<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Golden</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Golden"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Golden"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T15:11:14Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:God&amp;diff=52650</id>
		<title>Talk:God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:God&amp;diff=52650"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T22:30:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think the &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; page of ALL pages should have just a LITTLE bit longer page --[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:51, 12 March 2007 (EDT)--[[Elamdri|Elamdri]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixed a vandal.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:51, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Neutrality==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Made this page talk about God as a deistic being as well as the Christian PoV.[[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 15:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia is not about neutrality.  Conservapedia favors factual information over &amp;quot;neutral&amp;quot; information, and is written from a Christian point of view.  Thus, the article on God should accurately say that God is the creator of the universe, not &amp;quot;neutrally&amp;quot; imply the Christians invented God's status as the creator of the universe.  --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 16:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, nowhere in the Conservapedia Commandments does it mention a Christian PoV. In fact its called '''Conserv'''apedia and I'm fairly confident that not all Conservatives are Christians. Your reversion to the old very biased page is very strange to me. [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The definition of liberal is one who chooses right from wrong for themselves instead of accepting the objective right and wrong. Since Christianity is right, denial of that is liberalism. --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 16:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::you have a source for that definition?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::As a sociologist, I challenge you to definitively explain the &amp;quot;objective&amp;quot; right and wrong. I would also ask you to support your argument that &amp;quot;Christianity is right&amp;quot; with at least one academic source. --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 22:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree to the necessary explanation of right and wrong. Many different religions have many different views on god. Some have very different views on creation. An example of this would be [[Bumba]]. We need to make sure that all religions are encompassed.--[[User:Liberal|Liberal]] 14:16, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Many are skeptical of ''which'' idea?==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However, many are skeptical of this idea.&amp;quot; -- The idea of it being the same god, or that it's a Muslim plot? [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 18:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Note==&lt;br /&gt;
Excuse me, but is that really a fair assumption?  I'm also pretty sure that Judaism is the source of both Islam and Christianity, but those two aren't actually connected to each other.  But I could be wrong.  Either way, it also seems to paint Islam in some sort of satanic light.  They're just different and probably wrong, not evil.--[[User:Ronnyreg|Ronnyreg]] 22:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Errors==&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate the conclusion that the article needs to be locked in view of the high volume of vandalism, but I hope it's only temporary - especially as it prevents fine-tuning, and doesn't allow even alternative ''Christian'' views a look-in. For example, the article speaks of 'God' as a given, and without defining ''which'' God (as a previous version helpfully did). The expression 'fourth century' should in fact read 'second century' (I should know - I wrote it!). And the Bible doesn't require belief in a ''personal'' lord and saviour, whatever other kind of lord and saviour it may require belief in, and whatever additional ideas evangelicals might prefer to read into the Messianic texts. --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 06:38, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Omnibenevolence==&lt;br /&gt;
Is god omnibenevolent? [[User:Zed|Zed]] 06:21, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservapedia is not open==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can you claim to have a communally edited encyclopedia if some pages are locked. What a sham! I would think the article on God would be one that quite a lot of people would like to contribute to.--[[User:Golden|Golden]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=52610</id>
		<title>Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=52610"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T22:17:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Intelligent Design is the hypothesis that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, rather than natural processes, such as [[evolution]][http://www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php]. The hypothesis on intelligent design leaves the identity of the intelligent cause open, since this question is not accessible by scientific investigation [http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1341]. Many proponents however admit to believe the intelligent cause to be [[God]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major flaw with so-called Intelligent Design is that it in fact explains nothing. Instead of offering disprovable hypotheses to explain the origin and diversity of life on earth it invokes magic. Most reputable scientists are quick to point out the problem of infinite regression that dooms ID. &amp;quot;If God created the Universe, then who (or what) created God?&amp;quot; ID ends up mired in the irreducible complexity it purports to solve.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intelligent design looks to the order of the world as evidence of a designer, but [[George Hammond]] may have found stronger proof based on psychometric experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date there has been one peer-reviewed article supporting Intelligent Design in  the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington''  [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=2640]  However, the journal later withdrew the article citing improper reviewing practices. [http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Design hypothesis enjoys a small amount of stated support within the worldwide scientific community (creationist scientists report there is widespread discriminatory action against creationist scientists[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i2/suppression.asp]), but it is steadily growing. From 2001 to 2007 over 700 scientists had signed the pro-Intelligent Design manifesto ''A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'' published by the leaders of the design movement, the Discovery Institute. [http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/] This has caused some scientists to question the claim of the dominant scientific community that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life and call for public school science students to study the evidence supporting it in greater detail. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent trial in Dover, Pennsylvania Judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent Design was not valid science and &amp;quot;cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a speech to the Anti-Defamation League, Jones said that &amp;quot;had I decided the Dover matter in a different way, I would have then engaged in just the kind of judicial activism which critics decry,&amp;quot; stating that he was bound by &amp;quot;over a half century of strong legal precedents.&amp;quot;[http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/speech_judge_jones.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=52538</id>
		<title>Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=52538"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T22:03:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Atheism is disbelief in the existence of a [[God|god]] or gods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheism is a worldview based in reason and rationality rather than myth. Many people have argued that there really should be no need for a term like atheism, citing, for example, that there's no comparable term for someone who doesn't believe in astrology. Rather, it is argued, atheism should be the considered the norm and religious faith regarded as peculiar. Exactly why religion has persisted till modern times is a question of considerable debate, however, no consensus answer has emerged.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Well-known Atheists include [[Stephen Hawking]], [[Stephen Jay Gould]], [[Carl Sagan]], [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Douglas Adams]], [[William Borden]],[[Sam Harris]], [[Jeremey Alliadiaere]], [[Gary Neville]] and [[Ricky Gervais]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheist morality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists often base their [[moral code]] upon [[emotion]], [[experience]], empirically derived ethics, or some combination thereof.{{fact}} It is important to note, however, that just as many religions disagree on specific moral points, and there is sharp disagreement within many religions (e.g. denominational disputes within Christianity), atheists differ substantially from each other in the details of their moral beliefs.  Thus, it is difficult at best to summarize the beliefs of the &amp;quot;average atheist.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists typically hold that no religious text can be our only source of morality although all of them may contain useful ideas or principles. As atheists do not believe in any form of deity, books purported to be based upon the wishes of such deities are inherently suspect. Additionally, many atheists point out that all religious texts contain, and often ascribe to God, extremely immoral acts such as the Israelite expulsion of heathen nations from Canaan (i.e. [[ethnic cleansing]]), the stoning of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm homosexuals] to death, questionable treatment of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/19.html#1 women] and the institution of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/slavery.html slavery]. Additionally, atheists often point to a large number of prominent [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_name.html contradictions] present in the bible and other religious texts.  The presence of such contradictions challenges claims that these works are the infallible word of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists sometimes subscribe to the secular humanist idea that it is far more desirable to do what is right because you believe that it is right, rather than because you fear divine punishment or desire divine reward.  This view is illustrated by celebrated atheist [[Albert Einstein]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary.  Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists sometimes condemn religious desires for exclusive reward (and the punishment of others) such as are found in all religious texts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origins ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An atheist would claim that Atheism has existed for as long as man.  That man evolved, then Religion was invented by man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Christian would claim it can be traced back to specific date, as Adam and Eve believed in God so at some point somebody must have stopped believing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Christian View of Origins ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to trace the origins of atheism as a result of the incomplete historic record. It is known that ancient Greece produced a theory of materialism as early as the 5th century BC.  Materialism is a philosophical position that the material is all that exists. Therefore, it automatically excludes immaterial beings. In addition to materialism the Greeks also considered Spiritualism, in which the material world is an illusion and only spirit exists, as well as dualism, in which both the material and the spiritual exist (e.g. Christianity). It is important to note that while many atheists are strict materialists, some are not. As an example, some philosophical systems generally regarded as religions (i.e. Buddhism) lack deities and thus could be regarded as &amp;quot;atheistic faiths,&amp;quot; or forms of non-materialistic atheism. In any case, it is likely impossible to determine the true origins of atheism as it was presumably the default belief of most humans prior to the development of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writer of the Book of Psalms knew of atheists and atheism and registered disapproval in Psalm 14:  &amp;quot;The Fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.&amp;quot; The book of Psalms precedes the 5th century BC by hundreds of years {{fact}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prejudice Against Atheists ==&lt;br /&gt;
Research by Penny Edgell, Joseph Gerteis and Douglas Hartman in the American Sociological Review [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asoca/asr/2006/00000071/00000002/art00003 indicates] that most Americans would be more willing to vote for a gay or Muslim presidential candidate than an atheist. The same study indicates that 47.6% of Americans would disapprove of their child marrying an atheist. More recent [http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=26611&amp;amp;pg=1 Gallup polls] confirm this finding. In addition to discrimination in voting practices and marriage, George H.W. Bush has previously [http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/ghwbush.htm stated] that he does not believe atheists should be considered citizens of the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However this is not the case around the world, in the Great Britain 2001 census 15.5% of the population identify themselves as having no religious beliefs [http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=293 2001 Census].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Problem of Evil==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One argument against belief in all-powerful entities ('gods') is the problem of evil. First identified by the philosopher and materialist Epicurus (341-270 BC), this problem points out the difficulty created by the mere existence of evil:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent. &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of responses to this logical paradox have been put forth including those which assert human ignorance as the culprit, the concept of free will and the specific writings in some faiths which discuss the co-existence of good and evil (such as the book of Job in the Christian and Jewish faiths).[http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/evil-log.htm] Many Atheists, however, do not regard such evasions as convincing solutions to the underlying problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=52340</id>
		<title>Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=52340"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T21:03:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Atheism is disbelief in the existence of a [[God|god]] or gods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheism is a worldview based in reason and rationality rather than myth. Many people have argued that there really should be no need for a term like atheism, citing, for example, that there's no comparable term for someone who doesn't believe in astrology. Rather, it is argued, atheism should be the considered the norm and religious faith regarded as peculiar. Exactly why religion has persisted till modern times is a question of considerable debate, however, no consensus answer has emerged.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Well-known Atheists include [[Stephen Hawking]], [[Stephen Jay Gould]], [[Carl Sagan]], [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Douglas Adams]], [[William Borden]],[[Sam Harris]], [[Jeremey Alliadiaere]], [[Gary Neville]] and [[Ricky Gervais]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheist morality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists often base their [[moral code]] upon [[emotion]], [[experience]], empirically derived ethics, or some combination thereof.{{fact}} It is important to note, however, that just as many religions disagree on specific moral points, and there is sharp disagreement within many religions (e.g. denominational disputes within Christianity), atheists differ substantially from each other in the details of their moral beliefs.  Thus, it is difficult at best to summarize the beliefs of the &amp;quot;average atheist.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists typically hold that no religious text can be our only source of morality although all of them may contain useful ideas or principles. As atheists do not believe in any form of deity, books purported to be based upon the wishes of such deities are inherently suspect. Additionally, many atheists point out that all religious texts contain, and often ascribe to God, extremely immoral acts such as the Israelite expulsion of heathen nations from Canaan (i.e. [[ethnic cleansing]]), the stoning of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm homosexuals] to death, questionable treatment of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/19.html#1 women] and the institution of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/slavery.html slavery]. Additionally, atheists often point to a large number of prominent [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_name.html contradictions] present in the bible and other religious texts.  The presence of such contradictions challenges claims that these works are the infallible word of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists sometimes subscribe to the secular humanist idea that it is far more desirable to do what is right because you believe that it is right, rather than because you fear divine punishment or desire divine reward.  This view is illustrated by celebrated atheist [[Albert Einstein]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary.  Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists sometimes condemn religious desires for exclusive reward (and the punishment of others) such as are found in all religious texts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origins ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An atheist would claim that Atheism has existed for as long as man.  That man evolved, then Religion was invented by man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Christian would claim it can be traced back to specific date, as Adam and Eve believed in God so at some point somebody must have stopped believing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Christian View of Origins ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to trace the origins of atheism as a result of the incomplete historic record. It is known that ancient Greece produced a theory of materialism as early as the 5th century BC.  Materialism is a philosophical position that the material is all that exists. Therefore, it automatically excludes immaterial beings. In addition to materialism the Greeks also considered Spiritualism, in which the material world is an illusion and only spirit exists, as well as dualism, in which both the material and the spiritual exist (e.g. Christianity). It is important to note that while many atheists are strict materialists, some are not. As an example, some philosophical systems generally regarded as religions (i.e. Buddhism) lack deities and thus could be regarded as &amp;quot;atheistic faiths,&amp;quot; or forms of non-materialistic atheism. In any case, it is likely impossible to determine the true origins of atheism as it was presumably the default belief of most humans prior to the development of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writer of the Book of Psalms knew of atheists and atheism and registered disapproval in Psalm 14:  &amp;quot;The Fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.&amp;quot; The book of Psalms precedes the 5th century BC by hundreds of years {{fact}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prejudice Against Atheists ==&lt;br /&gt;
Research by Penny Edgell, Joseph Gerteis and Douglas Hartman in the American Sociological Review [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asoca/asr/2006/00000071/00000002/art00003 indicates] that most Americans would be more willing to vote for a gay or Muslim presidential candidate than an atheist. The same study indicates that 47.6% of Americans would disapprove of their child marrying an atheist. More recent [http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=26611&amp;amp;pg=1 Gallup polls] confirm this finding. In addition to discrimination in voting practices and marriage, George H.W. Bush has previously [http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/ghwbush.htm stated] that he does not believe atheists should be considered citizens of the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However this is not the case around the world, in the Great Britain 2001 census 15.5% of the population identify themselves as having no religious beliefs [http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=293 2001 Census].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Problem of Evil==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One argument against belief in all-powerful entities ('gods') is the problem of evil. First identified by the philosopher and materialist Epicurus (341-270 BC), this problem points out the difficulty created by the mere existence of evil:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent. &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of responses to this logical paradox have been put forth including those which assert human ignorance as the culprit, the concept of free will and the specific writings in some faiths which discuss the co-existence of good and evil (such as the book of Job in the Christian and Jewish faiths).[http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/evil-log.htm] Many Atheists, however, do not regard such evasions as convincing solutions to the underlying problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=52161</id>
		<title>Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=52161"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T20:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Wikipedia''' is a free-content online [[encyclopedia]] established on January 15, 2001. It currently has over 6 million articles, written in 250 languages&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias List of Wikipedias - Wikimedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on various topics, including over 1,600,000 articles in the English version. Like [[Conservapedia]], it is a [[wiki]] that is written and edited by its users. Under its GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), anyone can add to or edit the content on Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikipedia and Bias==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has been accused by Conservapedia of many biased entries. The article detailing these is found here: [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]. Wikipedia aims to reperesent a neutral point of view - a neutral point of view is a fundamental Wikipedia principle - however, there are a few articles that do not represent the neutral point of view. This happens partly due to Wikipedia's open nature, sometimes being accused by Conservapedians of having 'ingrained' liberal bias. Due to the open nature anyone who finds a biased article is encouraged to change the article to a neurtal point of view. This accidental bias differs from the Conservapedia, that defines itself as &amp;quot;a conservative encyclopedia&amp;quot; so will aim to be biased to the right.&lt;br /&gt;
The charge, by the creators of Conservapedia, of Wikipedia exhibiting a liberal bias is an example of an attribution error. Since Wikipedia is used and edited by people all over the world, casting its veracity in terms of American political factions is largely meaningless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wikipedia-watch.org Wikipedia Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wiki]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Peter_Pace&amp;diff=52051</id>
		<title>Peter Pace</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Peter_Pace&amp;diff=52051"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T19:49:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;General Peter Pace (b. 1945) serves as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the [[Bush Administration]] beginning in October 2005.  A Vietnam veteran, he is the first U.S. Marine to hold that top post.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:PeterPace.JPG|thumbnail|right|300px|Gen. Pace in Dress Uniform]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an interview by the [[Chicago Tribune]] on March 11, 2007, Pace made the following homophobic remarks:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nola.com/newsflash/topstories/index.ssf?/base/politics-11/1173832810104280.xml&amp;amp;storylist=topstories&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts. I do not believe that the armed forces of the United States are well served by saying through our policies that it's OK to be immoral in any way. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As an individual, I would not want (acceptance of gay behavior) to be our policy, just like I would not want it to be our policy that if we were to find out that so-and-so was sleeping with somebody else's wife, that we would just look the other way, which we do not. We prosecute that kind of immoral behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals immediately criticized his remarks:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Cal.) said, &amp;quot;We need the most talented people; we need the language skills. We need patriotic Americans who exist across the board in our population.  We don't need moral judgment from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass., who sponsored a bill to overturn the &amp;quot;don't ask, don't tell&amp;quot; policy, declared, &amp;quot;Our military is struggling to find and keep the soldiers we need.  We are turning away good troops to enforce a costly policy of discrimination.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General Pace refused to apologize for his remarks, saying only that &amp;quot;I should have focused more on my support of the policy and less on my personal moral views.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Clinton&amp;diff=52036</id>
		<title>Bill Clinton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Clinton&amp;diff=52036"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T19:45:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Golden: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:billclinton.jpg|thumb|right|300px|United States President Bill Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''William''' &amp;quot;Bill&amp;quot; '''Jefferson Clinton''' served as the 42nd [[President of the United States of America]] from 1993-2001, following [[George H. W. Bush]] and preceding [[George W. Bush]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Early Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe III on August 19, 1946 AD in Hope, Arkansas. His father, William Jefferson Blythe Jr. died in a car accident while his mother was pregnant with him. Clinton's mother later married Roger Clinton, and the four year-old William was given his stepfather's name.[http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton was active in high school, participating in various student government organizations as well as playing the saxophone. Roger Clinton, however, made Bill's family life unpleasant by repeatedly abusing Clinton's mother and her children.'''(sources needed)''' Bill Clinton would eventually stand up to his stepfather in high school, forcing him to stop beating his mother and kicking him out of the house. '''(sources needed)''' After Roger Clinton underwent alcohol rehabiliation, he would eventually rejoin the family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton attended [[Georgetown University]], then [[Oxford University]] after winning a [[Rhodes Scholarship]], and finally earned a Juris Doctorate from [[Yale University]] in 1973 ADE. At Yale he met [[Hillary Rodham]], whom he would later marry [http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Early Political Career and Whitewater Scandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After returning to live in Arkansas, Clinton was elected [[Attorney General]] of Arkansas in 1976 AD. Two years later, he was elected Governor of Arkansas, becoming the youngest governor in the country as a 32 year-old. Though defeated in 1980 AD, Clinton won back the governorship in 1982 AD and held it until becoming President in 1992 AD. Some business transactions he while made were extensively investigated for years (the [[Whitewater]] scandal). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presidency and Impeachment==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his presidency, Clinton presided over one of the most sustained periods of peace and prosperity since the end of the Second World War. Despite unrelenting, and largely baseless,  attacks from his political enemies, his popularity with the American people never wained. Clinton won in 1992 with 43% of the popular vote versus President [[George H. W. Bush's]] 37%, capitalizing on public discontent with a weak economy and public displeasure with Bush's proposed tax increases, and Ross Perot, a popular third candidate.  In his first two years in office, 1993 through 1994, Clinton was unable to &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; health-care in the United States by some sort of government-backed universal health-care insurance, which many conservatives felt would result in effective government control of the health care system. '''(sources needed)''' His approach consisted of appointing a planning committee with secret members to reshape this important sector of the economy. '''(sources needed)''' The [[Association of American Physicians and Surgeons]] successfully sued to force disclosure of the committee members, and Clinton ultimately failed to pass the program.'''(sources needed)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, voters expressed their high disapproval of Clinton by giving a victory to Republicans in Congress, where Republicans won 49.9% of the popular vote (compared to the Democrat's 44%).  This event was tagged the &amp;quot;Republican Revolution,&amp;quot; and began a series of showdowns with the Republican-led Congress.'''(sources needed)''' These showdowns were epitomized by the budget conflict with then-Speaker of the House [[Newt Gingrich]] in 1995. Gingrich refused to pass Clinton's budget proposal, and the latter threatened to shut down the government if he did not have his way. '''(sources needed)'''When Clinton called his bluff, Gingrich caused the federal government to shut down for several days.'''(sources needed)''' Clinton did not cave, however, and eventually had his budget passed [http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/commentprint082800d.html]. This showdown backfired for the Republicans, as it reinvigorated Clinton's flagging approval ratings, which would remain above 60% for most of his presidency[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/92/Clinton_approval_rating.JPG].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton was reelected in 1996 with 49.2% of the popular vote against Republican candidate  ([[Robert Dole | Bob Dole]]), who won 41%, and &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; candidate, [[H. Ross Perot]], who won 8%. Clinton spent a lot of the remainder of his presidency combating scandals. '''(sources needed)''' A special prosecutor was named to investigate Clinton for allegations of impropriety in the Whitewater real-estate scandal, an investment of Clinton's in a failed real estate venture. '''(sources needed)''' Although no charges against Clinton came out of this investigation, and it turned out that Clinton actually lost money on his investment, one of the results of the investigation was that the special prosecutor turned to investigating other Clinton activities, one of which (the [[Monica Lewinsky]] scandal) resulted in his impeachment and eventual loss of his license to practice law for a period of 5 years.'''(sources needed)''' The main charge was that he lied about a sexual relationship with an employee in an attempt to avoid paying damages to another employee for sexual harassment. After a brief trial, the Senate acquitted Clinton of all charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/impeachment/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton became just the second sitting president to be impeached by the US House of Representatives during his second term for lying in grand jury testimony connected to the Paula Jones lawsuit.'''(sources needed)''' However, the US Senate voted not to remove him from office, although he later lost his law license in Arkansas.  His term also saw an increase in terrorism directed at the United States. '''(sources needed)''' These incidents included the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the Alfred P. Murrah building bombing in Oklahoma City in 1995, the bombings of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 and the attack on the USS Cole in 2000. '''(sources needed)''' Clinton responded by striking back at [[al Qaeda]], the organization responsible for the attacks. '''(sources needed)''' He launched cruise missile strikes aimed to kill al Qaeda's leader [[Osama bin Laden]] [http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.01/], and began planning to invade [[Afghanistan]] in order to capture bin Laden and overthrow the [[Taliban]] government[http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/nov2001/afgh-n20.shtml].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton also signed into law the [[Violence Against Women Act]], which opened the federal courts to claims of domestic disputes between men and women, which had always been handled under state rather than federal law. '''(sources needed)'''  A key provision of this law was later ruled unconstitutional in [[United States v. Morrison]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-5.ZS.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton devoted much time during his two terms to the peace process in Northern Ireland. '''(sources needed)''' He made interventions including 3 trips to Ireland during periods of stagnation in  negotiations which coincided in major breakthroughs which ensured the province didn't slide back to the violence of the 70's and 80's. '''(sources needed)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== After the Presidency ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton has spent much of time since leaving office working for charitable causes such as support and fundraising for the victims of AIDS and the Asian tsunami. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Clinton's wife, [[Hillary_Rodham_Clinton|Hillary Clinton]], was elected Senator to New York in 2000.  Reelected in 2006, she is now running for president in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff was John Podesta between 1998-2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of the United States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Golden</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>