<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Canifis</id>
		<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Canifis"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Canifis"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T11:06:19Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=733594</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &quot;tolerant&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=733594"/>
				<updated>2009-12-16T21:17:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Canifis: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Red links==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that since those liberal vandals listed no longer have user pages or talk pages that instead in linking them (pointless, as the links lead to basically nowhere) we could put them in bold instead???  Just a thought.  --[[User:AmeliaJ|AmeliaJ]] 18:01, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. Thanks for the suggestion. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:24, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also agree very much. Great idea. [[User:AddisonDM]] 7 January 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This page should be deleted. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very existence of this page encourages vandalism.  It becomes a motive for people to commit vandalism. --[[User:TimS|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User talk:TimS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Formerly CPAdmin1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How so? [[User:JY23|JY23]] 13:50, 11 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cause it's funny to read what some people have wrote. It's like reading bash.org conversations. [[User:JonathanG|JonG]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JonathanG|Tennisu no Boifriendo]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:56, 28 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::In the end, I don't think it matters. It's better if we do get a slight increase in vandalism, and be able to show everyone the utter moronic nature of it, like this essay is meant to do. It is very important that the average reader actually see the kind of junk these vandals post. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:01, 16 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colbert vandals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we mention something about the recent Colbert-inspired vandalism? --[[User:OscarJ|OscarJ]] 14:19, 11 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==LOL==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry if I'm breaking your fourth wall, here, but this site is hilarious. Great job! (And I don't mind if you delete this to keep it up.)[[User:Canifis|Canifis]] 16:17, 16 December 2009 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Canifis</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=733592</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &quot;tolerant&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=733592"/>
				<updated>2009-12-16T21:16:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Canifis: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Red links==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that since those liberal vandals listed no longer have user pages or talk pages that instead in linking them (pointless, as the links lead to basically nowhere) we could put them in bold instead???  Just a thought.  --[[User:AmeliaJ|AmeliaJ]] 18:01, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. Thanks for the suggestion. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:24, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also agree very much. Great idea. [[User:AddisonDM]] 7 January 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This page should be deleted. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very existence of this page encourages vandalism.  It becomes a motive for people to commit vandalism. --[[User:TimS|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User talk:TimS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Formerly CPAdmin1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How so? [[User:JY23|JY23]] 13:50, 11 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cause it's funny to read what some people have wrote. It's like reading bash.org conversations. [[User:JonathanG|JonG]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JonathanG|Tennisu no Boifriendo]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:56, 28 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::In the end, I don't think it matters. It's better if we do get a slight increase in vandalism, and be able to show everyone the utter moronic nature of it, like this essay is meant to do. It is very important that the average reader actually see the kind of junk these vandals post. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:01, 16 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colbert vandals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we mention something about the recent Colbert-inspired vandalism? --[[User:OscarJ|OscarJ]] 14:19, 11 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry if I'm breaking your fourth wall, here, but this site is hilarious. Great job! (And I don't mind if you delete this to keep it up.)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Canifis</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>