<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=CWChandler</id>
		<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=CWChandler"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/CWChandler"/>
		<updated>2026-06-18T08:59:10Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:YouTube&amp;diff=790631</id>
		<title>Talk:YouTube</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:YouTube&amp;diff=790631"/>
				<updated>2010-06-28T17:17:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CWChandler: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars&amp;quot; This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of all liberal videos. Claiming that the majority is &amp;quot;poorly made&amp;quot; is just somebody throwing a tantrum. This is less of a conservapedia and more like an opinionpedia. - CWChandler&lt;br /&gt;
::::All liberal videos are poorly made as they are not supported by reality. At best they are like donkey dung - Shiny on the outside, but not very pleasant on the inside. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:55, 27 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You are entitled to your opinion but this is not opinionpedia. How can you see the world in absolutes where everything that is liberal is bad and everything that is conservative is good? You can't just find the worst of all liberals and label them as the epitome of liberalism and then find the best of conservatives and label them the epitome of conservatism. If you only listen to things that you agree with and censor anything that you disagree with you won't experience the world for what it truly is. To get back on subject: you can't stereotype all (as in 100%) liberal videos as &amp;quot;poorly made&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;donkey poo&amp;quot;, that is just ignorant labeling. - CWChandler&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CWChandler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:YouTube&amp;diff=790382</id>
		<title>Talk:YouTube</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:YouTube&amp;diff=790382"/>
				<updated>2010-06-27T23:41:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CWChandler: Created page with '&amp;quot;Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars&amp;quot; This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of…'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars&amp;quot; This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of all liberal videos. Claiming that the majority is &amp;quot;poorly made&amp;quot; is just somebody throwing a tantrum. This is less of a conservapedia and more like an opinionpedia. - CWChandler&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CWChandler</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>