<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Edgar</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Edgar"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Edgar"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T01:20:58Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contraception&amp;diff=557518</id>
		<title>Contraception</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contraception&amp;diff=557518"/>
		<updated>2008-11-14T19:07:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edgar: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Contraception''' (or '''birth control''') refers to techniques, drugs, or devices that prevent [[pregnancy|conception]]. There are many different [[Methods of contraception|methods]], each having its own level of effectiveness and safety. [[Abstinence]] during fertile times can take the place of artificial form of birth control. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;When a couple for serious reasons abstain from intercourse at times at which they might conceive, their abstaining is itself chosen sexual behaviour, and virtuous sexual behaviour because it is expressive of a recognition of the demands of the procreative good.&amp;quot; [http://www.linacre.org/contra.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The availability of contraception is often cited as one of the enabling conditions for [[feminism]] and the [[sexual revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Catholic teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic church  prohibits the use of artificial contraceptives such as pills or barriers to Catholics, though it supports natural methods of avoiding conception based on timing. The policy on contraception is given in the [[Humanae Vitae]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Church does not teach that in engaging in intercourse one has to be acting with a view to procreating, an objective one could realistically have in mind only when one was fertile. What she teaches is that sexual intercourse will not make for an authentic unity of two-in-one-flesh if those engaging in it set out to negate its built-in significance as generative/procreative behaviour. [http://www.linacre.org/contra.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anglican teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anglican church regards sexual love as an essential way for a husband and wife to express and strengthen their mutual love, citing Genesis 2:18 'It is not good that the man (Adam) should be alone' in support of this. At the [[Lambeth Conference]] of 1930 a resolution was passed stating: ''Where there is a clearly felt moral obligation to limit or avoid parenthood, complete abstinence is the primary and obvious method.'' It continued by saying that if there was morally sound reasoning for avoiding abstinence, ''the Conference agrees that other methods may be used, provided that this is done in the light of Christian principles.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, by the Lambeth Conference of 1958, contraceptive use among most Anglicans was widespread and a resolution that year stated that the responsibility for deciding upon the number and frequency of children was laid by God upon the consciences of parents ''in such ways as are acceptable to husband and wife''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.cofe.anglican.org/info/socialpublic/smte.html#contraception Science, Medicine, Technology &amp;amp;amp; Environment | Church of England] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legality (US)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until a 1923 court decision, the federal [[Cornstock Act]] prohibited the use of the mail service to distribute contraceptives or information on contraception or [[abortion]]. Contraception was until this time considered [[obscene]] for legal purposes, as it was considered to serve only in the promotion of immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unil 1965, some US states criminalized the possession and/or distribution of contraceptives for reasons of public morality on the grounds that contraception would encourage [[premarital sex]]. In the 1965 [[Supreme Court]] case of [[Griswold v. Connecticut]], [[activist judges]] invented a constitutional right to contraception. The 1972 case of [[Eisenstadt v. Baird]] later extended this invented right to include even unmarried couples, rendering any legal attempt to restrict access impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legality (International)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==   &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contraception]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/when-does-life-begin Opposing Views: When Does Life Begin?]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Edgar</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&amp;diff=557517</id>
		<title>Human reproduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&amp;diff=557517"/>
		<updated>2008-11-14T19:06:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edgar: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sperm-egg.jpg|thumbnail|Sperm cell hitting an egg cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Human reproduction''' is the process by which children are conceived and born. In order for human reproduction to occur under normal circumstances, a man and woman engage in [[sexual intercourse]]. Exceptionally, reproduction may take place via procedures such as [[in vitro fertilization]]. [[Christianity]] sanctions intercourse within [[marriage]]; most non-Christian cultures also enshrine this activity within a marriage-like union: a lifelong, religiously and legally sanctioned bond between one man and one woman. &lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Spiritual aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Soul_Conception.jpg|thumbnail|Artist's conception of soul joining the fertilized egg at conception.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human reproduction serves to create new human beings and with these human beings comes a [[soul]]. The soul appears with the person at the moment of [[conception]], making him a complete human being from the very start. This is why [[abortion]] is considered [[murder]]: the abortionist has rent the soul from a living human body, the soul being the source of a full life for human beings. If there was no soul present in the human at the time of conception and it entered the body at some later stage, then until that moment the [[fetus]] would hypothetically be nothing more than an animated body, similar to how animals and plants are alive but without souls. Thus, if this were the case, abortion would not be murder, but rather a termination of a non-human entity, at least until the soul finally joined the body. However, there is no evidence that the soul can enter the body at any time later than conception. Since the soul is intrinsic to human beings, it absolutely must be present at conception and therefore abortion is murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many religious beliefs, even within [[Christianity]], on the origin of the soul that accompanies a new human being. Some believe portions of the souls of the parents combine to form the new soul. Some believe a free-floating soul becomes trapped within the body. Some believe a soul is created with the fusion of the gametes, in a meta-chemical process. Believers of [[reincarnation]] would say that the soul of a previously deceased person or animal (this religion believes animals have souls too) would enter the new body, so that there is a spiritual [[memory]] of the previous life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate act of intimacy serves to unite the male and female [[gamete]]s, the [[sperm]] and [[egg]], respectively. These gametes carry just one half of the [[gene]]tic material ([[chromosome]]s) from each parent, and when they combine the new [[embryo]] contains a full set of chromosomes. The process of the gametes combining is called [[fertilization]], and takes place inside the woman's body, in the [[Fallopian tubes]] or [[uterus]]. The embryo then attaches itself to the uterine lining, and is nourished by the placenta (which in turn receives its nourishment from the mother's body) while it develops. This development takes roughly nine months (see [[Naegele's Rule]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of this process of protected development, what was once an embryo is now born as a new baby. Human babies are relatively helpless, and depend on the care and love of their parents in order to survive to maturity themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humans are not able to reproduce alone by [[budding]], [[parthenogenesis]], or [[self-cloning]] as some species are capable of. In addition, human [[gender]] is fixed at conception, unlike some species'; females are not able to become male or vice versa to deal with homogeneous populations of one gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/when-does-life-begin Opposing Views: When Does Life Begin?]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Edgar</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Agnosticism&amp;diff=557480</id>
		<title>Agnosticism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Agnosticism&amp;diff=557480"/>
		<updated>2008-11-14T18:45:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edgar: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:65375.jpg|thumb|David Hume]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Agnosticism''' is, in weaker forms, an affirmation of ignorance regarding the existence of God, and in stronger forms, the assertion that God's existence is not capable of being known (unknowable).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proponent of the weaker form does not make a claim to knowledge about existence, but he simply suspends from making a decision. A suspension of decision, in terms of logic, does not have a truth value, and therefore he is not making an argument. The proponent of the stronger form goes a step further and makes a claim to knowledge by saying, ''I know that the existence of God cannot be known''. However, the stronger form does have a truth value, and therefore can be right or wrong. Either what the proponent of stronger agnosticism is correct, that the existence of God is not capable of being known, or he is incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;agnostic&amp;quot; was coined in 1869 by [[T. H. Huxley]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. H. Huxley was also an early and influential supporter of Darwinism.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; from the Greek roots ''a-'' not, and ''-gnostic,'' knowing; the philosopher [[Herbert Spencer]] was influential in spreading its use. One nineteenth-century saw held that &amp;quot;There is no god but the Unknowable, and Herbert Spencer is his prophet.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;London, Jack (1913), ''Martin Eden,'' [http://london.sonoma.edu/Writings/MartinEden/chapter13.html Chapter 13]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[David Hume]] and [[Bertrand Russell]] were famous agnostics. Two present famous agnostics are [[Larry King]] and [[Fidel Castro]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agnosticism has become a fairly common belief system in Western culture with 14% of people in the United States, 32% of people in France and 35% of people in Great Britain self-identifying as agnostics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=1131&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Atheism and agnosticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some agnostics bristle at the term ''atheist''. They say they aren't atheists, because they don't &amp;quot;believe that God does not exist&amp;quot; but rather &amp;quot;neither believe nor disbelieve&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agnostics differ from regular [[Atheism|atheists]] in that they do not deny God's existence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious believers make no distinction among non-believers. If you're not sure that God exists, they combine the unsure and &amp;quot;surely not&amp;quot; into one lump. For these believers, an &amp;quot;atheist&amp;quot; is anyone who doesn't believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among those who have not decided whether to believe in God, or to disbelieve in Him, there are two main groups:&lt;br /&gt;
#Those who simply haven't made a decision&lt;br /&gt;
#Those who declare no rational decision is possible, on the grounds that the existence of God is not knowable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bertrand Russell]] once wrote that, in describing his beliefs,&lt;br /&gt;
:I never know whether I should say 'Agnostic' or whether I should say 'Atheist'.... As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one [can] prove that there is not a God. On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Russell, Bertrand (1947) [http://www.luminary.us/russell/atheist_agnostic.html Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic?] Most online sources say &amp;quot;by which one prove,&amp;quot; probably a mistake.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agnostics and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
Agnostics in the [[United States]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/reason/agnosticism/agnostic.html Origin of the word 'agnostic']&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wonderfulatheistsofcfl.org/Quotes.htm Famous Atheists, Freethinkers, Diests and Agnostics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.celebatheists.com/?title=Main_Page Celebrity Atheist List]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/is-there-a-god Opposing Views: Is There a God?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Agnosticism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Edgar</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Religion&amp;diff=557475</id>
		<title>Religion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Religion&amp;diff=557475"/>
		<updated>2008-11-14T18:43:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edgar: /* External Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;'''Religion'''&amp;quot; refers to a set of core beliefs upon which people base their lives.  Morality is often based on religion. Beyond this general definition, the word &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; is used in several ways:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Formal definition''':  &amp;quot;The service and worship of [[God]] or the [[supernatural]];&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&amp;amp;va=religion &amp;quot;Religion&amp;quot;] in Merriam Webster dictionary.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Under this definition, [[atheism]], [[agnosticism]], and [[secular humanism]] are not &amp;quot;religions.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Religious Groups Participating in Religious Congregations &amp;amp; Membership Study 2000. [http://www.thearda.com/mapsReports/reports/alldenoms.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Functional definition''':  &amp;quot;A cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&amp;amp;va=religion &amp;quot;Religion&amp;quot;] in Merriam Webster dictionary.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  By this definition, non-theistic belief systems such as [[atheism]], [[humanism]], and [[agnosticism]] could be considered religions. Indeed, the Supreme Court of the [[United States of America]] has acknowledged that &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; does not need to include a belief in a god or gods, and included Secular Humanism as an example of a non-theistic religion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Among religions in this country which do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God, are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism, and others.&amp;quot;.  [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;amp;vol=367&amp;amp;invol=488#t11 Torcaso v. Watkins, (1961)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;A federal court of appeals ruled ... Wisconsin prison officials violated an inmate's rights because they did not treat [[atheism]] as a religion.&amp;quot;  [http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874 Court rules [[atheism]] a religion] WorldNet Daily&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Organisational definition''':  Under the definition, the term refers to a particular religious organisation or movement, such a [[Roman Catholic|Catholicism]], [[Methodist|Methodism]], or [[Lutheran]]ism.  These groups generally consist of a central creed or body of beliefs, an ethical component (i.e. a code of morals), a body of literature or holy texts or stories, and a set of individual and communal practices.  Under this definition, a person might say, &amp;quot;I'm not religious, because I don't go to church&amp;amp;mdash;but I believe in God.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Practical definition''':  Under this definition, the term refers to a set of practices, rites, or rituals observed by followers.  Under this definition, a person might say, &amp;quot;I'm not religious, because I'm not into rituals.  My relationship with God is enough.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== List of religions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Religions can be classified according to how many gods the religion recognises.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monotheistic religions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monotheistic (&amp;quot;one god&amp;quot;) religions are followed by the vast majority of the world's population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bahá'í]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Messianic Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jehovah's Witnesses]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rastafari movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sikhism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Zoroastrianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Polytheistic religions ===&lt;br /&gt;
Polytheistic (&amp;quot;many gods&amp;quot;) religions believe in and worship multiple gods or spirits or other supernatural beings. Polytheism has declined since the rise of Christianity, but has seen a recent resurgence among pagan cults in developed nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cao Dai]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints|Mormonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paganism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientology]] {{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Shamanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Shinto]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wicca]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Pantheistic religions ===&lt;br /&gt;
Pantheistic (&amp;quot;all is god&amp;quot;) religions believe that all of creation or nature is divine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hinduism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jainism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Age]] beliefs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting the existence of 'Panentheism' and the importance of distinguishing it from Pantheism. Panentheism is the belief that God is ''in'' all things and is chiefly manifest in [[Animism]]. Nonetheless, Pantheism and Panentheism have also been shown to feature in some outlooks generally defined as 'Monotheistic' (cf. [[Baruch Spinoza]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Non-theistic religions and philosophies===&lt;br /&gt;
Non-theistic religions do not have a belief in God or gods. Some consider the existence of God to be unknown or irrelevant, while (strong) [[Atheism]] is the belief that asserts it is false.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agnostic]]ism&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Strong atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Weak atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Buddhism]] (though with elements of [[Pantheism]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Secular Humanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Parody and joke religions ===&lt;br /&gt;
Several &amp;quot;religions&amp;quot; have been invented in an effort to denigrate or parody traditional religions.  As a rule, these religions do not have followers who actually believe the tenets of the religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Flying Spaghetti Monster|The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Discordianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jedi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last Thursdayism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Church of the SubGenius|SubGeniism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faith in organised religion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The percentage of respondents answering they had a &amp;quot;great deal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;quite a lot&amp;quot; of confidence in organised religion has decreased in the [[United States]] according to a [[Gallup]] poll taken in 2007.  Only 46% of respondents selected either of the choices above.  The numbers peaked at 68% in May 1975.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christian Examiner, Sept. 2007, Vol 25, No 9, Pg. 24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[World Religions by Number of Followers]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/religion/ What Liberals Say - Category: Religion], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/is-there-a-god Opposing Views: Is There a God?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Edgar</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=557474</id>
		<title>God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=557474"/>
		<updated>2008-11-14T18:42:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edgar: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Alphaomega.jpg|thumb|200px|God is the Alpha and Omega, the first and last, the beginning and the ending]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''Genesis 1:1'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{trinity}}'''God''' is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist, whether in the physical [[universe]] or in the spiritual realm ([[Heaven]]){{citation needed}}. Not only is God the creator and ruler of the things and beings within those two realms, but he is also the creator of the realms themselves. God created the physical universe, and before he acted in this creation, the universe did not exist. Likewise God did with the spiritual realm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== God is Revealed: How we know about God ==&lt;br /&gt;
Other than creation itself, God is revealed in several ways, including conscience and special revelation (the bible, and prophets). Most importantly though, God is revealed in [[Jesus Christ]], who is the Son of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Attributes or Character of God ==&lt;br /&gt;
The attributes of God are things that describe who he is. Similar to the way one might describe a close friend to another individual, so too do these attributes describe God's character and nature. Attributes of God include but are not limited to [[Wisdom]], [[Infinitude]], [[Sovereignty]], [[Holiness]], [[Trinity]], [[Omniscience]], [[Faithfulness]], [[Love]], [[Omnipotence]], [[Self-existence]], [[Self-sufficiency]], [[Justice]], [[Immutability]], [[Mercy]], [[Eternal]], [[Goodness]], [[Gracious]], and [[Omnipresence]]. These attributes all work in complete and perfect harmony with one another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God exercises eternal and righteous judgment of the wicked in [[hell]], because of an inherent problem in the human heart, namely [[Sin]]. According to the [[Bible]], the sacrifice of [[Jesus Christ]] on the cross of [[calvary]] and then [[resurrection]], is God's merciful and gracious response to the problem of the human heart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== God is Triune ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Trinity}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Bible does not use the term, it is clear that God is a triune God, or three in one.&lt;br /&gt;
These are sometimes referred to as ''God the Father'', ''God the Son'' ([[Jesus Christ|Jesus]]), and the ''[[Holy Spirit]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first hint of the Trinity is in {{Bible ref|Genesis|1|26}} which relates God saying, &amp;quot;Let us make man in our image&amp;quot;, indicating that God is a plurality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three persons of God are treated as equivalents in these words of Jesus shortly after His resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible quote|Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.|book=Matthew|chap=28|verses=19|version=NIV}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Jesus is God ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first verse of the [[Gospel of John]], in which Jesus is referred to as the &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot;, makes clear that Jesus is synonymous with God:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible quote|In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.|book=John|chap=1|verses=1|version=NIV}}&lt;br /&gt;
This verse not only says that &amp;quot;the Word&amp;quot; (Jesus) is synonymous with God, but also says that the Word was &amp;quot;in the beginning&amp;quot;, which means that He existed before all else existed, something that is only true of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is reinforced two verses later, in which Jesus is described as the creator.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Genesis]] refers to God as being the Creator.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible quote|Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.|book=John|chap=1|verses=3|version=NIV}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The Holy Spirit is God ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following passage, the Holy Spirit is referred to as God:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible quote|Then Peter said, &amp;quot;Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God.&amp;quot;|book=Acts|chap=5|verses=3-4|version=NIV}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== God is omniscient ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|omniscience}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God knows everything:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible quote|This then is how we know that we belong to the truth, and how we set our hearts at rest in his presence whenever our hearts condemn us. For God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything.|book=1_John|chap=3|verses=19-20|version=NIV}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because God is outside of [[time]], He can see and knows the [[past]] and the [[future]] as well as the present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; sometimes used to refer to God the Father ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Velasco Padre Eterno.jpg|left|140px|God the Father]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the bible, the word &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; (θεός) does not always refer to God's being as a whole, but more specifically refers to the Person of the Father (God the Father). Here are some verses which demonstrate this:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''John 3:16''' (NASB)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Son&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''1 John 4:10''' (NASB)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;In this is love, not that we loved &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, but that He loved us and sent &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;His Son&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to be the propitiation for our sins.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Notice how in each case, &amp;quot;Father&amp;quot; can be substituted for &amp;quot;God.&amp;quot; For example, &amp;quot;For the ''Father'' so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;not that we loved the ''Father'', but that He loved us and sent His Son.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible uses several different words to refer to God.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;God&amp;quot; itself is not a name, but an [[Old English]] word meaning ''supreme being, diety'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=god God] Online Etymology Dictionary.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which the translators who translated the Bible in to English chose as the appropriate English word for the [[Hebrew]] ''elohim'' and the [[Greek]] ''theos'' used in the [[Old Testament]] and [[New Testament]] respectively.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DPK&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kruse, Dale P.,[http://www.layevangelism.com/advtxbk/sections/sect-10/sec10-9.htm More on the ''Names'' of God In the Bible], Advanced Training Program of Evangelism.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other main term for God is the Hebrew ''adonai'', usually translated ''Lord''.&lt;br /&gt;
There are various compound words also used in the Bible, such as ''el shaddai'', which means ''God Almighty'' (&amp;quot;''el''&amp;quot; is a short version of ''elohim'').&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DPK&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''YHWH'' is given in the Bible as God's actual name.  In most English Bibles it is translated as &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-variant:small-caps&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Lord''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;, in small capitals.  The name has various other English versions, including Yehovah, Jehovah, and Yahweh.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McHyde, Tim, [http://www.escapeallthesethings.com/yahweh.htm God’s Name: LORD, Yahweh, Yahveh, YHWH, YHVH, Jehovah or Yehovah?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Other gods]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theopedia.com/God Theopedia - God]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://christiananswers.net/dictionary/god.html ChristianAnswers.net - God]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://wikible.org/en/God Wikible.org - God]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/is-there-a-god Opposing Views: Is There a God?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Divine Beings]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Edgar</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Autism&amp;diff=557471</id>
		<title>Autism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Autism&amp;diff=557471"/>
		<updated>2008-11-14T18:41:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edgar: /* External Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Autism''' is a neurological disorder, characterized by inability to interact socially; linguistic disability; intense, narrow interests; and repetitive behaviors. These are called stims or stimming. They include walking on tiptoes, flapping of hands, staring at objects for a prolonged period of time, oral fixation, spinning in circles, and other repetitive activities.  Other signs include lack of eye contact, playing alone, lack of words, or in the case of Asperger's syndrome possessing a large vocabulary and intense knowledge of specialized areas but a lack of social skills or inappropriate behavior. It is usually detected by the time a child is four years old but in some cases, autism goes unnoticed into adulthood. There are many intelligent and talented autistic individuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Temple Grandin, &amp;quot;Thinking in Pictures, Expanded Edition: My Life with Autism&amp;quot; amazon link http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307275655/ref=wl_it_dp/103-3432247-4184629?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;coliid=I1CWNFSEUCIXQL&amp;amp;colid=49VN3HJC5OQK&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Diagnoses of autism has increased from 1:10,000 in 1988 to 1:166 people today. Some estimates are as high as 1 in 150 people &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/faq_prevalence.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and it has been rising. Among boys, 1 in 94 has the disorder.  In New Jersey, which has the highest rate in the nation, 1 in every 60 boys has autism and 1 in every 94 children is affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been claimed by some that a [[mercury]] preservative used in [[vaccines]], thimerosal, is the cause of injury in many recipients, including a cause of increase in autism rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:952MmAWeCOsJ:www.jpands.org/vol8no1/geier.pdf+jpands&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=2&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;client=firefox-a Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines,&lt;br /&gt;
Neurodevelopment Disorders, and Heart Disease in the United States]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thimerosal is a inorganic form of mercury that was widely used as a preservative, but since FDA and CDC action in 1999 and 2000 thimerosal usage in vaccines has been either removed or lessened to around 0.01% in [[vaccines]] that still use it, including influenza and DT vaccines. However, U.S. rates of autism have increased rather than declined.{{fact}} Vaccines have been shown not to be a likely cause for autism &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/13703.html,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B75KN-4DJ97VJ-8&amp;amp;_user=10&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=10&amp;amp;md5=c555dd340aa6cb7c3a18806ba0fd162a&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iom.edu/?id=27771&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but worries about the vaccine still linger in people who have not been informed of these findings and their subsequent refusal to vaccinate their children have been the leading cause in recent outbreaks of these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.acsh.org/publications/pubID.425/pub_detail.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Autism is a spectrum disorder which means there is a range in how it affects different people. There is the fragile x syndrome, Asperger's syndrome, pdd nos, mild autism, moderate autism, severe autism, and some [[idiot savants]].  Autistic children will not all act like the character portrayed in the movie ''[[Rain Man]]''.  Nor are all autistic children uncaring or unable to show emotion, in fact many are very caring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Autism was first identified in 1943 by Dr. [[Leo Kanner]]. Dr. Hans Asperger also did some research into autism at about the same time and discovered Asperger's syndrome. As early as the 90's many psychotherapies were used to treat it. One very effective treatment, though not a cure, is Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA therapy).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theories of causes of autism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, there is a strong interest in whether a possible link exists between the increasing numbers of people being diagnosed with autism, and the use of thimerosal (which contains mercury) as a preservative in vaccines. However, this has been disproved as a likely cause of autism and now most data indicates that autism is a mostly genetic condition. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''American Acadamy of Family Physicians'' http://www.aafp.org/afp/20020301/tips/14.html &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The genetics of this condition are not yet fully understood and could be caused by complex interactions between multiple genes which would account for the &amp;quot;spectrum&amp;quot; like differences in the severity of many cases &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://66.102.1.104/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;q=cache:7kMNqvTgRtoJ:www.ikhebeenvraag.be/mediastorage/FSDocument/52/Freitag-2.pdf+&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764594&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simon Baron-Cohen, director of the Autism Research Centre at the [[University of Cambridge]] (U.K.) notes the strong evidence that males and females are hardwired for different behavior, with boys tending to be stronger at mechanics, categorizing and systemizing information, mathematics, etc. and girls stronger at emotionalizing and empathizing.  He has proposed that autism is merely an extreme version of the male brain type, in which the (female) urge to empathize is nearly absent and the brain is almost entirely hardwired for the (male) tasks of systemizing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baron-Cohen, Simon.  ''The Essential Difference'', Basic Books 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leo Kanner in a 1949 paper identified &amp;quot;parental coldness&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lack of maternal warmth&amp;quot; in the parents of autistic children, leading to the term ''refrigerator mother''.  The theory here is autism is caused by incomplete [[socialization]] during early childhood because of emotionally cold parents.  The book ''Toxic Psychiatry'' by Peter Briggin notes that the frigid mother theory of autism was abandoned in recent years due to pressure groups.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Briggin, Peter R.  ''Toxic Psychiatry'', New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lenny Schafer, editor of the ''Schafer Autism Report'', rejects outright the current characterization of mild social retardation (such as &amp;quot;Asperger's syndrome&amp;quot;) as forms of autism.  He notes that autism is a disability, and if a person is not disabled from participation in society by their condition, in such areas as being able to hold a job or communicate, including communication over the Internet, they are not autistic and should not be diagnosed as such.  He accordingly rejects that there can be such a thing as autistic self-advocacy, as anyone who is truly autistic would not have that ability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sarnet.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Wired'' magazine has referred to autism as a &amp;quot;geek syndrome&amp;quot;, or essentially as a form of identity-politics-for-computer-nerds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aspergers_pr.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Those favoring this interpretation of autism have coined new terminology, including &amp;quot;neurodiversity&amp;quot; for a population with and without autistic individuals , and using the term &amp;quot;neurotypical&amp;quot; for those without autism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.autismspeaks.org/ &lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.autismdigest.com/&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.nationalautismassociation.org/&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.autism-society.org/site/PageServer&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.autismlink.com/&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/are-autism-and-vaccines-linked Opposing Views: Are Autism and Vaccines Linked?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category: medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Edgar</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>