical in nature and that [[Bible exegesis]] warrants a six-day creation with each day being 24 hours.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/Days_of_creation Days of Creation] (CreationWiki).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/genesis.asp Genesis Questions and Answers] (Answers in Genesis).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Niessen, Richard, [http://www.icr.org/article/164/ Theistic Evolution and the Day-Age Theory] ''Impact'' 81, March 1980.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Old Earth Creationists and Theistic Evolutionists argue that the Big Bang is in fact mentioned in the Bible. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reasons.org/resources/fff/2000issue03/index.shtml#big_bang_the_bible_taught_it_first http://www.reasons.org/resources/fff/2000issue03/index.shtml#big_bang_the_bible_taught_it_first]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some Christian apologists who believe in an old earth, such as [[William Craig]] use the Big Bang as an apologetic, arguing that it proves that the universe had a beginning. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Strobel, Lee. ''The Case for a Creator''. Zondervan, 2004. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He further discusses the many theories that have been proposed to counter the Big Bang Theory due to its conclusion that there is a beginning or origin of creation.  These additional theories have been broken down to still revert to a beginning.  This in essence tries to proves a divine power or creator, which frustrates the many atheistic scientists that are trying to prove that God does not exist, including well known physicist [[Stephen Hawking]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephen Hawking, ''A Brief History of Time.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scientific Criticism ==&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the Big Bang theory has received criticism because it ignores the theory of an oscillating universe. Also, no first cause from the Big Bang has ever been successfully identified, although none is needed as the universe does not exist within time. Furthermore, critics of the Big Bang point out that not everything in the universe is actually moving apart from everything else as some galaxies have collided with other galaxies in the past, although this could be explained through understanding of classical mechanics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The big bang theory is entirely unable to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry.  If the big bang theory did happen as they say, matter and antimatter would have been created in equal quantities.  When antimatter was first discovered in the 1930's, scientists immediately began looking for traces of it in the universe.  No traces have been found except what we produce in particle accelerators and positrons produced by a type of radiation called positron emission.  This asymmetry means that the big bang theory would have had to violate the laws of physics, since matter would have had to be produced without its antimatter partner, which violates the laws of conservation of electric charge and mass.  There was some excitement in the 1970's about electroweak symmetry breaking as a method by which the matter was &amp;quot;preferred&amp;quot; over antimatter, but the infrequency of the weak force made them conclude this was impossible.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Big Bang Theory Dissent Letter ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many have dissented from the theory, including the British astronomer Sir [[Fred Hoyle]], the Nobel Prize winner [[Hannes Alfven]], and astronomers [[Geoffrey Burbidge]] and [[Halton Arp]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/article/343/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was Hoyle who sarcastically coined the term during a radio broadcast.&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, an ‘Open Letter to the Scientific Community’ disputing the Big Bang theory was signed by 33 scientists and has been published on the internet and in the science journal [[New Scientist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0601skepticism.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18224482.900&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dissent letter has subsequently been signed by hundreds of individuals around the world. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cosmologystatement.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Professional cosmologists are actively creating models (some of which contradict the Big Bang scenario) and collecting data that probe the specific nature of the earliest observable aspects of the Universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Horizon Problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[horizon problem]] is an argument against the Big Bang theory.&lt;br /&gt;
As [[Jason Lisle]] explains:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quoteBox|The problem is this: even assuming the big bang timescale, there has not been enough time for light to travel between widely separated regions of space. So, how can the different regions of the current [cosmic microwave background] CMB have such precisely uniform temperatures if they have never communicated with each other? This is a light-travel–time problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisle, Jason, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/167/ Light-travel time: a problem for the big bang], ''Creation'' 25(4):48–49, September 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recognizing this difficulty, physicist [[Alan Guth]] conjured an explanation he named [[cosmic inflation]].&lt;br /&gt;
According to this claim, during the universe's first 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-35&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of a second, a period of extremely rapid, exponential inflation occurred, expanding the universe by a factor of at least 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;26&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
It would be the equivalent of taking a pea and expanding it to the size of our solar system in a time less than a millionth of a blink of an eye.&lt;br /&gt;
If this occurred, it would mathematically allow for the uniformity of the [[CMBR]] - the vast distances were in thermodynamical contact before the rapid inflation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Castelvecchi, Davide, [http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/cms/?pid=1000045 The Growth of Inflation] ''Symmetry'', 1(2), December 2004, p.12-17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hinshaw, Gary, [http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/24768 WMAP data put cosmic inflation to the test], 3rd May, 2006 (PhysicsWorld.com).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However, no naturalistic mechanism that would cause this sudden expansion is known, and inflation remains, at present, entirely speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Criticisms of the Big Bang ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Big Bang theory is unable to explain where the laws of [[gravity]] and [[inertia]] come from. It also cannot explain why the laws are consistent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Big Bang Theorists cannot explain where the matter arrived from in the first place. Also in order for the matter to move it requires energy and the Big Bang theory cannot explain its origins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In physics there is a law called the [[Conservation of Angular Momentum]]. If a spinning object breaks apart in a frictionless environment the pieces that lay off will be spinning in the same direction. If the Big Bang did happen then shouldn’t everything be spinning in the same direction? Galaxies and moons and planets spin in different directions. That doesn’t make sense according to the Big bang theory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Big Bang did happen then matter would be evenly distributed. Instead it is lumpy as there are clusters of stars and then great voids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.rareuniverse.org/general_science/bigbang.html Stages of the Big Bang]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mary_Magdalene&amp;diff=1005569</id>
		<title>Mary Magdalene</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mary_Magdalene&amp;diff=1005569"/>
		<updated>2012-09-12T12:25:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Mary Magdalene''' was a Jewish woman from the tribe of Benjamin who was also a disciple of [[Christ]].  She appears in all four [[Gospels]] in the [[New Testament]].  Mary came with [[Jesus]] on his journey to [[Jerusalem]] and witnessed his [[crucifixion]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] 23:55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She was also the first person to see that Jesus had [[resurrection|resurrected]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Gospel of John|John]] 20:1-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jesus cast 7 demons out of her by the power of the Holy Spirit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Luke 8:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Testament does not mention her beyond the Gospels.  It should be noted that the view of Mary Magdelene as a prostitute is not found within the Bible or the writings of the early church fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Georges de La Tour Mary Magdalene.jpg|thumb|left|Georges de La Tour, Mary Magdalene.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biblical Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_dislikes&amp;diff=1005475</id>
		<title>Liberal dislikes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_dislikes&amp;diff=1005475"/>
		<updated>2012-09-11T16:31:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''[[Liberal]]''' '''dislikes''' are things that annoy liberals as they have a great many things to dislike about the [[United States]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of things Liberals Dislike==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Second Amendment]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Free Market]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Constitution of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[freedom|Individual Freedom]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Facts and Logic (see [[Liberal logic]])&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christian]] faith and [[classroom prayer]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cornell_University&amp;diff=1004003</id>
		<title>Cornell University</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cornell_University&amp;diff=1004003"/>
		<updated>2012-09-04T18:21:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;C12Elliot: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{University&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Cornell University&lt;br /&gt;
|image=&lt;br /&gt;
|text=black&lt;br /&gt;
|background=#b31b1b&lt;br /&gt;
|type=Private&lt;br /&gt;
|city=Ithaca, New York&lt;br /&gt;
|sports=baseball, basketball, bowling, cross country, equestrian, fencing, field hockey, football, golf, gymnastics, hockey, lacrosse, rifle, rowing, rugby, skiing, soccer, softball, squash, swimming and diving, tennis, track and field, ultimate, volleyball, water polo, wrestling&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cstv.com/teams/corn/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|degrees=Bachelor's, Master's, Doctoral&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=College Board|format=HTML|language=English|accessdate=May 28, 2010|title=College Search - Cornell University - At a Glance|url=http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.jsp?collegeId=15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|colors=carnelian (shade of red), white&lt;br /&gt;
|mascot=Big Red&lt;br /&gt;
|website=http://www.cornell.edu/&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cornell University''' is a university in Ithaca, New York, founded in 1865 by businessman [[Ezra Cornell]]. It is the youngest member of the [[Ivy League]], the last of eight.  Cornell accepts applications from homeschooled children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christian Examiner, Sept. 2007, Vol 25, No 9, Pg. 12&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cornell was originally founded as a land grant institution with public funding, but has converted into essentially a private school (with some special relationships to the State of New York). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the Ivy League schools, Cornell is unusual in many ways. Educational historian Frederick Rudolph called Cornell the first &amp;quot;American university.&amp;quot; That is, it was the first university on the pattern that many American universities&amp;amp;mdash;particularly the land-grant state universities&amp;amp;mdash;were to follow: coeducational, nonsectarian, and comprehensive. From the beginning, it was intended to compass far more than the classics and the liberal arts. This is shown by Cornell's motto, “I would found an institution where any person can find instruction in any study,&amp;quot; and by the fact that it is the only Ivy League school whose motto is not in Latin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[University of Southern California]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ohio State University]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ave Maria University]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb_US_universities|New York}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Universities]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>C12Elliot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>