<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=FriedrichE</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=FriedrichE"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/FriedrichE"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T14:32:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Communism&amp;diff=805638</id>
		<title>Communism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Communism&amp;diff=805638"/>
		<updated>2010-08-14T22:33:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;FriedrichE: /* Notorious communists */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Captive-nations-01b----07-19-06.jpg|thumbnail|180px|right|A monument to the Captive Nations stands at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation in [[Washington, D.C.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Communism''' is a materialistic and militantly atheistic ideology created to justify the overthrow of [[Capitalism]], replacing [[free market]] economics and [[democracy]] with a &amp;quot;[[dictatorship of the proletariat]]&amp;quot;. Under Communism, the [[political]] system replaces the [[private property|private ownership]] of the [[means of production]] with &amp;quot;[[collective ownership]]&amp;quot; of the economy, this is to be accomplished through direct democratic control by the workers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.marxists.org/archive/mandel/1968/11/workersdem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Twentieth century Communism was based on [[Karl Marx]]'s manifesto which proposed to establishment of a &amp;quot;[[classless society]].&amp;quot;  However, all Communist societies have had a [[class structure]], notably the [[USSR]], which was dominated by a self appointed ''[[Nomenklatura]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the belief that &amp;quot;people cannot change&amp;quot;, governments under the banner of Communism have caused the death of somewhere between 40 million to 260 million human lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/finalconflict/fcrevb102.html The Black Book of Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/lelivrenoir.htm The Black Book of Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm Source List and Detailed Death Tolls for the Twentieth Century Hemoclysm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sarasotamagazine.com/blog/template_permalink.asp?id=365 Memory and Ideology]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2526 The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Dr.  R. J. Rummel, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Hawaii, is the scholar who first coined the term [[democide]] (death by government).  Dr. R. J. Rummel's mid estimate regarding the loss of life due to communism is that communism caused the death of approximately 110,286,000 people between 1917 and 1987.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President [[Ronald Reagan]] in an address before the British [[House of Commons]] said, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|What I am describing now is a plan and hope for the long term -- the march of freedom and democracy which will leave [[Marxism-Leninism]] on the ash heap of history as it has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Ronald Reagan [http://www.iri.org/history_ReaganSpeech.asp Speech to the British Parliament], June 8, 1982. Retrieved from International Republican Institute 05/24/07. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, communism continues to rule over at least one-fifth of the world's people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/history_communism.php Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation], Documenting Communism's Crimes Against Humanity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communist theory and practice==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HammerAndSickle.png|thumb|left|180px|The [[hammer and sickle]], the international symbol of communism, is a revolutionist symbol that stands for the uprising of the peasants (the sickle) and the workers (the hammer).]]   &lt;br /&gt;
Communism is based upon [[Marxism]], a philosophy which uses [[materialism]] to explain all physical and social phenomena.  The theory of [[evolution]] influenced the thinking of the Communists, including Marx, [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin]], and [[Joseph Stalin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Marx wrote, &amp;quot;[[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural science for the class struggle in history.&amp;quot; Marx offered to dedicate the second German edition of his polemic &amp;quot;Das Kapital&amp;quot; to [[Charles Darwin]], but Darwin declined the &amp;quot;honour.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought, Bob Jessop, ISBN 0415193265 (pg 476)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economically, communism advocates a [[socialist]] economy in which the government owns the [[means of production]]. In countries where communism has been imposed, the government has taken ownership of farms, factories, stores and so on in the name of the people; see &amp;quot;[[dictatorship of the proletariat]]&amp;quot;. This drives all [[free market|market-based]] economic activity underground and leads to inefficiencies and shortages. In both the Soviet Union and Red China, the number of people who starved to death when the government confiscated their farm products (animals and grain) is estimated in the tens of millions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even more important, one party controls every organization from the local labor union to the the army to the national government.  The party is not elected. Its top officials (the &amp;quot;Politburo&amp;quot;) select replacements when there is a vacancy.  usually a dictator (like Stalin, Mao or Castro) controls the Politburo, but sometimes power is shared among five or six people.  No dissent is allowed--all news media are controlled, and the Internet is heavily censored. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elites do not disappear. Members of the ruling party (see [[Nomenklatura]]) have special stores in which ordinary people are barred, stores which are allegedly immune to the shortages which the lower class must endure.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Various communist doctrines have evolved or been adapted to the time and place they have been implemented. Marxism, developed by [[Karl Marx]], and its modifications under [[Vladimir Ilyich Lenin| Vladimir Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin]], and [[Mao Zedong]], advocates the overthrow of the existing order by a revolution of the proletariat, the social group which does not control the means of production. The goal of Marxism is supposedly to create a classless society which would result in no longer the need for any [[government]] (Communism).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most famous government to label itself &amp;quot;communist&amp;quot; is the former [[USSR]] or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; the Communist Party controlled its government from 1918 to 1991. This government was officially [[atheist]] and attempted to suppress all religion until World War II, when it discovered religion was needed to rally the people against the Nazi invaders.  Like all authoritarian regimes, it tried to cultivate reverence for the state as a psychological substitute for religion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist theory is intended to appeal to its adherents with the phrase, &amp;quot;from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs&amp;quot;, which essentially states point blank a worker does not get paid according to his abilities, and there is no [[incentive]] within the economic theory. Another quote by Marx was, &amp;quot;The theory of the Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property,&amp;quot; or as some have phrased it, legalized theft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communism and militant atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] established [[atheism]] as a key part of communism.  He famously said,  &amp;quot;Religion ... is the opium of the masses.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, K. [http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/31765.html Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right] (Classic Quotations) (Standard translation from the original German).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He believed it was part of the &amp;quot;superstructure,&amp;quot; a false culture built to maintain the status quo.  Thus he denigrated Christianity as a fictional religion.  Instead, Marx was an avowed atheist, as he wrote, &amp;quot;Communism begins from the outset with [[atheism]]; but atheism is at first far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, Karl, [http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm Private Property and Communism], 1944.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]] similarly wrote: &amp;quot;A Marxist must be a materialist, i. e., an enemy of religion, but a dialectical materialist, i. e., one who treats the struggle against religion not in an abstract way, not on the basis of remote, purely theoretical, never varying preaching, but in a concrete way, on the basis of the class struggle which is going on ''in practice'' and is educating the masses more and better than anything else could.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, ''Proletary'', No. 45, May 13 (26), 1909, translated by Andrew Rothstein and Bernard Issacs, quote from [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1955, [[China|Chinese]] communist leader Chou En-lai declared, &amp;quot;We Communists are atheists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Noebel, David, The Battle for Truth, Harvest House, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[atheism]] in communist regimes has been and continues to be [[militant atheism]] and various acts of repression including the razing of thousands of religious buildings and the killing, imprisoning, and oppression of religious leaders and believers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.academia.org/campus_reports/2000/March_2000_4.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/frroman1.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/article/23082?page_no=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/7/120250.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_26_116/ai_56249447&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theworldnow.wordpress.com/tag/around-the-world/asia/china/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxists justification for its persecution of the Russian Orthodox Church was based upon the claim that the Church was a &amp;quot;willing tool of Tsarism.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.marxist.com/religion-soviet-union170406-6.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The clergy openly stated its support for the counter-revolution (White Revolution). Lenin proclaimed that a communist regime must show itself to be merciless toward the question of religion. There was no place for the church in Lenin's regime. This led to anti-religious decrees and propaganda. All church property was expropriated by the new Soviet government. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-42047/Union-of-Soviet-Socialist-Republics#277888.hook&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the late 1930's and later 1940's the restrictions on church activity were loosened as Stalin needed all the support he could get for the war. This doctrine of co-operation between the church and state continued through out the existence of the Soviet republics and the other Warszawa pact nations. Though never going as far as a leader of the Soviet Union asking [http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/simon_barrow/2007/03/hiding_behind_god.html god to bless the country] the clause in the Soviet Unions constitution addressing the separation of church and state was rendered useless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Martin Luther King]] said, &amp;quot;for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything - force, violence, murder, lying - is a justifiable means.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Stride Toward Freedom : The Montgomery Story'', Martin Luther King, Jr., Harper and Rowe, New York, 1958, p. 92.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atrocities and Repression ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stalin-kill.jpg|thumb|300px|left|Exhumed skeletons of [[class war]] victims murdered by communists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mega.nu/ampp/rummel/rm1.stalin.kill.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Apologists maintain communism has never really been tried.  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Communist regimes have engaged in mass killings on a scale of millions of individuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/comfaq.htm#part3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A work entitled ''[[The Black Book of Communism]]'' published by the [[Harvard]] Press focuses on the crimes, terror, and repression of modern communist regimes over a 70 year period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/COUBLA.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This book is fairly controversial partly due to the various estimates regarding the millions of people who died under communist regimes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/finalconflict/fcrevb102.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/lelivrenoir.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sarasotamagazine.com/blog/template_permalink.asp?id=365&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2526&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, a influential book which concerns itself with Russian communist torture, repression and atrocities is [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]]'s ''[[The Gulag Archipelago]]'' which won Solzhenitsyn a [[Nobel Prize]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/03/01/home/solz-gulag.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1983, Alexander Solzhenitsyn in which he gave his explanation of the cause of why millions of people died under Russian communism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: &amp;quot;Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened. Since then I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: &amp;quot;Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In communist [[North Korea]], abuse and killing in prison camps is occurring today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5596&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kimsoft.com/korea/nkdefec3.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the North Korean government practices brutal repression and atrocities against North Korean Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/article/23082?page_no=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/7/120250.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999, the publication [[Christian Century]] reported that &amp;quot;China has persecuted religious believers by means of &amp;quot;harassment, prolonged detention, and incarceration in prison or `reform-through-labor' camps and police closure of places of worship.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_26_116/ai_56249447&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2003, owners of Bibles in China were sent to prison camps and 125 Chinese churches were closed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China continues to practice religious oppression today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theworldnow.wordpress.com/tag/around-the-world/asia/china/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communists cite scripture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Communist ideology has made its way into the Church as a [[Social Gospel]], interpreting the Gospel as less redemptive of sin and more of a public works campaign and activism. They often cite Jesus feeding the masses and warnings to the wealthy who believed self-seeking is all this world has to offer. Communists often cite the Acts of the Apostles, as early Christians practicing some form of sharing for the common good:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And all that believed were together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. (Acts 2:44-45, KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet.(Acts 4:34-7, KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as Arnold Toynbee has pointed out, this Marxist view denies the most crucial points,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The passage in the Acts represents the philanthropy of the primitive Christian Society as flowing from a God-given grace which was the fruit of a belief in the divinity of Jesus. In other words, the charity which is here depicted as moving the primitive Christians to go—in their mutual concern for one another's welfare—to the extreme length of sharing all their worldly goods is not a mere love of Man for Man (which is the limited literal meaning of the word ‘philanthropy’), but is a spiritual relation to which God is a party as well as His human creatures. In fact, this Christian Socialism is a practical application, on the economic surface of life, of the fundamental religious truth that the brotherhood of man is a consequence of the fatherhood of God - a truth which is driven home with special force by a religion which teaches that God is not only the Father and Creator of man, but also his Savior, Who has been incarnate in human shape and has suffered, and triumphed over, death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585, ''Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cummunisms shared totalitarian ideals with facism and nazism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Adolf Hitler]] noted that Communists made excellent converts to Nazism, because the same personality type was attracted to both. &amp;quot;[T]here is more that binds us to [[Bolshevik|Bolshevism]] than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois [[Social democracy|Social-Democrat]] and the trade-union boss will never make a [[National Socialist]], but the Communists always will.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;quoted in Hermann Rauschning, ''Hitler Speaks''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Josef Stalin]] also recognized that ex-Nazis and ex-[[fascist]]s were natural recruits for post-war Communist regimes. As Stanley Payne notes in his ''A History of Fascism: 1914-1945'', &amp;quot;All over Soviet-occupied eastern Europe, most rank-and-file former fascist party members, together with many lower-level leaders, were welcomed to fill the ranks of the initially exiguous local Communist parties. The psychological transition seems to have been an easy one, for obvious reasons.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lietuvos.org/istorija/communism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cuban communism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cuba]] remains a communist state controlled by the Castro brothers since 1960 and under U.S economic sanctions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Asian communism==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[CCP]] in China retains an autocratic regime controlled by the Communist party, which allows no democracy or dissent. However it does allow capitalism, and has experienced a very rapid growth of the private sector and the middle class. Observers expect that the regime's efforts to control public opinion and forestall the will of the people will be more and more difficult. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[North Korea]] remains a brutal dictatorship controlled by the same family. [[Laos]], and [[Vietnam]] are also run by the old Communist cliques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Collapse of the Soviet bloc==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The shooting down by the Soviets on Sept. 1, 1983 of [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] may have been a contributing factor for the downfall of the Soviet Union as well as for the whole Soviet block. It being a catalyst for the collapse of the Soviet Union may be inferred from the fact that NATO had decided, under the impetus of the U.S. administration, to deploy Pershing II and cruise missiles in Europe, primarily West Germany. This deployment would have placed missiles just 6-10 minutes striking distance from Moscow. But support for the deployment was wavering and many doubted that the missile deployment would find enough support to effect it. When the Soviet Union shot down Flight 007 with 269 people aboard, including conservative Democratic Congressman [[Larry McDonald]] —an act which U.S. President Ronald Reagan characterized as a &amp;quot;massacre&amp;quot;—enough support was galvanized for the deployment. The deployment caused great resources of the Soviet Union to be diverted from inner economic use to military expenditures to counter the U.S. and NATO missile deployment. &lt;br /&gt;
Between 1989 and 1991, many communist governments fell. The [[Berlin Wall]] in [[Germany]], which had become a symbol for the division between the West and communist states, was torn down largely in response to Ronald Reagan in 1989, and there was also a large revolution against Romanian dictator [[Nicolaie Ceausescu]]. In 1991, the USSR broke up into several countries - each which reformed to capitalism. Some of these remained under autocratic governments, but some have embraced democracy.  With the collapse the remnants of Communist parties have dropped their old names and ideologies, but still operate on the left of the political spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American communism==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Committees of Correspondence]]''&lt;br /&gt;
With the collapse of Soviet communism and the conversion of Chinese communism to &amp;quot;state run capitalism,&amp;quot; the spiritual and ideological center of world of communism and the [[Marxist-Leninist]] tradition shifted to the [[United States]]. Several prominent American communists, rudderless without [[Moscow]] direction, formed a new organization in 1992 called the [[Committees of Correspondence for Democratic Socialism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial organizational conference was held in [[Berkeley]], [[California]], July 17-19, 1992. Charlene Mitchell, a former leader of the California Communist Party, speaking at the conference said, &amp;quot;the collapse of [[socialism]] in [[Eastern Europe]] left the [[United States]] in a near unchallenged position of world leadership.&amp;quot; Mitchell continued, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|What began as a moment to take stock and ponder where to go from there has now become a very different entity. People from the Communist Party, from CrossRoads, from the [[Democratic Socialists of America]], from NCIPA [National Committee for Independent Political Action], from Solidarity, from the Socialist Organizing Network and many others, including independent leftists and independent socialists, have come together here in Berkeley.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Criticizing U.S. actions in the [[First Gulf War]], Mitchell stated, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|[[progressive]] forces were nearly powerless in the face of an onslaught of demagogic, [[patriotic]] [[jingoism]] and yellow ribbons. This war, fought for no legitimate reason, was the crowning height of [[George H.W. Bush|President [George H.W.] Bush]]'s [[New World Order]].  Previously, the Soviet Union helped to provide a certain balance to rein in the crazies in this country. Now, that balance is no longer there. It is now up to us, the American people, to rein in our own crazies. The [[left]] must take a major responsibility in organizing this task.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notorious communists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well known communists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Ayers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fidel Castro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugo Chavez]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carl Davidson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Marshall Davis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernardine Dohrn]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Che Guevara]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Van Jones]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lazar Kaganovich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vladimir Lenin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mao Zedong]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Robeson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yakov Sverdlov]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Leon Trotsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Genrikh Yagoda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yakov Yurovsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
** Pipes, Richard. ''History of Communism: A Brief History'' (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* Priestland, David. ''The Red Flag: A History of Communism'' (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/stream/100thingsyoushou1949unit#page/n3/mode/2up 100 Things You Should Know About Communism'']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communist Party of the United States of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cold War]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Iron Curtain]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] for the connection of the shootdown by the Soviets of KAL 007, with 269 people aboard, on Sept. 1, 1983 with the heightened U.S./Soviet confrontations of 1983-4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes and references==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.memorialsighet.ro/en/colectie.asp?id=3 Memorial to the Victims of Communism and the Resistance]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/communism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Communism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Forms of Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FriedrichE</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=805618</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=805618"/>
		<updated>2010-08-14T22:14:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;FriedrichE: /* Other Socialist Countries (Current ) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|350px|right|One of the most well known socialist parties of the 20th century was the [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (NAZI) which was headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''', [[liberals]] will say, is an economic system with state ownership or control of the all the major means of production and distribution of goods and services&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism Meriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Because some businesses still are privately owned, ipso facto, the United States is not a socialistic government. &amp;quot;That definition is confuted by the earliest theoretical writings on socialism.  In France, Henri de Saint-Simon, in the first decades of the 1800s, and his pupil and colleague [[Auguste Comte]], in the 1820s and 30s, along with [[Robert Owen]] contemporaneously in England, ''stated that the essential feature of what Owen called socialism is government regulation of the means of production and distribution.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ Thomas E. Brewton; Once Again: What Is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the government controls the volume of money and its economic applications, it has the economy in a stranglehold.  When government controls education so that nothing other than secular socialism may be taught, as Saint-Simon advocated, it controls the future destiny of a nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the birth of the [[Soviet Union]] after the [[Communist Revolution]] did the idea become generally accepted that socialism meant government seizing ownership of the economy.  ''Experience in 19th and 20th century [[France]], [[England]], and [[Germany]], however, made it clear that regulatory control by government bureaucrats is sufficient to implement socialism.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ What is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Communism]] (the primary variant of socialism) the central goal is to establish a &amp;quot;worker's paradise&amp;quot;-an ideal state with perfect equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice the socialist government owns the banks, railroads, farmlands, factories, and stores, and is the only employer, or at least controls the regulation of production and distribution.  The central goal is to destroy the &amp;quot;evils of capitalism&amp;quot; by government ownership or control of the means of production, usually with one party controlling the government on behalf of the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist system never manages to establish this &amp;quot;paradise&amp;quot; because management for the benefit of the employees leads to featherbedding and lack of investment or economic growth, at the expense of consumers.  Collective farming (operating farms like factories) sharply reduced the food supply. The most thoroughgoing efforts by Communist regimes turned into authoritarian dictatorships. The government controls all investments, production, distribution, income, and prices, as well as all organizations, schools, news media and formerly private societies. Churches and labor unions are suppressed or controlled by the government. Socialism is the antithesis of [[capitalism]], because it opposes private ownership of capital or land, and rejects the free market in favor of central planning. It also rejects &amp;quot;civil society&amp;quot; and makes sure that all organizations are controlled by the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, socialist regimes can have multiple parties. In practice there is only one political party, and it controls the government. The leaders of the party choose the government officials and set all policies for the nation and for cities and localities.  Opposition parties are not allowed access to the media or to meeting halls or to funding, and their leaders are often arrested as &amp;quot;enemies of the people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the redistribution of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the many over the rights of the few, but in practice when socialist economic principles are forced onto a nation by a totalitarian government a new Upper Class appears which is much better off than the Lower Class.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- Winston Churchill&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/280995/winston-churchill/socialism-is-a-philosophy-of-failure-the-creed-of Churchill; Quotesdaddy.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contradictory Goals of Socialism=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism's stated purpose is to eliminate the huge gap between the highest and lowest classes of society. Their bitter complaint has been that the upper class exploits its dominance to gain privileges and wealth, while the lower class must suffer tyranny and poverty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;all socialists agree that a socialist economy must be run for the benefit of the vast majority of the people rather than for a small aristocratic, plutocratic, or capitalist class.&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_an_economic_system] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This obsession with class paradoxically creates a group of people with a vested interest in seeing class differences remain (socialist politicians, [[community organizer]]s, ''etc.''); if by some means the class system actually ''were'' destroyed, these people would be out of a job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another essential goal of most socialist thinkers has been to eliminate [[Capitalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... one of the fundamental goals of the socialist movement throughout history has been the abolition of capitalism&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_opposition_and_criticisms_of_socialism_arguments_for_and_against A Wisdom Archive on Socialism - Opposition and criticisms of socialism; arguments for and against]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
on the grounds that only &amp;quot;social control&amp;quot; of the economy can prevent abuses such as [[feudalism]], [[monopoly]], [[cartel]]s, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experiments on both a moderate and a grand scale have shown that socialism's main purpose has been undermined by its unremitting opposition to [[free market]] economics. In its drive to eliminate capitalism, it has overlooked the fact that general prosperity is vouchsafed by [[economic freedom]], and that free market economics improves the lot of the poor much more quickly and permanently than any system of central economic control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real aim of socialists is probably personal: why else would socialists want to create programs which encourage Dependency? Well, it fits into their lust for power. &lt;br /&gt;
People who want to control others need people who are willing to be controlled.&lt;br /&gt;
Independent, proactive people do not fit into the socialist Power Model. That is why the first thing [[Karl Marx|Marx]] wanted to remove from the economy was the [[Profit]] Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Types of Socialism=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main kinds of Socialism, all of them are built on the premise of government control of the means of production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leninism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Russian caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great unbeatable flag of [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist Socialism, or '''Leninism''', as revised by [[Vladimir Lenin]] and practiced in the pre-[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] Soviet Union, was the Socialistic theory developed by Vladimir Lenin during his rise to power. Lenin defined socialism as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism&amp;quot;, Lenin, State and Revolution, Selected Works, Progress publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 320. (End of chapter four)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leninism is totalitarian, with no [[democracy]] and all decision made by the leaders of the Communist party. Lenin saw the Communist Party as an &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; that was committed to ending capitalism and instituting socialism in its place and attaining the power by any means possible, including revolution. Lenin was quite mild on the belief, believing that, though controlling of resources was important, the people's will comes first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though [[Bolshevik]] Russia was far more prosperous than its former [[Russian Empire|Tsardom]], Lenin's death in 1924 sparked the overthrowal of his Marxist-Leninism and the imposition of [[Stalinism]], the violent, totalitarian belief that went entirely against Lenin's ideas (many of Lenin's works were censored by Stalin post-1924).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democratic Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
The second form (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Western Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the British Labour Party. It was democratic and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The idea was that labor unions controlled the government and therefore unions controlled working conditions and wages for the benefit of workers, regardless of the damage to long-term economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europe and Canada) have largely dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted capitalism. However they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism, but they have praised its vigorous anti-Communism.  Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In countries such as [[Sweden]], a form of [[democratic socialism]] has been much more successful, leading to high [[social equity]] and a burgeoning economy, as well as general [[content]]. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communal Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual.  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
''This section confuses &amp;quot;interpretation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]]. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called &amp;quot;the road to serfdom.&amp;quot;  Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marx, Karl|Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the western world throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists--they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismark]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of Democratic President, Franklin D. Roosevelt's,[[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the chaos sparked by the advent of the Reformation in Europe, several sects with radical new interpretations of Christianity sprung up, many of them Anabaptists (believers in adult baptism). Under the leadership of the reformer Thomas Muntzer the peasants of south-west Germany rose up in arms against the clergy and nobility, establishing anarcho-communes in their wake. Though they were massacred to a man, ten years later a group of radical Anabaptists under the leadership of Jan Matthys seized control of the north-western Germany city of Munster from the Prince-Archbishop there and established a Christian-Communist state. True to the spirit of applied communism, Mathys took twelve wives, held lavish feasts for himself and his most loyal followers and had himself crowned King of the World as the city starved, besieged by an alliance of Protestant and Catholic forces keen to see them exterminated. Mathys and all his followers were all tortured and killed when the Prince-Archbishop returned with professional troops to sack the city and reassert his authority, effectively wiping out all non-pacifistic Anabaptists in north-western Germany. Only Baptists as we know them today survived the following persecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====New Testament socialism====&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with basic aims of socialism, albeit with critical requirements and distinctions from its secularist expressions. Luke 14:33 requires the forsaking of all one has if one will be a disciple of Christ, and while this is not shown to necessarily always require the literally forsaking of all,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Acts 2:44 states that the communal believers &amp;quot;had all things common&amp;quot;. Acts 4:32-5:11 also describes community redistribution of property, and details the Divine punishment of a husband and wife for hypocrisy, in keeping proceeds from the sale of a piece of property while openly pretending that they gave it all, as others  voluntarily did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, 5:1-11)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, forsaking all is shown to be that of first surrendering oneself and life to the God of the Bible, and placing all at His disposal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry (1662 - 1714), ''Commentary on the Whole Bible'', Lk. 14:25-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Archibald Thomas Robertson, ''WORD PICTURES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT'', Lk. 14:33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with literal giving as a result being as He directs, and voluntary. (2Cor. 8,9) &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: (2 Corinthians 9:7-8)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the early organic community provides a noble model of communal life, and of a &amp;quot;seminary&amp;quot; type experience, it was also soon dispersed by persecution (thus greatly expanding the church: Acts 8:1-5; 11:19), and it is later indicated that believers retained ownership of property after conversion. (Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13) Rich Christians are evidenced to have been part of the early church, but were not mandated by the church itself to give all they had away, but to be lowly in mind, and to be ready and willing to distribute, in faith and surrender to God. (1Tim. 6:17-19) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in both Testaments capitalism is clearly supported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary North, ''Capitalism and the Bible''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and indolence is not subsidized, but penalized by poverty, while diligence in work is rewarded by its fruits. (Prov. 6:6-11; 13:4; 20:4; 2 Thes. 3:10-12; 1 Tim. 5:17-18) Although holy widows over 60 years old who were without familial support were taken in by the church, a man is clearly required to provide for his own family, if able. (1Tim. 5:2ff) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
While the success of the early church as an organic community is often invoked in support of modern socialism, and many communes of the 1960s evoked the Bible, the early organic church was a result of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit among believers, while the &amp;quot;administrators&amp;quot; were humble servants who were examples of self-sacrifice, and who worked with their own hands as needed, (1Cor. 4:9-16) and whose authority was established by manifest Divine attestation, including the pro-active exercise of church discipline being only by supernatural or otherwise spiritual means, not carnal force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:43; 5:5,9,10; 1Cor. 4:19-21; 2Cor. 13:2,3; 2Thes. 3:14,15; 2Tim. 4:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition other distinctions, without the unique changes and influence resulting from faith and full surrender to Christ from all the community, and His anointing upon the work, attempts to mimic the communal life of Christians have failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one critic of modern-day  socialism states: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Socialism, unfortunately, completely disregards Biblical teaching about the fallen nature of human beings and assumes that human beings will act in a morally upright fashion if their basic needs are met. This is at the heart of why socialistic systems never work: because human nature does not work in this fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/capitalism-and-socialism-in-light-of-the-bible Bob Ellis, ''Capitalism and Socialism in Light of the Bible''] Dakota Voice, June 23rd, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Britain, the Labor Party and Socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British system of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best known example is the nationalization of health care to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain, and it remains so today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] most of the nationalized industries were returned to the private sector, and public housing has been sold to the residents. These conservative decisions were endorsed by the &amp;quot;New Labour&amp;quot; of Tony Blair, to the annoyance of elderly radicals who fondly remember the poverty and inefficiencies of the old system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism of socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] and [[Ludwig von Mises]] were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate.  Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources.  That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices.  This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on [[Public choice theory]] that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
USSR, 1959: I am a &amp;quot;young pioneer&amp;quot; in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The slogans of &amp;quot;fairness and equality&amp;quot; sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport.aspx?id=512665 ''The Perspective Of A Russian Immigrant''], ''Investors Business Daily,'' 09/10/2009 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was popularly elected in Chile in 1970 in a minority government run by the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism. The Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income. The majority in Parliament never supported it and the plan was never carried out as Allende was overthrown by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current )==&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950's and has declared Cuba to be Communist since then. Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their Fundamental Rights. ([[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by Kim Il Sung and carried on by current leader Kim Jong Il. Although it is investing heavily in nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, extreme poverty on the verge of starvation is the fate of the people, who are very tightly controlled. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist policies of president-for-life Hugo Chavez have destroyed the economy of that oil-rich nation. In 2009, he seized the Venezuelan operations of U.S. based Cargill in order to tighten his grip on the shrinking food supply in his country. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/4938993/Venezuelas-Hugo-Chavez-tightens-state-control-of-food-amid-rocketing-inflation-and-food-shortages.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===France===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France openly accepted Socialism in 1940 when they handed control of all areas of state power to the national socialist party. This past tendency towards socialism has become even more evident under the radical left-wing government of Nicolas Sarkozy who has taken steps to limit all areas of personal freedom and continues to ignore the rising Islamo-communist influence in the nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
Some quotes on socialism by historical figures and great thinkers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Friedrich Hayek]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of mental illness more than it does a philosophy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- L. Neil Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Socialists cry &amp;quot;Power to the people&amp;quot;, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — power over people, power to the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Margaret Thatcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Socialism is the end of all known society. This justifies all means used in reaching it be they popular uprising or complete state control over every aspect of life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Anti-socialism Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Busky, Donald F. ''Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian Socialism to the Fall of the Soviet Union'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Communism-History-Theory-Utopian-Socialism/dp/027597748X/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-24 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dougherty, Jude P. &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
*Laslett, John, ed. ''Failure of a Dream: Essays in the History of American Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lindemann, Albert S. ''A History of European Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. ''It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States'' (2001), Lipset was a leading conservative scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Didnt-Happen-Here-Socialism-Failed/dp/0393322548/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [http://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], bu leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Nove, Alec. ''An Economic History of the USSR 1917-1991'' (3rd ed. 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Suny, Ronald Grigor. ''The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States.'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24265044# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp. 417-420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_countries]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist terminology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FriedrichE</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=805613</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=805613"/>
		<updated>2010-08-14T22:08:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;FriedrichE: /* Quotes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|350px|right|One of the most well known socialist parties of the 20th century was the [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (NAZI) which was headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''', [[liberals]] will say, is an economic system with state ownership or control of the all the major means of production and distribution of goods and services&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism Meriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Because some businesses still are privately owned, ipso facto, the United States is not a socialistic government. &amp;quot;That definition is confuted by the earliest theoretical writings on socialism.  In France, Henri de Saint-Simon, in the first decades of the 1800s, and his pupil and colleague [[Auguste Comte]], in the 1820s and 30s, along with [[Robert Owen]] contemporaneously in England, ''stated that the essential feature of what Owen called socialism is government regulation of the means of production and distribution.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ Thomas E. Brewton; Once Again: What Is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the government controls the volume of money and its economic applications, it has the economy in a stranglehold.  When government controls education so that nothing other than secular socialism may be taught, as Saint-Simon advocated, it controls the future destiny of a nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the birth of the [[Soviet Union]] after the [[Communist Revolution]] did the idea become generally accepted that socialism meant government seizing ownership of the economy.  ''Experience in 19th and 20th century [[France]], [[England]], and [[Germany]], however, made it clear that regulatory control by government bureaucrats is sufficient to implement socialism.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ What is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Communism]] (the primary variant of socialism) the central goal is to establish a &amp;quot;worker's paradise&amp;quot;-an ideal state with perfect equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice the socialist government owns the banks, railroads, farmlands, factories, and stores, and is the only employer, or at least controls the regulation of production and distribution.  The central goal is to destroy the &amp;quot;evils of capitalism&amp;quot; by government ownership or control of the means of production, usually with one party controlling the government on behalf of the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist system never manages to establish this &amp;quot;paradise&amp;quot; because management for the benefit of the employees leads to featherbedding and lack of investment or economic growth, at the expense of consumers.  Collective farming (operating farms like factories) sharply reduced the food supply. The most thoroughgoing efforts by Communist regimes turned into authoritarian dictatorships. The government controls all investments, production, distribution, income, and prices, as well as all organizations, schools, news media and formerly private societies. Churches and labor unions are suppressed or controlled by the government. Socialism is the antithesis of [[capitalism]], because it opposes private ownership of capital or land, and rejects the free market in favor of central planning. It also rejects &amp;quot;civil society&amp;quot; and makes sure that all organizations are controlled by the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, socialist regimes can have multiple parties. In practice there is only one political party, and it controls the government. The leaders of the party choose the government officials and set all policies for the nation and for cities and localities.  Opposition parties are not allowed access to the media or to meeting halls or to funding, and their leaders are often arrested as &amp;quot;enemies of the people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the redistribution of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the many over the rights of the few, but in practice when socialist economic principles are forced onto a nation by a totalitarian government a new Upper Class appears which is much better off than the Lower Class.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- Winston Churchill&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/280995/winston-churchill/socialism-is-a-philosophy-of-failure-the-creed-of Churchill; Quotesdaddy.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Contradictory Goals of Socialism=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism's stated purpose is to eliminate the huge gap between the highest and lowest classes of society. Their bitter complaint has been that the upper class exploits its dominance to gain privileges and wealth, while the lower class must suffer tyranny and poverty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;all socialists agree that a socialist economy must be run for the benefit of the vast majority of the people rather than for a small aristocratic, plutocratic, or capitalist class.&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_an_economic_system] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This obsession with class paradoxically creates a group of people with a vested interest in seeing class differences remain (socialist politicians, [[community organizer]]s, ''etc.''); if by some means the class system actually ''were'' destroyed, these people would be out of a job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another essential goal of most socialist thinkers has been to eliminate [[Capitalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... one of the fundamental goals of the socialist movement throughout history has been the abolition of capitalism&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_opposition_and_criticisms_of_socialism_arguments_for_and_against A Wisdom Archive on Socialism - Opposition and criticisms of socialism; arguments for and against]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
on the grounds that only &amp;quot;social control&amp;quot; of the economy can prevent abuses such as [[feudalism]], [[monopoly]], [[cartel]]s, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experiments on both a moderate and a grand scale have shown that socialism's main purpose has been undermined by its unremitting opposition to [[free market]] economics. In its drive to eliminate capitalism, it has overlooked the fact that general prosperity is vouchsafed by [[economic freedom]], and that free market economics improves the lot of the poor much more quickly and permanently than any system of central economic control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real aim of socialists is probably personal: why else would socialists want to create programs which encourage Dependency? Well, it fits into their lust for power. &lt;br /&gt;
People who want to control others need people who are willing to be controlled.&lt;br /&gt;
Independent, proactive people do not fit into the socialist Power Model. That is why the first thing [[Karl Marx|Marx]] wanted to remove from the economy was the [[Profit]] Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Types of Socialism=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main kinds of Socialism, all of them are built on the premise of government control of the means of production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leninism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Russian caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great unbeatable flag of [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist Socialism, or '''Leninism''', as revised by [[Vladimir Lenin]] and practiced in the pre-[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] Soviet Union, was the Socialistic theory developed by Vladimir Lenin during his rise to power. Lenin defined socialism as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism&amp;quot;, Lenin, State and Revolution, Selected Works, Progress publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 320. (End of chapter four)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leninism is totalitarian, with no [[democracy]] and all decision made by the leaders of the Communist party. Lenin saw the Communist Party as an &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; that was committed to ending capitalism and instituting socialism in its place and attaining the power by any means possible, including revolution. Lenin was quite mild on the belief, believing that, though controlling of resources was important, the people's will comes first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though [[Bolshevik]] Russia was far more prosperous than its former [[Russian Empire|Tsardom]], Lenin's death in 1924 sparked the overthrowal of his Marxist-Leninism and the imposition of [[Stalinism]], the violent, totalitarian belief that went entirely against Lenin's ideas (many of Lenin's works were censored by Stalin post-1924).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democratic Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
The second form (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Western Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the British Labour Party. It was democratic and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The idea was that labor unions controlled the government and therefore unions controlled working conditions and wages for the benefit of workers, regardless of the damage to long-term economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europe and Canada) have largely dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted capitalism. However they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism, but they have praised its vigorous anti-Communism.  Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In countries such as [[Sweden]], a form of [[democratic socialism]] has been much more successful, leading to high [[social equity]] and a burgeoning economy, as well as general [[content]]. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communal Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual.  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
''This section confuses &amp;quot;interpretation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]]. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called &amp;quot;the road to serfdom.&amp;quot;  Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marx, Karl|Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the western world throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists--they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismark]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of Democratic President, Franklin D. Roosevelt's,[[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the chaos sparked by the advent of the Reformation in Europe, several sects with radical new interpretations of Christianity sprung up, many of them Anabaptists (believers in adult baptism). Under the leadership of the reformer Thomas Muntzer the peasants of south-west Germany rose up in arms against the clergy and nobility, establishing anarcho-communes in their wake. Though they were massacred to a man, ten years later a group of radical Anabaptists under the leadership of Jan Matthys seized control of the north-western Germany city of Munster from the Prince-Archbishop there and established a Christian-Communist state. True to the spirit of applied communism, Mathys took twelve wives, held lavish feasts for himself and his most loyal followers and had himself crowned King of the World as the city starved, besieged by an alliance of Protestant and Catholic forces keen to see them exterminated. Mathys and all his followers were all tortured and killed when the Prince-Archbishop returned with professional troops to sack the city and reassert his authority, effectively wiping out all non-pacifistic Anabaptists in north-western Germany. Only Baptists as we know them today survived the following persecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====New Testament socialism====&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with basic aims of socialism, albeit with critical requirements and distinctions from its secularist expressions. Luke 14:33 requires the forsaking of all one has if one will be a disciple of Christ, and while this is not shown to necessarily always require the literally forsaking of all,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Acts 2:44 states that the communal believers &amp;quot;had all things common&amp;quot;. Acts 4:32-5:11 also describes community redistribution of property, and details the Divine punishment of a husband and wife for hypocrisy, in keeping proceeds from the sale of a piece of property while openly pretending that they gave it all, as others  voluntarily did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, 5:1-11)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, forsaking all is shown to be that of first surrendering oneself and life to the God of the Bible, and placing all at His disposal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry (1662 - 1714), ''Commentary on the Whole Bible'', Lk. 14:25-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Archibald Thomas Robertson, ''WORD PICTURES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT'', Lk. 14:33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with literal giving as a result being as He directs, and voluntary. (2Cor. 8,9) &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: (2 Corinthians 9:7-8)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the early organic community provides a noble model of communal life, and of a &amp;quot;seminary&amp;quot; type experience, it was also soon dispersed by persecution (thus greatly expanding the church: Acts 8:1-5; 11:19), and it is later indicated that believers retained ownership of property after conversion. (Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13) Rich Christians are evidenced to have been part of the early church, but were not mandated by the church itself to give all they had away, but to be lowly in mind, and to be ready and willing to distribute, in faith and surrender to God. (1Tim. 6:17-19) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in both Testaments capitalism is clearly supported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary North, ''Capitalism and the Bible''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and indolence is not subsidized, but penalized by poverty, while diligence in work is rewarded by its fruits. (Prov. 6:6-11; 13:4; 20:4; 2 Thes. 3:10-12; 1 Tim. 5:17-18) Although holy widows over 60 years old who were without familial support were taken in by the church, a man is clearly required to provide for his own family, if able. (1Tim. 5:2ff) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
While the success of the early church as an organic community is often invoked in support of modern socialism, and many communes of the 1960s evoked the Bible, the early organic church was a result of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit among believers, while the &amp;quot;administrators&amp;quot; were humble servants who were examples of self-sacrifice, and who worked with their own hands as needed, (1Cor. 4:9-16) and whose authority was established by manifest Divine attestation, including the pro-active exercise of church discipline being only by supernatural or otherwise spiritual means, not carnal force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:43; 5:5,9,10; 1Cor. 4:19-21; 2Cor. 13:2,3; 2Thes. 3:14,15; 2Tim. 4:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition other distinctions, without the unique changes and influence resulting from faith and full surrender to Christ from all the community, and His anointing upon the work, attempts to mimic the communal life of Christians have failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one critic of modern-day  socialism states: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Socialism, unfortunately, completely disregards Biblical teaching about the fallen nature of human beings and assumes that human beings will act in a morally upright fashion if their basic needs are met. This is at the heart of why socialistic systems never work: because human nature does not work in this fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/capitalism-and-socialism-in-light-of-the-bible Bob Ellis, ''Capitalism and Socialism in Light of the Bible''] Dakota Voice, June 23rd, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Britain, the Labor Party and Socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British system of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best known example is the nationalization of health care to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain, and it remains so today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] most of the nationalized industries were returned to the private sector, and public housing has been sold to the residents. These conservative decisions were endorsed by the &amp;quot;New Labour&amp;quot; of Tony Blair, to the annoyance of elderly radicals who fondly remember the poverty and inefficiencies of the old system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism of socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] and [[Ludwig von Mises]] were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate.  Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources.  That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices.  This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on [[Public choice theory]] that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
USSR, 1959: I am a &amp;quot;young pioneer&amp;quot; in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The slogans of &amp;quot;fairness and equality&amp;quot; sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport.aspx?id=512665 ''The Perspective Of A Russian Immigrant''], ''Investors Business Daily,'' 09/10/2009 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was popularly elected in Chile in 1970 in a minority government run by the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism. The Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income. The majority in Parliament never supported it and the plan was never carried out as Allende was overthrown by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current )==&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950's and has declared Cuba to be Communist since then. Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their Fundamental Rights. ([[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by Kim Il Sung and carried on by current leader Kim Jong Il. Although it is investing heavily in nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, extreme poverty on the verge of starvation is the fate of the people, who are very tightly controlled. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist policies of president-for-life Hugo Chavez have destroyed the economy of that oil-rich nation. In 2009, he seized the Venezuelan operations of U.S. based Cargill in order to tighten his grip on the shrinking food supply in his country. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/4938993/Venezuelas-Hugo-Chavez-tightens-state-control-of-food-amid-rocketing-inflation-and-food-shortages.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
Some quotes on socialism by historical figures and great thinkers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Friedrich Hayek]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of mental illness more than it does a philosophy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- L. Neil Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Socialists cry &amp;quot;Power to the people&amp;quot;, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — power over people, power to the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Margaret Thatcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Socialism is the end of all known society. This justifies all means used in reaching it be they popular uprising or complete state control over every aspect of life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Anti-socialism Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Busky, Donald F. ''Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian Socialism to the Fall of the Soviet Union'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Communism-History-Theory-Utopian-Socialism/dp/027597748X/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-24 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dougherty, Jude P. &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
*Laslett, John, ed. ''Failure of a Dream: Essays in the History of American Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lindemann, Albert S. ''A History of European Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. ''It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States'' (2001), Lipset was a leading conservative scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Didnt-Happen-Here-Socialism-Failed/dp/0393322548/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [http://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], bu leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Nove, Alec. ''An Economic History of the USSR 1917-1991'' (3rd ed. 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Suny, Ronald Grigor. ''The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States.'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24265044# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp. 417-420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_countries]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist terminology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FriedrichE</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>