<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ervin</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ervin"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Ervin"/>
	<updated>2026-09-24T06:14:35Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_science&amp;diff=765221</id>
		<title>Fake science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_science&amp;diff=765221"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T19:20:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Junk science''' is the promotion of a finding as &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unscientific&amp;quot; based mainly upon whether its conclusions support the answers (or views) favored by the promoters; see [[propaganda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Junk science consists of giving poorly done scientific work the same authority as work which conforms to the [[scientific method]]. It is akin to [[politicized science]], i.e., the selective use of scientific evidence to reach predetermined conclusions and support extra-scientific political goals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25458/pub_detail.asp Burying Evidence: The Union of Concerned Scientists' Unscientific Claims about Air Pollution and Health]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, junk science may result from a misinterpretation of previous sound scientific studies.  An example of this is the misinterpretation of the research on eggs and cholesterol&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hhp.ufl.edu/faculty/pbird/keepingfit/ARTICLE/eggs.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Studies had found that eggs contained cholesterol and that cholesterol in blood contributed to heart disease.  So as a result of these studies, people were advised against eating eggs.  What was missing, however, was a study showing that the cholesterol in blood is a direct result of cholesterol intake in diet.  We know now that that is not the case, that saturated fat intake and overall body fat are the primary contributors to cholesterol production in blood.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All sides in scientific controversies say that they condemn junk science, so this leaves the lay reader with the task of determining who is telling the truth. The best way is to examine the facts and reasoning in scientific reports. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, of course, the reader must penetrate the maze of confusing [[disinformation]] surrounding any controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The three great strategies for obscuring an issue are to introduce irrelevancies, to arouse prejudice, and to excite ridicule....  ---Bergen Evans, The Natural History of Nonsense &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skepdic.com/iqrace.html IQ and race]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ClimateGate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Politics of science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Big Bang theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DNA]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter W. Huber, ''Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom'', 1993. ISBN 0-465-02624-9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25458/pub_detail.asp Burying Evidence: The Union of Concerned Scientists' Unscientific Claims about Air Pollution and Health] - Joel Schwartz - January 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_science&amp;diff=765220</id>
		<title>Fake science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_science&amp;diff=765220"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T19:19:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Junk science''' is the promotion of a finding as &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unscientific&amp;quot; based mainly upon whether its conclusions support the answers (or views) favored by the promoters; see [[propaganda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Junk science consists of giving poorly done scientific work the same authority as work which conforms to the [[scientific method]]. It is akin to [[politicized science]], i.e., the selective use of scientific evidence to reach predetermined conclusions and support extra-scientific political goals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25458/pub_detail.asp Burying Evidence: The Union of Concerned Scientists' Unscientific Claims about Air Pollution and Health]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, junk science may result from a misinterpretation of previous sound scientific studies.  An example of this is the misinterpretation of the research on eggs and cholesterol&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hhp.ufl.edu/faculty/pbird/keepingfit/ARTICLE/eggs.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Studies had found that eggs contained cholesterol and that cholesterol in blood contributed to heart disease.  So as a result of these studies, people were advised against eating eggs.  What was missing, however, was a study showing that the cholesterol in blood is a direct result of cholesterol intake in diet.  We know now that that is not the case, that saturated fat intake and overall body fat are the primary contributors to cholesterol production in blood.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All sides in scientific controversies say that they condemn junk science, so this leaves the lay reader with the task of determining who is telling the truth. The best way is to examine the facts and reasoning in scientific reports. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, of course, the reader must penetrate the maze of confusing [[disinformation]] surrounding any controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The three great strategies for obscuring an issue are to introduce irrelevancies, to arouse prejudice, and to excite ridicule....  ---Bergen Evans, The Natural History of Nonsense &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skepdic.com/iqrace.html IQ and race]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ClimateGate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Politics of science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Big Bang theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter W. Huber, ''Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom'', 1993. ISBN 0-465-02624-9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25458/pub_detail.asp Burying Evidence: The Union of Concerned Scientists' Unscientific Claims about Air Pollution and Health] - Joel Schwartz - January 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_science&amp;diff=765219</id>
		<title>Fake science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_science&amp;diff=765219"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T19:18:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Junk science''' is the promotion of a finding as &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unscientific&amp;quot; based mainly upon whether its conclusions support the answers (or views) favored by the promoters; see [[propaganda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Junk science consists of giving poorly done scientific work the same authority as work which conforms to the [[scientific method]]. It is akin to [[politicized science]], i.e., the selective use of scientific evidence to reach predetermined conclusions and support extra-scientific political goals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25458/pub_detail.asp Burying Evidence: The Union of Concerned Scientists' Unscientific Claims about Air Pollution and Health]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, junk science may result from a misinterpretation of previous sound scientific studies.  An example of this is the misinterpretation of the research on eggs and cholesterol&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hhp.ufl.edu/faculty/pbird/keepingfit/ARTICLE/eggs.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Studies had found that eggs contained cholesterol and that cholesterol in blood contributed to heart disease.  So as a result of these studies, people were advised against eating eggs.  What was missing, however, was a study showing that the cholesterol in blood is a direct result of cholesterol intake in diet.  We know now that that is not the case, that saturated fat intake and overall body fat are the primary contributors to cholesterol production in blood.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All sides in scientific controversies say that they condemn junk science, so this leaves the lay reader with the task of determining who is telling the truth. The best way is to examine the facts and reasoning in scientific reports. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, of course, the reader must penetrate the maze of confusing [[disinformation]] surrounding any controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The three great strategies for obscuring an issue are to introduce irrelevancies, to arouse prejudice, and to excite ridicule....  ---Bergen Evans, The Natural History of Nonsense &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skepdic.com/iqrace.html IQ and race]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ClimateGate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Politics of science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter W. Huber, ''Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom'', 1993. ISBN 0-465-02624-9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25458/pub_detail.asp Burying Evidence: The Union of Concerned Scientists' Unscientific Claims about Air Pollution and Health] - Joel Schwartz - January 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Science&amp;diff=765216</id>
		<title>Science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Science&amp;diff=765216"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T19:14:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Cassini-science-289.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Science''' consists of three aspects: first, it provides systematic descriptions of everything in the world and all of human experience, generally considered as scientific [[knowledge]]. Second, there are the men (and a few rare women) of science who have amassed these descriptions and communicate them to everyone else. Third, there are the methods by which they carry out this work (see [[scientific method]]).&lt;br /&gt;
Science can be divided into two areas: [[natural science]], dealing with the [[physical]], [[natural]] world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Soanes and Stevenson called science &amp;quot;the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.&amp;quot;Soanes,C. and Stevenson, A. (eds.) (2005) 'The Oxford Dictionary of English (revised edition)' Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[social science]], dealing with society and human nature. It is very important for an intelligent person to be able to distinguish real science from [[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Science differs from other methodologies of classifying knowledge in that a scientific theory is a description of the world which in principle is cabable of being disproved; this is known as [[falsifiability]].  It is this property which distinguishes science from other possible methods of discovering knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Epicurus]] is an important figure in the development of the [[scientific method]]. He insisted that nothing should be accepted except that which has been sufficiently tested through direct observation and logical deduction. [[Roger Bacon]] is hailed by many as the father of modern science. His focus on empirical approaches to science was influential. He wrote an encyclopedia, his ''Opus Majus''.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People who study science are called [[scientist]]s. Most of the early scientists who started many of the scientific fields, and some of history's greatest thinkers, such as [[Galileo Galilei]] and [[Isaac Newton]], believed in [[God]], or some other higher power, and many were [[creationists]].&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Christianity]] played a pivotal role in the development of modern science (see [[Christianity and Science]]). However, in recent years, American scientists have deviated, and been much more [[atheism|atheistic]] as a group than the general public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of science ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basis of modern science is observation and hypothesis.  It involves constructing the best theory to explain an occurrence based on the evidence at the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economist [[Milton Friedman]] said, &amp;quot;In all of science, progress comes through people proposing hypotheses which are subject to test and rejected and replaced by better hypotheses.&amp;quot; [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/int_miltonfriedman.html#10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[scientific method]] consists of two stages, theory formation and theory testing. In the early 20th Century the scientific method was commonly understood to follow the inductive procedure, whereby general statements are derived from a collection of singular observations. It was thought that through this method theories were constructed; a collection of observations led to the formation of a general theory to explain them. Secondly, at the testing stage, it was considered that a hypothesis could be verified through a collection of singular observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Popper]], considered by many to be the most important contributor to the philosophy of science in recent times, put forward a damning critique of induction, going so far is to claim that it did not exist. Popper argued that general theories cannot ever be conclusively verified by singular observations, but that such a theory could be conclusively [[Falsifiable|falsified]] by such means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consensus today is based in large part upon the work of Popper, although in general induction is believed to play a part. The modern view is that the scientific method employs both inductive and deductive methods and is characterised by the principle of falsification:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A theory is put forward (Popper argues that this is not inductive, but the consensus is that people are led to invent theories based upon previous observations)&lt;br /&gt;
* This theory is provisionally assumed to be true for the purposes of testing it.&lt;br /&gt;
* Assuming the theory is true, we can logically follow it through to a specific and inevitable outcome, a prediction, which becomes the hypothesis. In order for the hypothesis to be considered scientific it must be falsifiable.&lt;br /&gt;
* The hypothesis is repeatedly tested empirically.&lt;br /&gt;
* If the observations do not falsify the hypothesis then we accept the theory provisionally (note, we cannot say that it is now 'fact', nor that is has been 'proven')&lt;br /&gt;
* If the observations do falsify the hypothesis then we reject it in its current form.&lt;br /&gt;
* The theory, or at least parts of it, can then be modified, or a new theory proposed, which takes us back to the beginning of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since verification of general theories is logically impossible, science is not, as many believe, a body of accumlated 'facts', but rather a collection of theories that have yet to be falsified. Via falsification we can move closer and closer to the truth, but since verification is not possible, we can never know if we ever reach the goal of 'ultimate truth' itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Naturalism and science==&lt;br /&gt;
Since the beginning of modern science, scientists have worked under the assumption that their subjects of study have been controlled by consistent natural laws.&lt;br /&gt;
There is good evidence that this assumption was based on the [[Christianity|Christian]] view that the laws were created by a consistent creator Who didn't change those laws on a whim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Natural science#Beginnings]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This assumption is seen as a prerequisite for logical deduction to act on the observations made. Without the assumption that the universe is consistent we cannot apply the lessons drawn from an observation to any area other than the observations themselves. If a [[chemical reaction]] occurs in a given solution in a laboratory in one city it is assumed that the same reaction can occur in a different laboratory in a different city on a different day because the chemical [[solution]] and situations will be the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a capricious supernatural force was to enter the equation they could not be controlled for and could not be studied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The physical sciences largely concern themselves with questions involving the natural, not the supernatural, but this is not the same as assuming that the supernatural does not exist.  In addition, there are also the social sciences like [[history]].   [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] maintain that history testifies to the supernatural existing and that the physical sciences (such as [[Biblical archaeology]]) can aid in historical determinations and testify to the existence of God and the truth of biblical Christianity.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three broad philosophies have developed in the scientific community.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Methodological naturalism]]&amp;quot; adheres to [[naturalism]] insofar as it concerns scientific experiments and observations, but does not rule out a personal deity.  It does, however, ''a priori'' rule out the supernatural being an explanation for observations.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Philosophical naturalism]]&amp;quot; adheres to the belief that there is no beings or forces beyond what can be observed; this [[atheism|atheistic]] view rejects the supernatural, or is skeptical of such beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
* The third approach is to follow the inference to the best explanation regarding whether or not a supernatural or natural cause best explains a past or present observation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1315/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cgst.edu/publication/journal/43/J43_203_Forum04Abstract.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, this third approach is advocated by [[creation science|creation scientists]] and [[intelligent design]] theorists when it comes to the origins of the natural world.  Creation scientists and intelligent design theorists rightfully maintain the falsity of the [[evolution|evolutionary]] position given the lack of evidence for evolutionary position and the many lines of evidence against the evolutionary position.  Another example is that the [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first]] and [[Second law of thermodynamics|second]] laws of thermodynamics argue against an eternal [[universe]], and [[creation science|creation scientists]] claim that these laws point to the universe being supernaturally created.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space&amp;amp;mdash;Laws of Science]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But in other respects, such as why [[Krakatoa]] exploded, a natural explanation would be considered the best explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious cultivation of early modern science==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the historian [[H. Floris Cohen]], there exists two distinct levels of argument along this line of historical scholarship. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://books.google.com/books?id=wu8b2NAqnb0C The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry], [[H. Floris Cohen]], University of Chicago Press 1994, 680 pages, ISBN 0-2261-1280-2, pages 308-321 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The first to be proposed was the [[Merton thesis]] in the late 1930's, which parallels the [[The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism|Weber thesis]] in suggesting that the rise of science was due, at first, to a [[protestant work ethic]] but later extended to a more general biblical ethic. The second to be proposed was that of [[Reijer Hooykaas]], who held the rise of early modern science was due to a unique combination of Greek and biblical thought.  One of the main aspects of Hooykaas's argument was that the Greek disrepect for manual work prevented an experimental science from truly developing until the biblical view of honoring work with one's hands was socially sanctioned.  Hooykaas reaches the conclusion that &amp;quot;Metaphorically speaking, whereas the bodily ingredients of science may have been greek, its vitamins and hormones were biblical.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; * [http://books.google.com/books?id=c6TEDHvAbXAC ''Religion and the Rise of Modern Science''], Regent College Publishing, 2000. ISBN 1-5738-3018-6 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historian and professor of religion [[Eugene Marion Klaaren|Eugene M Klaaren]] holds that &amp;quot;a belief in divine creation&amp;quot; was central to an emergence of science in seventeenth-century England. The philosopher [[Michael B. Foster]] has published influential analytical philosophy connecting Christian doctrines of creation with empiricism. Historian William B. Ashworth has argued against the historical notion of distinctive mind-sets and the idea of Catholic and Protestant sciences in &amp;quot;Catholicism and early modern science.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://books.google.com/books?id=hs2edDIGCqEC ''God and nature''], Lindberg and Numbers Ed., 1986, pp. 136-66; see also [http://cas.umkc.edu/history/faculty/AshworthW/pub.html William B. Ashworth Jr.'s publication list]; this is noted on page 366 of ''Science and Religion'', [[John Hedley Brooke]], 1991, [[Cambridge University Press]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historians James R. Jacob and Margaret C. Jacob have published the paper &amp;quot;The Anglican Origins of Modern Science,&amp;quot; which endeavors to show a linkage between seventeenth century [[Anglican]] intellectual transformations and influential English scientists (e.g., [[Robert Boyle]] and [[Isaac Newton]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20Jacob%20&amp;amp;%20Jacob%20Anglican%20Fdn%20of%20Modern%20Science.htm The Anglican Origins of Modern Science], [[Isis (journal)|Isis]], Volume 71, Issue 2, June 1980, 251-267; this is also noted on page 366 of ''Science and Religion'', [[John Hedley Brooke]], 1991, [[Cambridge University Press]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two well-respected theological surveys, which also illustrate other historical interactions between religion and science occurring in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, are [[John Dillenberger]]'s ''Protestant Thought and Natural Science'' ([[Doubleday]], 1960) and [[Christopher B. Kaiser]]'s ''Creation and the History of Science'' ([[Eerdmans]], 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotation|When natural philosophers referred to ''laws'' of nature, they were not glibly choosing that metaphor. Laws were the result of legislation by an intelligent deity. Thus the philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) insisted that he was discovering the &amp;quot;laws that God has put into nature.&amp;quot; Later Newton would declare that the regulation of the solar system presupposed the &amp;quot;counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[John Hedley Brooke]], ''Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives'', 1991, [[Cambridge University Press]], ISBN 0-521-23961-3, page 19 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Historian and [[Oxford University]] [[Science and Religion]] theologian [[John Hedley Brooke]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[University of California at Berkeley]]-educated historian [[Ronald L. Numbers]] has stated that this thesis &amp;quot;received a boost&amp;quot; from mathematician and philosopher[[Alfred North Whitehead]]'s ''[[Science and the Modern World]]'' (1925). Numbers has also claimed &amp;quot;Despite the manifest shortcomings of the claim that Christianity gave birth to science&amp;amp;mdash;most glaringly, it ignores or minimizes the contributions of ancient Greeks and medieval Muslims&amp;amp;mdash;it too, refuses to succumb to the death it deserves. The sociologist [[Rodney Stark]] at [[Baylor University]], a [[Southern Baptist]] institution, is only the latest in a long line of Christian apologists to insist that 'Christian theology was essential for the rise of science.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Science and Christianity in pulpit and pew'', [[Oxford University Press]], 2007, [[Ronald L. Numbers]], p. 4, and p.138 n. 3 where Numbers specifically raises his concerns with regards to the works of [[Michael B. Foster]], [[Reijer Hooykaas]], [[Eugene M. Klaaren]], and [[Stanley L. Jaki]] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific method]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Computing]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Earth&amp;diff=765211</id>
		<title>Earth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Earth&amp;diff=765211"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:56:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: /* Origin */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Planet|image=Blue Marble.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|symbol=Earth symbol.svg&lt;br /&gt;
|order=3&lt;br /&gt;
|primary=Sun&lt;br /&gt;
|periapsis=147,090,000 km (0.983 AU)&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html Earth Fact Sheet],&amp;quot; [[NASA]], April 19, 2007. Accessed May 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|apoapsis=152,100,000 km (1.017 AU)&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|semimajor=149,597,886.5 km (1.00000011 AU)&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|bode=1.0 AU&lt;br /&gt;
|eccentricity=0.01671022&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sidereal=365.256366 da&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|synodic=365.256366 da&lt;br /&gt;
|orbitspeed=29.783 km/s&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|inclination=0°&lt;br /&gt;
|reference=the ecliptic&lt;br /&gt;
|siderealday=23.9345 h&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|solarday=24 h&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rotatespeed=465.11 m/s&lt;br /&gt;
|axialtilt=23.439281°&lt;br /&gt;
|mass=5.9736 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|density=5,515.3 kg/m³&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|surfacegrav=9.780327 m/s²&lt;br /&gt;
|escapespeed=11.186 km/s&lt;br /&gt;
|meanradius=6371 km&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.solarviews.com/eng/earth.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|equatorradius =6378.135 km&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|polarradius =6356.750 km&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|surfacearea=510,065,600 km²&lt;br /&gt;
|landarea=148,939,100 km²&lt;br /&gt;
|waterarea=361,126,400 km²&lt;br /&gt;
|mintemp=185 K&lt;br /&gt;
|meantemp=287 K&lt;br /&gt;
|maxtemp=331 K&lt;br /&gt;
|moons=1&lt;br /&gt;
|composition=Rock&lt;br /&gt;
|albedo=0.37&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mfd=0.3076 G&amp;lt;ref name=earthfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|pmdm=7.98 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; N-m/T&amp;lt;ref name=calc&amp;gt;Calculated&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|cmdm=1.41 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; N-m/T&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys&amp;gt;Humphreys, D. R. &amp;quot;[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields].&amp;quot; ''Creation Research Society Quarterly'' 21(3), December 1984. Accessed April 29, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mdt=2049 a&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mhl=1420 a&amp;lt;ref name=calc/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Earth''' is the only known [[planet]] in our '''Solar System''' which can support [[life]]. It contains [[water]], reasonable levels of [[oxygen]], and a stable [[temperature]] range. Geometrically speaking, Earth is the largest of the terrestrial (rocky) planets in the [[solar system]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Physical Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the [[solar system]], Earth is the third planet from the [[Sun]]. It is approximately 8,000 miles (13,000 km) in diameter, which means that its equatorial circumference (measured around the equator) is 24,901 miles (40,075 kilometers), and the polar circumference is slightly less at 24,809 miles (40,008 km).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzcircumference.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reason its metric circumference is so close to the &amp;quot;round number&amp;quot; of 40,000 is that the [[kilometer]] was defined (by the French) as 1/10,000th the distance from the equator to the [[North Pole]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its surface area is approximately 4&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;pi;&amp;amp;nbsp;(4000 mi)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 200 million square miles (510 million km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;). It has been said that Earth should really be called &amp;quot;water&amp;quot;, as the larger part of it&amp;amp;mdash;about 70%&amp;amp;mdash;is covered by water. In fact, the [[Pacific Ocean|Pacific]] and [[Indian Ocean|Indian]] oceans alone cover about half of the Earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Earth orbits at an average distance of about 93 million miles (150 million km) from the Sun in an almost circular orbit. The plane of this orbit, or '''ecliptic''', is the common reference plane for the inclinations of the orbits of all [[planet]]s and [[dwarf planet]]s in the [[Solar System]], though in fact Earth's orbit is inclined 7.25° to the plane of the [[Sun]]'s equator. It takes light (and other forms of electromagnetic radiation) approximately 500 seconds to travel from the Sun to the Earth, i.e. the distance can also be stated as &amp;quot;500 light-seconds.&amp;quot; The distance to nearby stars is made by measuring the stellar [[parallax]] between observations when the earth is at opposite ends of its orbit, so the earth's orbit itself is a measuring stick for astronomical distances, and is known as the ''astronomical unit'' (A. U.)  It is worth noting that if the Earth were slightly closer to the Sun, it would be too hot for life while if Earth were slightly further away from the Sun, water would freeze and life would be impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origin==&lt;br /&gt;
People disagree about when and how the Earth was created. The three most popular ideas are:&lt;br /&gt;
#That God created the Earth several hundred generations ago, as recounted in [[Genesis]]. By adding years and other time indications in the [[Old Testament]] chronologies, one can calculate the age of the Earth as approximately 6,000 years (see [[Date of creation]] and [[Young Earth Creationism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
#That God created the Earth billions of years ago (see [[Old Earth Creationism]] and [[Theistic Evolution]]).&lt;br /&gt;
#That the Earth came into existence billions of years ago (approximately 4.5 billion years in modern estimates), but entirely through natural processes and without any intervention by God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clashes between adherents of these ideas have gone on since time immemorial (see [[origins debate]]), though the last theory has only matured in the last 200 years. The first idea is the oldest and most widely agreed upon by scientists, philosophers, and the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Young Earth Creationist view ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Formation and Age===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young Earth creationists believe, on the basis of the biblical account in Genesis and biblical geochronologies, that the entire Earth, including animal, plant, and human life, was formed in six days, around 4000 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
Mainstream scientific journals, committed to a [[naturalism|naturalistic]] worldview, contend this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0822sternberg.asp 1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/538.asp 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53400 3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3833&amp;amp;program=DI%20Main%20Page%20-%20News&amp;amp;callingPage=discoMainPage 4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most scientists believe believe that the Earth formed by natural processes instead of being supernaturally created. However, as one scientist noted, “...&amp;amp;nbsp;most every prediction by theorists about planetary formation has been wrong.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes43.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Magnetosphere ===&lt;br /&gt;
Earth is surrounded by a magnetic field powerful enough to prevent most of the sun's radiation from striking the earth and harming the life on it. This field has been decaying at a known exponential rate, as decades of recordkeeping reveal. In 1984, Dr. Russell Humphreys developed a model for the creation of magnetic fields&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt; that suggests that the earth was at first made entirely of water&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See {{Bible ref|book=II_Peter|chap=3|verses=5}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, much of which God transmuted into other elements after He made the earth, probably on Day 3 of creation. Humphreys' predicted magnetic decay time for the earth agrees well with published data and thus constitutes further evidence for a young earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shape of the Earth===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people dispute the shape of the earth, saying that according to the Bible, the earth is flat rather than spherical (presumably square, given that it is described as having &amp;quot;four corners&amp;quot; (Revelations 7:1)). However, no credible organization has ever expressed support for this theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/crea-fe.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some have disputed the idea that the earth rotates around the sun.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/febible.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Book of Revelations|Revelations]] 7:1 it is stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth...&amp;quot; (Revelations 7:1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A sphere has no corners. The four corners are also mentioned in Isaiah 11:12. This is often accepted to be a figure of speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth.&amp;quot; ([[Book of Daniel|Daniel]] 2:35)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AND&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus were the visions of mine head in my bed; I saw, and behold a tree in the midst of the earth, and the height thereof was great. The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the end of all the earth:&amp;quot; (Daniel 4:10-11)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AND&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Behold, [Jesus] cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him&amp;quot; (Revelations 1:7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AND&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Once again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world [cosmos] in their glory.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 4:8) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apologist [[JP Holding]]'s take on this is that this may have been a vision. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tektonics.org/af/earthshape.html#globe&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christianity and the Earth==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Christian Historical-Grammatical Bible Exegesis or Bible Literalism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Creation Ministries International]], most young earth creationists use a [[hermeneutic]] &amp;quot;best described as the [[Historical-grammatical exegesis|historical-grammatical method]] in which historical narrative (such as the book of Genesis) is interpreted as literal history, prophecy is interpreted as prophecy, poetry is interpreted as poetry, etc.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/tj/tjv16v2_forster.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Creation Ministries International further states that &amp;quot;Historical-grammatical exegesis involves a systematic approach to analyzing in detail the historical situation, events and circumstances surrounding the text, and the semantics and syntactical relationships of the words which comprise the text.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4880/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bible scholars have estimated the age of the earth based on the Creation account in Genesis and the genealogical accounts in Numbers and other books of the Pentateuch. One famous estimate was published in 1650 by [[James Ussher|James Ussher Archbishop of Armagh]] in a book called ''Annals of the World,'' in which he estimated the Creation to have occurred on 23 October 4004 B.C. Other Biblical scholars maintain that there are possible gaps in the genealogies, often using the ideas of the 19th century Calvinist theologian [[Benjamin Warfield]] on the issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/primeval_chronology.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, [[James Barr]], regius professor of Hebrew at [[Oxford University]], wrote in 1984 the following: &amp;quot;… probably, so far as I know, there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class university who does not believe that the writer(s) of Genesis 1–11 intended to convey to their readers the ideas that: … the figures contained in the Genesis genealogies provided by simple addition a chronology from the beginning of the world up to later stages in the biblical story.’&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1606/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, it should be noted that Barr himself rejects supernatural Christianity, and so is not a priori biased in favor of creationism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/pca_creation_study_committee_report.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many [[Christian|Christians]] believe that the Earth is the perfect distance away from the Sun and  take this to be evidence of [[God]]'s existence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Secular scientists, however, reject this reasoning using the anthropic principle&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.anthropic-principle.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Christian Non-Literalism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many mainstream Christian denominations believe the story of Genesis is not meant to be read literally, and believe that the age of the Earth is on the order of millions or billions of years, not thousands of years. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://webusers.xula.edu/cporter/2000n/evolution_and_religion.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scientific Uniformitarianism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformitarian scientists believe that the earth is beyond 4 billion years old.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  They also refute that the Earth is only 6,000 years old by quoting older human societies dated by their dating method as older than that.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ancientegypt.co.uk/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Naturalistic view ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates by uniformitarian geologists of the age of the Earth and the beginning of life give about 4.55 billion years and 3.5 billion years ago respectively. These estimates are primarily based on radioactive dating of meteorites and fossil specimens. Most scientists today conclude that the Earth formed by natural processes, specifically by the accumulation of debris orbiting the sun billions of years in the past.&amp;lt;ref name=nebula&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://science.jrank.org/pages/6265/Solar-System-solar-nebula-hypothesis.html The Solar Nebula Hypothesis].&amp;quot; ''The Science Encyclopedia''. Accessed May 6, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/earth.htm The Earth]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.noaa.gov/ NOAA] An agency that enriches life through science.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.enchantedlearning.com/geography/glossary/ Glossary]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Solarsystem}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=765209</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=765209"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:49:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is the world's largest religion, having 2.2 billion followers. It is a [[monotheistic]] religion that professes belief in [[Jesus]] as the Son of [[God]].  Christianity takes its name from [[Jesus Christ]] meaning &amp;quot;Jesus the Savior&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Jesus the Anointed One&amp;quot;.  Followers of Jesus are called Christians, meaning &amp;quot;of Christ&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is also the only religion that has been scientifically proven to be accurate. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allaboutcreation.org/scientific-proof-of-god-faq.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Anglican Christ Church.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Anglican Christ Church in Western Australia]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] whom Catholics believed established the Church and the succession of the [[Pope]]s as the spiritual authority over the Christian body of believers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) also trace their roots back to the beginnings of Christianity, but do not believe in the Primacy of the Pope.  Different theological perspectives led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]], the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 77 million baptized members) and the Lutheran World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. It first broke away from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of faith and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]] could not be adequately reconciled with Papal prescriptions as well as other practices that Luther saw in the Catholic Church at that time that he did not agree with. Other preachers and movements then followed Luther's example and also left the Catholic fold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian Beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of faith is the [[Nicene Creed| Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed]] below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I believe in one God, [[God the Father|the Father Almighty]], Maker of [[heaven]] and [[earth]], and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages. Light of Light; true God of true God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the [[Holy Spirit]] and the [[Virgin Mary]], and became man. And He was crucified for us under [[Pontius Pilate]], and suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again, according to the [[Bible|Scriptures]]; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; whose Kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father; who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets. In one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the [[Resurrection]] of the dead, and the life of the world to come.  Amen.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine and disagree on others. According to an online Harris poll from 2003  99% of all American Christians believe in God, 96% in the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in Heaven, 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in Hell, 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious dogma of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See also: the [[Apostle's Creed]], [[Athanasian Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|God}}&lt;br /&gt;
God is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. Christians are not polytheists because of the oneness of the divine nature (or essence).  The doctrine of the Trinity is central to most (but not all) Christian theology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major theme of the Bible is love.  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The God of the Christians is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus' Baptism.jpg|180px|left|]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the reign of [[Caeser Augustus]] the Son (e.g. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnate as a man.  He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At the age of thirty he was baptized by his cousin, the [[John the Baptist|Prophet John]], and began to preach in the area [[Palestine]].  About three years after his baptism, he raised his friend Lazarus from the dead, prompting the Jewish power establishment to plot Jesus death.  Jesus was [[crucified]].  He came back from the dead and was seen by over 500 people.  He ascended to heaven.  The four [[Gospels]] contain the records of some of what Jesus did and said, but he did much more than those four books relate, as the Apostle John said in his Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is love and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. Jesus summarized his teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constant debate has resulted as to how a person should express love for God in their moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.&amp;quot; (John 13:35)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In trying to understand the reason for the growth of Christianity in a pagan culture, it has been noted that while love of one's neighbor is not an exclusively Christian virtue, it appears that  the primitive Christian church practiced it much more effectively than any other group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.R. Dodds, 1970:136-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is most likely due to the constant mention of hospitality and generosity to one's &amp;quot;neighbors&amp;quot; in the Bible.  Jesus was especially passionate about caring for people in need:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus said to him, &amp;quot;If you want to be perfect, go and sell what you own and give the money to the destitute, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come back and follow me.&amp;quot; (Matthew 19:21)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to sacrificially showing care for those within the community as well as to those without, (cf. Gal. 6:10) the Christians elevated the sanctity of life, opposing abortion, infanticide, child abandonment, suicide, and gladiatorial contests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kenneth Scott Latourette, ''A history of Christianity'' p. 244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, Paul Copan, The Apologetics Study Bible, 274 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  While the primitive church tolerated the existing and pervasive cultural economic institution of slavery in the [[Roman Empire]], the mandate of equal pay and just treatment (Col. 4:1; Eph. 6:9) greatly ameliorated the treatment of slaves, while  advising them to seek freedom if possible, (1Cor. 7:21) and requiring that the escape slave Onesimus be received back not &amp;quot;as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved&amp;quot;. (Philemon 1:6)  The Christian ethos of love also motivated a great expansion in the building of hospitals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert John Ochsner, Meyer Joseph Sturm, ''The organization, construction and management of hospitals'', p. 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roderick E. McGrew, ''Encyclopaedia of Medical Care'',  p. 135&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 500 A.D., most large towns in in the Roman Empire had erected them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George D. Pozgar, ''Legal aspects of health care administration', p. 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Atonement of Jesus on the Cross===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dalí The Christ of St. John of the Cross.jpg|thumb|The Christ of St. John of the Cross by [[Salvador Dalí]], 1951.]]&lt;br /&gt;
All Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, along with His resurrection, is an indispensable proclamation of a crucial event for the reconciliation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to understanding His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and persevered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. Though there is ample recognition in the New Testament that others desired Him to die, and that the circumstances in which His path took him would bring Him to His end on earth, the mover of all these things was Himself and the will of the Father. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect that way. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.&amp;quot;  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben),  or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth..&amp;quot;, it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was for-planned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). And so, &amp;quot;The Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# It was the belief in Scripture, that in His death a way back to God was made possible for those that were near to God&amp;amp;mdash;the Jews. And a way back to God for those that were far away&amp;amp;mdash;the Gentiles. That is why the New Testament saw in the requirements of God for Israel a fulfillment in Jesus the Messiah. He was the perfect Israel, taken out of Egypt, to redeem Israel. And that is why the New Testament saw in Jesus, a  deepness to the incarnation of the Son of God, deeper than just a Jew of His time of a certain tribe. He was the &amp;quot;Second Adam&amp;quot; to redeem the sons of Adam. This encompassing perspective had further implications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself - How can I make reconciliation with my enemies, with even the members of my own family, of race with race and  people with people?; Does His death for the sins of the world include those who only partially understand, for the baby aborted, the feeble minded, and severely retarded?; For those who have never heard of Jesus, never been &amp;quot;enlightened&amp;quot;, distant and remote in place and time?;  Does His death for the sins of the world  also include a remedy for the ills that have come as a result of those sins&amp;amp;mdash;certain sicknesses, ills of the mind, body and the soul? Do they &amp;quot;hold&amp;quot; for today?; Does His death make good, turn to the better, show the way, effect the way, of the illnesses that have befallen the world, not only by sin, but simply by the circumstances of life, of degeneration, of compounded dysfunction? How does the fruit of His death bring in somehow the Kingdom &amp;quot;among us&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of the Son of God on the cross has provided the solution for sin, and it still holds its sway over the imagination and aspirations for the people of our generation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God&amp;quot; (Romans 3:23). This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.&amp;quot; (Mark 2:17, and &amp;quot;Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men&amp;quot; (Mark 2:28)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3).  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often use the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; interchangeably.  Other Christians, notably the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]].  &amp;quot;Jesus answered, Amen, amen, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.&amp;quot; (John 3:5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot; (Ephesians 5:8-10). Some believe that this is necessary in order to stay saved. However, this is a common misconception of the text. It is rather referring to proving that one is a child of God by their &amp;quot;fruit&amp;quot; (things that they do and how they behave). Christians in the Reformed tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer [[John Calvin]], as well as the faith outlined in the Belgic and Heidleberg Confessions) say that salvation is irrevocable and that it cannot be lost, if it were genuinely part of one's life to begin with.  Reformed Christians (often called [[Calvinists]]) often point to Romans 8:38-39 as validation of their belief: &amp;quot;For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord&amp;quot; (Romans 8:38-39; [[NASB]]). According to Calvinists, the reason it cannot be lost by natural things is because salvation was obtained through a supernatural being, namely Jesus Christ. This does not negate Jesus' human side, only that he was both one-hundred percent God and one-hundred percent man, according to the [[Council of Chalcedon]] (A. D. 451). The Bible also makes it clear that mankind cannot earn their salvation, and that it is a free gift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus resurrected.jpg|thumb|left|200px|&amp;quot;The Resurrection&amp;quot; by Carl Heinrich Bloch]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history Gary Habermas is considered the foremost [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fact of the Resurrection of Christ is a key element of the preaching of the message about Jesus and an essential of Christian belief. But there are also certain effects that this belief has on the lives of believers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead, that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The  New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion. He was &amp;quot;declared to be the Son of God&amp;quot;  by His resurrection. This brings believers in Him to a strong confidence in the determined power of God to both vindicate in their own lives and to bring His reign upon earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, their sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. His resurrection, carries with it our knowledge that our sin with its attendant death has been totally and finally paid for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life - as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life, and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully under the Spirit's control, guidance, and empowerment. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolations, and consider that even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him, a restoration, and that tears, even now, are wiped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gleyre The Departure of the Apostles.jpg|thumb|240px|The Departure of the Apostles by [[Charles Gleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History of the name &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The early Christian faith was sometimes called ''That Way'', (Acts 19:1,9,23; 24:22) and the church its adherents were also called ''Nazarenes'', (Acts 24:5) evidently after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived. Probably close to A.D 50 the [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) records that &amp;quot;the disciples were called Christians first in [[Antioch]].&amp;quot; The title ''Christian'' is also used in Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16, and likely is referred to in James 2:7, &amp;quot;Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: The Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible records that that at least initially, the church was a single organic community, in which &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. {43} And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. {44} And all that believed were together, and had all things common; {45} And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. {46} And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.&amp;quot;(Acts 2:42-47; 4:32) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This community was soon &amp;quot;scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles&amp;quot; due to determined persecution, which resulted in the dispersed disciples going &amp;quot;every where preaching the word.&amp;quot; (Acts 8:1,4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other evidence indicates believers had their own houses and goods. (Acts 10:6; 16:14,15,40; 21:8; 1Cor. 11:22; 1Tim. 6:17; Philemon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: the Post Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Justin martyr  100 A.D. - 165 A.D.   From the &amp;quot;First Apology&amp;quot; (Defense)&lt;br /&gt;
''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to genoito [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion. (Chapt. LXV - administration of the sacraments)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist = the Thanksgiving], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, &amp;quot;This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;&amp;quot; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, &amp;quot;This is My blood;&amp;quot; and gave it to them alone... (Chapt. LXVl - of the Eucharist)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead...(Chapt.LXVll - weekly worship of the Christians)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tertullian (A.D. 160 -220), Early ecclesiatical leader and writer, in his ''Apology'' (response to pagan charges) in describing the early church community  (197 A.D.): ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are a body knit together by one faith, one discipline and one hope. We meet together as a congregation, uniting together to offer prayer to God. We pray for the emperors and all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for peace and for the delay of the final end. We read our holy scriptures to nourish our faith, hope, steadfastness and good habits. We hear exhortations and rebukes. We take such judging very seriously – as befits those who believe they are in the sight of God – especially seriously when anyone sins so grievously we have to cut them off from our prayer, our congregation and all sacred things. Our elders preside over us, obtaining that honor not by money, but by their established character. There is no buying and selling in the things of God. Though we have a fund, but not because people can buy religion. Once a month, anyone who wants to makes a small donation – but only he who is able and willing; there is no compulsion. It is not spent on feasts, but to support and bury poor people, to provide for orphans, the elderly old persons, victims of shipwreck and those in prison for their faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Defense by Tertullian (39), Trans. Rev. S. Thelwall. Modernized, abridged and introduced by Stephen Tomkins. Edited and prepared for the web by Dan Graves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Pontus &amp;amp; Bithynia  (northern Turkey) from A.D. 111-113, reporting to emperor Trajan of Christians, whom such pagan rulers found intolerable:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed, stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished. There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pliny the Younger Letters, 10.96 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Orthodox churches icon artwork.jpg|thumb|Orthodox Church's icon artwork.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orthodox Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Church of England]] or ''Anglican Church''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Episcopal Church in the United States of America]] (or ''Episcopal Church'' or ''Episcopalians'') (Non-UK branch of the Anglican Church)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Seventh-day Adventist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evangelical Apostolic Church of North America (Syro-Chaldean)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gates of Hell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Encyclopedias===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bodensieck, Julius, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church,'' (3 vol 1965), ECLS perspective &lt;br /&gt;
* Brauer, Jerald C. ''The Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' (1971), 880pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newadvent.org/cathen/index.html ''The Catholic Encyyclopedia'' (1907-1913)], old but highly detailed and online&lt;br /&gt;
** '' New Catholic Encyclopedia'', edited by the Catholic University of America, 17 vol. 1967-1979.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cross, F. L., and E. A. Livingstone, eds. ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church''  (3rd ed. 1997), 1840pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Dictionary-Christian-Church/dp/0192802909/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Elwell, Walter A., ed. ''Evangelical Dictionary of Theology‎'' (2001) 1312 pages; articles by over 200 Evangelical or Fundamentalist scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Hastings, Adrian et al. eds. ''The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought'' (2000) 808pp; 600 articles by 260 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0198600240/ref=sib_dp_pt/105-4292297-2766841#reader-link excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), ), major sources of older scholarly articles; mainline Protestant perspective  &lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.toc.html Vol. 1: Aachen - Basilians]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.toc.html Vol. 2: Basilica - Chambers]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.toc.html Vol. 3: Chamier - Draendorf]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04.toc.html Vol. 4: Draeseke - Goa]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05.toc.html Vol. 5: Goar - Innocent]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06.toc.html Vol. 6: Innocents - Liudger]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc07.toc.html Vol. 7: Liutprand - Moralities]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc08.toc.html Vol. 8: Morality - Petersen]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc09.toc.html Vol. 9: Petri - Reuchlin]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc10.toc.html Vol. 10: Reutsch - Son]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc11.toc.html Vol. 11: Son of Man - Tremellius]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc12.toc.html Vol. 12: Trench - Zwingli]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc13.toc.html Vol. 13: Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Histories===&lt;br /&gt;
*Briggs, J. H. Y., Robert D. Linder, and David F. Wright. ''Introduction to the History of Christianity: First Century to the Present Day'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-History-Christianity-Century-Present/dp/0800638123/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*Gonzalez, Justo L. '' A History of Christian Thought: Volume 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon'' (2nd ed. 1987); [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Beginnings-Chalcedon/dp/0687171822/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2: From Augustine to the Eve of the Reformation'' (2nd ed. 1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Augustine-Reformation/dp/0687171830/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 2]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 3: From the Protestant Reformation to the Twentieth Century'' (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Protestant-Reformation/dp/0687171849/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-12 excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Horsley, Richard A. ''Christian Origins: A People's History Of Christianity, Vol. 1'' (2006), 318pp [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Origins-Peoples-History-Christianity/dp/080063411X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200886474&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A History of Christianity'' (2 vol 1975) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-Beginnings-1500-Revised/dp/0060649526/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1, to 1500], by leading Baptist scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A history of the expansion of Christianity'' (7 vol 1939-1970), monumental history of missionary work worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
*MacCulloch, Diarmaid. ''The Reformation'' (2005), influential recent survey [http://www.amazon.com/Reformation-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/014303538X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*McGonigle, Thomas D.,  and James F. Quigley. ''A history of the Christian Tradition: From Its Jewish Orgins to the Reformation'' (1988); ''A History of the Christian Tradition, Vol. II: From the Reformation to the Present'' (1996) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Tradition-Vol-Reformation/dp/0809136481/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine'' (5 vol 1975-91) [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Doctrine-Medieval/dp/0226653757/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search v. 3, 600 AD -1300]]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Reformation-1300-1700/dp/0226653773/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search vol 4, 1300-1700]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-History-Development-Doctrine/dp/0226653803/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 5, 1700-present] This is the standard history of Christian doctrine. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ward, Keith. ''Christianity: A Beginner's Guide'' (2008), 195pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ahlstrom,  Sydney E. ''A religious history of the American people‎'' (1979) 1192 pages; classic history from broad perspective [http://books.google.com/books?id=5kFF6a1viGcC&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ahlstrom&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Balmer, Randall. ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism'' (2nd ed.  2004), 655pp [http://www.questia.com/library/book/encyclopedia-of-evangelicalism-by-randall-balmer.jsp ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism''  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lippy,  Charles H. and Peter W. Williams, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the American religious experience: studies of traditions and movements'' (3 vol 1988) 1872 pages; standard reference work; long essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Noll, Mark A. '' A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada‎'' (1992), by leading Evangelical historian [http://books.google.com/books?id=VGF3wbzzy9QC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:christianity+inauthor:noll&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Queen, Edward L. et al, eds. Encyclopedia of American Religious History'' (3rd ed. 2 vol. 2009) 1200pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Reid, Daniel G. et al. eds., ''Dictionary of Christianity in America'' (199)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wooley,  Davis C. ed. '' Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists‎'' (5 vol 1958-19820; 2565 pages&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=765207</id>
		<title>United States of America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=765207"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:37:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''United States of America''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =US map.PNG&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of United States.png&lt;br /&gt;
|established=1776&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =50 star flag.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =United States arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Federal Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English&lt;br /&gt;
|official =n&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =3,718,695 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =301,554,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$13.049 trillion (2007&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$44,333 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=United States Dollar (USD)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''United States of America''' (''conventional short form'': '''United States'''; ''abbreviation'': '''US''' or '''USA'''; sometimes also referred to as '''the States''' or simply as '''America''') is a North American nation that consists of a federal union of fifty individual states, along with territories and a capital district. Founded originally as 13 colonies in the [[British Empire]], Britain's American colonies broke with the mother country on July 4, 1776 with the [[Declaration of Independence]] and were recognized as the new nation of the United States of America following the [[American Revolutionary War|War of Independence]] in 1783. The [[United States Constitution]] was written shortly thereafter, in 1787, grounded on Christian values and [[republicanism|republican]] political principles the constitution remains in effect today. During the 19th and 20th centuries, 37 new states were added to the original 13 as the nation expanded across the North American continent and acquired a number of overseas possessions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Americans created the world's first political parties and, since abolishing [[slavery]] in a bloody [[American Civil War|civil war]] (1861-65), has a government type committed to a Constitution-based federal republic, with a strong democratic tradition at home and abroad. Its capitalist economy grew rapidly, becoming the largest in the world by the 1870s. After defeating Communism in the [[Cold War]], the U.S. emerged as the world's only [[superpower]], boasting the largest economy and most powerful military. It exerts enormous cultural and intellectual influence worldwide, and in return is the target of the enemies of democracy and capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The capital of the United States of America is [[Washington, DC]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
North America, bordering both the North [[Atlantic Ocean]] and the North [[Pacific Ocean]], is between [[Canada]] and [[Mexico]]. In addition to the boundaries of the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean, the United States is otherwise bounded by the Bering Sea, the Arctic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Two of the fifty states, Alaska and Hawaii (an archipelago), are not contiguous with any of the other states. Puerto Rico, which is largely self governing, is part of the U.S., as are several smaller territories in the Pacific Ocean, such as Guam. Each of the 50 states has a large degree of sovereignty, but the boundaries are debated and shift slightly every year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At over 3.7 million square miles (over 9.6 million km²), the U.S. (including its non-contiguous and overseas states and territories) is the third largest country by total area. It is the world's third most populous nation, with over 350 million people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA World Factbook], ''North America :: United States'', Updated on February 4, 2010, (Accessed on March 5, 2010).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Constitution and Politics in the United States==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:76485685i79.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The drafting committee presenting the [[Declaration of Independence]] to the [[Continental Congress]], painted by John Trumbull 1817–1819.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1776 and 1788, the United States was governed according to the [[Articles of Confederation]].  The [[Founding Fathers]] formally established the current structure of the United States by ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1788. Since 1789, that constitution has been the basic governing document. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sovereignty in America comes from the citizenry, and the basic political values are called &amp;quot;[[republicanism]],&amp;quot; (not to be confused with the [[Republican Party]],)  especially the commitment to civic virtue and civic duty, and opposition to corruption and aristocracy.  Popular political parties emerged in the United States in the 1790s; currently the two major political parties are the [[Democratic Party]], and the [[Republican Party]]. Minor parties are of little importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Role of Religion in Government ===&lt;br /&gt;
see [[Religion and U.S. Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thirteen Colonies===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Thirteen Colonies}}  [[Image:Pop1750.jpg|left|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===American Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|American Revolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American Revolution exploded from fears the British Empire was trying to restrict the historic rights and liberties of Americans.  The British victory in the French and Indian War ended the threat that foreign powers might attack the colonies; Britain's protection was no longer needed. At the same time Britain decided to assert its powers by imposing taxes.  The taxes (as on stamps and sugar) were not large but the principle was: Americans insisted their own legislatures could impose taxes but not Parliament, because Americans were not represented there. &amp;quot;No taxation without representation!&amp;quot; became the American catch-word, but the British refused over and over again to accept it.  London sent in troops when Boston protested vehemently, amd Americans organized shadow governments in every colony. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile the Americans had been adopting a new political philosophy, called [[republicanism]] that stressed civic virtue, fear of corruption, and disdain for aristocracy (there were no aristocrats in America apart from occasional British visitors). Republicanism alerted Americans to their constitutional rights as Englishmen--one right was the people through their elected officials set the taxes.  To Americans this meant their colonial legislatures, because they were not represented in the British Parliament. The British replied haughtily that Americans were &amp;quot;virtually represented&amp;quot; somehow. The tax on stamps in 1765 incited near rebellion, as the 13 separate colonies began meeting together and sharing their grievances. The stamp tax was repealed but others followed, especially the tax on tea. Americans boycotted tea and merchants refused to order it, except in Boston. There a well-organized group of patriots dumped the tea in the harbor at the [[Boston Tea Party]]. London was livid and sent troops and stripped Massachusetts of its self government and suspended the historic rights the colonists were so proud of. Now all 13 colonies started organizing shadow governments called &amp;quot;Committees of Correspondence&amp;quot; that prepared for the day &amp;quot;patriots&amp;quot; 9or &amp;quot;Whigs&amp;quot;) as they called themselves could assume all functions of local government. That day came when the British sent troops from Boston to seize gunpowder and the patriots gathered there.  The American &amp;quot;Minute men&amp;quot; (militia) had trained and planned for the day and they back at Lexington and Concord, and defeated elite British troops. The war had begun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 colonies, now organized as the &amp;quot;Continental COngress&amp;quot; now became a national government, as the shadow governments in each colony took control and ousted all royal officials. Congress set up a Continental Army and gave command to Virginia leader [[George Washington]]. he took charge in Boston, and forced the British to leave in spring 1776.  All 13 colonies were now under Patriot control, and they listened as [[Tom Paine]] explained in ''Common Sense'' that America was a strong and powerful nation in its own right and no longer needed a foreign king. Congress called on the colonies to make themselves states and write new constitutions. On July 4, 1776, Congress unanimously declared the independence of a new nation, the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
King [[George III]] could not abide the insolent Americans and he sent his small army and large navy to reconquer his lost colonies.  They did capture New York City, but little else. The powerful Royal navy gave the British command of the seas and the ability to land troops anywhere and capture any specific place, but the shortage of British soldiers, and the very long 3000 mile supply line, meant that the British could only hold a few points at any one time. Hiring German soldiers (Hessians) was necessary, but they were not enough, for the Patriots always had more available soldiers. The British expectations that Loyalist would rise up and overthrow the Patriots was a chimera; the Loyalists did provide some help to British invasion forces, but were never strong enough to operate on their own or control any territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France, humiliated by Britain in the 1760s, was stronger now and wanted revenge. It secretly armed and financed the Americans.  In 1777 the British sent a large army to invade New York and cut off the revolutionary states of New England. The plan was a disaster as the American militia captured the entire British invasion force at Saratoga. Encouraged by diplomat [[Benjamin Franklin]], the French now recognized the United States, signed a treaty of alliance, and entered the war against Britain. Later it brought in Span and the Netherlands as allies; Britain's diplomacy was so bad that it had no allies at all, and now was militarily matched or surpassed by the allies.  The British invasion of the South in 178-81 was designed to bring out Loyalist support, but it failed and the second major British army was captured at thew [[Battle of Yorktown]]. The British Parliament revolted at their reckless king and his incompetent government and sued for peace, which was achieved on terms favorable to the U.S. in 1783. About 20% of the Loyalists removed to Canada, but the others stayed, and the new peaceful nation resumed its rapid growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New Nation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1783, when the Treaty of Paris concluded the war of independence, the American population totalled some three million citizens and slaves living on about one million square miles of land.  Tens of thousands of [[Native Americans]] also lived in the [[Northwest Territory]] and the Southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Thirteen original states are [[Connecticut]], [[Delaware]], [[Georgia]], [[Maryland]], [[Massachusetts]] (including [[maine]]), [[New Hampshire]], [[New Jersey]], [[New York]], [[North Carolina]], [[Pennsylvania]], [[Rhode Island]], [[South Carolina]] and [[Virginia]].  In 1790, an agreement between supporters of Jefferson and those of [[Alexander Hamilton]] resulted in the creation of the [[District of Columbia]] from part of [[Maryland]]; it has served as the national capital since 1800.  The remainder of the 1783 territory was eventually organized as the states of [[Ohio]], [[Indiana]], [[Michigan]], [[Illinois]], [[Wisconsin]], [[Kentucky]], [[Tennessee]], [[Mississippi]] and [[Alabama]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1803, [[French]] emperor [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] took advantage of a lull in his war with Great Britain to sell the [[Louisiana Territory]] to the United States, more than doubling the nation's land area.  This territory would later be organized as the states of [[Minnesota]], [[North Dakota]], [[South Dakota]], [[Montana]], [[Wyoming]], [[Nebraska]], [[Iowa]], [[Missouri]], [[Arkansas]], [[Kansas]], [[Oklahoma]], and [[Louisiana]] proper.  President Jefferson commissioned [[Lewis and Clark]] to explore the new territory from 1802 to 1804.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. seized, then purchased [[Florida]] from Spain in 1819. [[Texas]] joined the United States in 1845 after winning its revolution against Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After victory the [[Mexican American War]] of 1846-48, the U.S. purchased via the [[Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo]] territory that became the states of [[California]], [[Nevada]], [[Utah]], [[Colorado]], [[New Mexico]] and [[Arizona]].  In 1846 the U.S. and Britain agreed that the 49th Parallel (degree of latitude) would serve as the boundary between the U. S. and [[British Columbia]] (now part of Canada). The American portion became the states of [[Washington]], [[Oregon]] and [[Idaho]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1867, the U.S. purchased [[Alaska]] from [[Russia]]. It became a state in 1959.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hawaii became an independent republic in 1894 and voluntarily joined the U.S. in 1898, becoming a state in 1960. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the [[Spanish-American War]], in which the United States took control of the [[Philippines]] and annexed [[Puerto Rico]] and [[Guam]].  The Phillipines became independent in 1946, after the U.S. reconquered the islands from Japan in World War II. [[Puerto Rico]] has occasionally held referenda that ratified its continuing unique &amp;quot;Commonwealth&amp;quot; status as part of the United States.  The residents of Puerto Rico are U.S. citizens.  Guam continues as a U.S. owned territory with full citizenship for its inhabitants. The people of Puerto Rico and Guam have a vote in presidential primaries and a voice, but not a vote, in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:56eugyjnm.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The [[White House]], the official home and workplace of the [[President of the United States]] of America.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Executive Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
*Chief of state: The President of the United States is both the chief of state and head of government&lt;br /&gt;
*Head of government: President of the United States; Vice President of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*Cabinet: Cabinet appointed by the president with Senate approval&lt;br /&gt;
*Elections: The president and vice president serve four-year terms (eligible for a second term)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States legislative branch of government is a bicameral Congress, which consists of the Senate (100 seats, 2 members are elected from each state by popular vote to serve six-year terms; one-third are elected every two years) and the House of Representatives (435 seats; members are directly elected by popular vote to serve two-year terms).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States [[Supreme Court]] consists of nine justices, nominated by the president and confirmed with the advice and consent of the Senate. Members of the Supreme Court are appointed to serve for life; the judicial branch extends to the United States Courts of Appeal, the United States District Courts, and State and County Courts. The primary role of the nine justices of the Supreme Court is to assure the United States government does not attempt to surrender, sell or transfer the people's unalienable rights given by [[God]]. The Supreme Court has the power to consider the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 Federal Holidays==&lt;br /&gt;
The table below lists public holidays for U.S. Federal employees for 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.opm.gov/Operating_Status_Schedules/fedhol/2010.asp 2010 Federal Holidays], OPM.gov, Federal law (5 U.S.C. 6103).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Date&lt;br /&gt;
! Holiday&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Friday, Jan. 1 || [[New Year’s Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monday, Jan. 18 || Birthday of [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monday, Feb. 15* || Washington’s Birthday&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monday, May 31 || [[Memorial Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monday, July 5** || [[Independence Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monday, Sept. 6 || [[Labor Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Monday, Oct. 11 || [[Columbus Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thursday, Nov. 11 || [[Veterans Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thursday, Nov. 25 || [[Thanksgiving Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Friday, Dec. 24*** || [[Christmas|Christmas Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flag Description==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:50 star flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The [[Flag of the United States of America]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Flag of the United States of America}}&lt;br /&gt;
Thirteen equal horizontal stripes of red (top and bottom) alternating with white; there is a blue rectangle in the upper hoist-side corner bearing 50 small, white, five-pointed stars arranged in nine offset horizontal rows of six stars (top and bottom) alternating with rows of five stars; the 50 stars represent the 50 states, the 13 stripes represent the 13 original colonies; known as Old Glory; the design and colors have been the basis for a number of other flags, including [[Chile]], [[Liberia]], [[Malaysia]], and [[Puerto Rico]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Also See ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pledge of Allegiance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous American artists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of 50 states]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Americas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[America (continent)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CIA]] - [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html The World FactBook]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/america.htm America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/flags_of_us_states.htm Flags of the U.S. States]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pibmug.com/files/map_test.swf Interactive map test of the 50 U.S. states]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h445.html U.S. History]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb US universities}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geography]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States history]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&amp;diff=765206</id>
		<title>Albert Einstein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&amp;diff=765206"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:29:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:600px-Albert Einstein Head.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Albert Einstein''' (1879-1955) was the most famous [[physicist]] of the 20th century. He was born in Ulm, in Württemberg, [[Germany]] in a [[Judaism|Jewish]] family. During his stay at the [[Switzerland|Swiss]] [[Patent and Trademark Office|Patent Office]] Einstein produced much of his remarkable work. In 1905 he obtained his [[Doctor|doctor's degree]]. He won the [[Nobel Prize]] for his work on the Photoelectric Effect in 1921. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein [[Immigration|immigrated]] to the [[United States of America|United States]] in the late 1930s to take the position of Professor of Theoretical Physics at [[Princeton University|Princeton]]; upon the urging of a colleague in physics, recommended that [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Franklin Roosevelt|Franklin D. Roosevelt]] develop an [[atomic bomb]] project. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dannen.com/ae-fdr.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He later regretted this and became a passionate [[Pacifism|pacifist]]. He was also very religious, and strongly believed that the teachings of Jesus Christ were vital to a peaceful world. In 1952, he was offered the Presidency of [[Israel]], but he turned it down. Einstein collaborated with Dr. Chaim Weizmann in establishing the [[Hebrew]] [[University]] of [[Jerusalem]]. Albert Einstein died on April 18, 1955 at Princeton, [[New Jersey]] at the age of 76.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anecdotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1898, young Albert Einstein applied for admission to the Munich Technical Institute and was turned down. The young man, the Institute declared, &amp;quot;showed no promise&amp;quot; as a student. By 1905, he published his explanation of the special [[theory of relativity]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Einstein came to Princeton University in 1935 and was asked what he would require for his study. he replied: &amp;quot;A desk, some pads and a pencil, and a large wastebasket to hold all of my mistakes.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The sculptor Jacob Epstein tells this story:&lt;br /&gt;
*:&amp;quot;When I was doing Professor Albert Einstein's bust he had many a jibe at the Nazi professors, one hundred of whom had condemned his theory of relativity in a book. 'Were I wrong,' he said, 'one professor would have been enough.' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein contributed to the theory of a [[Special Relativity]] and the theory of [[General Relativity]].  He also contributed to the study of Photoelectric Effect, Brownian Motion and Bose-Einstein Statistics.  He was critical of quantum mechanics and has proposed the EPR-Paradox in attempt to point out spooky aspects of the theory.  The last fifteen years of his life were spent in unsuccessfully searching for a [[Unified Field Theory]].  &lt;br /&gt;
Einstein's best-known scientific work is his 1905 papers on [[Special Relativity]]. Einstein did not cite any references and it was widely and falsely assumed that his work was original. The theory of relativity had already been published by [[Hendrik Lorentz]] and [[Henri Poincaré]]. Einstein's contribution was to give a description of the Lorentz-Poincare theory without reference to the luminiferous aether, and to clarify some of the physical consequences of the theory. He used the term &amp;quot;stationary system&amp;quot; instead of the term aether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein then wrote a series of papers applying relativity to gravity using the mathematics of Riemannian Geometry, contributing to [[General Relativity]]. Much of the actual mathematics of general relativity was worked out by Marcel Grossman, David Hilbert, and others. Einstein's main contribution was to give an alternate derivation of the field equations, and to apply them to explain an [[anomaly]] in the advance of the perihelion in Mercury's orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Eddington popularized General Relativity by publishing an explanation of it and by attempting to prove the theory experimentally in a dramatic test.  Eddington embarked on a highly publicized trip into the Atlantic Ocean off Africa in order to observe the bending of [[star]]light passing nearby the [[Sun]] during the total [[solar eclipse]] of May 29, 1919.  Eddington returned with a declaration that he had proven Einstein's theory of [[General Relativity]], making Einstein extremely famous&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On November 8, 1919, for example, the ''London Times'' had an article headlined: &amp;quot;The Revolution In Science/Einstein Versus Newton.&amp;quot; Two days later, ''The New York Times''' headlines read: &amp;quot;Lights All Askew In The Heavens/Men Of Science More Or Less Agog Over Results Of Eclipse Observations/Einstein Theory Triumphs.&amp;quot; [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/relativity/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, when in fact he had selectively used data to attain this result.  No Nobel Prize was given for relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2004, NASA launched the satellite Gravity Probe B to test general relativity. The main purpose was to test relativistic frame dragging, but the results have been inconclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein compared the effects of large objects on space and time to the way that a large ball placed on a sheet of rubber stretches the material and causes it to sag, and drew the analogy with the way stars and planets warp space-time. A smaller ball rolling along the sagging fabric will be drawn towards the larger ball, in the same way that the Earth is drawn towards the sun, but will not fall into it as long as it continues to move at sufficient speed. This was a change in thinking from the Newtonian cosmos, in which gravity was viewed purely as an attractive force between bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein's statistical explanation of Brownian motion (the random movement of microscopic particles mixed in with pollen) is sometimes credited with helping to confirm the atomic theory at a time when some scientists argued against it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay-brownian.htm Einstein on Brownian Motion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most scientists had accepted atomic theory a century earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also published a heuristic explanation of the photoelectric effect in which light has particle like properties as well as wave like properties. According to Maxwell's equations, light is a wave so one might expect that increasing the intensity of light should increase the number of electrons emitted from metal. The German physicist Lénard did an experiment proving that this was not true. Einstein argued that the experiment was consistent with Max Planck's hypothesis that light is quantized and different particles of light or photons have different frequencies. Therefore, increasing the intensity of low frequency photons has no effect, while using a higher (blue or ultra violet) frequency of light does cause more electrons to be emitted. The formula Einstein used to explain this was Planck's formula e = hf, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency.[http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae24.cfm?CFID=8792067&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=36662276] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Einstein won a Nobel Prize for explaining the photoelectric effect, Lénard was critical of his accomplishments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard J. Evans, The Third Reich in Power, pages 306-309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Planck and Lénard had already received Nobel Prizes for related work explaining the photoelectric effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also recognized the value in work done by the physicist Bose when others did not, and helped Bose publish what is now referred to as Bose-Einstein statistics. A simplified explanation is that the statistics for bosons (including light) are different from the statistics for fermions which make up solid matter in that there is no way to tag or differentiate one boson from another for statistical comparisons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein’s famous formula E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; says that mass and energy can turn into each other. It was first published by H. Poincare. Einstein published an alternate derivation that was corrected and improved by M. Planck. E stands for [[energy]], m is [[mass]], and c is the [[speed of light]]. So, if you increase the energy of a substance, for example by heating it, it gains a minute amount of mass. It was later realized that if you split an atom apart, as in a nuclear explosion, it loses a tiny amount of mass and you release a huge amount of [[energy]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The connection E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; to nuclear energy is not as direct as pop culture sometimes represents. Einstein did not discover the huge energy available from nuclear reactions. Early workers in radioactivity, such as Ernest Rutherford, understood clearly that the natural radioactive decay of radium released quantities of energy that could not be explained by chemistry, and were much larger than those of chemical reactions. Neither did Einstein originate the key idea that made nuclear energy a possible weapon or a practical energy source. That was Leo Szilard, who acknowledged having been inspired by a 1914 H. G. Wells novel. Szilard discovered or invented the chain reaction (and patented it). However, other people recognized the relation between Einstein's interpretation of the E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; formula and chain reactions. Einstein explained that matter releasing energy is also losing mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Energy binds together the parts of an [[atom]], including the [[nucleus]]. The nucleus of an atom is tiny, but very little mass could release a huge amount of energy. When one nucleus splits apart, it splits other nuclei around it. This is called a [[chain reaction]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cosmological Constant===&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein revised his work on [[General Relativity]] to include a 'fudge-factor' which he termed the [[Cosmological Constant]]. He was trying to account for the apparent steady-state nature of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Edwin Hubble]], in whose name [[NASA]]'s famous [[Hubble Space Telescope]] is named, later convinced him otherwise.  At one point he had Einstein actually making direct observations alongside him, and Hubble's findings showed conclusively that the [[universe]] was indeed expanding, as predicted by certain solutions of GR's field equations in the absence of a cosmological constant.  Einstein recanted his original [[philosophy]], and accepted as true the notion of a changing universe having a definite [[begin]]ning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He later said of his Cosmological Constant, &amp;quot;It was the biggest blunder of my life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting end-note on this term: Principle investigators from [[Princeton University]] first published findings in 1998 apparently revealing an accelerating expansion for the universe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Because this initially seemed like it might be a sort of 'anti-gravity' effect (similar in concept to Einstein's original notion), it briefly became quite popular for scientists to dub the phenomenon the 'Cosmological Constant' as well.  For more information, see: [[Dark Energy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Special Theory of Relativity (1905)&lt;br /&gt;
*Relativity (English translations, 1920 and 1950) &lt;br /&gt;
*General Theory of Relativity (1916) &lt;br /&gt;
*Investigations on Theory of Brownian Movement (1926) &lt;br /&gt;
*The Evolution of Physics (1938) &lt;br /&gt;
*About Zionism (1930)&lt;br /&gt;
*Why War? (1933), &lt;br /&gt;
*My Philosophy (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
*(The World As I See It) (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
*Out of My Later Years (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''...the daily effort comes from no deliberate intention or program, but straight from the heart.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Honors ==&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein received honorary doctorate degrees in science, medicine and philosophy from many American and European universities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He won the Nobel Prize in 1921 for his work on the Photoelectric Effect.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It strikes me as unfair, and even in bad taste, to select a few individuals for boundless admiration, attributing superhuman powers of mind and character to them. This has been my fate, and the contrast between the popular assessment of my powers and achievements and the reality is simply grotesque.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein told a friend in 1930, &amp;quot;To punish me for my contempt of authority, Fate has made me an authority myself.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He gained the Copley Medal of the Royal Society of London in 1925 and the Franklin Medal of the Franklin Institute in 1935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was offered the presidency of Israel in 1952 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.einstein-website.de/z_information/variousthings.html#president]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but respectfully declined because he believed his life-long scientific attitude of objectivity made him an inappropriate candidate for such a high political position, he was also strongly opposed to nationalism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999, he was named &amp;quot;Person of the Century&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;Time&amp;quot; magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Einstein and the A-bomb==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1939 research done by several leading scientists including [[Enrico Fermi]] regarding chain reactions of nuclear fission prompted [[Leo Szilard]] to persuade Einstein to write a letter to President &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Roosevelt]] [http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to warn the President about the possibility of nuclear weapons and that Nazi [[Germany]] had already taken an interest in this technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein himself had never been involved in the [[Manhattan project]]. He was considered a security risk, as he was a member, sponsor, or affiliated with thirty-four communist fronts between 1937 and 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/einstein.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later he condemned the use of nuclear weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy Surrounding His Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Thomas Stoltz Harvey, then a pathologist, performed the autopsy on Einstein in the [[Princeton Medical Center]] several hours after his death.  Upon completion, Dr. Harvey removed the brain and eyes &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NPR, [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4602913]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  There is controversy about whether or not Harvey had consent from the Einstein family to remove the brain and keep it, though letters from Otto Nathan, executor of the Einstein estate, suggest that Harvey did indeed have permission to keep the brain, as long as research performed on it was only described in scientific journals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The brain was photographed and sliced into 240 pieces in order to be preserved and further studied.  Harvey hoped some uniqueness would be discovered that distinguished Einstein's brain as &amp;quot;genius&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although he sent pieces away for further study, the bulk of the brain remained with Harvey for over 40 years. His once-ambitious plans for doing research on Einstein's brain were never actualized, though there were at least two controversial studies performed which suggested a physical reason for Einstein's intelligence. In 1996 Harvey entrusted Elliot Krauss, cheif [[pathologist]] at the Princeton Medical Center, with the brain. The brain now sits in a secret location, possibly only a few feet away from where it was first removed from Einstein's head. Krauss loans out pieces of the brain for scientific research, but he is very discriminating in deciding whom shall receive a piece.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abraham, Carolyn. ''Possessing Genius''. Icon Books Ltd (2005)&amp;lt;/reF&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Einstein inshul1930.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein wearing a kippah in a Berlin Synagogue, 1930.|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
There is some controversy surrounding the religion of Albert Einstein.  &lt;br /&gt;
He explained his religious views to [[Time Magazine]] in this manner: &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;“I'm not an [[atheist]]. I don't think I can call myself a [[pantheist]]. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1607298,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the same interview, Einstein spoke of his feelings regarding Christianity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And when asked if he accepted the historical existence of Jesus, Einstein replied:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Unquestionably! No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also said &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fanatical atheists, are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who--in their grudge against traditional religion as the 'opium of the masses'-- cannot hear the music of the spheres.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God does not play dice with the universe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/878&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;as quoted in &amp;quot;Albert Einstein - The Human Side&amp;quot;, Selected and Edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press, 1979 from a letter on March 24th, 1954&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken as a whole, it appears Einstein rejected the literal stories of God's personal involvement with the Hebrews, but he did believe in the existence of a higher power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views On Judaism and Zionism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Einst 22.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein with [[David Ben-Gurion]].|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1920, in a letter to the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith, Einstein wrote&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am neither a German citizen, nor is there in me anything that can be described as ‘Jewish faith.’ But I am happy to belong to the Jewish people, even if I do not consider them in any way God's elect.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein do not view fellow Jews as co-religionists, but as tribal companions.&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was made an honorary citizen of [[Tel Aviv]] during his visit in 1923.&lt;br /&gt;
In 1952, Einstein was offered the position of president of Israel by the 1st prime minster of [[Israel]] David Ben-Gurion, but declined the offer.  Before his death in 1955, Einstein wrote to the Zionist leader Kurt Blumenfeld:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I thank you, even at this late hour, for having made me conscious of the Jewish soul.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein willed that all his scholarly work be archived in Israel's Hebrew University after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein always expressed his anti-war views and staunchly opposed nationalism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;He who joyfully marches to rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism on command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so a base of action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Einstein on Germany and the rise of Hitler==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1944, in a message to a bulletin run by Polish Jews in New York, Einstein wrote&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Germans as an entire people are responsible for the mass murders and must be punished as a people if there is justice in the world and if the consciousness of collective responsibility in the nations is not to perish from the earth entirely. Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book [Mein Kampf] and in his speeches made his shameful [genocidal] intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unsupported attributions == &lt;br /&gt;
Many ideas and quotes are falsely attributed to Einstein. He did not invent very much of we now call [[special relativity]]. The Principle of Relativity, that the law of physics should be the same in all inertial frames, had already been published before Einstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not discover the [[Lorentz transformation]], or the Lorentz invariance of [[Maxwell's equations]] for electromagnetism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://eprint.uq.edu.au/archive/00002307/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was not the first to propose that the [[speed of light]] is constant for all observers, or that &amp;quot;[[the aether]]&amp;quot; is superfluous and not observable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lost in Einstein's Shadow, American Scientist, 2006. [http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/49611/page/1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was not the first to recognize and explain how special relativity causes an ambiguity in defining simultaneity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/Poincare.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not combine space and time into a four-dimensional [[spacetime]] in his special relativity papers until others had been doing it for a couple of years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein did not invent the term &amp;quot;relativity theory&amp;quot;, and did not even like the term. He called it the &amp;quot;so-called relativity theory&amp;quot; until 1911. Einstein did not banish the ether from Physics. In a 1920 lecture, he said, &amp;quot;More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny æther.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted by Tulane astrophysicist Frank J. Tipler, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1271310&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was not the first to observe the equation E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; as a consequence of special relativity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;H. Poincare published it in 1900. [http://www.serve.com/herrmann/ein.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
or to foresee its application to [[nuclear binding]] energies or [[antimatter]] annihilation. &lt;br /&gt;
Einstein only published faulty and incomplete proofs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius, by Hans C. Ohanian, http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Mistakes-Human-Failings-Genius/dp/0393062937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://discovermagazine.com/2008/sep/01-einstein.s-23-biggest-mistakes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
He did not foresee a nuclear [[chain reaction]] and had to be persuaded about the possibility of an [[atomic bomb]]. &lt;br /&gt;
However, Einstein's interpretation of the E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; equation was fairly popular. &lt;br /&gt;
According to Einstein, a body losing energy through heat or [[radiation]] was losing mass.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Einstein, A., 1905, [http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/papers/1905_18_639-641.pdf Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von dessen Energieinhalt abhängig?], Annalen der Physik, volume 18, pages 639–643. See also [http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www English translation].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein did not originate the idea of using non-Euclidean geometry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His friend Paul Ehrenfest pointed out the need for curved space. [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/181349/Albert-Einstein]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[metric tensor]]s to reconcile gravity with special relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.univ-nancy2.fr/DepPhilo/walter/papers/b4.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was not his idea to describe gravity in [[covariant equations]], and he published papers supposedly showing that it was impossible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/decades_re-set.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not discover the Lagrangian formulation of [[general relativity]], and was not the first to publish the field equations. He did not foresee the [[expansion of the universe]] (although this expansion is consistent with the field equations), the possibility of black holes, or [[dark energy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein did not originate the idea that light is observable as particles. Max Planck published that a few years before Einstein, and received a Nobel prize for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein did not prove that matter was made of atoms. That had been known for a century when Einstein published his 1905 paper on Brownian motion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein never developed a [[unified field theory]] of any significance. He published papers on [[quantum mechanics]], but always insisted on a deterministic interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many quotes are falsely attributed to Einstein. Here are a few. &amp;quot;If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;We use only 10% of our brains.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Evil is simply the absence of God.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Originality is the art of concealing your sources.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;!-- please show location of quotes attributed to Einstein and who said them if they are to be attributed to another individual --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some quotes that have been attributed to Einstein, but which have not been verified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=H-GfO0jkBLsC&amp;amp;pg=PA146&amp;amp;dq=The+difference+between+stupidity+and+genius+is+that+genius+has+its+limits&amp;amp;ei=NtAaSsTZBZj2MJ2NyL8J And I Quote - Genius Page 146] by By Ashton Applewhite, William R. Evans, Tripp Evans, Andrew Frothingham &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=MbC45UX_4gMC&amp;amp;pg=PT19&amp;amp;dq=Learn+from+yesterday,+live+for+today,+hope+for+tomorrow.+The+important+thing+is+not+to+stop+questioning.&amp;amp;ei=Mdk-SormHozayQT1-uS-AQ A vision of transdisciplinarity : laying foundations for a world knowledge] by Frédéric Darbellay, Moira Cockell, Jerome Billotte&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=CNuwE3NL1QgC&amp;amp;pg=PA388&amp;amp;dq=Whoever+is+careless+with+the+truth+in+small+matters+cannot+be+trusted+with+important+matters&amp;amp;ei=swRFSoSYM46yzASEy8Bc Albert Einstein: historical and cultural perspectives : the centennial - Page 388] by Gerald James Holton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.relativitycalculator.com/E=mc2.shtml Relativity Calculator - e=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; derivation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921&amp;quot;[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On The Electrodynamics Of Moving Bodies&amp;quot;[http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Does The Inertia Of A Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?&amp;quot;[http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Paterniti, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Driving Mr. Albert: A Trip Across America With Einstein's Brain&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Collected Quotes from Albert Einstein&amp;quot; [http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Confusion regarding Einstein's Religion&amp;quot;[http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2004/04/confusion.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Einstein, Albert}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physicists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Health_Service&amp;diff=765203</id>
		<title>National Health Service</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Health_Service&amp;diff=765203"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:21:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: /* Poor quality care */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''National Health Service (NHS)''' is the [[United Kingdom]]'s nationalised [[health]] care system. It was established in 1948 as part of [[Clement Attlee]]'s post-[[World War II]] [[Labour Party|Labour]] government's socialist program, and has been supported by politicians of every party since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NHS is nominally funded out of &amp;quot;National Insurance contributions&amp;quot;, a form of personal [[taxation]] comparable to the US [[Social Security]] system. The NHS revenue stream is, in theory, entirely separate in operation from income tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1394285&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practice, the NHS is funded from general taxation, and is accepted by the British electorate as being funded in this way. All prescription medicines (however not over-the-counter ones) are available for a low standard fee in [[England]], with the fee in [[Scotland]] being slightly lower. Prescriptions are entirely free of charge in [[Wales]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Medicinespharmacyandindustry/Prescriptions/NHScosts/DH_508&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. NHS treatment is available to all residents of the UK. Most services, including complex and expensive surgical procedures and drugs, are free at the point of use, and those that are not (such as the provision of glasses and dental care) are free to people on low incomes. This ensures that everyone is able to be treated, no matter what their individual wealth or means may be.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nhs.uk/England/AboutTheNhs/Default.cmsx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Private&amp;quot; (i.e. non-NHS) doctors and hospitals do exist in Britain, but fewer than 10% of Britons choose to buy private health insurance in preference to using the NHS. (The big exception to this is in the area of dental care: NHS dentists are relatively difficult to find in many areas, and many people are forced to &amp;quot;go private&amp;quot;, even if uninsured.)&lt;br /&gt;
==Rationing==&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of its comprehensive coverage, the resources of the NHS have been consistently tightly stretched for many years, leading to rationing such as lengthy waiting lists for surgery. This was the case in the 1980s and 1990s in particular. Since 1997, the NHS has benefited from substantially increased spending under the Labour Party, but there is a perception among many in Britain that the extra money has not been well spent or delivered appropriate improvements. However, it is noteworthy that when individuals are surveyed regarding their own experience of the NHS, the vast majority report positive experiences. &lt;br /&gt;
==Poor quality care==&lt;br /&gt;
One million NHS patients have been the victims of appalling care in hospitals across Britain, according to a major report released Aug. 27, 2009.  In the last six years, says the Patients Association, hundreds of thousands have suffered from poor standards of nursing, often with 'neglectful, demeaning, painful and sometimes downright cruel' treatment. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rebecca Smith, &amp;quot;'Cruel and neglectful' care of one million NHS patients exposed,&amp;quot; [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6092658/Cruel-and-neglectful-care-of-one-million-NHS-patients-exposed.html ''Telegraph'' (London) 27 Aug 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many critics, including Daniel Hannan, have expressed serious concern over the failure of the NHS in providing Britain with an acceptable health care. Criticism included the immense wasteful costs of the NHS, shortage of doctors and other vital employees, lack of available care, and poor quality of facilities and care. Critics have also pointed to the fact that many British citizens travel to the United States to receive proper quality of care, because it simply does not exist in the British system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/danielhannan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==All party support==&lt;br /&gt;
The NHS is supported by politicians of all parties in the UK, but is widely regarded as the child of the Labour Party, and inspires particular affection in the supporters of this party.  All post [[World war II|war]] governments have consistently supported  the National Health Service.  British voters can see that it works well.  Even [[Margaret Thatcher]] worked to reform the National Health Service and make it more efficient. &amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt;http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/biography.asp#ess87-90&amp;lt;/Ref&amp;gt; Currently the Conservative website attacks the Labour party because  they feel it is underinvesting in the health service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nhs.uk/ NHS Official Homepage]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Health]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Health_Service&amp;diff=765202</id>
		<title>National Health Service</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Health_Service&amp;diff=765202"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:20:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: /* Poor quality care */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''National Health Service (NHS)''' is the [[United Kingdom]]'s nationalised [[health]] care system. It was established in 1948 as part of [[Clement Attlee]]'s post-[[World War II]] [[Labour Party|Labour]] government's socialist program, and has been supported by politicians of every party since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NHS is nominally funded out of &amp;quot;National Insurance contributions&amp;quot;, a form of personal [[taxation]] comparable to the US [[Social Security]] system. The NHS revenue stream is, in theory, entirely separate in operation from income tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1394285&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practice, the NHS is funded from general taxation, and is accepted by the British electorate as being funded in this way. All prescription medicines (however not over-the-counter ones) are available for a low standard fee in [[England]], with the fee in [[Scotland]] being slightly lower. Prescriptions are entirely free of charge in [[Wales]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Medicinespharmacyandindustry/Prescriptions/NHScosts/DH_508&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. NHS treatment is available to all residents of the UK. Most services, including complex and expensive surgical procedures and drugs, are free at the point of use, and those that are not (such as the provision of glasses and dental care) are free to people on low incomes. This ensures that everyone is able to be treated, no matter what their individual wealth or means may be.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nhs.uk/England/AboutTheNhs/Default.cmsx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Private&amp;quot; (i.e. non-NHS) doctors and hospitals do exist in Britain, but fewer than 10% of Britons choose to buy private health insurance in preference to using the NHS. (The big exception to this is in the area of dental care: NHS dentists are relatively difficult to find in many areas, and many people are forced to &amp;quot;go private&amp;quot;, even if uninsured.)&lt;br /&gt;
==Rationing==&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of its comprehensive coverage, the resources of the NHS have been consistently tightly stretched for many years, leading to rationing such as lengthy waiting lists for surgery. This was the case in the 1980s and 1990s in particular. Since 1997, the NHS has benefited from substantially increased spending under the Labour Party, but there is a perception among many in Britain that the extra money has not been well spent or delivered appropriate improvements. However, it is noteworthy that when individuals are surveyed regarding their own experience of the NHS, the vast majority report positive experiences. &lt;br /&gt;
==Poor quality care==&lt;br /&gt;
One million NHS patients have been the victims of appalling care in hospitals across Britain, according to a major report released Aug. 27, 2009.  In the last six years, says the Patients Association, hundreds of thousands have suffered from poor standards of nursing, often with 'neglectful, demeaning, painful and sometimes downright cruel' treatment. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rebecca Smith, &amp;quot;'Cruel and neglectful' care of one million NHS patients exposed,&amp;quot; [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6092658/Cruel-and-neglectful-care-of-one-million-NHS-patients-exposed.html ''Telegraph'' (London) 27 Aug 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many critics, including Daniel Hannan, have expressed serious concern over the failure of the NHS in providing Britain with an acceptable health care. Criticism included the immense wasteful costs of the NHS, shortage of doctors and other vital employees, lack of available care, and poor quality of facilities and care. Critics have also pointed to the fact that many British citizens travel to the United States to receive proper quality of care, because there is no market for quality care in the British system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/danielhannan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==All party support==&lt;br /&gt;
The NHS is supported by politicians of all parties in the UK, but is widely regarded as the child of the Labour Party, and inspires particular affection in the supporters of this party.  All post [[World war II|war]] governments have consistently supported  the National Health Service.  British voters can see that it works well.  Even [[Margaret Thatcher]] worked to reform the National Health Service and make it more efficient. &amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt;http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/biography.asp#ess87-90&amp;lt;/Ref&amp;gt; Currently the Conservative website attacks the Labour party because  they feel it is underinvesting in the health service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nhs.uk/ NHS Official Homepage]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Health]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Health_Service&amp;diff=765201</id>
		<title>National Health Service</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Health_Service&amp;diff=765201"/>
		<updated>2010-03-26T18:18:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ervin: /* Poor quality care */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''National Health Service (NHS)''' is the [[United Kingdom]]'s nationalised [[health]] care system. It was established in 1948 as part of [[Clement Attlee]]'s post-[[World War II]] [[Labour Party|Labour]] government's socialist program, and has been supported by politicians of every party since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NHS is nominally funded out of &amp;quot;National Insurance contributions&amp;quot;, a form of personal [[taxation]] comparable to the US [[Social Security]] system. The NHS revenue stream is, in theory, entirely separate in operation from income tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1394285&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practice, the NHS is funded from general taxation, and is accepted by the British electorate as being funded in this way. All prescription medicines (however not over-the-counter ones) are available for a low standard fee in [[England]], with the fee in [[Scotland]] being slightly lower. Prescriptions are entirely free of charge in [[Wales]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Medicinespharmacyandindustry/Prescriptions/NHScosts/DH_508&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. NHS treatment is available to all residents of the UK. Most services, including complex and expensive surgical procedures and drugs, are free at the point of use, and those that are not (such as the provision of glasses and dental care) are free to people on low incomes. This ensures that everyone is able to be treated, no matter what their individual wealth or means may be.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nhs.uk/England/AboutTheNhs/Default.cmsx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Private&amp;quot; (i.e. non-NHS) doctors and hospitals do exist in Britain, but fewer than 10% of Britons choose to buy private health insurance in preference to using the NHS. (The big exception to this is in the area of dental care: NHS dentists are relatively difficult to find in many areas, and many people are forced to &amp;quot;go private&amp;quot;, even if uninsured.)&lt;br /&gt;
==Rationing==&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of its comprehensive coverage, the resources of the NHS have been consistently tightly stretched for many years, leading to rationing such as lengthy waiting lists for surgery. This was the case in the 1980s and 1990s in particular. Since 1997, the NHS has benefited from substantially increased spending under the Labour Party, but there is a perception among many in Britain that the extra money has not been well spent or delivered appropriate improvements. However, it is noteworthy that when individuals are surveyed regarding their own experience of the NHS, the vast majority report positive experiences. &lt;br /&gt;
==Poor quality care==&lt;br /&gt;
One million NHS patients have been the victims of appalling care in hospitals across Britain, according to a major report released Aug. 27, 2009.  In the last six years, says the Patients Association, hundreds of thousands have suffered from poor standards of nursing, often with 'neglectful, demeaning, painful and sometimes downright cruel' treatment. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rebecca Smith, &amp;quot;'Cruel and neglectful' care of one million NHS patients exposed,&amp;quot; [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6092658/Cruel-and-neglectful-care-of-one-million-NHS-patients-exposed.html ''Telegraph'' (London) 27 Aug 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many critics, including Daniel Hannan, have expressed serious concern over the failure of the NHS in providing Britain with an acceptable health care. Criticism included the immense wasteful costs of the NHS, shortage of doctors and other vital employees, lack of available care, and poor quality of facilities and care. Critics have also pointed to the fact that many British citizens travel to the United States to receive proper quality of care, because there is no market for quality care in the British system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==All party support==&lt;br /&gt;
The NHS is supported by politicians of all parties in the UK, but is widely regarded as the child of the Labour Party, and inspires particular affection in the supporters of this party.  All post [[World war II|war]] governments have consistently supported  the National Health Service.  British voters can see that it works well.  Even [[Margaret Thatcher]] worked to reform the National Health Service and make it more efficient. &amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt;http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/biography.asp#ess87-90&amp;lt;/Ref&amp;gt; Currently the Conservative website attacks the Labour party because  they feel it is underinvesting in the health service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nhs.uk/ NHS Official Homepage]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Health]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ervin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>