<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Emba</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Emba"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Emba"/>
	<updated>2026-09-10T22:25:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mahabharata&amp;diff=806921</id>
		<title>Mahabharata</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mahabharata&amp;diff=806921"/>
		<updated>2010-08-18T05:14:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Mahabharata is a Sanskrit epic poem describing the conflict between two sets of cousins over an empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text is extremely long; its written form dates to the Third and Fourth Centuries B.C. and, along with the [[Ramayana]], is one of the major ancient [[Indian]] epics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Story==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The central story of the Mahabharata is that of the warring cousins known as the [[Pandavas]] and the [[Kauravas]]. The five Pandava brothers are the story's protagonists and they come to share a common wife named [[Draupadi]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conflict between the Pandavas and the Kauravas escalates throughout the story and culminates with the Battle of Kurukshetra. Before this battle, [[Arjuna]] (an archer who is the most skilled Pandava warrior) participates in a dialogue on spirituality with the Hindu god [[Krishna]]. This lesson is often separated from the Mahabharata and considered a work unto itself known as the [[Bhagavad Gita]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior the the Battle of Kurukshetra, Arjuna is told by his mother [[Kunti]] that one of the allies of the Kauravas (a great warrior named [[Karna]]) is her son also. Karna's father is the Hindu sun god [[Surya]]. Kunti pleads with Arjuna not to fight in the upcoming battle, as he and his brothers would be at war with their half-brother Karna. Arjuna eventually takes part in the battle and kills Karna.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kerala&amp;diff=800285</id>
		<title>Kerala</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kerala&amp;diff=800285"/>
		<updated>2010-08-02T19:07:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kerala.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kerala''' is a state of [[India]]. It is located in the south west and is heavily populated. The population is mostly [[Hindu]] but significant portions of the population are [[Muslim]] and [[Christian]]. The official language is [[Malayalam]]; [[English]] is widely used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Thiruvananthapuram]] (Trivandrum) is Kerala's capital and largest city; [[Kochi]] (Cochin) is the second largest city.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kerala.gov.in/ Kerala] Public Relations Department, Govt. of Kerala.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keralatourism.org/ Kerala] keralatourism.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Indian States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Luke_9-16_(Translated)&amp;diff=800153</id>
		<title>Talk:Luke 9-16 (Translated)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Luke_9-16_(Translated)&amp;diff=800153"/>
		<updated>2010-08-02T15:13:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I am a bit concerned by how often I am seeing the term &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; arbitrarily replaced with &amp;quot;the Lord.&amp;quot; (For example, &amp;quot;Kingdom of God&amp;quot; changed to &amp;quot;Truth of the Lord.&amp;quot;)  The two terms are not synonymous, and I feel the difference between θεος and κυριος should be retained.  Also, in the Gospel of Luke, and elsewhere on the site, &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; used as a translation of several different words: Kingdom, Word, gospel.  This is a big problem.  You can't simply replace every complex term with &amp;quot;truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:The distinction between 'Lord' and 'God', the substitution of 'Truth' for 'Word' is a matter for [[Bible Translation Issues]]. Specific problems with Luke 9-16 can be discussed here. [[User:JohnFraiser|JohnFraiser]] 10:22, 21 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translation of ευαγγελιον ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Luke 9:6- I don't know if &amp;quot;spreading the Truth&amp;quot; is a very good translation here.  Wouldn't a better translation of the Greek ευαγγελιζομενοι (euangelizomenoi) be &amp;quot;proclaiming the good news&amp;quot;? Or the more traditional &amp;quot;preaching the gospel&amp;quot;?  I think it may be a bad idea to downplay the term &amp;quot;gospel&amp;quot; too much. After all, most conservatives should be pretty familiar with the term &amp;quot;gospel.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Caspianrex|Cory Howell]] 15:48, 21 October 2009 (EDT)Cory Howell&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Over at the Gospel of Mark, the decision was made to translate ευαγγελιον as &amp;quot;good news.&amp;quot;  It seems to me that the same convention should be followed here in Luke.  Therefore, &amp;quot;spreading the Truth&amp;quot; in Luke 9:6 should be rendered either &amp;quot;proclaiming the good news&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;spreading the good news.&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;Proclaiming&amp;quot; would be more literal, and &amp;quot;spreading&amp;quot; would be a little more figurative, but would more clearly present the idea of the gospel spreading across the countryside.--[[User:Caspianrex|Cory Howell]] 11:46, 22 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the update, I think 'spreading' will be better. Is it a new Project Guideline to translate ευαγγελιον as 'good news'? [[User:JohnFraiser|JohnFraiser]] 11:56, 22 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Over at Mark, it looks like they are consistently using &amp;quot;good news,&amp;quot; and TerryH told me in an e-mail that it was supposed to be &amp;quot;good news.&amp;quot; That's all the info I have currently.--[[User:Caspianrex|Cory Howell]] 12:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::However, I glanced through Matthew, and it looks like the word gospel is currently still there.  Perhaps we need some clarification on this issue.--[[User:Caspianrex|Cory Howell]] 12:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Editing and creating quotations ==&lt;br /&gt;
Is it a good idea to edit existing quotes, or to create quotes where the existing work had none?  The accuracy and authenticity of existing quotes may be questionable, but altered or fabricated quotes are guaranteed to be inaccurate.--[[User:jason217|Jason Samantha]] 20:54, 02 November 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Lord's Prayer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm looking to restrict my changes to cleanup of spelling and grammar, but I have to raise a concern that troubles me.  Can the text of the Lord's Prayer in 11:1-4 be left intact instead of trying to revise it into a more contemporary form?  I'm a Catholic, and was taught the Lord's Prayer as a child using the form shown here in the KJV.  Even though the text of the KJV is a translation itself, it has been accepted by English-speaking Christians for hundreds of years.  I just don't see a need to &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; what isn't broken in the Bible, especially when it's supposed to be a direct instruction from Jesus.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 20:51, 8 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Chris, you express a reasonable view, but honestly I can't say I agree.  The English language changes over time.  Not everyone can understand Shakespeare today, and this disconnect gets worse every new day.  Precision is lost also.  Who talks about others being &amp;quot;indebted&amp;quot; to us now?  It's imprecise in 2009 English.  On the positive side, powerful new words and concepts are constantly being discovered that were not available in 1611.  Why ride in horse-and-buggy when Corvettes are available?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:58, 8 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I can certainly understand your viewpoint, and agree with it in general.  As I mentioned above, I learned the Lord's prayer as a child, and it took some time before I understood what &amp;quot;hallowed&amp;quot; meant.  The translated text is not worse, although &amp;quot;holy is your name&amp;quot; seems to sound better than &amp;quot;your name is holy&amp;quot;.  My feeling is taht judgment can be used selectively to determine which parts of a Bible translation should be brought up to date (most, so it's understandable), and which should be left intact out of respect for tradition and the beauty of KJV-style prose that is lost in modern English (a small but important amount).&lt;br /&gt;
::I appreciate you letting me express my thoughts.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 10:08, 9 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Chris, I understand your viewpoint and agree that the [[KJV]] rendition is majestic.  There is certainly a time and a place for that, and perhaps for some people it is for every time and every place.  But the market is speaking loudly and clearly:  the KJV loses market share every day.  Maybe that's unfortunate, but that trend is not likely to change.  It's all well and good for older folks to cling to the translation of their youth, but that's not helping younger folks or people who are hearing it for the first time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:42, 9 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for the responses.  I consider the question addressed, and will return to copy editing.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 21:24, 10 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question about 15:13 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could the wording of this translation be changed from &amp;quot;where he wasted his life with women and booze.&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;where he wasted his life through sinful behavior.&amp;quot;?  That seems closer to describing the meaning of &amp;quot;riotous living&amp;quot; in this passage.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 11:15, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Luke 11:33-34 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By stating ''The mind is the window to the body. '' in Luke 11:34a, the connection to Luke 11:33 is lost, as neither ''window'' nor ''mind'' is mentioned in the previous verse.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 17:26, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an interesting pair of verses to discuss, but I have a different reason than FrankC for thinking that the CBP translation needs to be revised.  Matthew 6:22-24 relates the same lesson from Jesus, and in both the Luke and Matthew gospels the original intent seems to be an emphasis on having a single-minded devotion to God and living one's life by God's rules.  When you lose that single-minded focus on a God-centered life, you are in effect allowing temptation to work on you.  Both gospels discuss this in black-and-white terms; you are either focused on God, or you are darkened by evil.  This may seem extreme, but Jesus had a tendency to use simple, clear examples in his lessons that didn't much leave room for watering his messages down.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Some references to this interpretation can be found [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom31.ix.lviii.html here], [http://www.biblemeanings.info/Words/Body/Eye.htm here] and [http://bible.cc/matthew/6-22.htm here].&lt;br /&gt;
:If others here agree with this interpretation, then the current translation of Luke 11:34 is actually taking the message away from the original intent.  It's good to be open-minded about many things, but not where God is concerned (&amp;quot;Keep your eyes on the prize&amp;quot;).  The conservative value of open-mindedness should be emphasized in more appropriate place, but not here.  My suggested CBP translation for this passage would be this:&lt;br /&gt;
::''The window to God's light is the eye.  When your eye is focused on God, your body is filled with his light; but when your eye is distracted or turned away then your body is left in darkness.''&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll leave the final decision to the senior editors here - this is only a recommendation.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 10:25, 14 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Luke 11:43 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty minor point. I respectfully disagree with the choice of &amp;quot;reckoning to you&amp;quot; for οὐαὶ ὑμῖν.  ''Ouai'' is an extremely common interjection in Greek usually translated as &amp;quot;woe&amp;quot;  or &amp;quot;alas&amp;quot; along with its object. In this case the object is the plural dative pronoun of su, which means &amp;quot;you all.&amp;quot; The combination of ''ouai su'' is so commonly used in the Bible that it's idiomatic. The idiom corresponds to those we're famliar with in English: &amp;quot;woe to you,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;woe unto you,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;alas for you.&amp;quot; So this is an example of where I think the KJV correctly translates the idiom and is perhaps the reason it is familiar to us as English speakers so many hundreds of years later. My only point here is that since I've never heard someone say &amp;quot;reckoning to you&amp;quot; and to the extent a familiar English idiom directly corresponds to the meaning of a Greek idiom I don't think it should not be discarded. Idioms like this have the ability to powerfully and effectively convey their meaning. I also think &amp;quot;reckoning is textually incorrect because the Gospel writers had word for &amp;quot;reckoning&amp;quot;  or &amp;quot;judgment,&amp;quot; depending on the context you intended. [[User:Cambrian|Cambrian]] 13:53, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You make good points.  Thank you.  I have an open mind about this, and think &amp;quot;reckoning&amp;quot; might be improved.  But &amp;quot;woe to you&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;alas to you&amp;quot;?  Those strike me as very archaic and ambiguous.  Is it a curse?  No, I don't think that is the original intent.  People just don't talk that way anymore, and a listener to those phrases does not understand the original intent.  Also, as to &amp;quot;you all,&amp;quot; that's too colloquial for a Bible translation, don't you think?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:33, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your thoughts, Mr. Schlafly. I also don't think it's a curse, but &amp;quot;reckoning&amp;quot; does refer to a judgment or curse. ''Ouai'' is an interjection, literally &amp;quot;woe!&amp;quot; as in &amp;quot;woe is me&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;woe unto you&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;alas, poor Yorick, I knew him well.&amp;quot; I guess we just see the power of the idiom differently. I can't think of anything powerful that retains the meaning of ''ouai'' that I'm familiar with but I am trying and my mind is open to capturing a more contemporary meaning of &amp;quot;woe.&amp;quot; One suggestion I would make is that the sense of ''ouai'' doesn't seem judgmental, as &amp;quot;reckoning&amp;quot; would imply that there will be a reckoning upon you (and there's no indication that the interjection is present progressive or gerundial), but purely interjectory along the lines of &amp;quot;poor you.&amp;quot; As for the &amp;quot;you all,&amp;quot; say no more. That was a carry-over from my internal dialog about plural pronouns like ὑμῖν when I read them because English has no plural form of &amp;quot;you&amp;quot; like Greek or Romance languages do. Don't worry, I wasn't suggesting &amp;quot;woe to you all&amp;quot; is appropriate. :-) Sorry about being unclear. By the way, the only reason I think this matters is that ''ouai'' or something similar might appear 50 or more times in the New Testament and its use is consistently translated as &amp;quot;woe&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;alas&amp;quot; from the Greek in the KJV. Catholics might find the similar Douay rendering of ''vae vobis''' as &amp;quot;woe unto you&amp;quot; familiar. [[User:Cambrian|Cambrian]] 15:12, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't see any merit to &amp;quot;alas&amp;quot; in this context.  &amp;quot;Alas to you who take the highest seats at the synagogue&amp;quot;???  A new listener of that is left dumbfounded and confused.  What's the point of it?  I'm not even sure myself with that rendering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Woe&amp;quot; seems better, but still archaic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The broader point is this:  we're not trying to translate the Bible so it sounds familiar to people who have already memorized, or frequently recite, an old translation.  We're trying to translate the Bible so it renders the original intent as precisely as possible to ''any'' modern listener, and particularly a new one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:29, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How about a slight modification to Andy's version: replace &amp;quot;Reckoning to you, Pharisees!&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Your reckoning is coming, Pharisees!&amp;quot;.  This would also work well in the preceding passage (42).  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 17:15, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Great suggestion!  Please make that improvement in verse 43.  I'm not sure using the exact same translation in 42 is helpful, but am open-minded about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:01, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'll put it into both now, and you can decide if you want to revise 42 after you see it.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 18:16, 16 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 11:46 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since there's a comment about whether this verse needs further work I'll add my 2 cents.  The way I read the original, the simplest interpretation is that the lawyers are being chastised for adding burdens to others while doing nothing to help with them.  Assuming that these burdens are equatable to regulations ''&amp;quot;and transactions costs&amp;quot;'' may be reading too much into it as a translation.  I'd suggest keeping the essence of Andy's translation, but streamlining it like this:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:''He replied, &amp;quot;You lawyers will be accountable too! For you impose burdensome regulations on others, but will not lift a finger to help those who struggle with them.'' &lt;br /&gt;
This also restores Jesus' reference to lifting a finger from the original text.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 15:01, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your suggestion is superb, Chris.  You're excellent at this.  Thanks for your insights.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:30, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks.  I've applied the change.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 16:05, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 11:47-48 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding 11:47, why change the translation of &amp;quot;Woe unto you!&amp;quot; to say &amp;quot;Pity you!!&amp;quot;, when the same phrase is translated to &amp;quot;Your reckoning is coming!&amp;quot; a few verses prior?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding 11:48, the translation is leaving out a key point of Jesus' message, that those He is addressing ''allowed'' the deeds of their fathers, not just witnessed them.  That's too important a distinction to be left out in the revised version.  I'd suggest the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:''By that you testify to sanctioning the deeds of your fathers, because they killed the prophets, and you build their tombs.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 15:09, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To your first point, I don't think the same Greek word or phrase should necessarily be translated repetitively and identically in English.  Modern English disfavors repetition, and the Greek was not as powerful in some ways as terms now available.  The meaning changes from context to context, and the original intent of the Greek was probably not identical in the different contexts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Your second point is terrific, but I wonder if we can improve it further.  How about:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''With that you endorse the deeds of your fathers, as they killed the prophets and you build their tombs.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps even more refinement can improve this.  Suggestions welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:33, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've left the first item intact, and replaced the second with your revision, which I agree is a further improvement.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 16:06, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks again for your superb contributions, from which I (and others) have  learned.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:08, 19 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Politically Incorrect&amp;quot; in 11:54 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the question is being asked, I'd suggest replacing &amp;quot;politically incorrect&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;controversial&amp;quot;, or even better, &amp;quot;heretical&amp;quot;.  Since it was a group of Pharisees looking to trap and accuse Jesus, the original meaning is most likely that they were tying to catch him in heresy, which was their domain.  Quoting Jesus as saying something politically incorrect for that period would only allow Him to be embarrassed at most - these men want to have Jesus eliminated since they saw him as a threat to their authority. --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 09:11, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the Pharisees had an atheistic separation between church and state. Heresey would have been considered politically incorrect. The Pharisees ''hated'' Christ. They would have jumped on anything, not just heresey. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 09:23, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Right, and the Pharisees did try to catch Jesus in criticism of Caesar, not only heresy.  Recall the question about whether one should pay taxes to Caesar.  It would have been &amp;quot;politically incorrect&amp;quot; -- and deadly -- for Jesus to answer as the Pharisees hoped.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But I have an open mind about this and agree that further discussion is warranted.  Note that because &amp;quot;politically incorrect&amp;quot; is one of the [[Best New Conservative Words]], it won't appear in any Greek-to-English lexicon.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:39, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The reason I suggested &amp;quot;heresy&amp;quot; is that it fits the intent of these Pharisees better.  In Mark 14:61-64 that is the accusation that is used to condemn Jesus to death, and it improves the consistency of this translation to support that intent by the Pharisees.  The point about the attempt to trick Jesus over paying taxes to Caeser is a good one, but even that was essentially a trap based on a religious question, not one about government policy.  The final point is that while we criticize people today for saying and doing politically incorrect things, at worst these are social blunders with few legal consequences.  The Pharisees were trying to eliminate a threat, and mere embarrassment was not going to be enough to stop a man performing actual miracles before the masses.  It would take a serious criminal or heretical act to discredit Jesus, not a social gaffe.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 10:10, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Nothing can discredit conservative principles, but that doesn't stop liberals from trying over every perceived gaffe a conservative makes. I don't see the Pharisees as being any different, but I have an open mind and you have made good points. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 10:21, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks.  What you say about people maliciously using gaffes to discredit people is true.  Where the Bible is concerned, I'm just trying to stay &amp;quot;on message&amp;quot; with this project's focus on supporting the original intent of these passages.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 10:36, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::We all welcome the best translation of the original intent, using the most powerful modern terms available.  I agree that &amp;quot;politically incorrect&amp;quot; has a connotation of superficiality, but it can be very serious in consequences also.  People can lose their careers and sometimes even their lives around the world with a single politically incorrect remark, and you can see liberals today try to provoke such a remark.  Solzhenitsyn spent years in hard labor in Siberia, and people languish in Cuban jails to this day for politically incorrect statements or writings.  Pharisees were playing a liberal game to trap Jesus.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:02, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Those are excellent examples of people suffering the consequences of saying the wrong things while living in modern-era oppressive states where freedom of speech is not permitted.  I suspect the that typical reader is not going to think of those cases when they see the phrase &amp;quot;politically incorrect&amp;quot; used in a Biblical context, though.  The essential question is, given who the questioners were and the setting they lived in at the time, could they have entrapped Jesus in a way that would eliminate him as a threat by getting him to say politically incorrect things?  That seems unlikely.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Remember that Jesus was healing people, raising the dead and performing miracles, and that this as much as his lessons were the reason for his popularity at that time (the lessons would be his enduring legacy, but the miracles were essential back then to show doubters that he spoke through the authority of God).  If a man walked among us today could cure blindness and disease with a touch and raise children from the dead, who wouldn't tolerate political incorrectness on his part as a price to pay?  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Since the miracles were witnessed by many, then the best way to discredit the miracle-worker, Jesus, would be to imply that the source of his power came not from God, but from the devil to lead men away from God.  Catching him in something that could be spun as heresy would be a means to that end.  This interpretation is straightforward, consistent with both the original scripture and the translated versions to date, and supports conservative efforts to stand up to people who try to trap men of faith into saying things that can be spun into an attack on that faith.  Sorry to be so wordy, but I've taken this project to heart and care about doing my best by it. --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 11:36, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::It's my belief that the Pharisees, like liberals, are nit picking. If a man walked among us who could cure blindness by touch, intellectual elitists who cling so desperately to their theories would be dying for a reason to ostracize him. That's exactly what the elitist Pharisees were doing to Jesus.  At least I think so. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 11:46, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Nitpicking would not have led to the fullfillment of scripture through Jesus' death.  When you read one of these Gospels as a whole,a nd not just in part, you get the benefit of seeing the bigger picture and the patterns that start to emerge, just as you do with any great novel.  In this section, Jesus was nothing but honest in calling the Pharisees out on their hypocrisy and style-over-substance, and now through his honesty he's made enemies of them.  They are now motivated to not just embarrass or pick at his teachings - they see him as a danger to their (misguided) way of life, and see him as a threat to be eliminated.  They choose to entrap him and get him to make a heretical statement, which would explain his ability to perform miracles while turning the people against him.  With this the pattern is set that leads to His trial and crucifixion.  Scripture isn't just a story, it's a tapestry, and trying to justify something that fits the context and intention like heresy being replaced by &amp;quot;political incorrectness&amp;quot; is like replacing silk with polyester - it still holds the tapestry together, but it doesn't really belong there.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 11:59, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Chris, you're using a lot of words but haven't addressed my simple point: how would modern day intellectual elitists treat someone who could perform miracles? And your analogy about replacing silk with polyester doesn't hold up. We're using powerful modern terms not available to the original authors which are an improvement, not replacing the original with cheap alternatives. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 12:15, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::No need to ask that hypothetically.  Look at James Randi and other skeptics' treatment of faith healers.  Sincere Christians imbued with the gifts promised by Christ help countless people around them, and they're called frauds and charlatans.  When called upon to &amp;quot;prove&amp;quot; their abilities, the goalposts are continually moved and excuses concocted so they can always be discredited in spite of their success. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 12:27, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If a man walked among us today could cure blindness and disease with a touch and raise children from the dead, who wouldn't tolerate political incorrectness on his part as a price to pay?&amp;quot;  The answer, of course, is that atheists and other liberals would viciously attack him.  Evil still exists, and he would threaten their power and control.  And of course liberals would try to trap him in some politically incorrect statement in order to use against him.  The point is not that the Pharisees wanted to learn the truth themselves, but that they were looking for something to use against Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see &amp;quot;heresy&amp;quot; as encompassing all of the tricks and traps used by the Pharisees in questioning Jesus.  &amp;quot;Controversy&amp;quot; doesn't seem to capture the meaning at all.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:21, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I seem to be in the minority on this one so I'll let it go and move on.  Being able to discuss these issues here is what makes this project productive versus a series of edits and counter-edits to the translation itself.  Some last answers to the points above:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Andy, you're absolutely correct in the Pharisees wanting to find something to use against Jesus, and I'm certain that there was no shortage of verbal games and tricks they tried to use against Him.  However, I wasn't stating that heresy was part of the tricks and traps they were using - I was suggesting that a charge of heresy was much more likely to be one of the ''results'' they were looking for than to merely catch Him saying something politically incorrect, which you yourself agree carries has a &amp;quot;connotation of superficiality&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Douglas, your point is interesting but the passage in question is not about anyone trying to debunk the miracles Jesus performed.  If anything, they were so utterly convincing that no one could dispute the power behind them.  The best the Pharisees could probably do is to be deceitful, and imply that Jesus was an agent of the devil rather than God, and this concurs with another Gospel passage where Jesus is accused of invoking demons to cast out other demons.  Getting Jesus to say something heretical would be a means to that end, while saying something politically incorrect would not.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Jeff, I apologize if my response to you seemed wordy, but you asked good questions that deserved a well-reasoned response.  Where the Bible is concerned, if I can't back up a suggestion than I don't make one.  To be brief, it's a tangent to ask what modern-day liberals and skeptics would do if Jesus walked on earth today.  Our assignment is to take the words of scripture describing what happened between those people, at that time and place, and use our best language to make it understandable.  To change the meaning so the actions of ancients are recast as the actions of our contemporaries is not what we are supposed to be doing, I think.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 15:13, 27 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Custodian&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapter 12: &amp;quot;The lord of that custodian&amp;quot; - seems awkward and archaic.  Any thoughts?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:42, 30 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps change custodian to &amp;quot;supervisor&amp;quot;, (seems to get across that he's in charge of the work, but not the owner) and lord to &amp;quot;employer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;businessman&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;owner&amp;quot; as each context requires, since lord used to refer to simply any landowner hiring people. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:30, 30 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a tricky passage, and finding the right words is not as easy as I would hope.  The key thread seems to be that there's a servant appointed by a lord/master to oversee his household, which seems to be better replaced by &amp;quot;affairs&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;business&amp;quot;, although the latter works as well.  This servant is the supervisor of all the lord's affairs in his absence, which is why all the other servants and maidens report to him, and why it is his role to hand out wages to them.  The cautionary tale is that when this overseer doesn't think the master is watching (coming back late) he gets lazy, abusive, and arrogant, and then faces his day of reckoning hen the master catches him by surprise.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::In strict business terms, the lord would be an executive or owner, the custodian would be a manager, and the others the staff.  I was undecided about whether to replace &amp;quot;lord&amp;quot; so folks don't confuse this with God despite the metaphor.  Jesus is telling this as a parable so He is not directly referring to God in this case.  How about these options, then:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&amp;quot;Lord&amp;quot; becomes &amp;quot;estate owner&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&amp;quot;The main servant becomes the &amp;quot;estate manager&amp;quot;, or simply &amp;quot;the manager&amp;quot;.  I like Douglas' suggestion of &amp;quot;supervisor&amp;quot;, too.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The others become the &amp;quot;estate staff&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;estate workers&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:That would work better than &amp;quot;custodian&amp;quot;, which I agree is awkward.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 13:32, 30 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think the parable is talking about a business, which on a feudal estate would be been indistinguishable from &amp;quot;affairs&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;estate&amp;quot;.  But wouldn't the modern lingo be &amp;quot;business&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;manageer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;supervisor&amp;quot;?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:29, 30 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::A present-day business would be an appropriate metaphor, along with manager/supervisor.  The only reason I tended to favor &amp;quot;estate&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;business&amp;quot; is verse 45, which seems to better fit someone overseeing a household/estate versus a business (unless the business is a restaurant).  I think of these settings being like the plantations of the old American south - the land &amp;amp; estate was the business, and vice-versa.  I think &amp;quot;business&amp;quot; and business-related terms can be used in translating this parable, though.  The message is about being a faithful and obedient servant to those in authority over you, and there are many ways to convey that.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 14:44, 30 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Luke 12:15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe Luke 12:15 is about the unimportance of wealth and should read: &amp;quot;a man's life is ''not'' measured by the number of things he comes to possess.&amp;quot; [[User:Emba|Emba]] 11:13, 2 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Karen_Armstrong&amp;diff=799978</id>
		<title>Karen Armstrong</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Karen_Armstrong&amp;diff=799978"/>
		<updated>2010-08-01T16:26:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Karen Armstrong.jpg|right|170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Karen Armstrong''' (born 1944) is a British comparative [[religion]] writer. Her first book, ''Through the Narrow Gate'', described her seven years as a nun in a [[Roman Catholic]] order. She has written more than 20 book including ''A History of God'', ''Islam: A Short History'', ''Buddha'', ''The Spiral Staircase'', ''The Great Transformation'', ''Muhammad: A Prophet for Our Time''  and most recently ''The Case for God ''; also numerous articles for ''The Guardian'' and other publications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karen Armstrong is a powerful voice for ecumenical understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Armstrong's 2008 TED Prize wish asks us to help her assemble the Charter for Compassion, a document around which religious leaders can work together for peace. In late fall 2008, the first draft of the document was written by the world, via a sharing website. [http://www.ted.com/speakers/karen_armstrong.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I say that religion isn't about believing things. It's ethical alchemy. It's about behaving in a way that changes you, that gives you intimations of holiness and sacredness.&amp;quot; Karen Armstrong on Powells.com&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The challenge of the XXIst century is to appreciate - not only to tolerate - to other religious traditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the Freedom of Worship Award by the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute was awarded to Karen Armstrong for her personal dedication to the ideal that peace can be found in religious understanding, for her teachings on compassion, and her appreciation for the positive sources of spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Major Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''A History of God'' (1993) is an overview of [[God]] in the Abrahamic Religions. The concept of God is traced from ancient [[Israel]] through the 20th Century. The book covers ancient [[Jewish]] views of God and how they changed during the [[Babylonian Captivity]], early [[Christianity]], the formation of the doctrine of the [[Trinity]], the formation and rise of [[Islam]], the development of [[Sunni]], [[Shia]] and [[Sufi]] Islam, the split between [[Eastern Orthodoxy]] and [[Roman Catholicism]], the [[Protestant Reformation]], the [[Enlightenment]] and in the [[modern]] and [[post-modern]] world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions'' (2006) is an overview of major religions from about 1600 to 200 B.C.; including [[Hinduism]], [[Buddhism]], [[Confucianism]], [[Daoism]], [[Greek]] rationalism and [[Judaism]]. The thrust of this book is that during the first millenium B.C., the major religions moved from a sole concern with ritual and sacrifice to a primary concern with personal ethics and morality. During this time, the leaders of these religions all developed doctrines of compassion and respect for others, which was quite a departure from the religious practices that preceded them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Martin Buber]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John L. Esposito]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm?frm=7158&amp;amp;sec_id=7158 Karen Armstrong: The Coherence of Her Incoherence]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fourfreedoms.nl/index.php?lang=en&amp;amp;id=16&amp;amp;laureate=77 Freedom of Worship - Four Freedoms Award.] Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://charterforcompassion.org/ Charter for Compassion.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Writers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_Does_Richard_Dawkins_have_machismo%3F&amp;diff=799686</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_Does_Richard_Dawkins_have_machismo%3F&amp;diff=799686"/>
		<updated>2010-07-31T14:08:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Should we not attack his view point than attack the person? This essay does not appear to be in a very good taste. --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 22:28, 22 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Are you saying that an essay cannot comment on a person's behavior or use satire?  If so, please justify.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 01:51, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::No I am not saying that. But I do not have any special knowledge about Richard Dawkin's manhood or machismo. I don't think any information is publicly available about his manhood related behaviour as well, So how do you comment on that? Satire is great if used well. For example Catch 22 is a great satire, but unfortunately your essay is not. It would be rude if I really express what I think about it. --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 15:41, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Perhaps, you should read the essay and the linked resources a few times more and see if you can spot a pattern of cowardice by Richard Dawkins. Anyways, I wrote the essay when I was rather tired and I am made some revisions to it.  By the way,  the Google algorithm loves the essay.  It ranks #1 for Richard Dawkins and Machismo and  ranks #1 for Dawkins and machismo.  However, I am guessing given Dawkins' behavior that many people don't associate the Richard Dawkins with machismo so there is probably not too many searches for this term.   There are a 11,900 Google search results for Richard Dawkins and cowardice, just in case you are looking for further evidence concerning the subject of Richard Dawkins and cowardice.   By the way, could you define &amp;quot;special knowledge&amp;quot;.   Also, do all Conservapedia essays need to pass a &amp;quot;special knowledge&amp;quot; litmus test? [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:12, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I wouldn't use the number of google results to prove a point, it's not a very accurate indicator.[[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 21:22, 28 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so.. are you writing this for google algorithm. Sorry to burst your bubble, but no one is going to search for Dawkins and Machismo. May be you should clear your cache and search it, because when I do that, your page is not even in the top 10. I don't understand what you aim to say by 11900 results for Dawkins and cowardice. conservative and cowardice brings up 287000 results. does that mean anything? I am not sure why you are so much obsessed  about Richard Dawkins' manhood. Shouldn't you be trying to refute his arguments in that precious time? --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 20:24, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I guess you need to take some reading comprehension classes.  I did indicate that I didn't believe there were going to be many searches for the term Dawkins and machismo.  I also noticed you also didn't answer my questions.  I will return the favor and not answer yours.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:57, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was given a link to this essay on youtube, and I can say that it certainly hits the target!  Dawkins is well know for being a coward with regards to avoid all debate with those who don't agree with his worldview, so this kind of hard-hitting satire suits him perfectly!  Keep up the good work Mr Conservative, sadly it's no surprise that the the liberal 'Dawkins Defenders' do nothing but criticize anything that exposes their evolutionist leaders for the frauds that they are. - Andrew.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for the positive review.  Here is something I just put at the bottom of the essay: '''QUICK NOTE:'''  The above essay was produced as part of the [[Conservapedia:Richard Dawkins Project]].  If you like this essay, please feel free to give it three &amp;quot;oles!&amp;quot; by creating a [[YouTube ]] video on it.  Also, feel free to mention it on your blog or [[Facebook]] page.  There are also some tips [[Conservapedia:Richard Dawkins Project - Spreading the News|HERE]] on spreading the word about this essay. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCZYpGzu7rA&amp;amp;feature=related Ole!][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAYSQXSMnss&amp;amp;feature=related Ole!][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQwWvw3uTJM&amp;amp;feature=related Ole!]  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:31, 24 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unconservapedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the point of all those essays about Richard Dawkinds? Is this the embryo of an ''unconservapedia'', parody of ''uncyclopedia'', the ''official'' parody of ''wikipedia''? That would be fun, a parody of a parody. Might as well be called ''liberopedia'', and have articles with the Khaddaffi Peace Prize or the Stalin Human Rights awards. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 10:01, 27 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::All those essays?  Two essays have been written.  Did Richard Dawkins teach you how to count? :) [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:57, 7 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yes! There are three kinds of people: those that can count, and those that can't! [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 16:49, 18 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The collection of articles has expanded since my June 7, 2010 post.  I thought liberals like the concept of &amp;quot;[[Evolution|change over time]]&amp;quot; - especially when they engage in equivocation. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:07, 18 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Messed up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purposefully creating provocative pages and then limiting the editing for such pages is ridiculous.  I can't even fix the spelling errors.&lt;br /&gt;
: First prove yourself by fixing up or writing other articles. We're not here just to talk, talk, talk. --[[User:ReligiousRight|ReligiousRight]] 22:39, 6 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Obviously this user needs to open his mind. He probably doesn't support school prayer and I'm 96% certain he also believes in gun control. [[User:KevinO|KevinO]] 22:46, 6 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::If there are typos and/or spelling errors, please list them on the talk page.  Unless, of course, you lack the machismo to do so!  :) [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:53, 7 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Grammar/Spelling problems: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senor ---&amp;gt; Señor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ole ---&amp;gt; Olé&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling in 2006 indicates that less than half of the US and British populace accept the evolutionary paradigm as the best description for the development of life.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
polling indicates that the evolutionary paradigm is losing public support in the United States.[8]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the key question stirring around the much discussed U.S Religious Landscape Survey released in late February by the Pew Forum on Religion &amp;amp; Public Life is what tale does it state about the state of the union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But atheist make up only 1.6% of respondents to this survey....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the evolutionaryscience community and the creation science community, Richard Dawkins has faced charges of engaging in pseudoscience and has also faced charges of committing elementary errors.[10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, if Senor Dawkins published fine works in the field of Christian apologetics, Senor Dawkins would have great confidence his work could withstand scrutiny and he wouldn't have to spend so much time in his &amp;quot;intellectual bunnyhole&amp;quot; hiding from strong debaters of the opposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And there's more.  This article needs many, many corrections. {{Unsigned|AnnaO}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And you're unable to work on other articles, why?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:10, 7 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This article is in the forefront right now. There are many errors on it.  Keeping this article in the condition its in paints the entire Conservapedia in a bad light.  The deflection &amp;quot;work on something else&amp;quot; is weak and garners no enthusiasm for effort elsewhere. {{Unsigned|AnnaO}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then why are you so desperate to fix the &amp;quot;errors&amp;quot; in just this article?  Is there something about you you're not telling us?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:30, 7 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*AnaO, you should be aware this is not an encyclopedic article, but a personal essay by the editor. As such changes are at the whim of the editor.  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:41, 7 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Something just occurred that I thought was entirely impossible, but is absolutely and unequivocally true.  With the adding of the words Señor and Olé, this essay now superpasses all essays at Conservapedia in terms of its unadulterated machismo and it now has entered the realm of über-machismo! :)  So unfortunately for Señor Dawkins, the hispanic ladies might become even more troublesome given his extreme reluctance to debate strong debate opponents (see: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]] ).  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 02:50, 8 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Spanish ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's supposed to be mucho machismo, not mu machismo (in one of the captions.) [[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 17:34, 30 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gracias,Señor. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 03:10, 6 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Over 5,000 views for the essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?  Olé! Olé! Olé! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 5,000 views for the essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo? [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCZYpGzu7rA&amp;amp;feature=related Olé!][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAYSQXSMnss&amp;amp;feature=related Olé!][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQwWvw3uTJM&amp;amp;feature=related Olé!] Will efforts be made to get this essay much more web traffic?  Please stay tuned for further developments!  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:06, 7 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==You are having an effect==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the time before his lecture at the UAF Davis concert hall yesterday I heard a group of students in a [[three syllable chant]] of &amp;quot;much-is-Mo! much-is-Mo! much-is-Mo!&amp;quot; and I didn't know what it was about (I thought they were saying &amp;quot;much is more&amp;quot;) until I saw this essay. Keep it up Conservative! Maybe you can shame him into growing a backbone and becoming a man  finally in his late 60's. I regret that I couldn't ask a question of my own but there were some real zingers asked, and he cut a few people short before the could hit him hard, I suspect it wont be too long before his untenable positions catch up with him and he is forced to silence everyone in an attempt to silence his critics!  --[[User:AbbieM|AbbieM]] 20:35, 16 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Were the students Spanish ladies?  Seriously, the article has not been distributed widely (yet). :)  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:48, 16 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::AbbieM, are you a commuter student?  The reason I ask is that you appear to be editing from Alaska. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:24, 17 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not anymore, Conservative. I decided it was best that she conserve fuel. ;-) --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:29, 17 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It does appear as if the UAF Davis concert hall is in Alaska.  At the same time, being a Christian and [http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#Reasonable_Explanations_for_Atheism not a gullible atheist], I do need good evidence before believing historical claims. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 08:45, 19 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Clarification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So...is Dawkins supposed to be the bull or the matador?&lt;br /&gt;
Also, Dawkins fans are...bunny rabbits? I'm not trying to be facetious here; I just don't get it. [[User:JoeFerguson|JoeFerguson]] 09:48, 17 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I added some footnotes for the bunny rabbits for you so you could more clearly see that birds of a feather do flock together. :)  In addition, despite the fact that Dawkins spreads plenty of unpleasant verbal and written bull manure in the public square, Dawkins was never represented as a bull in the satirical essay ''Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?''.  On the other hand, Dawkins' courage is shown as a dead bull. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 13:36, 18 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Welll that makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up; I feel like a big dummy now for not getting it in the first place. :) [[User:JoeFerguson|JoeFerguson]] 23:02, 19 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bad Debate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the spirit of Christianity and good debate, shouldn't Dawkins be treated with more respect? I do understand that this is satire, but shouldn't we generally be concise, factual and exclude gossip? There are plenty of Dawkins' views to attack without hurling insults about his masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, sweeping generalizations about Hispanic and Asian women (not to mention the line &amp;quot;more yang than yin&amp;quot;) can be offensive. [[User:Emba|Emba]] 10:08, 31 July 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mysticism&amp;diff=797680</id>
		<title>Mysticism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mysticism&amp;diff=797680"/>
		<updated>2010-07-26T02:36:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Mysticism''' is the idea that special mental states allow the communion with, or direct experience of, [[God]]. Mystics can use texts which are, or are not, canonical, like the [[Book of Revelation]]. Practices said to lead to this state are [[prayer]], fasting and self-denial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mystical tradition is 2000 years old. Important texts are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galatians 2:20&lt;br /&gt;
: I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but [[Christ]] liveth in me, and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me&lt;br /&gt;
1 John 3:2 &lt;br /&gt;
: Beloved, now we are the [[sons of God]], and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.&lt;br /&gt;
II Peter 1:4&lt;br /&gt;
: exceedingly great and precious promises [are given unto us]; that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust&lt;br /&gt;
2 Corinthians 12:2-4&lt;br /&gt;
: I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven. And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) how that he was caught up into [[paradise]], and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People claimed as mystics include [[John the Baptist]], Saint [[Peter]], [[St. Francis of Assisi]], [[Meister Eckhart]] (Eckhart von Hochheim), [[T. S. Eliot]], and [[Vernon Howard]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Varieties of mysticism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mystic traditions are influential in most religions. In Christianity, the Greek [[Hesychasts]] are important as well as the writings of [[Meister Eckhart]], [[Julian of Norwich]], [[Bridget of Sweden]] and many others. The mystic tradition in Christianity began in the Eastern Church in [[Greece]] and has always pervaded Eastern Orthodoxy. The [[Middle Ages]] saw a rise in mystic thought throughout Western Europe. In broad terms, the Christians of Eastern Europe have been more comfortable with mystical thought than their Western European counterparts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mystic tradition in [[Islam]] is known as [[Sufism]]. Muslim Sufis have enjoyed a longstanding influence on mainstream Islam, although that influence has been in decline for a few centuries. There have been many varieties of Sufism (from those who have strictly adhered to Islamic law to those who have reveled in drunkenness and pleasure) all across the Muslim world, but [[India]] has been the most common home to Sufis. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Jewish mystical discipline is [[Kabbalah]], developed in Medieval [[Europe]]. There are mystical traditions within [[Hinduism]] and [[Buddhism]] as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mysticism tends to have a focus on the broad human identity and the nature of God. Mystics tend to emphasize the personal religious experience rather than doctrine, which has caused distrust between orthodox and mystic traditions in almost every religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Mysticism.htm Mysticism in the Encyclopedia of Religion and Society]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccg.org/english/s/b7_4.html Mysticism, Christian Churches of God ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mysticism/ Mysticism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Spirituality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_Justice&amp;diff=785826</id>
		<title>Social Justice</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_Justice&amp;diff=785826"/>
		<updated>2010-06-08T02:52:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Social Justice''' also known as economic justice, is a term describing the redistribution of wealth for the common good of all. However, this comes at the expense of wage earners and liberty by demanding a society to conform. Those who work and have must give to those who don't work and don't have. This is the fundamental basis of [[Marxism]] and championed by [[liberal]] progressives. Everyone shall have equal advantages and everyone will have equal disadvantages. In reality it creates two classes, those with power and everyone else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Christian organizations strongly support social justice, this is a trap promoted by liberal Christianty claiming [[Jesus]] was a [[socialist]]. We are to help the less fortunate but we are not to become the less fortunate in the process. We are to give according to our abilities but social justice takes what is yours, thou shall not steal. The National Council of Churches, the group that translates the Bible to the New Revised Standard Version, is an advocate of Social Justice. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/article/20100320/glenn-beck-keeps-social-justice-debate-alive/index.html Glenn Beck Keeps 'Social Justice' Debate Alive Christian Post, March 20, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Roman Catholic Church and Social Justice===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church advocates social justice. The Church's support of the teaching began largely with &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Rerum Novarum&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, an encyclical letter written by Pope Leo XIII, published in 1891.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1962 - 1965 [[Second Vatican Council]] produced an Apostolic Constitution called &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Gaudium et Spes&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; which stated in Paragraph 90: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The council, considering the immensity of the hardships which still afflict the greater part of mankind today, regards it as most opportune that an organism of the universal Church be set up in order that both the justice and love of Christ toward the poor might be developed everywhere. The role of such an organism would be to stimulate the Catholic community to promote progress in needy regions and international social justice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the above statement, in 1967 Pope Paul VI created a Pontifical Commission called &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Justice and Peace&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, later re-named by Pope John Paul II &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://biggovernment.com/kashiver/2010/03/21/obamacare-a-social-justice-nightmare-for-the-whole-world/ Obamacare: A Social Justice Nightmare for the Whole World]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.christianpost.com/article/20100320/glenn-beck-keeps-social-justice-debate-alive/index.html Glenn Beck Keeps 'Social Justice' Debate Alive]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.networklobby.org NETWORK - A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby (advocate of Obamacare &amp;amp; Abortion)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm Vatican page of Social Justice]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Consolation_of_Philosophy&amp;diff=736767</id>
		<title>The Consolation of Philosophy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Consolation_of_Philosophy&amp;diff=736767"/>
		<updated>2009-12-24T14:59:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''The Consolation of Philosophy'' (De Consolatione Philosophiae) is a [[Latin]] text written by [[Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius|Boethius]] in the early 6th Century.  It was written while the author was in prison awaiting execution.  The text reflects the title: the story begins with the author imprisoned and feeling melancholy; [[Philosophy]] (here personified as a beautiful woman) appears and consoles him.  It is written in the first person and alternates between poetry and prose.  It was a favorite of [[Medieval]] [[European]] scholars and made the ancient concept of the [[Wheel of Fortune]] familiar.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Boethius was a Christian and the text is full of philosophical and spiritual ideas and frequently uses the word [[God]], it makes no outright reference to [[Christianity]].  Although Christianity influences the text, it is important to understand Boethius’s identity as a Roman.  While writing, he experienced the fall of Rome and his own imprisonment.  Coupled with his own rise and fall on the Wheel of Fortune, the [[Roman Empire]] has been destroyed. The imprisoned author draws on the Greco-Roman legacy of Philosophy for comfort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02610b.htm  Catholic Encyclopedia on Boethius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/14328 Project Gutenberg’s ''Consolation of Philosophy''; 1897 English translation&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Consolation_of_Philosophy&amp;diff=736762</id>
		<title>The Consolation of Philosophy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Consolation_of_Philosophy&amp;diff=736762"/>
		<updated>2009-12-24T14:57:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: /* External Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''The Consolation of Philosophy'' (De Consolatione Philosophiae) is a [[Latin]] text written by [[Boethius]] in the early 6th Century.  It was written while the author was in prison awaiting execution.  The text reflects the title: the story begins with the author imprisoned and feeling melancholy; [[Philosophy]] (here personified as a beautiful woman) appears and consoles him.  It is written in the first person and alternates between poetry and prose.  It was a favorite of [[Medieval]] [[European]] scholars and made the ancient concept of the [[Wheel of Fortune]] familiar.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Boethius was a Christian and the text is full of philosophical and spiritual ideas and frequently uses the word [[God]], it makes no outright reference to [[Christianity]].  Although Christianity influences the text, it is important to understand Boethius’s identity as a Roman.  While writing, he experienced the fall of Rome and his own imprisonment.  Coupled with his own rise and fall on the Wheel of Fortune, the [[Roman Empire]] has been destroyed. The imprisoned author draws on the Greco-Roman legacy of Philosophy for comfort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02610b.htm  Catholic Encyclopedia on Boethius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/14328 Project Gutenberg’s ''Consolation of Philosophy''; 1897 English translation&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Consolation_of_Philosophy&amp;diff=736761</id>
		<title>The Consolation of Philosophy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Consolation_of_Philosophy&amp;diff=736761"/>
		<updated>2009-12-24T14:56:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with '''The Consolation of Philosophy'' (De Consolatione Philosophiae) is a Latin text written by Boethius in the early 6th Century.  It was written while the author was in pri...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''The Consolation of Philosophy'' (De Consolatione Philosophiae) is a [[Latin]] text written by [[Boethius]] in the early 6th Century.  It was written while the author was in prison awaiting execution.  The text reflects the title: the story begins with the author imprisoned and feeling melancholy; [[Philosophy]] (here personified as a beautiful woman) appears and consoles him.  It is written in the first person and alternates between poetry and prose.  It was a favorite of [[Medieval]] [[European]] scholars and made the ancient concept of the [[Wheel of Fortune]] familiar.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Boethius was a Christian and the text is full of philosophical and spiritual ideas and frequently uses the word [[God]], it makes no outright reference to [[Christianity]].  Although Christianity influences the text, it is important to understand Boethius’s identity as a Roman.  While writing, he experienced the fall of Rome and his own imprisonment.  Coupled with his own rise and fall on the Wheel of Fortune, the [[Roman Empire]] has been destroyed. The imprisoned author draws on the Greco-Roman legacy of Philosophy for comfort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02610b.htm  Catholic Encyclopedia on Boethius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/14328 Project Gutenberg’s ‘’Consolation of Philosophy’’; 1897 English translation&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anicius_Manlius_Severinus_Boethius&amp;diff=736759</id>
		<title>Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anicius_Manlius_Severinus_Boethius&amp;diff=736759"/>
		<updated>2009-12-24T14:52:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with 'Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (480 – ca. 525) was a Roman Christian philosopher during the fall of Ancient Rome &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02610b...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (480 – ca. 525) was a [[Roman]] [[Christian]] [[philosopher]] during the fall of Ancient [[Rome]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02610b.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Boethius came from a noble Roman family; however Western Rome had fallen before he was born.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boethius was close to King Theodoric, an Ostrogoth who ruled the Italian peninsula in the early 6th Century.  He was accused of disloyalty to the King, imprisoned and executed.  While in prison, Boethius wrote his best known work: [[The Consolation of Philosophy]].  Throughout his life he translated much of [[Aristotle]]’s work into [[Latin]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Persian_language&amp;diff=736355</id>
		<title>Persian language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Persian_language&amp;diff=736355"/>
		<updated>2009-12-23T16:27:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Persian''', or '''Farsi''', is a language of [[Central Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is spoken in [[Iran]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Tajikstan]].  The [[Tajik]] variant is quite different than the Persian/Farsi spoken to its south.  Ancient Persian used different alphabets, but during the 7th Century Islamic conquest of Central Asia, the [[Arabic]] alphabet came into use and by the end of the 8th Century it had become the standard writing system.  Tajik Persian has been written in the [[Roman alphabet]], but today is written in [[Cyrillic]], due to [[20th Century]] [[Soviet]] control over the country.  The Arabic alphabet has been modified in Iran and Afghanistan to account for sounds in the language that do not exist in Arabic, such as a letter for the &amp;quot;P&amp;quot; sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Languages]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Advent&amp;diff=735548</id>
		<title>Advent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Advent&amp;diff=735548"/>
		<updated>2009-12-21T03:22:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Advent''' (from the [[Latin]] ''adventus'' meaning &amp;quot;coming&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;arrival&amp;quot;) is the season before [[Christmas]].  It includes four Sundays starting with the one nearest [[Saint Andrew]]'s Day (November 30th) and marks the beginning of the church year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advent has been observed since the 6th century as a season of meditative anticipation for the day of [[Christmas]] and the celebration of [[Jesus]]' birth and his future [[Second Coming]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Advent's theme of Christ's appearance, the readings include the messianic prophecies of [[Isaiah]] and the portions of the [[Gospels]] concerning [[John the Baptist]].  In the [[Roman Catholic]] tradition, purple is the color normally used for Advent decorations and priestly vestments.  Advent hymns often include &amp;quot;O Come, O Come Emmanuel&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Come Thou Long Expected Jesus.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advent Wreath==&lt;br /&gt;
During Advent, four candles within a wreath are normally set near the church altar.  Three of the candles are purple, one is pink.  On the first Sunday of Advent a purple candle is lit, the second Sunday two of the purple candles are lit, the third Sunday two purple candles and the pink candle are lit; on the fourth Sunday of Advent all four candles are lit.  The pink candle marks the halfway point of Advent, called [[Gaudete Sunday]].  On [[Christmas]] Day, a white &amp;quot;Christ Candle&amp;quot; is often placed and lit in the center of the Advent Wreath.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An Advent Wreath or Advent Calendar may also be kept in the home to mark the timing of the season before Christmas.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New American Desk Encyclopedia, Penguin Group, 1989&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian Rites]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Meditations_of_Marcus_Aurelius&amp;diff=735249</id>
		<title>Meditations of Marcus Aurelius</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Meditations_of_Marcus_Aurelius&amp;diff=735249"/>
		<updated>2009-12-20T04:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with '''The Meditations'' are a collection of twelve books written by Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius in the Second Century A.D.  Written in Koine Greek, they explicate his i...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''The Meditations'' are a collection of twelve books written by [[Roman]] Emperor [[Marcus Aurelius]] in the Second Century A.D.  Written in [[Koine Greek]], they explicate his ideas on [[Stoicism]] and make him one of the foremost Stoic [[philosophers]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://classics.mit.edu//Antoninus/meditations.html  ''The Meditations'' Online.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rite_of_Christian_Initiation_of_Adults&amp;diff=734952</id>
		<title>Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rite_of_Christian_Initiation_of_Adults&amp;diff=734952"/>
		<updated>2009-12-19T13:23:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with 'The Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) is a program used in the Roman Catholic Church to prepare adults for the sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation, an...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) is a program used in the [[Roman Catholic Church]] to prepare adults for the [[sacraments]] of [[Baptism]], [[Confirmation]], and the [[Eucharist]].  The program was implemented in 1972 by [[Pope Paul VI]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The RCIA: Transforming the Church'' (1989, 1997) by Thomas H. Morris&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The program varies from parish to parish, but is generally comprised of regular meetings by active church members with unbaptized and/or unconfirmed church-goers, along with rites performed in mass during [[Lent]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The meetings can range from a [[Bible]]-study to discussion of the weekly mass to simply reading the [[Catechism]] of the Church.  They are normally led by laymen, but sometimes by priests and are generally aimed at teaching the unconfirmed what it means to be Catholic.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rites performed during mass before Lent can include a welcoming of those seeking Confirmation (called candidates), and a presentation of a copy of the Bible to the candidates.  The rites performed during Lent are called Scrutinies, which are similar to exorcisms.  A Scrutiny is aimed not at purging evil from the candidates, but more at inviting the [[Holy Spirit]] to inspire their hearts and make them ready for Confirmation and Eucharist.  At the end of Lent, the unbaptized are baptized (often at the [[Easter]] Vigil) and after Easter, the candidates are confirmed and receive Holy [[Communion]] (the Eucharist).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gospel_of_Mary_Magdalene&amp;diff=734949</id>
		<title>Gospel of Mary Magdalene</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gospel_of_Mary_Magdalene&amp;diff=734949"/>
		<updated>2009-12-19T12:51:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Gnostic Writings]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Gospel of Mary Magdalene is a [[Gnostic]] Christian writing from the 2nd Century A.D.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Gospel of Mary Magdalene'' (2002) Translated by Jean-Yves Leloup, Introduction, p. 6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It survives in partial form written on [[papyrus]] in [[Coptic]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The story told features a meeting of the [[Disciples]] in which St. [[Peter]] asks [[Mary Magdalene]] to reveal to the Disciples any sayings of [[Christ]] (here called &amp;quot;The Teacher&amp;quot;) of which they may not have been aware.  Mary does so, and Peter is astonished at the vision of Christ which she tells.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Peter acknowledges, &amp;quot;Sister, we know that the Teacher loved you differently from other women . . .&amp;quot; he is unwilling to accept the idea that Mary held a special place for Christ.  Peter asks the disciples, &amp;quot;How is it possible that the Teacher talked in this manner with a woman about secrets of which we ourselves are ignorant . . . Did he really choose her, and prefer her to us?&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
Mary asks Peter, &amp;quot;. . . do you believe that I would lie about our Teacher?&amp;quot;  In the end Peter is chastised by Levi:  &amp;quot;Peter, you have always been hot-tempered, and now we see you repudiating a woman, just as our adversaries do.  Yet if the Teacher found her worthy, who are you to reject her?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gospel is [[Apocrypha|apocryphal]] and was not dicovered until the late 19th Century and not translated until the 1950's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.maryofmagdala.com/GMary_Text/gmary_text.html Text of the Gospel of Mary&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gospel_of_Mary_Magdalene&amp;diff=734737</id>
		<title>Gospel of Mary Magdalene</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gospel_of_Mary_Magdalene&amp;diff=734737"/>
		<updated>2009-12-18T19:13:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with 'Category:Gnostic Writings The Gospel of Mary Magdalene is a Gnostic Christian writing from the 2nd Century A.D.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Gospel of Mary Magdalene'' (2002) Translated by ...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Gnostic Writings]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Gospel of Mary Magdalene is a [[Gnostic]] Christian writing from the 2nd Century A.D.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Gospel of Mary Magdalene'' (2002) Translated by Jean-Yves Leloup, Introduction, p. 6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It survives in partial form written on [[papyrus]] in [[Coptic]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The story told features a meeting of the [[Disciples]] in which St. [[Peter]] asks [[Mary Magdalene]] to reveal to the Disciples any sayings of [[Christ]] (here called &amp;quot;The Teacher&amp;quot;) of which they may not have been aware.  Mary does so, and Peter is astonished at the vision of Christ which she tells.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Peter acknowledges, &amp;quot;Sister, we know that the Teacher loved you differently from other women . . .&amp;quot; he is unwilling to accept the idea that Mary held a special place for Christ.  Peter asks the disciples, &amp;quot;How is it possible that the Teacher talked in this manner with a woman about secrets of which we ourselves are ignorant . . . Did he really choose her, and prefer her to us?&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
Mary asks Peter, &amp;quot;. . . do you believe that I would lie about our Teacher?&amp;quot;  In the end Peter is chastised by Levi:  &amp;quot;Peter, you have always been hot-tempered, and now we see you repudiating a woman, just as our adversaries do.  Yet if the Teacher found her worthy, who are you to reject her?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gospel is [[Apocrypha|apocryphal]] and was not dicovered until the late 19th Century and not translated until the 1950's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.maryofmagdala.com/GMary_Text/gmary_text.html Text of the Gospel of Mary&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haiti&amp;diff=734615</id>
		<title>Haiti</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haiti&amp;diff=734615"/>
		<updated>2009-12-18T16:05:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''République d'Haïti&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Repiblik d Ayiti'' &lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Haiti rel99.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Haiti.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Haiti.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Port-au-Prince &lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=French, Haitian Creole&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=René Préval&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Jacques-Edouard Alexis&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =10,714 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =8,528,000 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$14.76 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$1,800 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Gourde&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Republic of Haiti''' is a country located in the [[Caribbean Sea]], and occupies one-third of the Caribbean island [[Hispaniola]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Columbus' ship the Santa Maria reached Haiti on Christmas Eve 1492.  The settlement there was named &amp;quot;La Navidad&amp;quot;. Haiti was given to Spain in the Line of Demarcation set up by the Pope in 1515.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haiti formed the first successful slave revolt under the leadership of [[Toussaint L'Ouverture]] and was the first independent black republic. Haiti claimed its independence from France on January 1, 1804, making it the second country in the Americas to gain its independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About 80% of the population lives in wretched [[poverty]], and Haiti is one of the poorest countries in the western hempisphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/LACEXT/HAITIEXTN/0,,contentMDK:21040686~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:338165,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Haiti is the origin of the [[occult]] practice of [[voodoo]], which is still popular in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[French]] is taught in schools, but the language of conversation is [[Haitian Creole]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Caribbean Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haitian_Creole&amp;diff=734613</id>
		<title>Haitian Creole</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haitian_Creole&amp;diff=734613"/>
		<updated>2009-12-18T16:05:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with 'Haitian Creole (''Kréyol'') is a language based on French spoken in the Caribbean nation of Haiti.  Most of the lexicon is derived from French, however many of the w...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Haitian Creole (''Kréyol'') is a language based on [[French]] spoken in the [[Caribbean]] nation of [[Haiti]].  Most of the lexicon is derived from French, however many of the words can be traced to West [[Africa]].  The language deveoped in Haiti in the 17th and 18th Centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===History===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Haiti's colonial rule by France, West African slaves were imported in large numbers.  Like much of the Caribbean, Africans became the majority of the population.  The languages of West Africa are numerous and the only language most newly arrived slaves had in common was French.  French is taught in Haitian schools and is understood well by most Haitians, but Creole is the language of conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Linguistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haitian Creole often corresponds to French.  The Creole phrase ''Komoun ou ye''? (how are you?) is congruent to the (non-existent, grammatically incorrect) French phrase ''Comment tu est''?  Likewise, the Creole phrase ''Sakpasé''? (what is happening?) is congruent to ''Ça que passe''? in French.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haitian Creole has no verb conjugation.  A Creole verb chart looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mwen traval  (I work)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ou traval  (You work)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Li traval  (He/she works)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nou traval  (We work)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yo traval  (They work)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haitian Creole uses markers for tense such as ''te'', ''ap'' and ''pral'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mwen te traval (I worked)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M'ap traval (I am working)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mwen pral traval (I am going to work)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Mwen'' for I correlates to the French ''moi''.  ''Traval'' correlates to the French ''travailler''.  In Caribbean and French fashion, Creole words are easily abbreviated or pushed together; in the above example ''m'ap'' is a contraction of ''mwen ap''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar French Creole languages are spoken on several other Caribbean Islands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Variations of the [[English]] and [[Spanish]] languages also exist in the Caribbean.  These dialects also feature simplified verb conjugation, abbreviation and words of West African origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.travelinghaiti.com/haitian_kreyol.asp   Creole words and phrases&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haiti&amp;diff=734516</id>
		<title>Haiti</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haiti&amp;diff=734516"/>
		<updated>2009-12-18T05:53:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''République d'Haïti&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Repiblik d Ayiti'' &lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Haiti rel99.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Haiti.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Haiti.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Port-au-Prince &lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=French, Haitian Creole&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=René Préval&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Jacques-Edouard Alexis&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =10,714 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =8,528,000 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$14.76 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$1,800 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Gourde&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Republic of Haiti''' is a country located in the [[Caribbean Sea]], and occupies one-third of the Caribbean island [[Hispaniola]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Columbus' ship the Santa Maria reached Haiti on Christmas Eve 1492.  The settlement there was named &amp;quot;La Navidad&amp;quot;. Haiti was given to Spain in the Line of Demarcation set up by the Pope in 1515.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haiti formed the first successful slave revolt under the leadership of [[Toussaint L'Ouverture]] and was the first independent black republic. Haiti claimed its independence from France on January 1, 1804, making it the second country in the Americas to gain its independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About 80% of the population lives in wretched [[poverty]], and Haiti is one of the poorest countries in the western hempisphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/LACEXT/HAITIEXTN/0,,contentMDK:21040686~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:338165,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Haiti is the origin of the [[occult]] practice of [[voodoo]], which is still popular in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[French]] is taught in schools, but the language of conversation is [[Haitian Creole]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Caribbean Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haiti&amp;diff=734507</id>
		<title>Haiti</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Haiti&amp;diff=734507"/>
		<updated>2009-12-18T04:59:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''République d'Haïti&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Repiblik d Ayiti'' &lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Haiti rel99.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Haiti.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Haiti.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Port-au-Prince &lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=French, Haitian Creole&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=René Préval&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Jacques-Edouard Alexis&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =10,714 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =8,528,000 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$14.76 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$1,800 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Gourde&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Republic of Haiti''' is a country located in the [[Caribbean Sea]], and occupies one-third of the Caribbean island [[Hispaniola]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Columbus' ship the Santa Maria reached Haiti on Christmas Eve 1492.  The settlement there was named &amp;quot;La Navidad&amp;quot;. Haiti was given to Spain in the Line of Demarcation set up by the Pope in 1515.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haiti formed the first successful slave revolt under the leadership of [[Toussaint L'Ouverture]] and was the first independent black republic. Haiti claimed its independence from France on January 1, 1804, making it the second country in the Americas to gain its independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About 80% of the population lives in wretched [[poverty]], and Haiti is known as one of the poorest countries in the western hempisphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/LACEXT/HAITIEXTN/0,,contentMDK:21040686~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:338165,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Haiti is the origin of the [[occult]] practice of [[voodoo]], which is still popular in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[French]] is taught in schools, but the language of conversation is [[Haitian Creole]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Caribbean Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ronald_Rolheiser&amp;diff=734149</id>
		<title>Ronald Rolheiser</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ronald_Rolheiser&amp;diff=734149"/>
		<updated>2009-12-17T21:25:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Rolheiser is a Canadian [[Catholic]] Priest and author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is a member of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate and is currently the president of the Oblate School of Theology in [[San Antonio]], [[Texas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fr. Rolheiser writes for ''The Catholic Herald''.  His books include ''The Holy Longing: Guidelines for a Christian Spirituality'' (1999),&lt;br /&gt;
''The Restless Heart: Finding Our Spiritual Home in Times of Loneliness'' (2004) and ''Forgotten Among the Lilies: Learning to Love Beyond Our Fears'' (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ost.edu The Oblate School of Theology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/ The Catholic Herald&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=734148</id>
		<title>Henri Nouwen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=734148"/>
		<updated>2009-12-17T21:24:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
Henri J. M. Nouwen (1932 - 1996) was a Dutch [[Catholic]] Priest and author.  His books include ''The Wounded Healer'' (1972) and ''In the Name of Jesus'' (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was ordained in 1957 and moved to the United States in 1964.  He taught at [[Yale University]], [[Harvard University]] and the [[University of Notre Dame]].  He also ministered to the poor in [[Peru]] and the mentally handicapped in [[Toronto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His book ''The Return of the Prodigal Son'' (1992) is a spiritual interpretation of the [[Rembrandt]] painting of the same name.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nouwen battled with depression in the late 1980's, he published his personal writings from this time in ''The Inner Voice of Love'' (1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.henrinouwen.org The Henri Nouwen Society&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=734147</id>
		<title>Henri Nouwen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=734147"/>
		<updated>2009-12-17T21:24:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henri J. M. Nouwen (1932 - 1996) was a Dutch [[Catholic]] Priest and author.  His books include ''The Wounded Healer'' (1972) and ''In the Name of Jesus'' (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was ordained in 1957 and moved to the United States in 1964.  He taught at [[Yale University]], [[Harvard University]] and the [[University of Notre Dame]].  He also ministered to the poor in [[Peru]] and the mentally handicapped in [[Toronto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His book ''The Return of the Prodigal Son'' (1992) is a spiritual interpretation of the [[Rembrandt]] painting of the same name.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nouwen battled with depression in the late 1980's, he published his personal writings from this time in ''The Inner Voice of Love'' (1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.henrinouwen.org The Henri Nouwen Society&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cigar&amp;diff=734129</id>
		<title>Cigar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cigar&amp;diff=734129"/>
		<updated>2009-12-17T20:49:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with '==Cigar==  A cigar is a tobacco product intended for smoking.  Cigars are cylindrical and can be as small as cigarettes, but are normally about 4 - 6 inches long and abou...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cigar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cigar is a [[tobacco]] product intended for smoking.  Cigars are cylindrical and can be as small as [[cigarettes]], but are normally about 4 - 6 inches long and about 1/2 - 3/4 of an inch in diameter.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are manufactured by rolling shredded tobacco filler into a tobacco leaf wrapper. The first cigars were rolled by hand, but most cigar makers now use machines for efficiency and quality control.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cigars are normally manufacured in the tropics, including the [[Caribbean]] Islands, [[Central America]], [[Brazil]], [[Cameroon]], and the South [[Pacific]]. The filler tobacco for cigars is usually grown in the Caribbean, while the tobacco for wrappers may be grown in [[Honduras]], [[Ecuador]], or [[Connecticut]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cigars have long been manufactured in the Caribbean, and are a very important industry for [[Cuba]] and the [[Dominican Republic]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rum&amp;diff=734120</id>
		<title>Rum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rum&amp;diff=734120"/>
		<updated>2009-12-17T20:29:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:rum.jpg|right|250px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Rum''' is a strong alcoholic [[liquor]] that originates in the [[Caribbean]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Manufacture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rum is made from [[molasses]] and can either be clear (white rum) or opaque (dark rum).  Dark rums are usually tea-colored, but some are almost black, such as Gosling's Black Seal Rum from [[Bermuda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some varieties of rum are made directly from sugar cane juice, such as [[Brazil]]'s Cachaça and [[Columbia]]'s Aguardiente.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rum is often flavored, most often with [[coconut]], [[pineapple]] or other tropical fruit flavors.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tradition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British navy used to afford each sailor a [[ration]] of rum per day of a voyage to lift morale and prevent mutiny. This nautical tradition still carries on strong to this day, with a &amp;quot;rum ration&amp;quot; used as a term to describe a range of [[fringe benefits]]. Some companies (Scottish and English) still give sailors an actual rum ration whilst at sea whilst some companies with a nautical tradition (even though they may now deal in other business) give their employees a payment in &amp;quot;kind&amp;quot; in lieu of a rum ration. A good example is the Royal Bank of Scotland (formerly brokers for shipmen and traders) who, to this day, still give out a &amp;quot;rum ration&amp;quot; in the form of a free beef filled &amp;quot;[[bampot]]&amp;quot; every lunchtime and a leg of [[lamb]] or a ham shank for the employees table every other weekend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terminology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As well as describing the drink. the word &amp;quot;rum&amp;quot; can be used to describe something that may be amiss. For example, &amp;quot;gay marriage, that sounds a bit ''rum''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alcoholic Beverages]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Saint&amp;diff=733481</id>
		<title>Saint</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Saint&amp;diff=733481"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T18:31:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''saint''' is a person who has been recognized by the [[Catholic Church]] or the [[Orthodox Church]] or the [[Anglican Communion|Anglican Church]] as doing great works or making a great personal [[sacrifice]] for the [[Christian]] [[church]].  Saints, especially early saints in Christian history, were often [[martyr]]s.  Many saints are often associated with miracles, either in this life, or, in the Catholic tradition, through miracles that occur when praying to them after death. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Catholic and Orthodox doctrine, saints are believed to be able to intercede on behalf of mankind before God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Persons recognized as saints must first be [[beatified]] (After which the deceased person is given the title 'Blessed') and then [[canonized]] by the [[Pope]]. Usually a person is canonized if at least three miracles have been performed by them through lay people asking the deceased to intercede with [[God]] on their behalf. These miracles must be thoroughly investigated by church authorities and declared valid before canonization occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many martyrs, people who died either for their faith or for another person, are recognized as saints based upon what [[Jesus]] said; the greatest commandments are to love God with your whole heart and soul and to love your neighbor as yourself. Also, when he told His disciples that 'greater love than this no man hath, that a man lay down his life for his friends.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Queen of Saints is [[Mary]], the Mother of Jesus the savior, also known as the Blessed Virgin. The feast of All Saints is November 1st preceded by All Hallow's Eve which refers to [[All Saints Day]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notable Saints include the [[Twelve Apostles]], St. [[Paul]], [[St. Patrick]], St. Francis of Assisi, St. [[Theresa of Avila]] and St. Katharine Drexel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Beatification and Canonization'', http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02364b.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian Group Structuring]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Catholic Church]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ronald_Rolheiser&amp;diff=733464</id>
		<title>Ronald Rolheiser</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ronald_Rolheiser&amp;diff=733464"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T17:58:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with 'Category:Authors ==Ronald Rolheiser==  Ronald Rolheiser is a Canadian Catholic Priest and author.  He is a member of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate and is curr...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Ronald Rolheiser==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Rolheiser is a Canadian [[Catholic]] Priest and author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is a member of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate and is currently the president of the Oblate School of Theology in [[San Antonio]], [[Texas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fr. Rolheiser writes for ''The Catholic Herald''.  His books include ''The Holy Longing: Guidelines for a Christian Spirituality'' (1999),&lt;br /&gt;
''The Restless Heart: Finding Our Spiritual Home in Times of Loneliness'' (2004) and ''Forgotten Among the Lilies: Learning to Love Beyond Our Fears'' (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ost.edu The Oblate School of Theology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/ The Catholic Herald&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=733450</id>
		<title>Henri Nouwen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=733450"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T17:39:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Henri Nouwen==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henri J. M. Nouwen (1932 - 1996) was a Dutch [[Catholic]] Priest and author.  His books include ''The Wounded Healer'' (1972) and ''In the Name of Jesus'' (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was ordained in 1957 and moved to the United States in 1964.  He taught at [[Yale University]], [[Harvard University]] and the [[University of Notre Dame]].  He also ministered to the poor in [[Peru]] and the mentally handicapped in [[Toronto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His book ''The Return of the Prodigal Son'' (1992) is a spiritual interpretation of the [[Rembrandt]] painting of the same name.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nouwen battled with depression in the late 1980's, he published his personal writings from this time in ''The Inner Voice of Love'' (1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.henrinouwen.org The Henri Nouwen Society&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=733444</id>
		<title>Henri Nouwen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henri_Nouwen&amp;diff=733444"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T17:32:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: Created page with '==Henri Nouwen==  Henri J. M. Nouwen (1932 - 1996) was a Dutch Catholic Priest and author.  His books include ''The Wounded Healer'' (1972) and ''In the Name of Jesus'' (1989...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Henri Nouwen==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henri J. M. Nouwen (1932 - 1996) was a Dutch [[Catholic]] Priest and author.  His books include ''The Wounded Healer'' (1972) and ''In the Name of Jesus'' (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was ordained in 1957 and moved to the United States in 1964.  He taught at [[Yale University]], [[Harvard University]] and the [[University of Notre Dame]].  He also ministered to the poor in [[Peru]] and the mentally handicapped in [[Toronto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His book ''The Return of the Prodigal Son'' (1992) is a spiritual interpretation of the [[Rembrandt]] painting of the same name.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nouwen battled with depression in the late 1980's, he published his personal writings from this time in ''The Inner Voice of Love'' (1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.henrinouwen.org The Henri Nouwen Society&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Church&amp;diff=733433</id>
		<title>Roman Catholic Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Church&amp;diff=733433"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T17:02:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: /* Teachings */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Roman Catholic Church''' is the common name of the oldest, largest and most important Christian denomination.  Members are called &amp;quot;Catholics.&amp;quot; It is headed by the [[Pope]] (Supreme Pontiff), currently [[Pope Benedict XVI]]. It is the largest [[Christian]] denomination in the world, with more than 1.3 billion officially baptized adherents, or 17.4 per cent of the world population (In the United States more than 64 million). In recent years growth has been greatest in Africa and Latin America, while the numbers and influence in Europe have declined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church is the oldest institution in the western world; it asserts that the Pope is the divinely-chosen successor of [[St. Peter]], the 'rock' ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matt]] 16:18) upon whom Jesus built his church. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Church consists of those Christians who are in full communion with the Pope. It includes &amp;quot;Uniate Catholics&amp;quot; in Eastern Europe who, strictly speaking, are not part of the &amp;quot;Roman&amp;quot; Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;Catholic Church&amp;quot; is, literally, the ''Universal Church'' of [[Jesus Christ]] (from the Greek ''katholikos'', &amp;quot;universal&amp;quot;). see [[Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The split between Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy dates to the eleventh century. The [[Reformation]] is the split between Catholicism and Protestantism that occurred in the sixteenth century. Two of the principal issues of contention between Catholics and Protestants are ''[[sola scriptura]]'' (the Protestant doctrine that the Bible alone is the final authority for Christians, which denies the authority of the Pope) and ''sola fide'' (the doctrine, popularized by [[Martin Luther]], that faith alone, as opposed to faith expressed in good works, is sufficient for salvation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cathpop.jpg|right|thumb|350px|Catholics in the world.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Organization==&lt;br /&gt;
The Pope and the the international leadership of the Church are based in [[Vatican City]], an independent tiny country located inside Rome, Italy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Church has a complex hierarchy of clergy, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* The Pope&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cardinal]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Archbishop]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bishop]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abbot]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Monsignor|Monsignori]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Archpriest]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Priest]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deacon]]s&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key roles are played by the Pope and the bishops, and the question of whether national governments should play a major role in nominating bishops to the Pope has been a major issue for centuries. See [[Gallicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Teachings==&lt;br /&gt;
The chief teachings of the Catholic church are: God’s objective existence; God’s interest in individual human beings, who can enter into relations with God (through prayer); the Trinity; the divinity of Jesus; the immortality of the [[soul]] of each human being, each one being accountable at death for his or her actions in life, with the award of heaven or hell; the resurrection of the dead; the historicity of the [[Gospels]]; and the divine commission of the church. In addition the Roman Catholic Church stresses that since the members, living and dead, share in each other’s merits, the [[Virgin Mary]] and other saints and the dead in purgatory are never forgotten.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.bartleby.com/65/ro/RomanCat.html The Columbia Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The presence of Christ is believed to be present in the Eucharist, the bread and wine is Jesus himself. Another essential belief is the veneration of Mary, the mother of Jesus as the Blessed Virgin Mary and veneration of the saints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal sources for the essential beliefs  of the Catholic Church are the Sacred Scriptures (the Bible), Sacred Tradition, and Living Magisterium of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term Catholic is frequently applied to the Roman Catholic Church. Although many [[Protestantism|Protestant]]s object to Roman Catholics monopolizing the term, because the defined meaning of Catholic is &amp;quot;universal&amp;quot; and comes from the Greek word Katholikos. The Eastern [[Orthodox Church]] and [[Anglican Communion]] also refer to themselves as, &amp;quot;one holy, catholic, and apostolic church...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answers.com/topic/catholic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Church teaches respect for all human life.  It opposes the practices of contraception, abortion,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul VI, Humanae Vitae (1968) http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; euthanasia and capital punishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (1995) http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0141/_INDEX.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Church is in favor of social justice and &amp;quot;the common good.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Benedict XVI, Caritas in Veritate (2009) http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Church===&lt;br /&gt;
The original Christian community was founded by Jesus Christ and led by the Apostles. St. [[Paul|Paul the Apostle]] was, together with [[Saint Peter]], the most notable of Early Christian missionaries. Christians were subjected to persecution, first under [[Nero]], shortly after the foundation of the church, and again, more severely, under the emperors [[Decius]] and [[Diocletian]] in the third century as well as [[Domitian]], [[Marcus Aurelius]] and others with the penalty for being Christian ultimately being death.  After almost 300 years of persecution against the Church had only seen Christianity flourish, the Emperor [[Constantine I]] had a religious experience and legalized Christianity in the early fourth century.  Going to war with the co-Emperor of the east [[Lucinius]] over his continued persecution of Christians, Constantine won and became sole Emperor.  The age of persecution was over. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Christians.jpg|thumb|450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 380, Emperor [[Theodosius I]] accepted Christianity as the official religion of the [[Roman Empire]].  &lt;br /&gt;
=== Fathers of the Church ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paul|St. Paul]] is the most prolific contributor to the [[New Testament]], and has been the most influential of all theologians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other important early theologians include [[St. Ambrose]], Bishop of [[Milan]] from 374 to 397, and especially [[St. Augustine]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Barbarians converted===&lt;br /&gt;
Until the early fourth century AD Christianity enjoyed mixed reception in the Roman Empire and Christians were frequently subject to persecution. In the 310s Christianity became legalized and shortly thereafter became officially recognized by Constantine. In the following years Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular became increasingly powerful in the Roman Empire, although [[Arianism]] remained strong. In 380 AD, [[Theodosius I]] established the Catholic Church as the official religion of the Roman Empire. While the Empire continued to decline, Catholicism and Christianity continued to grow both among those directly under the Empire and among the barbarians until Rome was sacked by [[Alaric]] in 410. Alaric was an Arian Christian. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Western Empire, the Catholic Church became the most powerful political and religious force in Latin-speaking Europe and by the 8th century had achieved near total religious dominance with the removal of the last significant Arian groups.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aggressive missionary activities accomplished the conversion of almost all the pagan tribes in Europe by the year 1000 AD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Great Schism ===&lt;br /&gt;
After numerous disputes between eastern and western churches that became more pronounced from the ninth century onwards, the Church underwent the [[Great Schism]] in 1054 that divided it into a Western (Latin) branch, which has been called the Catholic Church and an Eastern branch, which has become known as the [[Orthodox Church]]. Both traced their roots to the time of Jesus, but the Orthodox Church did not acknowledge the Pope as the one leader of the Church and instead believed that all of the patriarchs were equals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 11th century, the [[Great Schism]] occurred between the church in the West and [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]. This schism occurred over a variety of issues, especially those dealing with how much authority the Pope had. The causes were not purely religious, but cultural and geographic elements also played a role. Although later attempts at reconciliation occurred, such as at the [[Council of Basel]], the two remain separate to this day although both accept many of each others sacraments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Late Middle Ages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning in 1092 and continuing until the end of the 13th century, the Crusades occurred. These were a series of religious wars instigated by the Church against various other groups, especially the Muslims. Despite the focus on removing Islamic control of the Holy Land, the Crusaders massacred Jews and sacked Constantinople. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this time period, the [[Inquisition]]s started and would continue through the Protestant Reformation. The medieval inquisition focused on rooting out Cathars, while the later inquisitions such as the [[Spanish Inquisition]] focused on people who were believed to be secretly practicing [[Judaism]] or [[Islam]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reformation and Counter-Reformation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1517, [[Martin Luther]] started the [[Protestant Reformation]] which initially focused on the giving of [[indulgences]] but eventually grew to have a wide variety of different causes and issues. Eventually, Protestants rejected the notions of saintly intercession, the authority of the pope and many of the sacraments. This eventually led to a series of religious wars in [[Europe]] and the Protestant-Catholic split became one of the dominant themes in European events until modern times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1815 to 1914===&lt;br /&gt;
====Pius VII====&lt;br /&gt;
Pius VII (1800-23) was stripped of powers by [[Napoleon]] but made a striking comeback after Napoleon's fall in 1815. Pius VII was a deeply religious Benedictine, and a theologian; he lived simply and  avoided nepotism. His unusually able Secretary of State Cardinal Consalvi won the restoration to the Pope of most of the territories in Italy which Napoleon had seized. He reinvigorated numerous monastic orders and helped create new societies for men and women, especially those engaged in teaching and missionary work. &lt;br /&gt;
Most important was the restoration of the Jesuits in 1814; they had been suppressed in most countries. They grew larger and even more influential in the 19th century. &lt;br /&gt;
====Conservatism====&lt;br /&gt;
After 1800 the Papacy became the center of conservatism in Europe in reaction against the liberalism of the French Revolution and its admirers. The Papacy recognized that throughout Europe millions of peasants and poor folk were devoted to the saints and traditions of the Church; the Popes responded energetically by promoting new Marian devotions (such as the rosary). Rome had fallen into disrepair and Pius VII began the restoration of the city's artistic glories, an enterprise that continues into the 21st century. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kelly (1999); Duffy (2006); Latourette (1958) vol 1. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Ultramontane vs Gallican====&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;ultramontane&amp;quot; tendency in the Church centralized more power and authority in the Papacy. It was opposed by the &amp;quot;[[Gallican]]&amp;quot; tendency, especially in France, to give national churches more control over their affairs.  The ultramontine forces generally won out, especially with the declaration of [[Papal Infallibility]] at the First Vatican Council in 1870. The ultramontane forces cited the old doctrines of [[Robert Bellarmine]] (1542-1621) and [[Francisco de Suárez]] (1548-1617) to bolster the papal claim to absolute power in spiritual matters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gallicanism in France was damaged by the rise of ultramontanism in the 1850s and the devotional revolution that shifted piety to devotions sponsored by Rome. Gallicanism was officially suppressed by the First Vatican Council in 1870, which established the paramount authority of the pope as a matter of dogma. However informal manifestations of Gallicanism continue in some countries, especially China. In Canada, the Irish clergy fought for ultramontanism against the French clergy, who were Gallican. The [[Catholicism in Ireland|Irish]] won out with the support of the Vatican.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Vatican II, 1962-65, the multiple and often confused controversy among Catholics over papal  authority and infallibility largely ended, though some significant degree of opposition to it remains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as by historian Garry Wills, author of ''Papal Sin: Structures of Deceit'' (Sophia Institute Press, 2003), and liberal theologian Hans Kung, author of ''Infallible?: An inquiry'' (1970)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Carlin, ''The Decline and Fall of the Catholic Church in America'',‎ appendix 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/3543/vatican.htm Raymond Taouk, ''What are Catholics to think of Vatican II?'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This dissent is mainly manifested in disagreement with Roman Catholic teaching on birth control and abortion, which yet remains strong.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianethicstoday.com/Issue/014/Infallibility%20in%20Ethical%20Perspective%20By%20John%20M.%20Swomley_014_26_.htm John M. Swomley, ''Infallibility in Ethical Perspective Christian Ethics Today], Issue 014 Volume 4 No 1 February 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;56% of U.S. Catholics said that the pope is not infallible &amp;quot;when he teaches on matters of morals, such as birth control and abortion&amp;quot;; 80%  of Catholics believed it is possible to disagree with the pope on official positions on morality and still be a good Catholic. Time/CNN nationwide poll of 1,000 adults, conducted by Yankelovich Partners, Sept. 27-28, 1995&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Facing Modernity====&lt;br /&gt;
Despite dire predictions, the Church adapted to modernity in its own way and increased its role in people's lives in the 19th century. The Church escaped irrelevance by using the same means as did emerging nation-states; establishing more administrative and doctrinal centralization in Rome; establishing a homogeneous culture, aided especially by universal use of Latin; promoting new rites and folk devotions, especially those focused on Mary and other favored saints; promoting pilgrimages to holy sites; encouraging clergy to endorse and lead regional nationalist movements that focused on historic languages and cultures; creating many new teaching orders and establishing Catholic schools and colleges; supporting intellectuals and publishing houses; enhancing papal power; and cultivating an image of both theologiocal canonical and moral superiority. Of special importance was the missionary activity, based especially in Germany, that was in competition with Protestant missions in China, India, Africa and other non-Christain lands.  The Jesuits proved highly adept at promoting the Papal cause. The Pope thereby became less symbolic and more powerful. There was internal dissent among some Catholic intellectuals, such as historian [[Lord Acton]] in Britain and theologian Ignaz von Döllinger in Germany, who opposed the declaration of the dogma of papal infallibility. &lt;br /&gt;
=====Syllabus of Errors=====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Syllabus of Errors]] of Pope [[Pius IX]] in 1864 rejected the liberal doctrines of the modern world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see text at [http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It denounced pantheism, naturalism, nationalism, indifferentism, socialism, communism, freemasonry, and other modern views. The Pope claimed for the Catholic Church total control over science and culture. The liberals viewed this as a declaration of war by the Church on modern civilization. Its repercussions within France, the U.S., Britain and other countries were resounding, nearly destroying the liberal Catholic movement and furnishing a powerful weapon to the anticlerical faction, or (in the U.S.) to anti-Catholic Protestants. Opponents stressed the Papacy had become intolerant and medieval and largely political in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Latourette (1958) vol 1 ch. 6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Facing Liberalism====  &lt;br /&gt;
Burns (1990) takes a sociological perspective on the Papacy's long battle with liberalism. He shows how the papacy, in reaction to the rise of the liberal states of the 19th and 20th centuries, gradually reformulated Catholic ideology within the limited autonomy they possessed and carefully subordinated social and political issues to more purely religious and moral issues as they constructed an ideological opposition to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany in the 1840s the ultramontane movement used mass meetings and pilgrimages to combat the growth of liberalism and modernism. However the abnti-clerical liberal press attacked these mass meetings, and in response a large number of Catholic newspapers emerged in Germany starting in the 1840s. To ensure their own survival, these newspapers championed the liberal idea of press freedom. In addition, local clubs were established to mobilize the Catholic working class. These clubs tried to end discrimination against ordinary Catholics by working to establish freedom of religion and freedom of thought and by entering the electoral process.  With the unification of Germany in 1870, the new nation faced the problems of consolidation, one of which was secularization. The laws dealing with secularization opened a poltical battle between Bismark and the Protestants and liberals on one side, and the Catholics on the other, called the &amp;quot;[[Kulturkampf]].&amp;quot; The Catholics organized their own political parties and protected their interests by voting as a bloc into the 1930s, when the Nazis closed down all other parties.&lt;br /&gt;
====Freemasons====&lt;br /&gt;
In many countries the Church faced off against the Freemasons, a secret society that was politically active in numerous countries. The Papcy coordinated a counterattack. For example in Brazil, the religious question in the 1870s centered on the Masonic controversy and the struggle between regalist and ultramontane forces.  One method of counterattack was to found Catholic universities. Thus Mgr. Ignace Bourget, second bishop of Montreal, Canada, founded Laval University, as a Catholic reaction to a liberal and secularist outburst in Quebec. Bourget said the university would be the principal instrument for &amp;quot;wresting the elite from the clutches of liberalism.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
====Women====&lt;br /&gt;
A spiritual revolution took place in the 19th century, moving individuals to personal piety.  There was a much greater emphasis on the role of Mary, and a greatly increased involvement of women; the number of sisters and nuns increased from 20,000 to 400,000 between 1815 and 1914.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Camp (1990) traces the treatment of women. In the late 19th century the papacy began to revise its public teachings about the proper role of women in the Church and society. From Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903) to Pope John Paul II (1978-2005), papal social pronouncements reveal an evolution in attitudes toward a woman's proper &amp;quot;place&amp;quot; from the view that women are passive subordinates to men in all spheres of life to the current teaching that lay and clerical women are equal but complementary partners with men in religious, political, economic, and social endeavors. However, the papacy has remained firm in the conviction that ordination to the priesthood is for men only.&lt;br /&gt;
====Social changes====&lt;br /&gt;
Urbanization brought millions of peasants out of the villages to industrial cities, where church facilities were few. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Arts====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cerro_de_Angeles.jpg|right|thumb|230px|Cerro de los Angeles, Madrid, Spain.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The arts provided a refuge from modernity in the form of a nostalgic aesthetic. Church architecture saw the revival of the medieval [[Gothic]] style. Romantic literature, for example by Chateaubriand, helped inspire a Catholic revival. In music, Catholic churchgoers were likely to be exposed to an officially sponsored revival of a cappella singing in the manner of Palestrina. The rapid development of symphonic and operatic forms affected sacred music, resulting in many masses, requiems, and te deums for large orchestra and chorus, sometimes even composed by skeptics such as Berlioz and Verdi.&lt;br /&gt;
====Politics====&lt;br /&gt;
In politics as democracy and popular government spread, religious motivations moved people into one party or the other.  The parties in such battles tended to be different depending on the religious configuration of a given country. In Catholic countries such as France, Italy, Spain, and Portugal, sharp confrontations emerged between clericals and anti-clericals; in countries with mixed Catholic and Protestant populations such as Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Britain and the U.S., political splits occurred along confessional lines.  In the U.S. the great majority of the Catholics -- led by the Irish--became [[Democratic Party|Democrats]].  In Germany the Catholics formed their own Center party to fight off attacks from the Protestants, such as the [[Kulturkampf]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British attempt to impose Protestantism on Ireland not only fueled the Catholic revival there but also contributed to its spread via emigration – not only to the U.S. and Canada, but also to Australia, New Zealand, and England itself, increasing the Catholic population in all of these. Quickly the Irish took control of the Church in each country and created a new system of schools, colleges, hospitals and charities.  The Poles, having lost their nation state in the 1790s, turned to an intense religiousity, that preserved national identity, and which they carried with them to industrial centers in the U.S. and Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
====Vatican II====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John-23.jpg|right|thumb|270px|[[Pope John XXIII]] reigned 1958-63]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Second Ecumenical Council of the Vatican&amp;quot; (called [[Vatican II]]), was called by [[Pope John XXIII]] and was in session from 1962 to 1965. It dramatically modernized and transformed church policies, with major changes to official theology and liturgy. Liturgical changes included the introduction Mass in local languages instead of Latin. Theologically, the council deemphasized somewhat the centrality of Mary while also adding a new emphasis on individual and personal holiness. It recognized the possibility of salvation for Jews, Muslims, and Protestants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reactions among Catholics to Vatican II fall into three camps. &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; Catholics, drawing on the established Catholic belief in the &amp;quot;journeying&amp;quot; nature of the Church, see Vatican II and the new period that it marked in Catholic history as representing a significant advancement in our understanding of the divine revelation contained in the Gospels which justifies major changes in Catholic belief and practice. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; Catholics (including the recent popes) hold that the decrees of the Council, properly understood, are wholly in line with the historic Catholic faith, and that they should not be used as an excuse for unwarranted innovations. &amp;quot;Traditional&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;traditionalist&amp;quot;) Catholics regard the teachings of Vatican II as problematic, or even as heretical, and tried to operate churches using the old liturgies.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JpII.jpg|right|thumb|[[Pope John Paul II]] reigned 1978-2005]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abuse scandal==&lt;br /&gt;
Widespread controversy erupted in 2001 and the years following over past abuse of teenage boys by some Catholic priests involving inappropriate sexual contact. Worse, bishops typically covered up the episodes and moved the offending priests to new positions. For the most part the Catholic Church quietly cleaned this up internally in the mid 1980s. The vast majority of allegations of abuse that came to light in the 2000s occurred before this time period. Of course most priests were not involved, but the damage that could be done by even a small number of priests if not properly checked was horrible. It was a case of breaking vows, including vows of celibacy, and committing acts of [[homosexuality]] which are condemned by the Church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=72992710807995&amp;amp;mkt=en-US&amp;amp;lang=en-US&amp;amp;w=98cf251&amp;amp;FORM=CVRE4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. There were no reports of girls as victims, or nuns as perpetrators. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stereotype resulting from the scandal portrayed the priests involved as [[pedophilia|pedophiles]], though most of them were [[pederasty|pederasts]] who preyed upon post-pubescent teenage boys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E2D71E38F931A15750C0A9649C8B63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the scandal, the U.S. Catholic Church has paid out $2.6 billion in abuse claims.  The Los Angeles diocese settled claims by 500 victims for $660 million.  Similar scandals hit the Catholic Church in other countries, notably Ireland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cafeteria Catholic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholic views on creationism‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dead Sea Scrolls]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pope John Paul II]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vatican City]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Virgen.jpg|right|thumb|Virgin Mary and Child]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.Vatican.va The Vatican]&lt;br /&gt;
*A digital version of [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/ ''The Catholic Encyclopedia''].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cua.edu/ The Catholic University of America] Washington, D. C.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11567b.htm St. Paul] Catholic Encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc.htm Catechism of the Catholic Church] Saint Charles Borromeo Catholic Church web site.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pellegrinocattolico.com/index.html Al Pellegrino Cattolico] Italian web site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Bokenkotter, Thomas. ''A Concise History of the Catholic Church'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Concise-History-Catholic-Church/dp/0385516134/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241119912&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brown, Peter. ''The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity 200-1000 AD'' (2002), 640pp &lt;br /&gt;
*  Chadwick, Owen. ''A History of the Popes, 1830-1914.'' (1998), 616pp; a standard recent history. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=12355195 online edition], &lt;br /&gt;
* Coppa, Frank J.  ''The Modern Papacy since 1789.'' Longman, 1998. 296 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel-Rops, Henri. ''The Church in the Eighteenth Century'' (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel-Rops, Henri. ''The Church in an Age of Revolution'' (1965).&lt;br /&gt;
* Holland, Joe.  ''Modern Catholic Social Teaching: The Popes Confront the Industrial Age 1740-1958.'' Paulist Press, 2003. 404 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Kung, Hans. ''The Catholic Church: A Short History'' (2003), by a leading Catholic scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Church-History-Library-Chronicles/dp/0812967623/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241119912&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''Christianity in a Revolutionary Age: A History of Christianity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries'' 5 Vol'' (1958), a detailed history of Chritianity 1800-1950 by a fair-minded Protestant scholar. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101463833 vol 1 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Logan, F. Donald.  ''A History of the Church in the Middle Ages.'' 2002. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102805754# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Mullett, Michael A. ''The Catholic Reformation,'' (1999), [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102890994 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Toole, James M. ''The Faithful: A History of Catholics in America'' (2008) [http://books.google.com/books?id=BFlBzSAVW6kC&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=intitle:The+intitle:Faithful+intitle:A+intitle:History+intitle:of+intitle:Catholics+intitle:in+intitle:America&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pastor, Ludwig von. ''History of the Popes From the Close of the Middle Ages'', (1894-1930), 16 vol, older Catholic history [http://books.google.com/books?spell=1&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;q=pastor+history+popes&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online from books.google.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ullmann, Walter. ''A Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages,'' (2002), 393pp, [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=107602176 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schreck, Alan. ''The Compact History of the Catholic Church'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vidmar, John. ''The Catholic Church through the Ages: A History'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Church-through-Ages-History/dp/0809142341/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241119912&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Reference===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''New Catholic 'Encyclopedia'' (1967), complete coverage of all topics by Catholic scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Catholic Encyclopedia,'' (1913) [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/ online edition]  complete coverage by Catholic scholars; the articles were written about 100 years ago&lt;br /&gt;
* Coppa, Frank J., ed.  ''Great Popes through History: An Encyclopedia.'' (2002). 600 pp.    &lt;br /&gt;
* Kelly, J.N.D. ''The Oxford Dictionary of Popes'' (1988). 349pp; scholarly short biographies; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=54850171 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Catholic Church| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian Denominations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Church&amp;diff=733431</id>
		<title>Roman Catholic Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Church&amp;diff=733431"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T17:01:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: /* Teachings */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Roman Catholic Church''' is the common name of the oldest, largest and most important Christian denomination.  Members are called &amp;quot;Catholics.&amp;quot; It is headed by the [[Pope]] (Supreme Pontiff), currently [[Pope Benedict XVI]]. It is the largest [[Christian]] denomination in the world, with more than 1.3 billion officially baptized adherents, or 17.4 per cent of the world population (In the United States more than 64 million). In recent years growth has been greatest in Africa and Latin America, while the numbers and influence in Europe have declined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church is the oldest institution in the western world; it asserts that the Pope is the divinely-chosen successor of [[St. Peter]], the 'rock' ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matt]] 16:18) upon whom Jesus built his church. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Church consists of those Christians who are in full communion with the Pope. It includes &amp;quot;Uniate Catholics&amp;quot; in Eastern Europe who, strictly speaking, are not part of the &amp;quot;Roman&amp;quot; Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;Catholic Church&amp;quot; is, literally, the ''Universal Church'' of [[Jesus Christ]] (from the Greek ''katholikos'', &amp;quot;universal&amp;quot;). see [[Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The split between Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy dates to the eleventh century. The [[Reformation]] is the split between Catholicism and Protestantism that occurred in the sixteenth century. Two of the principal issues of contention between Catholics and Protestants are ''[[sola scriptura]]'' (the Protestant doctrine that the Bible alone is the final authority for Christians, which denies the authority of the Pope) and ''sola fide'' (the doctrine, popularized by [[Martin Luther]], that faith alone, as opposed to faith expressed in good works, is sufficient for salvation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cathpop.jpg|right|thumb|350px|Catholics in the world.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Organization==&lt;br /&gt;
The Pope and the the international leadership of the Church are based in [[Vatican City]], an independent tiny country located inside Rome, Italy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Church has a complex hierarchy of clergy, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* The Pope&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cardinal]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Archbishop]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bishop]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abbot]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Monsignor|Monsignori]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Archpriest]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Priest]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deacon]]s&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key roles are played by the Pope and the bishops, and the question of whether national governments should play a major role in nominating bishops to the Pope has been a major issue for centuries. See [[Gallicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Teachings==&lt;br /&gt;
The chief teachings of the Catholic church are: God’s objective existence; God’s interest in individual human beings, who can enter into relations with God (through prayer); the Trinity; the divinity of Jesus; the immortality of the [[soul]] of each human being, each one being accountable at death for his or her actions in life, with the award of heaven or hell; the resurrection of the dead; the historicity of the [[Gospels]]; and the divine commission of the church. In addition the Roman Catholic Church stresses that since the members, living and dead, share in each other’s merits, the [[Virgin Mary]] and other saints and the dead in purgatory are never forgotten.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.bartleby.com/65/ro/RomanCat.html The Columbia Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The presence of Christ is believed to be present in the Eucharist, the bread and wine is Jesus himself. Another essential belief is the veneration of Mary, the mother of Jesus as the Blessed Virgin Mary and veneration of the saints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal sources for the essential beliefs  of the Catholic Church are the Sacred Scriptures (the Bible), Sacred Tradition, and Living Magisterium of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term Catholic is frequently applied to the Roman Catholic Church. Although many [[Protestantism|Protestant]]s object to Roman Catholics monopolizing the term, because the defined meaning of Catholic is &amp;quot;universal&amp;quot; and comes from the Greek word Katholikos. The Eastern [[Orthodox Church]] and [[Anglican Communion]] also refer to themselves as, &amp;quot;one holy, catholic, and apostolic church...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answers.com/topic/catholic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Church teaches respect for all human life.  It opposes the practices of contraception, abortion,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul VI, Humanae Vitae 1968 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; euthanasia and capital punishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae 1995 http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0141/_INDEX.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Church is in favor of social justice and &amp;quot;the common good.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Benedict XVI, Caritas in Veritate, 2009 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Church===&lt;br /&gt;
The original Christian community was founded by Jesus Christ and led by the Apostles. St. [[Paul|Paul the Apostle]] was, together with [[Saint Peter]], the most notable of Early Christian missionaries. Christians were subjected to persecution, first under [[Nero]], shortly after the foundation of the church, and again, more severely, under the emperors [[Decius]] and [[Diocletian]] in the third century as well as [[Domitian]], [[Marcus Aurelius]] and others with the penalty for being Christian ultimately being death.  After almost 300 years of persecution against the Church had only seen Christianity flourish, the Emperor [[Constantine I]] had a religious experience and legalized Christianity in the early fourth century.  Going to war with the co-Emperor of the east [[Lucinius]] over his continued persecution of Christians, Constantine won and became sole Emperor.  The age of persecution was over. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Christians.jpg|thumb|450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 380, Emperor [[Theodosius I]] accepted Christianity as the official religion of the [[Roman Empire]].  &lt;br /&gt;
=== Fathers of the Church ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paul|St. Paul]] is the most prolific contributor to the [[New Testament]], and has been the most influential of all theologians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other important early theologians include [[St. Ambrose]], Bishop of [[Milan]] from 374 to 397, and especially [[St. Augustine]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Barbarians converted===&lt;br /&gt;
Until the early fourth century AD Christianity enjoyed mixed reception in the Roman Empire and Christians were frequently subject to persecution. In the 310s Christianity became legalized and shortly thereafter became officially recognized by Constantine. In the following years Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular became increasingly powerful in the Roman Empire, although [[Arianism]] remained strong. In 380 AD, [[Theodosius I]] established the Catholic Church as the official religion of the Roman Empire. While the Empire continued to decline, Catholicism and Christianity continued to grow both among those directly under the Empire and among the barbarians until Rome was sacked by [[Alaric]] in 410. Alaric was an Arian Christian. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Western Empire, the Catholic Church became the most powerful political and religious force in Latin-speaking Europe and by the 8th century had achieved near total religious dominance with the removal of the last significant Arian groups.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aggressive missionary activities accomplished the conversion of almost all the pagan tribes in Europe by the year 1000 AD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Great Schism ===&lt;br /&gt;
After numerous disputes between eastern and western churches that became more pronounced from the ninth century onwards, the Church underwent the [[Great Schism]] in 1054 that divided it into a Western (Latin) branch, which has been called the Catholic Church and an Eastern branch, which has become known as the [[Orthodox Church]]. Both traced their roots to the time of Jesus, but the Orthodox Church did not acknowledge the Pope as the one leader of the Church and instead believed that all of the patriarchs were equals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 11th century, the [[Great Schism]] occurred between the church in the West and [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]. This schism occurred over a variety of issues, especially those dealing with how much authority the Pope had. The causes were not purely religious, but cultural and geographic elements also played a role. Although later attempts at reconciliation occurred, such as at the [[Council of Basel]], the two remain separate to this day although both accept many of each others sacraments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Late Middle Ages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning in 1092 and continuing until the end of the 13th century, the Crusades occurred. These were a series of religious wars instigated by the Church against various other groups, especially the Muslims. Despite the focus on removing Islamic control of the Holy Land, the Crusaders massacred Jews and sacked Constantinople. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this time period, the [[Inquisition]]s started and would continue through the Protestant Reformation. The medieval inquisition focused on rooting out Cathars, while the later inquisitions such as the [[Spanish Inquisition]] focused on people who were believed to be secretly practicing [[Judaism]] or [[Islam]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reformation and Counter-Reformation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1517, [[Martin Luther]] started the [[Protestant Reformation]] which initially focused on the giving of [[indulgences]] but eventually grew to have a wide variety of different causes and issues. Eventually, Protestants rejected the notions of saintly intercession, the authority of the pope and many of the sacraments. This eventually led to a series of religious wars in [[Europe]] and the Protestant-Catholic split became one of the dominant themes in European events until modern times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1815 to 1914===&lt;br /&gt;
====Pius VII====&lt;br /&gt;
Pius VII (1800-23) was stripped of powers by [[Napoleon]] but made a striking comeback after Napoleon's fall in 1815. Pius VII was a deeply religious Benedictine, and a theologian; he lived simply and  avoided nepotism. His unusually able Secretary of State Cardinal Consalvi won the restoration to the Pope of most of the territories in Italy which Napoleon had seized. He reinvigorated numerous monastic orders and helped create new societies for men and women, especially those engaged in teaching and missionary work. &lt;br /&gt;
Most important was the restoration of the Jesuits in 1814; they had been suppressed in most countries. They grew larger and even more influential in the 19th century. &lt;br /&gt;
====Conservatism====&lt;br /&gt;
After 1800 the Papacy became the center of conservatism in Europe in reaction against the liberalism of the French Revolution and its admirers. The Papacy recognized that throughout Europe millions of peasants and poor folk were devoted to the saints and traditions of the Church; the Popes responded energetically by promoting new Marian devotions (such as the rosary). Rome had fallen into disrepair and Pius VII began the restoration of the city's artistic glories, an enterprise that continues into the 21st century. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kelly (1999); Duffy (2006); Latourette (1958) vol 1. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Ultramontane vs Gallican====&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;ultramontane&amp;quot; tendency in the Church centralized more power and authority in the Papacy. It was opposed by the &amp;quot;[[Gallican]]&amp;quot; tendency, especially in France, to give national churches more control over their affairs.  The ultramontine forces generally won out, especially with the declaration of [[Papal Infallibility]] at the First Vatican Council in 1870. The ultramontane forces cited the old doctrines of [[Robert Bellarmine]] (1542-1621) and [[Francisco de Suárez]] (1548-1617) to bolster the papal claim to absolute power in spiritual matters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gallicanism in France was damaged by the rise of ultramontanism in the 1850s and the devotional revolution that shifted piety to devotions sponsored by Rome. Gallicanism was officially suppressed by the First Vatican Council in 1870, which established the paramount authority of the pope as a matter of dogma. However informal manifestations of Gallicanism continue in some countries, especially China. In Canada, the Irish clergy fought for ultramontanism against the French clergy, who were Gallican. The [[Catholicism in Ireland|Irish]] won out with the support of the Vatican.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Vatican II, 1962-65, the multiple and often confused controversy among Catholics over papal  authority and infallibility largely ended, though some significant degree of opposition to it remains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as by historian Garry Wills, author of ''Papal Sin: Structures of Deceit'' (Sophia Institute Press, 2003), and liberal theologian Hans Kung, author of ''Infallible?: An inquiry'' (1970)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Carlin, ''The Decline and Fall of the Catholic Church in America'',‎ appendix 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/3543/vatican.htm Raymond Taouk, ''What are Catholics to think of Vatican II?'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This dissent is mainly manifested in disagreement with Roman Catholic teaching on birth control and abortion, which yet remains strong.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianethicstoday.com/Issue/014/Infallibility%20in%20Ethical%20Perspective%20By%20John%20M.%20Swomley_014_26_.htm John M. Swomley, ''Infallibility in Ethical Perspective Christian Ethics Today], Issue 014 Volume 4 No 1 February 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;56% of U.S. Catholics said that the pope is not infallible &amp;quot;when he teaches on matters of morals, such as birth control and abortion&amp;quot;; 80%  of Catholics believed it is possible to disagree with the pope on official positions on morality and still be a good Catholic. Time/CNN nationwide poll of 1,000 adults, conducted by Yankelovich Partners, Sept. 27-28, 1995&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Facing Modernity====&lt;br /&gt;
Despite dire predictions, the Church adapted to modernity in its own way and increased its role in people's lives in the 19th century. The Church escaped irrelevance by using the same means as did emerging nation-states; establishing more administrative and doctrinal centralization in Rome; establishing a homogeneous culture, aided especially by universal use of Latin; promoting new rites and folk devotions, especially those focused on Mary and other favored saints; promoting pilgrimages to holy sites; encouraging clergy to endorse and lead regional nationalist movements that focused on historic languages and cultures; creating many new teaching orders and establishing Catholic schools and colleges; supporting intellectuals and publishing houses; enhancing papal power; and cultivating an image of both theologiocal canonical and moral superiority. Of special importance was the missionary activity, based especially in Germany, that was in competition with Protestant missions in China, India, Africa and other non-Christain lands.  The Jesuits proved highly adept at promoting the Papal cause. The Pope thereby became less symbolic and more powerful. There was internal dissent among some Catholic intellectuals, such as historian [[Lord Acton]] in Britain and theologian Ignaz von Döllinger in Germany, who opposed the declaration of the dogma of papal infallibility. &lt;br /&gt;
=====Syllabus of Errors=====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Syllabus of Errors]] of Pope [[Pius IX]] in 1864 rejected the liberal doctrines of the modern world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see text at [http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It denounced pantheism, naturalism, nationalism, indifferentism, socialism, communism, freemasonry, and other modern views. The Pope claimed for the Catholic Church total control over science and culture. The liberals viewed this as a declaration of war by the Church on modern civilization. Its repercussions within France, the U.S., Britain and other countries were resounding, nearly destroying the liberal Catholic movement and furnishing a powerful weapon to the anticlerical faction, or (in the U.S.) to anti-Catholic Protestants. Opponents stressed the Papacy had become intolerant and medieval and largely political in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Latourette (1958) vol 1 ch. 6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Facing Liberalism====  &lt;br /&gt;
Burns (1990) takes a sociological perspective on the Papacy's long battle with liberalism. He shows how the papacy, in reaction to the rise of the liberal states of the 19th and 20th centuries, gradually reformulated Catholic ideology within the limited autonomy they possessed and carefully subordinated social and political issues to more purely religious and moral issues as they constructed an ideological opposition to liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany in the 1840s the ultramontane movement used mass meetings and pilgrimages to combat the growth of liberalism and modernism. However the abnti-clerical liberal press attacked these mass meetings, and in response a large number of Catholic newspapers emerged in Germany starting in the 1840s. To ensure their own survival, these newspapers championed the liberal idea of press freedom. In addition, local clubs were established to mobilize the Catholic working class. These clubs tried to end discrimination against ordinary Catholics by working to establish freedom of religion and freedom of thought and by entering the electoral process.  With the unification of Germany in 1870, the new nation faced the problems of consolidation, one of which was secularization. The laws dealing with secularization opened a poltical battle between Bismark and the Protestants and liberals on one side, and the Catholics on the other, called the &amp;quot;[[Kulturkampf]].&amp;quot; The Catholics organized their own political parties and protected their interests by voting as a bloc into the 1930s, when the Nazis closed down all other parties.&lt;br /&gt;
====Freemasons====&lt;br /&gt;
In many countries the Church faced off against the Freemasons, a secret society that was politically active in numerous countries. The Papcy coordinated a counterattack. For example in Brazil, the religious question in the 1870s centered on the Masonic controversy and the struggle between regalist and ultramontane forces.  One method of counterattack was to found Catholic universities. Thus Mgr. Ignace Bourget, second bishop of Montreal, Canada, founded Laval University, as a Catholic reaction to a liberal and secularist outburst in Quebec. Bourget said the university would be the principal instrument for &amp;quot;wresting the elite from the clutches of liberalism.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
====Women====&lt;br /&gt;
A spiritual revolution took place in the 19th century, moving individuals to personal piety.  There was a much greater emphasis on the role of Mary, and a greatly increased involvement of women; the number of sisters and nuns increased from 20,000 to 400,000 between 1815 and 1914.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Camp (1990) traces the treatment of women. In the late 19th century the papacy began to revise its public teachings about the proper role of women in the Church and society. From Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903) to Pope John Paul II (1978-2005), papal social pronouncements reveal an evolution in attitudes toward a woman's proper &amp;quot;place&amp;quot; from the view that women are passive subordinates to men in all spheres of life to the current teaching that lay and clerical women are equal but complementary partners with men in religious, political, economic, and social endeavors. However, the papacy has remained firm in the conviction that ordination to the priesthood is for men only.&lt;br /&gt;
====Social changes====&lt;br /&gt;
Urbanization brought millions of peasants out of the villages to industrial cities, where church facilities were few. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Arts====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cerro_de_Angeles.jpg|right|thumb|230px|Cerro de los Angeles, Madrid, Spain.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The arts provided a refuge from modernity in the form of a nostalgic aesthetic. Church architecture saw the revival of the medieval [[Gothic]] style. Romantic literature, for example by Chateaubriand, helped inspire a Catholic revival. In music, Catholic churchgoers were likely to be exposed to an officially sponsored revival of a cappella singing in the manner of Palestrina. The rapid development of symphonic and operatic forms affected sacred music, resulting in many masses, requiems, and te deums for large orchestra and chorus, sometimes even composed by skeptics such as Berlioz and Verdi.&lt;br /&gt;
====Politics====&lt;br /&gt;
In politics as democracy and popular government spread, religious motivations moved people into one party or the other.  The parties in such battles tended to be different depending on the religious configuration of a given country. In Catholic countries such as France, Italy, Spain, and Portugal, sharp confrontations emerged between clericals and anti-clericals; in countries with mixed Catholic and Protestant populations such as Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Britain and the U.S., political splits occurred along confessional lines.  In the U.S. the great majority of the Catholics -- led by the Irish--became [[Democratic Party|Democrats]].  In Germany the Catholics formed their own Center party to fight off attacks from the Protestants, such as the [[Kulturkampf]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British attempt to impose Protestantism on Ireland not only fueled the Catholic revival there but also contributed to its spread via emigration – not only to the U.S. and Canada, but also to Australia, New Zealand, and England itself, increasing the Catholic population in all of these. Quickly the Irish took control of the Church in each country and created a new system of schools, colleges, hospitals and charities.  The Poles, having lost their nation state in the 1790s, turned to an intense religiousity, that preserved national identity, and which they carried with them to industrial centers in the U.S. and Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
====Vatican II====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John-23.jpg|right|thumb|270px|[[Pope John XXIII]] reigned 1958-63]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Second Ecumenical Council of the Vatican&amp;quot; (called [[Vatican II]]), was called by [[Pope John XXIII]] and was in session from 1962 to 1965. It dramatically modernized and transformed church policies, with major changes to official theology and liturgy. Liturgical changes included the introduction Mass in local languages instead of Latin. Theologically, the council deemphasized somewhat the centrality of Mary while also adding a new emphasis on individual and personal holiness. It recognized the possibility of salvation for Jews, Muslims, and Protestants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reactions among Catholics to Vatican II fall into three camps. &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; Catholics, drawing on the established Catholic belief in the &amp;quot;journeying&amp;quot; nature of the Church, see Vatican II and the new period that it marked in Catholic history as representing a significant advancement in our understanding of the divine revelation contained in the Gospels which justifies major changes in Catholic belief and practice. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; Catholics (including the recent popes) hold that the decrees of the Council, properly understood, are wholly in line with the historic Catholic faith, and that they should not be used as an excuse for unwarranted innovations. &amp;quot;Traditional&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;traditionalist&amp;quot;) Catholics regard the teachings of Vatican II as problematic, or even as heretical, and tried to operate churches using the old liturgies.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JpII.jpg|right|thumb|[[Pope John Paul II]] reigned 1978-2005]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abuse scandal==&lt;br /&gt;
Widespread controversy erupted in 2001 and the years following over past abuse of teenage boys by some Catholic priests involving inappropriate sexual contact. Worse, bishops typically covered up the episodes and moved the offending priests to new positions. For the most part the Catholic Church quietly cleaned this up internally in the mid 1980s. The vast majority of allegations of abuse that came to light in the 2000s occurred before this time period. Of course most priests were not involved, but the damage that could be done by even a small number of priests if not properly checked was horrible. It was a case of breaking vows, including vows of celibacy, and committing acts of [[homosexuality]] which are condemned by the Church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=72992710807995&amp;amp;mkt=en-US&amp;amp;lang=en-US&amp;amp;w=98cf251&amp;amp;FORM=CVRE4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. There were no reports of girls as victims, or nuns as perpetrators. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stereotype resulting from the scandal portrayed the priests involved as [[pedophilia|pedophiles]], though most of them were [[pederasty|pederasts]] who preyed upon post-pubescent teenage boys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E2D71E38F931A15750C0A9649C8B63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the scandal, the U.S. Catholic Church has paid out $2.6 billion in abuse claims.  The Los Angeles diocese settled claims by 500 victims for $660 million.  Similar scandals hit the Catholic Church in other countries, notably Ireland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cafeteria Catholic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholic views on creationism‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dead Sea Scrolls]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pope John Paul II]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vatican City]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Virgen.jpg|right|thumb|Virgin Mary and Child]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.Vatican.va The Vatican]&lt;br /&gt;
*A digital version of [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/ ''The Catholic Encyclopedia''].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cua.edu/ The Catholic University of America] Washington, D. C.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11567b.htm St. Paul] Catholic Encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc.htm Catechism of the Catholic Church] Saint Charles Borromeo Catholic Church web site.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pellegrinocattolico.com/index.html Al Pellegrino Cattolico] Italian web site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Bokenkotter, Thomas. ''A Concise History of the Catholic Church'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Concise-History-Catholic-Church/dp/0385516134/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241119912&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brown, Peter. ''The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity 200-1000 AD'' (2002), 640pp &lt;br /&gt;
*  Chadwick, Owen. ''A History of the Popes, 1830-1914.'' (1998), 616pp; a standard recent history. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=12355195 online edition], &lt;br /&gt;
* Coppa, Frank J.  ''The Modern Papacy since 1789.'' Longman, 1998. 296 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel-Rops, Henri. ''The Church in the Eighteenth Century'' (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel-Rops, Henri. ''The Church in an Age of Revolution'' (1965).&lt;br /&gt;
* Holland, Joe.  ''Modern Catholic Social Teaching: The Popes Confront the Industrial Age 1740-1958.'' Paulist Press, 2003. 404 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Kung, Hans. ''The Catholic Church: A Short History'' (2003), by a leading Catholic scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Church-History-Library-Chronicles/dp/0812967623/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241119912&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''Christianity in a Revolutionary Age: A History of Christianity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries'' 5 Vol'' (1958), a detailed history of Chritianity 1800-1950 by a fair-minded Protestant scholar. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101463833 vol 1 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Logan, F. Donald.  ''A History of the Church in the Middle Ages.'' 2002. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102805754# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Mullett, Michael A. ''The Catholic Reformation,'' (1999), [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102890994 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Toole, James M. ''The Faithful: A History of Catholics in America'' (2008) [http://books.google.com/books?id=BFlBzSAVW6kC&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=intitle:The+intitle:Faithful+intitle:A+intitle:History+intitle:of+intitle:Catholics+intitle:in+intitle:America&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pastor, Ludwig von. ''History of the Popes From the Close of the Middle Ages'', (1894-1930), 16 vol, older Catholic history [http://books.google.com/books?spell=1&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;q=pastor+history+popes&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online from books.google.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ullmann, Walter. ''A Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages,'' (2002), 393pp, [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=107602176 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schreck, Alan. ''The Compact History of the Catholic Church'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vidmar, John. ''The Catholic Church through the Ages: A History'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Church-through-Ages-History/dp/0809142341/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241119912&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Reference===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''New Catholic 'Encyclopedia'' (1967), complete coverage of all topics by Catholic scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Catholic Encyclopedia,'' (1913) [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/ online edition]  complete coverage by Catholic scholars; the articles were written about 100 years ago&lt;br /&gt;
* Coppa, Frank J., ed.  ''Great Popes through History: An Encyclopedia.'' (2002). 600 pp.    &lt;br /&gt;
* Kelly, J.N.D. ''The Oxford Dictionary of Popes'' (1988). 349pp; scholarly short biographies; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=54850171 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Catholic Church| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian Denominations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Capital_punishment&amp;diff=733417</id>
		<title>Capital punishment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Capital_punishment&amp;diff=733417"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T16:48:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: /* Roman Catholicism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Capital punishment''', also known as the death penalty, refers to the custom of executing prisoners who are convicted of certain crimes. Such crimes are known as capital [[crime]]s, and tend to be grave crimes against persons or governments (such as [[premeditation|premeditated]] [[murder]], [[rape]] or [[treason]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In the world today ==&lt;br /&gt;
Of the main developed countries, only the [[United States]] and [[Japan]] use formalized capital punishment, though many developed countries give law enforcement greater authority to kill than allowed by the [[United States]]. For emerging countries, [[China]] uses the death penalty and in the non-developed world it is practiced in most [[Sharia]] states (those whose legal systems are based on [[Muslim]] legal philosophy), as well as many others.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot;&amp;gt;EU: [http://www.eurunion.org/legislat/deathpenalty/EurHRConvProt13Decl.htm Concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty in all Circumstances]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encarta: [http://encarta.msn.com/media_461543496/Capital_Punishment_Worldwide.html Capital Punishment Worldwide]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to officially released governmental figures, the [[human rights]] organization  [[Amnesty International]] estimates that [[Singapore]] has the highest execution rate in the world, at 13.65 hangings per 1,000,000 residents.  [[Saudi Arabia]] has the second-highest rate, at 4.65 per 1,000,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on 2004 figures, China is the world leader in total number of executions with an estimated 3,400. Following China is [[Iran]] with 159 and [[Vietnam]] with an estimated 64 executions. The [[United States]] executed the 5th greatest number of people in the world with a total of 52. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Economist Pocket World in Figures 2008 Edition'' 2007, p. 99. London: Profile Books. ISBN 978-1846680908&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== United States ===&lt;br /&gt;
Capital punishment in the United States is handled on a state-by-state basis; twelve states' laws do not allow for executions at all. Capital punishment is also used by the federal government and the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pennsylvania]] has hundreds of people on [[death row]], though only three inmates have been executed since the reinstatement of capital punishment laws, and all three essentially &amp;quot;volunteered&amp;quot; by dropping their appeals. In [[Texas]], one man has been on death row for 31 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-deathrow28jan28,1,1271967.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Appeals and stays of execution can create a backlog on death rows in many states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the United States suspended the death penalty in 1973, it was reinstated in 1977. 65% of Americans believe putting someone to death for a crime is acceptable, according to a recent poll.  But respondents were close to evenly split on whether they would prefer the death penalty (50%) to mandatory life in prison (46%).  The death penalty is most favored by age 30+ males who are [[Caucasian]] and [[Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ABC News/Washington Post poll: [http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/1015a3DeathPenalty.pdf Death Penalty]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capital punishment for federal crimes began in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.justice.gov/dag/pubdoc/deathpenaltystudy.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some studies conducted since the start of the new millennium have consistently shown a deterrence factor in the United States based on use of the death penalty.  It has been calculated that each person executed saves the lives of anywhere from 3 to 18 innocent people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Studies: Death penalty discourages crime  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,280215,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other studies have shown that as a whole, &amp;quot;death-penalty states&amp;quot; typically have higher murder rates than states that do not have capital punishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?&amp;amp;did=1705#STATES%20WITH%20THE%20DEATH%20PENALTY%20V.%20STATES%20WITHOUT|format=HTML|work=Death Penalty Information Center|language=English|title=Deterrence|accessdate=2007-08-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have questioned how a nation such as the United States that largely identifies itself as [[Christian]] (76.5%) could have 65% of Americans believing putting someone to death for a crime is acceptable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_prac2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They question whether or not the [[Bible]] allows such a view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.itsyourtimes.com/?q=node/3524&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The 6th Commandment is sometimes translated as, &amp;quot;Thou shalt not kill.&amp;quot;  This translation suggests that executions are a sin.  The 6th Commandment is also sometimes translated as, &amp;quot;Thou shalt commit no murder.&amp;quot;  As murder is defined as &amp;quot;wrongful killing&amp;quot;, when following that translation it is possible to argue whether or not judicial executions are murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Methods in the United States ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lethal injection]] is the official method of capital punishment in almost all of the 38 states that have the death penalty. A few states allow for other methods in some circumstances. Several botched electrocutions in [[Florida]] in the 1990s have effectively put an end to the era of the [[electric chair]], which was the most common means of execution in the United States before 1972. In addition to these two methods of execution, lethal gas, hanging, and shooting have all been used at least twice since 1977. Both [[firing squad]]s were conducted in [[Utah]], most recently in 1996. The three hangings took place in [[Washington]] and [[Delaware]], most recently Billy Bailey's 1996 hanging in Delaware. The [[gas chamber]], which has been abandoned because it has been found to normally lead to slow death, has been used in [[California]], [[Arizona]], [[Nevada]], [[Mississippi]], and [[North Carolina]] since 1977. Walter LeGrand's 1999 execution in Arizona's gas chamber will almost certainly be the last of this type.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===France===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has never used the [[guillotine]], which was very popular in [[France]]. The last use of the guillotine in France was in 1977. Thereafter, capital punishment in France was abolished, in 1981.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Canada===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Canada]] does not employ capital punishment, and it has not been a possible sentence in Canadian civilian courts since 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada long employed capital punishment as a punishment for [[murder]] or [[treason]], typically executing prisoners by [[long drop hanging|long drop]] [[hanging]] in the case of civilians, and by [[firing squad]] in the case of soldiers or other military. (In particular, 25 soldiers were executed for various crimes during [[World War I]].) Canada had several notorious executioners, particularly [[Arthur B. English]], also known as &amp;quot;Arthur Ellis&amp;quot;, after whom [[Arthur Ellis Awards|a Canadian literary award]] for mystery writing is named.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Canada's use of capital punishment was inherited from the legal system of the [[United Kingdom]], opposition to capital punishment began to arise in the late 1950s, and came to a head in 1959, when [[Steven Truscott]], a 14-year-old boy, was convicted of murder, with a recommendation from the [[jury]] for mercy. The judge passed down a sentence of execution by hanging, then the only legal punishment for murder in Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Truscott's death sentence would later be commuted in 1960, his case galvanized public opinion, and in 1961 Canada reclassified capital murder, defining it as a murder that involved [[premeditation]], murder during the commission of a violent crime, or the murder of a [[police officer]] or [[prison guard]]. This marked the beginning of the decline of capital punishment in Canada, as the last executions would be in [[December]], 1962. The government of Canada routinely [[commutation|commuted]] any death sentence passed thereafter (indeed, the [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] made opposition to capital punishment a part of their [[platform (politics)|platform]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1976, this [[de facto]] state of affairs became law, when the [[Parliament (Canada)|Canadian Parliament]] abolished the use of capital punishment under the [[Criminal Code (Canada)|Criminal Code]]. Executions were still permitted under the [[National Defense Act (Canada)|National Defense Act]] until 1998, when they were similarly abolished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Canada's [[Supreme Court of Canada|Supreme Court]] does not allow the [[extradition]] of criminals who may be executed for their crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Saudi Arabia===&lt;br /&gt;
Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islam under which those convicted of murder, drug trafficking, rape and armed robbery are executed in public with a sword. As of November 25, 2007, Saudi Arabia has beheaded 136 people, 38 people in 2006 and 83 people in 2005. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312768,00.html Saudi Arabia Marks 136th Beheading of 2007], Associated Press, [[Fox News Channel|Fox News]], November 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===European Union===&lt;br /&gt;
The death penalty has been abolished in all 27 [[European Union]] member states, and 47 out of the 50 countries in [[Europe]] (only [[Belarus]] still practices it), and [[Russia]] has had an effective moratorium since 1996).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ACT50/001/2007/en/ACT500012007en.html Document - List of abolitionist and retentionist countries (1 January 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The EU has long been against capital punishment, and campaigns for its abolition worldwide. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, legally adopted in the Treaty of Lisbon, bans execution in all member states, and abolition is a condition of acceding to the EU.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; EU law also bans detainee transfers in cases where the receiving party may seek the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Associated Press]] has reported that executions and [[torture]] in [[North Korea]] are &amp;quot;worse than [[animal]] slaughter.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One inmate, Choe Kwang Ho, sneaked away from his work for 15 minutes to pick fruit. He was executed, his mouth stuffed with gravel to prevent him from protesting.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;If a female inmate got pregnant, he said, she and her lover would be shot to death publicly. Then, An said, prison guards would cut open her womb, remove the fetus and bury it or feed it to guard dogs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,444672,00.html Executions, Torture in North Korea 'Worse Than Animal Slaughter'], Associated Press,  ''Fox News'', October 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious views of capital punishment==&lt;br /&gt;
===Christianity===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Biblical View ====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament]] of the [[Bible]] has several passages that recommend the death penalty for different offenses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Old Testament, these are the offenses which merit the [[death penalty]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Worshiping a false god ([[Deuteronomy]] 13:6-10)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sacrificing to false gods ([[Exodus]] 22:20)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sacrificing children to Molech ([[Leviticus]] 20:2)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Blasphemy]] (Leviticus 24:16)&lt;br /&gt;
# Desecrating the [[Sabbath]] (Exodus31:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# False [[Prophecy]] (Deuteronomy 13:5)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Witchcraft]] (Exodus 22:18, Leviticus 20:27)&lt;br /&gt;
# Cursing Parents (Exodus 21:17)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rebellious Sons (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)&lt;br /&gt;
# Disobedience to judgments by authority established God (Deuteronomy 17:9-13)&lt;br /&gt;
# False witness in a capital crime (Deuteronomy 19:16-20)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Murder]] ([[Exodus]] 21:12, 21:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# Negligent [[homicide]] Exodus 21:29)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Homosexual]] intercourse ([[Leviticus 18]]:22, 20:13)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bestiality (Leviticus 20:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Adultery]] (Leviticus 20:10; 19:20)&lt;br /&gt;
# Incest (Leviticus 20:11; from Moses onward: [[Genesis]] 19:33,35; 4:17)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sex with a woman betrothed to another (Deuteronomy 22:25)&lt;br /&gt;
# Un[[chastity]]; marriage under false pretense of virginity (Deuteronomy 22:21-24)&lt;br /&gt;
# Daughter of a priest becoming a prostitute (Leviticus 21:9)&lt;br /&gt;
# Kidnapping to sell into slavery (Exodus 21:16)&lt;br /&gt;
# Coveting and making a wicked thing one's possession (Deuteronomy 7:26; [[Joshua]] 7:15,25)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;put to death&amp;quot; or similar explicit terms are usually used in commands mandating capital punishment, though the term &amp;quot;cut off from his people&amp;quot; (Lev. 17:4, etc.) may also denote such,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. John Gill (1690-1771) on Lv. 17:4, 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and which would increase the number of capital offenses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/TheDeathPenalty.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions necessary for true conviction: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.&amp;quot; (Deuteronomy 17:6; cf. Exodus 20:16) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Requirements for Judges:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lev 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Few people support capital punishment for non-murder offenses, and a number of Christians oppose the death penalty in all cases. Apologist [[JP Holding]] argues that the Bible including the [[New Testament]] nowhere repudiates the use of capital punishment (by the State), but that it does not necessarily mandate its use, either. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tektonics.org/af/cappun.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Acts 25:11, the [[apostle Paul]] stated, &amp;quot;...if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die&amp;quot;, while Romans 13:1-5 states that God has ordained the just use of the sword by the government. (cf. 1 Pet. 2:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Christians who are opposed to the death penalty cite John 8:3-11, which describes how Christ saved an adulteress from death by stoning by challenging the crowd &amp;quot;let he who has not sinned cast the first stone&amp;quot;, which they interpret as saying that man does not have the moral authority to condemn man to death. However, apart from the controversy regarding the canonical status of the passage, it is argued that Jesus is shown to be upholding the law&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4222897/k.64E4/John_8_is_a_Condemnation_of_Capital_Punishment.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, while only stopping the execution of the women by hypocrites, who were themselves convicted of such sins, similar to or including adultery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (cf. Matthew 7:5; Romans 2:1) Other Christians argue that the unjust execution of Jesus demonstrates that capital punishment is immoral, though Jesus is not seen opposing the legitimacy of capital punishment itself, and only the unjust use of such power. (Jn. 10:32; 18:23; Acts 25:11) Some Christians claim that the passage was a later addition to the Bible (see article: &amp;quot;[[Adulteress story]]&amp;quot;) - if it was a later addition, this might not be an issue to those Christians who believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Roman Catholicism ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Catholic Church]] has historically supported capital punishment in many circumstances that range from combating heresy to saving lives of potential victims of crime. Traditionally, capital punishment has been endorsed by the Church for reasons beyond preventing additional wrongdoing by the same criminal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) explains the historical use by the Church and Catholic nations to executing heretics, and even cremating the remains of heretics, as a way of expunging evil:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12565a.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nations of modern Europe, as they gradually developed, seemed to have agreed upon the necessity of extirpating all influences and agencies which tended to pervert the faith of the people, or which seemed to them to betray the potency of evil spirits. Therefore, the laws of all these nations provided for the destruction of contumacious unbelievers, teachers of heresy, witches, and sorcerers, by fire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent decades, however, officials within the Catholic Church have taken differing stances on the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The renowned Modern Catholic Dictionary (1980) by John A. Hardon, S.J., which was given the &amp;quot;imprimatur&amp;quot; (official endorsement) by Joseph T. O'Keefe, Vicar General, Archdiocese of New York (Dec. 13, 1979), describes the Catholic position of capital punishment as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is certain from Scripture that civil authorities may lawfully put malefactors to death.  ...  Christian dispensation made no essential change [to the Old Testament endorsement of the death penalty], as St. Paul expressly says .... [citing Romans 13:4].  Among the errors of the Waldenses condemned by the Church in the early thirteenth century was the proposition that denied the lawfulness of capital punishment (Argentre, ''Collectio de Novis Erroribus'', I, 86).  St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) defends capital punishment on the grounds of the common good. ...  If even with capital punishment crime abounds, no lesser penalty will suffice.  The practice question remains of how effective a deterrent capital punishment is in some modern states, when rarely used or only after long delays.  In principle, however, it is morally licit because in the most serious crimes the claims of retribution and deterrence are so demanding that the corrective value of punishment must, if necessary, be sacrificed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current official Catholic teaching, as stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, reads as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If, instead, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, public authority should limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Today, in fact, given the means at the State's disposal to effectively repress crime by rendering inoffensive the one who has committed it, without depriving him definitively of the possibility of redeeming himself, cases of absolute necessity for suppression of the offender &amp;quot;today ... are very rare, if not practically non-existent.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56.]http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P7Z.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Catholic officials have gone further. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has &amp;quot;called for an end to the use of the death penalty for more than twenty-five years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usccb.org/deathpenalty/index.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This surprising new position is at odds with the historic use by the Church of capital punishment to deal with heretics, and the cremation of the exhumed bodies of heretics. It may have simply reflected the late 20th century repudiation in Europe of all uses of capital punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church generally holds the position of a &amp;quot;Consistent Life Ethic.&amp;quot; The Church teaches the protection of life for all humans, from conception to natural death&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul VI, Humanae Vitae 1968 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae 1995 http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0141/_INDEX.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benedict XVI, Caritas in Veritate 2009 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  In line with their anti-capital punishment stance, the Church opposes abortion, euthanasia and usually war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Injustices Caused by Limits on Death Penalty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasingly arbitrary limits have been placed on use of the death penalty.  One arbitrary prohibition established by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] on use of the death penalty is when the murder is committed by someone under the age of 18.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See [[Roper v. Simmons]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Prior to this Supreme Court ruling, states had statutory minimum ages (at the time of crime) for when the death penalty could be imposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The award-winning documentary ''The Thin Blue Line'' portrays the true story of the framing of an innocent drifter because the age of the real murderer was slightly below the legal minimum for imposing the death penalty.  The crime was the heinous murder of a police officer during a routine traffic stop, and the outrage at the crime cried out for retribution with the death penalty.  But the authorities were legally barred from executing the real murderer, and an adult drifter who was in the wrong place at the wrong time was convicted for it.  He served years on death row before being released after the movie was widely seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Guillotine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hanging]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lethal injection]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55990 Christian sentenced to death for blasphemy], By Michael Ireland, ''WorldNetDaily,com'', June 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:law]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Punishment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Capital_punishment&amp;diff=733416</id>
		<title>Capital punishment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Capital_punishment&amp;diff=733416"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T16:47:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: /* Roman Catholicism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Capital punishment''', also known as the death penalty, refers to the custom of executing prisoners who are convicted of certain crimes. Such crimes are known as capital [[crime]]s, and tend to be grave crimes against persons or governments (such as [[premeditation|premeditated]] [[murder]], [[rape]] or [[treason]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In the world today ==&lt;br /&gt;
Of the main developed countries, only the [[United States]] and [[Japan]] use formalized capital punishment, though many developed countries give law enforcement greater authority to kill than allowed by the [[United States]]. For emerging countries, [[China]] uses the death penalty and in the non-developed world it is practiced in most [[Sharia]] states (those whose legal systems are based on [[Muslim]] legal philosophy), as well as many others.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot;&amp;gt;EU: [http://www.eurunion.org/legislat/deathpenalty/EurHRConvProt13Decl.htm Concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty in all Circumstances]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encarta: [http://encarta.msn.com/media_461543496/Capital_Punishment_Worldwide.html Capital Punishment Worldwide]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to officially released governmental figures, the [[human rights]] organization  [[Amnesty International]] estimates that [[Singapore]] has the highest execution rate in the world, at 13.65 hangings per 1,000,000 residents.  [[Saudi Arabia]] has the second-highest rate, at 4.65 per 1,000,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on 2004 figures, China is the world leader in total number of executions with an estimated 3,400. Following China is [[Iran]] with 159 and [[Vietnam]] with an estimated 64 executions. The [[United States]] executed the 5th greatest number of people in the world with a total of 52. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Economist Pocket World in Figures 2008 Edition'' 2007, p. 99. London: Profile Books. ISBN 978-1846680908&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== United States ===&lt;br /&gt;
Capital punishment in the United States is handled on a state-by-state basis; twelve states' laws do not allow for executions at all. Capital punishment is also used by the federal government and the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pennsylvania]] has hundreds of people on [[death row]], though only three inmates have been executed since the reinstatement of capital punishment laws, and all three essentially &amp;quot;volunteered&amp;quot; by dropping their appeals. In [[Texas]], one man has been on death row for 31 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-deathrow28jan28,1,1271967.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Appeals and stays of execution can create a backlog on death rows in many states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the United States suspended the death penalty in 1973, it was reinstated in 1977. 65% of Americans believe putting someone to death for a crime is acceptable, according to a recent poll.  But respondents were close to evenly split on whether they would prefer the death penalty (50%) to mandatory life in prison (46%).  The death penalty is most favored by age 30+ males who are [[Caucasian]] and [[Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ABC News/Washington Post poll: [http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/1015a3DeathPenalty.pdf Death Penalty]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capital punishment for federal crimes began in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.justice.gov/dag/pubdoc/deathpenaltystudy.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some studies conducted since the start of the new millennium have consistently shown a deterrence factor in the United States based on use of the death penalty.  It has been calculated that each person executed saves the lives of anywhere from 3 to 18 innocent people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Studies: Death penalty discourages crime  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,280215,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other studies have shown that as a whole, &amp;quot;death-penalty states&amp;quot; typically have higher murder rates than states that do not have capital punishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?&amp;amp;did=1705#STATES%20WITH%20THE%20DEATH%20PENALTY%20V.%20STATES%20WITHOUT|format=HTML|work=Death Penalty Information Center|language=English|title=Deterrence|accessdate=2007-08-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have questioned how a nation such as the United States that largely identifies itself as [[Christian]] (76.5%) could have 65% of Americans believing putting someone to death for a crime is acceptable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_prac2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They question whether or not the [[Bible]] allows such a view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.itsyourtimes.com/?q=node/3524&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The 6th Commandment is sometimes translated as, &amp;quot;Thou shalt not kill.&amp;quot;  This translation suggests that executions are a sin.  The 6th Commandment is also sometimes translated as, &amp;quot;Thou shalt commit no murder.&amp;quot;  As murder is defined as &amp;quot;wrongful killing&amp;quot;, when following that translation it is possible to argue whether or not judicial executions are murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Methods in the United States ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lethal injection]] is the official method of capital punishment in almost all of the 38 states that have the death penalty. A few states allow for other methods in some circumstances. Several botched electrocutions in [[Florida]] in the 1990s have effectively put an end to the era of the [[electric chair]], which was the most common means of execution in the United States before 1972. In addition to these two methods of execution, lethal gas, hanging, and shooting have all been used at least twice since 1977. Both [[firing squad]]s were conducted in [[Utah]], most recently in 1996. The three hangings took place in [[Washington]] and [[Delaware]], most recently Billy Bailey's 1996 hanging in Delaware. The [[gas chamber]], which has been abandoned because it has been found to normally lead to slow death, has been used in [[California]], [[Arizona]], [[Nevada]], [[Mississippi]], and [[North Carolina]] since 1977. Walter LeGrand's 1999 execution in Arizona's gas chamber will almost certainly be the last of this type.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===France===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has never used the [[guillotine]], which was very popular in [[France]]. The last use of the guillotine in France was in 1977. Thereafter, capital punishment in France was abolished, in 1981.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Canada===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Canada]] does not employ capital punishment, and it has not been a possible sentence in Canadian civilian courts since 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada long employed capital punishment as a punishment for [[murder]] or [[treason]], typically executing prisoners by [[long drop hanging|long drop]] [[hanging]] in the case of civilians, and by [[firing squad]] in the case of soldiers or other military. (In particular, 25 soldiers were executed for various crimes during [[World War I]].) Canada had several notorious executioners, particularly [[Arthur B. English]], also known as &amp;quot;Arthur Ellis&amp;quot;, after whom [[Arthur Ellis Awards|a Canadian literary award]] for mystery writing is named.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Canada's use of capital punishment was inherited from the legal system of the [[United Kingdom]], opposition to capital punishment began to arise in the late 1950s, and came to a head in 1959, when [[Steven Truscott]], a 14-year-old boy, was convicted of murder, with a recommendation from the [[jury]] for mercy. The judge passed down a sentence of execution by hanging, then the only legal punishment for murder in Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Truscott's death sentence would later be commuted in 1960, his case galvanized public opinion, and in 1961 Canada reclassified capital murder, defining it as a murder that involved [[premeditation]], murder during the commission of a violent crime, or the murder of a [[police officer]] or [[prison guard]]. This marked the beginning of the decline of capital punishment in Canada, as the last executions would be in [[December]], 1962. The government of Canada routinely [[commutation|commuted]] any death sentence passed thereafter (indeed, the [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] made opposition to capital punishment a part of their [[platform (politics)|platform]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1976, this [[de facto]] state of affairs became law, when the [[Parliament (Canada)|Canadian Parliament]] abolished the use of capital punishment under the [[Criminal Code (Canada)|Criminal Code]]. Executions were still permitted under the [[National Defense Act (Canada)|National Defense Act]] until 1998, when they were similarly abolished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Canada's [[Supreme Court of Canada|Supreme Court]] does not allow the [[extradition]] of criminals who may be executed for their crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Saudi Arabia===&lt;br /&gt;
Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islam under which those convicted of murder, drug trafficking, rape and armed robbery are executed in public with a sword. As of November 25, 2007, Saudi Arabia has beheaded 136 people, 38 people in 2006 and 83 people in 2005. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312768,00.html Saudi Arabia Marks 136th Beheading of 2007], Associated Press, [[Fox News Channel|Fox News]], November 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===European Union===&lt;br /&gt;
The death penalty has been abolished in all 27 [[European Union]] member states, and 47 out of the 50 countries in [[Europe]] (only [[Belarus]] still practices it), and [[Russia]] has had an effective moratorium since 1996).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ACT50/001/2007/en/ACT500012007en.html Document - List of abolitionist and retentionist countries (1 January 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The EU has long been against capital punishment, and campaigns for its abolition worldwide. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, legally adopted in the Treaty of Lisbon, bans execution in all member states, and abolition is a condition of acceding to the EU.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; EU law also bans detainee transfers in cases where the receiving party may seek the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Associated Press]] has reported that executions and [[torture]] in [[North Korea]] are &amp;quot;worse than [[animal]] slaughter.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One inmate, Choe Kwang Ho, sneaked away from his work for 15 minutes to pick fruit. He was executed, his mouth stuffed with gravel to prevent him from protesting.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;If a female inmate got pregnant, he said, she and her lover would be shot to death publicly. Then, An said, prison guards would cut open her womb, remove the fetus and bury it or feed it to guard dogs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,444672,00.html Executions, Torture in North Korea 'Worse Than Animal Slaughter'], Associated Press,  ''Fox News'', October 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious views of capital punishment==&lt;br /&gt;
===Christianity===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Biblical View ====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament]] of the [[Bible]] has several passages that recommend the death penalty for different offenses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Old Testament, these are the offenses which merit the [[death penalty]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Worshiping a false god ([[Deuteronomy]] 13:6-10)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sacrificing to false gods ([[Exodus]] 22:20)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sacrificing children to Molech ([[Leviticus]] 20:2)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Blasphemy]] (Leviticus 24:16)&lt;br /&gt;
# Desecrating the [[Sabbath]] (Exodus31:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# False [[Prophecy]] (Deuteronomy 13:5)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Witchcraft]] (Exodus 22:18, Leviticus 20:27)&lt;br /&gt;
# Cursing Parents (Exodus 21:17)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rebellious Sons (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)&lt;br /&gt;
# Disobedience to judgments by authority established God (Deuteronomy 17:9-13)&lt;br /&gt;
# False witness in a capital crime (Deuteronomy 19:16-20)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Murder]] ([[Exodus]] 21:12, 21:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# Negligent [[homicide]] Exodus 21:29)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Homosexual]] intercourse ([[Leviticus 18]]:22, 20:13)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bestiality (Leviticus 20:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Adultery]] (Leviticus 20:10; 19:20)&lt;br /&gt;
# Incest (Leviticus 20:11; from Moses onward: [[Genesis]] 19:33,35; 4:17)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sex with a woman betrothed to another (Deuteronomy 22:25)&lt;br /&gt;
# Un[[chastity]]; marriage under false pretense of virginity (Deuteronomy 22:21-24)&lt;br /&gt;
# Daughter of a priest becoming a prostitute (Leviticus 21:9)&lt;br /&gt;
# Kidnapping to sell into slavery (Exodus 21:16)&lt;br /&gt;
# Coveting and making a wicked thing one's possession (Deuteronomy 7:26; [[Joshua]] 7:15,25)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;put to death&amp;quot; or similar explicit terms are usually used in commands mandating capital punishment, though the term &amp;quot;cut off from his people&amp;quot; (Lev. 17:4, etc.) may also denote such,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. John Gill (1690-1771) on Lv. 17:4, 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and which would increase the number of capital offenses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/TheDeathPenalty.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions necessary for true conviction: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.&amp;quot; (Deuteronomy 17:6; cf. Exodus 20:16) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Requirements for Judges:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lev 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Few people support capital punishment for non-murder offenses, and a number of Christians oppose the death penalty in all cases. Apologist [[JP Holding]] argues that the Bible including the [[New Testament]] nowhere repudiates the use of capital punishment (by the State), but that it does not necessarily mandate its use, either. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tektonics.org/af/cappun.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Acts 25:11, the [[apostle Paul]] stated, &amp;quot;...if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die&amp;quot;, while Romans 13:1-5 states that God has ordained the just use of the sword by the government. (cf. 1 Pet. 2:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Christians who are opposed to the death penalty cite John 8:3-11, which describes how Christ saved an adulteress from death by stoning by challenging the crowd &amp;quot;let he who has not sinned cast the first stone&amp;quot;, which they interpret as saying that man does not have the moral authority to condemn man to death. However, apart from the controversy regarding the canonical status of the passage, it is argued that Jesus is shown to be upholding the law&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4222897/k.64E4/John_8_is_a_Condemnation_of_Capital_Punishment.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, while only stopping the execution of the women by hypocrites, who were themselves convicted of such sins, similar to or including adultery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (cf. Matthew 7:5; Romans 2:1) Other Christians argue that the unjust execution of Jesus demonstrates that capital punishment is immoral, though Jesus is not seen opposing the legitimacy of capital punishment itself, and only the unjust use of such power. (Jn. 10:32; 18:23; Acts 25:11) Some Christians claim that the passage was a later addition to the Bible (see article: &amp;quot;[[Adulteress story]]&amp;quot;) - if it was a later addition, this might not be an issue to those Christians who believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Roman Catholicism ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Catholic Church]] has historically supported capital punishment in many circumstances that range from combating heresy to saving lives of potential victims of crime. Traditionally, capital punishment has been endorsed by the Church for reasons beyond preventing additional wrongdoing by the same criminal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) explains the historical use by the Church and Catholic nations to executing heretics, and even cremating the remains of heretics, as a way of expunging evil:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12565a.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nations of modern Europe, as they gradually developed, seemed to have agreed upon the necessity of extirpating all influences and agencies which tended to pervert the faith of the people, or which seemed to them to betray the potency of evil spirits. Therefore, the laws of all these nations provided for the destruction of contumacious unbelievers, teachers of heresy, witches, and sorcerers, by fire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent decades, however, officials within the Catholic Church have taken differing stances on the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The renowned Modern Catholic Dictionary (1980) by John A. Hardon, S.J., which was given the &amp;quot;imprimatur&amp;quot; (official endorsement) by Joseph T. O'Keefe, Vicar General, Archdiocese of New York (Dec. 13, 1979), describes the Catholic position of capital punishment as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is certain from Scripture that civil authorities may lawfully put malefactors to death.  ...  Christian dispensation made no essential change [to the Old Testament endorsement of the death penalty], as St. Paul expressly says .... [citing Romans 13:4].  Among the errors of the Waldenses condemned by the Church in the early thirteenth century was the proposition that denied the lawfulness of capital punishment (Argentre, ''Collectio de Novis Erroribus'', I, 86).  St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) defends capital punishment on the grounds of the common good. ...  If even with capital punishment crime abounds, no lesser penalty will suffice.  The practice question remains of how effective a deterrent capital punishment is in some modern states, when rarely used or only after long delays.  In principle, however, it is morally licit because in the most serious crimes the claims of retribution and deterrence are so demanding that the corrective value of punishment must, if necessary, be sacrificed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current official Catholic teaching, as stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, reads as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If, instead, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, public authority should limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Today, in fact, given the means at the State's disposal to effectively repress crime by rendering inoffensive the one who has committed it, without depriving him definitively of the possibility of redeeming himself, cases of absolute necessity for suppression of the offender &amp;quot;today ... are very rare, if not practically non-existent.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56.]http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P7Z.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Catholic officials have gone further. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has &amp;quot;called for an end to the use of the death penalty for more than twenty-five years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usccb.org/deathpenalty/index.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This surprising new position is at odds with the historic use by the Church of capital punishment to deal with heretics, and the cremation of the exhumed bodies of heretics. It may have simply reflected the late 20th century repudiation in Europe of all uses of capital punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church generally holds the position of a &amp;quot;Consistent Life Ethic.&amp;quot; The Church teaches the protection of life for all humans, from conception to natural death&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Paul VI, Humanae Vitae 1968] http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae 1995] http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0141/_INDEX.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [Benedict XVI, Caritas in Veritate 2009] http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  In line with their anti-capital punishment stance, the Church opposes abortion, euthanasia and usually war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Injustices Caused by Limits on Death Penalty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasingly arbitrary limits have been placed on use of the death penalty.  One arbitrary prohibition established by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] on use of the death penalty is when the murder is committed by someone under the age of 18.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See [[Roper v. Simmons]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Prior to this Supreme Court ruling, states had statutory minimum ages (at the time of crime) for when the death penalty could be imposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The award-winning documentary ''The Thin Blue Line'' portrays the true story of the framing of an innocent drifter because the age of the real murderer was slightly below the legal minimum for imposing the death penalty.  The crime was the heinous murder of a police officer during a routine traffic stop, and the outrage at the crime cried out for retribution with the death penalty.  But the authorities were legally barred from executing the real murderer, and an adult drifter who was in the wrong place at the wrong time was convicted for it.  He served years on death row before being released after the movie was widely seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Guillotine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hanging]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lethal injection]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55990 Christian sentenced to death for blasphemy], By Michael Ireland, ''WorldNetDaily,com'', June 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:law]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Punishment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Capital_punishment&amp;diff=733216</id>
		<title>Capital punishment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Capital_punishment&amp;diff=733216"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T05:11:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: /* Roman Catholicism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Capital punishment''', also known as the death penalty, refers to the custom of executing prisoners who are convicted of certain crimes. Such crimes are known as capital [[crime]]s, and tend to be grave crimes against persons or governments (such as [[premeditation|premeditated]] [[murder]], [[rape]] or [[treason]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In the world today ==&lt;br /&gt;
Of the main developed countries, only the [[United States]] and [[Japan]] use formalized capital punishment, though many developed countries give law enforcement greater authority to kill than allowed by the [[United States]]. For emerging countries, [[China]] uses the death penalty and in the non-developed world it is practiced in most [[Sharia]] states (those whose legal systems are based on [[Muslim]] legal philosophy), as well as many others.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot;&amp;gt;EU: [http://www.eurunion.org/legislat/deathpenalty/EurHRConvProt13Decl.htm Concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty in all Circumstances]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encarta: [http://encarta.msn.com/media_461543496/Capital_Punishment_Worldwide.html Capital Punishment Worldwide]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to officially released governmental figures, the [[human rights]] organization  [[Amnesty International]] estimates that [[Singapore]] has the highest execution rate in the world, at 13.65 hangings per 1,000,000 residents.  [[Saudi Arabia]] has the second-highest rate, at 4.65 per 1,000,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on 2004 figures, China is the world leader in total number of executions with an estimated 3,400. Following China is [[Iran]] with 159 and [[Vietnam]] with an estimated 64 executions. The [[United States]] executed the 5th greatest number of people in the world with a total of 52. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Economist Pocket World in Figures 2008 Edition'' 2007, p. 99. London: Profile Books. ISBN 978-1846680908&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== United States ===&lt;br /&gt;
Capital punishment in the United States is handled on a state-by-state basis; twelve states' laws do not allow for executions at all. Capital punishment is also used by the federal government and the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pennsylvania]] has hundreds of people on [[death row]], though only three inmates have been executed since the reinstatement of capital punishment laws, and all three essentially &amp;quot;volunteered&amp;quot; by dropping their appeals. In [[Texas]], one man has been on death row for 31 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-deathrow28jan28,1,1271967.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Appeals and stays of execution can create a backlog on death rows in many states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the United States suspended the death penalty in 1973, it was reinstated in 1977. 65% of Americans believe putting someone to death for a crime is acceptable, according to a recent poll.  But respondents were close to evenly split on whether they would prefer the death penalty (50%) to mandatory life in prison (46%).  The death penalty is most favored by age 30+ males who are [[Caucasian]] and [[Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ABC News/Washington Post poll: [http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/1015a3DeathPenalty.pdf Death Penalty]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capital punishment for federal crimes began in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.justice.gov/dag/pubdoc/deathpenaltystudy.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some studies conducted since the start of the new millennium have consistently shown a deterrence factor in the United States based on use of the death penalty.  It has been calculated that each person executed saves the lives of anywhere from 3 to 18 innocent people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Studies: Death penalty discourages crime  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,280215,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other studies have shown that as a whole, &amp;quot;death-penalty states&amp;quot; typically have higher murder rates than states that do not have capital punishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?&amp;amp;did=1705#STATES%20WITH%20THE%20DEATH%20PENALTY%20V.%20STATES%20WITHOUT|format=HTML|work=Death Penalty Information Center|language=English|title=Deterrence|accessdate=2007-08-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have questioned how a nation such as the United States that largely identifies itself as [[Christian]] (76.5%) could have 65% of Americans believing putting someone to death for a crime is acceptable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_prac2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They question whether or not the [[Bible]] allows such a view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.itsyourtimes.com/?q=node/3524&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The 6th Commandment is sometimes translated as, &amp;quot;Thou shalt not kill.&amp;quot;  This translation suggests that executions are a sin.  The 6th Commandment is also sometimes translated as, &amp;quot;Thou shalt commit no murder.&amp;quot;  As murder is defined as &amp;quot;wrongful killing&amp;quot;, when following that translation it is possible to argue whether or not judicial executions are murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Methods in the United States ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lethal injection]] is the official method of capital punishment in almost all of the 38 states that have the death penalty. A few states allow for other methods in some circumstances. Several botched electrocutions in [[Florida]] in the 1990s have effectively put an end to the era of the [[electric chair]], which was the most common means of execution in the United States before 1972. In addition to these two methods of execution, lethal gas, hanging, and shooting have all been used at least twice since 1977. Both [[firing squad]]s were conducted in [[Utah]], most recently in 1996. The three hangings took place in [[Washington]] and [[Delaware]], most recently Billy Bailey's 1996 hanging in Delaware. The [[gas chamber]], which has been abandoned because it has been found to normally lead to slow death, has been used in [[California]], [[Arizona]], [[Nevada]], [[Mississippi]], and [[North Carolina]] since 1977. Walter LeGrand's 1999 execution in Arizona's gas chamber will almost certainly be the last of this type.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===France===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has never used the [[guillotine]], which was very popular in [[France]]. The last use of the guillotine in France was in 1977. Thereafter, capital punishment in France was abolished, in 1981.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Canada===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Canada]] does not employ capital punishment, and it has not been a possible sentence in Canadian civilian courts since 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada long employed capital punishment as a punishment for [[murder]] or [[treason]], typically executing prisoners by [[long drop hanging|long drop]] [[hanging]] in the case of civilians, and by [[firing squad]] in the case of soldiers or other military. (In particular, 25 soldiers were executed for various crimes during [[World War I]].) Canada had several notorious executioners, particularly [[Arthur B. English]], also known as &amp;quot;Arthur Ellis&amp;quot;, after whom [[Arthur Ellis Awards|a Canadian literary award]] for mystery writing is named.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Canada's use of capital punishment was inherited from the legal system of the [[United Kingdom]], opposition to capital punishment began to arise in the late 1950s, and came to a head in 1959, when [[Steven Truscott]], a 14-year-old boy, was convicted of murder, with a recommendation from the [[jury]] for mercy. The judge passed down a sentence of execution by hanging, then the only legal punishment for murder in Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Truscott's death sentence would later be commuted in 1960, his case galvanized public opinion, and in 1961 Canada reclassified capital murder, defining it as a murder that involved [[premeditation]], murder during the commission of a violent crime, or the murder of a [[police officer]] or [[prison guard]]. This marked the beginning of the decline of capital punishment in Canada, as the last executions would be in [[December]], 1962. The government of Canada routinely [[commutation|commuted]] any death sentence passed thereafter (indeed, the [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] made opposition to capital punishment a part of their [[platform (politics)|platform]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1976, this [[de facto]] state of affairs became law, when the [[Parliament (Canada)|Canadian Parliament]] abolished the use of capital punishment under the [[Criminal Code (Canada)|Criminal Code]]. Executions were still permitted under the [[National Defense Act (Canada)|National Defense Act]] until 1998, when they were similarly abolished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Canada's [[Supreme Court of Canada|Supreme Court]] does not allow the [[extradition]] of criminals who may be executed for their crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Saudi Arabia===&lt;br /&gt;
Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islam under which those convicted of murder, drug trafficking, rape and armed robbery are executed in public with a sword. As of November 25, 2007, Saudi Arabia has beheaded 136 people, 38 people in 2006 and 83 people in 2005. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312768,00.html Saudi Arabia Marks 136th Beheading of 2007], Associated Press, [[Fox News Channel|Fox News]], November 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===European Union===&lt;br /&gt;
The death penalty has been abolished in all 27 [[European Union]] member states, and 47 out of the 50 countries in [[Europe]] (only [[Belarus]] still practices it), and [[Russia]] has had an effective moratorium since 1996).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ACT50/001/2007/en/ACT500012007en.html Document - List of abolitionist and retentionist countries (1 January 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The EU has long been against capital punishment, and campaigns for its abolition worldwide. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, legally adopted in the Treaty of Lisbon, bans execution in all member states, and abolition is a condition of acceding to the EU.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; EU law also bans detainee transfers in cases where the receiving party may seek the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Associated Press]] has reported that executions and [[torture]] in [[North Korea]] are &amp;quot;worse than [[animal]] slaughter.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One inmate, Choe Kwang Ho, sneaked away from his work for 15 minutes to pick fruit. He was executed, his mouth stuffed with gravel to prevent him from protesting.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;If a female inmate got pregnant, he said, she and her lover would be shot to death publicly. Then, An said, prison guards would cut open her womb, remove the fetus and bury it or feed it to guard dogs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,444672,00.html Executions, Torture in North Korea 'Worse Than Animal Slaughter'], Associated Press,  ''Fox News'', October 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious views of capital punishment==&lt;br /&gt;
===Christianity===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Biblical View ====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament]] of the [[Bible]] has several passages that recommend the death penalty for different offenses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Old Testament, these are the offenses which merit the [[death penalty]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Worshiping a false god ([[Deuteronomy]] 13:6-10)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sacrificing to false gods ([[Exodus]] 22:20)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sacrificing children to Molech ([[Leviticus]] 20:2)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Blasphemy]] (Leviticus 24:16)&lt;br /&gt;
# Desecrating the [[Sabbath]] (Exodus31:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# False [[Prophecy]] (Deuteronomy 13:5)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Witchcraft]] (Exodus 22:18, Leviticus 20:27)&lt;br /&gt;
# Cursing Parents (Exodus 21:17)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rebellious Sons (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)&lt;br /&gt;
# Disobedience to judgments by authority established God (Deuteronomy 17:9-13)&lt;br /&gt;
# False witness in a capital crime (Deuteronomy 19:16-20)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Murder]] ([[Exodus]] 21:12, 21:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# Negligent [[homicide]] Exodus 21:29)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Homosexual]] intercourse ([[Leviticus 18]]:22, 20:13)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bestiality (Leviticus 20:15)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Adultery]] (Leviticus 20:10; 19:20)&lt;br /&gt;
# Incest (Leviticus 20:11; from Moses onward: [[Genesis]] 19:33,35; 4:17)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sex with a woman betrothed to another (Deuteronomy 22:25)&lt;br /&gt;
# Un[[chastity]]; marriage under false pretense of virginity (Deuteronomy 22:21-24)&lt;br /&gt;
# Daughter of a priest becoming a prostitute (Leviticus 21:9)&lt;br /&gt;
# Kidnapping to sell into slavery (Exodus 21:16)&lt;br /&gt;
# Coveting and making a wicked thing one's possession (Deuteronomy 7:26; [[Joshua]] 7:15,25)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;put to death&amp;quot; or similar explicit terms are usually used in commands mandating capital punishment, though the term &amp;quot;cut off from his people&amp;quot; (Lev. 17:4, etc.) may also denote such,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. John Gill (1690-1771) on Lv. 17:4, 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and which would increase the number of capital offenses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/TheDeathPenalty.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions necessary for true conviction: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.&amp;quot; (Deuteronomy 17:6; cf. Exodus 20:16) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Requirements for Judges:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lev 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Few people support capital punishment for non-murder offenses, and a number of Christians oppose the death penalty in all cases. Apologist [[JP Holding]] argues that the Bible including the [[New Testament]] nowhere repudiates the use of capital punishment (by the State), but that it does not necessarily mandate its use, either. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tektonics.org/af/cappun.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Acts 25:11, the [[apostle Paul]] stated, &amp;quot;...if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die&amp;quot;, while Romans 13:1-5 states that God has ordained the just use of the sword by the government. (cf. 1 Pet. 2:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Christians who are opposed to the death penalty cite John 8:3-11, which describes how Christ saved an adulteress from death by stoning by challenging the crowd &amp;quot;let he who has not sinned cast the first stone&amp;quot;, which they interpret as saying that man does not have the moral authority to condemn man to death. However, apart from the controversy regarding the canonical status of the passage, it is argued that Jesus is shown to be upholding the law&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4222897/k.64E4/John_8_is_a_Condemnation_of_Capital_Punishment.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, while only stopping the execution of the women by hypocrites, who were themselves convicted of such sins, similar to or including adultery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (cf. Matthew 7:5; Romans 2:1) Other Christians argue that the unjust execution of Jesus demonstrates that capital punishment is immoral, though Jesus is not seen opposing the legitimacy of capital punishment itself, and only the unjust use of such power. (Jn. 10:32; 18:23; Acts 25:11) Some Christians claim that the passage was a later addition to the Bible (see article: &amp;quot;[[Adulteress story]]&amp;quot;) - if it was a later addition, this might not be an issue to those Christians who believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Roman Catholicism ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Catholic Church]] has historically supported capital punishment in many circumstances that range from combating heresy to saving lives of potential victims of crime. Traditionally, capital punishment has been endorsed by the Church for reasons beyond preventing additional wrongdoing by the same criminal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) explains the historical use by the Church and Catholic nations to executing heretics, and even cremating the remains of heretics, as a way of expunging evil:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12565a.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nations of modern Europe, as they gradually developed, seemed to have agreed upon the necessity of extirpating all influences and agencies which tended to pervert the faith of the people, or which seemed to them to betray the potency of evil spirits. Therefore, the laws of all these nations provided for the destruction of contumacious unbelievers, teachers of heresy, witches, and sorcerers, by fire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent decades, however, officials within the Catholic Church have taken differing stances on the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The renowned Modern Catholic Dictionary (1980) by John A. Hardon, S.J., which was given the &amp;quot;imprimatur&amp;quot; (official endorsement) by Joseph T. O'Keefe, Vicar General, Archdiocese of New York (Dec. 13, 1979), describes the Catholic position of capital punishment as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is certain from Scripture that civil authorities may lawfully put malefactors to death.  ...  Christian dispensation made no essential change [to the Old Testament endorsement of the death penalty], as St. Paul expressly says .... [citing Romans 13:4].  Among the errors of the Waldenses condemned by the Church in the early thirteenth century was the proposition that denied the lawfulness of capital punishment (Argentre, ''Collectio de Novis Erroribus'', I, 86).  St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) defends capital punishment on the grounds of the common good. ...  If even with capital punishment crime abounds, no lesser penalty will suffice.  The practice question remains of how effective a deterrent capital punishment is in some modern states, when rarely used or only after long delays.  In principle, however, it is morally licit because in the most serious crimes the claims of retribution and deterrence are so demanding that the corrective value of punishment must, if necessary, be sacrificed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current official Catholic teaching, as stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, reads as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If, instead, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, public authority should limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Today, in fact, given the means at the State's disposal to effectively repress crime by rendering inoffensive the one who has committed it, without depriving him definitively of the possibility of redeeming himself, cases of absolute necessity for suppression of the offender &amp;quot;today ... are very rare, if not practically non-existent.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56.]http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P7Z.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Catholic officials have gone further. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has &amp;quot;called for an end to the use of the death penalty for more than twenty-five years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usccb.org/deathpenalty/index.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This surprising new position is at odds with the historic use by the Church of capital punishment to deal with heretics, and the cremation of the exhumed bodies of heretics. It may have simply reflected the late 20th century repudiation in Europe of all uses of capital punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church generally holds the position of a &amp;quot;Consistent Life Ethic.&amp;quot; The Church teaches the protection of life for all humans, from conception to natural death.  In line with their anti-capital punishment stance, the Church opposes abortion, euthanasia and usually war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Injustices Caused by Limits on Death Penalty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasingly arbitrary limits have been placed on use of the death penalty.  One arbitrary prohibition established by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] on use of the death penalty is when the murder is committed by someone under the age of 18.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See [[Roper v. Simmons]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Prior to this Supreme Court ruling, states had statutory minimum ages (at the time of crime) for when the death penalty could be imposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The award-winning documentary ''The Thin Blue Line'' portrays the true story of the framing of an innocent drifter because the age of the real murderer was slightly below the legal minimum for imposing the death penalty.  The crime was the heinous murder of a police officer during a routine traffic stop, and the outrage at the crime cried out for retribution with the death penalty.  But the authorities were legally barred from executing the real murderer, and an adult drifter who was in the wrong place at the wrong time was convicted for it.  He served years on death row before being released after the movie was widely seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Guillotine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hanging]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lethal injection]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55990 Christian sentenced to death for blasphemy], By Michael Ireland, ''WorldNetDaily,com'', June 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:law]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Punishment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hezbollah&amp;diff=733213</id>
		<title>Hezbollah</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hezbollah&amp;diff=733213"/>
		<updated>2009-12-16T04:50:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:800px-Flag of Hezbollah svg.png|right|thumb|200px|Flag of Hezbollah.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hezbollah''' (حزب الله, &amp;quot;Party of [[Allah]]&amp;quot;; sometimes spelled ''Hizbullah'', ''Hezbullah'', or ''Hezballah'') is a Shi'a [[Islam|Islamic]] [[terrorist]] organization based in [[Lebanon]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It has been declared a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada, Israel, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Australia. See:&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm United States Department of State] 	 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/eng/documents/advisories/docs/entstld.txt Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada]	 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.psepc.gc.ca/prg/ns/le/cle-en.asp Listed entities pursuant to the Anti-Terrorism Act (2001, c. 41)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2005/Summary+of+Terrorist+Activity+2004.htm Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5262484.stm BBC news]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.minbuza.nl/nl/actueel/brievenparlement,2003/12/beantwoording_toezegging_inzake_de_positie_van_hezbollah.html The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurity.nsf/AllDocs/7986D1536C0FFD5FCA256FCD001BE859?OpenDocument Australian National Security]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Founded in 1982, its primary goal is the elimination of the state of Israel. Its current Secretary General, Hassan Nasrallah, has publicly stated: &amp;quot;''if Jews all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/774649/posts ''The Daily Star'' (Beirut) October 23, 2002]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2004, the organization's privately controlled TV broadcast station ''Al-Manar'' was banned in [[France]] for inciting racial hatred and [[Holocaust denial]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funded and armed by the [[Islamic Republic of Iran]], the group's first major terrorist attacks were the April 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing in which 63 people were killed and the 1983 [[Beirut]] barracks bombing in which 241 American military personnel were killed. While Iran is still the major source of their funding, they also receive financial backing from [[South America]] and  U.S. law enforcement officials estimate that smugglers of illegal cigarettes in the United States provide millions of dollars to the group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Armed with rockets with ranges varying from 13 to 100 kilometers, the group subjects Israel to constant cross-border bombardment; this led to the 2006 [[2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Lebanon War]]. Hezbollah claims that its attacks are aimed at military bases inside Israel, but most of the attacks are actually directed at civilian areas and have hit pedestrians, hospitals, schools and private homes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/08/05/lebano13921.htm ''Rocket Attacks on Civilians in Israel Are War Crimes''] 5 August 2006  &amp;quot;Israel/Lebanon: Hezbollah Must End Attacks on Civilians&amp;quot;. Accessed 17 February 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to their military operations, Hezbollah is a Lebanese political party.  They hold 14 of the 128 seats in Lebanon's Parliament and 11 of 30 seats in the nation's cabinet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cfr.org/publication/9155 Hezbollah information from the Council on Foreign Relations] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17874369/ Hezbollah builds a Western base], From inside South America’s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S. By Pablo Gato and Robert Windrem, ''NBC News'', May 9, 2007. Retrieved from MSNBC.com June 4 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lebanon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hezbollah&amp;diff=732857</id>
		<title>Hezbollah</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hezbollah&amp;diff=732857"/>
		<updated>2009-12-15T17:56:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Emba: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:800px-Flag of Hezbollah svg.png|right|thumb|200px|Flag of Hezbollah.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hezbollah''' (حزب الله, &amp;quot;Party of [[Allah]]&amp;quot;; sometimes spelled ''Hizbullah'', ''Hezbullah'', or ''Hezballah'') is a Shi'a [[Islam|Islamic]] [[terrorist]] organization based in [[Lebanon]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It has been declared a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada, Israel, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Australia. See:&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm United States Department of State] 	 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/eng/documents/advisories/docs/entstld.txt Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada]	 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.psepc.gc.ca/prg/ns/le/cle-en.asp Listed entities pursuant to the Anti-Terrorism Act (2001, c. 41)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2005/Summary+of+Terrorist+Activity+2004.htm Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5262484.stm BBC news]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.minbuza.nl/nl/actueel/brievenparlement,2003/12/beantwoording_toezegging_inzake_de_positie_van_hezbollah.html The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurity.nsf/AllDocs/7986D1536C0FFD5FCA256FCD001BE859?OpenDocument Australian National Security]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Founded in 1982, its primary goal is the elimination of the state of Israel. Its current Secretary General, Hassan Nasrallah, has publicly stated: &amp;quot;''if Jews all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/774649/posts ''The Daily Star'' (Beirut) October 23, 2002]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2004, the organization's privately controlled TV broadcast station ''Al-Manar'' was banned in [[France]] for inciting racial hatred and [[Holocaust denial]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funded and armed by the [[Islamic Republic of Iran]], the group's first major terrorist attacks were the April 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing in which 63 people were killed and the 1983 [[Beirut]] barracks bombing in which 241 American military personnel were killed. While Iran is still the major source of their funding, they also receive financial backing from [[South America]] and  U.S. law enforcement officials estimate that smugglers of illegal cigarettes in the United States provide millions of dollars to the group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Armed with rockets with ranges varying from 13 to 100 kilometers, the group subjects Israel to constant cross-border bombardment; this led to the 2006 [[2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Lebanon War]]. Hezbollah claims that its attacks are aimed at military bases inside Israel, but most of the attacks are actually directed at civilian areas and have hit pedestrians, hospitals, schools and private homes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/08/05/lebano13921.htm ''Rocket Attacks on Civilians in Israel Are War Crimes''] 5 August 2006  &amp;quot;Israel/Lebanon: Hezbollah Must End Attacks on Civilians&amp;quot;. Accessed 17 February 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to their military operations, Hezbollah is a Lebanese political party.  They hold 14 of the 128 seats in Lebanon's Parliament and 11 of 30 seats in the nation's cabinet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cfr.org/publication/9155]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17874369/ Hezbollah builds a Western base], From inside South America’s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S. By Pablo Gato and Robert Windrem, ''NBC News'', May 9, 2007. Retrieved from MSNBC.com June 4 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lebanon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Emba</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>