Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:RobSmith

2022-05-10T18:19:11Z

Chewy Suarez:

*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13]]

==Dec 2021==

I've been trying to figure out how to work this one in, combining the Rittenhouse verdict and [[Fredogate]] with the subject of self-defense: [https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/11/27/says-the-guy-who-threatens-to-beat-people-up-a-lot-chris-cuomo-is-unhappy-with-self-defense-definition-1168453/ ‘Says the guy who threatens to beat people up;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:53, December 1, 2021 (EST)
:Will look into it. I have to say that Cuomo wasn't that far lefty before 2016.| Good morning. Please caution on first image, not on an empty stomach.
[https://www.news1.co.il/uploadimages/NEWS1-13-413784205913544.jpg (Oct/2000)]
[https://img.mako.co.il/2015/10/13/17029_C.jpg wild mob]
[https://www.makorrishon.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/WhatsApp-Image-2021-12-02-at-08.50.18.jpeg Hamas cartoon condemning PA for rescuing the 2 Jews Dec-1-2021][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:14, December 2, 2021 (EST)
::Real "victims" Smollet & Brooks LOL-
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollett-real-victim-attack-chicago-lawyer-argues | https://www.foxnews.com/us/waukesha-parade-suspect-darrell-brooks-jail-dehumanized-demonized-interview [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

:Looks like a developing, long-running storyline and narrative. Brooks apparently is the next Michael Brown of Ferguson fame. Brooks apparently was trying to surrender to the police (who were incompetently protecting minority citizens from a neighboring city) while fleeing a knife fight when his car accidentally lost control and killed six people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:32, December 2, 2021 (EST)
::Is woke-ism till in the "works" in "improving" this theory? [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::Oh yes, definitely. These poor oppressed individuals Smollett & Brooks, in their desperate actions to fight for social justice, now face the white man's justice. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:13, December 2, 2021 (EST)

::::2 recent...[https://b7net.co.il/dyncontent/2021/11/29/ba4ffd78-e16a-4150-bb28-bd7ddf8e2a5b.jpeg Nov-29-21] |[https://ynet-images1.yit.co.il/picserver5/crop_images/2021/11/29/BJgxmexfFK/BJgxmexfFK_258_173_717_404_0_large.jpg Nov-28-21][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Done]. Sorry for the delay. I'm up to my ears in research on [[Faucism]] right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 22:26, December 4, 2021 (EST)
:::::I got the lynching one, too. Also, my Skype account crashed and I haven't reloaded it yet, so I'm back on Slack for instant messaging. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:28, December 4, 2021 (EST)

::::::I'm on there only once in a while. I hope you succeed with Skype etc.. This 2019 is classic, as both messages are on packages... Jihad and swastika...[https://www.0404.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/חבילות-חשד-למטען-כביש-חוצה-יהודה1-e1564340789639.jpg July/2019, Islamic Jihad w/ swastika in Judea][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:26, December 5, 2021 (EST)

:::::::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Jihad_and_swastika.jpg Got it]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:35, December 5, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Seen latest on Chris Cuomo?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::::::It'll be interesting to see where he lands. Maybe as Antfa's press spokesman. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:24, December 5, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::This [https://t.co/uGLJtHvlfg Chris Cuomo’s entire career was worth it for this one moment ] is epic.|Another topic, look at this woke Dem useful idiot fooled [https://nypost.com/2021/12/04/woke-new-jersey-dem-fooled-by-fake-rabbis-parody-twitter-account/] the joke of the year.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::::::::Dunno whether to laugh or cry. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 10:11, December 7, 2021 (EST)

===Image===
[https://images1.ynet.co.il/PicServer5/2017/03/30/7685990/76859850100082640360no.jpg Himmler to Mufti 1 (1943)]|[https://images1.ynet.co.il//PicServer5/2017/03/30/7685998/76859870100079640360no.jpg Himmler to Mufti 2 (1943)]|[https://images.jpost.com/image/upload/f_auto,fl_lossy/t_JM_ArticleMainImageFaceDetect/469952 Mufti's Muslim-SS Handschar]|[https://64.media.tumblr.com/6db777f1acef5f25b9aae589731ea5b9/tumblr_pridnjoCTJ1r29p1do1_1280.jpg lying Rashida1]|[https://i.imgur.com/pcM7XRJ.png L.R.2], when you get a chance.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload All caught up now.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 10:29, December 7, 2021 (EST)
::Thanks. Appreciated, especially that you're so busy. Can you grab a screenshot of this [https://books.google.com/books?id=X74zAQAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Shukairy+%22Our+common+target%22]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Survey_of_China_Mainland_Press,_Issues_3406-3428,_1965,_p_35.PNG Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:20, December 8, 2021 (EST)
::::HI. I couldn't stop laughing. This is awesome https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1473079182980788226 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, December 20, 2021 (EST)
:::::It's like Andrew Klavan said, we have to laugh our way through the fall of the republic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:13, December 20, 2021 (EST)
::::::Yup. For now. Till with the Grace of God it will all be improved.~~•
:::::::And God acts through people. This we have to realize and keep in mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 22:51, December 20, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Sure. Stay safe this holiday season. G'night.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

__

Hi. This one is shameful...[https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1473435061768929281/photo/1 Kimberlynn]
Happy New Year![[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:18, December 27, 2021 (EST)
:Yah, I saw this story, and it was so unbelievable, I wasn't sure which article it could be included in. This looks almost like cult behavior. [ https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski.PNG] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::You're right. Can you grab a screenshot where her name appears at WATKINS section? [https://www.capitolhillclusterschool.org/lsat][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski_LSAT.PNG How's this?] I can crop it down to just the bottom half, if you want. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:13, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::::As always, you're doing great. | I made the distinction between WW2 era and today at ''antifa''. I hope it's clear. As today it's a clear '''oxymoron'''. They always hide their twisted ideas under perceived nice "benign" titles.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::Yah, that Antifa article is pretty good as is, but it could use some reorganization, clarity, and updating. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:04, December 27, 2021 (EST)
:::::Basically, it's too cramped. It needs some expansion. The original authors wrote it as if it was the final word on the subject, but much information and interest has developed since then. Perhaps dividing into eras, like pre-WWII, East German, evolution and change, late 20th century, Trump era, Biden era, etc.

___

Hi. When you get a chance:
[https://www.brooklynpaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/00E83409-D7DC-4478-9033-E9C36ED9AB0A-1200x675.png June 27, 2021. Little Palestine, Bay Ridge]| [https://2nqf1a2pxrmv1i0jyy3lbz8e-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ScreenShot2020-12-22at4_55_07PM_644fad5187eac0ced9a0031c5b9a2d60_2000-298x300.jpg Swastika on Park Slope school, Dec 13, 2020]| [https://newyork.cbslocal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/14578484/2021/12/3523-21-68-Pct.-HCTF-12-26-21-Photo-1.jpg?w=1068 Hate crime, little Palestine, Bay Ridge, Dec 28, 2021]. Regards.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==Lie of the year==
Can someone create a graphic per this:

[https://freebeacon.com/?p=1551060 LIE OF THE THE YEAR: ‘I Will Shut Down The Virus’]
<blockquote>
Biden's COVID-19 death count passes 400K

Andrew Stiles • December 23, 2021

More than 400,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 since President Joe Biden took office.
Biden achieved the grim milestone despite repeatedly telling the American people that electing him president was the only way to "shut down the virus." That turned out to be an egregious lie.

The Washington Free Beacon projects that Biden's COVID-19 death toll will exceed that of his predecessor (408,450) by the end of the year, and will reach approximately 420,069 by the time he delivers his first State of the Union address.</blockquote>
Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:I've been on the lookout for a graphic, too. Maybe I can ask LT to do something with it.
:Anther thing I've been looking for, which according to public and private agencies that keep such records and are often delayed months and years, is the number of illegal immigrant deaths, both in custody and out. Since it's been a record year of illegal immigration, it naturally follows that it must also have been a record year of illegal immigrant deaths, whether in custody, crossing the border, or trying to cross the border. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:17, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:Since Biden invited illegals in, if a mother and child died of thirst in the Sonora desert 100 miles south of the border, or were murdered by cayotes for not paying a fee, those deaths can also be laid on Biden's doorstep. That's what Democrats call "compassion." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]

::What an interesting and such an important subject. You're so right. I'm sure there are so many unknown cases. 2,800 died between 2009-2019 [https://www.animalpolitico.com/2019/03/mexicanos-murieron-frontera-eu/]. Yet:<blockquote>650 deaths on the US border.- Mexico EN 2021, according to organization 1:18 (CNN) - At least 650 people died when trying to cross the border between Mexico and the United States this year, more than any other year since an international body began documenting</blockquote>
[https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2021/12/09/muertes-migrantes-frontera-mexico-estados-unidos-trax/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::I've been studying this question for much of this year now, and it's hard to back up numbers with good sources, but I'd say 650 on the U.S side sounds very realistic (up from a 280 average over the past 10 years). And it cannot be conclusive, cause we have little or no idea what happens on the Mexican side, which has all the same qualifying factor to account. And the numbers of those forced into human trafficing and sexual slavery could be 10 times as high as what happens to an illegal once they reach the U.S. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:39, December 23, 2021 (EST)

==R.T.==
Seen [https://www.wnd.com/2021/11/notorious-dem-rashida-tlaib-grins-talks-dream-release-every-con-federal-prison/ this]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:Yah, this deserves follow up and adding to her bio. Dems are splitting between the "Normal Democrats" and Defunders right now, but Tlaib seems intent on keeping the Defund Police/End Bail/Abolish the Prison Industrial Complex movement alive upto the 2022 elections. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:38, November 27, 2021 (EST)

==Qatar==
Qatari hypocrisy - cartoon in Chatlie Hebdo [https://mobile.twitter.com/oritperlov/status/1429773962871984130/photo/1]. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==New section==
Hi.
Good [https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1488617503853060101 answer] by McConnell. Regards. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==AOC image==
Hi Rob. [https://mobile.twitter.com/GPrime85/status/1441136342637944832/photo/1 img] Caption -
"You mean all those poor rockets won't even get a chance to land?" [https://twitter.com/gprime85/status/1441136342637944832 source][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==Racism images==
Hi Rob. This one relates to the image you uploaded days ago of Time100. The elkurd twins.
[https://i2.wp.com/www.israellycool.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/muna-hitler.png?ssl=1 img]
[https://algulf.net/2021/07/04/palestinian-arab-poster-boy-mohammed-el-kurds-jew-hate-emerges/ source] | This one is about Arab Oakestinisbs" putting up nazi flags near their mosque in Beit Ummar in 2014. [https://www.srugim.co.il/i/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/TAZ1__w200h200q80.jpg img] [https://mobile.srugim.co.il/article/45694 source] | This nazi flag was put up today by Arabs Palestinians in Beit Ummar and was removed by the IDF.
[https://twitter.com/Saher95755738/status/1441784045021671428?s=20 img] [https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/nazi-flag-taken-down-by-idf-soldiers-in-hebron-680311/amp info][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:55, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:Ok, sorry, i forgot. You want the AOC image, too, right. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:59, September 25, 2021 (EDT)

::OK, got'em all. [https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 21:12, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
===2022===
:::Another anti-Asian hate crime, and as usual, not by a MAGA guy...
[https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2022/03/f0f66810-46be-4d22-9ad1-d34973fc3941.jpg image], [https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17954960/who-is-tammel-esco/amp/ source]. Thanks [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Tammel_Esco.PNG Here you go]. I got some theories why these tensions exist between Africans and Asians. I could never prove them to be true, but I think both groups being minorities, are hypersensitive around strangers. They have almost like a sixth sense. Members of one group can "give off vibes" of fear upon seeing a stranger, and the members of the other group are quick to read how receptive strangers are to them. These impressions can happen in a moment, without a word being spoken. And if the strangers receives "negative vibes", they can be quick to violence. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:19, March 15, 2022 (EDT)

== [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] ==

Want to make "New Pages" lowercase as "New pages" (just to be consistent with the capitalization of the other common noun words in the sidebar list)? [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:41, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
:Yah. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 02:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
::I haven't seen changes take effect yet. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

== [[Kirby's Dream Land 2]] ==
Is it ok if you undelete this video game article too? I forgot to request it -- thank you [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

== Files for deletion ==

Mind deleting:

*[[:File:Flag of Colombia.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Colombia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the Comoros.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the Comoros.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Hungary.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Hungary.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Luxembourg.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Luxembourg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Monaco.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Monaco.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Medal Law.jpg]] and [[:File:Medal Music.jpg]] (MS Paint-like pictures that probably don't have a practical use)
*[[:File:Maine State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Maine.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Georgia State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of State of Georgia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Arizona State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Arizona.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Pennsylvania State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Pennsylvania.png|this file]])
*[[:File:South Carolina State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of South Carolina.png|this file]])
*[[:File:North Carolina State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of North Carolina.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Jersey State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Jersey.png|this file]])
*[[:File:11121.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Virginia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Rhode Island State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Rhode Island.png|this file]])
[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:16, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

:Hey, thanks. What a mess, huh? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:28, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::Yeah I've noticed quite a bit of things needing cleanup around the wiki, including duplicate/low quality unused files. There's more state flags that I haven't listed yet. you forgot to delete [[:File:Medal Music.jpg]] btw [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 16:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

:::Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated. That Categorization scheme is all screwed up, so it's difficult to even round up what needs to be deleted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:46, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::::Yeah, and I have to ask administrators about some of these because some are admin-protected so therefore cannot be tagged. I'll try and see if I can find more [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 16:49, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::::My guess is 11k of 22k Files are uncategorized. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:51, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Here's some more:

*[[:File:DC flag.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:DC flag.GIF|this file]])
*[[:File:2628589070 30f1d23517.jpg]] (doesn't appear to serve any practical purpose)
*[[:File:Capital.jpg]] (file redirect with no links to it)
*[[:File:Vermont State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Vermont.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Wyoming State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Wyoming.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Tennessee State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Tennessee.png|this file]])

[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 17:06, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
:A couple of those still link to pages. 18:41, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
::The DC flag one no longer does. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 11:11, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

== Deleting short articles ==

Personally, I don't see any harm in short stubs: CP could work at least as a kind of dictionary. But I suppose it is a matter of taste.
Just a request: could you check "what links here" before deleting a page? Thanks! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 09:24, August 11, 2021 (EDT)
:Yah, that's what I've been doing, but a few might have slipped past. The problem right now is, much of these pages someone studiously compiled in [[:Category:Dictionary]] are all orphans. And no one has bothered to de-orphan in 10 years. This is an object lesson for all editors: when you create a page, make sure you integrate the page into the whole wiki with a reverse link from at least one other page. Otherwise, it might eventually get deleted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 09:42, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

== Administrators ==

A couple of days ago, I looked up the [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop list of administrators] (to find someone to convince Andy on a mathematical subject): most of them have stopped contributing before 2012. Do you intend to delete all of their talk-pages and user-pages? Or is there a reason that you singled out User:Joaquin Martinez? It leaves lots of red links behind.... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:57, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
:That was done on user request, I beleive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 03:09, August 12, 2021 (EDT)

== More files for deletion ==

*[[:File:Nevada State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Nevada.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Texas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Texas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Arkansas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Arkansas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:California State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of California.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Colorado State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Colorado.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Connecticut State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Connecticut.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Delaware State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Delaware.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Florida State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Florida.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Hawaii State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Hawaii.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Idaho State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Idaho.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Indiana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Indiana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Iowa State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Iowa.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Kansas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Kansas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Kentucky State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Kentucky.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Louisiana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Louisiana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Maryland State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Maryland.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Massachusetts State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Massachusetts.png|this file]], although the GIF needs to be replaced with the PNG duplicate on two admin-protected articles)
*[[:File:Michigan State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Michigan.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Mississippi State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Mississippi.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Missouri State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Missouri.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Montana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Montana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Nebraska State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Nebraska.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Hampshire State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Hampshire.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Mexico State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Mexico.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Newyorkflag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New York.png|this file]])
*[[:File:North Dakota State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of North Dakota.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Ohio State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Ohio.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oklahoma State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oklahoma.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oregon State Flag (Front).gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oregon.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oregon State Flag (Back).gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oregon reverse.png|this file]])
*[[:File:South Dakota State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of South Dakota.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Utah State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Utah.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Washington State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Washington.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Wisconsin.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Wisconsin state flag.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Guam.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Guam.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:DC flag.GIF]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Washington, D.C..png|this file]])

[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 15:27, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
:Thanks! I'll get on it with the next batch. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:49, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
::Connecticut's one hasn't been deleted yet (oversight?) and i provided a note for the Massachusetts flag. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 20:47, August 14, 2021 (EDT)
:::Yah it's on hold for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:36, August 15, 2021 (EDT)

== In the News ==

::Please add to the Conservapedia headlines how Twitter has suspended Amrullah Saleh but not the Taliban[[https://www.republicworld.com/technology-news/social-media-news/afghanistan-twitter-suspends-accounts-of-amrullah-salehs-office-taliban-still-active.html]].[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 12:10, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::I dunno; what is the significnce? Big Tech and Twitter have been working against America and for the Taliban for years now already. 12:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::Don't you think Biden [[colluding]] with Russia is a bigger story? [https://tass.com/world/1326699] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 12:25, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::Well I think it is important given how Amrullah Saleh is the leader of Afghanistan.[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 12:57, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::(a) never heard of him (b) is there a single leader? (c) I thought it was [[Mullah Baradar]]. You're not falling for CCP/Big Tech/MSM agitprop to confuse people and take the focus off real issues, are you? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 13:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

:::Baradar is the head of the Taliban not the legitimate Afghan government. But if you feel there are issues more important than this then you don't need to put it. [[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 13:31, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::"legitimate government?" Wow. Wow. And again I say wow. Talk about putting the barndoor before the horse.... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 13:48, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::Did I hear you right? Are you referring to a group that shoots women in the street for not wearing burqas, as "legitimate"? Maybe in Twitter world, Anthony Blinken, Joe Biden, a host of Democrats and MSM, but not in the real universe that I personally was born into, or the real universe that God created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 14:05, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::My sources say, "[https://uncoverdc.com/2021/08/16/bidens-disastrous-exit-from-afghanistan/ Afghanistan’s President Ashraf Ghani has already relinquished power to an interim government led by Taliban commander Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar."] What is significant here is, we don't have articles on either Amrullah Saleh or Mullah Baradar, before we go off half-cocked on MSM/Democrat/Biden junta/CCP [[fake news]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:38, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

==You're a liberal==
Deletion of climate LIBRAL
:Sticks and stones may break my bones, but idiots never hurt me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:12, August 21, 2021 (EDT)

== A request ==

I don't think Conservapedia has in it's manual of style page info on not creating orphan pages.

Since orphan pages are not a good thing and you have mentioned how irritating they are to you, please update our manual of style page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:56, August 23, 2021 (EDT)

:Ok, will do. it kinda goes hand in hand with categorizing, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 01:11, August 23, 2021 (EDT)
== Request ==

For [[:File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture.jpg]], I made the mistake of downloading the direct history.house.gov version to upload rather than Wikimedia Common's improved version. However, if I upload a new cropped version with even a slightly different aspect ratio, everything will likely get messed up. Can you go to the file page and see if you can delete the current file version without deleting the page entirely? Correct me if I'm wrong, but there should be a way to do that in the timestamp table under "File history." Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:19, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:I see you deleted the file, which still works because I was able to upload a better version in its place successfully; however, was it impossible to only delete the file version without deleting the entire page, even though there was only one file revision? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:31, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:(ec) I dunno if that fixed it. You may have to re-upload as File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture2 or something. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:32, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
::Whoops, pardon my quick reply here which caused an edit conflict. So to clarify, my request was to avoid having to re-upload the file separately under another title. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:34, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
== Vaccine mandates and a quote from a Clint Eastwood movie ==

[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|300px|center|[[Adolf Hitler]] was against vaccine mandates!<ref>[https://jacobinmag.com/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-covid-pandemic-german-nazi-inoculation-policy You Know Who Else Opposed Vaccine Mandates? Hitler.]</ref> ]]
{{clear}}
[[File:Washington-deleware.jpg|thumbnail|600px|center|General [[George Washington]] ordered [[smallpox]] inoculations for all troops.<ref>[https://health.mil/News/Articles/2021/08/16/Gen-George-Washington-Ordered-Smallpox-Inoculations-for-All-Troops General George Washington Ordered [[Smallpox]] Inoculations for All Troops]</ref>
 
 
"I have right to a lawYEEER!" - the killer Scorpio in the 1971 movie ''Dirty Harry'' which featured [[Clint Eastwood]].<ref>[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066999/characters/nm0000142 Dirty Harry (1971)]</ref>
 
 
Apparently, George Washington's troops didn't have ready access to legal counsel concerning their innoculations or they thought they had weak cases. Or consider this radical thought: His troops thought their responsibility to get vaccinated against smallpox trumped any potential right they had to not get vaccinated.]]
{{clear}}
[[File:Donald Trump and Jesus is King sign.jpg|center|thumbnail|400px|A quick note to [[conservative]], Republican [[Donald Trump]] supporters who are against Covid-19 vaccines: Donald J. Trump launched [[Operation Warp Speed]] which helped cause Covid-19 vaccines be developed in a speedy fashion. Put that in your anti Covid-19 vaccine pipes and smoke it!
 
 
Donald Trump and [[Melania Trump]] were both vaccinated with a Covid-19 vaccine with no apparent catastrophic effects!<ref>[https://www.deseret.com/2021/4/23/22399234/former-president-donald-trump-americans-coronavirus-vaccine-obama-bush-clinton-carter Former President Donald Trump tells Americans to get the coronavirus vaccine, calls it a ‘true miracle’]</ref>
 
 
Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.<ref>[https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html#:~:text=Serious%20side%20effects%20that%20could,receiving%20a%20vaccine%20dose. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines]</ref> See also: [https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-long-term-effects/art-20490351 Long haul Covid-19 - Mayo Clinic]
 
 
For more information, please see: [https://conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Sports,_exercise_and_diet#Coronavirus_prevention.2C_info_and_treatments Coronavirus prevention, Covid-19 vaccines, treatments and general information] ]]
:Yah, Hitler was against smoking, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:10, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:(A) Donald Trump ordered a vaccine, not a genetic experiment. (B) mRNA experiments are not a vaccine. (C) The CDC changed the definition of vaccine in August 2021. (D) Dr. Anthony Fauci did not inform President Trump that [[SARS-CoV-2]] was not a naturally occurring virus and was created in a laboratory at the time of President Trump's approval of Warp Speed. (E) We still await the arrival of a vaccine, and the results of the illegal genetic experiments. However, the science has become so politicized, it's impossible to put a timeframe on expectations. Simply because Trump was deceived by the CCP, WHO, and Dr. Fauci is your weakest argument to have confidence in genetic experiments carrying the misnomer of a vaccine. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:48, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:(E) And your use of MSM & govt propaganda regarding George Washington is flawed. That was [https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/smallpox/sp_variolation.html variolation], not vaccination. Variolation is taking material {scabs} directly from an infected person and infecting another person. Your cited source uses the word inoculation; the alleged covid vaccines fail to inoculate, witness [[breakthrough case]]s. A vaccine is the actual virus itself, measured out in doses to fit a person's age and body weight. The mRNA spiked protein is invented in a laboratory and is not a synthetic reproduction of the SARS CoV-19 virus. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 07:19, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
::I think we should largely agree to disagree.

::I do know that you are incorrect about some basic facts.

::For example, vaccines commonly are not 100% effective and thus have some breakthrough cases. "Even the measles vaccine, which is incredibly effective, fails to protect about 3 percent of vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine—hailed a medical miracle—was 80 percent to 90 percent effective at preventing paralysis caused by the polio virus. Breakthrough infections of flu are even more common. While the exact effectiveness of the flu vaccine fluctuates year-to-year, it ranges between 40 percent and 60 percent."[https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/six-important-things-know-about-breakthrough-infections-180978408/]

::In addition, even in the case of breakthrough cases of coronavirus, a person's morbidity rate will be lower than if they were not inoculated against the disease.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:31, September 30, 2021 (EDT)

:::Well, we can resolve much of this by understanding what a vaccine is. Vaccines are measured doses of the virus itself to induce an immunological reaction. It should be obvious by now that covid so-called "vaccines" do no such thing. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 14:33, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
{{clear}}
=== Notes ===
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

== Uighur Genocide Article ==

:How do you propose that we start the article?[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 20:26, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

::[https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&search=%22Uyghur+genocide%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns120=1&ns121=1&ns122=1&ns123=1&ns124=1&ns125=1&ns126=1&ns127=1&profile=advanced Here's all the pages that use the term.] In the China article, we have three different subsections that touch on it, [[China#East_Turkestan_.28Xinjiang.29]], [[China#Uyghurs_and_Muslims]], and [[China#Uyghur_genocide]]. I suggest we begin with the cite in [https://conservapedia.com/China#cite_note-183 footnote 183] from the Uyghur genocide subsection for the Intro, and consolidate information from the other two subsections to eliminate redundancy.

::Also, after laying out the case for genocide in the main body, then include a second section on Forced labor and re-education, which technically may be considered a separate issue from [[genocide]], and eventually can be made into a single article as well, with information collected in a Uyghur genocide page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:51, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

::I named the article as East Turkestani genocide due to it including not just Uighurs but all Turkic peoples.[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 21:16, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

== Category move request ==

Hi RobSmith, can you please move Category:Old Guard (The South) to "Category:Old Republicans (The South)" without leaving a redirect? When I created the category, it had been a while since I read a hard cover of ''The End of Southern Exceptionalism'', and now realizing that I can just access it via Google Books and even [https://books.google.com/books?id=tiNYRu5rvVgC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=old&f=false search for key terms], I likely confused the term used in the book with something else.

Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 22:43, October 29, 2021 (EDT)

== YOU ARE A RADICAL ABORTIONIST ==

YOU DISGUST ME!!! YOU THINK ABORTION ISNT MURDER. GET A LIFE AND GO BACK TO LIBERAL WIKIPEDIA!! IM REFERING TO WHEN YOU REMOVED MY EDITS FROM PRAMILLA JAYAPAL!!! SHE MURDERED HUMAN AND YOU SUPPORT THAT DISGUSTING {{unsigned|Superbanana}}

== Conservative Of The Year 2021 ==

Hello,

It starting to get close towards the end of the year. Should Conservapedia create the Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page? Also, I think it might be interesting if Conservapedia created a RINO Of The Year.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 14:22, November 4, 2021 (EDT)
:I think there is a page already started, but I don't have a link yet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 01:44, November 5, 2021 (EDT)
::The Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page does not appear to have been made yet. Could I be given permission to make the page?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:35, November 17, 2021 (EST)
:::Sure. Please pattern it after the previous year's pages with the appropriate catgorization, etc. If another already exists and found later, we can merge it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 18:38, November 17, 2021 (EST)
::::Could you give me the power to create new pages? I cannot create new pages.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:36, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::Do you have SkipCapthca? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 19:09, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::I do not think I do.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:52, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Never mind I do have SkipCaptcha. How would I go about crating a page. I cannot figure out how to create one.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:54, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Do you know how to activate your user page? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 21:56, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::::According to your contribs, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Former_Tea_Party_Supporters_Who_Have_Become_RINOs_or_Never_Trumpers&diff=1685562&oldid=1683587 you created this page right here.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:00, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::I was able to create the page! Thank you for your help!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:24, November 18, 2021 (EST)

== Conservative is doxxing others ==

In [[Essay:_A_reply_to_some_desperate_secular_liberals/leftists_who_pulled_out_the_race_card_and_unsuccessfully_tried_to_compare_me_to_Klansmen#10_point_to_do_list_and_considerations_concerning_potential_defamation_lawsuit_or_lawsuits_2|this recent essay of his]], the fifth point in that particular subsection is publicly revealing private information about others. Can you delete the essay, since I don't have deletion powers? Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 13:37, November 7, 2021 (EST)
::Yah I saw. I initiated a private discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:04, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::Shouldn't those types of inappropriate postings simply be nuked on the spot? It doesn't matter who inserts such information, as they should not be allowed to remain on the site, period. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:07, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::Also, thanks for removing the link to the essay from MPR. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:08, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::(ec) Yes, for registered users, but an Admin should be given the opportunity to correct the error. I did remove the link from MPR to the doxxing page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::This reminds much of another unnamed former Admin: he just likes pressing buttons to nuke his enemies because he can and doesn't think before hand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
::::::Conservative has demonstrated himself to continuously make inappropriate postings and often times stubbornly refuse to admit he's wrong. He's been given enough chances. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::::They think being an Admin is just a game of Space Invaders and they can nuke their opponents by pressing a button. This is why I advocated for bureaucrat powers to teach them the proper role of an Admin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:15, November 7, 2021 (EST

== Trevor Noah ==

I think [[Trevor Noah]] is very famous liberal comedian. in article I showed his double standards for his views on police brutality in USA and South Africa. I wish you to show the article again, and thank you --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:I recreated the page. It needs to be brought up to encyclopedic standards. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 19:22, November 7, 2021 (EST)

== Please delete the two revisions left by a recent vandal ==

[[Special:Contributions/PerterKabangsLT|Please hide the content, username and edit summaries for those diffs ASAP.]] Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 21:59, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:User:Conservative is more skilled at deleting whole talk pages like that than I am. I might leave it for him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:04, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::I believe you've deleted revisions before. Don't administrator duties include the deletion of diffs left by inappropriate edits? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 22:08, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::I don't want to make the wrong deletion, and I believe he's more skilled at it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:12, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::In case you haven't yet noticed, Conservative frivolously deletes perfectly fine diffs while declining to delete inappropriate revisions most of the time. Do you actually expect him to carry out administrator duties after all the times he's abused them? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 22:15, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::Someday we'll make you boss, and you can handle all these weighty decisions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 23:30, November 18, 2021 (EST)

== Quick Question ==

Hey, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. I was wondering if you could tell me if I have the ability to apply files, such as pictures and such, to articles on here? I have tried a few times to add pictures to the pages I’ve already created. Also, how do you think I’m doing with making pages and editing? Thanks in advance and have a great [[Thanksgiving]]! -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 14:45, November 23, 2021 (EST)

:Place image upload requests here: [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]. As to editing, it looks pretty good, with the exception of uncited editorial comments such as these [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Derek_Chauvin&diff=prev&oldid=1762732][https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Derek_Chauvin&diff=prev&oldid=1773759], which make you look like a subversive Democrat trying to play the [[race card]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:28, November 23, 2021 (EST)

::Thanks, and my apologies for that. I’ve since learned that I shouldn’t submit personal opinions such as those. I hope I can put that mishap behind me so I can further contribute to Conservapedia. God Bless and Happy Thanksgiving! -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 15:48, November 23, 2021 (EST)

:::Well, that's good to hear. Cuz even if you are or were a subversive Democrat, that tired old stale stuff gets pretty insulting after a while, as if we're too stupid to see it or notice it. You need to become more sophisticated in your use of dogwhistles and subversion. Good luck. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 16:05, November 23, 2021 (EST)

== Another category move request ==

Hi RobSmith, can you please move [[:Category:Half-Breeds]] to [[:Category:Half-Breeds (Republican Party)]]? Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Friday, 14:55, November 26, 2021 (EST)

== Please don't plagiarize my work ==

Pertaining to most of the block of text you added [[Mask_mandate#Laws_for_thee_but_not_for_me|here]], it appears you outright copy/pasted it from my [[Salongate]] article. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Sunday, 16:56, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:[https://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Copyright By contributing information to Conservapedia, you irrevocably consent to the display, copying, reuse or editing of your information, edits and entries, with or without attribution. You agree to waive and indemnify this and all affiliated sponsors, editors, users, or sites from claims for liability resulting from use, by you, of the content contained herein. This is a binding legal document. By using this site you agree to be bound by it.]
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:01, November 28, 2021 (EST)
::Even if CP allows it, plagiarizing is not a good practice. I don't think readers want to see the exact same block of text in multiple articles. Can you at least re-write it in your own words? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Sunday, 17:04, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::Well, edit it then. As an Admin, you need to know these things.
:::Granted, the phrase "your information" may need to be amended, being that it may now have an ambiguous or diferent meaning (related to doxxing) that was not commonly or popularly known at the time that version of the policy was written. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:07, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::And your understanding or use of the term "plagiarizing" is incorrect, given the copyright policy, which you have agreed to, nullifies making any such claim. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:11, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::WP:OWN, or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content Ownership of content] may be helpful before you employ such language as "my Salongate article." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:17, November 28, 2021 (EST)

:::As I've said 10,000 times, being an Admin isn't about pressing buttons to nuke your enemies. It's about educating and helping users and Admins become better editors and Admins. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:21, November 28, 2021 (EST)

:::Let's take [https://conservapedia.com/File:McGowan_Harris_Clinton_Giuffre.PNG this tweet, for example, copypasted from Wikipedia] and tweeted to Kamala Harris by [[Rose McGowan]]. I wrote most of that text (which now has minor edits), but have no claim of plagiarism or ownership of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:32, November 28, 2021 (EST)

== Please check your email ==

Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Monday, 23:23, November 28, 2021 (EST)

== I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page ==

Rob, I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page

You can see the changes at: [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy]]

Also, I made some minor improvements to this page: [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] at the [https://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines#Conservapedia.27s_blocking_policy_for_editors_of_the_wiki Conservapedia's blocking policy for editors of the wiki] section.

Generally speaking, given human nature (see: [[Fall of man]]), wikis are more prone to heavy-handed blocking than to too lenient blocking. The Bible refers to the authoritarian aspect of human nature once people have power. For example, "But Jesus called them to Himself and said, 'You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.'" (Matthew 20:25-26). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:57, November 29, 2021 (EST)

== Main page right ==

As your request, I removed the main page right item. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:06, December 2, 2021 (EST)

== quick note ==

Do you reinstall Skype? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:22, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:yah, give it a try. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:24, December 12, 2021 (EST)
::It says you are not online. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:::Sign into Skype. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
::::Are you signed into Skype? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:28, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:::::I'm in as HJ. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:29, December 12, 2021 (EST)
Then call me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:31, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:It says PM is not online. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:33, December 12, 2021 (EST)

== Another Quick Question ==

Hi, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. Based on my contributions these past few months, do you think I have the qualities to be an Administrator on here one day? Hopefully soon, I can earn access to photo upload privileges so I won’t have to bug you about adding photos to the pages I create, haha. Thanks in advance and have a great Christmas. -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 19:00, December 17, 2021 (EST)
:Sorry, I have no say in that at all. Those decisions are made by the boss. It's probably been 10 years or more since a new Admin was created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:07, December 17, 2021 (EST)

== Kathy Hochul ==

Why do you add Satanists category to [[Kathy Hochul]]? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:34, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:I think the answer is in the two sentence text: "Hochul claims the coronavirus vaccine is from God and that people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ to go out and spread the vaccine." (It's obvious this racist scumbag is speaking to what the atheist left consider superstitious God-fearing and God-believing African Americans in the traditional Marxist and Satanic [[sociopath]]ic manipulation of Black voters). But you have a point; perhaps the Category should not have been created or perhaps the Category needs some discussion to keep it.

:I would argue however, if the decision is to keep the Category, this crossing-the-line of [[separation of church and state]] by an elected official to manipulate vulnerable and oppressed people certainly qualifies as Satanic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:45, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:And we know for a fact the coronavirus is not from God, it came from God-hating Satanists and idolators like Anthony Fauci and the Chinese Communist Party. If that's not proof of another Satanic lie from the pit of hell by a white Democrat, what is? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:55, December 23, 2021 (EST)

::''people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ ''
::Is Hochel, like Anthony Fauci, claiming to be God? or the Way, the Truth, and the Life? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::Attaboy. Let it all out. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 18:31, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::Let's not lose focus, the question is over creating and keeping certain categories. On a more philosophical plane however, an agnostic certainly would have a measure of deniability for engaging in Satanic activities, whereas atheists, their cohorts and supporters are more less indefensible. Go ahead, please, try justifying an atheist and Satanic position to a God-fearing African American. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:53, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::Hochel, in her own words, is belittling and mocking African Americas for believing in God and not accepting the gospel of [[Faucism]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:54, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::We have the same phenomena in the UK, where the Archbishop of Canterbury said [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yzva0Wrs8Os 'Jesus would take the vaccine'.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::::Defeating parodists by making them redundant is quite the flex, man. You wouldn't believe the amount of money Soros recently offered to try & get the band back together, but it was agreed round the table that your stuff just couldn't be topped. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 20:19, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::::Truth is like the coronavirus, its spread cannot be stopped despite the best efforts of men. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:38, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Dang. [https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/12/23/trump-appeals-supreme-court-dispute-over-jan-6-documents/8892937002/ God loves a trier, though, right?] [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 21:29, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Too bad the [[J6 panel]] is illegal. The House Resolution that created it requires 13 members and 6 appoint by Kevin McCarthy, which never happened. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:35, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:: I dont agree with her vaccine policy, but sorry that doesnt make her a Satanist or even Atheist. I would like to see reliable sources instead of personal conclusions to prove that she is Satanist. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:20, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::It's her own words. If she's not claiming to be God herself, she engaged in some sickening racist pandering. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:21, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::Wait wait wait. Is the argument now, "Sure, racism is bad, but it's not as bad as being a Satanist?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:23, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::: No I want to see reliable source prove that she is satanist. Blasphemy doesnt make her Satanist --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:41, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::::Blasphemy makes her a child of God? Racism makes here a child of God? (Blacks certainly would be interested in hearing that).

:::::Unfortunately, God doesn't really provide neutral space for agnostics. That's purely a human construct. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:46, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::::[https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/n-y-governor-kathy-hochuls-god-is-satan-preaches-at-nyc-church-and-proudly-displays-the-mark-of-the-beast/ N.Y. Governor Kathy Hochul’s “God” is Satan – Preaches at NYC Church and Proudly Displays the “Mark of the Beast”]
:::::Let's not leave it at that - let's dissect her words a little further....
{{quotebox|"I prayed a lot to God during this time.

And you know what? God did answer our prayers. '''He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers, he made them come up with a vaccine.'''

That is from God to us. And we must say, “Thank you, God. Thank you.”

And I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to to say “I’m vaccinated.”

All of you. Yes, I know '''you’re vaccinated. You’re the smart ones."'''}}
:And how does God answer all this?
:*''Pride goeth before destruction''
:*''He catcheth the crafty in their own craftiness
:*''God has chosen the foolish things of this world to confound the wise
::I could go on... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:03, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:*''I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
:*[https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Flattery 34 Bible Verses about Flattery]
:Maybe flattery works on liberals and Satanists, but to a child of God it's a red flag. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Then we have to consider the fact that she spoke these words in the midst of the congregation.... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Her pitch sounds a bit more like Pharoah calling upon Jannes and Jambres. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:Please, don't take my judgement on the matter. Let's look at some of the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXaP76musWM 2,000+ comments on her words in Youtube] (I know, I know, Youtube just hasn't gotten around to blocking them yet).
:*"God told me not to listen to false prophets. - 793 Likes
:*“Now let me tell you how God loves abortion.” Gov. Hochul. - 798 Likes
:None of this is surprising, Democrat officials have mouthing this kinda Satanic BS for decades.
:*"It's so cringe worthy when self serving politicians invoke the name of god. - 790 Likes
::*Rob's comment: No, Donald Trump is not self serving. You miss the qualifier.
:*"This is what a cult leader sounds like. - 797 Likes
:*"Unbelievable level of evil. To stand in "church" and commit blasphemy. To promote a shot that is killing people worldwide. The audacity of these people is astounding. They WILL answer to God for their sins.
:Yah, does she really listen to the voters? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:45, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Personally, when I hear someone like this talk, I can only scratch my head and say, "What the hell is wrong with people in New York to elect someone like this?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:What a way to burst onto the national scene. Does she, or any professional media consultant, think she can ever rescind this level of stupidity, ignorance, and outright insulting comments? Ever?
:Maybe this crap flies in New York, but name one, just one, New York politician between FDR & Trump who made it on the national scene? And the reason for that is, New Yorkers consider people like Hochel, AOC, Schumer, Nadler, Gillibrand, Cuomo, De Blasio etc etc etc as "leaders" and representatives of themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:: I checked the link that you share but is also its personal conclusion not reliable source. What she said speaks her foolishness lower IQ, and she made big mistake for using religion to convince people to take the vaccine. but again that doesnt make her necessarily a Satanist. a Satanist mean worshiper of Satan, is there any proof that she worship Satan, I didnt see that. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:21, December 24, 2021 (EST)-
:::No, you are dead wrong. Most servants of Satan are so deceived by the father of lies, they do not know they are serving Satan. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:35, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::There are numerous examples, both from the bible and in everyday life to verify this. For example, what could be more Satanic than an atheist, many of whom deny that the spirit world and Satan exists? That proves the level of so-called "self-deception", which really is Satanic deception. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:38, December 24, 2021 (EST)

: The Encyclopedias should rely on reliable sources, not personal conclusions. does the other administrators agree with that? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:33, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::Ask em. Personally, I can't think of a one that would defend a Satanist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:41, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::She supports abortion, doesn't she? I doubt anyone here in CP management thinks a child of God supports abortion (I could be wrong). And I doubt anyone thinks there's a grey area where one can be both. But I don't know. Anyways, it's a debate I wouldn't hesitate to engage in. You can always create a debate page on that subject, either Hochul individually or [[Debate:Can an abortion supporter also be a child of God?]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:46, December 25, 2021 (EST)

::What you need to realize here is, Hochul stepped into one big pile of doggie-doodoo with her stupid, off the cuff, Satanic remarks inside a church during a church service. And there is no way out for her other than repentance and baptism. And if it takes New York Democrats to wish Andrew Cuomo was back, so be it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:55, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:: For Abortion we can add [[:Category:Abortion Advocates]] instead of [[:Category:Satanists]]. and also if she support Abortion that doesnt make her Satanist. Satanist is big insult, We can't accuse anyone we don't like of being Satanic. and do you really think abortion supporter is Satanist?, maybe you dont many figures support abortion including the conservative ones like [[Tomi Lahren]], [[Rudy Giuliani]] and [[Margaret Thatcher]]. president Trump formerly was supporter of abortion, is he former Satanist?. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:29, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Satanism is an insult? I've never met the Satanist yet who wasn't proud of being in rebellion against God. Children of God are not afraid of the devil, they have been set free. Only sinners cower before the devil. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::: OK so does Hochul ever stated she is Satanist? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:39, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::*''They speak lies to one another; They speak with flattering lips and a double heart.'' Ps. 12:2
:::::*''with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes.'' Rm. 3:13-15
::::::I think it's obvious which side she's on. She spoke her words in church. She should have saved it for Don Lemon or NBC. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:59, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::::Now, we can break it down (for example, '' Their feet are swift to shed blood'' can be laid at the doorstep of her predecessor Andrew Cuomo and the nursing home crisis, and I don't know her involvement, but what is she doing to bring Cuomo and other conspirators to justice?) ''Their is no fear of God before their eyes'' - why did she speak such blasphemies before a the congregation in church? What interests me most is ''Whose mouth is full of cursing'' because this is a twofer related to ''flattery''; she flatters her followers with ''you are the smart ones'', while cursing the stupid unvaccinated. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 26, 2021 (EST)

:: I need reliable source to prove that she is Satanist, this is simple. if there are no source, so you should delete category from article --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:31, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Her sources are her own mouth. It's no different than Fauci claiming to be God ("I am Truth"). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::: I didnt saw any sources, I am only saw personal conclusions. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::In sending out her 'apostles', she implies the unvaccinated are in rebellion against God, i.e. Satanists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:27, December 26, 2021 (EST)

: In order to prove what you are saying, you either have to bring a source that admits that she is a Satanist from her mouth, or another source that proves that she is performing Satanic rituals
:Other than this, your words are nothing but personal conclusions and conspiracy theory and may harm the reputation of this encyclopedia. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::It's no big deal. Anyone in rebellion against God is a Satanist, which is the vast majority of people on planet earth. Only those in rebellion against God fear Satan, or think it's a big insult. It's not. Satan is who their boss is and who they serve. It is not even a case of outing a Satanist in the closet - by their works ye shall know them. Was Christ a liar when he said that? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:47, December 27, 2021 (EST)
{{quotebox|"there’s people out there who aren’t listening to God and what God wants."}}
::Now, there's people out there who aren't listening to Anthony Fauci, who claims to be God ("to attack me is to attack Truth"), and what Fauci wants. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 05:07, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:: I dont think Jesus asked you to add Satanist Category to Kathy Hochul article. again you are going too far by this stubbornness by bringing Bible verse. Bible didnt prove she is Satanist. also I dont think Jesus would like us to make assumptions to other people without reliable source even if they are our enemy. I dont like anyone to make assumption to me, I am also dont make any assumption to other people without reliable source. Assumption is a characteristic of liberals against their enemies (read [[Meena Harris]] story), but we must be better than them. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:41, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:::I'm going too far? She's the one claiming the unvaccinated don't listen to her god, Dr. Fauci. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:44, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:::Before It's News: [https://beforeitsnews.com/new-world-order/2021/10/new-york-governor-kathy-hochul-is-an-evil-satanic-witch-who-claims-to-speak-for-god-and-says-vaccines-are-a-gift-from-god-no-not-unless-it-is-the-faslse-god-lucifer-pure-blashemy-truly-dispicabl-10443.html New York Governor Kathy Hochul is an Evil Satanic Witch, Who Claims to Speak For GOD and Says Vaccines Are a Gift From GOD. No, Not Unless it is the Faslse god Lucifer. Pure Blashemy- Truly Dispicable]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:46, December 27, 2021 (EST)

== Russia is a place where one can have a good life, but they are still overcoming their past ==

Everyone once in a while, I watch a documentary. I watched this documentary: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxpEsBqliEQ Love in Russia].

Russian society is traditional in some ways, but I am sure that 70+ years of godless communism has had its effect on society.

But people with Christian values are having kids and the irreligious/nonreligious are not, so things can gradually get better. Time will tell. I think in the next 12 years or so, there will be a global recession, so that will cause a lot of problems. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:I let a homeless lady from Russia stay at my place for about 2 weeks. I learned more about Russia.

:The USA should try to have better relations with Russia. Trump tried to do this.

:By the way, I bailed out of the documentary at the 30 minute point. It dealt with the 3% of Russian society that are freaks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:25, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::So I watched the documentary all the way thru. These kids these days, wudayagonnado? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::I don't know if you're familiar with [[Pelageya]], probably one of the greatest vocalists alive today. She's sings Cossack (or Kazakh) warrior songs. This is nothing new, Russia has longtime (even in Czarist times) been a nation of widows and orphans, cause it is a warrior culture, having so many borders to defend, or absorbing so many smaller nations and tribes into it. Even Pelageya has no idea who her father is. So what the DW documentary reports really has not emerged since the collapse of USSR. The aftermath of WWII was just another time when Russia again was a nation of widows. And many of the songs Pelageya sings are about the warrior dying on the battlefield and thinking about his wife. Once you grasp these songs go back hundreds of years, you can get a great insight into Russian culture. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)

=== This is what I was referring to above ===

[[File:04656 market in Sanok.JPG|thumbnail|200px|center|[[Alcoholism]] was a serious social problem in the former atheistic [[Soviet Union]].[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18245818] Between 1940 and 1980, this [[atheist state]] had the largest increase of the amount of alcohol usage in the developed world.[http://isw.sagepub.com/content/35/4/441.extract] ]]
{{clear}}
It's too bad that Russia chose atheistic communism for so many decades. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:I have to admit, my appreciation and love of Russian society and culture has come a long way in the past 25-30 years. What went unreported in the West, it was the Church more than anything that caused the demise of Soviet Communism.
:Despite what Soviet communism did to Russian culture - and you are absolutely correct the damage was serious and longlasting - IMO a typical Russian of average intelligence, education, and maybe even with fetal alcohol syndrome, is more objective and levelheaded in their understanding of culture, society, history the issues affecting the contemporary world than 90% of our "best educated" professors in the United States.
:Bear in mind, nearly 40% of the Russian federation are Muslims - [[secular]] Muslims - and they wouldn't have it any other way. They supported Soviet Communism then, and Russian Democracy now, cause they don't want to live under [[Shariah]] law. And they have a higher birth rate than ethnic Russians. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:52, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Watch [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bnt3CIqGhk this 3 1/2 minute video.] You don't need any translation or English subtitles to understand what is going on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::a white boy is abusing his girlfriend on the streets of Moscow, and nobody reacts. The same couple do it again, only this time she wears a [[hijab]] {Islamic headscarf}, and Muslim men step up to protect her. It's not a religious thing, it's a culture phenomena in a multicultural society. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::Putin does not drink and he works out two hours a day so that is good.[https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-daily-routine-2017-6#his-work-schedule-tends-to-be-more-flexible-over-the-weekend-to-accommodate-putins-english-language-classes-on-sunday-he-sometimes-prays-and-makes-confession-23] But he is a former KGB agent and Business Insider reports: "On Sunday, he sometimes prays and makes confession... Nonetheless, Russian officials close to the president stress that "his life is not that of a Christian," according to Newsweek."[https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-daily-routine-2017-6#his-work-schedule-tends-to-be-more-flexible-over-the-weekend-to-accommodate-putins-english-language-classes-on-sunday-he-sometimes-prays-and-makes-confession-23]

:::As long as the corrupt Putin is in office, Russia will stagnate. Leadership is by example. Russia has to overcome its demographic death spiral. And the heavy drinking and Russian men cheating on their wives is causing family problems. Apparently, Putin cheated on his wife. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:15, December 24, 2021 (EST)

::::This debate has raged forever - I recall my teacher [https://books.google.com/books?id=RniDlAP7ulkC&pg=PT4&lpg=PT4&dq=prof+william+renzi&source=bl&ots=TZH9Xyh_Oz&sig=ACfU3U1w12_iNy0BaGTV9umVsry_zEQrXw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiO1pP8l_z0AhVZG80KHbrFAPQQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=prof%20william%20renzi&f=false Bill Renzi] saying many people believe Russia has to be governed by autocrats to keep it together, be it the Czars, Lenin, Stalin, or Brezhnev. It's too big and too diverse (Stalin's own son didn't speak Russian). Russia is not a single ethnicity, culture, religion or language. It is a "Union of Peoples" and has been since Czarist times.
:::::Technically, no nation has been one ethnicity/culture at all short of Balkanization, so please don't use that as a reason to justify a communist stooge like Putin (especially when even the JBS-backed New American made clear he was still communist). Even France has had multiple ethnicities in there (Alsace was a germanophone-speaking region [in fact, one of the reasons why the Jacobins planned a genocide of that region before the guillotine was used on Robespierre is precisely BECAUSE of its german-speaking population], and there's hints at Napoleon and Robespierre being ethnically Sicilian and Irish, respectively). And Great Britain is composed of four ethnicities/cultures (Irish, Scottish, Welsh, and English). And don't get me started on America which is multicultural even WITHOUT the current diversity crap being forced unto us by leftists. Germany was similar, originally being composed of multiple different countries (Bavaria, Poland, Austria, Deutsch, among others). In fact, the entire POINT of being a nation is in fact a "Union of Peoples", so it's not exclusive to Russia. And for the record, while it might be true the Tsars were autocratic, at least they believed in God and NOT Socialism or anything like that, unlike Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, or, yes, even Putin. I appreciate Russian society pre-Lenin. Post-Lenin, it is garbage, even under Putin, who refuses to go back to the Tsar. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 12:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::The 'captive nations' have been set free. The rest remain part of the federation because they want to, given the alternative of being swallowed up by Islamic or Sinic culture, or other hostile neighbors. Russia has played a role in history similar to that of the British Empire, raising up peoples all over the planet to a level above what used to be call 'barbarism'. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::If that's the case, please explain why Putin's gunning to go to war and annex various nations? If I were him and I truly thought they should remain free, I wouldn't even bother trying to prep an invasion of them. Besides, don't you think the fact that actual right-wing/conservative sources like JBS/New American and outono claiming Putin's a communist should give you pause? It's not like I'm citing Time Magazine or any left-wing rags. And for the record, if he truly cared about getting rid of Communism, he'd make sure ALL of it is destroyed, make sure the populace has nothing but disgust, regarding of ethnicity and culture, make sure to fire all the KGB priests and if necessary even line them up to a wall and shoot them, and certainly tear down Marx's statue and Lenin's tomb. That's what I would have done as an anti-Communist, make sure Communism is extinct. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:57, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::NATO provocation. You read too much CIA agitprop. NATO is supplying lethal weapons to Ukraine in the Donbass region, hence Putin and Russia are reacting. Whatever idiots in the Pentagon and CIA drum up this senseless bs need to be chastised forthwith. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 16:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::Ah, first of all, JBS has been [https://thenewamerican.com/fire-brennan-or-abolish-the-cia/ highly critical] [https://thenewamerican.com/is-it-time-to-shut-down-the-cia/ of the CIA], so it's not like they'd be pushing for the CIA's propaganda anyhow. Second of all, Putin was also funding the very same groups that George Soros is funding going by [https://www.outono.net/elentir/2017/11/22/neither-with-soros-nor-with-putin-the-russian-interference-in-catalonia-and-the-spanish-right/ this article] here as well as [https://www.outono.net/elentir/2020/03/05/the-george-soros-of-moscow-vladimir-putin-and-his-support-to-the-radical-left-of-the-west/ this article] (and it's very obvious that they're not CIA either. Actually, while commentating on the state of other countries, they are primarily concerned with Spain first, and they spare no criticism of socialism in their own country, being as merciless in their criticisms of Spanish Socialists as they are of Putin, of Cuba, and of any socialist/Communist nation. And just as an FYI, they've been VERY critical of the EU as well, especially it's soft treatment of socialists. If anything, outono's been far more consistent in being anti-socialist than Putin EVER was.). Third of all, Putin as of now is ALLYING with China, meaning they're not even enemies at all, or rivals. You're making the same mistake that people in the 1930s did with Stalin and Hitler before their Molotov-Ribbentropp act. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 17:10, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::I haven't read any of the JBS stuff on Putin, and if it's anything like how you characterize it, they are wrong, assuming you are characterizing is correctly. Russia harbors no aggressive intentions against anybody outside its borders. Russia, as always, is preoccupied with defending its immense borders (and possible hostile actors within its borders). As to Ukraine, if it thinks it's going to convert Sevastopol into a NATO naval base, think again. As Dana Carvey would say, ''Naga doit''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:06, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::It's EXACTLY what they're saying. And BTW, it's not just JBS, it's plenty of other conservative sources as well. And BTW, did you know that Putin literally FUNNELED the Steele Dossier as well, aka the whole Russian Collusion thing? Don't take it from me, read it from Daniel Greenfield on Front Page Magazine: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ And don't forget outono, they're critical of Putin, the EU, all the socialist actors around the world. Actually, with the information FPM provided among others, if you support Putin, you support the Russian Dossier. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 18:19, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::Putin handed the Steele dossier to [[Peter Strzok]] and said, "Here, do something with it"? No, don't think so. That was the Hillary-Brennan-Comey-McCabe pipeline. Now, if you wanna discuss who handed it to the NYT, WaPo, ''etal'', you're not going to find Putin there, either. The pipeline goes Hillary-[[Jake Sullivan]]-[[Isikoff]] etal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:26, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::He used a cutout. Of course Putin wouldn't directly order for or hand over those things, he's not stupid. Even Lenin avoided directly signing the death warrants that the Chekha carried out despite obviously encouraging it behind the scenes. Heck, if anything, Putin PAID those guys to spread that disinformation via Vincent Roberti and [https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/05/lobbying-push-russian-pipeline/ Putin's] Gazprom lobbying group. Me? I'd fight against China AND Russia, heck, fight against any Communist country, even risk rendering the world to cinders just to ensure Communism's dead and God's iron fist is controlling the world alongside his son Jesus Christ. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 18:33, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::I gitit I gitit. Hillary was just a stooge as was the whole corrupt Democrat machine and MSM. There were victimized by one of Putin's evil plots to take over the world. That, of course is why we have to put back these idiots and maintain them in power, to defend against the evil Putin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::I never said the Democrats or Hillary were victims of Putin. Actually, if anything, I'd argue they're ALLIES, aka, collaborators with Putin, not victims of any sort. And for the record, I don't support the Democrats, at all. Especially not the ones who pushed the dossier. If anything, the fact that the same guys who pushed the Russia Collusion narrative to oust Trump are getting paid by Putin proves that, no, if anything, THEY'RE the ones colluding with Putin. If ANYONE was a victim of Putin, it's Trump. And quite frankly, you're acting more like Lyn Wood when he ordered for people to not vote during the period between the election and Biden's "inauguration", which apparently resulted in those crypto-commies Jon Ossoff and Warnock being elected into office (that, and voter fraud). And for the record, Obama was allied with Putin even back then, as you can see [https://thenewamerican.com/putin-bombs-obama-s-syrian-rebels-obama-joins-putin-alliance/ here]. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:29, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::Congrats. It's only December 2021, and you figured out the Trump-Russia hoax is a hoax. I had it figured by December 2016, and provided the corroborating evidence by March 2017, two months before Comey got fired and Mueller was called in to coverup the scandal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:34, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::::I already figured it out even earlier, like during March 2016. I knew Trump would never have colluded with Russia at all, that it was a hoax. Heck, despite my being autistic/aspergers with humor not being one of my strongest suits, even I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office. And the reason I knew that, is because Putin made no secret to wanting to restore Communism in Russia (I've already seen photos years back of Putin giving speeches in front of Soviet paraphanelia on Breitbart, BEFORE the 2016 election I should add, and posts on freerepublic making clear that he was pushing for a revitalization of Stalin). My mom also recognized that Trump couldn't have colluded with Putin either, even pointing out that Putin would have known what he was going to get regarding a good deal via Hillary Clinton and her Uranium deal. The only difference between you and me regarding the Trump-Russia Hoax is that I was firmly aware of Russia under Putin STILL being communist, while you are naively believing that they've given up on Communism despite even KGB defectors making it clear that they still hold on to Communism. And BTW, I pegged Russia as still being Communist as early as 2012 when I briefly saw in ''Dreams of my Father'' Karl Marx's statue being in Moscow, something that, had they genuinely given up on it, they would have torn it down like they did various Lenin and Stalin statues. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:40, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::You're betraying yourself with the above posting. Let me count the ways. (a) "Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office." Trump never said or implied any such thing. You are repeating Democrat commie agitprop (meaning you do not understand anything about the issue). (b) Putin had no involvement in any way, shape, or form in the origins of the dossier. (c) The Trump-Russia hoax at no point ever was a foreign policy issue. It was purely, from origin and inception, domestic politic corruption. (d) You continue to imply that Vladimir Putin, and/or Communism, has something, anything, to do with Trump-Russia You are in fact mouthing DNC talking points at this point. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:51, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::At this point, based on your posting above, I don't think you know or understand anything about what the scandal or crime was in the Trump-Russia hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::Trump-Russia has absolutely nothing to do with Russia. It was a hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::The origins of Trump-Russia can be traced back to (a) the long delays in investigating Hillary's emails; (b) the fact that James Comey, and not Loretta Lynch, held a press conference clearing Hillary. This should have raised eyebrows everywhere. (c) The Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting. These were all the clues in open source MSM that something was seriously wrong with the Obama [[DOJ]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::::That's actually what I was referring to. The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. [https://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/07/25/trump-taunts-claims-that-russia-hacked-dnc-emails-for-him-the-new-joke-in-town Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them] (and the Blaze, the source of that, was on Trump's side, not the dossier's side. Same goes for [https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/donald-trump-russian-network-vladimir-putin/2016/09/08/id/747391/ Newsmax], which the democrat agitprop hates as well.). My dad watched the broadcast, BTW, and he recognized it as a joke. As far as the Trump-Russia collusion Hoax, let me remind you that Daniel Greenfield, in the link I provided to you above, specifically pointed out that ALL of the Democrats who claimed Trump engaged in collusion, ended up paid by Putin and his shell corporation, meaning they if ANYTHING were the ones colluding with Putin, and more importantly, that Putin was pushing the collusion hoax as well. And yes, ultimately, it DOES have to do with Russia as well. And BTW, if I were you, I'd dedicate full hatred to both China AND Russia, not to mention Cuba, Vietnam, Venezuela, and the like, any and all Communist countries, dedicate every waking hour to wiping out Communism across the globe, and replacing it with the governments they had prior to Communism's take over, bare minimum (in Russia's case, reinstitute the Tsar). I would NEVER side with a Communist, period. I'd fight ALL of them, even down to the last breath if I must, as God demands that I and others do, fight to the bitter end, not care if it results in our extinction as a result. God wants Communism dead above all else, to ensure his rule is NEVER challenged at all. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 20:20, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::::::::It was an inside job or "hack" in May 2016. In August, Trump jokingly invited Russia to clear their name from the false accusations that "Russia hacked the DNC", or that "WikiLeaks is a KGB front." (You still seem to think Russia had something to do with the "DNC hack". I suppose you think Julian Assange is a KGB agent, too).
:::::::::::::::::::::[[Michael Sussmann]], who was just indicted by John Durham, is the guy who initiated the DNC hack hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:::::::::::::::::::::Let's clarify the misleading narrative you began here: Trump's comments to "Russia" had nothing to do with '''[https://conservapedia.com/CrowdStrike#DNC_hack_hoax Sussmann's DNC hack hoax]''' - Trump was talking about recovering Hillary's emails, which Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and Lynch never prosecuted for destruction of U.S. government documents and mishandling of national security information. Be careful where you are going with DNC BS. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::::::I never said anything about Russia having anything to do with the DNC hack at all. If anything, I specifically indicated that Donald Trump was joking on that front, in other words, that he trolled the MSM and Russia WASN'T responsible for the hack. But Russia DEFINTIELY had something to do with the Dossier, especially when all the principal actors of that dossier, from Pelosi to Schumer, conveniently got paid by one of Putin's shell corporations around the time of the pipeline thing, as Daniel Greenfield pointed out in that article. Also, Wikileaks is obviously not a KGB front (the KGB died with the Soviet Union), and aside from that, Julian Assange isn't even on the Russian payroll, but he is definitely a Marxist-Leninist. I WILL admit I probably mixed up the two events. My mistake on that front. But Putin being Communist has been backed up by Conservative/right wing sources who also have spent quite a few times condemning various communist deep state groups as well, including Ion Mihai Pacepa. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:::::::::::::::::::::::*''I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office.''
:::::::::::::::::::::::*''The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them
:::::::::::::::::::::::Do you even pay attention to what you post, or do you just like trolling me? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:47, December 24, 2021 (EST)

::::And they certainly have [https://youtu.be/cMFIWBQB1kE a better national anthem than then we do - including the lyrics (click CC).] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 05:22, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::I think it is mostly due to Eastern Orthodox Christianity being more hierarchal than Protestant Christianity. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:46, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::Except for the 70 year captivity in the Soviet era, Russia never had a separation of church and state in its 1,000 year history. And still doesn't. Even in Soviet times the people (''narodny'') never accepted separation of church and state. What is odd, how Muslims are content to live under the Russian Orthodox rather than under Shariah theocracy. The Jews OTOH, have had big problems with it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)

===Greenfield article===
While the [https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ Greenfield article certainly is interesting] and worthy of coverage in its own right, it adds nothing to our knowledge of the internal conspirators and law breakers involved in the [[Russia collusion hoax]]. These all are merely Democrat elected officials who spewed ''[[WaPo]]'' bullcrap. And the point of the article is, that while they were lying and deceiving the American electorate, they were also taking money from Russians. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Watch this video. It is very informative ==

Watch this video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTf4JYfMuoI Bad News: How Woke Media Undermines Democracy]

It is very informative. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Watched most of it last night. Will finish up today or tomorrow. How did they hold a symposium on this at Berkley without leftist Stormtroopers not burning the building down? Is it possible in 2021 for scholarship, discussion, and debate to still occur at leftist institutions? Makes me somewhat suspicious. She says, 'eight million people who voted for Obama also voted for Trump, so the idea Trump supporters are all racists is bs.' Better late than never. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:54, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::Here is another excellent video on the book with multiple people giving their perspectives: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKD7e5WoF_8 How woke media undermines democracy: A book event with Batya Ungar-Sargon].

::The videos confirmed what I thought all along which is the "golden rule". Namely, he who holds the gold rules. The left-leaning media caters to wealthy people on the left side of the spectrum because that maximizes advertising revenue. And the right-leaning media caters the wealthy right leaning wealthy people because that maximizes their advertising revenue. In addition, it is engagement that drives up revenue online so news stories are crafted to push people's buttons (like cause moral outrage). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::If it bleeds, it leads, as they say in the newspaper industry. People don't want stories about a newborn liter of puppies on the front page. In sales we say 'fear sells'. In fact, that is the secret of sales - the message is always negative. The two motivating factors to get people to part with their money is fear and greed. Fear that you may miss out on a deal or that your house will burn down with everybody in it ''if you don't buy'', and greed - 'wouldn't you like to be the first one on your block to have one?'
:::So that's how you capture people's attention - fear and greed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::This explains the incessant [[race card]], Dems have to scare the daylights out Blacks to keep them motivated to keep them voting. "The Klan is going to burn a cross on your yard!" Repubs have to recognize how powerful and effective this latent internal fear in Blacks is. So "racism", "white supremacy", "white privilege", "systemic racism" become buzzwords and phrases tossed around to great effect. Ignoring the impact it has, and why these are used, is not helpful, and can even fuel more of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::The point of the book/video is that white, liberal elites care more about racism than blacks/Latinos and have hyper concern about racism because it makes them feel morally superior. And that hyper anti-racism causes radical policies like defund the police which actually hurts blacks/Latinos. And that this hyper anti-racism is partly fueled by the media whose journalists/interns come from Ivy League schools where hyper, anti-racism is also fueled.

::::Meanwhile, these white, liberal elites want open borders which drive down wages for Anerican Blacks/Latinos and working class whites. And they fight school choice (which blacks/Latinos want) which would give Black/Latinos and working class whites better educations. And these same white, liberal elites pushed policies that shipped blue-collar jobs overseas which hurt working class Black/Latinos and working class whites. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::::It's a ''[[quid pro quo]]:'' white liberals in politics and media spread alarm and fear among Blacks with, "boogeyman is gonna getcha," for which they hope to be rewarded with votes.
:::::In 2020, the Democrats already knew the "cry wolf" effect is diminishing: and [https://conservapedia.com/images/e/e6/Support_for_Democratic_Candidates%2C_2012-2020.PNG in fact provides us with evidence of voter fraud.] While the percentage of Blacks voting Democrat continues to slip, all the fraud and ballot box stuffing occurred predominantly in black precincts. It's pathological: Democrats would have to cheat in black precincts with or without covid and mail-in ballots, if they hoped to win with declining numbers of blacks voting Democrat. Fortunately for them, they had enough of experienced ballot box stuffing teams in place already, and even were able to train new participants in how to do it in such a massive effort. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:23, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022 ==

Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022.[https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999]

Compete.com was retired previously.

It looks like Similarweb.com will be the only free major ranking of a website's traffic.

Similarweb.com is more reliable than Alexa, but it is updated less frequently. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:This means two things: (a) Amazon (and Bezos), which owns Alexa, will move it resources into another area to attack and try to destroy conservative websites: and (b) numerous startups (both black hat and white hat) will step up to try to fill the gap left by Alexa. So we'll have to go through a period of screening new startups beginning now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

::In January/February, I will have access to a SEMRush.com subscription which ranks websites by web traffic. The public can see the rankings for the top 100 websites ranked by SEMRush.[https://www.semrush.com/blog/most-visited-websites/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:24, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Actually, the fact that Compete.com and Alexa.com disappeared/disappearing means there is not a lot of money in providing free rankings so the gap might not be filled. But there is not a gap since SimilarWeb.com still exists. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Alexa's pretty big; they have to wait til March to fill out contracts for service that exist. They likely will take many of their clients with them into a new subscription service (under whatever name). Similarweb and SEMRush will pick up a lot. But the global market is sooo big, there will be a rush by small startups. It will not be unlike all the smaller competitors Twitter and YouTube have. And they'll offer free service to attract new customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:37, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Alexa is so big, it feels it has gathered enough knowledge about how the business works (and have gathered the best customers) they can squash any competitors and starts ups. But one or two small startups will survive in the long run.
::::Also, Alexa feels the market has reached a saturation point to where the prospects for future growth do not require them to offer free service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Anyways, this explains why their free ranking service has gone haywire over the past 9 months - they didn't want any new customers. It would only require them to hire more expert help to take on piddly-squat customers. Now they can concentrate their best employees on their best customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Actually, Alexa.com had a free service plus with a subscription, you could get more data. Both are disappearing in 2022.

Anyways, I have access to multiple tools that show a website's relative strength compared to other websites.

For example, here is some information from Ahrefs.com about Conservapedia:

[[File:Conservapedia linking websites.JPG|thumbnail|center|700px|Amount of domains linking to Conservapedia according to Ahrefs.com]].
{{Clear}}
The domain strength reflects both the quality/quantity of domains linking to Conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:No way is Alexa giving up the money from its subscription service. It is simply changing its name. If that were not true, the market to fill in the gap would be even more wide open. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::"Existing subscriptions will remain active until May 1, 2022 UTC. After that, customers will no longer have access to Alexa.com."[https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999]

::In May of 2022, Alexa will end as a subscription service. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:11, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::Yes, the name Alexa. It's no different than when the [[NKVD]] changed its name to the [[KGB]], or [[ACORN]] changed its name to dozens of other names in different states. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::There is no way they will walk away from the revenue stream they built over 25 years. And even if they did, the people they fired will start up a new business and reclaim the lost customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::They will walk away from a revenue if the [[opportunity cost]] warrants it. It comes down to return on investment (ROI). If a higher ROI can be had elsewhere, Alexa's subscribers will be abandoned. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:43, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::Amazon purchased the company for $250 millilon in 1996; it made $6 million last year. So yah, it looks like a loser. So they shut it down and write off the losses (which go against income of Amazon). But nobody walks away from the $6 million revenue stream they built up, and the knowledge of the industry they created (at such a cost). So it gets reorganized. Some employees get transferred, others go off and create a new company with their knowledge base and existing client list. Now, the relationship of the new company to Amazon is different question; Bezos may be just a stockholder in the new company - apart from Amazon (or other executives buy stock or make loans to their former employees).
:::::Bottomline, if it is not an opportunity for the existing hands-on employees with knowledge and the client list, it is an opportunity for others to gross $6 million a year. The demand from the existing clients will not disappear with Alexa. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Can you please check your email? ==

Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Monday, 22:20, December 26, 2021 (EST)

== Hi Rob. This is Nishant Xavier ==

Hi Rob. How are you? This is Nishant. I'm back now and am in the process of writing a Book on how we can distribute Crores (10s of Millions) of Bibles to the Masses in India. I want to complete the Conservapedia Bible Project Translation. I like it: https://conservapedia.com/Matthew_1-9_(Translated) But I have a question. Why is "He" and "His" etc not Capitalized when referring to Lord Jesus Christ? It should be imho, as He is King of Kings. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]][[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]] 17:07, February 1, 2022 (EST)
:Welcome back. Good to hear from you. I know User:Liberaltears was anxious to talk with you about a few things. As to the CBP, I'm not certain what the answer is cause I've not been involved in the Project. However, my guess would be that some editors deem capitalizing "He" as somewhat archaic, although I can't say for sure. Anyways, welcome back. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:17, February 1, 2022 (EST)

== Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts ==

Uh, do you not want any rebuttals against the arguments used to disprove its existence? - [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-8-22
:Huh, what? you mean Marxists claim it doesn't exist? Figures. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:03, February 8, 2022 (EST)

Can’t imagine why that would be the case. In any event, it would probably be useful to display the arguments used to claim it’s a conspiracy theory before said arguments are picked apart by the facts. Do you agree? - [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-8-22

== Please check your email ==

Please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:43, February 13, 2022 (EST)
:Check your email again. I responded. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:12, February 13, 2022 (EST)
::Check your email again. I responded another time. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:24, February 13, 2022 (EST)

== Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts Pt 2 ==

Rob, I thought we had an understanding. What are you doing? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21
:Understanding on what? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:FYI, if you think you're going to hijack the Cultural Marxism page so proponents of Cultural Marxism can call their critics 'anti-Semites', think again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:21, February 14, 2022 (EST)

What do you mean ‘hijacked’? The criticism section is being expanded so that it can refute accusations of anti-semitism. How on earth do you end up misinterpreting all this? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21

:Where are the accusations coming from? Are they from a reputable or reliable source other than an extremist source? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:39, February 14, 2022 (EST)

The accusations are literally on wikipedia and any other leftist outlet trying to call it a myth. Are you seriously unaware of this? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21

:No, it's to be expected. As Wikipedia says, 'an extremist source can only be used about itself.' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:15, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:The purpose of our Cultural Marxism page is to describe what it is, not rehash debates and talking points among Marxists to being exposed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:18, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:Why would you consider what Marxists say about Cultural Marxism as credible? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:The situation is no different than Marxist school boards that claim [[Critical Race Theory]] doesn't exist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:28, February 14, 2022 (EST)

If you don’t want the marxist talking points to be shown and debunked then why do you even bother to have a criticism page pointing out why they think it’s fake? And why are you assuming that I think what they say is credible? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21
:(a) good question. It needs proofreading. (b) why do you insist on inserting Marxist propaganda? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:47, February 14, 2022 (EST)

Well while you’re ‘proofreading’ arguments literally made to refute marxist propaganda, do you mind not rushing to assumptions and actually realize that Im trying to help the article? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]]

== Image uploading ==
Hello RobSmith! Could you help in uploading [[Conservapedia:Image_upload_requests#Echmiatsin.2C_Armenian_Apostolic_Church_and_Michael_Patrick_Mulroy|these two photos]]? For about two months no one answered me. I will be grateful for your help! [[User:Garik Avakian|Sincerely, Garik Avakian]] ([[User talk:Garik Avakian|talk]]) 02:58, February 28, 2022 (EST)
:Okay, give me few minutes. Sorry for the delay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:09, February 28, 2022 (EST)
:;Okay, they are in the [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Upload log]. Sorry for the long delay. I never did get the message from David. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:20, February 28, 2022 (EST)
::: Thank you very much for your help! [[User:Garik Avakian|Sincerely, Garik Avakian]] ([[User talk:Garik Avakian|talk]]) 13:19, March 1, 2022 (EST)

== Ukraine and the Wuhan Lab ==
Hey, RobSmith.

I noticed that you recently added a section on the alleged bioweapon labs to the [[Ukraine]] article. With that in mind, I’m interested in knowing if your perspective on the Wuhan lab has changed. I’ve always been suspicious that it was actually our own government who released the virus and that China was framed, while you have always maintained that China was indeed the culprit. Again, has your perspective on the Wuhan lab changed?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:34, March 1, 2022 (EST)
:No, not unless someone could show evidence of political collusion in addition scientific and commercial.

:And of course you have the question of motive. Now, motives in the CCP and the US public and private commercial interest may be easy to theorize, the problem gets down to ''who'' however, in addition to evidence. So you're left with just a theory, and a pretty well unfounded one, at that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:51, March 1, 2022 (EST)

:In the case of the CCP, the political motivations are transparent: the Trump tariffs were about to take effect, the international organ harvesting Study was about to made public, and Trump stood a good chance of being re-elected.

:In the case of Fauci, despite his promise to get rid of Trump on January 11, 2017 with a pandemic, when news came of the "leak", his first reaction was "oh goodie, more money for Pfizer". Then he got an email saying "but your fingerprints are all over it." So one would have to prove a larger political agenda between the [[Deep State]] and the CCP to deliberately exterminate millions of people and shrink the global economy. Difficult task, but not impossible, that maybe your children or grandchild may one day wish to tackle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:04, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::incidentally, they are not "alleged bioweapon labs" in Ukraine, they are bio weapon labs owned and operated by the DoD. The cover story is they are disposing of Soviet-era bio weapons, but we have strong evidence of ongoing research. It'll be interesting watch them being handed over to Russian forces, and what kinda English language documents the Russians will make public. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:13, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::Now in the [[North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization#History]], they got the [[marginal cost]] of killing people down to 29 cents per head with a deadly strain of Yellow fever distributed through mosquitos, but nukes remain your best bet with a marginal cost of 10-12 cents per head, last I heard (these estimates would have to be revised to include the cost of storage and maintenance of a nuke over 30 years or whatever timeframe). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:28, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::If Trump is to be criticized for anything, it's that he didn't listen to Pompeo or whoever who warned him, "they could release a bioweapon and cause a global pandemic before they ever pay a dime in tariffs, and you could be voted out." Somebody had to tell Trump that, but he dismissed as "they're just bluffing." Kinda like NATO idiots who think Putin is bluffing as they try to stir up nuclear war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:44, March 1, 2022 (EST)
==Harris==
Hi. Here is her embarrassing reaction to an important question.
[https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1501907918261788673]
Image [https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/03/harris-poland-presser-03.jpg][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Harris_in_Poland.PNG Got it.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 12:05, March 10, 2022 (EST)::Thanks. Photo credit seems to be NYPost.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
::In the 1990s, when Sen. Moynihan was still alive, we used to talk about "the dumbing down of America." With Harris (and AOC) we've come full circle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:26, March 10, 2022 (EST)

==Frank James==

NY Subway attacker (Apr.12.22) Frank James AKA Frank Whitaker - [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQLpkupWYAMWjw2?format=jpg image]
[https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1514029565622075405 source].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Frank_Whitaker.jpg Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:34, April 13, 2022 (EDT)

==Re Mosque and Gaza==

These are pics from Apr 15 and Apr 16 about the rioters' rocks at the Al Aqsa Mosque, ready to throw at police and at Jewish worshippers.
[https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQiRnyrXwAEZ5Sb?format=jpg 1] , [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQYN6lNWQAAVcq4?format=jpg 2].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload They're in the Upload Log]. The rioters wearing shoes I found extremely interesting. Of course, our readers need more context about how disrespectful that is, and how it shows preplanning and intent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:46, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
::Indeed I inserted, that according to their own laws...etc.
[https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjY-4WFG0yPOkiCpSEuEfEJtUvxZa64JVofeSjhVmagNV9RE89u8e_5XtwPP5CkGORdpE2h2wQt4V5rQ5dqR91aII1lu9DbS0MmPfGYbFtQCd1zgWJXTpKnWBjvpNPsTjVoYHHOPQKATnV2vnO8jWtkoz7ljFQ7deHi5XlHq6dgKUOZgEWdPQ8/w329-h419/stockpile%20rocks.jpg See the pile of rocks at their mosque], [https://www.israelhayom.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cartoon-4.jpg cartoon, how they use Al Aqsa].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:16, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:Looks like they were preparing to commemorate George Floyd. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:You need these uploaded? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:15, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
::yes, they called all 2020 rioters like in OR/WA as "protesters" of course. When you're able, have the time, please upload.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:52, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:::Ok, [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload got em]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:18, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

==PIJ==
This [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQTAfjkXoAoS-HX?format=jpg] belonged to ''Sha's Kamamji'', of [[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]] before he was eliminated in Jenin when he opened fire.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:51, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Sha's_Kamamji.jpg Got it]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
::Cheers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

==Burning their own mosque==
Hi. Can you get a screenshit from within [https://twitter.com/LiorHaiat/status/1516699900779577351 this clip] and upload it? This is today, when "Palestinian" Islamists throw Molotov cocktail ontebted against police and fall inside their holy" compound.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload How's this?] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 11:37, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

== Bytemsbu is wrong ==

You are tight. Bytemsbu is wrong, like on so many edits. It seems he has an anti Jewish agenda problem. Using "neo con" cover.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])
==NYT==
Good morning. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDcugJzXMAE0XYR?format=jpg This one] was hired in Feb 2022. Please upload, when can. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:02, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Abdulrahim.jpg Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:33, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

== I see you are still here. ==

What is going on with the war and stuff? --[[User:Yeschayi|Yeschayi]] ([[User talk:Yeschayi|talk]]) 14:21, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
:Having failed to get Poland to start WWIII, NATO apparently has convinced Romania to do it with an attack on ethnic Russians in Transnistria and oil shipments by rail. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 14:48, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
::I see. --[[User:Yeschayi|Yeschayi]] ([[User talk:Yeschayi|talk]]) 17:06, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

You claim to be a bastion of free speech but in Russia people can be sentenced for to 15 years in prison for peacefully protesting against the war, indeed even calling the invasion of Ukraine a war can land you in prison. How is that in anyway free speech? You also claim to be pro life but hundreds of children and thousands of other innocent victims have been killed, even murdered in The Ukraine, or were they all Nazis? I think it is far more simple than that. Putin helped Trump and Zelensky refused to too. You love Trump and hate Biden so all your morals go out of the window which means they were false morals to begin with.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:05, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
:Thanks for that. Should I add you to the pro-Nazi column? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:09, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
::How is condemning murder and restrictions of free speech pro Nazi? Those are against everything the Nazi's were about. You calling me pro Nazi is like calling User:Conservative pro atheism. How about the you address the murder/free speech/false moral issues I bought up rather then ask a sarcastic not even wrong question?--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:38, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
:::Good question: How is condemning US complicity in the murder of Donbas civilians and children since 2014 and the [[Ministry of Truth]] pro Nazi? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:53, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
::::I have not once shown any support of what you claim while you have again and again supported the murder of Ukrainians.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 14:18, May 10, 2022 (EDT)

User talk:RobSmith

2022-05-10T18:18:44Z

Chewy Suarez:

*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13]]

==Dec 2021==

I've been trying to figure out how to work this one in, combining the Rittenhouse verdict and [[Fredogate]] with the subject of self-defense: [https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/11/27/says-the-guy-who-threatens-to-beat-people-up-a-lot-chris-cuomo-is-unhappy-with-self-defense-definition-1168453/ ‘Says the guy who threatens to beat people up;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:53, December 1, 2021 (EST)
:Will look into it. I have to say that Cuomo wasn't that far lefty before 2016.| Good morning. Please caution on first image, not on an empty stomach.
[https://www.news1.co.il/uploadimages/NEWS1-13-413784205913544.jpg (Oct/2000)]
[https://img.mako.co.il/2015/10/13/17029_C.jpg wild mob]
[https://www.makorrishon.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/WhatsApp-Image-2021-12-02-at-08.50.18.jpeg Hamas cartoon condemning PA for rescuing the 2 Jews Dec-1-2021][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:14, December 2, 2021 (EST)
::Real "victims" Smollet & Brooks LOL-
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollett-real-victim-attack-chicago-lawyer-argues | https://www.foxnews.com/us/waukesha-parade-suspect-darrell-brooks-jail-dehumanized-demonized-interview [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

:Looks like a developing, long-running storyline and narrative. Brooks apparently is the next Michael Brown of Ferguson fame. Brooks apparently was trying to surrender to the police (who were incompetently protecting minority citizens from a neighboring city) while fleeing a knife fight when his car accidentally lost control and killed six people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:32, December 2, 2021 (EST)
::Is woke-ism till in the "works" in "improving" this theory? [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::Oh yes, definitely. These poor oppressed individuals Smollett & Brooks, in their desperate actions to fight for social justice, now face the white man's justice. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:13, December 2, 2021 (EST)

::::2 recent...[https://b7net.co.il/dyncontent/2021/11/29/ba4ffd78-e16a-4150-bb28-bd7ddf8e2a5b.jpeg Nov-29-21] |[https://ynet-images1.yit.co.il/picserver5/crop_images/2021/11/29/BJgxmexfFK/BJgxmexfFK_258_173_717_404_0_large.jpg Nov-28-21][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Done]. Sorry for the delay. I'm up to my ears in research on [[Faucism]] right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 22:26, December 4, 2021 (EST)
:::::I got the lynching one, too. Also, my Skype account crashed and I haven't reloaded it yet, so I'm back on Slack for instant messaging. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:28, December 4, 2021 (EST)

::::::I'm on there only once in a while. I hope you succeed with Skype etc.. This 2019 is classic, as both messages are on packages... Jihad and swastika...[https://www.0404.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/חבילות-חשד-למטען-כביש-חוצה-יהודה1-e1564340789639.jpg July/2019, Islamic Jihad w/ swastika in Judea][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:26, December 5, 2021 (EST)

:::::::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Jihad_and_swastika.jpg Got it]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:35, December 5, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Seen latest on Chris Cuomo?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::::::It'll be interesting to see where he lands. Maybe as Antfa's press spokesman. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:24, December 5, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::This [https://t.co/uGLJtHvlfg Chris Cuomo’s entire career was worth it for this one moment ] is epic.|Another topic, look at this woke Dem useful idiot fooled [https://nypost.com/2021/12/04/woke-new-jersey-dem-fooled-by-fake-rabbis-parody-twitter-account/] the joke of the year.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::::::::Dunno whether to laugh or cry. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 10:11, December 7, 2021 (EST)

===Image===
[https://images1.ynet.co.il/PicServer5/2017/03/30/7685990/76859850100082640360no.jpg Himmler to Mufti 1 (1943)]|[https://images1.ynet.co.il//PicServer5/2017/03/30/7685998/76859870100079640360no.jpg Himmler to Mufti 2 (1943)]|[https://images.jpost.com/image/upload/f_auto,fl_lossy/t_JM_ArticleMainImageFaceDetect/469952 Mufti's Muslim-SS Handschar]|[https://64.media.tumblr.com/6db777f1acef5f25b9aae589731ea5b9/tumblr_pridnjoCTJ1r29p1do1_1280.jpg lying Rashida1]|[https://i.imgur.com/pcM7XRJ.png L.R.2], when you get a chance.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload All caught up now.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 10:29, December 7, 2021 (EST)
::Thanks. Appreciated, especially that you're so busy. Can you grab a screenshot of this [https://books.google.com/books?id=X74zAQAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Shukairy+%22Our+common+target%22]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Survey_of_China_Mainland_Press,_Issues_3406-3428,_1965,_p_35.PNG Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:20, December 8, 2021 (EST)
::::HI. I couldn't stop laughing. This is awesome https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1473079182980788226 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, December 20, 2021 (EST)
:::::It's like Andrew Klavan said, we have to laugh our way through the fall of the republic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:13, December 20, 2021 (EST)
::::::Yup. For now. Till with the Grace of God it will all be improved.~~•
:::::::And God acts through people. This we have to realize and keep in mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 22:51, December 20, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Sure. Stay safe this holiday season. G'night.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

__

Hi. This one is shameful...[https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1473435061768929281/photo/1 Kimberlynn]
Happy New Year![[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:18, December 27, 2021 (EST)
:Yah, I saw this story, and it was so unbelievable, I wasn't sure which article it could be included in. This looks almost like cult behavior. [ https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski.PNG] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::You're right. Can you grab a screenshot where her name appears at WATKINS section? [https://www.capitolhillclusterschool.org/lsat][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski_LSAT.PNG How's this?] I can crop it down to just the bottom half, if you want. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:13, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::::As always, you're doing great. | I made the distinction between WW2 era and today at ''antifa''. I hope it's clear. As today it's a clear '''oxymoron'''. They always hide their twisted ideas under perceived nice "benign" titles.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::Yah, that Antifa article is pretty good as is, but it could use some reorganization, clarity, and updating. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:04, December 27, 2021 (EST)
:::::Basically, it's too cramped. It needs some expansion. The original authors wrote it as if it was the final word on the subject, but much information and interest has developed since then. Perhaps dividing into eras, like pre-WWII, East German, evolution and change, late 20th century, Trump era, Biden era, etc.

___

Hi. When you get a chance:
[https://www.brooklynpaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/00E83409-D7DC-4478-9033-E9C36ED9AB0A-1200x675.png June 27, 2021. Little Palestine, Bay Ridge]| [https://2nqf1a2pxrmv1i0jyy3lbz8e-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ScreenShot2020-12-22at4_55_07PM_644fad5187eac0ced9a0031c5b9a2d60_2000-298x300.jpg Swastika on Park Slope school, Dec 13, 2020]| [https://newyork.cbslocal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/14578484/2021/12/3523-21-68-Pct.-HCTF-12-26-21-Photo-1.jpg?w=1068 Hate crime, little Palestine, Bay Ridge, Dec 28, 2021]. Regards.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==Lie of the year==
Can someone create a graphic per this:

[https://freebeacon.com/?p=1551060 LIE OF THE THE YEAR: ‘I Will Shut Down The Virus’]
<blockquote>
Biden's COVID-19 death count passes 400K

Andrew Stiles • December 23, 2021

More than 400,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 since President Joe Biden took office.
Biden achieved the grim milestone despite repeatedly telling the American people that electing him president was the only way to "shut down the virus." That turned out to be an egregious lie.

The Washington Free Beacon projects that Biden's COVID-19 death toll will exceed that of his predecessor (408,450) by the end of the year, and will reach approximately 420,069 by the time he delivers his first State of the Union address.</blockquote>
Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:I've been on the lookout for a graphic, too. Maybe I can ask LT to do something with it.
:Anther thing I've been looking for, which according to public and private agencies that keep such records and are often delayed months and years, is the number of illegal immigrant deaths, both in custody and out. Since it's been a record year of illegal immigration, it naturally follows that it must also have been a record year of illegal immigrant deaths, whether in custody, crossing the border, or trying to cross the border. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:17, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:Since Biden invited illegals in, if a mother and child died of thirst in the Sonora desert 100 miles south of the border, or were murdered by cayotes for not paying a fee, those deaths can also be laid on Biden's doorstep. That's what Democrats call "compassion." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]

::What an interesting and such an important subject. You're so right. I'm sure there are so many unknown cases. 2,800 died between 2009-2019 [https://www.animalpolitico.com/2019/03/mexicanos-murieron-frontera-eu/]. Yet:<blockquote>650 deaths on the US border.- Mexico EN 2021, according to organization 1:18 (CNN) - At least 650 people died when trying to cross the border between Mexico and the United States this year, more than any other year since an international body began documenting</blockquote>
[https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2021/12/09/muertes-migrantes-frontera-mexico-estados-unidos-trax/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::I've been studying this question for much of this year now, and it's hard to back up numbers with good sources, but I'd say 650 on the U.S side sounds very realistic (up from a 280 average over the past 10 years). And it cannot be conclusive, cause we have little or no idea what happens on the Mexican side, which has all the same qualifying factor to account. And the numbers of those forced into human trafficing and sexual slavery could be 10 times as high as what happens to an illegal once they reach the U.S. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:39, December 23, 2021 (EST)

==R.T.==
Seen [https://www.wnd.com/2021/11/notorious-dem-rashida-tlaib-grins-talks-dream-release-every-con-federal-prison/ this]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:Yah, this deserves follow up and adding to her bio. Dems are splitting between the "Normal Democrats" and Defunders right now, but Tlaib seems intent on keeping the Defund Police/End Bail/Abolish the Prison Industrial Complex movement alive upto the 2022 elections. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:38, November 27, 2021 (EST)

==Qatar==
Qatari hypocrisy - cartoon in Chatlie Hebdo [https://mobile.twitter.com/oritperlov/status/1429773962871984130/photo/1]. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==New section==
Hi.
Good [https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1488617503853060101 answer] by McConnell. Regards. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==AOC image==
Hi Rob. [https://mobile.twitter.com/GPrime85/status/1441136342637944832/photo/1 img] Caption -
"You mean all those poor rockets won't even get a chance to land?" [https://twitter.com/gprime85/status/1441136342637944832 source][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==Racism images==
Hi Rob. This one relates to the image you uploaded days ago of Time100. The elkurd twins.
[https://i2.wp.com/www.israellycool.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/muna-hitler.png?ssl=1 img]
[https://algulf.net/2021/07/04/palestinian-arab-poster-boy-mohammed-el-kurds-jew-hate-emerges/ source] | This one is about Arab Oakestinisbs" putting up nazi flags near their mosque in Beit Ummar in 2014. [https://www.srugim.co.il/i/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/TAZ1__w200h200q80.jpg img] [https://mobile.srugim.co.il/article/45694 source] | This nazi flag was put up today by Arabs Palestinians in Beit Ummar and was removed by the IDF.
[https://twitter.com/Saher95755738/status/1441784045021671428?s=20 img] [https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/nazi-flag-taken-down-by-idf-soldiers-in-hebron-680311/amp info][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:55, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:Ok, sorry, i forgot. You want the AOC image, too, right. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:59, September 25, 2021 (EDT)

::OK, got'em all. [https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 21:12, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
===2022===
:::Another anti-Asian hate crime, and as usual, not by a MAGA guy...
[https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2022/03/f0f66810-46be-4d22-9ad1-d34973fc3941.jpg image], [https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17954960/who-is-tammel-esco/amp/ source]. Thanks [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Tammel_Esco.PNG Here you go]. I got some theories why these tensions exist between Africans and Asians. I could never prove them to be true, but I think both groups being minorities, are hypersensitive around strangers. They have almost like a sixth sense. Members of one group can "give off vibes" of fear upon seeing a stranger, and the members of the other group are quick to read how receptive strangers are to them. These impressions can happen in a moment, without a word being spoken. And if the strangers receives "negative vibes", they can be quick to violence. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:19, March 15, 2022 (EDT)

== [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] ==

Want to make "New Pages" lowercase as "New pages" (just to be consistent with the capitalization of the other common noun words in the sidebar list)? [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:41, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
:Yah. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 02:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
::I haven't seen changes take effect yet. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

== [[Kirby's Dream Land 2]] ==
Is it ok if you undelete this video game article too? I forgot to request it -- thank you [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

== Files for deletion ==

Mind deleting:

*[[:File:Flag of Colombia.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Colombia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the Comoros.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the Comoros.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Hungary.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Hungary.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Luxembourg.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Luxembourg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Monaco.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Monaco.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Medal Law.jpg]] and [[:File:Medal Music.jpg]] (MS Paint-like pictures that probably don't have a practical use)
*[[:File:Maine State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Maine.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Georgia State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of State of Georgia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Arizona State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Arizona.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Pennsylvania State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Pennsylvania.png|this file]])
*[[:File:South Carolina State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of South Carolina.png|this file]])
*[[:File:North Carolina State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of North Carolina.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Jersey State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Jersey.png|this file]])
*[[:File:11121.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Virginia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Rhode Island State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Rhode Island.png|this file]])
[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:16, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

:Hey, thanks. What a mess, huh? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:28, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::Yeah I've noticed quite a bit of things needing cleanup around the wiki, including duplicate/low quality unused files. There's more state flags that I haven't listed yet. you forgot to delete [[:File:Medal Music.jpg]] btw [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 16:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

:::Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated. That Categorization scheme is all screwed up, so it's difficult to even round up what needs to be deleted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:46, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::::Yeah, and I have to ask administrators about some of these because some are admin-protected so therefore cannot be tagged. I'll try and see if I can find more [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 16:49, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::::My guess is 11k of 22k Files are uncategorized. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:51, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Here's some more:

*[[:File:DC flag.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:DC flag.GIF|this file]])
*[[:File:2628589070 30f1d23517.jpg]] (doesn't appear to serve any practical purpose)
*[[:File:Capital.jpg]] (file redirect with no links to it)
*[[:File:Vermont State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Vermont.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Wyoming State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Wyoming.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Tennessee State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Tennessee.png|this file]])

[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 17:06, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
:A couple of those still link to pages. 18:41, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
::The DC flag one no longer does. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 11:11, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

== Deleting short articles ==

Personally, I don't see any harm in short stubs: CP could work at least as a kind of dictionary. But I suppose it is a matter of taste.
Just a request: could you check "what links here" before deleting a page? Thanks! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 09:24, August 11, 2021 (EDT)
:Yah, that's what I've been doing, but a few might have slipped past. The problem right now is, much of these pages someone studiously compiled in [[:Category:Dictionary]] are all orphans. And no one has bothered to de-orphan in 10 years. This is an object lesson for all editors: when you create a page, make sure you integrate the page into the whole wiki with a reverse link from at least one other page. Otherwise, it might eventually get deleted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 09:42, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

== Administrators ==

A couple of days ago, I looked up the [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop list of administrators] (to find someone to convince Andy on a mathematical subject): most of them have stopped contributing before 2012. Do you intend to delete all of their talk-pages and user-pages? Or is there a reason that you singled out User:Joaquin Martinez? It leaves lots of red links behind.... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:57, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
:That was done on user request, I beleive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 03:09, August 12, 2021 (EDT)

== More files for deletion ==

*[[:File:Nevada State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Nevada.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Texas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Texas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Arkansas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Arkansas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:California State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of California.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Colorado State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Colorado.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Connecticut State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Connecticut.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Delaware State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Delaware.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Florida State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Florida.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Hawaii State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Hawaii.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Idaho State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Idaho.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Indiana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Indiana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Iowa State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Iowa.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Kansas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Kansas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Kentucky State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Kentucky.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Louisiana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Louisiana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Maryland State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Maryland.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Massachusetts State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Massachusetts.png|this file]], although the GIF needs to be replaced with the PNG duplicate on two admin-protected articles)
*[[:File:Michigan State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Michigan.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Mississippi State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Mississippi.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Missouri State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Missouri.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Montana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Montana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Nebraska State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Nebraska.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Hampshire State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Hampshire.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Mexico State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Mexico.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Newyorkflag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New York.png|this file]])
*[[:File:North Dakota State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of North Dakota.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Ohio State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Ohio.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oklahoma State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oklahoma.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oregon State Flag (Front).gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oregon.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oregon State Flag (Back).gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oregon reverse.png|this file]])
*[[:File:South Dakota State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of South Dakota.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Utah State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Utah.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Washington State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Washington.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Wisconsin.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Wisconsin state flag.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Guam.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Guam.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:DC flag.GIF]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Washington, D.C..png|this file]])

[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 15:27, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
:Thanks! I'll get on it with the next batch. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:49, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
::Connecticut's one hasn't been deleted yet (oversight?) and i provided a note for the Massachusetts flag. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 20:47, August 14, 2021 (EDT)
:::Yah it's on hold for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:36, August 15, 2021 (EDT)

== In the News ==

::Please add to the Conservapedia headlines how Twitter has suspended Amrullah Saleh but not the Taliban[[https://www.republicworld.com/technology-news/social-media-news/afghanistan-twitter-suspends-accounts-of-amrullah-salehs-office-taliban-still-active.html]].[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 12:10, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::I dunno; what is the significnce? Big Tech and Twitter have been working against America and for the Taliban for years now already. 12:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::Don't you think Biden [[colluding]] with Russia is a bigger story? [https://tass.com/world/1326699] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 12:25, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::Well I think it is important given how Amrullah Saleh is the leader of Afghanistan.[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 12:57, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::(a) never heard of him (b) is there a single leader? (c) I thought it was [[Mullah Baradar]]. You're not falling for CCP/Big Tech/MSM agitprop to confuse people and take the focus off real issues, are you? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 13:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

:::Baradar is the head of the Taliban not the legitimate Afghan government. But if you feel there are issues more important than this then you don't need to put it. [[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 13:31, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::"legitimate government?" Wow. Wow. And again I say wow. Talk about putting the barndoor before the horse.... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 13:48, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::Did I hear you right? Are you referring to a group that shoots women in the street for not wearing burqas, as "legitimate"? Maybe in Twitter world, Anthony Blinken, Joe Biden, a host of Democrats and MSM, but not in the real universe that I personally was born into, or the real universe that God created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 14:05, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::My sources say, "[https://uncoverdc.com/2021/08/16/bidens-disastrous-exit-from-afghanistan/ Afghanistan’s President Ashraf Ghani has already relinquished power to an interim government led by Taliban commander Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar."] What is significant here is, we don't have articles on either Amrullah Saleh or Mullah Baradar, before we go off half-cocked on MSM/Democrat/Biden junta/CCP [[fake news]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:38, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

==You're a liberal==
Deletion of climate LIBRAL
:Sticks and stones may break my bones, but idiots never hurt me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:12, August 21, 2021 (EDT)

== A request ==

I don't think Conservapedia has in it's manual of style page info on not creating orphan pages.

Since orphan pages are not a good thing and you have mentioned how irritating they are to you, please update our manual of style page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:56, August 23, 2021 (EDT)

:Ok, will do. it kinda goes hand in hand with categorizing, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 01:11, August 23, 2021 (EDT)
== Request ==

For [[:File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture.jpg]], I made the mistake of downloading the direct history.house.gov version to upload rather than Wikimedia Common's improved version. However, if I upload a new cropped version with even a slightly different aspect ratio, everything will likely get messed up. Can you go to the file page and see if you can delete the current file version without deleting the page entirely? Correct me if I'm wrong, but there should be a way to do that in the timestamp table under "File history." Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:19, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:I see you deleted the file, which still works because I was able to upload a better version in its place successfully; however, was it impossible to only delete the file version without deleting the entire page, even though there was only one file revision? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:31, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:(ec) I dunno if that fixed it. You may have to re-upload as File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture2 or something. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:32, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
::Whoops, pardon my quick reply here which caused an edit conflict. So to clarify, my request was to avoid having to re-upload the file separately under another title. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:34, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
== Vaccine mandates and a quote from a Clint Eastwood movie ==

[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|300px|center|[[Adolf Hitler]] was against vaccine mandates!<ref>[https://jacobinmag.com/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-covid-pandemic-german-nazi-inoculation-policy You Know Who Else Opposed Vaccine Mandates? Hitler.]</ref> ]]
{{clear}}
[[File:Washington-deleware.jpg|thumbnail|600px|center|General [[George Washington]] ordered [[smallpox]] inoculations for all troops.<ref>[https://health.mil/News/Articles/2021/08/16/Gen-George-Washington-Ordered-Smallpox-Inoculations-for-All-Troops General George Washington Ordered [[Smallpox]] Inoculations for All Troops]</ref>
 
 
"I have right to a lawYEEER!" - the killer Scorpio in the 1971 movie ''Dirty Harry'' which featured [[Clint Eastwood]].<ref>[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066999/characters/nm0000142 Dirty Harry (1971)]</ref>
 
 
Apparently, George Washington's troops didn't have ready access to legal counsel concerning their innoculations or they thought they had weak cases. Or consider this radical thought: His troops thought their responsibility to get vaccinated against smallpox trumped any potential right they had to not get vaccinated.]]
{{clear}}
[[File:Donald Trump and Jesus is King sign.jpg|center|thumbnail|400px|A quick note to [[conservative]], Republican [[Donald Trump]] supporters who are against Covid-19 vaccines: Donald J. Trump launched [[Operation Warp Speed]] which helped cause Covid-19 vaccines be developed in a speedy fashion. Put that in your anti Covid-19 vaccine pipes and smoke it!
 
 
Donald Trump and [[Melania Trump]] were both vaccinated with a Covid-19 vaccine with no apparent catastrophic effects!<ref>[https://www.deseret.com/2021/4/23/22399234/former-president-donald-trump-americans-coronavirus-vaccine-obama-bush-clinton-carter Former President Donald Trump tells Americans to get the coronavirus vaccine, calls it a ‘true miracle’]</ref>
 
 
Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.<ref>[https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html#:~:text=Serious%20side%20effects%20that%20could,receiving%20a%20vaccine%20dose. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines]</ref> See also: [https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-long-term-effects/art-20490351 Long haul Covid-19 - Mayo Clinic]
 
 
For more information, please see: [https://conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Sports,_exercise_and_diet#Coronavirus_prevention.2C_info_and_treatments Coronavirus prevention, Covid-19 vaccines, treatments and general information] ]]
:Yah, Hitler was against smoking, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:10, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:(A) Donald Trump ordered a vaccine, not a genetic experiment. (B) mRNA experiments are not a vaccine. (C) The CDC changed the definition of vaccine in August 2021. (D) Dr. Anthony Fauci did not inform President Trump that [[SARS-CoV-2]] was not a naturally occurring virus and was created in a laboratory at the time of President Trump's approval of Warp Speed. (E) We still await the arrival of a vaccine, and the results of the illegal genetic experiments. However, the science has become so politicized, it's impossible to put a timeframe on expectations. Simply because Trump was deceived by the CCP, WHO, and Dr. Fauci is your weakest argument to have confidence in genetic experiments carrying the misnomer of a vaccine. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:48, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:(E) And your use of MSM & govt propaganda regarding George Washington is flawed. That was [https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/smallpox/sp_variolation.html variolation], not vaccination. Variolation is taking material {scabs} directly from an infected person and infecting another person. Your cited source uses the word inoculation; the alleged covid vaccines fail to inoculate, witness [[breakthrough case]]s. A vaccine is the actual virus itself, measured out in doses to fit a person's age and body weight. The mRNA spiked protein is invented in a laboratory and is not a synthetic reproduction of the SARS CoV-19 virus. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 07:19, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
::I think we should largely agree to disagree.

::I do know that you are incorrect about some basic facts.

::For example, vaccines commonly are not 100% effective and thus have some breakthrough cases. "Even the measles vaccine, which is incredibly effective, fails to protect about 3 percent of vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine—hailed a medical miracle—was 80 percent to 90 percent effective at preventing paralysis caused by the polio virus. Breakthrough infections of flu are even more common. While the exact effectiveness of the flu vaccine fluctuates year-to-year, it ranges between 40 percent and 60 percent."[https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/six-important-things-know-about-breakthrough-infections-180978408/]

::In addition, even in the case of breakthrough cases of coronavirus, a person's morbidity rate will be lower than if they were not inoculated against the disease.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:31, September 30, 2021 (EDT)

:::Well, we can resolve much of this by understanding what a vaccine is. Vaccines are measured doses of the virus itself to induce an immunological reaction. It should be obvious by now that covid so-called "vaccines" do no such thing. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 14:33, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
{{clear}}
=== Notes ===
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

== Uighur Genocide Article ==

:How do you propose that we start the article?[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 20:26, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

::[https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&search=%22Uyghur+genocide%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns120=1&ns121=1&ns122=1&ns123=1&ns124=1&ns125=1&ns126=1&ns127=1&profile=advanced Here's all the pages that use the term.] In the China article, we have three different subsections that touch on it, [[China#East_Turkestan_.28Xinjiang.29]], [[China#Uyghurs_and_Muslims]], and [[China#Uyghur_genocide]]. I suggest we begin with the cite in [https://conservapedia.com/China#cite_note-183 footnote 183] from the Uyghur genocide subsection for the Intro, and consolidate information from the other two subsections to eliminate redundancy.

::Also, after laying out the case for genocide in the main body, then include a second section on Forced labor and re-education, which technically may be considered a separate issue from [[genocide]], and eventually can be made into a single article as well, with information collected in a Uyghur genocide page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:51, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

::I named the article as East Turkestani genocide due to it including not just Uighurs but all Turkic peoples.[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 21:16, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

== Category move request ==

Hi RobSmith, can you please move Category:Old Guard (The South) to "Category:Old Republicans (The South)" without leaving a redirect? When I created the category, it had been a while since I read a hard cover of ''The End of Southern Exceptionalism'', and now realizing that I can just access it via Google Books and even [https://books.google.com/books?id=tiNYRu5rvVgC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=old&f=false search for key terms], I likely confused the term used in the book with something else.

Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 22:43, October 29, 2021 (EDT)

== YOU ARE A RADICAL ABORTIONIST ==

YOU DISGUST ME!!! YOU THINK ABORTION ISNT MURDER. GET A LIFE AND GO BACK TO LIBERAL WIKIPEDIA!! IM REFERING TO WHEN YOU REMOVED MY EDITS FROM PRAMILLA JAYAPAL!!! SHE MURDERED HUMAN AND YOU SUPPORT THAT DISGUSTING {{unsigned|Superbanana}}

== Conservative Of The Year 2021 ==

Hello,

It starting to get close towards the end of the year. Should Conservapedia create the Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page? Also, I think it might be interesting if Conservapedia created a RINO Of The Year.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 14:22, November 4, 2021 (EDT)
:I think there is a page already started, but I don't have a link yet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 01:44, November 5, 2021 (EDT)
::The Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page does not appear to have been made yet. Could I be given permission to make the page?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:35, November 17, 2021 (EST)
:::Sure. Please pattern it after the previous year's pages with the appropriate catgorization, etc. If another already exists and found later, we can merge it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 18:38, November 17, 2021 (EST)
::::Could you give me the power to create new pages? I cannot create new pages.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:36, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::Do you have SkipCapthca? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 19:09, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::I do not think I do.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:52, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Never mind I do have SkipCaptcha. How would I go about crating a page. I cannot figure out how to create one.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:54, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Do you know how to activate your user page? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 21:56, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::::According to your contribs, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Former_Tea_Party_Supporters_Who_Have_Become_RINOs_or_Never_Trumpers&diff=1685562&oldid=1683587 you created this page right here.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:00, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::I was able to create the page! Thank you for your help!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:24, November 18, 2021 (EST)

== Conservative is doxxing others ==

In [[Essay:_A_reply_to_some_desperate_secular_liberals/leftists_who_pulled_out_the_race_card_and_unsuccessfully_tried_to_compare_me_to_Klansmen#10_point_to_do_list_and_considerations_concerning_potential_defamation_lawsuit_or_lawsuits_2|this recent essay of his]], the fifth point in that particular subsection is publicly revealing private information about others. Can you delete the essay, since I don't have deletion powers? Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 13:37, November 7, 2021 (EST)
::Yah I saw. I initiated a private discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:04, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::Shouldn't those types of inappropriate postings simply be nuked on the spot? It doesn't matter who inserts such information, as they should not be allowed to remain on the site, period. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:07, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::Also, thanks for removing the link to the essay from MPR. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:08, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::(ec) Yes, for registered users, but an Admin should be given the opportunity to correct the error. I did remove the link from MPR to the doxxing page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::This reminds much of another unnamed former Admin: he just likes pressing buttons to nuke his enemies because he can and doesn't think before hand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
::::::Conservative has demonstrated himself to continuously make inappropriate postings and often times stubbornly refuse to admit he's wrong. He's been given enough chances. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::::They think being an Admin is just a game of Space Invaders and they can nuke their opponents by pressing a button. This is why I advocated for bureaucrat powers to teach them the proper role of an Admin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:15, November 7, 2021 (EST

== Trevor Noah ==

I think [[Trevor Noah]] is very famous liberal comedian. in article I showed his double standards for his views on police brutality in USA and South Africa. I wish you to show the article again, and thank you --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:I recreated the page. It needs to be brought up to encyclopedic standards. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 19:22, November 7, 2021 (EST)

== Please delete the two revisions left by a recent vandal ==

[[Special:Contributions/PerterKabangsLT|Please hide the content, username and edit summaries for those diffs ASAP.]] Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 21:59, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:User:Conservative is more skilled at deleting whole talk pages like that than I am. I might leave it for him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:04, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::I believe you've deleted revisions before. Don't administrator duties include the deletion of diffs left by inappropriate edits? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 22:08, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::I don't want to make the wrong deletion, and I believe he's more skilled at it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:12, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::In case you haven't yet noticed, Conservative frivolously deletes perfectly fine diffs while declining to delete inappropriate revisions most of the time. Do you actually expect him to carry out administrator duties after all the times he's abused them? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 22:15, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::Someday we'll make you boss, and you can handle all these weighty decisions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 23:30, November 18, 2021 (EST)

== Quick Question ==

Hey, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. I was wondering if you could tell me if I have the ability to apply files, such as pictures and such, to articles on here? I have tried a few times to add pictures to the pages I’ve already created. Also, how do you think I’m doing with making pages and editing? Thanks in advance and have a great [[Thanksgiving]]! -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 14:45, November 23, 2021 (EST)

:Place image upload requests here: [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]. As to editing, it looks pretty good, with the exception of uncited editorial comments such as these [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Derek_Chauvin&diff=prev&oldid=1762732][https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Derek_Chauvin&diff=prev&oldid=1773759], which make you look like a subversive Democrat trying to play the [[race card]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:28, November 23, 2021 (EST)

::Thanks, and my apologies for that. I’ve since learned that I shouldn’t submit personal opinions such as those. I hope I can put that mishap behind me so I can further contribute to Conservapedia. God Bless and Happy Thanksgiving! -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 15:48, November 23, 2021 (EST)

:::Well, that's good to hear. Cuz even if you are or were a subversive Democrat, that tired old stale stuff gets pretty insulting after a while, as if we're too stupid to see it or notice it. You need to become more sophisticated in your use of dogwhistles and subversion. Good luck. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 16:05, November 23, 2021 (EST)

== Another category move request ==

Hi RobSmith, can you please move [[:Category:Half-Breeds]] to [[:Category:Half-Breeds (Republican Party)]]? Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Friday, 14:55, November 26, 2021 (EST)

== Please don't plagiarize my work ==

Pertaining to most of the block of text you added [[Mask_mandate#Laws_for_thee_but_not_for_me|here]], it appears you outright copy/pasted it from my [[Salongate]] article. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Sunday, 16:56, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:[https://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Copyright By contributing information to Conservapedia, you irrevocably consent to the display, copying, reuse or editing of your information, edits and entries, with or without attribution. You agree to waive and indemnify this and all affiliated sponsors, editors, users, or sites from claims for liability resulting from use, by you, of the content contained herein. This is a binding legal document. By using this site you agree to be bound by it.]
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:01, November 28, 2021 (EST)
::Even if CP allows it, plagiarizing is not a good practice. I don't think readers want to see the exact same block of text in multiple articles. Can you at least re-write it in your own words? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Sunday, 17:04, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::Well, edit it then. As an Admin, you need to know these things.
:::Granted, the phrase "your information" may need to be amended, being that it may now have an ambiguous or diferent meaning (related to doxxing) that was not commonly or popularly known at the time that version of the policy was written. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:07, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::And your understanding or use of the term "plagiarizing" is incorrect, given the copyright policy, which you have agreed to, nullifies making any such claim. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:11, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::WP:OWN, or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content Ownership of content] may be helpful before you employ such language as "my Salongate article." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:17, November 28, 2021 (EST)

:::As I've said 10,000 times, being an Admin isn't about pressing buttons to nuke your enemies. It's about educating and helping users and Admins become better editors and Admins. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:21, November 28, 2021 (EST)

:::Let's take [https://conservapedia.com/File:McGowan_Harris_Clinton_Giuffre.PNG this tweet, for example, copypasted from Wikipedia] and tweeted to Kamala Harris by [[Rose McGowan]]. I wrote most of that text (which now has minor edits), but have no claim of plagiarism or ownership of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:32, November 28, 2021 (EST)

== Please check your email ==

Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Monday, 23:23, November 28, 2021 (EST)

== I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page ==

Rob, I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page

You can see the changes at: [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy]]

Also, I made some minor improvements to this page: [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] at the [https://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines#Conservapedia.27s_blocking_policy_for_editors_of_the_wiki Conservapedia's blocking policy for editors of the wiki] section.

Generally speaking, given human nature (see: [[Fall of man]]), wikis are more prone to heavy-handed blocking than to too lenient blocking. The Bible refers to the authoritarian aspect of human nature once people have power. For example, "But Jesus called them to Himself and said, 'You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.'" (Matthew 20:25-26). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:57, November 29, 2021 (EST)

== Main page right ==

As your request, I removed the main page right item. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:06, December 2, 2021 (EST)

== quick note ==

Do you reinstall Skype? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:22, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:yah, give it a try. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:24, December 12, 2021 (EST)
::It says you are not online. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:::Sign into Skype. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
::::Are you signed into Skype? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:28, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:::::I'm in as HJ. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:29, December 12, 2021 (EST)
Then call me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:31, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:It says PM is not online. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:33, December 12, 2021 (EST)

== Another Quick Question ==

Hi, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. Based on my contributions these past few months, do you think I have the qualities to be an Administrator on here one day? Hopefully soon, I can earn access to photo upload privileges so I won’t have to bug you about adding photos to the pages I create, haha. Thanks in advance and have a great Christmas. -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 19:00, December 17, 2021 (EST)
:Sorry, I have no say in that at all. Those decisions are made by the boss. It's probably been 10 years or more since a new Admin was created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:07, December 17, 2021 (EST)

== Kathy Hochul ==

Why do you add Satanists category to [[Kathy Hochul]]? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:34, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:I think the answer is in the two sentence text: "Hochul claims the coronavirus vaccine is from God and that people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ to go out and spread the vaccine." (It's obvious this racist scumbag is speaking to what the atheist left consider superstitious God-fearing and God-believing African Americans in the traditional Marxist and Satanic [[sociopath]]ic manipulation of Black voters). But you have a point; perhaps the Category should not have been created or perhaps the Category needs some discussion to keep it.

:I would argue however, if the decision is to keep the Category, this crossing-the-line of [[separation of church and state]] by an elected official to manipulate vulnerable and oppressed people certainly qualifies as Satanic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:45, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:And we know for a fact the coronavirus is not from God, it came from God-hating Satanists and idolators like Anthony Fauci and the Chinese Communist Party. If that's not proof of another Satanic lie from the pit of hell by a white Democrat, what is? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:55, December 23, 2021 (EST)

::''people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ ''
::Is Hochel, like Anthony Fauci, claiming to be God? or the Way, the Truth, and the Life? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::Attaboy. Let it all out. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 18:31, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::Let's not lose focus, the question is over creating and keeping certain categories. On a more philosophical plane however, an agnostic certainly would have a measure of deniability for engaging in Satanic activities, whereas atheists, their cohorts and supporters are more less indefensible. Go ahead, please, try justifying an atheist and Satanic position to a God-fearing African American. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:53, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::Hochel, in her own words, is belittling and mocking African Americas for believing in God and not accepting the gospel of [[Faucism]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:54, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::We have the same phenomena in the UK, where the Archbishop of Canterbury said [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yzva0Wrs8Os 'Jesus would take the vaccine'.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::::Defeating parodists by making them redundant is quite the flex, man. You wouldn't believe the amount of money Soros recently offered to try & get the band back together, but it was agreed round the table that your stuff just couldn't be topped. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 20:19, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::::Truth is like the coronavirus, its spread cannot be stopped despite the best efforts of men. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:38, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Dang. [https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/12/23/trump-appeals-supreme-court-dispute-over-jan-6-documents/8892937002/ God loves a trier, though, right?] [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 21:29, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Too bad the [[J6 panel]] is illegal. The House Resolution that created it requires 13 members and 6 appoint by Kevin McCarthy, which never happened. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:35, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:: I dont agree with her vaccine policy, but sorry that doesnt make her a Satanist or even Atheist. I would like to see reliable sources instead of personal conclusions to prove that she is Satanist. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:20, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::It's her own words. If she's not claiming to be God herself, she engaged in some sickening racist pandering. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:21, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::Wait wait wait. Is the argument now, "Sure, racism is bad, but it's not as bad as being a Satanist?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:23, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::: No I want to see reliable source prove that she is satanist. Blasphemy doesnt make her Satanist --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:41, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::::Blasphemy makes her a child of God? Racism makes here a child of God? (Blacks certainly would be interested in hearing that).

:::::Unfortunately, God doesn't really provide neutral space for agnostics. That's purely a human construct. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:46, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::::[https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/n-y-governor-kathy-hochuls-god-is-satan-preaches-at-nyc-church-and-proudly-displays-the-mark-of-the-beast/ N.Y. Governor Kathy Hochul’s “God” is Satan – Preaches at NYC Church and Proudly Displays the “Mark of the Beast”]
:::::Let's not leave it at that - let's dissect her words a little further....
{{quotebox|"I prayed a lot to God during this time.

And you know what? God did answer our prayers. '''He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers, he made them come up with a vaccine.'''

That is from God to us. And we must say, “Thank you, God. Thank you.”

And I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to to say “I’m vaccinated.”

All of you. Yes, I know '''you’re vaccinated. You’re the smart ones."'''}}
:And how does God answer all this?
:*''Pride goeth before destruction''
:*''He catcheth the crafty in their own craftiness
:*''God has chosen the foolish things of this world to confound the wise
::I could go on... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:03, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:*''I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
:*[https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Flattery 34 Bible Verses about Flattery]
:Maybe flattery works on liberals and Satanists, but to a child of God it's a red flag. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Then we have to consider the fact that she spoke these words in the midst of the congregation.... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Her pitch sounds a bit more like Pharoah calling upon Jannes and Jambres. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:Please, don't take my judgement on the matter. Let's look at some of the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXaP76musWM 2,000+ comments on her words in Youtube] (I know, I know, Youtube just hasn't gotten around to blocking them yet).
:*"God told me not to listen to false prophets. - 793 Likes
:*“Now let me tell you how God loves abortion.” Gov. Hochul. - 798 Likes
:None of this is surprising, Democrat officials have mouthing this kinda Satanic BS for decades.
:*"It's so cringe worthy when self serving politicians invoke the name of god. - 790 Likes
::*Rob's comment: No, Donald Trump is not self serving. You miss the qualifier.
:*"This is what a cult leader sounds like. - 797 Likes
:*"Unbelievable level of evil. To stand in "church" and commit blasphemy. To promote a shot that is killing people worldwide. The audacity of these people is astounding. They WILL answer to God for their sins.
:Yah, does she really listen to the voters? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:45, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Personally, when I hear someone like this talk, I can only scratch my head and say, "What the hell is wrong with people in New York to elect someone like this?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:What a way to burst onto the national scene. Does she, or any professional media consultant, think she can ever rescind this level of stupidity, ignorance, and outright insulting comments? Ever?
:Maybe this crap flies in New York, but name one, just one, New York politician between FDR & Trump who made it on the national scene? And the reason for that is, New Yorkers consider people like Hochel, AOC, Schumer, Nadler, Gillibrand, Cuomo, De Blasio etc etc etc as "leaders" and representatives of themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:: I checked the link that you share but is also its personal conclusion not reliable source. What she said speaks her foolishness lower IQ, and she made big mistake for using religion to convince people to take the vaccine. but again that doesnt make her necessarily a Satanist. a Satanist mean worshiper of Satan, is there any proof that she worship Satan, I didnt see that. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:21, December 24, 2021 (EST)-
:::No, you are dead wrong. Most servants of Satan are so deceived by the father of lies, they do not know they are serving Satan. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:35, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::There are numerous examples, both from the bible and in everyday life to verify this. For example, what could be more Satanic than an atheist, many of whom deny that the spirit world and Satan exists? That proves the level of so-called "self-deception", which really is Satanic deception. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:38, December 24, 2021 (EST)

: The Encyclopedias should rely on reliable sources, not personal conclusions. does the other administrators agree with that? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:33, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::Ask em. Personally, I can't think of a one that would defend a Satanist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:41, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::She supports abortion, doesn't she? I doubt anyone here in CP management thinks a child of God supports abortion (I could be wrong). And I doubt anyone thinks there's a grey area where one can be both. But I don't know. Anyways, it's a debate I wouldn't hesitate to engage in. You can always create a debate page on that subject, either Hochul individually or [[Debate:Can an abortion supporter also be a child of God?]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:46, December 25, 2021 (EST)

::What you need to realize here is, Hochul stepped into one big pile of doggie-doodoo with her stupid, off the cuff, Satanic remarks inside a church during a church service. And there is no way out for her other than repentance and baptism. And if it takes New York Democrats to wish Andrew Cuomo was back, so be it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:55, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:: For Abortion we can add [[:Category:Abortion Advocates]] instead of [[:Category:Satanists]]. and also if she support Abortion that doesnt make her Satanist. Satanist is big insult, We can't accuse anyone we don't like of being Satanic. and do you really think abortion supporter is Satanist?, maybe you dont many figures support abortion including the conservative ones like [[Tomi Lahren]], [[Rudy Giuliani]] and [[Margaret Thatcher]]. president Trump formerly was supporter of abortion, is he former Satanist?. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:29, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Satanism is an insult? I've never met the Satanist yet who wasn't proud of being in rebellion against God. Children of God are not afraid of the devil, they have been set free. Only sinners cower before the devil. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::: OK so does Hochul ever stated she is Satanist? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:39, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::*''They speak lies to one another; They speak with flattering lips and a double heart.'' Ps. 12:2
:::::*''with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes.'' Rm. 3:13-15
::::::I think it's obvious which side she's on. She spoke her words in church. She should have saved it for Don Lemon or NBC. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:59, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::::Now, we can break it down (for example, '' Their feet are swift to shed blood'' can be laid at the doorstep of her predecessor Andrew Cuomo and the nursing home crisis, and I don't know her involvement, but what is she doing to bring Cuomo and other conspirators to justice?) ''Their is no fear of God before their eyes'' - why did she speak such blasphemies before a the congregation in church? What interests me most is ''Whose mouth is full of cursing'' because this is a twofer related to ''flattery''; she flatters her followers with ''you are the smart ones'', while cursing the stupid unvaccinated. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 26, 2021 (EST)

:: I need reliable source to prove that she is Satanist, this is simple. if there are no source, so you should delete category from article --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:31, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Her sources are her own mouth. It's no different than Fauci claiming to be God ("I am Truth"). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::: I didnt saw any sources, I am only saw personal conclusions. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::In sending out her 'apostles', she implies the unvaccinated are in rebellion against God, i.e. Satanists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:27, December 26, 2021 (EST)

: In order to prove what you are saying, you either have to bring a source that admits that she is a Satanist from her mouth, or another source that proves that she is performing Satanic rituals
:Other than this, your words are nothing but personal conclusions and conspiracy theory and may harm the reputation of this encyclopedia. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::It's no big deal. Anyone in rebellion against God is a Satanist, which is the vast majority of people on planet earth. Only those in rebellion against God fear Satan, or think it's a big insult. It's not. Satan is who their boss is and who they serve. It is not even a case of outing a Satanist in the closet - by their works ye shall know them. Was Christ a liar when he said that? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:47, December 27, 2021 (EST)
{{quotebox|"there’s people out there who aren’t listening to God and what God wants."}}
::Now, there's people out there who aren't listening to Anthony Fauci, who claims to be God ("to attack me is to attack Truth"), and what Fauci wants. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 05:07, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:: I dont think Jesus asked you to add Satanist Category to Kathy Hochul article. again you are going too far by this stubbornness by bringing Bible verse. Bible didnt prove she is Satanist. also I dont think Jesus would like us to make assumptions to other people without reliable source even if they are our enemy. I dont like anyone to make assumption to me, I am also dont make any assumption to other people without reliable source. Assumption is a characteristic of liberals against their enemies (read [[Meena Harris]] story), but we must be better than them. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:41, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:::I'm going too far? She's the one claiming the unvaccinated don't listen to her god, Dr. Fauci. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:44, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:::Before It's News: [https://beforeitsnews.com/new-world-order/2021/10/new-york-governor-kathy-hochul-is-an-evil-satanic-witch-who-claims-to-speak-for-god-and-says-vaccines-are-a-gift-from-god-no-not-unless-it-is-the-faslse-god-lucifer-pure-blashemy-truly-dispicabl-10443.html New York Governor Kathy Hochul is an Evil Satanic Witch, Who Claims to Speak For GOD and Says Vaccines Are a Gift From GOD. No, Not Unless it is the Faslse god Lucifer. Pure Blashemy- Truly Dispicable]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:46, December 27, 2021 (EST)

== Russia is a place where one can have a good life, but they are still overcoming their past ==

Everyone once in a while, I watch a documentary. I watched this documentary: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxpEsBqliEQ Love in Russia].

Russian society is traditional in some ways, but I am sure that 70+ years of godless communism has had its effect on society.

But people with Christian values are having kids and the irreligious/nonreligious are not, so things can gradually get better. Time will tell. I think in the next 12 years or so, there will be a global recession, so that will cause a lot of problems. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:I let a homeless lady from Russia stay at my place for about 2 weeks. I learned more about Russia.

:The USA should try to have better relations with Russia. Trump tried to do this.

:By the way, I bailed out of the documentary at the 30 minute point. It dealt with the 3% of Russian society that are freaks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:25, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::So I watched the documentary all the way thru. These kids these days, wudayagonnado? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::I don't know if you're familiar with [[Pelageya]], probably one of the greatest vocalists alive today. She's sings Cossack (or Kazakh) warrior songs. This is nothing new, Russia has longtime (even in Czarist times) been a nation of widows and orphans, cause it is a warrior culture, having so many borders to defend, or absorbing so many smaller nations and tribes into it. Even Pelageya has no idea who her father is. So what the DW documentary reports really has not emerged since the collapse of USSR. The aftermath of WWII was just another time when Russia again was a nation of widows. And many of the songs Pelageya sings are about the warrior dying on the battlefield and thinking about his wife. Once you grasp these songs go back hundreds of years, you can get a great insight into Russian culture. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)

=== This is what I was referring to above ===

[[File:04656 market in Sanok.JPG|thumbnail|200px|center|[[Alcoholism]] was a serious social problem in the former atheistic [[Soviet Union]].[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18245818] Between 1940 and 1980, this [[atheist state]] had the largest increase of the amount of alcohol usage in the developed world.[http://isw.sagepub.com/content/35/4/441.extract] ]]
{{clear}}
It's too bad that Russia chose atheistic communism for so many decades. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:I have to admit, my appreciation and love of Russian society and culture has come a long way in the past 25-30 years. What went unreported in the West, it was the Church more than anything that caused the demise of Soviet Communism.
:Despite what Soviet communism did to Russian culture - and you are absolutely correct the damage was serious and longlasting - IMO a typical Russian of average intelligence, education, and maybe even with fetal alcohol syndrome, is more objective and levelheaded in their understanding of culture, society, history the issues affecting the contemporary world than 90% of our "best educated" professors in the United States.
:Bear in mind, nearly 40% of the Russian federation are Muslims - [[secular]] Muslims - and they wouldn't have it any other way. They supported Soviet Communism then, and Russian Democracy now, cause they don't want to live under [[Shariah]] law. And they have a higher birth rate than ethnic Russians. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:52, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Watch [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bnt3CIqGhk this 3 1/2 minute video.] You don't need any translation or English subtitles to understand what is going on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::a white boy is abusing his girlfriend on the streets of Moscow, and nobody reacts. The same couple do it again, only this time she wears a [[hijab]] {Islamic headscarf}, and Muslim men step up to protect her. It's not a religious thing, it's a culture phenomena in a multicultural society. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::Putin does not drink and he works out two hours a day so that is good.[https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-daily-routine-2017-6#his-work-schedule-tends-to-be-more-flexible-over-the-weekend-to-accommodate-putins-english-language-classes-on-sunday-he-sometimes-prays-and-makes-confession-23] But he is a former KGB agent and Business Insider reports: "On Sunday, he sometimes prays and makes confession... Nonetheless, Russian officials close to the president stress that "his life is not that of a Christian," according to Newsweek."[https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-daily-routine-2017-6#his-work-schedule-tends-to-be-more-flexible-over-the-weekend-to-accommodate-putins-english-language-classes-on-sunday-he-sometimes-prays-and-makes-confession-23]

:::As long as the corrupt Putin is in office, Russia will stagnate. Leadership is by example. Russia has to overcome its demographic death spiral. And the heavy drinking and Russian men cheating on their wives is causing family problems. Apparently, Putin cheated on his wife. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:15, December 24, 2021 (EST)

::::This debate has raged forever - I recall my teacher [https://books.google.com/books?id=RniDlAP7ulkC&pg=PT4&lpg=PT4&dq=prof+william+renzi&source=bl&ots=TZH9Xyh_Oz&sig=ACfU3U1w12_iNy0BaGTV9umVsry_zEQrXw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiO1pP8l_z0AhVZG80KHbrFAPQQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=prof%20william%20renzi&f=false Bill Renzi] saying many people believe Russia has to be governed by autocrats to keep it together, be it the Czars, Lenin, Stalin, or Brezhnev. It's too big and too diverse (Stalin's own son didn't speak Russian). Russia is not a single ethnicity, culture, religion or language. It is a "Union of Peoples" and has been since Czarist times.
:::::Technically, no nation has been one ethnicity/culture at all short of Balkanization, so please don't use that as a reason to justify a communist stooge like Putin (especially when even the JBS-backed New American made clear he was still communist). Even France has had multiple ethnicities in there (Alsace was a germanophone-speaking region [in fact, one of the reasons why the Jacobins planned a genocide of that region before the guillotine was used on Robespierre is precisely BECAUSE of its german-speaking population], and there's hints at Napoleon and Robespierre being ethnically Sicilian and Irish, respectively). And Great Britain is composed of four ethnicities/cultures (Irish, Scottish, Welsh, and English). And don't get me started on America which is multicultural even WITHOUT the current diversity crap being forced unto us by leftists. Germany was similar, originally being composed of multiple different countries (Bavaria, Poland, Austria, Deutsch, among others). In fact, the entire POINT of being a nation is in fact a "Union of Peoples", so it's not exclusive to Russia. And for the record, while it might be true the Tsars were autocratic, at least they believed in God and NOT Socialism or anything like that, unlike Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, or, yes, even Putin. I appreciate Russian society pre-Lenin. Post-Lenin, it is garbage, even under Putin, who refuses to go back to the Tsar. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 12:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::The 'captive nations' have been set free. The rest remain part of the federation because they want to, given the alternative of being swallowed up by Islamic or Sinic culture, or other hostile neighbors. Russia has played a role in history similar to that of the British Empire, raising up peoples all over the planet to a level above what used to be call 'barbarism'. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::If that's the case, please explain why Putin's gunning to go to war and annex various nations? If I were him and I truly thought they should remain free, I wouldn't even bother trying to prep an invasion of them. Besides, don't you think the fact that actual right-wing/conservative sources like JBS/New American and outono claiming Putin's a communist should give you pause? It's not like I'm citing Time Magazine or any left-wing rags. And for the record, if he truly cared about getting rid of Communism, he'd make sure ALL of it is destroyed, make sure the populace has nothing but disgust, regarding of ethnicity and culture, make sure to fire all the KGB priests and if necessary even line them up to a wall and shoot them, and certainly tear down Marx's statue and Lenin's tomb. That's what I would have done as an anti-Communist, make sure Communism is extinct. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:57, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::NATO provocation. You read too much CIA agitprop. NATO is supplying lethal weapons to Ukraine in the Donbass region, hence Putin and Russia are reacting. Whatever idiots in the Pentagon and CIA drum up this senseless bs need to be chastised forthwith. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 16:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::Ah, first of all, JBS has been [https://thenewamerican.com/fire-brennan-or-abolish-the-cia/ highly critical] [https://thenewamerican.com/is-it-time-to-shut-down-the-cia/ of the CIA], so it's not like they'd be pushing for the CIA's propaganda anyhow. Second of all, Putin was also funding the very same groups that George Soros is funding going by [https://www.outono.net/elentir/2017/11/22/neither-with-soros-nor-with-putin-the-russian-interference-in-catalonia-and-the-spanish-right/ this article] here as well as [https://www.outono.net/elentir/2020/03/05/the-george-soros-of-moscow-vladimir-putin-and-his-support-to-the-radical-left-of-the-west/ this article] (and it's very obvious that they're not CIA either. Actually, while commentating on the state of other countries, they are primarily concerned with Spain first, and they spare no criticism of socialism in their own country, being as merciless in their criticisms of Spanish Socialists as they are of Putin, of Cuba, and of any socialist/Communist nation. And just as an FYI, they've been VERY critical of the EU as well, especially it's soft treatment of socialists. If anything, outono's been far more consistent in being anti-socialist than Putin EVER was.). Third of all, Putin as of now is ALLYING with China, meaning they're not even enemies at all, or rivals. You're making the same mistake that people in the 1930s did with Stalin and Hitler before their Molotov-Ribbentropp act. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 17:10, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::I haven't read any of the JBS stuff on Putin, and if it's anything like how you characterize it, they are wrong, assuming you are characterizing is correctly. Russia harbors no aggressive intentions against anybody outside its borders. Russia, as always, is preoccupied with defending its immense borders (and possible hostile actors within its borders). As to Ukraine, if it thinks it's going to convert Sevastopol into a NATO naval base, think again. As Dana Carvey would say, ''Naga doit''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:06, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::It's EXACTLY what they're saying. And BTW, it's not just JBS, it's plenty of other conservative sources as well. And BTW, did you know that Putin literally FUNNELED the Steele Dossier as well, aka the whole Russian Collusion thing? Don't take it from me, read it from Daniel Greenfield on Front Page Magazine: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ And don't forget outono, they're critical of Putin, the EU, all the socialist actors around the world. Actually, with the information FPM provided among others, if you support Putin, you support the Russian Dossier. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 18:19, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::Putin handed the Steele dossier to [[Peter Strzok]] and said, "Here, do something with it"? No, don't think so. That was the Hillary-Brennan-Comey-McCabe pipeline. Now, if you wanna discuss who handed it to the NYT, WaPo, ''etal'', you're not going to find Putin there, either. The pipeline goes Hillary-[[Jake Sullivan]]-[[Isikoff]] etal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:26, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::He used a cutout. Of course Putin wouldn't directly order for or hand over those things, he's not stupid. Even Lenin avoided directly signing the death warrants that the Chekha carried out despite obviously encouraging it behind the scenes. Heck, if anything, Putin PAID those guys to spread that disinformation via Vincent Roberti and [https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/05/lobbying-push-russian-pipeline/ Putin's] Gazprom lobbying group. Me? I'd fight against China AND Russia, heck, fight against any Communist country, even risk rendering the world to cinders just to ensure Communism's dead and God's iron fist is controlling the world alongside his son Jesus Christ. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 18:33, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::I gitit I gitit. Hillary was just a stooge as was the whole corrupt Democrat machine and MSM. There were victimized by one of Putin's evil plots to take over the world. That, of course is why we have to put back these idiots and maintain them in power, to defend against the evil Putin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::I never said the Democrats or Hillary were victims of Putin. Actually, if anything, I'd argue they're ALLIES, aka, collaborators with Putin, not victims of any sort. And for the record, I don't support the Democrats, at all. Especially not the ones who pushed the dossier. If anything, the fact that the same guys who pushed the Russia Collusion narrative to oust Trump are getting paid by Putin proves that, no, if anything, THEY'RE the ones colluding with Putin. If ANYONE was a victim of Putin, it's Trump. And quite frankly, you're acting more like Lyn Wood when he ordered for people to not vote during the period between the election and Biden's "inauguration", which apparently resulted in those crypto-commies Jon Ossoff and Warnock being elected into office (that, and voter fraud). And for the record, Obama was allied with Putin even back then, as you can see [https://thenewamerican.com/putin-bombs-obama-s-syrian-rebels-obama-joins-putin-alliance/ here]. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:29, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::Congrats. It's only December 2021, and you figured out the Trump-Russia hoax is a hoax. I had it figured by December 2016, and provided the corroborating evidence by March 2017, two months before Comey got fired and Mueller was called in to coverup the scandal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:34, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::::I already figured it out even earlier, like during March 2016. I knew Trump would never have colluded with Russia at all, that it was a hoax. Heck, despite my being autistic/aspergers with humor not being one of my strongest suits, even I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office. And the reason I knew that, is because Putin made no secret to wanting to restore Communism in Russia (I've already seen photos years back of Putin giving speeches in front of Soviet paraphanelia on Breitbart, BEFORE the 2016 election I should add, and posts on freerepublic making clear that he was pushing for a revitalization of Stalin). My mom also recognized that Trump couldn't have colluded with Putin either, even pointing out that Putin would have known what he was going to get regarding a good deal via Hillary Clinton and her Uranium deal. The only difference between you and me regarding the Trump-Russia Hoax is that I was firmly aware of Russia under Putin STILL being communist, while you are naively believing that they've given up on Communism despite even KGB defectors making it clear that they still hold on to Communism. And BTW, I pegged Russia as still being Communist as early as 2012 when I briefly saw in ''Dreams of my Father'' Karl Marx's statue being in Moscow, something that, had they genuinely given up on it, they would have torn it down like they did various Lenin and Stalin statues. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:40, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::You're betraying yourself with the above posting. Let me count the ways. (a) "Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office." Trump never said or implied any such thing. You are repeating Democrat commie agitprop (meaning you do not understand anything about the issue). (b) Putin had no involvement in any way, shape, or form in the origins of the dossier. (c) The Trump-Russia hoax at no point ever was a foreign policy issue. It was purely, from origin and inception, domestic politic corruption. (d) You continue to imply that Vladimir Putin, and/or Communism, has something, anything, to do with Trump-Russia You are in fact mouthing DNC talking points at this point. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:51, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::At this point, based on your posting above, I don't think you know or understand anything about what the scandal or crime was in the Trump-Russia hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::Trump-Russia has absolutely nothing to do with Russia. It was a hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::The origins of Trump-Russia can be traced back to (a) the long delays in investigating Hillary's emails; (b) the fact that James Comey, and not Loretta Lynch, held a press conference clearing Hillary. This should have raised eyebrows everywhere. (c) The Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting. These were all the clues in open source MSM that something was seriously wrong with the Obama [[DOJ]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::::That's actually what I was referring to. The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. [https://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/07/25/trump-taunts-claims-that-russia-hacked-dnc-emails-for-him-the-new-joke-in-town Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them] (and the Blaze, the source of that, was on Trump's side, not the dossier's side. Same goes for [https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/donald-trump-russian-network-vladimir-putin/2016/09/08/id/747391/ Newsmax], which the democrat agitprop hates as well.). My dad watched the broadcast, BTW, and he recognized it as a joke. As far as the Trump-Russia collusion Hoax, let me remind you that Daniel Greenfield, in the link I provided to you above, specifically pointed out that ALL of the Democrats who claimed Trump engaged in collusion, ended up paid by Putin and his shell corporation, meaning they if ANYTHING were the ones colluding with Putin, and more importantly, that Putin was pushing the collusion hoax as well. And yes, ultimately, it DOES have to do with Russia as well. And BTW, if I were you, I'd dedicate full hatred to both China AND Russia, not to mention Cuba, Vietnam, Venezuela, and the like, any and all Communist countries, dedicate every waking hour to wiping out Communism across the globe, and replacing it with the governments they had prior to Communism's take over, bare minimum (in Russia's case, reinstitute the Tsar). I would NEVER side with a Communist, period. I'd fight ALL of them, even down to the last breath if I must, as God demands that I and others do, fight to the bitter end, not care if it results in our extinction as a result. God wants Communism dead above all else, to ensure his rule is NEVER challenged at all. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 20:20, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::::::::It was an inside job or "hack" in May 2016. In August, Trump jokingly invited Russia to clear their name from the false accusations that "Russia hacked the DNC", or that "WikiLeaks is a KGB front." (You still seem to think Russia had something to do with the "DNC hack". I suppose you think Julian Assange is a KGB agent, too).
:::::::::::::::::::::[[Michael Sussmann]], who was just indicted by John Durham, is the guy who initiated the DNC hack hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:::::::::::::::::::::Let's clarify the misleading narrative you began here: Trump's comments to "Russia" had nothing to do with '''[https://conservapedia.com/CrowdStrike#DNC_hack_hoax Sussmann's DNC hack hoax]''' - Trump was talking about recovering Hillary's emails, which Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and Lynch never prosecuted for destruction of U.S. government documents and mishandling of national security information. Be careful where you are going with DNC BS. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::::::I never said anything about Russia having anything to do with the DNC hack at all. If anything, I specifically indicated that Donald Trump was joking on that front, in other words, that he trolled the MSM and Russia WASN'T responsible for the hack. But Russia DEFINTIELY had something to do with the Dossier, especially when all the principal actors of that dossier, from Pelosi to Schumer, conveniently got paid by one of Putin's shell corporations around the time of the pipeline thing, as Daniel Greenfield pointed out in that article. Also, Wikileaks is obviously not a KGB front (the KGB died with the Soviet Union), and aside from that, Julian Assange isn't even on the Russian payroll, but he is definitely a Marxist-Leninist. I WILL admit I probably mixed up the two events. My mistake on that front. But Putin being Communist has been backed up by Conservative/right wing sources who also have spent quite a few times condemning various communist deep state groups as well, including Ion Mihai Pacepa. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:::::::::::::::::::::::*''I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office.''
:::::::::::::::::::::::*''The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them
:::::::::::::::::::::::Do you even pay attention to what you post, or do you just like trolling me? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:47, December 24, 2021 (EST)

::::And they certainly have [https://youtu.be/cMFIWBQB1kE a better national anthem than then we do - including the lyrics (click CC).] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 05:22, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::I think it is mostly due to Eastern Orthodox Christianity being more hierarchal than Protestant Christianity. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:46, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::Except for the 70 year captivity in the Soviet era, Russia never had a separation of church and state in its 1,000 year history. And still doesn't. Even in Soviet times the people (''narodny'') never accepted separation of church and state. What is odd, how Muslims are content to live under the Russian Orthodox rather than under Shariah theocracy. The Jews OTOH, have had big problems with it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)

===Greenfield article===
While the [https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ Greenfield article certainly is interesting] and worthy of coverage in its own right, it adds nothing to our knowledge of the internal conspirators and law breakers involved in the [[Russia collusion hoax]]. These all are merely Democrat elected officials who spewed ''[[WaPo]]'' bullcrap. And the point of the article is, that while they were lying and deceiving the American electorate, they were also taking money from Russians. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Watch this video. It is very informative ==

Watch this video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTf4JYfMuoI Bad News: How Woke Media Undermines Democracy]

It is very informative. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Watched most of it last night. Will finish up today or tomorrow. How did they hold a symposium on this at Berkley without leftist Stormtroopers not burning the building down? Is it possible in 2021 for scholarship, discussion, and debate to still occur at leftist institutions? Makes me somewhat suspicious. She says, 'eight million people who voted for Obama also voted for Trump, so the idea Trump supporters are all racists is bs.' Better late than never. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:54, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::Here is another excellent video on the book with multiple people giving their perspectives: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKD7e5WoF_8 How woke media undermines democracy: A book event with Batya Ungar-Sargon].

::The videos confirmed what I thought all along which is the "golden rule". Namely, he who holds the gold rules. The left-leaning media caters to wealthy people on the left side of the spectrum because that maximizes advertising revenue. And the right-leaning media caters the wealthy right leaning wealthy people because that maximizes their advertising revenue. In addition, it is engagement that drives up revenue online so news stories are crafted to push people's buttons (like cause moral outrage). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::If it bleeds, it leads, as they say in the newspaper industry. People don't want stories about a newborn liter of puppies on the front page. In sales we say 'fear sells'. In fact, that is the secret of sales - the message is always negative. The two motivating factors to get people to part with their money is fear and greed. Fear that you may miss out on a deal or that your house will burn down with everybody in it ''if you don't buy'', and greed - 'wouldn't you like to be the first one on your block to have one?'
:::So that's how you capture people's attention - fear and greed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::This explains the incessant [[race card]], Dems have to scare the daylights out Blacks to keep them motivated to keep them voting. "The Klan is going to burn a cross on your yard!" Repubs have to recognize how powerful and effective this latent internal fear in Blacks is. So "racism", "white supremacy", "white privilege", "systemic racism" become buzzwords and phrases tossed around to great effect. Ignoring the impact it has, and why these are used, is not helpful, and can even fuel more of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::The point of the book/video is that white, liberal elites care more about racism than blacks/Latinos and have hyper concern about racism because it makes them feel morally superior. And that hyper anti-racism causes radical policies like defund the police which actually hurts blacks/Latinos. And that this hyper anti-racism is partly fueled by the media whose journalists/interns come from Ivy League schools where hyper, anti-racism is also fueled.

::::Meanwhile, these white, liberal elites want open borders which drive down wages for Anerican Blacks/Latinos and working class whites. And they fight school choice (which blacks/Latinos want) which would give Black/Latinos and working class whites better educations. And these same white, liberal elites pushed policies that shipped blue-collar jobs overseas which hurt working class Black/Latinos and working class whites. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::::It's a ''[[quid pro quo]]:'' white liberals in politics and media spread alarm and fear among Blacks with, "boogeyman is gonna getcha," for which they hope to be rewarded with votes.
:::::In 2020, the Democrats already knew the "cry wolf" effect is diminishing: and [https://conservapedia.com/images/e/e6/Support_for_Democratic_Candidates%2C_2012-2020.PNG in fact provides us with evidence of voter fraud.] While the percentage of Blacks voting Democrat continues to slip, all the fraud and ballot box stuffing occurred predominantly in black precincts. It's pathological: Democrats would have to cheat in black precincts with or without covid and mail-in ballots, if they hoped to win with declining numbers of blacks voting Democrat. Fortunately for them, they had enough of experienced ballot box stuffing teams in place already, and even were able to train new participants in how to do it in such a massive effort. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:23, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022 ==

Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022.[https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999]

Compete.com was retired previously.

It looks like Similarweb.com will be the only free major ranking of a website's traffic.

Similarweb.com is more reliable than Alexa, but it is updated less frequently. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:This means two things: (a) Amazon (and Bezos), which owns Alexa, will move it resources into another area to attack and try to destroy conservative websites: and (b) numerous startups (both black hat and white hat) will step up to try to fill the gap left by Alexa. So we'll have to go through a period of screening new startups beginning now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

::In January/February, I will have access to a SEMRush.com subscription which ranks websites by web traffic. The public can see the rankings for the top 100 websites ranked by SEMRush.[https://www.semrush.com/blog/most-visited-websites/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:24, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Actually, the fact that Compete.com and Alexa.com disappeared/disappearing means there is not a lot of money in providing free rankings so the gap might not be filled. But there is not a gap since SimilarWeb.com still exists. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Alexa's pretty big; they have to wait til March to fill out contracts for service that exist. They likely will take many of their clients with them into a new subscription service (under whatever name). Similarweb and SEMRush will pick up a lot. But the global market is sooo big, there will be a rush by small startups. It will not be unlike all the smaller competitors Twitter and YouTube have. And they'll offer free service to attract new customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:37, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Alexa is so big, it feels it has gathered enough knowledge about how the business works (and have gathered the best customers) they can squash any competitors and starts ups. But one or two small startups will survive in the long run.
::::Also, Alexa feels the market has reached a saturation point to where the prospects for future growth do not require them to offer free service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Anyways, this explains why their free ranking service has gone haywire over the past 9 months - they didn't want any new customers. It would only require them to hire more expert help to take on piddly-squat customers. Now they can concentrate their best employees on their best customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Actually, Alexa.com had a free service plus with a subscription, you could get more data. Both are disappearing in 2022.

Anyways, I have access to multiple tools that show a website's relative strength compared to other websites.

For example, here is some information from Ahrefs.com about Conservapedia:

[[File:Conservapedia linking websites.JPG|thumbnail|center|700px|Amount of domains linking to Conservapedia according to Ahrefs.com]].
{{Clear}}
The domain strength reflects both the quality/quantity of domains linking to Conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:No way is Alexa giving up the money from its subscription service. It is simply changing its name. If that were not true, the market to fill in the gap would be even more wide open. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::"Existing subscriptions will remain active until May 1, 2022 UTC. After that, customers will no longer have access to Alexa.com."[https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999]

::In May of 2022, Alexa will end as a subscription service. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:11, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::Yes, the name Alexa. It's no different than when the [[NKVD]] changed its name to the [[KGB]], or [[ACORN]] changed its name to dozens of other names in different states. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::There is no way they will walk away from the revenue stream they built over 25 years. And even if they did, the people they fired will start up a new business and reclaim the lost customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::They will walk away from a revenue if the [[opportunity cost]] warrants it. It comes down to return on investment (ROI). If a higher ROI can be had elsewhere, Alexa's subscribers will be abandoned. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:43, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::Amazon purchased the company for $250 millilon in 1996; it made $6 million last year. So yah, it looks like a loser. So they shut it down and write off the losses (which go against income of Amazon). But nobody walks away from the $6 million revenue stream they built up, and the knowledge of the industry they created (at such a cost). So it gets reorganized. Some employees get transferred, others go off and create a new company with their knowledge base and existing client list. Now, the relationship of the new company to Amazon is different question; Bezos may be just a stockholder in the new company - apart from Amazon (or other executives buy stock or make loans to their former employees).
:::::Bottomline, if it is not an opportunity for the existing hands-on employees with knowledge and the client list, it is an opportunity for others to gross $6 million a year. The demand from the existing clients will not disappear with Alexa. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Can you please check your email? ==

Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Monday, 22:20, December 26, 2021 (EST)

== Hi Rob. This is Nishant Xavier ==

Hi Rob. How are you? This is Nishant. I'm back now and am in the process of writing a Book on how we can distribute Crores (10s of Millions) of Bibles to the Masses in India. I want to complete the Conservapedia Bible Project Translation. I like it: https://conservapedia.com/Matthew_1-9_(Translated) But I have a question. Why is "He" and "His" etc not Capitalized when referring to Lord Jesus Christ? It should be imho, as He is King of Kings. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]][[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]] 17:07, February 1, 2022 (EST)
:Welcome back. Good to hear from you. I know User:Liberaltears was anxious to talk with you about a few things. As to the CBP, I'm not certain what the answer is cause I've not been involved in the Project. However, my guess would be that some editors deem capitalizing "He" as somewhat archaic, although I can't say for sure. Anyways, welcome back. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:17, February 1, 2022 (EST)

== Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts ==

Uh, do you not want any rebuttals against the arguments used to disprove its existence? - [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-8-22
:Huh, what? you mean Marxists claim it doesn't exist? Figures. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:03, February 8, 2022 (EST)

Can’t imagine why that would be the case. In any event, it would probably be useful to display the arguments used to claim it’s a conspiracy theory before said arguments are picked apart by the facts. Do you agree? - [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-8-22

== Please check your email ==

Please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:43, February 13, 2022 (EST)
:Check your email again. I responded. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:12, February 13, 2022 (EST)
::Check your email again. I responded another time. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:24, February 13, 2022 (EST)

== Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts Pt 2 ==

Rob, I thought we had an understanding. What are you doing? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21
:Understanding on what? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:FYI, if you think you're going to hijack the Cultural Marxism page so proponents of Cultural Marxism can call their critics 'anti-Semites', think again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:21, February 14, 2022 (EST)

What do you mean ‘hijacked’? The criticism section is being expanded so that it can refute accusations of anti-semitism. How on earth do you end up misinterpreting all this? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21

:Where are the accusations coming from? Are they from a reputable or reliable source other than an extremist source? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:39, February 14, 2022 (EST)

The accusations are literally on wikipedia and any other leftist outlet trying to call it a myth. Are you seriously unaware of this? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21

:No, it's to be expected. As Wikipedia says, 'an extremist source can only be used about itself.' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:15, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:The purpose of our Cultural Marxism page is to describe what it is, not rehash debates and talking points among Marxists to being exposed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:18, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:Why would you consider what Marxists say about Cultural Marxism as credible? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:The situation is no different than Marxist school boards that claim [[Critical Race Theory]] doesn't exist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:28, February 14, 2022 (EST)

If you don’t want the marxist talking points to be shown and debunked then why do you even bother to have a criticism page pointing out why they think it’s fake? And why are you assuming that I think what they say is credible? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21
:(a) good question. It needs proofreading. (b) why do you insist on inserting Marxist propaganda? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:47, February 14, 2022 (EST)

Well while you’re ‘proofreading’ arguments literally made to refute marxist propaganda, do you mind not rushing to assumptions and actually realize that Im trying to help the article? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]]

== Image uploading ==
Hello RobSmith! Could you help in uploading [[Conservapedia:Image_upload_requests#Echmiatsin.2C_Armenian_Apostolic_Church_and_Michael_Patrick_Mulroy|these two photos]]? For about two months no one answered me. I will be grateful for your help! [[User:Garik Avakian|Sincerely, Garik Avakian]] ([[User talk:Garik Avakian|talk]]) 02:58, February 28, 2022 (EST)
:Okay, give me few minutes. Sorry for the delay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:09, February 28, 2022 (EST)
:;Okay, they are in the [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Upload log]. Sorry for the long delay. I never did get the message from David. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:20, February 28, 2022 (EST)
::: Thank you very much for your help! [[User:Garik Avakian|Sincerely, Garik Avakian]] ([[User talk:Garik Avakian|talk]]) 13:19, March 1, 2022 (EST)

== Ukraine and the Wuhan Lab ==
Hey, RobSmith.

I noticed that you recently added a section on the alleged bioweapon labs to the [[Ukraine]] article. With that in mind, I’m interested in knowing if your perspective on the Wuhan lab has changed. I’ve always been suspicious that it was actually our own government who released the virus and that China was framed, while you have always maintained that China was indeed the culprit. Again, has your perspective on the Wuhan lab changed?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:34, March 1, 2022 (EST)
:No, not unless someone could show evidence of political collusion in addition scientific and commercial.

:And of course you have the question of motive. Now, motives in the CCP and the US public and private commercial interest may be easy to theorize, the problem gets down to ''who'' however, in addition to evidence. So you're left with just a theory, and a pretty well unfounded one, at that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:51, March 1, 2022 (EST)

:In the case of the CCP, the political motivations are transparent: the Trump tariffs were about to take effect, the international organ harvesting Study was about to made public, and Trump stood a good chance of being re-elected.

:In the case of Fauci, despite his promise to get rid of Trump on January 11, 2017 with a pandemic, when news came of the "leak", his first reaction was "oh goodie, more money for Pfizer". Then he got an email saying "but your fingerprints are all over it." So one would have to prove a larger political agenda between the [[Deep State]] and the CCP to deliberately exterminate millions of people and shrink the global economy. Difficult task, but not impossible, that maybe your children or grandchild may one day wish to tackle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:04, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::incidentally, they are not "alleged bioweapon labs" in Ukraine, they are bio weapon labs owned and operated by the DoD. The cover story is they are disposing of Soviet-era bio weapons, but we have strong evidence of ongoing research. It'll be interesting watch them being handed over to Russian forces, and what kinda English language documents the Russians will make public. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:13, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::Now in the [[North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization#History]], they got the [[marginal cost]] of killing people down to 29 cents per head with a deadly strain of Yellow fever distributed through mosquitos, but nukes remain your best bet with a marginal cost of 10-12 cents per head, last I heard (these estimates would have to be revised to include the cost of storage and maintenance of a nuke over 30 years or whatever timeframe). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:28, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::If Trump is to be criticized for anything, it's that he didn't listen to Pompeo or whoever who warned him, "they could release a bioweapon and cause a global pandemic before they ever pay a dime in tariffs, and you could be voted out." Somebody had to tell Trump that, but he dismissed as "they're just bluffing." Kinda like NATO idiots who think Putin is bluffing as they try to stir up nuclear war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:44, March 1, 2022 (EST)
==Harris==
Hi. Here is her embarrassing reaction to an important question.
[https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1501907918261788673]
Image [https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/03/harris-poland-presser-03.jpg][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Harris_in_Poland.PNG Got it.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 12:05, March 10, 2022 (EST)::Thanks. Photo credit seems to be NYPost.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
::In the 1990s, when Sen. Moynihan was still alive, we used to talk about "the dumbing down of America." With Harris (and AOC) we've come full circle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:26, March 10, 2022 (EST)

==Frank James==

NY Subway attacker (Apr.12.22) Frank James AKA Frank Whitaker - [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQLpkupWYAMWjw2?format=jpg image]
[https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1514029565622075405 source].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Frank_Whitaker.jpg Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:34, April 13, 2022 (EDT)

==Re Mosque and Gaza==

These are pics from Apr 15 and Apr 16 about the rioters' rocks at the Al Aqsa Mosque, ready to throw at police and at Jewish worshippers.
[https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQiRnyrXwAEZ5Sb?format=jpg 1] , [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQYN6lNWQAAVcq4?format=jpg 2].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload They're in the Upload Log]. The rioters wearing shoes I found extremely interesting. Of course, our readers need more context about how disrespectful that is, and how it shows preplanning and intent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:46, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
::Indeed I inserted, that according to their own laws...etc.
[https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjY-4WFG0yPOkiCpSEuEfEJtUvxZa64JVofeSjhVmagNV9RE89u8e_5XtwPP5CkGORdpE2h2wQt4V5rQ5dqR91aII1lu9DbS0MmPfGYbFtQCd1zgWJXTpKnWBjvpNPsTjVoYHHOPQKATnV2vnO8jWtkoz7ljFQ7deHi5XlHq6dgKUOZgEWdPQ8/w329-h419/stockpile%20rocks.jpg See the pile of rocks at their mosque], [https://www.israelhayom.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cartoon-4.jpg cartoon, how they use Al Aqsa].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:16, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:Looks like they were preparing to commemorate George Floyd. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:You need these uploaded? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:15, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
::yes, they called all 2020 rioters like in OR/WA as "protesters" of course. When you're able, have the time, please upload.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:52, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:::Ok, [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload got em]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:18, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

==PIJ==
This [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQTAfjkXoAoS-HX?format=jpg] belonged to ''Sha's Kamamji'', of [[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]] before he was eliminated in Jenin when he opened fire.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:51, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Sha's_Kamamji.jpg Got it]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
::Cheers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

==Burning their own mosque==
Hi. Can you get a screenshit from within [https://twitter.com/LiorHaiat/status/1516699900779577351 this clip] and upload it? This is today, when "Palestinian" Islamists throw Molotov cocktail ontebted against police and fall inside their holy" compound.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload How's this?] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 11:37, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

== Bytemsbu is wrong ==

You are tight. Bytemsbu is wrong, like on so many edits. It seems he has an anti Jewish agenda problem. Using "neo con" cover.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])
==NYT==
Good morning. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDcugJzXMAE0XYR?format=jpg This one] was hired in Feb 2022. Please upload, when can. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:02, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Abdulrahim.jpg Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:33, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

== I see you are still here. ==

What is going on with the war and stuff? --[[User:Yeschayi|Yeschayi]] ([[User talk:Yeschayi|talk]]) 14:21, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
:Having failed to get Poland to start WWIII, NATO apparently has convinced Romania to do it with an attack on ethnic Russians in Transnistria and oil shipments by rail. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 14:48, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
::I see. --[[User:Yeschayi|Yeschayi]] ([[User talk:Yeschayi|talk]]) 17:06, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

You claim to be a bastion of free speech but in Russia people can be sentenced for to 15 years in prison for peacefully protesting against the war, indeed even calling the invasion of Ukraine a war can land you in prison. How is that in anyway free speech? You also claim to be pro life but hundreds of children and thousands of other innocent victims have been killed, even murdered in The Ukraine, or were they all Nazis? I think it is far more simple than that. Putin helped Trump and Zelensky refused to too. You love Trump and hate Biden so all your morals go out of the window which means they were false morals to begin with.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:05, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
:Thanks for that. Should I add you to the pro-Nazi column? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:09, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
::How is condemning murder and restrictions of free speech pro Nazi? Those are against everything the Nazi's were about. You calling me pro Nazi is like calling User:Conservative pro atheism. How about the you address the murder/free speech/false moral issues I bought up rather then ask a sarcastic not even wrong question?--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:38, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
:::Good question: How is condemning US complicity in the murder of Donbas civilians and children since 2014 and the [[Ministry of Truth]] pro Nazi? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:53, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
::::I have not once shown any support of what you claim while you have again and again supported supported the murder of Ukrainians.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 14:18, May 10, 2022 (EDT)

User talk:RobSmith

2022-05-10T16:48:10Z

Chewy Suarez:

User talk:RobSmith

2022-05-10T16:38:44Z

Chewy Suarez: /* I see you are still here. */

*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12]]
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13]]

==Dec 2021==

I've been trying to figure out how to work this one in, combining the Rittenhouse verdict and [[Fredogate]] with the subject of self-defense: [https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/11/27/says-the-guy-who-threatens-to-beat-people-up-a-lot-chris-cuomo-is-unhappy-with-self-defense-definition-1168453/ ‘Says the guy who threatens to beat people up;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:53, December 1, 2021 (EST)
:Will look into it. I have to say that Cuomo wasn't that far lefty before 2016.| Good morning. Please caution on first image, not on an empty stomach.
[https://www.news1.co.il/uploadimages/NEWS1-13-413784205913544.jpg (Oct/2000)]
[https://img.mako.co.il/2015/10/13/17029_C.jpg wild mob]
[https://www.makorrishon.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/WhatsApp-Image-2021-12-02-at-08.50.18.jpeg Hamas cartoon condemning PA for rescuing the 2 Jews Dec-1-2021][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:14, December 2, 2021 (EST)
::Real "victims" Smollet & Brooks LOL-
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollett-real-victim-attack-chicago-lawyer-argues | https://www.foxnews.com/us/waukesha-parade-suspect-darrell-brooks-jail-dehumanized-demonized-interview [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

:Looks like a developing, long-running storyline and narrative. Brooks apparently is the next Michael Brown of Ferguson fame. Brooks apparently was trying to surrender to the police (who were incompetently protecting minority citizens from a neighboring city) while fleeing a knife fight when his car accidentally lost control and killed six people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:32, December 2, 2021 (EST)
::Is woke-ism till in the "works" in "improving" this theory? [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::Oh yes, definitely. These poor oppressed individuals Smollett & Brooks, in their desperate actions to fight for social justice, now face the white man's justice. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:13, December 2, 2021 (EST)

::::2 recent...[https://b7net.co.il/dyncontent/2021/11/29/ba4ffd78-e16a-4150-bb28-bd7ddf8e2a5b.jpeg Nov-29-21] |[https://ynet-images1.yit.co.il/picserver5/crop_images/2021/11/29/BJgxmexfFK/BJgxmexfFK_258_173_717_404_0_large.jpg Nov-28-21][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Done]. Sorry for the delay. I'm up to my ears in research on [[Faucism]] right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 22:26, December 4, 2021 (EST)
:::::I got the lynching one, too. Also, my Skype account crashed and I haven't reloaded it yet, so I'm back on Slack for instant messaging. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:28, December 4, 2021 (EST)

::::::I'm on there only once in a while. I hope you succeed with Skype etc.. This 2019 is classic, as both messages are on packages... Jihad and swastika...[https://www.0404.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/חבילות-חשד-למטען-כביש-חוצה-יהודה1-e1564340789639.jpg July/2019, Islamic Jihad w/ swastika in Judea][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:26, December 5, 2021 (EST)

:::::::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Jihad_and_swastika.jpg Got it]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:35, December 5, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Seen latest on Chris Cuomo?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::::::It'll be interesting to see where he lands. Maybe as Antfa's press spokesman. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:24, December 5, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::This [https://t.co/uGLJtHvlfg Chris Cuomo’s entire career was worth it for this one moment ] is epic.|Another topic, look at this woke Dem useful idiot fooled [https://nypost.com/2021/12/04/woke-new-jersey-dem-fooled-by-fake-rabbis-parody-twitter-account/] the joke of the year.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::::::::Dunno whether to laugh or cry. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 10:11, December 7, 2021 (EST)

===Image===
[https://images1.ynet.co.il/PicServer5/2017/03/30/7685990/76859850100082640360no.jpg Himmler to Mufti 1 (1943)]|[https://images1.ynet.co.il//PicServer5/2017/03/30/7685998/76859870100079640360no.jpg Himmler to Mufti 2 (1943)]|[https://images.jpost.com/image/upload/f_auto,fl_lossy/t_JM_ArticleMainImageFaceDetect/469952 Mufti's Muslim-SS Handschar]|[https://64.media.tumblr.com/6db777f1acef5f25b9aae589731ea5b9/tumblr_pridnjoCTJ1r29p1do1_1280.jpg lying Rashida1]|[https://i.imgur.com/pcM7XRJ.png L.R.2], when you get a chance.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload All caught up now.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 10:29, December 7, 2021 (EST)
::Thanks. Appreciated, especially that you're so busy. Can you grab a screenshot of this [https://books.google.com/books?id=X74zAQAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Shukairy+%22Our+common+target%22]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Survey_of_China_Mainland_Press,_Issues_3406-3428,_1965,_p_35.PNG Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:20, December 8, 2021 (EST)
::::HI. I couldn't stop laughing. This is awesome https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1473079182980788226 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, December 20, 2021 (EST)
:::::It's like Andrew Klavan said, we have to laugh our way through the fall of the republic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:13, December 20, 2021 (EST)
::::::Yup. For now. Till with the Grace of God it will all be improved.~~•
:::::::And God acts through people. This we have to realize and keep in mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 22:51, December 20, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Sure. Stay safe this holiday season. G'night.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

__

Hi. This one is shameful...[https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1473435061768929281/photo/1 Kimberlynn]
Happy New Year![[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:18, December 27, 2021 (EST)
:Yah, I saw this story, and it was so unbelievable, I wasn't sure which article it could be included in. This looks almost like cult behavior. [ https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski.PNG] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::You're right. Can you grab a screenshot where her name appears at WATKINS section? [https://www.capitolhillclusterschool.org/lsat][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::[https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski_LSAT.PNG How's this?] I can crop it down to just the bottom half, if you want. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:13, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::::As always, you're doing great. | I made the distinction between WW2 era and today at ''antifa''. I hope it's clear. As today it's a clear '''oxymoron'''. They always hide their twisted ideas under perceived nice "benign" titles.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::::Yah, that Antifa article is pretty good as is, but it could use some reorganization, clarity, and updating. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:04, December 27, 2021 (EST)
:::::Basically, it's too cramped. It needs some expansion. The original authors wrote it as if it was the final word on the subject, but much information and interest has developed since then. Perhaps dividing into eras, like pre-WWII, East German, evolution and change, late 20th century, Trump era, Biden era, etc.

___

Hi. When you get a chance:
[https://www.brooklynpaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/00E83409-D7DC-4478-9033-E9C36ED9AB0A-1200x675.png June 27, 2021. Little Palestine, Bay Ridge]| [https://2nqf1a2pxrmv1i0jyy3lbz8e-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ScreenShot2020-12-22at4_55_07PM_644fad5187eac0ced9a0031c5b9a2d60_2000-298x300.jpg Swastika on Park Slope school, Dec 13, 2020]| [https://newyork.cbslocal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/14578484/2021/12/3523-21-68-Pct.-HCTF-12-26-21-Photo-1.jpg?w=1068 Hate crime, little Palestine, Bay Ridge, Dec 28, 2021]. Regards.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==Lie of the year==
Can someone create a graphic per this:

[https://freebeacon.com/?p=1551060 LIE OF THE THE YEAR: ‘I Will Shut Down The Virus’]
<blockquote>
Biden's COVID-19 death count passes 400K

Andrew Stiles • December 23, 2021

More than 400,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 since President Joe Biden took office.
Biden achieved the grim milestone despite repeatedly telling the American people that electing him president was the only way to "shut down the virus." That turned out to be an egregious lie.

The Washington Free Beacon projects that Biden's COVID-19 death toll will exceed that of his predecessor (408,450) by the end of the year, and will reach approximately 420,069 by the time he delivers his first State of the Union address.</blockquote>
Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:I've been on the lookout for a graphic, too. Maybe I can ask LT to do something with it.
:Anther thing I've been looking for, which according to public and private agencies that keep such records and are often delayed months and years, is the number of illegal immigrant deaths, both in custody and out. Since it's been a record year of illegal immigration, it naturally follows that it must also have been a record year of illegal immigrant deaths, whether in custody, crossing the border, or trying to cross the border. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:17, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:Since Biden invited illegals in, if a mother and child died of thirst in the Sonora desert 100 miles south of the border, or were murdered by cayotes for not paying a fee, those deaths can also be laid on Biden's doorstep. That's what Democrats call "compassion." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]

::What an interesting and such an important subject. You're so right. I'm sure there are so many unknown cases. 2,800 died between 2009-2019 [https://www.animalpolitico.com/2019/03/mexicanos-murieron-frontera-eu/]. Yet:<blockquote>650 deaths on the US border.- Mexico EN 2021, according to organization 1:18 (CNN) - At least 650 people died when trying to cross the border between Mexico and the United States this year, more than any other year since an international body began documenting</blockquote>
[https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2021/12/09/muertes-migrantes-frontera-mexico-estados-unidos-trax/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::I've been studying this question for much of this year now, and it's hard to back up numbers with good sources, but I'd say 650 on the U.S side sounds very realistic (up from a 280 average over the past 10 years). And it cannot be conclusive, cause we have little or no idea what happens on the Mexican side, which has all the same qualifying factor to account. And the numbers of those forced into human trafficing and sexual slavery could be 10 times as high as what happens to an illegal once they reach the U.S. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:39, December 23, 2021 (EST)

==R.T.==
Seen [https://www.wnd.com/2021/11/notorious-dem-rashida-tlaib-grins-talks-dream-release-every-con-federal-prison/ this]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:Yah, this deserves follow up and adding to her bio. Dems are splitting between the "Normal Democrats" and Defunders right now, but Tlaib seems intent on keeping the Defund Police/End Bail/Abolish the Prison Industrial Complex movement alive upto the 2022 elections. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:38, November 27, 2021 (EST)

==Qatar==
Qatari hypocrisy - cartoon in Chatlie Hebdo [https://mobile.twitter.com/oritperlov/status/1429773962871984130/photo/1]. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==New section==
Hi.
Good [https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1488617503853060101 answer] by McConnell. Regards. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==AOC image==
Hi Rob. [https://mobile.twitter.com/GPrime85/status/1441136342637944832/photo/1 img] Caption -
"You mean all those poor rockets won't even get a chance to land?" [https://twitter.com/gprime85/status/1441136342637944832 source][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

==Racism images==
Hi Rob. This one relates to the image you uploaded days ago of Time100. The elkurd twins.
[https://i2.wp.com/www.israellycool.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/muna-hitler.png?ssl=1 img]
[https://algulf.net/2021/07/04/palestinian-arab-poster-boy-mohammed-el-kurds-jew-hate-emerges/ source] | This one is about Arab Oakestinisbs" putting up nazi flags near their mosque in Beit Ummar in 2014. [https://www.srugim.co.il/i/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/TAZ1__w200h200q80.jpg img] [https://mobile.srugim.co.il/article/45694 source] | This nazi flag was put up today by Arabs Palestinians in Beit Ummar and was removed by the IDF.
[https://twitter.com/Saher95755738/status/1441784045021671428?s=20 img] [https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/nazi-flag-taken-down-by-idf-soldiers-in-hebron-680311/amp info][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:55, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:Ok, sorry, i forgot. You want the AOC image, too, right. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:59, September 25, 2021 (EDT)

::OK, got'em all. [https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 21:12, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
===2022===
:::Another anti-Asian hate crime, and as usual, not by a MAGA guy...
[https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2022/03/f0f66810-46be-4d22-9ad1-d34973fc3941.jpg image], [https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17954960/who-is-tammel-esco/amp/ source]. Thanks [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])

:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Tammel_Esco.PNG Here you go]. I got some theories why these tensions exist between Africans and Asians. I could never prove them to be true, but I think both groups being minorities, are hypersensitive around strangers. They have almost like a sixth sense. Members of one group can "give off vibes" of fear upon seeing a stranger, and the members of the other group are quick to read how receptive strangers are to them. These impressions can happen in a moment, without a word being spoken. And if the strangers receives "negative vibes", they can be quick to violence. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:19, March 15, 2022 (EDT)

== [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] ==

Want to make "New Pages" lowercase as "New pages" (just to be consistent with the capitalization of the other common noun words in the sidebar list)? [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:41, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
:Yah. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 02:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
::I haven't seen changes take effect yet. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

== [[Kirby's Dream Land 2]] ==
Is it ok if you undelete this video game article too? I forgot to request it -- thank you [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

== Files for deletion ==

Mind deleting:

*[[:File:Flag of Colombia.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Colombia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the Comoros.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the Comoros.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Hungary.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Hungary.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Luxembourg.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Luxembourg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Monaco.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Monaco.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Medal Law.jpg]] and [[:File:Medal Music.jpg]] (MS Paint-like pictures that probably don't have a practical use)
*[[:File:Maine State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Maine.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Georgia State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of State of Georgia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Arizona State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Arizona.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Pennsylvania State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Pennsylvania.png|this file]])
*[[:File:South Carolina State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of South Carolina.png|this file]])
*[[:File:North Carolina State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of North Carolina.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Jersey State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Jersey.png|this file]])
*[[:File:11121.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Virginia.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Rhode Island State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Rhode Island.png|this file]])
[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:16, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

:Hey, thanks. What a mess, huh? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:28, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::Yeah I've noticed quite a bit of things needing cleanup around the wiki, including duplicate/low quality unused files. There's more state flags that I haven't listed yet. you forgot to delete [[:File:Medal Music.jpg]] btw [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 16:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

:::Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated. That Categorization scheme is all screwed up, so it's difficult to even round up what needs to be deleted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:46, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::::Yeah, and I have to ask administrators about some of these because some are admin-protected so therefore cannot be tagged. I'll try and see if I can find more [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 16:49, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

::::My guess is 11k of 22k Files are uncategorized. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:51, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Here's some more:

*[[:File:DC flag.jpg]] (duplicate of [[:File:DC flag.GIF|this file]])
*[[:File:2628589070 30f1d23517.jpg]] (doesn't appear to serve any practical purpose)
*[[:File:Capital.jpg]] (file redirect with no links to it)
*[[:File:Vermont State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Vermont.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Wyoming State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Wyoming.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Tennessee State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Tennessee.png|this file]])

[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 17:06, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
:A couple of those still link to pages. 18:41, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
::The DC flag one no longer does. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 11:11, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

== Deleting short articles ==

Personally, I don't see any harm in short stubs: CP could work at least as a kind of dictionary. But I suppose it is a matter of taste.
Just a request: could you check "what links here" before deleting a page? Thanks! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 09:24, August 11, 2021 (EDT)
:Yah, that's what I've been doing, but a few might have slipped past. The problem right now is, much of these pages someone studiously compiled in [[:Category:Dictionary]] are all orphans. And no one has bothered to de-orphan in 10 years. This is an object lesson for all editors: when you create a page, make sure you integrate the page into the whole wiki with a reverse link from at least one other page. Otherwise, it might eventually get deleted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 09:42, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

== Administrators ==

A couple of days ago, I looked up the [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop list of administrators] (to find someone to convince Andy on a mathematical subject): most of them have stopped contributing before 2012. Do you intend to delete all of their talk-pages and user-pages? Or is there a reason that you singled out User:Joaquin Martinez? It leaves lots of red links behind.... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:57, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
:That was done on user request, I beleive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 03:09, August 12, 2021 (EDT)

== More files for deletion ==

*[[:File:Nevada State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Nevada.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Texas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Texas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Arkansas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Arkansas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:California State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of California.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Colorado State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Colorado.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Connecticut State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Connecticut.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Delaware State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Delaware.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Florida State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Florida.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Hawaii State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Hawaii.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Idaho State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Idaho.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Indiana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Indiana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Iowa State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Iowa.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Kansas State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Kansas.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Kentucky State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Kentucky.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Louisiana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Louisiana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Maryland State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Maryland.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Massachusetts State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Massachusetts.png|this file]], although the GIF needs to be replaced with the PNG duplicate on two admin-protected articles)
*[[:File:Michigan State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Michigan.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Mississippi State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Mississippi.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Missouri State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Missouri.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Montana State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Montana.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Nebraska State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Nebraska.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Hampshire State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Hampshire.png|this file]])
*[[:File:New Mexico State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New Mexico.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Newyorkflag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of New York.png|this file]])
*[[:File:North Dakota State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of North Dakota.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Ohio State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Ohio.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oklahoma State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oklahoma.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oregon State Flag (Front).gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oregon.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Oregon State Flag (Back).gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Oregon reverse.png|this file]])
*[[:File:South Dakota State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of South Dakota.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Utah State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Utah.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Washington State Flag.gif]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Washington.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Wisconsin.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Wisconsin state flag.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:Flag of Guam.png]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Guam.svg.png|this file]])
*[[:File:DC flag.GIF]] (duplicate of [[:File:Flag of Washington, D.C..png|this file]])

[[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 15:27, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
:Thanks! I'll get on it with the next batch. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:49, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
::Connecticut's one hasn't been deleted yet (oversight?) and i provided a note for the Massachusetts flag. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 20:47, August 14, 2021 (EDT)
:::Yah it's on hold for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:36, August 15, 2021 (EDT)

== In the News ==

::Please add to the Conservapedia headlines how Twitter has suspended Amrullah Saleh but not the Taliban[[https://www.republicworld.com/technology-news/social-media-news/afghanistan-twitter-suspends-accounts-of-amrullah-salehs-office-taliban-still-active.html]].[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 12:10, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::I dunno; what is the significnce? Big Tech and Twitter have been working against America and for the Taliban for years now already. 12:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::Don't you think Biden [[colluding]] with Russia is a bigger story? [https://tass.com/world/1326699] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 12:25, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::Well I think it is important given how Amrullah Saleh is the leader of Afghanistan.[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 12:57, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
:::(a) never heard of him (b) is there a single leader? (c) I thought it was [[Mullah Baradar]]. You're not falling for CCP/Big Tech/MSM agitprop to confuse people and take the focus off real issues, are you? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 13:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

:::Baradar is the head of the Taliban not the legitimate Afghan government. But if you feel there are issues more important than this then you don't need to put it. [[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 13:31, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::"legitimate government?" Wow. Wow. And again I say wow. Talk about putting the barndoor before the horse.... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 13:48, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::Did I hear you right? Are you referring to a group that shoots women in the street for not wearing burqas, as "legitimate"? Maybe in Twitter world, Anthony Blinken, Joe Biden, a host of Democrats and MSM, but not in the real universe that I personally was born into, or the real universe that God created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 14:05, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

::My sources say, "[https://uncoverdc.com/2021/08/16/bidens-disastrous-exit-from-afghanistan/ Afghanistan’s President Ashraf Ghani has already relinquished power to an interim government led by Taliban commander Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar."] What is significant here is, we don't have articles on either Amrullah Saleh or Mullah Baradar, before we go off half-cocked on MSM/Democrat/Biden junta/CCP [[fake news]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:38, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

==You're a liberal==
Deletion of climate LIBRAL
:Sticks and stones may break my bones, but idiots never hurt me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:12, August 21, 2021 (EDT)

== A request ==

I don't think Conservapedia has in it's manual of style page info on not creating orphan pages.

Since orphan pages are not a good thing and you have mentioned how irritating they are to you, please update our manual of style page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:56, August 23, 2021 (EDT)

:Ok, will do. it kinda goes hand in hand with categorizing, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 01:11, August 23, 2021 (EDT)
== Request ==

For [[:File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture.jpg]], I made the mistake of downloading the direct history.house.gov version to upload rather than Wikimedia Common's improved version. However, if I upload a new cropped version with even a slightly different aspect ratio, everything will likely get messed up. Can you go to the file page and see if you can delete the current file version without deleting the page entirely? Correct me if I'm wrong, but there should be a way to do that in the timestamp table under "File history." Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:19, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:I see you deleted the file, which still works because I was able to upload a better version in its place successfully; however, was it impossible to only delete the file version without deleting the entire page, even though there was only one file revision? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:31, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
:(ec) I dunno if that fixed it. You may have to re-upload as File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture2 or something. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 16:32, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
::Whoops, pardon my quick reply here which caused an edit conflict. So to clarify, my request was to avoid having to re-upload the file separately under another title. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 16:34, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
== Vaccine mandates and a quote from a Clint Eastwood movie ==

[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|300px|center|[[Adolf Hitler]] was against vaccine mandates!<ref>[https://jacobinmag.com/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-covid-pandemic-german-nazi-inoculation-policy You Know Who Else Opposed Vaccine Mandates? Hitler.]</ref> ]]
{{clear}}
[[File:Washington-deleware.jpg|thumbnail|600px|center|General [[George Washington]] ordered [[smallpox]] inoculations for all troops.<ref>[https://health.mil/News/Articles/2021/08/16/Gen-George-Washington-Ordered-Smallpox-Inoculations-for-All-Troops General George Washington Ordered [[Smallpox]] Inoculations for All Troops]</ref>
 
 
"I have right to a lawYEEER!" - the killer Scorpio in the 1971 movie ''Dirty Harry'' which featured [[Clint Eastwood]].<ref>[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066999/characters/nm0000142 Dirty Harry (1971)]</ref>
 
 
Apparently, George Washington's troops didn't have ready access to legal counsel concerning their innoculations or they thought they had weak cases. Or consider this radical thought: His troops thought their responsibility to get vaccinated against smallpox trumped any potential right they had to not get vaccinated.]]
{{clear}}
[[File:Donald Trump and Jesus is King sign.jpg|center|thumbnail|400px|A quick note to [[conservative]], Republican [[Donald Trump]] supporters who are against Covid-19 vaccines: Donald J. Trump launched [[Operation Warp Speed]] which helped cause Covid-19 vaccines be developed in a speedy fashion. Put that in your anti Covid-19 vaccine pipes and smoke it!
 
 
Donald Trump and [[Melania Trump]] were both vaccinated with a Covid-19 vaccine with no apparent catastrophic effects!<ref>[https://www.deseret.com/2021/4/23/22399234/former-president-donald-trump-americans-coronavirus-vaccine-obama-bush-clinton-carter Former President Donald Trump tells Americans to get the coronavirus vaccine, calls it a ‘true miracle’]</ref>
 
 
Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.<ref>[https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html#:~:text=Serious%20side%20effects%20that%20could,receiving%20a%20vaccine%20dose. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines]</ref> See also: [https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-long-term-effects/art-20490351 Long haul Covid-19 - Mayo Clinic]
 
 
For more information, please see: [https://conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Sports,_exercise_and_diet#Coronavirus_prevention.2C_info_and_treatments Coronavirus prevention, Covid-19 vaccines, treatments and general information] ]]
:Yah, Hitler was against smoking, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:10, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:(A) Donald Trump ordered a vaccine, not a genetic experiment. (B) mRNA experiments are not a vaccine. (C) The CDC changed the definition of vaccine in August 2021. (D) Dr. Anthony Fauci did not inform President Trump that [[SARS-CoV-2]] was not a naturally occurring virus and was created in a laboratory at the time of President Trump's approval of Warp Speed. (E) We still await the arrival of a vaccine, and the results of the illegal genetic experiments. However, the science has become so politicized, it's impossible to put a timeframe on expectations. Simply because Trump was deceived by the CCP, WHO, and Dr. Fauci is your weakest argument to have confidence in genetic experiments carrying the misnomer of a vaccine. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 04:48, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:(E) And your use of MSM & govt propaganda regarding George Washington is flawed. That was [https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/smallpox/sp_variolation.html variolation], not vaccination. Variolation is taking material {scabs} directly from an infected person and infecting another person. Your cited source uses the word inoculation; the alleged covid vaccines fail to inoculate, witness [[breakthrough case]]s. A vaccine is the actual virus itself, measured out in doses to fit a person's age and body weight. The mRNA spiked protein is invented in a laboratory and is not a synthetic reproduction of the SARS CoV-19 virus. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 07:19, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
::I think we should largely agree to disagree.

::I do know that you are incorrect about some basic facts.

::For example, vaccines commonly are not 100% effective and thus have some breakthrough cases. "Even the measles vaccine, which is incredibly effective, fails to protect about 3 percent of vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine—hailed a medical miracle—was 80 percent to 90 percent effective at preventing paralysis caused by the polio virus. Breakthrough infections of flu are even more common. While the exact effectiveness of the flu vaccine fluctuates year-to-year, it ranges between 40 percent and 60 percent."[https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/six-important-things-know-about-breakthrough-infections-180978408/]

::In addition, even in the case of breakthrough cases of coronavirus, a person's morbidity rate will be lower than if they were not inoculated against the disease.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:31, September 30, 2021 (EDT)

:::Well, we can resolve much of this by understanding what a vaccine is. Vaccines are measured doses of the virus itself to induce an immunological reaction. It should be obvious by now that covid so-called "vaccines" do no such thing. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 14:33, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
{{clear}}
=== Notes ===
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

== Uighur Genocide Article ==

:How do you propose that we start the article?[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 20:26, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

::[https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&search=%22Uyghur+genocide%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns120=1&ns121=1&ns122=1&ns123=1&ns124=1&ns125=1&ns126=1&ns127=1&profile=advanced Here's all the pages that use the term.] In the China article, we have three different subsections that touch on it, [[China#East_Turkestan_.28Xinjiang.29]], [[China#Uyghurs_and_Muslims]], and [[China#Uyghur_genocide]]. I suggest we begin with the cite in [https://conservapedia.com/China#cite_note-183 footnote 183] from the Uyghur genocide subsection for the Intro, and consolidate information from the other two subsections to eliminate redundancy.

::Also, after laying out the case for genocide in the main body, then include a second section on Forced labor and re-education, which technically may be considered a separate issue from [[genocide]], and eventually can be made into a single article as well, with information collected in a Uyghur genocide page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 20:51, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

::I named the article as East Turkestani genocide due to it including not just Uighurs but all Turkic peoples.[[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 21:16, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

== Category move request ==

Hi RobSmith, can you please move Category:Old Guard (The South) to "Category:Old Republicans (The South)" without leaving a redirect? When I created the category, it had been a while since I read a hard cover of ''The End of Southern Exceptionalism'', and now realizing that I can just access it via Google Books and even [https://books.google.com/books?id=tiNYRu5rvVgC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=old&f=false search for key terms], I likely confused the term used in the book with something else.

Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Saturday, 22:43, October 29, 2021 (EDT)

== YOU ARE A RADICAL ABORTIONIST ==

YOU DISGUST ME!!! YOU THINK ABORTION ISNT MURDER. GET A LIFE AND GO BACK TO LIBERAL WIKIPEDIA!! IM REFERING TO WHEN YOU REMOVED MY EDITS FROM PRAMILLA JAYAPAL!!! SHE MURDERED HUMAN AND YOU SUPPORT THAT DISGUSTING {{unsigned|Superbanana}}

== Conservative Of The Year 2021 ==

Hello,

It starting to get close towards the end of the year. Should Conservapedia create the Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page? Also, I think it might be interesting if Conservapedia created a RINO Of The Year.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 14:22, November 4, 2021 (EDT)
:I think there is a page already started, but I don't have a link yet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 01:44, November 5, 2021 (EDT)
::The Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page does not appear to have been made yet. Could I be given permission to make the page?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:35, November 17, 2021 (EST)
:::Sure. Please pattern it after the previous year's pages with the appropriate catgorization, etc. If another already exists and found later, we can merge it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 18:38, November 17, 2021 (EST)
::::Could you give me the power to create new pages? I cannot create new pages.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:36, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::Do you have SkipCapthca? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 19:09, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::I do not think I do.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:52, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Never mind I do have SkipCaptcha. How would I go about crating a page. I cannot figure out how to create one.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:54, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Do you know how to activate your user page? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 21:56, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::::::According to your contribs, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Former_Tea_Party_Supporters_Who_Have_Become_RINOs_or_Never_Trumpers&diff=1685562&oldid=1683587 you created this page right here.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:00, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::I was able to create the page! Thank you for your help!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:24, November 18, 2021 (EST)

== Conservative is doxxing others ==

In [[Essay:_A_reply_to_some_desperate_secular_liberals/leftists_who_pulled_out_the_race_card_and_unsuccessfully_tried_to_compare_me_to_Klansmen#10_point_to_do_list_and_considerations_concerning_potential_defamation_lawsuit_or_lawsuits_2|this recent essay of his]], the fifth point in that particular subsection is publicly revealing private information about others. Can you delete the essay, since I don't have deletion powers? Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 13:37, November 7, 2021 (EST)
::Yah I saw. I initiated a private discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:04, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::Shouldn't those types of inappropriate postings simply be nuked on the spot? It doesn't matter who inserts such information, as they should not be allowed to remain on the site, period. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:07, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::Also, thanks for removing the link to the essay from MPR. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:08, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::(ec) Yes, for registered users, but an Admin should be given the opportunity to correct the error. I did remove the link from MPR to the doxxing page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::This reminds much of another unnamed former Admin: he just likes pressing buttons to nuke his enemies because he can and doesn't think before hand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
::::::Conservative has demonstrated himself to continuously make inappropriate postings and often times stubbornly refuse to admit he's wrong. He's been given enough chances. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]''''' Sunday, 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:::::::They think being an Admin is just a game of Space Invaders and they can nuke their opponents by pressing a button. This is why I advocated for bureaucrat powers to teach them the proper role of an Admin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 15:15, November 7, 2021 (EST

== Trevor Noah ==

I think [[Trevor Noah]] is very famous liberal comedian. in article I showed his double standards for his views on police brutality in USA and South Africa. I wish you to show the article again, and thank you --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)
:I recreated the page. It needs to be brought up to encyclopedic standards. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 19:22, November 7, 2021 (EST)

== Please delete the two revisions left by a recent vandal ==

[[Special:Contributions/PerterKabangsLT|Please hide the content, username and edit summaries for those diffs ASAP.]] Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 21:59, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:User:Conservative is more skilled at deleting whole talk pages like that than I am. I might leave it for him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:04, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::I believe you've deleted revisions before. Don't administrator duties include the deletion of diffs left by inappropriate edits? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 22:08, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::I don't want to make the wrong deletion, and I believe he's more skilled at it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 22:12, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::::In case you haven't yet noticed, Conservative frivolously deletes perfectly fine diffs while declining to delete inappropriate revisions most of the time. Do you actually expect him to carry out administrator duties after all the times he's abused them? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(TALK PAGE]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|CONTRIBUTIONS)]]''''' Friday, 22:15, November 18, 2021 (EST)
:::::Someday we'll make you boss, and you can handle all these weighty decisions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]] 23:30, November 18, 2021 (EST)

== Quick Question ==

Hey, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. I was wondering if you could tell me if I have the ability to apply files, such as pictures and such, to articles on here? I have tried a few times to add pictures to the pages I’ve already created. Also, how do you think I’m doing with making pages and editing? Thanks in advance and have a great [[Thanksgiving]]! -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 14:45, November 23, 2021 (EST)

:Place image upload requests here: [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]. As to editing, it looks pretty good, with the exception of uncited editorial comments such as these [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Derek_Chauvin&diff=prev&oldid=1762732][https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Derek_Chauvin&diff=prev&oldid=1773759], which make you look like a subversive Democrat trying to play the [[race card]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:28, November 23, 2021 (EST)

::Thanks, and my apologies for that. I’ve since learned that I shouldn’t submit personal opinions such as those. I hope I can put that mishap behind me so I can further contribute to Conservapedia. God Bless and Happy Thanksgiving! -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 15:48, November 23, 2021 (EST)

:::Well, that's good to hear. Cuz even if you are or were a subversive Democrat, that tired old stale stuff gets pretty insulting after a while, as if we're too stupid to see it or notice it. You need to become more sophisticated in your use of dogwhistles and subversion. Good luck. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 16:05, November 23, 2021 (EST)

== Another category move request ==

Hi RobSmith, can you please move [[:Category:Half-Breeds]] to [[:Category:Half-Breeds (Republican Party)]]? Thanks! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Friday, 14:55, November 26, 2021 (EST)

== Please don't plagiarize my work ==

Pertaining to most of the block of text you added [[Mask_mandate#Laws_for_thee_but_not_for_me|here]], it appears you outright copy/pasted it from my [[Salongate]] article. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Sunday, 16:56, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:[https://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Copyright By contributing information to Conservapedia, you irrevocably consent to the display, copying, reuse or editing of your information, edits and entries, with or without attribution. You agree to waive and indemnify this and all affiliated sponsors, editors, users, or sites from claims for liability resulting from use, by you, of the content contained herein. This is a binding legal document. By using this site you agree to be bound by it.]
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:01, November 28, 2021 (EST)
::Even if CP allows it, plagiarizing is not a good practice. I don't think readers want to see the exact same block of text in multiple articles. Can you at least re-write it in your own words? —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Sunday, 17:04, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::Well, edit it then. As an Admin, you need to know these things.
:::Granted, the phrase "your information" may need to be amended, being that it may now have an ambiguous or diferent meaning (related to doxxing) that was not commonly or popularly known at the time that version of the policy was written. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:07, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::And your understanding or use of the term "plagiarizing" is incorrect, given the copyright policy, which you have agreed to, nullifies making any such claim. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:11, November 28, 2021 (EST)
:::WP:OWN, or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content Ownership of content] may be helpful before you employ such language as "my Salongate article." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:17, November 28, 2021 (EST)

:::As I've said 10,000 times, being an Admin isn't about pressing buttons to nuke your enemies. It's about educating and helping users and Admins become better editors and Admins. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:21, November 28, 2021 (EST)

:::Let's take [https://conservapedia.com/File:McGowan_Harris_Clinton_Giuffre.PNG this tweet, for example, copypasted from Wikipedia] and tweeted to Kamala Harris by [[Rose McGowan]]. I wrote most of that text (which now has minor edits), but have no claim of plagiarism or ownership of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:32, November 28, 2021 (EST)

== Please check your email ==

Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Monday, 23:23, November 28, 2021 (EST)

== I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page ==

Rob, I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page

You can see the changes at: [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy]]

Also, I made some minor improvements to this page: [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] at the [https://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines#Conservapedia.27s_blocking_policy_for_editors_of_the_wiki Conservapedia's blocking policy for editors of the wiki] section.

Generally speaking, given human nature (see: [[Fall of man]]), wikis are more prone to heavy-handed blocking than to too lenient blocking. The Bible refers to the authoritarian aspect of human nature once people have power. For example, "But Jesus called them to Himself and said, 'You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.'" (Matthew 20:25-26). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:57, November 29, 2021 (EST)

== Main page right ==

As your request, I removed the main page right item. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:06, December 2, 2021 (EST)

== quick note ==

Do you reinstall Skype? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:22, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:yah, give it a try. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:24, December 12, 2021 (EST)
::It says you are not online. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:::Sign into Skype. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
::::Are you signed into Skype? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:28, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:::::I'm in as HJ. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:29, December 12, 2021 (EST)
Then call me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:31, December 12, 2021 (EST)
:It says PM is not online. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:33, December 12, 2021 (EST)

== Another Quick Question ==

Hi, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. Based on my contributions these past few months, do you think I have the qualities to be an Administrator on here one day? Hopefully soon, I can earn access to photo upload privileges so I won’t have to bug you about adding photos to the pages I create, haha. Thanks in advance and have a great Christmas. -[[User:SteKelBry|SteKelBry]] ([[User talk:SteKelBry|talk]]) 19:00, December 17, 2021 (EST)
:Sorry, I have no say in that at all. Those decisions are made by the boss. It's probably been 10 years or more since a new Admin was created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:07, December 17, 2021 (EST)

== Kathy Hochul ==

Why do you add Satanists category to [[Kathy Hochul]]? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:34, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:I think the answer is in the two sentence text: "Hochul claims the coronavirus vaccine is from God and that people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ to go out and spread the vaccine." (It's obvious this racist scumbag is speaking to what the atheist left consider superstitious God-fearing and God-believing African Americans in the traditional Marxist and Satanic [[sociopath]]ic manipulation of Black voters). But you have a point; perhaps the Category should not have been created or perhaps the Category needs some discussion to keep it.

:I would argue however, if the decision is to keep the Category, this crossing-the-line of [[separation of church and state]] by an elected official to manipulate vulnerable and oppressed people certainly qualifies as Satanic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:45, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:And we know for a fact the coronavirus is not from God, it came from God-hating Satanists and idolators like Anthony Fauci and the Chinese Communist Party. If that's not proof of another Satanic lie from the pit of hell by a white Democrat, what is? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:55, December 23, 2021 (EST)

::''people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ ''
::Is Hochel, like Anthony Fauci, claiming to be God? or the Way, the Truth, and the Life? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::Attaboy. Let it all out. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 18:31, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::Let's not lose focus, the question is over creating and keeping certain categories. On a more philosophical plane however, an agnostic certainly would have a measure of deniability for engaging in Satanic activities, whereas atheists, their cohorts and supporters are more less indefensible. Go ahead, please, try justifying an atheist and Satanic position to a God-fearing African American. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:53, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::Hochel, in her own words, is belittling and mocking African Americas for believing in God and not accepting the gospel of [[Faucism]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:54, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::We have the same phenomena in the UK, where the Archbishop of Canterbury said [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yzva0Wrs8Os 'Jesus would take the vaccine'.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::::Defeating parodists by making them redundant is quite the flex, man. You wouldn't believe the amount of money Soros recently offered to try & get the band back together, but it was agreed round the table that your stuff just couldn't be topped. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 20:19, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::::Truth is like the coronavirus, its spread cannot be stopped despite the best efforts of men. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:38, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Dang. [https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/12/23/trump-appeals-supreme-court-dispute-over-jan-6-documents/8892937002/ God loves a trier, though, right?] [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 21:29, December 23, 2021 (EST)
::::::::Too bad the [[J6 panel]] is illegal. The House Resolution that created it requires 13 members and 6 appoint by Kevin McCarthy, which never happened. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:35, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:: I dont agree with her vaccine policy, but sorry that doesnt make her a Satanist or even Atheist. I would like to see reliable sources instead of personal conclusions to prove that she is Satanist. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:20, December 23, 2021 (EST)
:::It's her own words. If she's not claiming to be God herself, she engaged in some sickening racist pandering. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:21, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::Wait wait wait. Is the argument now, "Sure, racism is bad, but it's not as bad as being a Satanist?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:23, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::: No I want to see reliable source prove that she is satanist. Blasphemy doesnt make her Satanist --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:41, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::::Blasphemy makes her a child of God? Racism makes here a child of God? (Blacks certainly would be interested in hearing that).

:::::Unfortunately, God doesn't really provide neutral space for agnostics. That's purely a human construct. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:46, December 23, 2021 (EST)

:::::[https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/n-y-governor-kathy-hochuls-god-is-satan-preaches-at-nyc-church-and-proudly-displays-the-mark-of-the-beast/ N.Y. Governor Kathy Hochul’s “God” is Satan – Preaches at NYC Church and Proudly Displays the “Mark of the Beast”]
:::::Let's not leave it at that - let's dissect her words a little further....
{{quotebox|"I prayed a lot to God during this time.

And you know what? God did answer our prayers. '''He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers, he made them come up with a vaccine.'''

That is from God to us. And we must say, “Thank you, God. Thank you.”

And I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to to say “I’m vaccinated.”

All of you. Yes, I know '''you’re vaccinated. You’re the smart ones."'''}}
:And how does God answer all this?
:*''Pride goeth before destruction''
:*''He catcheth the crafty in their own craftiness
:*''God has chosen the foolish things of this world to confound the wise
::I could go on... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:03, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:*''I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
:*[https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Flattery 34 Bible Verses about Flattery]
:Maybe flattery works on liberals and Satanists, but to a child of God it's a red flag. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Then we have to consider the fact that she spoke these words in the midst of the congregation.... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Her pitch sounds a bit more like Pharoah calling upon Jannes and Jambres. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:Please, don't take my judgement on the matter. Let's look at some of the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXaP76musWM 2,000+ comments on her words in Youtube] (I know, I know, Youtube just hasn't gotten around to blocking them yet).
:*"God told me not to listen to false prophets. - 793 Likes
:*“Now let me tell you how God loves abortion.” Gov. Hochul. - 798 Likes
:None of this is surprising, Democrat officials have mouthing this kinda Satanic BS for decades.
:*"It's so cringe worthy when self serving politicians invoke the name of god. - 790 Likes
::*Rob's comment: No, Donald Trump is not self serving. You miss the qualifier.
:*"This is what a cult leader sounds like. - 797 Likes
:*"Unbelievable level of evil. To stand in "church" and commit blasphemy. To promote a shot that is killing people worldwide. The audacity of these people is astounding. They WILL answer to God for their sins.
:Yah, does she really listen to the voters? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:45, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Personally, when I hear someone like this talk, I can only scratch my head and say, "What the hell is wrong with people in New York to elect someone like this?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:What a way to burst onto the national scene. Does she, or any professional media consultant, think she can ever rescind this level of stupidity, ignorance, and outright insulting comments? Ever?
:Maybe this crap flies in New York, but name one, just one, New York politician between FDR & Trump who made it on the national scene? And the reason for that is, New Yorkers consider people like Hochel, AOC, Schumer, Nadler, Gillibrand, Cuomo, De Blasio etc etc etc as "leaders" and representatives of themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:: I checked the link that you share but is also its personal conclusion not reliable source. What she said speaks her foolishness lower IQ, and she made big mistake for using religion to convince people to take the vaccine. but again that doesnt make her necessarily a Satanist. a Satanist mean worshiper of Satan, is there any proof that she worship Satan, I didnt see that. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:21, December 24, 2021 (EST)-
:::No, you are dead wrong. Most servants of Satan are so deceived by the father of lies, they do not know they are serving Satan. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:35, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::There are numerous examples, both from the bible and in everyday life to verify this. For example, what could be more Satanic than an atheist, many of whom deny that the spirit world and Satan exists? That proves the level of so-called "self-deception", which really is Satanic deception. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:38, December 24, 2021 (EST)

: The Encyclopedias should rely on reliable sources, not personal conclusions. does the other administrators agree with that? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:33, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::Ask em. Personally, I can't think of a one that would defend a Satanist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:41, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::She supports abortion, doesn't she? I doubt anyone here in CP management thinks a child of God supports abortion (I could be wrong). And I doubt anyone thinks there's a grey area where one can be both. But I don't know. Anyways, it's a debate I wouldn't hesitate to engage in. You can always create a debate page on that subject, either Hochul individually or [[Debate:Can an abortion supporter also be a child of God?]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:46, December 25, 2021 (EST)

::What you need to realize here is, Hochul stepped into one big pile of doggie-doodoo with her stupid, off the cuff, Satanic remarks inside a church during a church service. And there is no way out for her other than repentance and baptism. And if it takes New York Democrats to wish Andrew Cuomo was back, so be it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:55, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:: For Abortion we can add [[:Category:Abortion Advocates]] instead of [[:Category:Satanists]]. and also if she support Abortion that doesnt make her Satanist. Satanist is big insult, We can't accuse anyone we don't like of being Satanic. and do you really think abortion supporter is Satanist?, maybe you dont many figures support abortion including the conservative ones like [[Tomi Lahren]], [[Rudy Giuliani]] and [[Margaret Thatcher]]. president Trump formerly was supporter of abortion, is he former Satanist?. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:29, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Satanism is an insult? I've never met the Satanist yet who wasn't proud of being in rebellion against God. Children of God are not afraid of the devil, they have been set free. Only sinners cower before the devil. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::: OK so does Hochul ever stated she is Satanist? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:39, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::*''They speak lies to one another; They speak with flattering lips and a double heart.'' Ps. 12:2
:::::*''with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes.'' Rm. 3:13-15
::::::I think it's obvious which side she's on. She spoke her words in church. She should have saved it for Don Lemon or NBC. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:59, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::::Now, we can break it down (for example, '' Their feet are swift to shed blood'' can be laid at the doorstep of her predecessor Andrew Cuomo and the nursing home crisis, and I don't know her involvement, but what is she doing to bring Cuomo and other conspirators to justice?) ''Their is no fear of God before their eyes'' - why did she speak such blasphemies before a the congregation in church? What interests me most is ''Whose mouth is full of cursing'' because this is a twofer related to ''flattery''; she flatters her followers with ''you are the smart ones'', while cursing the stupid unvaccinated. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:09, December 26, 2021 (EST)

:: I need reliable source to prove that she is Satanist, this is simple. if there are no source, so you should delete category from article --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:31, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Her sources are her own mouth. It's no different than Fauci claiming to be God ("I am Truth"). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::: I didnt saw any sources, I am only saw personal conclusions. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::In sending out her 'apostles', she implies the unvaccinated are in rebellion against God, i.e. Satanists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:27, December 26, 2021 (EST)

: In order to prove what you are saying, you either have to bring a source that admits that she is a Satanist from her mouth, or another source that proves that she is performing Satanic rituals
:Other than this, your words are nothing but personal conclusions and conspiracy theory and may harm the reputation of this encyclopedia. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
::It's no big deal. Anyone in rebellion against God is a Satanist, which is the vast majority of people on planet earth. Only those in rebellion against God fear Satan, or think it's a big insult. It's not. Satan is who their boss is and who they serve. It is not even a case of outing a Satanist in the closet - by their works ye shall know them. Was Christ a liar when he said that? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:47, December 27, 2021 (EST)
{{quotebox|"there’s people out there who aren’t listening to God and what God wants."}}
::Now, there's people out there who aren't listening to Anthony Fauci, who claims to be God ("to attack me is to attack Truth"), and what Fauci wants. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 05:07, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:: I dont think Jesus asked you to add Satanist Category to Kathy Hochul article. again you are going too far by this stubbornness by bringing Bible verse. Bible didnt prove she is Satanist. also I dont think Jesus would like us to make assumptions to other people without reliable source even if they are our enemy. I dont like anyone to make assumption to me, I am also dont make any assumption to other people without reliable source. Assumption is a characteristic of liberals against their enemies (read [[Meena Harris]] story), but we must be better than them. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:41, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:::I'm going too far? She's the one claiming the unvaccinated don't listen to her god, Dr. Fauci. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:44, December 27, 2021 (EST)

:::Before It's News: [https://beforeitsnews.com/new-world-order/2021/10/new-york-governor-kathy-hochul-is-an-evil-satanic-witch-who-claims-to-speak-for-god-and-says-vaccines-are-a-gift-from-god-no-not-unless-it-is-the-faslse-god-lucifer-pure-blashemy-truly-dispicabl-10443.html New York Governor Kathy Hochul is an Evil Satanic Witch, Who Claims to Speak For GOD and Says Vaccines Are a Gift From GOD. No, Not Unless it is the Faslse god Lucifer. Pure Blashemy- Truly Dispicable]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:46, December 27, 2021 (EST)

== Russia is a place where one can have a good life, but they are still overcoming their past ==

Everyone once in a while, I watch a documentary. I watched this documentary: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxpEsBqliEQ Love in Russia].

Russian society is traditional in some ways, but I am sure that 70+ years of godless communism has had its effect on society.

But people with Christian values are having kids and the irreligious/nonreligious are not, so things can gradually get better. Time will tell. I think in the next 12 years or so, there will be a global recession, so that will cause a lot of problems. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:I let a homeless lady from Russia stay at my place for about 2 weeks. I learned more about Russia.

:The USA should try to have better relations with Russia. Trump tried to do this.

:By the way, I bailed out of the documentary at the 30 minute point. It dealt with the 3% of Russian society that are freaks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:25, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::So I watched the documentary all the way thru. These kids these days, wudayagonnado? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::I don't know if you're familiar with [[Pelageya]], probably one of the greatest vocalists alive today. She's sings Cossack (or Kazakh) warrior songs. This is nothing new, Russia has longtime (even in Czarist times) been a nation of widows and orphans, cause it is a warrior culture, having so many borders to defend, or absorbing so many smaller nations and tribes into it. Even Pelageya has no idea who her father is. So what the DW documentary reports really has not emerged since the collapse of USSR. The aftermath of WWII was just another time when Russia again was a nation of widows. And many of the songs Pelageya sings are about the warrior dying on the battlefield and thinking about his wife. Once you grasp these songs go back hundreds of years, you can get a great insight into Russian culture. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)

=== This is what I was referring to above ===

[[File:04656 market in Sanok.JPG|thumbnail|200px|center|[[Alcoholism]] was a serious social problem in the former atheistic [[Soviet Union]].[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18245818] Between 1940 and 1980, this [[atheist state]] had the largest increase of the amount of alcohol usage in the developed world.[http://isw.sagepub.com/content/35/4/441.extract] ]]
{{clear}}
It's too bad that Russia chose atheistic communism for so many decades. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:I have to admit, my appreciation and love of Russian society and culture has come a long way in the past 25-30 years. What went unreported in the West, it was the Church more than anything that caused the demise of Soviet Communism.
:Despite what Soviet communism did to Russian culture - and you are absolutely correct the damage was serious and longlasting - IMO a typical Russian of average intelligence, education, and maybe even with fetal alcohol syndrome, is more objective and levelheaded in their understanding of culture, society, history the issues affecting the contemporary world than 90% of our "best educated" professors in the United States.
:Bear in mind, nearly 40% of the Russian federation are Muslims - [[secular]] Muslims - and they wouldn't have it any other way. They supported Soviet Communism then, and Russian Democracy now, cause they don't want to live under [[Shariah]] law. And they have a higher birth rate than ethnic Russians. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:52, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Watch [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bnt3CIqGhk this 3 1/2 minute video.] You don't need any translation or English subtitles to understand what is going on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::a white boy is abusing his girlfriend on the streets of Moscow, and nobody reacts. The same couple do it again, only this time she wears a [[hijab]] {Islamic headscarf}, and Muslim men step up to protect her. It's not a religious thing, it's a culture phenomena in a multicultural society. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::Putin does not drink and he works out two hours a day so that is good.[https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-daily-routine-2017-6#his-work-schedule-tends-to-be-more-flexible-over-the-weekend-to-accommodate-putins-english-language-classes-on-sunday-he-sometimes-prays-and-makes-confession-23] But he is a former KGB agent and Business Insider reports: "On Sunday, he sometimes prays and makes confession... Nonetheless, Russian officials close to the president stress that "his life is not that of a Christian," according to Newsweek."[https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-daily-routine-2017-6#his-work-schedule-tends-to-be-more-flexible-over-the-weekend-to-accommodate-putins-english-language-classes-on-sunday-he-sometimes-prays-and-makes-confession-23]

:::As long as the corrupt Putin is in office, Russia will stagnate. Leadership is by example. Russia has to overcome its demographic death spiral. And the heavy drinking and Russian men cheating on their wives is causing family problems. Apparently, Putin cheated on his wife. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:15, December 24, 2021 (EST)

::::This debate has raged forever - I recall my teacher [https://books.google.com/books?id=RniDlAP7ulkC&pg=PT4&lpg=PT4&dq=prof+william+renzi&source=bl&ots=TZH9Xyh_Oz&sig=ACfU3U1w12_iNy0BaGTV9umVsry_zEQrXw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiO1pP8l_z0AhVZG80KHbrFAPQQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=prof%20william%20renzi&f=false Bill Renzi] saying many people believe Russia has to be governed by autocrats to keep it together, be it the Czars, Lenin, Stalin, or Brezhnev. It's too big and too diverse (Stalin's own son didn't speak Russian). Russia is not a single ethnicity, culture, religion or language. It is a "Union of Peoples" and has been since Czarist times.
:::::Technically, no nation has been one ethnicity/culture at all short of Balkanization, so please don't use that as a reason to justify a communist stooge like Putin (especially when even the JBS-backed New American made clear he was still communist). Even France has had multiple ethnicities in there (Alsace was a germanophone-speaking region [in fact, one of the reasons why the Jacobins planned a genocide of that region before the guillotine was used on Robespierre is precisely BECAUSE of its german-speaking population], and there's hints at Napoleon and Robespierre being ethnically Sicilian and Irish, respectively). And Great Britain is composed of four ethnicities/cultures (Irish, Scottish, Welsh, and English). And don't get me started on America which is multicultural even WITHOUT the current diversity crap being forced unto us by leftists. Germany was similar, originally being composed of multiple different countries (Bavaria, Poland, Austria, Deutsch, among others). In fact, the entire POINT of being a nation is in fact a "Union of Peoples", so it's not exclusive to Russia. And for the record, while it might be true the Tsars were autocratic, at least they believed in God and NOT Socialism or anything like that, unlike Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, or, yes, even Putin. I appreciate Russian society pre-Lenin. Post-Lenin, it is garbage, even under Putin, who refuses to go back to the Tsar. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 12:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::The 'captive nations' have been set free. The rest remain part of the federation because they want to, given the alternative of being swallowed up by Islamic or Sinic culture, or other hostile neighbors. Russia has played a role in history similar to that of the British Empire, raising up peoples all over the planet to a level above what used to be call 'barbarism'. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::If that's the case, please explain why Putin's gunning to go to war and annex various nations? If I were him and I truly thought they should remain free, I wouldn't even bother trying to prep an invasion of them. Besides, don't you think the fact that actual right-wing/conservative sources like JBS/New American and outono claiming Putin's a communist should give you pause? It's not like I'm citing Time Magazine or any left-wing rags. And for the record, if he truly cared about getting rid of Communism, he'd make sure ALL of it is destroyed, make sure the populace has nothing but disgust, regarding of ethnicity and culture, make sure to fire all the KGB priests and if necessary even line them up to a wall and shoot them, and certainly tear down Marx's statue and Lenin's tomb. That's what I would have done as an anti-Communist, make sure Communism is extinct. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:57, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::NATO provocation. You read too much CIA agitprop. NATO is supplying lethal weapons to Ukraine in the Donbass region, hence Putin and Russia are reacting. Whatever idiots in the Pentagon and CIA drum up this senseless bs need to be chastised forthwith. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 16:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::Ah, first of all, JBS has been [https://thenewamerican.com/fire-brennan-or-abolish-the-cia/ highly critical] [https://thenewamerican.com/is-it-time-to-shut-down-the-cia/ of the CIA], so it's not like they'd be pushing for the CIA's propaganda anyhow. Second of all, Putin was also funding the very same groups that George Soros is funding going by [https://www.outono.net/elentir/2017/11/22/neither-with-soros-nor-with-putin-the-russian-interference-in-catalonia-and-the-spanish-right/ this article] here as well as [https://www.outono.net/elentir/2020/03/05/the-george-soros-of-moscow-vladimir-putin-and-his-support-to-the-radical-left-of-the-west/ this article] (and it's very obvious that they're not CIA either. Actually, while commentating on the state of other countries, they are primarily concerned with Spain first, and they spare no criticism of socialism in their own country, being as merciless in their criticisms of Spanish Socialists as they are of Putin, of Cuba, and of any socialist/Communist nation. And just as an FYI, they've been VERY critical of the EU as well, especially it's soft treatment of socialists. If anything, outono's been far more consistent in being anti-socialist than Putin EVER was.). Third of all, Putin as of now is ALLYING with China, meaning they're not even enemies at all, or rivals. You're making the same mistake that people in the 1930s did with Stalin and Hitler before their Molotov-Ribbentropp act. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 17:10, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::I haven't read any of the JBS stuff on Putin, and if it's anything like how you characterize it, they are wrong, assuming you are characterizing is correctly. Russia harbors no aggressive intentions against anybody outside its borders. Russia, as always, is preoccupied with defending its immense borders (and possible hostile actors within its borders). As to Ukraine, if it thinks it's going to convert Sevastopol into a NATO naval base, think again. As Dana Carvey would say, ''Naga doit''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:06, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::It's EXACTLY what they're saying. And BTW, it's not just JBS, it's plenty of other conservative sources as well. And BTW, did you know that Putin literally FUNNELED the Steele Dossier as well, aka the whole Russian Collusion thing? Don't take it from me, read it from Daniel Greenfield on Front Page Magazine: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ And don't forget outono, they're critical of Putin, the EU, all the socialist actors around the world. Actually, with the information FPM provided among others, if you support Putin, you support the Russian Dossier. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 18:19, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::Putin handed the Steele dossier to [[Peter Strzok]] and said, "Here, do something with it"? No, don't think so. That was the Hillary-Brennan-Comey-McCabe pipeline. Now, if you wanna discuss who handed it to the NYT, WaPo, ''etal'', you're not going to find Putin there, either. The pipeline goes Hillary-[[Jake Sullivan]]-[[Isikoff]] etal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:26, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::He used a cutout. Of course Putin wouldn't directly order for or hand over those things, he's not stupid. Even Lenin avoided directly signing the death warrants that the Chekha carried out despite obviously encouraging it behind the scenes. Heck, if anything, Putin PAID those guys to spread that disinformation via Vincent Roberti and [https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/05/lobbying-push-russian-pipeline/ Putin's] Gazprom lobbying group. Me? I'd fight against China AND Russia, heck, fight against any Communist country, even risk rendering the world to cinders just to ensure Communism's dead and God's iron fist is controlling the world alongside his son Jesus Christ. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 18:33, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::I gitit I gitit. Hillary was just a stooge as was the whole corrupt Democrat machine and MSM. There were victimized by one of Putin's evil plots to take over the world. That, of course is why we have to put back these idiots and maintain them in power, to defend against the evil Putin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::I never said the Democrats or Hillary were victims of Putin. Actually, if anything, I'd argue they're ALLIES, aka, collaborators with Putin, not victims of any sort. And for the record, I don't support the Democrats, at all. Especially not the ones who pushed the dossier. If anything, the fact that the same guys who pushed the Russia Collusion narrative to oust Trump are getting paid by Putin proves that, no, if anything, THEY'RE the ones colluding with Putin. If ANYONE was a victim of Putin, it's Trump. And quite frankly, you're acting more like Lyn Wood when he ordered for people to not vote during the period between the election and Biden's "inauguration", which apparently resulted in those crypto-commies Jon Ossoff and Warnock being elected into office (that, and voter fraud). And for the record, Obama was allied with Putin even back then, as you can see [https://thenewamerican.com/putin-bombs-obama-s-syrian-rebels-obama-joins-putin-alliance/ here]. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:29, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::Congrats. It's only December 2021, and you figured out the Trump-Russia hoax is a hoax. I had it figured by December 2016, and provided the corroborating evidence by March 2017, two months before Comey got fired and Mueller was called in to coverup the scandal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:34, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::::I already figured it out even earlier, like during March 2016. I knew Trump would never have colluded with Russia at all, that it was a hoax. Heck, despite my being autistic/aspergers with humor not being one of my strongest suits, even I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office. And the reason I knew that, is because Putin made no secret to wanting to restore Communism in Russia (I've already seen photos years back of Putin giving speeches in front of Soviet paraphanelia on Breitbart, BEFORE the 2016 election I should add, and posts on freerepublic making clear that he was pushing for a revitalization of Stalin). My mom also recognized that Trump couldn't have colluded with Putin either, even pointing out that Putin would have known what he was going to get regarding a good deal via Hillary Clinton and her Uranium deal. The only difference between you and me regarding the Trump-Russia Hoax is that I was firmly aware of Russia under Putin STILL being communist, while you are naively believing that they've given up on Communism despite even KGB defectors making it clear that they still hold on to Communism. And BTW, I pegged Russia as still being Communist as early as 2012 when I briefly saw in ''Dreams of my Father'' Karl Marx's statue being in Moscow, something that, had they genuinely given up on it, they would have torn it down like they did various Lenin and Stalin statues. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:40, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::You're betraying yourself with the above posting. Let me count the ways. (a) "Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office." Trump never said or implied any such thing. You are repeating Democrat commie agitprop (meaning you do not understand anything about the issue). (b) Putin had no involvement in any way, shape, or form in the origins of the dossier. (c) The Trump-Russia hoax at no point ever was a foreign policy issue. It was purely, from origin and inception, domestic politic corruption. (d) You continue to imply that Vladimir Putin, and/or Communism, has something, anything, to do with Trump-Russia You are in fact mouthing DNC talking points at this point. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:51, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::At this point, based on your posting above, I don't think you know or understand anything about what the scandal or crime was in the Trump-Russia hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::Trump-Russia has absolutely nothing to do with Russia. It was a hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::The origins of Trump-Russia can be traced back to (a) the long delays in investigating Hillary's emails; (b) the fact that James Comey, and not Loretta Lynch, held a press conference clearing Hillary. This should have raised eyebrows everywhere. (c) The Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting. These were all the clues in open source MSM that something was seriously wrong with the Obama [[DOJ]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::::That's actually what I was referring to. The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. [https://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/07/25/trump-taunts-claims-that-russia-hacked-dnc-emails-for-him-the-new-joke-in-town Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them] (and the Blaze, the source of that, was on Trump's side, not the dossier's side. Same goes for [https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/donald-trump-russian-network-vladimir-putin/2016/09/08/id/747391/ Newsmax], which the democrat agitprop hates as well.). My dad watched the broadcast, BTW, and he recognized it as a joke. As far as the Trump-Russia collusion Hoax, let me remind you that Daniel Greenfield, in the link I provided to you above, specifically pointed out that ALL of the Democrats who claimed Trump engaged in collusion, ended up paid by Putin and his shell corporation, meaning they if ANYTHING were the ones colluding with Putin, and more importantly, that Putin was pushing the collusion hoax as well. And yes, ultimately, it DOES have to do with Russia as well. And BTW, if I were you, I'd dedicate full hatred to both China AND Russia, not to mention Cuba, Vietnam, Venezuela, and the like, any and all Communist countries, dedicate every waking hour to wiping out Communism across the globe, and replacing it with the governments they had prior to Communism's take over, bare minimum (in Russia's case, reinstitute the Tsar). I would NEVER side with a Communist, period. I'd fight ALL of them, even down to the last breath if I must, as God demands that I and others do, fight to the bitter end, not care if it results in our extinction as a result. God wants Communism dead above all else, to ensure his rule is NEVER challenged at all. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 20:20, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::::::::::::::::::It was an inside job or "hack" in May 2016. In August, Trump jokingly invited Russia to clear their name from the false accusations that "Russia hacked the DNC", or that "WikiLeaks is a KGB front." (You still seem to think Russia had something to do with the "DNC hack". I suppose you think Julian Assange is a KGB agent, too).
:::::::::::::::::::::[[Michael Sussmann]], who was just indicted by John Durham, is the guy who initiated the DNC hack hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:::::::::::::::::::::Let's clarify the misleading narrative you began here: Trump's comments to "Russia" had nothing to do with '''[https://conservapedia.com/CrowdStrike#DNC_hack_hoax Sussmann's DNC hack hoax]''' - Trump was talking about recovering Hillary's emails, which Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and Lynch never prosecuted for destruction of U.S. government documents and mishandling of national security information. Be careful where you are going with DNC BS. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 20:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::::::::::::::::::I never said anything about Russia having anything to do with the DNC hack at all. If anything, I specifically indicated that Donald Trump was joking on that front, in other words, that he trolled the MSM and Russia WASN'T responsible for the hack. But Russia DEFINTIELY had something to do with the Dossier, especially when all the principal actors of that dossier, from Pelosi to Schumer, conveniently got paid by one of Putin's shell corporations around the time of the pipeline thing, as Daniel Greenfield pointed out in that article. Also, Wikileaks is obviously not a KGB front (the KGB died with the Soviet Union), and aside from that, Julian Assange isn't even on the Russian payroll, but he is definitely a Marxist-Leninist. I WILL admit I probably mixed up the two events. My mistake on that front. But Putin being Communist has been backed up by Conservative/right wing sources who also have spent quite a few times condemning various communist deep state groups as well, including Ion Mihai Pacepa. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)

:::::::::::::::::::::::*''I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office.''
:::::::::::::::::::::::*''The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them
:::::::::::::::::::::::Do you even pay attention to what you post, or do you just like trolling me? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 23:47, December 24, 2021 (EST)

::::And they certainly have [https://youtu.be/cMFIWBQB1kE a better national anthem than then we do - including the lyrics (click CC).] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 05:22, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::::I think it is mostly due to Eastern Orthodox Christianity being more hierarchal than Protestant Christianity. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:46, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::::Except for the 70 year captivity in the Soviet era, Russia never had a separation of church and state in its 1,000 year history. And still doesn't. Even in Soviet times the people (''narodny'') never accepted separation of church and state. What is odd, how Muslims are content to live under the Russian Orthodox rather than under Shariah theocracy. The Jews OTOH, have had big problems with it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 07:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)

===Greenfield article===
While the [https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ Greenfield article certainly is interesting] and worthy of coverage in its own right, it adds nothing to our knowledge of the internal conspirators and law breakers involved in the [[Russia collusion hoax]]. These all are merely Democrat elected officials who spewed ''[[WaPo]]'' bullcrap. And the point of the article is, that while they were lying and deceiving the American electorate, they were also taking money from Russians. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Watch this video. It is very informative ==

Watch this video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTf4JYfMuoI Bad News: How Woke Media Undermines Democracy]

It is very informative. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Watched most of it last night. Will finish up today or tomorrow. How did they hold a symposium on this at Berkley without leftist Stormtroopers not burning the building down? Is it possible in 2021 for scholarship, discussion, and debate to still occur at leftist institutions? Makes me somewhat suspicious. She says, 'eight million people who voted for Obama also voted for Trump, so the idea Trump supporters are all racists is bs.' Better late than never. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 15:54, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::Here is another excellent video on the book with multiple people giving their perspectives: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKD7e5WoF_8 How woke media undermines democracy: A book event with Batya Ungar-Sargon].

::The videos confirmed what I thought all along which is the "golden rule". Namely, he who holds the gold rules. The left-leaning media caters to wealthy people on the left side of the spectrum because that maximizes advertising revenue. And the right-leaning media caters the wealthy right leaning wealthy people because that maximizes their advertising revenue. In addition, it is engagement that drives up revenue online so news stories are crafted to push people's buttons (like cause moral outrage). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::If it bleeds, it leads, as they say in the newspaper industry. People don't want stories about a newborn liter of puppies on the front page. In sales we say 'fear sells'. In fact, that is the secret of sales - the message is always negative. The two motivating factors to get people to part with their money is fear and greed. Fear that you may miss out on a deal or that your house will burn down with everybody in it ''if you don't buy'', and greed - 'wouldn't you like to be the first one on your block to have one?'
:::So that's how you capture people's attention - fear and greed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:::This explains the incessant [[race card]], Dems have to scare the daylights out Blacks to keep them motivated to keep them voting. "The Klan is going to burn a cross on your yard!" Repubs have to recognize how powerful and effective this latent internal fear in Blacks is. So "racism", "white supremacy", "white privilege", "systemic racism" become buzzwords and phrases tossed around to great effect. Ignoring the impact it has, and why these are used, is not helpful, and can even fuel more of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
::::The point of the book/video is that white, liberal elites care more about racism than blacks/Latinos and have hyper concern about racism because it makes them feel morally superior. And that hyper anti-racism causes radical policies like defund the police which actually hurts blacks/Latinos. And that this hyper anti-racism is partly fueled by the media whose journalists/interns come from Ivy League schools where hyper, anti-racism is also fueled.

::::Meanwhile, these white, liberal elites want open borders which drive down wages for Anerican Blacks/Latinos and working class whites. And they fight school choice (which blacks/Latinos want) which would give Black/Latinos and working class whites better educations. And these same white, liberal elites pushed policies that shipped blue-collar jobs overseas which hurt working class Black/Latinos and working class whites. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::::It's a ''[[quid pro quo]]:'' white liberals in politics and media spread alarm and fear among Blacks with, "boogeyman is gonna getcha," for which they hope to be rewarded with votes.
:::::In 2020, the Democrats already knew the "cry wolf" effect is diminishing: and [https://conservapedia.com/images/e/e6/Support_for_Democratic_Candidates%2C_2012-2020.PNG in fact provides us with evidence of voter fraud.] While the percentage of Blacks voting Democrat continues to slip, all the fraud and ballot box stuffing occurred predominantly in black precincts. It's pathological: Democrats would have to cheat in black precincts with or without covid and mail-in ballots, if they hoped to win with declining numbers of blacks voting Democrat. Fortunately for them, they had enough of experienced ballot box stuffing teams in place already, and even were able to train new participants in how to do it in such a massive effort. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:23, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022 ==

Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022.[https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999]

Compete.com was retired previously.

It looks like Similarweb.com will be the only free major ranking of a website's traffic.

Similarweb.com is more reliable than Alexa, but it is updated less frequently. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:This means two things: (a) Amazon (and Bezos), which owns Alexa, will move it resources into another area to attack and try to destroy conservative websites: and (b) numerous startups (both black hat and white hat) will step up to try to fill the gap left by Alexa. So we'll have to go through a period of screening new startups beginning now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

::In January/February, I will have access to a SEMRush.com subscription which ranks websites by web traffic. The public can see the rankings for the top 100 websites ranked by SEMRush.[https://www.semrush.com/blog/most-visited-websites/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:24, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::Actually, the fact that Compete.com and Alexa.com disappeared/disappearing means there is not a lot of money in providing free rankings so the gap might not be filled. But there is not a gap since SimilarWeb.com still exists. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Alexa's pretty big; they have to wait til March to fill out contracts for service that exist. They likely will take many of their clients with them into a new subscription service (under whatever name). Similarweb and SEMRush will pick up a lot. But the global market is sooo big, there will be a rush by small startups. It will not be unlike all the smaller competitors Twitter and YouTube have. And they'll offer free service to attract new customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:37, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Alexa is so big, it feels it has gathered enough knowledge about how the business works (and have gathered the best customers) they can squash any competitors and starts ups. But one or two small startups will survive in the long run.
::::Also, Alexa feels the market has reached a saturation point to where the prospects for future growth do not require them to offer free service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::Anyways, this explains why their free ranking service has gone haywire over the past 9 months - they didn't want any new customers. It would only require them to hire more expert help to take on piddly-squat customers. Now they can concentrate their best employees on their best customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 01:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Actually, Alexa.com had a free service plus with a subscription, you could get more data. Both are disappearing in 2022.

Anyways, I have access to multiple tools that show a website's relative strength compared to other websites.

For example, here is some information from Ahrefs.com about Conservapedia:

[[File:Conservapedia linking websites.JPG|thumbnail|center|700px|Amount of domains linking to Conservapedia according to Ahrefs.com]].
{{Clear}}
The domain strength reflects both the quality/quantity of domains linking to Conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:No way is Alexa giving up the money from its subscription service. It is simply changing its name. If that were not true, the market to fill in the gap would be even more wide open. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 02:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::"Existing subscriptions will remain active until May 1, 2022 UTC. After that, customers will no longer have access to Alexa.com."[https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999]

::In May of 2022, Alexa will end as a subscription service. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:11, December 25, 2021 (EST)

:::Yes, the name Alexa. It's no different than when the [[NKVD]] changed its name to the [[KGB]], or [[ACORN]] changed its name to dozens of other names in different states. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::There is no way they will walk away from the revenue stream they built over 25 years. And even if they did, the people they fired will start up a new business and reclaim the lost customers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
::::They will walk away from a revenue if the [[opportunity cost]] warrants it. It comes down to return on investment (ROI). If a higher ROI can be had elsewhere, Alexa's subscribers will be abandoned. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:43, December 25, 2021 (EST)
:::::Amazon purchased the company for $250 millilon in 1996; it made $6 million last year. So yah, it looks like a loser. So they shut it down and write off the losses (which go against income of Amazon). But nobody walks away from the $6 million revenue stream they built up, and the knowledge of the industry they created (at such a cost). So it gets reorganized. Some employees get transferred, others go off and create a new company with their knowledge base and existing client list. Now, the relationship of the new company to Amazon is different question; Bezos may be just a stockholder in the new company - apart from Amazon (or other executives buy stock or make loans to their former employees).
:::::Bottomline, if it is not an opportunity for the existing hands-on employees with knowledge and the client list, it is an opportunity for others to gross $6 million a year. The demand from the existing clients will not disappear with Alexa. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)

== Can you please check your email? ==

Thanks. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code>'''LT'''</code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|(The Old Right was right!)]]''''' Monday, 22:20, December 26, 2021 (EST)

== Hi Rob. This is Nishant Xavier ==

Hi Rob. How are you? This is Nishant. I'm back now and am in the process of writing a Book on how we can distribute Crores (10s of Millions) of Bibles to the Masses in India. I want to complete the Conservapedia Bible Project Translation. I like it: https://conservapedia.com/Matthew_1-9_(Translated) But I have a question. Why is "He" and "His" etc not Capitalized when referring to Lord Jesus Christ? It should be imho, as He is King of Kings. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]][[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]] 17:07, February 1, 2022 (EST)
:Welcome back. Good to hear from you. I know User:Liberaltears was anxious to talk with you about a few things. As to the CBP, I'm not certain what the answer is cause I've not been involved in the Project. However, my guess would be that some editors deem capitalizing "He" as somewhat archaic, although I can't say for sure. Anyways, welcome back. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:17, February 1, 2022 (EST)

== Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts ==

Uh, do you not want any rebuttals against the arguments used to disprove its existence? - [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-8-22
:Huh, what? you mean Marxists claim it doesn't exist? Figures. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:03, February 8, 2022 (EST)

Can’t imagine why that would be the case. In any event, it would probably be useful to display the arguments used to claim it’s a conspiracy theory before said arguments are picked apart by the facts. Do you agree? - [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-8-22

== Please check your email ==

Please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:43, February 13, 2022 (EST)
:Check your email again. I responded. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:12, February 13, 2022 (EST)
::Check your email again. I responded another time. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:24, February 13, 2022 (EST)

== Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts Pt 2 ==

Rob, I thought we had an understanding. What are you doing? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21
:Understanding on what? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:FYI, if you think you're going to hijack the Cultural Marxism page so proponents of Cultural Marxism can call their critics 'anti-Semites', think again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:21, February 14, 2022 (EST)

What do you mean ‘hijacked’? The criticism section is being expanded so that it can refute accusations of anti-semitism. How on earth do you end up misinterpreting all this? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21

:Where are the accusations coming from? Are they from a reputable or reliable source other than an extremist source? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 17:39, February 14, 2022 (EST)

The accusations are literally on wikipedia and any other leftist outlet trying to call it a myth. Are you seriously unaware of this? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21

:No, it's to be expected. As Wikipedia says, 'an extremist source can only be used about itself.' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:15, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:The purpose of our Cultural Marxism page is to describe what it is, not rehash debates and talking points among Marxists to being exposed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:18, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:Why would you consider what Marxists say about Cultural Marxism as credible? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
:The situation is no different than Marxist school boards that claim [[Critical Race Theory]] doesn't exist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:28, February 14, 2022 (EST)

If you don’t want the marxist talking points to be shown and debunked then why do you even bother to have a criticism page pointing out why they think it’s fake? And why are you assuming that I think what they say is credible? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]] 2-14-21
:(a) good question. It needs proofreading. (b) why do you insist on inserting Marxist propaganda? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:47, February 14, 2022 (EST)

Well while you’re ‘proofreading’ arguments literally made to refute marxist propaganda, do you mind not rushing to assumptions and actually realize that Im trying to help the article? [[User:SmashCulturalMarxism|SmashCulturalMarxism]]

== Image uploading ==
Hello RobSmith! Could you help in uploading [[Conservapedia:Image_upload_requests#Echmiatsin.2C_Armenian_Apostolic_Church_and_Michael_Patrick_Mulroy|these two photos]]? For about two months no one answered me. I will be grateful for your help! [[User:Garik Avakian|Sincerely, Garik Avakian]] ([[User talk:Garik Avakian|talk]]) 02:58, February 28, 2022 (EST)
:Okay, give me few minutes. Sorry for the delay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:09, February 28, 2022 (EST)
:;Okay, they are in the [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload Upload log]. Sorry for the long delay. I never did get the message from David. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 03:20, February 28, 2022 (EST)
::: Thank you very much for your help! [[User:Garik Avakian|Sincerely, Garik Avakian]] ([[User talk:Garik Avakian|talk]]) 13:19, March 1, 2022 (EST)

== Ukraine and the Wuhan Lab ==
Hey, RobSmith.

I noticed that you recently added a section on the alleged bioweapon labs to the [[Ukraine]] article. With that in mind, I’m interested in knowing if your perspective on the Wuhan lab has changed. I’ve always been suspicious that it was actually our own government who released the virus and that China was framed, while you have always maintained that China was indeed the culprit. Again, has your perspective on the Wuhan lab changed?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:34, March 1, 2022 (EST)
:No, not unless someone could show evidence of political collusion in addition scientific and commercial.

:And of course you have the question of motive. Now, motives in the CCP and the US public and private commercial interest may be easy to theorize, the problem gets down to ''who'' however, in addition to evidence. So you're left with just a theory, and a pretty well unfounded one, at that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 18:51, March 1, 2022 (EST)

:In the case of the CCP, the political motivations are transparent: the Trump tariffs were about to take effect, the international organ harvesting Study was about to made public, and Trump stood a good chance of being re-elected.

:In the case of Fauci, despite his promise to get rid of Trump on January 11, 2017 with a pandemic, when news came of the "leak", his first reaction was "oh goodie, more money for Pfizer". Then he got an email saying "but your fingerprints are all over it." So one would have to prove a larger political agenda between the [[Deep State]] and the CCP to deliberately exterminate millions of people and shrink the global economy. Difficult task, but not impossible, that maybe your children or grandchild may one day wish to tackle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:04, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::incidentally, they are not "alleged bioweapon labs" in Ukraine, they are bio weapon labs owned and operated by the DoD. The cover story is they are disposing of Soviet-era bio weapons, but we have strong evidence of ongoing research. It'll be interesting watch them being handed over to Russian forces, and what kinda English language documents the Russians will make public. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:13, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::Now in the [[North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization#History]], they got the [[marginal cost]] of killing people down to 29 cents per head with a deadly strain of Yellow fever distributed through mosquitos, but nukes remain your best bet with a marginal cost of 10-12 cents per head, last I heard (these estimates would have to be revised to include the cost of storage and maintenance of a nuke over 30 years or whatever timeframe). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:28, March 1, 2022 (EST)

::If Trump is to be criticized for anything, it's that he didn't listen to Pompeo or whoever who warned him, "they could release a bioweapon and cause a global pandemic before they ever pay a dime in tariffs, and you could be voted out." Somebody had to tell Trump that, but he dismissed as "they're just bluffing." Kinda like NATO idiots who think Putin is bluffing as they try to stir up nuclear war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 19:44, March 1, 2022 (EST)
==Harris==
Hi. Here is her embarrassing reaction to an important question.
[https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1501907918261788673]
Image [https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/03/harris-poland-presser-03.jpg][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Harris_in_Poland.PNG Got it.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 12:05, March 10, 2022 (EST)::Thanks. Photo credit seems to be NYPost.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
::In the 1990s, when Sen. Moynihan was still alive, we used to talk about "the dumbing down of America." With Harris (and AOC) we've come full circle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:26, March 10, 2022 (EST)

==Frank James==

NY Subway attacker (Apr.12.22) Frank James AKA Frank Whitaker - [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQLpkupWYAMWjw2?format=jpg image]
[https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1514029565622075405 source].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Frank_Whitaker.jpg Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 00:34, April 13, 2022 (EDT)

==Re Mosque and Gaza==

These are pics from Apr 15 and Apr 16 about the rioters' rocks at the Al Aqsa Mosque, ready to throw at police and at Jewish worshippers.
[https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQiRnyrXwAEZ5Sb?format=jpg 1] , [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQYN6lNWQAAVcq4?format=jpg 2].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload They're in the Upload Log]. The rioters wearing shoes I found extremely interesting. Of course, our readers need more context about how disrespectful that is, and how it shows preplanning and intent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 21:46, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
::Indeed I inserted, that according to their own laws...etc.
[https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjY-4WFG0yPOkiCpSEuEfEJtUvxZa64JVofeSjhVmagNV9RE89u8e_5XtwPP5CkGORdpE2h2wQt4V5rQ5dqR91aII1lu9DbS0MmPfGYbFtQCd1zgWJXTpKnWBjvpNPsTjVoYHHOPQKATnV2vnO8jWtkoz7ljFQ7deHi5XlHq6dgKUOZgEWdPQ8/w329-h419/stockpile%20rocks.jpg See the pile of rocks at their mosque], [https://www.israelhayom.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cartoon-4.jpg cartoon, how they use Al Aqsa].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:16, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:Looks like they were preparing to commemorate George Floyd. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:You need these uploaded? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:15, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
::yes, they called all 2020 rioters like in OR/WA as "protesters" of course. When you're able, have the time, please upload.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:52, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
:::Ok, [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload got em]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 14:18, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

==PIJ==
This [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQTAfjkXoAoS-HX?format=jpg] belonged to ''Sha's Kamamji'', of [[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]] before he was eliminated in Jenin when he opened fire.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:51, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Sha's_Kamamji.jpg Got it]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
::Cheers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

==Burning their own mosque==
Hi. Can you get a screenshit from within [https://twitter.com/LiorHaiat/status/1516699900779577351 this clip] and upload it? This is today, when "Palestinian" Islamists throw Molotov cocktail ontebted against police and fall inside their holy" compound.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/upload How's this?] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]] 11:37, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

== Bytemsbu is wrong ==

You are tight. Bytemsbu is wrong, like on so many edits. It seems he has an anti Jewish agenda problem. Using "neo con" cover.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])
==NYT==
Good morning. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDcugJzXMAE0XYR?format=jpg This one] was hired in Feb 2022. Please upload, when can. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:02, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Abdulrahim.jpg Done]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:33, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

== I see you are still here. ==

What is going on with the war and stuff? --[[User:Yeschayi|Yeschayi]] ([[User talk:Yeschayi|talk]]) 14:21, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
:Having failed to get Poland to start WWIII, NATO apparently has convinced Romania to do it with an attack on ethnic Russians in Transnistria and oil shipments by rail. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 14:48, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
::I see. --[[User:Yeschayi|Yeschayi]] ([[User talk:Yeschayi|talk]]) 17:06, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

You claim to be a bastion of free speech but in Russia people can be sentenced for to 15 years in prison for peacefully protesting against the war, indeed even calling the invasion of Ukraine a war can land you in prison. How is that in anyway free speech? You also claim to be pro life but hundreds of children and thousands of other innocent victims have been killed, even murdered in The Ukraine, or were they all Nazis? I think it is far more simple than that. Putin helped Trump and Zelensky refused to too. You love Trump and hate Biden so all your morals go out of the window which means they were false morals to begin with.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:05, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
:Thanks for that. Should I add you to the pro-Nazi column? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Z]] 12:09, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
::How is condemning murder and restrictions of free speech pro Nazi? Those are against everything the Nazi's were about. How about the you address the murder/free speech/false moral issues I bought up rather then ask a sarcastic not even wrong question?--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:38, May 10, 2022 (EDT)

User talk:RobSmith

2022-05-10T16:05:52Z

Chewy Suarez:

Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Video Games

2019-10-06T14:22:04Z

Chewy Suarez:

== Red Dead Redemption and Red Dead Redemption 2 ==

I was wondering if they belong to at least the Debatable part of this article. If not, that's fine. Anyway, here's what I think can be described of both games.

Red Dead Redemption: A former outlaw named John Marston is tasked by a corrupt government official to hunt down his former gang members in exchange for getting his wife and son back. It promote family in the form of John trying to work hard to be with his family again, even trying to spend time with his son Jack. It also promotes doing good like donating to a nunnery, helping people (whether from gangs or wild animals), and doing jobs for them. However, the player also has the option of doing bad things like murder, theft, and robbery.

Red Dead Redemption 2: Set before the events of Red Dead Redemption, this game explores how the Dutch Van Der Linde gang had fallen. As the title suggests, it promotes redemption in the form of main protagonist Arthur Morgan helping John Marston and his family escape the collapsing gang at the cost of his own life (whether from dying from tuberculosis or being murdered), and like the previous game, shows doing good deeds, heroism, and family in good light. However, also like the first game, the player can do bad things. --[[User:The Autistic Patriot|The Autistic Patriot]] ([[User talk:The Autistic Patriot|talk]]) 19:48, 7 March 2019 (EST)

== South Park Video Games ==

Trey Parker and Matt Stone have produced two official video games under Ubisoft: ''South Park: The Stick of Truth'' and ''South Park: The Fractured But Whole''. Yes, they're vulgar, but they do make fun of political correctness (the second game actually has the player learn a "Microagression" fighting technique from PC Principal where they get a free hit on an enemy if they say anything that could be perceived as bigoted), environmentalism, feminism, gun control, among other things. They make fun of the idea that the police are racist by having them worship a demon that specifically targets blacks for consumption in the game (this is obviously sarcastic). They make fun of identity politics in allowing the character to choose their gender, race/ethnicity, and religion, and then engaging in battle with rednecks who will beat you up no matter what you choose! Also, when the gender is chosen, the game implicitly satirizes the concept of transgenderism, especially considering the player is allowed to return to the counselor at any time to change their gender. The second game is arguably more conservative than the first (or maybe that's just me; I was still apolitical and a progressive liberal by default when I was playing the first one), but they're both undeniably conservative, or at least libertarian. I just don't want to see them end up in "Worst Liberal" like the South Park movie.
==Skyrim==
Great game with some conservative aspects along with some very liberal ones. Same sex marriage, burly female warriors including legates (equivalent rank of full colonel) and multiculturalism are important aspects of the game. Should be moved to debatable.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 10:22, 6 October 2019 (EDT)

User talk:SamHB

2019-09-30T14:28:07Z

Chewy Suarez:

[[User talk:SamHB/Archive 1]]
[[User_talk:SamHB/archive_2]]
[[User_talk:SamHB/archive_3]]

== Red telephone for Cons ==

Cons: Thank you for dealing with the matter of [[Special:Contributions/Cal_Um]]. I know that you recognize that you are not an expert in relativity and know better than to get into the technical details of these discussions, and I appreciate that. (I wish more people recognized their limitations in this area; you can look up my recent controversies.) But this was a clear case of you recognizing that this guy was a troublemaker, and coming to my aid.

And now I see that there has been another case, with [[Special:Contributions/Bobbillyman69]], taken care of by Andy. Vandals look at the Recent Changes log: "Oh, look! Relativity is on today's dinner menu!" We old-timers know all about that phenomenon.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:21, 7 March 2017 (EST)
:Your welcome. I just happened to see it. I am guessing that for the foreseeable future that you and Andy are going to have to maintain the article as far as keeping it in accordance to compromise you two reached as far as the wording of the article. I don't think I will be of much help in the future. Again, I just happened to see that particular vandal.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:32, 7 March 2017 (EST)

== A liberal is wanted for an online dialogue ==

A liberal is wanted to have a single online dialogue. Please let them know at http://opposing-views.org/ if you are interested. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:15, 29 March 2017 (EDT)
:Here is their contact page: http://opposing-views.org/contact/ [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:25, 29 March 2017 (EDT)

::Well, I'm somewhat flattered, but significantly puzzled, by this. From looking at the web page, it looks like some kind of general liberal/conservative debate site. Currently focused on Obamacare, but with a wider outlook in general. My guess is that they are looking to increase their "contributor staff", particularly liberals, and they came to you. Or, more likely, you discovered them.

::I'm not interested in contributing to such a site. And one thing puzzles me about it. There are '''thousands''' of liberal/conservative discussions/debates/controversies that take place every day. I find myself in such discussions several times per day. So these people want to create yet another one? With nothing noteworthy about it? They will be (already are) totally drowned out by the discussions already going on around the internet. I have about a dozen such web sites already bookmarked.

::Now, about your choice of correspondent: I'm flattered, of course. But, when you needed to find a liberal friend, you came to ''Conservapedia''? Well, perhaps you contacted 97 other liberal acquaintances, besides EJamesW, AlanE, and myself. Actual liberals are a rare and endangered species here.

::About my politics. You put in some question, that you seem to have deleted, asking whether it's really true that I'm a liberal. Well, compared to most people, especially the admins, here at CP, I am way far left of the norm. But relative to the outside world, I am rather middle-of-the-road. (I can't speak for EJamesW or Alan, but I would guess that they are similar.) I actually hold a lot of conservative and "traditional" views, though that doesn't seem to mean much at CP. For example, I am appalled that we have a President who is a serial adulterer and is on his third marriage. And, all through the cold war, I was on the side of freedom, not the side of the murderous Communist thugs who were out to conquer the world. I believe in American exceptionalism, and believed that the United States was a beacon of liberty to the whole world. I was relieved when the Soviet Union collapsed. But now Russia, the descendant of the Soviet Union, is ruled by Vladimir Putin, a descendant of the Communists, one who invades other countries and fairly openly has his political opponents murdered. I am appalled that our current President doesn't have a problem with this.

::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
:::OK. Thanks for letting me know your decision promptly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:03, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
::::I hope that it is possible to be a social conservative, a fiscal conservative, a political conservative, but still believe in rule of law, quantum mechanics, special relativity, and recent advances in machine learning/artificial intelligence. I never thought of SamHB as being a "liberal." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 18:39, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
OK. SamHB is less on the left spectrum that I thought. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:11, 2 April 2017 (EDT)
:Doesn't help him though, does it, when some ''petty tyrant of the field'' decides to burn a conversation and give him a day off just because they can. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 00:24, 3 April 2017 (EDT)
::Sigh. Semper idem. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:25, 3 April 2017 (EDT)
:::Well, actually, he can't. No, to be precise, he ''can'', but he ''may not''. It's interesting that this happened shortly after I complained about abuse of block power [[Talk:Main_Page#Abuse_of_block_power|here]], and his reply seemed to acknowledge that it was not within his authority to block me—"That's not up to me at this point, but to one of the admins".

:::I suspect that Northwest is probably feeling a bit guity about having violated his position of trust so blatantly by blocking someone over a content dispute. He may not realize that I am well respected by the admins; I've been around a while and they know me well. I've had some run-ins with Ed Poor, and he blocked me a couple of times for my abrasiveness, but we have since made peace. If Northwest looks at my block log, he will see that, until this week, none of my blocks involved "liberal POV". Mostly they were by people who had a rather checkered history of honesty, or for totally bogus claims of sockpuppetry with people I had never heard of.

:::It's ironic that all this happened only 2-1/2 hours after I put the lyrics to ''America'' on my user page, specifically calling out the lines
::::Confirm thy soul in self-control,
::::Thy liberty in law!
:::That was aimed at Donald Trump, who seems to have little self-control, little respect for law, little knowledge of American history and traditions, and little knowledge of, and respect for, the teachings of Jesus. But, as we say in this country: if the shoe fits, wear it.

:::In a few days I may go over to his talk page and try to make peace. To try to convince him that we can make CP a better place if we all work together. And that it would be better not to toss around the words "liberal" and "leftist" with such wild abandon, because it just makes CP look less respectable and trustworthy to do so. And that one doesn't need to be a "leftist" to oppose murderous thug Vladimir Putin.

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:38, 13 April 2017 (EDT)

::::To make it short and to the point: You were warned before about your behavior on CP and you didn't want to listen (specifically regarding numbers 9 and 10 - ''especially'' number 10, which you violated several times before - at [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia|How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]]), so that's how you got the day off. To read how both you and AlanE are talking about this, you both come off sounding like the liberal media pundits who complain about Donald Trump's travel ban against specific Islamic countries and his proposed illegal immigration ban.

::::Your comment "And that it would be better not to toss around the words "liberal" and "leftist" with such wild abandon, because it just makes CP look less respectable and trustworthy to do so" also reflects exactly the type of things liberals say regarding CP (at the [[Liberal Style]] article, under Debate and rhetorical tactics):
:::::"Like to use the phrase 'reflects poorly on the site' when talking about the liberal articles on Conservapedia."
::::And numbers 5 and 6 under Liberalism in the same article:
:::::"Calling the use of the term liberal when used in a derogatory context 'stupid'"
:::::"Will often deny being a liberal, or will claim to be a 'true conservative', while spouting liberal and Democrat talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles."
::::And under Personal traits (again in the same article):
:::::"Concealing one's liberal views rather than admitting them"
::::But at day's end, this is still Conservapedia, ''not'' Liberalpedia. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:11, 14 April 2017 (EDT)

::I could parody being a liberal, but when pressed to the wall all my inner contradictions and stupidity would come out, which might then just seal the deal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]] 13:15, 13 April 2017 (EDT)
:::I puzzled by several aspects of this. By "parody being a liberal" do you mean make fun of liberals with over-the-top humor, the way Stephen Colbert used to parody conservatives on his "Colbert Report"? (He shows his politics in a different way in his present show.) Or do you mean "Convincingly pretend to be a liberal, in a way that would trick one into believing that I am sincere?" Any intelligent and well-informed person (which you are) can do that. What do you mean by "my inner contradictions and stupidity would come out"? That you would have a hard time convincingly imitating the stupidity of liberals (liberals and conservatives both have consistency problems) so that your ruse would be unsuccessful? Or that your personal "contradictions and stupidity" would make you unable to do the job? And what do you mean by "seal the deal"? Succeed at your imitation? Or let others succeed at unmasking your attempts? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:51, 13 April 2017 (EDT)
::::You covered all bases quite well. Parodying a liberal is not hard. If you come to a juncture where you're at a loss, and you have to think "''What would be the appropriate liberal response?''", you just say something nonsensical and contradictory, and it would pass. That's what I mean by seal the deal - there would be no question I'm a liberal speaking from the heart. [[Poe's Law]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]] 19:07, 14 April 2017 (EDT)

== Vaping ==

(No, I'm not referring to E-cigarettes.) Cons, please do not vape other people's talk pages, OK? I know that what you recently vaped here was insignificant, but please don't do it. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:14, 14 April 2017 (EDT)

== 9th anniversary ==

Congratulations on your 9th anniversary here! Despite disagreements, edit wars, and 19 blocks, you are still around! I know a number of people don't agree with you on various topics, and even I disagree on some things you believe (most notably, macroevolution) but I appreciate that you have "stuck it out" and are still trying to make CP better. I also appreciate your insights on matters which have been influenced by things long before I was here. You were also the only one when I first joined who seemed to be making an effort to help me learn the ropes and how things work here (an effort I am trying to pass on to others now). Thanks for your efforts! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 11:49, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Claims of familiarity with CP guidelines ==

Since you claim to be familiar with, and "well versed in", Conservapedia's guidelines (per your edit on [[User talk:1990'sguy|1990'sguy's talk page]]), here's a refresher from the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Member Accounts|Member Accounts]] section:

* Conservapedia is a politically conservative, Christian encyclopedia project. We welcome opposing views, but are not interested in users who come here only to change articles to their ideology (''as you've insisted on doing with selected articles here as of late to change them to fit liberal POV, despite your claims otherwise - ed.''), or disrupt by constantly arguing on the article talk pages that we are "wrong" (''likewise - ed.''). Trolling comments, incivility and personal attacks can be removed from discussion pages.
* We are not a debate forum, but a project. If you contribute, where you can, by adding substantive content, abiding by our Guidelines, we welcome you. If not, remember it is a big Internet, and you should go where you can support the goals of that project.

[[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:37, 28 April 2017 (EDT)
:Go write up a Popeye episode, son. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:43, 28 April 2017 (EDT)
::This applies to you too, JohnZ, just so you know. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:13, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

== re: Liberal article ==

I made some revisions to the [[liberal]] article to make it more accurate. And made some talk page edits indicating my reasons for the changes. For example, liberalism is not communism or Nazism. [[Attila the Hun]] was not a liberal, etc.

If you want to review the article periodically to make sure my changes stick, it would be appreciated.

I will pay you the courtesy of not having all or most liberals equated with Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler, Mao or Stalin. I would ask you, however, to have the decency to not publicize private emails.

By the way, I have been to Framingham, MA and got along with all the people I met. The people I met in Framingham did not give me Nazi salutes. And I did not see any Nazi flags on front lawns. Nor did I see any statues of Lenin while on Massachusetts thruways or while in Framingham. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:45, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

:No Nazi flags? No Lenin statues? Not one? I guess Massachusetts is going soft. It must be all the political correctness or something. :-) I haven't seen any of that stuff in my trips to upstate New York either. Or in my trips to Iowa, Arizona, Arkansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Virginia, Alabama, Tennessee, or Missouri. What's the world coming to?

:Seriously, I have noticed your recent attempts to inject some reasonableness into certain articles, and I appreciate that. (I'm serious this time!) In fact, I have recently noticed some rather decent articles here. But plenty of awful ones, like "liberal" and its ilk. I'm trying to improve the good ones, while ignoring the awful ones. But you need to know that my ability to "make changes stick" is very limited, though I'll try. See my block log, the history of the [[Pussy Riot]] article, and the last half of the "A liberal is wanted for an online dialogue" section above (as well as a paragraph below), to see what I'm talking about. So someone might undo anything I do (and block me in violation of policy). But I'll try.

:I don't consider "not having all or most liberals equated with Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler, Mao or Stalin" to be a courtesy to me personally. It's a courtesy to Conservapedia. But I appreciate it in any case.

:About the email: Perhaps I should have redacted the email address, but I considered that the name was so nondescript that it must have been a garbage gmail account that you created. If you have gotten spam on that account, I apologize. However, I think the general content of emails can't be considered private. (Just ask Hillary Clinton!) And most of the message was just hawking your own pages right here at CP, along with one link to a vimeo clip to an old Star Trek thing.

:Peace, my non-Nazi non-Communist friend, [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:45, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

:::Follow-up: I have redacted the email more thoroughly; I assume from Cons's vaping that that is what he wanted me to to. He can't possibly have wanted me to conceal the ''fact that he sent it'', since he openly announced it in advance on this page.

::But if you do anything that goes against Conservapedia policy (as you've done repeatedly over time, and even recently), you ''will'' stand a chance of being blocked again (and despite what you otherwise think, blocking someone for violating CP policy is ''not'' "illegal"), so don't go thinking you can game the system just so you can get your way and get liberal POV imposed on this site. All you're doing every time you bring this up is that you're showing you prefer to ignore the rules of this site (and your history here, once again, proves that). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:43, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::SamHB, I look at your restoration and its skepticism that more than one person has edited using the User: Conservative account.

:::The edit log shows that the User: Conservative account created the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] article. The edit log shows that the User: Conservative account created the [[Gay bowel syndrome]] and [[Homosexuality and Parasites]] articles. No intelligent person believes that these articles are the work of one person. The footnoting style is radically different for the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] article and frankly the article lacked machismo as soon as it used the alphabet soup of LGBTQ. Frankly, I don't even know what all those letters stand for. Why is the Q even used? It seems redundant.

:::You still not reconciled this blaring incongruently which was even noticed by a non-fan of the User: Conservative account. There must be some reason why you are not coming up with a reasonable explanation of the incongruity? What is it?

:::By the way, the explanation is so simple. More than one person has edited using the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:45, 30 May 2017 (EDT)

== re: "I'm going to organize this in broad categories. That's the right thing to do for articles about scientists" ==

Bill Nye is an engineer. He is not a scientist. Stop engaging in credential inflation! I realize that evolutionism is exceedingly weak. But try to not engage in desperation tactics and make efforts to control yourself. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:46, 1 June 2017 (EDT)
:Well, it's the right thing for articles about science popularizers too.

:Sorry, I should have said "science popularizers". The fact that he's an engineer is irrelevant.

:I think the suggestion that I need to make efforts to control myself is a little harsh for such an infraction as calling him a scientist instead of a science popularizer. It doesn't strike me as anywhere near as great a failure of self-control as spending years pretending to be multiple people, or spending years making tens of thousands (hundreds of thousands? millions?) of edits, deletions, renamings, cross-links, and ineffably pointless changes to image sizes, mostly for an utterly obsessive corpus of foolishness.

:But we're still friends. I enjoy sparring with you. And I've got more stuff to do in reply to your previous edit on this page. But first, I need to change an image size.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:18, 1 June 2017 (EDT)

== talk page second archive ==

You user talk page is insanely long. I think you are overdue for [[User talk:SamHB/archive 2]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:03, 2 June 2017 (EDT)

:You're right. Done. Thank you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:12, 3 June 2017 (EDT)
== Nice job ==
I read your user page archives - really entertaining, and they made me realized how wretched I was to write articles for Cons, even if they did get on the Main Page. Please, don't stop believing in relativity. Hold onto that feeling.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

== re: well-intentioned and level-headed people ==

You wrote: "You need to know that user "Conservative" ''is not in any way typical of the people we have here''. There are a lot of well-intentioned and level-headed people here, and you could have been a member of that community."

:First of all, User: Conservative is not merely one editor. So your petty personal attacks are lamer than you think. It is readily apparent that User: Conservative is more than editor. For example, the glaring topical/footnoting/writing style differences in the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] article and some of the other homosexuality articles by the User: Conservative account. You have never explained these glaring differences.

:Secondly, you have yet to find a single factual error in any of the articles written by the User:Conservative account. You merely dislike some of the articles because they conflict with some of your errant/miscreant, liberal notions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:29, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
:::Actually, I've been meaning to rip you to shreds, yet again, over that weird fantasy of yours. But there's usually something more urgent to do. Especially now, with the "abcqwe" issue. Trying to keep him on board is much more important than yet another go-around with you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:30, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
::Your name is <name redacted>, everybody who has ever posted on this site knows your name is <name redacted>, people who died 100 years ago know your name is <name redacted>. People who will not be born until the 22nd century knows your name is <name redacted>. Insult your own intelligence(not hard to do I know) but the rest of us are not falling for it.
:::Actually, that's not my name, assuming that you were referring to me (SamHB) when you wrote "you" above. Maybe you are confusing me with someone else.
:::In any case, it is considered poor form to "out" or "dox" someone on a wiki. And the identity and personal info about the person you are perhaps referring to are well known. I suspect that you are about to be blocked, if you haven't already been blocked as I write this. And what you wrote above will likely be vaped, though I will restore it (with the name redacted) if that happens. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:30, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
::::
::::SanHV, why is the footnoting for [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] different from many other [[User: Conservative]] articles?

:::: I found out this month what the Q is in the acronym LGBTQ stands for. Why does the article [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] use the term LGBTQ, but the other homosexuality articles created by the User: Conservtive account not use that term?
:::::Probably because you are a klutz with your keyboard, as indicated by your spelling of "Conservtive". It stands for "queer", by the way.[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Is the term LGBTQ one that I would likely use? For example, how often does the word "gay" appear in Conservapedia's homosexuality articles?
:::::I wouldn't know. I'd have to read them. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Is the term "persecution of homosexuals" one that I would likely use? Why was there an internal battle within the User: Conservative account about the title of the article [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]]? For example, why was the title of that article changed/moved?
:::::Because you like to do that kind of thing, as anyone who looks at your contributions knows. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Liberals dominate the field of psychology. Do liberals excel in the field of psychology in order to be able to discern that more than one editor has used the User:Conservative account?
:::::I doubt it. I doubt that, by and large, they give a hoot about the size of your "collective". [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
::::If liberals do excel in the discipline of psychology, why do so many psychology experiments and journal articles have an inability to be replicated? See: [http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248 Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test], ''Nature'', August 27, 2015

::::RobS, 1990sguy and Karajou have been told privately that more than one editor has used the User: Conservative account. There was an attempt to make one of these editors an editor of the User: Conservative account, but Aschlafly would not permit it.
:::::Can you send me the email in which Andy said that? And, by "one of these editors" do you mean one of RobS, 1990sguy and Karajou? All you would have to do is privately send them your CP password. Andy would not know. In fact, if you mail me your password, at sam4557@gmail.com, I could become a member of your collective! The "sockpuppet" rule prohibits one person from having multiple CP accounts, but there's no rule about giving out your password. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Lastly, you couldn't rip a wet paper bad to shreds, let alone rip of member of the User: Conservative account to shreds. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:04, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
By the way, a 2006 international survey reported that 30% of the Swiss reject evolution which is one of the highest national percentages in Europe.[http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Home/Archive/Swiss_drag_knuckles_accepting_evolution.html?cid=70292] [[Switzerland]] has one of the very highest standards of living in Europe.

Denmark has one of the highest rates of belief in evolution in Europe (See: Jon D. Miller; Eugenie C. Scott; Shinji Okamoto (11 August 2006). "Public Acceptance of Evolution". Science. 313 (5788): 765–766.).

The Swiss are known for yodeling.
::I'm extremely fascinated, delighted, and enchanted to hear that. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
The Danes are known for bestiality! A 2015 ''Jerusalem Post'' article indicates "[[Copenhagen]] has for long been the bestiality capital of Europe and has attracted many tourists mainly visiting to have sex with animals. Legislation against this practice was only enacted this year."[http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Suggestions-for-the-anti-Semitic-slurs-list-434293] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:28, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:There are some worthwhile projects that I want to accomplish. I am not going to continue this latest battle between us. It doesn't make sense to respond to every slight someone directs your way. I am moving on. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::I regret using the word miscreant above. It wasn't necessary.
:::No hard feelings. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)

::I also agree with you that it would have been nice to retain the editor who recently departed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:57, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::::What??? To whom were you referring??? The one who was "showboating" and annoying Karajou and VargasMilan2 [sic]? I assumed you thought it was abcqwe, and I could find no evidence that he communicated with Karajou or VargasMilan. Who was it? Seriously, I'm curious. I'd like to know whether it was someone that I also disliked. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I just discovered that someone blocked [[User:Abcqwe]]. He made a number of posts to talk pages that irritated people. It seems as if he was spoiling for a fight and/or trying to gain attention. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:13, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::You just discovered that now?????? Really? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::::For the record, he blocked himself indefinitely, but I changed the block to five years because indefinite blocks are problematic. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:23, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::OK. He was a provocateur at the end. No great loss. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:57, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::But, was it necessary to delete his user and talk pages? Or is this just CP policy? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:24, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::No, it is not policy. Please restore them. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
In terms of webmaster best practices, deleting low value pages is a beneficial thing to do. In 2017, Conservapedia is going to delete abandoned user pages and their respective talk pages. Andy has given the green light about this matter and he is not changing his mind about it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:00, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::It is a "best practice" only because you have the technical permission, as an administrator, to do whatever you please. You can delete whatever you want, vape whatever you want, and block whomever you want, at any time. You even burned down ''this'' page on 10 January, 2015. I was never under the illusion that you would honor my request to restore his pages. And I can't help noticing that, shortly after you explained this "best practice", you deleted a few pages just to make the point. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
:Re: annoying Karajou and VargasMilan2 - see: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=1351118&oldid=1350637 He sometimes signed his posts "Nate". As far as VargaMilan2, see conversation I moved to the community portal. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::I think [[User:Abcqwe]] began to be more of a provocateur after I posted this article [[American liberalism and 21st century political losses]]. Given that he is an American liberal, it probably triggered his backlash/bitterness/resentment.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:33, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I don't think Abcqwe annoyed Karajou or VargasMilan while he actually edited. They wrote what they did in response to the news that he was leaving. On top of that, it seems that Abcqwe uses a lot of sarcasm and sarcastic humor, and I think his "confession" displayed some of it. He also seems to have overexaggerated. Personally, I think he should have been more frank in his post, and I don't think his sense of humor helped at all. Many people probably got the impression that he was a parodist/liberal, while I think it is more believable that he was a more moderate person who originally joined in good faith. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:06, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I seem to be the invisible man regarding Abcque. I was the one who tried to keep a lid on his vandalism. Did I need help? Yes. Did I ask for it?Yes. Did I get any from the lads wallowing in their anti liberal groupthinkfest, not giving a stuff for truth? No I did not. Do I still think that CP should be vehicle for information for homesckoolers? Yes. Is it ? No. Do I give a damn? Strangely, yes I do.
::::Sorry Sam. I have tried other forums to change an article title to allow me to correct the article. I want [[Joseph Belloc]] changed to [[Hilaire Belloc]]. Its simple really but the lads are too busy doing what they like doing. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 03:08, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

== Border fence for the unfree state of Massachusetts ==

[[File:Prison.jpg|thumbnail|200px|center|Border fence for the unfree state of [[Massachusetts]] designed to keep people from leaving the state. See also: [[Essay: Free States Movement|Free States Movement]] ]]
Actually, I haven't seen any fences like that, except at MCI<ref>Massachusetts Correctional Institution</ref> Concord, where I go to visit my cousin (you know, the one who is a member of your collective; they let people edit Conservapedia from the slammer), who is serving a 5-year stretch for not being a [[Essay: Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course#Addendum|"svelte Bible believing young earth creationist like Chuck Norris"]].
{{clear}}

==Joking about TAR==

Question: Will TAR return? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:24, 8 June 2017 (EDT)
:I will consider it ''only'' if he agrees to completely stop link-spamming and adding categories. If not, I or someone else will be forced to block him. I agree that he made some good changes, but the bad far outweighed the good. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:00, 8 June 2017 (EDT)
::I don't believe TAR is coming back. I was merely joking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])

That joke is not the least bit funny. I doubt that 1990'sguy appreciated the humor. As I'm sure you recall, during the period when TAR was being removed from the site (which is chronicled at [[User_talk:DavidB4#Cleaning_up_after_the_blocked_users]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive60#Re:_Cleanup_work_post_TheAmericanRedoubt]], you repeatedly implied that you were somehow in private communication with him, and that, because of this, you could reassure everyone that he had no intention of coming back. But since you have a reputation for pretending to be in secret communication with people, just as you pretend to be multiple people, no one believed you. So Andy had to revoke his rights.

I don't believe he's coming back either, but not because of some private communication. It's because he would be shown the door instantly.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:33, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
:At this point, I really am not concerned if you believe I have had various private conversations with people or if you believe more than one person has edited using the [[User: Conservative]] account.

:It is probably best if we keep our communications cordial, but very limited in the future.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, 10 June 2017 (EDT)

::OK. The "ripping you to shreds" that I had planned will not occur. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:31, 11 June 2017 (EDT)
:::A few points:

:::1. You called my liar and I have never lied at this wiki. More than one person has edited using the User: Conservative account. You may not accept this fact as being true, but that is your problem and not mine. Aschafly is certainly aware that the User: Conservative account has had more than one editor use it and Karajou is aware as well. I did a checker user on the User: Conservative account and at least one other editor has used the account in the last 3 months.

:::2. I should have been more cordial in my last communication with you. After all is said and done, I have decided to communicate far less on talk pages due to competing priorities. So any absence of communication with you isn't personal. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:36, 11 June 2017 (EDT)

== From warrior to diplomat ==

"Warrior to Diplomat

In his previous roles, Harald had focused primarily on marshaling the troops to defeat the competition. Now he found himself devoting a surprising amount of time to influencing a host of external constituencies, including regulators, the media, investors, and NGOs. His support staff was bombarded with requests for his time: Could he participate in industry or government forums sponsored by the government affairs department? Would he be willing to sit for an interview with an editor from a leading business publication? Could he meet with a key group of institutional investors? Some of these groups he was familiar with; others not at all. But what was entirely new to him was his responsibility not just to interact with various stakeholders but also to proactively address their concerns in ways that meshed with the firm’s interests. Little of Harald’s previous experience prepared him for the challenges of being a corporate diplomat.

What do effective corporate diplomats do? They use the tools of diplomacy—negotiation, persuasion, conflict management, and alliance building—to shape the external business environment to support their strategic objectives. In the process they often find themselves collaborating with people with whom they compete aggressively in the market every day.

To do this well, enterprise leaders need to embrace a new mind-set—to look for ways that interests can or do align, understand how decisions are made in different kinds of organizations, and develop effective strategies for influencing others."[https://hbr.org/2012/06/how-managers-become-leaders]

Harald made the transition. The Apostle Paul made the transition. I wonder if someone else can? :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:50, 11 June 2017 (EDT)

:I '''think''' you are making some good points in what you say, and it's certainly true that my ways of interacting with people on the internet (and in real life too) could use some improvement. But I'm having a hard time following your examples. I don't know who "Harald" is/was. Some ancient Nordic king? I know who the Apostle Paul was, but I don't see his situation as being relevant to business, the media, investors, or NGO's. And my situation isn't relevant to those things either. At least you didn't bring in Sun-Tzu. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 17:20, 19 June 2017 (EDT)
::SamHB, I was merely saying that I have decided to be more diplomatic.
:::Oh! I was reading way too much into what you were saying. (I often do that.) So you were saying that '''you''' want to "make the transition" and do a better job of persuasion and conflict management. OK, I will try to do the same.
:::As an example, I will try to calm GinnyS down. I think she may be cruisin' for a bruisin'. I will try to explain that you are an acquired taste, and that personal attacks are ''never'' allowed. And I'll try to make that same point to JohnZ, for when he comes back. He is in a situation that is similar in some ways but different in other ways. I think that, due to my longevity, I have gotten a certain amount of respect among the young-uns, and I can use that respect to get them to behave better.
:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:00, 30 June 2017 (EDT)

::As an aside, as far as Trump, I have never seen a president attacked as much as Trump and with such venom. On the other hand, I have never seen a president counterpunch as much too (and sometimes in a very personal way). It is nothing new though. Burr/Hamilton had many exchanges of words before their duel. And Lincoln was viciously attacked by his critics if memory serves. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:22, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:::Trump deserves every bit of what he gets. He knows next to nothing about American government, institutions, history, or traditions, seems to know very little about Christianity (though I realize I'm suppose to remove the plank from my own eye before making accusations like that), and seems to know very little about the Christian notions of generosity, forgiveness, humility, and contrition. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:00, 30 June 2017 (EDT)

== If you know of any good faith editors who have edited in the last 5 years and... ==

If you know of any good faith editors who have edited in the last 5 years and they are not on my list at [[User talk:Wikignome72]], please let me know.

I relied on: the recent changes list, my memory, user talk page edits for some of the active or formerly active editors. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:11, 19 June 2017 (EDT)

:Actually, yes, I could contribute a lot of names of people to keep. As you may know, I do a lot of "homework" or "research" here at CP, and I have a pretty good idea of who's who. Perhaps second only to you. But I think it's an unnecessary exercise to delete the old pages. And I sure hope your current deletion binge (well, deletion suggestion binge) isn't a reaction to my complaining, above, that you should not have deleted abcqwe's page.

:By the way, I have been trying to make an addition to Wikignome72's page, saying essentially the same thing, for over 3 hours, getting edit conflicts each time. I'll wait until you come up for air.

:If you actually want me to come up with a list of people that should be protected, I could do that. I would probably do it by going through the edit histories of all the articles that I have worked on and think are good, and noting everyone who contributed (who isn't a jerk).

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 17:20, 19 June 2017 (EDT)

== Some people our friend ought to keep ==

First preliminary, your quizzes are cute.

Second preliminary, I really think he ought to be welcomed, even if he is just you. I don't know why you keep deleting my attempts to welcome him. I like to keep up the pretense that he's a real person.

Third preliminary, I had no idea there was so much garbage in the user base. But I hope you don't think you are saving disk space; you aren't. Nothing ever really goes away in a computer database. Except "vaping", which you aren't doing.

I see the purge is in full swing. I've gone over the list, and there are a few people I recognize as having been, one way or another, significant people in CP's history. I'd like you (him, her) to consider restoring them. Some people left in anger (and at least one had some serious criticism of you personally.) But they are nevertheless part of our history. People won't know how we got here if they can't see our history. I've argued in the recent past that we should keep the "Parthian shot" of someone who has been blocked, so that, if they try to come back, we will know why they were kicked out and why they should not be allowed back in. But it's more than that. We need to remember the conflicts that have gone on in the past. Well, some of them; many people were just losers and deserve to be forgotten. Heck, isn't there a page called something like "Examples of censorship by the 'tolerant'"? I haven't looked at it lately, but we may be damaging it. We need to keep at least some of those examples around, don't we?

So here are a few people I've found so far. Is it possible to bring them back? I think it is, unless they have been "vaped", which I don't think they have been.
*DanH Wasn't he a sysop and well-respected person? Wasn't he the chess player? I may misremember the details [I sure do!], but he was an important part of our history. I seem to have confused him with ...
*DeanS Wasn't he a sysop and well-respected person? Wasn't he the chess player? And the Mormon who was concerned about whether there would be intolerance of Mormon? (Answer: none at all.) Wasn't he the person whose wife died? Wasn't he the geologist whose user name was originally "crocoite" (an interesting mineral), and then changed it in order to comply with the username policy? I may misremember the details, but he was an important part of our history.
*MatthewQ I see there's been some back-and-forth on this. He was a somewhat interesting science contributor.
*StaceyT Yeah, she was unhappy. But we need to see what sorts of things made people unhappy.
*Ymmotrojam He was a big player at one time.
*Coolguy Yes, he was recent, and p*ss*d some people off and was shown the door. But we need to see that history.
*And, of course, you won't delete Philip J Rayment, right?
There are others that haven't been deleted (yet).

Did you know that DeborahB created her account when Conservapedia was only 6 days old? She was a true "founding mother".

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:20, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
:I will restore DanH.

:MathewQ mere had "useful links" on his user page so there is no need to restore that, but I kept his user talk page.

:StacyT was contentious and probably a sock of a man if I recall. Definitely a loser. Not restoring.

:Ymmotrojam deleted his own user page and talk page. I am respecting his wishes and keeping those pages deleted.

:Coolguy was a person who was not willing to engage in dialogue. Like many on the left, he was ignorant of history and/or wanted to engage in revisionism. He just wanted to pontificate. There are plenty of reasons to believe that various founding fathers were not Christians. But when you look at the state constitutions and various other important historical considerations, it is very apparent that Coolguy was pushing a very ignorant/false narrative of American history. I not going to bother to restore his user page or talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:31, 20 June 2017 (EDT)

== Re: restoration of DanH and PJR. Looking into other restoration ==

The user pages of [[User:DanH]] and [[User:Philip J. Rayment]] (PJR) were so boring, it gave me an excuse to delete them. But I really shouldn't have deleted them. And I just discovered that TK made those pages boring with his revisions to those pages.

So I restored those pages to their former glory. I did add a link to my atheism article from PJR's talk page by adding a bracket around his use of the word "atheists" on his user page. I am still in communication with PJR and his wife, and I know that PJR would not mind my small change.

I am looking into the DeanS restoration. I did not delete it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:22, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
:[[User:DeanS]] user page history has been restored along with TK's replacing of the blanking by DeanS with a retired template. The retired template looks better. I don't think DeanS would have minded.

:DeanS deleted his user talk page. I am going to keep it deleted.

:I think DeanS left due to ill health, but it could have been due to disputes with evangelical Christians on the website (He was a Mormon) or some other reason. I have no idea. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:32, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
::As far as DeanS, I did a little detective work and restored his talk page to the version I think he would have wanted. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
:::Thanks for attending to these details. As far as leaving the last version of something up, when it just says "retired", there's nothing wrong with that, as long as data squirrels like myself can look through the history and see what led to the retirement. That's what we should have—a historical record. (Excuse me, an historical record.) [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:34, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
::::I think PJR left due to a battle over gun owner rights/public safety controversies. But perhaps that was merely the final straw. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:41, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
I restored the user page of [[User:JacobB]] as well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:58, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
::I removed the striked out text from PJR's user page. It looked sloppy and I didn't see any real purpose in it. Next time I talk to PJR, I will see if he is fine with the edit. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:32, 20 June 2017 (EDT)

==Taking some of your advice==

Greetings, Cons!

The long message you left for me yesterday was extremely interesting. I had to go back a long way (June 29, 2015) to find what you were referring to and refresh my memory of the issue. It's too bad that yesterday's message was lost in a wiki server malfunction.<ref>This seems to happen a lot with your contributions.</ref> The "advice" that you seem to have been referring to was that you should direct your persuasive energies into ways that are more likely to have an actual effect on people, such as human interaction, rather than writing Conservapedia articles. And you mentioned "opportunity cost", that is, the cost of one approach versus another in terms of actual payoff.

You ended with your usual argument against evolution, giving two web references. The first was to a page that had a religious web site in its name. As you know, I totally ignore any arguments about scientific topics appearing in religious web sites or religious publications. If one can't make an argument about a scientific topic (as opposed to, say, a topic of morality or ethics), without saying "because the Bible says so", I'm not interested.

The second web site was [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohp4dmkOmKE this]. So I had to look. Though it was clear right from the start (though not from the URL itself) that it was a religious web site—it was from the PNN News and Ministry Network, and it also had front-page references to http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org and http://creation.com. It had five "questions for the evolution believer". I had to sit through a guy with a very irritating voice listing the questions. (Aren't there 15 questions elsewhere? This guy isn't even trying!)
:The first was about abiogenesis. We all know that the question of abiogenesis, while interesting and having no known solution at present (or perhaps ever), lies outside of the issues of evolution/Biblical creation and young-Earth/old-Earth cosmology. So I had to sit through 55 seconds (opportunity cost!) of that nonsense.
:The second one was about "language", making the point that the DNA code satisfies all the accepted criteria for being a language, yet is unique among languages in that it was not developed by humans. (Not true, by the way.) And so somehow this meant that evolution must not have happened. Huh?
:It went downhill rapidly from there. The third was about sexual reproduction, and how "wasted energy" involved in this meant that evolution could not be correct. Or something. I stopped listening.
All things considered, sort of fun. But now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take your advice about taking my advice, and consider the opportunity cost of replying to you on my talk page. So long for now. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:19, 7 July 2017 (EDT)
::Essentially, I said that I am going to use my time better so I have a greater positive impact in life. Recently, I am more on track except for a comment on main page talk today.

::In July of 2017, I will be working on a Conservapedia related project. But you will see no edits being performed by the User: Conservative account in relation to this project.

::“Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate.” - [[Sun Tzu]]
:::Well, that's some advice I am '''not''' going to take. But if you think it works for you (I disagree) go right ahead. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:58, 8 July 2017 (EDT)

::此（译注：用间）兵之要，三军之所恃而动也 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:12, 7 July 2017 (EDT)
::::I sent you a sour email recently about you publishing one of my emails recently. Looking back, I shouldn't have sent it.

::::No hard feelings. Enjoy your summer. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:45, 10 July 2017 (EDT)

OK, I got the email. I want to apologize for any behavior that may have led you to believe I can't be trusted with private information. Let me assure you that I am a trustworthy person when I know what information is being kept confidential.

The email that you are referring to is presumably the message listed above somewhere (or maybe it's been archived by now), in which I divulged both the sender and the content. Of course I divulged the fact that you sent the message--you had already said publicly that you were going to send it. I assumed that the email name of the sender was not secret because it looked like a "throwaway" name of the sort that people often create. In fact, you have sent other emails to people with various names. I assumed that you don't consider them secret. If I harmed you by revealing the name, I apologize.

After you complained, I redacted everything in the email listed above except the content. I believed that the content was typical of the things you write all over the place at Conservapedia. It was largely references to your various articles, as is your writing style. If the particular content of that message was something you wanted protected, I apologize.

If you wish to vape the redacted message above on this page, go ahead; I won't complain or restore it. (As you know, I usually oppose vaping, especially on users' talk pages, and sometimes restore the vaped material.)

So I need to know just how much secrecy you desire:
*Do you want me not to reveal even the fact of having received a message? Even if you said, here on this talk page, that you are going to send it or have sent it?
*Do you want me not to reveal the user ID of the sender?
*Do you want me not to reveal the content?
*Do you want me not even to say that I have replied, or otherwise give any general information about what was discussed?
At the risk of violating the last point, I suspect that the project you referred to (which you also mentioned above on this page) is something I wouldn't be interested in. I know that, in the past, your projects have been things like an anti-evolution pamphlet. Now if you want to collaborate on an anti-creationist pamphlet (you know, things like "15 questions that creationists can't answer") by all means, sign me up.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:07, 13 July 2017 (EDT)

:At Conservapedia, I am not going to discuss any of the off wiki activities of the editors who use the User: Conservative account. This is the simplest solution to potential problems caused by the intolerant left.

:The simplest solution to the email issue is for me to no longer send you any emails. But perhaps I will change my mind on this matter. I can certainly pray about this matter. If we were to communicate privately it would probably be Skype communication due to constraints upon my time. I am going to strongly endeavor to be more efficient with my time and communicating via email can be more time intensive. But you have indicated that you are not interested in Skype communications so in all likelihood, I doubt there will be future private communications between us.

:Again, no hard feelings. I will certainly endeavor to keep my communications with you at Conservapedia cordial. And again, enjoy your summer. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:43, 13 July 2017 (EDT)
::I just sent you an email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:43, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
:::I sent you an additional email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:20, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
::::I will keep my promise of confidentiality. So let me just say that there has been some traffic on the sam4557 email account of late. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 09:29, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::I just sent you another email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:10, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
::::::I sent you a small request via email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:34, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
== re: polishing up my grammar and writing skills ==

I sent you a private email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:32, 31 July 2017 (EDT)

==For Cons==
I normally find "listicles" ("The 15 worst beaches", etc.) on the internet to be extremely stupid. But [https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/whats-hot/38-things-no-man-over-40-should-own/ss-AAoKipb?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral#image=2 this one] was actually entertaining. I especially liked [https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/whats-hot/38-things-no-man-over-40-should-own/ss-AAoKipb?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral#image=9 item number 8]. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:33, 2 August 2017 (EDT)
::I am cutting back on entertainment. I made a couple of promises to people that require stricter time management.

::In terms of time management, I shouldn't have done any Conservapedia editing today. But I decided to get back on track.

::"Top performers make mistakes, commit errors, and get off track just like everyone else. The difference is that they get back on track as quickly as possible." - How to Build a New Habit: This is Your Strategy Guide by James Clear[http://jamesclear.com/habit-guide]

::There are so many internet cat videos, but so little time. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
I did a little bit of additional editing to reflect some significant changes relative to some of the articles I have created in the past. But I really shouldn't have done that.

But I am getting back on track in terms of some important promises.

However, I will not be editing Conservapedia for 66 days (see this interesting study: [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.674/full How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world]). You can hold me to this. On October 7, 2017, I will let you know how things went in terms of new habit creation and bad habit cessation.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:34, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

::I find it odd that all the many members of the User:Conservative account are all going to be busy for the next 66 days, is this an admission that there is only one of you? Listed in the differences between Wikipedia and Conservapedia is the respect for a users talk page. So what is this about?
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SamHB&curid=133755&action=history]
Not a lot of respect for the rules here, but then again the rules have never applied to you have they?--[[User:JoshO|JoshO]] ([[User talk:JoshO|talk]]) 16:12, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

:Those 66 days just flew by. If you cannot model your habits on your own, perhaps you should try to get help from others? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 06:07, 10 August 2017 (EDT)

::Are you forgetting that more than one editor uses the User:Conservative account and it's the specific editor who said he was taking time off that would be doing it? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 06:30, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
:::AugustO, I am going to get back on track. I will not edit Conservapedia until Sunday, October 15, 2017. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:00, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
AugustO, I am going to get back on track. '''I will not edit Conservapedia until Sunday, October 15, 2017'''
*13:37, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+96)‎ . . 2018 Global Atheist Convention ‎
*13:37, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+125)‎ . . 2018 Global Atheist Convention ‎
*13:19, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+30)‎ . . Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising ‎ (→‎See also) (current)
*13:18, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-12)‎ . . Fundraising ‎ (→‎Religious fundraising vs. atheist/irreligious fundraising) (current)
*13:17, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+17)‎ . . Charity ‎ (→‎See also) (current)
*13:17, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+30)‎ . . Fundraising ‎
*13:16, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-1)‎ . . Fundraising ‎
*13:15, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m Fundraising ‎ (Conservative moved page Fund-raising to Fundraising) --[[User:IMcCleod|IMcCleod]] ([[User talk:IMcCleod|talk]]) 16:18, 12 August 2017 (EDT)

::IMcCleod, do you also assume that only one editor uses the User:Conservative account (even though it has been made clear that it is used by multiple editors)? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:16, 12 August 2017 (EDT)
:::<s>IMcCloud, Christendom is playing a significant role in bringing [[Atheist factions|the quarrelsome]] and socially challenged [[atheist movement]] to its knees and now [[Global atheism statistics|atheists are shrinking in their global influence]].

:::American [[Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising|atheist fundraising]] is now anemic. The atheist activist Lee Moore recently admitted concerning major atheist organizations in the United States: "Most of them are starved for cash. They're downsizing left and right."[http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheist_fundraising_vs._religious_fundraising#Atheist_activist_Lee_Moore:_Donations_to_atheist_organizations_are_down_due_to_infighting_within_the_atheist_movement]

:::While I am pleased to see that the largely despondent atheist movement is imploding while Christendom is going one glorious victory after another (see: [[Atheist pessimism about the atheist movement]] and [[Future of Christianity]]), I have decided to broaden my horizons (And SamHB has played a role in this matter).

:::As tempting as it is to add further information about the current state of affairs concerning the [[atheism vs. Christianity]] topic, I have decided that I must do better in keeping my commitment to be more focused in some of my current endeavors. Therefore, I am going to be completely resolute in this matter and not edit this wiki until October 18, 2017. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])</s>

"AugustO, I am going to get back on track. '''I will not edit Conservapedia until Sunday, October 15, 2017"
*18:01, 15 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+280)‎ . . Millennials, irreligion and obesity ‎ (→‎See also) (current)
*17:54, 15 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-25)‎ . . Millennials, irreligion and obesity--[[User:Jaris|Jaris]] ([[User talk:Jaris|talk]]) 18:17, 15 August 2017 (EDT) ‎

==More about Cons==
In a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB#Taking_some_of_your_advice section above] Cons asked for complete secrecy if we are to engage in an email dialog. I gave him that assurance. I have abided by it, and will continue to do so. He then wrote that he had sent me an email.

Other than to say that there has been some traffic on the sam4557 account, I will have nothing to say about any email. Please do not ask about it; I will not reply. Everything I write below is based entirely on material that is publicly visible on this website.

Alert observers may have noticed that I dropped out of sight at about the same time that Cons (first) did. That is entirely a coincidence; there was no "pact" or "challenge". I dropped out because it became clear, from the [[Pussy Riot]] article, that "assistants" / "junior sysops" have been granted absolute power to control editorial content however they see fit, blocking other contributors if it suits them, and that a few of those assistants are actively wielding that power.

Now, about Cons's "pledge" to refrain from editing CP and pursue more productive activities (I have no idea where the 66 days figure comes from), it is clear that, although there has been some good behavior, there has been some backsliding. Various other people have, quite understandably, chided him over this. Cons has apologized and promised to do better, only to have succumbed to temptation again. Longstanding bad habits are difficult to break. I would recommend that people show some Christian forgiveness, forbearance, and understanding as he struggles with this. (This would certainly be easier if Cons had shown more understanding and forbearance toward others in the past.)

But there is something quite revealing about what has been going on. '''He could easily have blamed the backsliding on other members of his "consortium".''' Instead, he owned up to it. This shows, ''the way nothing else can'', that the business of Cons's account being operated by multiple people was utter nonsense. Most sensible people, including myself, saw through this all along. But a few people, as seen above on this page, including sysops who presumably had access to whatever non-public information there might have been, seem to have been totally taken in by this nonsense. Cons was man enough to admit to his failings, and other people should be man enough to accept that this "multiple person" fantasy was just that.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:37, 19 August 2017 (EDT)

:I know you're referring specifically to me regarding the Pussy Riot article, SamHB. You were told on that and other articles (more than once) not to impose a liberal POV on them, but you didn't take heed of that advice and you went ahead anyway in violation of Conservapedia policy, following past behavioral patterns that led to you being blocked numerous times before by other editors. When you also say "various other people" regarding User:Conservative, what you really mean is the same poster using multiple accounts (most of which have since been blocked for sockpuppeteering) to hurl that accusation about the account just being used by one editor as opposed to more than one. Until Conservative says otherwise, I'm going to take his word for it. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:24, 19 August 2017 (EDT)

== Re: SamHB's recent post to his talk page ==

A few things:

'''1.''' The 66 days is based on a journal article in the ''European Journal of Social Psychology'' entitled ''How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world''.[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.674/full]

'''2.''' Sysops/admins have been told that more one person has used the User:Conservative account and I have indicated this multiple times. Sysops/admins have access to the check user function of this wiki which has enabled them to see that the User: Conservative account has been edited from multiple geographic regions (sometimes the account has been edited from more than one geographic region in the same day due to the fact that the account has been used by more than one editor).

It has also been observed that the footnoting style of various User: Conservative edits has been radically different.

In addition, skepticism has been expressed that one of the users of the User: Conservative account would create an article entitled [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]].

'''3.''' SamHB is correct that longstanding bad habits can be difficult to break. While it is true that I had about a week long stretch without editing Conservapedia in early August of 2017, I ended my break from editing this wiki before the 66 days was up.

Since this habit is more entrenched than anticipated, more drastic measures are clearly needed! So this habit will be broken using multiple methods - including a tried and true Marine Corps and Navy Seal method (Push ups if the old habit reemerges!).

My next edit to this wiki will be on Tuesday, October 25, 2017.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:33, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

:There might be things I want to say here, but they will have to wait until the 66 days are up.
:@Cons: You know what you need to do. Or, more precisely, what not to do. If you absolutely have to have some critical change made, feel free to send me an email.
:@everyone else: Please stay away.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:10, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

== Please check your email ==

SamHB, please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:18, 14 September 2017 (EDT)
:I have not looked at my sam4557 email since late August, and do not plan to look at it for 66 days. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:05, 14 September 2017 (EDT)

== Quick note ==

For the next 66 days, I may not strictly adhere to the 66 days editing total fast on Conservapedia editing, but I will at least be on a very restricted diet. :)

I may do a limited amount of main page posts. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:03, 28 September 2017 (EDT)
:I know I have to be very strict about this former pledge. The Apostle Paul says some relevant things about this matter. I am going to write to you about this matter.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
== More than one User: Conservative at Conservapedia ==

<s>Note the footnoting and writing styles in these recent articles written using the [[User: Conservative]] account:

*[[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]

*[[Atheism and mental illness]]

*[[Essay: Was Stephen Paddock an atheist mass killer?]]

The footnoting styles are clearly different between the first/second works and the third work (which is an essay). Why are the footnoting styles different? Because multiple editors have used the User: Conservative account.

Clearly, the [[ad hominem]] attacks against "User: Conservative" and the armchair psychological analysis of "User: Conservative" should be reexamined.

There are scholars that speculate there are multiple writers behind the work commonly associated with [[Sun Tzu]].

"Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate." - Sun Tzu.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])</s>
== A major search engine whose name begins with the letter G, recognizes that certain "atheist gentlemen" have been rattled and overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the "Atheism and ...." heavy artillery barage by the User: Conservative collective ==
[[File:Google recognizes COCD.png|thumbnail|center|800px]]
{{clear}}

<s>For more information, please see:

*[[Essay: Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is an officially recognized mental disorder|Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is an officially recognized mental disorder]]</s>

Talking about obsessions:
{{cquote|My next edit to this wiki will be on Tuesday, October 25, 2017.Conservative (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2017 (EDT)}}
And no, I had no trouble waiting until '''''Wednesday''''', October 25, 2017, to post this comment ;-)
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 04:51, 25 October 2017 (EDT)
:Which is nowhere ''near'' the level of liberal obsession with wanting to silence free speech for everyone but themselves (hence the regular attacks on this site by immature liberal vandals, and even attacks from within by the few regular liberal posters who ''think'' they know what's best for this site better than the admins do). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 00:26, 26 October 2017 (EDT)

== User: Conservative account ==

I had another member of the User: Conservative editor base change the password to the User: Conservative account.

In about a couple months or so, he will give me the new password.

Taking a break from editing for awhile. See you when you get back.

By the way, the [[2018 Global Atheist Convention that was cancelled|2018 Global Atheist Convention]] was cancelled due to lack of interest. Of course, this is yet another sign that Christendom has gloriously triumphed over the [[atheist movement]]! :)[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:02, 15 November 2017 (EST)

== Not impressed ==

Besides you seeking to provoke yet another fight on this site, you've also demonstrated two things by copying the user template I created for my user page (the one indicating that the user does not support the liberal media) and changing it into something else (accusing Breitbart News, a conservative news site, of being "fake news" even though it is not):

# You proved through your actions that liberals (like yourself) lack originality and prefer to copy and imitate others (per the [[Liberal Style]] article, in number seven of the [[Liberal Style#Debate and rhetorical tactics|Debate and rhetorical tactics section]])
# You resorted to the notorious tactic made infamous by Marx, Lenin and Goebbels in accusing conservative media of what the liberal media (particularly CNN, MSNBC, the nightly network newscasts, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, Vice Media, etc.) is guilty of itself (propagating lies, bias and fake news)

Congrats, you just proved the point Conservapedia (and other sources) made about liberals and their tactics once again through your actions in trying to force a liberal POV here. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:37, 21 November 2017 (EST)

::Well, I '''am''' impressed. You say that "liberals [...] lack originality and prefer to copy and imitate others [...]", and yet I have this: [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:SamHB#The_current_occupant_of_the_White_House] on my user page, from 03:52, 12 December 2017, and you made an interesting edit to your user page [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Northwest] at 16:58 the same day. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:42, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

:::Which was in response to the false claims you made about President Trump, FYI. Are you really itching to start yet another fight here? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:34, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

== This page is not to be used for abusing, insulting, berating, or bullying cancer patients, or otherwise engaging in the kind of social, moral, or ethical depravity that people outgrow by age 10. ==

I didn't berate any cancer patients. I merely pointed out the unhealthy and anti-social habits of atheists which give the atheist population a higher cancer rate.
:You most certainly did. A careful reading of your activities here at CP relating to cancer, as well as what's been going on over at RW, shows very clearly that you were engaging in abusive and, frankly, un-Christian behavior toward RW user "Mercian". It is completely obvious from a careful reading of this what has been going on. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:32, 30 December 2017 (EST)
In 2017, I helped my friend by researching the best solutions to treat his loved one's cancer. He asked me to do it because he felt I had strong research skills. In 2018, I am helping an anti-cancer initiative. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:15, 24 December 2017 (EST)
:Congratulations. BTW, I'm also engaged in helping an anti-cancer initiative.
:Also, your suggestion that left-handed people are somehow "mutant" strikes me as a bit more provocative than someone who is trying to win hearts and minds ought to be. You might want to tone down the negativity in the things you write. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:32, 30 December 2017 (EST)
::<s>"A systematic literature review combined with primary research on handedness demonstrates that atheism and/or paranormal belief is associated with all of these indicators of high mutational load."[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0133-5]

::Judging by [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKl9H037C1k THE VIDEO] I saw where he explains his theory, the British anthropologist who published the article appears to be a person of high intelligence, but likely not as creative in his thinking as he ought to be (Maybe left-handedness creates otherness and people less prone to conformity), Nevertheless, he does appear to be smart enough to recognize what high mutational load is.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:37, 30 December 2017 (EST)</s>
=== Atheism and cancer ===

<s>Some atheist (or at the very least someone who appeared to be an atheist) claimed an [[Atheism and cancer]] article was created in the past at this wiki. Yet, when I did a search using the search box, I found no record of such an article being created at this wiki.</s>
:That's funny. The article you cite was created, by you, at 14:39 on 22 December, before you wrote the above. It's still there now, having been edited almost continuously by you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:29, 23 December 2017 (EST)

<s>Given what I know about [[Atheism and health]] and [[Global atheism and aging populations]], I suspected there was a positive correlation between atheism and cancer. And lo and behold, there is!

By the way, you might find this to be interesting:

According to the American Cancer Society:

"According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 69% of cancer patients say they pray for their health. A recent study published in Cancer, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, suggests a link between religious or spiritual beliefs and better physical health reported among patients with cancer."[https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/study-cancer-patients-with-strong-religious-or-spiritual-beliefs-report-better-health.html]

The Christian apologist Gary Habermas wrote: "Double-blind prayer experiments: where people pray for others with terminal illness. Habermas admitted that most such experiments have not worked, but the three that he knows of that have indeed worked were cases of orthodox-Christians praying for the sick."[https://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-apologist-10-reasons-for-the-fall-of-atheism-106531/]

See: [[Atheism and cancer#Religion/irreligion and cancer treatment|Religion/irreligion and cancer treatment]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:19, 22 December 2017 (EST)</s>

=== I've got the power! ===
[[File:Freethinkers.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|<s>Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] is a staff member of [[Creation Ministries International]].</s> ]]
<s>An atheist/agnostic wrote about me: "These people get off on controlling you, on subjecting you to their power... I'm sorry that... mound of misery got to you."

SamHB, I thought Christians believed in free will, that people are free moral agents and that God can help people overcome various temptations? See also: [[Atheism and free will]]</s>
:Actually, we do believe that! Conservapedia addiction is a tough addiction to break, but people have broken even tougher ones. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:29, 23 December 2017 (EST)

<s>"When in reality no one can ever make you feel ANYTHING! That’s right; you heard me. No one can make you cry. No one can make you happy. No one can make you sad. No one can make you feel better. No one can make you feel guilty…but you." - Heather Wilson

Evidently, Heather Wilson has more [[machismo]] than the gentlemen of a certain atheist wiki!

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BRv9wGf5pk I've got the power!]

The truth often hurts. And certain gentlemen can't handle the truth!

Evidently, I am the puppet master and certain atheist gentlemen are my puppets!</s>
[[File:Second dog with a bone.jpg|right|thumbnail|220px|<s>Atheists obsessed with [[Conservapedia]] are like a [[dog]] with a bone. Their dogged persistence in thinking about Conservapedia, discussing Conservapedia and making forecasts about Conservapedia is quite prodigious and intense.</s> ]]
<s>I've got the power.

I've got the power.

Like the crack of the whip, I Snap attack...

Bang the bass, turn up the treble.

Radical mind, day and night all the time.

7:14, wise divine. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
:I read this comment directed to me by a member of SJW atheist wiki: "What have you done but spiel hate...".

:A best selling book declares that SJWs always project. It's so true.

:Well cited and factual encyclopedia articles spieling hate. it such an absurd proposition. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations." (see: [[Essay: A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:54, 23 December 2017 (EST)</s>

== Re: Online boxing match ==

Merician and I have been engaging in a bit of an online boxing match lately, but we have been playing by [https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Marquis+of+Queensberry+rules Marquess of Queensberry Rules].

See also: [[Talk:Essay: British atheist acknowledges the reasonableness of a User: Conservative editor]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:09, 30 December 2017 (EST)
:Addemdun: See my comments above regarding high mutational loads/left-handedness/socialization, otherness and less likely to engage in conformity (I expanded the [[Atheists and genetic mutations]] article to provide more in-depth analysis/commentary.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:41, 31 December 2017 (EST)

== Your edits ==

When you edited the Billy Graham article, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_elections,_2018&diff=826892431&oldid=826891839 you reverted] my previous edit in addition to making the grammar fix. I didn't notice your fix, and with good reason, considering that your improvement was very small compared to what you reverted. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:21, 21 February 2018 (EST)

==This refers to some stuff in archive #3==
Actually, we did mark your words, in 2017, 2016, 2015, .... Your words were found wanting.

Incidentally, the deceptiveness of Cons's "as I watch it burn" quote was discussed at [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:SamHB#I_would_really_love_to_see_User:Conservative_slowly_and_painfully_burn] on my user page.

Cons would do well to write original material, that the majority of Conservapedians won't feel ashamed of, on topics that the majority of Conservapedians would find worthwhile for this web site.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:35, 27 February 2018 (EST)
::Didn't Conservative suggest the man in the picture was a cowardly unionized firefighter. Most of the firefighters on 9/11 were unionized and they rushed into those buildings knowing fine well that the odds of them coming out alive were slim. Horribly disrespectful.--[[User:RSturmer|RSturmer]] ([[User talk:RSturmer|talk]]) 12:55, 27 February 2018 (EST)

:<s>The global market share of atheist has generally been declining since 1970 (see: [[Global atheism statistics]]). So atheism has burned from 2015-2017. Please don't post counter factual rubbish/contentions on your talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])</s>

== You're Cool ==

Just Sayin'. [[User:DaveSG|DaveSG]] ([[User talk:DaveSG|talk]]) 01:09, 24 February 2018 (EST)

:Thanks. And I have 19 blocks to show for it. I think the powers that be have come to an understanding that I do not harm or materially dilute what Conservapedia is saying, and that what I say is generally rather thoughtful, so they don't generally harm me these days. Many other, far less thoughtful, users can be found in the permanent block log. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:57, 24 February 2018 (EST)

::Getting blocked 19 times for your misbehavior on this site is nothing to be proud of, and denying that you ''have'' tried to harm this site by repeatedly forcing a liberal viewpoint on it (including under the transparent guise of "essays") and provoking fights with other posters does not make what you've done here over time untrue or any less bad. That you would be praised for your behavior by a troll who has since been blocked says plenty. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:58, 25 February 2018 (EST)

:::And incidentally, your recent snide edit summary comment in the Pussy Riot article, combined with your decision to ignore Conservapedia guidelines yet again by edit warring, insistently imposing liberal POV on that and other articles and by provoking yet another fight, just earned you a two-day break. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:30, 25 February 2018 (EST)

::::Hi Northwest, you did not give a reason why the essay of SamHB is written from a "liberal point of view". Instead of arguing with him you simply started an edit war. I could not find any liberal tendencies in this essay and therefore there is no comprehensible reason for his block.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 08:46, 26 February 2018 (EST)

:::::Again, Assistant SysOps are not allowed by the rules to block longstanding membersto resolve disputes--I agree with JoeyJ's response. That said, edit warring is also unproductive, and making essay versions of CP articles has already been discussed and generally disapproved of. (Yes, I know, I just used a trailing preposition....)
:::::I do see the differences between these two (listed here: https://www.diffchecker.com/49fnIo4C), but in the long run, do they make that much of a difference? Can't we let the reader decide what view to take? I don't trust Putin either, but the fact these people are using obscene activities to convey their message still stands. Perhaps focusing on them and their activities rather than Putin's is the best idea? {{unsigned|DavidB4}}

==Northwest and Pussy Riot==
User Northwest seems to have a spectacular disdain for me. This can be seen in many things he has written in a number of places, most notably here on this talk page, and on the [[Pussy Riot]] article and talk page. A particularly noteworthy case of this can be seen in the "not impressed" section above, where he takes me to task for copying material from another template (something that people do all the time) to accuse me of lacking originality, claiming that all liberals do the same, and comparing me to Marx, Lenin and Goebbels.

He also says, in the "You're Cool" section above, that my having been blocked 19 (now 20) times shows misbehavior. A few things:
*I have been here much longer than Northwest, and most of those blocks were before his time. He knows nothing about the circumstances.
*Other than a few that naturally expired, all of those blocks were later rescinded, either by the blocking party directly, or by being countermanded by an admin.
*One of those blocks was by someone who was later unmasked as a parodist.
*One of those blocks was for a completely bogus accusation of being a sock of AlanS, whom I never knew. (That incident has led me to have no confidence in the process of identifying sock accounts.)
As far as I know, I am respected at least to some extent by virtually everyone that I have had contact with here at Conservapedia. Even someone who had earlier gotten the wrong impressions and blocked me. I have had my work praised by a number of admins, ''including the site owner''. So I do not know why Northwest takes such a strong attitude against me. I have mostly ignored him, but the Pussy Riot issue did not admit a solution other than making an "essay" alternative article.

I agree with DavidB4 that having an alternative "essay" article is not a good idea. I only did that because Northwest's insistence that only "leftists" and "Social Justice Warriors" (SJW's) oppose murderous thug Putin. I simply could not stand for that implication.

In further response to DavidB4, yes, these people use obscene activities (I've seen the youtube videos; some of them are appalling). But the article is almost entirely focused on them and their activities. There is only a small portion about the international protest of Putin regarding their imprisonment and pardon. That is a small, but nevertheless important, part of the article. The protests in support of Pussy Riot were an international phenomenon, and was not limited to leftists and SJW's.

I would have no problem with getting rid of the essay (it was admittedly picayune, and the change was extremely minor) if it were permitted to mention the international protests. We would either have to have the article locked by an admin (this has been done on several other articles that were subject to edit warring) or we would need a clear statement from Northwest that the article reflect a consensus of the Conservapedia community.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:38, 28 February 2018 (EST)

:Ignoring the truth about those protests - that they were staged by leftists (regardless of nationality) with an anti-Christian animus like the band itself has - does you no favors. As for the past blocks against you, regardless of what you think about those blocks, they were justified because you saw fit to violate Conservapedia's guidelines more than once, including imposing a liberal viewpoint on that article and on the Nazi Party article (and your attitude toward the blocks also reflects your attitude toward the rules of the site itself), and ignoring that fact does nothing for you either.

:And about your claim of "being respected at least to some extent by virtually everyone that I have had contact with here at Conservapedia", your attitude toward [[User:Conservative]] and other editors here who don't necessarily agree with your viewpoint here and who counter or refute your claims with counterpoints supported by non-liberal-sourced, reference-backed evidence (which you've shown to get offended by in at least Conservative's case, and has led you to provoke fights against myself and other posters in other cases and to make false claims of conservative media like Breitbart being "fake news" in response to the fact that the liberal media itself purveys fake news) appears to show that that respect is not a two-way street when it isn't convenient for you (as part of that, I've even noticed that in [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&diff=prev&oldid=1404861 this edit] in [[Conservapedia proven right]], most of your sources in that edit come from liberal media websites, specifically NBC, CBS and the BBC - all of which have been discredited due to being exposed as fake news creators, and all of which you put back in the article in response to Andy Schlafly removing them because he noted that the sources were from multiple liberal sites all reporting the same thing and that your claim of "gravitational waves being convincingly detected" was itself implausible and claimed by liberals, whose claims you used via those sources). Those are some of the things you really should keep in mind. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 04:29, 28 February 2018 (EST)
:*My relationship with Cons is far more complex and nuanced, both publicly and privately, than you seem to be aware. If we didn't actually have a cordial relationship beneath those gruff exteriors, he wouldn't post pictures of concertina wire on my talk page. You would do well not to assume that you understand the situation correctly.
:*On the anti-relativity bandwagon? Really? Please do your homework, as outlined in the "People who write about relativity but don't know what they are talking about" section of my user page.
:*The Nazi Party article? You really follow me around, don't you? That stuff was from a year and a half ago. Do you keep similarly detailed dossiers on other people? Or is there something about me that fascinates you?
:*I am actually well aware of the rules of the site, having read them many many times. You don't seem to be.
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:41, 28 February 2018 (EST)
:::Your comments still don't excuse your behavior on this site, or the fact that you not only continue to manipulatively deny any wrongdoing you've done here (including your use of liberal sources for your science article edits and claiming them as "fact" despite Andy stating otherwise) and shift the blame to everyone else (a hallmark liberal tactic), you even claim to be "well aware of the rules of the site" yet continue to violate them when you see fit. I'm actually more aware of the rules here than you realize (or care to admit), so don't go making assumptions (including about the reversions of edits in which you imposed a liberal POV). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 14:54, 28 February 2018 (EST)

==John McCain==
Rob Smith: I have reverted your additional negative comments about John McCain.
:"I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president," -- Gen. [[Wesley Clark]], June 30, 2008 as a surrogate for the Obama campaign.
:"They want us to forget the insults we've had to endure. Intolerance. They've made us feel marginalized in this country we love so much. John McCain and his Republican friends have two faces," -- 2008 Obama campaign ad.
It's well known that people say negative things about their opponents during election campaigns. And I'm not aware that Mr. McCain ran on a platform of having been a POW in North Vietnam, though I'm sure it got mentioned. My recollection is that he ran mostly on his legislative record. The two comments that I put on my user page were simply pure evil.

Feel free to take the material and put it into some kind of "McCaingate timeline" article, or whatever you want. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:28, 26 May 2018 (EDT)
:My apologies. I thought I'd help you appear to be a fair minded individual rather than standing by Democrat race baiting and hypocrisy. Again, my apologies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 04:16, 27 May 2018 (EDT)
::Well, I thank you for your offer of help in keeping my talk page free of race baiting and hypocrisy. But I think the amount of race baiting that I do (zero) is just right. I'll be really careful not to engage in race baiting in the future. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:40, 27 May 2018 (EDT)

Rob's finding that I engaged in race-baiting in the John McCain tribute on my user page piqued my curiosity. I wondered "What is RobSmith's writing actually like?" I hadn't read any of it in many months, since he has lately been engaging in manic editing sprees that would put [[User:Conservative]] to shame. And the edit comments and article titles indicate that the edits must be rubbish on a par with Cons's writing. Worse than, for example [[Atheists_and_physical_attractiveness]]? Hard to say. I'd have to read that stuff.

So I picked one of Rob's edits at random: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_transition&diff=1425318&oldid=1425317 this one]. He essentially added "... as millions of misogynist white women went to the polls on election day ..." to the Trump transition article. Huh?? In an ''encyclopedia''? One that prides itself on being trustworthy?

That edit was one of 211 edits, over a 30 hour period with just 3 breaks, of less than 5, 4, and 2 hours. That's the sort of thing that Rob considers worth spending his time on? By contrast, Cons made only 10 edits in that same time frame. Cons still has a long way to go, be he's making progress.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:22, 31 May 2018 (EDT)
:USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/27/john-mccain-ran-repealing-obamacare-he-broke-his-promise-robert-robb-column/708114001/ John McCain ran on repealing Obamacare. He broke his promise].

:John McCain is a petty, vindictive and unreliable man. He is a war hero though. McCain let his anger at Trump get the best of him (Trump's comment on his military service). I suppose this isn't the first or last time that a person of Irish descent let their anger get the best of them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:08, 31 May 2018 (EDT)
::Cons, my friend, a couple of points. (You know me well enough to know when I'm reaming you out and when I'm just disagreeing, right? This is the latter.)
::*It's true that McCain's recent vote on healthcare was the opposite of what you, and many others, had hoped for. But people change their position between their campaigns and their final votes all the time. If everyone was required to vote exactly the way they campaigned, they wouldn't bother to hold votes in Congress. On the first day of the session, they would just enact into law whatever people had indicated they would do while they were running for office, no? Then they could all go home. In reality, they hold committee hearings, they hold conferences, they try to reach consensus, they try to persuade their colleagues ("log-rolling", I believe it's called), they rewrite the proposed legislation again and again and again, trying to get it into a form that will pass the voting. What people vote on is often not what the issues were perceived to be when they were campaigning. You really shouldn't call McCain unreliable for this. (By the way, I'm kind of neutral on this issue, and I haven't compared McCain's vote with what the issue was when he was campaigning.) I'm sorry that his vote disappointed you, but these things happen. That's why we have a Congress.
::*Petty and vindictive? Are you suggesting that he voted that way because of personal animosity at President Trump? That his "anger ... got the best of him?" Really? His anger over the "I want people who weren't shot down" comment from a year before is what led to his vote? Can you back up that connection with some statements of his?
::*I know you are not a bigot, but the reference to people of Irish descent was unnecessary. People occasionally let their anger get the best of them all the time. And I doubt that it's related to being Irish. (Though, truth to tell, this isn't the first time I've heard a statement like that.) I don't associate irascibility with being Irish. BTW, I'm not Irish, and I'm pretty sure you aren't either. Just say that he let his anger get the best of him. Though I don't think it did.
::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:14, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
"The so-called Irish temperament is a mixture of flaming ego, hot temper, stubbornness, great personal charm and warmth, and a wit that shines through adversity. An irrepressible buoyancy, a vivacious spirit, a kindliness and tolerance for the common frailties of man and a feeling that 'it is time enough to bid the devil good morning when you meet him' are character traits which Americans have associated with their Irish neighbors for more than a century." - Dr. Carl Wittke, Chair, History Department, Western Reserve University, 1952-1962.[https://lasvegassun.com/news/1997/mar/17/where-i-stand-irish-a-mix-of-ego-stubbornness-grea/][https://immigration.procon.org/view.source.php?sourceID=008659] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:15, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
:OK, you win. I've also been told that the Irish are known for their humor. In any case, well played, sir! [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:32, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
::My sincerest dream for America is that we can once again have a sane and realistic enough public discourse to admit that we can, at least partially, attribute somebody's temper to their Irish heritage. And that, yes, [[Valerie Jarrett]] really does look like that one monkey lady from ''Planet of the Apes''. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 02:51, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
:::You never cease to amaze me. Not well played. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:08, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

'''''USA Today'' (reprinted from The Arizona Republic, opinion piece):'''

"This is one instance in which President Trump’s criticisms of McCain are well-founded. McCain did run, as Trump is drumming, on a strong repeal-and-replace platform. In fact, it was the principal distinction he drew with his Democratic opponent, Ann Kirkpatrick.

McCain now says that Democrats made a mistake in passing Obamacare on a partisan basis, and that Republicans shouldn’t undo it on a similarly partisan basis. But that’s the equivalent of a Brezhnev doctrine on domestic policy. Democrats can enact legislation on a partisan basis. But Republicans can undo it only if Democrats agree.

McCain is undoubtedly correct that bipartisan policy changes are more enduring. But when one side acts unilaterally, it shouldn’t get a veto when the other side attempts to undo it."[https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/27/john-mccain-ran-repealing-obamacare-he-broke-his-promise-robert-robb-column/708114001/]

'''IrishCentral.com:'''

"An article on McCain in Prospect Magazine from August 2008 saw writer Anatol Lieven attribute many of Sen. McCain's traits to his heritage. Lieven wrote, "his obstinacy; his tendency towards unshakeable friendship and implacable hatred; his hair-trigger temper; his deep patriotism; his obsession with American honor; and his furious response to any criticism of the US.""[https://www.irishcentral.com/news/politics/john-and-cindy-mccain-s-irish-roots-what-you-need-to-know]

"In the end, Irish American McCain took revenge for Trump's deadly attack on him last year calling him no hero because he was captured in Vietnam."[https://www.irishcentral.com/opinion/niallodowd/irish-american-john-mccain-proves-revenge-is-a-dish-best-eaten-cold]

'''''The New York Times:'''''

''The New York Times'' admits: "It probably didn’t hurt that it was also a measure of cold revenge against Mr. Trump, a man who on the campaign trail in 2015 had mocked Mr. McCain’s ordeal as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. "[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/28/us/john-mccains-real-return.html] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:19, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

:Trump's blunder was that he did not know his enemy. In a divided country where U.S. Senate votes can be close, creating a bitter enemy in the U.S. Senate was definitely not smart. Trump should have merely said that military service should be respected, but being a war hero does not give someone a free pass to do whatever they want or make them immune from legitimate criticism. In the 2016 election, Trump may have gotten more votes from veterans had he done that. In addition, perhaps McCain would not have voted against ObamaCare.

:The ''Independent'': "When he arrived for the vote McCain, who could easily have pleaded ill-health and simply stayed out of the whole thing, told assembled reporters to '''“wait for the show”'''.(bolding added for emphasis)".[https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/donald-trump-john-mccain-obamacare-revenge-voted-no-vietnam-war-obama-a7864701.html]

:McCain's vote was a showy vote of revenge. Had he not campaigned so strongly against ObamaCare previously, a more convincing counterargument could be made. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:35, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

::Well played again!! You do your homework on current events and contemporary U.S. politics as diligently as I do my homework on math and physics. I'd '''much''' rather read your writings on current events than on why potholes show that evolution didn't happen. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:42, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
:::You make too many mistakes for ''that'' to be true. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 23:04, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

::::Ireland, Scotland and the USA gave a significantly higher GDP than Britain.[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html] It helps to have a fighting spirit that drives the British from your land! Don't get the Scotch-Irish or the Americans mad![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

== Inactivity? ==

Your user page says you will be inactive for 66 days, until late August. Did something change, or did you forget about it? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:51, 15 July 2018 (EDT)

== re: Having an article related to attractiveness and a segment of the human population ==
[[File:Bvdy76.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|"<s>Of course, we do not deny evolutionism itself."[https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-il] - [[Kim Jong-il]], an overweight, unattractive leftist, evolutionist and atheist who died of a heart attack. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]
 
 
Truly knowledgeable individuals in terms of knowledge about biology and science properly regulate a basic function such as eating and also get an adequate amount of exercise!!!]]
[[Carrie Nation]], a radical member of the temperance movement, used to go into taverns and wreak havoc with a hatchet. Since you appear to see no value as far as attractiveness when it comes to people's appearances, have you ever thought of going around beauty parlors and wreaking havoc with a hatchet? You could also lead protests outside of beauty parlors. You could lead a movement to ban beauty contests.

For thousands of years, cultures have valued beauty. Even the Bible comments on [[Sarah]]'s beauty. [[Solomon]]'s [[Song of Songs]] mentions beauty.

And yet, a petulant liberal complains about an article on [[Atheists and physical attractiveness]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:01, 6 September 2018 (EDT)

:By the way, given that the social science data indicates that right-wing individuals are better looking than left of center individuals, is the reason you take umbrage at the article due to jealousy?
:Deny that [[Donald Trump]] is taller and better looking than the godless, leftist and evolutionist [[Kim Jong-un]] and lose all credibility!

:"Of course, we do not deny evolutionism itself."[https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-il] - [[Kim Jong-il]], an overweight, unattractive leftist/evolutionist/atheist who died of a heart attack. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]

:Truly knowledgeable individuals, in terms of knowledge about biology and science, properly regulate a basic function such as eating and also get an adequate amount of exercise!!![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:17, 6 September 2018 (EDT)
=== Meet PZ Myers, the overweight and unattractive atheist/evolutionist/leftist ===
[[File:PZ Myers pic.jpg|thumbnail|275px|center|The biologist and evolutionist [[PZ Myers]] in 2006. Myers is also a staunch atheist. See also: [[Atheism and obesity]]
 
 
For further information, please see: [[Essay: PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Creation Museum|PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Creation Museum]] and [[Essay: Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course|Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course]] ]]</s>
{{clear}}

== User: Conservative proven right again! ==

<s>At the 2018 [[American Atheists]] convention, the ex-president of the American Atheist organization [[David Silverman]] declared:
{{Cquote|It is a hard time to be [[Atheist activist|an atheist activist]]. This has affected us. And it has affected our community...

...it has really affected us. We are suffering a level of [[defeatism]] that I have never seen before...

We feel the loss. And we feel like we have lost. We feel like [[Donald Trump and American atheists|we lost the election]]... We see this cascade of attack coming down at us over and over from all different directions and we feel like it's over. I have heard so many times it makes me sick. It makes me sad. It feels like we lost.

The [[Atheism and apathy|apathy that follows]]. It doesn't matter. We can't win anyways. It's useless to fight. This apathy is infecting us. It's hurting us.

And people are reacting to each other now. And so that is [[Atheist factions|causing a division]]. Lots and lots of division in our movement. Hard, bad division... And that has resulted in a splintering and factioning of the movement that I have never seen before and none of us have.

In other words, '''we're in a bad situation and it's getting worse.''' (bolding added for emphasis).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8VYLMYvImc David Silverman - How the Mighty Get Back Up]</ref>}}

Didn't I tell you that each successive year was going to be the WORST year for atheism? It's coming to pass! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:57, 9 September 2018 (EDT)</s>

== Re: Religious people and Donald Trump ==

So, [https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/06/30/atheism-is-rising-but/ this article from a liberal-leaning anti-Trump website] (as it makes clear [https://www.the-american-interest.com/2018/05/23/defining-the-american-interest/ in its About Us page]) is your source in your latest anti-Trump attack on your user page (which claims in effect, "religiously observant Christians were least likely to be seduced by Donald Trump’s “post-truth” style politics in the GOP primary")? You do realize that liberal-biased websites like the one you linked, like the rest of the liberal media, are more likely to lie and make baseless and unsourced claims about the targets of their attacks, right? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 04:05, 25 September 2018 (EDT)

:Oh, my! I do seem to attract the attention of junior "assistant sysops". Ordinary contributors have better things to do than attack me, and actual admins do too. In fact, there are a few traits that I've noticed in assistants such as yourself and Vargas "embraces the pseudoscience that leavens science too tightly to be trusted"<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Parrot#No_Credit_Where_Credit_is_Not_Due</ref> Milan. An example was Vargas bringing me in to a discussion of FredJ with a [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=1450367&oldid=1450282 comment that actually had nothing to do with me], simply because I had welcomed FredJ and advised him not to use "fact" tags. And, of course, there is your comment above.

:A striking trait that assistants seem to display is the tendency to think that they, and apparently only they, can police the "ideological purity" of the web site. In fact, the admins can control the ideological content of CP; they don't need your help in this regard. Your efforts are plainly on display in the fight over the [[Pussy Riot]] article, in which you seem to accuse me of turning the place into "liberalpedia". Apparently because you believe that anyone who opposes a murderous dictator who imprisons, murders, and poisons dissenters, must be a "leftist", "elitist" or "social justice warrior". I can assure everyone that I have no intention of trying to turn this web site into "liberalpedia".

:Now, to address the most recent claim (just above) that I am citing a "liberal-leaning anti-Trump website", I don't go searching for liberal web sites in order to post references to them here at Conservapedia. The web site that I was citing was taken from footnote number 4 of [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Attention_atheists:_You_don%27t_own_the_internet&oldid=1449976 this]. That was put in by Cons. So you'll have to ask him why he was putting in "left-wing" web sites. I figured that, if it's good enough for Cons, it's good enough for Conservapedia, and if he doesn't actually read the articles that he cites, that's his problem.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 19:03, 28 September 2018 (EDT)

::Sounds more to me like you're trying to make this more about yourself (indicated by your pretended "offence" at the truth being pointed out to you in your reply) to distract from your history of trying to ideologically reshape Conservapedia to suit your tastes and those of your fellow liberals (as well as the liberal trolls who come here for the sole purpose of vandalizing the site, along with your denial of doing so), particularly regarding the Pussy Riot article (a fight which ''you'' started, by the way). All you're doing here is further proving the points being made in the [[Liberal Style]] article regarding what your type does and how they react (acting "offended", not taking responsibility, etc.) and what they resort to (denials, deflection, condescension, attacking those who catch them, etc. - all of which you've pulled on other editors and admins here before, in case you need reminding again) when caught at their actions. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 20:14, 28 September 2018 (EDT)
:::Well, people do sometimes get accused of talking or writing about themselves, and seeming to make everything about "me, me, me", and using a lot of first-person pronouns in their writing. I've been accused of that myself on occasion, but it doesn't seem to apply in the case of the paragraphs above. You, on the other hand, seem to write about "liberals, liberals, liberals", and accusing anyone who says something you don't agree with of being one. This is most obvious in your claim that anyone who opposes murderous thug Vladimir Putin must be a "leftist", "elitist" or "social justice warrior". And must be trying to change this site into "liberalpedia". Anyone who has been around here for any length of time knows that, in my 10-1/2 years here, I don't do that. Feel free to ask any admin, like Andy or Cons, for example. Or, for that matter, any trustworthy and decent person that's been around for any length of time. They can also tell you that I have repaired a lot of vandalism and other damage, though probably not as much as I could have repaired if I'd been given sysop powers.

:::Now let's go through your paragraph above.

::::Sounds more to me like you're trying to make this more about yourself (indicated by your pretended "offence" at the truth being pointed out to you in your reply)
:::::I'm not offended, just annoyed.
::::to distract from your history of trying to ideologically reshape Conservapedia to suit your tastes
:::::Really? Give an example. Opposing Putin is not ''my'' taste; it is the taste of any decent person.
::::and those of your fellow liberals
:::::Huh?
::::(as well as the liberal trolls who come here for the sole purpose of vandalizing the site,
:::::We are all aware that this site is the frequent target of vandalism. I've done my share of repairing this.
::::along with your denial of doing so),
:::::I don't deny that there are vandals.
::::particularly regarding the Pussy Riot article (a fight which ''you'' started, by the way).
:::::Well, actually, you were the one who started it, with your edit of 08:14, 13 February 2017.
::::All you're doing here is further proving the points being made in the [[Liberal Style]] article
:::::No, that article has nothing to do with me. It's incredibly badly written, by the way.
::::regarding what your type does
:::::My type? What type is that?
::::and how they react (acting "offended", not taking responsibility, etc.)
:::::I fail to take responsibility? Given an example.
::::and what they resort to (denials,
:::::really?
::::deflection,
:::::really?
::::condescension,
:::::really?
::::attacking
:::::really?
::::those who catch them, etc.
:::::You've "caught" me? You realize that everything on this site is public, right?
::::all of which you've pulled on other editors and admins here before,
:::::Really? Give an example.
::::in case you need reminding again) when caught at their actions.
:::::Really? Give an example.

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:57, 1 October 2018 (EDT)

::::The rambling wall of text you posted (where you do exactly as I said you'd do on all counts, including deny your repeated past wrongdoing and refuse to take responsibility for it, and even try to push a liberal POV here while you simultaneously deny doing so - all liberal traits) is proof enough - and no, I was ''not'' the one who started that fight, ''you'' did [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&diff=1313984&oldid=1307294 by removing factual info from the article on March 2, 2017] (just as you're trying to provoke another fight even now). By even objecting to the Liberal Style article (by claiming it is "badly written" when it is nothing of the kind), all you're doing is further proving the points made by that article.

::::And incidentally, the reason you don't get given sysop powers here is because if that happened, you'd most certainly abuse them by misusing them to force a liberal POV on articles and blocking those you don't agree with here (which would mean just about every conservative-leaning editor here), which would result in even more fights here than you already cause and would only be disruptive to the site - and that's not needed here. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:46, 1 October 2018 (EDT)

:::::Your presumption to know the reason I don't have assistant ("sysop") authority is incorrect. I do not want block powers, and I have said so many times over the last 10-1/2 years. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (EST)

== Resurrection - The new and improved version of the phantom essay ==

*[[Essay: The thrill of Christian victory and the agony of atheist defeat|The thrill of Christian victory and the agony of atheist defeat]]

I hope you find that the added content further clarifies matters.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:24, 24 December 2018 (EST)

:Well, I'm glad you have apparently decided that this "essay" should become a permanent part of your work. I was worried for a while that you considered it to be some silly "throwaway" thing. It's really one of your most charming things, mostly because of the really nice picture of the two kids. Though it's not clear to me that they are cheering over the victory of Christianity. They might be exulting over having won something in a computer game they are playing. Or maybe cheering over having posted something stupid, perhaps involving cats, or maybe gerbils, on social media. Or maybe they are cheering about having successfully vandalized Conservapedia. :-) You never know.

:But its not possible that your added content "clarifies matters". I'd have to read the article. You see, I don't read your articles. I just look at the pictures. And this was a nice picture.

:Now, I have a bone to pick with you over your flippant use of the word "resurrection". I've never liked the use of that word other than in the context of Jesus. Here you are talking about having undeleted a file on a wiki.
::And they gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.
::And they did a "delete page" operation on him, and parted his garments. And they "changed visibility of 3 revisions" on him.
::But on the third day they "restored his page".

:Not right.

:Be that as it may, have a Merry Christmas.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (EST)

::"The act or fact of bringing someone back to life, or bringing something back into use or existence."- Cambridge Dictionary[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/resurrection]

::I hope the Queen's English helps clarify things for you.:)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:05, 25 December 2018 (EST)

:::Yes, I know English pretty well, and I did not need to look at your dictionary reference. I know that "resurrect" is often used in a secular sense. But it still sort of bothers me that you use it in a totally flippant and childish article. And I notice that you are continuing to mess around with that article, among other things, vaping/memory-holing 45 versions at a time. Can't you make up your mind? Is there something about those vaped versions that embarrasses you? Jesus was only crucified and resurrected once.

:::And speaking of childish, I speculated above on the possibility that those children "might be exulting over having won something in a computer game they are playing." Well, I was right. The picture is from https://pixabay.com/en/children-win-success-video-game-593313/. They were '''not''' celebrating "The thrill of Christian victory", as your caption says.

:::Do you think Christianity is a video game?

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:03, 25 December 2018 (EST)
== re: Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages ==

This page [[Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages]] at Conservapedia needs to have a section on how to create quotes.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:23, 7 January 2019 (EST)
:Thanks for the suggestion. I'm busy just now, but I'll get to it. The usefulness of this was brought to my attention by some recent comments about the various templates or whatever. Something about one of the templates being changed. So I need to do some research into this. Do You by any chance know where that discussion was? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:28, 10 January 2019 (EST)

::I hope you don't mind me cutting in. The hubbub you heard in regard to quote templates was just that I added some documentation to [[:template:Cquote]] but also accidentally added a category outside of the noinclude tags, so all the pages using that template were suddenly in [[:Category:Quotation Templates]]. I have since fixed the issue.
::We do seem to have three different quotation templates, so I have wondered if there is a specific policy or it is more a matter of preference, save the discussion about Cquote. Anyway, I hope this clarifies and saves you some time. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 19:02, 11 January 2019 (EST)

:::Right. I'm awfully busy these days, but I'll get to it. I have a personal stake in having these quote templates documents, since I use them and typically have to look around for examples of my, and other people's, work to figure out how to proceed. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (EST)

I'm ready to go. Please unlock this page. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:37, 19 January 2019 (EST)

== I recreated the article and removed the duplicate content ==

I deleted [[User:SamHB/Cons Christian victory Dec+27+2018]] because I recreated the article at: [[Essay: The thrill of Christian victory and the agony of atheist defeat]].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:32, 13 January 2019 (EST)

:OK. I'm going to have to reorganize my "rogues' gallery of things you have vaped"; I have a significant backlog already. You could help by not vaping things, recognizing that '''The Internet is Forever''', and perhaps not writing things you will later be ashamed of. Just sayin' [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (EST)
::It is not a matter of being ashamed, it is rather a matter of material being funny vs. non-funny or effective or ineffective.

::One of the reasons why Chess computers can beat chessmasters is because the machines don't have big egos and can pullback from an ineffective chess attack.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff4W7A-j1RM] Computers change course when it is warranted.

::If I decide I don't like some of my material in retrospect, I delete/vape it.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:59, 3 February 2019 (EST)

== Vindication is sweet ==

*[https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2018/06/crumbling-britain-uk-s-pothole-plague-sign-national-decline Crumbling Britain: the UK’s pothole plague is a sign of national decline], ''New Statesman'', June 13, 2018

Even the British ''New Statesman'' admits that the UK pothole crisis is a sign of national decline.

See also: [[United Kingdom's road repair crisis]]

I hope the ''New Statesman'' article helped clarify things for you.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:34, 13 January 2019 (EST)

:Right. The things you send me in the hopes that they "clarify things" for me rarely have the desired effect, to say the least. But keep trying.

:I may create an article on causation vs. correlation. Including such examples as potholes vs. Darwin's homeland. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (EST)

:::[Some material was put in here and then vaped a short time later (before I could catch it), with the edit comment "I think I will be editing less at this wiki". That person then made 30 more edits within a fairly short span of time. People would do well not to make edits that they are going to be ashamed of later.]

==Name-calling -- "making a fool of oneself"==

I was recently accused of name-calling, when I told Cons to stop "[https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Message_to_SamHB making a fool of himself]". According to [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/make%20a%20fool%20of%20oneself Merriam-Webster], "making a fool of oneself" simply means "behav[ing] in a very foolish or silly way". That's not the same as being a fool—we all do foolish things from time to time. I intended no name-calling, and I apologize to anyone who took my comment as such.

I try to avoid name-calling, such as calling people
*[[Atheism_and_stealing|thieves]], particularly [[Irreligion_and_car_theft|car thieves]]
*[[Prominent,_militant_atheists_and_short_men|short]]
*[[Essay:_Militant_atheism_and_short_man's_syndrome|short]]
*[[Atheists_and_physical_attractiveness|unattractive]]
*[[Essay:_Science_proves_that_atheist_"men"_lack_machismo|lacking in machismo]]
*[[Essay:_Science_proves_that_atheists_can't_jump|unable to jump]]
*[[Atheism_and_gluttony|gluttonous]]
*[[Essay:_Prominent_atheists_weighed_on_the_scales_and_found_wanting|obese]]
*[[Atheism_and_obesity|obese]]
*[[Atheism_and_evolutionary_racism|racist]]
*[[Atheism_and_incest|practicers of incest]]
*[[Atheism_and_necrophilia|necrophiliacs]]
*[[Atheism_and_cannibalism|cannibals]]
*[[Atheism_and_cowardice|cowards]]

and so on. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:44, 2 February 2019 (EST)

:SamHB, a 2016 press release of a University of Minnesota study on atheists reported: "Survey data collected in 2014 shows that, compared to data collected in 2003, Americans have sharpened their negative views of atheists.."[https://cla.umn.edu/news-events/news/atheists-remain-most-disliked-religious-minority-us]

:In addition, according to a study published in the International Journal for The Psychology of Religion: "anti-atheist prejudice is not confined either to dominantly religious countries or to religious individuals, but rather appears to be a robust judgment about atheists."[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/anti-atheist-distrust-deeply-and-culturally-ingrained-study-finds-a6952276.html]

:For more information, please see: [[Views on atheists]] and [[Distrust of atheists]]

::This section is not about atheists; it is about name-calling. It has nothing to do with atheists or atheism.
::As I'm sure you know, I have absolutely no interest in the things you write about atheism. As I'm sure you know, this is because your writings about atheism, and nearly everything else you write, are simply the result of scouring the internet for anything you can find that might support whatever it is you're trying to say. As I'm sure you know, on a planet with 6 billion people expressing 6 billion opinions, you can find just about anything you want on the internet.

:I realize that you take exception to my atheism content, nevertheless it is undeniable that my atheism content gets significant web traffic. For example, my [[atheism and stealing]] article is merely about a month old and already it has over 2,200 page views.

:"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - [[Sun Tzu]]

:In all seriousness, I do plan on changing some of my priorities. There are a number of worthy endeavors that I wish to pursue.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:53, 3 February 2019 (EST)

::Yes, please do that. You probably have more worthy endeavors than vaping your own edits to other people's talk pages. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:26, 3 February 2019 (EST)

== You should face reality and accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: Conservative account ==

SamHB, you are wrong. Most, if not all, the active Conservapedia admins know there is more than one User: Conservative editor. So does the owner of the website. On one or more occasions, I have received an email from one of the fellow admins saying, "Why did you do such and such?" I then explain it was one of the other editors of the User: Conservative account. And then I either reverse that co-editor of the User: Conservative account's decision or I explain his/her (I say his or her to keep the veil of mystery thicker) decision to my fellow admins. By the way, your objections are not cruel, they are just misguided and/or haughty/vain.

I hope this further clarifies matters for you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:23, 5 April 2019 (EDT)

:Just for further clarification: How many edits are done by the most prominent persona of your little posse: 90%? 99%? 99.9%? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:19, 7 April 2019 (EDT)
::Whether it is a little posse or large posse, I will not disclose. I will merely say the decision to have more than one editor use the account involved more than one consideration.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:01, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
:::I'll get to your outlandish claims of being multiple people, and the outlandish "proof" of this that you have been pushing (unsuccessfully) over the years, soon. Be patient. I have this thing called a "life" that sometimes gets in the way of any desire I might have to spend all my time writing stuff at Conservapedia. And a relativity issue has just come up, that needs to be attended to. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:21, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
::::SamHB, a majority of my online work has been related to atheism (or related issues such as [[evolutionism]]). Now that the [[atheist movement]] in the Western World has been burnt to a crisp and has been soundly defeated (see: [[Decline of the atheist movement]] and [[Decline of militant atheism in the West]]), my desire to have a protracted discussion about how many users use the [[User: Conservative]] account has waned. One thing I can say with absolute certainty, there is more than one editor who uses the User: Conservative account.

::::Second, if the owner of Conservapedia decides to bequeath control of Conservapedia in his waning years, unlike Conservapedia editors whose accounts will remain inactive after they meet their Maker, the Conservapedia account I created will live on. "Old soldiers never die, they simply fade away".[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:47, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
SamHB, I enabled other editors to use the User: Conservative account for these reasons: 1) [[Sun Tzu]] is considered by many as one of the greatest strategist/tacticians of all history. He said to be mysterious for various reasons. What could be more mysterious than multiple anonymous editors? 2) After TK passed away, his influence at this website obviously went down (I was never a fan of TK). It occurred to me that if a prominent editor has a "succession plan" in relation to his/her account, it would be a better thing for multiple reasons. 3) The amusement factor. Frankly, it is amusing to see people rail at the User: Conservative and construct armchair psychological analysis of the account when the fact is that the account has multiple editors which makes their foolish strategy of personal attacks rather impotent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:54, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
:Let it go, man. Your real life identity is well known, and your writing / argumentation style is unmistakable. Hyraxes chewing the cud, etc. No amount of dissembling is going to change this.

:FFIW, though, your general sentence construction has improved considerably over the past few years. There's less repetition and far fewer redundant phrases than there used to be. Good work (seriously). [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 17:14, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
::There is more than one person who uses the User: Conservative account. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:04, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
::::No there isn't. No one believes you. You have been given many opportunities to show that there is more than one person, and you have notgiven a positive response to any of them. Not a single admin (these people might be in a position to know about this) has come forth to support your claim, nor has anyone else. All you do is write the same trash over and over again, sticking in different footnoting styles and such. But it's the same trash, a fact which anyone can see. Whether you use the "Q" in "LGBTQ", or whether you once used a diacritical mark, is irrelevant. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
:::Fine. Have it your way. ''The real life identity of the primary user of the User:Conservative account is well known, and his writing / argumentation style is unmistakable. Hyraxes chewing the cud, etc. No amount of dissembling is going to change this.''

:::Happy now? [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 19:27, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
JohnZ, key question: Did the same person largely write these articles: [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] and [[Atheism and women]] and [[Homosexuality]]?

Please address both the writing and footnoting styles of the three articles. Also, address any quote box differences. In addition, address any differences in points of view.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:01, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

===Multiple personalities, part 1===
You have, for years, been claiming that the senior admins here know about your multiple personalities, and accept this behavior. (I know it's been going on for a couple of years; I can't be bothered to look it up just now, but I will if necessary.) I'd like you to prove it.

You recently said, in [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#A_digression_on_muliple_personality_disorders], that "Most, if not all, the active Conservapedia admins know there is more than one User: Conservative editor. So does the owner of the website." Thats good to hear. If it's true. But I have my doubts. Why don't you have those admins (including Andy) put short posts here assuring all of us that what you say is true. Or, if you or they prefer, tell me so in private email—I happen to have, from time to time, had email conversations with a number of admins and we trust each other. So have them reassure us of their acceptance of this situation.

Another thing would be for you to post or forward any emails from these senior admins, indicating that they know about and accept this. If you (quite understandably) don't want to post those emails here in public, forward them to me at the email that we use for our extensive correspondence: sam4557@gmail.com. You know that I can be trusted with our confidential conversations.

===Multiple personalities, part 2===
You also said, in the same place, "On one or more occasions, I have received an email from one of the fellow admins saying, 'Why did you do such and such?' I then explain it was one of the other editors of the User: Conservative account. And then I either reverse that co-editor of the User: Conservative account's decision or I explain his/her (I say his or her to keep the veil of mystery thicker) decision to my fellow admins." So this is the excuse you hide behind when the other admins overrule your actions? Wouldn't it be more straightforward simply to accept that what you had written was inappropriate? Also, can you post or forward some of the emails in which the other admins take you to task, and the emails in which you explain his/her decision?

===Multiple personalities, part 3===
Another thing you have been doing for years, in support of this multiple personality fantasy, is claiming that it is proved by inconsistent footnoting style in your articles. This, too, is discussed at some length in [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#A_digression_on_muliple_personality_disorders]. So let me get this straight: You are intentionally using inconsistent footnoting style for the purpose of "proving" that you are multiple people? You are using '''your own writing''' as evidence in this case? Writing that you can, of course manipulate any way you wish, to make any point you wish? And you expect the rest of us to believe that? In the real world that would be called "fabricating evidence". Wouldn't it be more straightforward just to fix the inconsistent styles?

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:28, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
=== From User: Conservative to SamHB: My additional responses to SamHB about more than one editor using the User: Conservative account ===

The other admins at Conservapedia either agree with my decision to expand the editor base of the User: Conservative account or they tolerate it or they are ambivalent (I really haven't deeply queried them about this matter).
::::I don't believe you. I see no evidence that the other admins, or any other people, accept that you have "expanded the editor base" of your account. Just saying it again and again and again and again doesn't make it any more convincing. You have utterly failed to substantiate this claim, a claim you have been making for years. I would think you would be able to come up with some evidence by now. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
After all is said and done, they see that Andy Schlafly is not making a big stink about it so they are ok with it.
::::Perhaps the reason Andy isn't making a big stink about it is that it doesn't matter how many people you say you are. Perhaps he doesn't care who is behind your keyboard. Perhaps he sees this whole situation as amusing but irrelevant to anything he cares about. Perhaps he doesn't care whether you are being truthful. Perhaps the other admins have a similar view, and just don't care whether you are being truthful.

As far as Andy Schlafly goes, he knows there are more than one editor of the User: Conservative account and he tolerates it.
::::I don't believe you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
He is not excited about it despite the fact that account could potentially remain active upon my demise. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:39, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
:Here is an excerpt from an email I sent other admins on Jun 30, 2018, 9:02 AM: "Given that another editor of my User: Conservative account unblocked him, I think he was hoping would be unblocked again. That is not going to happen."[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:50, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I don't know whether to believe you. Saying things like "Given that another editor of my User: Conservative account ..." doesn't convince me of anything. You make such statements all the time, in public on this web site, so it doesn't surprise me that you would make them in private emails also. How about posting (or forwarding to sam4557@gmail.com) the full message, with headers intact so that I can closely examine its authenticity, showing that the recipient acknowledged that your account is actually used by multiple people. Just saying that you said this is no more convincing than saying it directly. Which you do again and again and again and again. I want acknowledgement of this from someone else. By having them post something to that effect on this web site, or send me email to that effect. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
::SamHB, did you notice that editor of the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] used the term LGBTQ. Personally, I think the Q is rather redundant so I am not a fan of this term. How often was the term LGBTQ used in other articles created by the User: Conservative account? Of course, this is yet another sign there is more than one editor of the User: Conservative account.

::And then there are the stylistic issues of: the footnoting style differences; the quote box differences; the greater tendency to put footnotes in the middle of sentences; the multiple use of the word gay in the article which is a term I rarely use; the dependent clause "as such" used in the beginning of a sentence which I believe I have never done in any of my writings at Conservapedia and finally the multiple use of the word "régime" in the article/page (I may have used the term "regime" in my articles but I never spelled it "régime").
::::We've been through this before. You write articles in which you deliberately use varying styles, and then you claim that that proves you are multiple people? Really? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)

::SamHB, it's time to face that more than one editor has used the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:30, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I don't believe you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
:::Have you noticed that User: Karajou, who commonly uses check user, has never disputed the notion that more than one editor has used (or uses) the User: Conservative account?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:14, 14 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I haven't actually noticed the connection between your multiple-personality fantasy and checkuser. There's a very simple explanation for the fact that none of the people with checkuser rights sees anything amiss. All your edits come from the same person, at the same IP address. Nothing for Karajou to notice or comment on. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
I listened to a video of a hardcore, no nonsense, high performance coach yesterday. He said not to care about what other people think, but to just move forward and do the right things. That is excellent advice! Sorry to hear that you don't believe that more than one editor uses the User: Conservative account. But frankly, I don't care! I hope this helps clarifies things for you. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:20, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::Well, it clarifies that you are making no attempt to convince people of your multiple personalities. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

== And accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: SamHB account ==
HEY EVERYBODY! MORE THAN ONE PERSON USES THE SAMHB ACCOUNT! I'M ONE OF THE OTHER PEOPLE. I KNOW YOU'RE SKEPTICAL OF THIS, BUT I HAVE PROOF. WE HAVE DIFFERENT WRITING STYLES. CAN YOU FIGURE IT OUT? BY GEORGE, YOU'VE GOT IT. I WRITE IN ALL CAPS. ISN'T THAT CUTE? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:38, 13 April 2019 (EDT)

== Not any more there isn't ==
I have just changed my password and revoked Samantha's permission to edit under my account. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:39, 13 April 2019 (EDT)

== Announcements concerning the User: Conservative editor team ==

Two announcements:

1. This month saw an expansion of the number of editors in the [[User: Conservative]] editor team.
::Right. It's been raised to te 6th power. Thanks for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

2. One of the editors of User: Conservative team was given an update as far as the password for User: Conservative account as the account has periodic password updates.
::Right. You've been making periodic password changes (always a good idea), and it just now occurred to you to let one (just one?) of your alternate personalities know about it. Thanks for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

By the way, I have finally figured out your steadfast refusal to accept the fact that more than one editor uses the account. Of course, it is jealousy. Deep down you want to be a member of the User: Conservative editor team![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:20, 27 April 2019 (EDT)
::Right. Your actions certainly entertain my "armchair psychological analysis" proclivities. Actually becoming one of your alternate personalities is certainly an intriguing thought. Thanks for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
::::Hang on - Conservative is a bunch of different people? How is it there are a bunch of people who ALL have the same verbal style and have all the same rhetorical tics. Seems unlikely to me. [[User:JohnSelway|JohnSelway]] ([[User talk:JohnSelway|talk]]) 02:50, 30 April 2019 (EDT)

== Number of editors using the User: Conservative account ==

[[File:Apocalypse vasnetsov 4 horsemen.jpg|thumbnail|400px|center|The User: Conservative account was launched around the birth of the [[New Atheism]] movement. The New Atheism movement had four horsemen. Namely, [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], [[Daniel Dennett]], and [[Sam Harris]]. With the newly minted editor being given the username and password of the User: Conservative account, the User: Conservative account now consists of four individuals. The new editor of the User: Conservative account, however, cannot be a fourth horseman of the User: Conservative account. Why? Because the fourth horse of [[Revelation]] is a pale/ashen horse named Death. And is you many know, the [[atheist movement]] already died before he/she was made an editor (See: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]).]]
{{Clear}}
Well gosh. I've been trying for months (years?) to get you to convince me, or anyone else, that multiple people use your account and make Conservapedia contributions under your name.

When you produce, as "evidence", your claim that various sysops and admins know about this, and I ask you to produce the emails or other validating information, you change the subject. When you repeatedly and obsessively repeat, to me and others, that your writings do not all have identical styles (including footnoting differences, knowledge of what the "Q" in "LGBTQ" means, or different use of diacritical marks), and I point out that anyone can manipulate their own writing style to get that effect, you change the subject.

And now I see that there is a very simple ironclad proof that you are 4 people—an 1887 painting by Viktor Vasnetsov. So there are 4 people, corresponding to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, in your "collective". How could I not have seen that before? It's so simple and straightforward now. Thank you, as usual, for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:21, 26 May 2019 (EDT)

== A message I left on User: JohnZ's talk page ==

I left the following message on User: JohnZ's talk page:

:"By the way, the User: Conservative account is a mixture of Protestant/Catholic editors (I have asked the Catholic editors to refrain from anti-Protestant posts using the User: Conservative account). A message from one of the User: Conservative Catholic editors to the British atheist JohnZ: Deus vult![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:52, 29 April 2019 (EDT)"

I trust this further clarifies the number of editors using the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:29, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
== [[Essay: The unfree city of Boston, Massachusetts and its rat infestation problem|The unfree city of Boston, Massachusetts and its rat infestation problem]] ==

[[File:Rat.jpg|center|thumbnail|205px|[[Boston]], which is the capital and most populous city of the Commonwealth of [[Massachusetts]], is one of the ten most rat infested cities of the world.[http://www.animalplanet.com/wild-animals/3-baltimore-md/]
 
 
As you are probably aware, rat infestation is a sign of societal decay. More orderly societies like [[Switzerland]], which is a beacon of [[young earth creationism]] in [[Europe]], simply don't have significant rat infestation problems.[https://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/switzerland-beacon-of-european.html]
 
 
It's not too late to leave the [[Essay: Free States Movement|unfree state of Massachusetts]] and move to a more orderly, rat free area that enjoys the blessings of liberty.]]
{{clear}}
=== Swissinfo.ch: Rats save lives in landmine-infested areas ===

*[https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/lifesavers-landmines-explosives-rats-cambodia-deadly/44928164 Swissinfo.ch: Rats save lives in landmine-infested areas]

(Swiss neutrality has insured that Switzerland is not a landmine-infested area needing the assistance of rats)

==References==
{{reflist}}

== SamHB vs. User: Conservative. SamHB badly loses again ==

[[User: Conservative]] wrote: 7-11-2017 Newsweek article: ''Why American Conservatives Love Anti-Gay Putin''. Putin's workouts have more machismo than Obama's too.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcb4rLzXFl0] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6i0Z0hCIzo][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LggcoH1VHo] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:13, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

SamHB wrote: "Well, this sure started a lively discussion! It was gratifying to see so many people come out and do the things that we each do so well. I look forward to seeing the videos of Donald Trump showing off his athletic prowess. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:36, 3 August 2019 (EDT)".

According to liberal/left leaning Wikipedia: "Golf is a club-and-ball sport in which players use various clubs to hit balls into a series of holes on a course in as few strokes as possible."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Golf&oldid=909235827]

According to ''Golf Digest'': "My main memory of playing golf with Donald Trump—preserved with more care now that he's the president—is that he really went after the ball hard. But the interesting thing is that though Trump's action might have looked a little reckless, it soon became clear that it was quite under control... Trump was 67 when I played with him in 2013 at his course outside Charlotte and in early 2014 at Doral, but he still possessed a significant remnant of big-man athleticism... As a golfer, the 45th president is the real deal."[https://www.golfdigest.com/story/how-good-is-donald-trump-the-golfer]

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kq84r4lqo VIDEO: ''Golf Digest'': Trump vs. Obama]. According to ''Golf Digest'', Trump is the better golfer! Specifically, ''Golf Digest'' said that Trump was the "best golfer ever to hold the presidency."[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kq84r4lqo]

I hope this clarifies the issue of whether Trump has more machismo than Obama.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:01, 4 August 2019 (EDT)
:By the way, once ObamaCare disappears, Trump's victory over Obama will be complete![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:03, 4 August 2019 (EDT)

== Best and fastest way to create an ex-homosexual ==

In 1980 a study was published in the ''American Journal of Psychiatry'' and eleven men participated in this study. The study reported that eleven homosexual men became heterosexuals "without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy" through their participation in a Pentecostal church.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7435713] The Apostle Paul in a letter to the church of Corinth indicated that Christians were able to overcome being homosexuals through the power of Jesus Christ (I Corinthians 6:9-11). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:29, 4 September 2019 (EDT)

== Atheistic Troll ==

According to my [[User_talk:Wikignome72#Why?|exchange]] with [[User:Conservative]] / [[User:Wikignome72]], he just lost (temporarily) the access to his account ("''The other editor of the account reset the password''" - so there is only one other user). Perhaps an intervention by a concerned friend or relative? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:14, 26 September 2019 (EDT)
:Somewhat the "exchange" mentioned above got erased - perhaps to save valuable memory space. Nevertheless, I just reprint it here:
::{{cquote|Why?
Just why? And please, don't quote Sun Tzu. --AugustO (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2019 (EDT)

Did the creationist Dwight D. Eisenhower tell the German evolutionist Adolf Hitler why he did things or his future plans? Nein!Wikignome72 (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2019 (EDT)
:If you just forgot User:Conservative's password, you probably can ask Andy to reset it. It's quite irritating to have a wiki gnome making substantial edits - like having a user calling himself robot. (BTW: happy 47th birthday! ;-) ) --AugustO (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2019 (EDT)
::There is more than one editor of the User: Conservative account. The other editor of the account reset the password. I will get the new password from that person down the pike. In the meantime, I will make an edit on the User page so there is not an unsightly red username in the recent changes to the wiki page.Wikignome72 (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2019 (EDT)
}}
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:35, 26 September 2019 (EDT)

“The whole secret lies in confusing the enemy, so that he cannot fathom our real intent.” - Sun Tzu, ''The Art of War''. Donald Trump (who quoted Sun Tzu on Twitter) and [[User:Conservative]]dom, are both unpredictable. Get used to it! I realize this may be upsetting to a certain editor who has a Germanic love of rules and predictability, but this is going to be the way it is![[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 19:47, 26 September 2019 (EDT)
::OK. I will offer a fuller explanation. I will be working on about 5 or so significantly sized projects soon so I asked the other editor of the account to change the password. Previously, SamHB and I discussed doing a 66 day period of nonediting of CP. SamHB already did his 66 day period. Soon, I will be using these two extensions to my main browser: [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/site-blocker/oohkinmgbkhgcobnipoijafcjgfcogpk Site blocker] and [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/stayfocusd/laankejkbhbdhmipfmgcngdelahlfoji Stayfcsd]. I have decided to do the 66 day period of nonediting of CP after I finish about a 12 hour project related to CP.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 03:42, 27 September 2019 (EDT)
:::A few comments:
:::#I have never had any communication with "Wikignome72", on- or off-wiki, on the 66 day topic or any other topic, until just now.
:::#The 66 day business appears to have come from the [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Personal_development_skill_sets_etc#Developing_good_habits_and_breaking_bad_habits Developing_good_habits_and_breaking_bad_habits] section of Cons's user page. It was probably placed there in late 2017, but it's hard to tell, because the page has been repeatedly vaped/burned/rebuilt. I have not read the two referenced articles; they might have wise counsel, though it doesn't appear that they helped the 4 Cons people achieve their goal.
:::#I promised one of the 4 users of the Conservative account (at the time I did not believe his assertion that there are actually 4) that I would respect the confidentiality of emails with that person. [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB #Taking_some_of_your_advice https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB Taking_some_of_your_advice]. Therefore, I will not discuss my communications, with that person, on the subject of the 66 day "challenge".
:::AugustO hypothesizes that, perhaps because of an "intervention", or perhaps because of dissension among the 4 people, some or all of the 4 users have had their password involuntarily reset. Perhaps this was done by Wikignome72, in an apparently successful hijacking of an account. Perhaps the 4 people gave out their password a little too freely, Of course, the Cons people could request that Andy reset the password, which he has apparently not done.

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:54, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
::::There have been 3 users of the User: Conservative account. A 4rth person was given the password to the account, but never began editing.

::::Again, I asked another editor of the account to change the password as I want to tackle some upcoming projects and wanted less potential distractions. It was understood between us that I would ask for the new password later. I have nothing more to say about this matter. As far as I am concerned. AugustO is making a tempest in a teapot.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 17:12, 28 September 2019 (EDT)

Sorry. Surprisingly, I'm a member of this site for more than eight years. I apologize if I assumed an unwarranted familiarity with you all: frankly, I was just amused that a long-term user lost his/her/their access... - and I was annoyed when a wiki-gnome acted as an administrator: that's just wrong.

User:Conservative, over the years you have announced countless projects, out-times, booklets, etc. - nothing ever came of it. For me, you are somewhat the "comic relief" of Conservapedia, so, please, do not take our interactions too seriously. I hope that quenches the tempest in the teapot. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:05, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
::AugustO, a few matters: 1) I promised the author of the book/booklet that I would not discuss any details concerning the book/booklet. I am certainly not going to break that promise for the sake of some foolish evolutionists who assert a ridiculous ideology. 2) A far as my projects/operations, the web traffic to my articles speak for themselves. My key articles are receiving thousands and thousands of page views each and every month. Evidentally, those projects/operations worked! 3) AugustO, now please feel free to go on with your work on that Bible Project you got involved in (A project you were unqualified for "Dr. Augusto - Professor Emeritus of Greek and Hebrew literature!").09:26, 30 September 2019 (EDT)
:::Is the author George R.R. Martin? We have been awaiting his publication for a long time also (Joking of course).--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 10:28, 30 September 2019 (EDT)
:Well, this gets more confusing practically every day. Wikignome72 writes ("I asked another editor of the account [clearly referring to the Conservative account] to change the password ..." '''Another''' editor? This suggests the WGN is one of the editors of that account. But that would be sockpuppetry, which is clearly forbidden, and gets people banned instantly. So we have to assume WGN simply misspoke.

:And now WGN says, as though he is in close communication with the Cons people, that the number of Cons people is only 3, not 4. Perhaps it was hoped there would be 4 horseman of the [[User:Conservative]] account, but that this never occurred. Perhaps that 4th person, who was given the password but apparently never did anything, engaged in a bit of treachery and changed the password. Or perhaps the password change was actually done at the request of WGN, in order to keep him from being distracted while he (WGN) tackled some projects. Though I don't understand why the actions of the Cons folks would distract WGN. And WGN now appears to be tackling the same projects (atheism, atheism, atheism, New Zealand, and atheism), and with the same zeal and intensity, that the Cons's did.

:And it's possible that WGN's failure to simply reset the Cons password was because he had forgotten that he had admin privileges, or perhaps was never aware of this in the first place? Even though his user page has said, since 00:06 on 26 September, that he has them?

:So it's all very confusing. I don't know what the relationship is between WGN and the Cons folks, or the relationship among the Cons folks. But it appears that the number of Cons folks is 3, not 4.

:By the way, I don't normally follow Richard Dawkins, or all the atheist material the the Cons folks, and WGN, write, but today I just happened to look at [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=atheism,atheist,Richard%20Dawkins,agnostic,agnosticism a Google trends page]. And I thought "Mission accomplished!", depending on what the mission is. I can't figure out what the surveys mean. They seem to be treating Richard Dawkins as though he, personally, is a religious stance. But the [http://www.sneps.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jssr_15101.pdf pre-2043] page certainly suggests that something has been a smashing success!!

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:40, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
::In a private email, I will tell you about Operation Super Fortresses![[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 22:52, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
:::Warning!! I have not promised email confidentiality to anyone other than the person who I believed at the time was the sole owner of the User:Conservative CP account. Any mail that I get that appears (based on, for example, its topicality to the present discussion) to be from Wikignome72, I will assume to be from Wikignome72, and will be subject to being made public. If it comes from one of the email addresses of the Conservative group, I will simply assume that someone in that group gave his email password to Wikignome72, and that the latter is posting it on his own. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (EDT)
::::Eisenhower had many good points indeed but it should be understood that he was not a "fighting general" in the mold of Patton, Montgomery or Rommel. He was a superb administrator and took well informed strategic decisions that were presented to him. He had little actual battlefield experience, a great man and leader perhaps but certainly no master tactician.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 08:40, 30 September 2019 (EDT)

User talk:SamHB

2019-09-30T12:40:19Z

Chewy Suarez:

[[User talk:SamHB/Archive 1]]
[[User_talk:SamHB/archive_2]]
[[User_talk:SamHB/archive_3]]

== Red telephone for Cons ==

Cons: Thank you for dealing with the matter of [[Special:Contributions/Cal_Um]]. I know that you recognize that you are not an expert in relativity and know better than to get into the technical details of these discussions, and I appreciate that. (I wish more people recognized their limitations in this area; you can look up my recent controversies.) But this was a clear case of you recognizing that this guy was a troublemaker, and coming to my aid.

And now I see that there has been another case, with [[Special:Contributions/Bobbillyman69]], taken care of by Andy. Vandals look at the Recent Changes log: "Oh, look! Relativity is on today's dinner menu!" We old-timers know all about that phenomenon.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:21, 7 March 2017 (EST)
:Your welcome. I just happened to see it. I am guessing that for the foreseeable future that you and Andy are going to have to maintain the article as far as keeping it in accordance to compromise you two reached as far as the wording of the article. I don't think I will be of much help in the future. Again, I just happened to see that particular vandal.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:32, 7 March 2017 (EST)

== A liberal is wanted for an online dialogue ==

A liberal is wanted to have a single online dialogue. Please let them know at http://opposing-views.org/ if you are interested. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:15, 29 March 2017 (EDT)
:Here is their contact page: http://opposing-views.org/contact/ [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:25, 29 March 2017 (EDT)

::Well, I'm somewhat flattered, but significantly puzzled, by this. From looking at the web page, it looks like some kind of general liberal/conservative debate site. Currently focused on Obamacare, but with a wider outlook in general. My guess is that they are looking to increase their "contributor staff", particularly liberals, and they came to you. Or, more likely, you discovered them.

::I'm not interested in contributing to such a site. And one thing puzzles me about it. There are '''thousands''' of liberal/conservative discussions/debates/controversies that take place every day. I find myself in such discussions several times per day. So these people want to create yet another one? With nothing noteworthy about it? They will be (already are) totally drowned out by the discussions already going on around the internet. I have about a dozen such web sites already bookmarked.

::Now, about your choice of correspondent: I'm flattered, of course. But, when you needed to find a liberal friend, you came to ''Conservapedia''? Well, perhaps you contacted 97 other liberal acquaintances, besides EJamesW, AlanE, and myself. Actual liberals are a rare and endangered species here.

::About my politics. You put in some question, that you seem to have deleted, asking whether it's really true that I'm a liberal. Well, compared to most people, especially the admins, here at CP, I am way far left of the norm. But relative to the outside world, I am rather middle-of-the-road. (I can't speak for EJamesW or Alan, but I would guess that they are similar.) I actually hold a lot of conservative and "traditional" views, though that doesn't seem to mean much at CP. For example, I am appalled that we have a President who is a serial adulterer and is on his third marriage. And, all through the cold war, I was on the side of freedom, not the side of the murderous Communist thugs who were out to conquer the world. I believe in American exceptionalism, and believed that the United States was a beacon of liberty to the whole world. I was relieved when the Soviet Union collapsed. But now Russia, the descendant of the Soviet Union, is ruled by Vladimir Putin, a descendant of the Communists, one who invades other countries and fairly openly has his political opponents murdered. I am appalled that our current President doesn't have a problem with this.

::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
:::OK. Thanks for letting me know your decision promptly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:03, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
::::I hope that it is possible to be a social conservative, a fiscal conservative, a political conservative, but still believe in rule of law, quantum mechanics, special relativity, and recent advances in machine learning/artificial intelligence. I never thought of SamHB as being a "liberal." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 18:39, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
OK. SamHB is less on the left spectrum that I thought. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:11, 2 April 2017 (EDT)
:Doesn't help him though, does it, when some ''petty tyrant of the field'' decides to burn a conversation and give him a day off just because they can. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 00:24, 3 April 2017 (EDT)
::Sigh. Semper idem. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:25, 3 April 2017 (EDT)
:::Well, actually, he can't. No, to be precise, he ''can'', but he ''may not''. It's interesting that this happened shortly after I complained about abuse of block power [[Talk:Main_Page#Abuse_of_block_power|here]], and his reply seemed to acknowledge that it was not within his authority to block me—"That's not up to me at this point, but to one of the admins".

:::I suspect that Northwest is probably feeling a bit guity about having violated his position of trust so blatantly by blocking someone over a content dispute. He may not realize that I am well respected by the admins; I've been around a while and they know me well. I've had some run-ins with Ed Poor, and he blocked me a couple of times for my abrasiveness, but we have since made peace. If Northwest looks at my block log, he will see that, until this week, none of my blocks involved "liberal POV". Mostly they were by people who had a rather checkered history of honesty, or for totally bogus claims of sockpuppetry with people I had never heard of.

:::It's ironic that all this happened only 2-1/2 hours after I put the lyrics to ''America'' on my user page, specifically calling out the lines
::::Confirm thy soul in self-control,
::::Thy liberty in law!
:::That was aimed at Donald Trump, who seems to have little self-control, little respect for law, little knowledge of American history and traditions, and little knowledge of, and respect for, the teachings of Jesus. But, as we say in this country: if the shoe fits, wear it.

:::In a few days I may go over to his talk page and try to make peace. To try to convince him that we can make CP a better place if we all work together. And that it would be better not to toss around the words "liberal" and "leftist" with such wild abandon, because it just makes CP look less respectable and trustworthy to do so. And that one doesn't need to be a "leftist" to oppose murderous thug Vladimir Putin.

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:38, 13 April 2017 (EDT)

::::To make it short and to the point: You were warned before about your behavior on CP and you didn't want to listen (specifically regarding numbers 9 and 10 - ''especially'' number 10, which you violated several times before - at [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia|How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]]), so that's how you got the day off. To read how both you and AlanE are talking about this, you both come off sounding like the liberal media pundits who complain about Donald Trump's travel ban against specific Islamic countries and his proposed illegal immigration ban.

::::Your comment "And that it would be better not to toss around the words "liberal" and "leftist" with such wild abandon, because it just makes CP look less respectable and trustworthy to do so" also reflects exactly the type of things liberals say regarding CP (at the [[Liberal Style]] article, under Debate and rhetorical tactics):
:::::"Like to use the phrase 'reflects poorly on the site' when talking about the liberal articles on Conservapedia."
::::And numbers 5 and 6 under Liberalism in the same article:
:::::"Calling the use of the term liberal when used in a derogatory context 'stupid'"
:::::"Will often deny being a liberal, or will claim to be a 'true conservative', while spouting liberal and Democrat talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles."
::::And under Personal traits (again in the same article):
:::::"Concealing one's liberal views rather than admitting them"
::::But at day's end, this is still Conservapedia, ''not'' Liberalpedia. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:11, 14 April 2017 (EDT)

::I could parody being a liberal, but when pressed to the wall all my inner contradictions and stupidity would come out, which might then just seal the deal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]] 13:15, 13 April 2017 (EDT)
:::I puzzled by several aspects of this. By "parody being a liberal" do you mean make fun of liberals with over-the-top humor, the way Stephen Colbert used to parody conservatives on his "Colbert Report"? (He shows his politics in a different way in his present show.) Or do you mean "Convincingly pretend to be a liberal, in a way that would trick one into believing that I am sincere?" Any intelligent and well-informed person (which you are) can do that. What do you mean by "my inner contradictions and stupidity would come out"? That you would have a hard time convincingly imitating the stupidity of liberals (liberals and conservatives both have consistency problems) so that your ruse would be unsuccessful? Or that your personal "contradictions and stupidity" would make you unable to do the job? And what do you mean by "seal the deal"? Succeed at your imitation? Or let others succeed at unmasking your attempts? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:51, 13 April 2017 (EDT)
::::You covered all bases quite well. Parodying a liberal is not hard. If you come to a juncture where you're at a loss, and you have to think "''What would be the appropriate liberal response?''", you just say something nonsensical and contradictory, and it would pass. That's what I mean by seal the deal - there would be no question I'm a liberal speaking from the heart. [[Poe's Law]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]] 19:07, 14 April 2017 (EDT)

== Vaping ==

(No, I'm not referring to E-cigarettes.) Cons, please do not vape other people's talk pages, OK? I know that what you recently vaped here was insignificant, but please don't do it. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:14, 14 April 2017 (EDT)

== 9th anniversary ==

Congratulations on your 9th anniversary here! Despite disagreements, edit wars, and 19 blocks, you are still around! I know a number of people don't agree with you on various topics, and even I disagree on some things you believe (most notably, macroevolution) but I appreciate that you have "stuck it out" and are still trying to make CP better. I also appreciate your insights on matters which have been influenced by things long before I was here. You were also the only one when I first joined who seemed to be making an effort to help me learn the ropes and how things work here (an effort I am trying to pass on to others now). Thanks for your efforts! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 11:49, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Claims of familiarity with CP guidelines ==

Since you claim to be familiar with, and "well versed in", Conservapedia's guidelines (per your edit on [[User talk:1990'sguy|1990'sguy's talk page]]), here's a refresher from the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Member Accounts|Member Accounts]] section:

* Conservapedia is a politically conservative, Christian encyclopedia project. We welcome opposing views, but are not interested in users who come here only to change articles to their ideology (''as you've insisted on doing with selected articles here as of late to change them to fit liberal POV, despite your claims otherwise - ed.''), or disrupt by constantly arguing on the article talk pages that we are "wrong" (''likewise - ed.''). Trolling comments, incivility and personal attacks can be removed from discussion pages.
* We are not a debate forum, but a project. If you contribute, where you can, by adding substantive content, abiding by our Guidelines, we welcome you. If not, remember it is a big Internet, and you should go where you can support the goals of that project.

[[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:37, 28 April 2017 (EDT)
:Go write up a Popeye episode, son. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:43, 28 April 2017 (EDT)
::This applies to you too, JohnZ, just so you know. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:13, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

== re: Liberal article ==

I made some revisions to the [[liberal]] article to make it more accurate. And made some talk page edits indicating my reasons for the changes. For example, liberalism is not communism or Nazism. [[Attila the Hun]] was not a liberal, etc.

If you want to review the article periodically to make sure my changes stick, it would be appreciated.

I will pay you the courtesy of not having all or most liberals equated with Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler, Mao or Stalin. I would ask you, however, to have the decency to not publicize private emails.

By the way, I have been to Framingham, MA and got along with all the people I met. The people I met in Framingham did not give me Nazi salutes. And I did not see any Nazi flags on front lawns. Nor did I see any statues of Lenin while on Massachusetts thruways or while in Framingham. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:45, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

:No Nazi flags? No Lenin statues? Not one? I guess Massachusetts is going soft. It must be all the political correctness or something. :-) I haven't seen any of that stuff in my trips to upstate New York either. Or in my trips to Iowa, Arizona, Arkansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Virginia, Alabama, Tennessee, or Missouri. What's the world coming to?

:Seriously, I have noticed your recent attempts to inject some reasonableness into certain articles, and I appreciate that. (I'm serious this time!) In fact, I have recently noticed some rather decent articles here. But plenty of awful ones, like "liberal" and its ilk. I'm trying to improve the good ones, while ignoring the awful ones. But you need to know that my ability to "make changes stick" is very limited, though I'll try. See my block log, the history of the [[Pussy Riot]] article, and the last half of the "A liberal is wanted for an online dialogue" section above (as well as a paragraph below), to see what I'm talking about. So someone might undo anything I do (and block me in violation of policy). But I'll try.

:I don't consider "not having all or most liberals equated with Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler, Mao or Stalin" to be a courtesy to me personally. It's a courtesy to Conservapedia. But I appreciate it in any case.

:About the email: Perhaps I should have redacted the email address, but I considered that the name was so nondescript that it must have been a garbage gmail account that you created. If you have gotten spam on that account, I apologize. However, I think the general content of emails can't be considered private. (Just ask Hillary Clinton!) And most of the message was just hawking your own pages right here at CP, along with one link to a vimeo clip to an old Star Trek thing.

:Peace, my non-Nazi non-Communist friend, [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:45, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

:::Follow-up: I have redacted the email more thoroughly; I assume from Cons's vaping that that is what he wanted me to to. He can't possibly have wanted me to conceal the ''fact that he sent it'', since he openly announced it in advance on this page.

::But if you do anything that goes against Conservapedia policy (as you've done repeatedly over time, and even recently), you ''will'' stand a chance of being blocked again (and despite what you otherwise think, blocking someone for violating CP policy is ''not'' "illegal"), so don't go thinking you can game the system just so you can get your way and get liberal POV imposed on this site. All you're doing every time you bring this up is that you're showing you prefer to ignore the rules of this site (and your history here, once again, proves that). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:43, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::SamHB, I look at your restoration and its skepticism that more than one person has edited using the User: Conservative account.

:::The edit log shows that the User: Conservative account created the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] article. The edit log shows that the User: Conservative account created the [[Gay bowel syndrome]] and [[Homosexuality and Parasites]] articles. No intelligent person believes that these articles are the work of one person. The footnoting style is radically different for the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] article and frankly the article lacked machismo as soon as it used the alphabet soup of LGBTQ. Frankly, I don't even know what all those letters stand for. Why is the Q even used? It seems redundant.

:::You still not reconciled this blaring incongruently which was even noticed by a non-fan of the User: Conservative account. There must be some reason why you are not coming up with a reasonable explanation of the incongruity? What is it?

:::By the way, the explanation is so simple. More than one person has edited using the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:45, 30 May 2017 (EDT)

== re: "I'm going to organize this in broad categories. That's the right thing to do for articles about scientists" ==

Bill Nye is an engineer. He is not a scientist. Stop engaging in credential inflation! I realize that evolutionism is exceedingly weak. But try to not engage in desperation tactics and make efforts to control yourself. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:46, 1 June 2017 (EDT)
:Well, it's the right thing for articles about science popularizers too.

:Sorry, I should have said "science popularizers". The fact that he's an engineer is irrelevant.

:I think the suggestion that I need to make efforts to control myself is a little harsh for such an infraction as calling him a scientist instead of a science popularizer. It doesn't strike me as anywhere near as great a failure of self-control as spending years pretending to be multiple people, or spending years making tens of thousands (hundreds of thousands? millions?) of edits, deletions, renamings, cross-links, and ineffably pointless changes to image sizes, mostly for an utterly obsessive corpus of foolishness.

:But we're still friends. I enjoy sparring with you. And I've got more stuff to do in reply to your previous edit on this page. But first, I need to change an image size.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:18, 1 June 2017 (EDT)

== talk page second archive ==

You user talk page is insanely long. I think you are overdue for [[User talk:SamHB/archive 2]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:03, 2 June 2017 (EDT)

:You're right. Done. Thank you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:12, 3 June 2017 (EDT)
== Nice job ==
I read your user page archives - really entertaining, and they made me realized how wretched I was to write articles for Cons, even if they did get on the Main Page. Please, don't stop believing in relativity. Hold onto that feeling.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

== re: well-intentioned and level-headed people ==

You wrote: "You need to know that user "Conservative" ''is not in any way typical of the people we have here''. There are a lot of well-intentioned and level-headed people here, and you could have been a member of that community."

:First of all, User: Conservative is not merely one editor. So your petty personal attacks are lamer than you think. It is readily apparent that User: Conservative is more than editor. For example, the glaring topical/footnoting/writing style differences in the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] article and some of the other homosexuality articles by the User: Conservative account. You have never explained these glaring differences.

:Secondly, you have yet to find a single factual error in any of the articles written by the User:Conservative account. You merely dislike some of the articles because they conflict with some of your errant/miscreant, liberal notions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:29, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
:::Actually, I've been meaning to rip you to shreds, yet again, over that weird fantasy of yours. But there's usually something more urgent to do. Especially now, with the "abcqwe" issue. Trying to keep him on board is much more important than yet another go-around with you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:30, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
::Your name is <name redacted>, everybody who has ever posted on this site knows your name is <name redacted>, people who died 100 years ago know your name is <name redacted>. People who will not be born until the 22nd century knows your name is <name redacted>. Insult your own intelligence(not hard to do I know) but the rest of us are not falling for it.
:::Actually, that's not my name, assuming that you were referring to me (SamHB) when you wrote "you" above. Maybe you are confusing me with someone else.
:::In any case, it is considered poor form to "out" or "dox" someone on a wiki. And the identity and personal info about the person you are perhaps referring to are well known. I suspect that you are about to be blocked, if you haven't already been blocked as I write this. And what you wrote above will likely be vaped, though I will restore it (with the name redacted) if that happens. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:30, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
::::
::::SanHV, why is the footnoting for [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] different from many other [[User: Conservative]] articles?

:::: I found out this month what the Q is in the acronym LGBTQ stands for. Why does the article [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] use the term LGBTQ, but the other homosexuality articles created by the User: Conservtive account not use that term?
:::::Probably because you are a klutz with your keyboard, as indicated by your spelling of "Conservtive". It stands for "queer", by the way.[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Is the term LGBTQ one that I would likely use? For example, how often does the word "gay" appear in Conservapedia's homosexuality articles?
:::::I wouldn't know. I'd have to read them. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Is the term "persecution of homosexuals" one that I would likely use? Why was there an internal battle within the User: Conservative account about the title of the article [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]]? For example, why was the title of that article changed/moved?
:::::Because you like to do that kind of thing, as anyone who looks at your contributions knows. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Liberals dominate the field of psychology. Do liberals excel in the field of psychology in order to be able to discern that more than one editor has used the User:Conservative account?
:::::I doubt it. I doubt that, by and large, they give a hoot about the size of your "collective". [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
::::If liberals do excel in the discipline of psychology, why do so many psychology experiments and journal articles have an inability to be replicated? See: [http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248 Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test], ''Nature'', August 27, 2015

::::RobS, 1990sguy and Karajou have been told privately that more than one editor has used the User: Conservative account. There was an attempt to make one of these editors an editor of the User: Conservative account, but Aschlafly would not permit it.
:::::Can you send me the email in which Andy said that? And, by "one of these editors" do you mean one of RobS, 1990sguy and Karajou? All you would have to do is privately send them your CP password. Andy would not know. In fact, if you mail me your password, at sam4557@gmail.com, I could become a member of your collective! The "sockpuppet" rule prohibits one person from having multiple CP accounts, but there's no rule about giving out your password. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

::::Lastly, you couldn't rip a wet paper bad to shreds, let alone rip of member of the User: Conservative account to shreds. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:04, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
By the way, a 2006 international survey reported that 30% of the Swiss reject evolution which is one of the highest national percentages in Europe.[http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Home/Archive/Swiss_drag_knuckles_accepting_evolution.html?cid=70292] [[Switzerland]] has one of the very highest standards of living in Europe.

Denmark has one of the highest rates of belief in evolution in Europe (See: Jon D. Miller; Eugenie C. Scott; Shinji Okamoto (11 August 2006). "Public Acceptance of Evolution". Science. 313 (5788): 765–766.).

The Swiss are known for yodeling.
::I'm extremely fascinated, delighted, and enchanted to hear that. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
The Danes are known for bestiality! A 2015 ''Jerusalem Post'' article indicates "[[Copenhagen]] has for long been the bestiality capital of Europe and has attracted many tourists mainly visiting to have sex with animals. Legislation against this practice was only enacted this year."[http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Suggestions-for-the-anti-Semitic-slurs-list-434293] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:28, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:There are some worthwhile projects that I want to accomplish. I am not going to continue this latest battle between us. It doesn't make sense to respond to every slight someone directs your way. I am moving on. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::I regret using the word miscreant above. It wasn't necessary.
:::No hard feelings. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)

::I also agree with you that it would have been nice to retain the editor who recently departed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:57, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::::What??? To whom were you referring??? The one who was "showboating" and annoying Karajou and VargasMilan2 [sic]? I assumed you thought it was abcqwe, and I could find no evidence that he communicated with Karajou or VargasMilan. Who was it? Seriously, I'm curious. I'd like to know whether it was someone that I also disliked. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I just discovered that someone blocked [[User:Abcqwe]]. He made a number of posts to talk pages that irritated people. It seems as if he was spoiling for a fight and/or trying to gain attention. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:13, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::You just discovered that now?????? Really? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::::For the record, he blocked himself indefinitely, but I changed the block to five years because indefinite blocks are problematic. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:23, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::OK. He was a provocateur at the end. No great loss. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:57, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::But, was it necessary to delete his user and talk pages? Or is this just CP policy? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:24, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::No, it is not policy. Please restore them. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:40, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
In terms of webmaster best practices, deleting low value pages is a beneficial thing to do. In 2017, Conservapedia is going to delete abandoned user pages and their respective talk pages. Andy has given the green light about this matter and he is not changing his mind about it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:00, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::It is a "best practice" only because you have the technical permission, as an administrator, to do whatever you please. You can delete whatever you want, vape whatever you want, and block whomever you want, at any time. You even burned down ''this'' page on 10 January, 2015. I was never under the illusion that you would honor my request to restore his pages. And I can't help noticing that, shortly after you explained this "best practice", you deleted a few pages just to make the point. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:59, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
:Re: annoying Karajou and VargasMilan2 - see: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=1351118&oldid=1350637 He sometimes signed his posts "Nate". As far as VargaMilan2, see conversation I moved to the community portal. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
::I think [[User:Abcqwe]] began to be more of a provocateur after I posted this article [[American liberalism and 21st century political losses]]. Given that he is an American liberal, it probably triggered his backlash/bitterness/resentment.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:33, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I don't think Abcqwe annoyed Karajou or VargasMilan while he actually edited. They wrote what they did in response to the news that he was leaving. On top of that, it seems that Abcqwe uses a lot of sarcasm and sarcastic humor, and I think his "confession" displayed some of it. He also seems to have overexaggerated. Personally, I think he should have been more frank in his post, and I don't think his sense of humor helped at all. Many people probably got the impression that he was a parodist/liberal, while I think it is more believable that he was a more moderate person who originally joined in good faith. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:06, 6 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I seem to be the invisible man regarding Abcque. I was the one who tried to keep a lid on his vandalism. Did I need help? Yes. Did I ask for it?Yes. Did I get any from the lads wallowing in their anti liberal groupthinkfest, not giving a stuff for truth? No I did not. Do I still think that CP should be vehicle for information for homesckoolers? Yes. Is it ? No. Do I give a damn? Strangely, yes I do.
::::Sorry Sam. I have tried other forums to change an article title to allow me to correct the article. I want [[Joseph Belloc]] changed to [[Hilaire Belloc]]. Its simple really but the lads are too busy doing what they like doing. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 03:08, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

== Border fence for the unfree state of Massachusetts ==

[[File:Prison.jpg|thumbnail|200px|center|Border fence for the unfree state of [[Massachusetts]] designed to keep people from leaving the state. See also: [[Essay: Free States Movement|Free States Movement]] ]]
Actually, I haven't seen any fences like that, except at MCI<ref>Massachusetts Correctional Institution</ref> Concord, where I go to visit my cousin (you know, the one who is a member of your collective; they let people edit Conservapedia from the slammer), who is serving a 5-year stretch for not being a [[Essay: Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course#Addendum|"svelte Bible believing young earth creationist like Chuck Norris"]].
{{clear}}

==Joking about TAR==

Question: Will TAR return? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:24, 8 June 2017 (EDT)
:I will consider it ''only'' if he agrees to completely stop link-spamming and adding categories. If not, I or someone else will be forced to block him. I agree that he made some good changes, but the bad far outweighed the good. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:00, 8 June 2017 (EDT)
::I don't believe TAR is coming back. I was merely joking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])

That joke is not the least bit funny. I doubt that 1990'sguy appreciated the humor. As I'm sure you recall, during the period when TAR was being removed from the site (which is chronicled at [[User_talk:DavidB4#Cleaning_up_after_the_blocked_users]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive60#Re:_Cleanup_work_post_TheAmericanRedoubt]], you repeatedly implied that you were somehow in private communication with him, and that, because of this, you could reassure everyone that he had no intention of coming back. But since you have a reputation for pretending to be in secret communication with people, just as you pretend to be multiple people, no one believed you. So Andy had to revoke his rights.

I don't believe he's coming back either, but not because of some private communication. It's because he would be shown the door instantly.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:33, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
:At this point, I really am not concerned if you believe I have had various private conversations with people or if you believe more than one person has edited using the [[User: Conservative]] account.

:It is probably best if we keep our communications cordial, but very limited in the future.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, 10 June 2017 (EDT)

::OK. The "ripping you to shreds" that I had planned will not occur. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:31, 11 June 2017 (EDT)
:::A few points:

:::1. You called my liar and I have never lied at this wiki. More than one person has edited using the User: Conservative account. You may not accept this fact as being true, but that is your problem and not mine. Aschafly is certainly aware that the User: Conservative account has had more than one editor use it and Karajou is aware as well. I did a checker user on the User: Conservative account and at least one other editor has used the account in the last 3 months.

:::2. I should have been more cordial in my last communication with you. After all is said and done, I have decided to communicate far less on talk pages due to competing priorities. So any absence of communication with you isn't personal. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:36, 11 June 2017 (EDT)

== From warrior to diplomat ==

"Warrior to Diplomat

In his previous roles, Harald had focused primarily on marshaling the troops to defeat the competition. Now he found himself devoting a surprising amount of time to influencing a host of external constituencies, including regulators, the media, investors, and NGOs. His support staff was bombarded with requests for his time: Could he participate in industry or government forums sponsored by the government affairs department? Would he be willing to sit for an interview with an editor from a leading business publication? Could he meet with a key group of institutional investors? Some of these groups he was familiar with; others not at all. But what was entirely new to him was his responsibility not just to interact with various stakeholders but also to proactively address their concerns in ways that meshed with the firm’s interests. Little of Harald’s previous experience prepared him for the challenges of being a corporate diplomat.

What do effective corporate diplomats do? They use the tools of diplomacy—negotiation, persuasion, conflict management, and alliance building—to shape the external business environment to support their strategic objectives. In the process they often find themselves collaborating with people with whom they compete aggressively in the market every day.

To do this well, enterprise leaders need to embrace a new mind-set—to look for ways that interests can or do align, understand how decisions are made in different kinds of organizations, and develop effective strategies for influencing others."[https://hbr.org/2012/06/how-managers-become-leaders]

Harald made the transition. The Apostle Paul made the transition. I wonder if someone else can? :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:50, 11 June 2017 (EDT)

:I '''think''' you are making some good points in what you say, and it's certainly true that my ways of interacting with people on the internet (and in real life too) could use some improvement. But I'm having a hard time following your examples. I don't know who "Harald" is/was. Some ancient Nordic king? I know who the Apostle Paul was, but I don't see his situation as being relevant to business, the media, investors, or NGO's. And my situation isn't relevant to those things either. At least you didn't bring in Sun-Tzu. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 17:20, 19 June 2017 (EDT)
::SamHB, I was merely saying that I have decided to be more diplomatic.
:::Oh! I was reading way too much into what you were saying. (I often do that.) So you were saying that '''you''' want to "make the transition" and do a better job of persuasion and conflict management. OK, I will try to do the same.
:::As an example, I will try to calm GinnyS down. I think she may be cruisin' for a bruisin'. I will try to explain that you are an acquired taste, and that personal attacks are ''never'' allowed. And I'll try to make that same point to JohnZ, for when he comes back. He is in a situation that is similar in some ways but different in other ways. I think that, due to my longevity, I have gotten a certain amount of respect among the young-uns, and I can use that respect to get them to behave better.
:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:00, 30 June 2017 (EDT)

::As an aside, as far as Trump, I have never seen a president attacked as much as Trump and with such venom. On the other hand, I have never seen a president counterpunch as much too (and sometimes in a very personal way). It is nothing new though. Burr/Hamilton had many exchanges of words before their duel. And Lincoln was viciously attacked by his critics if memory serves. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:22, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:::Trump deserves every bit of what he gets. He knows next to nothing about American government, institutions, history, or traditions, seems to know very little about Christianity (though I realize I'm suppose to remove the plank from my own eye before making accusations like that), and seems to know very little about the Christian notions of generosity, forgiveness, humility, and contrition. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:00, 30 June 2017 (EDT)

== If you know of any good faith editors who have edited in the last 5 years and... ==

If you know of any good faith editors who have edited in the last 5 years and they are not on my list at [[User talk:Wikignome72]], please let me know.

I relied on: the recent changes list, my memory, user talk page edits for some of the active or formerly active editors. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:11, 19 June 2017 (EDT)

:Actually, yes, I could contribute a lot of names of people to keep. As you may know, I do a lot of "homework" or "research" here at CP, and I have a pretty good idea of who's who. Perhaps second only to you. But I think it's an unnecessary exercise to delete the old pages. And I sure hope your current deletion binge (well, deletion suggestion binge) isn't a reaction to my complaining, above, that you should not have deleted abcqwe's page.

:By the way, I have been trying to make an addition to Wikignome72's page, saying essentially the same thing, for over 3 hours, getting edit conflicts each time. I'll wait until you come up for air.

:If you actually want me to come up with a list of people that should be protected, I could do that. I would probably do it by going through the edit histories of all the articles that I have worked on and think are good, and noting everyone who contributed (who isn't a jerk).

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 17:20, 19 June 2017 (EDT)

== Some people our friend ought to keep ==

First preliminary, your quizzes are cute.

Second preliminary, I really think he ought to be welcomed, even if he is just you. I don't know why you keep deleting my attempts to welcome him. I like to keep up the pretense that he's a real person.

Third preliminary, I had no idea there was so much garbage in the user base. But I hope you don't think you are saving disk space; you aren't. Nothing ever really goes away in a computer database. Except "vaping", which you aren't doing.

I see the purge is in full swing. I've gone over the list, and there are a few people I recognize as having been, one way or another, significant people in CP's history. I'd like you (him, her) to consider restoring them. Some people left in anger (and at least one had some serious criticism of you personally.) But they are nevertheless part of our history. People won't know how we got here if they can't see our history. I've argued in the recent past that we should keep the "Parthian shot" of someone who has been blocked, so that, if they try to come back, we will know why they were kicked out and why they should not be allowed back in. But it's more than that. We need to remember the conflicts that have gone on in the past. Well, some of them; many people were just losers and deserve to be forgotten. Heck, isn't there a page called something like "Examples of censorship by the 'tolerant'"? I haven't looked at it lately, but we may be damaging it. We need to keep at least some of those examples around, don't we?

So here are a few people I've found so far. Is it possible to bring them back? I think it is, unless they have been "vaped", which I don't think they have been.
*DanH Wasn't he a sysop and well-respected person? Wasn't he the chess player? I may misremember the details [I sure do!], but he was an important part of our history. I seem to have confused him with ...
*DeanS Wasn't he a sysop and well-respected person? Wasn't he the chess player? And the Mormon who was concerned about whether there would be intolerance of Mormon? (Answer: none at all.) Wasn't he the person whose wife died? Wasn't he the geologist whose user name was originally "crocoite" (an interesting mineral), and then changed it in order to comply with the username policy? I may misremember the details, but he was an important part of our history.
*MatthewQ I see there's been some back-and-forth on this. He was a somewhat interesting science contributor.
*StaceyT Yeah, she was unhappy. But we need to see what sorts of things made people unhappy.
*Ymmotrojam He was a big player at one time.
*Coolguy Yes, he was recent, and p*ss*d some people off and was shown the door. But we need to see that history.
*And, of course, you won't delete Philip J Rayment, right?
There are others that haven't been deleted (yet).

Did you know that DeborahB created her account when Conservapedia was only 6 days old? She was a true "founding mother".

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:20, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
:I will restore DanH.

:MathewQ mere had "useful links" on his user page so there is no need to restore that, but I kept his user talk page.

:StacyT was contentious and probably a sock of a man if I recall. Definitely a loser. Not restoring.

:Ymmotrojam deleted his own user page and talk page. I am respecting his wishes and keeping those pages deleted.

:Coolguy was a person who was not willing to engage in dialogue. Like many on the left, he was ignorant of history and/or wanted to engage in revisionism. He just wanted to pontificate. There are plenty of reasons to believe that various founding fathers were not Christians. But when you look at the state constitutions and various other important historical considerations, it is very apparent that Coolguy was pushing a very ignorant/false narrative of American history. I not going to bother to restore his user page or talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:31, 20 June 2017 (EDT)

== Re: restoration of DanH and PJR. Looking into other restoration ==

The user pages of [[User:DanH]] and [[User:Philip J. Rayment]] (PJR) were so boring, it gave me an excuse to delete them. But I really shouldn't have deleted them. And I just discovered that TK made those pages boring with his revisions to those pages.

So I restored those pages to their former glory. I did add a link to my atheism article from PJR's talk page by adding a bracket around his use of the word "atheists" on his user page. I am still in communication with PJR and his wife, and I know that PJR would not mind my small change.

I am looking into the DeanS restoration. I did not delete it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:22, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
:[[User:DeanS]] user page history has been restored along with TK's replacing of the blanking by DeanS with a retired template. The retired template looks better. I don't think DeanS would have minded.

:DeanS deleted his user talk page. I am going to keep it deleted.

:I think DeanS left due to ill health, but it could have been due to disputes with evangelical Christians on the website (He was a Mormon) or some other reason. I have no idea. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:32, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
::As far as DeanS, I did a little detective work and restored his talk page to the version I think he would have wanted. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
:::Thanks for attending to these details. As far as leaving the last version of something up, when it just says "retired", there's nothing wrong with that, as long as data squirrels like myself can look through the history and see what led to the retirement. That's what we should have—a historical record. (Excuse me, an historical record.) [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:34, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
::::I think PJR left due to a battle over gun owner rights/public safety controversies. But perhaps that was merely the final straw. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:41, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
I restored the user page of [[User:JacobB]] as well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:58, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
::I removed the striked out text from PJR's user page. It looked sloppy and I didn't see any real purpose in it. Next time I talk to PJR, I will see if he is fine with the edit. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:32, 20 June 2017 (EDT)

==Taking some of your advice==

Greetings, Cons!

The long message you left for me yesterday was extremely interesting. I had to go back a long way (June 29, 2015) to find what you were referring to and refresh my memory of the issue. It's too bad that yesterday's message was lost in a wiki server malfunction.<ref>This seems to happen a lot with your contributions.</ref> The "advice" that you seem to have been referring to was that you should direct your persuasive energies into ways that are more likely to have an actual effect on people, such as human interaction, rather than writing Conservapedia articles. And you mentioned "opportunity cost", that is, the cost of one approach versus another in terms of actual payoff.

You ended with your usual argument against evolution, giving two web references. The first was to a page that had a religious web site in its name. As you know, I totally ignore any arguments about scientific topics appearing in religious web sites or religious publications. If one can't make an argument about a scientific topic (as opposed to, say, a topic of morality or ethics), without saying "because the Bible says so", I'm not interested.

The second web site was [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohp4dmkOmKE this]. So I had to look. Though it was clear right from the start (though not from the URL itself) that it was a religious web site—it was from the PNN News and Ministry Network, and it also had front-page references to http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org and http://creation.com. It had five "questions for the evolution believer". I had to sit through a guy with a very irritating voice listing the questions. (Aren't there 15 questions elsewhere? This guy isn't even trying!)
:The first was about abiogenesis. We all know that the question of abiogenesis, while interesting and having no known solution at present (or perhaps ever), lies outside of the issues of evolution/Biblical creation and young-Earth/old-Earth cosmology. So I had to sit through 55 seconds (opportunity cost!) of that nonsense.
:The second one was about "language", making the point that the DNA code satisfies all the accepted criteria for being a language, yet is unique among languages in that it was not developed by humans. (Not true, by the way.) And so somehow this meant that evolution must not have happened. Huh?
:It went downhill rapidly from there. The third was about sexual reproduction, and how "wasted energy" involved in this meant that evolution could not be correct. Or something. I stopped listening.
All things considered, sort of fun. But now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take your advice about taking my advice, and consider the opportunity cost of replying to you on my talk page. So long for now. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:19, 7 July 2017 (EDT)
::Essentially, I said that I am going to use my time better so I have a greater positive impact in life. Recently, I am more on track except for a comment on main page talk today.

::In July of 2017, I will be working on a Conservapedia related project. But you will see no edits being performed by the User: Conservative account in relation to this project.

::“Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate.” - [[Sun Tzu]]
:::Well, that's some advice I am '''not''' going to take. But if you think it works for you (I disagree) go right ahead. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:58, 8 July 2017 (EDT)

::此（译注：用间）兵之要，三军之所恃而动也 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:12, 7 July 2017 (EDT)
::::I sent you a sour email recently about you publishing one of my emails recently. Looking back, I shouldn't have sent it.

::::No hard feelings. Enjoy your summer. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:45, 10 July 2017 (EDT)

OK, I got the email. I want to apologize for any behavior that may have led you to believe I can't be trusted with private information. Let me assure you that I am a trustworthy person when I know what information is being kept confidential.

The email that you are referring to is presumably the message listed above somewhere (or maybe it's been archived by now), in which I divulged both the sender and the content. Of course I divulged the fact that you sent the message--you had already said publicly that you were going to send it. I assumed that the email name of the sender was not secret because it looked like a "throwaway" name of the sort that people often create. In fact, you have sent other emails to people with various names. I assumed that you don't consider them secret. If I harmed you by revealing the name, I apologize.

After you complained, I redacted everything in the email listed above except the content. I believed that the content was typical of the things you write all over the place at Conservapedia. It was largely references to your various articles, as is your writing style. If the particular content of that message was something you wanted protected, I apologize.

If you wish to vape the redacted message above on this page, go ahead; I won't complain or restore it. (As you know, I usually oppose vaping, especially on users' talk pages, and sometimes restore the vaped material.)

So I need to know just how much secrecy you desire:
*Do you want me not to reveal even the fact of having received a message? Even if you said, here on this talk page, that you are going to send it or have sent it?
*Do you want me not to reveal the user ID of the sender?
*Do you want me not to reveal the content?
*Do you want me not even to say that I have replied, or otherwise give any general information about what was discussed?
At the risk of violating the last point, I suspect that the project you referred to (which you also mentioned above on this page) is something I wouldn't be interested in. I know that, in the past, your projects have been things like an anti-evolution pamphlet. Now if you want to collaborate on an anti-creationist pamphlet (you know, things like "15 questions that creationists can't answer") by all means, sign me up.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:07, 13 July 2017 (EDT)

:At Conservapedia, I am not going to discuss any of the off wiki activities of the editors who use the User: Conservative account. This is the simplest solution to potential problems caused by the intolerant left.

:The simplest solution to the email issue is for me to no longer send you any emails. But perhaps I will change my mind on this matter. I can certainly pray about this matter. If we were to communicate privately it would probably be Skype communication due to constraints upon my time. I am going to strongly endeavor to be more efficient with my time and communicating via email can be more time intensive. But you have indicated that you are not interested in Skype communications so in all likelihood, I doubt there will be future private communications between us.

:Again, no hard feelings. I will certainly endeavor to keep my communications with you at Conservapedia cordial. And again, enjoy your summer. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:43, 13 July 2017 (EDT)
::I just sent you an email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:43, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
:::I sent you an additional email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:20, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
::::I will keep my promise of confidentiality. So let me just say that there has been some traffic on the sam4557 email account of late. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 09:29, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::I just sent you another email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:10, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
::::::I sent you a small request via email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:34, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
== re: polishing up my grammar and writing skills ==

I sent you a private email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:32, 31 July 2017 (EDT)

==For Cons==
I normally find "listicles" ("The 15 worst beaches", etc.) on the internet to be extremely stupid. But [https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/whats-hot/38-things-no-man-over-40-should-own/ss-AAoKipb?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral#image=2 this one] was actually entertaining. I especially liked [https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/whats-hot/38-things-no-man-over-40-should-own/ss-AAoKipb?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral#image=9 item number 8]. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:33, 2 August 2017 (EDT)
::I am cutting back on entertainment. I made a couple of promises to people that require stricter time management.

::In terms of time management, I shouldn't have done any Conservapedia editing today. But I decided to get back on track.

::"Top performers make mistakes, commit errors, and get off track just like everyone else. The difference is that they get back on track as quickly as possible." - How to Build a New Habit: This is Your Strategy Guide by James Clear[http://jamesclear.com/habit-guide]

::There are so many internet cat videos, but so little time. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
I did a little bit of additional editing to reflect some significant changes relative to some of the articles I have created in the past. But I really shouldn't have done that.

But I am getting back on track in terms of some important promises.

However, I will not be editing Conservapedia for 66 days (see this interesting study: [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.674/full How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world]). You can hold me to this. On October 7, 2017, I will let you know how things went in terms of new habit creation and bad habit cessation.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:34, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

::I find it odd that all the many members of the User:Conservative account are all going to be busy for the next 66 days, is this an admission that there is only one of you? Listed in the differences between Wikipedia and Conservapedia is the respect for a users talk page. So what is this about?
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SamHB&curid=133755&action=history]
Not a lot of respect for the rules here, but then again the rules have never applied to you have they?--[[User:JoshO|JoshO]] ([[User talk:JoshO|talk]]) 16:12, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

:Those 66 days just flew by. If you cannot model your habits on your own, perhaps you should try to get help from others? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 06:07, 10 August 2017 (EDT)

::Are you forgetting that more than one editor uses the User:Conservative account and it's the specific editor who said he was taking time off that would be doing it? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 06:30, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
:::AugustO, I am going to get back on track. I will not edit Conservapedia until Sunday, October 15, 2017. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:00, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
AugustO, I am going to get back on track. '''I will not edit Conservapedia until Sunday, October 15, 2017'''
*13:37, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+96)‎ . . 2018 Global Atheist Convention ‎
*13:37, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+125)‎ . . 2018 Global Atheist Convention ‎
*13:19, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+30)‎ . . Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising ‎ (→‎See also) (current)
*13:18, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-12)‎ . . Fundraising ‎ (→‎Religious fundraising vs. atheist/irreligious fundraising) (current)
*13:17, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+17)‎ . . Charity ‎ (→‎See also) (current)
*13:17, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+30)‎ . . Fundraising ‎
*13:16, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-1)‎ . . Fundraising ‎
*13:15, 12 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m Fundraising ‎ (Conservative moved page Fund-raising to Fundraising) --[[User:IMcCleod|IMcCleod]] ([[User talk:IMcCleod|talk]]) 16:18, 12 August 2017 (EDT)

::IMcCleod, do you also assume that only one editor uses the User:Conservative account (even though it has been made clear that it is used by multiple editors)? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:16, 12 August 2017 (EDT)
:::<s>IMcCloud, Christendom is playing a significant role in bringing [[Atheist factions|the quarrelsome]] and socially challenged [[atheist movement]] to its knees and now [[Global atheism statistics|atheists are shrinking in their global influence]].

:::American [[Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising|atheist fundraising]] is now anemic. The atheist activist Lee Moore recently admitted concerning major atheist organizations in the United States: "Most of them are starved for cash. They're downsizing left and right."[http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheist_fundraising_vs._religious_fundraising#Atheist_activist_Lee_Moore:_Donations_to_atheist_organizations_are_down_due_to_infighting_within_the_atheist_movement]

:::While I am pleased to see that the largely despondent atheist movement is imploding while Christendom is going one glorious victory after another (see: [[Atheist pessimism about the atheist movement]] and [[Future of Christianity]]), I have decided to broaden my horizons (And SamHB has played a role in this matter).

:::As tempting as it is to add further information about the current state of affairs concerning the [[atheism vs. Christianity]] topic, I have decided that I must do better in keeping my commitment to be more focused in some of my current endeavors. Therefore, I am going to be completely resolute in this matter and not edit this wiki until October 18, 2017. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])</s>

"AugustO, I am going to get back on track. '''I will not edit Conservapedia until Sunday, October 15, 2017"
*18:01, 15 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+280)‎ . . Millennials, irreligion and obesity ‎ (→‎See also) (current)
*17:54, 15 August 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-25)‎ . . Millennials, irreligion and obesity--[[User:Jaris|Jaris]] ([[User talk:Jaris|talk]]) 18:17, 15 August 2017 (EDT) ‎

==More about Cons==
In a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB#Taking_some_of_your_advice section above] Cons asked for complete secrecy if we are to engage in an email dialog. I gave him that assurance. I have abided by it, and will continue to do so. He then wrote that he had sent me an email.

Other than to say that there has been some traffic on the sam4557 account, I will have nothing to say about any email. Please do not ask about it; I will not reply. Everything I write below is based entirely on material that is publicly visible on this website.

Alert observers may have noticed that I dropped out of sight at about the same time that Cons (first) did. That is entirely a coincidence; there was no "pact" or "challenge". I dropped out because it became clear, from the [[Pussy Riot]] article, that "assistants" / "junior sysops" have been granted absolute power to control editorial content however they see fit, blocking other contributors if it suits them, and that a few of those assistants are actively wielding that power.

Now, about Cons's "pledge" to refrain from editing CP and pursue more productive activities (I have no idea where the 66 days figure comes from), it is clear that, although there has been some good behavior, there has been some backsliding. Various other people have, quite understandably, chided him over this. Cons has apologized and promised to do better, only to have succumbed to temptation again. Longstanding bad habits are difficult to break. I would recommend that people show some Christian forgiveness, forbearance, and understanding as he struggles with this. (This would certainly be easier if Cons had shown more understanding and forbearance toward others in the past.)

But there is something quite revealing about what has been going on. '''He could easily have blamed the backsliding on other members of his "consortium".''' Instead, he owned up to it. This shows, ''the way nothing else can'', that the business of Cons's account being operated by multiple people was utter nonsense. Most sensible people, including myself, saw through this all along. But a few people, as seen above on this page, including sysops who presumably had access to whatever non-public information there might have been, seem to have been totally taken in by this nonsense. Cons was man enough to admit to his failings, and other people should be man enough to accept that this "multiple person" fantasy was just that.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:37, 19 August 2017 (EDT)

:I know you're referring specifically to me regarding the Pussy Riot article, SamHB. You were told on that and other articles (more than once) not to impose a liberal POV on them, but you didn't take heed of that advice and you went ahead anyway in violation of Conservapedia policy, following past behavioral patterns that led to you being blocked numerous times before by other editors. When you also say "various other people" regarding User:Conservative, what you really mean is the same poster using multiple accounts (most of which have since been blocked for sockpuppeteering) to hurl that accusation about the account just being used by one editor as opposed to more than one. Until Conservative says otherwise, I'm going to take his word for it. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:24, 19 August 2017 (EDT)

== Re: SamHB's recent post to his talk page ==

A few things:

'''1.''' The 66 days is based on a journal article in the ''European Journal of Social Psychology'' entitled ''How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world''.[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.674/full]

'''2.''' Sysops/admins have been told that more one person has used the User:Conservative account and I have indicated this multiple times. Sysops/admins have access to the check user function of this wiki which has enabled them to see that the User: Conservative account has been edited from multiple geographic regions (sometimes the account has been edited from more than one geographic region in the same day due to the fact that the account has been used by more than one editor).

It has also been observed that the footnoting style of various User: Conservative edits has been radically different.

In addition, skepticism has been expressed that one of the users of the User: Conservative account would create an article entitled [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]].

'''3.''' SamHB is correct that longstanding bad habits can be difficult to break. While it is true that I had about a week long stretch without editing Conservapedia in early August of 2017, I ended my break from editing this wiki before the 66 days was up.

Since this habit is more entrenched than anticipated, more drastic measures are clearly needed! So this habit will be broken using multiple methods - including a tried and true Marine Corps and Navy Seal method (Push ups if the old habit reemerges!).

My next edit to this wiki will be on Tuesday, October 25, 2017.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:33, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

:There might be things I want to say here, but they will have to wait until the 66 days are up.
:@Cons: You know what you need to do. Or, more precisely, what not to do. If you absolutely have to have some critical change made, feel free to send me an email.
:@everyone else: Please stay away.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:10, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

== Please check your email ==

SamHB, please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:18, 14 September 2017 (EDT)
:I have not looked at my sam4557 email since late August, and do not plan to look at it for 66 days. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:05, 14 September 2017 (EDT)

== Quick note ==

For the next 66 days, I may not strictly adhere to the 66 days editing total fast on Conservapedia editing, but I will at least be on a very restricted diet. :)

I may do a limited amount of main page posts. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:03, 28 September 2017 (EDT)
:I know I have to be very strict about this former pledge. The Apostle Paul says some relevant things about this matter. I am going to write to you about this matter.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
== More than one User: Conservative at Conservapedia ==

<s>Note the footnoting and writing styles in these recent articles written using the [[User: Conservative]] account:

*[[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]

*[[Atheism and mental illness]]

*[[Essay: Was Stephen Paddock an atheist mass killer?]]

The footnoting styles are clearly different between the first/second works and the third work (which is an essay). Why are the footnoting styles different? Because multiple editors have used the User: Conservative account.

Clearly, the [[ad hominem]] attacks against "User: Conservative" and the armchair psychological analysis of "User: Conservative" should be reexamined.

There are scholars that speculate there are multiple writers behind the work commonly associated with [[Sun Tzu]].

"Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate." - Sun Tzu.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])</s>
== A major search engine whose name begins with the letter G, recognizes that certain "atheist gentlemen" have been rattled and overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the "Atheism and ...." heavy artillery barage by the User: Conservative collective ==
[[File:Google recognizes COCD.png|thumbnail|center|800px]]
{{clear}}

<s>For more information, please see:

*[[Essay: Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is an officially recognized mental disorder|Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is an officially recognized mental disorder]]</s>

Talking about obsessions:
{{cquote|My next edit to this wiki will be on Tuesday, October 25, 2017.Conservative (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2017 (EDT)}}
And no, I had no trouble waiting until '''''Wednesday''''', October 25, 2017, to post this comment ;-)
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 04:51, 25 October 2017 (EDT)
:Which is nowhere ''near'' the level of liberal obsession with wanting to silence free speech for everyone but themselves (hence the regular attacks on this site by immature liberal vandals, and even attacks from within by the few regular liberal posters who ''think'' they know what's best for this site better than the admins do). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 00:26, 26 October 2017 (EDT)

== User: Conservative account ==

I had another member of the User: Conservative editor base change the password to the User: Conservative account.

In about a couple months or so, he will give me the new password.

Taking a break from editing for awhile. See you when you get back.

By the way, the [[2018 Global Atheist Convention that was cancelled|2018 Global Atheist Convention]] was cancelled due to lack of interest. Of course, this is yet another sign that Christendom has gloriously triumphed over the [[atheist movement]]! :)[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:02, 15 November 2017 (EST)

== Not impressed ==

Besides you seeking to provoke yet another fight on this site, you've also demonstrated two things by copying the user template I created for my user page (the one indicating that the user does not support the liberal media) and changing it into something else (accusing Breitbart News, a conservative news site, of being "fake news" even though it is not):

# You proved through your actions that liberals (like yourself) lack originality and prefer to copy and imitate others (per the [[Liberal Style]] article, in number seven of the [[Liberal Style#Debate and rhetorical tactics|Debate and rhetorical tactics section]])
# You resorted to the notorious tactic made infamous by Marx, Lenin and Goebbels in accusing conservative media of what the liberal media (particularly CNN, MSNBC, the nightly network newscasts, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, Vice Media, etc.) is guilty of itself (propagating lies, bias and fake news)

Congrats, you just proved the point Conservapedia (and other sources) made about liberals and their tactics once again through your actions in trying to force a liberal POV here. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:37, 21 November 2017 (EST)

::Well, I '''am''' impressed. You say that "liberals [...] lack originality and prefer to copy and imitate others [...]", and yet I have this: [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:SamHB#The_current_occupant_of_the_White_House] on my user page, from 03:52, 12 December 2017, and you made an interesting edit to your user page [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Northwest] at 16:58 the same day. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:42, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

:::Which was in response to the false claims you made about President Trump, FYI. Are you really itching to start yet another fight here? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:34, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

== This page is not to be used for abusing, insulting, berating, or bullying cancer patients, or otherwise engaging in the kind of social, moral, or ethical depravity that people outgrow by age 10. ==

I didn't berate any cancer patients. I merely pointed out the unhealthy and anti-social habits of atheists which give the atheist population a higher cancer rate.
:You most certainly did. A careful reading of your activities here at CP relating to cancer, as well as what's been going on over at RW, shows very clearly that you were engaging in abusive and, frankly, un-Christian behavior toward RW user "Mercian". It is completely obvious from a careful reading of this what has been going on. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:32, 30 December 2017 (EST)
In 2017, I helped my friend by researching the best solutions to treat his loved one's cancer. He asked me to do it because he felt I had strong research skills. In 2018, I am helping an anti-cancer initiative. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:15, 24 December 2017 (EST)
:Congratulations. BTW, I'm also engaged in helping an anti-cancer initiative.
:Also, your suggestion that left-handed people are somehow "mutant" strikes me as a bit more provocative than someone who is trying to win hearts and minds ought to be. You might want to tone down the negativity in the things you write. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:32, 30 December 2017 (EST)
::<s>"A systematic literature review combined with primary research on handedness demonstrates that atheism and/or paranormal belief is associated with all of these indicators of high mutational load."[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0133-5]

::Judging by [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKl9H037C1k THE VIDEO] I saw where he explains his theory, the British anthropologist who published the article appears to be a person of high intelligence, but likely not as creative in his thinking as he ought to be (Maybe left-handedness creates otherness and people less prone to conformity), Nevertheless, he does appear to be smart enough to recognize what high mutational load is.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:37, 30 December 2017 (EST)</s>
=== Atheism and cancer ===

<s>Some atheist (or at the very least someone who appeared to be an atheist) claimed an [[Atheism and cancer]] article was created in the past at this wiki. Yet, when I did a search using the search box, I found no record of such an article being created at this wiki.</s>
:That's funny. The article you cite was created, by you, at 14:39 on 22 December, before you wrote the above. It's still there now, having been edited almost continuously by you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:29, 23 December 2017 (EST)

<s>Given what I know about [[Atheism and health]] and [[Global atheism and aging populations]], I suspected there was a positive correlation between atheism and cancer. And lo and behold, there is!

By the way, you might find this to be interesting:

According to the American Cancer Society:

"According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 69% of cancer patients say they pray for their health. A recent study published in Cancer, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, suggests a link between religious or spiritual beliefs and better physical health reported among patients with cancer."[https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/study-cancer-patients-with-strong-religious-or-spiritual-beliefs-report-better-health.html]

The Christian apologist Gary Habermas wrote: "Double-blind prayer experiments: where people pray for others with terminal illness. Habermas admitted that most such experiments have not worked, but the three that he knows of that have indeed worked were cases of orthodox-Christians praying for the sick."[https://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-apologist-10-reasons-for-the-fall-of-atheism-106531/]

See: [[Atheism and cancer#Religion/irreligion and cancer treatment|Religion/irreligion and cancer treatment]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:19, 22 December 2017 (EST)</s>

=== I've got the power! ===
[[File:Freethinkers.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|<s>Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] is a staff member of [[Creation Ministries International]].</s> ]]
<s>An atheist/agnostic wrote about me: "These people get off on controlling you, on subjecting you to their power... I'm sorry that... mound of misery got to you."

SamHB, I thought Christians believed in free will, that people are free moral agents and that God can help people overcome various temptations? See also: [[Atheism and free will]]</s>
:Actually, we do believe that! Conservapedia addiction is a tough addiction to break, but people have broken even tougher ones. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:29, 23 December 2017 (EST)

<s>"When in reality no one can ever make you feel ANYTHING! That’s right; you heard me. No one can make you cry. No one can make you happy. No one can make you sad. No one can make you feel better. No one can make you feel guilty…but you." - Heather Wilson

Evidently, Heather Wilson has more [[machismo]] than the gentlemen of a certain atheist wiki!

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BRv9wGf5pk I've got the power!]

The truth often hurts. And certain gentlemen can't handle the truth!

Evidently, I am the puppet master and certain atheist gentlemen are my puppets!</s>
[[File:Second dog with a bone.jpg|right|thumbnail|220px|<s>Atheists obsessed with [[Conservapedia]] are like a [[dog]] with a bone. Their dogged persistence in thinking about Conservapedia, discussing Conservapedia and making forecasts about Conservapedia is quite prodigious and intense.</s> ]]
<s>I've got the power.

I've got the power.

Like the crack of the whip, I Snap attack...

Bang the bass, turn up the treble.

Radical mind, day and night all the time.

7:14, wise divine. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
:I read this comment directed to me by a member of SJW atheist wiki: "What have you done but spiel hate...".

:A best selling book declares that SJWs always project. It's so true.

:Well cited and factual encyclopedia articles spieling hate. it such an absurd proposition. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations." (see: [[Essay: A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:54, 23 December 2017 (EST)</s>

== Re: Online boxing match ==

Merician and I have been engaging in a bit of an online boxing match lately, but we have been playing by [https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Marquis+of+Queensberry+rules Marquess of Queensberry Rules].

See also: [[Talk:Essay: British atheist acknowledges the reasonableness of a User: Conservative editor]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:09, 30 December 2017 (EST)
:Addemdun: See my comments above regarding high mutational loads/left-handedness/socialization, otherness and less likely to engage in conformity (I expanded the [[Atheists and genetic mutations]] article to provide more in-depth analysis/commentary.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:41, 31 December 2017 (EST)

== Your edits ==

When you edited the Billy Graham article, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_elections,_2018&diff=826892431&oldid=826891839 you reverted] my previous edit in addition to making the grammar fix. I didn't notice your fix, and with good reason, considering that your improvement was very small compared to what you reverted. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:21, 21 February 2018 (EST)

==This refers to some stuff in archive #3==
Actually, we did mark your words, in 2017, 2016, 2015, .... Your words were found wanting.

Incidentally, the deceptiveness of Cons's "as I watch it burn" quote was discussed at [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:SamHB#I_would_really_love_to_see_User:Conservative_slowly_and_painfully_burn] on my user page.

Cons would do well to write original material, that the majority of Conservapedians won't feel ashamed of, on topics that the majority of Conservapedians would find worthwhile for this web site.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:35, 27 February 2018 (EST)
::Didn't Conservative suggest the man in the picture was a cowardly unionized firefighter. Most of the firefighters on 9/11 were unionized and they rushed into those buildings knowing fine well that the odds of them coming out alive were slim. Horribly disrespectful.--[[User:RSturmer|RSturmer]] ([[User talk:RSturmer|talk]]) 12:55, 27 February 2018 (EST)

:<s>The global market share of atheist has generally been declining since 1970 (see: [[Global atheism statistics]]). So atheism has burned from 2015-2017. Please don't post counter factual rubbish/contentions on your talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])</s>

== You're Cool ==

Just Sayin'. [[User:DaveSG|DaveSG]] ([[User talk:DaveSG|talk]]) 01:09, 24 February 2018 (EST)

:Thanks. And I have 19 blocks to show for it. I think the powers that be have come to an understanding that I do not harm or materially dilute what Conservapedia is saying, and that what I say is generally rather thoughtful, so they don't generally harm me these days. Many other, far less thoughtful, users can be found in the permanent block log. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:57, 24 February 2018 (EST)

::Getting blocked 19 times for your misbehavior on this site is nothing to be proud of, and denying that you ''have'' tried to harm this site by repeatedly forcing a liberal viewpoint on it (including under the transparent guise of "essays") and provoking fights with other posters does not make what you've done here over time untrue or any less bad. That you would be praised for your behavior by a troll who has since been blocked says plenty. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:58, 25 February 2018 (EST)

:::And incidentally, your recent snide edit summary comment in the Pussy Riot article, combined with your decision to ignore Conservapedia guidelines yet again by edit warring, insistently imposing liberal POV on that and other articles and by provoking yet another fight, just earned you a two-day break. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:30, 25 February 2018 (EST)

::::Hi Northwest, you did not give a reason why the essay of SamHB is written from a "liberal point of view". Instead of arguing with him you simply started an edit war. I could not find any liberal tendencies in this essay and therefore there is no comprehensible reason for his block.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 08:46, 26 February 2018 (EST)

:::::Again, Assistant SysOps are not allowed by the rules to block longstanding membersto resolve disputes--I agree with JoeyJ's response. That said, edit warring is also unproductive, and making essay versions of CP articles has already been discussed and generally disapproved of. (Yes, I know, I just used a trailing preposition....)
:::::I do see the differences between these two (listed here: https://www.diffchecker.com/49fnIo4C), but in the long run, do they make that much of a difference? Can't we let the reader decide what view to take? I don't trust Putin either, but the fact these people are using obscene activities to convey their message still stands. Perhaps focusing on them and their activities rather than Putin's is the best idea? {{unsigned|DavidB4}}

==Northwest and Pussy Riot==
User Northwest seems to have a spectacular disdain for me. This can be seen in many things he has written in a number of places, most notably here on this talk page, and on the [[Pussy Riot]] article and talk page. A particularly noteworthy case of this can be seen in the "not impressed" section above, where he takes me to task for copying material from another template (something that people do all the time) to accuse me of lacking originality, claiming that all liberals do the same, and comparing me to Marx, Lenin and Goebbels.

He also says, in the "You're Cool" section above, that my having been blocked 19 (now 20) times shows misbehavior. A few things:
*I have been here much longer than Northwest, and most of those blocks were before his time. He knows nothing about the circumstances.
*Other than a few that naturally expired, all of those blocks were later rescinded, either by the blocking party directly, or by being countermanded by an admin.
*One of those blocks was by someone who was later unmasked as a parodist.
*One of those blocks was for a completely bogus accusation of being a sock of AlanS, whom I never knew. (That incident has led me to have no confidence in the process of identifying sock accounts.)
As far as I know, I am respected at least to some extent by virtually everyone that I have had contact with here at Conservapedia. Even someone who had earlier gotten the wrong impressions and blocked me. I have had my work praised by a number of admins, ''including the site owner''. So I do not know why Northwest takes such a strong attitude against me. I have mostly ignored him, but the Pussy Riot issue did not admit a solution other than making an "essay" alternative article.

I agree with DavidB4 that having an alternative "essay" article is not a good idea. I only did that because Northwest's insistence that only "leftists" and "Social Justice Warriors" (SJW's) oppose murderous thug Putin. I simply could not stand for that implication.

In further response to DavidB4, yes, these people use obscene activities (I've seen the youtube videos; some of them are appalling). But the article is almost entirely focused on them and their activities. There is only a small portion about the international protest of Putin regarding their imprisonment and pardon. That is a small, but nevertheless important, part of the article. The protests in support of Pussy Riot were an international phenomenon, and was not limited to leftists and SJW's.

I would have no problem with getting rid of the essay (it was admittedly picayune, and the change was extremely minor) if it were permitted to mention the international protests. We would either have to have the article locked by an admin (this has been done on several other articles that were subject to edit warring) or we would need a clear statement from Northwest that the article reflect a consensus of the Conservapedia community.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:38, 28 February 2018 (EST)

:Ignoring the truth about those protests - that they were staged by leftists (regardless of nationality) with an anti-Christian animus like the band itself has - does you no favors. As for the past blocks against you, regardless of what you think about those blocks, they were justified because you saw fit to violate Conservapedia's guidelines more than once, including imposing a liberal viewpoint on that article and on the Nazi Party article (and your attitude toward the blocks also reflects your attitude toward the rules of the site itself), and ignoring that fact does nothing for you either.

:And about your claim of "being respected at least to some extent by virtually everyone that I have had contact with here at Conservapedia", your attitude toward [[User:Conservative]] and other editors here who don't necessarily agree with your viewpoint here and who counter or refute your claims with counterpoints supported by non-liberal-sourced, reference-backed evidence (which you've shown to get offended by in at least Conservative's case, and has led you to provoke fights against myself and other posters in other cases and to make false claims of conservative media like Breitbart being "fake news" in response to the fact that the liberal media itself purveys fake news) appears to show that that respect is not a two-way street when it isn't convenient for you (as part of that, I've even noticed that in [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&diff=prev&oldid=1404861 this edit] in [[Conservapedia proven right]], most of your sources in that edit come from liberal media websites, specifically NBC, CBS and the BBC - all of which have been discredited due to being exposed as fake news creators, and all of which you put back in the article in response to Andy Schlafly removing them because he noted that the sources were from multiple liberal sites all reporting the same thing and that your claim of "gravitational waves being convincingly detected" was itself implausible and claimed by liberals, whose claims you used via those sources). Those are some of the things you really should keep in mind. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 04:29, 28 February 2018 (EST)
:*My relationship with Cons is far more complex and nuanced, both publicly and privately, than you seem to be aware. If we didn't actually have a cordial relationship beneath those gruff exteriors, he wouldn't post pictures of concertina wire on my talk page. You would do well not to assume that you understand the situation correctly.
:*On the anti-relativity bandwagon? Really? Please do your homework, as outlined in the "People who write about relativity but don't know what they are talking about" section of my user page.
:*The Nazi Party article? You really follow me around, don't you? That stuff was from a year and a half ago. Do you keep similarly detailed dossiers on other people? Or is there something about me that fascinates you?
:*I am actually well aware of the rules of the site, having read them many many times. You don't seem to be.
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:41, 28 February 2018 (EST)
:::Your comments still don't excuse your behavior on this site, or the fact that you not only continue to manipulatively deny any wrongdoing you've done here (including your use of liberal sources for your science article edits and claiming them as "fact" despite Andy stating otherwise) and shift the blame to everyone else (a hallmark liberal tactic), you even claim to be "well aware of the rules of the site" yet continue to violate them when you see fit. I'm actually more aware of the rules here than you realize (or care to admit), so don't go making assumptions (including about the reversions of edits in which you imposed a liberal POV). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 14:54, 28 February 2018 (EST)

==John McCain==
Rob Smith: I have reverted your additional negative comments about John McCain.
:"I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president," -- Gen. [[Wesley Clark]], June 30, 2008 as a surrogate for the Obama campaign.
:"They want us to forget the insults we've had to endure. Intolerance. They've made us feel marginalized in this country we love so much. John McCain and his Republican friends have two faces," -- 2008 Obama campaign ad.
It's well known that people say negative things about their opponents during election campaigns. And I'm not aware that Mr. McCain ran on a platform of having been a POW in North Vietnam, though I'm sure it got mentioned. My recollection is that he ran mostly on his legislative record. The two comments that I put on my user page were simply pure evil.

Feel free to take the material and put it into some kind of "McCaingate timeline" article, or whatever you want. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:28, 26 May 2018 (EDT)
:My apologies. I thought I'd help you appear to be a fair minded individual rather than standing by Democrat race baiting and hypocrisy. Again, my apologies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 04:16, 27 May 2018 (EDT)
::Well, I thank you for your offer of help in keeping my talk page free of race baiting and hypocrisy. But I think the amount of race baiting that I do (zero) is just right. I'll be really careful not to engage in race baiting in the future. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:40, 27 May 2018 (EDT)

Rob's finding that I engaged in race-baiting in the John McCain tribute on my user page piqued my curiosity. I wondered "What is RobSmith's writing actually like?" I hadn't read any of it in many months, since he has lately been engaging in manic editing sprees that would put [[User:Conservative]] to shame. And the edit comments and article titles indicate that the edits must be rubbish on a par with Cons's writing. Worse than, for example [[Atheists_and_physical_attractiveness]]? Hard to say. I'd have to read that stuff.

So I picked one of Rob's edits at random: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_transition&diff=1425318&oldid=1425317 this one]. He essentially added "... as millions of misogynist white women went to the polls on election day ..." to the Trump transition article. Huh?? In an ''encyclopedia''? One that prides itself on being trustworthy?

That edit was one of 211 edits, over a 30 hour period with just 3 breaks, of less than 5, 4, and 2 hours. That's the sort of thing that Rob considers worth spending his time on? By contrast, Cons made only 10 edits in that same time frame. Cons still has a long way to go, be he's making progress.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:22, 31 May 2018 (EDT)
:USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/27/john-mccain-ran-repealing-obamacare-he-broke-his-promise-robert-robb-column/708114001/ John McCain ran on repealing Obamacare. He broke his promise].

:John McCain is a petty, vindictive and unreliable man. He is a war hero though. McCain let his anger at Trump get the best of him (Trump's comment on his military service). I suppose this isn't the first or last time that a person of Irish descent let their anger get the best of them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:08, 31 May 2018 (EDT)
::Cons, my friend, a couple of points. (You know me well enough to know when I'm reaming you out and when I'm just disagreeing, right? This is the latter.)
::*It's true that McCain's recent vote on healthcare was the opposite of what you, and many others, had hoped for. But people change their position between their campaigns and their final votes all the time. If everyone was required to vote exactly the way they campaigned, they wouldn't bother to hold votes in Congress. On the first day of the session, they would just enact into law whatever people had indicated they would do while they were running for office, no? Then they could all go home. In reality, they hold committee hearings, they hold conferences, they try to reach consensus, they try to persuade their colleagues ("log-rolling", I believe it's called), they rewrite the proposed legislation again and again and again, trying to get it into a form that will pass the voting. What people vote on is often not what the issues were perceived to be when they were campaigning. You really shouldn't call McCain unreliable for this. (By the way, I'm kind of neutral on this issue, and I haven't compared McCain's vote with what the issue was when he was campaigning.) I'm sorry that his vote disappointed you, but these things happen. That's why we have a Congress.
::*Petty and vindictive? Are you suggesting that he voted that way because of personal animosity at President Trump? That his "anger ... got the best of him?" Really? His anger over the "I want people who weren't shot down" comment from a year before is what led to his vote? Can you back up that connection with some statements of his?
::*I know you are not a bigot, but the reference to people of Irish descent was unnecessary. People occasionally let their anger get the best of them all the time. And I doubt that it's related to being Irish. (Though, truth to tell, this isn't the first time I've heard a statement like that.) I don't associate irascibility with being Irish. BTW, I'm not Irish, and I'm pretty sure you aren't either. Just say that he let his anger get the best of him. Though I don't think it did.
::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:14, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
"The so-called Irish temperament is a mixture of flaming ego, hot temper, stubbornness, great personal charm and warmth, and a wit that shines through adversity. An irrepressible buoyancy, a vivacious spirit, a kindliness and tolerance for the common frailties of man and a feeling that 'it is time enough to bid the devil good morning when you meet him' are character traits which Americans have associated with their Irish neighbors for more than a century." - Dr. Carl Wittke, Chair, History Department, Western Reserve University, 1952-1962.[https://lasvegassun.com/news/1997/mar/17/where-i-stand-irish-a-mix-of-ego-stubbornness-grea/][https://immigration.procon.org/view.source.php?sourceID=008659] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:15, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
:OK, you win. I've also been told that the Irish are known for their humor. In any case, well played, sir! [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:32, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
::My sincerest dream for America is that we can once again have a sane and realistic enough public discourse to admit that we can, at least partially, attribute somebody's temper to their Irish heritage. And that, yes, [[Valerie Jarrett]] really does look like that one monkey lady from ''Planet of the Apes''. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 02:51, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
:::You never cease to amaze me. Not well played. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:08, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

'''''USA Today'' (reprinted from The Arizona Republic, opinion piece):'''

"This is one instance in which President Trump’s criticisms of McCain are well-founded. McCain did run, as Trump is drumming, on a strong repeal-and-replace platform. In fact, it was the principal distinction he drew with his Democratic opponent, Ann Kirkpatrick.

McCain now says that Democrats made a mistake in passing Obamacare on a partisan basis, and that Republicans shouldn’t undo it on a similarly partisan basis. But that’s the equivalent of a Brezhnev doctrine on domestic policy. Democrats can enact legislation on a partisan basis. But Republicans can undo it only if Democrats agree.

McCain is undoubtedly correct that bipartisan policy changes are more enduring. But when one side acts unilaterally, it shouldn’t get a veto when the other side attempts to undo it."[https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/27/john-mccain-ran-repealing-obamacare-he-broke-his-promise-robert-robb-column/708114001/]

'''IrishCentral.com:'''

"An article on McCain in Prospect Magazine from August 2008 saw writer Anatol Lieven attribute many of Sen. McCain's traits to his heritage. Lieven wrote, "his obstinacy; his tendency towards unshakeable friendship and implacable hatred; his hair-trigger temper; his deep patriotism; his obsession with American honor; and his furious response to any criticism of the US.""[https://www.irishcentral.com/news/politics/john-and-cindy-mccain-s-irish-roots-what-you-need-to-know]

"In the end, Irish American McCain took revenge for Trump's deadly attack on him last year calling him no hero because he was captured in Vietnam."[https://www.irishcentral.com/opinion/niallodowd/irish-american-john-mccain-proves-revenge-is-a-dish-best-eaten-cold]

'''''The New York Times:'''''

''The New York Times'' admits: "It probably didn’t hurt that it was also a measure of cold revenge against Mr. Trump, a man who on the campaign trail in 2015 had mocked Mr. McCain’s ordeal as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. "[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/28/us/john-mccains-real-return.html] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:19, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

:Trump's blunder was that he did not know his enemy. In a divided country where U.S. Senate votes can be close, creating a bitter enemy in the U.S. Senate was definitely not smart. Trump should have merely said that military service should be respected, but being a war hero does not give someone a free pass to do whatever they want or make them immune from legitimate criticism. In the 2016 election, Trump may have gotten more votes from veterans had he done that. In addition, perhaps McCain would not have voted against ObamaCare.

:The ''Independent'': "When he arrived for the vote McCain, who could easily have pleaded ill-health and simply stayed out of the whole thing, told assembled reporters to '''“wait for the show”'''.(bolding added for emphasis)".[https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/donald-trump-john-mccain-obamacare-revenge-voted-no-vietnam-war-obama-a7864701.html]

:McCain's vote was a showy vote of revenge. Had he not campaigned so strongly against ObamaCare previously, a more convincing counterargument could be made. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:35, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

::Well played again!! You do your homework on current events and contemporary U.S. politics as diligently as I do my homework on math and physics. I'd '''much''' rather read your writings on current events than on why potholes show that evolution didn't happen. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:42, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
:::You make too many mistakes for ''that'' to be true. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 23:04, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

::::Ireland, Scotland and the USA gave a significantly higher GDP than Britain.[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html] It helps to have a fighting spirit that drives the British from your land! Don't get the Scotch-Irish or the Americans mad![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

== Inactivity? ==

Your user page says you will be inactive for 66 days, until late August. Did something change, or did you forget about it? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:51, 15 July 2018 (EDT)

== re: Having an article related to attractiveness and a segment of the human population ==
[[File:Bvdy76.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|"<s>Of course, we do not deny evolutionism itself."[https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-il] - [[Kim Jong-il]], an overweight, unattractive leftist, evolutionist and atheist who died of a heart attack. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]
 
 
Truly knowledgeable individuals in terms of knowledge about biology and science properly regulate a basic function such as eating and also get an adequate amount of exercise!!!]]
[[Carrie Nation]], a radical member of the temperance movement, used to go into taverns and wreak havoc with a hatchet. Since you appear to see no value as far as attractiveness when it comes to people's appearances, have you ever thought of going around beauty parlors and wreaking havoc with a hatchet? You could also lead protests outside of beauty parlors. You could lead a movement to ban beauty contests.

For thousands of years, cultures have valued beauty. Even the Bible comments on [[Sarah]]'s beauty. [[Solomon]]'s [[Song of Songs]] mentions beauty.

And yet, a petulant liberal complains about an article on [[Atheists and physical attractiveness]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:01, 6 September 2018 (EDT)

:By the way, given that the social science data indicates that right-wing individuals are better looking than left of center individuals, is the reason you take umbrage at the article due to jealousy?
:Deny that [[Donald Trump]] is taller and better looking than the godless, leftist and evolutionist [[Kim Jong-un]] and lose all credibility!

:"Of course, we do not deny evolutionism itself."[https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-il] - [[Kim Jong-il]], an overweight, unattractive leftist/evolutionist/atheist who died of a heart attack. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]

:Truly knowledgeable individuals, in terms of knowledge about biology and science, properly regulate a basic function such as eating and also get an adequate amount of exercise!!![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:17, 6 September 2018 (EDT)
=== Meet PZ Myers, the overweight and unattractive atheist/evolutionist/leftist ===
[[File:PZ Myers pic.jpg|thumbnail|275px|center|The biologist and evolutionist [[PZ Myers]] in 2006. Myers is also a staunch atheist. See also: [[Atheism and obesity]]
 
 
For further information, please see: [[Essay: PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Creation Museum|PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Creation Museum]] and [[Essay: Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course|Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course]] ]]</s>
{{clear}}

== User: Conservative proven right again! ==

<s>At the 2018 [[American Atheists]] convention, the ex-president of the American Atheist organization [[David Silverman]] declared:
{{Cquote|It is a hard time to be [[Atheist activist|an atheist activist]]. This has affected us. And it has affected our community...

...it has really affected us. We are suffering a level of [[defeatism]] that I have never seen before...

We feel the loss. And we feel like we have lost. We feel like [[Donald Trump and American atheists|we lost the election]]... We see this cascade of attack coming down at us over and over from all different directions and we feel like it's over. I have heard so many times it makes me sick. It makes me sad. It feels like we lost.

The [[Atheism and apathy|apathy that follows]]. It doesn't matter. We can't win anyways. It's useless to fight. This apathy is infecting us. It's hurting us.

And people are reacting to each other now. And so that is [[Atheist factions|causing a division]]. Lots and lots of division in our movement. Hard, bad division... And that has resulted in a splintering and factioning of the movement that I have never seen before and none of us have.

In other words, '''we're in a bad situation and it's getting worse.''' (bolding added for emphasis).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8VYLMYvImc David Silverman - How the Mighty Get Back Up]</ref>}}

Didn't I tell you that each successive year was going to be the WORST year for atheism? It's coming to pass! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:57, 9 September 2018 (EDT)</s>

== Re: Religious people and Donald Trump ==

So, [https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/06/30/atheism-is-rising-but/ this article from a liberal-leaning anti-Trump website] (as it makes clear [https://www.the-american-interest.com/2018/05/23/defining-the-american-interest/ in its About Us page]) is your source in your latest anti-Trump attack on your user page (which claims in effect, "religiously observant Christians were least likely to be seduced by Donald Trump’s “post-truth” style politics in the GOP primary")? You do realize that liberal-biased websites like the one you linked, like the rest of the liberal media, are more likely to lie and make baseless and unsourced claims about the targets of their attacks, right? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 04:05, 25 September 2018 (EDT)

:Oh, my! I do seem to attract the attention of junior "assistant sysops". Ordinary contributors have better things to do than attack me, and actual admins do too. In fact, there are a few traits that I've noticed in assistants such as yourself and Vargas "embraces the pseudoscience that leavens science too tightly to be trusted"<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Parrot#No_Credit_Where_Credit_is_Not_Due</ref> Milan. An example was Vargas bringing me in to a discussion of FredJ with a [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=1450367&oldid=1450282 comment that actually had nothing to do with me], simply because I had welcomed FredJ and advised him not to use "fact" tags. And, of course, there is your comment above.

:A striking trait that assistants seem to display is the tendency to think that they, and apparently only they, can police the "ideological purity" of the web site. In fact, the admins can control the ideological content of CP; they don't need your help in this regard. Your efforts are plainly on display in the fight over the [[Pussy Riot]] article, in which you seem to accuse me of turning the place into "liberalpedia". Apparently because you believe that anyone who opposes a murderous dictator who imprisons, murders, and poisons dissenters, must be a "leftist", "elitist" or "social justice warrior". I can assure everyone that I have no intention of trying to turn this web site into "liberalpedia".

:Now, to address the most recent claim (just above) that I am citing a "liberal-leaning anti-Trump website", I don't go searching for liberal web sites in order to post references to them here at Conservapedia. The web site that I was citing was taken from footnote number 4 of [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Attention_atheists:_You_don%27t_own_the_internet&oldid=1449976 this]. That was put in by Cons. So you'll have to ask him why he was putting in "left-wing" web sites. I figured that, if it's good enough for Cons, it's good enough for Conservapedia, and if he doesn't actually read the articles that he cites, that's his problem.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 19:03, 28 September 2018 (EDT)

::Sounds more to me like you're trying to make this more about yourself (indicated by your pretended "offence" at the truth being pointed out to you in your reply) to distract from your history of trying to ideologically reshape Conservapedia to suit your tastes and those of your fellow liberals (as well as the liberal trolls who come here for the sole purpose of vandalizing the site, along with your denial of doing so), particularly regarding the Pussy Riot article (a fight which ''you'' started, by the way). All you're doing here is further proving the points being made in the [[Liberal Style]] article regarding what your type does and how they react (acting "offended", not taking responsibility, etc.) and what they resort to (denials, deflection, condescension, attacking those who catch them, etc. - all of which you've pulled on other editors and admins here before, in case you need reminding again) when caught at their actions. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 20:14, 28 September 2018 (EDT)
:::Well, people do sometimes get accused of talking or writing about themselves, and seeming to make everything about "me, me, me", and using a lot of first-person pronouns in their writing. I've been accused of that myself on occasion, but it doesn't seem to apply in the case of the paragraphs above. You, on the other hand, seem to write about "liberals, liberals, liberals", and accusing anyone who says something you don't agree with of being one. This is most obvious in your claim that anyone who opposes murderous thug Vladimir Putin must be a "leftist", "elitist" or "social justice warrior". And must be trying to change this site into "liberalpedia". Anyone who has been around here for any length of time knows that, in my 10-1/2 years here, I don't do that. Feel free to ask any admin, like Andy or Cons, for example. Or, for that matter, any trustworthy and decent person that's been around for any length of time. They can also tell you that I have repaired a lot of vandalism and other damage, though probably not as much as I could have repaired if I'd been given sysop powers.

:::Now let's go through your paragraph above.

::::Sounds more to me like you're trying to make this more about yourself (indicated by your pretended "offence" at the truth being pointed out to you in your reply)
:::::I'm not offended, just annoyed.
::::to distract from your history of trying to ideologically reshape Conservapedia to suit your tastes
:::::Really? Give an example. Opposing Putin is not ''my'' taste; it is the taste of any decent person.
::::and those of your fellow liberals
:::::Huh?
::::(as well as the liberal trolls who come here for the sole purpose of vandalizing the site,
:::::We are all aware that this site is the frequent target of vandalism. I've done my share of repairing this.
::::along with your denial of doing so),
:::::I don't deny that there are vandals.
::::particularly regarding the Pussy Riot article (a fight which ''you'' started, by the way).
:::::Well, actually, you were the one who started it, with your edit of 08:14, 13 February 2017.
::::All you're doing here is further proving the points being made in the [[Liberal Style]] article
:::::No, that article has nothing to do with me. It's incredibly badly written, by the way.
::::regarding what your type does
:::::My type? What type is that?
::::and how they react (acting "offended", not taking responsibility, etc.)
:::::I fail to take responsibility? Given an example.
::::and what they resort to (denials,
:::::really?
::::deflection,
:::::really?
::::condescension,
:::::really?
::::attacking
:::::really?
::::those who catch them, etc.
:::::You've "caught" me? You realize that everything on this site is public, right?
::::all of which you've pulled on other editors and admins here before,
:::::Really? Give an example.
::::in case you need reminding again) when caught at their actions.
:::::Really? Give an example.

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:57, 1 October 2018 (EDT)

::::The rambling wall of text you posted (where you do exactly as I said you'd do on all counts, including deny your repeated past wrongdoing and refuse to take responsibility for it, and even try to push a liberal POV here while you simultaneously deny doing so - all liberal traits) is proof enough - and no, I was ''not'' the one who started that fight, ''you'' did [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&diff=1313984&oldid=1307294 by removing factual info from the article on March 2, 2017] (just as you're trying to provoke another fight even now). By even objecting to the Liberal Style article (by claiming it is "badly written" when it is nothing of the kind), all you're doing is further proving the points made by that article.

::::And incidentally, the reason you don't get given sysop powers here is because if that happened, you'd most certainly abuse them by misusing them to force a liberal POV on articles and blocking those you don't agree with here (which would mean just about every conservative-leaning editor here), which would result in even more fights here than you already cause and would only be disruptive to the site - and that's not needed here. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:46, 1 October 2018 (EDT)

:::::Your presumption to know the reason I don't have assistant ("sysop") authority is incorrect. I do not want block powers, and I have said so many times over the last 10-1/2 years. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (EST)

== Resurrection - The new and improved version of the phantom essay ==

*[[Essay: The thrill of Christian victory and the agony of atheist defeat|The thrill of Christian victory and the agony of atheist defeat]]

I hope you find that the added content further clarifies matters.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:24, 24 December 2018 (EST)

:Well, I'm glad you have apparently decided that this "essay" should become a permanent part of your work. I was worried for a while that you considered it to be some silly "throwaway" thing. It's really one of your most charming things, mostly because of the really nice picture of the two kids. Though it's not clear to me that they are cheering over the victory of Christianity. They might be exulting over having won something in a computer game they are playing. Or maybe cheering over having posted something stupid, perhaps involving cats, or maybe gerbils, on social media. Or maybe they are cheering about having successfully vandalized Conservapedia. :-) You never know.

:But its not possible that your added content "clarifies matters". I'd have to read the article. You see, I don't read your articles. I just look at the pictures. And this was a nice picture.

:Now, I have a bone to pick with you over your flippant use of the word "resurrection". I've never liked the use of that word other than in the context of Jesus. Here you are talking about having undeleted a file on a wiki.
::And they gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.
::And they did a "delete page" operation on him, and parted his garments. And they "changed visibility of 3 revisions" on him.
::But on the third day they "restored his page".

:Not right.

:Be that as it may, have a Merry Christmas.

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (EST)

::"The act or fact of bringing someone back to life, or bringing something back into use or existence."- Cambridge Dictionary[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/resurrection]

::I hope the Queen's English helps clarify things for you.:)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:05, 25 December 2018 (EST)

:::Yes, I know English pretty well, and I did not need to look at your dictionary reference. I know that "resurrect" is often used in a secular sense. But it still sort of bothers me that you use it in a totally flippant and childish article. And I notice that you are continuing to mess around with that article, among other things, vaping/memory-holing 45 versions at a time. Can't you make up your mind? Is there something about those vaped versions that embarrasses you? Jesus was only crucified and resurrected once.

:::And speaking of childish, I speculated above on the possibility that those children "might be exulting over having won something in a computer game they are playing." Well, I was right. The picture is from https://pixabay.com/en/children-win-success-video-game-593313/. They were '''not''' celebrating "The thrill of Christian victory", as your caption says.

:::Do you think Christianity is a video game?

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:03, 25 December 2018 (EST)
== re: Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages ==

This page [[Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages]] at Conservapedia needs to have a section on how to create quotes.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:23, 7 January 2019 (EST)
:Thanks for the suggestion. I'm busy just now, but I'll get to it. The usefulness of this was brought to my attention by some recent comments about the various templates or whatever. Something about one of the templates being changed. So I need to do some research into this. Do You by any chance know where that discussion was? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:28, 10 January 2019 (EST)

::I hope you don't mind me cutting in. The hubbub you heard in regard to quote templates was just that I added some documentation to [[:template:Cquote]] but also accidentally added a category outside of the noinclude tags, so all the pages using that template were suddenly in [[:Category:Quotation Templates]]. I have since fixed the issue.
::We do seem to have three different quotation templates, so I have wondered if there is a specific policy or it is more a matter of preference, save the discussion about Cquote. Anyway, I hope this clarifies and saves you some time. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 19:02, 11 January 2019 (EST)

:::Right. I'm awfully busy these days, but I'll get to it. I have a personal stake in having these quote templates documents, since I use them and typically have to look around for examples of my, and other people's, work to figure out how to proceed. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (EST)

I'm ready to go. Please unlock this page. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:37, 19 January 2019 (EST)

== I recreated the article and removed the duplicate content ==

I deleted [[User:SamHB/Cons Christian victory Dec+27+2018]] because I recreated the article at: [[Essay: The thrill of Christian victory and the agony of atheist defeat]].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:32, 13 January 2019 (EST)

:OK. I'm going to have to reorganize my "rogues' gallery of things you have vaped"; I have a significant backlog already. You could help by not vaping things, recognizing that '''The Internet is Forever''', and perhaps not writing things you will later be ashamed of. Just sayin' [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (EST)
::It is not a matter of being ashamed, it is rather a matter of material being funny vs. non-funny or effective or ineffective.

::One of the reasons why Chess computers can beat chessmasters is because the machines don't have big egos and can pullback from an ineffective chess attack.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff4W7A-j1RM] Computers change course when it is warranted.

::If I decide I don't like some of my material in retrospect, I delete/vape it.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:59, 3 February 2019 (EST)

== Vindication is sweet ==

*[https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2018/06/crumbling-britain-uk-s-pothole-plague-sign-national-decline Crumbling Britain: the UK’s pothole plague is a sign of national decline], ''New Statesman'', June 13, 2018

Even the British ''New Statesman'' admits that the UK pothole crisis is a sign of national decline.

See also: [[United Kingdom's road repair crisis]]

I hope the ''New Statesman'' article helped clarify things for you.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:34, 13 January 2019 (EST)

:Right. The things you send me in the hopes that they "clarify things" for me rarely have the desired effect, to say the least. But keep trying.

:I may create an article on causation vs. correlation. Including such examples as potholes vs. Darwin's homeland. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (EST)

:::[Some material was put in here and then vaped a short time later (before I could catch it), with the edit comment "I think I will be editing less at this wiki". That person then made 30 more edits within a fairly short span of time. People would do well not to make edits that they are going to be ashamed of later.]

==Name-calling -- "making a fool of oneself"==

I was recently accused of name-calling, when I told Cons to stop "[https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Message_to_SamHB making a fool of himself]". According to [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/make%20a%20fool%20of%20oneself Merriam-Webster], "making a fool of oneself" simply means "behav[ing] in a very foolish or silly way". That's not the same as being a fool—we all do foolish things from time to time. I intended no name-calling, and I apologize to anyone who took my comment as such.

I try to avoid name-calling, such as calling people
*[[Atheism_and_stealing|thieves]], particularly [[Irreligion_and_car_theft|car thieves]]
*[[Prominent,_militant_atheists_and_short_men|short]]
*[[Essay:_Militant_atheism_and_short_man's_syndrome|short]]
*[[Atheists_and_physical_attractiveness|unattractive]]
*[[Essay:_Science_proves_that_atheist_"men"_lack_machismo|lacking in machismo]]
*[[Essay:_Science_proves_that_atheists_can't_jump|unable to jump]]
*[[Atheism_and_gluttony|gluttonous]]
*[[Essay:_Prominent_atheists_weighed_on_the_scales_and_found_wanting|obese]]
*[[Atheism_and_obesity|obese]]
*[[Atheism_and_evolutionary_racism|racist]]
*[[Atheism_and_incest|practicers of incest]]
*[[Atheism_and_necrophilia|necrophiliacs]]
*[[Atheism_and_cannibalism|cannibals]]
*[[Atheism_and_cowardice|cowards]]

and so on. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:44, 2 February 2019 (EST)

:SamHB, a 2016 press release of a University of Minnesota study on atheists reported: "Survey data collected in 2014 shows that, compared to data collected in 2003, Americans have sharpened their negative views of atheists.."[https://cla.umn.edu/news-events/news/atheists-remain-most-disliked-religious-minority-us]

:In addition, according to a study published in the International Journal for The Psychology of Religion: "anti-atheist prejudice is not confined either to dominantly religious countries or to religious individuals, but rather appears to be a robust judgment about atheists."[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/anti-atheist-distrust-deeply-and-culturally-ingrained-study-finds-a6952276.html]

:For more information, please see: [[Views on atheists]] and [[Distrust of atheists]]

::This section is not about atheists; it is about name-calling. It has nothing to do with atheists or atheism.
::As I'm sure you know, I have absolutely no interest in the things you write about atheism. As I'm sure you know, this is because your writings about atheism, and nearly everything else you write, are simply the result of scouring the internet for anything you can find that might support whatever it is you're trying to say. As I'm sure you know, on a planet with 6 billion people expressing 6 billion opinions, you can find just about anything you want on the internet.

:I realize that you take exception to my atheism content, nevertheless it is undeniable that my atheism content gets significant web traffic. For example, my [[atheism and stealing]] article is merely about a month old and already it has over 2,200 page views.

:"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - [[Sun Tzu]]

:In all seriousness, I do plan on changing some of my priorities. There are a number of worthy endeavors that I wish to pursue.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:53, 3 February 2019 (EST)

::Yes, please do that. You probably have more worthy endeavors than vaping your own edits to other people's talk pages. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:26, 3 February 2019 (EST)

== You should face reality and accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: Conservative account ==

SamHB, you are wrong. Most, if not all, the active Conservapedia admins know there is more than one User: Conservative editor. So does the owner of the website. On one or more occasions, I have received an email from one of the fellow admins saying, "Why did you do such and such?" I then explain it was one of the other editors of the User: Conservative account. And then I either reverse that co-editor of the User: Conservative account's decision or I explain his/her (I say his or her to keep the veil of mystery thicker) decision to my fellow admins. By the way, your objections are not cruel, they are just misguided and/or haughty/vain.

I hope this further clarifies matters for you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:23, 5 April 2019 (EDT)

:Just for further clarification: How many edits are done by the most prominent persona of your little posse: 90%? 99%? 99.9%? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:19, 7 April 2019 (EDT)
::Whether it is a little posse or large posse, I will not disclose. I will merely say the decision to have more than one editor use the account involved more than one consideration.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:01, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
:::I'll get to your outlandish claims of being multiple people, and the outlandish "proof" of this that you have been pushing (unsuccessfully) over the years, soon. Be patient. I have this thing called a "life" that sometimes gets in the way of any desire I might have to spend all my time writing stuff at Conservapedia. And a relativity issue has just come up, that needs to be attended to. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:21, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
::::SamHB, a majority of my online work has been related to atheism (or related issues such as [[evolutionism]]). Now that the [[atheist movement]] in the Western World has been burnt to a crisp and has been soundly defeated (see: [[Decline of the atheist movement]] and [[Decline of militant atheism in the West]]), my desire to have a protracted discussion about how many users use the [[User: Conservative]] account has waned. One thing I can say with absolute certainty, there is more than one editor who uses the User: Conservative account.

::::Second, if the owner of Conservapedia decides to bequeath control of Conservapedia in his waning years, unlike Conservapedia editors whose accounts will remain inactive after they meet their Maker, the Conservapedia account I created will live on. "Old soldiers never die, they simply fade away".[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:47, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
SamHB, I enabled other editors to use the User: Conservative account for these reasons: 1) [[Sun Tzu]] is considered by many as one of the greatest strategist/tacticians of all history. He said to be mysterious for various reasons. What could be more mysterious than multiple anonymous editors? 2) After TK passed away, his influence at this website obviously went down (I was never a fan of TK). It occurred to me that if a prominent editor has a "succession plan" in relation to his/her account, it would be a better thing for multiple reasons. 3) The amusement factor. Frankly, it is amusing to see people rail at the User: Conservative and construct armchair psychological analysis of the account when the fact is that the account has multiple editors which makes their foolish strategy of personal attacks rather impotent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:54, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
:Let it go, man. Your real life identity is well known, and your writing / argumentation style is unmistakable. Hyraxes chewing the cud, etc. No amount of dissembling is going to change this.

:FFIW, though, your general sentence construction has improved considerably over the past few years. There's less repetition and far fewer redundant phrases than there used to be. Good work (seriously). [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 17:14, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
::There is more than one person who uses the User: Conservative account. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:04, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
::::No there isn't. No one believes you. You have been given many opportunities to show that there is more than one person, and you have notgiven a positive response to any of them. Not a single admin (these people might be in a position to know about this) has come forth to support your claim, nor has anyone else. All you do is write the same trash over and over again, sticking in different footnoting styles and such. But it's the same trash, a fact which anyone can see. Whether you use the "Q" in "LGBTQ", or whether you once used a diacritical mark, is irrelevant. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
:::Fine. Have it your way. ''The real life identity of the primary user of the User:Conservative account is well known, and his writing / argumentation style is unmistakable. Hyraxes chewing the cud, etc. No amount of dissembling is going to change this.''

:::Happy now? [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 19:27, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
JohnZ, key question: Did the same person largely write these articles: [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] and [[Atheism and women]] and [[Homosexuality]]?

Please address both the writing and footnoting styles of the three articles. Also, address any quote box differences. In addition, address any differences in points of view.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:01, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

===Multiple personalities, part 1===
You have, for years, been claiming that the senior admins here know about your multiple personalities, and accept this behavior. (I know it's been going on for a couple of years; I can't be bothered to look it up just now, but I will if necessary.) I'd like you to prove it.

You recently said, in [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#A_digression_on_muliple_personality_disorders], that "Most, if not all, the active Conservapedia admins know there is more than one User: Conservative editor. So does the owner of the website." Thats good to hear. If it's true. But I have my doubts. Why don't you have those admins (including Andy) put short posts here assuring all of us that what you say is true. Or, if you or they prefer, tell me so in private email—I happen to have, from time to time, had email conversations with a number of admins and we trust each other. So have them reassure us of their acceptance of this situation.

Another thing would be for you to post or forward any emails from these senior admins, indicating that they know about and accept this. If you (quite understandably) don't want to post those emails here in public, forward them to me at the email that we use for our extensive correspondence: sam4557@gmail.com. You know that I can be trusted with our confidential conversations.

===Multiple personalities, part 2===
You also said, in the same place, "On one or more occasions, I have received an email from one of the fellow admins saying, 'Why did you do such and such?' I then explain it was one of the other editors of the User: Conservative account. And then I either reverse that co-editor of the User: Conservative account's decision or I explain his/her (I say his or her to keep the veil of mystery thicker) decision to my fellow admins." So this is the excuse you hide behind when the other admins overrule your actions? Wouldn't it be more straightforward simply to accept that what you had written was inappropriate? Also, can you post or forward some of the emails in which the other admins take you to task, and the emails in which you explain his/her decision?

===Multiple personalities, part 3===
Another thing you have been doing for years, in support of this multiple personality fantasy, is claiming that it is proved by inconsistent footnoting style in your articles. This, too, is discussed at some length in [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#A_digression_on_muliple_personality_disorders]. So let me get this straight: You are intentionally using inconsistent footnoting style for the purpose of "proving" that you are multiple people? You are using '''your own writing''' as evidence in this case? Writing that you can, of course manipulate any way you wish, to make any point you wish? And you expect the rest of us to believe that? In the real world that would be called "fabricating evidence". Wouldn't it be more straightforward just to fix the inconsistent styles?

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:28, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
=== From User: Conservative to SamHB: My additional responses to SamHB about more than one editor using the User: Conservative account ===

The other admins at Conservapedia either agree with my decision to expand the editor base of the User: Conservative account or they tolerate it or they are ambivalent (I really haven't deeply queried them about this matter).
::::I don't believe you. I see no evidence that the other admins, or any other people, accept that you have "expanded the editor base" of your account. Just saying it again and again and again and again doesn't make it any more convincing. You have utterly failed to substantiate this claim, a claim you have been making for years. I would think you would be able to come up with some evidence by now. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
After all is said and done, they see that Andy Schlafly is not making a big stink about it so they are ok with it.
::::Perhaps the reason Andy isn't making a big stink about it is that it doesn't matter how many people you say you are. Perhaps he doesn't care who is behind your keyboard. Perhaps he sees this whole situation as amusing but irrelevant to anything he cares about. Perhaps he doesn't care whether you are being truthful. Perhaps the other admins have a similar view, and just don't care whether you are being truthful.

As far as Andy Schlafly goes, he knows there are more than one editor of the User: Conservative account and he tolerates it.
::::I don't believe you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
He is not excited about it despite the fact that account could potentially remain active upon my demise. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:39, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
:Here is an excerpt from an email I sent other admins on Jun 30, 2018, 9:02 AM: "Given that another editor of my User: Conservative account unblocked him, I think he was hoping would be unblocked again. That is not going to happen."[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:50, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I don't know whether to believe you. Saying things like "Given that another editor of my User: Conservative account ..." doesn't convince me of anything. You make such statements all the time, in public on this web site, so it doesn't surprise me that you would make them in private emails also. How about posting (or forwarding to sam4557@gmail.com) the full message, with headers intact so that I can closely examine its authenticity, showing that the recipient acknowledged that your account is actually used by multiple people. Just saying that you said this is no more convincing than saying it directly. Which you do again and again and again and again. I want acknowledgement of this from someone else. By having them post something to that effect on this web site, or send me email to that effect. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
::SamHB, did you notice that editor of the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] used the term LGBTQ. Personally, I think the Q is rather redundant so I am not a fan of this term. How often was the term LGBTQ used in other articles created by the User: Conservative account? Of course, this is yet another sign there is more than one editor of the User: Conservative account.

::And then there are the stylistic issues of: the footnoting style differences; the quote box differences; the greater tendency to put footnotes in the middle of sentences; the multiple use of the word gay in the article which is a term I rarely use; the dependent clause "as such" used in the beginning of a sentence which I believe I have never done in any of my writings at Conservapedia and finally the multiple use of the word "régime" in the article/page (I may have used the term "regime" in my articles but I never spelled it "régime").
::::We've been through this before. You write articles in which you deliberately use varying styles, and then you claim that that proves you are multiple people? Really? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)

::SamHB, it's time to face that more than one editor has used the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:30, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I don't believe you. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
:::Have you noticed that User: Karajou, who commonly uses check user, has never disputed the notion that more than one editor has used (or uses) the User: Conservative account?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:14, 14 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I haven't actually noticed the connection between your multiple-personality fantasy and checkuser. There's a very simple explanation for the fact that none of the people with checkuser rights sees anything amiss. All your edits come from the same person, at the same IP address. Nothing for Karajou to notice or comment on. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:40, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
I listened to a video of a hardcore, no nonsense, high performance coach yesterday. He said not to care about what other people think, but to just move forward and do the right things. That is excellent advice! Sorry to hear that you don't believe that more than one editor uses the User: Conservative account. But frankly, I don't care! I hope this helps clarifies things for you. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:20, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::Well, it clarifies that you are making no attempt to convince people of your multiple personalities. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

== And accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: SamHB account ==
HEY EVERYBODY! MORE THAN ONE PERSON USES THE SAMHB ACCOUNT! I'M ONE OF THE OTHER PEOPLE. I KNOW YOU'RE SKEPTICAL OF THIS, BUT I HAVE PROOF. WE HAVE DIFFERENT WRITING STYLES. CAN YOU FIGURE IT OUT? BY GEORGE, YOU'VE GOT IT. I WRITE IN ALL CAPS. ISN'T THAT CUTE? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:38, 13 April 2019 (EDT)

== Not any more there isn't ==
I have just changed my password and revoked Samantha's permission to edit under my account. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:39, 13 April 2019 (EDT)

== Announcements concerning the User: Conservative editor team ==

Two announcements:

1. This month saw an expansion of the number of editors in the [[User: Conservative]] editor team.
::Right. It's been raised to te 6th power. Thanks for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

2. One of the editors of User: Conservative team was given an update as far as the password for User: Conservative account as the account has periodic password updates.
::Right. You've been making periodic password changes (always a good idea), and it just now occurred to you to let one (just one?) of your alternate personalities know about it. Thanks for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

By the way, I have finally figured out your steadfast refusal to accept the fact that more than one editor uses the account. Of course, it is jealousy. Deep down you want to be a member of the User: Conservative editor team![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:20, 27 April 2019 (EDT)
::Right. Your actions certainly entertain my "armchair psychological analysis" proclivities. Actually becoming one of your alternate personalities is certainly an intriguing thought. Thanks for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:54, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
::::Hang on - Conservative is a bunch of different people? How is it there are a bunch of people who ALL have the same verbal style and have all the same rhetorical tics. Seems unlikely to me. [[User:JohnSelway|JohnSelway]] ([[User talk:JohnSelway|talk]]) 02:50, 30 April 2019 (EDT)

== Number of editors using the User: Conservative account ==

[[File:Apocalypse vasnetsov 4 horsemen.jpg|thumbnail|400px|center|The User: Conservative account was launched around the birth of the [[New Atheism]] movement. The New Atheism movement had four horsemen. Namely, [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], [[Daniel Dennett]], and [[Sam Harris]]. With the newly minted editor being given the username and password of the User: Conservative account, the User: Conservative account now consists of four individuals. The new editor of the User: Conservative account, however, cannot be a fourth horseman of the User: Conservative account. Why? Because the fourth horse of [[Revelation]] is a pale/ashen horse named Death. And is you many know, the [[atheist movement]] already died before he/she was made an editor (See: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]).]]
{{Clear}}
Well gosh. I've been trying for months (years?) to get you to convince me, or anyone else, that multiple people use your account and make Conservapedia contributions under your name.

When you produce, as "evidence", your claim that various sysops and admins know about this, and I ask you to produce the emails or other validating information, you change the subject. When you repeatedly and obsessively repeat, to me and others, that your writings do not all have identical styles (including footnoting differences, knowledge of what the "Q" in "LGBTQ" means, or different use of diacritical marks), and I point out that anyone can manipulate their own writing style to get that effect, you change the subject.

And now I see that there is a very simple ironclad proof that you are 4 people—an 1887 painting by Viktor Vasnetsov. So there are 4 people, corresponding to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, in your "collective". How could I not have seen that before? It's so simple and straightforward now. Thank you, as usual, for clarifying that for me. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:21, 26 May 2019 (EDT)

== A message I left on User: JohnZ's talk page ==

I left the following message on User: JohnZ's talk page:

:"By the way, the User: Conservative account is a mixture of Protestant/Catholic editors (I have asked the Catholic editors to refrain from anti-Protestant posts using the User: Conservative account). A message from one of the User: Conservative Catholic editors to the British atheist JohnZ: Deus vult![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:52, 29 April 2019 (EDT)"

I trust this further clarifies the number of editors using the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:29, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
== [[Essay: The unfree city of Boston, Massachusetts and its rat infestation problem|The unfree city of Boston, Massachusetts and its rat infestation problem]] ==

[[File:Rat.jpg|center|thumbnail|205px|[[Boston]], which is the capital and most populous city of the Commonwealth of [[Massachusetts]], is one of the ten most rat infested cities of the world.[http://www.animalplanet.com/wild-animals/3-baltimore-md/]
 
 
As you are probably aware, rat infestation is a sign of societal decay. More orderly societies like [[Switzerland]], which is a beacon of [[young earth creationism]] in [[Europe]], simply don't have significant rat infestation problems.[https://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/switzerland-beacon-of-european.html]
 
 
It's not too late to leave the [[Essay: Free States Movement|unfree state of Massachusetts]] and move to a more orderly, rat free area that enjoys the blessings of liberty.]]
{{clear}}
=== Swissinfo.ch: Rats save lives in landmine-infested areas ===

*[https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/lifesavers-landmines-explosives-rats-cambodia-deadly/44928164 Swissinfo.ch: Rats save lives in landmine-infested areas]

(Swiss neutrality has insured that Switzerland is not a landmine-infested area needing the assistance of rats)

==References==
{{reflist}}

== SamHB vs. User: Conservative. SamHB badly loses again ==

[[User: Conservative]] wrote: 7-11-2017 Newsweek article: ''Why American Conservatives Love Anti-Gay Putin''. Putin's workouts have more machismo than Obama's too.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcb4rLzXFl0] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6i0Z0hCIzo][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LggcoH1VHo] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:13, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

SamHB wrote: "Well, this sure started a lively discussion! It was gratifying to see so many people come out and do the things that we each do so well. I look forward to seeing the videos of Donald Trump showing off his athletic prowess. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:36, 3 August 2019 (EDT)".

According to liberal/left leaning Wikipedia: "Golf is a club-and-ball sport in which players use various clubs to hit balls into a series of holes on a course in as few strokes as possible."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Golf&oldid=909235827]

According to ''Golf Digest'': "My main memory of playing golf with Donald Trump—preserved with more care now that he's the president—is that he really went after the ball hard. But the interesting thing is that though Trump's action might have looked a little reckless, it soon became clear that it was quite under control... Trump was 67 when I played with him in 2013 at his course outside Charlotte and in early 2014 at Doral, but he still possessed a significant remnant of big-man athleticism... As a golfer, the 45th president is the real deal."[https://www.golfdigest.com/story/how-good-is-donald-trump-the-golfer]

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kq84r4lqo VIDEO: ''Golf Digest'': Trump vs. Obama]. According to ''Golf Digest'', Trump is the better golfer! Specifically, ''Golf Digest'' said that Trump was the "best golfer ever to hold the presidency."[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kq84r4lqo]

I hope this clarifies the issue of whether Trump has more machismo than Obama.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:01, 4 August 2019 (EDT)
:By the way, once ObamaCare disappears, Trump's victory over Obama will be complete![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:03, 4 August 2019 (EDT)

== Best and fastest way to create an ex-homosexual ==

In 1980 a study was published in the ''American Journal of Psychiatry'' and eleven men participated in this study. The study reported that eleven homosexual men became heterosexuals "without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy" through their participation in a Pentecostal church.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7435713] The Apostle Paul in a letter to the church of Corinth indicated that Christians were able to overcome being homosexuals through the power of Jesus Christ (I Corinthians 6:9-11). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:29, 4 September 2019 (EDT)

== Atheistic Troll ==

According to my [[User_talk:Wikignome72#Why?|exchange]] with [[User:Conservative]] / [[User:Wikignome72]], he just lost (temporarily) the access to his account ("''The other editor of the account reset the password''" - so there is only one other user). Perhaps an intervention by a concerned friend or relative? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:14, 26 September 2019 (EDT)
:Somewhat the "exchange" mentioned above got erased - perhaps to save valuable memory space. Nevertheless, I just reprint it here:
::{{cquote|Why?
Just why? And please, don't quote Sun Tzu. --AugustO (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2019 (EDT)

Did the creationist Dwight D. Eisenhower tell the German evolutionist Adolf Hitler why he did things or his future plans? Nein!Wikignome72 (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2019 (EDT)
:If you just forgot User:Conservative's password, you probably can ask Andy to reset it. It's quite irritating to have a wiki gnome making substantial edits - like having a user calling himself robot. (BTW: happy 47th birthday! ;-) ) --AugustO (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2019 (EDT)
::There is more than one editor of the User: Conservative account. The other editor of the account reset the password. I will get the new password from that person down the pike. In the meantime, I will make an edit on the User page so there is not an unsightly red username in the recent changes to the wiki page.Wikignome72 (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2019 (EDT)
}}
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:35, 26 September 2019 (EDT)

“The whole secret lies in confusing the enemy, so that he cannot fathom our real intent.” - Sun Tzu, ''The Art of War''. Donald Trump (who quoted Sun Tzu on Twitter) and [[User:Conservative]]dom, are both unpredictable. Get used to it! I realize this may be upsetting to a certain editor who has a Germanic love of rules and predictability, but this is going to be the way it is![[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 19:47, 26 September 2019 (EDT)
::OK. I will offer a fuller explanation. I will be working on about 5 or so significantly sized projects soon so I asked the other editor of the account to change the password. Previously, SamHB and I discussed doing a 66 day period of nonediting of CP. SamHB already did his 66 day period. Soon, I will be using these two extensions to my main browser: [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/site-blocker/oohkinmgbkhgcobnipoijafcjgfcogpk Site blocker] and [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/stayfocusd/laankejkbhbdhmipfmgcngdelahlfoji Stayfcsd]. I have decided to do the 66 day period of nonediting of CP after I finish about a 12 hour project related to CP.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 03:42, 27 September 2019 (EDT)
:::A few comments:
:::#I have never had any communication with "Wikignome72", on- or off-wiki, on the 66 day topic or any other topic, until just now.
:::#The 66 day business appears to have come from the [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Personal_development_skill_sets_etc#Developing_good_habits_and_breaking_bad_habits Developing_good_habits_and_breaking_bad_habits] section of Cons's user page. It was probably placed there in late 2017, but it's hard to tell, because the page has been repeatedly vaped/burned/rebuilt. I have not read the two referenced articles; they might have wise counsel, though it doesn't appear that they helped the 4 Cons people achieve their goal.
:::#I promised one of the 4 users of the Conservative account (at the time I did not believe his assertion that there are actually 4) that I would respect the confidentiality of emails with that person. [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB #Taking_some_of_your_advice https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB Taking_some_of_your_advice]. Therefore, I will not discuss my communications, with that person, on the subject of the 66 day "challenge".
:::AugustO hypothesizes that, perhaps because of an "intervention", or perhaps because of dissension among the 4 people, some or all of the 4 users have had their password involuntarily reset. Perhaps this was done by Wikignome72, in an apparently successful hijacking of an account. Perhaps the 4 people gave out their password a little too freely, Of course, the Cons people could request that Andy reset the password, which he has apparently not done.

:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:54, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
::::There have been 3 users of the User: Conservative account. A 4rth person was given the password to the account, but never began editing.

::::Again, I asked another editor of the account to change the password as I want to tackle some upcoming projects and wanted less potential distractions. It was understood between us that I would ask for the new password later. I have nothing more to say about this matter. As far as I am concerned. AugustO is making a tempest in a teapot.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 17:12, 28 September 2019 (EDT)

Sorry. Surprisingly, I'm a member of this site for more than eight years. I apologize if I assumed an unwarranted familiarity with you all: frankly, I was just amused that a long-term user lost his/her/their access... - and I was annoyed when a wiki-gnome acted as an administrator: that's just wrong.

User:Conservative, over the years you have announced countless projects, out-times, booklets, etc. - nothing ever came of it. For me, you are somewhat the "comic relief" of Conservapedia, so, please, do not take our interactions too seriously. I hope that quenches the tempest in the teapot. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:05, 28 September 2019 (EDT)

:Well, this gets more confusing practically every day. Wikignome72 writes ("I asked another editor of the account [clearly referring to the Conservative account] to change the password ..." '''Another''' editor? This suggests the WGN is one of the editors of that account. But that would be sockpuppetry, which is clearly forbidden, and gets people banned instantly. So we have to assume WGN simply misspoke.

:And now WGN says, as though he is in close communication with the Cons people, that the number of Cons people is only 3, not 4. Perhaps it was hoped there would be 4 horseman of the [[User:Conservative]] account, but that this never occurred. Perhaps that 4th person, who was given the password but apparently never did anything, engaged in a bit of treachery and changed the password. Or perhaps the password change was actually done at the request of WGN, in order to keep him from being distracted while he (WGN) tackled some projects. Though I don't understand why the actions of the Cons folks would distract WGN. And WGN now appears to be tackling the same projects (atheism, atheism, atheism, New Zealand, and atheism), and with the same zeal and intensity, that the Cons's did.

:And it's possible that WGN's failure to simply reset the Cons password was because he had forgotten that he had admin privileges, or perhaps was never aware of this in the first place? Even though his user page has said, since 00:06 on 26 September, that he has them?

:So it's all very confusing. I don't know what the relationship is between WGN and the Cons folks, or the relationship among the Cons folks. But it appears that the number of Cons folks is 3, not 4.

:By the way, I don't normally follow Richard Dawkins, or all the atheist material the the Cons folks, and WGN, write, but today I just happened to look at [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=atheism,atheist,Richard%20Dawkins,agnostic,agnosticism a Google trends page]. And I thought "Mission accomplished!", depending on what the mission is. I can't figure out what the surveys mean. They seem to be treating Richard Dawkins as though he, personally, is a religious stance. But the [http://www.sneps.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jssr_15101.pdf pre-2043] page certainly suggests that something has been a smashing success!!

:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:40, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
::In a private email, I will tell you about Operation Super Fortresses![[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 22:52, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
:::Warning!! I have not promised email confidentiality to anyone other than the person who I believed at the time was the sole owner of the User:Conservative CP account. Any mail that I get that appears (based on, for example, its topicality to the present discussion) to be from Wikignome72, I will assume to be from Wikignome72, and will be subject to being made public. If it comes from one of the email addresses of the Conservative group, I will simply assume that someone in that group gave his email password to Wikignome72, and that the latter is posting it on his own. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (EDT)
::::Eisenhower had many good points indeed but it should be understood that he was not a "fighting general" in the mold of Patton, Montgomery or Rommel. He was a superb administrator and took well informed strategic decisions that were presented to him. He had little actual battlefield experience, a great man and leader perhaps but certainly no master tactician.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 08:40, 30 September 2019 (EDT)

Talk:Universe

2019-08-25T13:52:54Z

Chewy Suarez:

[[Talk:Universe/Archive 1]]

I think the statement, "the common view among cosmologists is that the universe comprises more than the three dimensions that we see, and that the universe is expanding in another dimension," is incorrect.
The expansion/contraction of the universe is governed by general relativity, which is a theory about the intrinsic geometry of spacetime. As such, the universe isn't really expanding into another dimension like a balloon would, but rather there is an increase in distance between two nearby points in the universe over time, which is colloquially interpreted as expansion. I'm going ahead an changing this to avoid confusion. However, the analogy drawn in the next paragraph is a good one. --[[User:Quantumdot|Quantumdot]] 20:50, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

==Questions on Age==

In the source material that is given as evidence that the ''measurable'' age of the universe may not truly reflect the ''actual'' age of the universe, it is stated that because clocks run faster at the top of tall buildings, this is evidence of time running faster because of the decreased effect of gravity. However, I cannot understand how the effect of gravity on a human instrument of measurement can be said to be affecting the actual time constant. That is; how do we know that it is not only our instruments which are affected by gravity, but the fabric of time itself? I find this article very interesting, though there are one or two more problems I have with it, I might need to read the book before I bring them up --[[User:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 16:59, 5 August 2008 (BST)

==Origin of the universe==

The scientific theory on the origin of the universe isn't that it "erupted from nothing", but that a quantum singularity burst outwards because of an explosion created from the immense pressure and heat. I've changed the article, but the citation is still something that twists the idea into something it isn't. {{unsigned|Grapes}}
: The citation is explaining the view of a Big Bang ''expert'', so can't be said to be "twisting" the idea. And a singularity is something that has no dimensions—i.e. it's synonymous with ''nothing''. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:24, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Would it be alright to write a comprehensive section on the age of the universe from the mainstream secular science POV. The age of the universe is virtually non-existent except for the YEC point of view and it be good to have more balance. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 20:51, 25 December 2009 (EST)
:I have an open mind about this, but I couldn't object more and I can't imagine that such a section would be useful. We don't have a section on Hindu creation myths, or on the pre-1900 scientific view, I really don't see the point to having another nonsensical history of the Universe. If you want to add anything, put it in a special section called "Atheist viewpoint" or something like that, to keep it from being presented as settled fact. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 22:13, 25 December 2009 (EST)
==On the first day==
God created The Heavens and the Earth. It is safe to assume he created The Heavens first. Without The Earth the definition of a day is arbitrary as a day is defined as the time it takes to spin once on its axis. With this is mind we can assume that The Earth is only thousands of years old while The Universe could be much older, even up to 13 billion years old. A young Earth does not necessarily equate to a young Universe. --[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 09:52, 25 August 2019 (EDT)

User talk:1990'sguy

2019-07-23T17:48:28Z

Chewy Suarez:

{{welcome}}

Thanks for adding your edits, hopefully you'll become a regular contributor. If I can help you out with anything let me know. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 19:45, 27 July 2016 (EDT)

:Thank you! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:49, 27 July 2016 (EDT)

Account promoted to skip the Captcha requirement. Thanks for your enlightening edits to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]].

Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:37, 28 July 2016 (EDT)

:Thank you! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:45, 28 July 2016 (EDT)
::Congratulations and welcome. You should be aware that people who edit at both CP and WP with the same user name are sometimes harrassed at WP as a result. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 00:11, 29 July 2016 (EDT)
:::Thank you for the welcome and thanks for the heads up! I've already received some heat on Wikipedia for taking some unpopular positions and opposing the bias there, so it will be nothing new for me. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:36, 29 July 2016 (EDT)

----
I saw your helpful addition to the article on Murder of Seth Rich, so I thought I would visit your talk page. How long have you lasted on the WickedPedia? I would be surprised that you would last long there, as I have found the WickedPedia incredibly intolerant and censorious, a pseudo-aristocracy with dominating bullies, biased enough for me to consider it a candidate for the Big T award (T in the Calvinist TULIP); i.e, total depravity! LOL I don't think you can do much on Wikipedia without being part of a group of old boys or buddies who work together. ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 19:26, 23 August 2016 (EDT))

:Did you mean my Wikipedia talk page? I have been editing Wikipedia for almost three years already. A big reason why I've lasted so long there is because many of the topics I edit are not particularly controversial. However, you are completely right in your description of Wikipedia. I have seen firsthand the massive (and very visible) intolerance and bias Wikipedia has against conservatives, Christians, and anything that contradicts secular and humanistic (pseudo)"scientific knowledge". I could probably write a book about all my criticisms of Wikipedia. I have been able to do some good work (I was able to bring the article "Electoral history of Ronald Reagan" to official "Good Article" status, and I created a few articles), but on other articles, like the Murder of Seth Rich, we cannot have much confidence on the quality and neutrality of those articles. I do applaud you, Thunkful2, for your excellent work on "Murder of Seth Rich". It's awesome that at least one person can accurately present this story! :) --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:35, 23 August 2016 (EDT)

----
I meant right here, this talk page -- I visited it after seeing your good edit. No, I haven't gone to your talk page on the WickedPedia. Thanks for the complement. ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 10:45, 24 August 2016 (EDT))

:OK, got it. And thanks for your complement. :) --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:50, 24 August 2016 (EDT)

== References from Wikipedia ==

While it's not really plagiarism to copy a reference from WP, it just want to point out that you probably shouldn't do so unless you have read that source, and believe that it supports what is being said. If you are reading the books you are referencing, that's fine--I just can't tell. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 23:33, 8 September 2016 (EDT)
:Oh, that's a good point. I actually did not read those books, I just wanted to cite something so I wouldn't be adding unsourced info to the article. Should I remove those references anyway? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:36, 8 September 2016 (EDT)

::It is a good idea to find references to support unsourced statements, but it is a little deceptive to cite something you haven't read. To be entirely beyond reproach, removal probably would be best. At this point though, I honestly don't know if I'd bother. In my opinion, it's up to you. No one else has said anything, so it might be okay to leave them, I'm just not sure. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 23:51, 8 September 2016 (EDT)

:::OK. I will do my own research and find other sources that I can use instead. However, it's getting late, so I will deal with that tomorrow. Thanks for your help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:58, 8 September 2016 (EDT)

== Account promoted ==

Your account has been promoted to include blocking and overnight editing capability. Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:30, 29 September 2016 (EDT)

:Congratulations! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 00:57, 29 September 2016 (EDT)

::Well done! [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 01:06, 29 September 2016 (EDT)

:::Thanks all! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:21, 29 September 2016 (EDT)

::::Excellent! you did good keeping an eye on that vandal yesterday. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 14:52, 29 September 2016 (EDT)

:::::Thanks, Progressingamerica, I appreciate it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:42, 29 September 2016 (EDT)

==Reading the WSJ==
Re: [[Christoph Blocher]]

Typically, when I want to read a WSJ article that requires subscriber sign in is to Google the headline and access the web page from a search engine instead of directly. Most of the time this requires a clean browser tab, sometimes it needs to be done in a different browser. Rarely, it requires a cookie clearing. Just thought that information may be of help. This even works with articles that are years old.

As a last resort, see if its in the internet archive.(though, most articles I don't want that bad to keep trying) But they're all good procedures to know. Sometimes works for other news sites too, besides WSJ. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 00:00, 10 October 2016 (EDT)

:Thanks for the tip! That's what I will do. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:32, 10 October 2016 (EDT)

== Account promoted ==

Your account has been promoted to include upload and rollback features. Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:26, 13 October 2016 (EDT)
:Thanks! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:36, 13 October 2016 (EDT)
::Congratulations! Keep it up! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 19:31, 13 October 2016 (EDT)
:::Thanks David! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2016 (EDT)

== Move and unlock requests ==

You can post your move and unlock requests to [[User talk:Karajou]]. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:30, 13 October 2016 (EDT)
:Thanks for the tip! It's getting late, so I will do that tomorrow. I appreciate it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:37, 13 October 2016 (EDT)
::You don't actually need any privileges to do a move. You can cut-and-paste from one lemma to another. For purposes of copyright law, the edit summaries must make it clear where the incoming material comes from. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:54, 14 October 2016 (EDT)

== Karajou blocked a user who expressed views supporting the Presidential candidate who is not a sexual preditor. ==

People should not be judged in race on alleged sexuality. A proper critique of Karajou would be asking him about blocking a user who expressed views supporting the Presidential candidate who is not a sexual preditor.--[[User:Rodgerr|Rodgerr]] ([[User talk:Rodgerr|talk]]) 19:04, 14 October 2016 (EDT)

:If you think you have been judged unfairly, you could have just emailed Karajou or webmaster@conservapedia.com (see [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Member Accounts]]). However, more than once, you decided to take the low route, calling him filthy, immature words [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=1283494&oldid=1283491]. See [[Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks]]. And why in the world did you do this? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Coal_burning&curid=140922&diff=1283484&oldid=1283423] (for someone who apparently abhors Trump for the tape, your words seem just as bad) That, honestly, is shameful. I will note that the "Bringreaganback" account clearly violated [[Conservapedia:90/10 rule]]. Considering all this, it's quite clear you deserved the block. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:12, 14 October 2016 (EDT)

== Mainpageleft ==

In response to your good question about entries on [[Template:Mainpageleft|Mainpageleft]], currently there are about 112 featured entries there, which are "reshuffled" periodically. Do you have any suggestions about how that "team" of entries be improved, with respect to insight, influence, popularity, interest level, educational value, etc.? It's a terrific mix of topics now but there is always room for improvement, particularly as the issues and interest in certain topics by the public inevitably shifts over time. Thanks much for any suggestions you may have.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:46, 18 October 2016 (EDT)

:An example: "[[Underrated Sports Stars]]" is a solid entry, but should probably be replaced on [[Template:Mainpageleft|Mainpageleft]]. Do you have any favored, influential, insightful, potentially or already popular entry that you like, which you would recommend to replace it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 12:55, 18 October 2016 (EDT)

::I do have a few suggestions. [[Murder of Seth Rich]] is probably the best suggestion, as it is very detailed and well sourced. Also, the Wikipedia article of the murder has been the victim of leftist bias (two times, within a month, editors have tried to delete the article, and with that failing, the article appears to have been stripped of much detail) which our article covers well. Other suggestions that I have are the [[Ark Encounter]] (a popular and influential attraction, and one that has been the victim of atheist and evolutionary bias, which the article covers), and [[Larry McDonald]] (a true patriot who stayed true to his principles, and his article actually covers the theories on his possible survival). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:22, 18 October 2016 (EDT)

== Account promoted again ==

Congratulations, your account has been promoted again, so that you can edit protected articles, and protect and unprotect articles. Very well done!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:05, 10 November 2016 (EST)
:Wow! Thank you very much, Mr. Schlafly! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:19, 10 November 2016 (EST)
::Congratulations! I've had some problems with the "protect" privilege, but I hope it works for you! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 01:35, 12 November 2016 (EST)
:::Thanks! I hope so too! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:15, 12 November 2016 (EST)
::::Congratulations on yet another promotion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:46, 12 November 2016 (EST)
:::::Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:46, 12 November 2016 (EST)

==Can't edit article==
Hi again, 1990'sguy, it's Ambassador. Is there any reason I can't edit the article on the [[Big Bang]]? To keep atheists from changing it, I suppose. If you have access to it, you might want to add the point about the Big Bang, due to planets and moons spinning backwards, contradicting the law of Conservation of angular momentum. Find out about it [http://www.creationwiki.org/Three_planets_and_several_moons_revolve_backwards_(Talk.Origins) here]. Thanks! [[User:Ambassador|Ambassador]] ([[User talk:Ambassador|talk]]) 19:56, 22 November 2016 (EST)
:Yes, the article is protected probably because of atheist/secularist/liberal vandalism. Unfortunately, I cannot edit it myself as I do not have full admin capabilities. I recommend asking an admin ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&username=&group=sysop&limit=100 list]) to unlock the article or add the information you want added. Or, you can go to [[Talk:Main Page|the main talk page]] and add your request there, where more people can see it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:08, 22 November 2016 (EST)

== Thank you! ==

Hello there, and thank you for editing the article on [[Islam and Christianity]]. --[[User:SWAJCAHL&S|SWAJCAHL&S]] ([[User talk:SWAJCAHL&S|talk]]) 09:13, 23 November 2016 (EST)
:No problem, and thank you for creating it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:14, 23 November 2016 (EST)

::And also thank you, for your help - and tips! - on [[Jared Kushner]]. I'll try to remember the ref's and cat's in the future. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ([[User talk:Ed Poor|talk]]) 21:49, 23 November 2016 (EST)
:::Sounds great and you're welcome! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:05, 23 November 2016 (EST)

== Geocentric page ==

I added a bit on the talk page a while ago. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 17:15, 3 December 2016 (EST)
:Do you mean on the section "Ptolemy's view of a stationary earth"? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:13, 3 December 2016 (EST)
::Sorry for the late reply but yes. It doesn't seemed to have created a new heading so I will add that now. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 17:11, 5 December 2016 (EST)
:::I removed it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:21, 5 December 2016 (EST)

== This is a simple misunderstanding. Please be reasonable. ==

This is [[User:Amorrow]]. I had to dirty myself by creating a sockpuppet because you cut off every last channel of communication. The issues:
# SSN of dead people are release by the government of the USA. I made it clear that my father is dead. His name was William Knight Morrow. You can find his name and SSN, for instance, at [http://sortedbybirthdate.com/pages/19311104.html this page]. It is public, not private.
# You could have removed that link and let it go at that. I do not require notification of such actions. I do not care about that link very much. I put it there simply as a convenience.
Is the matter resolved? If so, then please unblock me or let me know here what remains unresolved.--[[User:Amorrow2|Amorrow2]] ([[User talk:Amorrow2|talk]]) 20:44, 3 December 2016 (EST)

:I am discussing the issue on [[User talk:DavidB4]]. You are welcome to join in. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:48, 3 December 2016 (EST)
::You are unblocked. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:46, 3 December 2016 (EST)

Hello um 1990sguy Im not a spammer or troll I just want to edit this page so I can mod the Alexa device to read out conservapedia instead of wickedpedia.
:First off, you need talk page permission if you're going to make massive changes on one of CP's most important articles. I re-inserted some of your edits, but you need talk page permission to go further and change the article's very tone and point of view. Second, are you a sock of Amorrow? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:58, 8 November 2018 (EST)
::I am almost certainly not apart of this sock of amorrow, what is an Amorrow anyway 1990s?--[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]] ([[User talk:Reevestehsnek|talk]] 14:58, 8 November 2018 (EST)
:::Amorrow is the user who started the discussion you're commenting in. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:04, 8 November 2018 (EST)
::::Reeves, if your going to troll, you need an upgrade. Don't be so amatuerish about it. Show us something new and witty so we can develop appropriate countermeasures. You're obviously not stupid. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 15:31, 8 November 2018 (EST)
:::::Not a Troll, just following guidelines to not start a new section unless it hasn't been posted--[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]] ([[User talk:Reevestehsnek|talk]] 16:09, 8 November 2018 (EST)
::::::Like I am legit confused, During these last few Hours I get the feeling that you 1990s guy either think Im trying to wreck youre words or that I'm a troll. I also get the feeling that I am extremely unwelcome. Like is all this because I'm black. Because if that's the case Ill leave this site like real pronto.--[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]] ([[User talk:Reevestehsnek|talk]] 16:26, 8 November 2018 (EST)
:::::::You're confusing me with RobS, who also commented right above. I did not accuse you of trolling. If you feel unwelcome, it's probably because you're new, and you are not familiar with CP's rules. Also, CP is an '''extremely''' high target of vandalism, so we act the same way for '''every''' new user to vet them. Your skin color (which nobody knows) has nothing to do with it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:58, 8 November 2018 (EST)
::::::::Also, we '''recommend''' that you make a new section on a talk page. We discourage commenting on a two-year-old section about a completely different topic. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:11, 8 November 2018 (EST)

==Pitch hitting==

Thanks for the ref [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump&oldid=1293435]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 13:34, 18 December 2016 (EST)
:You're welcome. Always happy to help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:15, 18 December 2016 (EST)

==Trump==
You're not telling me it's just a coincidence, are you? [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:44, 23 December 2016 (EST)

:Seriously? It is extremely unlikely that this passage, which is about the Second Coming of Christ, has anything to do with Donald Trump. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:46, 23 December 2016 (EST)
::Dang :( Thought I'd had my first ever conservative insight. Must be the morphine. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:56, 23 December 2016 (EST)
:::I think this has more to do with biblical [[hermeneutics]] than conservatism. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:00, 23 December 2016 (EST)

== Merry Christmas ==

[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]
{{clear}}
Thank you for all your contributions to Conservaoedia as far your web article content.

Merry Christmas! And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:37, 24 December 2016 (EST)

:Thank you very much, Conservative, and the same to you as well! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:43, 24 December 2016 (EST)

== [[St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre]] ==

I suggest doing the redirect in the opposite direction for two reasons. First, it preserves the history and visits to the pre-existing entry. Second, it leaves intact the "Saint" spelled out, which is a stronger and more effective title than the secularized abbreviation. I'd be happy to change the direction of the redirect, if you agree. Regardless, thanks for your efforts!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:01, 27 December 2016 (EST)

:Yes please, Mr. Schlafly, that would be great if you would move it. Just as long as the article shows up as being created by me on the "New Pages" feed. I didn't know that this article already existed, but I worked hard on it and I think that my article is of higher quality by any objective measure. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:39, 28 December 2016 (EST)

==European immigration==
I was thinking of doing an article on the [[European immigration]] problem (don't want to call 'European immigration crisis', yet). Americans are woefully ignorant of what's happening in Europe, and we're looking at doing perhaps the biggest change in Immigration law since 1952. In Europe, whole new political parties have been spawned because of the establishment parties failure to deal with the problems. In 20 years, the German mi!itary may be majority Muslim which would impact the future of the NATO alliance. Better get started now in educating the American public on changing demographics and how this may affect America's role as a Superpower, assuming it still is by then.

Would you care to collaborate? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']] 01:39, 29 December 2016 (EST)

:Of course, I'll be happy to help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:39, 29 December 2016 (EST)
::Do you think we should add a subsection under UK about Brexit and to what extent that was motivated by immigration? Also, I'd like to include something about the Schengen Agreement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']] 16:46, 29 December 2016 (EST)
:::Both of those are great ideas. The "freedom of movement" EU policy played a large part in the referendum and its aftermath. People are tired of unlimited immigration.
:::As for the Schengen area, people can go anywhere they want in Europe without worrying about border security (and before, it was quite tough crossing the border I've heard). The agreement is an essential part of the EU plan to reach full political unification. It really has nothing to do with economics. Also, criminals and terrorists can easily cross the border. The recent Berlin attacker was caught in Italy. He crossed at least two borders without being caught. Imagine if he tried doing that without the agreement. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:53, 29 December 2016 (EST)
:::::Same as most of suspects in 1200 reported sexual assault cases New Years Eve in Cologne. Something like only 7 or 22 arrests have ever been made, while most of the other identified suspects are reported to have fled the country.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']] 17:06, 29 December 2016 (EST)

== Father's SSN ==

I created [[Social Security Death Index]]. After I add some ref's, I hope that we can revisit the notion of me declaring what my father's SSN is.

Just to mention where I got this idea from, it is from the web site anusha.com . Sloan has lived an erratic and at times immoral life, but he is just below the level of genius in raw talent. I refer to him as an "accidental adventurer". Please see thermo4thermo.org/sam_sloan.html for some of his life-adventures.
I am not promoting his lifestyle, but he is my publisher for my upcoming book. His web site is a mess. It has about 3000 pages but just a mess of cross-references. The home page is very, very long. You can look at pages like www.anusha.com/pafc147.htm . He also has pages like www.anusha.com/uncles-p.htm . His memory is almost perfect. Near Total Recall. Anyway, I hope we can engage in dialog about my father's SSN.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 22:11, 3 January 2017 (EST)
==Hate crime==
Dear 1990'sguy, I am not trying to get into an edit war with you, but I believe that you are misreading the hate crime laws. They do not address "hate speech," just violence or other criminal acts against target groups that receive a lot of hate. I suggest that you do further research, and I hope that you will come to the same conclusion. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 20:31, 7 January 2017 (EST)
:For clarification, are you telling me that hate crime laws do not cover "hate speech"? Regardless, I think we should mention that slowly (but steadily) speaking out for biblical Christian principles (opposition to homosexual marriage, saying Islam is a false religion, etc.) is being seen as "hate speech" and vulnerable to being criminalized. See this recent story[https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/simon-turpin/2016/01/08/northern-ireland-pastor-not-guilty-criticising-islam/] and please note the recent attempts to censor Christian sermons in Houston (I don't know if other cities did the same). Censorship of Christian and conservative opinions is growing, and I could a few (but probably unrelated to hate crimes) examples. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:09, 7 January 2017 (EST)
::Also, while you can keep you additions, would you please restore the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hate_crime&curid=3861&diff=1298155&oldid=1298153 material you deleted in this edit] (particularly those three completely deleted paragraphs)? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:11, 7 January 2017 (EST)
:::Thank you for fixing the dead link and finding an additional source. You are exactly right. Hate crime and hate speech are completely different. All Conservatives disapprove of speech codes, "safe spaces policy" and political correctness. The First Amendment is clear that regulation of speech must be neutral as to the message. The person(s) who wrote the [[Hate crime]] article years ago got a bit tangled up. Liberals want hate speech codes, and Conservatives oppose them. Both Liberals and Conservatives have voted to enact true hate crime laws to protect religious freedom and to address hate violence on the basis of race. Some Conservatives argue that the list of hate targets in those laws should not include "sexual orientation," but that argument does not belong in a section discussing protecting religion.
:::I took out the two paragraphs because they were repetitive, out-of-place and not germaine. Why not add them to [[Hate speech]]? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 21:39, 7 January 2017 (EST)
::::Thank you for clarifying and for moving the content. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:00, 7 January 2017 (EST)
:::::You are welcome. Our discussion here was a bit time delayed. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:02, 7 January 2017 (EST)
If you want to include the legislative history, it should explain which bill that was finally adopted that is being discussed and how the bill that was adopted differs from the earlier bills. The people that worked on this article years ago were obviously opposed to a series of bills and were making arguments on why a bill would be bad. Their narative is out of date. We have a number of state and federal hate crime laws on the books and we need to describe what exists, give facts and statistics about how the laws work, and include some commentary on whether the law has been applied fairly. If you want to expand the history section beyond the two sentences that I have explaining how the federal law expanded the role of the FBI, please do so. But the fact that certain people sponsored bills that did not pass before a bill did pass is not helpful unless you explain what changes were made or how the early efforts illumniates our understanding of the bill that passed. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 00:50, 13 January 2017 (EST)
:If these proposed bills became law, we should definitely include this (even if we word it differently). We should do this in order to inform the public about leftist laws and to show that they didn't always exist. Unfortunately, I am quite busy right now, so I cannot do anything about this at the moment. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:49, 13 January 2017 (EST)
:::1990sguy, these bills did '''not''' become law. A similar bill later became law. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:10, 14 January 2017 (EST)
::Not to sidetrack your guys discussion, but let me point out (cause the media hasn't) we have just witnessed something very rare and unusual in the US. Traditionally, because of state sovereignty, the states prosecute murder cases and federal government's role is restricted, for most of our history, to capital cases in the US military. In the 20th century federal crimes like murdering the president, or terrorism on federal property causing death ([[Timothy McVeigh]]), were added. This guy, [http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/12/us/dylann-roof-death-penalty-explainer/ Dylann Roof], has just been sentenced to death for violating peoples civil rights with a hate crime enhancement, and ''not for murder''. The federal government does not have the legal authority to try this as a murder case. In fact, Roof probably never will be tried for murder cause the State of South Carolina isn't gonna spend the time and money to do it after the feds are done. In my lifetime, I think this is only the fourth case like this I ever heard of, tho I'm sure there's been a few others. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]] 22:37, 13 January 2017 (EST)
:::Rob, this happened a lot in the 1960s. Civil rights workers would go South and were murdered and either the murder was not prosecuted or a local jury would acquit the accused. The FBI would then investigate and the US DOJ would successfully prosecute for civil rights violations in Federal Court. The question is whether there is enough of a commerce clause basis to allow for the passage of such federal crimes, and the courts have upheld them on the grounds that if the federal government did not prevent such intimidation, people would not feel safe crossing state lines. Also, many states have suspended or abolished the death penalty, while it remains available in federal court. State "sovereignty" is very limited and not ''actual'' sovereignty in the legal sense. To me, this is a more interesting aspect of the Hate crime article than whether or not the definition should be expanded to include "gender identity." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:08, 14 January 2017 (EST)
::::I'm not sure it happened "a lot". There was the 'Mississippi Burning' case, where the local cops and others were charged with civil rights violations, but no one served more than a six year sentence. This is why "hate crime" legislation was added later, cause sentences were too light for a "civil rights violation resulting in death". The problem in those days were all-white juries exonerating murder cases, so the feds invented a way they could prosecute killers. One guy was convicted in a state trial [http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/price&bowers/killen.htm 40 years later in 2005 of manslaughter,] but he wasn't the trigger man. No one has ever been charged with the actual killings.
::::Then there was Salt Lake City case of a civil rights violation resulting in death in 1978, but Utah was never part of the Confederacy, was not put under federal scrutiny in the Voting Rights Act, nor has a history of all-white jurries exonersting whites accused of murdering blacks.

::::In the 1990s, Brian Beckwith was convicted of violating Medgar Evers civil rights by killing him in the 1970s.

::::In the 90s Timothy McVeigh was the first person executed by the federal government since, like 1956. But this was a terrorism charge resulting in death, not a civil rights violation, AFAIK. ([https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3azq6b/eli5how_timothy_mcveigh_only_got_convicted_of_8/ McVeigh was only charged with 8 counts of murder, although 168 were killed]). Since McVeigh, there's been maybe one or two other cases of people executed by the federal government.
::::Bottomline, the federal hate crime enhancement was added cause, while the feds proved they could get a conviction where the state failed to act, the penalty was too low. Since its inception, it's hard to find a single case that the law was used for what it was designed for. There is no evidence whatsoever that South Carolina would not prosecute Dylann Roos, or an all-white jury would have exonerated him if the feds failed to intrude. South Carolina has lost its right to govern itself, its sovereignty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]] 06:32, 14 January 2017 (EST)
:::::If this is true, then it definitely should be added. It would give yet another ignored example of massive governmental expansion and movement towards socialism. JDano, if the 2009 proposal did not become law, then what did the actual law consist of? If the bill that was listed on the article did not become law, then there is no point in including it. However, a legislative history of successful bills would be good. However, I am still quite busy, so I will not attempt to do anything about this at the moment. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:49, 14 January 2017 (EST)

==Contest==
I will provide the details you seek when i get some time. You were in the top 5. --Jpatt 10:19, 16 January 2017 (EST)
:Thank you for the reply Jpatt! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:40, 16 January 2017 (EST)

== discuession ==

I am continuing the discussion on my talk page.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 10:39, 22 January 2017 (EST)

==Question==
What would be the best word to describe Eurosceptic's opponents? Eurocentric? Pan European? Some other? I don't like globalist in this context. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]] 12:42, 28 January 2017 (EST)
:I would say either "Europeanists," "Europhiles," or "Euro-Federalists" are the best. They either seem to be the most used terms. Of those three, I would personally opt for the first. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:00, 28 January 2017 (EST)

== Ban editing ==

Hi, I've noticed you sometimes change blocks by other admins to increase the time or make in infinite. I appreciate your intentions, but just thought I would point out a couple things. Firstly, the blocking admin generally has the final say over the block they have imposed. For example, if a person want to dispute the ban, they are to go to the blocking admin, and that admin decides whether to revoke the ban or not (as can be seen [[Conservapedia:Quick_reference#If_you_get_blocked|here]]). Since you are not revoking a block, it's probably not as big of an issue, but it still seems to be proper etiquette. Of course, full admins have authority over assistants such as you and I, so they have the right to direct revise of revoke blocks we make. 
Secondly, While it makes good sense to block those people forever, it doesn't really work that way. A ban applies to the username, and the IP from which they edited if the option is selected--nothing more. Vandals almost always use servers to redirect their connection, however, so that their true IP is never seen by CP. This means that when we block those users, we are really just blocking the server they were using. This is a good thing too, but the problem is that these servers are usually assigned new IPs periodically, so the block no longer applies--now the blocked IP is unassigned. Since most people in the western world still use IPv4, there are not that many spare IP addresses, so the IP is soon assigned to someone else. Now some innocent person is using an IP which for all eternity has been blocked on CP. They probably will never even know, but if we set infinite blocks enough, the chances of that happening regularly increase continuously. I know some people here do use infinite block regularly, but in my opinion its a logistical problem. This is why I almost always set a time limit, or block only the username infinitely, and leave the IP unblocked (which I prefer not to do).
Thanks for your ongoing efforts! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 22:05, 31 January 2017 (EST)
:Yikes, I should have thought of that. The thought of indefinitely blocking innocent people from CP certainly is not a good thing. If you haven't reverted by block change, feel free to undo it. I'm too busy right now to do it myself. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:11, 31 January 2017 (EST)

::The chances of that happening from a couple blocks are pretty low, but it can add up. Anyway, no harm done. I just thought I'd mention it. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 22:24, 31 January 2017 (EST)

:::I apologize for adding to a discussion which is over a year old. However, DMorris straightened me out about this, and I wanted to belatedly set the record straight. When a user is blocked, the username/account is blocked for a specified amount of time, but the IP address is only blocked for 24 hours, unless it is banned separately. Autoblock will put a 24-hour ban on all IPs used by the banned account, though I'm not sure if it also blocks IPs which log into the banned account at a later time...I believe it does. Therefore, it seems we do not need to worry about the last point I made, as I was mistaken. Once DMorris corrected me, I did some research and testing, which confirmed what he told me. --[[User:DavidB4|DavidB4]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 00:03, 28 March 2019 (EDT)

::::Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:23, 28 March 2019 (EDT)

== expand ==

[[Gainful employment]]. Yes. I dare you to.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 08:32, 4 February 2017 (EST)
:Why? What's the purpose of you messaging me? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:25, 4 February 2017 (EST)

==[[Abortion]] article==
It's open for you to make your suggested additions. As to the Leif Ericson image, what needs to happen is a new image uploaded in its place. I'll try to find one later. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 13:18, 6 February 2017 (EST)
:New Leif image uploaded and added to article. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 12:56, 7 February 2017 (EST)
::Thank you. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:02, 7 February 2017 (EST)

== Addiction article and TAR ==

Hello again, Regarding the [[Addiction]] article and specifically its categories, I agree with JDano. Let me attempt to explain: 

"TAR" is short for [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] a former user and assistant SysOp here at Conservapedia. People have differing opinions of him, but mine is that he did offer some valuable contributions, but also did not understand and did not learn the rules of CP. Among some other issues, he tended to add many "See also" links to articles which were not sufficiently relevant and did the same with categories. Thus, when editors refer to "TAR" they are usually talking about this debris, which should not exist. TheAmericanRedoubt (TAR) has since stopped editing here, and his account has been deleted. However, some of the links and categories he inserted still exists, and make things look messy. For this reason, a number of editors (including myself) try to clean up these issues and restore a little more order. The guide page [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles]] was the direct result of TAR's methods. 
Regarding the categories specifically, it's best to maintain a "tree" structure. A page should not connect to categories which also contain subcategories it links to. Also, it should link only to categories which contain it, not categories which the page topic can contain. In other words, a page "drug" should be in the category "medicines" but not in a category "antibiotics". 
I hope this clarifies a bit. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 00:42, 13 February 2017 (EST)

:Please allow me to apologize for my impatience with the "addiction" article. You accidentally stepped into the remains of a hornets' nest. TAR added lots of utterly irrelevant see-also's and categories, in what can only be described as an attempt to turn this wiki into survivalist-pedia, or perhaps James-Wesley-Rawles-pedia. He offended a huge number of people with his implications that we were all supposed to stockpile bullets, batteries, and other survivalist stuff (I could look it up but it's too nauseating) and move to a "redoubt" in Idaho or similar place while we wait for the apocalypse. We were also all supposed to be into some kind of crackpot Indian alternative medicine. (I think it was called "ayurvedic" or something like that; once again too nauseating.) The whole wiki was in an enormous uproar for a few months. (And Cons, who really doesn't subscribe to that stuff, nevertheless stirred up the pot by pretending to be in email contact with the guy.)
:So if you see suspicious see-also's or categories, especially with codewords like "nanny state" or "gun-grabbing", be aware this might be detritus from TAR. I support the second amendment, but I don't support putting all this survivalist garbage into an article on fire hydrants.
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:36, 13 February 2017 (EST)
::It has taken a huge amount of work to undo TAR's damage. I suppose that you think that there is a bias against any change he had made, and there is probably some truth to that. He did not understand that our categories have a tree structure. Instead, he thought of categories as a word association test. Putting in excess categories and excessive red links makes Conservapedia less appealing to users and lowers our google search engine rankings. In theory, every article could be in every category, because there is some plausible connection between any two subjects. If we had a separate article on "Drug Addiction" then it could have categories like [[:Category:Illegal Drugs]] or [[:Category:Drugs]]. The problem is that [[:Category:Illegal Drugs]] is a subcategory of [[:Category:Drugs]] ''breaking up the category tree with an infinite loop.'' Here the Addiction article is on a much higher level that discusses video games, etc. So, it is not useful to a high school student looking for information about illegal drugs, in my opinion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 05:46, 13 February 2017 (EST)

:::Thank you all for your explanations. Considering these things, I will try not to get in the way next time this clean up occurs. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (EST)
== Thanks! ==

You helped make [http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com THIS] happen.

I have never seen a non-profit website go from below 100,000 rank to nearly a 50,000 Alexa ranking in about a year. And Andy payed zero dollars for internet marketing services during this period.

And there is no sign of a nearing web traffic plateau. My guess is that Trump supporters/Trump era and the resulting political waves significantly explains the boost in traffic.

Trump supporters seem very loyal so the traffic boost could be long lasting. It also seems like there is a reawakening of right-wing politics/nationalism that will be long lasting. And right-wing populism and "[[best of the public]]" go together like peanut butter and jelly. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:30, 13 February 2017 (EST)

:You're welcome, and thank ''you'' for all your edits! I'm happy to help improve the quality of Conservapedia. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:56, 13 February 2017 (EST)
==Quick project==
Dear Guy:
Our state articles list the members of Congress from each state, but they have not be updated for 2016. If five editors could update 10 states each, we would be done quickly. Could you please take a look at [[Conservapedia:Community Portal#Political directory]]? Thanks in advance, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 16:13, 15 February 2017 (EST)

Thank you for your help with the project and with People's Party. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:02, 21 February 2017 (EST)

== Tip ==

Thanks for your terrific work. One tip: the licensing information should be expressly included in the uploads. I added it here: [[File:EU_member_states.png]]. Thanks again for your edits and uploads.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:27, 7 March 2017 (EST)
:Thank you for the tip. I will remember to add the information next time. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:34, 7 March 2017 (EST)

==[[Template:Book]]==
Try working on it now. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 10:48, 11 March 2017 (EST)

== Questions ==

A few months ago, you told me to ask you any questions I had, so here goes:
*When recategorizing the massive and messy [Category:Authors] by nationality, I found two authors, [[Theo Hobson]] and [[Carl Sagan]], whom I could not recategorize as [Category:American Authors]. Could you change them for me?
*When fixing the [[Francois Rabelais]] cedilla mess, I set up a redirect. Has anyone ever made a loop out of redirects? If so, what happened? I'm scared to try it.
*Lastly, where is my attention now best sent - expanding the author articles, improving our coverage of science and mathematics, or maybe tackling another recat job, like [Category:Music]?

:1) Concerning [[Theo Hobson]] and [[Carl Sagan]], those articles are protected, and as an assistant sysop, I do not have the ability to edit them. I recommend asking someone like [[User:Karajou]] or CP's owner, [[User:Aschlafly]] to either unlock the articles to allow you to fix the category or to have them change the cat themselves. I've made many similar requests to them and they will be happy to help.

:2) I have not heard of someone doing that before. I personally don't think anything bad would happen if someone did try it, as you can still access the actual redirect page to remove the loop.

:3) Honestly, all three choices are great. If I were you, I would probably choose to expand the articles already created so that the average reader would find them more interesting and worthwhile, rather than just seeing a stub. After that, I would personally move on to work on another category, so that CP is better-organized. Then after that, I would do math and science, which is (as far as I can tell) on a different theme than your other work. This is my personal preference, but if you would prefer doing it in a different order feel free! You have been very helpful to CP, and I appreciate your work. Keep it up! :) --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:20, 14 March 2017 (EDT)

::Hi, just a quick note: A redirect loop shouldn't be a problem. I think the user is only redirected once, so after that they see the second redirect page. Redirect loops, double redirects, and dead redirects should all be avoided when possible. Thanks for your contributions! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 20:23, 14 March 2017 (EDT)

:::You are entirely correct, DavidB4; I just tried a loop with soda and pop (and removed it). Typing one would give you the page for the other, and an option to redirect. I'll proceed to expand the author pages now. Feel free to removed this section to abridge the talk page.--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 15:58, 15 March 2017 (EDT)

== Could you please write this article? ==

Could you please write this important article: [[Atheism and ethics]]?

I may ask another writer or tow to contribute to it also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:07, 18 March 2017 (EDT)

:Yes, I think I will be able to find some time to do it. Unfortunately, I have other things on my to-do list (even for CP), but this article is important, and I will try to find time to help. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:10, 18 March 2017 (EDT)

::OK. Thanks. I think [[User:Pokeria1]] will be assisting you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:55, 18 March 2017 (EDT)

=== Sources to help you write an article ===

*[https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/04/ethics-for-atheists/# Would human life be sacred in an atheist world?]

*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_more_immoral.html Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior - Or Does It?]

*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheism_determinism_morality.html Does Atheism (Determinism) Negatively Impact Morality?]

*[http://apologetics-notes.comereason.org/2015/03/atheism-ethics-and-immorality.html Atheism, Ethics, and Immorality]

*[https://www.thinkingchristian.net/posts/2016/01/good-nothing-make-atheist-ethics-better-christian/ Being Good “For Nothing” — Does That Make Atheist Ethics Better Than Christian?]

*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/questions-on-atheism-ethics-and-marital-conflict Questions on Atheism, Ethics, and Marital Conflict]

*[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics]

Secular sources:

*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]

*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]

Additional sources:

*[http://www.paulcopan.com/articles/pdf/God-naturalism-morality.pdf God, Naturalism, and the Foundations of Morality] by Paul Copan
*[http://www.equip.org/articles/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality/ Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality] by Chad Meister
*[http://themelios.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-amorality-of-atheism The amorality of atheim] by Rob Smith
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/can-we-be-good-without-godCan Can we be good without God?] by William Lane Craig]
*[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics and morality] by Ken Ammi
*[http://www.doesgodexist.org/NovDec06/AtheisticExplanations.html Atheist explanations of morality and common sense]
*[http://whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2015/09/does_being_an_atheist_interfer.html Does being an atheist interfere with being moral?] by Lydia McGrew
*[http://americanvision.org/2742/nietzsche-slaps-down-dawkins-on-the-illusion-of-atheist-morality/ Nietzsche slaps down Dawkins on the illusion of atheist morality] by Dr. Joel McDurmon

== quick note ==

Would you be interested in email communication with me? My email is userconservative135@gmail.com

Please let me know if you are interested. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:54, 18 March 2017 (EDT)

:Yes, that would be great! I've been thinking for some time of setting up a CP email address account, and I'll do that within the next couple of days. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:29, 18 March 2017 (EDT)
::OK. That sounds good. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:02, 19 March 2017 (EDT)
:::Here it is: 1990sguysdg@gmail.com --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:46, 21 March 2017 (EDT)
I just sent you an email. Let me know if you got it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:10, 21 March 2017 (EDT)
::I wrote another response to your email. Please check your email box. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:05, 22 March 2017 (EDT)
:::I got your latest email and responded to it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:41, 22 March 2017 (EDT)

== If you are interested, another article that needs to be created ==

If you are interested, another article that needs to be created: [[Secular ethics]]

Sources about this topic:

*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_ethics Secular ethics]

*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]

*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]

Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:11, 20 March 2017 (EDT)

=== A couple more article suggestions related to atheism and morality ===

Also, here are a few more articles that need to be written about atheism and morality:

*[[Evolutionary ethics]], Wikipedia has an article on it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_ethics

*[[Ethical naturalism]], Wikipedia has an article on it at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_naturalism

*[[Ethical subjectivism]], Wikipedia has an article on this subject at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_subjectivism

Thanks for your assistance on the [[Atheism and ethics]] article. It was much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:21, 22 March 2017 (EDT)

== The Project I invited you to participate in plus ==

Here is the project I invited you to participate in:

*[[Conservapedia:Atheism Project]]

It should be easy to find relevant online material in order to create some of the articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:19, 22 March 2017 (EDT)
:Thank you, Conservative, for your suggestions. I will begin on some of these soon. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (EDT)
::I sent you an email. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)

== Blocking user "reformed" ==

Well, I've got to say that vandalizing the user page of someone with block authority is '''really''' stupid.

But I take issue with your claim that he was an "obvious sock". As one who has been blocked a number of times on completely bogus socking charges, I take that stuff seriously. (The blocking was generally done by someone (now deceased) who had "checkuser" privileges and therefore had good tools for detecting socks, but did not understand how internet addresses work.)

It is not at all obvious to me, as one who has a lot of experience at CP, that he was a sock. He was a vandal, and you should block him for that.

Oh, dear. Now I see that there's a big storm of this stuff going on. And, yes, these guys, or at least some of them, are probably socks of each other. And at least one of them is using the name "obvioussock", just to taunt you. And one says he used to be a washing machine in his previous life.

My goodness! I think you are being trolled! :-) :-) And no, I had nothing to do with this. Just block them. It will blow over soon.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:54, 25 March 2017 (EDT)

:Thank you for your message. :) Due to the fact that "reformed" was created right after I blocked two users and vandalized my user page, I assumed that it was a clear sock of one or both of them. However, as it was not clear to you and possibly others, I changed the block settings to just include vandalism. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:06, 25 March 2017 (EDT)

==Screw up==
Sorry, I'm working with a tablet, and it's a piece of garbage. I didn't intentionally remove your comments. Sorry. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]] 15:31, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
:Assuming you're referring to those at [[Talk:Main Page]], apology accepted. It can happen to the best of us. They were other user's edits, however. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:33, 25 March 2017 (EDT)

== Thank you ==

For your reverts yesterday on my userpage, saw the sock puppet master was not finished with his trolling. [[User:YortKeldher|YortKeldher]] ([[User talk:YortKeldher|talk]]) 07:37, 26 March 2017 (EDT)
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:54, 26 March 2017 (EDT)

== Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination ==

Thank you for your improvements to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination]]. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 16:13, 29 March 2017 (EDT)
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:30, 29 March 2017 (EDT)

== small request ==

I sent you a message at the last place we communicated. Can you please read that message? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
:I sent you the information I promised. It is located at the place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:36, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
::Sent you message. Please check place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
:::I sent you a quick note to the place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:51, 18 April 2017 (EDT)
::::Could you please go to the place we last communicated? It is regarding another matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])

==Photo size==
With a large photo, there is much more word wrap in the table of contents, which makes it even longer. We need a wide table of contents. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 19:08, 10 April 2017 (EDT)
:I've checked and double-checked, and I see no way how the larger-sized photo does anything to the table of contents. And I'm using a standard Google Chrome, 100% zoom screen. Could it be your search engine/zoom? I don't see any reason why the larger image is a problem in any way. I think it looks better, regardless. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:06, 10 April 2017 (EDT)
:::On Firefox the TOC is longer due to word wrap. You can get other pictures to help fill the space, but the space will be shorter if the TOC is wider. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:19, 10 April 2017 (EDT)
I am getting a lot of 500 errors. I will wait for you to finish, and then I will go back and apply my changes. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:07, 11 April 2017 (EDT)
:I have done my changes. But please, when making those changes, please do ''not'' revert changes I have made, particularly changes that I have already reverted you multiple times. I'm tired of these disputes. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:09, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

== IRC ==

Hello, 
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009. It is now registered and somewhat set up. I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel. Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering. In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later. If you are interested, please let me know! 
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net 
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 15:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

:Thank you for your response. I have never used or really even heard of IRC prior before now (or, more accurately, before you and Andy started talking about it). What is the purpose of IRC? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:47, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

::It is perhaps the oldest form of instant messaging. It is basically a chat room, where people can join and idle or actively chat. Visitors can ask members questions, and members can collaborate. There is even file sharing, if that would be useful. I'm going to be writing a how-to-use guide to explain the actual usage better. 
::Most people use software clients, which they install (or run portably, which a whole different story), but web clients are also available, such as [https://kiwiirc.com/client?settings=7c7240c62a5d4861a8ad0ba697929f39 this one]. With the web client, you can just pick a name and connect, without installing anything. Also, since IRC has been around so long, software for it is compatible with almost anything. All desktop and most mobile operating systems support it. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 15:55, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

:::Thanks for the info! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:24, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Vandal ==

Already took care of that and left a note for [[User talk:Teapublican|Teapublican]] on his talk page. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 00:09, 20 April 2017 (EDT)
:Thank you. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:08, 20 April 2017 (EDT)

== Recent item on maintalk -- congratulations! ==

Sorry, I just couldn't resist making fun of you there. I immediately recognized the Breitbart article, as one that I had seen shortly before. And then I saw that it was you. No hard feelings, I hope. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:22, 24 April 2017 (EDT)
:None at all. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:37, 24 April 2017 (EDT)

::Congratulations! The [[March for Science]] article is a ''really good article''. And you made it so. (Well, with a little prodding from me.) It sets out, straightforwardly, what was going on, and it doesn't descend into namecalling. I realize that you probably have very strong disagreements with what most of those people were doing, but you kept it professional.

::Really good articles, especially on potential "hot button" issues of politics, aren't all that common. Now maybe I will make another attempt to return the [[Pussy Riot]] article to the good state it was in back when I expanded it in 2014, before it got messed up with the implication that anyone who opposes murderous thug tyrant Vladimir Putin must be a "leftist", "elitist", or "social justice warrior". For which I was blocked, in blatant violation of the rules of this site. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:25, 26 April 2017 (EDT)

:::Thank you for the compliment! Unfortunately, the router I'm using blocked the "Pussy Riot" article because of the first word in the title, so I cannot comment on that at all. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:00, 26 April 2017 (EDT)

::::How sad. I have created the redirect [[Nadezhda Tolokonnikova]] in case that helps. But it probably won't. You had no trouble typing the "P" word above, so I guess it's a problem of your router not going to a page with that word in the title. Maybe I should have named the page with its Cyrillc letters: "Пусси Райот". Well, you're not missing anything of cosmic importance. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:42, 26 April 2017 (EDT)

:::::The redirect actually did work. Thanks! The article does not appear to have a high quality (at least in the aesthetic sense), so changes would probably be beneficial, but if you're going to make changes, I would like to remind you to be cautious and not to contradict CP's POV. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:17, 26 April 2017 (EDT)

:::In case you forgot, Sam <s>(and how fast it appears that happens with you)</s>, it was ''you'' who violated the rules of this site by putting a liberal POV into that article (among others, [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamHB per your history]) in the first place, then insistently readding it after your edit was reverted and you were warned about violating CP policy and about starting fights with other editors. You really should take the advice you're being given here and not continue violating CP policy. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:59, 26 April 2017 (EDT)

A few things:
*Today is my 9th anniversary at Conservapedia!
*I can assure everyone that I am very familiar with, and well versed in, the rules, commandments, guidelines, customs, and habits of CP. I am also familiar with the many, many, many discussions of these points that have taken place over the years.
*@Northwest: this is the expected response.
*@1990's guy: this is ''not'' the response I expected. I'm chagrined that you think the article is of low quality. Especially since you know how to write high quality articles.
I'm serious. I was proud of that article as originally written/expanded by me. I thought it laid out the facts accurately, and avoided name-calling and such. Exactly like the March for Science article. Please look at the article (preferably the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&oldid=1328015] version, before name-calling got put in) and fix it up as you see fit. The name-calling consisted, among other things, of saying that those people around the world who took an interest in the case were "elitists" and "social justice warriors on the left". The latter term is straight out of Huffington Post and their ilk. It is a term of bleeding hearts in America, and not used widely elsewhere. In any case, one doesn't need to be an SJW to oppose murderous thug tyrant Vladimir Putin. In fact, given the recent falling out between President Trump and Putin, the accepted orthodoxy here at CP might be swinging away from support for the murderous thug. I hope so.

Please improve the article.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:28, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

:My problem is not with content; it is with organization, layout, aesthetics, etc. There are no subsections, which at least show the reader how the article is organized; it is just many paragraphs. Such articles do not appeal to the reader. IMO, it feels like reading a textbook. If it is just a few paragraphs, it is fine, but thus article has ten paragraphs. Adding a few headers and possibly an image would be beneficial (and I realized just as I wrote this that the March for Science article is approaching that length as well, so I probably either should just keep my mouth shut or add headers there as well). I did not mean to insult or degrade your work, and I apologize for giving that impression. BTW, happy 9th anniversary! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:46, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

:Sam - by your response, you're only proving what I said about your tactics and your history here right. You claim to be "very familiar with, and well versed in, the rules, commandments, guidelines, customs, and habits of CP", but you only pay lip service to them here while your actions on CP over the years (and even now) are showing that you simply choose to disregard them for the sake of pushing liberal POV on this site and to start fights with those who don't share your viewpoint. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:08, 28 April 2017 (EDT)

== Bill Nye ==

Could you please contact me by email at sam4557@gmail.com? I think we can make a really good article out of this. I have a number of criticisms of his behavior--my opinion of him has gone down a whole lot over the last few weeks, and I think I have some insights about this that I'd like to bounce off of you. I know that you and I disagree totally about evolution and creationism, but we can put together a good article stating the facts. We can stay away from the name-calling that so many articles contain, and avoid things like "so-and-so falsely believes that ..."

This is ''not'' about Pussy Riot, ''not'' about Conservapedia politics, and ''not'' about you-know-who. I just want to bounce some ideas off of you about Bill Nye and see if we can put together a really nice article.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:00, 4 May 2017 (EDT)

== Expanded article, footnote did not support genocide/racist abortions adequately ==

I greatly expanded this article [[Abortion and eugenics]]. The footnote in the liberal article was not supporting or at the very least inadequately supporting racist/genocidal abortion policies of [[Margaret Sanger]], etc.

Specifically, I skimmed the article as far as the footnoted article and it did not appear to strongly support such a big claim like abortion/genocide, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

==Something isn't right here==
... Ohhh I know what it is. ''Margaret Thatcher'' is on the list of liberals. ''Margaret. Thatcher.'' The bastion of conservatism. A favourite of Reagan. How in the ''world'' did she make the liberal list? [[User:Koidevelopment|Vive]] [[User talk:Koidevelopment|Liberté!]] 09:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:Wasn't me who added her. She was not as conservative as people think she is, as she did vote in favor of legalizing abortion and homosexuality. But, that said, it would probably be better without mentioning her, to avoid people focusing on her mention in the article. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:24, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

::She might not have been a perfect conservative, but I still think she probably doesn't belong on that list. Of course, if you go back 80 years and read writings and speeches from liberals of the day, they sound downright conservative now. Still, she did defend liberty and much of conservatism. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 13:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::Lady Thatcher's criticism of Simon Callow's performance in ''Amadeaus'' made her homophobic, I thought. Being homophobic wouldn't preclude one from being liberal however, [[Bill Moyers]] and Louis Black for example. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']] 15:31, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
I assume that adding the liberalism template to the [[Episcopal Church]] article was improper? I would like to know what the proper usage of this template is for future reference. TEC is one of, if not the most liberal Christian denomination in the US these days, sadly. I do apologize for this improper usage, as I am a new editor. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:00, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:Hello Anglican! I removed the template because I thought the article was outside the scope of the "liberal" template. What I mean is that the template links to liberal traits, but not necessarily to liberal organizations. I think the category is good for the article, but not template. I hope this helps! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:11, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
::That makes sense. Thank you for your patience. It's sad what has happened to the Episcopal Church in recent years. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::You're welcome, and I agree. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

== User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on liberalism. So... ==

User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on [[liberalism]].

The article needs major improvements.

I am not going to work on it due to time restraints. I spent a lot of time improving the [[liberal]] article.

I would use the same approach used with the liberal article. Clearly delineate liberalism from socialism/fascism because they are very substantially different (for example, Sweden vs. Communist China vs. Nazi Germany). But mention how the gap between the ideologies has narrowed in the United States. I don't keep up with European politics to know the situation there as far as the gap other than knowing that China has become more capitalistic. European countries commonly have more major political parties in a country so the situation is more difficult to keep tabs on. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:33, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

:I posted the below information on RobS' talk page and thought I would share it with you also. You can go to RobS' talk page to see his response to me.

::I would work on the liberalism article. But also create 2-3 sub-articles: [[American liberalism]] and [[Western liberalism]] and [[European liberalism]]. The [[American liberalism]] article is just a one sentence stub article.

::I suggest a [[Western liberalism]] article due to the Canadians, Australia, NZ, and South Africa. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:09, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::Since the Brits and Canadians have the most influence in the Anglosphere on the USA, you might want to create a [[British liberalism]] article and a [[Canadian liberalism]] article too.

:::Its too bad all this wasn't done before given that CP is a political website. I was largely focused on [[atheism]] which is a dying ideology. This had an indirect relation to liberalism given the prominence of the [[secular left]] on liberal/leftist politics. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:17, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

== Re: American liberalism ==

I copied and pasted some of the [[liberal]] article into the [[American liberalism]] article.

Generally speaking, ideally you want the material in the section for main article linking to a sub-article to have substantially different content. In this case, you want the [[American liberalism]] article to have different content than the "American liberalism" section of the [[liberal]] article.

So if you want to reword and/or add material to the [[American liberalism]] article the would be excellent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:17, 9 May 2017 (EDT)

== Opinion on renaming an article ==

I wanted your opinion on an idea of mines to rename one of our articles on Conservapedia before taking it to an admin or someone with the ability to actually change the name of a page.

The current page [[Exodus of Israel]], I think, should be renamed to [[The Exodus]], where [[Exodus of Israel]] should simply be a redirect to that page. Not many users would think of typing 'Exodus of Israel' to get to a page on 'The Exodus', and 'The Exodus' is just much simpler. As it is, [[The Exodus]] is currently a redirect to [[Exodus of Israel]]. I think it should be the other way around. Your thoughts?[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 13:34, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
:No, I think it is better the way it is. My main reason is that having titles along the lines of "The...." does not sound encyclopedic. The current name, I believe, is more high quality for that reason. Now, it is true that many users might not think of typing "Exodus of Israel," but if they type "[[Exodus]]," they'll run into the disambiguation page and find the actual article. Also, I'm not sure that many people would think of typing "The Exodus." To sum it up, I think the current title is better and give the article a more encyclopedic feel, but you're welcome to ask another editor what they think. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:59, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
Thanks for the thoughts. Wikipedia currently uses 'The Exodus', and I find that it simply looks better, as a title, then 'Exodus of Israel'. Secondly, I also consider it more likely for someone to type in 'The Exodus' then 'Exodus of Israel'.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 15:59, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
:Once again, if you want to ask another editor for their opinion, like DavidB4, feel free to do so. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:20, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
Thanks for your opinion. One thing though, do you know who can get this template locked?

At this point, all relevant pages have been created, and therefore this template no longer will ever need any more editing as it is complete. So the best thing to do is to get it locked to avoid any vandalism problems in the future. Just to note, before I came on, it was already locked, even though it still had many problems. Now that the template is fixed, the best thing to do is to get it locked. [[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 20:57, 12 May 2017 (EDT)
:I recommend asking [[User:Aschlafly]] or [[User:Karajou]]. They have protection powers. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:15, 12 May 2017 (EDT)
==Block length==
Thanks for your alert blocks. But one year is a long time for a block. IP addresses often change in a shorter period. You might consider 3 months as a better block duration in many cases.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:25, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
:OK. I'll see to that. Should I change the blocks I just did? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:26, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
::I just went ahead and changed them. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:41, 17 May 2017 (EDT)

== Congratulations on Donald Trump accomplishments ==

Hey, I just checked Google. While that movie award comes up first when "Donald Trump achievements," is Googled, and you are the first result after, you get nice results with certain other phrases:
*Donald Trump accomplishments - third link, no box
*Trump achievements - first link, no box
*Trump accomplishments - fourth link, no box
*Donald Trump achievements and failures - fourth link, no box
While Conservative's essays come up first when their exact titles are Googled, bear in mind that these phrases are Googled more frequently.
Congratulations on the publicity, 1990sguy!--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 08:07, 25 May 2017 (EST)

:Great job, it is well deserved! - -[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])
::Thanks, Nathan and DavidB, I appreciate it! It seems I chose the right article to create, in terms of gaining page views. For a while, when one searched the exact title of my article, that silly award was not at the top of the article, and in its place was a box with a picture of Trump linking to my article. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:24, 25 May 2017 (EDT)
== Can you chat briefly? ==

Can we chat briefly? Can you please go to place I sent you messages before? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:16, 3 June 2017 (EDT)
== Here is the the article ==

*[[Liberal vs. libertarian]]

Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:54, 3 June 2017 (EDT)

== It's been great ==

You've been helpful since I you first welcomed me here - me, someone who had never used wikitext or HTML in his life and never believed in a young Earth. You've really made me consider that viewpoint, and you've done it with a brilliant personal appeal, far better than User:Conservative ever has.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

==Europe's childless leaders==
Where do you think [http://dcwhispers.com/rather-odd-troubling-fact-european-leaders/ we can squeeze this in] [[European migrant crisis]]? In the Intro or elsewhere? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 02:13, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
:I think that would be a good idea. We could also, possibly, add it to the [[European Union]] article, and maybe [[Globalism]] or [[Liberal]], as these leaders advocate for left-wing globalist policies. Are you able to find other sources that note this fact? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:53, 9 June 2017 (EDT)
::I think this also illustrates liberal European values. They support mass immigration of peoples who do not share their culture while they themselves have no children. They are committing national/cultural suicide. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:15, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

== The reason I removed Ted Nugent from Notable Texans ==

Because Ted Nugent is actually from Michigan. Sorry that I forgot to add an explanation. ([[User:King Conservative|King Conservative]] ([[User talk:King Conservative|talk]]) 13:37, 17 June 2017 (EDT)King Conservative)
:I removed him from the list. Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:16, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

==Template tweak==

Hi, guy! Thanks for the {{tl|See also}} in [[Neil Gorsuch]]. That template works better. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 08:53, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:You're welcome, always happy to help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:58, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
==Nasty edit summaries==
Dear 1990sguy: Please stop writing inflammatory edit summaries. There is no need to make false personal attacks on other editors. As for Breitbart, each reference is evaluated individually on its own merits. If it is news reporting, I welcome it. However, some references are clearly opinion-editorial pieces that criticize other news stories instead of offering any independent news gathering. Some authors there are editorial-opinion writers rather than news reporters. Also, when I check a source and see photos of immodestly dressed women with "wardrobe malfunction" captions or women wearing tight T-shirts imprinted with "no silicone", I am less inclined to use those sources, given our family-friendly approach. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 15:31, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:Conservapedia has no requirement that only news reporter sources can be used for mews sources. For example, many excellent conservative editorial pieces link to a news story or quote a news story while providing excellent commentary.

:The mainstream press. which is very liberal, have a lot more reporters and they still have some foreign bureaus if I am not mistaken. Then you have Fox which only has a fraction of the combined viewership of ABC, CBS, and NBC.

:To be overly reliant on news sources merely from websites who have reporters is not a good policy.

:Yes, there are conservative news organizations such as CNS News. But I don't think we should limit ourselves to merely using conservative news organizations as far as news sources.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:54, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

::I agree with Conservative on this. We can use conservative news sources, even if the articles appear to be editorializing. This is a conservative encyclopedia, after all. Why should we adopt editing policies that give liberal MSM sources an unfair advantage? How then can we differentiate ourselves from Wikipedia? I am not opposed to citing MSM sources (I do it myself), but we should give precedence to conservative sources, which do not have leftist bias. Yes, Breitbart has silly ads, but I care more about the content of the article than the ads. There are many Breitbart writers who support conservative, Christian pro-family policies. Are there any at CNN or the NYT?

::JDano, yes, my edit summaries were inflammatory. I probably should have acted cooler when dealing with you, and for that, I apologize. Your behavior, constantly reverting and adding changes that I genuinely believe to contain leftist bias without going to the talk page until you've been reverted several times, is not constructive. I do believe your changes are undermining our status as a conservative alternative to Wikipedia. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:50, 29 June 2017 (EDT)

== re: JDano and you getting "horse throwing" mad ==

In the recent edit changes, I saw you use all caps in your description of your edit. It was for the [[Travel ban]] article.

This tells me that you are starting to get "horse throwing" mad.

If it becomes necessary, you can impose a [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]] to JDano since you have blocking rights. You can make it applicable to certain articles or certain article categories. Probably a certain article would be best as a shot across his bow.

If JDano also has blocking rights, you can get Karajou/Aschlafly to impose such a ban. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:29, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:P.S. I don't know if you are correct in this matter. And I don't have time to mediate. I am just offering you a suggestion since I have experienced JDano being unreasonable at times. Also, the majority of Conservapedians/Republicans/conservatives are more fans of Trump than Lindsey Graham. JDano appears to be in the Graham camp. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:37, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
::Please see my comment in the section immediately above. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:51, 29 June 2017 (EDT)

== JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the "travel ban" article. ==

I just posted this message to JDano's talk page:

"You are not allowed to edit the [[travel ban]] article anymore. I am imposing a [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]] on you for this article.

By the way, Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in terms of its Muslim population. The travel ban of the Trump administration does not include Indonesia."[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:13, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

== JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the fake news article ==

I posted this on JDano's talk page:

"The [[fake news]] article was locked/protected. It seems as if the root cause of the page being locked was an edit war involving yourself.

You are no longer allowed to edit the fake news article. I am imposing a Conservapedia topic ban on you for this article. See: [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]]

I hope additional topic bans are not imposed on you by people with block rights." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:23, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

== Socks of JamesWilson ==

Socks of this clown should receive five year bans. He is a malicious provocateur, and he singlehandedly destroyed another website as well as leading dozens of people off this site. Show this schlemiel no mercy. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:16, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:I don't see why we should be giving long blocks to this guy. He's clearly using multiple ip addresses. These addresses will probably get passed to one or more people who have no intention of vandalizing CP. DavidB4 explained by long blocks are not a good idea on my talk page: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1304184&oldid=1303142] However, I will not challenge your lengthening of that block or any other. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:20, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
::Maybe you do have a point because he has created a few different accounts in the past day or so. All I'm saying is that lightening up on him isn't going to work. My late friend George let this guy off easy, and he destroyed an entire community. I've had plenty of experience with this guy in the past to know his MO, and he's fanatically obsessed with Taylor Swift and "avenging" others because they "ruined" his articles. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:28, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:::That's fair. This guy is clearly bad news. Regardless of what block lengths we give him (and I can see some sense in making them longer), we should try not to accidently prevent innocent people from viewing CP. Thanks for your help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:30, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
::::How do we know that this editor is a "sock" of JamesWilson? Has anyone checked the IP user logs? The Taylor Swift connection could be a false-flag operation. If George and James got into an edit-war on a different website, that would not be relevant here. Let's judge each editor separately until they can be linked by evidence. Are all of the problem users created in the past few days created from the same or very similar IP addresses? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 15:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::He put "Sad case!- James Wilson" in the edit summary of all of his vandalism, and it was the same stuff he's always done. If he says it's him, I'm just gonna assume it's him. Dont give this guy the benefit of the doubt. He's had plenty enough breaks here and elsewhere. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 16:03, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::@JDano: Yes, I think it clearly is JamesWilson. His vandalism is very repetitive -- he even vandalizes the user pages of the same users. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:52, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
*FYI, even if an account is blocked indefinitely, the autoblock on the IPs is only for twenty-four hours. If the IP block was for as long as the account's block, checkusers wouldn't have to put separate blocks on persistent vandals' IP addresses. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 18:26, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
==Articles==
Since I've written a few articles on Christianity, please feel free to edit them to conform to the views of Conservapedia if necessary. Admittedly, writing about Christianity as a Jew can be a bit difficult at times. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:35, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
:I have not seen any factual problems with the articles you created. However, I do recommend that you add categories of the religion you are writing about to those articles. For example, that you add "Category:Christianity" to [[Secular Christianity]] and "Category:Judaism" to [[Secular Judaism]]. The people who practice these are not Jews (religiously speaking) or Christians, but the articles are relevant to those religions.

:Also, I recommend that you add at least one source to the articles you create. Adding sources to articles is Commandment #2 in [[Conservapedia:Commandments]], and it makes the articles better for readers. They know where you are getting your information from, and they can read further if they are interested. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:51, 6 July 2017 (EDT)

== Changing my username ==

I don't know if Andy saw my request on his talk page. Did he skip it or didn't see it? --[[User:KommissarReb|KommissarReb]] ([[User talk:KommissarReb|talk]]) 9:18, 10 July 2017 (EDT)
:I don't know. Sometimes he does that, but when I message him again he usually replies. I recommend commenting again, letting him know how much you want your username changed, and asking him to respond. I think we will do it, but only if you absolutely want it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:49, 10 July 2017 (EDT)
::I read [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Inquiry|the back and forth]] with the guy you probably were referring to on Andy's page. Andy seemed pretty reluctant to change the RonaldB's name for most of the discussion.. Is the process of changing someone's username complex or difficult to do, or did he just want to make sure that the guy wasn't being wishy-washy about the change? I was a little sheepish about asking him again because I don't want to seem annoying. --[[User:KommissarReb|KommissarReb]] ([[User talk:KommissarReb|talk]]) 5:07, 11 July 2017 (EDT)
:::I think CP admins generally prefer simply creating a new account. The user who made the other request was not the original person using the account. The original person let him take over the account. I can see why Andy wanted him to create a new account. I recommend you politely letting him know how much you want your username changed, and why, and asking him to respond, regardless of his answer. I think that would be a good move on your part. It would show how serious you are with this request. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:06, 11 July 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Trump ==

I think Donald Trump is going to get stuck with the blame for the economic bubble created by the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHwtkIpgAnA]

In addition, TrumpCare probably will not work because it is keeping the "precondition clause" of ObamaCare due to its popularity. People will often not buy health insurance until they are sick. So the health care system will not be viable. Car insurance companies could not be profitable if people could buy their car insurance after their car accident in order to replace their car. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:00, 11 July 2017 (EDT)

:You are probably right on both of those things. The first point would be the fault of the Obama Administration, and the second by the establishment GOP Congress. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:05, 11 July 2017 (EDT)

Got it, thanks for letting me know. --[[User:OneTrueConservative|OneTrueConservative]] ([[User talk:OneTrueConservative|talk]]) 00:12, 12 July 2017 (EDT)
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:21, 12 July 2017 (EDT)
== Expansion of right-wing material on the internet ==

*[https://www.axios.com/the-partisan-explosion-of-digital-news-2279022772.html The recent explosion of right-wing news sites]

*[https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3dy7vb/why-the-right-is-dominating-youtube Why the Right Is Dominating YouTube] - Vice News

*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HndA5MoxK08 Why the Right is Dominating YouTube (A Response to Vice)]

*[https://www.nctv.nl/binaries/psychological-effects-of-right-wing-and-islamic-extremist-internet-videos_tcm31-30177.pdf Psychological effects of right-wing and Islamic extremist videos] - Netherlands and German report

I know Twitter bans and shadow bans right-wingers.

I haven't looked at the latter two items, but right-wingers gaining momentum on the internet is an interesting development. With nationalism gaining ground in Europe and 21st century [[desecularization]] occurring, the trend is bound to continue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])

===Scriptural Geology===
Scriptural Geologists published in the USA as well. CRSQ published my review of David Lord "Geognosy" (that has other citations as well). [my magazines are in
storage but the year was 2000-2004.] Another recent CRSQ review was Gordon's 1878 book that mentioned USA Scriptural Geologist Martyn Payne.
:Thanks, Snoopy2, for your addition! I noted this fact, briefly in the article, in "The scriptural geologists" section. I knew that most of the Scriptural Geologists were British, and I did not have the time or knowledge of them to go into much more detail. Thanks for your help! Please remember to sign your posts in the future. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:06, 31 July 2017 (EDT)

== important message for you ==

I sent you an important message to the last place we communicated.

I also have some good news for you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:10, 13 July 2017 (EDT)

== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==

BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!

== Block duration ==

Thanks for your great blocks but they should generally not exceed 6 months in duration. By then the IP address is typically being used by someone else.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:27, 27 July 2017 (EDT)
:OK. I will keep that in mind. I will change this vandal's block. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:46, 27 July 2017 (EDT)

== "Denkmal der Schande" ==

Björn Höcke nannte das Holocaust-Mahnmal ein "Denkmal der Schande". Zudem sprach er von einer "dämlichen Bewältigungspolitik" und forderte eine "erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad". Hinterher behauptete Höcke, er hätte den Holocaust als Schande bezeichnet. Wenn man sich nun seine Rede genau anschaut, kann er nur das Denkmal als Schande bezeichnet haben. Höcke hat offen NS-Gedankengut offenbart und dies auch gewollt. Er ist ein Agent des BRD-Systems, die zum Ziel haben, die AfD unwählbar zu machen. Dasselbe haben sie schon mit der NPD gemacht (in den 90er Jahren). Ich find's ja auch schade, dass die AfD unterwandert wurde und nicht mehr wählbar ist. Auch ich habe große Hoffnungen in sie gesetzt. Aber spätestens seit dem letzten Parteitag ist sie unwählbar, die Neo-Nazis gewannen die Oberhand, Gauland wurde Spitzenkandidat. Solange Petry keine neue Partei gründet, müssen Rechtschaffene bei der Bundestagswahl das geringste Übel wählen (z.B. die Freien Wähler oder die BüSo). Aber die AfD ist klar von NS-Agenten unterwandert und ich schrieb noch mehr in den Artikel, also lassen Sie mich zumindest Höckes Rede einfügen, dann kann sich jeder selber ein Bild machen. MfG --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 10:16, 1 August 2017 (EDT)
:Grüetzi Elessar, CP ist ein Englisher website, so es ist besser wann wir in English schreiben. Ich denke dass die meisten leute heir sprechen kein Deutsch. Danke. Wass ich sage ist sehr kontrovers in Deutschland, aber, Ich probiere ein klares und gutes antwort zum geben:

:First off, many political parties have their crazy members. I know that UKIP explicitly disavows racism, but it has had some members who have said some silly things. I definitely do ''not'' believe the GOP in the U.S. is racist, but David Duke considers himself a Republican (and every other Republican disavows him). Even the Swiss People's Party in my country (I am also a U.S. citizen) has some members who have said racist things. Just because parties have members like this does not necessarily mean that the entire party is racist or whatever. In the case of Höcke's speech, Petry (the party leader, as you know) condemned what he said, or at least criticized him.

:Second, I know the mindset that the German have today. They are still ashamed for what they did during World War II, and they are still focused on trying to make restitution. Personally, I think it is good that they have repented, but they miss the fact that there are two extremes: one extreme is what the Nazis did, the other is being so ashamed bad things one did that they essentially hate their country. We see this with liberals in the United States. I think the German mindset is too far in the second extreme -- and no, I am anywhere close to being a racist or Nazi. Patriotism and nationalism can be very good things, as long as they are handled correctly and are not an excuse to persecute others. The German people, I think, are trying to extinguish them, and they have accused people, even those in the middle of those two extremes, as being Nazis.

:Let me also make clear that I have not read much about Björn Höcke's speech, other than what you provided and what his English Wikipedia article states, so I cannot comment on his entire speech and his entire character. He may very well be what you say he is. However, what I read about his speech and about him actually seems reasonable. Many peoples all over the world have done many evil things -- slavery in the U.S. and the other European colonies, the Islamic slave trade, religious persecution in Rome and the communist nations, the several genocides in history, etc. However, it is not constructive for cultures to focus on these events. It is good to remember them and repent of them, but not to obsess about them. There is much more to German history than World War II, just as there is more to U.S. history than slavery. Why can't we build monuments celebrating the positive things about our cultures and our people? It is cultural suicide not to do so. While we should not forget the bad events, we should focus on the good events and remain proud as a people in order to remain strong. This seems to me what Höcke is getting at. Am I wrong?

:Reading his Wikipedia article, I came accross this quote: "Die Syrer, die zu uns kommen, haben immer noch Syrien. Wenn wir – durch die Syrer – unser Deutschland verloren haben, dann haben wir keine Heimat mehr." I can see how in Germany this is very controversial, but I think in most other countries, this is quite reasonable. It may not be a bad thing if Syrians come, but it would mean that the German people would be in danger of disappearing, at least in a cultural sense. If someone values this (as most people of all ethnicies and nationalities do -- just ask the Poles or Hungarians), they will strongly oppose immigration.

:Am I wrong in what I am saying? Am I misrepresenting Höcke? I would appreciate some dialogue. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:18, 1 August 2017 (EDT)

::No, you aren't wrong and I too was never questioning that the "eternal fault" (electing Hitler/WW2) which is propagated by German liberals is bullshit. I only mean that Höcke was not only saying that, but he also clearly favorized the Holocaust by calling for an "erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad" and calling the Holocaust monument a "Denkmal der Schande". This speech was much criticized by Jewish organizations in Germany and Höcke was forbidden to visit Concentration Camp Memorials. He's not a single exemption, but there are unfortunately already lots of neo-Nazis or neo-Nazi sympathizers in the AfD who are all defending Höcke's speech, including Spitzenkandidat Alexander Gauland. Party leader Petry was forced by them not to participate. These (real) neo-Nazis are system agents who are overrunning the AfD like they did decades ago with the NPD in order to make these parties uneligible by conservative voters. But of course many liberals call all ''real'' conservatives "neo-Nazis" which there is nonsense. But Höcke is really a neo-Nazi and anti-semite and should be excluded together with his inner-party defenders. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 14:05, 1 August 2017 (EDT)

:::I don't understand how the "erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad" shows that Höcke is a neo-Nazi. It seems to be saying that German policy on these matters needs to change, which I also think is reasonable. The culture of shame in Germany must end -- when will Egypt build a monument mourning the Islamic slave trade, and when will Turkey build a monument mourning the Armenian Genocide? That's what I think he is saying. Am I wrong? Please explain.

:::While I am a strong supporter of Israel, I do think that many Jewish organizations in Europe and the United States are politically left-wing -- unlike the current Israeli government. The fact that they opposed Höcke's speech is unsurprising, even if he is not a neo-Nazi. Most European/American Jews support the ruling establishment's views on who is extreme and who is "moderate." And besides, Jewish organizations have their own interests. It's reasonable for them to defend monuments mourning a genocide of their own people, regardless of whether having such a monument, or at least the mindset behind it, is a good thing or not.

:::It seems to me that you are making a jump from noting what Höcke is saying to calling him a neo-Nazi. A lot of what he is saying seems reasonable, even if it is better that he watches what he says more closely, and I don't see how these comments make them neo-Nazis (I do see, however, how such comments are far outside the current German mainstream, and that they make such parties less attractive to moderate Germans). It seems to me that Höcke is a nationalist who is angry at the culture of shame in his country, which is probably the reason why it is being flooded with immigrants and weakened by the EU. Many conservatives said silly things (that sounded extremely racist) about Obama when he was U.S. President, even though those people would have voted for conservative blacks (Ben Carson, Allen West, Herman Cain) or Hispanics (Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz) in a heartbeat. Could it be that this is what Höcke is doing?

:::My last thing I want to say in this comment is not related to the above. I would like to remind you that CP is a family-friendly encyclopedia, and I think this policy also applies to talk pages. I request that you thus refrain from spelling out cuss words when making comments. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:35, 1 August 2017 (EDT)

::::Sorry about the term "b***" but I'm as angry as you about the "eternal fault" dogma. And you are completely right with most (including the Jews being too liberal in Europe), but in my opinion the quote "erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad" is like he wanted to say "The Holocaust was nothing bad" or "not so bad" or so. Like it would be Holocaust relativation. Maybe Höcke really didn't mean anything bad in his speech but then he's simply uncaring of what he says because he damages his party with such unclear statements. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 16:34, 1 August 2017 (EDT)

:::::As we disagree on his speech (even though I do think your last comment was very reasonable), I chose to move the info to another place in the article and re-word it. If you have any problems with how I re-worded it, we can discuss that as well. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:05, 1 August 2017 (EDT)

::::::Björn Höcke said in whole this: "Wir Deutschen – und ich rede jetzt nicht von euch Patrioten, die sich hier heute versammelt haben – wir Deutschen, also unser Volk, sind das einzige Volk der Welt, das sich ein Denkmal der Schande in das Herz seiner Hauptstadt gepflanzt hat." This means, not German patriots but the other Germans (liberals e.g.) have founded the Holocaust monument which he calls a Denkmal der Schande. Which means, according to him true German patriots wouldn't have built the Holocaust monument, which can be interpreted as he's pro-Holocaust. The same interpretation is open in his other quote "Wir brauchen eine erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad". Maybe he didn't want to relativate the Holocaust but he should watch out what he says, especially if his party wants to enter a coalition. A coalition with establishment parties wouldn't be bad as long as the AfD maintains its goals and gets many of them into a government program. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 01:37, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

:::::::I can see now how people think the speech was sympathizing with Nazis -- the Holocaust and WWII is a touchy topic, especially for Germans. However, I still see how what he is saying is reasonable. Turkey, for example, is not going to build a monument for the Armenian Genocide anytime soon, Russia is not going to build a monument for the many Baltic peoples they killed during WWII, and Japan is not going to build any monument for the millions of people they killed, including concentration camp prisoners.

:::::::I do know that there are two AfD factions: one that has a goal of becoming a coalition party, and the other that wants to remain an anti-establishment party. Höcke is clearly part of the latter, while Petry is in the former. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:31, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

::::::::The AfD can remain an anti-establishment party and anyway be part of a government coalition, like the Austrian [[FPÖ]] which also seeks being part in coalitions (and already is in two states) and remains loyal to all of its positions. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 14:09, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

:::::::::Fair enough, but you get the point: there are two factions in the party on the best way foreward for the party. One of them support coalition agreements and the other side is less pragmatic in this regard. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:23, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

==Brexit==
Hi - not sure why you changed my edits on the BREXIT page - I tried to provide an accurate account of what is happening and what is being reported by many news outlets --unsigned comment by HORSEMAN
:Hello "HORSEMAN", I removed the info about the potential referendums because this was just speculation that died down. I also thought that some of your wording (such as the "full complexity and impacts of BREXIT become apparent" and by removing the mention of the EU being obstructionist) seemed to insert a left-of-center bias into the article. CP is a conservative encyclopedia, and we align firmly with Brexit and Euroskepticism. However, I will see if I can re-add some of your wording. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:31, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
::Another problem is that for the part about the proposed payments and EU citizen rights, you did not provide sources. The existing info already had a source, and you changed the info while keeping the source. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:35, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
:::Hi Again, would this link suffice http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-2001_en.htm It is the definitive statement from the EU negotiating team and sets out the negotiating agenda. Thanks Horseman
::::You can definitely cite the source, but do you also have third party sources as well? I see nothing in the EU source about the monetary amount of the settlement. We prefer sources with conservative editorial stances. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:57, 10 August 2017 (EDT)
:::::Is this syitable, I don't pay for Telegraph articles so only have this link. Thanks Horseman
::::::The Telegraph is one of numerous conservative news organizations. Besides, their non-commentary articles are free for viewing. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:13, 10 August 2017 (EDT)

==[[Margaret Sanger]] revision that you undid==
Hi 1990'sguy,

Is there a way to reword what I wrote in such a way that it could be considered "encyclopedic"?

Thanks,
[[User:Bluedogdemocrat|Bluedogdemocrat]] ([[User talk:Bluedogdemocrat|talk]]) 22:59, 18 August 2017 (EDT)
:You could write "Planned Parenthood eventually expanded to support the form of murder known as abortion." Something like that. We should keep the wording encyclopedic, as this is not a blog or anything like that. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:05, 18 August 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Block of TimJim ==

Sorry about that, I wasn't aware you had already blocked TimJim when I blocked him, so I reset the block length back to that of your original block. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:45, 19 August 2017 (EDT)

== Article move request ==

Hi I'd be happy to move those articles you are requesting, but as you know, I cannot avoid the creation of redirects. Let me know if you want this, but hopefully you can get it done the right way. It's also probably easier to ask for a move than a delete. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 17:43, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
:I appreciate your offer, David, but I think it would be better if I keep it simple for Andy, rather than explain that the articles were moved and that he only has to delete the redirect -- having one person do it is more simple. Thanks anyway! :) --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:46, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
::Agreed...okay. I didn't want to cut in and disrupt things, but just thought I'd offer. Cheers! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 17:49, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
:::I do appreciate your offer, David. Thanks! It looks like Andy just moved the articles. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:50, 21 August 2017 (EDT)

==Contact==
You can email me at wirepaladin36@gmail.com [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 11:22, 26 August 2017 (EDT)

==snoopy2==
1990s guy, I just want to verify u could read the Theistic ev. entry and 1994 film clip on my user talk. any comments?
:I could watch it, but would you please explain what it's about in a little more detail? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:55, 11 December 2017 (EST)

== Maybe I was too pessimistic. Good news ==

'''Why [[Democrats]] Should Be''' Losing Sleep Over Generation Z.[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2017/08/11/why-democrats-should-be-losing-sleep-over-generation-z/]

Bye for now. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:47, 5 September 2017 (EDT)
:Thanks for the article. Bye for now. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:48, 5 September 2017 (EDT)

== File comparison tool ==

Did Cons ever get back to you with the comparison tool? I'm curious about it, and whether it does a good job of checking for copied content. The problems that it appears to solve are different from the problems of comparison tools used in software development. I'm curious about whether it uses line hashing, sentence hashing, word group hashing, and things like that. I'd like to try it out, and not just at CP. In fact, probably not at all for CP; I'm not interested in who plagiarizes what at CP, though, when I am, I use other techniques to catch people. I'm just curious as to whether those other techniques have been automated.

It's puzzling that Cons deleted the screenshot, as though he ''wants'' people to believe he's a liar, though I don't think he is.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:57, 12 September 2017 (EDT)
:I can assure you that the tool exists. I have not tried it yet and thus cannot answer your question. I have no reason to try it as JDano's essays were deleted, so I recommend that you ask Conservative directly these things. Maybe he will share it with you. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:23, 12 September 2017 (EDT)

::Great!! I'm still very much interested in it. Is it a "cloud app"? Is it a downloadable app that I can run locally on my own computer? Can you send me a URL?
::By the way, the standard wiki comparison of your last edit to the [[Guy Verhofstadt]] article, just as a random example, shows how bad text comparers can be. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 17:40, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
:::You are going to have to ask Conservative for the details of the tool -- he told me not to give it away to anyone, and while I personally have no problem with sharing it with you, I shouldn't go against what he said. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:43, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
::::Well, this is really weird. Cons seems to be trying to censor the internet itself, hiding the location of this tool. And he seems to think that only you can be trusted with it. He said "I will share this tool with 1990sguy [...] so he can evaluate your [JDano's] efforts in an objective way." I of course took this as a challenge. A Google search for "similar page checker tool" gets a number of hits. Ignoring the ones that cost a lot of money, and those that attempt to check a given page against the entire internet, narrowed it down to a few. This one: [https://www.duplichecker.com/similar-page-checker.php] seems to be the right thing. It's a "cloud app" rather than an installable program, but I can put up with that. It has the same appearance—color and layout—as the screenshot that Cons posted and removed. I ran it on the versions of this page before and after your recent reply to me, and it said they were 100% the same. I'm not particularly happy about that, but the additional text was only about 0.3 percent of the total, so I suppose I can accept that. Then I ran it on versions that differ in length by 10% (the 100K version and the 110K version.) It said they were 98% similar. Not good. But I still might find it to be a useful tool. There are pages not relating to JDano that could benefit from such an analysis.

::::I will probably check in with Cons on this, once he stays away from CP for 10 days.

::::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:39, 13 September 2017 (EDT)

==Getting help==
I am trying to fix the stuff on the Corporate bullies page. Am still learning my way around on how to use things. Think I am starting to get it though. The Georgia 2016 stuff has a lot of info and I am in the process of editing it, though it's going to take a while (at least 20 or more minutes. I'm trying though. (BTW, if I wasn't supposed to edit here, sorry. I don't know how to reply to your remark otherwise.) [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 22:31, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
:It's OK to edit here. I recommend that you read CP's guidelines, and probably more importantly, that you read [[Help:How to edit a website like Conservapedia]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:34, 15 September 2017 (EDT)

==Fabulous block and reverts==

Fabulous block and reverts this afternoon!!!! Well done!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:51, 21 September 2017 (EDT)
:Thanks, Andy! :) --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:52, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

== re: JohnZ ==

User: JohnZ fails to recognize that my interest to be a referee to protect a marginal online sparring partner (whose greatest achievement was his dogged stubbornness to ignore facts/evidence) was largely protected by his edits to main space articles and my desire for an online sparring partner.

His rudeness to other editors and his desire to barely skate by with his main space edits certainly did not help matters. In addition, given the [[decline of the atheist movement]] and it now being a hopeless cause destined to ever increasing irrelevance, my desire for an atheist online sparring partner is non-existent at this point given my current/future priorities.

If he wants to create two quality, well-sourced original articles of at least 2,00 words on these topics [[Anti-religious Soviet Union propaganda]] and [[Christian persecution in communist China]] to restore his other editing privileges, that is what is required.

He would also have to pledge to refrain from hurling insults to other editors (idiot, etc.). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:01, 3 November 2017 (EDT)

:Hopefully he'll do it. We've given him these opportunities before and he rejected them. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:18, 3 November 2017 (EDT)
::I made a minor adjustment to his requirements for fully restoring his editing privileges in case someone creates articles on those subjects.

::Secondly, ardent secular leftists generally always double down regardless of any contrary facts/evidence presented to them. Of course, you never know what is going to happen. The Apostle Paul went from being one of Christianity's chief opponents to being its greatest champion. He will just need to be open minded.

::It is very widely recognized that there is and has been religious persecution in communist China and that there was anti-religious propaganda in the former Soviet Union. So I am giving him ample opportunity to show that he is not a close-minded individual given to hurling insults. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:31, 3 November 2017 (EDT)

I would say no to this for a couple reasons. The first is his blatant disrespect of everyone here, and he has shown that multiple times. The gist of it is a pretense of superiority over us, as if it is mandatory that we listen to him; he stated a short time ago that some of us are idiots for not engaging him in conversation. Which I might add is his kind of conversation.

The second reason is that he's a leftist brand of liberal from Great Britain, which means we cannot change his way of thinking whatsoever. Unfortunately for someone who is that close-minded he is going to go into lock-step with every other like-minded individual in his country, which would mean the loss of the United Kingdom as a political entity within a few years time. In his case, he is more concerned with picking a fight with the users of a small American conservative website then he is with what he and his kind are allowing to happen in Britain, namely the Islamic takeover. As a leftist, he probably feels he can get along with them in the name of diversity and multiculturalism, but when all is said and done he will either be forced on his hands and knees with his butt high in the air, or he'll have his head chopped off.

Unfortunately, some people think they're so better than others that they've blinded themselves to what they're actually doing. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 04:35, 4 November 2017 (EDT)
:Karajou, if you look at my comment to his talk page, you will see that I am giving him an opportunity to show that he can be open-minded and reasonable by writing on two topics related to atheistic communism persecution of Christians/religious (namely [[Christian persecution in communist China]] and [[Anti-religious propaganda in the Soviet Union]]) via two quality articles of at least 2,000 words.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:38, 4 November 2017 (EDT)

== Anti-Christian bias in Wikipedia ==

Hello 1990'sguy. Am I being hypersensitive or is Wikipedia's anti-Christian bias increasing? For example, the recent dispute about content at Answers in Genesis.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAnswers_in_Genesis&type=revision&diff=810473662&oldid=810471171] I see also that User:Synthetic Woolly Mammoth[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Synthetic_Woolly_Mammoth] has just been blocked, allegedly for being a sockpuppet of Biscuittin, but more likely because he has been speaking up in support of some Christian editors. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 05:27, 20 November 2017 (EST)
:I know another editor who has extensively edited topics related to Christianity and atheism on WP, and he told me that the ati-Christian bias on the site was much worse back around 2012. The militant atheists don't have as much power as they did back then. However, the anti-Christian bias obviously is still very bad, especially on YEC topics, which I have been dealing with for years already. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:20, 20 November 2017 (EST)

== Block length ==

Thanks for your alert block of new user "CPishilarious", but I'm going to change the block duration from 2 years to 1 month. Long blocks are disfavored on wikis because they block the IP address as well as the user. The IP address could be a library or other general access IP address, or the user could move or be a college student, or the user could have a change of heart. But thanks again for your quick action.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:11, 20 November 2017 (EST)
:OK, and you're welcome. I have seen blocked vandals come back with their same accounts after their blocks expire, so I wanted to protect against that. But I will shorten blocks like these in the future. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:54, 21 November 2017 (EST)
::Thanks so much for your alert block this morning, but again the block duration is too long. Another user could be trying to use that same IP address within a few months, or the user himself could have a change of heart. I'll shorten it to 4 months. Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:25, 4 December 2017 (EST)
:::Andy, it feels like I'm the only editor you're messaging about block length, ''even though my blocks are much shorter than most other editors.'' For example, just yesterday, I blocked two accounts for six months for having a silly username and for (relatively) non-serious vandalism, but shortly later, DMorris reset the blocks for 5 years. See here: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Bernieman][http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Hillary_clinton] If you're going (for good reason) to message me for my blocks, please do the same for the other editors who prefer even longer blocks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:33, 4 December 2017 (EST)
:::But yes, I will still shorten my blocks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:36, 4 December 2017 (EST)

== Suggested article ==

Here is an article suggestion:

*[[Donald Trump and evangelicals]]

I think there would be public interest in such an article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:20, 9 December 2017 (EST)
:Thanks. If I get time, I will start this article. I will add it to my list of articles to create. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:16, 9 December 2017 (EST)

== Two things ==

For one, why do you not have email enabled? Secondly, consider longer blocks for these obviously malicious accounts. You can block an account for infinity and the autoblock on the IP still only lasts 24 hours. There is no reason for these sleeper accounts to come back to life three months later. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 16:19, 13 December 2017 (EST)

:In his defense, he was doing longer blocks until [[User_talk:1990'sguy#Block_length|Andy started asking him not too]], then [[User_talk:1990'sguy#Block_length_2|reminded him again]]. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 16:25, 13 December 2017 (EST)

::Yes, for crying out loud, why am I the only one being criticized for my block lengths? If I make my block lengths long, Andy posts on my talk page, and if I make my block lengths shorter, DMorris posts on my talk page.

::DMorris, please talk to Andy about this. I will continue making my blocks on the shorter side until your differing opinions are sorted out.

::About my email, I have my email address posted on my user page. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:46, 13 December 2017 (EST)

== Articles of the year: 2017 - your article is being featured on the main page (left side) ==

*[[Donald Trump achievements]]

*[[European migrant crisis]]

*[[Atheists and genetic mutations]]

Keep up the good work.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
:Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:12, 24 December 2017 (EST)

== Nationalism v Globalism ==

I went ahead and added a link to the Gardner article on the Nationalism v Globalism article for you. I figured since we were referencing it, it would be good to see the original article too.--[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] ([[User talk:Whizkid|talk]]) 23:52, 7 January 2018 (EST)
:Thanks! I already saw and added it to other articles where I mentioned Gardner. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:53, 7 January 2018 (EST)

==Homeschooling==
I deleted the paragraph on Texas requirements (which I originally added) since it was duplicative of the information I added from HSLDA (which covers all 50 states) regarding state requirements. I left the New Hampshire one since it involved a court imposing its will on a family in violation of state law.

I'm glad you liked my original work, but after finding something better and covering more than just one state, I amended my original work. Though after your comments, I revised it to explain that another state court (Texas) made homeschooling far easier than before. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 17:22, 29 January 2018 (EST)

:Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:27, 29 January 2018 (EST)

==Deep State==
I will agree with your removal of the word "theory", but I did add the phrase "(or are believed to control)" because there are many conservative Christians who are not totally convinced that the deep state really exists. I believe my edits will be a happy medium between those who hold to the deep state view and those who do not. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 15:11, 30 January 2018 (EST)
:I kept most of your "is believed/considered" wording (except for the first sentence, which is unnecessary as the first sentence already makes clear that "deep state" is a term and not necessarily reality. I found most of your other changes to be too wordy and unnecessary, so I reverted some of it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:04, 30 January 2018 (EST)
::I looked at your revisions and all you did was revert to your original article, with a few minor edits to try to convince me that you really took my suggestions into consideration. Basically what you did to the article is like putting wood filler and new paint on a house with termite rot. I've dealt with folks like you over on "the other site", who think that once they write an article, it's perfect and can't accept any changes to it. I'm not going to waste time with this one any more; clearly you're trying to espouse tinfoil hat conspiracy theory under the guise of "Christian conservatism". [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 09:22, 31 January 2018 (EST)
:::Much of your changes involved inserting parenthetical notes, which I think made the article more bloated than it had to be. The "or are believed to control" phrase in the first sentence was simply unnecessary and overemphasized your disbelief in the deep state. The part about Wall Street was cited to a good research article, so I don't think we need the "is believed" language for that. But I will still see if I can incorporate more of your edits.
:::About the existence of the deep state, it and the drive for one-world government are things that should be common and uncontroversial knowledge -- but people (both supporters and detractors) "conspiracize" these things and that's how accusations of me wearing a tinfoil hat come about. Look at the evidence -- most of our society (except theologically conservative Christians, most of them probably being premillennialist) accept the Idea of Progress, adopted during the Enlightenment Era. They believe that humanity is progressing for the better, and that this will lead to a one-world utopia with world peace and freedom for humanity (read Kant, for example). Thus, they believe that national identity, subsidiarity, and national sovereignty are growing useless and antiquated and actually are impediments to this utopia. This flows into their policies -- advancing international organizations, taking away national sovereignty, etc. As for the deep state, just look at the whole DOJ/FBI stuff going on right now, or the fact that Republicans and Democrats hire administration personnel from the same group of organizations -- CFR, Trilateral, etc.
:::The garbage that there is some secret conspiracy by liberals to take over the world, that their motives are malevolent, that they want to do evil, that this is a short-term project, and that the Illuminati is involved with all this -- this is all garbage perfectly fit for "the other site". In reality, the drive for a one-world utopia is one of the fundamental philosophical views in our culture, and liberals openly see it as natural/normal/benign (and they're in it for the long haul). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:04, 31 January 2018 (EST)

== Suggested Name Change for [[Christmas and Easter Catholic]] ==
I propose changing this to "Christmas and Easter Christian", since the phenomenon of persons attending church on those days is by no means limited to Catholics. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 16:17, 30 January 2018 (EST)
:I disagree. I recommend that a separate article entitled "Christmas and Easter Christian" be created -- C&E Catholicism is a notable concept on its own right, enough to have its own article. I think an article on C&E Christianity in general would be a good addition. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:07, 30 January 2018 (EST)
::What's the difference? Both are the same phenomenon -- "so-called" Christian believers who attend only during those two holidays (or weddings and funerals). The current article is fine, it just needs to be revised to not pick on one branch of Christianity. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 09:17, 31 January 2018 (EST)
:::I've heard Roman Catholics specifically mentioned much more than other Christians when hearing about this "phenomenon." But I will ask another editor of his opinion on this. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:32, 31 January 2018 (EST)

==Campaign promises==
Hello,

The thought occurred to me that Wikipedia does not normally catalog campaign promises.(It never has, that I have seen) Elections there follow a formula of "what did they actually do after getting elected" and election results - which is both boring and completely useless, because we have a big problem with people running for office one way and then governing another way. This leaves a glaring hole of accountability with all of our politicians and it also offers us an opportunity to distinguish ourselves from Wikipedia. What do you think about this? I made a few changes [[Bruce Rauner|here]] as an example start. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 15:00, 4 February 2018 (EST)
:I think your suggestion is a great idea -- we have too many politicians who make really great promises during election campaigns, but they later act like they never even made those promises. When Rauner and his GOP primary opponent (Jeanne Ives) sat down with the ''Chicago Tribune'' editorial board a few days ago, Rauner said that he never promised he would veto a major pro-abortion bill that he ultimately signed (he actually explicitly promised he would multiple times).[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/30/jeanne-ives-crushes-gop-gov-bruce-rauner-illinois-candidates-meet-first-time/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/31/conservative-jeanne-ives-rips-il-gov-bruce-rauner-abortion-flip-flop/]
:I can also think of Sen. Thom Tillis of NC who campaigned against amnesty in 2014 and is now advocating for a "conservative" amnesty bill (though it's inferior to the Goodlatte bill).
:I support your suggestion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:11, 4 February 2018 (EST)

== FPÖ ==

Hi, I just wanted to ask you why you have removed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom_Party_of_Austria&diff=1403167&oldid=1403166 my entry] on the article of the Freedom Party of Austria. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreisky%E2%80%93Peter%E2%80%93Wiesenthal_affair Kreisky–Peter–Wiesenthal affair] is an important event in the history of this party that should not be discreeted.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 09:41, 7 February 2018 (EST)
:First off, the info was inserted right in the middle of a paragraph discussing the FPO's ideological development and alliance with the SPO. Your info was out of place.
:Second, the info was unduly wordy. I am sick of seeing the media and leftists do everything in their power to tie right-wing conservative parties like the FPO to Nazi Germany, such as by unduly emphasizing those aspects of the parties and calling them "far-right", "extreme right", "ultra-right", etc. By American conservative standards, these parties are actually quite moderate, and for those of us who realize that Nazism is a vastly overrated threat (placed alongside climate change by the Left), such parties have clearly moved away from their pasts.
:I don't want our articles to accept the left-wing narratives of these right-wing populist parties. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:50, 7 February 2018 (EST)
::Well, all the informations I have put in the article were confirmed with trustworthy sources. [[Simon Wiesenthal]] who accused the FPÖ leader Friedrich Peter of being part in a unit which committed massacres against jews, was himself a Conservative. Wiesenthal supported the (at that time very conservative) Austrian People's Party. So it is not easy to label his accusations as "left-wing narratives". I am also pretty sure that the Conservative government of Israel does not spread "left-wing propaganda" if they criticize the party for its charged history. Instead of simply removing facts from the article, you might emphasize how the FPÖ moved away from its past.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 10:01, 7 February 2018 (EST)
:::Israel is a Jewish state, so issues related to the Holocaust are sensitive to them. But as much as I support Israel and its right-wing government, Israel's position toward the FPO is irrational, and they are unduly obsessed with Nazism like Western Europe is. Israel's opinion on the FPO means very little because of the context -- it's easy to offend Israel on matters like this.
:::About Wiesenthal, I don't know anything about him, but him supporting the OVP does not mean much to me. If the party were "very conservative", why did it support the EU, Maastricht Treaty, Schengen Agreement, etc.
:::And yes, these are the narratives promoted by the Left, the establishment, and the media. These are the same people who were comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler during the election campaign and who tried to smear Breitbart News as anti-Semite (despite loads of evidence to the contrary), among many other cases. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:17, 7 February 2018 (EST)
::::Just because these "narratives" are promoted by the Left it does not mean that they are wrong. I can ensure you that Simon Wiesenthal was never a supporter of left-wing policies. As I already told you it would be better to emphasize the current measures by Strache to reappraise the controversial history of this party instead of denying it.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 11:20, 8 February 2018 (EST)
:::::They're wrong -- they overemphasize every small and petty incident related to parties like the FPO that allude to Nazi Germany. Their point in doing so is to make it seem like that if we elect these people/parties into power (including Donald Trump), we'll be repeating 1933 all over again and will usher in the end of freedom in Europe -- never mind that Germany is still enforcing the Nazi ban on homeschooling, or that many Western European countries have free speech restrictions even on topics like Islam and homosexuality, or etc. Conservapedia will not go along with the media -- we acknowledge that parties like the FPO are conservative and/or right-wing (not "far-right" or "neo-Nazi") and the best choice in order to protect/expand freedom and protect European culture/patriotism. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:58, 8 February 2018 (EST)

== request ==

Can you create this article: [[Donald Trump's major achievements]]? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, 9 February 2018 (EST)
:This seems like a good idea, and I will do it. I won't do it immediately, since I have a lot of other things to do, but I will create it soon. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:54, 9 February 2018 (EST)
::OK. Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:18, 9 February 2018 (EST)

I'm very sorry about the article. If it make you feel like a advertisement. However, everything that is state is true. Thank you for your understanding. Pleased assist by make any corrections. That you think is necessary. When your time is most convenient.

Your brother in Christ,
Luke
:Thanks for your message, but the article I deleted is not acceptable for Conservapedia. There is nothing I can do to change that, unless you receive coverage from good sources (Breitbart, Fox, etc.). I'm keeping the other article for now, since it's one I can imagine keeping, but I'm discussing it with other editors to see what to ultimately do about it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:00, 21 February 2018 (EST)

Could you add some categories to my page please? [[User:Willow Smith|Willow Smith]] ([[User talk:Willow Smith|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2018 (EST)

==Response to your complaints==
From what appears EVERY time someone creates a new page or edits an existing one:

"Please note that all contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here."

If the real rule is "any contributions by Conservapedia administrators -- no matter how good, bad, or ugly they may be -- are fixed for all time and never to be altered", then make that the rule. But don't invite someone to improve things, then complain because they do. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 10:26, 6 March 2018 (EST)
:Your bolding does not improve things. Also, nobody reverted your turning pages into redirects -- it's just a good idea to let people know before making major unilateral changes. If your complaint is that I'm messaging you about these things, then you have no real complaint at all. If you make edits here, you (like I was, and still am to an extent) are bound to be messaged about these things, which other editors do with the intention of improving others' editing. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:37, 6 March 2018 (EST)

::Additionally, administrators and editors alike must watch the activity of others, especially newer editors. A few people have the hobby of trying to vandalize CP in any way possible, so excuse us if we sound cynical or obstinate, but some "new users" are actually just the same vandals as always. Since we don't really know you yet, we do our best to assume good intent, but can't afford to ignore what seems to be odd behavior.
::I'm sure you'll do fine, if you just listen to the recommendations of others and keep improving content. Thank you for your efforts, and for understanding! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 17:16, 6 March 2018 (EST)

==Thank you for the intro==
Just wanted to say thank you for the welcome! PS--Do you know what an eagle does when a storm approaches? [[User:Bcarlin|Bcarlin]] ([[User talk:Bcarlin|talk]]) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (EDT)

== Double standard article is now unprotected ==
1990sguy, I unprotected the [[Double standard]] article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:16, 3 April 2018 (EDT)
:Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:43, 3 April 2018 (EDT)

== Regarding the Whale article ==

Hello,
I would like to know what caused you to revert my edits to the Whale article, and what I could do in the future to avoid this.--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:23, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
:First off, I did not revert everything -- not even close. I reverted what appeared to be unnecessary wordiness on your part, along with your insertion of evolutionist-favored terms ("evolutionary biologists" instead of "evolutionists"--believe it or not, but people who believe in a young Earth can be evolutionary biologists too). If you keep your wording as concise as possible and if you choose your wording while keeping in mind that this is a conservative-Christian encyclopedia (thus, using terms favored by conservatives and Christians), then you won't be reverted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
::OK, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep that in mind. I think I was correct about Darwin's views, though - could I reinstate that part?--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:23, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
:::Fine, but only if you change that part. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:27, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
::::Done. Thank you!--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:40, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
== Thanks for your edits ==

Thanks for cleaning up the edits to [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]]. I was planning to do likewise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:13, 24 April 2018 (EDT)
:You're welcome, happy to help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:15, 24 April 2018 (EDT)

== Ummm... how? ==

Ok... if not supernatural then how is evolution a folklore genre? I don't understand... Do you go to your doctor... Do you believe in evidence based medicine? If so, are you aware that many medicines and treatment methods are derived from experiment on animals... In your viewpoint why? If animals are COMPLETELY unrelated to us IN ANY WAY... then what is the point of experimenting and more importantly, why do those experiments help us develop pills and treatment of diseases? Why do the animals most close to us suffer from related diseases? Why do chimps suffer from HIV and not cockroaches? Just coincidence that our nearest relative is the one who suffers from problems more close to us? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 00:01, 25 April 2018 (EDT)

== Things for you to note ==

Ok... thanks... I feel like there are a couple of things you have to know about potholer54... First, he DOES NOT discuss the political regulations on climate change (https://youtu.be/MTJQPyTVtNA?t=10) in other words, he maintains that political part of the debate (whether conservative or not) is NOT his business. Also, he has criticized leftists for blowing up the effects of climate change (he has frequently said that science does not support earth being destroyed by climate change since in history there have been higher CO2 levels)... these are the reasons why I felt that my wording was correct, but I will not start arguing. Do as you wish. I only ask that if you modify my article please try expanding it (there are enough stubs and short articles here), and cite sources. Even if the sources would not be considered legitimate (by other's standards), citing the sources makes the article look good. I see too many articles, where the writer goes on and on without citing a single source.

About evolution. I do NOT agree with everything here. But I understand your mission. And I understand that people here feel differently and it is NOT my mission to undermine your work. I simply add and create pages which I think Conservapedia lacks, and I try to write from neutral point of view (more experienced people can edit it to sound more conservative, I do not want to seem like a troll).

I did as you commanded. I know the wiki that shall not be named is not welcome here, but I wanted people to have another way to contact me. Anyways, it is removed
--[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 19:09, 26 April 2018 (EDT)
:Responded on your talk page. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:26, 26 April 2018 (EDT)

1)Yes... there are several instances of him trying to take the politics out of it... I'll send them later

2)When you say he "criticizes skepticism" as opposed to "denialism" the reader may have the impression that potholer is against being skeptical when in fact he is against what he considers to be denialsim... He is pro free speech, he welcomes questions, I have even spoken with him at length months ago. That is why I wrote what I wrote.

3)That's ok. While my interests change very unpredictably and rapidly, recently I am more interested in history, pseudohistory and archaeology, pseudoarchaeology articles.

4)I understand... I will obey. But just for curiosity, can I know where does that rule originate from? I have read the Guidelines and the Commandments and I did not see any mention of the site which calls itself that which it thinks Conservapedia is not? I do obey, and I respect, but just for interest, where is that rule documented and what is the purpose (since you seem to tolerate other anti-Conservapedia wikis like Lieberapedia) --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 20:48, 26 April 2018 (EDT)

:Responded again on your talk page. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:31, 26 April 2018 (EDT)

::OK... Is there a way for me to add images (illustrations) to my articles? How do I do that and what is CP policy on that? Are google images, wiki images ok? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 21:43, 26 April 2018 (EDT)
:::You can post requests at [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]. User:DavidB4 usually uploads the requests. If the image has a license that allows us to use it, we can upload it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:53, 26 April 2018 (EDT)

== Blocked me ==

Hey...
1)I thought that the ban meant that I was actually banned, meaning the site would prevent me from editing, so when I saw that I could edit, I thought it was ok... I did not know that you meant I should stay away from those topics. I simply thought the article used to many words, so I made it simple and more encyclopedic.

2)Your addition to my article is also written, don't get me wrong, a little too simply. I understand that editors here do not accept the scientific consensus on evolution, but at least you can write it more encyclopedically, like you state that scientists say that humans turned from dumb to intelligent and turned to farmers... That sounds like something a 12 year old would write... Can't you make it sound more scientific. I mean, disagree with it, but at least a)represent it correctly b)write it in a grown-up manner...

3)Why did you delete my "Gay Nazis" article... From what I understand, that is pseudo historical and Hitler hated gays and persecuted them?

By the way, thanks for a reasonable block time... I thought I might be blocked for another two years without a chance to explain myself --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 18:26, 27 April 2018 (EDT)
:1) Topic bans mean you're not allowed to edit a topic, not that you don't have the ability to do so. Besides, regardless of your apparent misunderstanding, you removed content that you disagreed with, something I told you repeatedly not to do.
:2) Disapproving of my wording isn't a good reason to remove the entire thing, especially considering that it is one of the few examples in the article that secularists hate. Besides, we're supposed to give reasonably simple explanations when writing (see [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Style]]). My explanation is what the "scientific/historical consensus" essentially holds, and if that's the case, there's no reason to make it read like it was copied out of a prestigious journal. But regardless, I will see if there's any wording that I could change.
:3) It cited two explicitly left-wing sources that use this example to advocate for social-leftist policies and to criticize modern American conservatives. Surely there must be more apolitical sources out there about this? Also, regardless, it's good not to confuse Adolf Hitler's opposition to homosexuality (and the policies that came out of that) with homosexuality's presence in the Nazi Party. What I mean is that some high-ranking people in the Nazi Party, who helped found and build up the party (most notably Ernst Röhm), were homosexuals, and it's more complicated than "Nazis hated homosexuals."
:4) You're welcome. But also a warning: if you don't improve (and I hope you do improve), I will progressively increase the block lengths. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:55, 27 April 2018 (EDT)

::Ok, fine... But out of curiosity, does everyone on this site share your views on evolution, black holes, relativity, atheists etc? Is this site representative of Conservative (and/or Christian) values in general or a very specific type of sense? Do mainstream conservatives reference this site as an authority? And also, is there a rule (formal) where this has to be YEC or strictly Christian? Or is it an unspoken rule? Or does it depend on editors? I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes, I am genuinely interested. One more thing, you told me that I could NOT become an admin/sysop because there were very few, yet you clearly have more authority than me. You block and unblock me at will... How can I get that authority? Thanks! --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 23:39, 27 April 2018 (EDT)
:::No, not everyone shares CP's views on these issues -- in fact, we've had some liberals and atheists edit CP on relatively good terms. However, most editors here (including myself, though I'm agnostic on the relativity info and opposed to the CBP) share the vast majority of CP's stated views. As the owner of CP, Andy obviously has the right to choose what it says.
:::CP is representative of, for lack of a better term, what I would call "full conservatism", rather than cafeteria conservatism, where people pick and choose what parts of conservatism they support and what they don't. There are many people (especially in Europe, but also here) who say they are conservative but share many views and even many underlying presuppositions of the globalist Left. CP is pretty consistent with our support for limited/small government and staying true to the values of the founding fathers.
:::It really depends on who you mean when you say "mainstream conservative" -- that's a slippery term that can mean different things.
:::I'm not an admin -- I'm technically an assistant admin, since I have many but not all sysop rights. Even getting those took a while, and it's all at Andy's discretion. If you become a good editor who respects CP's perspective and does not challenge them in any way, you'll probably get some rights eventually. But you were just blocked twice, and you're still having problems learning how to edit CP without undermining its perspective -- I don't think you should count on being promoted anytime soon -- focus on other things here for now. CP has a significantly stricter sysop policy than "the other website", and for good reason -- we're the target of parodists and other people who regularly seek to vandalize and undermine us, and we want to ensure that we don't have to deal with a parodist sysop or anything like that. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:09, 28 April 2018 (EDT)

== Sorry ==

Sorry, you'll have to explain that more... What do I not do? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 15:58, 28 April 2018 (EDT)

== Left Wing Sources ==

Hi... I do not usually look at the political leanings... I cite sources which I am SURE state something that is verifiable... Though, SPLC might be left leaning, I am SURE they can get Richard Spencer's birth date right... So I cited as a source for his birth date... The RWW, was a YOUTUBE video, that is the one I found first, I don't cite them to support left leaning politics, just facts that are verifiable by ANY honest person... I repeat SPLC might be left, but I am sure they can get a BIRTH DATE correctly! So that is what I cited, but do as you please! --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 16:22, 28 April 2018 (EDT)
:Surely, there are better sources that give Spencer's birthdate than SPLC. Also, those sources are not merely "left-leaning" (that designation more properly belongs to something like "The Atlantic") -- they are far-left partisan interest groups. They have no business being here. As a conservative encyclopedia, it makes sense to predominantly rely on conservative sources (or, at least, apolitical sources). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:27, 28 April 2018 (EDT)

== Arguing With You ==

Lol.. You are trying to get me to argue about evolution... but the problem is that if I do that I (and ONLY I, ie NOT both of us) will get blocked... It's kinda dirty that you on one hand basically provoke me to argument and if I do respond to your arguments you have the authority to block me... Assuming, this time you really were interested and WILL NOT block me for simply RESPONDING TO WHAT YOU TOLD ME... It is my humble opinion, based on what you have said here, you do not understand what The Theory of Evolution actually is... You seem to think that evolution says that monkeys turned human and that macro evolution means that a new organism appears over time, although macro evolution is THE SAME as micro evolution only on a larger time scale (yes as simple as that)... You have made it clear NOT to correct these errors (ERRORS) so I respect conservapedia rules... I respect what you told me and I keep away from stuff that we disagree on and keep contributing what I can in good faith...

Last time we got into this argument, I pointed out a really good and simple thing... I told you how we can see the familial pattern and the animals closer to us suffer more ailments like us... I also pointed out that experiments on animals closer to us help us find treatment, this was a good point to think about... Instead you chose to ignore it... So I did NOT want to get blocked, so I simply let it go (again, respecting your opinions)... Yet you show NONE of this respect calling 200 years of research "junk science" simply because you have been unable to process this information... @Karajou is YEC too and he thinks that evolution is fake, but he does not push it, and he is not calling me out on "believing" (or understanding, as I prefer) evolution... He simply keeps what he believes to himself... I can respect that!

I am ready to respond if you have questions... But only if I am guaranteed not to get blocked like last time (after I RESPONDED to QUESTIONS addressed to me FOR 2 years)! --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 20:40, 30 April 2018 (EDT)

:On a side note, I happen to know of a CP user who openly created a RW account. They were immediately interrogated on evolution as well.
:To the main issue, though, microevolution is not the same as macroevolution. You should really do some research on the subject. There is a significant difference between a change in fur length, and a change in species. That and other issues I disagree with you aside, I don't think you will or should get blocked simply for stating your opinion. As long as you continue to respect our polices regarding mainspace articles, you should be safe. (I don't know the details of the block, but I suspect there was more going on than just an angry response to your opposing opinion.)
:Anyway, I'm cutting in on this conversation, and I should really just let 1990'sguy speak for himself. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 22:00, 30 April 2018 (EDT)

::@Kingdamian1: I am '''not''' trying to argue with you about evolution. First off, I explicitly tried to end the discussion on Andy's talk page because I didn't want to use it arguing about political positions. Also, I was more focused on your political positions. We all know what you believe on evolution. I was tempted to ask clarifying questions about your ''political'' views, but I thought it wasn't worth it.
::Also, I actually don't care whether you believe in evolution. What I care about is the fact that you are apparently unable to put away your bias when editing CP. Your edits on the [[Potholer54]], [[Pseudohistory]], and [[Macroevolution]] inserted pro-evolution bias into CP (and keep in mind that your first edit after joining was creating a debate page on evolution where the first sentence insulted CP). As I noted elsewhere, you inserted bias on other topics in your edits. I don't care about your personal views on any of this (there are several CP users who believe in evolution) -- the fact that you are struggling to make your editing compatible with CP's point of view is a problem. Hopefully, you're learning.
::Claiming that I'm "''unable to process this information''" on evolution shows how little you actually know about me, and it's not a good strategy for staying on this site. I've thought a lot about this issue, and its strengthened my belief that the Bible is authoritative in all it says and that science affirms it as true (rather than Ephesians 6:14).
::DavidB4's comment above is correct, and to clarify to him, Kingdamian1 was blocked (by Karajou and me) for more than simply giving an opposing opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:18, 30 April 2018 (EDT)
I CLEARLY have it on my page that I am a LIBERTARIAN... according to Conservapedia, that is what you would consider conservative, you keep telling me I admitted I was NOT conservative, where Conservapedia COUNTS Libertarianism as conservative... About evolution, I do NOT think you do not think about the subject, I think you look at it FROM A SINGLE point of view. I suspect that your view about evolution comes from strictly YEC... The first of your many mistakes, is saying that evolution=atheism, when in fact, OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of religious people agree with evolution. If you really are honest and interest in BOTH sides and NOT JUST ONE... there are MANY videos you can watch...

I have these 2 videos I usually recommend as they are NOT boring and fun and also explain things in easy to understand terms...
If you are truly interested in BOTH sides, try to seat through these two videos. Watch them in order (1st and then 2nd) as one is kind of answering the rebuttal that followed (the rebuttal you may have in mind when watching the first one)... If you can sit through both of them calmly without getting agitated (They are NOT boring and easy to understand, filled with humor), please, get back to me and tell me (after watching BOTH completely) how has your view changed about what evolution actually is!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RnygS7opCA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-ilMYc5xdQ

--[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 23:59, 30 April 2018 (EDT)
:KingDamian, you are bringing back an argument that has been refuted again and again and again. I've seen the videos you posted, and all it does is once more post an assumption that we must accept evolution as true based upon the word of a scientist who said so. So I'm going to ask you once, and I expect a straight up or down YES or NO answer, and it's based on the horse line at the end of video 2: DID YOU PHYSICALLY SEE THE ''EOHIPPUS'' CHANGE INTO THE ''EQUUS''? Keep in mind that I will not accept as an answer anyone pointing to the fossils themselves and saying we must assume a change took place. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 00:21, 1 May 2018 (EDT)

::Hi... No I have not seen it... But do you realize that if I had that would be THE SINGLE MOST POTENT evidence against evolution? Do you realize that? If I had actually observed the change that would be the single best evidence against evolution NOT for it... AGAINST IT! Do I make myself clear? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 00:26, 1 May 2018 (EDT)
:::And there you go. You haven't seen it happen. And neither has every single scientist who ever lived; they didn't see it happen either. And we have to sit here and take their word - and your's, I might add - that evolution did take place because they eyeballed a bunch of fossils and ''said'' a change took place? We have to ''assume'' the change happened because these guys put these fossils in a nice little line-up? This website will not accept evolution based on hearsay evidence; we will call evolution what it actually is - JUNK SCIENCE; and we will post direct evidence that contradicts what these supporters say about it. Do I make myself clear? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 00:49, 1 May 2018 (EDT)

I am not here to argue... I like CP... I think you are worthy of a response, so please don't block me, Brian. Evolution has not been observed? Did you watch it from beginning to end? Evolution Has been observed... What you asked me was if we had observed a SPECIFIC species change over millions of years with my eyes... no I have not. But I have not observed ancient English evolve into modern english either, i have not observed Latin change into Italian either... and you have not observed George Washington s life... so according to your logic, all of this must be junk science too Kingdamian1 (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2018 (EDT)
:No, evolution has not been observed; you are arguing, and you have been arguing since day one, when you know full well where we stand on the subject. It's stopping now. And I'm not going to stand for someone who demands we look at pretty pictures just to get us to believe in an assumption; we might as well assume a monkey evolved from a living room wall because Little Billy drew one on it with his crayons. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 07:18, 1 May 2018 (EDT)
::I agree with Karajou and DavidB4 (on his own talk page). Kingdamian1, your comments show you think I'm some "low-information" person who lives in a bubble who will immediately change my mind once I'm "enlightened" (emphasis on the scare quotes) -- your assumption is complete BS (it shows you have no clue who I am). I tried to end a discussion on Andy's talk page and you brought it up again on my talk page (and I didn't even have to be present for it to heat up). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:32, 1 May 2018 (EDT)
:::Also, I just saw [http://www.psypost.org/2018/04/scientific-reasoning-ability-not-predict-acceptance-evolution-among-religious-individuals-study-finds-51082 this study published in a scientific journal] (by evolutionists, with an evolutionist perspective) that admits that there's no correlation between one's level of education or intelligence and their acceptance of evolution. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:21, 1 May 2018 (EDT)
::::Here's a link to an article responding to the "You don't understand real evolution" argument: [https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2015/09/24/do-we-have-misconceptions-about-evolution/] AiG Also has many articles on the many "proofs" of Evolution that have been used ad Nauseum to attack creationism, such as this one about bacteria: [https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/antibiotic-resistance/is-antibiotic-resistance-proof-of-evolution/] Here's and article explaining why the changes that are actually observed are not even really "evolution": [https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/is-natural-selection-the-same-thing-as-evolution/] And here's a comprehensive list of some of the most common attacks against Creationist assertions: [http://creationwiki.org/Index_to_Creationist_Claims_(Talk.Origins)]

::::The thing is, Creationists are very well aware of the weapons used against them by Evolutionists and one of the biggest mistakes evolutionists make is assuming that Evolutionists know some critical piece of information that is a "knockout punch" to Creationism, when in reality, Creationists are very well aware of these assertions and have written many articles responding to them. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 23:55, 20 May 2018 (EDT)

One more thing. As Frank Turek, one of the foremost Christian apologists, says "Science doesn't say anything, scientists do." Whenever anyone says "Science says that..." what it should really be is "based on their interpretations of certain observations, scientists conclude..." When people say "Science says..." they are committing the fallacy of reification. A detailed explanation can be found here: [https://answersingenesis.org/logic/the-fallacy-of-reification/] Despite KingDamian1's claims that he is "not trolling" he has carried a rather rude and condescending tone typical of those who attack Creationism. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 13:16, 21 May 2018 (EDT)

:As User:Kingdamian1 is a new user, I feel like he/she should given another chance, rather than indeffed. After all, he/she seems really interested in improving Conservapedia and creating articles here, as evidenced from his/her multiple comments even on Wikipedia, requesting his unblock and his/her desire to change. Would there be any objections to me unblocking him/her, with him/her understanding that he/she is topic-banned from any science-related articles (since this seems to be the reason other editors are upset with him/her)? I hope this helps. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]][[User talk:Anupam|Talk]] 04:07, 23 May 2018 (EDT)
::We gave him a chance, and he had more than NPOV problems (which were in and of themselves annoying, since it was my role to check his articles). I was really annoyed at his expectation that he could be instantly promoted to adminship status (and his apparent desperation at it, since he messaged several editors several times about it), when it is very hard and takes a long time even to become an assistant admin. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:35, 23 May 2018 (EDT)

== Question ==

How do you ping someone? (i responded to you on my talk page) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 17:21, 8 May 2018 (EDT)
:I don't think CP has a ping option. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:23, 8 May 2018 (EDT)

== Hi ==

I'm new to this project and I do need help with this sentence:
{{Quote|[[Mike Pompeo]] and the Trump administration helped secure the release of Kim Dong Chul, Kim Hak Song and Tony Kim from North Korea.{{cite news|author=Andrew O'Reilly|coauthors=Elizabeth Llorente|title=Trump administration finds success in bringing home detained Americans|url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/09/trump-administration-finds-success-in-bringing-home-detained-americans.html|work=[[Associated Press (AP)|Associated Press]]|publisher=[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]]|date=9 May 2018}} The three men described their “deep appreciation” for the Trump administration for help freeing them.{{Cite news|last=Dorell|first=Oren|title='God Bless America': Freed American prisoners thankful after being released from North Korea|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/05/09/north-korea-kim-jong-un-free-3-american-citizens/582094002/|publisher=[[USA Today]]|date=9 May 2018|accessdate=10 May 2018|quote=We thank God, and all our families and friends who prayed for us and for our return}}</ref>}}

I believe it should go under [[Donald Trump achievements: Foreign policy]] but for 2018, which section do you believe it fits best under? Also, how do sources work here? --[[User:MaddieJ|MaddieJ]] ([[User talk:MaddieJ|talk]]) 15:14, 11 May 2018 (EDT)
:I already added this to the article, but I will look through your sources to see if more can be added. References could be surrounded by ref tags, like this : <code><nowiki><ref>[citation]</ref></nowiki></code> --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:29, 11 May 2018 (EDT)
::Hi [[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] I just want to let you know I'm glad I'm learning how to edit here. I just recently added the ISIS statements on [[Justin Trudeau]] and also mentioned [[Maxime Waters]] on this edit [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=2017_left-wing_violence&diff=prev&oldid=1422057]. I will allow you to monitor me if any edit I do is good or bad, and I will message you if I need anything. Regards.
--[[User:MaddieJ|MaddieJ]] ([[User talk:MaddieJ|talk]]) 10:03, 15 May 2018 (EDT)
:OK, thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:01, 15 May 2018 (EDT)

== A Message for that British Troll ==

Just in case (s)he makes another sock account, (s)he should know that campaign finance laws are unfair and D'Souza was directly targeted because of his unpopular opinions. Also, in the case of Roy Moore, there is only accusations and hearsay. That troll must also ignore the things that Leftist politicians did:

Bill Clinton: raped, molested and abused several women.

Hillary Clinton: Deflected responsibility for Bengazi, kept emails on her own private servers illegally, and covered up her husband's illicit affairs.

And I'm sure you could name more. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (EDT)

== Conservapedia's Opinion on Joseph McCarthy ==

Hello,
I noticed that you reverted my edit to the Joseph McCarthy page. I made the edit to align with the views expressed in a news story I saw in the main page that described McCarthy as "two of a kind" with Robert Mueller. I feel that Conservapedia should be consistent, so I would appreciate it if the news story was removed/replaced, or the McCarthy article was changed.--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 18:35, 16 May 2018 (EDT)
:I added sources from a reliable conservative source backing up the article. Besides, the sentence as it is now is more neutrally-worded than your wording (I think even the person who posted the news blurb could agree with it). Bottom line: the article is fine, but it's not worth fighting what is a good analogy (considering that we have many leftist readers who hate McCarthy) on the news feed. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:48, 16 May 2018 (EDT)

== About draft ==

I just replied to your email. Its for here, not for Wikipedia. --MaddieJ 14:45, 18 May 2018 (EDT)

== [[Brian and Ed Krassenstein]] ==

I created the article [[Brian and Ed Krassenstein]]. If you would like to do improvements and better grammar to it, feel free to do so. --[[User:MaddieJ|MaddieJ]] ([[User talk:MaddieJ|talk]]) 14:38, 20 May 2018 (EDT)

== Barack Obama's achievements ==

See: [[Essay: President Barack Obama's achievements]]

It required a lot less work than your article [[Donald Trump achievements]]. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:59, 29 May 2018 (EDT)

:Ha! And the little that Obama actually did is being wiped away by President Trump right as we speak! :) --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:22, 29 May 2018 (EDT)

==Finland==
I didnt find a way to send a message here so i assume, once its a wiki, that im supposed to edit this page when i want to contact you. Im not sure if i comment on the articles talk page, would it inform you?
I wanted to ask you about your edits of Finland's article, noticed few grammar mistakes that you corrected but didnt get why the day of independence cant be on the page? Then wanted to mention hat the the Lapps is a same name as Sami, so its like mention the same ethnic group twice.
Then i wondered why the population of the capital city shouldnt be mentioned?
The name of party Perussuomalaiset is in english "the Finns Party" not "True Finns".
There is also few smaller issues i will come back to them later. So would be nice to have a talk about these. Thanks. -Karjalainen

:First off, thank you for editing, and for messaging me here! The problem with the date of independence is that the infobox does not have a parameter (at least that I'm aware of) for the date of independence. This means that if you add the date of independence like what you did, the infobox will not actually show it to whoever is reading.

:I was not aware that the Lapps and Sami are the same. I will fix this. I will also fix the part about the Finns Party, since you're also right on this.

:I just didn't think it was necessary to list the population of Helsinki, especially since the population keeps changing and few editors are available to change it. But, if you want to add the population on the [[Helsinki]] article, you are free to do so.

:I noticed that you updated the economic information using Euros, rather than dollars. The reason why I changed it back is that most Conservapedia readers live in the United States, and the dollar is obviously what they use (and they probably don't know the exchange rate). We can mention the numbers in Euros, but we should also use dollars. Since I don't know the exchange rate, I did not add both.

:I hope all this helps! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:05, 22 July 2018 (EDT)

Thanks for answering.
I dont know if this info can be found but is CP based on the MediaWiki platfom? If yes, is it being updated when never versions come out?
Scrolling around some tutorial pages i found a template of countries where i took that "established" tag from, why does it exist if it doesnt show?
How do you edit the sources? I wanted to add but i dont see the other sources listed there?
Is there any plans to add to CP also other languages?
Is there a way to add both mi2/km2 or $/€ ? Would be nice to attrack also non-american readers and make this website even bigger and popular, maybe one day to replace wikipedia as the biggest.
I will write the issues concerning Finland on the talk page of Finland, please refer to there. -Karjalainen
:Sorry for the belated response. CP is based on the MediaWiki platform, but we use a different infobox than Wikipedia -- we didn't just copy and paste their infobox. We do update it, but I don't know how often.
:You can add sources by putting them in in between a tag like this <code><nowiki><ref>[source]</ref></nowiki></code>
:There are no plans to make CP in a different language that I am aware of, but I recommend asking Andy Schlafly, the site's owner here: [[User talk:Aschlafly]].
:Unfortunately, I do not know how to add both mi2/km2 or $/€ to the infobox.
:I will take a look at your message on the Finland talk page. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:23, 26 July 2018 (EDT)

== Five solas ==

Hearty thanks, 1990'sguy, for your assist with [[Five Solas]]! --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 14:44, 29 July 2018 (EDT)
:You're welcome! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:24, 29 July 2018 (EDT)
== requested article: Trumponomics ==

Article request: [[Trumponomics]]. It would be a nice complementary article to our [[Obamunism]] article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 5 August 2018 (EDT)
:I'll see what I can do. The [[Donald Trump achievements: Economic policy and labor]] (along with the trade sub-article) give a pretty good overview of his economic policies and the effects of those policies. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:48, 5 August 2018 (EDT)

==Contact==
I don't have yours, either. Use this: nobs315@gmail.com [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 23:07, 15 August 2018 (EDT)
:Mine is on my user page. You can verify there. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:18, 15 August 2018 (EDT)
==Capital Punishment==
By quoting Genesis 9:5 you are confusing what God is permitted to do versus what man may do and how man is to conduct himself in relation to his fellow man. It is also inaccurate to write that Jesus had nothing to say on the subject of capital punishment when he directly called into question the teaching of "eye for an eye."[[User:Tulip Festival|Tulip Festival]] ([[User talk:Tulip Festival|talk]]) 19:02, 17 August 2018 (EDT)
:No, Genesis 9:5-6 clearly says that the just punishment for taking a human life is that one's own life be taken. The proportionate and just punishment for murder is not jail time, nor community service. You're confusing what the Bible says regarding personal conduct and governmental policy, which is not personal. I recommend you read these two links: [https://www.gotquestions.org/death-penalty.html][https://answersingenesis.org/culture/the-death-penalty-wdjb-not-wwjd/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:15, 17 August 2018 (EDT)

== HTTP -->HTTPS update ==

As you probably saw, I have moved this list to: [[User:DavidB4-bot/HTTPS URL update project]]. Thank you for your additions to the list...my apologies for adding your entries to the new page under may name. I hope you don't mind. Please feel free to continue adding to that list. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 23:45, 10 September 2018 (EDT)
:Thanks, and thanks for creating this list! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (EDT)

== i try ==

More than a single sentence? Okay I can try. [[User:Knockforpeace|Knockforpeace]] ([[User talk:Knockforpeace|talk]]) 19:29, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
::Sorry i have a disorder. I will try to add more. [[User:Knockforpeace|Knockforpeace]] ([[User talk:Knockforpeace|talk]]) 19:39, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
:::See [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles]] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:41, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
::::Tutoring avalible? By you? [[User:Knockforpeace|Knockforpeace]] ([[User talk:Knockforpeace|talk]]) 19:45, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
:::::Read and follow all of the links provided at the very top of this talk page. That will help you. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:09, 15 September 2018 (EDT)

== Logician account ==

It wasn’t a troll. Could you unblock it? Also, I removed Russell and Whitehead’s Principia Mathematica because it’s supposedly recommended reading. Thing is though that it’s such dense and complicated symbolic logic that no one would actually be able to understand it. It shouldn’t be recommended reading. Anyway, thanks. [[User:Anaxagoras|Anaxagoras]] ([[User talk:Anaxagoras|talk]]) 12:36, 20 September 2018 (EDT)
:I will unblock the account (though I will procedurally block the "Anaxagoras" one), but do not remove the Principia Mathematica book. It may be dense and complicated, and it may be to the extent that laypeople can't understand it, but it should remain for those who can understand it and who will find it useful. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:50, 20 September 2018 (EDT)

== Re: [[Kavanaugh smear]] article name change ==

A high proportion of CP's readers lean left. I changed the title because I thought the new title would engender less cognitive resistance to these readers and therefore be more likely to change their mind. In addition, I thought the new title sounded more encyclopedic.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:01, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
:That's understandable, but the article is not about opposition to Kavanaugh in general, it's specifically about the accusations made against him by left-wing people (as opposed to people criticizing him with his judicial philosophy being the stated reason). I'm not opposed to the page being moved, but it would be a title that makes it clear that the article is specifically about the attempted rape allegations against him. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:37, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
::The allegations against him are a joke. It is a reflection that the Democrats are a sad joke. All the corroborating witnesses say the events never happened.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:14, 24 September 2018 (EDT)
::::Exactly -- they're politically-motivated character assassination, nothing more. Thus, "Kavanaugh smear" is an appropriate title for the article. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:24, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

:::I have chimed in [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Kavanaugh_smear&curid=150814&diff=1450439&oldid=1450438 here]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 10:28, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

== Re: Switzerland vs. Britain ==

I believe you have visited Switzerland.

Below is a post I made to some left leaning atheists/evolutionists.

Gentlemen,

Don't think I haven't noticed your silence on Swiss trains being more timelier than British trains. What's your excuse for British trains being less timelier than Swiss trains?

Just admit it. The [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/switzerland-beacon-of-european.html industrious and wealthy Swiss], who have one of the highest rates of creationism in Europe, have a better, wealthier and more efficient society than post Darwinism Britain.

By the way, deny that Britain is the fountainhead of Darwinism and lose all credibility!

=== Main page right post in question ===

'''The British recently had a hard''' time getting their trains to run on time.[https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45572736]

According to [[Wikipedia]], "The Swiss rail network is noteworthy for its density, its coordination between services, its integration with other modes of transport, timeliness and a thriving domestic and trans-alp freight system."

Why can't [[Britain]], the fountainhead of [[Darwinism]], compete with [[Switzerland]] which is known for having one of the highest rates of [[creationism]] [[per capita]] in Europe?[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/switzerland-beacon-of-european.html][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:01, 23 September 2018 (EDT)

:I have dual Swiss citizenship, so yes, I have visited the country multiple times. For the record, some (not many, though) of my relatives there are biblical creationists. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:37, 23 September 2018 (EDT)

==Formatting of quotes==

Thanks for the {{tl|cquote}} thing - I had forgotten that template. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 09:15, 26 September 2018 (EDT)
:You're welcome -- happy to help! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:21, 26 September 2018 (EDT)

== Trumpiantexan is a vandal ==

There's a Vandal called "Trumpiantexan" [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 18:53, 16 October 2018 (EDT)

== Why you said this so.. ==

...'' I don't know if his pro-Marx comments actually make him a communist. He's your typical globalist/liberal European uniparty elite.'' It is not mine definition but more a true fact. Regards, [[User:YortKeldher|YortKeldher]] ([[User talk:YortKeldher|talk]]) 11:15, 20 October 2018 (EDT)
:Most liberal/globalist European elites think the same way Juncker does. It would not be a good idea to label them all as communists. They have many of the same goals as communists, but there is some nuance between them (for example, different different tactics/methods, and Juncker and many of his friends are part of "liberal" or "center-right" parties, and seem to like big corporations). Either the "liberal" and "globalist" categories are enough (since liberals and globalists have many similarities with Marxists, like Juncker), or a new category is needed. I prefer the former, as it doesn't imply that liberalism and globalism are too different from Marxism and communism (different strands of the same thing, and the existing categories take the nuances into account). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:00, 20 October 2018 (EDT)

== Cesar Sayoc Article==
Wouldn’t a person with prudent ethics be willing to discuss whether or not a new article should be deleted prior to deleting said article? Cesar Sayoc is dominating the headlines of America yet you say he is a ‘nobody’? Based on your reasoning the [[Lee Harvey Oswald]] article should be deleted immediately.--[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 17:01, 26 October 2018 (EDT)
:Lee Harvey Oswald has historical significance -- and fortunately, we get the facts right, that he was a left-wing Marxist (a fact many on the Left like to ignore). The Cesar Sayoc guy may be dominating headlines (of the left-wing mainstream media and the Left, which want to capitalize on this single incident of a mentally ill man and put a rug over the [[Left-wing violence in the Trump era|many examples of leftist violence in the past couple years]]) at the moment, but his 15 minutes of fame will soon end and his 58-year jail sentence will soon begin. I let the other administrators know of the dispute over this page, and they will decide soon. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:08, 26 October 2018 (EDT)
::I got the facts right in the Sayoc article, I hope you are not implying otherwise. I’d like to think the Best of the Public could create an article free from liberal bias. Alas, it looks like the readers of Conservapedia will have to suffice with the liberal slant since you are keen to prevent this educational resource from telling the truth. Sad.--[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 17:35, 26 October 2018 (EDT)
:::All the facts except that he wasn't a bomber. ''Per the Associated Press'': {{quotebox|7:50 p.m. A law enforcement official says tests have determined that a powder found inside an envelope delivered to CNN along with a pipe bomb was harmless. The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the investigation publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. New York City’s police commissioner said earlier Wednesday that the package sent to CNN’s offices in Manhattan contained a live explosive and an envelope containing white powder. The FBI said the package was similar to explosives sent to former President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Eric Holder and billionaire George Soros. The package sent to CNN was addressed to former CIA Director John Brennan, a frequent guest on the channel. The official says that parcel contained no note or claim of responsibility. — Tom Hays Associated Press, October 24, 2018}} [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 17:41, 26 October 2018 (EDT)
::A man sends bombs through the mail, and in your opinion, he is not a bomber? The director of the FBI is quoted as saying the devices were ‘…not hoax devices’. What, exactly, is your definition of a bomber?--[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 18:17, 26 October 2018 (EDT)
:::They were too hoax devices. You have terrible reading comprehension. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:44, 28 October 2018 (EDT)

Why did you block me? All I did was state the obvious fact that Joe Manchin is a DINO. he voted to confirm Kavanaugh, confirm Gorsuch, and supports the coal industry. He's even more right-wing than Lisa Murkowski! [[User:Libertarianmoderate2|Libertarianmoderate2]] ([[User talk:Libertarianmoderate2|talk]]) 17:50, 28 October 2018 (EDT)
:Manchin lives in a state that voted for Trump by 40 points, and he knows it. He's appealing to the people of his state so he doesn't alienate them. Take a broader view, rather than look at the narrow set of issues where he made a big deal of supporting right-of-center people on -- for example, notice how he's voted against many of Trump's conservative circuit court nominees and several cabinet nominees. Also, when there were narrow votes for any nominee or bill, Manchin voted with Democrats -- he only voted with Republicans when his vote wasn't anywhere close to affecting the vote's outcome. And his support for Planned Parenthood is pretty extreme for a red-state Democrat who has claimed to be pro-life. I stand entirely by my reverts, and CP has never considered Murkowski a conservative, AFAIK. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:44, 28 October 2018 (EDT)
::And look at his record with the 2A -- he has a "D" rating from the NRA, a moderate (as opposed to GOA) pro-gun organization -- several Democrats even have better ratings than him.
::In short, Manchin only votes with conservatives in high profile votes when his vote is not a deciding factor in whether the bill/nominee will pass. He's not a conservative, and he's in line with the Democrat Party. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:54, 28 October 2018 (EDT)

Sorry about that. In the meantime, I'm a very skilled wiki writer who wrote for Wikivoyage for a while, and my skills are exactly what this site needs. I hope you can overlook this disagreement. [[User:Libertarianmoderate2|Libertarianmoderate2]] ([[User talk:Libertarianmoderate2|talk]]) 19:58, 29 October 2018 (EDT)

==Pinging==
I tried to ping you, but it didn't work. I typed {d{Ping|1990'sguy}d} (remove the d's, I added them here so it comes out as text). [[User:Libertarianmoderate2|Libertarianmoderate2]] ([[User talk:Libertarianmoderate2|talk]]) 20:26, 29 October 2018 (EDT)

== Troll ==

Eleonóra Dubiczki is defacing the page on Rightpedia. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 14:47, 3 November 2018 (EDT)
:There's another one named Fiala, probably a sock of the same person. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 14:50, 3 November 2018 (EDT)

==UN migrant treaty==
We're gonna need a [[UN Migrant Treaty]] page. To begin, we need a thumbnail sketch what it is, then a list whose all opposed. Do you have any info to help start? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 15:46, 22 November 2018 (EST)
:Yes -- or [[UN Global Compact on Migration]] or something like that. Several countries have already said they will leave, so it will take some effort to track them all down. I can help. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:46, 22 November 2018 (EST)
::Coincidentally, I found this article giving a good list: [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/22/world-follows-trumps-lead-nations-abandon-legal-framework-building-un-migration-pact/] I can create and/or expand the article, if you want. I think the biggest issue will be what the title should be. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:50, 22 November 2018 (EST)
:::I'd suggest UN Migrant Treaty, then bolden the formal title; its already being discussed as "the [[migrant treaty]]". Moves & redirects can be done as needed. But both the [[European migrant crisis]] and [[2018 Migrant caravan]] already need minor subsections or references to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 19:53, 22 November 2018 (EST)
::::I started it. I will do more work tomorrow, if I have time. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:56, 22 November 2018 (EST)

==Wanna chat?==
Hey, I'm curious if I could get to know you. I like your edits. [[User:AnnBelleAldaco96|AnnBelleAldaco96]] ([[User talk:AnnBelleAldaco96|talk]]) 22:00, 28 November 2018 (EST)

:You can either contact me through my CP email address or through this talk page. I won't reveal/discuss personal/private info about myself (obviously), but I'd be happy to talk. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:32, 28 November 2018 (EST)

== Does CP hate video games? ==

I think the tone of the video games article is a little too critical. If you truly are a 1990's guy, then you probably grew up with video games too. You probably also remember the controversy of video game violence back in the 90s too (perhaps there should be a section in the article on that). Ironically, the members of Congress who pushed for potential legislation were two Democrat senators, Joe Lieberman and Herb Kohl. I was, along with my fellow kids of the 90s, booing and jeering at the old people who knew nothing about video games criticizing our hobby. There is a reason why the article "Essay:Greatest Conservative Video Games" exists. Most of the people who criticize video games are older people who didn't grow up with them. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 11:15, 29 November 2018 (EST)

:To be clear, the 1990s was the decade I was born in, so unfortunately, I don't have firsthand knowledge of the controversies of that decade. I played some video games, though not as much as other people, and only on my Gameboy and Nintendo DS, and I lost all interest by the time I turned, roughly, 13.

:I have nothing against video games in and of themselves, and I still think positively of some of the games I played. However, I think many of the criticisms of video games -- such as encouraging obesity and staying indoors rather than going outside -- are valid. Also, video game addition appears to be a real problem: [https://www.foxnews.com/tech/girl-9-sent-to-rehab-after-refusing-to-stop-playing-fortnite-wetting-herself][https://www.foxnews.com/health/compulsive-video-game-playing-now-qualifies-as-mental-health-condition] Those problems probably aren't inherent to video games, though -- they can and are used in good, harmless ways too, as I have experienced. That said, it's not a topic that I have strong feelings on.

:About the article itself, it is Andy's choice to have the article the way it is. There is nothing I can do about it -- it would have to be something you would have to discuss with him if it should be changed. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:20, 29 November 2018 (EST)

== Explaination of edits to the page regarding Thomas Aquinas and theft ==

Did Aquinas endorse theft?

Without the full quote from the Summa Theologica it would appear so, However:
Whether it is lawful to steal through stress of need?
Objection 1: It would seem unlawful to steal through stress of need. For penance is not imposed except on one who has sinned. Now it is stated (Extra, De furtis, Cap. Si quis): "If anyone, through stress of hunger or nakedness, steal food, clothing or beast, he shall do penance for three weeks." Therefore it is not lawful to steal through stress of need.

Objection 2: Further, the Philosopher says (Ethic. ii, 6) that "there are some actions whose very name implies wickedness," and among these he reckons theft. Now that which is wicked in itself may not be done for a good end. Therefore a man cannot lawfully steal in order to remedy a need.

Objection 3: Further, a man should love his neighbor as himself. Now, according to Augustine (Contra Mendac. vii), it is unlawful to steal in order to succor one's neighbor by giving him an alms. Therefore neither is it lawful to steal in order to remedy one's own needs.

On the contrary, In cases of need all things are common property, so that there would seem to be no sin in taking another's property, for need has made it common.

I answer that, Things which are of human right cannot derogate from natural right or Divine right. Now according to the natural order established by Divine Providence, inferior things are ordained for the purpose of succoring man's needs by their means. Wherefore the division and appropriation of things which are based on human law, do not preclude the fact that man's needs have to be remedied by means of these very things. Hence whatever certain people have in superabundance is due, by natural law, to the purpose of succoring the poor. For this reason Ambrose [*Loc. cit., A[2], OBJ[3]] says, and his words are embodied in the Decretals (Dist. xlvii, can. Sicut ii): "It is the hungry man's bread that you withhold, the naked man's cloak that you store away, the money that you bury in the earth is the price of the poor man's ransom and freedom."

Since, however, there are many who are in need, while it is impossible for all to be succored by means of the same thing, each one is entrusted with the stewardship of his own things, so that out of them he may come to the aid of those who are in need. Nevertheless, if the need be so manifest and urgent, that it is evident that the present need must be remedied by whatever means be at hand (for instance when a person is in some imminent danger, and there is no other possible remedy), then it is lawful for a man to succor his own need by means of another's property, by taking it either openly or secretly: nor is this properly speaking theft or robbery.

Reply to Objection 1: This decretal considers cases where there is no urgent need.

Reply to Objection 2: It is not theft, properly speaking, to take secretly and use another's property in a case of extreme need: because that which he takes for the support of his life becomes his own property by reason of that need.

Reply to Objection 3: In a case of a like need a man may also take secretly another's property in order to succor his neighbor in need.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum322.htm

"In cases of need all things are common property, so that there would seem to be no sin in taking another's property, for need has made it common" is not in the Summa Theogica and is therefore inaccurate and misleading. The quote should be:

"It is not theft, properly speaking, to take secretly and use another's property in a case of extreme need: because that which he takes for the support of his life becomes his own property by reason of that need."

I will therefore change the quote to the correct quotation. {{unsigned|JPConservative}}

:Look again -- both quotes are there, and they're quoted accurately. The article is correct in saying that Aquinas does not take a strong position on property rights as other conservatives (including John Locke, the intellectual father of the founding fathers) held. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:39, 11 December 2018 (EST)

The quotes used misses out that Thomas Aquinas was referring to those who might die of starvation, not merely out of need. The original quotes in the article imply that he supported "Socialism" which is not so. Aquinas did take a strong stand on property rights, he made one exception, those who face death can take some food (and by implication, water & clothing.) This is the interpretation that the Catholic Church uses and is supported by the majority of Thomists. {{unsigned|JPConservative}}

:Once again, the quote mentioning hunger was already quoted in the paragraph. Also, the paragraph doesn't say that he supported socialism, but that it represented a slippery slope. Either way, his position is weaker than that of some other intellectuals who wrote on property rights. I might (possibly) be OK with a single short sentence/phrase saying that overall he supported property rights, if you can back it up, but the specific info you're citing does not back it up. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:03, 11 December 2018 (EST)

Yes hunger is mentioned, but the meaning has been distorted, I can assure you that having studied the Summa Theologica in a monastery guided by a Thomist professor that the section on Politic Philosophy is wrong. It is not a correct interpretation of Aquinas's political views. Thomas Aquinas clearly upholds property rights in the Summa Theologica:

I answer that, Two things are competent to man in respect of exterior things. One is the power to procure and dispense them, and in this regard it is lawful for man to possess property. Moreover this is necessary to human life for three reasons. First because every man is more careful to procure what is for himself alone than that which is common to many or to all: since each one would shirk the labor and leave to another that which concerns the community, as happens where there is a great number of servants. Secondly, because human affairs are conducted in more orderly fashion if each man is charged with taking care of some particular thing himself, whereas there would be confusion if everyone had to look after any one thing indeterminately. Thirdly, because a more peaceful state is ensured to man if each one is contented with his own. Hence it is to be observed that quarrels arise more frequently where there is no division of the things possessed.

The second thing that is competent to man with regard to external things is their use. In this respect man ought to possess external things, not as his own, but as common, so that, to wit, he is ready to communicate them to others in their need. Hence the Apostle says (1 Tim. 6:17, 18): "Charge the rich of this world . . . to give easily, to communicate to others," etc.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum322.htm

Yes, I can back up my claims. The quoted I cited are from authorized sites. I have used the quotes as written and provided links, so please explain how I am wrong?

Here is additional proof that Thomas Aquinas upheld property rights https://tifwe.org/five-insights-about-private-property-from-aquinas/
{{unsigned|JPConservative}}

I have added further material to refute the idea that the writings of Thomas Aquinas can be used to support Socialism. If you edit or remove it, please first demonstrate that I am wrong. Thank you & God Blessings be with you.

==just an idea...==
What do you think of coining the term [[anti-constitutionalist]] to describe people who oppose constitutionalists? People who oppose free speech, gun rights, due process, etc. There certainly are a lot of them in the upcoming session of Congress.

First, we'd need a working definition, then a list of members with their stated positions. The idea may catch on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 23:52, 12 December 2018 (EST)

:I like it. What do you think of a definition along the lines of "someone who opposes the rights contained in the Constitution, and by extension, the United States as envisioned by the founding fathers"? This is just a draft proposal, the wording wouldn't be final. Maybe we should note that the Constitution reflects a classical liberal philosophy, showing that these "liberals" reject liberalism? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:06, 13 December 2018 (EST)
::Yes. In various articles [[Justice Kavanaugh]] is refered to as a constitutionalist, so I suspect we'll be hearing more of term in the future.

::Now, advocates for Amending the Constitution wouldn't automatically fall into this category. People who want to abolish the Electoral College or hold a constitutional convention, for example - if that is their single issue. I'm thinking of people who want outright repeal of the 2nd Amendment, advocate free speech suppression and censorship, disrespect due process and the presumption of innocence as in the Kavanaugh and Judge Moore cases, or ignore the 4th Amendment violations of the FBI & DOJ. Anyone who holds two or more of these positions could be considered an anti-constitutionalist.

::One more thing, I've discovered that whoever is among the first to create a page with a new term entering the public lexicon, Google algorithms favor and can hold a high ranking for years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 00:26, 13 December 2018 (EST)

:::About the Electoral College and Con Con distinction, it think that's fair, and it would be good to at least make a distinction between the two. We would need to make this clear to readers, though. That said, one could argue that wanting to change the Constitution on something as important as the Electoral College also a rejection of the U.S. as envisioned by the founding fathers. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:46, 13 December 2018 (EST)
::::That's right. That's why I'm thinking two or more. Somebody who wants to abolidh the electoral college and repeal gun rights, then refuses due process and presumption of innocence, and is okay with illegal domestic spying, is an anti-constitutionalist. Throw in support for [[Medicare for All]] and they call themselves a progressive or Democratic Socialist, it's pretty clear they want to tear down the two party system. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 21:34, 13 December 2018 (EST)
::::We shouldn't spell out our criteria on the page before naming names, and if we put everybody on the list who belongs, it would be too long and nobody would read it. We simply need a paragraph or two or three to define in philosophical terms what makes someone opposed to our system of government, and then in the next section spell out a few leaders what positions they've taken to supoort the label, Pelosi, Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, and other high profile figures we can cite. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 21:40, 13 December 2018 (EST)
:::::The draft below looks great -- and it accurately describes the modern Left. Is "collective responsibility" (#6) the left's counter to states' rights? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 06:26, 14 December 2018 (EST)
::::::On number 6 that's right. I don't recall the exact language on Form 1040 related to the Obamacare individual mandate. I should dig it out and tweak it.
::::::Anyway we got enough to get started. It'll change over time. We should be on the look out for buzzwords and phrases that help define an Anti-Constitutionalist.
::::::As the 2020 election approaches, rather than a long list on the page, we can just create a Category. And the beauty of this idea is, in keeping with liberalism, they don't have to adhere to a strict set of principles, all they have to do is exhibit a few characteristics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 16:16, 14 December 2018 (EST)

===Pattern===
I googled around and found most definitions of constitutionalist are cut n pastes of each other. Some have lists of principles, but remember, anti-constitutionalists have no principles, they have characteristics. To be an anti-constitutionalist, you don't have to conform or adhere to a list of principles, you just have to resemble a few characteristics.

This came ftom the Urban Dictionary. So all we need to do is tweak the language away from it's original documents or meaning into something other, or it's opposite:

Constitutionalist
1. An individual that shares the views of the political theories of John Locke and the founders of the American republic, that government can and should be legally limited in its powers, and that its authority or legitimacy depends on its observing these limitations.

2. An individual who believes in the basic standards and ideals are to be consistent with an overriding rule of law or ethics.

The 7 principles of a Constitutionalist:

1. Life: For all human beings, from conception to natural death;

2. Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions for the self-governed individual;

3. Family: One husband and one wife with their children as divinely instituted;

4. Property: Each individual's right to own and steward personal property without government burden;

5. Constitution: and Bill of Rights interpreted according to the actual intent of the Founding Fathers;

6. States' Rights: Everything not specifically delegated by the Constitution to the federal government, nor prohibited by the Constitution to the states, is reserved to the states or to the people;

7. American Sovereignty: American government committed to the protection of the borders, trade, and common defense of Americans, and not entangled in foreign alliances.

===Draft 1===
Here's a start. Now remember. we sort of want to use their own langusge, logic, meaning, and reasoning, so when they read it, they're looking in a mirror. Characteristic #2 needs some work. Feel free to change or suggest anything.

Anti-Constitutionalists

Persons who reject the views of the political theories of [[John Locke]] and the founding fathers of the American republic, that government can and should be limited in its powers. Anti-Constitutionalists believe in the supremacy of federal power over individual rights.

2. Persons who believe in the basic standards and ideals are to be consistent with [[progressive]] values and the rule of law.

The 7 characteristics of many anti-constitutionalists:

1. Life: For all human beings, and a [[pro-abortion|right to choice]].

2. Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions to suppress [[fascist]] ideals;

3. Family: Equal rights to marry anyone among 58 known genders;

4. Diversity: Out of one, many.

5. Constitution: Outdated and written by white male slaveghlolders;

6. Collective Responsibilty: A duty not a choice;

7. Sovereignty: The universal power, authority, and kinship of the human species.

==Can you unblock me please?, I want to improve Dirty War pg==

Got your message loud and clear and want to keep creating pages for Conservapedia but only under 1 account name. Thanks again.--[[User:Raymondo|Raymondo]] ([[User talk:Raymondo|talk]]) 08:56, 13 December 2018 (EST)
:The account you used to write on my talk page is unblocked. You can use that one. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:34, 13 December 2018 (EST)

Thanks for unblocking me, greatly appreciated.--[[User:Raymondo|Raymondo]] ([[User talk:Raymondo|talk]]) 07:53, 25 December 2018 (EST)

Hello again, can we change the following page title [[Battles of Mount Kent and Top Malo House]] to [[Battle of Mount Kent and Top Malo House]], remove the "s" from battles, once again thanking you very much and all the best in the new year.--[[User:Raymondo|Raymondo]] ([[User talk:Raymondo|talk]]) 20:17, 25 December 2018 (EST)
:Hello, please request this change at [[User talk:DavidB4]], as I currently do not have move powers. He will move the page for you. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:25, 25 December 2018 (EST)

::Done as requested: [[Battle of Mount Kent and Top Malo House]] --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 01:14, 26 December 2018 (EST)

== Appeal ==

Hi. I noticed I can't edit anything to appeal my block [[Special:Contribs/Edenfaithful|here]]. I'm sorry if you thought my edits were trolling; they weren't. AOC does actually want a government-enforced redistribution of wealth via her universal basic income ideas and other concepts. I won't use this account to do anything other than appeal; it's not meant to be harmful. I want to contribute. [[User:Tempacctformessage|Tempacctformessage]] ([[User talk:Tempacctformessage|talk]]) 13:38, 25 December 2018 (EST)
:I have unblocked your account. In the future, please do not make any edits that could be seen as trolling or parody -- your edits on AOC may have been true, but this is an encyclopedia -- all wording should be encyclopedic. If you're going to add particularly strong language like that, it should at least be cited by a good conservative news source. Otherwise, it's personal commentary, which should stay on your user page or an "essay" page. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:37, 25 December 2018 (EST)

== Internet control ==

Hello, 
I have a random question which I was wondering if you might know the answer to. When Obama was in office, he released control of the Internet to the W3C (an international organization). In the opinion of many conservatives including myself, this was a big mistake. I since heard in vague terms that Trump had somehow put a stop to the transfer and retained at least partial control. However, my research attempts have turned up little of value. Do you know if this is something Trump has done, and if so, to what extent? Thank you! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 19:00, 8 January 2019 (EST)
:I remember noting that there was a bit of a controversy between Ted Cruz and the Commerce Department nominee most in charge of this topic area, but the nominee agreed to "look into it" (whatever that means): [http://thehill.com/policy/technology/359325-trump-pick-confirmed-to-telecommunications-federal-agency 1],[https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/23/trump-commerce-pick-internet-oversight-reversal-305178 2],[http://thehill.com/policy/technology/370426-trump-commerce-pick-told-lawmakers-he-would-look-at-reversing-obama-move-on 3] I looked into it further, and found these opinion articles ([http://netpolicynews.com/index.php/89-r/997-trump-wants-u-s-to-take-over-internet-governance-like-putin 1],[https://lawreview.unl.edu/Should-the-U.S.-Reclaim-Control-of-the-Internet 2]), which indicate that nothing was done, though I also found [https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/06/05/ntia-internet-policy-noi-jun18.pdf this notice in the Federal Register] where the Commerce Department asked what should be done with the transfer. The government is looking into it, but so far, I have not found anything saying that an official policy change has been enacted.
:I am very interested in this, and I think whatever decision the government makes, it will be relevant to the [[Donald Trump achievements]] series -- so if you find anything else, or if the government makes a decision in the future, please let me know. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:27, 8 January 2019 (EST)

::"Looking into it...." I feel so much better now. I thought I probably would have heard something if action had been taken, but figured I'd check with you. I will keep my ears, and if I hear anything, will let you know. I expect it would be relevant to the achievements pages, hopefully in a positive way. Thank you for the information! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 19:33, 8 January 2019 (EST)
:::I suppose I must admit that one of the main arguments from the left is true...we were not evenly allocating IP addresses. However, if we invented the internet, do we really need to evenly distribute them? Using Network Address Translation, IPv4 has worked quite well. As we began running out of addresses even then, IPv6 was set up in some parts of the world, which gives us MANY more addresses to work with. Should everyone be switched over to IPv6? Yes, probably. However, just giving away all control of the internet to an organization which may as well be a U.N. of sorts can't be a good solution. I also hope the W3C doesn't start setting up new root servers in more...questionable locations. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 19:39, 8 January 2019 (EST)
::::The Left and globalists don't want the U.S. to be dominant, independent/sovereign, or self-sufficient, so that explains why they chose to give away our control of the internet to a "fair" international organization that socialist, Islamic, anti-American, and autocratic governments can control just as much, if not more, than our country. Globalists and the Left would prefer that the U.S. just follows along with the "rules-based international order" rather than take leadership and go its own way. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:36, 8 January 2019 (EST)

== Seraphim 2 ==

What led you to believe this is a sock account? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 15:48, 23 January 2019 (EST)
:It was created during a vandalism spree, and once or twice, the vandal(s) created two accounts simultaneously and started vandalizing through both of them. This account was created at the same time as another account (can't remember which one) which began continuing the vandalism, appearing to follow the trend. Thus, I blocked the other account and then blocked this one before (I assumed) it started vandalizing. If it doesn't seem suspicious to you, then please unblock it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:04, 23 January 2019 (EST)
::I would try to avoid doing that in absence of evidence because there have been cases on other wikis when innocent parties have been blocked like this, but I'm not going to undo the block at this time. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 17:23, 23 January 2019 (EST)

== Your wiki work on Trump was alluded to in a web article ==

Your wiki work on Trump was alluded to in a web article. See: http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2018/11/losing-dignity-still-losing/

It is a pretty well read website as can be seen here: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/quadrant.org.au

I found out about the citation using this free tool: https://muckrack.com [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:53, 29 January 2019 (EST)

:Great -- it's an indirect allusion, but it works. Have you seen these mentions of my [[Donald Trump achievements]] article? [https://stonecoldtruth.com/despite-continuous-attacks-trump-getting-the-job-done/ One from Roger Stone] and [https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/881978883771445248 another by Bill Mitchell], who Trump has retweeted in the past. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:52, 29 January 2019 (EST)
::Thanks for sharing with me those mentions of your article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, 29 January 2019 (EST)

== Lou Dobbs ==

Hey, 1990's guy, check out [[Lou Dobbs]]' Conservapedia article: He himself claims he is an "independent populist". Lots of people who do news reporting and support Trump call themselves independent like [[Jedidiah Bila]], [[Alex Jones]] or were Democrat, like [[Harlan Hill]]. We really ought to respect their wishes, don't you think? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:11, 8 February 2019 (EST)
:First off, self-descriptions are meaningless. Dobbs can call himself whatever he wants, but it's his actual positions that matter -- and those positions are, without a doubt, conservative. There are many [[token conservative]]s who align 80-100% with globalist Democrats but still call themselves "conservative" -- but we shouldn't add them to your essay because of what they call themselves.
:Also, you may be confusing political party affiliation with political philosophy -- Dobbs isn't a Republican (maybe he rejoined, IDK), but he left because of the Bush Administration's liberal policies on issues such as immigration. It's his political views that matter, not his political party, and Dobbs's positions are conservative, meaning we can safely call him a conservative. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:27, 8 February 2019 (EST)
::I'm a bit embarrassed that I took Lou Dobbs' self-description "independent" to mean non-conservative instead of non-Republican, so not only is what you say correct, but it turns out I've never even heard him deny he's a conservative, here or elsewhere. I don't know if you know this, but coincidentally, I added Lou Dobbs' name to the TCOT list myself in April 2017. But I removed it the same day because of the "independent" label I saw mentioned in his Conservapedia entry soon after I had added his name to the list.

::I'm still concerned, though—Lou Dobbs lives in the liberal stronghold, New York City, and there are cowards that live there who can be vicious if they think they have an easy target.

::Here's something else that's funny; [[Jedidiah Bila]] also called herself an independent (in November 2016) and also lives in New York City. And I delisted her for the very same reasons I used for removing Lou Dobbs' name. I just now checked to see if I could find whether she ever called herself a conservative or just an independent, and, long story short, she labelled herself as conservative in September 2017!

::So, in a way, your diligence has rescued Jedidiah Bila from obscurity in the "conservative world"! But I'm still interested in what you think about Lou Dobbs. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 02:20, 9 February 2019 (EST)
:::Basically, there are two types of Republicans, National Republicans involved in federal issues, and Independent Republicans - people involved in local and state issues, like school board elections and legislative races. The IRs are moreless divorced from the federal issues, usually because they just aren't interested in what the RNC is doing, occassionally over a policy dispute. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 04:07, 9 February 2019 (EST)
::::Dobbs is a TV host -- he has to live in New York City (or nearby) as a result. He has company though, with Trump, Hannity, and others. I think it's obvious Tucker Carlson is a conservative, but he lives in Washington, D.C., where only 4% of the population voted for Trump. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:29, 9 February 2019 (EST)

==ESchlafly==

I get the name "Schlafly" being suspect, but Andy doesn't have a monopoly on it. I say assume good faith for now, unless a senior admin says otherwise. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 20:41, 12 February 2019 (EST)
:Fair enough. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:54, 12 February 2019 (EST)

::Technically, the username is "ESchafly," which is slightly different anyway. In any case, for an apparently good faith editor, perhaps autoblock should be disabled if they are blocked on grounds of their username alone. Anyway, I was also suspicious...no harm done. --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 13:51, 13 February 2019 (EST)

==Thank you==
Thank you for tidying my attempt at an external link in the article on the [[British Psychological Society]]. It is appreciated. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 12:33, 18 March 2019 (EDT)
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:57, 18 March 2019 (EDT)

== Christchurch: terrorism? ==

Hi there! Thanks for your frequent positive contributions to Conservapedia. I'm new here so still trying to learn the ropes.

I feel like the use of "Direct Action" in the leading paragraph of the [[New Zealand mosque shooting]] article, rather than "terrorism", is euphemstic and betrays the principles put forth on [[Conservapedia:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia]]. Would a similar change be appropriate on the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] page? {{unsigned|Liberalnutjob}}
:I'm not opposed to labeling it a terrorist attack -- the article uses the term several times, including through some edits I made to the article. I'm not sure the CP article you linked is particularly relevant here since the Wikipedia article does call it a terrorist attack in the intro (just as we do in the body).

:I recommend you message [[User talk:RobSmith]], who is the main author of the article and who inserted the "direct action" link in the intro. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:17, 6 April 2019 (EDT)

==Hello!==
:Hey dude! I know you from Wikipedia! I'm here for anti-vandalism work. I am an administrator from [http://deletionpedia.org/en/Special:UserRights/DW Deletionpedia.org]. [[User:DW|DW]] ([[User talk:DW|talk]]) 13:29, 9 April 2019 (EDT)
::Hello -- what is your Wikipedia account name, if you don't mind me asking? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:57, 9 April 2019 (EDT)
== Please create these articles ==

1990'sguy, please create these article and I will tell you why later:

*[[Top 10 achievements of Donald Trump]]

*[[Donald Trump achievements before presidency]]

*[[List of Trump's accomplishments in 2019]]

*[[List of Trump's accomplishments in 2018]]

*[[Donald Trump achievements in his life]]

Also, if this article can be improved, please do it: [[Trump administration]]

I hope this helps.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:52, 10 April 2019 (EDT)

:I will try to create at least some of these when I get time. The two "life achievements" articles seem like good ideas, though the 2018 and 2019 articles would be problematic, particularly with fitting them into my article series which is not based on year. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:36, 10 April 2019 (EDT)

== Unnecessary? ==

My prefix to [[liberal]], describing that kind of person as a United States resident, was included because it's an exclusively U.S. term. In other countries, liberals are known by other names, such as the Labor party in the UK. My edit was not unnecessary, and I would appreciate it if you could please let it stand.

I took a similar issue with the statement that "most individuals are overweight" in every article dealing with obesity. Nationally, this is true, but, globally, it is false. There are more Asians than there are Americans in the world, and 2 billion of them are starving, outnumbering America's obese population 10 to 1. {{unsigned|MacTavish}}

:I oppose changing it back, and there's a big difference between the exact definition of certain terminology and health statistics.

:Labour Party is a political party, and CP's "liberal" page refers to the ideology. I travel to (continental) Europe frequently, and the word "liberal" is increasingly meaning the same thing as in the U.S. while "conservative" increasingly means something similar to the U.S.

:More importantly, the CP article clearly defines what a liberal is, and that's what matters. Every political term like this has multiple meanings, depending on who's doing the explaining. The best solution to the problem of the same words having many different meanings is to clearly define the word and create articles such as the [[classical liberalism]] or [[liberal conservatism]] articles. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:59, 15 April 2019 (EDT)

== Bible ==

I note that you believe that "As unpopular it is to believe this in our present culture, I know that the Bible contains absolutely no errors or mistakes". Last night I was listening to an interesting talk on the radio about [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8%3A3-11&version=ESV John 8:3-11], and this has led me to pondering this morning [https://www.openbible.info/topics/stoning_to_death what the Bible has to say about stoning people to death]. My question is how can anyone, in light of this, believe that the Bible is always to be taken literally? I accept that the Bible contains invaluable spiritual truths but I also consider that it is the creation of fallible human beings. I believe that such barbarous practices as stoning someone to death, for blasphemy, sexual misconduct, and breaking the Sabbath, is a reflection of the values of an early pastoral society and not God's word. To be honest with you I find ''any'' type of dogmatic belief deeply disturbing. I note that the Conservapedia article takes a moderate line on the [[Bible]]: "The Bible is the most logical, insightful and influential collection of books and letters ever written", and doesn't claim that it's the word of God.

Because of our recent "conversations" you seemed to be the most obvious person to ask this question. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 13:15, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

:First off, the Bible contains a unified narrative free of contradictions and errors. The human writers were men of their times (Solomon's wives, Noah's drunkenness), but God is the true author of the Bible and none of his commands are wrong or "barbarous." The Mosaic Law was directly commanded by God and is not some reflection of early pastoral society values (I will also say that stoning is ''not'' merely an "early pastoral society" value--the urban Greeks did it, Acts 14:19, and modern urban Brunei and other Islamic countries are doing it).

:You need to understand the Mosaic Law and its place in God's plan to redeem humanity. God revealed Himself first to the Israelites, and in preparing them for the Promised Land, he gave them the Mosaic Law. The Mosaic Law was good and holy (Romans 7:12) -- so good that the Israelites found they, sinful humans, couldn't even follow it correctly. Yes, some of the punishments for various sins include stoning, but remember, "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23). The better question than "why did God command this" is "why didn't God command this for everybody and for every sin". Instead, by giving the law to the Israelites, God showed them they couldn't save themselves. They needed a savior--Jesus Christ. Also, see Deuteronomy 17:6 -- two or three witnesses were required to be stoned.

:Jesus didn't abolish the law, he fulfilled it. I recommend reading the Book of Hebrews -- because of Christ's sacrificing Himself on the cross (great timing in asking your question), we no longer need to make animal sacrifices or follow the civic parts of the law (which include stoning)--that doesn't make the law "barbaric" though. Also, in John 8, Jesus did not condemn stoning outright. The Jews did not have witnesses nor did they have the guilty man with them either to stone, contrary to the law's requirements.[https://www.gotquestions.org/without-sin-cast-first-stone.html]

:I hope this helps. Ask me other questions if you'd like. I also highly recommend [https://www.gotquestions.org/ GotQuestion.org] for other Christianity-related questions. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:47, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

::Many thanks for taking the time to answer me. Sorry to be argumentative, but I'm still confused, because on one hand you seem to be suggesting that Christ would have supported stoning the adulteress to death if the man had also been arrested, and there had been two witnesses? But on the other hand you also seem to suggest that, because Christ rose from the dead, Mosaic law no longer needed be applied. and that following the Resurrection stoning someone to death was no longer lawful?

::Surely Christans are right in believing that stoning a rebellious child, or someone who collects firewood on a Sunday, or because they are sexually involved with someone of the same sex is no longer the word of God? That ''now'' such practices are dated –"barbaric"? That Christ brought a new message from God, one that is entirely different from what Moses received? A message in which charity and forgiveness is far more important than punishment. That we should focus first on our own failures rather than those of others: "Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her”. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 15:41, 19 April 2019 (EDT)
:::The gospel was preached to Israel in the wilderness (Hebrews 4:2). Israel was given the choice between Law and Grace. Law can only condemn, Grace saves. Israel chose Law ("Moses told us to stone such a one").
:::There are other such examples in the Bible where people (or man, to use the politically incorrect parlance), made choices with long-term consequences that God did not ordain, such as when Jethro (Moses' father-in-law) gave advice to [[community organizer|organize]] the people into captains of tens and captains of hundreds, etc., or when God advised against Israel having a King who would "multiply horses," (i.e. build a military industrial complex) and Solomon proceeded to do exactly that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 15:56, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

:::: Thanks [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]. So how should 21st century man operate? You generalize, whereas I asked specific questions. Do fundamentalist Christians believe that Christ's Resurrection changed Mosaic law, or should we , if possible, return to it. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 16:52, 19 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::If you're going to continue editing here, it's important you realise the management considers the adultress story to be a [[Essay:Adulteress Story|liberal insertion]]. Buckle in! [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 16:56, 19 April 2019 (EDT)
::::::Mosaic Law never intended to save. It is still operable for those who reject Grace. And faith in the Resurrection always provided grace - knowing that whatsoever he promised, he was able to deliver (Romans 4:21) - even before Jesus' birth, death, and resurrection. Law always only applies to the lost, and not blood washed believers in Christ.
::::::Now, Christians are admonished to act in such a way as to be an example to non-believers (to do otherwise is not acting in love); however it is not determinative of a person's standing in Christ or eternal salvation, and to preach otherwise, that is to say salvation is determined by works, is the spirit of anti-Christ. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 17:02, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

:::::::I would not so much say that Israel chose the law, as it was a matter of that being all there was. The law taught a great deal about the nature of God, the depravity of men, and the seriousness of sin, among other lessons. The law was given to state how, from at least an outward sense, mankind should behave in order to keep God's perfect law. Under the law, certain sins were deserving of death--this was to show the seriousness of transgression. It is easy for us to look at some sin and say, "Well, it was only one small sin. Everyone makes mistakes, so just give him/her a break! It's not THAT serious!" However, we are judging with sentimentality from the perspective of a sinner. Only God can judge righteously from the perspective of perfection.
:::::::This rule did not really go away, either. Certainly we don't execute people for "minor" sins, but James said that "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all" (James 2:10). One singe sin is enough to make us less than perfect, which makes us utterly filthy and unacceptable to God, much as a single act of defiance made an old testament Jew unacceptable to the congregation. God has given us a way out through His Son, but without that, we will face a judgement worse than stoning for a single act of sin (which is itself defiance against the one truly holy God). Only because of Jesus' shed blood can we be forgiven these sins, and made as though we are perfect, by Jesus' merit. The Hebrews didn't seem to know that Jesus was coming as a sacrifice, rather than a king, but yet they sacrificed animals to gain forgiveness for their sins, looking forward to Jesus' sacrifice.
:::::::In regard to the adulteress specifically, There has been a great deal of debate by people more intelligent than I. Under mosaic law, she was guilty, but it seems that either she was forgiven under the new law and no longer deserving of death, or she should have justly been stoned, but the congregation failed to do so(or the witnesses failed to testify against her properly), due to Jesus' words. In either case, Jesus sends her away alive. --[[User:DavidB4|DavidB4]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 17:11, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

::::::::In response to Timber's followup question, the Mosaic Law is just, but it's impossible to follow. That's why Jesus died on the cross -- so we can actually have a path to salvation, one by God's grace through faith and not by works.

::::::::However, this doesn't mean that the message of the law is "entirely different" from Christ -- in fact, the total opposite. The law pointed people to Christ, that it's impossible to follow it and that they need Jesus. Also, through sacrifices, God provided a way for the Jews' sins to be forgiven. By dying on the cross, our past, present, and future sins are forgiven if we trust in Christ, without need for sacrifices. God will judge everyone in the end, but right now, we live in the age of grace, and the Mosaic Law has been fulfilled through Christ. '''Also,''' the Mosaic Law was never intended to be required of all people everywhere -- only the Israelites before Christ.

::::::::If I'm understanding [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&curid=139936&diff=1517413&oldid=1517408 Rob] correctly, I agree that many actions by people in the Bible are not condoned by God, but the Mosaic Law isn't one of them. It came from God to set the Israelites apart from other nations (Exodus 19:5) and reveal their sinfulness to them (Galatians 3:19; Romans 3:20), among other reasons.

::::::::For the record, I believe the adultress story is a valid part of the Bible. Others here disagree. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:15, 19 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::::::Moses spoke to Lord face to face as a man speaketh to his friend (Exodus 33:11) and "found grace in thy sight" (Exodus 33:13); the New Testament says "No man hath seen God at anytime" (John 1:27). Now, unless you think there are contradictions in the Bible, one has to explain Hebrews 12:14 (without holiness no one will see the Lord) and more specifically, 1 Cor. 2:13, "comparing spiritual things with spiritual".
:::::::::In conclusion, (a) Moses was saved; (b) the Law of Moses could not save then, and it can not save now; (c) Christ has existed from everlasting to everlasting, before the foundations of the earth were laid; (d) ye are not under law, but under grace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 17:36, 19 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::::::Roman Catholic theology explains the difference between the Perfect Will of God and the Permissive Will of God (for example, God allowing David to marry Bethsheba after David committed adultery and murdered her husband). And while the Mosaic Law may be an expression of the Perfect Will of God, it nevertheless still cannot save. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 17:44, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

Many thanks that makes things much clearer. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 19:29, 19 April 2019 (EDT) I greatly appreciate that you both have offered such a thorough explanation. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 19:31, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

== Cyrus ==
Hi 1990'sguy,

I don't think we need flashy photos of anti-Christian celebrities, which promote their lifestyles to our kids. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] ([[User talk:DouglasA|talk]]) 13:54, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

:I'll ask Andy about this. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:58, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

::We could get a less "flashy" photo I suppose, but we are here to educate people of all ages. While I may not approve of her lifestyle, I don't really see an problem with including it, since this helps to educate our readers. It is not at all uncommon for use to include photos of people on pages talking about them. And actually, this "flashy" photo may be well suited, since it demonstrates that she is all about the show. --[[User:DavidB4|DavidB4]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]]) 14:27, 19 April 2019 (EDT)
:::This is becoming a real problem for CP, since deviant sex seems to be the Democratic party's key plank in the 2020 elections. Ignoring their issues is fraught with problems. They must be tastefully addressed; and we shouldn't pass up the opportunity to straighten out readers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 16:09, 19 April 2019 (EDT)

== Edit war ==

Hi 1990'sguy, you have twice blocked me for edit warring. I don't like being quarrelsome but with due respect to your seniority I don't think you really understand what edit warring is. My reverts had an explanation and yours did not. You tended to ignore
the Conservapedia Guidelines. Also you didn't issue any warning, or suggest starting a discussion. I have edited on Wikipedia for several years and have a clean record there, I'd also note, the highly undemocratic exercise of administrative power here. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 16:24, 21 April 2019 (EDT)

:The fact is the Barack Obama article has been the way it is for years, and several editors (RobS and Pokeria, for example) support it, at least overall, and oppose your changes. Also, you admit you're not a conservative. And you think you can just come in and unilaterally make edits that others oppose? That's not how it works here. Continuing to revert will only get you indefinitely banned -- I hope you realize I'm being extremely gracious by only giving short blocks.

:Also, CP makes no apology for not being "democratic." We're a conservative encyclopedia with a conservative point of view, which includes support for natural law and republicanism over mob-rule democracy that Aristotle, the Ancient Roman Republicans, and the U.S. founding fathers opposed. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:57, 21 April 2019 (EDT)

::::Thanks -[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]]. I have no quarrel with this site's extreme right wing ideology but I do quarrel with its failure at times to implement its own policy of truth and verifiablity and the way some editors use of gossip and dubious sources. Also most of the editors I have dealt with recently are very slippery politicians–that is they avoid answering any comment or question. By the way the Barack Obama article is contradictory. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 18:18, 21 April 2019 (EDT) Additionally most edits made by you and others do not have an explanation. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 18:25, 21 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::ach ach <choke> WaPo, NYT & CNN aren't dubious sources? they don't use gossip? Liberal commie scholars and Marxist PhD's aren't dubious sources? As to edit summaries, you gotta earn your stripes. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 18:46, 21 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::C'mon. Be reasonable and realistic. The ''NYT'' White House correspondent thinks ''Edelweiss'' is a Nazi anthem. Never in my life has there been such an open opportunity for citizen journalists as right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 18:49, 21 April 2019 (EDT)
::::::@Timber: I'm not particularly interested in the Barack Obama dispute -- what I care about is avoiding edit warring and making sure we give due treatment to material which has been in the articles for a long time. Thus, the content should be discussed on the talk page. On Wikipedia, not having a consensus for changes similar to yours is good enough explanation for reverting, so CP isn't actually too much different. Regarding the behavior of other editors, you might just be experiencing their differing personalities, that's all. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::::@1990'sguy, he's not learning his lesson, I've given him a long block, not just for the edit warring, but also for his pretentious attitude, especially on this edit summary: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Michelle_Obama&diff=1518377&oldid=1518376] [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 19:18, 21 April 2019 (EDT)

::Personally, I have no objection to moving the sections on natural born citizenship to [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]] where it can be debated or sources challenged. The lesson here is, work somebody else put much time into should not be overwritten just cause some liberal communist doesn't like it or it isn't sanctioned by [[fake news]] [[mainstream media]] sources. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 17:08, 21 April 2019 (EDT)

:::@RobS: It might be worth considering moving some of that content into the [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]] article. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:14, 21 April 2019 (EDT)
::::Let Timber do it, and we can seriously vet sources and wording on the Talk page there. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 17:16, 21 April 2019 (EDT)

== Look at this edit ==

Please look at this edit: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&diff=1519161&oldid=1516763 1990'sguy and Conservapedia]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:39, 24 April 2019 (EDT)
:Thanks, Conservative, I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:57, 24 April 2019 (EDT)
::That's great, I only wish the essays I made about Christian virtues could get this kind of notability. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 14:26, 24 April 2019 (EDT)
:::I recommend linking them in the "See also" sections of relevant articles and continuing to work on them. That might make Andy or Cons more likely to promote them on the main page. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:38, 24 April 2019 (EDT)

== What happened to you user page? ==

Your page was vaped by [[User:Conservative]], on or about April 22. It was then recreated as a blank page, also by Cons, on April 23. Do you know anything about this? I recall that you had a lot of interesting things to say on your user page. Do you have a backup copy? Alas, I don't normally checkpoint other people's user pages, so I don't have a copy. (Though I do have a checkpoint copy of your talk page.) [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:51, 26 April 2019 (EDT)
:I asked Cons to do it -- don't worry, I have all the information saved, and I could recreate it if I want. I thought I should be more "low-key" on wikis, and I did the same to my Wikipedia user page (which I also have a copy of). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:34, 26 April 2019 (EDT)

== Question. ==

Hello. Is it possible to write about artists? {{unsigned|RinatMilow}}

:You may write about what you want on the following conditions:
:#Everything is sourced with reliable sources -- no exceptions
:#This is a conservative encyclopedia, so nothing from a non-conservative perspective, wherever applicable
:#Absolutely no plagiarism, including from Wikipedia
:#Know all of CP's rules and guidelines (you can find them at the top of my talk page)
:I hope this helps. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:28, 4 May 2019 (EDT)

I wrote an article,tried to do it right.

[[User:RinatMilow|RinatMilow]]
:This website does not do self-promotion. You can write about artists like Picasso, Dali, Michaelangelo, etc, but I noticed that you're doing promoting yourself on this (deleted) and other websites. Not here. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 11:00, 4 May 2019 (EDT)

I don't promote anything anywhere where to me what to write, it is especially my personal right. I'm not upset. I'm not upset that the article didn't fit.
[[User:RinatMilow|RinatMilow]]

== Donald Trump's achievements keep rolling in ==

'''The ''[[New York Times]]'' FINALLY Admits:''' The World is Turning [[Nationalism|Nationalist]] [[Populism|Populist]].[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQOgUVsUQJQ]

The ''New York Times'' article admitted that this statement of [[Donald Trump]] was prophetic: "We gonna win so much you may even get tired of winning and you'll say please, please Mr. President, It's too much winning! We can't take it anymore!"[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:34, 27 May 2019 (EDT)

:Trump has been very successful as a president so far, especially considering that Republicans opposed much of his agenda in 2017/2018 and the divided Congress now. The EU elections went well -- the League outperformed exit polls by a lot, becoming the largest party in Italy and tied as the largest in the EU Parliament, and the Brexit Party also won more seats than predictions I saw beforehand. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:43, 27 May 2019 (EDT)

::The Greens continue to gain, at the expense of Social Democrats. This is reflective of a younger, climate orientated group of socialists, just as radical, more single issue oriented and naive, trying to throw off the history established Socialist parties. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 16:06, 27 May 2019 (EDT)

== Article suggestion ==

Consider creating this article: [[Donald Trump achievements: Religious freedom]][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:08, 1 July 2019 (EDT)
:It might be a good split-up article. All religious freedom achievements are currently at [[Donald Trump achievements: Religious liberty, gender issues, and other social policies]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:19, 1 July 2019 (EDT)
::I might split the article into [[Donald Trump achievements: Religious freedom and LGBTQ]] and [[Donald Trump achievements: Healthcare, welfare, housing, and affirmative action]] -- I might have to rework the article titles, among other changes, before I actually implement this. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 1 July 2019 (EDT)

§== Could you delete this file? ==

I uploaded this file from the mobile version of the website and the title messed up, could you remove the pic? I already uploaded the correct one. [[:File:' 'Copied from' '- https---commons-wikimedia-org-wiki-File-Luis Pardo Villalón - Armada de Chile-png--br--' 'Original source' '- http---www-armada-cl-custom-pilotopardo-pilotopardo-html--br--' 'License' '- Th 2019-07-01 04-37.png|file]] --[[User:Capitalist.Chile|Capitalist.Chile]] ([[User talk:Capitalist.Chile|talk]]) 16:38, 4 July 2019 (EDT)
:Done! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 4 July 2019 (EDT)

== Salute to America ==

'Salute to America' articele - this was not a copy of Wikipedia, but independent research. Your deletion is merely censorship. too bad for conservapedia. I was on a roll... [[User:Let us eat lettuce|Let us eat lettuce]] ([[User talk:Let us eat lettuce|talk]]) 18:30, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

:That's a ridiculous response that will get you no respect from conservatives. I cross-checked [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salute_to_America&oldid=905110556 the Wikipedia article], and you indeed copied the article (not the whole thing but only a condensed version. Your wording changes were far too minor to not consider it plagiarism. You also cited the same sources (from the MSM, by the way) for the same sentences.
:If you create an original article, citing conservative media sources (you know, the kind of information that will actually get censored on Wikipedia and other leftist websites), it won't get deleted. Another admin already deleted a previous article of yours for plagiarism, and I already (and kindly) warned you. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:36, 6 July 2019 (EDT)
::Okay, you're "right". but my research was original. maybe the same sources, is all. [[User:Let us eat lettuce|Let us eat lettuce]] ([[User talk:Let us eat lettuce|talk]]) 18:47, 6 July 2019 (EDT)
:::The second version is even worse than the first (for a different reason). It's a stub; the wording is sloppy, poor, and vague; and you didn't cite any sources. If you cannot create a quality article citing multiple conservative media sources (Breitbart, TNA, Daily Caller, Daily Wire, Free Beacon, etc.) without having to consult Wikipedia or plagiarizing, you probably shouldn't create articles.
:::You saw my message on your talk page, as well as the welcome template with the various links. We're giving you multiple chances to improve. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:15, 6 July 2019 (EDT)
::::Don't make up rules. There is nothing that requires the use of "conservative media sources" in either the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandments]], the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|guidelines]], the [[Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages|manual of style]], or the [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles|general guidance on "high-quality" articles]].

::::Your preferences are not policy. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 08:25, 7 July 2019 (EDT)
:::::The 1990'sguy just deleted the article without contributing a thing. On the article talk page, I had encouraged others to collaborate. Not much collaboration here. [[User:Let us eat lettuce|Let us eat lettuce]] ([[User talk:Let us eat lettuce|talk]]) 08:37, 7 July 2019 (EDT)
::::::JohnZ, you don't get to decide what Conservapedia policy is (especially not if you're trying to force liberal POV again as you usually do). That's for the admins to decide, not you. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 08:38, 7 July 2019 (EDT)
:::::::@Let us eat lettuce: "encouraging others to collaborate" does not equal making others write 99% of an article (because it was a tiny, vague stub), or making a great effort to completely revamp the article because it was plagiarized.
:::::::@JohnZ: I never said citing from the conservative media is a website requirement, but it's necessary if you want to create a quality article from a conservative point of view. And keep in mind that I told this to an editor who copied from Wikipedia, including, but not only, the citations (many new users do this, and I gave advice on how to write a good article). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:39, 7 July 2019 (EDT)
::::::::I don't get it anyway. What's the purpose of creating a Salute to America article? Is he going to create separate articles for every Forth of July celebration since 1776? Is there not enough news happening this Summer to write about? Is there not enough Trump news to write on?
::::::::If someone wants to trash Trump, be it on Wikipedia or here, don't be so lame and obvious about it. Get creative. Use some subtlety, ambiguity, and imagination. Goosestepping to liberal fascist talking points won't get you there. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 13:13, 7 July 2019 (EDT)
==Nitpicking I know but==
Boris Johnson is not as yet The Prime Minister of the UK.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 13:48, 23 July 2019 (EDT)

Debate: Communism

2019-07-16T16:25:51Z

Chewy Suarez:

This is a debate page solely to discuss communism, at the insistence of the individual calling himself "MarxistLeninist".
*Rules:
::The debate will be civil.
::Individuals debating will not be blocked from doing so.
::IP addresses will be blocked if they are determined to be proxies.
::Enver Hoxxa is not authorized as part of the discussion. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 02:07, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
[[Category: Debate]]

==Debate starts here==

:Since the original user's history has been entirely wiped out, what exactly were they asking to be debated? Was it yet another Marxism vs Capitalism debate? Was it a debate about something specific on one or more pages? Was it the superiority of his wiki vs ours?

:As to communism and moreso communists themselves, the debate is not usually worth having. '''They can't even be honest about communism's existence wherever it has existed''' - both pre or post Marx. Bring up Venezuela? That wasn't real communism. USSR? That was just a dictatorship, not communism. They will scream bloody murder that communism has never been tried even though it has been tried dozens, if not hundreds of times. I am all up for a debate but when you have a co-debater who keeps clearing facts off of the table in order to cheat in the debate and give themselves a tactical advantage, debate becomes impossible courtesy of the cheater. Debates require facts, especially the inconvenient ones.

:As Benjamin Constant explains[https://www.cato.org/blog/benjamin-constant-eloquent-defender-freedom] in his ''The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns'',[https://web.archive.org/web/20160320234406/http://www.uark.edu/depts/comminfo/cambridge/ancients.html] the "liberty" of the ancients consists of a collective "liberty", that is, government granted rights. One of the biggest flaws of any of these "isms" from Europe is that they all believe that government is the pinnacle of existence. Communists like to play that their ideas are some of the newest on the planet, when in reality all Marx did was re-package the flaws of the ancients into a new box with new wrapping paper. Reagan was correct when he said: "This idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man." That's because the basis of Communism is not the individualist Liberty of the Moderns, communism is based on the collectivist "liberty" of the ancients. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 06:54, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

::I think Medieval Christians deserve the credit, not the "Moderns":

:::"Christian doctrine fomented the transformation of political ideas and practices to the gradual evolution of a constitutionalism of medieval provenance. As the eminent Carlyle brothers abundantly documented in their monumental ''History of Political Theory in the West'', this Christian tradition of law and government maintained that the immediate source of political authority is the community; that law and authority are both purposively ordained to the advantage of the governed conceived as justice and commonweal; that the contractual relation between ruler and ruled is reciprocally binding and its conditions mutually inviolable; and that the supremacy of law rests juridically, as Hincmar of Rheims [806 A.D.–882 A.D.] pointed out, upon the consent of the governed."<ref>Costanzo, Joseph F. (1964). [https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/common-misconceptions/the-religious-heritage-of-american-democracy.html "The religious heritage of American democracy".] Chap. 1 in ''This Nation Under God: Church, State and Schools in America''. Catholic Education Resource Center website/en/controversy/common misconceptions. (New York: Herder and Herder), pp. 24-48.</ref>

::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Tuesday, 11:15, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

:::Look, if the argument is "the USSR wasn't communism," and then post up a bunch of quotes from the Book of Acts, we're just spinning our wheels. It's no different than forcing Christians to defend a bunch of atrocities from the Crusades. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 11:20, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

My question is pretty simple for this ML guy, should he return: What makes you think that an ideology that has to control 80% or more of an individual's existence a good thing, up to and including stuffing someone into a gulag for not toeing the commie party line? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 07:09, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

:ML is in serious denial that that even happened. For example, he is very much in denial of Holodomor, and cites that infamous Canadian Communist Douglas Tottle, who's book he referred to was discredited soon after it came out, as noted on this very website here: [https://www.conservapedia.com/Holodomor_denial#Douglas_Tottle_and_Holodomor_denial] People who have sympathies with the Soviet Union have been trying to cover this up for a long time, but I submit these: [http://holodomorct.org/holodomor-survivor-eyewitness-accounts/] [http://holodomorct.org/holodomor-information-links/accounts-memoirs/] [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/red-famine-anne-applebaum-ukraine-soviet-union/542610/] [https://www.mythdetector.ge/en/myth/three-lies-about-holodomor-ukraine] [https://nationalpost.com/opinion/robert-fulford-how-an-atrocity-that-killed-millions-remained-a-secret-for-decades] [https://usefulstooges.com/tag/douglas-tottle/] [https://youtu.be/eOfxiQuqNzg] [https://youtu.be/IJ_4AZtGNn8] I concur with Progressingamerica's comment earlier of '''"They can't even be honest about communism's existence wherever it has existed"''' and denials and attempted coverups of Holodomor have been attempted since it originally happened. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:45, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
:Since ML cited Tottle's book, I will submit "Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine" by Anne Applebaum. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:53, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
::Anne Applebaum, a once respected writer on the Soviet system (rare among living Americans), burnt off a few calories of credibility as a Russia collusion hoaxer. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 11:26, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
:::Germany prior to reunification 1990: In the east even highly qualified professionals like doctors had to wait years to be able to buy the antiquated Trabant whilst in the west low skilled workers bought MK2 VW Golfs in their millions. Even if you strip communism to just economics it is obvious what a disaster it was.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:23, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
----
{{reflist}}

Debate: Communism

2019-07-16T16:23:24Z

Chewy Suarez:

This is a debate page solely to discuss communism, at the insistence of the individual calling himself "MarxistLeninist".
*Rules:
::The debate will be civil.
::Individuals debating will not be blocked from doing so.
::IP addresses will be blocked if they are determined to be proxies.
::Enver Hoxxa is not authorized as part of the discussion. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 02:07, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
[[Category: Debate]]

==Debate starts here==

:Since the original user's history has been entirely wiped out, what exactly were they asking to be debated? Was it yet another Marxism vs Capitalism debate? Was it a debate about something specific on one or more pages? Was it the superiority of his wiki vs ours?

:As to communism and moreso communists themselves, the debate is not usually worth having. '''They can't even be honest about communism's existence wherever it has existed''' - both pre or post Marx. Bring up Venezuela? That wasn't real communism. USSR? That was just a dictatorship, not communism. They will scream bloody murder that communism has never been tried even though it has been tried dozens, if not hundreds of times. I am all up for a debate but when you have a co-debater who keeps clearing facts off of the table in order to cheat in the debate and give themselves a tactical advantage, debate becomes impossible courtesy of the cheater. Debates require facts, especially the inconvenient ones.

:As Benjamin Constant explains[https://www.cato.org/blog/benjamin-constant-eloquent-defender-freedom] in his ''The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns'',[https://web.archive.org/web/20160320234406/http://www.uark.edu/depts/comminfo/cambridge/ancients.html] the "liberty" of the ancients consists of a collective "liberty", that is, government granted rights. One of the biggest flaws of any of these "isms" from Europe is that they all believe that government is the pinnacle of existence. Communists like to play that their ideas are some of the newest on the planet, when in reality all Marx did was re-package the flaws of the ancients into a new box with new wrapping paper. Reagan was correct when he said: "This idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man." That's because the basis of Communism is not the individualist Liberty of the Moderns, communism is based on the collectivist "liberty" of the ancients. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 06:54, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

::I think Medieval Christians deserve the credit, not the "Moderns":

:::"Christian doctrine fomented the transformation of political ideas and practices to the gradual evolution of a constitutionalism of medieval provenance. As the eminent Carlyle brothers abundantly documented in their monumental ''History of Political Theory in the West'', this Christian tradition of law and government maintained that the immediate source of political authority is the community; that law and authority are both purposively ordained to the advantage of the governed conceived as justice and commonweal; that the contractual relation between ruler and ruled is reciprocally binding and its conditions mutually inviolable; and that the supremacy of law rests juridically, as Hincmar of Rheims [806 A.D.–882 A.D.] pointed out, upon the consent of the governed."<ref>Costanzo, Joseph F. (1964). [https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/common-misconceptions/the-religious-heritage-of-american-democracy.html "The religious heritage of American democracy".] Chap. 1 in ''This Nation Under God: Church, State and Schools in America''. Catholic Education Resource Center website/en/controversy/common misconceptions. (New York: Herder and Herder), pp. 24-48.</ref>

::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Tuesday, 11:15, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

:::Look, if the argument is "the USSR wasn't communism," and then post up a bunch of quotes from the Book of Acts, we're just spinning our wheels. It's no different than forcing Christians to defend a bunch of atrocities from the Crusades. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 11:20, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

My question is pretty simple for this ML guy, should he return: What makes you think that an ideology that has to control 80% or more of an individual's existence a good thing, up to and including stuffing someone into a gulag for not toeing the commie party line? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 07:09, 16 July 2019 (EDT)

:ML is in serious denial that that even happened. For example, he is very much in denial of Holodomor, and cites that infamous Canadian Communist Douglas Tottle, who's book he referred to was discredited soon after it came out, as noted on this very website here: [https://www.conservapedia.com/Holodomor_denial#Douglas_Tottle_and_Holodomor_denial] People who have sympathies with the Soviet Union have been trying to cover this up for a long time, but I submit these: [http://holodomorct.org/holodomor-survivor-eyewitness-accounts/] [http://holodomorct.org/holodomor-information-links/accounts-memoirs/] [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/red-famine-anne-applebaum-ukraine-soviet-union/542610/] [https://www.mythdetector.ge/en/myth/three-lies-about-holodomor-ukraine] [https://nationalpost.com/opinion/robert-fulford-how-an-atrocity-that-killed-millions-remained-a-secret-for-decades] [https://usefulstooges.com/tag/douglas-tottle/] [https://youtu.be/eOfxiQuqNzg] [https://youtu.be/IJ_4AZtGNn8] I concur with Progressingamerica's comment earlier of '''"They can't even be honest about communism's existence wherever it has existed"''' and denials and attempted coverups of Holodomor have been attempted since it originally happened. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:45, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
:Since ML cited Tottle's book, I will submit "Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine" by Anne Applebaum. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:53, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
::Anne Applebaum, a once respected writer on the Soviet system (rare among living Americans), burnt off a few calories of credibility as a Russia collusion hoaxer. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]][[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']] 11:26, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
:::Germany prior to reunification 1990: In the east even highly qualified professionals like doctors had to wait years to be able to buy the antiquated Trabant whilst in the west low skilled workers bought MK2 VW Golfs in their millions which by that time was close to being replaced by the then ultra modern MK 3. Even if you strip communism to just economics it is obvious what a disaster it was.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 12:23, 16 July 2019 (EDT)
----
{{reflist}}