https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=ForHimOnly 2026-10-25T10:56:12Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Antichrist&diff=787270 2010-06-14T10:41:10Z

<p>ForHimOnly: </p> <hr /> <div>This article needs a complete rewrite; it appears to be possibly written from a non Christian standpoint. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:30, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> : Not my impression, it does seem to be written by someone who doesn't think that the anti-Christ is meant to be a literal person. That's a view that many Christians have. Still, the article could use some rewriting. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Either that or a Preterist perspective, I should clarify. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:42, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> : One doesn't need to be preterist to see the antichrist as not a single individual. Anyways, I've expanded the article and reworked parts. Let me know what you think. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:55, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Looks good! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:01, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Do you think it is worth including some of the theories put forward for the idenitities of the anti-Christ (e.g. Hitler)? I don't think so, but any thoughts?-[[User:Sanser|Sanser]]<br /> ::No. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:39, 6 December 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> <br /> === Possible Antichrist among the political leadership of the US today ===<br /> <br /> We should add a section about the likelihood of Obama or Nancy Pelosi being the anti-christ. I'm not saying any of them are, but the possibility should be described here. --[[User:ForHimOnly|ForHimOnly]] 06:39, 14 June 2010 (EDT)</div>

ForHimOnly https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Antichrist&diff=787269 2010-06-14T10:39:50Z

<p>ForHimOnly: </p> <hr /> <div>This article needs a complete rewrite; it appears to be possibly written from a non Christian standpoint. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:30, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> : Not my impression, it does seem to be written by someone who doesn't think that the anti-Christ is meant to be a literal person. That's a view that many Christians have. Still, the article could use some rewriting. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Either that or a Preterist perspective, I should clarify. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:42, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> : One doesn't need to be preterist to see the antichrist as not a single individual. Anyways, I've expanded the article and reworked parts. Let me know what you think. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:55, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Looks good! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:01, 25 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Do you think it is worth including some of the theories put forward for the idenitities of the anti-Christ (e.g. Hitler)? I don't think so, but any thoughts?-[[User:Sanser|Sanser]]<br /> ::No. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:39, 6 December 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> We should add a section about the likelihood of Obama or Nancy Pelosi being the anti-christ. I'm not saying any of them are, but the possibility should be described here. --[[User:ForHimOnly|ForHimOnly]] 06:39, 14 June 2010 (EDT)</div>

ForHimOnly