<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=GSmiley</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=GSmiley"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/GSmiley"/>
	<updated>2026-10-20T13:17:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_rights_advocacy&amp;diff=157222</id>
		<title>Homosexual rights advocacy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_rights_advocacy&amp;diff=157222"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T13:16:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: Polls revealing the scale of public disaffection with the homosexual lifestyle are'nt hard to find&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''gay rights''' movement seeks to elevate [[homosexuality]] to the same level of social and political respectability as heterosexual relationships. It denies or dismisses the Biblical prohibitions against homosexual acts. &amp;quot;Our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof.&amp;quot; [http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/socarides.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seeks to remove the stigma of [[sexual perversion]] from homosexuality by arguing that either, &lt;br /&gt;
# Homosexuality is an immutable trait, and discriminating against immutable traits is wrong (cf. race discrimination), or,&lt;br /&gt;
# Homosexuality, if not immutable, is highly correlated with personality, and discriminating against such deeply rooted notions of self is wrong, as well (cf. religious intolerance).&lt;br /&gt;
The movement does not seek to convince others that homosexuality is ''right'': rather, it seeks to convince the public that it is not ''wrong'' enough to regulate, criminalize, or stigmatize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Legal Success ==&lt;br /&gt;
Courts, including the Supreme Court, have accepted either one or both of these rationales.  In ''[[Romer v. Evans]]'', the Court found that discriminating against homosexuals could only be explained by a rational of animus laid bare, which was not enough even to allow state condemnation of homosexuality under the [[rational basis review]] test.  ''Romer'', then, protects the status of homosexuality from undue discrimination that occurs without a rational basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homosexual conduct was formerly illegal in many states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See generally ''Bowers v. Hardwick'', 478 U.S. 186&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the last decade of the twentieth century, although these laws existed, they were rarely (if ever) enforced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas,'' 539 U.S. 558, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the Opinion of the Court, found this in his historical analysis.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Without disclosing whether it saw homosexuality as a status protected from discrimination at as high of a level as gender and race, the Court struck down bans on homosexual conduct, framing it as an expansion of its privacy jurisprudence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas'', 539 U.S. 558&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The status of homosexuality before the law, then, is in some degree of flux.  While bare discrimination against homosexual status is facially unconstitutional lacking a rational basis, and while preventing homosexual conduct is similarly unconstitutional, the Supreme Court has held in these landmark cases that the state may discriminate against homosexuals to preserve an &amp;quot;institution that the law protects&amp;quot; - namely, [[marriage]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas''; Kennedy &amp;amp; O'Connor both reached this conclusion explicitly.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As such, the standard to be applied in deciding if discrimination against homosexuals is wrong is somewhere in between [[rational basis review]] and [[strict scrutiny review]].  Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] thinks that this uncertainty will surely be resolved in the favor of gay rights, and he warns that such a legal erosion will result in the downfall of the law's moral authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas'', Scalia, J., dissenting.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Opposition to Gay Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Polls consistently reveal that a clear majority &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/18/AR2007031800484.html|Clinton, Obama Slow to Respond to Questions on Homosexuality]Washington Post, March 18, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/963906/posts| New poll shows Americans oppose gay civil unions 58%-37%] Washington Post, August 18, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of people agree homosexuality is immoral, sinful, distasteful, degrading, or less than ideal, and prefer that public policy does not encourage it. They also do not think that we should lose rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, and traditional marriage in order to promote acceptance of homosexual behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives criticize attempts by gay rights activists to prohibit any statements which are critical of homosexuality, such as the idea that it is &amp;quot;unnatural&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sinful&amp;quot;, using [[hate crime]]s statutes and anti-[[discrimination]] laws: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The EU parliament called on Polish authorities to publicly condemn and take measures against declarations by officials &amp;quot;inciting discrimination and hatred based on sexual orientation.&amp;quot; [http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OOFTCO5&amp;amp;show_article=1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
As Amazon.com said in a review of a book of [[Harry Hay]]'s writings, he &amp;quot;is the acknowledged father…of the modern gay liberation movement.&amp;quot; As a [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) organizer, he turned out &amp;quot;essays, position papers, critical studies, and manifestos concerning what it means to be gay in the world.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Accuracy in Media, [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A269_0_2_0_C/ ''Red Roots Of Gay Movement''], Cliff Kincaid, September 10, 2003. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Human Rights Campaign]] referred to Hay as &amp;quot;founder and architect of the modern movement for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Harry was one of the first to realize that the dream of equality for our community could be attained through visibility and activism&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.hrc.org/Content/ContentGroups/News_Releases/20021/HRC_Mourns_the_Death_of_Gay_Rights_Pioneer_Harry_Hay.htm Human Rights Campaign Mourns the Death of Gay Rights Pioneer Harry Hay], Press Release, Oct. 24, 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hay not only promoted homosexual rights, he actively campaigned for the &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; of [[pedophile]]s. ''The Boston Phoenix'' noted that nowhere was this more evident than in Hay's persistent support of the right of the North American Man-Boy Love Association, [[NAMBLA]], to march in gay-pride parades. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Boston Phoenix'', [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm The real Harry Hay], Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; NAMBLA maintains a website with a body of Hay's work  and a tribute to Harry Hay on its homepage.  The [[Human Rights Campaign]] and other gay rights organizations, while revering Hay for his contributions to gay rights, do not support NAMBLA or communism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tactics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Kirk and Madsen predicted a mass public change of heart would follow, even among opponents, &amp;quot;if we can actually make them like us.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/socarides.html, arguing that Hollywood movies sometimes show homosexual men or boys taking a harmless &amp;quot;Cupid&amp;quot; role to help solidify a budding heterosexual relationship.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*A gay rights perspective, the Human Rights Campaign, www.hrc.org &lt;br /&gt;
*An anti-gay rights perspective, Accuracy in Media, [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A269_0_2_0_C/ ''Red Roots Of Gay Movement''], Cliff Kincaid, September 10, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/socarides.html How America Went Gay]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=157145</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=157145"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T10:48:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: Obama's Political Views&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Barack Hussein Obama''' (b. 4 August 1961) is the junior Senator from [[Illinois]], elected to the United States Senate as a Democrat in 2004.  He is currently a high profile candidate for the Democratic Nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]].  He is, at present, the only African American serving in the [[United States Senate]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life and Education==&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama was born in Honolulu, [[Hawaii]] to Barack Obama, Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961.  In 1967 he moved to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]] with his mother and new stepfather.  He attended an Indonesian Public School followed by a [[Catholic]] school until he returned with his mother to Hawaii.  There he attended the Punahou School, a private preparatory school until 1979, the year of his graduation.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama continued his education at Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]] before graduating with his Bachelor of Arts from [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]].  After as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He was the first African American editor of the Harvard Law Review and graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as Director of Illinois Project Vote.  In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C. and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School.  He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama rose to national prominence following his keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He defeated his opponent, Alan Keyes, and was elected to the 109th Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His voting record places him as the tenth-most Liberal member of the U. S. Senate. His composite liberal rating was 86 percent, just seven points behind [[Ted Kennedy]]. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].[http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/opinion_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23972_5436474,00.html]  Senator Obama is a Democratic front-runner for the 2008 United States presidential election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book authored, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' has spent 23 weeks on the New York Times Nonfiction Best Sellers List. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/books/bestseller/0408besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama announced his candidacy for President of the United States on Saturday, February 10, 2007 in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided Speech.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for president&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early April 2007, Obama's campaign announced his first quarter fund raising figures.  The campaign generated over $25 million dollars from over 100,000 users.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Views==&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Barack Hussein Obama's political views have been a matter of controversy even before he put himself forward as a Presidential Candidate. The veteran House Majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist.”]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11th, 2007 staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4th broadcast. Obama did not comment on the Imus' remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10th by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Globe reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus' remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Melissa Harris Lacewell exposed as hypocrite, ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Senators|Obama, Barack]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_rights_advocacy&amp;diff=157134</id>
		<title>Homosexual rights advocacy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_rights_advocacy&amp;diff=157134"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T10:19:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: clarified and strengthened breadth of popular feeling against homosexuality&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''gay rights''' movement seeks to elevate [[homosexuality]] to the same level of social and political respectability as heterosexual relationships. It denies or dismisses the Biblical prohibitions against homosexual acts. &amp;quot;Our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof.&amp;quot; [http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/socarides.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seeks to remove the stigma of [[sexual perversion]] from homosexuality by arguing that either, &lt;br /&gt;
# Homosexuality is an immutable trait, and discriminating against immutable traits is wrong (cf. race discrimination), or,&lt;br /&gt;
# Homosexuality, if not immutable, is highly correlated with personality, and discriminating against such deeply rooted notions of self is wrong, as well (cf. religious intolerance).&lt;br /&gt;
The movement does not seek to convince others that homosexuality is ''right'': rather, it seeks to convince the public that it is not ''wrong'' enough to regulate, criminalize, or stigmatize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Legal Success ==&lt;br /&gt;
Courts, including the Supreme Court, have accepted either one or both of these rationales.  In ''[[Romer v. Evans]]'', the Court found that discriminating against homosexuals could only be explained by a rational of animus laid bare, which was not enough even to allow state condemnation of homosexuality under the [[rational basis review]] test.  ''Romer'', then, protects the status of homosexuality from undue discrimination that occurs without a rational basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homosexual conduct was formerly illegal in many states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See generally ''Bowers v. Hardwick'', 478 U.S. 186&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the last decade of the twentieth century, although these laws existed, they were rarely (if ever) enforced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas,'' 539 U.S. 558, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the Opinion of the Court, found this in his historical analysis.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Without disclosing whether it saw homosexuality as a status protected from discrimination at as high of a level as gender and race, the Court struck down bans on homosexual conduct, framing it as an expansion of its privacy jurisprudence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas'', 539 U.S. 558&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The status of homosexuality before the law, then, is in some degree of flux.  While bare discrimination against homosexual status is facially unconstitutional lacking a rational basis, and while preventing homosexual conduct is similarly unconstitutional, the Supreme Court has held in these landmark cases that the state may discriminate against homosexuals to preserve an &amp;quot;institution that the law protects&amp;quot; - namely, [[marriage]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas''; Kennedy &amp;amp; O'Connor both reached this conclusion explicitly.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As such, the standard to be applied in deciding if discrimination against homosexuals is wrong is somewhere in between [[rational basis review]] and [[strict scrutiny review]].  Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] thinks that this uncertainty will surely be resolved in the favor of gay rights, and he warns that such a legal erosion will result in the downfall of the law's moral authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Lawrence v. Texas'', Scalia, J., dissenting.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Opposition to Gay Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Polls reveal that a clear majority of people find homosexuality immoral, sinful, distasteful, degrading, or less than ideal, and prefer that public policy does not encourage it. They also do not think that we should lose rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, and traditional marriage in order to promote acceptance of homosexual behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives criticize attempts by gay rights activists to prohibit any statements which are critical of homosexuality, such as the idea that it is &amp;quot;unnatural&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sinful&amp;quot;, using [[hate crime]]s statutes and anti-[[discrimination]] laws: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The EU parliament called on Polish authorities to publicly condemn and take measures against declarations by officials &amp;quot;inciting discrimination and hatred based on sexual orientation.&amp;quot; [http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OOFTCO5&amp;amp;show_article=1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
As Amazon.com said in a review of a book of [[Harry Hay]]'s writings, he &amp;quot;is the acknowledged father…of the modern gay liberation movement.&amp;quot; As a [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) organizer, he turned out &amp;quot;essays, position papers, critical studies, and manifestos concerning what it means to be gay in the world.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Accuracy in Media, [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A269_0_2_0_C/ ''Red Roots Of Gay Movement''], Cliff Kincaid, September 10, 2003. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Human Rights Campaign]] referred to Hay as &amp;quot;founder and architect of the modern movement for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Harry was one of the first to realize that the dream of equality for our community could be attained through visibility and activism&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.hrc.org/Content/ContentGroups/News_Releases/20021/HRC_Mourns_the_Death_of_Gay_Rights_Pioneer_Harry_Hay.htm Human Rights Campaign Mourns the Death of Gay Rights Pioneer Harry Hay], Press Release, Oct. 24, 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hay not only promoted homosexual rights, he actively campaigned for the &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; of [[pedophile]]s. ''The Boston Phoenix'' noted that nowhere was this more evident than in Hay's persistent support of the right of the North American Man-Boy Love Association, [[NAMBLA]], to march in gay-pride parades. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Boston Phoenix'', [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm The real Harry Hay], Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; NAMBLA maintains a website with a body of Hay's work  and a tribute to Harry Hay on its homepage.  The [[Human Rights Campaign]] and other gay rights organizations, while revering Hay for his contributions to gay rights, do not support NAMBLA or communism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tactics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Kirk and Madsen predicted a mass public change of heart would follow, even among opponents, &amp;quot;if we can actually make them like us.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/socarides.html, arguing that Hollywood movies sometimes show homosexual men or boys taking a harmless &amp;quot;Cupid&amp;quot; role to help solidify a budding heterosexual relationship.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*A gay rights perspective, the Human Rights Campaign, www.hrc.org &lt;br /&gt;
*An anti-gay rights perspective, Accuracy in Media, [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A269_0_2_0_C/ ''Red Roots Of Gay Movement''], Cliff Kincaid, September 10, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/socarides.html How America Went Gay]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Yorkshire&amp;diff=157133</id>
		<title>Yorkshire</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Yorkshire&amp;diff=157133"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T10:16:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: &amp;quot;football&amp;quot; changed to &amp;quot;soccer&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Yorkshire''' used to be a  county in Northern [[England]], and was once the largest county, divided into three 'Ridings' (OE ''thridings'', 'thirds'). However, the Local Government Act of 1972 broke it into three smaller counties - North, South and West Yorkshire, as well as transferring the East (and part of the West) Riding to Humberside, and parts of the traditional county to Durham, Cumbria and Greater Manchester.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The county has varied geography from the hills and mountains of the [[Pennines]] and North Yorkshire moors, to the flatlands of the Vale of York and the fen country of the Humberhead Levels. Principal cities in Yorkshire include [[Leeds]], Hull, [[Sheffield]], [[York]], and [[Goole]], Britain' most inland seaport.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yorkshire borders with the counties of Greater Manchester, [[Lancashire]], [[Cumbria]], [[County Durham]], [[Cleveland]], [[Lincolnshire]], [[Nottinghamshire]], and [[Derbyshire]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, the symbol of Yorkshire was the white [[rose]]. The traditional game of Yorkshire is cricket, though in recent years the county side has lagged. Similarly, Yorkshire soccer teams no longer occuopy their former prominent positions in the soccer leagues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yorkshire people are supposed to be dour and of few words, careful with money but loyal friends once their reserve has been penetrated. A traditional rhyme runs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Yorkshire born, Yorkshire bred''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Strong in't arm and thick in't head''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yorkshire is associated with the [[Yorkshire Pudding]], and with the [[Yorkshire Ripper]], the serial killer [[Peter Sutcliffe]] (b. 2 June 1946) of [[Bradford]] who murdered thirteen women in northern [[England]] between 1975 and 1980.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:UK Counties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=156584</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=156584"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T00:40:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: added links to Homosexual Agenda section of Policies/Criticism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|right|thumb|200px|Official logo of the Democratic Party.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic Party''' is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. It is generally seen as being politically between center and [[leftist | left]] of center, while the rival [[Republican Party]] is positioned to the [[rightist | right]] of center (see [[political spectrum theory]]). Members and supporters of the Democratic Party are known as Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats currently control the United States [[House of Representatives]] and the [[Senate]], together with the majority of State governorships and legislatures. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a Pew Research Center poll, 50 percent of Americans identify themselves with the Democratic Party as opposed to 35 percent for the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312 Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007] Pew Research Center, 22 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Democrats have served out only three of the last ten presidential terms. Democrats in the US Congress currently have a 52.6% disapproval and a  38% approval rating according to the RealClearPolitics Average of several dozens of Congressional Job Approval polls conducted 04/05 - 04/18. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/archive/index.php?poll_id=18&amp;amp;page=2 RealClearPolitics Congressional Job Approval Poll], 04/09 - 05/01 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the Republicans, the Democrats are currently selecting their candidate for the 2008  presidential election; the front-runners in the contest are Senator [[Hillary Clinton]] of [[New York]] and Senator [[Barack Obama]] of [[Illinois]]. The most recent president who was a Democrat was [[Bill Clinton]], who served from 1993 to 2001. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party was founded in 1792  by [[Thomas Jefferson]] as a congressional caucus to fight for the [[Bill of Rights]] and to oppose the elitist [[Federalist Party]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1798 , the party was officially named the &amp;quot;Democratic-Republican Party&amp;quot;, and in 1800  Jefferson was elected as the first Democrat [[President of the United States]]. Jefferson, a member of the landed gentry and a slave owner, served two terms as president with distinction, and was succeeded by another Democrat, [[James Madison]], in 1808 . Madison strengthened America's armed forces and helped to reaffirm American independence by defeating the [[United Kingdom]] in the [[War of 1812]]. James Monroe, another Democratic-Republican, was elected president in 1816  and led the nation through a time commonly known as &amp;quot;The Era of Good Feeling&amp;quot;. In this period, the party dominated American politics with little opposition.  [[Andrew Jackson]], who signed into law the [[Indian Removal Act of 1830]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edweb.tusd.k12.az.us/UHS/APUSH/1st%20Sem/Articles%20Semester%201/Artiles%20Semester%201/Remini.htm Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal], by&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Remini.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; according to the Democratic National Committee's website is &amp;quot;considered — along with Jefferson — one of the founding fathers of the Democratic Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/06/our_history.php  Democratic National Committee, ''Our History''], retrieved 25 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Annual Jefferson-Jackson Day celebrations nationwide by local chapters of the Democratic Party commemorate the two founders of the Democratic Party. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022001949.html String of Successes Enlivens Democratic Party], Michael D. Shear, ''The Washington Post'', 22 February 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Franklin Roosevelt]], president during the [[Great Depression]] and [[Second World War]], was a Democrat, as was his successor, [[Harry Truman]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies and criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the views of individual Democrats sometimes diverge from the party's official stance as expressed in its national platform. The same is true of individual Republicans. Nonetheless, Tyrell accuses Democrats of wearing ideological blinders:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can anything embarrass [[Speaker Pelosi]] and the rest of the Democratic leadership? Frankly I doubt it. They are all neatly shut off from the world in their fantasy of moral and intellectual superiority. [http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20070510-092027-4746r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of economic policy, Democrats favor high progressive taxes, higher government spending and a relatively high minimum wage.'{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party has historically had ties to [[union|organized labor]]. The [[National Education Association]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nea.org/index.html National Education Association homepage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the largest union of public school teachers, is a backbone of the party, supplying the largest number of delegates to its national conventions.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military policy===&lt;br /&gt;
According to its platform, the Democratic Party has the objective of strengthening America.  Democratic national leadership has been accused of being ambivalent about terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and insufficiently patriotic &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News]Transcript: December 1, 2001 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, such as Saxby Chambliss' campaign against Senator Max Cleland--a Vietnam veteran and triple amputee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14474-2002Jun19.html &amp;quot;Dirty-Bomb Politics&amp;quot;] Mary McGrory, ''The Washington Post'', 20 June 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===   &lt;br /&gt;
An organization affiliated with the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] called the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] which claims a long standing opposition to school vouchers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;21st Century Schools Project Bulletin: Special Edition [http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&amp;amp;subsecID=900001&amp;amp;contentID=250630 ''Putting Vouchers in Perspective''], PPI E-newsletter 2 July 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reported Jonathan Alter of ''Newsweek'' saying,   &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Can wealthy white liberals - many of whom send their kids to private school - really say to poor parents: 'We can have choices, but you must not?'...This is a glaring hypocrisy sitting at the heart of the liberal opposition to targeted vouchers… Right now, Democrats are in a highly compromised position on education.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=newsLetter&amp;amp;sectionID=29&amp;amp;NLissueID=4&amp;amp;articleID=11&amp;amp;altCol=2 Center For Education Reform, Monthly Letter to Friends No. 75], Back to School 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment vs Labor===&lt;br /&gt;
Two other important coalition groups also find themselves in direct conflict with each other within the Democratic party coalition--Environmentalists and Labor Unions.  While environmentalists support efforts like clean air and alternative fuels, for example, this creates tension with the workers of American automobile manufactures whose jobs are threatened by environmental policies such as increasing regulations and high costs. Such policies can lead to cutbacks and layoffs. Balancing these issues is difficult because some sacrifices of interests must be made by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Healthcare===&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat fondness for heavy government intervention into the marketplace and social engineering means that a significant proportion of their base and of their candidates for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election ideologically favor introducing a system of [[socialized healthcare]]; regardless of the crippling tax burden this would require to sustain itself and the low standard of care achieved by socialized health programs in other countries compared to the United States. Among the leading proponents for this idea include [[Barack Obama|Sen. Barack Hussein Obama]] and [[John Edwards|Sen. John Edwards]]; the latter formerly being the running mate to [[John Kerry|Sen. John Kerry]] in the disastrous [[2004 Presidential Election]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homosexual Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat lawmakers and opinion-formers consistently favor measures such as the establishment of same-sex civil unions, gay marriage and gay adoption of heterosexual children over defense of the traditional family. Likewise they are vigorous in attempting to amend [[hate crime|&amp;quot;hate crime&amp;quot;]] laws to make criticism of the homosexual lifestyle illegal; while at the same time supporting efforts to [[propaganda|disseminate favorable opinions]] regarding [[homosexuality]] through channels such as the mainstream media and even the educational system in the face of opposition from churches and religious authorities, a broad coalition of [[Republican Party|Republican]] and Independent politicians and a clear majority of the American public. Democrats reject that the [[Homosexual agenda]] exists so would not consider themselves to be in thrall to it, preferring to speak in terms of [[Gay rights|&amp;quot;gay rights&amp;quot;]] when this issue is raised; but from their actions the Democrat Party can certainly be considered the United States' largest and most powerful de facto supporter of the Homosexual Agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Policies===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats frequently support [[abortion]], [[gun control]], same- sex civil unions, and the separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, there is some correlation between religious and political affiliation, though people of all faiths and denominations can be found among the supporters of each of the main parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both historically and today, [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] voters have had a tendency to identify with the Democratic Party, and a number of Democratic office-holders, such as Senator [[Jim Webb]] of [[Virginia]], are Catholics. However, several general ideals of the Democratic Party's platform - most notably, the party's overall support for the legality of [[abortion]] - are contrary to the position of the [[Catholic Church]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to [[Protestant]] Christians, members of [[Evangelical]] churches in particular are associated with the [[Republican Party]]. One unusual feature of the Democratic Party, however, is that it draws substantial support both from committed African-American Protestant Christians and from secular and atheist white voters. The strong opposition to [[homosexuality]] found among many Black Protestant Christians (and, indeed, among orthodox Catholics) contrasts strikingly with the support frequently shown by other Democrats for the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=156572</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=156572"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T00:33:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|right|thumb|200px|Official logo of the Democratic Party.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic Party''' is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. It is generally seen as being politically between center and [[leftist | left]] of center, while the rival [[Republican Party]] is positioned to the [[rightist | right]] of center (see [[political spectrum theory]]). Members and supporters of the Democratic Party are known as Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats currently control the United States [[House of Representatives]] and the [[Senate]], together with the majority of State governorships and legislatures. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a Pew Research Center poll, 50 percent of Americans identify themselves with the Democratic Party as opposed to 35 percent for the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312 Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007] Pew Research Center, 22 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Democrats have served out only three of the last ten presidential terms. Democrats in the US Congress currently have a 52.6% disapproval and a  38% approval rating according to the RealClearPolitics Average of several dozens of Congressional Job Approval polls conducted 04/05 - 04/18. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/archive/index.php?poll_id=18&amp;amp;page=2 RealClearPolitics Congressional Job Approval Poll], 04/09 - 05/01 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the Republicans, the Democrats are currently selecting their candidate for the 2008  presidential election; the front-runners in the contest are Senator [[Hillary Clinton]] of [[New York]] and Senator [[Barack Obama]] of [[Illinois]]. The most recent president who was a Democrat was [[Bill Clinton]], who served from 1993 to 2001. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party was founded in 1792  by [[Thomas Jefferson]] as a congressional caucus to fight for the [[Bill of Rights]] and to oppose the elitist [[Federalist Party]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1798 , the party was officially named the &amp;quot;Democratic-Republican Party&amp;quot;, and in 1800  Jefferson was elected as the first Democrat [[President of the United States]]. Jefferson, a member of the landed gentry and a slave owner, served two terms as president with distinction, and was succeeded by another Democrat, [[James Madison]], in 1808 . Madison strengthened America's armed forces and helped to reaffirm American independence by defeating the [[United Kingdom]] in the [[War of 1812]]. James Monroe, another Democratic-Republican, was elected president in 1816  and led the nation through a time commonly known as &amp;quot;The Era of Good Feeling&amp;quot;. In this period, the party dominated American politics with little opposition.  [[Andrew Jackson]], who signed into law the [[Indian Removal Act of 1830]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edweb.tusd.k12.az.us/UHS/APUSH/1st%20Sem/Articles%20Semester%201/Artiles%20Semester%201/Remini.htm Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal], by&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Remini.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; according to the Democratic National Committee's website is &amp;quot;considered — along with Jefferson — one of the founding fathers of the Democratic Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/06/our_history.php  Democratic National Committee, ''Our History''], retrieved 25 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Annual Jefferson-Jackson Day celebrations nationwide by local chapters of the Democratic Party commemorate the two founders of the Democratic Party. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022001949.html String of Successes Enlivens Democratic Party], Michael D. Shear, ''The Washington Post'', 22 February 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Franklin Roosevelt]], president during the [[Great Depression]] and [[Second World War]], was a Democrat, as was his successor, [[Harry Truman]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies and criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the views of individual Democrats sometimes diverge from the party's official stance as expressed in its national platform. The same is true of individual Republicans. Nonetheless, Tyrell accuses Democrats of wearing ideological blinders:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can anything embarrass [[Speaker Pelosi]] and the rest of the Democratic leadership? Frankly I doubt it. They are all neatly shut off from the world in their fantasy of moral and intellectual superiority. [http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20070510-092027-4746r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of economic policy, Democrats favor high progressive taxes, higher government spending and a relatively high minimum wage.'{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party has historically had ties to [[union|organized labor]]. The [[National Education Association]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nea.org/index.html National Education Association homepage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the largest union of public school teachers, is a backbone of the party, supplying the largest number of delegates to its national conventions.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military policy===&lt;br /&gt;
According to its platform, the Democratic Party has the objective of strengthening America.  Democratic national leadership has been accused of being ambivalent about terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and insufficiently patriotic &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News]Transcript: December 1, 2001 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, such as Saxby Chambliss' campaign against Senator Max Cleland--a Vietnam veteran and triple amputee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14474-2002Jun19.html &amp;quot;Dirty-Bomb Politics&amp;quot;] Mary McGrory, ''The Washington Post'', 20 June 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===   &lt;br /&gt;
An organization affiliated with the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] called the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] which claims a long standing opposition to school vouchers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;21st Century Schools Project Bulletin: Special Edition [http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&amp;amp;subsecID=900001&amp;amp;contentID=250630 ''Putting Vouchers in Perspective''], PPI E-newsletter 2 July 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reported Jonathan Alter of ''Newsweek'' saying,   &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Can wealthy white liberals - many of whom send their kids to private school - really say to poor parents: 'We can have choices, but you must not?'...This is a glaring hypocrisy sitting at the heart of the liberal opposition to targeted vouchers… Right now, Democrats are in a highly compromised position on education.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=newsLetter&amp;amp;sectionID=29&amp;amp;NLissueID=4&amp;amp;articleID=11&amp;amp;altCol=2 Center For Education Reform, Monthly Letter to Friends No. 75], Back to School 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment vs Labor===&lt;br /&gt;
Two other important coalition groups also find themselves in direct conflict with each other within the Democratic party coalition--Environmentalists and Labor Unions.  While environmentalists support efforts like clean air and alternative fuels, for example, this creates tension with the workers of American automobile manufactures whose jobs are threatened by environmental policies such as increasing regulations and high costs. Such policies can lead to cutbacks and layoffs. Balancing these issues is difficult because some sacrifices of interests must be made by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Healthcare===&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat fondness for heavy government intervention into the marketplace and social engineering means that a significant proportion of their base and of their candidates for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election ideologically favor introducing a system of [[socialized healthcare]]; regardless of the crippling tax burden this would require to sustain itself and the low standard of care achieved by socialized health programs in other countries compared to the United States. Among the leading proponents for this idea include [[Barack Obama|Sen. Barack Hussein Obama]] and [[John Edwards|Sen. John Edwards]]; the latter formerly being the running mate to [[John Kerry|Sen. John Kerry]] in the disastrous [[2004 Presidential Election]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homosexual Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat lawmakers and opinion-formers consistently favor measures such as the establishment of same-sex civil unions, gay marriage and gay adoption of heterosexual children over defense of the traditional family. Likewise they are vigorous in attempting to amend &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot; laws to make criticism of the homosexual lifestyle illegal; while at the same time supporting efforts to disseminate favorable opinions regarding homosexuality through channels such as the mainstream media and even the educational system in the face of opposition from churches and religious authorities, a broad coalition of Republican and Independent politicians and a clear majority of the American public. Democrats reject that the [[Homosexual Agenda]] exists so would not consider themselves to be in thrall to it, preferring to speak in terms of &amp;quot;equal rights&amp;quot; when this issue is raised; but from their actions the Democrat Party can certainly be considered the United States' largest and most powerful de facto supporter of the Homosexual Agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Policies===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats frequently support [[abortion]], [[gun control]], same- sex civil unions, and the separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, there is some correlation between religious and political affiliation, though people of all faiths and denominations can be found among the supporters of each of the main parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both historically and today, [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] voters have had a tendency to identify with the Democratic Party, and a number of Democratic office-holders, such as Senator [[Jim Webb]] of [[Virginia]], are Catholics. However, several general ideals of the Democratic Party's platform - most notably, the party's overall support for the legality of [[abortion]] - are contrary to the position of the [[Catholic Church]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to [[Protestant]] Christians, members of [[Evangelical]] churches in particular are associated with the [[Republican Party]]. One unusual feature of the Democratic Party, however, is that it draws substantial support both from committed African-American Protestant Christians and from secular and atheist white voters. The strong opposition to [[homosexuality]] found among many Black Protestant Christians (and, indeed, among orthodox Catholics) contrasts strikingly with the support frequently shown by other Democrats for the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=156533</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=156533"/>
		<updated>2007-05-12T00:16:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: added Heathcare in Policy/Criticism section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|right|thumb|200px|Official logo of the Democratic Party.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic Party''' is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. It is generally seen as being politically between center and [[leftist | left]] of center, while the rival [[Republican Party]] is positioned to the [[rightist | right]] of center (see [[political spectrum theory]]). Members and supporters of the Democratic Party are known as Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats currently control the United States [[House of Representatives]] and the [[Senate]], together with the majority of State governorships and legislatures. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a Pew Research Center poll, 50 percent of Americans identify themselves with the Democratic Party as opposed to 35 percent for the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312 Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007] Pew Research Center, 22 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Democrats have served out only three of the last ten presidential terms. Democrats in the US Congress currently have a 52.6% disapproval and a  38% approval rating according to the RealClearPolitics Average of several dozens of Congressional Job Approval polls conducted 04/05 - 04/18. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/archive/index.php?poll_id=18&amp;amp;page=2 RealClearPolitics Congressional Job Approval Poll], 04/09 - 05/01 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the Republicans, the Democrats are currently selecting their candidate for the 2008  presidential election; the front-runners in the contest are Senator [[Hillary Clinton]] of [[New York]] and Senator [[Barack Obama]] of [[Illinois]]. The most recent president who was a Democrat was [[Bill Clinton]], who served from 1993 to 2001. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party was founded in 1792  by [[Thomas Jefferson]] as a congressional caucus to fight for the [[Bill of Rights]] and to oppose the elitist [[Federalist Party]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1798 , the party was officially named the &amp;quot;Democratic-Republican Party&amp;quot;, and in 1800  Jefferson was elected as the first Democrat [[President of the United States]]. Jefferson, a member of the landed gentry and a slave owner, served two terms as president with distinction, and was succeeded by another Democrat, [[James Madison]], in 1808 . Madison strengthened America's armed forces and helped to reaffirm American independence by defeating the [[United Kingdom]] in the [[War of 1812]]. James Monroe, another Democratic-Republican, was elected president in 1816  and led the nation through a time commonly known as &amp;quot;The Era of Good Feeling&amp;quot;. In this period, the party dominated American politics with little opposition.  [[Andrew Jackson]], who signed into law the [[Indian Removal Act of 1830]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edweb.tusd.k12.az.us/UHS/APUSH/1st%20Sem/Articles%20Semester%201/Artiles%20Semester%201/Remini.htm Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal], by&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Remini.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; according to the Democratic National Committee's website is &amp;quot;considered — along with Jefferson — one of the founding fathers of the Democratic Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/06/our_history.php  Democratic National Committee, ''Our History''], retrieved 25 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Annual Jefferson-Jackson Day celebrations nationwide by local chapters of the Democratic Party commemorate the two founders of the Democratic Party. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022001949.html String of Successes Enlivens Democratic Party], Michael D. Shear, ''The Washington Post'', 22 February 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Franklin Roosevelt]], president during the [[Great Depression]] and [[Second World War]], was a Democrat, as was his successor, [[Harry Truman]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies and criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the views of individual Democrats sometimes diverge from the party's official stance as expressed in its national platform. The same is true of individual Republicans. Nonetheless, Tyrell accuses Democrats of wearing ideological blinders:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can anything embarrass [[Speaker Pelosi]] and the rest of the Democratic leadership? Frankly I doubt it. They are all neatly shut off from the world in their fantasy of moral and intellectual superiority. [http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20070510-092027-4746r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of economic policy, Democrats favor high progressive taxes, higher government spending and a relatively high minimum wage.'{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party has historically had ties to [[union|organized labor]]. The [[National Education Association]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nea.org/index.html National Education Association homepage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the largest union of public school teachers, is a backbone of the party, supplying the largest number of delegates to its national conventions.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military policy===&lt;br /&gt;
According to its platform, the Democratic Party has the objective of strengthening America.  Democratic national leadership has been accused of being ambivalent about terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and insufficiently patriotic &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News]Transcript: December 1, 2001 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, such as Saxby Chambliss' campaign against Senator Max Cleland--a Vietnam veteran and triple amputee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14474-2002Jun19.html &amp;quot;Dirty-Bomb Politics&amp;quot;] Mary McGrory, ''The Washington Post'', 20 June 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===   &lt;br /&gt;
An organization affiliated with the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] called the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] which claims a long standing opposition to school vouchers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;21st Century Schools Project Bulletin: Special Edition [http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&amp;amp;subsecID=900001&amp;amp;contentID=250630 ''Putting Vouchers in Perspective''], PPI E-newsletter 2 July 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reported Jonathan Alter of ''Newsweek'' saying,   &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Can wealthy white liberals - many of whom send their kids to private school - really say to poor parents: 'We can have choices, but you must not?'...This is a glaring hypocrisy sitting at the heart of the liberal opposition to targeted vouchers… Right now, Democrats are in a highly compromised position on education.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=newsLetter&amp;amp;sectionID=29&amp;amp;NLissueID=4&amp;amp;articleID=11&amp;amp;altCol=2 Center For Education Reform, Monthly Letter to Friends No. 75], Back to School 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment vs Labor===&lt;br /&gt;
Two other important coalition groups also find themselves in direct conflict with each other within the Democratic party coalition--Environmentalists and Labor Unions.  While environmentalists support efforts like clean air and alternative fuels, for example, this creates tension with the workers of American automobile manufactures whose jobs are threatened by environmental policies such as increasing regulations and high costs. Such policies can lead to cutbacks and layoffs. Balancing these issues is difficult because some sacrifices of interests must be made by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Healthcare===&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat fondness for heavy government intervention into the marketplace and social engineering means that a significant proportion of their base and of their candidates for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election ideologically favor introducing a system of [[socialized healthcare]]; regardless of the crippling tax burden this would require to sustain itself and the low standard of care achieved by socialized health programs in other countries compared to the United States. Among the leading proponents for this idea include [[Barack Obama|Sen. Barack Hussein Obama]] and [[John Edwards|Sen. John Edwards]]; the latter formerly being the running mate to [[John Kerry|Sen. John Kerry]] in the disastrous [[2004 Presidential Election]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Policies===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats frequently support [[abortion]], [[gun control]], same- sex civil unions, and the separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, there is some correlation between religious and political affiliation, though people of all faiths and denominations can be found among the supporters of each of the main parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both historically and today, [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] voters have had a tendency to identify with the Democratic Party, and a number of Democratic office-holders, such as Senator [[Jim Webb]] of [[Virginia]], are Catholics. However, several general ideals of the Democratic Party's platform - most notably, the party's overall support for the legality of [[abortion]] - are contrary to the position of the [[Catholic Church]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to [[Protestant]] Christians, members of [[Evangelical]] churches in particular are associated with the [[Republican Party]]. One unusual feature of the Democratic Party, however, is that it draws substantial support both from committed African-American Protestant Christians and from secular and atheist white voters. The strong opposition to [[homosexuality]] found among many Black Protestant Christians (and, indeed, among orthodox Catholics) contrasts strikingly with the support frequently shown by other Democrats for the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Mohandas_K._Gandhi&amp;diff=156440</id>
		<title>Talk:Mohandas K. Gandhi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Mohandas_K._Gandhi&amp;diff=156440"/>
		<updated>2007-05-11T23:45:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;GSmiley: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Jesus Christ/Christianity Quote ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is is really necessary to have this quote in its entirity or for it to be quite as prominent as it is? Considering all the other things (Communism, extramarital sex, murder/abortion, etc.) which Gandhi certainly spoke out against in his life why single out Christianity and Christians in particular as something he disapproved of? I think it's in danger of giving an anti-Christian gloss to the article which could mislead and which could be quoted against Christianity in the future. I would suggest either removing the second half of the quote to balance it more fairly, or if that's not possible perhaps remove it entirely until a better balance can be struck with this article as a whole. --[[User:GSmiley|GSmiley]] 19:43, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article could mention his dates, and how, when, and why he died.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GSmiley</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>