<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Godlovestoteach</id>
		<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Godlovestoteach"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Godlovestoteach"/>
		<updated>2026-06-18T09:10:48Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge&amp;diff=484341</id>
		<title>Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge&amp;diff=484341"/>
				<updated>2008-06-30T15:44:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Godlovestoteach: /* Examples? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I wanted to fix the formatting here, but it has already been locked.  So I guess maybe you could do it, Conservative?  I was going to change the final sentence from being a single huge link, to only having one word linked, or possibly made a reference.--[[user:TomMoore|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Tom Moore&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:21, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks but I prefer it be the way it is as the [[CreationWiki]] article is the best article on the internet on the subject in my estimation. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:24, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Is that the reason for the redundant link? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 20:34, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Counter-argument==&lt;br /&gt;
RE: The bible prohibits homosexuality because of diseases.  One, if God did not want homosexuality, then it seems more probable that the diseases would be the result of His dislike, rather than vice versa.  More likely reasons for why God would prohibit homosexuality would be either, one, that He designed men and women to copulate together, therefore to copulate in an unintended way is abhorrent, or two, two men who are homosexual and are not married are two less people who could have contributed to increasing the overall size of the population of the Ancient Hebrews, at a time where their survival was a daily worry, and a large population would have helped many of their problems (that was a run-on sentence, and I do apologize).  Either way, it seems unlikely that the ban on homosexuality is because of the diseases associated with it.  [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 16:58, 26 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where are the examples of the Christian Bible detailing scientific knowledge? Is the prohibition of homosexuality the lone example?  {{unsigned|Zeitgeisted}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, you're forgetting how many times it was wrong, like how it said that the earth was flat, that the sun went around the earth, and that the moon was unreachable, and that you could make a tower to physically reach heaven, just to name a few.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JackSmith|JackSmith]] 16:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not simply the bible that is full of inspired scientific foresight.  Divinely inspired authors such as Jules Verne or scientists such as Konstantin Tsiolkovsky saw technological glimpses centuries ahead of their time.  Given the abundance of science fiction and scientific papers, one cannot help but see God's hand in the revelation of technological advances.  God's ability to reveal technological glimpses of the future is only distantly rivaled by Satan's ability to pervert God's teachings with concepts like homosexuality, atheism, and evolution, which are clearly not divinely inspired concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
Other great scientists, like Albert Einstein, were clearly divinely inspired, seeing details of the universe that defied intuition of other scientists of his day, and could not have been known without the direct intervention of god.  The mathematical techniques that Einstein built upon were developed by God for centuries under the guise of Lorentz, Gauss, Riemann, and others.  The fact that the Bible did not specifically foresee the development of the computer revolution, the standard model of particle physics, the automobile, airplanes, or high oil prices is simply a function of its limited text, with verbosity suppressed in order to provide a more accessible text for mankind.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Godlovestoteach</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>