<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Conservatores</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Conservatores"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservatores"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T19:46:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Classical_Liberalism&amp;diff=542808</id>
		<title>Classical Liberalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Classical_Liberalism&amp;diff=542808"/>
		<updated>2008-10-25T19:18:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* See Also */ Minor touchup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Classical Liberalism''' refers to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*an [[economic]] view in support of free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
*a political philosophy based on a belief in progress and goodness in man&lt;br /&gt;
*a [[Protestantism|Protestant]] movement embracing intellectual liberty&lt;br /&gt;
*support of individual liberty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term is almost never used in regards to contemporary political discourse in the [[United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=542807</id>
		<title>New Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=542807"/>
		<updated>2008-10-25T19:17:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Democratic Party''' or '''NDP''' is a [[democratic socialist]] [[Canadian]] political party. Its current leader is [[Jack Layton]]. It is noted for being the party of [[Tommy Douglas]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts/canadian_studies/english/about/study_guide/roots/ccf2ndp.html NDP Party history, tracing its roots from the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had to change its image as it was seen by some as nearly Communist.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founder of Canada's [[universal healthcare]] system and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000662/bio IMDB trivia and Bio page for Keifer Sutherland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Said of Douglas &amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;. Douglas also criticized [[liberalism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NDP has traditionally been an opponent to both the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] and [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] as well as the separatist [[Bloc Québécois]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal&amp;diff=542802</id>
		<title>Talk:Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal&amp;diff=542802"/>
		<updated>2008-10-25T19:04:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Liberal/Arch1|Archive 1]]|[[Talk:Liberal/Arch2|Archive 2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Talk:Liberal/Arch3|Archive 3]]|[[Talk:Liberal/Arch4|Archive 4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- =============DO NOT ARCHIVE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE!============================== --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't the picture be something representative of liberals rather than a satirical cartoon?[[User:JPohl|JPohl]] 08:53, 2 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, yes it should. I understand that this is supposed to be &amp;quot;an encyclopedia with articles written from a conservative viewpoint&amp;quot;, but doesn't that make it especially necessary that we don't make ourselves look like clowns? If anything, that was probably drawn up by a self-aware liberal with a sense of humor. [[User:Harbinger|Harbinger]] 11:22, 27 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional Liberal Organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
Center for Democracy &amp;amp; Technology, a civil liberties group that filed briefs against the law Child Online Protection Act and is working in coordination with the ACLU. {{unsigned|Jpatt}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Two more--Brookings Institute and Fairness In Accuracy &amp;amp; Media --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 08:25, 23 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also Research for Change, Emily's List, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Human Rights Campaign, People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals, Planned Parenthood, Creative Commons, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Democracy For America, and ActBlue! --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 08:31, 23 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be aware that some liberal organizations, in an attempt to hide their agenda, will tout themselves as &amp;quot;Progressive&amp;quot; organizations instead.  --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 08:35, 23 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another: Center For American Progress --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 11:21, 24 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more I think about it, probably need a whole page dedicated to Liberal Organizations. They can be sorted and divided by Soros funded / abortion sponsors / environmental / innocuous named (e.g. Democracy For America) / gay support / union  backed / progressive advocates / Conservative watchdogs. Your thoughts?--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:29, 25 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Hmmmm, the more you think about it you've come to that conclusion?  Well, it's such a good conclusion, I came up with it yesterday and asked Mr. Schlafly about it [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Liberal_Organizations here]!  Although I believe a different organizational system is worthwhile.  Hey, if you keep checking my contributions, you may find some other ideas that you can &amp;quot;think about&amp;quot; and claim as your own.  --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:57, 25 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Darn, if I only stalked jareds posts I would have realized that I was beaten by liberal intelligence. Let me guess your suggestion 'different organizational system' - hmmm, watered down to alphabetical and by state. If there becomes a Liberal Organizational page, it will need to be a tool for people to know what organizations to stay away from and why they are for boycott.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 19:45, 25 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Hmmm, I was actually thinking about organizing it by media, topic type, purported purpose.  But take my idea and let's collaborate.  That was the point of my post the other day, which you buried when you were insulting me.  Let's collaborate and put something together.  Obviously I had a good idea that you also like, so instead of continuing to insult me, let's make something out of it.  --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 21:01, 25 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'll just do my own work, you edit, like always. I have no desire to collaborate with you. Sorry. The most you 'll get from me is a prayer that your heart changes--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:07, 25 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founding Fathers were liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
For their time at least. And you can't deny this. All of their rallying cries were liberal for their day. &amp;quot;No taxation without representation.&amp;quot; Liberal. No authoritarian autocrats, wow that's very liberal considering the day. Freedom of religion, and religion seperated fom state? Why, those are some of the very things some of you hate &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; for to begin with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Point is, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is just a word. But some of the less sociable and not so well adjusted conservatives *gasp, they exist* have used the same silly word games with &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; as they did when they coined that lovely little phrase &amp;quot;pro-life.&amp;quot; Actually it's quite clever. Now liberal is, supposedly, perjorative along he same lines that anyone not &amp;quot;pro-life&amp;quot; must be &amp;quot;pro-death.&amp;quot; And how horrible is that, pro-death? Exactly...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What ever happened to moderation =( Middle of the road is not so bad, folks. There's something to be had from either end of the spectrum. Extremism is never the best choice. Self profesed &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are as guilty of it as self profesed &amp;quot;liberals.&amp;quot; The problem, unfortunately, is relly with all of us in general. It's just in our nature to prefer the radicals over the moderates. It's more exciting to us, and none of us are above it. However, we can actively be aware of that and make a point not to fall in lock step with the radicals on either end. And in truth, many do. They are just quiet, it's always th fringes that are the loudest... [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 13:55, 24 August 2008 (EDT) (I'm goig to be blasted as one of those &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; lol...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List at top==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list at the top makes it clear that it's supposed to be strictly a list of things liberals support, almost a &amp;quot;liberal platform&amp;quot;, if you will. Why are there &amp;quot;studies&amp;quot; like this: &amp;quot;In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution. Support for the theory of evolution which is a key component of atheistic ideologies in the Western World.&amp;quot; Why can't we just say &amp;quot;secularism and atheism&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or this: &amp;quot;Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., Richard Dawkins and Barack Obama).&amp;quot; Just seems gossipy, and not really representative of a whole, but rather some particular instances with which someone has taken issue. I'm all for being honest about what they're trying to do, and I'm just saying this information should be placed where it deserves to go. Does this merit a new section to place this info in, or does anyone think there's a better place on the article to put this? [[User:PCarson|PCarson]] 13:49, 1 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
Would like to add Liberal education. --[[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 21:10, 2 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Clean up article==&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone tell me how to edit the main page? The list of liberals in the see also section is a bit long so I created another page to place them located [[List of liberalism in America|here]]. Thank you.--[[User:JasonM|JasonM]] 21:39, 5 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The page is locked so nobody can edit except for sysops. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:58, 6 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent changes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the list of ideologies there is a missing line break in the line &amp;quot;A &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended* Government programs to rehabilitate criminals&amp;quot;. This should be two lines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the wording on the sex ed line needs to be tweaked. As it is, it reads like liberals actually want to teach people to be promiscuous, which isn't true. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:58, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The new definition is... circular. And there's still a typo (mentioned above). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:26, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps the word you're looking for is [[tautology]]? &amp;quot;A liberal is someone who denies any harm caused by liberal ideology&amp;quot; - this doesn't actually tell the reader anything about what a 'liberal' is, except that the author clearly doesn't like them. And I'm disappointed to see that the 'brain of a Democrat' cartoon has returned to such prominent placement too - it's unencyclopaedic, to say the least (although I did laugh at the &amp;quot;anti-bellum&amp;quot;). [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 00:05, 13 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hate to sound like a bother, but could anyone address these comments? (Anyone with the capability to edit the article, that is) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:50, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: That better?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:00, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's not bad, actually. I'd rather have a more textbook defintion, but I'm pretty satisfied. Thanks Philip :) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:57, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama: Professor?==&lt;br /&gt;
''Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., Richard Dawkins and Barack Obama)''  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has suggested that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''&amp;quot;I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution,&amp;quot; Obama told an audience at a campaign fundraiser. ... Responding to Obama's comments, Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, said, &amp;quot;Senator Obama needs to understand that at this level words matter and he will be scrutinized.&amp;quot;  Ronayne pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. The University of Chicago lists him as a senior lecturer on leave.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  So in this reference, an AP story in the San Francisco Chronicle, we have evidence that Obama has indeed called himself a law professor, and a quote from an RNC spokesman claiming he was not entitled to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* University of Chicago's ''Statement Regarding Barack Obama''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  states:  ''The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as &amp;quot;Senior Lecturer.&amp;quot;  From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.''  It seems that he was an adjunct from '92 to '96, but after that, as a Senior Lecturer, he was considered a professor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Next, let's look at a news article on UChicago's site from '04.  It uses the title of Senior Lecturer to describe Obama, which confirms that he was indeed at that time a Senior Lecturer.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/04/041103.obama.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the references seem to agree that Obama was a Senior Lecturer, and that he was not full-time.  The RNC spokesman said that Obama was &amp;quot;only a Senior Lecturer and not a full professor&amp;quot;, but this is contradicted by the university itself; UofC said &amp;quot;Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track&amp;quot;.  I think this makes a pretty strong case for Obama having been entitled to use the title &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; to describe at least the latter part of his time teaching at UofC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, I suggest that the sentence ''Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., Richard Dawkins and Barack Obama)'' be changed to remove Obama's name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggestions: ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party of Canada should also be in the &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; section of the page. Nothing more Liberal than a party that declares itself so. [[User:Conservatores|Conservatores]] 15:04, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Houston&amp;diff=538355</id>
		<title>Houston</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Houston&amp;diff=538355"/>
		<updated>2008-10-18T17:31:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Houston''' is the largest city in the state of [[Texas]] and the fourth largest city in the [[United States]] of America.  Houston is the county seat of Harris county, with a population of approximately 1.9 million. Houston is fondly referred to by many as the &amp;quot;Bayou City&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Houston is known for its thriving energy industry and the largest medical center in the country, as well as the second largest performing arts district in the nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== '''History''' ==&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The city of Houston was founded on August, 30 1836. The founders were two brothers named Augustus C. and John K. Allen. They bought 6,642 acres of land near the Buffalo Bayou. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== '''Famous People from Houston''' ==&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Michael Dell'''- Born February 23, 1965, he is a [[Conservative]] entrepreneur who founded Dell Computer Systems.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Beyonce Knowles'''- Born September 4, 1981, Beyonce is a singer and actress. She was apart of the band Destiny's Child for a while. She's also acted in movies such as Dream Girls and Austin Powers.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dan Rather '''- Born October 31, 1931. Dan Rather was a journalist and news anchor for CBS Evening News for 24 years.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Houston Texas Temple]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Texas Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=536106</id>
		<title>Liberal Party of Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=536106"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T15:28:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: correction of a link, lower and upper case&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' is a federal political party within the [[Canadian]] Federal Government.  Other Liberal Parties exist in all of the Canadian Provinces, but not all are directly afflicated with the federal party.  The current party leader is [[Stéphane Dion]], who is often portrayed as a very innefectual leader and is often lampooned in the Canadian media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stéphane Dion [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLNfNsHooNo portrayed as an idiot by the CBC]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the party has been traditional a [[liberal|left of center]] party with power in vote rich [[Ontario]] and [[Québec]], and has been known as &amp;quot;Canada's Governing Party&amp;quot; because of the large number of elections they have won. However, the party has been rocked by a sponsorship scandal in Québec of late, and their popularity has not returned. The Liberals have not been as popular in western Canada, where voters have voted for the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party is has been plagued for years by corruption scandals. It also wholeheartedly rejects [[conservative]] and [[family values]]; it instituted socialized medicine, legalized gay marriage, decriminalized marijuana possession, upholds abortion, and affirms [[global warming]]. Stéphane Dion, a former sociology professor, claims to be a devout Catholic, but evidence suggests that this is merely a political visage, and thus another example of [[professor values]].{{fact}} They are satirically portrayed in the media as scrawny effeminate nerds. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cASLdaver3I Political Satire show This Hour has 22 Minutes elaborates on the public perception of the Liberals.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party, and liberals in Canada are known informally as &amp;quot;Grits&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are opposed by the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]], [[New Democratic Party]] and the separatist [[Bloc Québecois]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==    &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada official site] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=536105</id>
		<title>Liberal Party of Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=536105"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T15:28:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' is a federal political party within the [[Canadian]] Federal Government.  Other Liberal Parties exist in all of the Canadian Provinces, but not all are directly afflicated with the federal party.  The current party leader is [[Stéphane Dion]], who is often portrayed as a very innefectual leader and is often lampooned in the Canadian media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stéphane Dion [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLNfNsHooNo portrayed as an idiot by the CBC]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the party has been traditional a [[liberal|left of center]] party with power in vote rich [[Ontario]] and [[Québec]], and has been known as &amp;quot;Canada's Governing Party&amp;quot; because of the large number of elections they have won. However, the party has been rocked by a sponsorship scandal in Québec of late, and their popularity has not returned. The Liberals have not been as popular in western Canada, where voters have voted for the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party is has been plagued for years by corruption scandals. It also wholeheartedly rejects [[conservative]] and [[family values]]; it instituted socialized medicine, legalized gay marriage, decriminalized marijuana possession, upholds abortion, and affirms [[global warming]]. Stéphane Dion, a former sociology professor, claims to be a devout Catholic, but evidence suggests that this is merely a political visage, and thus another example of [[professor values]].{{fact}} They are satirically portrayed in the media as scrawny effeminate nerds. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cASLdaver3I Political Satire show This Hour has 22 Minutes elaborates on the public perception of the Liberals.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party, and liberals in Canada are known informally as &amp;quot;Grits&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are opposed by the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]], [[New democratic Party]] and the separatist [[Bloc Québecois]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==    &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada official site] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536098</id>
		<title>New Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536098"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:58:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Democratic Party''' or '''NDP''' is a [[democratic socialist]] [[Canadian]] political party. Its current leader is [[Jack Layton]]. It is noted for being the party of [[Tommy Douglas]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts/canadian_studies/english/about/study_guide/roots/ccf2ndp.html NDP Party history, tracing its roots from the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had to change its image as it was seen by some as nearly Communist.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founder of Canada's [[Universal Healthcare]] system and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000662/bio IMDB trivia and Bio page for Keifer Sutherland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Said of Douglas '''&amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;'''. Douglas also criticized Liberalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NDP has traditionally been an opponent to both the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] and [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] as well as the separatist [[Bloc Québécois]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536097</id>
		<title>New Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536097"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:57:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Ref notes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Democratic Party''' or '''NDP''' is a [[democratic socialist]] [[Canadian]] political party. Its current leader is [[Jack Layton]]. It is noted for being the party of [[Tommy Douglas]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts/canadian_studies/english/about/study_guide/roots/ccf2ndp.html NDP Party history, tracing its roots from the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had to change its image as it was seen by some as nearly Communist.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founder of Canada's [[Universal Healthcare]] system and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000662/bio IMDB trivia and Bio page for Keifer Sutherland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Said of Douglas '''&amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;'''. Douglas also criticized Liberalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NDP has traditionally been an opponent to both the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] and [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] as well as the separatist [[Bloc Québécois]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Terrorism&amp;diff=536092</id>
		<title>Terrorism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Terrorism&amp;diff=536092"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:51:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Famous Radical Groups */ Minor cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Terrormunich.jpg|thumb|right|300px|A member of [[Black September]], a terrorist group, during the [[1972 Munich Olympics]]]]'''[[Terrorism]]''' is defined by the US [[Department of Defense]] as &amp;quot;''the unlawful use of -- or threatened use of -- force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives.''&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terrorist==&lt;br /&gt;
One who uses [[terroristic tactics]] to coerce behavior in another person or group is generally considered to fall under the definition of the term &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot;.  One who uses such terroristic tactics ([[suicide bombing]], [[sniper]], [[assassination]], [[random bombing]], etc.) can often be described as such. Aeroflight in the UK [http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/definitions.htm], defines it as:  ''&amp;quot;One who utilizes the systematic use of violence and/or intimidation to achieve political objectives, while disguised as a civilian non-combatant. The use of a civilian disguise while on operations exempts the perpetrator from protection under the Geneva Conventions, and consequently if captured they are liable for prosecution as common criminals.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terrorism==&lt;br /&gt;
Terrorism is the use of terror (fear), violence, and intimidation to achieve an end. Terrorism also refers to any fear and subjugation produced by this. The term is also used to describe violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians by groups or persons for political or ideological goals. Terrorism is the unlawful use or threatened use, of force, ''intimidation'', and/or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leftist (Radical) Terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leftist Terrorism, often referred to as radical terrorism, is terrorism that embraces the fringe left side of the political spectrum (Countries that are hostile to dissident terrorist movements often also see violence from the far left as well). Radical terrorists are future orientated. That is, radicals believe that they are currently being oppressed by some current government, ideology or regime, and therefore they should overthrow that oppressor and install a better government. Radical terrorists often operate with the belief that it is possible to create a utopia for the people. Radicals generally follow the beliefs of Karl Marx and Lenin, with emphasis on the idea of Lenin's vanguard party. Leftist terrorists often choose symbolic targets that emphasize what they see as a an oppressor to the working class. Leftist terrorist tend to target buildings and governmental structures that represent capitalism, or assassinate government leaders and capitalists. Leftist terrorists are self characterized as the young, self-educated elites of society, who are destined to both weaken the oppressive government and at the same time expose the weakness of the government to the exploited workforce. Radicals also tend be more exclusive with what issues they champion. Often, very narrow radicals will focus on one issue, resulting in animal rights, feminist, and eco-terrorists. Radical groups often operated in highly organized and clandestine groups, easily recognizable and orderly. However, leftist groups often had internal divisions in the larger groups that often broke off to create new group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gus Martin. Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Famous Radical Groups====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al-Qaeda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Animal Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Earth Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Front de libération du Québec]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irish Republican Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Brown Anti-Klan Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[May 19th Communist Organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Muslim Brotherhood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prairie Fire Organizing Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red Army Faction]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revolutionary Organization 17 November]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Symbionese Liberation Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Weather Underground Organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Youth International Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Right (Reactionary) Terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, reactionary terrorism has been less organized and less symbolic than leftist terrorists. Reactionary terrorists, like radical terrorists, see the current government as corrupt, but unlike radical leftists, reactionaries do not see the current government as needing revolutionary change. Rather, reactionaries view the government as a perversion of some older, better, government or social order. Reactionary terrorist violence is an attempt to regain the lost government and return to &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; and status quo. Reactionary violence is often justified by a use of mysticism about the old order. Scapegoating is a common tactic among reactionary terrorists to create an enemy for which to blame for the current order. Historical scapegoats among reactionary terrorists have included Jews, foreigners, homosexuals, atheists, leftists, blacks, illegal immigrants, and other racial minorities. Reactionary groups often defined by racial supremacy and a sense of order. Goals of reactionary terrorist include the delegation of minorities back to secondary status with respect to the national majority and a creation of a strong government to sustain order and prevent chaos through a police state. It should be noted however that due to conspiracy theories prevalence in the American fringe right, American reactionaries do not seek the creation of a strong government. Reactionaries often act as individuals or small groups and are not as discriminate with their targets as are leftist groups. This is partially due to the lack of unity between reactionaries and the scope of reactionary targets, often encompassing entire races.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gus Martin. Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Famous Reactionary Groups====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ku Klux Klan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skinheads]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Order]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Contras]] in Nicaragua&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Domestic terrorists ==&lt;br /&gt;
In describing domestic terrorism before the House Resources Committee on February 12, 2002, James F. Jarboe, Domestic Terrorism Section Chief of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division, stated:&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States (or its territories) without foreign direction, committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.  During the past decade we have witnessed dramatic changes in the nature of the terrorist threat. In the 1990s, right-wing extremism overtook left-wing terrorism as the most dangerous domestic terrorist threat to the country. During the past several years, special interest extremism, as characterized by the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), has emerged as a serious terrorist threat. Generally, extremist groups engage in much activity that is protected by constitutional guarantees of free speech and assembly. Law enforcement becomes involved when the volatile talk of these groups transgresses into unlawful action. The FBI estimates that the ALF/ELF have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the United States since 1996, resulting in damages in excess of 43 million dollars.&amp;quot;'' [http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress02/jarboe021202.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following organizations have been accused by the FBI of being involved with domestic terrorism:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Animal Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Black Liberation Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Earth Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional]] (FALN)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ku Klux Klan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Symbionese Liberation Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Army of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Weather Underground]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== International ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al-Qaeda]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PIRA]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hamas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terrorism and the Media==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prime goal of any terrorist is mass media exposure. Terrorism cannot recruit new initiates like regular armies, rather when they run out of discontented radicals within their state, they must rely on the media to spread their message. Therefore, media outlets and the press must be careful when choosing a story, as often running a story about a terrorist attack just creates more support for a terrorist cause.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Groups Considered by the United States to be Terrorist Organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abu Sayyaf]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al-Qaeda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ansar Al-Islam]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ETA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hamas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hizbollah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jemaa Islamiya]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Maoist rebels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PKK]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Real ETA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tamil Tigers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Turkistan Islamic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Groups directly or indirectly supporting terrorists==&lt;br /&gt;
The following organizations within the United States have either directly supported terrorist organizations world-wide through the use of money contributions or media influence, or have prevented enforcement of the laws on the books via court petitions and lawsuits:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Noraid]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Groups receiving CIA support ==&lt;br /&gt;
The American CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) has the stated objective of ''&amp;quot;Conducting covert action at the direction of the President to preempt threats or achieve US policy objectives.&amp;quot;''[https://www.cia.gov/cia/information/mission.html]. Over the course of it's well-documented history, this has involved the establishment, funding and organization of various organizations some have regarded as terrorist, including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Contras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Front for the Advancement and Progress of Haïti]] (FRAPH)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reed Lindsay,[http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1163909,00.html ''Cold War returns to US backyard''], The Observer, March 7, 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== War on terror ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fighting terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://lightonthings.blogspot.com#fight The Reality Show - The Watch the Fight] links to many sites that deal with the 'war on terror'.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]] has compiled a [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335500,00.html list of known terror plots] thwarted by the U.S. government since Sept. 11, 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FBI Most Wanted Terrorist List]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[September 11, 2001 attacks]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[June 2007 UK terror attacks]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Osama Bin Laden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homicide Bombers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pyroterrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sudden Jihad Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/guideDesc.asp?is_campus_support=1 DiscoverTheNetworks.org - Campus Support For Terrorism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/terrorism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Terrorism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Terrorism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Terrorism&amp;diff=536091</id>
		<title>Terrorism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Terrorism&amp;diff=536091"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:50:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Famous Radical Groups */  They commited over 200 bombings. Beheaded a politician and kidnapped a British Trade Commissioner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Terrormunich.jpg|thumb|right|300px|A member of [[Black September]], a terrorist group, during the [[1972 Munich Olympics]]]]'''[[Terrorism]]''' is defined by the US [[Department of Defense]] as &amp;quot;''the unlawful use of -- or threatened use of -- force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives.''&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terrorist==&lt;br /&gt;
One who uses [[terroristic tactics]] to coerce behavior in another person or group is generally considered to fall under the definition of the term &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot;.  One who uses such terroristic tactics ([[suicide bombing]], [[sniper]], [[assassination]], [[random bombing]], etc.) can often be described as such. Aeroflight in the UK [http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/definitions.htm], defines it as:  ''&amp;quot;One who utilizes the systematic use of violence and/or intimidation to achieve political objectives, while disguised as a civilian non-combatant. The use of a civilian disguise while on operations exempts the perpetrator from protection under the Geneva Conventions, and consequently if captured they are liable for prosecution as common criminals.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terrorism==&lt;br /&gt;
Terrorism is the use of terror (fear), violence, and intimidation to achieve an end. Terrorism also refers to any fear and subjugation produced by this. The term is also used to describe violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians by groups or persons for political or ideological goals. Terrorism is the unlawful use or threatened use, of force, ''intimidation'', and/or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leftist (Radical) Terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leftist Terrorism, often referred to as radical terrorism, is terrorism that embraces the fringe left side of the political spectrum (Countries that are hostile to dissident terrorist movements often also see violence from the far left as well). Radical terrorists are future orientated. That is, radicals believe that they are currently being oppressed by some current government, ideology or regime, and therefore they should overthrow that oppressor and install a better government. Radical terrorists often operate with the belief that it is possible to create a utopia for the people. Radicals generally follow the beliefs of Karl Marx and Lenin, with emphasis on the idea of Lenin's vanguard party. Leftist terrorists often choose symbolic targets that emphasize what they see as a an oppressor to the working class. Leftist terrorist tend to target buildings and governmental structures that represent capitalism, or assassinate government leaders and capitalists. Leftist terrorists are self characterized as the young, self-educated elites of society, who are destined to both weaken the oppressive government and at the same time expose the weakness of the government to the exploited workforce. Radicals also tend be more exclusive with what issues they champion. Often, very narrow radicals will focus on one issue, resulting in animal rights, feminist, and eco-terrorists. Radical groups often operated in highly organized and clandestine groups, easily recognizable and orderly. However, leftist groups often had internal divisions in the larger groups that often broke off to create new group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gus Martin. Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Famous Radical Groups====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al-Qaeda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Animal Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Earth Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Front_de_libération_du_Québec]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irish Republican Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Brown Anti-Klan Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[May 19th Communist Organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Muslim Brotherhood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prairie Fire Organizing Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red Army Faction]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revolutionary Organization 17 November]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Symbionese Liberation Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Weather Underground Organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Youth International Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Right (Reactionary) Terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, reactionary terrorism has been less organized and less symbolic than leftist terrorists. Reactionary terrorists, like radical terrorists, see the current government as corrupt, but unlike radical leftists, reactionaries do not see the current government as needing revolutionary change. Rather, reactionaries view the government as a perversion of some older, better, government or social order. Reactionary terrorist violence is an attempt to regain the lost government and return to &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; and status quo. Reactionary violence is often justified by a use of mysticism about the old order. Scapegoating is a common tactic among reactionary terrorists to create an enemy for which to blame for the current order. Historical scapegoats among reactionary terrorists have included Jews, foreigners, homosexuals, atheists, leftists, blacks, illegal immigrants, and other racial minorities. Reactionary groups often defined by racial supremacy and a sense of order. Goals of reactionary terrorist include the delegation of minorities back to secondary status with respect to the national majority and a creation of a strong government to sustain order and prevent chaos through a police state. It should be noted however that due to conspiracy theories prevalence in the American fringe right, American reactionaries do not seek the creation of a strong government. Reactionaries often act as individuals or small groups and are not as discriminate with their targets as are leftist groups. This is partially due to the lack of unity between reactionaries and the scope of reactionary targets, often encompassing entire races.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gus Martin. Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Famous Reactionary Groups====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ku Klux Klan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skinheads]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Order]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Contras]] in Nicaragua&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Domestic terrorists ==&lt;br /&gt;
In describing domestic terrorism before the House Resources Committee on February 12, 2002, James F. Jarboe, Domestic Terrorism Section Chief of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division, stated:&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States (or its territories) without foreign direction, committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.  During the past decade we have witnessed dramatic changes in the nature of the terrorist threat. In the 1990s, right-wing extremism overtook left-wing terrorism as the most dangerous domestic terrorist threat to the country. During the past several years, special interest extremism, as characterized by the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), has emerged as a serious terrorist threat. Generally, extremist groups engage in much activity that is protected by constitutional guarantees of free speech and assembly. Law enforcement becomes involved when the volatile talk of these groups transgresses into unlawful action. The FBI estimates that the ALF/ELF have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the United States since 1996, resulting in damages in excess of 43 million dollars.&amp;quot;'' [http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress02/jarboe021202.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following organizations have been accused by the FBI of being involved with domestic terrorism:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Animal Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Black Liberation Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Earth Liberation Front]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional]] (FALN)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ku Klux Klan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Symbionese Liberation Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Army of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Weather Underground]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== International ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al-Qaeda]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PIRA]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hamas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terrorism and the Media==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prime goal of any terrorist is mass media exposure. Terrorism cannot recruit new initiates like regular armies, rather when they run out of discontented radicals within their state, they must rely on the media to spread their message. Therefore, media outlets and the press must be careful when choosing a story, as often running a story about a terrorist attack just creates more support for a terrorist cause.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Groups Considered by the United States to be Terrorist Organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abu Sayyaf]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Al-Qaeda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ansar Al-Islam]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ETA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hamas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hizbollah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jemaa Islamiya]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Maoist rebels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PKK]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Real ETA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tamil Tigers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Turkistan Islamic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Groups directly or indirectly supporting terrorists==&lt;br /&gt;
The following organizations within the United States have either directly supported terrorist organizations world-wide through the use of money contributions or media influence, or have prevented enforcement of the laws on the books via court petitions and lawsuits:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Noraid]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Groups receiving CIA support ==&lt;br /&gt;
The American CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) has the stated objective of ''&amp;quot;Conducting covert action at the direction of the President to preempt threats or achieve US policy objectives.&amp;quot;''[https://www.cia.gov/cia/information/mission.html]. Over the course of it's well-documented history, this has involved the establishment, funding and organization of various organizations some have regarded as terrorist, including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Contras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Front for the Advancement and Progress of Haïti]] (FRAPH)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reed Lindsay,[http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1163909,00.html ''Cold War returns to US backyard''], The Observer, March 7, 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== War on terror ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fighting terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://lightonthings.blogspot.com#fight The Reality Show - The Watch the Fight] links to many sites that deal with the 'war on terror'.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]] has compiled a [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335500,00.html list of known terror plots] thwarted by the U.S. government since Sept. 11, 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FBI Most Wanted Terrorist List]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[September 11, 2001 attacks]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[June 2007 UK terror attacks]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Osama Bin Laden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homicide Bombers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pyroterrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sudden Jihad Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/guideDesc.asp?is_campus_support=1 DiscoverTheNetworks.org - Campus Support For Terrorism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/terrorism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Terrorism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Terrorism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tommy_Douglas&amp;diff=536085</id>
		<title>Tommy Douglas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tommy_Douglas&amp;diff=536085"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:39:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: More information. Interesting facts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Tommy Douglas''' was a Canadian [[Christian]] Minister and politican. He was a former leader of the [[NDP]] and was a strong proponent of universal healthcare. He was recently voted the Greatest Canadian of All Time. Douglas is credited with the implementation of [[universal health care]]. Said of Douglas '''&amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;'''. Douglas also criticized Liberalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is the grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000662/bio IMDB trivia and Bio page for Keifer Sutherland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Douglas, Tommy}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536082</id>
		<title>New Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536082"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:35:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Added a proper category&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Democratic Party''' or '''NDP''' is a [[democratic socialist]] [[Canadian]] political party. Its current leader is [[Jack Layton]]. It is noted for being the party of [[Tommy Douglas]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts/canadian_studies/english/about/study_guide/roots/ccf2ndp.html NDP Party history, tracing its roots from the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had to change its image as it was seen by some as nearly Communist.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founder of Canada's [[Universal Healthcare]] system and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000662/bio IMDB trivia and Bio page for Keifer Sutherland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Said of Douglas '''&amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;'''. Douglas also criticized Liberalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NDP has traditionally been an opponent to both the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] and [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] as well as the separatist [[Bloc Québécois]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536078</id>
		<title>New Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536078"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:29:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Democratic Party''' or '''NDP''' is a [[democratic socialist]] [[Canadian]] political party. Its current leader is [[Jack Layton]]. It is noted for being the party of [[Tommy Douglas]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts/canadian_studies/english/about/study_guide/roots/ccf2ndp.html NDP Party history, tracing its roots from the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had to change its image as it was seen by some as nearly Communist.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founder of Canada's [[Universal Healthcare]] system and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000662/bio IMDB trivia and Bio page for Keifer Sutherland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Said of Douglas '''&amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;'''. Douglas also criticized Liberalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536076</id>
		<title>New Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Democratic_Party&amp;diff=536076"/>
		<updated>2008-10-14T14:24:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Democratic Party''' or '''NDP''' is a [[democratic socialist]] [[Canadian]] political party. Its current leader is [[Jack Layton]]. It is noted for being the party of [[Tommy Douglas]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts/canadian_studies/english/about/study_guide/roots/ccf2ndp.html NDP Party history, tracing its roots from the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had to change its image as it was seen by some as nearly Communist.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founder of Canada's [[Universal Healthcare]] system and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland, star of [[24]]. Said of Douglas '''&amp;quot;He pursued his radical ideas relentlessly until they became so mainstream rival politicians claimed them as their own&amp;quot;'''. Douglas also criticized Liberalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/topics/851/ CBC historical archive on Tommy Douglas and the NDP.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Victoria&amp;diff=534742</id>
		<title>Victoria</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Victoria&amp;diff=534742"/>
		<updated>2008-10-12T13:34:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Are you looking for [[Queen Victoria]]''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Victoria''' is a state of [[Australia]], occupying the southeastern corner of the mainland of the continent.&lt;br /&gt;
Its capital and largest city is [[Melbourne]].&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the northern boundary is formed by the [[Murray River]]. To the north is [[New South Wales]], and to the west is [[South Australia]].&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the coast of Victoria faces south onto [[Bass Strait]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Victoria is geographically the smallest mainland state in Australia (the island state of Tasmania, to the south of Victoria, is smaller), but the second most populated, with just over 5,000,000 residents, 3,600,000 (72%) of whom live in the greater Melbourne area.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3235.2.55.001 Population by Age and Sex, Victoria], Australian Bureau of Statistics, June 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources ==&lt;br /&gt;
Victorian industry is mainly manufacturing and farming.&lt;br /&gt;
Mining is mainly limited to [[lignite|brown coal]], which is used for power generation, supplying most of the state's electricity.  The remaining electricity production is from hydro-electric sources and, in recent times, some wind-power generation.&lt;br /&gt;
Natural gas is obtained from platforms off the Victorian coast in Bass Strait.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Australia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservatores&amp;diff=534215</id>
		<title>User:Conservatores</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservatores&amp;diff=534215"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T17:37:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Love thy neighbour, honour they father and mother, help the needy, the poor and the sick. Those are my values. [[User:Conservatores|Conservatores]] 21:11, 1 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bit more history about myself: I used to work for the Salvation Army. At least until I was attacked by a thief with her car after I caught her stealing. After that, my immune system couldn't keep up with the disease around me and I sadly, had to leave my position. I would go back if I could. Gods work is never done. [[User:Conservatores|Conservatores]] 13:37, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=North_Korea&amp;diff=534212</id>
		<title>North Korea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=North_Korea&amp;diff=534212"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T17:35:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Terrorism */ Minor polish&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =조선민주주의인민공화국&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; ''Democratic People's Republic of Korea''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Korea north rel 2005.jpg &lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =NorthKoreaFlag.gif‎|thumb|170px&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=P'yongyang&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Communist totalitarian state&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Korean&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =46,526 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =23,301,725(2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$22.85 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$1,007 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	= North Korean won&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic People's Republic of Korea''', or '''North Korea''', is a totalitarian state in eastern Asia that occupies the Korean peninsula north of a line that roughly follows the 38th parallel. Ruled by dictator and 'Dear Leader' [[Kim Jong Il]], who succeeded his father the 'Great Leader' [[Kim Il Sung]], it is the last completely [[Stalinism|Stalinist]] government on Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The official North Korean ideology is known as [[Juche]] (roughly translates as &amp;quot;national self-reliance&amp;quot;), and since the mid 1990s, [[Songun]] (&amp;quot;military first&amp;quot;).  A cult-like devotion to the &amp;quot;Great Leader&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Dear Leader&amp;quot; is expected of citizens, and heavily promoted in the North Korean news media which has little actual &amp;quot;news&amp;quot; and mostly consists of effuse praise toward Kim Jong Il, grandiose and unsubstantiated claims about great feats by him and his father, and repetitious admonitions that the Korean people are totally united as one behind his leadership; in contrast between 1 million and 2 million North Koreans have died of starvation in recent years because the Kim government has so mismanaged the economy, particularly agriculture, and has hampered outside efforts at relief. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071009/COMMENTARY/110090010/1012&amp;amp;template=nextpage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Atrocities of the Korean War==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fred Schwarz]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:When the Communists retreated in North Korea, they took with them all the able-bodied personnel to serve as laborers. Those who could not stand the rigors of the northward journey-- old men and women, pregnant women, very young children and babies-- they massacred and buried in a [[mass grave]] if they belonged to the untrustworthy social classes. The advancing American troops time and again found mass graves filled with the bodies of those murdered by the Communists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.schwarzreport.org/yct/01ycttc.htm You Can Trust the Communists - To Be Communists]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2006): 23.1 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate: About +0.98%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: [[Korean]]; small ethnic Chinese and Japanese populations. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: [[Buddhism]], [[Confucianism]], [[Shamanism]], [[Chongdogyo]], [[Christian]]; autonomous religious activities have been virtually nonexistent since 1945. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Korean. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory--11. Attendance--3 million (primary, 1.5 million; secondary, 1.2 million; tertiary, 0.3 million). Literacy--99%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Health (1998): Medical treatment is free; one doctor for every 700 inhabitants; one hospital bed for every 350; there are severe shortages of medicines and medical equipment. Infant mortality rate--23.29 /1,000 (2006 est.). Life expectancy--males 68 yrs., females 74 yrs. (2006 est.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea has a centralized government under the rigid control of the communist Korean Workers' Party (KWP), to which all government officials belong. A few minor political parties are allowed to exist in name only. Kim Il-sung ruled North Korea from 1948 until his death in July 1994. Kim served both as Secretary General of the KWP and as President of North Korea. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Little is known about the actual lines of power and authority in the North Korean Government despite the formal structure set forth in the constitution. Following the death of Kim Il-sung, his son--Kim Jong-il--inherited supreme power. Kim Jong-il was named General Secretary of the KWP in October 1997, and in September 1998, the Supreme People's Assembly (SPA) reconfirmed Kim Jong-il as Chairman of the National Defense Commission and declared that position as the &amp;quot;highest office of state.&amp;quot; However, the President of the Presidium of the National Assembly, Kim Yong-nam, serves as the nominal head of state. North Korea's 1972 constitution was amended in late 1992 and in September 1998. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution designates the Central People's Committee (CPC) as the government's top policymaking body. The CPC makes policy decisions and supervises the cabinet, or State Administration Council (SAC). The SAC is headed by a premier and is the dominant administrative and executive agency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officially, the legislature, the SPA, is the highest organ of state power. Its members are elected every four years. Usually only two meetings are held annually, each lasting a few days. A standing committee elected by the SPA performs legislative functions when the Assembly is not in session. In reality, the Assembly serves only to ratify decisions made by the ruling KWP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's judiciary is &amp;quot;accountable&amp;quot; to the SPA and the president. The SPA's standing committee also appoints judges to the highest court for four-year terms that are concurrent with those of the Assembly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Administratively, North Korea is divided into nine provinces and four provincial-level municipalities--[[Pyongyang]], [[Chongjin]], [[Nampo]], and [[Kaesong]]. It also appears to be divided into nine military districts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Party and Government Officials=== &lt;br /&gt;
*Kim Jong-il--General Secretary of the KWP; Supreme Commander of the People's Armed Forces; Chairman of the National Defense *Commission; son of North Korea's founder Kim Il-sung&lt;br /&gt;
*Kim Yong-nam--President of the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly; titular head of state&lt;br /&gt;
*Pak Gil-yon--Ambassador to D.P.R.K. Permanent Mission to the UN&lt;br /&gt;
*Pak Ui-chun--Minister of Foreign Affairs &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's relationship with the South has determined much of its post-[[World War II]] history and still undergirds much of its foreign policy. North and South Korea have had a difficult and acrimonious relationship from the Korean War. In recent years, North Korea has pursued a mixed policy--seeking to develop economic relations with South Korea and to win the support of the South Korean public for greater North-South engagement while at the same time continuing to denounce the R.O.K.'s security relationship with the United States and maintaining a threatening conventional force posture on the DMZ and in adjacent waters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The military demarcation line (MDL) of separation between the belligerent sides at the close of the Korean War divides North Korea from South Korea. A demilitarized zone (DMZ) extends for 2,000 meters (just over 1 mile) on either side of the MDL. Both the North and South Korean governments hold that the MDL is only a temporary administrative line, not a permanent border. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the postwar period, both Korean governments have repeatedly affirmed their desire to reunify the Korean Peninsula, but until 1971 the two governments had no direct, official communications or other contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reunification Efforts Since 1971====&lt;br /&gt;
In August 1971, North and South Korea held talks through their respective Red Cross societies with the aim of reuniting the many Korean families separated following the division of Korea and the Korean War. In July 1972, the two sides agreed to work toward peaceful reunification and an end to the hostile atmosphere prevailing on the peninsula. Officials exchanged visits, and regular communications were established through a North-South coordinating committee and the Red Cross. These initial contacts broke down in 1973 following South Korean President Park Chung-hee's announcement that the South would seek separate entry into the United Nations, and after the kidnapping of South Korean opposition leader Kim Dae-jung--perceived as friendly to unified entry into the UN--by South Korean intelligence services. There was no other significant contact between North and South Korea until 1984. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dialogue was renewed in September 1984, when South Korea accepted the North's offer to provide relief goods to victims of severe flooding in South Korea. Red Cross talks to address the plight of separated families resumed, as did talks on economic and trade issues and parliamentary-level discussions. However, the North then unilaterally suspended all talks in January 1986, arguing that the annual U.S.-ROK &amp;quot;Team Spirit&amp;quot; military exercise was inconsistent with dialogue. There was a brief flurry of negotiations that year on co-hosting the upcoming 1988 Seoul Olympics, which ended in failure and was followed by the 1987 bombing of a South Korean commercial aircraft (KAL 858) by North Korean agents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 1988, South Korean President Roh Tae-woo called for new efforts to promote North-South exchanges, family reunification, inter-Korean trade, and contact in international forums. Roh followed up this initiative in a UN General Assembly speech in which South Korea offered for the first time to discuss security matters with the North. Initial meetings that grew out of Roh's proposals started in September 1989. In September 1990, the first of eight prime minister-level meetings between North Korean and South Korean officials took place in Seoul. The prime ministerial talks resulted in two major agreements: the Agreement on Reconciliation, Nonaggression, Exchanges, and Cooperation (the &amp;quot;Basic Agreement&amp;quot;) and the Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (the &amp;quot;Joint Declaration&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Basic Agreement, signed on December 13, 1991, called for reconciliation and nonaggression and established four joint commissions. These commissions--on South-North reconciliation, South-North military affairs, South-North economic exchanges and cooperation, and South-North social and cultural exchange--were to work out the specifics for implementing the basic agreement. Subcommittees to examine specific issues were created, and liaison offices were established in Panmunjom, but in the fall of 1992 the process came to a halt because of rising tension over North Korea's nuclear program. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Joint Declaration on denuclearization was initialed on December 31, 1991. It forbade both sides from testing, manufacturing, producing, receiving, possessing, storing, deploying, or using nuclear weapons and forbade the possession of nuclear reprocessing and uranium enrichment facilities. A procedure for inter-Korean inspection was to be organized and a North-South Joint Nuclear Control Commission (JNCC) was mandated to verify the denuclearization of the peninsula. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 30, 1992, the D.P.R.K. finally signed a nuclear safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), as it had pledged to do in 1985 when it acceded to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This safeguards agreement allowed IAEA inspections to begin in June 1992. In March 1992, the JNCC was established in accordance with the Joint Declaration, but subsequent meetings failed to reach agreement on the main issue of establishing a bilateral inspection regime. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the 1990s progressed, concern over the North's nuclear program became a major issue in North-South relations and between North Korea and the United States. The lack of progress on implementation of the Joint Declaration's provision for an inter-Korean nuclear inspection regime led to reinstatement of the U.S.-R.O.K. Team Spirit military exercise for 1993. The situation worsened rapidly when North Korea, in January 1993, refused IAEA access to two suspected nuclear waste sites and then announced in March 1993 its intent to withdraw from the NPT. During the next two years, the United States held direct talks with the D.P.R.K. that resulted in a series of agreements on nuclear matters, including the 1994 Agreed Framework (which broke down in 2002 when North Korea was discovered to be pursuing a uranium enrichment program for nuclear weapons--see below, Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At his inauguration in February 1998, R.O.K. President Kim Dae-jung enunciated a new policy of engagement with the D.P.R.K., dubbed &amp;quot;the Sunshine Policy.&amp;quot; The policy had three fundamental principles: no tolerance of provocations from the North, no intention to absorb the North, and the separation of political cooperation from economic cooperation. Private sector overtures would be based on commercial and humanitarian considerations. The use of government resources would entail reciprocity. This policy set the stage for the first inter-Korean summit, held in Pyongyang June 13-15, 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.O.K. President Roh Moo-hyun, following his inauguration in February 2003, has continued his predecessor's policy of engagement with the North, though he abandoned the name &amp;quot;Sunshine Policy.&amp;quot; The United States supports President Roh's engagement policy and North-South dialogue and cooperation. Major economic reunification projects have included a tourism development in Mt. Geumgang, the re-establishment of road and rail links across the demilitarized zone (DMZ) and a joint North-South industrial park near the North Korean city of Kaesong (see further information below in the section on the Economy). In August 2007, the R.O.K. and D.P.R.K. announced plans to hold a second inter-Korean summit, scheduled for October 2-4 in Pyongyang. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations Outside the Korean Peninsula=== &lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the Cold War, North Korea balanced its relations with China and the Soviet Union to extract the maximum benefit from the relationships at minimum political cost. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and China, the Soviet-backed Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia, and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan created strains between China and the Soviet Union and, in turn, in North Korea's relations with its two major communist allies. North Korea tried to avoid becoming embroiled in the Sino-Soviet split, obtaining aid from both the Soviet Union and China and trying to avoid dependence on either. Following Kim Il-sung's 1984 visit to Moscow, there was an improvement in Soviet-D.P.R.K. relations, resulting in renewed deliveries of Soviet weaponry to North Korea and increases in economic aid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The establishment of diplomatic relations by South Korea with the Soviet Union in 1990 and with China in 1992 seriously strained relations between North Korea and its traditional allies. Moreover, the fall of communism in eastern Europe in 1989 and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 resulted in a significant drop in communist aid to North Korea. Despite these changes and its past reliance on this military and economic assistance, North Korea continued to proclaim a militantly independent stance in its foreign policy in accordance with its official ideology of &amp;quot;juche,&amp;quot; or self-reliance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both North and South Korea became parties to the Biological Weapons Convention in 1987. (North Korea is not a member of the Chemical Weapons Convention, nor is it a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime, or MTCR.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea has maintained membership in some multilateral organizations. It became a member of the UN in September 1991. North Korea also belongs to the Food and Agriculture Organization; the International Civil Aviation Organization; the International Postal Union; the UN Conference on Trade and Development; the International Telecommunications Union; the UN Development Program; the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; the World Health Organization; the World Intellectual Property Organization; the World Meteorological Organization; the International Maritime Organization; the International Committee of the Red Cross; and the Nonaligned Movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid-1990s, when the economic situation worsened dramatically and following the death of D.P.R.K. founder Kim Il-sung, the North abandoned some of the more extreme manifestations of its &amp;quot;self reliance&amp;quot; ideology to accept foreign humanitarian relief and create the possibility, as noted below, for foreign investment in the North. In subsequent years, the D.P.R.K. has continued to pursue a tightly restricted policy of opening to the world in search of economic aid and development assistance. However, this has been matched by an increased determination to counter perceived external and internal threats by a self-proclaimed &amp;quot;military first&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Songun&amp;quot;) policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the present period of limited, extremely cautious opening, North Korea has sought to broaden its formal diplomatic relationships. In July 2000, North Korea began participating in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), with Foreign Minister Paek Nam-sun attending the ARF ministerial meeting in Bangkok. The D.P.R.K. also expanded its bilateral diplomatic ties in that year, establishing diplomatic relations with Italy, Australia, the Philippines, Australia, Canada, the U.K., Germany, and many other European countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the September 19, 2005 Joint Statement issued at the end of the fourth round of Six-Party Talks, the United States and the D.P.R.K. committed to undertake steps to normalize relations (see below, Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula). The D.P.R.K. and Japan also agreed to take steps to normalize relations and to discuss outstanding issues of concern, such as abductions. The U.S.-D.P.R.K. and Japan-D.P.R.K. bilateral working groups on normalization of relations met in March and September 2007. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Terrorism==== &lt;br /&gt;
The D.P.R.K. is not known to have sponsored terrorist acts since the 1987 bombing of KAL flight 858. Pyongyang continues to provide sanctuary to members of the Japanese Communist League-Red Army Faction (JRA) who participated in the hijacking of a Japan Airlines flight to North Korea in 1970. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D.P.R.K. has made several statements condemning terrorism. In October 2000, the United States and the D.P.R.K. issued a joint statement on terrorism in which &amp;quot;the two sides agreed that international terrorism poses an unacceptable threat to global security and peace, and that terrorism should be opposed in all its forms.&amp;quot; The United States and the D.P.R.K. agreed to support the international legal regime combating international terrorism and to cooperate with each other to fight terrorism. The D.P.R.K. became a signatory to the Convention for the Suppression of Financing of Terrorism and a party to the Convention Against the Taking of Hostages in November 2001. In the February 13, 2007 Initial Actions agreement, the [[United States of America]] agreed to begin the process of removing the designation of the D.P.R.K. as a state sponsor of terrorism. On Saturday October 11, 2008. The United States officially removed North Korea from the Terrorism Watch List. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,436382,00.html North Korea no longer a recognized Terrorist sponsor.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Abductions==== &lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the D.P.R.K. has also been involved in the abduction of foreign citizens. In 2002, Kim Jong-il acknowledged to Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi the involvement of D.P.R.K. &amp;quot;special institutions&amp;quot; in the kidnapping of Japanese citizens between 1977 and 1983 and said that those responsible had been punished. While five surviving victims and their families were allowed to leave the D.P.R.K. and resettle in Japan in October 2002, 12 other cases remain unresolved and continue to be a major issue in D.P.R.K.-Japanese relations. In October 2005, the D.P.R.K. acknowledged for the first time having kidnapped R.O.K. citizens in previous decades, claiming that several abductees, as well as several POWs from the Korean War, were still alive. In June 2006, North Korea allowed Kim Young-nam, a South Korean abducted by the North in 1978, to participate in a family reunion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States policy towards North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
====U.S. Support for North-South Dialogue and Reunification==== &lt;br /&gt;
The United States supports the peaceful reunification of Korea on terms acceptable to the Korean people and recognizes that the future of the Korean Peninsula is primarily a matter for them to decide. The United States believes that a constructive and serious dialogue between the authorities of North and South Korea is necessary to resolve outstanding problems, including the North's nuclear program and human rights abuses, and to encourage the North's integration with the rest of the international community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula====&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear weapons state in 1985. North and South Korean talks begun in 1990 resulted in the 1992 Joint Declaration for a Non-Nuclear Korean Peninsula (see, under Foreign Relations, Reunification Efforts Since 1971). However, the international standoff over the North's failure to implement an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency for the inspection of the North's nuclear facilities led Pyongyang to announce in March 1993 its intention to withdraw from the NPT. A UN Security Council Resolution in May 1993 urged the D.P.R.K. to cooperate with the IAEA and to implement the 1992 North-South Denuclearization Statement. It also urged all UN Member States to encourage the D.P.R.K. to respond positively to this resolution and to facilitate a solution to the nuclear issue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States opened talks with the D.P.R.K. in June 1993 and eventually reached agreement in October 1994 on a diplomatic roadmap, known as the Agreed Framework, for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. The Agreed Framework called for the following steps: &lt;br /&gt;
*North Korea agreed to freeze its existing nuclear program and allow monitoring by the IAEA. &lt;br /&gt;
*Both sides agreed to cooperate to replace the D.P.R.K.'s graphite-moderated reactors with light-water reactor (LWR) power plants, by a target date of 2003, to be financed and supplied by an international consortium (later identified as the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization or KEDO). &lt;br /&gt;
*As an interim measure, the United States agreed to provide North Korea with 500,000 tons of heavy fuel oil annually until the first reactor was built. &lt;br /&gt;
*The United States and D.P.R.K. agreed to work together to store safely the spent fuel from the five-megawatt reactor and dispose of it in a safe manner that did not involve reprocessing in the D.P.R.K. &lt;br /&gt;
*The two sides agreed to move toward full normalization of political and economic relations. &lt;br /&gt;
*The two sides agreed to work together for peace and security on a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. &lt;br /&gt;
*The two sides agreed to work together to strengthen the international nuclear non-proliferation regime. &lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the terms of the Agreed Framework, in January 1995 the U.S. Government eased economic sanctions against North Korea in response to North Korea's freezing its graphite-moderated nuclear program under United States and IAEA verification. North Korea agreed to accept the decisions of KEDO, the financier and supplier of the LWRs, with respect to provision of the reactors. KEDO subsequently identified Sinpo as the LWR project site and held a groundbreaking ceremony in August 1997. In December 1999, KEDO and the (South) Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) signed the Turnkey Contract (TKC), permitting full-scale construction of the LWRs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1995, as called for in the 1994 Agreed Framework, the United States and D.P.R.K. negotiated a method to store safely the spent fuel from the D.P.R.K.'s five-megawatt nuclear reactor. Under this method, United States and D.P.R.K. operators worked together to can the spent fuel and store the canisters in a spent fuel pond; canning began in 1995. In April 2000, canning of all accessible spent fuel rods and rod fragments was completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1998, the United States identified an underground site in Kumchang-ni, North Korea, which it suspected of being nuclear-related. In March 1999, after several rounds of negotiations, the United States and D.P.R.K. agreed that the United States would be granted &amp;quot;satisfactory access&amp;quot; to the underground site at Kumchang-ni. In October 2000, during D.P.R.K. Special Envoy Marshal Jo Myong-rok's visit to Washington, and after two visits to the site by teams of U.S. experts, the United States announced in a Joint Communiqué with the D.P.R.K. that U.S. concerns about the site had been resolved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As called for in former Defense Secretary William Perry's official review of U.S. policy toward North Korea, the United States and the D.P.R.K. launched Agreed Framework Implementation Talks in May 2000 The United States and the D.P.R.K. also began negotiations for a comprehensive missile agreement, pursuant to the Perry recommendations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2001, the Bush Administration discontinued nuclear and missile talks, specifying that it intended to review the United States' North Korea policy. The Administration announced on June 6, 2001, that it was prepared to resume dialogue with North Korea on a broader agenda of issues--including North Korea's conventional force posture, missile development and export programs, human rights practices, and humanitarian issues. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2002, a U.S. delegation confronted North Korea with the assessment that the D.P.R.K. was pursuing a uranium enrichment program, in violation of North Korea's obligations under the NPT and its commitments in the 1992 North-South Joint Declaration on Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the Agreed Framework. North Korean officials asserted to the U.S. delegation, headed by then-Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs James A. Kelly, the D.P.R.K.'s &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; to a uranium enrichment program and indicated that that it had such a program. The U.S. side stated that North Korea would have to terminate the program before any further progress could be made in U.S.-D.P.R.K. relations. The United States also made clear that if this program were verifiably eliminated, it would be prepared to work with North Korea on the development of a fundamentally new relationship. Subsequently, the D.P.R.K. has denied the existence of a uranium enrichment program. In November 2002, the member countries of KEDO's Executive Board agreed to suspend heavy fuel oil shipments to North Korea pending a resolution of the nuclear dispute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2002 and early 2003, North Korea terminated the freeze on its existing plutonium-based nuclear facilities at Yongbyon, expelled IAEA inspectors, removed seals and monitoring equipment at Yongbyon, announced its withdrawal from the NPT, and resumed reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel to extract plutonium for weapons purposes. North Korea announced that it was taking these steps to provide itself with a deterrent force in the face of U.S. threats and U.S. &amp;quot;hostile policy.&amp;quot; Beginning in mid-2003, the North repeatedly claimed to have completed reprocessing of the spent fuel rods previously frozen at Yongbyon and publicly said that the resulting fissile material would be used to bolster its &amp;quot;nuclear deterrent force.&amp;quot; There is no independent confirmation of North Korea's claims. The KEDO Executive Board suspended work on the LWR Project beginning December 1, 2003. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Bush has made clear that the United States has no intention to invade or attack North Korea. The President has also stressed that the United States seeks a peaceful end to North Korea's nuclear program in cooperation with North Korea's neighbors, who are directly affected by the threat the nuclear program poses to regional stability and security. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2003, the United States proposed multilateral talks on the North Korean nuclear issue. North Korea initially opposed such a process, maintaining that the nuclear dispute was purely a bilateral matter between the United States and the D.P.R.K. However, under pressure from its neighbors and with the active involvement of China, North Korea agreed to three-party talks with China and the United States in Beijing in April 2003 and to Six-Party Talks with the United States, China, R.O.K., Japan and Russia in August 2003, also in Beijing. During the August 2003 round of Six-Party Talks, North Korea agreed to the eventual elimination of its nuclear programs if the United States were first willing to sign a bilateral &amp;quot;non-aggression treaty&amp;quot; and meet various other conditions, including the provision of substantial amounts of aid and normalization of relations. The North Korean proposal was unacceptable to the United States, which insisted on a multilateral resolution to the issue and opposed provision of benefits before the D.P.R.K.'s complete denuclearization. In October 2003, President Bush said he would consider a multilateral written security guarantee in the context of North Korea's complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of its nuclear weapons program. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China hosted a second round of Six-Party Talks in Beijing in February 2004. The United States saw the results as positive, including the announced intention of all parties to hold a third round by the end of June and to form a working group to maintain momentum between plenary sessions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the third round of Six-Party Talks in Beijing, in June 2004, the United States tabled a comprehensive and substantive proposal aimed at resolving the nuclear issue. All parties agreed to hold a fourth round of talks by the end of September 2004. Despite its commitment, the D.P.R.K. refused to return to the table, and in the months that followed issued a series of provocative statements. In a February 10, 2005, Foreign Ministry statement, the D.P.R.K. declared that it had &amp;quot;manufactured nuclear weapons&amp;quot; and was &amp;quot;indefinitely suspending&amp;quot; its participation in the Six-Party Talks. In Foreign Ministry statements in March, the D.P.R.K. said it would no longer be bound by its voluntary moratorium on ballistic missile launches, and declared itself a nuclear weapons state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following intense diplomatic efforts by the United States and other parties, the fourth round of Six-Party Talks were held in Beijing over a period of 20 days from July-September 2005, with a recess period in August. Discussions resulted in all parties agreeing to a Joint Statement of Principles. In the September 19, 2005 Joint Statement, the six parties unanimously reaffirmed the goal of verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in a peaceful manner. The D.P.R.K. for the first time committed to abandon all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs and to return, at an early date, to the NPT and to IAEA safeguards. The other parties agreed to provide economic cooperation and energy assistance. The United States and the D.P.R.K. agreed to take steps to normalize relations subject to bilateral policies, which for the United States includes our concerns over North Korea's ballistic missile programs and deplorable human rights conditions. While the Joint Statement provides a vision of the end-point of the Six-Party process, much work lies ahead to implement the elements of the agreement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A fifth round of talks began in November 2005, but ended inconclusively as the D.P.R.K. began a boycott of the Six-Party Talks, citing the &amp;quot;U.S.' hostile policy&amp;quot; and specifically U.S. law enforcement action that had led in September to a freeze of North Korean accounts in Macau's Banco Delta Asia (BDA). The United States held discussions in Kuala Lumpur (July 2006) and New York in (September 2006) with other Six-Party partners, except North Korea, along with representatives from other regional powers in the Asia-Pacific region, to discuss Northeast Asian security issues, including North Korea. On July 4-5, 2006 (local Korea time), the D.P.R.K. launched seven ballistic missiles, including six short- and medium-range missiles and one of possible intercontinental range. In response, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1695 on July 15, which demands that the D.P.R.K. suspend all activities related to its ballistic missile program and reestablish existing commitments to a moratorium on missile launching. The resolution also requires all UN Member States, in accordance with their national legal authorities and consistent with international law, to exercise vigilance and prevent missile and missile-related items, materials, goods and technology from being transferred to the D.P.R.K.'s missile or weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs, prevent the procurement of missiles or related items, materials, goods and services from the D.P.R.K., and the transfer of any financial resources in relation to the D.P.R.K.'s missile or WMD programs. The D.P.R.K. immediately rejected the resolution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 9, 2006, North Korea announced the successful test of a nuclear explosive device, verified by the United States on October 11. In response, the United Nations Security Council, citing Chapter VII of the UN Charter, unanimously passed Resolution 1718, condemning North Korea and imposing sanctions on certain luxury goods and trade of military units, WMD and missile-related parts, and technology transfers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6032525.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Six-Party Talks resumed in December 2006 after a 13-month hiatus. Following a bilateral meeting between the United States and D.P.R.K. in Berlin in January 2007, another round of Six-Party Talks was held in February 2007. On February 13, 2007, the parties reached an agreement on &amp;quot;Initial Actions for the Implementation of the Joint Statement&amp;quot; in which North Korea agreed to shut down and seal its Yongbyon nuclear facility, including the reprocessing facility and to invite back IAEA personnel to conduct all necessary monitoring and verification of these actions as agreed between the IAEA and the D.P.R.K. The other five parties agreed to provide emergency energy assistance to North Korea in the amount of 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil (HFO) in the initial phase and the equivalent of 950,000 tons of HFO in the next phase of North Korea's denuclearization. The six parties also established five working groups to form specific plans for implementing the Joint Statement in the following areas: denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, normalization of D.P.R.K.-U.S. relations, normalization of D.P.R.K.-Japan relations, economic and energy cooperation, and a Northeast Asia peace and security mechanism. All parties agreed that the working groups would meet within 30 days of the agreement, which they did. The agreement also envisions the directly-related parties negotiating a permanent peace regime on the Korean Peninsula at an appropriate separate forum. As part of the initial actions, North Korea invited IAEA Director General ElBaradei to Pyongyang in early March for preliminary discussions on the return of the IAEA to the D.P.R.K. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sixth round of Six-Party Talks took place on March 19-23, 2007. The parties reported on the first meetings of the five working groups. At the invitation of the D.P.R.K., Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill visited Pyongyang in June 2007 as part of ongoing consultations with the six parties on implementation of the Initial Actions agreement. In July 2007, the D.P.R.K. shut down the Yongbyon nuclear facility, as well as an uncompleted reactor at Taechon, and IAEA personnel returned to the D.P.R.K. to monitor and verify the shut-down and to seal the facility. In July 2007, the R.O.K. provided the first shipment of 50,000 tons of HFO under the Initial Actions agreement. The Six-Party Heads of Delegation met July 18-20, 2007 to discuss implementation of the D.P.R.K.'s next phase commitments, including the D.P.R.K.'s provision of a complete declaration of all nuclear programs and disablement of existing nuclear facilities. All five working groups met in August and September to discuss detailed plans for implementation of the next phase of the Initial Actions agreement, and will report the results of those discussions to the next Six-Party plenary meeting. As part of the denuclearization process, the D.P.R.K. invited a team of experts from the United States, China, and Russia to visit the Yongbyon nuclear facility in September 2007 to discuss specific steps that could be taken to disable the facility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
North Korea now has the fourth-largest army in the world. It has an estimated 1.21 million armed personnel, compared to about 680,000 in the South. Military spending is estimated at as much as a quarter of GNP, with about 20% of men ages 17-54 in the regular armed forces. North Korean forces have a substantial numerical advantage over the South (between 2 and 3 to 1) in several key categories of offensive weapons--tanks, long-range artillery, and armored personnel carriers. The North has perhaps the world's second-largest special operations force, designed for insertion behind the lines in wartime. While the North has a relatively impressive fleet of submarines, its surface fleet has a very limited capability. Its air force has twice the number of aircraft as the South, but, except for a few advanced fighters, the North's air force is obsolete. The North deploys the bulk of its forces well forward, along the demilitarized zone (DMZ). Several North Korean military tunnels under the DMZ were discovered in the 1970s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the last several years, North Korea has moved more of its rear-echelon troops to hardened bunkers closer to the DMZ. Given the proximity of Seoul to the DMZ (some 25 miles), South Korean and U.S. forces are likely to have little warning of any attack. The United States and South Korea continue to believe that the U.S. troop presence in South Korea remains an effective deterrent. North Korea's nuclear weapons program has also been a source of international tension (see below, Reunification Efforts Since 1971; Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1953, the Military Armistice Commission (MAC) was created to oversee and enforce the terms of the armistice. Over the past decade, North Korea has sought to dismantle the MAC in a push for a new &amp;quot;peace mechanism&amp;quot; on the peninsula. In April 1994, it declared the MAC void and withdrew its representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's economy declined sharply in the 1990s with the end of communism in Eastern Europe, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of bloc-trading with the countries of the former socialist bloc. Gross national income per capita is estimated to have fallen by about one-third between 1990 and 2002. The economy has since stabilized and shown some modest growth in recent years, which may be reflective of increased inter-Korean economic cooperation. Output and living standards, however, remain far below 1990 levels. Other centrally-planned economies in similar situations opted for domestic economic reform and liberalization of trade and investment. North Korea formalized some modest wage and price reforms in 2002, and has increasingly tolerated markets and a small private sector as the state-run distribution system has deteriorated. The regime, however, seems determined to maintain control. In October 2005, emboldened by an improved harvest and increased food donations from South Korea, the North Korean Government banned private grain sales and announced a return to centralized food rationing. Reports indicate this effort to reassert state control and to control inflation has been largely ineffective. Another factor contributing to the economy's poor performance is the disproportionately large share of GDP (thought to be about one-fourth) that North Korea devotes to its military. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korean industry is operating at only a small fraction of capacity due to lack of fuel, spare parts, and other inputs. Agriculture is now 30% of GDP, even though agricultural output has not recovered to early 1990 levels. The infrastructure is generally poor and outdated, and the energy sector has collapsed. About 80% of North Korea's terrain consists of moderately high mountain ranges and partially forested mountains and hills separated by deep, narrow valleys and small, cultivated plains. The most rugged areas are the north and east coasts. Good harbors are found on the eastern coast. Pyongyang, the capital, near the country's west coast, is located on the Taedong River. &lt;br /&gt;
*GNI (2004 estimate): $20.8 billion; 26.7% in agriculture and fishery, 27.2% in mining, 13.7% in manufacturing, 32.3% in services (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita GNI (2004): $914. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--[[rice]], [[potato]]es, [[soybean]]s, [[cattle]], [[pig]]s, [[pork]] and [[egg]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mining and manufacturing: Types--military products; machine building; chemicals; mining (gold, coal, iron ore, limestone, magnesite, etc.); metallurgy; textiles; food processing; tourism. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$1.47 billion: minerals, non-ferrous metals, garments, machinery, electric and electronic products, chemicals, precious metals, wood products, and shellfish products. The D.P.R.K. is also thought to earn hundreds of millions of dollars from the unreported sale of missiles, narcotics and counterfeit cigarettes, and other illicit activities. Imports--$2.88 billion: minerals, petroleum, machinery, textiles, chemicals, non-ferrous metals, and animal products. &lt;br /&gt;
*Major trading partners (2006): (1) China, (2) R.O.K., (3) Thailand, (4) Russia and (5) Japan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea experienced a severe famine following record floods in the summer of 1995 and continues to suffer from chronic food shortages and malnutrition. The United Nations World Food Program (WFP) provided substantial emergency food assistance beginning in 1995 (2 million tons of which came from the United States), but the North Korean Government suspended the WFP emergency program at the end of 2005. It has since permitted the WFP to resume operations on a greatly reduced scale through a Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation. External food aid now comes primarily from China and South Korea in the form of grants and long-term concessional loans. South Korea also donates fertilizer and other materials, while China provides energy. South Korea suspended food and fertilizer shipments to the North in response to North Korea's missile launches in July 2006. However, when severe floods later that month threatened to produce another humanitarian crisis, South Korea announced a one-time donation of 100,000 tons of food, matching contributions from South Korean non-governmental organizations (NGOs). South Korea resumed fertilizer shipments to North Korea in late March 2007. In early July, South Korea announced that it would provide $20 million worth of food assistance to the D.P.R.K. through the World Food Program. South Korea also resumed bilateral food aid in June 2007. Following severe flooding in North Korea in August 2007, South Korea announced that it would provide $7.5 million worth of emergency aid materials to North Korea, and $3.2 million to NGOs providing flood assistance in North Korea. The R.O.K. also provided $39.4 million in construction materials to the D.P.R.K. to assist with reconstruction efforts following the floods. The United States provided $100,000 to two U.S. NGOs for antibiotics in the wake of the floods. The United States also announced that is was prepared to engage in discussions with the D.P.R.K. of monitoring arrangements to provide additional substantial humanitarian assistance, including food aid, to the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Development Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union and termination of subsidized trade arrangements with Russia, other former Communist states, and China, North Korea announced the creation of a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in the northeast regions of Najin (sometime rendered &amp;quot;Rajin&amp;quot;), Chongjin, and Sonbong. Problems with infrastructure, bureaucracy, and uncertainties about investment security and viability have hindered growth and development of this SEZ. The government announced in 2002 plans to establish a Special Administrative Region (SAR) in Sinuiju, at the western end of the North Korea-China border. However, the government has taken few concrete steps to establish the Sinuiju SAR, and its future is uncertain. In addition, North Korea and South Korea have established a special economic zone near the city of Kaesong, where about 20 South Korean companies operate manufacturing facilities employing North Korean workers (see further information under North-South Economic Ties). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea implemented limited micro- and macroeconomic reforms in 2002, including increases in prices and wages, changes in foreign investment laws, a steep currency devaluation, and reforms in industry and management. Though the changes have failed to stimulate recovery of the industrial sector, there are reports of changed economic behavior at the enterprise and individual level. One unintended consequence of the 2002 changes has been severe inflation. An increasing number of North Koreans now try to work in the informal sector to cope with growing hardship and reduced government support. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====North-South Economic Ties====&lt;br /&gt;
Two-way trade between North and South Korea, legalized in 1988, had risen to more than $1 billion by 2005, much of it related to out-processing or assembly work undertaken by South Korean firms in the Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC). A significant portion of the total also includes donated goods provided to the North as humanitarian assistance or as part of inter-Korean cooperation projects. Although business-based and processing-on-commission transactions continued to grow, the bulk of South Korean exports to North Korea in 2006 was still non-commercial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the June 2000 North-South summit, North and South Korea have reconnected their east and west coast railroads and roads where they cross the DMZ and are working to improve these transportation routes. North and South Korea conducted tests of the east and west coast railroads on May 17, 2007. Much of the work done in North Korea has been funded by the South. The west coast rail and road are complete as far north as the KIC (six miles north of the DMZ), but little work is being done north of Kaesong. On the east coast, the road is complete but the rail line is far from operational. Since 2003, tour groups have been using the east coast road to travel from South Korea to Mt. Geumgang in North Korea, where cruise ship-based tours had been permitted since 1998. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of August 2007, 26 South Korean firms were manufacturing goods in the KIC, employing nearly 17,000 North Korean workers. Most of the goods are sold in South Korea; a small quantity is being exported to foreign markets. Ground was broken on the complex in June 2003, and the first products were shipped from the KIC in December 2004. Plans envision 250 firms employing 350,000 workers by 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The Korean Peninsula was first populated by peoples of a Tungusic branch of the Ural-Altaic language family, who migrated from the northwestern regions of Asia. Some of these peoples also populated parts of northeast China (Manchuria); Koreans and Manchurians still show physical similarities. Koreans are racially and linguistically homogeneous. Although there are no indigenous minorities in North Korea, there is a small Chinese community (about 50,000) and some 1,800 Japanese wives who accompanied the roughly 93,000 Koreans returning to the North from Japan between 1959 and 1962. Although dialects exist, the Korean spoken throughout the peninsula is mutually comprehensible. In North Korea, the Korean alphabet (hangul) is used exclusively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Korea's traditional religions are Buddhism and Shamanism. Christian missionaries arrived as early as the 16th century, but it was not until the 19th century that major missionary activity began. Pyongyang was a center of missionary activity, and there was a relatively large Christian population in the north before 1945. Although religious groups exist in North Korea today, the government severely restricts religious activity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the first century AD, the Korean Peninsula was divided into the kingdoms of Shilla, Koguryo, and Paekche. In 668 AD, the Shilla kingdom unified the peninsula. The Koryo dynasty--from which Portuguese missionaries in the 16th century derived the Western name &amp;quot;Korea&amp;quot;--succeeded the Shilla kingdom in 935. The Choson dynasty, ruled by members of the Yi clan, supplanted Koryo in 1392 and lasted until Japan annexed Korea in 1910. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout its history, Korea has been invaded, influenced, and fought over by its larger neighbors. Korea was under Mongolian occupation from 1231 until the early 14th century. The unifier of Japan, Hideyoshi Toyotomi, launched major invasions of Korea in 1592 and 1597. When Western powers focused &amp;quot;gunboat&amp;quot; diplomacy on Korea in the mid-19th century, Korea's rulers adopted a closed-door policy, earning Korea the title of &amp;quot;Hermit Kingdom.&amp;quot; Though the Choson dynasty recognized China's hegemony in East Asia, Korea was independent until the late 19th century. At that time, China sought to block growing Japanese influence on the Korean Peninsula and Russian pressure for commercial gains there. The competition produced the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-95 and the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05. Japan emerged victorious from both wars and in 1910 annexed Korea as part of the growing Japanese empire. Japanese colonial administration was characterized by tight control from Tokyo and ruthless efforts to supplant Korean language and culture. Organized Korean resistance during the colonial era was generally unsuccessful, and Japan remained firmly in control of the Peninsula until the end of World War II in 1945. The surrender of Japan in August 1945 led to the immediate division of Korea into two occupation zones, with the United States administering the southern half of the peninsula and the U.S.S.R. taking over the area to the north of the 38th parallel. This division was meant to be temporary until the United States, U.K., Soviet Union, and China could arrange a trusteeship administration. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 1945, a conference was convened in Moscow to discuss the future of Korea. A five-year trusteeship was discussed, and a joint Soviet-American commission was established. The commission met intermittently in Seoul but deadlocked over the issue of establishing a national government. In September 1947, with no solution in sight, the United States submitted the Korean question to the UN General Assembly. Initial hopes for a unified, independent Korea quickly evaporated as the politics of the Cold War and domestic opposition to the trusteeship plan resulted in the 1948 establishment of two separate nations with diametrically opposed political, economic, and social systems. Elections were held in the South under UN observation, and on August 15, 1948, the Republic of Korea (R.O.K.) was established in the South. Syngman Rhee, a nationalist leader, became the Republic's first president. On September 9, 1948, the North established the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (D.P.R.K.) headed by then-Premier Kim Il-sung, who had been cultivated and supported by the U.S.S.R. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Korean War of 1950-53==== &lt;br /&gt;
Almost immediately after establishment of the D.P.R.K., guerrilla warfare, border clashes, and naval battles erupted between the two Koreas. North Korean forces launched a massive surprise attack and invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950. The United Nations, in accordance with the terms of its Charter, engaged in its first collective action and established the UN Command (UNC), to which 16 member nations sent troops and assistance. Next to South Korea, the United States contributed the largest contingent of forces to this international effort. The battle line fluctuated north and south, and after large numbers of Chinese &amp;quot;People's Volunteers&amp;quot; intervened to assist the North, the battle line stabilized north of Seoul near the 38th parallel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Armistice negotiations began in July 1951, but hostilities continued until July 27, 1953. On that date, at Panmunjom, the military commanders of the North Korean People's Army, the Chinese People's Volunteers, and the UNC signed an armistice agreement. Neither the United States nor South Korea is a signatory to the armistice per se, although both adhere to it through the UNC. No comprehensive peace agreement has replaced the 1953 armistice pact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theodora.com/wfbcurrent/korea_north/index.html Korea, North - 2007] Geographic.org &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Copyright Details (US Government)}} &lt;br /&gt;
source= [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2792.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictatorships]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Korea]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=North_Korea&amp;diff=534209</id>
		<title>North Korea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=North_Korea&amp;diff=534209"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T17:33:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Terrorism */  The US officially remove North Korea from its watch list, not to say we shouldn't still be careful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =조선민주주의인민공화국&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; ''Democratic People's Republic of Korea''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Korea north rel 2005.jpg &lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =NorthKoreaFlag.gif‎|thumb|170px&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=P'yongyang&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Communist totalitarian state&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Korean&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =46,526 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =23,301,725(2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$22.85 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$1,007 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	= North Korean won&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic People's Republic of Korea''', or '''North Korea''', is a totalitarian state in eastern Asia that occupies the Korean peninsula north of a line that roughly follows the 38th parallel. Ruled by dictator and 'Dear Leader' [[Kim Jong Il]], who succeeded his father the 'Great Leader' [[Kim Il Sung]], it is the last completely [[Stalinism|Stalinist]] government on Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The official North Korean ideology is known as [[Juche]] (roughly translates as &amp;quot;national self-reliance&amp;quot;), and since the mid 1990s, [[Songun]] (&amp;quot;military first&amp;quot;).  A cult-like devotion to the &amp;quot;Great Leader&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Dear Leader&amp;quot; is expected of citizens, and heavily promoted in the North Korean news media which has little actual &amp;quot;news&amp;quot; and mostly consists of effuse praise toward Kim Jong Il, grandiose and unsubstantiated claims about great feats by him and his father, and repetitious admonitions that the Korean people are totally united as one behind his leadership; in contrast between 1 million and 2 million North Koreans have died of starvation in recent years because the Kim government has so mismanaged the economy, particularly agriculture, and has hampered outside efforts at relief. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071009/COMMENTARY/110090010/1012&amp;amp;template=nextpage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Atrocities of the Korean War==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fred Schwarz]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:When the Communists retreated in North Korea, they took with them all the able-bodied personnel to serve as laborers. Those who could not stand the rigors of the northward journey-- old men and women, pregnant women, very young children and babies-- they massacred and buried in a [[mass grave]] if they belonged to the untrustworthy social classes. The advancing American troops time and again found mass graves filled with the bodies of those murdered by the Communists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.schwarzreport.org/yct/01ycttc.htm You Can Trust the Communists - To Be Communists]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2006): 23.1 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate: About +0.98%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: [[Korean]]; small ethnic Chinese and Japanese populations. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: [[Buddhism]], [[Confucianism]], [[Shamanism]], [[Chongdogyo]], [[Christian]]; autonomous religious activities have been virtually nonexistent since 1945. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Korean. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory--11. Attendance--3 million (primary, 1.5 million; secondary, 1.2 million; tertiary, 0.3 million). Literacy--99%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Health (1998): Medical treatment is free; one doctor for every 700 inhabitants; one hospital bed for every 350; there are severe shortages of medicines and medical equipment. Infant mortality rate--23.29 /1,000 (2006 est.). Life expectancy--males 68 yrs., females 74 yrs. (2006 est.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea has a centralized government under the rigid control of the communist Korean Workers' Party (KWP), to which all government officials belong. A few minor political parties are allowed to exist in name only. Kim Il-sung ruled North Korea from 1948 until his death in July 1994. Kim served both as Secretary General of the KWP and as President of North Korea. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Little is known about the actual lines of power and authority in the North Korean Government despite the formal structure set forth in the constitution. Following the death of Kim Il-sung, his son--Kim Jong-il--inherited supreme power. Kim Jong-il was named General Secretary of the KWP in October 1997, and in September 1998, the Supreme People's Assembly (SPA) reconfirmed Kim Jong-il as Chairman of the National Defense Commission and declared that position as the &amp;quot;highest office of state.&amp;quot; However, the President of the Presidium of the National Assembly, Kim Yong-nam, serves as the nominal head of state. North Korea's 1972 constitution was amended in late 1992 and in September 1998. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution designates the Central People's Committee (CPC) as the government's top policymaking body. The CPC makes policy decisions and supervises the cabinet, or State Administration Council (SAC). The SAC is headed by a premier and is the dominant administrative and executive agency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officially, the legislature, the SPA, is the highest organ of state power. Its members are elected every four years. Usually only two meetings are held annually, each lasting a few days. A standing committee elected by the SPA performs legislative functions when the Assembly is not in session. In reality, the Assembly serves only to ratify decisions made by the ruling KWP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's judiciary is &amp;quot;accountable&amp;quot; to the SPA and the president. The SPA's standing committee also appoints judges to the highest court for four-year terms that are concurrent with those of the Assembly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Administratively, North Korea is divided into nine provinces and four provincial-level municipalities--[[Pyongyang]], [[Chongjin]], [[Nampo]], and [[Kaesong]]. It also appears to be divided into nine military districts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Party and Government Officials=== &lt;br /&gt;
*Kim Jong-il--General Secretary of the KWP; Supreme Commander of the People's Armed Forces; Chairman of the National Defense *Commission; son of North Korea's founder Kim Il-sung&lt;br /&gt;
*Kim Yong-nam--President of the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly; titular head of state&lt;br /&gt;
*Pak Gil-yon--Ambassador to D.P.R.K. Permanent Mission to the UN&lt;br /&gt;
*Pak Ui-chun--Minister of Foreign Affairs &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's relationship with the South has determined much of its post-[[World War II]] history and still undergirds much of its foreign policy. North and South Korea have had a difficult and acrimonious relationship from the Korean War. In recent years, North Korea has pursued a mixed policy--seeking to develop economic relations with South Korea and to win the support of the South Korean public for greater North-South engagement while at the same time continuing to denounce the R.O.K.'s security relationship with the United States and maintaining a threatening conventional force posture on the DMZ and in adjacent waters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The military demarcation line (MDL) of separation between the belligerent sides at the close of the Korean War divides North Korea from South Korea. A demilitarized zone (DMZ) extends for 2,000 meters (just over 1 mile) on either side of the MDL. Both the North and South Korean governments hold that the MDL is only a temporary administrative line, not a permanent border. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the postwar period, both Korean governments have repeatedly affirmed their desire to reunify the Korean Peninsula, but until 1971 the two governments had no direct, official communications or other contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reunification Efforts Since 1971====&lt;br /&gt;
In August 1971, North and South Korea held talks through their respective Red Cross societies with the aim of reuniting the many Korean families separated following the division of Korea and the Korean War. In July 1972, the two sides agreed to work toward peaceful reunification and an end to the hostile atmosphere prevailing on the peninsula. Officials exchanged visits, and regular communications were established through a North-South coordinating committee and the Red Cross. These initial contacts broke down in 1973 following South Korean President Park Chung-hee's announcement that the South would seek separate entry into the United Nations, and after the kidnapping of South Korean opposition leader Kim Dae-jung--perceived as friendly to unified entry into the UN--by South Korean intelligence services. There was no other significant contact between North and South Korea until 1984. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dialogue was renewed in September 1984, when South Korea accepted the North's offer to provide relief goods to victims of severe flooding in South Korea. Red Cross talks to address the plight of separated families resumed, as did talks on economic and trade issues and parliamentary-level discussions. However, the North then unilaterally suspended all talks in January 1986, arguing that the annual U.S.-ROK &amp;quot;Team Spirit&amp;quot; military exercise was inconsistent with dialogue. There was a brief flurry of negotiations that year on co-hosting the upcoming 1988 Seoul Olympics, which ended in failure and was followed by the 1987 bombing of a South Korean commercial aircraft (KAL 858) by North Korean agents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 1988, South Korean President Roh Tae-woo called for new efforts to promote North-South exchanges, family reunification, inter-Korean trade, and contact in international forums. Roh followed up this initiative in a UN General Assembly speech in which South Korea offered for the first time to discuss security matters with the North. Initial meetings that grew out of Roh's proposals started in September 1989. In September 1990, the first of eight prime minister-level meetings between North Korean and South Korean officials took place in Seoul. The prime ministerial talks resulted in two major agreements: the Agreement on Reconciliation, Nonaggression, Exchanges, and Cooperation (the &amp;quot;Basic Agreement&amp;quot;) and the Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (the &amp;quot;Joint Declaration&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Basic Agreement, signed on December 13, 1991, called for reconciliation and nonaggression and established four joint commissions. These commissions--on South-North reconciliation, South-North military affairs, South-North economic exchanges and cooperation, and South-North social and cultural exchange--were to work out the specifics for implementing the basic agreement. Subcommittees to examine specific issues were created, and liaison offices were established in Panmunjom, but in the fall of 1992 the process came to a halt because of rising tension over North Korea's nuclear program. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Joint Declaration on denuclearization was initialed on December 31, 1991. It forbade both sides from testing, manufacturing, producing, receiving, possessing, storing, deploying, or using nuclear weapons and forbade the possession of nuclear reprocessing and uranium enrichment facilities. A procedure for inter-Korean inspection was to be organized and a North-South Joint Nuclear Control Commission (JNCC) was mandated to verify the denuclearization of the peninsula. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 30, 1992, the D.P.R.K. finally signed a nuclear safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), as it had pledged to do in 1985 when it acceded to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This safeguards agreement allowed IAEA inspections to begin in June 1992. In March 1992, the JNCC was established in accordance with the Joint Declaration, but subsequent meetings failed to reach agreement on the main issue of establishing a bilateral inspection regime. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the 1990s progressed, concern over the North's nuclear program became a major issue in North-South relations and between North Korea and the United States. The lack of progress on implementation of the Joint Declaration's provision for an inter-Korean nuclear inspection regime led to reinstatement of the U.S.-R.O.K. Team Spirit military exercise for 1993. The situation worsened rapidly when North Korea, in January 1993, refused IAEA access to two suspected nuclear waste sites and then announced in March 1993 its intent to withdraw from the NPT. During the next two years, the United States held direct talks with the D.P.R.K. that resulted in a series of agreements on nuclear matters, including the 1994 Agreed Framework (which broke down in 2002 when North Korea was discovered to be pursuing a uranium enrichment program for nuclear weapons--see below, Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At his inauguration in February 1998, R.O.K. President Kim Dae-jung enunciated a new policy of engagement with the D.P.R.K., dubbed &amp;quot;the Sunshine Policy.&amp;quot; The policy had three fundamental principles: no tolerance of provocations from the North, no intention to absorb the North, and the separation of political cooperation from economic cooperation. Private sector overtures would be based on commercial and humanitarian considerations. The use of government resources would entail reciprocity. This policy set the stage for the first inter-Korean summit, held in Pyongyang June 13-15, 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.O.K. President Roh Moo-hyun, following his inauguration in February 2003, has continued his predecessor's policy of engagement with the North, though he abandoned the name &amp;quot;Sunshine Policy.&amp;quot; The United States supports President Roh's engagement policy and North-South dialogue and cooperation. Major economic reunification projects have included a tourism development in Mt. Geumgang, the re-establishment of road and rail links across the demilitarized zone (DMZ) and a joint North-South industrial park near the North Korean city of Kaesong (see further information below in the section on the Economy). In August 2007, the R.O.K. and D.P.R.K. announced plans to hold a second inter-Korean summit, scheduled for October 2-4 in Pyongyang. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations Outside the Korean Peninsula=== &lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the Cold War, North Korea balanced its relations with China and the Soviet Union to extract the maximum benefit from the relationships at minimum political cost. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and China, the Soviet-backed Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia, and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan created strains between China and the Soviet Union and, in turn, in North Korea's relations with its two major communist allies. North Korea tried to avoid becoming embroiled in the Sino-Soviet split, obtaining aid from both the Soviet Union and China and trying to avoid dependence on either. Following Kim Il-sung's 1984 visit to Moscow, there was an improvement in Soviet-D.P.R.K. relations, resulting in renewed deliveries of Soviet weaponry to North Korea and increases in economic aid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The establishment of diplomatic relations by South Korea with the Soviet Union in 1990 and with China in 1992 seriously strained relations between North Korea and its traditional allies. Moreover, the fall of communism in eastern Europe in 1989 and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 resulted in a significant drop in communist aid to North Korea. Despite these changes and its past reliance on this military and economic assistance, North Korea continued to proclaim a militantly independent stance in its foreign policy in accordance with its official ideology of &amp;quot;juche,&amp;quot; or self-reliance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both North and South Korea became parties to the Biological Weapons Convention in 1987. (North Korea is not a member of the Chemical Weapons Convention, nor is it a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime, or MTCR.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea has maintained membership in some multilateral organizations. It became a member of the UN in September 1991. North Korea also belongs to the Food and Agriculture Organization; the International Civil Aviation Organization; the International Postal Union; the UN Conference on Trade and Development; the International Telecommunications Union; the UN Development Program; the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; the World Health Organization; the World Intellectual Property Organization; the World Meteorological Organization; the International Maritime Organization; the International Committee of the Red Cross; and the Nonaligned Movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid-1990s, when the economic situation worsened dramatically and following the death of D.P.R.K. founder Kim Il-sung, the North abandoned some of the more extreme manifestations of its &amp;quot;self reliance&amp;quot; ideology to accept foreign humanitarian relief and create the possibility, as noted below, for foreign investment in the North. In subsequent years, the D.P.R.K. has continued to pursue a tightly restricted policy of opening to the world in search of economic aid and development assistance. However, this has been matched by an increased determination to counter perceived external and internal threats by a self-proclaimed &amp;quot;military first&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Songun&amp;quot;) policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the present period of limited, extremely cautious opening, North Korea has sought to broaden its formal diplomatic relationships. In July 2000, North Korea began participating in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), with Foreign Minister Paek Nam-sun attending the ARF ministerial meeting in Bangkok. The D.P.R.K. also expanded its bilateral diplomatic ties in that year, establishing diplomatic relations with Italy, Australia, the Philippines, Australia, Canada, the U.K., Germany, and many other European countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the September 19, 2005 Joint Statement issued at the end of the fourth round of Six-Party Talks, the United States and the D.P.R.K. committed to undertake steps to normalize relations (see below, Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula). The D.P.R.K. and Japan also agreed to take steps to normalize relations and to discuss outstanding issues of concern, such as abductions. The U.S.-D.P.R.K. and Japan-D.P.R.K. bilateral working groups on normalization of relations met in March and September 2007. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Terrorism==== &lt;br /&gt;
The D.P.R.K. is not known to have sponsored terrorist acts since the 1987 bombing of KAL flight 858. Pyongyang continues to provide sanctuary to members of the Japanese Communist League-Red Army Faction (JRA) who participated in the hijacking of a Japan Airlines flight to North Korea in 1970. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D.P.R.K. has made several statements condemning terrorism. In October 2000, the United States and the D.P.R.K. issued a joint statement on terrorism in which &amp;quot;the two sides agreed that international terrorism poses an unacceptable threat to global security and peace, and that terrorism should be opposed in all its forms.&amp;quot; The United States and the D.P.R.K. agreed to support the international legal regime combating international terrorism and to cooperate with each other to fight terrorism. The D.P.R.K. became a signatory to the Convention for the Suppression of Financing of Terrorism and a party to the Convention Against the Taking of Hostages in November 2001. In the February 13, 2007 Initial Actions agreement, the United States agreed to begin the process of removing the designation of the D.P.R.K. as a state sponsor of terrorism. On Saturday October 11, 2008. The United States officially removed North Korea from the Terrorism Watch List. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,436382,00.html North Korea no longer a recognized Terrorist sponsor.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Abductions==== &lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the D.P.R.K. has also been involved in the abduction of foreign citizens. In 2002, Kim Jong-il acknowledged to Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi the involvement of D.P.R.K. &amp;quot;special institutions&amp;quot; in the kidnapping of Japanese citizens between 1977 and 1983 and said that those responsible had been punished. While five surviving victims and their families were allowed to leave the D.P.R.K. and resettle in Japan in October 2002, 12 other cases remain unresolved and continue to be a major issue in D.P.R.K.-Japanese relations. In October 2005, the D.P.R.K. acknowledged for the first time having kidnapped R.O.K. citizens in previous decades, claiming that several abductees, as well as several POWs from the Korean War, were still alive. In June 2006, North Korea allowed Kim Young-nam, a South Korean abducted by the North in 1978, to participate in a family reunion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States policy towards North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
====U.S. Support for North-South Dialogue and Reunification==== &lt;br /&gt;
The United States supports the peaceful reunification of Korea on terms acceptable to the Korean people and recognizes that the future of the Korean Peninsula is primarily a matter for them to decide. The United States believes that a constructive and serious dialogue between the authorities of North and South Korea is necessary to resolve outstanding problems, including the North's nuclear program and human rights abuses, and to encourage the North's integration with the rest of the international community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula====&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear weapons state in 1985. North and South Korean talks begun in 1990 resulted in the 1992 Joint Declaration for a Non-Nuclear Korean Peninsula (see, under Foreign Relations, Reunification Efforts Since 1971). However, the international standoff over the North's failure to implement an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency for the inspection of the North's nuclear facilities led Pyongyang to announce in March 1993 its intention to withdraw from the NPT. A UN Security Council Resolution in May 1993 urged the D.P.R.K. to cooperate with the IAEA and to implement the 1992 North-South Denuclearization Statement. It also urged all UN Member States to encourage the D.P.R.K. to respond positively to this resolution and to facilitate a solution to the nuclear issue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States opened talks with the D.P.R.K. in June 1993 and eventually reached agreement in October 1994 on a diplomatic roadmap, known as the Agreed Framework, for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. The Agreed Framework called for the following steps: &lt;br /&gt;
*North Korea agreed to freeze its existing nuclear program and allow monitoring by the IAEA. &lt;br /&gt;
*Both sides agreed to cooperate to replace the D.P.R.K.'s graphite-moderated reactors with light-water reactor (LWR) power plants, by a target date of 2003, to be financed and supplied by an international consortium (later identified as the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization or KEDO). &lt;br /&gt;
*As an interim measure, the United States agreed to provide North Korea with 500,000 tons of heavy fuel oil annually until the first reactor was built. &lt;br /&gt;
*The United States and D.P.R.K. agreed to work together to store safely the spent fuel from the five-megawatt reactor and dispose of it in a safe manner that did not involve reprocessing in the D.P.R.K. &lt;br /&gt;
*The two sides agreed to move toward full normalization of political and economic relations. &lt;br /&gt;
*The two sides agreed to work together for peace and security on a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. &lt;br /&gt;
*The two sides agreed to work together to strengthen the international nuclear non-proliferation regime. &lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the terms of the Agreed Framework, in January 1995 the U.S. Government eased economic sanctions against North Korea in response to North Korea's freezing its graphite-moderated nuclear program under United States and IAEA verification. North Korea agreed to accept the decisions of KEDO, the financier and supplier of the LWRs, with respect to provision of the reactors. KEDO subsequently identified Sinpo as the LWR project site and held a groundbreaking ceremony in August 1997. In December 1999, KEDO and the (South) Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) signed the Turnkey Contract (TKC), permitting full-scale construction of the LWRs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1995, as called for in the 1994 Agreed Framework, the United States and D.P.R.K. negotiated a method to store safely the spent fuel from the D.P.R.K.'s five-megawatt nuclear reactor. Under this method, United States and D.P.R.K. operators worked together to can the spent fuel and store the canisters in a spent fuel pond; canning began in 1995. In April 2000, canning of all accessible spent fuel rods and rod fragments was completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1998, the United States identified an underground site in Kumchang-ni, North Korea, which it suspected of being nuclear-related. In March 1999, after several rounds of negotiations, the United States and D.P.R.K. agreed that the United States would be granted &amp;quot;satisfactory access&amp;quot; to the underground site at Kumchang-ni. In October 2000, during D.P.R.K. Special Envoy Marshal Jo Myong-rok's visit to Washington, and after two visits to the site by teams of U.S. experts, the United States announced in a Joint Communiqué with the D.P.R.K. that U.S. concerns about the site had been resolved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As called for in former Defense Secretary William Perry's official review of U.S. policy toward North Korea, the United States and the D.P.R.K. launched Agreed Framework Implementation Talks in May 2000 The United States and the D.P.R.K. also began negotiations for a comprehensive missile agreement, pursuant to the Perry recommendations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2001, the Bush Administration discontinued nuclear and missile talks, specifying that it intended to review the United States' North Korea policy. The Administration announced on June 6, 2001, that it was prepared to resume dialogue with North Korea on a broader agenda of issues--including North Korea's conventional force posture, missile development and export programs, human rights practices, and humanitarian issues. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2002, a U.S. delegation confronted North Korea with the assessment that the D.P.R.K. was pursuing a uranium enrichment program, in violation of North Korea's obligations under the NPT and its commitments in the 1992 North-South Joint Declaration on Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the Agreed Framework. North Korean officials asserted to the U.S. delegation, headed by then-Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs James A. Kelly, the D.P.R.K.'s &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; to a uranium enrichment program and indicated that that it had such a program. The U.S. side stated that North Korea would have to terminate the program before any further progress could be made in U.S.-D.P.R.K. relations. The United States also made clear that if this program were verifiably eliminated, it would be prepared to work with North Korea on the development of a fundamentally new relationship. Subsequently, the D.P.R.K. has denied the existence of a uranium enrichment program. In November 2002, the member countries of KEDO's Executive Board agreed to suspend heavy fuel oil shipments to North Korea pending a resolution of the nuclear dispute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2002 and early 2003, North Korea terminated the freeze on its existing plutonium-based nuclear facilities at Yongbyon, expelled IAEA inspectors, removed seals and monitoring equipment at Yongbyon, announced its withdrawal from the NPT, and resumed reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel to extract plutonium for weapons purposes. North Korea announced that it was taking these steps to provide itself with a deterrent force in the face of U.S. threats and U.S. &amp;quot;hostile policy.&amp;quot; Beginning in mid-2003, the North repeatedly claimed to have completed reprocessing of the spent fuel rods previously frozen at Yongbyon and publicly said that the resulting fissile material would be used to bolster its &amp;quot;nuclear deterrent force.&amp;quot; There is no independent confirmation of North Korea's claims. The KEDO Executive Board suspended work on the LWR Project beginning December 1, 2003. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Bush has made clear that the United States has no intention to invade or attack North Korea. The President has also stressed that the United States seeks a peaceful end to North Korea's nuclear program in cooperation with North Korea's neighbors, who are directly affected by the threat the nuclear program poses to regional stability and security. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2003, the United States proposed multilateral talks on the North Korean nuclear issue. North Korea initially opposed such a process, maintaining that the nuclear dispute was purely a bilateral matter between the United States and the D.P.R.K. However, under pressure from its neighbors and with the active involvement of China, North Korea agreed to three-party talks with China and the United States in Beijing in April 2003 and to Six-Party Talks with the United States, China, R.O.K., Japan and Russia in August 2003, also in Beijing. During the August 2003 round of Six-Party Talks, North Korea agreed to the eventual elimination of its nuclear programs if the United States were first willing to sign a bilateral &amp;quot;non-aggression treaty&amp;quot; and meet various other conditions, including the provision of substantial amounts of aid and normalization of relations. The North Korean proposal was unacceptable to the United States, which insisted on a multilateral resolution to the issue and opposed provision of benefits before the D.P.R.K.'s complete denuclearization. In October 2003, President Bush said he would consider a multilateral written security guarantee in the context of North Korea's complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of its nuclear weapons program. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China hosted a second round of Six-Party Talks in Beijing in February 2004. The United States saw the results as positive, including the announced intention of all parties to hold a third round by the end of June and to form a working group to maintain momentum between plenary sessions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the third round of Six-Party Talks in Beijing, in June 2004, the United States tabled a comprehensive and substantive proposal aimed at resolving the nuclear issue. All parties agreed to hold a fourth round of talks by the end of September 2004. Despite its commitment, the D.P.R.K. refused to return to the table, and in the months that followed issued a series of provocative statements. In a February 10, 2005, Foreign Ministry statement, the D.P.R.K. declared that it had &amp;quot;manufactured nuclear weapons&amp;quot; and was &amp;quot;indefinitely suspending&amp;quot; its participation in the Six-Party Talks. In Foreign Ministry statements in March, the D.P.R.K. said it would no longer be bound by its voluntary moratorium on ballistic missile launches, and declared itself a nuclear weapons state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following intense diplomatic efforts by the United States and other parties, the fourth round of Six-Party Talks were held in Beijing over a period of 20 days from July-September 2005, with a recess period in August. Discussions resulted in all parties agreeing to a Joint Statement of Principles. In the September 19, 2005 Joint Statement, the six parties unanimously reaffirmed the goal of verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in a peaceful manner. The D.P.R.K. for the first time committed to abandon all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs and to return, at an early date, to the NPT and to IAEA safeguards. The other parties agreed to provide economic cooperation and energy assistance. The United States and the D.P.R.K. agreed to take steps to normalize relations subject to bilateral policies, which for the United States includes our concerns over North Korea's ballistic missile programs and deplorable human rights conditions. While the Joint Statement provides a vision of the end-point of the Six-Party process, much work lies ahead to implement the elements of the agreement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A fifth round of talks began in November 2005, but ended inconclusively as the D.P.R.K. began a boycott of the Six-Party Talks, citing the &amp;quot;U.S.' hostile policy&amp;quot; and specifically U.S. law enforcement action that had led in September to a freeze of North Korean accounts in Macau's Banco Delta Asia (BDA). The United States held discussions in Kuala Lumpur (July 2006) and New York in (September 2006) with other Six-Party partners, except North Korea, along with representatives from other regional powers in the Asia-Pacific region, to discuss Northeast Asian security issues, including North Korea. On July 4-5, 2006 (local Korea time), the D.P.R.K. launched seven ballistic missiles, including six short- and medium-range missiles and one of possible intercontinental range. In response, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1695 on July 15, which demands that the D.P.R.K. suspend all activities related to its ballistic missile program and reestablish existing commitments to a moratorium on missile launching. The resolution also requires all UN Member States, in accordance with their national legal authorities and consistent with international law, to exercise vigilance and prevent missile and missile-related items, materials, goods and technology from being transferred to the D.P.R.K.'s missile or weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs, prevent the procurement of missiles or related items, materials, goods and services from the D.P.R.K., and the transfer of any financial resources in relation to the D.P.R.K.'s missile or WMD programs. The D.P.R.K. immediately rejected the resolution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 9, 2006, North Korea announced the successful test of a nuclear explosive device, verified by the United States on October 11. In response, the United Nations Security Council, citing Chapter VII of the UN Charter, unanimously passed Resolution 1718, condemning North Korea and imposing sanctions on certain luxury goods and trade of military units, WMD and missile-related parts, and technology transfers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6032525.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Six-Party Talks resumed in December 2006 after a 13-month hiatus. Following a bilateral meeting between the United States and D.P.R.K. in Berlin in January 2007, another round of Six-Party Talks was held in February 2007. On February 13, 2007, the parties reached an agreement on &amp;quot;Initial Actions for the Implementation of the Joint Statement&amp;quot; in which North Korea agreed to shut down and seal its Yongbyon nuclear facility, including the reprocessing facility and to invite back IAEA personnel to conduct all necessary monitoring and verification of these actions as agreed between the IAEA and the D.P.R.K. The other five parties agreed to provide emergency energy assistance to North Korea in the amount of 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil (HFO) in the initial phase and the equivalent of 950,000 tons of HFO in the next phase of North Korea's denuclearization. The six parties also established five working groups to form specific plans for implementing the Joint Statement in the following areas: denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, normalization of D.P.R.K.-U.S. relations, normalization of D.P.R.K.-Japan relations, economic and energy cooperation, and a Northeast Asia peace and security mechanism. All parties agreed that the working groups would meet within 30 days of the agreement, which they did. The agreement also envisions the directly-related parties negotiating a permanent peace regime on the Korean Peninsula at an appropriate separate forum. As part of the initial actions, North Korea invited IAEA Director General ElBaradei to Pyongyang in early March for preliminary discussions on the return of the IAEA to the D.P.R.K. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sixth round of Six-Party Talks took place on March 19-23, 2007. The parties reported on the first meetings of the five working groups. At the invitation of the D.P.R.K., Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill visited Pyongyang in June 2007 as part of ongoing consultations with the six parties on implementation of the Initial Actions agreement. In July 2007, the D.P.R.K. shut down the Yongbyon nuclear facility, as well as an uncompleted reactor at Taechon, and IAEA personnel returned to the D.P.R.K. to monitor and verify the shut-down and to seal the facility. In July 2007, the R.O.K. provided the first shipment of 50,000 tons of HFO under the Initial Actions agreement. The Six-Party Heads of Delegation met July 18-20, 2007 to discuss implementation of the D.P.R.K.'s next phase commitments, including the D.P.R.K.'s provision of a complete declaration of all nuclear programs and disablement of existing nuclear facilities. All five working groups met in August and September to discuss detailed plans for implementation of the next phase of the Initial Actions agreement, and will report the results of those discussions to the next Six-Party plenary meeting. As part of the denuclearization process, the D.P.R.K. invited a team of experts from the United States, China, and Russia to visit the Yongbyon nuclear facility in September 2007 to discuss specific steps that could be taken to disable the facility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
North Korea now has the fourth-largest army in the world. It has an estimated 1.21 million armed personnel, compared to about 680,000 in the South. Military spending is estimated at as much as a quarter of GNP, with about 20% of men ages 17-54 in the regular armed forces. North Korean forces have a substantial numerical advantage over the South (between 2 and 3 to 1) in several key categories of offensive weapons--tanks, long-range artillery, and armored personnel carriers. The North has perhaps the world's second-largest special operations force, designed for insertion behind the lines in wartime. While the North has a relatively impressive fleet of submarines, its surface fleet has a very limited capability. Its air force has twice the number of aircraft as the South, but, except for a few advanced fighters, the North's air force is obsolete. The North deploys the bulk of its forces well forward, along the demilitarized zone (DMZ). Several North Korean military tunnels under the DMZ were discovered in the 1970s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the last several years, North Korea has moved more of its rear-echelon troops to hardened bunkers closer to the DMZ. Given the proximity of Seoul to the DMZ (some 25 miles), South Korean and U.S. forces are likely to have little warning of any attack. The United States and South Korea continue to believe that the U.S. troop presence in South Korea remains an effective deterrent. North Korea's nuclear weapons program has also been a source of international tension (see below, Reunification Efforts Since 1971; Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1953, the Military Armistice Commission (MAC) was created to oversee and enforce the terms of the armistice. Over the past decade, North Korea has sought to dismantle the MAC in a push for a new &amp;quot;peace mechanism&amp;quot; on the peninsula. In April 1994, it declared the MAC void and withdrew its representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's economy declined sharply in the 1990s with the end of communism in Eastern Europe, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of bloc-trading with the countries of the former socialist bloc. Gross national income per capita is estimated to have fallen by about one-third between 1990 and 2002. The economy has since stabilized and shown some modest growth in recent years, which may be reflective of increased inter-Korean economic cooperation. Output and living standards, however, remain far below 1990 levels. Other centrally-planned economies in similar situations opted for domestic economic reform and liberalization of trade and investment. North Korea formalized some modest wage and price reforms in 2002, and has increasingly tolerated markets and a small private sector as the state-run distribution system has deteriorated. The regime, however, seems determined to maintain control. In October 2005, emboldened by an improved harvest and increased food donations from South Korea, the North Korean Government banned private grain sales and announced a return to centralized food rationing. Reports indicate this effort to reassert state control and to control inflation has been largely ineffective. Another factor contributing to the economy's poor performance is the disproportionately large share of GDP (thought to be about one-fourth) that North Korea devotes to its military. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korean industry is operating at only a small fraction of capacity due to lack of fuel, spare parts, and other inputs. Agriculture is now 30% of GDP, even though agricultural output has not recovered to early 1990 levels. The infrastructure is generally poor and outdated, and the energy sector has collapsed. About 80% of North Korea's terrain consists of moderately high mountain ranges and partially forested mountains and hills separated by deep, narrow valleys and small, cultivated plains. The most rugged areas are the north and east coasts. Good harbors are found on the eastern coast. Pyongyang, the capital, near the country's west coast, is located on the Taedong River. &lt;br /&gt;
*GNI (2004 estimate): $20.8 billion; 26.7% in agriculture and fishery, 27.2% in mining, 13.7% in manufacturing, 32.3% in services (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita GNI (2004): $914. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--[[rice]], [[potato]]es, [[soybean]]s, [[cattle]], [[pig]]s, [[pork]] and [[egg]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mining and manufacturing: Types--military products; machine building; chemicals; mining (gold, coal, iron ore, limestone, magnesite, etc.); metallurgy; textiles; food processing; tourism. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$1.47 billion: minerals, non-ferrous metals, garments, machinery, electric and electronic products, chemicals, precious metals, wood products, and shellfish products. The D.P.R.K. is also thought to earn hundreds of millions of dollars from the unreported sale of missiles, narcotics and counterfeit cigarettes, and other illicit activities. Imports--$2.88 billion: minerals, petroleum, machinery, textiles, chemicals, non-ferrous metals, and animal products. &lt;br /&gt;
*Major trading partners (2006): (1) China, (2) R.O.K., (3) Thailand, (4) Russia and (5) Japan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea experienced a severe famine following record floods in the summer of 1995 and continues to suffer from chronic food shortages and malnutrition. The United Nations World Food Program (WFP) provided substantial emergency food assistance beginning in 1995 (2 million tons of which came from the United States), but the North Korean Government suspended the WFP emergency program at the end of 2005. It has since permitted the WFP to resume operations on a greatly reduced scale through a Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation. External food aid now comes primarily from China and South Korea in the form of grants and long-term concessional loans. South Korea also donates fertilizer and other materials, while China provides energy. South Korea suspended food and fertilizer shipments to the North in response to North Korea's missile launches in July 2006. However, when severe floods later that month threatened to produce another humanitarian crisis, South Korea announced a one-time donation of 100,000 tons of food, matching contributions from South Korean non-governmental organizations (NGOs). South Korea resumed fertilizer shipments to North Korea in late March 2007. In early July, South Korea announced that it would provide $20 million worth of food assistance to the D.P.R.K. through the World Food Program. South Korea also resumed bilateral food aid in June 2007. Following severe flooding in North Korea in August 2007, South Korea announced that it would provide $7.5 million worth of emergency aid materials to North Korea, and $3.2 million to NGOs providing flood assistance in North Korea. The R.O.K. also provided $39.4 million in construction materials to the D.P.R.K. to assist with reconstruction efforts following the floods. The United States provided $100,000 to two U.S. NGOs for antibiotics in the wake of the floods. The United States also announced that is was prepared to engage in discussions with the D.P.R.K. of monitoring arrangements to provide additional substantial humanitarian assistance, including food aid, to the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Development Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union and termination of subsidized trade arrangements with Russia, other former Communist states, and China, North Korea announced the creation of a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in the northeast regions of Najin (sometime rendered &amp;quot;Rajin&amp;quot;), Chongjin, and Sonbong. Problems with infrastructure, bureaucracy, and uncertainties about investment security and viability have hindered growth and development of this SEZ. The government announced in 2002 plans to establish a Special Administrative Region (SAR) in Sinuiju, at the western end of the North Korea-China border. However, the government has taken few concrete steps to establish the Sinuiju SAR, and its future is uncertain. In addition, North Korea and South Korea have established a special economic zone near the city of Kaesong, where about 20 South Korean companies operate manufacturing facilities employing North Korean workers (see further information under North-South Economic Ties). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea implemented limited micro- and macroeconomic reforms in 2002, including increases in prices and wages, changes in foreign investment laws, a steep currency devaluation, and reforms in industry and management. Though the changes have failed to stimulate recovery of the industrial sector, there are reports of changed economic behavior at the enterprise and individual level. One unintended consequence of the 2002 changes has been severe inflation. An increasing number of North Koreans now try to work in the informal sector to cope with growing hardship and reduced government support. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====North-South Economic Ties====&lt;br /&gt;
Two-way trade between North and South Korea, legalized in 1988, had risen to more than $1 billion by 2005, much of it related to out-processing or assembly work undertaken by South Korean firms in the Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC). A significant portion of the total also includes donated goods provided to the North as humanitarian assistance or as part of inter-Korean cooperation projects. Although business-based and processing-on-commission transactions continued to grow, the bulk of South Korean exports to North Korea in 2006 was still non-commercial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the June 2000 North-South summit, North and South Korea have reconnected their east and west coast railroads and roads where they cross the DMZ and are working to improve these transportation routes. North and South Korea conducted tests of the east and west coast railroads on May 17, 2007. Much of the work done in North Korea has been funded by the South. The west coast rail and road are complete as far north as the KIC (six miles north of the DMZ), but little work is being done north of Kaesong. On the east coast, the road is complete but the rail line is far from operational. Since 2003, tour groups have been using the east coast road to travel from South Korea to Mt. Geumgang in North Korea, where cruise ship-based tours had been permitted since 1998. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of August 2007, 26 South Korean firms were manufacturing goods in the KIC, employing nearly 17,000 North Korean workers. Most of the goods are sold in South Korea; a small quantity is being exported to foreign markets. Ground was broken on the complex in June 2003, and the first products were shipped from the KIC in December 2004. Plans envision 250 firms employing 350,000 workers by 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The Korean Peninsula was first populated by peoples of a Tungusic branch of the Ural-Altaic language family, who migrated from the northwestern regions of Asia. Some of these peoples also populated parts of northeast China (Manchuria); Koreans and Manchurians still show physical similarities. Koreans are racially and linguistically homogeneous. Although there are no indigenous minorities in North Korea, there is a small Chinese community (about 50,000) and some 1,800 Japanese wives who accompanied the roughly 93,000 Koreans returning to the North from Japan between 1959 and 1962. Although dialects exist, the Korean spoken throughout the peninsula is mutually comprehensible. In North Korea, the Korean alphabet (hangul) is used exclusively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Korea's traditional religions are Buddhism and Shamanism. Christian missionaries arrived as early as the 16th century, but it was not until the 19th century that major missionary activity began. Pyongyang was a center of missionary activity, and there was a relatively large Christian population in the north before 1945. Although religious groups exist in North Korea today, the government severely restricts religious activity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the first century AD, the Korean Peninsula was divided into the kingdoms of Shilla, Koguryo, and Paekche. In 668 AD, the Shilla kingdom unified the peninsula. The Koryo dynasty--from which Portuguese missionaries in the 16th century derived the Western name &amp;quot;Korea&amp;quot;--succeeded the Shilla kingdom in 935. The Choson dynasty, ruled by members of the Yi clan, supplanted Koryo in 1392 and lasted until Japan annexed Korea in 1910. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout its history, Korea has been invaded, influenced, and fought over by its larger neighbors. Korea was under Mongolian occupation from 1231 until the early 14th century. The unifier of Japan, Hideyoshi Toyotomi, launched major invasions of Korea in 1592 and 1597. When Western powers focused &amp;quot;gunboat&amp;quot; diplomacy on Korea in the mid-19th century, Korea's rulers adopted a closed-door policy, earning Korea the title of &amp;quot;Hermit Kingdom.&amp;quot; Though the Choson dynasty recognized China's hegemony in East Asia, Korea was independent until the late 19th century. At that time, China sought to block growing Japanese influence on the Korean Peninsula and Russian pressure for commercial gains there. The competition produced the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-95 and the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05. Japan emerged victorious from both wars and in 1910 annexed Korea as part of the growing Japanese empire. Japanese colonial administration was characterized by tight control from Tokyo and ruthless efforts to supplant Korean language and culture. Organized Korean resistance during the colonial era was generally unsuccessful, and Japan remained firmly in control of the Peninsula until the end of World War II in 1945. The surrender of Japan in August 1945 led to the immediate division of Korea into two occupation zones, with the United States administering the southern half of the peninsula and the U.S.S.R. taking over the area to the north of the 38th parallel. This division was meant to be temporary until the United States, U.K., Soviet Union, and China could arrange a trusteeship administration. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 1945, a conference was convened in Moscow to discuss the future of Korea. A five-year trusteeship was discussed, and a joint Soviet-American commission was established. The commission met intermittently in Seoul but deadlocked over the issue of establishing a national government. In September 1947, with no solution in sight, the United States submitted the Korean question to the UN General Assembly. Initial hopes for a unified, independent Korea quickly evaporated as the politics of the Cold War and domestic opposition to the trusteeship plan resulted in the 1948 establishment of two separate nations with diametrically opposed political, economic, and social systems. Elections were held in the South under UN observation, and on August 15, 1948, the Republic of Korea (R.O.K.) was established in the South. Syngman Rhee, a nationalist leader, became the Republic's first president. On September 9, 1948, the North established the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (D.P.R.K.) headed by then-Premier Kim Il-sung, who had been cultivated and supported by the U.S.S.R. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Korean War of 1950-53==== &lt;br /&gt;
Almost immediately after establishment of the D.P.R.K., guerrilla warfare, border clashes, and naval battles erupted between the two Koreas. North Korean forces launched a massive surprise attack and invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950. The United Nations, in accordance with the terms of its Charter, engaged in its first collective action and established the UN Command (UNC), to which 16 member nations sent troops and assistance. Next to South Korea, the United States contributed the largest contingent of forces to this international effort. The battle line fluctuated north and south, and after large numbers of Chinese &amp;quot;People's Volunteers&amp;quot; intervened to assist the North, the battle line stabilized north of Seoul near the 38th parallel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Armistice negotiations began in July 1951, but hostilities continued until July 27, 1953. On that date, at Panmunjom, the military commanders of the North Korean People's Army, the Chinese People's Volunteers, and the UNC signed an armistice agreement. Neither the United States nor South Korea is a signatory to the armistice per se, although both adhere to it through the UNC. No comprehensive peace agreement has replaced the 1953 armistice pact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theodora.com/wfbcurrent/korea_north/index.html Korea, North - 2007] Geographic.org &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Copyright Details (US Government)}} &lt;br /&gt;
source= [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2792.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictatorships]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Korea]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=534157</id>
		<title>Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=534157"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:30:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* External Links */ Fixed an error with a bracket&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;300&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|[[Image:Canada pol99.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|''Canada''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Flag&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|[[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|50px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Arms&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|[[Image:Canada arms.png|48px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Capital&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ottawa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Government&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parliamentary Democracy]]/[[Federal]] [[Constitutional monarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monarch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom|Queen Elizabeth II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Official Languages&lt;br /&gt;
|[[English]] and [[French]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Governor General&lt;br /&gt;
|Her Excellency the Right Honourable [[Michaëlle Jean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Prime Minister&lt;br /&gt;
|The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Area&lt;br /&gt;
|3,854,085 sq mi&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;9,984,670 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Population (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|32,907,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GDP (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.105 trillion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GDP per capita (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|$35,133&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Canada''' is the largest country in [[North America]], and the second largest in the world behind [[Russia]]. It also has the longest coastline of any nation. Canada borders the [[United States]] to the south and northwest. Canada's motto &amp;quot;A Mari usque ad Mare&amp;quot; (From sea to sea) is based on biblical scripture: &amp;quot;He shall have dominion from sea to sea and from the river unto the ends of the earth (Psalm 72:8)&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/arm2_e.cfm The Arms of Canada- Description]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The name Canada comes from the St. Lawrence Iroquoian word &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, meaning &amp;quot;village&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;settlement&amp;quot;. In 1535, two Huron youths directed [[Jacques Cartier]] to &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, their village. The village they referred to was Stadacona, the future site of Quebec City.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Canadian_Encylopedia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;ArticleId=A0001216 The Canadian Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1545, European books and maps began referring to this region as Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name ''Dominion of Canada'' was adopted during [[British North America Act|confederation]] in 1867, and kept until the [[Constitution Act]] of 1982, when &amp;quot;Canada&amp;quot; became the only legal name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History and the Constitution ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Supreme Court of Canada.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The Supreme Court of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Canada was officially created by the signing of the British North America Act, which came into force on July 1, 1867. The BNA Act was an [[Act of Parliament|Act of the British Parliament]], and is also referred to as the Constitution Act of 1867. The first Prime Minister, [[John A Macdonald|Sir John A. Macdonald]], was a member of the Liberal-Conservative Party.&lt;br /&gt;
The BNA Act was later amended in 1982 by the Constitution Act of 1982. The Right Honourable [[Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], the Liberal Prime Minister of Canada at the time, also established the Canadian [[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]] as part of the Constitution Act. The Charter sets clear, fundamental freedoms for all Canadians.  It has been cited in thousands of court challenges and is the fundamental legal document supporting the national legalization of same-sex marriages and the prevention of government intervention regarding abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national flag was officially adopted February 15, 1965; prior to that time and subsequent to Confederation in 1867, Canada used a variant of the Red Ensign, a British merchant flag, as its national flag. The new flag was imposed by the Liberal government in an effort to appease socialists and Quebec Nationalists.  The Liberal government refused to hold a referendum on the subject; instead the public was invited to submit designs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/df3_e.cfm Birth of the Canadian Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The introduction of the new flag was not without controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a memo from Diefenbaker’s personal files he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Pearson flag is a meaningless Flag. There is no recognition of history; no indication of the existence of French and English Canada; the partnership of the races; no acknowledgement of history. It is a flag without a past, without history, without honour and without pride.” (Source – I Stand for Canada: The Story of the Maple Leaf Flag ).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/cultural/flag/national-flag-canada.html The Debate Over the Maple Leaf Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the debate has been largely forgotten today, the Red Ensign can still be seen flying on some private homes and the debate does reemerge into the public domain occasionally. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070321.wxflag21/BNStory/National/ PM wants Red Ensign to fly at Vimy, sources say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national anthem, '[[O Canada]]', was written by Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier as a poem, to which music, composed by Calixa Lavall&amp;amp;eacute;e, was later added, in 1880. The original was composed in French, and was first translated into English by Dr. Thomas Bedford Richardson of Toronto, Ontario, in 1906. However, it was not officially adopted as the national anthem until 1980.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/anthem_e.cfm National Anthem: O Canada]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is important to distinguish between 'O Canada', the national anthem, and 'God Save The Queen', which is the Royal anthem, played as a salute to Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]] as Queen of Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Provinces and Territories ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-Canada-satellite.jpg|right|thumb|300px|A satellite image of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of Confederation, Canada was comprised of four provinces: Upper Canada (now Ontario), Lower Canada (now Québec), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Since that time, six additional provinces have joined Canada or have been created. From west to east, the provinces are [[British Columbia]], [[Alberta]], [[Saskatchewan]], [[Manitoba]], [[Ontario]], [[Québec]], [[New Brunswick]], [[Prince Edward Island]], [[Nova Scotia]], and [[Newfoundland|Newfoundland and Labrador]]. Newfoundland was the last province to join Canada, in 1949.  The provinces all elect a single (unicameral) legislature, headed by Premier, who is selected the same way as the Prime Minister.  A Lieutenant-Governor represents the Queen, similar to the Governor General.  &lt;br /&gt;
Canada has three territories: the [[Yukon Territory]], the [[Northwest Territories]], and [[Nunavut]]. Territories have only have those powers delegated to them by the federal government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Government ==&lt;br /&gt;
The government of Canada is split into two orders, federal and provincial, as outlined by the BNA Act. Each has very specific responsibilities, with some overlap. For instance, universal health care is mandated by the Federal Government, but it is administered by the Provincial Governments.  Neither level has supremacy over the other.  The Federal Government is run out of [[Ottawa]], [[Ontario]]; the provincial governments are run out the ten provincial capitals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The federal parliament is bicameral, including both a lower house - the [[Canadian House of Commons]] - and an upper house - the [[Canadian Senate]].  The parliamentary system is based on the British parliament. Members of Parliament represent specific geographical areas, generally chosen to have approximately equal population. A single member is elected from each on a [[first past the post]] system. The [[prime minister]] is usually the leader of the party with the most seats, though two or more parties may form a [[coalition]] to form a government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate is made up of sentors appointed for life by the prime minister (acting on behalf of the Governer General).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In almost all cases, Acts of Parliament are created in the House of Commons. After passing three readings in the House of Commons, the bill is passed to the Senate.  The job of the Senate is to further debate the proposed legislation, before passing it to the Governor General for Royal Assent. The Governor General is the official representative of Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]], Queen of Canada. The Governor General is, in the absence of the Queen, Canada's Head of State, and the Commander-in-Chief of the [[Canadian Forces]].  The Prime Minister of Canada is the head of Government of Canada, acting as the Minister of the Crown, based on the British system.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All provincial legislatures are unicameral.  The legislative process for provincial legislation is the same as for federal legislation, except that there is no Senate and the legislation is given royal assent by the provincial Lieutenant Governors, who represent the monarch at the provincial level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1841 to 1844, the capital city of what would become Canada was located in [[Kingston|Kingston, Ontario]]. Subsequently the capital alternated between [[Toronto]] and [[Montreal]] until 1857, when the capital moved to [[Ottawa|Ottawa, Ontario]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Present Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, the Prime Minister is The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]], a member of the [[Conservative Party of Canada]], while Her Excellency [[Michaëlle Jean]] is the Governor General. At present Canada is governed by a [[minority government]].  In 2005 the city of [[Vancouver]], [[British Columbia]] was voted &amp;quot;the world's best place to live&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;   [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4306936.stm Vancouver is &amp;quot;best place to live&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Canada's population is increasingly urban, with 6 cities recording a population over 1 million ([[Toronto]], [[Montreal]], [[Vancouver]], [[Ottawa]]-Gatineau, [[Calgary]], [[Edmonton]]); these 6 cities represent over 45% of Canada's population.  Canada is becoming an increasingly multicultural country, with most new immigrants settling in [[Toronto]], [[Montreal]] and [[Vancouver]].  [[Toronto]] is the world's most multicultural city, with 43% a member of a visible minority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=bb0fee45-b305-490a-b161-a21bcb1d7329&amp;amp;k=34160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public Health Care ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the Federal Government, under the leadership of the Liberals and The Right Honourable [[Pierre Trudeau|Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], enacted the Canada Health Act. This act was based on the five principles of &amp;quot;universality, accessibility, portability, comprehensiveness, and public administration&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/FEDPROV/hise.html History of Canada Health and Social Transfer]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This public health care system is run in partnership by Health Canada and provincial Ministries of Health, who both contribute tax revenues. The federal government sets policy, while the provinces are responsible for actual administration. In 1995, the Canada Health and Social Transfer was created to replace existing systems for the transferal of tax funding to the provinces to administer social programs. The rationale behind the system is to allow all Canadians equal access to equal treatment, regardless of socio-economic status. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada health care is frequently listed as top issue in election campaigns and is both a topic of frequent debate and a point of pride for many Canadians, Tommy Douglas the founder of medicare was, for example, voted the &amp;quot;Greatest Canadian&amp;quot; on a CBC television programme in 2004 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current state of Canada's public health care system is gathering increasing media attention due to rising wait times. [[David Gratzer]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;... government researchers have provided the best data on the doctor shortage, noting, for example, that more than 1.5 million Ontarians (or 12 percent of that province’s population) can’t find family physicians. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html The Ugly Truth about Canadian Healthcare] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the blame for the current state of affairs has been placed on successive government mismanagement. This represents a failure of the federal government to properly regulate the level of service being offered in the provinces. People regularly have to wait between four and eight months for necessary surgeries depending on the nature of the surgery, and province of residence.{{fact}} The median wait time for an MRI across Canada is 10.3 weeks in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&amp;amp;id=753&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, former Prime Minister [[Jean Chretien|Jean Chrétien]] campaigned on a promise to shut down private MRI clinics because it creates a two tier system, regardless of the demand for more facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, there has been suggestion from some lobby groups that Canada should adopt a two-tier health care system, while others have expressed strong opposition to this idea, including the federal government under the Liberal party. Some argue that Canada already does have a two-tier health care system as the very wealthy can go to the United States for treatment. The argument for allowing private health care is twofold. The first reason is that competition may improve the quality of products and services, while the increase in options will allow those with the means to access private health care and may relieve some of the burden off the public system. Critics argue that health is a right, and that everyone should have access to the same standard of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, in [[Québec]], a provincial judge has ruled that private health care providers must be allowed to compete with the government-run health care system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secession movements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are separatist movements lobbying for independence from Canada in British Columbia, Alberta, and Québec. The only movement of real significance is in Québec, where the province has twice voted on whether or not to separate from Canada, once in 1980 and again in 1995; the vote in 1995 failed by just 1 percent. On November 27, 2006, the Federal Government passed a motion declaring Québec a nation &amp;quot;within a united Canada&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=hansard&amp;amp;Language=E&amp;amp;Mode=1&amp;amp;Parl=39&amp;amp;Ses=1&amp;amp;DocId=2544166&amp;amp;File=0#OOB-1799206&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its colonial past, Canadian culture has historically been heavily influenced by [[United Kingdom|British]] and [[France|French]] cultures and traditions. In more modern times, Canadian culture has been greatly influenced by United States' culture, due to the proximity and the migration of people, ideas, and capital. Amidst this, Canadian culture has developed some unique characteristics, and many Canadian movies, authors, [[television]] shows, and musicians are equally popular in United States. Canadian culture has also been influenced by indigenous cultures, and by immigrant groups from around the world. It has the highest per capita immigration rate of any country in the world &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;.http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080402/d080402a.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada has two federal official languages, French and English. The province of Quebec has French as an official language, New Brunswick both French and English, and all other provinces English (although in some parts of Ontario French has special status). The territory of Nunavut has Inuktitu and Innuinaqtun as official languages in addition to French and English, the North West territories has eleven official languages, and the Yukon recognises French and English.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada tends to reflect more liberal ideals than the United States. Two such examples are the legalizing of [[gay marriage]] in June, 2005&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/06/28/samesex050628.html CBC news article on passing of gay marriage law]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, in some regions, the decriminalization of medicinal [[marijuana]] and small amounts of other psychoactive substances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notable sports which are enjoyed throughout Canada include [[hockey]], [[curling]], [[lacrosse]], and [[football]]. Canada collected 18 medals in the Summer Olympics, more per capita than the United States but less than Australia.  The country finished third overall in the Torino Winter Olympics, with a total of 24 medals, one less than the United States and 10 more than next-place [[Sweden]].  The next winter Olympics, to be held in 2010 will be held in Vancouver and Whistler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
For the total population, approximately 44% of the population of Canada is  [[Catholicism|Catholic]], with a another 29% being [[Protestantism|Protestant]] (all denominations). However, while 16% of the total population has no religious affiliation (including atheists and agnostics), 20% of the population under 25 has declared no religion, congruent with the world-wide trend of increasing secularism in young demographics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statistics Canada - Cat. No. 97F0022XCB2001002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other religions of significance in Canada include Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, and Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taxation ==&lt;br /&gt;
The average tax rate in Canada is higher than in the United States. In 2003, Canada's tax burden equals about 33.8% of GDP placing it in the middle of the G7 countries, with Japan lowest at 25.3% and France highest at 43.4% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/faq1e.html#Taxation Department of Finance Canada: FAQs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The US rate is roughly 25.6%; this discrepancy is consistent with the differing levels of social services which the governments funds. Canada also has managed to run without a budget deficit for a number of years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equalization payments, worth 11.7 billion Canadian dollars are made by the federal government to the provinces from richer provinces (currently Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia) and the poorer provinces (Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan) .  This is to ensure that reasonably uniform standards of services and taxation are kept between the richer and poorer provinces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Budget 2007 [http://www.budget.gc.ca/2007/bp/bpc4e.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These payments have not been without controversy as provinces begin to make more revenues from natural resources they do not want to give up the Equalization payments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British Columbia has the lowest corporate tax rate in North America &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investbc.com/businessclimate.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada also has a national sales tax, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) of 5% on all purchases. Some provinces add an additional percentage in the form of a Provincial Sales Tax (PST), or a combined Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) combining GST and the Provincial Sales Tax. Based on actual income, and a number of other factors, the government will refund GST/HST to eligible tax payers in quarterly installments on the fifth of the month in July, October, January, and April.&lt;br /&gt;
==Cultural style==&lt;br /&gt;
Canadian culture puts stress on open-mindedness and tolerance of multiple viewpoints -- even the (very strong) view that Quebec should declare independence and break up Canada.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/features/cucanada.xml&amp;amp;source=EMC-exp_01102008 National Cultural Profiles, a guide from the London ''Telegraph''  to the thinking patterns of all the world's major cultures] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Canadian opinion shows a strong sense of wanting to be independent of the U.S., although the economy, society and culture closely resembles the U.S. , and most Canadians live a short drive from the border.  (The main difference is the state-provided health care system.)  Much of the anti-Americanism comes from exiles who left the U.S., for example in fleeing the draft during the Vietnam War (1965-72). Recent surges in oil prices have lifted the Canadian economy, and shifted power toward the oil-rich province of Alberta.&lt;br /&gt;
== Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
Education in Canada is the responsibility of provincial and territorial governments; curriculum and marking schemes are completely removed from the control of the federal government. Each province uses a different method of administering education, with variation in the number of years and the curriculum. Quebec, for example has five years of secondary school finishing at the equivalent of grade 11 followed by two years of CEGEP, while Ontario has two years of kindergarten. Most provinces have kidergarten beginning at age 5 through grade 12 (age 17) as part of the public system. Some provinces have standardised provincial exams at the end of secondary school and/or at other designated grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several provinces have two publically funded school systems: public and separate (e.g. Catholic). The constitution also guarantees education in one's first official language and, as such, all provinces and territories have both English and French language schooling.  Additionally, private schools both religious and secular exist throughout the country. Alberta has an additional category, known as charter schools. Charter schools are schools that have been created in the community to surround a particular theme. They could be artistic, vocational, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian grading scale markedly differs from the grading scale in the United States. In the US, a 59% or below earns you an F, a 60% nets a D-, and 80% a B. However, in Canadian universities, only 49% or below is an R, 60% will net a C+, and 80% is an A-. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federal-realestate.com/info-schools/mcgill-university.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Marking in Canadian universities, however, tends to be lower with grades over 90% extremely rare in the humanities and social sciences, and higher entrance marks required for those entering from American high schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some Canadian secondary schools, the mark F is absent and substituted by R. A ranges from 100%-80%, B from 79%-70%, C from 69%-60%, D from 59%-50% and R is  any mark less than 50%. However, as education is under provincial jurisdiction marking varies regionally and it is difficult to make generalisations across the board.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may vary from province to province; it is also important to note that comparison of educational achievement requires more than a cursory observation of grading scales. Perhaps a better source of comparison is the Human Development Index, a measurement of literacy, education, life expectancy and standard of living. Using this scale, with Iceland at number one, Canada falls in at number four and the United States ranks at 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Military ==&lt;br /&gt;
As of the most recent cabinet shuffle, Conservative MP Peter MacKay has assumed the role of Minister of National Defence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Canadian Forces]] is comprised of the Regular Force, the Reserve Force, and the Special Force (when so in service). The Regular and Reserve Forces employ over 62,000 and 25,000 members respectively. While the various branches wear distinctive elemental uniforms (DEU), the Royal Canadian Navy, Canadian Army and the Royal Canadian Air Force were amalgamated in 1968 into one common command structure &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/about/index_e.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian Forces are &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canadianally.com/ca/forces-cf-en.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;equipped with modern vehicles such as the Canadian-built LAV III, the German-built Leopard CII tanks and both the American-built CF-18 Hornet and CC-177 Globemaster III. The Canadian government spends about 17 billion Canadian dollars annually on defence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Conservative government has continued the trend of increased defence spending initiated by the Liberals, and have also taken steps to decrease red-tape preventing the troops from having the necessary equipment to keep them safe and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 3000 Canadian troops are currently deployed around the world, with over 2500 in [[Afghanistan]] where they are assisting in anti-terrorism &amp;amp; reconstruction operations, and another 500 are deployed to the Middle East where they are attached to a US-led coalition fleet and the Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 (SNMG1). These are prime examples of Canada's capability for interoperability with foreign military forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gc.ca/ Government of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.parl.gc.ca/ Parliament of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pch.gc.ca/ Department of Canadian Heritage]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ca.html CIA World Factbook:Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.forces.ca The Canadian Forces]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Party Websites ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;* [http://www.blocquebecois.org Bloc Québécois]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.conservative.ca Conservative Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://http://www.fpnpoc.ca/ First Peoples National Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.greenparty.ca Green Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca Liberal Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ndp.ca New Democratic Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.partyofalberta.org/ Party of Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.progressivecanadian.org/ Progressive Canadian Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mlpc.ca/ Marxist-Leninist Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/ Canadian Action Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.peoplespoliticalpower.ca/ People's Political Power Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.animalalliance.ca/ Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.westernblockparty.com/ Western Bloc Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chp.ca/en/index.html Christian Heritage Party of Canada]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Advocacy Websites===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.canadadivided.com/ Canada Divided]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.projectalberta.com/ Project Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://onthefencefilms.com/video/twowomen.html Two Women]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.westcan.org/ Western Canada Concept]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=534154</id>
		<title>Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=534154"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:29:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* External Links */ Placed the link to the Canadian forces where it belonged on the page,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;300&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|[[Image:Canada pol99.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|''Canada''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Flag&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|[[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|50px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Arms&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|[[Image:Canada arms.png|48px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Capital&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ottawa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Government&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parliamentary Democracy]]/[[Federal]] [[Constitutional monarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monarch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom|Queen Elizabeth II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Official Languages&lt;br /&gt;
|[[English]] and [[French]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Governor General&lt;br /&gt;
|Her Excellency the Right Honourable [[Michaëlle Jean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Prime Minister&lt;br /&gt;
|The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Area&lt;br /&gt;
|3,854,085 sq mi&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;9,984,670 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Population (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|32,907,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GDP (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.105 trillion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GDP per capita (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|$35,133&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Canada''' is the largest country in [[North America]], and the second largest in the world behind [[Russia]]. It also has the longest coastline of any nation. Canada borders the [[United States]] to the south and northwest. Canada's motto &amp;quot;A Mari usque ad Mare&amp;quot; (From sea to sea) is based on biblical scripture: &amp;quot;He shall have dominion from sea to sea and from the river unto the ends of the earth (Psalm 72:8)&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/arm2_e.cfm The Arms of Canada- Description]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The name Canada comes from the St. Lawrence Iroquoian word &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, meaning &amp;quot;village&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;settlement&amp;quot;. In 1535, two Huron youths directed [[Jacques Cartier]] to &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, their village. The village they referred to was Stadacona, the future site of Quebec City.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Canadian_Encylopedia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;ArticleId=A0001216 The Canadian Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1545, European books and maps began referring to this region as Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name ''Dominion of Canada'' was adopted during [[British North America Act|confederation]] in 1867, and kept until the [[Constitution Act]] of 1982, when &amp;quot;Canada&amp;quot; became the only legal name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History and the Constitution ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Supreme Court of Canada.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The Supreme Court of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Canada was officially created by the signing of the British North America Act, which came into force on July 1, 1867. The BNA Act was an [[Act of Parliament|Act of the British Parliament]], and is also referred to as the Constitution Act of 1867. The first Prime Minister, [[John A Macdonald|Sir John A. Macdonald]], was a member of the Liberal-Conservative Party.&lt;br /&gt;
The BNA Act was later amended in 1982 by the Constitution Act of 1982. The Right Honourable [[Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], the Liberal Prime Minister of Canada at the time, also established the Canadian [[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]] as part of the Constitution Act. The Charter sets clear, fundamental freedoms for all Canadians.  It has been cited in thousands of court challenges and is the fundamental legal document supporting the national legalization of same-sex marriages and the prevention of government intervention regarding abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national flag was officially adopted February 15, 1965; prior to that time and subsequent to Confederation in 1867, Canada used a variant of the Red Ensign, a British merchant flag, as its national flag. The new flag was imposed by the Liberal government in an effort to appease socialists and Quebec Nationalists.  The Liberal government refused to hold a referendum on the subject; instead the public was invited to submit designs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/df3_e.cfm Birth of the Canadian Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The introduction of the new flag was not without controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a memo from Diefenbaker’s personal files he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Pearson flag is a meaningless Flag. There is no recognition of history; no indication of the existence of French and English Canada; the partnership of the races; no acknowledgement of history. It is a flag without a past, without history, without honour and without pride.” (Source – I Stand for Canada: The Story of the Maple Leaf Flag ).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/cultural/flag/national-flag-canada.html The Debate Over the Maple Leaf Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the debate has been largely forgotten today, the Red Ensign can still be seen flying on some private homes and the debate does reemerge into the public domain occasionally. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070321.wxflag21/BNStory/National/ PM wants Red Ensign to fly at Vimy, sources say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national anthem, '[[O Canada]]', was written by Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier as a poem, to which music, composed by Calixa Lavall&amp;amp;eacute;e, was later added, in 1880. The original was composed in French, and was first translated into English by Dr. Thomas Bedford Richardson of Toronto, Ontario, in 1906. However, it was not officially adopted as the national anthem until 1980.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/anthem_e.cfm National Anthem: O Canada]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is important to distinguish between 'O Canada', the national anthem, and 'God Save The Queen', which is the Royal anthem, played as a salute to Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]] as Queen of Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Provinces and Territories ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-Canada-satellite.jpg|right|thumb|300px|A satellite image of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of Confederation, Canada was comprised of four provinces: Upper Canada (now Ontario), Lower Canada (now Québec), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Since that time, six additional provinces have joined Canada or have been created. From west to east, the provinces are [[British Columbia]], [[Alberta]], [[Saskatchewan]], [[Manitoba]], [[Ontario]], [[Québec]], [[New Brunswick]], [[Prince Edward Island]], [[Nova Scotia]], and [[Newfoundland|Newfoundland and Labrador]]. Newfoundland was the last province to join Canada, in 1949.  The provinces all elect a single (unicameral) legislature, headed by Premier, who is selected the same way as the Prime Minister.  A Lieutenant-Governor represents the Queen, similar to the Governor General.  &lt;br /&gt;
Canada has three territories: the [[Yukon Territory]], the [[Northwest Territories]], and [[Nunavut]]. Territories have only have those powers delegated to them by the federal government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Government ==&lt;br /&gt;
The government of Canada is split into two orders, federal and provincial, as outlined by the BNA Act. Each has very specific responsibilities, with some overlap. For instance, universal health care is mandated by the Federal Government, but it is administered by the Provincial Governments.  Neither level has supremacy over the other.  The Federal Government is run out of [[Ottawa]], [[Ontario]]; the provincial governments are run out the ten provincial capitals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The federal parliament is bicameral, including both a lower house - the [[Canadian House of Commons]] - and an upper house - the [[Canadian Senate]].  The parliamentary system is based on the British parliament. Members of Parliament represent specific geographical areas, generally chosen to have approximately equal population. A single member is elected from each on a [[first past the post]] system. The [[prime minister]] is usually the leader of the party with the most seats, though two or more parties may form a [[coalition]] to form a government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate is made up of sentors appointed for life by the prime minister (acting on behalf of the Governer General).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In almost all cases, Acts of Parliament are created in the House of Commons. After passing three readings in the House of Commons, the bill is passed to the Senate.  The job of the Senate is to further debate the proposed legislation, before passing it to the Governor General for Royal Assent. The Governor General is the official representative of Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]], Queen of Canada. The Governor General is, in the absence of the Queen, Canada's Head of State, and the Commander-in-Chief of the [[Canadian Forces]].  The Prime Minister of Canada is the head of Government of Canada, acting as the Minister of the Crown, based on the British system.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All provincial legislatures are unicameral.  The legislative process for provincial legislation is the same as for federal legislation, except that there is no Senate and the legislation is given royal assent by the provincial Lieutenant Governors, who represent the monarch at the provincial level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1841 to 1844, the capital city of what would become Canada was located in [[Kingston|Kingston, Ontario]]. Subsequently the capital alternated between [[Toronto]] and [[Montreal]] until 1857, when the capital moved to [[Ottawa|Ottawa, Ontario]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Present Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, the Prime Minister is The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]], a member of the [[Conservative Party of Canada]], while Her Excellency [[Michaëlle Jean]] is the Governor General. At present Canada is governed by a [[minority government]].  In 2005 the city of [[Vancouver]], [[British Columbia]] was voted &amp;quot;the world's best place to live&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;   [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4306936.stm Vancouver is &amp;quot;best place to live&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Canada's population is increasingly urban, with 6 cities recording a population over 1 million ([[Toronto]], [[Montreal]], [[Vancouver]], [[Ottawa]]-Gatineau, [[Calgary]], [[Edmonton]]); these 6 cities represent over 45% of Canada's population.  Canada is becoming an increasingly multicultural country, with most new immigrants settling in [[Toronto]], [[Montreal]] and [[Vancouver]].  [[Toronto]] is the world's most multicultural city, with 43% a member of a visible minority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=bb0fee45-b305-490a-b161-a21bcb1d7329&amp;amp;k=34160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public Health Care ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the Federal Government, under the leadership of the Liberals and The Right Honourable [[Pierre Trudeau|Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], enacted the Canada Health Act. This act was based on the five principles of &amp;quot;universality, accessibility, portability, comprehensiveness, and public administration&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/FEDPROV/hise.html History of Canada Health and Social Transfer]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This public health care system is run in partnership by Health Canada and provincial Ministries of Health, who both contribute tax revenues. The federal government sets policy, while the provinces are responsible for actual administration. In 1995, the Canada Health and Social Transfer was created to replace existing systems for the transferal of tax funding to the provinces to administer social programs. The rationale behind the system is to allow all Canadians equal access to equal treatment, regardless of socio-economic status. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada health care is frequently listed as top issue in election campaigns and is both a topic of frequent debate and a point of pride for many Canadians, Tommy Douglas the founder of medicare was, for example, voted the &amp;quot;Greatest Canadian&amp;quot; on a CBC television programme in 2004 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current state of Canada's public health care system is gathering increasing media attention due to rising wait times. [[David Gratzer]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;... government researchers have provided the best data on the doctor shortage, noting, for example, that more than 1.5 million Ontarians (or 12 percent of that province’s population) can’t find family physicians. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html The Ugly Truth about Canadian Healthcare] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the blame for the current state of affairs has been placed on successive government mismanagement. This represents a failure of the federal government to properly regulate the level of service being offered in the provinces. People regularly have to wait between four and eight months for necessary surgeries depending on the nature of the surgery, and province of residence.{{fact}} The median wait time for an MRI across Canada is 10.3 weeks in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&amp;amp;id=753&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, former Prime Minister [[Jean Chretien|Jean Chrétien]] campaigned on a promise to shut down private MRI clinics because it creates a two tier system, regardless of the demand for more facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, there has been suggestion from some lobby groups that Canada should adopt a two-tier health care system, while others have expressed strong opposition to this idea, including the federal government under the Liberal party. Some argue that Canada already does have a two-tier health care system as the very wealthy can go to the United States for treatment. The argument for allowing private health care is twofold. The first reason is that competition may improve the quality of products and services, while the increase in options will allow those with the means to access private health care and may relieve some of the burden off the public system. Critics argue that health is a right, and that everyone should have access to the same standard of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, in [[Québec]], a provincial judge has ruled that private health care providers must be allowed to compete with the government-run health care system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secession movements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are separatist movements lobbying for independence from Canada in British Columbia, Alberta, and Québec. The only movement of real significance is in Québec, where the province has twice voted on whether or not to separate from Canada, once in 1980 and again in 1995; the vote in 1995 failed by just 1 percent. On November 27, 2006, the Federal Government passed a motion declaring Québec a nation &amp;quot;within a united Canada&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=hansard&amp;amp;Language=E&amp;amp;Mode=1&amp;amp;Parl=39&amp;amp;Ses=1&amp;amp;DocId=2544166&amp;amp;File=0#OOB-1799206&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its colonial past, Canadian culture has historically been heavily influenced by [[United Kingdom|British]] and [[France|French]] cultures and traditions. In more modern times, Canadian culture has been greatly influenced by United States' culture, due to the proximity and the migration of people, ideas, and capital. Amidst this, Canadian culture has developed some unique characteristics, and many Canadian movies, authors, [[television]] shows, and musicians are equally popular in United States. Canadian culture has also been influenced by indigenous cultures, and by immigrant groups from around the world. It has the highest per capita immigration rate of any country in the world &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;.http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080402/d080402a.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada has two federal official languages, French and English. The province of Quebec has French as an official language, New Brunswick both French and English, and all other provinces English (although in some parts of Ontario French has special status). The territory of Nunavut has Inuktitu and Innuinaqtun as official languages in addition to French and English, the North West territories has eleven official languages, and the Yukon recognises French and English.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada tends to reflect more liberal ideals than the United States. Two such examples are the legalizing of [[gay marriage]] in June, 2005&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/06/28/samesex050628.html CBC news article on passing of gay marriage law]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, in some regions, the decriminalization of medicinal [[marijuana]] and small amounts of other psychoactive substances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notable sports which are enjoyed throughout Canada include [[hockey]], [[curling]], [[lacrosse]], and [[football]]. Canada collected 18 medals in the Summer Olympics, more per capita than the United States but less than Australia.  The country finished third overall in the Torino Winter Olympics, with a total of 24 medals, one less than the United States and 10 more than next-place [[Sweden]].  The next winter Olympics, to be held in 2010 will be held in Vancouver and Whistler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
For the total population, approximately 44% of the population of Canada is  [[Catholicism|Catholic]], with a another 29% being [[Protestantism|Protestant]] (all denominations). However, while 16% of the total population has no religious affiliation (including atheists and agnostics), 20% of the population under 25 has declared no religion, congruent with the world-wide trend of increasing secularism in young demographics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statistics Canada - Cat. No. 97F0022XCB2001002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other religions of significance in Canada include Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, and Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taxation ==&lt;br /&gt;
The average tax rate in Canada is higher than in the United States. In 2003, Canada's tax burden equals about 33.8% of GDP placing it in the middle of the G7 countries, with Japan lowest at 25.3% and France highest at 43.4% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/faq1e.html#Taxation Department of Finance Canada: FAQs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The US rate is roughly 25.6%; this discrepancy is consistent with the differing levels of social services which the governments funds. Canada also has managed to run without a budget deficit for a number of years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equalization payments, worth 11.7 billion Canadian dollars are made by the federal government to the provinces from richer provinces (currently Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia) and the poorer provinces (Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan) .  This is to ensure that reasonably uniform standards of services and taxation are kept between the richer and poorer provinces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Budget 2007 [http://www.budget.gc.ca/2007/bp/bpc4e.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These payments have not been without controversy as provinces begin to make more revenues from natural resources they do not want to give up the Equalization payments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British Columbia has the lowest corporate tax rate in North America &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investbc.com/businessclimate.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada also has a national sales tax, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) of 5% on all purchases. Some provinces add an additional percentage in the form of a Provincial Sales Tax (PST), or a combined Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) combining GST and the Provincial Sales Tax. Based on actual income, and a number of other factors, the government will refund GST/HST to eligible tax payers in quarterly installments on the fifth of the month in July, October, January, and April.&lt;br /&gt;
==Cultural style==&lt;br /&gt;
Canadian culture puts stress on open-mindedness and tolerance of multiple viewpoints -- even the (very strong) view that Quebec should declare independence and break up Canada.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/features/cucanada.xml&amp;amp;source=EMC-exp_01102008 National Cultural Profiles, a guide from the London ''Telegraph''  to the thinking patterns of all the world's major cultures] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Canadian opinion shows a strong sense of wanting to be independent of the U.S., although the economy, society and culture closely resembles the U.S. , and most Canadians live a short drive from the border.  (The main difference is the state-provided health care system.)  Much of the anti-Americanism comes from exiles who left the U.S., for example in fleeing the draft during the Vietnam War (1965-72). Recent surges in oil prices have lifted the Canadian economy, and shifted power toward the oil-rich province of Alberta.&lt;br /&gt;
== Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
Education in Canada is the responsibility of provincial and territorial governments; curriculum and marking schemes are completely removed from the control of the federal government. Each province uses a different method of administering education, with variation in the number of years and the curriculum. Quebec, for example has five years of secondary school finishing at the equivalent of grade 11 followed by two years of CEGEP, while Ontario has two years of kindergarten. Most provinces have kidergarten beginning at age 5 through grade 12 (age 17) as part of the public system. Some provinces have standardised provincial exams at the end of secondary school and/or at other designated grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several provinces have two publically funded school systems: public and separate (e.g. Catholic). The constitution also guarantees education in one's first official language and, as such, all provinces and territories have both English and French language schooling.  Additionally, private schools both religious and secular exist throughout the country. Alberta has an additional category, known as charter schools. Charter schools are schools that have been created in the community to surround a particular theme. They could be artistic, vocational, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian grading scale markedly differs from the grading scale in the United States. In the US, a 59% or below earns you an F, a 60% nets a D-, and 80% a B. However, in Canadian universities, only 49% or below is an R, 60% will net a C+, and 80% is an A-. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federal-realestate.com/info-schools/mcgill-university.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Marking in Canadian universities, however, tends to be lower with grades over 90% extremely rare in the humanities and social sciences, and higher entrance marks required for those entering from American high schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some Canadian secondary schools, the mark F is absent and substituted by R. A ranges from 100%-80%, B from 79%-70%, C from 69%-60%, D from 59%-50% and R is  any mark less than 50%. However, as education is under provincial jurisdiction marking varies regionally and it is difficult to make generalisations across the board.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may vary from province to province; it is also important to note that comparison of educational achievement requires more than a cursory observation of grading scales. Perhaps a better source of comparison is the Human Development Index, a measurement of literacy, education, life expectancy and standard of living. Using this scale, with Iceland at number one, Canada falls in at number four and the United States ranks at 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Military ==&lt;br /&gt;
As of the most recent cabinet shuffle, Conservative MP Peter MacKay has assumed the role of Minister of National Defence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Canadian Forces]] is comprised of the Regular Force, the Reserve Force, and the Special Force (when so in service). The Regular and Reserve Forces employ over 62,000 and 25,000 members respectively. While the various branches wear distinctive elemental uniforms (DEU), the Royal Canadian Navy, Canadian Army and the Royal Canadian Air Force were amalgamated in 1968 into one common command structure &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/about/index_e.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian Forces are &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canadianally.com/ca/forces-cf-en.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;equipped with modern vehicles such as the Canadian-built LAV III, the German-built Leopard CII tanks and both the American-built CF-18 Hornet and CC-177 Globemaster III. The Canadian government spends about 17 billion Canadian dollars annually on defence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Conservative government has continued the trend of increased defence spending initiated by the Liberals, and have also taken steps to decrease red-tape preventing the troops from having the necessary equipment to keep them safe and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 3000 Canadian troops are currently deployed around the world, with over 2500 in [[Afghanistan]] where they are assisting in anti-terrorism &amp;amp; reconstruction operations, and another 500 are deployed to the Middle East where they are attached to a US-led coalition fleet and the Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 (SNMG1). These are prime examples of Canada's capability for interoperability with foreign military forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gc.ca/ Government of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.parl.gc.ca/ Parliament of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pch.gc.ca/ Department of Canadian Heritage]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ca.html CIA World Factbook:Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.forces.ca The Canadian Forces&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Party Websites ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;* [http://www.blocquebecois.org Bloc Québécois]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.conservative.ca Conservative Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://http://www.fpnpoc.ca/ First Peoples National Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.greenparty.ca Green Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca Liberal Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ndp.ca New Democratic Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.partyofalberta.org/ Party of Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.progressivecanadian.org/ Progressive Canadian Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mlpc.ca/ Marxist-Leninist Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/ Canadian Action Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.peoplespoliticalpower.ca/ People's Political Power Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.animalalliance.ca/ Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.westernblockparty.com/ Western Bloc Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chp.ca/en/index.html Christian Heritage Party of Canada]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Advocacy Websites===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.canadadivided.com/ Canada Divided]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.projectalberta.com/ Project Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://onthefencefilms.com/video/twowomen.html Two Women]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.westcan.org/ Western Canada Concept]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534146</id>
		<title>Liberal Party of Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534146"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:24:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Created a reflist&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' is a federal political party within the [[Canadian]] Federal Government.  Other Liberal Parties exist in all of the Canadian Provinces, but not all are directly afflicated with the federal party.  The current party leader is [[Stéphane Dion]], whom is often portrayed as a very innefectual leader and is often lampooned in the Canadian media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephane Dion [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLNfNsHooNo portrayed as an idiot by the CBC]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the party has been traditional a [[liberal|left of center]] party with power in vote rich [[Ontario]] and [[Québec]], and has been known as &amp;quot;Canada's Governing Party&amp;quot; because of the large number of elections they have won, however the party has been rocked by a sponsorship scandal in Québec of late, and their popularity has not returned.  The Liberals have not been as popular in western Canada, where voters have voted for the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party is indicative of Liberal [[deceit]] as it has been plagued for years by corruption scandals.  It also wholeheartedly rejects [[conservative]] and family values; it instituted socialized medicine, legalized gay marriage, decriminalized marijuana possession, upholds abortion, and affirms [[global warming]].  Stéphane Dion, a former sociology professor, claims to be a devout Catholic, but evidence suggests that this is merely a political visage, and thus another example of [[professor values]]. They are portrayed in the Media as scrawny effeminate nerds. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cASLdaver3I Political Satire show This Hour has 22 Minutes elaborates on the public perception of the Liberals.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party, and liberals in Canada are known informally as &amp;quot;Grits&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==    &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada official site] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534140</id>
		<title>Liberal Party of Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534140"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:19:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Showing the public perception of Liberals in general.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' is a federal political party within the [[Canadian]] Federal Government.  Other Liberal Parties exist in all of the Canadian Provinces, but not all are directly afflicated with the federal party.  The current party leader is [[Stéphane Dion]], whom is often portrayed as a very innefectual leader and is often lampooned in the Canadian media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephane Dion [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLNfNsHooNo portrayed as an idiot by the CBC]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the party has been traditional a [[liberal|left of center]] party with power in vote rich [[Ontario]] and [[Québec]], and has been known as &amp;quot;Canada's Governing Party&amp;quot; because of the large number of elections they have won, however the party has been rocked by a sponsorship scandal in Québec of late, and their popularity has not returned.  The Liberals have not been as popular in western Canada, where voters have voted for the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party is indicative of Liberal [[deceit]] as it has been plagued for years by corruption scandals.  It also wholeheartedly rejects [[conservative]] and family values; it instituted socialized medicine, legalized gay marriage, decriminalized marijuana possession, upholds abortion, and affirms [[global warming]].  Stéphane Dion, a former sociology professor, claims to be a devout Catholic, but evidence suggests that this is merely a political visage, and thus another example of [[professor values]]. They are portrayed in the Media as scrawny effeminate nerds. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cASLdaver3I Political Satire show This Hour has 22 Minutes elaborates on the public perception of the Liberals.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party, and liberals in Canada are known informally as &amp;quot;Grits&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==    &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada official site] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534137</id>
		<title>Liberal Party of Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534137"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:14:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Ref not showing up oddly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' is a federal political party within the [[Canadian]] Federal Government.  Other Liberal Parties exist in all of the Canadian Provinces, but not all are directly afflicated with the federal party.  The current party leader is [[Stéphane Dion]], whom is often portrayed as a very innefectual leader and is often lampooned in the Canadian media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephane Dion [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLNfNsHooNo portrayed as an idiot by the CBC]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the party has been traditional a [[liberal|left of center]] party with power in vote rich [[Ontario]] and [[Québec]], and has been known as &amp;quot;Canada's Governing Party&amp;quot; because of the large number of elections they have won, however the party has been rocked by a sponsorship scandal in Québec of late, and their popularity has not returned.  The Liberals have not been as popular in western Canada, where voters have voted for the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party is indicative of Liberal [[deceit]] as it has been plagued for years by corruption scandals.  It also wholeheartedly rejects [[conservative]] and family values; it instituted socialized medicine, legalized gay marriage, decriminalized marijuana possession, upholds abortion, and affirms [[global warming]].  Stéphane Dion, a former sociology professor, claims to be a devout Catholic, but evidence suggests that this is merely a political visage, and thus another example of [[professor values]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party, and liberals in Canada are known informally as &amp;quot;Grits&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==    &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada official site] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534135</id>
		<title>Liberal Party of Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada&amp;diff=534135"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:13:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: Stephane Dion is fun for Canadians to make fun of.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' is a federal political party within the [[Canadian]] Federal Government.  Other Liberal Parties exist in all of the Canadian Provinces, but not all are directly afflicated with the federal party.  The current party leader is [[Stéphane Dion]], whom is often portrayed as a very innefectual leader and is often lampooned in the Canadian media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephane Dion [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLNfNsHooNo portrayed as an idiot] by the [[CBC]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the party has been traditional a [[liberal|left of center]] party with power in vote rich [[Ontario]] and [[Québec]], and has been known as &amp;quot;Canada's Governing Party&amp;quot; because of the large number of elections they have won, however the party has been rocked by a sponsorship scandal in Québec of late, and their popularity has not returned.  The Liberals have not been as popular in western Canada, where voters have voted for the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party is indicative of Liberal [[deceit]] as it has been plagued for years by corruption scandals.  It also wholeheartedly rejects [[conservative]] and family values; it instituted socialized medicine, legalized gay marriage, decriminalized marijuana possession, upholds abortion, and affirms [[global warming]].  Stéphane Dion, a former sociology professor, claims to be a devout Catholic, but evidence suggests that this is merely a political visage, and thus another example of [[professor values]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Liberal Party, and liberals in Canada are known informally as &amp;quot;Grits&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==    &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada official site] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_McCain&amp;diff=534129</id>
		<title>John McCain</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_McCain&amp;diff=534129"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:07:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Russia */ Minor typo correction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Casmier.jpg|right|thumb|250px|'''Senator John McCain, R-Arizona''']] '''John Sidney McCain III''' (born in the U.S. [[Panama Canal]] Zone, August 29, 1936) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=m0003http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Button_enter.png Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, is the Republican nominee for President in 2008, prominent maverick politician and Vietnam War hero, and is the senior [[United States Senate|Senator]] of [[Arizona]]. He has been an influential leader in American politics since 1986, when he ran for office crusading against corruption, attacking pork barrel spending and working for campaign finance reform.  He was defeated by [[George W. Bush]] for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000, and in 2008 kept his distance from the president, despite efforts of Democrats to paint the two as close allies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a pilot for the United States Navy and former Prisoner-of-War (POW), he served in the military for 22 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=m000303 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain, a [[Baptist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296973,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has impressive credentials on issues of foreign policy and national security, which have propelled him in the forefront of national politics as both an outspoken voice for the United States military and as a Presidential contender for the Republican Party since 1993.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain is the [[Republican]] nominee for [[President of the United States of America|President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 Election]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080305/NATIONWORLD/803050441/0/LOCAL1901 ''McCain clinches GOP nomination; Huckabee bows out''] 5 March 2008 IndyStar.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,255535,00.html John McCain Announces Plans for '08 Presidential Candidacy on 'Late Night With David Letterman'], Associated Press, 1 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's family has a long history of military service, including ancestors who fought as army soldiers in the Indian Wars, [[American Revolutionary War]], [[War of 1812]], for the Confederate States of America in the [[American Civil War]], and in [[World War I]]. Both his father and grandfather were high-ranking United States Navy admirals. In addition, McCain's two sons are currently serving in the U.S. Navy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1951, the McCain family moved to Northern [[Virginia]] and he attended Episcopal High School, a private preparatory boarding school in Alexandria. McCain was on the wrestling team and went on to graduate in 1954. He later joined the U.S. Naval Academy and graduated in 1958.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military career==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:McCain 1965.jpg|left|thumb|200px|McCain photographed in 1965]]&lt;br /&gt;
McCain served heroically in the [[United States Navy]] from 1958 to 1981. He spent two and a half years as a naval aviator in training at the Naval Air Station Pensacola in Florida and the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi in Texas. By 1967, McCain was a veteran pilot aboard the ''USS Forrestal'' aircraft carrier off the coast of Vietnam. On 29 July 1967, while preparing to take off on a bombing run over North Vietnam, a missile accidentally fired from another plane, hitting the fuel tanks on McCain's aircraft and triggering explosions and a fire. McCain escaped from his plane by crawling onto the nose of the aircraft and diving on to the ship's deck which was ablaze from burning fuel. His attempt to rescue a fellow pilot whose flight suit was on fire was prevented when McCain was blown over by further explosions. When the fire was contained 24 hours later, 134 men had been killed and hundreds more injured. It was called the worst non-combat-related accident in U.S. naval history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=526451&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The coronation of the ultimate survivor, John McCain''] 5 March 2008 [[Daily Mail]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prisoner-Of-War (1967 - 1973)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 26, 1967, as McCain was flying over Hanoi's Thermal Power Plant during his 23rd bombing mission, he was shot down and captured by the North Vietnamese. He had just released his bombs when [[A-4 Skyhawk|his plane]] was shot down by a surface-to-air missile. As he ejected, unconscious from the accident, he broke his knee and both arms and descended by parachute into a lake. When he floated ashore, Vietnamese locals spit and kicked him, nearly killing him. The police took him to Hoa Loa Prison where he was held in solitary captivity without medical attention or sufficient food. During brutal interrogations, he was asked for information in return for medical care. McCain refused, giving only his name and date of birth. When it was discovered that he was the son of a top U.S. Admiral, he was given medical care. Hospital personnel never believed he would survive, as he had large wounds and weighed a mere 100 lbs. He also had completely white hair, a product of accelerated aging under harsh conditions. Nonetheless, his health improved and McCain was held as a Prisoner-Of-War (POW) at the Hanoi Hilton. As a prisoner, guards tortured him with frequent beatings and painful contortions, breaking his teeth and bones. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After months of beating sessions and intense interrogations, McCain was psychologically and physically weakened. At one point, he was forced to sign a statement which made claims exonerating his captors of inhumane treatment. The paper was intended for use as propaganda, but in all their subsequent attempts for promoting a &amp;quot;humane&amp;quot; image of the POW camp, McCain worked his hardest to thwart them. In 1971, four years from his capture, he was placed with 20 to 30 other Americans in better treatment. They were allowed to celebrate Christian holidays, including Christmas. McCain, who served as an impromptu chaplain, recalled that during their services, men cried; &amp;quot;They were tears of joy that for the first time... we were able to celebrate Christmas together.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In light of his father's high military status, McCain was offered early release, which he adamantly refused in honor of the &amp;quot;First in, first out&amp;quot; clause of the POW Code of Conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On March 14, 1973, after five and a half years of imprisonment, McCain was released alongside 106 other pilots under the Nixon administration. McCain received a heartfelt reception at the White House and was pronounced a war hero and eminent voice for the Vietnam War.  Awards from the military followed, including the Legion of Merit, a Silver Star, a Bronze Star, a [[Purple Heart]], the [[Distinguished Flying Cross]], and the Vietnamese Legion of Honor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain's severe war injuries prevent him today from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://graphics.boston.com/news/politics/campaign2000/news/McCain_character_loyal_to_a_fault+.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Return to the Navy (1973 - 1981)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--He was recovering and studying until about  1975. 1982 was the beginning of his Congress years--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Vietnam War and his military service remained strong in McCain's memory. He immediately wanted to rejoin the Navy, and spent years preparing with excruciating physical therapy and a year of study in the Naval War College, where he attacked the liberal anti-war movement for weakening the morale of his fellow POWs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkpatrick, David D. &amp;quot;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/14/america/15pows.php In '74 thesis, the seeds of McCain's war views.]&amp;quot; The New York Times (June 15, 2008) p. A1.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With his extensive experience in the Navy's Aviation division, he was selected to reform the flying fleet as Commanding Officer. John McCain quickly transformed his crew's personnel, which had been underfunded in the post-Vietnam era. Carl Smith, who served under McCain, stated, &amp;quot;He immediately began making changes. He fired people, and he replaced people at the top who he thought were not being as effective as he wanted them to be. He wanted real leadership. He wanted the squadron to come to life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. pg. 57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many in his staff were disappointed to have him leave, and praised his work in promoting efficiency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Command of a training squadron (1976-77), gave him some executive experience, which his supporters contrast to [[Barack Obama]]'s lack of any executive experience whatsoever. Former Arkansas Governor and Presidential candidate [[Mike Huckabee]] said that this experience should be valued because just one choice he makes in that position could have disastrous consequences.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his assignment to the Senate as the Navy's liaison, 1977-81, McCain began to join the ranks of politicians. He transformed the position from a rather unimportant post into one of authority and respect{{fact}}, gaining allies in the Senate. The Senate liaison role provided a learning experience in national security policy and foreign affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political career==&lt;br /&gt;
===Congressional (1982 - 1986)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to entering public service, McCain worked in [[Phoenix]] for his father-in-law's company, Hensley &amp;amp; Co, which was an Anheuser-Busch beer wholesaler and distributor. With nagging injuries and limited physical mobility, McCain realized he would never become a four-star general like his forefathers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9542249 John McCain Biography (1936-)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some biographers argue that he shifted into politics so that he could achieve the equivalent in politics, leading to his Senatorial career. After gaining support from local business leaders, he ran for a congressional seat for Arizona's 1st congressional district as a Republican in 1982. His [[liberal]] opponents labeled him as a &amp;quot;carpetbagger&amp;quot;. McCain responded to a voter making the charge of &amp;quot;carpetbagging&amp;quot; saying,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Listen, pal. I spent 22 years in the Navy. My father was in the Navy. My grandfather was in the Navy. We in the military service tend to move a lot. We have to live in all parts of the country, all parts of the world. I wish I could have had the luxury, like you, of growing up and living and spending my entire life in a nice place like the First District of Arizona, but I was doing other things. As a matter of fact, when I think about it now, the place I lived longest in my life was Hanoi.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the endorsements of local newspapers, McCain easily won the election. In 1983, he became President of the Republican freshman class of representatives. At the time, he largely supported Reagan's hard stance against the [[Soviet Union]], his tax cuts and matters on Indian Affairs. He did, however, break with the President on the decision to place a U.S. military presence in Lebanon, saying {{cquote|''I do not foresee obtainable objectives in Lebanon; I believe the longer we stay, the more difficult it will be to leave.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. pg. 100&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} During his four years in [[Congress]], McCain and his wife Cindy had three children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatorial (1986 - Present)===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Reagan mccain.jpg|left|thumb|300px|3/3/1987 President Reagan and Nancy Reagan greet John McCain in the Blue Room during a dinner for newly elected members of the 100th Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
When Republican and [[conservative]] icon [[Barry Goldwater]] retired from the United States Senate in Arizona in 1986, Congressman McCain announced his candidacy for the seat. He easily won the election, defeating his Democratic opponent Richard Kimball by 20 percentage points. When entering the Senate, he became a member of the powerful Armed Services Committee and he also joined the Commerce Committee and the Indian Affairs Committee. During the 1988 Presidential Election, McCain was named chairman of Veterans for Bush. In 1991, Senator McCain became part of the &amp;quot;Keating Five&amp;quot; scandal, where McCain and four other Senators (all Democrats) were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Between 1982 and 1987, McCain had received approximately $112,000 in political contributions from Charles Keating Jr. After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined that McCain was not involved in any wrongdoing, and McCain, along with the four other Senators, was not charged with any crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;quot;Maverick&amp;quot; Image in the Senate====&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain has gained a reputation as a &amp;quot;maverick&amp;quot; for his sponsorship of many bills and leadership on almost every issue. Starting in 1994, he worked with Democratic [[Wisconsin]] Senator [[Russ Feingold]] on campaign finance reform. The McCain-Feingold bill banned &amp;quot;soft money&amp;quot;. It passed and was signed into law on November 6th, 2002, by President Bush. In the 1990's, McCain gained attention for his strong opposition to pork barrel spending. He championed the 1996 Line Item Veto Act, which gave the President the power to veto individual spending items. However, in 1998, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled the act unconstitutional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voteview.com rated McCain as the second most conservative Senator in the 109th Congress (Jan. 2005 - Jan. 2007).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voteview.com/SEN109.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain and the Bush administration agree on most issues. He voted with the Bush administration 95% of the time in 2007, according to Congressional Quarterly's &amp;quot;Presidential Support Scores&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/512/ Politifact fact checks McCain's voting support&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Issues include making the Bush tax cuts permanent (even though he originally opposed and voted against them), energy independence, winning the war in Iraq, reforming Social Security, and continuing and expanding Bush's supply-side economic policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, McCain asked for $0 in earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2008_database 2008 ''Pig Book''], Council for Citizens Against Government Waste&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 100% in 2007 (88% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2000 Presidential Campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain launched his first campaign for President in 2000, when he challenged then-[[Texas]] Governor [[George W. Bush]] for the Republican nomination. McCain's campaign was surprisingly strong. By ignoring the [[Iowa Caucus]], he was able to win the [[New Hampshire]] Primary by nineteen percentage points. He then won the [[Michigan]] Primary. However, he went on to lose [[South Carolina]] and 9 out of the 13 [[Super Tuesday]] states. McCain withdrew from the race on March 9, 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====After 2000====&lt;br /&gt;
Following McCain's loss in the 2000 Presidential primary and reports of dirty tricks in [[South Carolina]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/03/21/the_anatomy_of_a_smear_campaign/ The anatomy of a smear campaign,  March 21, 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2007/12/30/top-romney-advisor-tied-to-anonymous-attacks-of-previous-presidential-primary/ Top Romney advisor tied to anonymous attacks of previous presidential primary, December 30, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, McCain began to disagree with President Bush on many issues, such as tax cuts, climate change, and gun legislation. After the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]], McCain wrote legislation that created the 9/11 Commission, while he and Democratic Senator Fritz Hollings co-sponsored the Aviation and Transportation Security Act that federalized airport security. In May 2005, McCain led the so-called &amp;quot;[[Gang of 14]]&amp;quot; in the Senate, which established a compromise that preserved the ability of senators to filibuster judicial nominees, but only in &amp;quot;extraordinary circumstances&amp;quot;. McCain also co-sponsored comprehensive immigration reform (see below under political record for details).   In addition to bipartisan work in the Senate, it was during this period that McCain was courted by the Senate Democrats, and considered switching parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-say-mccain-nearly-abandoned-gop-2007-03-28.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008 Presidential Campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|John McCain 2008 Presidential Campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:McCain_nomination.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Senator John McCain accepting his party's presidential nomination, 09/04/08]] McCain announced his run for President in the highly volatile 2008 Republican primary early in 2007 at New Hampshire. Throughout the early months, the debates represented a splintered Party among the strong Christian constituency (Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee), anti-immigration activists (Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo), and the blockbuster fundraising by Mitt Romney and Giuliani, who appeared to be media favorites upon entry. Mitt Romney raised $23 million in the first three months of 2007, for instance, three times that of Sen. McCain. In addition, McCain's refusal to sign pacts with important donors and his distaste for political fundraising&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cook, Charles. &amp;quot;The 2008 Presidential Primaries: What in America's Name Is Going On?&amp;quot; The Washington Quarterly Vol. 31 Issue 3 pp. 193-204.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;often left him at odds with the other candidates, namely Rudy Giuliani, who amassed over $10 million in March 2007 alone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;amp;sid=aZ7SuEo0wuMM&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain failed to win strong support because of his maverick image, especially with difficult relationships with key Christian leaders. Social conservatives flocked to Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee with strong disfavor for McCain because of his mixed statements on abortion and religious initiatives. Many evangelicals remained reluctant to support McCain because of longstanding offense he had raised during his 2000 campaign against George W. Bush; news had been raised that many influential Christian organizations would schism from the GOP if they did not reconcile relationships with the Republican Party nominee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Luo, Michael. &amp;quot;Evangelicals see Dilemma in GOP Field.&amp;quot; July 8, 2007. New York Times.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain also suffered from his strong support for the Iraq war, which had erupted in sharp violence during early 2007, and was attacked for his position on immigration reform, a hotly-debated issue among conservatives. A damaging false story by the New York Times, which claimed McCain had an affair with a lobbyist, hurt his stature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When news had spread that McCain's campaign bankrupted and &amp;quot;imploded&amp;quot; in the summer of 2007, the Republican nomination began a period of quick shifting; other candidates began to soar in the polls, detracting McCain's support. Rudy Giuliani, who collected a strong following based on his leadership as &amp;quot;America's Mayor&amp;quot;, began to court evangelical Christians who felt uneasy about McCain, gaining the endorsement of televangelist Pat Robertson. However, as his less-than-flattering personal life and liberal positions on social issues became apparent, he quickly lost momentum to Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cook, Charles. &amp;quot;The 2008 Presidential Primaries: What in America's Name Is Going On?&amp;quot; The Washington Quarterly Vol. 31 Issue 3 pp. 193-204.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fred Thompson, who entered late in the race, quickly withdrew because of lackadaisical popularity and poor fund-raising efforts. Huckabee remained popular in the Southern United States, but failed to win major contests among independents and Democrat voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney had the edge in early races, but couldn't deliver a knockout blow.  McCain's poll numbers slowly increased and benefited as the field narrowed.  After McCain defeated top contender Mitt Romney by a large margin on Super Tuesday in delegate-rich states like New York, California, and Arizona,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Neuman and Howard Berkes. &amp;quot;Mitt Romney Drops Out of GOP Presidential Race.&amp;quot; Feb. 7, 2008. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18772382&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mitt Romney withdrew with some protest, leaving McCain the clear front-runner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bumiller, Elisabeth, Kirkpatrick, David. &amp;quot;Romney Is Out; McCain Emerges as G.O.P. Choice.&amp;quot; Feb. 8, 2008. New York Times.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although McCain's proportion of the vote was not much higher than Romney's, he won most of the 'winner take all' states giving him a much higher proportion of the delegate count.  Without Romney's well-financed opposition, McCain easily clinched the necessary delegate lead of 1,191 in March after a spirited yet short-lived fight from Mike Huckabee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NPR.org. &amp;quot;Election 2008: Huckabee, Romney Stay in Race for GOP Nomination.&amp;quot; Feb. 6, 2008. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18739137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain became the official Republican nominee on September 3 at the Republican National Convention. His running mate is Governor [[Sarah Palin]] of [[Alaska]] and his [[Democrat]] opponent is Senator [[Barack Obama]] of [[Illinois]]. Election day will be on November 4, 2008.  After trailing Obama in the national polls, McCain suddenly took the lead after the two conventions, baffling the Democrats who had built their own campaign entirely on attacking President Bush, whom McCain ignored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The latest poll results are summarized at [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html Real Clear Politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain is a good man and a Maverick, willing do do what is right above all else, taking a moment to rectify certain misconceptions the media has portrayed about Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCain shows his moral fiber and lets the people know that he wishes to keep the race respectful. Shows he is a [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27130877#27130877 Real Leader.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Domestic Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:McCain_on_Meet_the_Press.jpg|left|thumb|300px|Senator John McCain discusses his opinions with Tim Russert on &amp;quot;Meet the Press&amp;quot;, 2005]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Balanced Budget===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has emphasized reducing government spending over tax cuts. He is one of the Senate's most outspoken critics of pork barrel spending and has pledged to veto any bill with pork as President. Congressional experience has enabled John McCain to identify items that are unnecessary. McCain is fiscally responsible with the taxpayers' money and created a simple method to detect spending abuses. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&amp;amp;Issue_id=d1a878d9-f16c-4570-b402-9d1bc3fe6ab9] , http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&amp;amp;Issue_id=d1a878d9-f16c-4570-b402-9d1bc3fe6ab9, U.S. Senate Pork Barrel Spending&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An appropriation that is not properly authorized by the Senate and not requested by the Administration.&lt;br /&gt;
* An unauthorized and unrequested, locality-specific or facility-specific earmark (including those funds that are above the Administration request).&lt;br /&gt;
* A budget add-on that would be subject to a budget point of order.&lt;br /&gt;
* The transfer or disposal of federal property or items under terms that circumvent existing law.&lt;br /&gt;
* New items added in conference that were never considered in either bill in either House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain is a staunch advocate of freedom in the [[economy]]. He has spent his career fighting for deregulation and the prosperity of a free market. In 1999, McCain voted in favor of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which passed in the Senate by a vote of 54-44.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00105&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill promoted more freedom for banks, brokerage houses, and insurance companies. In 2002 he voted for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which passed the Senate without opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00192&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2005 McCain co-sponsored the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act which would allow the office of Federal Housing Enterprise oversight of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), an independent Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Agency which shall have authority over Federal Home Associations. McCain said the following on May 26th, 2006: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]] pose to'' ''the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://beltwaysnark.com/2008/09/16/john-mccain-supported-a-proposal-for-an-agency-to-oversee-fannie-and-freddiein-2005/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress did not act, with the bill dying in committee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Earmarks===&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain staunchly opposes [[earmarks]] as wasteful spending. In his 28 years in federal government, McCain has never requested an earmark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain supports school vouchers and charter schools. His voting record shows support for reducing the federal government's role in [[education]]. He voted for school vouchers for Washington, D.C., education savings accounts, and against $5 billion for grants to local educational agencies. McCain sponsored the Education A-Plus bill in 1997 and again in 1999, which allowed parents to open tax-free saving accounts for their children's school supplies. McCain also co-sponsored the Child Nutrition Act, which would provide federal funding for at-risk children. He has publicly stated he supports [[intelligent design]] teaching in schools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/90069 &amp;quot;On Tuesday, though, he sided with the president on two issues that have made headlines recently: teaching intelligent design in schools...McCain told the Star that, like Bush, he believes &amp;quot;all points of view&amp;quot; should be available to students studying the origins of mankind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health Care===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's record and stated positions on [[health care]] are based on true conservative principles. He is against socialized health care and health coverage mandates. McCain supports tax credits for personal health savings accounts and enhancing competition in the health care industry to improve quality and lower costs. He also supports allowing citizens to purchase out-of-state health insurance. In an October 2007 statement, McCain said: &amp;quot;In health care, we believe in enhancing the freedom of individuals to receive necessary and desired care. We do not believe in coercion and the use of state power to mandate care, coverage or costs.&amp;quot; McCain is a member of the Republican Main Street Partnership. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.republicanmainstreet.org/healthcare.htm Pro Healthcare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain has stated &amp;quot;ethanol subsidies, tariff barriers and sugar quotas drive up food prices and hurt Americans. However, we cannot take the wrong direction and cut off trade for American goods.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/4dbd2cc7-890e-47f1-882f-b8fc4cfecc78.htm], McCain Economic Plan&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; “America’s most vital interests call us to the mission of energy security, and so does our sense of honor. And the straightest, swiftest path to energy security is to produce more, use less, and find new sources of power — so that no commodity can determine our security, and no crisis can undermine our economy,” McCain said in Houston, TX, June 16, 2008. He proposes to remove federal obstacles to offshore drilling. Among his major initiatives is the removal of the 27-year old federal moratorium on states’ abilities to explore and drill for oil and natural gas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/06/17/mccain-slaps-obama-on-energy-calls-for-more-drilling/], McCain slaps Obama on energy, June 17th, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, he wants the states to receive incentives and royalties to drill. The current ban on offshore drilling covers an estimated 80 percent of U.S. coastal waters.&amp;quot;We've seen the impact of it in the form of food prices, in the form of gasoline, in the form of threats of inflation and indeed indications of inflation, and we must embark on a national mission to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080616/ap_on_el_pr/mccain] , http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080616/ap_on_el_pr/mccain , AP McCain urges end to ban on offshore drilling , June 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He indicated, though, that the end of the ban on offshore drilling would have mostly psychological effects in the short term.  At a town hall meeting, McCain stated, &amp;quot;I don't see an immediate relief, but I do see that exploitation of existing reserves that may exist -- and in view of many experts that do exist off our coasts -- is also a way that we need to provide relief. Even though it may take some years, the fact that we are exploiting those reserves would have psychological impact that I think is beneficial.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
He would support incentives for building new nuclear power plants. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/06/24/1163504.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; John McCain wants more nuclear reactors to increase America's energy independence. He is calling for the construction of 45 new reactors by 2030. Also, McCain wants to increase federal funds for clean coal technology by 2 billion dollars to reduce dependence on foreign oil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91CMT0O0&amp;amp;show_article=1] , http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91CMT0O0&amp;amp;show_article=1 , AP McCain calls for building 45 new nuclear reactors, June 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCain supports increasing ethanol imports and more production of hybrid vehicles. He is co-sponsor of a Senate cap-and-trade bill designed to limit greenhouse gas emissions. He has consistently voted for preserving the budget for ANWR but against drilling for [[oil]] in the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]] (ANWR), because of environmental concerns.  Conservationists differ from conservatives that 2000 acres for oil drilling is not enough to impact [[polar bears]] in the region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's position on [[global warming]] issues has put him at odds with conservatives. His [[environment]]al proposals are mostly sound modern thinking by someone that understands the enormity of the problem.  McCain says that we can go green as a nation without bankrupting America. Per his website, Senator McCain &amp;quot;wants to leave a better future for our children.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
On January 2007, McCain said, &amp;quot;we continue to learn more about the science of climate change and the dangerous precedence of not addressing this environmental problem. The science tells us that urgent and significant action is needed.&amp;quot; On October 30, 2003, he co-sponsored the Climate Stewardship Act (S.139), which was defeated. McCain is a member of, and was endorsed by, the Republicans for Environmental Protection organization. His conservative stances include voting to confirm Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior and he is in favor of renewable energy such as solar, hydro, and wind. &amp;quot;Wind power is one of many alternative energy sources that are changing our economy for the better, and one day they will change our economy forever.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain says that he will secure the borders first and many [[immigration]] issue are still needed but will have to come later. In 2007, McCain worked to provide border security efforts with a temporary worker program and an eventual path to citizenship for many illegal immigrants. Conservatives wanted nothing to do with the proposal and in June 2007, Congress' efforts collapsed. McCain said of the outcome,&amp;quot;I say it is a lesson learned about what the American people's priorities are. And their priority is to secure the borders.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-11-03-610628094_x.htm] , http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-11-03-610628094_x.htm, AP McCain emphasizes border security, November 4, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;..I support the same solution. But we've got to secure the borders first&amp;quot; says McCain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Jan. 5, regarding the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007, Senator McCain announced that anyone who says he supported amnesty is &amp;quot;a liar, is lying.&amp;quot; The senator stated &amp;quot;I do not support, nor would I ever support, any services provided to someone who came to this country illegally, nor would I ever and I never have supported [[Social Security]] benefits for people who are in this country illegally. Any assertion to the contrary is absolutely false.&amp;quot; During the comprehensive immigration reform debate, Senator McCain voted to table an amendment that would have prevented illegal immigrants from receiving Social Security who &amp;quot;are not able to receive Social Security benefits as a result of unlawful activity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Senator McCain stated in a May 29, 2003 interview, &amp;quot;Amnesty has to be an important part because there are people who have lived in this country for 20, 30 or 40 years, who have raised children here and pay taxes here and are not citizens.&amp;quot; Arguing amnesty is not a free pass or a reward for law breaking, McCain stated, &amp;quot;Well, because amnesty, according to the dictionary, is forgiveness. The proposal that we had- would require fines, would require back in the line, would require deportation for some. It would require others to go back to the country of their origin&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/John_McCain_Immigration.htm] , Ontheissues.com, John McCain on Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the [[Republican]] debate at the Reagan Library, McCain stated he supports the deportation of 2 million illegals who have committed crimes in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conversely, in a June 2008 meeting with Hispanic leaders in Chicago, McCain indicated he would push legislation to overhaul federal immigration laws if elected.  According to one attendee, Rosanna Pulido, head of the Illinois [[Minuteman Project]], &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He's one John McCain in front of white Republicans. And he's a different John McCain in front of Hispanics...&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/20/mccain-discusses-immigrat_n_108297.html McCain Discusses Immigration With Hispanic Leaders&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-06-19-4020801806_x.htm McCain Meets With Hispanic Leaders&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Pulido further stated, &amp;quot;He was telling one group of people one thing and the Hispanics another, I'm a conservative and I think he's throwing conservatives under the bus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/06/title----mcca-1.html McCain Double-Talk on Immigration?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Due to his support, members of the Minuteman Project, participating in the Minuteman Project Caravan, traveled to Washington, D.C. to register their disapproval.  They made an entry into McCain's Guest Log Book asking him to uphold the Constitution and enforce the law.  After making the entry, the group was forced to leave by a senior staffer for Senator McCain or be reported to the police. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643181/posts Minuteman Project Thrown Out of McCain's Office&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCain's position on illegal immigration has arguably resulted in the most criticisms from conservatives. On May 12, 2005, McCain joined Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] (D-[[Massachusetts]]) as co-sponsor of the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act. The bill would legalize and eventually grant citizenship to the estimated 12–20 million [[illegal alien]]s in the United States and have them immediately start collecting social security and other government benefits. The bill never came for a vote on the Senate floor. The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 and the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 are two additional compromises based on the original McCain-Kennedy bill. McCain has consistently voted for visas for skilled workers. McCain voted for the Secure Fence Act of 2006 and has said border security should be a bigger priority then the illegal aliens who are currently here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Global Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has actively supported reducing barriers to trade and has shown leadership in the [[Senate]] on Free Trade Agreements (FTA). Senator McCain supports both pending FTAs for Columbia and [[South Korea]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://useconomy.about.com/od/candidatesandtheeconomy/p/McCain_Trade.htm], John McCain and Trade&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He voted for and defends the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Social Security===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain is a strong supporter of private [[Social Security]] accounts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tax Reform===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2001, McCain gained attention as one of only two Republicans who voted against President Bush's tax cuts. He opposed accelerating the cuts in 2003, saying, &amp;quot;I voted against the tax cuts because of the disproportional amount that went to the wealthiest Americans. I would clearly support not extending those tax cuts in order to help address the deficit.&amp;quot; He has now changed his stance, by voting to make the tax cuts permanent, and says he would do the same as President. In 2002, Senator McCain was one of only two Republicans to twice vote against the permanent repeal of the Death Tax. He has also refused to sign a pledge put forth by Americans for Tax Freedom not to impose any new taxes or increase existing taxes. However, many of McCain's votes has shown support for lower taxes, such as eliminating the marriage penalty, a 1997 vote to cut capital gains taxes and he introduced measures that would require a sixty-vote majority to pass a tax increase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Security===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain urges the Senate to pass FISA. “For months, House Democrats, the [[ACLU]], and the trial lawyers have held up legislation to modernize our nation’s terrorist surveillance laws.  Today, the House passed a compromise bill to end this impasse.  While I would have preferred to see the Senate bill enacted, which I voted for earlier this year, I am pleased Congressional leaders and the Administration were able to reach an agreement to reform our current surveillance law and not let FISA expire in August.  I hope [[Senate]] Democrats will allow this matter to quickly be considered by the Senate and sent to the President for his signature.  I will support this measure and hope that politics will be put aside in favor of this vital national security matter.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&amp;amp;ContentRecord_id=a7f9dc6c-da0e-459d-dd6c-91e20a46e1e5] , McCAIN URGES SENATE PASSAGE OF FISA &lt;br /&gt;
, June 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was established in 1978.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has voted in support of the [[Patriot Act|USA PATRIOT Act]] as well as National Missile Defense. However, he has joined [[liberal]]s in support of immediately closing [[Guantanamo Bay]], and moving all the prisoners to Fort Leavenworth. On October 3, 2005, he introduced the McCain Detainee Amendment which prohibits inhumane treatment of prisoners, including prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. The bill was passed and signed by President [[George W. Bush]]. McCain has recently criticized the practice of [[waterboarding]], saying &amp;quot;they should know what it is. It is not a complicated procedure. It is torture.&amp;quot; McCain voted against HR 2082, the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, which included provisions that would have prevented the CIA from water boarding prisoners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Afghanistan===&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] McCain was a strong advocate for military action in [[Afghanistan]], saying:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''We did not cause this war. Our enemies did, and they are to blame for the deprivations and difficulties it occasions. They are to'' ''blame for the loss of innocent life. They are to blame for the geopolitical problems confronting our friends and us. We can help'' ''repair the damage of war. But to do so, we must destroy the people who started it.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=95001375&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain is currently calling for 15,000 additional troops to address the situation in Afghanistan, similar to his victorious 2007 troop surge in Iraq.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iran===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has said that &amp;quot;We continue to be concerned about [[Iran]]ian influence and assistance to Hezbollah as well as Iranian pursuit of nuclear weapons.&amp;quot; He tried to ban Iran from playing in the 2006 World Cup, citing Iranian President [[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]'s [[Holocaust]] denials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraq===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:610x.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Senator John McCain with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, 03/17/08]] McCain voted with the majority [[Republican]] Party and 29 Democrats of the Senate in favor of the 2002 &amp;quot;[[Iraq War]] Resolution&amp;quot; authorizing President George W. Bush to go to war against Iraq and overthrow the [[Saddam Hussein]] regime. In 1998, McCain voted in favor of HR 4655 Iraq Liberation Act, signed by then President Clinton. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Legislation/ILA.htm], http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Legislation/ILA.htm, HR4655 Public Law: 105-338, October 31, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; HR 4655 declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government. McCain went on to became a critic of the management of the war, arguing that there wasn't enough troop strength in the area. However, he never became a defeatist advocating surrender. McCain publicly stated that he had &amp;quot;no confidence&amp;quot; in then-Secretary of Defense [[Donald Rumsfeld]]. However, he refused to call for his resignation, saying that &amp;quot;the President picks his team, and the president has the right to stay with that team if he wants to.&amp;quot; McCain became one of the strongest leading advocates in the Senate for the 2007 troop surge, which increased the number of American troops by 20,500, deployed to provide security to [[Baghdad]] and Al Anbar Province. On February 4, he criticized a non-binding resolution opposing the troop buildup, calling it a reckless &amp;quot;vote of no confidence&amp;quot; in the U.S. Commanders and in the military. Additionally, he voted against all measures aimed at withdrawal of U.S. forces and voted against cutting off of war funds. McCain rightly believes that Congress should not micromanage the war and to give the military everything they ask for to successfully complete the mission. He has mentioned in a town hall forum that staying the course in Iraq for 'a hundred years' would not bother him if no American soldier's were losing their lives. This became an issue for Democratic political strategy. The DNC lead by chairman [[Howard Dean]] repeatedly tried to use false statements in justifying attacking McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html]http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html, Washington post Fact Checker, April 2, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  What McCain said is very different from what the liberal media and the DNC were reporting. Asked in Derry, NH of the willingness to keep troops in Iraq for 50 years, he said &amp;quot;Make it 100&amp;quot; and   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  {{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;That's fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia===&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCain has strongly criticized [[Russia]]n President [[Vladimir Putin]]. During a primary debate he said, &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He bullies his neighbors and he wants to get a control of the energy supply of Western Europe. This is a dangerous person. And he has to understand that there's a cost to some of his actions.&amp;quot; In 2005 McCain and [[Connecticut]] senator [[Joe Lieberman]] drafted a resolution banning Russia from attending the Group of 8 (G8) international forum. McCain is also a strong supporter of ballistic national missile defenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cuba===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain forcefully supports the [[Cuban embargo]] and believes it should be maintained until certain specific political freedoms are restored to the country. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=1&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;fta=y&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1222106556-zea3cQG12OakFI9P97dogQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If I am fortunate enough to be elected as the next President of the United States, I pledge to you to be a loyal and unswerving friend of the right to life movement.&amp;quot;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sen. John McCain has more than a twenty year anti-[[abortion]] record, first in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]], then in the U.S. Senate. McCain voted 11 times on anti-abortion and other [[pro-life]] issues in  the House. Senator McCain has voted 119 times on anti-abortion and other pro-life measures in the Senate. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.naral.org/assets/files/mccain_fact_sheet.pdf], http://www.naral.org/assets/files/mccain_fact_sheet.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's record in the Senate on abortion is pro-life. He voted for the 2003 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act. McCain has also voted against government funding of birth control and sex education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00214 Voted Nay on an amendment to authorize grants to carry out programs to provide education on preventing teen pregnancies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00075 Vote against allocation of $100m for prevention of unintended pregnancies &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nowpublic.com/quiet-campaign-against-contraception Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain's campaign officials boast that he has &amp;quot;consistently voted against taxpayer-funded contraception programs.&amp;quot; And Mr. McCain reports that his adviser on sexual-health matters is Sen. Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, who leads campaigns claiming condoms are unsafe and opposing emergency contraception.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During his first Presidential campaign for the 2000 election, McCain said the following on [[Roe v. Wade]], &amp;quot;I'd love to see a point where it is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/feb/07021908.html McCain's &amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has since changed his position, saying Roe v. Wade should be overturned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain:&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted against a [[Roe v. Wade]] resolution&lt;br /&gt;
* Co-sponsored and voted for the Federal Abortion Ban&lt;br /&gt;
* Supported H.R.1997, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted for four anti-abortion U.S. Supreme Court judges&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted for six anti-abortion lower court judges&lt;br /&gt;
* Supported H.R.3913, to prohibit federal funds for abortion services in any case &lt;br /&gt;
* Voted to make it a federal crime for anyone but a parent to cross state lines for abortion termination&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted in favor of a national network of parental notification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Quotations====&lt;br /&gt;
“I do not support Roe v. Wade. It should be overturned.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ann Althouse, Rudy &amp;amp; Mitt Hem &amp;amp; Haw on Abortion, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 24, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have many, many votes and it’s been consistent. And I’ve got a consistent zero from NARAL throughout all those years….&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John McCain for President 2008, On the Issues: Human Dignity and the Sanctity of Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;My record is clear, and I think the important thing is you look at people’s voting record because sometimes rhetoric can be a little… misleading…. As you know I don’t support Roe v. Wade…. I thought it was a bad decision, and I think that the decision should be made in the states&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John McCain for President 2008, On the Issues: Human Dignity and the Sanctity of Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*“I’m proud that we have Justice Alito and Roberts on the United States Supreme Court. I’m very proud to have played a very small role in making that happen.” McCain explained further that he “will try to find clones of Alito and Roberts” to fill future court vacancies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=26539], Letter from Sen. John McCain to Pro‐Life Community Janary 23, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gun Control===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's record on [[gun control]] is mixed. He co-sponsored the Gun Show Loophole Closing and Gun Law Enforcement Act of 2001. This act would reduce the number of gun shows, require gun-owners to purchase trigger locks, and allow federal agents to arrest those who violate federal gun laws. However, McCain has frequently voted in support of the Second Amendment, such as voting against background checks at gun shows and voting in support of prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. In August of 1999, McCain said he was open to voting for an assault weapon ban, depending on the details. However, he still voted against the Federal Assault Weapons Ban and the efforts to renew it, as well as the Brady Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A top official of the [[National Rifle Association]] said McCain has been a reliable ally of gun owners despite divisions with the powerful lobbying group on some issues. NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre told The Associated Press &amp;quot;...We're not foolish enough to ignore the vast areas of agreement in which John McCain has been a friend to gun owners.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republican presidential nominee has voted against a ban on assault-type weapons with restrictions which were objected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Same-sex marriage===&lt;br /&gt;
In the speech on the Senate floor July 13th, 2004, McCain stated “Mr. President, most Americans believe, as I do, that the institution of marriage should be reserved for the union of a man and a woman.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.friendsofmccain.com/news/dspnews.cfm?id=143&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; John McCain revealed his decision based on super majority requirements and the current political realities within Congress. “By my count, there is not at this time even a small majority of senators who would vote for Senator Allard’s amendment, much less the 67 votes required by the Constitution. That won’t change, Mr. President, unless public opinion changes significantly. The [[Founders]], wisely, made certain that the Constitution is difficult to amend, and, as a practical political matter, can’t be done without overwhelming public approval. And thank God for that. Were it any easier I fear we could not make the claim for the Constitution’s enduring success that I have just made.&amp;quot; Further, he explained his approach to the amendment's ultimate success “If a constitution is to be amended, Mr. President, it should be a state constitution.&amp;quot; McCain voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment. In May 2008, the California Supreme Court effectively created a ruling to grant same-sex partners equal rights to [[Marriage]] and to be recognized by the state. A spokesman for Republican John McCain, who opposes gay marriage, said the Arizona senator &amp;quot;doesn't believe judges should be making these decisions.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Votes missed == &lt;br /&gt;
As of August 2007, McCain had missed more votes during the current session of Congress than any Senator other than [[South Dakota]] [[Democrat]] [[Tim Johnson]], who had suffered a brain hemorrhage that had kept him from Congress. He had missed over 48% of his votes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lawrence Journal-World, August 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is due to the fact that he is running a nationwide campaign for President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal life==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cindy McCain.jpg|thumb|Cindy McCain]]&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has been married twice.  His first marriage, to Carol Shepp, ended in [[divorce]] in 1980 after 15 years, of which he spent five in captivity. McCain publicly acknowledges the responsibility for the breakup as his, stating in a 2008 interview with Pastor Rick Warren that &amp;quot;My greatest moral failing, and I have been a very imperfect person, is the failure of my first marriage&amp;quot;. .&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/rules021299.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His second and current wife is Cindy Lou Hensley, to whom he has been married for 28 years.  His son John Sidney IV is a Midshipman at the [[United States Naval Academy]], Annapolis, and his son James is a non-commissioned officer in the [[United States Marine Corps]], who is serving in [[Iraq]] as part of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]].  Also, the McCains adopted a ten-week old baby girl in 1993, who they named Bridget, from [[Mother Teresa]]'s orphanage in [[Bangladesh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://celebrity.rightpundits.com/?p=3183 Bridget McCain Biography] Rightpundits.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/109022008.htm Bridget vs Sonia: McCain vs Rajiv Gandhi] News Analysis India&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cindy McCain was in the country as part of the American Voluntary Medical Team &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-041408-cindy-mccain-bio,1,2151434.story Bio of Cindy McCain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in response to the 1991 [[Bangladesh]] cyclone.&lt;br /&gt;
===McCain's family===&lt;br /&gt;
*Wife Cindy &lt;br /&gt;
*4 sons &lt;br /&gt;
**Douglas &lt;br /&gt;
**Andrew &lt;br /&gt;
**John (''&amp;quot;Jack&amp;quot;'') Sidney IV &lt;br /&gt;
**James &lt;br /&gt;
*3 daughters&lt;br /&gt;
**Sidney&lt;br /&gt;
**Meghan&lt;br /&gt;
**Bridget &lt;br /&gt;
*Parents &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Admiral]] John Sydney McCain, Jr. (from [[Indiana]]) &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Roberta McCain|Roberta Wright McCain]] (from [[Oklahoma]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Faith of My Fathers'' (Random House; 1999) ISBN 0-3755-0191-6&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Odysseus in America'' (Scribner; 2002) ISBN 0-7432-1156-1&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Worth Fighting For: A Memoir'' (Diane Publ. Co; 2002) ISBN 0-7567-6759-8&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Medal of Honor'' (Artisan; 2003) ISBN 1-5796-5240-9&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Why Courage Matters: The Way to a Braver Life'' (Random House; 2004) ISBN 1-4000-6030-3&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Character Is Destiny: Inspiring Stories Every Young Person Should Know and Every Adult Should Remember'' (Random House; 2005) ISBN 1-4000-6412-0&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Hard Call: Great Decisions and the Extraordinary People Who Made Them'' (Twelve; 2007) ISBN 0-4466-9911-X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*McCain, John [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=513224&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''My six years of hell: John McCain recalls life as a prisoner of war in Vietnam''] 8 February 2008 [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 9 February 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John McCain 2008 Presidential Campaign]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Previous Breaking News/John McCain|Articles about John McCain from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[White House]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cindy McCain]], spouse of John McCain&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roberta McCain]], mother of John McCain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQsckD9trn4&amp;amp;eurl=http://evangelicalsformccain.org/meetthesenator.htm ''John McCain: Courageous Service''] - Streaming video documentary hosted at YouTube, including footage of McCain's time as a POW and the Forrestal incident. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9542249 John McCain Biography]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://evangelicalsformccain.org/index.htm Evangelicals for McCain] - Christians, Families and Patriots for John McCain&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://studentsformccain08.blogspot.com/ Students for McCain 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/mccains-mom-pop.html McCain's Mom Pops Off]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.rd.com/national-interest/people-and-politics/our-interview-with-sen-john-mccain/article.html Presidential Candidate John McCain on the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=53270 Voting record]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCain, John}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Arizona Senators]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_McCain&amp;diff=534124</id>
		<title>John McCain</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_McCain&amp;diff=534124"/>
		<updated>2008-10-11T16:05:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* 2008 Presidential Campaign */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Casmier.jpg|right|thumb|250px|'''Senator John McCain, R-Arizona''']] '''John Sidney McCain III''' (born in the U.S. [[Panama Canal]] Zone, August 29, 1936) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=m0003http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Button_enter.png Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, is the Republican nominee for President in 2008, prominent maverick politician and Vietnam War hero, and is the senior [[United States Senate|Senator]] of [[Arizona]]. He has been an influential leader in American politics since 1986, when he ran for office crusading against corruption, attacking pork barrel spending and working for campaign finance reform.  He was defeated by [[George W. Bush]] for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000, and in 2008 kept his distance from the president, despite efforts of Democrats to paint the two as close allies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a pilot for the United States Navy and former Prisoner-of-War (POW), he served in the military for 22 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=m000303 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain, a [[Baptist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296973,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has impressive credentials on issues of foreign policy and national security, which have propelled him in the forefront of national politics as both an outspoken voice for the United States military and as a Presidential contender for the Republican Party since 1993.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain is the [[Republican]] nominee for [[President of the United States of America|President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 Election]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080305/NATIONWORLD/803050441/0/LOCAL1901 ''McCain clinches GOP nomination; Huckabee bows out''] 5 March 2008 IndyStar.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,255535,00.html John McCain Announces Plans for '08 Presidential Candidacy on 'Late Night With David Letterman'], Associated Press, 1 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's family has a long history of military service, including ancestors who fought as army soldiers in the Indian Wars, [[American Revolutionary War]], [[War of 1812]], for the Confederate States of America in the [[American Civil War]], and in [[World War I]]. Both his father and grandfather were high-ranking United States Navy admirals. In addition, McCain's two sons are currently serving in the U.S. Navy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1951, the McCain family moved to Northern [[Virginia]] and he attended Episcopal High School, a private preparatory boarding school in Alexandria. McCain was on the wrestling team and went on to graduate in 1954. He later joined the U.S. Naval Academy and graduated in 1958.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military career==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:McCain 1965.jpg|left|thumb|200px|McCain photographed in 1965]]&lt;br /&gt;
McCain served heroically in the [[United States Navy]] from 1958 to 1981. He spent two and a half years as a naval aviator in training at the Naval Air Station Pensacola in Florida and the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi in Texas. By 1967, McCain was a veteran pilot aboard the ''USS Forrestal'' aircraft carrier off the coast of Vietnam. On 29 July 1967, while preparing to take off on a bombing run over North Vietnam, a missile accidentally fired from another plane, hitting the fuel tanks on McCain's aircraft and triggering explosions and a fire. McCain escaped from his plane by crawling onto the nose of the aircraft and diving on to the ship's deck which was ablaze from burning fuel. His attempt to rescue a fellow pilot whose flight suit was on fire was prevented when McCain was blown over by further explosions. When the fire was contained 24 hours later, 134 men had been killed and hundreds more injured. It was called the worst non-combat-related accident in U.S. naval history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=526451&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The coronation of the ultimate survivor, John McCain''] 5 March 2008 [[Daily Mail]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prisoner-Of-War (1967 - 1973)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 26, 1967, as McCain was flying over Hanoi's Thermal Power Plant during his 23rd bombing mission, he was shot down and captured by the North Vietnamese. He had just released his bombs when [[A-4 Skyhawk|his plane]] was shot down by a surface-to-air missile. As he ejected, unconscious from the accident, he broke his knee and both arms and descended by parachute into a lake. When he floated ashore, Vietnamese locals spit and kicked him, nearly killing him. The police took him to Hoa Loa Prison where he was held in solitary captivity without medical attention or sufficient food. During brutal interrogations, he was asked for information in return for medical care. McCain refused, giving only his name and date of birth. When it was discovered that he was the son of a top U.S. Admiral, he was given medical care. Hospital personnel never believed he would survive, as he had large wounds and weighed a mere 100 lbs. He also had completely white hair, a product of accelerated aging under harsh conditions. Nonetheless, his health improved and McCain was held as a Prisoner-Of-War (POW) at the Hanoi Hilton. As a prisoner, guards tortured him with frequent beatings and painful contortions, breaking his teeth and bones. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After months of beating sessions and intense interrogations, McCain was psychologically and physically weakened. At one point, he was forced to sign a statement which made claims exonerating his captors of inhumane treatment. The paper was intended for use as propaganda, but in all their subsequent attempts for promoting a &amp;quot;humane&amp;quot; image of the POW camp, McCain worked his hardest to thwart them. In 1971, four years from his capture, he was placed with 20 to 30 other Americans in better treatment. They were allowed to celebrate Christian holidays, including Christmas. McCain, who served as an impromptu chaplain, recalled that during their services, men cried; &amp;quot;They were tears of joy that for the first time... we were able to celebrate Christmas together.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In light of his father's high military status, McCain was offered early release, which he adamantly refused in honor of the &amp;quot;First in, first out&amp;quot; clause of the POW Code of Conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On March 14, 1973, after five and a half years of imprisonment, McCain was released alongside 106 other pilots under the Nixon administration. McCain received a heartfelt reception at the White House and was pronounced a war hero and eminent voice for the Vietnam War.  Awards from the military followed, including the Legion of Merit, a Silver Star, a Bronze Star, a [[Purple Heart]], the [[Distinguished Flying Cross]], and the Vietnamese Legion of Honor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. Published 2003 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-47545-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain's severe war injuries prevent him today from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://graphics.boston.com/news/politics/campaign2000/news/McCain_character_loyal_to_a_fault+.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Return to the Navy (1973 - 1981)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--He was recovering and studying until about  1975. 1982 was the beginning of his Congress years--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Vietnam War and his military service remained strong in McCain's memory. He immediately wanted to rejoin the Navy, and spent years preparing with excruciating physical therapy and a year of study in the Naval War College, where he attacked the liberal anti-war movement for weakening the morale of his fellow POWs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkpatrick, David D. &amp;quot;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/14/america/15pows.php In '74 thesis, the seeds of McCain's war views.]&amp;quot; The New York Times (June 15, 2008) p. A1.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With his extensive experience in the Navy's Aviation division, he was selected to reform the flying fleet as Commanding Officer. John McCain quickly transformed his crew's personnel, which had been underfunded in the post-Vietnam era. Carl Smith, who served under McCain, stated, &amp;quot;He immediately began making changes. He fired people, and he replaced people at the top who he thought were not being as effective as he wanted them to be. He wanted real leadership. He wanted the squadron to come to life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. pg. 57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many in his staff were disappointed to have him leave, and praised his work in promoting efficiency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Command of a training squadron (1976-77), gave him some executive experience, which his supporters contrast to [[Barack Obama]]'s lack of any executive experience whatsoever. Former Arkansas Governor and Presidential candidate [[Mike Huckabee]] said that this experience should be valued because just one choice he makes in that position could have disastrous consequences.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his assignment to the Senate as the Navy's liaison, 1977-81, McCain began to join the ranks of politicians. He transformed the position from a rather unimportant post into one of authority and respect{{fact}}, gaining allies in the Senate. The Senate liaison role provided a learning experience in national security policy and foreign affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political career==&lt;br /&gt;
===Congressional (1982 - 1986)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to entering public service, McCain worked in [[Phoenix]] for his father-in-law's company, Hensley &amp;amp; Co, which was an Anheuser-Busch beer wholesaler and distributor. With nagging injuries and limited physical mobility, McCain realized he would never become a four-star general like his forefathers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9542249 John McCain Biography (1936-)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some biographers argue that he shifted into politics so that he could achieve the equivalent in politics, leading to his Senatorial career. After gaining support from local business leaders, he ran for a congressional seat for Arizona's 1st congressional district as a Republican in 1982. His [[liberal]] opponents labeled him as a &amp;quot;carpetbagger&amp;quot;. McCain responded to a voter making the charge of &amp;quot;carpetbagging&amp;quot; saying,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Listen, pal. I spent 22 years in the Navy. My father was in the Navy. My grandfather was in the Navy. We in the military service tend to move a lot. We have to live in all parts of the country, all parts of the world. I wish I could have had the luxury, like you, of growing up and living and spending my entire life in a nice place like the First District of Arizona, but I was doing other things. As a matter of fact, when I think about it now, the place I lived longest in my life was Hanoi.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the endorsements of local newspapers, McCain easily won the election. In 1983, he became President of the Republican freshman class of representatives. At the time, he largely supported Reagan's hard stance against the [[Soviet Union]], his tax cuts and matters on Indian Affairs. He did, however, break with the President on the decision to place a U.S. military presence in Lebanon, saying {{cquote|''I do not foresee obtainable objectives in Lebanon; I believe the longer we stay, the more difficult it will be to leave.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander, Paul. John McCain: Man of the People. pg. 100&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} During his four years in [[Congress]], McCain and his wife Cindy had three children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatorial (1986 - Present)===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Reagan mccain.jpg|left|thumb|300px|3/3/1987 President Reagan and Nancy Reagan greet John McCain in the Blue Room during a dinner for newly elected members of the 100th Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
When Republican and [[conservative]] icon [[Barry Goldwater]] retired from the United States Senate in Arizona in 1986, Congressman McCain announced his candidacy for the seat. He easily won the election, defeating his Democratic opponent Richard Kimball by 20 percentage points. When entering the Senate, he became a member of the powerful Armed Services Committee and he also joined the Commerce Committee and the Indian Affairs Committee. During the 1988 Presidential Election, McCain was named chairman of Veterans for Bush. In 1991, Senator McCain became part of the &amp;quot;Keating Five&amp;quot; scandal, where McCain and four other Senators (all Democrats) were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Between 1982 and 1987, McCain had received approximately $112,000 in political contributions from Charles Keating Jr. After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined that McCain was not involved in any wrongdoing, and McCain, along with the four other Senators, was not charged with any crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;quot;Maverick&amp;quot; Image in the Senate====&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain has gained a reputation as a &amp;quot;maverick&amp;quot; for his sponsorship of many bills and leadership on almost every issue. Starting in 1994, he worked with Democratic [[Wisconsin]] Senator [[Russ Feingold]] on campaign finance reform. The McCain-Feingold bill banned &amp;quot;soft money&amp;quot;. It passed and was signed into law on November 6th, 2002, by President Bush. In the 1990's, McCain gained attention for his strong opposition to pork barrel spending. He championed the 1996 Line Item Veto Act, which gave the President the power to veto individual spending items. However, in 1998, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled the act unconstitutional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voteview.com rated McCain as the second most conservative Senator in the 109th Congress (Jan. 2005 - Jan. 2007).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voteview.com/SEN109.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain and the Bush administration agree on most issues. He voted with the Bush administration 95% of the time in 2007, according to Congressional Quarterly's &amp;quot;Presidential Support Scores&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/512/ Politifact fact checks McCain's voting support&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Issues include making the Bush tax cuts permanent (even though he originally opposed and voted against them), energy independence, winning the war in Iraq, reforming Social Security, and continuing and expanding Bush's supply-side economic policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, McCain asked for $0 in earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2008_database 2008 ''Pig Book''], Council for Citizens Against Government Waste&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 100% in 2007 (88% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2000 Presidential Campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain launched his first campaign for President in 2000, when he challenged then-[[Texas]] Governor [[George W. Bush]] for the Republican nomination. McCain's campaign was surprisingly strong. By ignoring the [[Iowa Caucus]], he was able to win the [[New Hampshire]] Primary by nineteen percentage points. He then won the [[Michigan]] Primary. However, he went on to lose [[South Carolina]] and 9 out of the 13 [[Super Tuesday]] states. McCain withdrew from the race on March 9, 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====After 2000====&lt;br /&gt;
Following McCain's loss in the 2000 Presidential primary and reports of dirty tricks in [[South Carolina]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/03/21/the_anatomy_of_a_smear_campaign/ The anatomy of a smear campaign,  March 21, 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2007/12/30/top-romney-advisor-tied-to-anonymous-attacks-of-previous-presidential-primary/ Top Romney advisor tied to anonymous attacks of previous presidential primary, December 30, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, McCain began to disagree with President Bush on many issues, such as tax cuts, climate change, and gun legislation. After the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]], McCain wrote legislation that created the 9/11 Commission, while he and Democratic Senator Fritz Hollings co-sponsored the Aviation and Transportation Security Act that federalized airport security. In May 2005, McCain led the so-called &amp;quot;[[Gang of 14]]&amp;quot; in the Senate, which established a compromise that preserved the ability of senators to filibuster judicial nominees, but only in &amp;quot;extraordinary circumstances&amp;quot;. McCain also co-sponsored comprehensive immigration reform (see below under political record for details).   In addition to bipartisan work in the Senate, it was during this period that McCain was courted by the Senate Democrats, and considered switching parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-say-mccain-nearly-abandoned-gop-2007-03-28.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008 Presidential Campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|John McCain 2008 Presidential Campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:McCain_nomination.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Senator John McCain accepting his party's presidential nomination, 09/04/08]] McCain announced his run for President in the highly volatile 2008 Republican primary early in 2007 at New Hampshire. Throughout the early months, the debates represented a splintered Party among the strong Christian constituency (Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee), anti-immigration activists (Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo), and the blockbuster fundraising by Mitt Romney and Giuliani, who appeared to be media favorites upon entry. Mitt Romney raised $23 million in the first three months of 2007, for instance, three times that of Sen. McCain. In addition, McCain's refusal to sign pacts with important donors and his distaste for political fundraising&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cook, Charles. &amp;quot;The 2008 Presidential Primaries: What in America's Name Is Going On?&amp;quot; The Washington Quarterly Vol. 31 Issue 3 pp. 193-204.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;often left him at odds with the other candidates, namely Rudy Giuliani, who amassed over $10 million in March 2007 alone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;amp;sid=aZ7SuEo0wuMM&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain failed to win strong support because of his maverick image, especially with difficult relationships with key Christian leaders. Social conservatives flocked to Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee with strong disfavor for McCain because of his mixed statements on abortion and religious initiatives. Many evangelicals remained reluctant to support McCain because of longstanding offense he had raised during his 2000 campaign against George W. Bush; news had been raised that many influential Christian organizations would schism from the GOP if they did not reconcile relationships with the Republican Party nominee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Luo, Michael. &amp;quot;Evangelicals see Dilemma in GOP Field.&amp;quot; July 8, 2007. New York Times.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain also suffered from his strong support for the Iraq war, which had erupted in sharp violence during early 2007, and was attacked for his position on immigration reform, a hotly-debated issue among conservatives. A damaging false story by the New York Times, which claimed McCain had an affair with a lobbyist, hurt his stature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When news had spread that McCain's campaign bankrupted and &amp;quot;imploded&amp;quot; in the summer of 2007, the Republican nomination began a period of quick shifting; other candidates began to soar in the polls, detracting McCain's support. Rudy Giuliani, who collected a strong following based on his leadership as &amp;quot;America's Mayor&amp;quot;, began to court evangelical Christians who felt uneasy about McCain, gaining the endorsement of televangelist Pat Robertson. However, as his less-than-flattering personal life and liberal positions on social issues became apparent, he quickly lost momentum to Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cook, Charles. &amp;quot;The 2008 Presidential Primaries: What in America's Name Is Going On?&amp;quot; The Washington Quarterly Vol. 31 Issue 3 pp. 193-204.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fred Thompson, who entered late in the race, quickly withdrew because of lackadaisical popularity and poor fund-raising efforts. Huckabee remained popular in the Southern United States, but failed to win major contests among independents and Democrat voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney had the edge in early races, but couldn't deliver a knockout blow.  McCain's poll numbers slowly increased and benefited as the field narrowed.  After McCain defeated top contender Mitt Romney by a large margin on Super Tuesday in delegate-rich states like New York, California, and Arizona,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Neuman and Howard Berkes. &amp;quot;Mitt Romney Drops Out of GOP Presidential Race.&amp;quot; Feb. 7, 2008. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18772382&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mitt Romney withdrew with some protest, leaving McCain the clear front-runner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bumiller, Elisabeth, Kirkpatrick, David. &amp;quot;Romney Is Out; McCain Emerges as G.O.P. Choice.&amp;quot; Feb. 8, 2008. New York Times.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although McCain's proportion of the vote was not much higher than Romney's, he won most of the 'winner take all' states giving him a much higher proportion of the delegate count.  Without Romney's well-financed opposition, McCain easily clinched the necessary delegate lead of 1,191 in March after a spirited yet short-lived fight from Mike Huckabee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NPR.org. &amp;quot;Election 2008: Huckabee, Romney Stay in Race for GOP Nomination.&amp;quot; Feb. 6, 2008. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18739137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain became the official Republican nominee on September 3 at the Republican National Convention. His running mate is Governor [[Sarah Palin]] of [[Alaska]] and his [[Democrat]] opponent is Senator [[Barack Obama]] of [[Illinois]]. Election day will be on November 4, 2008.  After trailing Obama in the national polls, McCain suddenly took the lead after the two conventions, baffling the Democrats who had built their own campaign entirely on attacking President Bush, whom McCain ignored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The latest poll results are summarized at [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html Real Clear Politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCain is a good man and a Maverick, willing do do what is right above all else, taking a moment to rectify certain misconceptions the media has portrayed about Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCain shows his moral fiber and lets the people know that he wishes to keep the race respectful. Shows he is a [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27130877#27130877 Real Leader.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Domestic Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:McCain_on_Meet_the_Press.jpg|left|thumb|300px|Senator John McCain discusses his opinions with Tim Russert on &amp;quot;Meet the Press&amp;quot;, 2005]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Balanced Budget===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has emphasized reducing government spending over tax cuts. He is one of the Senate's most outspoken critics of pork barrel spending and has pledged to veto any bill with pork as President. Congressional experience has enabled John McCain to identify items that are unnecessary. McCain is fiscally responsible with the taxpayers' money and created a simple method to detect spending abuses. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&amp;amp;Issue_id=d1a878d9-f16c-4570-b402-9d1bc3fe6ab9] , http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&amp;amp;Issue_id=d1a878d9-f16c-4570-b402-9d1bc3fe6ab9, U.S. Senate Pork Barrel Spending&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An appropriation that is not properly authorized by the Senate and not requested by the Administration.&lt;br /&gt;
* An unauthorized and unrequested, locality-specific or facility-specific earmark (including those funds that are above the Administration request).&lt;br /&gt;
* A budget add-on that would be subject to a budget point of order.&lt;br /&gt;
* The transfer or disposal of federal property or items under terms that circumvent existing law.&lt;br /&gt;
* New items added in conference that were never considered in either bill in either House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain is a staunch advocate of freedom in the [[economy]]. He has spent his career fighting for deregulation and the prosperity of a free market. In 1999, McCain voted in favor of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which passed in the Senate by a vote of 54-44.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00105&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill promoted more freedom for banks, brokerage houses, and insurance companies. In 2002 he voted for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which passed the Senate without opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00192&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2005 McCain co-sponsored the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act which would allow the office of Federal Housing Enterprise oversight of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), an independent Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Agency which shall have authority over Federal Home Associations. McCain said the following on May 26th, 2006: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]] pose to'' ''the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://beltwaysnark.com/2008/09/16/john-mccain-supported-a-proposal-for-an-agency-to-oversee-fannie-and-freddiein-2005/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress did not act, with the bill dying in committee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Earmarks===&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain staunchly opposes [[earmarks]] as wasteful spending. In his 28 years in federal government, McCain has never requested an earmark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain supports school vouchers and charter schools. His voting record shows support for reducing the federal government's role in [[education]]. He voted for school vouchers for Washington, D.C., education savings accounts, and against $5 billion for grants to local educational agencies. McCain sponsored the Education A-Plus bill in 1997 and again in 1999, which allowed parents to open tax-free saving accounts for their children's school supplies. McCain also co-sponsored the Child Nutrition Act, which would provide federal funding for at-risk children. He has publicly stated he supports [[intelligent design]] teaching in schools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/90069 &amp;quot;On Tuesday, though, he sided with the president on two issues that have made headlines recently: teaching intelligent design in schools...McCain told the Star that, like Bush, he believes &amp;quot;all points of view&amp;quot; should be available to students studying the origins of mankind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health Care===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's record and stated positions on [[health care]] are based on true conservative principles. He is against socialized health care and health coverage mandates. McCain supports tax credits for personal health savings accounts and enhancing competition in the health care industry to improve quality and lower costs. He also supports allowing citizens to purchase out-of-state health insurance. In an October 2007 statement, McCain said: &amp;quot;In health care, we believe in enhancing the freedom of individuals to receive necessary and desired care. We do not believe in coercion and the use of state power to mandate care, coverage or costs.&amp;quot; McCain is a member of the Republican Main Street Partnership. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.republicanmainstreet.org/healthcare.htm Pro Healthcare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain has stated &amp;quot;ethanol subsidies, tariff barriers and sugar quotas drive up food prices and hurt Americans. However, we cannot take the wrong direction and cut off trade for American goods.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/4dbd2cc7-890e-47f1-882f-b8fc4cfecc78.htm], McCain Economic Plan&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; “America’s most vital interests call us to the mission of energy security, and so does our sense of honor. And the straightest, swiftest path to energy security is to produce more, use less, and find new sources of power — so that no commodity can determine our security, and no crisis can undermine our economy,” McCain said in Houston, TX, June 16, 2008. He proposes to remove federal obstacles to offshore drilling. Among his major initiatives is the removal of the 27-year old federal moratorium on states’ abilities to explore and drill for oil and natural gas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/06/17/mccain-slaps-obama-on-energy-calls-for-more-drilling/], McCain slaps Obama on energy, June 17th, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, he wants the states to receive incentives and royalties to drill. The current ban on offshore drilling covers an estimated 80 percent of U.S. coastal waters.&amp;quot;We've seen the impact of it in the form of food prices, in the form of gasoline, in the form of threats of inflation and indeed indications of inflation, and we must embark on a national mission to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080616/ap_on_el_pr/mccain] , http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080616/ap_on_el_pr/mccain , AP McCain urges end to ban on offshore drilling , June 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He indicated, though, that the end of the ban on offshore drilling would have mostly psychological effects in the short term.  At a town hall meeting, McCain stated, &amp;quot;I don't see an immediate relief, but I do see that exploitation of existing reserves that may exist -- and in view of many experts that do exist off our coasts -- is also a way that we need to provide relief. Even though it may take some years, the fact that we are exploiting those reserves would have psychological impact that I think is beneficial.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
He would support incentives for building new nuclear power plants. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/06/24/1163504.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; John McCain wants more nuclear reactors to increase America's energy independence. He is calling for the construction of 45 new reactors by 2030. Also, McCain wants to increase federal funds for clean coal technology by 2 billion dollars to reduce dependence on foreign oil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91CMT0O0&amp;amp;show_article=1] , http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91CMT0O0&amp;amp;show_article=1 , AP McCain calls for building 45 new nuclear reactors, June 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCain supports increasing ethanol imports and more production of hybrid vehicles. He is co-sponsor of a Senate cap-and-trade bill designed to limit greenhouse gas emissions. He has consistently voted for preserving the budget for ANWR but against drilling for [[oil]] in the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]] (ANWR), because of environmental concerns.  Conservationists differ from conservatives that 2000 acres for oil drilling is not enough to impact [[polar bears]] in the region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's position on [[global warming]] issues has put him at odds with conservatives. His [[environment]]al proposals are mostly sound modern thinking by someone that understands the enormity of the problem.  McCain says that we can go green as a nation without bankrupting America. Per his website, Senator McCain &amp;quot;wants to leave a better future for our children.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
On January 2007, McCain said, &amp;quot;we continue to learn more about the science of climate change and the dangerous precedence of not addressing this environmental problem. The science tells us that urgent and significant action is needed.&amp;quot; On October 30, 2003, he co-sponsored the Climate Stewardship Act (S.139), which was defeated. McCain is a member of, and was endorsed by, the Republicans for Environmental Protection organization. His conservative stances include voting to confirm Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior and he is in favor of renewable energy such as solar, hydro, and wind. &amp;quot;Wind power is one of many alternative energy sources that are changing our economy for the better, and one day they will change our economy forever.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain says that he will secure the borders first and many [[immigration]] issue are still needed but will have to come later. In 2007, McCain worked to provide border security efforts with a temporary worker program and an eventual path to citizenship for many illegal immigrants. Conservatives wanted nothing to do with the proposal and in June 2007, Congress' efforts collapsed. McCain said of the outcome,&amp;quot;I say it is a lesson learned about what the American people's priorities are. And their priority is to secure the borders.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-11-03-610628094_x.htm] , http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-11-03-610628094_x.htm, AP McCain emphasizes border security, November 4, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;..I support the same solution. But we've got to secure the borders first&amp;quot; says McCain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Jan. 5, regarding the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007, Senator McCain announced that anyone who says he supported amnesty is &amp;quot;a liar, is lying.&amp;quot; The senator stated &amp;quot;I do not support, nor would I ever support, any services provided to someone who came to this country illegally, nor would I ever and I never have supported [[Social Security]] benefits for people who are in this country illegally. Any assertion to the contrary is absolutely false.&amp;quot; During the comprehensive immigration reform debate, Senator McCain voted to table an amendment that would have prevented illegal immigrants from receiving Social Security who &amp;quot;are not able to receive Social Security benefits as a result of unlawful activity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Senator McCain stated in a May 29, 2003 interview, &amp;quot;Amnesty has to be an important part because there are people who have lived in this country for 20, 30 or 40 years, who have raised children here and pay taxes here and are not citizens.&amp;quot; Arguing amnesty is not a free pass or a reward for law breaking, McCain stated, &amp;quot;Well, because amnesty, according to the dictionary, is forgiveness. The proposal that we had- would require fines, would require back in the line, would require deportation for some. It would require others to go back to the country of their origin&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/John_McCain_Immigration.htm] , Ontheissues.com, John McCain on Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the [[Republican]] debate at the Reagan Library, McCain stated he supports the deportation of 2 million illegals who have committed crimes in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conversely, in a June 2008 meeting with Hispanic leaders in Chicago, McCain indicated he would push legislation to overhaul federal immigration laws if elected.  According to one attendee, Rosanna Pulido, head of the Illinois [[Minuteman Project]], &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He's one John McCain in front of white Republicans. And he's a different John McCain in front of Hispanics...&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/20/mccain-discusses-immigrat_n_108297.html McCain Discusses Immigration With Hispanic Leaders&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-06-19-4020801806_x.htm McCain Meets With Hispanic Leaders&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Pulido further stated, &amp;quot;He was telling one group of people one thing and the Hispanics another, I'm a conservative and I think he's throwing conservatives under the bus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/06/title----mcca-1.html McCain Double-Talk on Immigration?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Due to his support, members of the Minuteman Project, participating in the Minuteman Project Caravan, traveled to Washington, D.C. to register their disapproval.  They made an entry into McCain's Guest Log Book asking him to uphold the Constitution and enforce the law.  After making the entry, the group was forced to leave by a senior staffer for Senator McCain or be reported to the police. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643181/posts Minuteman Project Thrown Out of McCain's Office&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCain's position on illegal immigration has arguably resulted in the most criticisms from conservatives. On May 12, 2005, McCain joined Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] (D-[[Massachusetts]]) as co-sponsor of the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act. The bill would legalize and eventually grant citizenship to the estimated 12–20 million [[illegal alien]]s in the United States and have them immediately start collecting social security and other government benefits. The bill never came for a vote on the Senate floor. The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 and the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 are two additional compromises based on the original McCain-Kennedy bill. McCain has consistently voted for visas for skilled workers. McCain voted for the Secure Fence Act of 2006 and has said border security should be a bigger priority then the illegal aliens who are currently here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Global Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has actively supported reducing barriers to trade and has shown leadership in the [[Senate]] on Free Trade Agreements (FTA). Senator McCain supports both pending FTAs for Columbia and [[South Korea]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://useconomy.about.com/od/candidatesandtheeconomy/p/McCain_Trade.htm], John McCain and Trade&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He voted for and defends the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Social Security===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain is a strong supporter of private [[Social Security]] accounts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tax Reform===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2001, McCain gained attention as one of only two Republicans who voted against President Bush's tax cuts. He opposed accelerating the cuts in 2003, saying, &amp;quot;I voted against the tax cuts because of the disproportional amount that went to the wealthiest Americans. I would clearly support not extending those tax cuts in order to help address the deficit.&amp;quot; He has now changed his stance, by voting to make the tax cuts permanent, and says he would do the same as President. In 2002, Senator McCain was one of only two Republicans to twice vote against the permanent repeal of the Death Tax. He has also refused to sign a pledge put forth by Americans for Tax Freedom not to impose any new taxes or increase existing taxes. However, many of McCain's votes has shown support for lower taxes, such as eliminating the marriage penalty, a 1997 vote to cut capital gains taxes and he introduced measures that would require a sixty-vote majority to pass a tax increase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Security===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain urges the Senate to pass FISA. “For months, House Democrats, the [[ACLU]], and the trial lawyers have held up legislation to modernize our nation’s terrorist surveillance laws.  Today, the House passed a compromise bill to end this impasse.  While I would have preferred to see the Senate bill enacted, which I voted for earlier this year, I am pleased Congressional leaders and the Administration were able to reach an agreement to reform our current surveillance law and not let FISA expire in August.  I hope [[Senate]] Democrats will allow this matter to quickly be considered by the Senate and sent to the President for his signature.  I will support this measure and hope that politics will be put aside in favor of this vital national security matter.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&amp;amp;ContentRecord_id=a7f9dc6c-da0e-459d-dd6c-91e20a46e1e5] , McCAIN URGES SENATE PASSAGE OF FISA &lt;br /&gt;
, June 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was established in 1978.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has voted in support of the [[Patriot Act|USA PATRIOT Act]] as well as National Missile Defense. However, he has joined [[liberal]]s in support of immediately closing [[Guantanamo Bay]], and moving all the prisoners to Fort Leavenworth. On October 3, 2005, he introduced the McCain Detainee Amendment which prohibits inhumane treatment of prisoners, including prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. The bill was passed and signed by President [[George W. Bush]]. McCain has recently criticized the practice of [[waterboarding]], saying &amp;quot;they should know what it is. It is not a complicated procedure. It is torture.&amp;quot; McCain voted against HR 2082, the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, which included provisions that would have prevented the CIA from water boarding prisoners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Afghanistan===&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] McCain was a strong advocate for military action in [[Afghanistan]], saying:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''We did not cause this war. Our enemies did, and they are to blame for the deprivations and difficulties it occasions. They are to'' ''blame for the loss of innocent life. They are to blame for the geopolitical problems confronting our friends and us. We can help'' ''repair the damage of war. But to do so, we must destroy the people who started it.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=95001375&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain is currently calling for 15,000 additional troops to address the situation in Afghanistan, similar to his victorious 2007 troop surge in Iraq.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iran===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has said that &amp;quot;We continue to be concerned about [[Iran]]ian influence and assistance to Hezbollah as well as Iranian pursuit of nuclear weapons.&amp;quot; He tried to ban Iran from playing in the 2006 World Cup, citing Iranian President [[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]'s [[Holocaust]] denials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraq===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:610x.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Senator John McCain with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, 03/17/08]] McCain voted with the majority [[Republican]] Party and 29 Democrats of the Senate in favor of the 2002 &amp;quot;[[Iraq War]] Resolution&amp;quot; authorizing President George W. Bush to go to war against Iraq and overthrow the [[Saddam Hussein]] regime. In 1998, McCain voted in favor of HR 4655 Iraq Liberation Act, signed by then President Clinton. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Legislation/ILA.htm], http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Legislation/ILA.htm, HR4655 Public Law: 105-338, October 31, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; HR 4655 declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government. McCain went on to became a critic of the management of the war, arguing that there wasn't enough troop strength in the area. However, he never became a defeatist advocating surrender. McCain publicly stated that he had &amp;quot;no confidence&amp;quot; in then-Secretary of Defense [[Donald Rumsfeld]]. However, he refused to call for his resignation, saying that &amp;quot;the President picks his team, and the president has the right to stay with that team if he wants to.&amp;quot; McCain became one of the strongest leading advocates in the Senate for the 2007 troop surge, which increased the number of American troops by 20,500, deployed to provide security to [[Baghdad]] and Al Anbar Province. On February 4, he criticized a non-binding resolution opposing the troop buildup, calling it a reckless &amp;quot;vote of no confidence&amp;quot; in the U.S. Commanders and in the military. Additionally, he voted against all measures aimed at withdrawal of U.S. forces and voted against cutting off of war funds. McCain rightly believes that Congress should not micromanage the war and to give the military everything they ask for to successfully complete the mission. He has mentioned in a town hall forum that staying the course in Iraq for 'a hundred years' would not bother him if no American soldier's were losing their lives. This became an issue for Democratic political strategy. The DNC lead by chairman [[Howard Dean]] repeatedly tried to use false statements in justifying attacking McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html]http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html, Washington post Fact Checker, April 2, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  What McCain said is very different from what the liberal media and the DNC were reporting. Asked in Derry, NH of the willingness to keep troops in Iraq for 50 years, he said &amp;quot;Make it 100&amp;quot; and   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  {{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;That's fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia===&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCain has strongly criticized [[Russia]]n President [[Vladimir Putin]]. During a primary debate he sad, &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He bullies his neighbors and he wants to get a control of the energy supply of Western Europe. This is a dangerous person. And he has to understand that there's a cost to some of his actions.&amp;quot; In 2005 McCain and [[Connecticut]] senator [[Joe Lieberman]] drafted a resolution banning Russia from attending the Group of 8 (G8) international forum. McCain is also a strong supporter of ballistic national missile defenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cuba===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain forcefully supports the [[Cuban embargo]] and believes it should be maintained until certain specific political freedoms are restored to the country. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=1&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;fta=y&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1222106556-zea3cQG12OakFI9P97dogQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If I am fortunate enough to be elected as the next President of the United States, I pledge to you to be a loyal and unswerving friend of the right to life movement.&amp;quot;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sen. John McCain has more than a twenty year anti-[[abortion]] record, first in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]], then in the U.S. Senate. McCain voted 11 times on anti-abortion and other [[pro-life]] issues in  the House. Senator McCain has voted 119 times on anti-abortion and other pro-life measures in the Senate. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.naral.org/assets/files/mccain_fact_sheet.pdf], http://www.naral.org/assets/files/mccain_fact_sheet.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's record in the Senate on abortion is pro-life. He voted for the 2003 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act. McCain has also voted against government funding of birth control and sex education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00214 Voted Nay on an amendment to authorize grants to carry out programs to provide education on preventing teen pregnancies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00075 Vote against allocation of $100m for prevention of unintended pregnancies &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nowpublic.com/quiet-campaign-against-contraception Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain's campaign officials boast that he has &amp;quot;consistently voted against taxpayer-funded contraception programs.&amp;quot; And Mr. McCain reports that his adviser on sexual-health matters is Sen. Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, who leads campaigns claiming condoms are unsafe and opposing emergency contraception.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During his first Presidential campaign for the 2000 election, McCain said the following on [[Roe v. Wade]], &amp;quot;I'd love to see a point where it is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/feb/07021908.html McCain's &amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has since changed his position, saying Roe v. Wade should be overturned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain:&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted against a [[Roe v. Wade]] resolution&lt;br /&gt;
* Co-sponsored and voted for the Federal Abortion Ban&lt;br /&gt;
* Supported H.R.1997, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted for four anti-abortion U.S. Supreme Court judges&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted for six anti-abortion lower court judges&lt;br /&gt;
* Supported H.R.3913, to prohibit federal funds for abortion services in any case &lt;br /&gt;
* Voted to make it a federal crime for anyone but a parent to cross state lines for abortion termination&lt;br /&gt;
* Voted in favor of a national network of parental notification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Quotations====&lt;br /&gt;
“I do not support Roe v. Wade. It should be overturned.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ann Althouse, Rudy &amp;amp; Mitt Hem &amp;amp; Haw on Abortion, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 24, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have many, many votes and it’s been consistent. And I’ve got a consistent zero from NARAL throughout all those years….&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John McCain for President 2008, On the Issues: Human Dignity and the Sanctity of Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;My record is clear, and I think the important thing is you look at people’s voting record because sometimes rhetoric can be a little… misleading…. As you know I don’t support Roe v. Wade…. I thought it was a bad decision, and I think that the decision should be made in the states&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John McCain for President 2008, On the Issues: Human Dignity and the Sanctity of Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*“I’m proud that we have Justice Alito and Roberts on the United States Supreme Court. I’m very proud to have played a very small role in making that happen.” McCain explained further that he “will try to find clones of Alito and Roberts” to fill future court vacancies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=26539], Letter from Sen. John McCain to Pro‐Life Community Janary 23, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gun Control===&lt;br /&gt;
McCain's record on [[gun control]] is mixed. He co-sponsored the Gun Show Loophole Closing and Gun Law Enforcement Act of 2001. This act would reduce the number of gun shows, require gun-owners to purchase trigger locks, and allow federal agents to arrest those who violate federal gun laws. However, McCain has frequently voted in support of the Second Amendment, such as voting against background checks at gun shows and voting in support of prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. In August of 1999, McCain said he was open to voting for an assault weapon ban, depending on the details. However, he still voted against the Federal Assault Weapons Ban and the efforts to renew it, as well as the Brady Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A top official of the [[National Rifle Association]] said McCain has been a reliable ally of gun owners despite divisions with the powerful lobbying group on some issues. NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre told The Associated Press &amp;quot;...We're not foolish enough to ignore the vast areas of agreement in which John McCain has been a friend to gun owners.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republican presidential nominee has voted against a ban on assault-type weapons with restrictions which were objected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Same-sex marriage===&lt;br /&gt;
In the speech on the Senate floor July 13th, 2004, McCain stated “Mr. President, most Americans believe, as I do, that the institution of marriage should be reserved for the union of a man and a woman.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.friendsofmccain.com/news/dspnews.cfm?id=143&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; John McCain revealed his decision based on super majority requirements and the current political realities within Congress. “By my count, there is not at this time even a small majority of senators who would vote for Senator Allard’s amendment, much less the 67 votes required by the Constitution. That won’t change, Mr. President, unless public opinion changes significantly. The [[Founders]], wisely, made certain that the Constitution is difficult to amend, and, as a practical political matter, can’t be done without overwhelming public approval. And thank God for that. Were it any easier I fear we could not make the claim for the Constitution’s enduring success that I have just made.&amp;quot; Further, he explained his approach to the amendment's ultimate success “If a constitution is to be amended, Mr. President, it should be a state constitution.&amp;quot; McCain voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment. In May 2008, the California Supreme Court effectively created a ruling to grant same-sex partners equal rights to [[Marriage]] and to be recognized by the state. A spokesman for Republican John McCain, who opposes gay marriage, said the Arizona senator &amp;quot;doesn't believe judges should be making these decisions.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Votes missed == &lt;br /&gt;
As of August 2007, McCain had missed more votes during the current session of Congress than any Senator other than [[South Dakota]] [[Democrat]] [[Tim Johnson]], who had suffered a brain hemorrhage that had kept him from Congress. He had missed over 48% of his votes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lawrence Journal-World, August 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is due to the fact that he is running a nationwide campaign for President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal life==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cindy McCain.jpg|thumb|Cindy McCain]]&lt;br /&gt;
McCain has been married twice.  His first marriage, to Carol Shepp, ended in [[divorce]] in 1980 after 15 years, of which he spent five in captivity. McCain publicly acknowledges the responsibility for the breakup as his, stating in a 2008 interview with Pastor Rick Warren that &amp;quot;My greatest moral failing, and I have been a very imperfect person, is the failure of my first marriage&amp;quot;. .&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/rules021299.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His second and current wife is Cindy Lou Hensley, to whom he has been married for 28 years.  His son John Sidney IV is a Midshipman at the [[United States Naval Academy]], Annapolis, and his son James is a non-commissioned officer in the [[United States Marine Corps]], who is serving in [[Iraq]] as part of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]].  Also, the McCains adopted a ten-week old baby girl in 1993, who they named Bridget, from [[Mother Teresa]]'s orphanage in [[Bangladesh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://celebrity.rightpundits.com/?p=3183 Bridget McCain Biography] Rightpundits.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/109022008.htm Bridget vs Sonia: McCain vs Rajiv Gandhi] News Analysis India&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cindy McCain was in the country as part of the American Voluntary Medical Team &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-041408-cindy-mccain-bio,1,2151434.story Bio of Cindy McCain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in response to the 1991 [[Bangladesh]] cyclone.&lt;br /&gt;
===McCain's family===&lt;br /&gt;
*Wife Cindy &lt;br /&gt;
*4 sons &lt;br /&gt;
**Douglas &lt;br /&gt;
**Andrew &lt;br /&gt;
**John (''&amp;quot;Jack&amp;quot;'') Sidney IV &lt;br /&gt;
**James &lt;br /&gt;
*3 daughters&lt;br /&gt;
**Sidney&lt;br /&gt;
**Meghan&lt;br /&gt;
**Bridget &lt;br /&gt;
*Parents &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Admiral]] John Sydney McCain, Jr. (from [[Indiana]]) &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Roberta McCain|Roberta Wright McCain]] (from [[Oklahoma]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Faith of My Fathers'' (Random House; 1999) ISBN 0-3755-0191-6&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Odysseus in America'' (Scribner; 2002) ISBN 0-7432-1156-1&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Worth Fighting For: A Memoir'' (Diane Publ. Co; 2002) ISBN 0-7567-6759-8&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Medal of Honor'' (Artisan; 2003) ISBN 1-5796-5240-9&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Why Courage Matters: The Way to a Braver Life'' (Random House; 2004) ISBN 1-4000-6030-3&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Character Is Destiny: Inspiring Stories Every Young Person Should Know and Every Adult Should Remember'' (Random House; 2005) ISBN 1-4000-6412-0&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Hard Call: Great Decisions and the Extraordinary People Who Made Them'' (Twelve; 2007) ISBN 0-4466-9911-X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*McCain, John [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=513224&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''My six years of hell: John McCain recalls life as a prisoner of war in Vietnam''] 8 February 2008 [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 9 February 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John McCain 2008 Presidential Campaign]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Previous Breaking News/John McCain|Articles about John McCain from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[White House]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cindy McCain]], spouse of John McCain&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roberta McCain]], mother of John McCain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQsckD9trn4&amp;amp;eurl=http://evangelicalsformccain.org/meetthesenator.htm ''John McCain: Courageous Service''] - Streaming video documentary hosted at YouTube, including footage of McCain's time as a POW and the Forrestal incident. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9542249 John McCain Biography]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://evangelicalsformccain.org/index.htm Evangelicals for McCain] - Christians, Families and Patriots for John McCain&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://studentsformccain08.blogspot.com/ Students for McCain 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/mccains-mom-pop.html McCain's Mom Pops Off]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.rd.com/national-interest/people-and-politics/our-interview-with-sen-john-mccain/article.html Presidential Candidate John McCain on the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=53270 Voting record]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCain, John}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Arizona Senators]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservatores&amp;diff=527844</id>
		<title>User:Conservatores</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservatores&amp;diff=527844"/>
		<updated>2008-10-02T01:11:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: New page: Love thy neighbour, honour they father and mother, help the needy, the poor and the sick. Those are my values. ~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Love thy neighbour, honour they father and mother, help the needy, the poor and the sick. Those are my values. [[User:Conservatores|Conservatores]] 21:11, 1 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Keith_Olbermann&amp;diff=527832</id>
		<title>Keith Olbermann</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Keith_Olbermann&amp;diff=527832"/>
		<updated>2008-10-02T00:55:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Olbermann sees conspiracies */ Outrageous claim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{merge|Olbermann Watch}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Keith-ratingslie.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Keith Olbermann, liberal commentator]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Keith Olbermann''' is a [[liberal]] commentator and activist, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keith Olbermann ... is notorious for anti-Bush, anti-conservative rants. [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
formerly a sportscaster on ESPN. He currently hosts ''Countdown,'' a nightly news and commentary program on [[MSNBC]]. Olbermann's show is known for liberal analysis of the issues, with [[conservatives]] rarely being invited to discuss news events. Olbermann is also a co-host of NBC's ''Football Night in America''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Olbermann sees conspiracies==&lt;br /&gt;
In a broadcast after the FBI made an arrest of four [[terror]] suspects for plot to attack JFK International Airport and plant explosives to blow up major jet-fuel supply tanks and pipelines,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newyork.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel07/plot060207.pdf Four Individuals Charged in Plot to Bomb John F. Kennedy International Airport], FBI Press Release New York Field Office, June 2 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Olbermanmn charged the [[Bush adminstration]] with [[conspiracy]].  JFK handles on average over 1,000 flights daily. The plotters were assisted by an international network of Muslim extremists from the United States, Guyana, and Caribbean, including senior leadership of [[Jamaat Al Muslimeen]] (“JAM”), which was responsible for a deadly coup attempt in Trinidad in 1990. In Olbermann &lt;br /&gt;
's mind &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the so-called plot happens to be revealed the day before the second [[2008 Presidential Election|Democratic presidential]] debate and, as the scandal continues to unfold over the firings of U.S. attorneys and their replacements by political hacks. The so-called plot is announced by the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney for Brooklyn, New York, and by the police chief of New York City, the father of a correspondent for [[Fox News Channel]].&amp;quot;  Olbermann further theorized that President Bush was &amp;quot;fomenting yet another war...a new Cold War with Russia, possibly to obscure the unending nightmare in Iraq. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2007/06/05/publiceye/entry2886646.shtml Olbermann Overstates?,]  Matthew Felling, ''CBS News'', June 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthew Felling of ''CBS News'' noted in the same piece, &amp;quot;Hammering away at things that aren’t there – or barely there – is a surefire way to dilute your message.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has also made outrageous claims of the Republican hijacking 9/11 for personal gain, probably made simply for shock value.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26645619/ Oblermann alleges Republican &amp;quot;hijacking&amp;quot; of 9/11. Weren't the Terrorists the hijackers?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nazi salute controversey==&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2006, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] filed a complaint to MSNBC because of Olbermann's repeated use of the [[Nazi]] salute while attacking popular commentator [[Bill O'Reilly]] on his television show and in public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adl.org/media_watch/tv/20060728-MSNBC.htm Anti-Defamation League Letter to MSNBC], July 28, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''24'' controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
In January of 2007, Olbermann attacked the popular FOX television series ''24'' with rather bizarre claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the January 16, 2007 edition of Olbermann's show, ''Countdown with Keith Olbermann'', he accused the widely acclaimed ''[[24]]'' of &amp;quot;fearmongering&amp;quot; and being &amp;quot;propaganda designed to keep people thinking about domestic terrorism to keep us scared,&amp;quot; asking, &amp;quot;is it a program-length commercial for one political party?&amp;quot; Olbermann also asked the rhetorical question, &amp;quot;if the irrational right can claim that the news is fixed to try to alter people's minds or that networks should be boycotted for nudity or for immorality, shouldn't those same groups be saying ''24'' should be taken off of TV because it's naked [[brainwashing]]?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was in response to the January 15 broadcast of ''24'' in which a low-grade nuclear weapon is detonated in the [[Valencia]] community of [[Los Angeles]] by a [[terrorist]] group. Fox Commentator [[Cal Thomas]] had written an editorial in which he advised, &amp;quot;Watch the TV drama 24 for what could be our prophetic and imminent future, with a nuclear device exploding in major cities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the February 2, 2007 edition of ''Countdown'', Olbermann gave the show the &amp;quot;bronze&amp;quot; in his nightly &amp;quot;Worst Person in the World&amp;quot; segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://media.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2IwYTc1MTVlMTU0ZDZlN2ViZGI0YzJmZWJiZjBhZTE= Keith Olbermann: &amp;quot;24&amp;quot; is a Right-Wing Plot]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://newsbusters.org/node/10206 Olbermann Denounces '24' as Part of Pro-Bush 'Fearmongering' and 'Brainwashing']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://newsbusters.org/node/10224 Olbermann Hates '24', NewsBusters, and All References to Terrorism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/syuhas_20070118.html MSNBC's Very Own Conspiracy Nut: Keith Olbermann &amp;amp; Fox's fictional TV show '24']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obADH-gUG5o Video of Olbermann's accusations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Olbermann Watch]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Olbermann, Keith}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Broadcasters|Olbermann, Keith]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists|Olbermann, Keith]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=527831</id>
		<title>Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=527831"/>
		<updated>2008-10-02T00:52:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatores: /* Military */  Link to the Canadian Forces website&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;300&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|[[Image:Canada pol99.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|''Canada''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Flag&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|[[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|50px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Arms&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|[[Image:Canada arms.png|48px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Capital&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ottawa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Government&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parliamentary Democracy]]/[[Federal]] [[Constitutional monarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monarch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom|Queen Elizabeth II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Official Languages&lt;br /&gt;
|[[English]] and [[French]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Governor General&lt;br /&gt;
|Her Excellency the Right Honourable [[Michaëlle Jean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Prime Minister&lt;br /&gt;
|The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Area&lt;br /&gt;
|3,854,085 sq mi&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;9,984,670 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Population (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|32,907,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GDP (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.105 trillion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GDP per capita (2007 estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
|$35,133&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Canada''' is the largest country in [[North America]], and the second largest in the world behind [[Russia]]. It also has the longest coastline of any nation. Canada borders the [[United States]] to the south and northwest. Canada's motto &amp;quot;A Mari usque ad Mare&amp;quot; (From sea to sea) is based on biblical scripture: &amp;quot;He shall have dominion from sea to sea and from the river unto the ends of the earth (Psalm 72:8)&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/arm2_e.cfm The Arms of Canada- Description]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The name Canada comes from the St. Lawrence Iroquoian word &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, meaning &amp;quot;village&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;settlement&amp;quot;. In 1535, two Huron youths directed [[Jacques Cartier]] to &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, their village. The village they referred to was Stadacona, the future site of Quebec City.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Canadian_Encylopedia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;ArticleId=A0001216 The Canadian Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1545, European books and maps began referring to this region as Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name ''Dominion of Canada'' was adopted during [[British North America Act|confederation]] in 1867, and kept until the [[Constitution Act]] of 1982, when &amp;quot;Canada&amp;quot; became the only legal name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History and the Constitution ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Supreme Court of Canada.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The Supreme Court of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Canada was officially created by the signing of the British North America Act, which came into force on July 1, 1867. The BNA Act was an [[Act of Parliament|Act of the British Parliament]], and is also referred to as the Constitution Act of 1867. The first Prime Minister, [[John A Macdonald|Sir John A. Macdonald]], was a member of the Liberal-Conservative Party.&lt;br /&gt;
The BNA Act was later amended in 1982 by the Constitution Act of 1982. The Right Honourable [[Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], the Liberal Prime Minister of Canada at the time, also established the Canadian [[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]] as part of the Constitution Act. The Charter sets clear, fundamental freedoms for all Canadians.  It has been cited in thousands of court challenges and is the fundamental legal document supporting the national legalization of same-sex marriages and the prevention of government intervention regarding abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national flag was officially adopted February 15, 1965; prior to that time and subsequent to Confederation in 1867, Canada used a variant of the Red Ensign, a British merchant flag, as its national flag. The new flag was imposed by the Liberal government in an effort to appease socialists and Quebec Nationalists.  The Liberal government refused to hold a referendum on the subject; instead the public was invited to submit designs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/df3_e.cfm Birth of the Canadian Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The introduction of the new flag was not without controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a memo from Diefenbaker’s personal files he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Pearson flag is a meaningless Flag. There is no recognition of history; no indication of the existence of French and English Canada; the partnership of the races; no acknowledgement of history. It is a flag without a past, without history, without honour and without pride.” (Source – I Stand for Canada: The Story of the Maple Leaf Flag ).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/cultural/flag/national-flag-canada.html The Debate Over the Maple Leaf Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the debate has been largely forgotten today, the Red Ensign can still be seen flying on some private homes and the debate does reemerge into the public domain occasionally. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070321.wxflag21/BNStory/National/ PM wants Red Ensign to fly at Vimy, sources say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national anthem, '[[O Canada]]', was written by Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier as a poem, to which music, composed by Calixa Lavall&amp;amp;eacute;e, was later added, in 1880. The original was composed in French, and was first translated into English by Dr. Thomas Bedford Richardson of Toronto, Ontario, in 1906. However, it was not officially adopted as the national anthem until 1980.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/anthem_e.cfm National Anthem: O Canada]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is important to distinguish between 'O Canada', the national anthem, and 'God Save The Queen', which is the Royal anthem, played as a salute to Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]] as Queen of Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Provinces and Territories ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-Canada-satellite.jpg|right|thumb|300px|A satellite image of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of Confederation, Canada was comprised of four provinces: Upper Canada (now Ontario), Lower Canada (now Québec), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Since that time, six additional provinces have joined Canada or have been created. From west to east, the provinces are [[British Columbia]], [[Alberta]], [[Saskatchewan]], [[Manitoba]], [[Ontario]], [[Québec]], [[New Brunswick]], [[Prince Edward Island]], [[Nova Scotia]], and [[Newfoundland|Newfoundland and Labrador]]. Newfoundland was the last province to join Canada, in 1949.  The provinces all elect a single (unicameral) legislature, headed by Premier, who is selected the same way as the Prime Minister.  A Lieutenant-Governor represents the Queen, similar to the Governor General.  &lt;br /&gt;
Canada has three territories: the [[Yukon Territory]], the [[Northwest Territories]], and [[Nunavut]]. Territories have only have those powers delegated to them by the federal government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Government ==&lt;br /&gt;
The government of Canada is split into two orders, federal and provincial, as outlined by the BNA Act. Each has very specific responsibilities, with some overlap. For instance, universal health care is mandated by the Federal Government, but it is administered by the Provincial Governments.  Neither level has supremacy over the other.  The Federal Government is run out of [[Ottawa]], [[Ontario]]; the provincial governments are run out the ten provincial capitals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The federal parliament is bicameral, including both a lower house - the [[Canadian House of Commons]] - and an upper house - the [[Canadian Senate]].  The parliamentary system is based on the British parliament. Members of Parliament represent specific geographical areas, generally chosen to have approximately equal population. A single member is elected from each on a [[first past the post]] system. The [[prime minister]] is usually the leader of the party with the most seats, though two or more parties may form a [[coalition]] to form a government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate is made up of sentors appointed for life by the prime minister (acting on behalf of the Governer General).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In almost all cases, Acts of Parliament are created in the House of Commons. After passing three readings in the House of Commons, the bill is passed to the Senate.  The job of the Senate is to further debate the proposed legislation, before passing it to the Governor General for Royal Assent. The Governor General is the official representative of Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]], Queen of Canada. The Governor General is, in the absence of the Queen, Canada's Head of State, and the Commander-in-Chief of the [http://www.forces.gc.ca/ Canadian Forces].  The Prime Minister of Canada is the head of Government of Canada, acting as the Minister of the Crown, based on the British system.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All provincial legislatures are unicameral.  The legislative process for provincial legislation is the same as for federal legislation, except that there is no Senate and the legislation is given royal assent by the provincial Lieutenant Governors, who represent the monarch at the provincial level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1841 to 1844, the capital city of what would become Canada was located in [[Kingston|Kingston, Ontario]]. Subsequently the capital alternated between [[Toronto]] and [[Montreal]] until 1857, when the capital moved to [[Ottawa|Ottawa, Ontario]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Present Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, the Prime Minister is The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]], a member of the [[Conservative Party of Canada]], while Her Excellency [[Michaëlle Jean]] is the Governor General. At present Canada is governed by a [[minority government]].  In 2005 the city of [[Vancouver]], [[British Columbia]] was voted &amp;quot;the world's best place to live&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;   [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4306936.stm Vancouver is &amp;quot;best place to live&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Canada's population is increasingly urban, with 6 cities recording a population over 1 million ([[Toronto]], [[Montreal]], [[Vancouver]], [[Ottawa]]-Gatineau, [[Calgary]], [[Edmonton]]); these 6 cities represent over 45% of Canada's population.  Canada is becoming an increasingly multicultural country, with most new immigrants settling in [[Toronto]], [[Montreal]] and [[Vancouver]].  [[Toronto]] is the world's most multicultural city, with 43% a member of a visible minority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=bb0fee45-b305-490a-b161-a21bcb1d7329&amp;amp;k=34160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public Health Care ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the Federal Government, under the leadership of the Liberals and The Right Honourable [[Pierre Trudeau|Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], enacted the Canada Health Act. This act was based on the five principles of &amp;quot;universality, accessibility, portability, comprehensiveness, and public administration&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/FEDPROV/hise.html History of Canada Health and Social Transfer]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This public health care system is run in partnership by Health Canada and provincial Ministries of Health, who both contribute tax revenues. The federal government sets policy, while the provinces are responsible for actual administration. In 1995, the Canada Health and Social Transfer was created to replace existing systems for the transferal of tax funding to the provinces to administer social programs. The rationale behind the system is to allow all Canadians equal access to equal treatment, regardless of socio-economic status. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada health care is frequently listed as top issue in election campaigns and is both a topic of frequent debate and a point of pride for many Canadians, Tommy Douglas the founder of medicare was, for example, voted the &amp;quot;Greatest Canadian&amp;quot; on a CBC television programme in 2004 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current state of Canada's public health care system is gathering increasing media attention due to rising wait times. [[David Gratzer]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;... government researchers have provided the best data on the doctor shortage, noting, for example, that more than 1.5 million Ontarians (or 12 percent of that province’s population) can’t find family physicians. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html The Ugly Truth about Canadian Healthcare] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the blame for the current state of affairs has been placed on successive government mismanagement. This represents a failure of the federal government to properly regulate the level of service being offered in the provinces. People regularly have to wait between four and eight months for necessary surgeries depending on the nature of the surgery, and province of residence.{{fact}} The median wait time for an MRI across Canada is 10.3 weeks in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&amp;amp;id=753&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, former Prime Minister [[Jean Chretien|Jean Chrétien]] campaigned on a promise to shut down private MRI clinics because it creates a two tier system, regardless of the demand for more facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, there has been suggestion from some lobby groups that Canada should adopt a two-tier health care system, while others have expressed strong opposition to this idea, including the federal government under the Liberal party. Some argue that Canada already does have a two-tier health care system as the very wealthy can go to the United States for treatment. The argument for allowing private health care is twofold. The first reason is that competition may improve the quality of products and services, while the increase in options will allow those with the means to access private health care and may relieve some of the burden off the public system. Critics argue that health is a right, and that everyone should have access to the same standard of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, in [[Québec]], a provincial judge has ruled that private health care providers must be allowed to compete with the government-run health care system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secession movements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are separatist movements lobbying for independence from Canada in British Columbia, Alberta, and Québec. The only movement of real significance is in Québec, where the province has twice voted on whether or not to separate from Canada, once in 1980 and again in 1995; the vote in 1995 failed by just 1 percent. On November 27, 2006, the Federal Government passed a motion declaring Québec a nation &amp;quot;within a united Canada&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=hansard&amp;amp;Language=E&amp;amp;Mode=1&amp;amp;Parl=39&amp;amp;Ses=1&amp;amp;DocId=2544166&amp;amp;File=0#OOB-1799206&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its colonial past, Canadian culture has historically been heavily influenced by [[United Kingdom|British]] and [[France|French]] cultures and traditions. In more modern times, Canadian culture has been greatly influenced by United States' culture, due to the proximity and the migration of people, ideas, and capital. Amidst this, Canadian culture has developed some unique characteristics, and many Canadian movies, authors, [[television]] shows, and musicians are equally popular in United States. Canadian culture has also been influenced by indigenous cultures, and by immigrant groups from around the world. It has the highest per capita immigration rate of any country in the world &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;.http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080402/d080402a.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada has two federal official languages, French and English. The province of Quebec has French as an official language, New Brunswick both French and English, and all other provinces English (although in some parts of Ontario French has special status). The territory of Nunavut has Inuktitu and Innuinaqtun as official languages in addition to French and English, the North West territories has eleven official languages, and the Yukon recognises French and English.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada tends to reflect more liberal ideals than the United States. Two such examples are the legalizing of [[gay marriage]] in June, 2005&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/06/28/samesex050628.html CBC news article on passing of gay marriage law]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, in some regions, the decriminalization of medicinal [[marijuana]] and small amounts of other psychoactive substances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notable sports which are enjoyed throughout Canada include [[hockey]], [[curling]], [[lacrosse]], and [[football]]. Canada collected 18 medals in the Summer Olympics, more per capita than the United States but less than Australia.  The country finished third overall in the Torino Winter Olympics, with a total of 24 medals, one less than the United States and 10 more than next-place [[Sweden]].  The next winter Olympics, to be held in 2010 will be held in Vancouver and Whistler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
For the total population, approximately 44% of the population of Canada is  [[Catholicism|Catholic]], with a another 29% being [[Protestantism|Protestant]] (all denominations). However, while 16% of the total population has no religious affiliation (including atheists and agnostics), 20% of the population under 25 has declared no religion, congruent with the world-wide trend of increasing secularism in young demographics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statistics Canada - Cat. No. 97F0022XCB2001002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other religions of significance in Canada include Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, and Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taxation ==&lt;br /&gt;
The average tax rate in Canada is higher than in the United States. In 2003, Canada's tax burden equals about 33.8% of GDP placing it in the middle of the G7 countries, with Japan lowest at 25.3% and France highest at 43.4% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/faq1e.html#Taxation Department of Finance Canada: FAQs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The US rate is roughly 25.6%; this discrepancy is consistent with the differing levels of social services which the governments funds. Canada also has managed to run without a budget deficit for a number of years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equalization payments, worth 11.7 billion Canadian dollars are made by the federal government to the provinces from richer provinces (currently Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia) and the poorer provinces (Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan) .  This is to ensure that reasonably uniform standards of services and taxation are kept between the richer and poorer provinces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Budget 2007 [http://www.budget.gc.ca/2007/bp/bpc4e.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These payments have not been without controversy as provinces begin to make more revenues from natural resources they do not want to give up the Equalization payments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British Columbia has the lowest corporate tax rate in North America &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investbc.com/businessclimate.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada also has a national sales tax, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) of 5% on all purchases. Some provinces add an additional percentage in the form of a Provincial Sales Tax (PST), or a combined Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) combining GST and the Provincial Sales Tax. Based on actual income, and a number of other factors, the government will refund GST/HST to eligible tax payers in quarterly installments on the fifth of the month in July, October, January, and April.&lt;br /&gt;
==Cultural style==&lt;br /&gt;
Canadian culture puts stress on open-mindedness and tolerance of multiple viewpoints -- even the (very strong) view that Quebec should declare independence and break up Canada.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/features/cucanada.xml&amp;amp;source=EMC-exp_01102008 National Cultural Profiles, a guide from the London ''Telegraph''  to the thinking patterns of all the world's major cultures] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Canadian opinion shows a strong sense of wanting to be independent of the U.S., although the economy, society and culture closely resembles the U.S. , and most Canadians live a short drive from the border.  (The main difference is the state-provided health care system.)  Much of the anti-Americanism comes from exiles who left the U.S., for example in fleeing the draft during the Vietnam War (1965-72). Recent surges in oil prices have lifted the Canadian economy, and shifted power toward the oil-rich province of Alberta.&lt;br /&gt;
== Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
Education in Canada is the responsibility of provincial and territorial governments; curriculum and marking schemes are completely removed from the control of the federal government. Each province uses a different method of administering education, with variation in the number of years and the curriculum. Quebec, for example has five years of secondary school finishing at the equivalent of grade 11 followed by two years of CEGEP, while Ontario has two years of kindergarten. Most provinces have kidergarten beginning at age 5 through grade 12 (age 17) as part of the public system. Some provinces have standardised provincial exams at the end of secondary school and/or at other designated grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several provinces have two publically funded school systems: public and separate (e.g. Catholic). The constitution also guarantees education in one's first official language and, as such, all provinces and territories have both English and French language schooling.  Additionally, private schools both religious and secular exist throughout the country. Alberta has an additional category, known as charter schools. Charter schools are schools that have been created in the community to surround a particular theme. They could be artistic, vocational, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian grading scale markedly differs from the grading scale in the United States. In the US, a 59% or below earns you an F, a 60% nets a D-, and 80% a B. However, in Canadian universities, only 49% or below is an R, 60% will net a C+, and 80% is an A-. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federal-realestate.com/info-schools/mcgill-university.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Marking in Canadian universities, however, tends to be lower with grades over 90% extremely rare in the humanities and social sciences, and higher entrance marks required for those entering from American high schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some Canadian secondary schools, the mark F is absent and substituted by R. A ranges from 100%-80%, B from 79%-70%, C from 69%-60%, D from 59%-50% and R is  any mark less than 50%. However, as education is under provincial jurisdiction marking varies regionally and it is difficult to make generalisations across the board.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may vary from province to province; it is also important to note that comparison of educational achievement requires more than a cursory observation of grading scales. Perhaps a better source of comparison is the Human Development Index, a measurement of literacy, education, life expectancy and standard of living. Using this scale, with Iceland at number one, Canada falls in at number four and the United States ranks at 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Military ==&lt;br /&gt;
As of the most recent cabinet shuffle, Conservative MP Peter MacKay has assumed the role of Minister of National Defence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.forces.ca Canadian Forces] is comprised of the Regular Force, the Reserve Force, and the Special Force (when so in service). The Regular and Reserve Forces employ over 62,000 and 25,000 members respectively. While the various branches wear distinctive elemental uniforms (DEU), the Royal Canadian Navy, Canadian Army and the Royal Canadian Air Force were amalgamated in 1968 into one common command structure &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/about/index_e.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian Forces are &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canadianally.com/ca/forces-cf-en.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;equipped with modern vehicles such as the Canadian-built LAV III, the German-built Leopard CII tanks and both the American-built CF-18 Hornet and CC-177 Globemaster III. The Canadian government spends about 17 billion Canadian dollars annually on defence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Conservative government has continued the trend of increased defence spending initiated by the Liberals, and have also taken steps to decrease red-tape preventing the troops from having the necessary equipment to keep them safe and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 3000 Canadian troops are currently deployed around the world, with over 2500 in [[Afghanistan]] where they are assisting in anti-terrorism &amp;amp; reconstruction operations, and another 500 are deployed to the Middle East where they are attached to a US-led coalition fleet and the Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 (SNMG1). These are prime examples of Canada's capability for interoperability with foreign military forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gc.ca/ Government of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.parl.gc.ca/ Parliament of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pch.gc.ca/ Department of Canadian Heritage]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ca.html CIA World Factbook:Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Party Websites ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;* [http://www.blocquebecois.org Bloc Québécois]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.conservative.ca Conservative Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://http://www.fpnpoc.ca/ First Peoples National Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.greenparty.ca Green Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca Liberal Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ndp.ca New Democratic Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.partyofalberta.org/ Party of Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.progressivecanadian.org/ Progressive Canadian Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mlpc.ca/ Marxist-Leninist Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/ Canadian Action Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.peoplespoliticalpower.ca/ People's Political Power Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.animalalliance.ca/ Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.westernblockparty.com/ Western Bloc Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chp.ca/en/index.html Christian Heritage Party of Canada]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Advocacy Websites===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.canadadivided.com/ Canada Divided]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.projectalberta.com/ Project Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://onthefencefilms.com/video/twowomen.html Two Women]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.westcan.org/ Western Canada Concept]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatores</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>