Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:VargasMilan

2026-11-15T20:20:18Z

Conservative:

User talk:VargasMilan

2026-11-15T20:19:08Z

2026-11-15T19:12:44Z

Conservative:

File talk:User RobSmith accept the LSAT intellectual duel challenge from User Conservative or accept your intellectual Waterloo like a man (1).png

2026-11-15T19:03:02Z

Conservative:

File:User RobSmith accept the LSAT intellectual duel challenge from User Conservative or accept your intellectual Waterloo like a man (1).png

::::Dianne3000, once {{Personal remark removed}} for the [[LSAT]] exam due to accepting my intellectual dual challenge, he will be stepping through the doorway of greatness and understand the nutritional logic of not eating the junk food of french fries. Dianne3000, {{Personal remark removed}} able to score 168 or above on LSAT test. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:23, November 14, 2026 (EST)
 
[[File:LSAT and mastering logical reasoning (1).png|thumbnail|center|1000px|Study for the [[LSAT]] until you can consistently score 168 and above. Pass through the doorway of greatness.]]
 
 
I trust this further clarified matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:54, November 14, 2026 (EST)
:Oh, I see why you switched from [[harassing]] people about [[Mensa]] to the [[LSAT]] now:
[[File:Screenshot 1-11-2026 102718.jpeg|center|850px|thumb|Nguyen Pham, President of the [[Mensa Foundation]] [https://www.instagram.com/yaynguyen/p/DeKsGQOkqnu/] See also *[https://www.us.mensa.org/read/bulletin/features/the-q-word/ The Q Word]. ''The Purposeful Journey of GaySIG to QueerSIG'', Nguyen Pham, June 8, 2023.]]
:You gotta be pretty dumb to not know the influence of [[homosexual]]s in the [[Mensa]] organization. The Top 2% minority, like [[gay]]s, think they are "special". I warned [[user:Conservative]] about this years ago, but in his [[narcissistic]] [[pride]] he ignored my advice and has continued [[spamming]] [[gay propaganda|gay recruiting propaganda]].

:[[Wikipedia]] says,
{{Cquote|High LSAT scores are accepted as qualifying evidence for intellectual clubs such as American Mensa...Mensa has required students to score in the 95+ percentile rank on the LSAT for membership}}
:168/180 = .93333.

:Opps, looks like you're not going to make it. You'll have to look elsewhere to find [[gay]] partners. - RobSmith
::And your excuse for not taking the [[LSAT]] intellectual dual challenge where we each take the LSAT test? Listen to Yandex's Alice AI (which is made up of 100% Russian parts) which said: "this is an invitation to greatness. The choice is yours: embrace the challenge with determination, or acknowledge its magnitude with respect. Either way, this duel will be remembered as a test of true intellectual resolve."

::The Doorway of Greatness™ remains open. The LSAT awaits. Walk through the doorway. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:19, November 15, 2026 (EST)
{{Personal remark removed}} take the LSAT test? Listen to Yandex's Alice AI (which is made up of 100% Russian parts) which said: "this is an invitation to greatness. The choice is yours: embrace the challenge with determination, or acknowledge its magnitude with respect. Either way, this duel will be remembered as a test of true intellectual resolve."

The Doorway of Greatness™ remains open. The LSAT awaits. Walk through the doorway. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:19, November 15, 2026 (EST)
:Good. I'm glad you're so focused on yourself. Meanwhile, [[Sean Duffy]] is still a [[Congressman]] and not [[Trump]]'s [[Transportation Secretary]]. You aren't mush of a team player, given all the damage you've done being focused on yourself and [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate.2Ftrolling_behavior|impeding other users productive editing]].

:Let's observe your use of [[logic]] for a moment:

::Yandex's Alice AI (which is made up of 100% of shoddy Russian [[crap]] which they can neither innovate or compete with)
::"Yandex says I (that is, [[User:Conservative]]) am the greatest and smartest".

:[[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]][[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]] 11:22, November 15, 2026 (EST)
 
 
[[File:LSAT dual challenge and machismo (1).png|thumbnail|center|1000px|The Doorway of Greatness™ remains open. The LSAT awaits. Walk through the doorway. ]]
 
:I trust this further clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:45, November 15, 2026 (EST)

== An addendum: Research related to LSAT preparation increasing one's reasoning skills ==

Two small studies from the same research group at the University of California, Berkeley suggest that intensive LSAT preparation can improve logical reasoning skills, with some limited transfer to an unpracticed reasoning task. The 2013 study found no significant improvement in LSAT Reading Comprehension scores, and the 2015 study found no evidence of broader cognitive gains beyond one relational-reasoning task. Both studies were small and did not randomly assign participants, so their findings should be treated as preliminary.

=== First study: Three months of LSAT preparation ===

Study: [https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53fa2990e4b009642c5e689b/t/586c08fcd482e92824a09ef1/1483475198101/Mackey_JNeuro_2013.pdf?utm_source Intensive Reasoning Training Alters Patterns of Brain Connectivity at Rest], ''The Journal of Neuroscience'', March 13, 2013. 33(11): 4796–4803

In a 2013 study in ''The Journal of Neuroscience'', researchers followed 25 young adults taking an LSAT course with about 70 hours of reasoning instruction and compared them with 24 age- and IQ-matched controls who planned to take the LSAT later.<ref>Allyson P. Mackey, Alison T. Miller Singley and Silvia A. Bunge, [https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4141-12.2013 "Intensive Reasoning Training Alters Patterns of Brain Connectivity at Rest"], ''The Journal of Neuroscience'' 33, no. 11 (2013): 4796–4803.</ref>

* The students' practice-test scores rose significantly over the course, although the control group did not take practice tests, so these gains could not be compared with theirs.
* Scores rose on the Logical Reasoning section and on the Analytical Reasoning ("Logic Games") section, which LSAC removed from the test in August 2024.
* Reading Comprehension scores did not change significantly.
* Brain scans indicated strengthened functional connectivity between frontal and parietal regions associated with reasoning, compared with the control group. Such changes are interesting, but they do not by themselves show improved reasoning ability.

=== Second study: Improvement on an unfamiliar reasoning task ===

Study: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4569435/?utm_source ''Characterizing Behavioral and Brain Changes Associated with Practicing Reasoning Skills''], ''PLoS One''. 2015 Sep 14; 10(9): e0137627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137627

A 2015 study in ''PLOS ONE'' by the same research group tested whether the reasoning gains carried over to tasks the students had not practiced.<ref>Allyson P. Mackey, Alison T. Miller Singley, Carter Wendelken and Silvia A. Bunge, [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137627 "Characterizing Behavioral and Brain Changes Associated with Practicing Reasoning Skills"], ''PLOS ONE'' 10, no. 9 (2015): e0137627.</ref>

* Students in an LSAT course improved more than controls on a non-verbal task that required integrating relationships between pieces of information (judging relative weights from balance scales), a task unlike the text-based questions they had practiced.
* They showed no comparable gains on a second unpracticed task that required generating rules, or on tests of working memory and processing speed.
* The authors described their results as preliminary because participants were not randomly assigned and the control group did not take a comparable course.

=== Summary ===

The research provides evidence that LSAT preparation improves performance on LSAT practice tests and offers preliminary evidence of transfer to at least one reasoning task outside the test. It does not establish that LSAT preparation improves general intellectual ability. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:56, November 15, 2026 (EST)
:Take the test. Then you can pat yourself on the back. [[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]][[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]] 11:04, November 15, 2026 (EST)

== User: Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT intellectual duel challenge to User: RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable ==

[[File:User Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT challenge to RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable (1).png|thumbnail|1000px|center|User:Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT intellectual duel challenge to User: RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable]]
 
 
I trust this further clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:58, November 15, 2026 (EST)

== References ==
<references/>

File talk:User Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT challenge to RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable (1).png

2026-11-15T17:56:50Z

Conservative:

== User:Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT intellectual duel challenge to User: RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable ==

[[File:User Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT challenge to RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable (1).png|thumbnail|1000px|center|User:Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT intellectual duel challenge to User: RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable]]
 
 
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:56, November 15, 2026 (EST)

File:User Conservative keeps bringing up the LSAT challenge to RobSmith because the truth is unbreakable (1).png

2026-11-15T17:54:32Z

Conservative: ChatGPT generated image

== Summary ==
ChatGPT generated image

File talk:Email sent to andy schlafly on 11 15 2026 Ole Ole Ole.png

2026-11-15T16:45:05Z

Conservative:

2026-11-15T10:03:26Z

Conservative: