https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=FexuoConservapedia - User contributions [en]2026-09-23T11:07:57ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.14https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Atheism&diff=962864Talk:Atheism2012-02-20T12:34:05Z<p>Fexuo: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| align=right border=2 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 3px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;"<br />
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Atheism/Archive_Set_2|Set 2 of Archives]]<br />
|}<br />
{| align=right border=2 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 3px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;"<br />
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Atheism/Archive_Set_1|Set 1 of Archives]]<br />
|}<br />
__TOC__<br />
<!-- =============DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS TEXT WHEN ARCHIVING=================== --><br />
<br />
==Is atheism protected by the First Amendment?==<br />
I think this issue needs to be researched and clarified in the page. Thank you. [[User:JoeSmithson117|JoeSmithson117]] 18:53, 4 December 2011 (EST)<br />
::I am not a lawyer who specializes in U.S. Constitutional law. Setting the issue of the law aside, I can tell you that there will be no protecting atheism from the [[Question evolution! campaign]] which will rip it to shreds. <br />
[[File:Carcharodon carcharias.jpg|thumbnail|400px|right|The [http://creation.com/question-evolution 15 razor sharp teeth] of the [[Question evolution! campaign]], are going to publicly rip [[evolution]]ary [[pseudoscience]] and atheism to shreds. Evolutionists have a long track record of getting devoured in [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBRpZhk_vA open water] conditions (please see: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].) ]]<br />
<br />
==This article is full of complete BS==<br />
Atheism has no rules. Of course rape isn't forbidden, but that doesn't mean that all atheists are homosexual rapists. The atheism and obesity 'connection' is just garbage thrown in. The only accurate sentence in this entire article is 'Atheism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and other philosophy reference works, is the denial of the existence of God.' I'm surprised 'pedophilla' is only mentioned once, whenever there's someone you don't like you slap the word pedophile on them with no evidence to back it up.</div>Fexuo