https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Dancanm 2026-10-20T18:17:57Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:No_Child_Left_Behind&diff=281823 2007-08-30T18:55:27Z

<p>Dancanm: Weasel Words</p> <hr /> <div>It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> :Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> I'll include more sources. And that's the whole point. If the law is flawed, then of course they'll be trouble carrying it out. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:52, 14 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Why do we keep reverting to the NEA? I'm not with the NEA, and I agree with those points (I've been a teacher for ten years). [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 12:27, 22 June 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Weasel Words ==<br /> <br /> Saying &quot;many teachers say that it has failed&quot; is inaccurate and imprecise. Come up with a better way of phrasing it.</div>

Dancanm