<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Chriscience</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Chriscience"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Chriscience"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T11:42:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Parthenogenesis&amp;diff=645081</id>
		<title>Talk:Parthenogenesis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Parthenogenesis&amp;diff=645081"/>
		<updated>2009-03-27T13:59:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chriscience: New page: I am new to this and this is my first contribution, sorry if I don't know exactly how to word it. I decided to make this article because I came across the concept and cannot believe that t...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I am new to this and this is my first contribution, sorry if I don't know exactly how to word it. I decided to make this article because I came across the concept and cannot believe that this fits into God's intention for the world. One of the most clear and famous Biblical stories simply contradicts it. God's command that a male and female of each animal be put on the ark is clear, and is proof enough for me or anyone else that both must be present for any kind of reproduction. As I understand it, this is just another drop in the bucket of lies coming from liberal secular sciences to discredit Christianity and promote atheism. I would even go so far as to say that this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; may even be an attempt to discredit the significance of the virgin birth of Jesus. Since my edits keep getting deleted, how can we provide a truly conservative explanation of this? [[User:Chriscience|Chriscience]] 09:59, 27 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chriscience</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Parthenogenesis&amp;diff=644951</id>
		<title>Parthenogenesis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Parthenogenesis&amp;diff=644951"/>
		<updated>2009-03-26T22:03:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chriscience: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Parthenogenesis''' (Greek: ''παρθενος γενεσις'', &amp;quot;virgin birth&amp;quot;) is the term in science in which certain species of plant and animals can reproduce without the need of fertilization by a male. Many do not believe in it as it does not adhere to the Christian worldview whereby God intended a male and female of each species to reproduce. As evidenced by the story of Noah, before the flood God commanded him to bring exactly two of each animal, and not in any case only 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-definition/Parthenogenesis/ Bio-Medicine.org definition]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chriscience</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Parthenogenesis&amp;diff=644946</id>
		<title>Parthenogenesis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Parthenogenesis&amp;diff=644946"/>
		<updated>2009-03-26T21:38:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chriscience: New page: Parthenogenesis is the term for a secular scientific theory whereby a living organism can reproduce without a sexual partner (of the opposite sex). It is considered false by the majority o...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Parthenogenesis is the term for a secular scientific theory whereby a living organism can reproduce without a sexual partner (of the opposite sex). It is considered false by the majority of scientists. God requires a male and female of any species to reproduce, as for example there were no animals that God commanded Noah to bring only 1 of, and so this method of reproduction is widely considered to be untrue.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chriscience</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>