<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=HWessel</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=HWessel"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/HWessel"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T10:54:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&amp;diff=616036</id>
		<title>Neutral point of view</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&amp;diff=616036"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T14:39:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Neutral point of view''' (NPOV) is a [[Wikipedia]] [[guideline]] which proved to be infected with [[atheism|atheistic]] [[liberal bias]] in its application.&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning around 2004, it has functioned to [[censor]] information about conservative points of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original intent, when first expounded by [[Jimbo Wales]] and [[Larry Sanger]], was to prevent any article from presenting exclusively one point of view on any controversial subject. However, influential cliques eventually found that they could suppress minority viewpoints with the &amp;quot;undue weight&amp;quot; provision. The members of these cliques would claim that by giving attention to a &amp;quot;fringe&amp;quot; viewpoint, an article would give &amp;quot;equal validity&amp;quot; to POV. In practice, this functioned the same as University [[speech codes]] to prevent opposing viewpoints from being described fairly - which directly contradicts NPOV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Wikipedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009&amp;diff=616030</id>
		<title>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009&amp;diff=616030"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T14:32:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: Why hide his full name?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Economic stimulus package''' is a 2009 bill by president [[Barack Obama|B.Hussein Obama]] and the Democratic leadership in Congress to spend $819 billion or more dollars to revive an ailing U.S. economy, battered by the [[Recession of 2008]]. It includes $275 billion in tax cuts, and the rest for spending on a very wide variety of projects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29assess.html?hp David M. Herszenhorn, &amp;quot;Stimulus Package’s Components Vary in Speed and Efficiency,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' Jan. 28, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The strategy under this bill is to throw billions of dollars in every bureaucratic direction, and cross our fingers and hope for the best,&amp;quot; said Rep. Ken Calvert (R., Calif.) during debate. Rep. David Obey (D., Wis.), the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, responded, &amp;quot;We need to compare the cost of this package against the cost of doing nothing. The cost of nothing would be catastrophic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123315486943524321.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy Jonathan Weisman, Greg Hitt And Naftali Bendavid, &amp;quot;House Passes Stimulus Package; $819 Billion Jolt to Economy Aims to Reshape Education, Health Care; Deficit to Soar,&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal'' Jan. 29, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stimulus package is aimed at preventing the economy from collapsing and restoring it to normal. Conservative critics claims it will do little to help the economy and is filled with non-essential spending. The [[Congressional Budget Office]] says $347 billion more in interest will be the result, which brings the total plan over 1 [[trillion]] dollars. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/28/special-groups-line-piece-stimulus/ Special-Interest Groups Line Up for a Piece of Stimulus] Fox News, January 28, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
House Republicans proposed a stimulus bill tilted more sharply toward tax cuts, which they say will generate the most economic activity the fastest. Their substitute proposed cutting individual and business taxes as well as reducing much of the bill’s spending; it was rejected by a party-line vote of 170-266. The failed GOP measure totaled about $479 billion, a little more than half the total passed by the Democrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2009 bill includes tax rebates that resemble in part the $152 billion stimulus law proposed by President [[George W. Bush]] and passed by Congress in Feb. 2008; those rebates were mostly saved and failed to stimulate the economy in 2008. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0631744820080208 Reuters, Feb. 8, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==House== &lt;br /&gt;
The House of Representative passed the economic stimulus package January 28, 2009 by a vote of 244-188, and now the bill heads for the U.S. Senate. All Republicans cast a no vote as did eleven Democrats.  It is expected the Senate will increase the amounts allocated for tax cuts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Non Essential==&lt;br /&gt;
The people in charge of spending tax dollars are set to spend like never before and special interest groups are poised to be the recipients. Some of the 'stimulus' works proposed;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* $25 million for new ATV trails&lt;br /&gt;
* $400 million for the [[National Endowment for the Arts]]&lt;br /&gt;
* $400 million for global warming research&lt;br /&gt;
* $30 billion has been set aside for infrastructure spending&lt;br /&gt;
* $200 million for Dep. of Defense to acquire alternative energy vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
* $1.5 billion for a CO2 Reductions&lt;br /&gt;
* $3.5 billion for higher education facilities&lt;br /&gt;
* $400 million for [[HIV]] and chlamydia testing&lt;br /&gt;
* $150 million for The Smithsonian&lt;br /&gt;
* $81 billion for [[Medicaid]]&lt;br /&gt;
* $36 billion for expanded unemployment benefits&lt;br /&gt;
* $20 billion for food stamps&lt;br /&gt;
* $83 billion for the earned income credit.&lt;br /&gt;
* $54 billion will go to federal programs Economic Development Administration, the Small Business Administration, the 10 federal job training programs&lt;br /&gt;
* $66 billion for education&lt;br /&gt;
* $650 million coupons to subsidize digital television conversion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;addref&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* $572 million for Coast Guard improvements &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/28/stimulus-stupidity-alert-460000coast-guard-job-15-bil-carbon-capturing-contest-more/ Stimulus stupidity alert] Michelle Malkin,January 28, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Items removed from the House bill&lt;br /&gt;
* $200 million for new contraceptive service&lt;br /&gt;
* $20 million to renovate the National Mall&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Napoleon_Bonaparte&amp;diff=616019</id>
		<title>Napoleon Bonaparte</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Napoleon_Bonaparte&amp;diff=616019"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T13:14:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: cheese eating atheists&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Y8r587ig.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Napoleon I by [[Jacques Louis David]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Napoleon''' ('''Napoleon Bonaparte''' or, after 1804, '''Napoleon I, Emperor of the French''') (15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821) was a world historic figure and First Consul of [[France]] from 1799 to 1804, Emperor of the French from 1804 to 1814 and from 1 March to 22 June 1815, and King of Italy. He was the greatest general of his age--perhaps any age, with a sure command of battlefield tactics and campaign strategies. He revolutionized the military applications of artillery, and routinely moved his troops faster and with fewer supplies than was then thought possible, allowing for amazingly large and rapid concentrations of force against his slower and less adaptable enemies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a civil leader he played a major role in the [[French Revolution]], then ended it when he became dictator in 1799 and Emperor of France in 1804. He modernized the French military, fiscal, political legal and religious systems.  The Napoleonic Civil Code is considered the first successful codification that strongly influenced the law of many other countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He fought an unending series of wars against Britain with a complex, ever-changing coalition of European nations on both sides. Refusing to compromise after his immense defeat in Russia in 1812, he was overwhelmed by a coalition of enemies, forced to abdicate in 1814 and sent into exile at Elba (an island north of Rome). In 1815, after escaping from Elba, he took control of France again, built a new army, and in 100 days almost succeeded, but was defeated at Waterloo and exiled to St. Helena--an island in the South Atlantic Ocean; there he died 6 years later, in 1821. His image and memory are central to French national identity, but he is despised by the British and Russians and is a controversial figure in Germany and elsewhere in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early History==&lt;br /&gt;
He was born ''Napoleone di Buonaparte'' in the town of Ajaccio, one year after the island of [[Corsica]] was transferred to France by the Republic of Genoa ([[Italy]]). He was the second son of Carlo Buonaparte, a lawyer with some claim to noble rank; his mother was Marie-Letizia Bonaparte. The Buonaparte's were a wealthy family from the Corsican nobility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carlo Buonaparte had fought for Corsican independence under [[Pasquale Paoli]]; he now switched and became a supporter of the French regime, which recognized his noble rank.  When the King offered free education to impoverished noble families, Napoleon and several siblings were educated at royal expense. In 1779, after a few months' schooling at Autun to improve his French--he always had a thick Corsican accent--Napoleon entered the military academy at Brienne, which was run by a Catholic religious order.  He remained there for five years. Taunted by his schoolmates as being provincial from the wildest and most violent part of France, and uncouth, a pauper even among the aristocratic poor, he professed an intense Corsican patriotism and hatred of the French &amp;quot;oppressors.&amp;quot; In 1784 he was selected to attend the top-ranked Ecole Militaire in [[Paris]] to study the science and mathematics of artillery. Napoleon spent the year in luxury such as he had never known before, and graduated 42nd in a class of 130. Commissioned as second lieutenant of artillery, he was sent to Valence in southern France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was revolution in the air; Napoleon was an intellectual and an ardent disciple of Voltaire, Rousseau and the philosophes; he saluted the people but hated mob violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Englund pp 29-33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During his 10 years as a junior officer made 5 extended trips to Corsica, seeking a politico-military career, alongside Paoli or against him. He took prolonged leaves, adding up to three years in seven, sometimes failing to report back on time. In June 1793 Napoleon in Corsica was defeated by the Paolists; he and his family fled to France, joined the French revolutionary cause and forgot Corsica.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Englund ch. 1-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rise to Power==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1799italy.jpg|thumb|375px|Italy and Corsica in 1799]]&lt;br /&gt;
Once the Revolution had begun, so many of the aristocratic officers turned against the Revolutionary government, or were exiled or executed, that a vacuum of senior leadership resulted. Promotions came very quickly now, and loyalty to the Revolution was as important as technical skill; Napoleon had both.  His demerits were overlooked as he was twice reinstated, promoted, and allowed to collect his back pay. Paris knew him as an intellectual soldier deeply involved in politics. His first test of military genius came at Toulon in 1793, where the British had seized this key port. Napoleon, an acting Lieutenant-Colonel,  used his artillery to force the British to abandon the city.  He was immediately promoted by the Jacobin radicals under [[Robespierre]] to brigadier-general, joining the ranks of several brilliant young generals.  He played a major role in defending Paris itself from counter-revolutionaries, and became the operational planner for the Army of Italy and planned two successful attacks in April 1794. He married Josephine (Rose de Beauharnais) in 1796, after falling violently in love with the older aristocratic widow.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Englund pp. 63-73, 91-2, 97-8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
===Italy===&lt;br /&gt;
In Italy, Napoleon's rapid maneuvers proved brilliantly successful and had major long-term effects. He defeated [[Austria]], France's most dangerous enemy. He established French hegemony in the Italian peninsula, put Vienna in an impossible strategic situation, and solidified his reputation as a military genius beloved by the men in the ranks; he became a major national hero, and thus a political force in his own right.&lt;br /&gt;
===Egypt===&lt;br /&gt;
The governing Directory was happy to send Napoleon to far-off [[Egypt]]. In July 1798, Napoleon led the Armée d’Orient an expeditionary force of 36,000 men to conquer Egypt from the Ottoman Empire, the opening move in his plan to acquire a new colony for France, block England's access to India, and export the values of French republicanism to a modernized Middle East. Aware that Europe was ignorant of cultural and religious Islam, Napoleon brought along a hundred scholars and linguists. The scholars opened the field of [[Orientalism|Oriental]] studies; the third-ranking French general converted to Islam as Abdallah Menou.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rosetta Stone.jpg|thumb|200px|The [[Rosetta Stone]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He easily defeated the 60,000-man army of the Marmelukes (horsemen) at the [[Battle of the Pyramids]] (July 21, 1798). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intending to transplant French liberty to Egypt, Napoleon encountered stiff resistance and reacted with the same barbarism and repression used by the Ottomans.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Juan Cole, ''Napoleon's Egypt'' (2007); Irene A. Bierman, ed., ''Napoleon in Egypt'' (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British under Admiral [[Horatio Nelson]] sank Napoleon's entire fleet at the [[Battle of the Nile]] (August 1, 1798), trapping the French army as the [[Turkish]] main army approached. Napoleon attacked first, invading Syria and defeating the Turks in a bloody massacre.  As he laid siege to Acre, plague broke out among his troops, forcing Napoleon to retreat back to Egypt.  At the [[Battle of Aboukir]] (July 25, 1799), his 6000 men defeated a Turkish force three times as strong. Napoleon then slipped through the blockade and returned to France. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The British defeated the French army in Egypt in 1801 and allowed it to return to France. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Coup d'etat of the 18th Brumaire===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the failures in Egypt, Napoleon returned to a hero's welcome. In alliance with the director [[Emmanuel Sieyès]] and his brother, [[Lucien Bonaparte]], president of the council of five hundred, he overthrew the Directory by a coup d'etat on November 9, 1799 (&amp;quot;the 18th Brumaire&amp;quot; according to the revolutionary calendar), and closed down the council of five hundred.  Napoleon became &amp;quot;first consul&amp;quot; for ten years, with two consuls appointed by him who had consultative voices only. His power was confirmed by the new constitution (&amp;quot;Constitution of the year VIII&amp;quot;), originally devised by Sieyès to give Napoleon a minor role, but rewritten by Napoleon, and accepted by direct popular vote (3,000,000 in favor, 1,567 opposed). The constitution preserved the appearance of a [[republic]] but in reality established a military dictatorship. The days of Brumaire sounded the end of the short-lived republic: no more representative government, assemblies, a collegian executive, or liberty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Furet (1996) p 212&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diplomacy==&lt;br /&gt;
The long string of wars was broken by the Treaty of Amiens (1802), which proved to be only a 14 month pause. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Historians often use the Treaty of Amiens to separate what they call the &amp;quot;French Revolutionary wars&amp;quot; from the &amp;quot;Napoleonic wars.&amp;quot; The new wars were much more nationalistic and less ideological. John D. Grainger, ''The Amiens Truce: Britain and Bonaparte, 1801-1803.'' (2004)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Napoleon used the interlude to make major territorial gains in Italy and Germany without firing a shot, an unexpected development that forced the British back to the battlefield.  &lt;br /&gt;
===Slavery===&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon's major adventure into the Caribbean--sending 30,000 troops in 1802 to retake Saint Domingue (Haiti) from ex-slaves under [[Toussaint L'Ouverture]] who had revolted. Napoleon wanted to preserve France's financial benefits from the colony's sugar and coffee crops; he then planned to establish a major base at New Orleans. He therefore reestablished slavery in Haiti and Guadeloupe, where it had been abolished after rebellions. Slaves and black freedmen fought the French for their freedom and independence. Revolutionary ideals played a central role in the fighting for it was the slaves and their comrades who were fighting for the revolutionary ideals of freedom and equality, while the French troops under General Charles Leclerc fought to restore the order of the ancien régime. The goal of reestablishing slavery - which explicitly contradicted the ideals of the French Revolution - demoralized the French troops. The demoralized French soldiers were unable to cope with the tropical diseases, and most died of yellow fever.  Slavery was reimposed in Guadeloupe but not in Haiti, which became an independent black republic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Philippe R. Girard, &amp;quot;Liberte, Egalite, Esclavage: French Revolutionary Ideals and the Failure of the Leclerc Expedition to Saint-Domingue.&amp;quot; ''French Colonial History'' 2005 6: 55-77. Issn: 1539-3402 Fulltext: in Project Muse &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Napoleon's vast colonial dreams for Egypt, India, the Caribbean, Louisiana, and even Australia were all doomed for lack of a fleet capable of matching Britain's Royal Navy. Realizing the fiasco Napoleon liquidated the Haiti project, brought home the survivors and sold off Louisiana to the U.S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Englund p 259. Slavery remained in Guadeloupe until 1848.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The treaty of Tilsit in 1807 ended the War of the Third Coalition--in which Russia, Prussia, and Austria defeated in turn and Napoleon gained control of most of the continent.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military action to 1812==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:David - Napoleon.jpg|thumb|left|Napoleon Crossing The Alps by [[Jacques Louis David]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon's basic military strategy was to identify and defeat the enemy's main force. The goal was to break the enemy's will to resist so that favorable negotiations followed; the conquest of territory was won in negotiations. &amp;quot;I see only one thing,&amp;quot; Napoleon explained in 1797, &amp;quot;namely the enemy's main body. I try to crush it, confident that secondary matters will then settle themselves.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Maximilian Yorck von Wartenburg, [http://books.google.com/books?id=CWwPAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA39&amp;amp;dq=%22confident+that+secondary+matters+will+then+settle+%22&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0 ''Napoleon as a General'' (1902) p. 39]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Less flamboyant was his close attention to selecting his  generals, and his calculations of the logistical needs of a campaign. He also pioneered the use of the [[division]] as a [[combined arms]] formation, although he did not standardize their organization. Napoleon also made much more routine use of maps and accurate watches, for [[military synchronization|synchronizing]] operations, than had previous military commanders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His failure in [[Russia]] was due primarily to his bad logistical planning, a blunder historians have been unable to explain. In battle he paid close attention to the overall picture, but left the critical decisions to his marshals. He rarely issued detailed guidance on corps level tactical employment; instead he devised the overall battle plans, and directed the combined attacks of infantry, cavalry reserves, and massed batteries of guns. Since he was simultaneously head of the government, he integrated the military, political and diplomatic dimensions. He was an accurate judge of his opponents, except that is for Britain and Russia. He could never be at peace with Britain; with Russia he let his need for diplomatic prestige overcome his military judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Austerlitz, 1805===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Battle of Austerlitz]] on 2 December 1805 is celebrated as Napoleon's greatest victory. The collapse of the Peace of Amiens led Britain to assemble the &amp;quot;Third Coalition&amp;quot; in April 1805, including Austria, Russia, and Sweden. After threatening to invade Britain, Napoleon sent 200,000 soldiers marching east. He used six army corps, each a self-contained, all-arms combat force. The corps was a Napoleonic invention, and each was strong enough to operate independently, allowing the army to advance along a broad front, which facilitated logistics (each army seized supplies in its region), and increased the speed of the advance. Napoleon commanded in person in Germany; relying on the support of most of the south German states, he advanced to meet the Austrians who had invaded Bavaria. On the upper Danube he concentrated his 200,000 men, reinforced by Bernadotte, and by allied from Bavaria, Württemberg, Baden, Hesse, Nassau. After the Austrians had been defeated in several engagements, their main army was surrounded at Ulm and surrendered 30,000 men on October 17, 1805 without a fight.  At the same time the British navy won a total victory under [[Horatio Nelson]] sinking the combined French and Spanish fleet at [[Trafalgar]] on October 21, 1805, permanently destroying Napoleon's sea power.  On December 2, 1805, at the [[Battle of Austerlitz]], called &amp;quot;the battle of the three emperors,&amp;quot; Napoleon split the enemy center, encircled the enemy left, and won a smashing victory over the united forces of Austria and Russia.  Napoleon lost 9000 men, the enemy 26,000. Austria made peace; the Russians retreated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Artillery===&lt;br /&gt;
The increased importance of artillery after 1807 stemmed from Napoleon's creation of a highly mobile artillery force, the growth in artillery numbers, and changes in artillery practices. As a result of these factors, Napoleon, rather than relying on infantry to wear away the enemy's defenses, now could use massed artillery as a spearhead to pound a break in the enemy's line that was then exploited by supporting infantry and cavalry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Bruce McConachy, &amp;quot;The Roots of Artillery Doctrine: Napoleonic Artillery Tactics Reconsidered.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Military History'' 2001 65(3): 617-640. Issn: 0899-3718 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0899-3718(200107)65%3A3%3C617%3ATROADN%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z in Jstor]. McConachy rejects the alternative theory that growing reliance on artillery by the French army beginning in 1807 was an outgrowth of the declining quality of the French infantry and, later, France's inferiority in cavalry numbers.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia to 1812===&lt;br /&gt;
===The Polish issue===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1807 Napoleon created a powerful outpost of his empire in Eastern Europe. [[Poland]] had recently been divided up by its neighbors, but Napoleon created the Grand Duchy of Warsaw, which depended on France from the very beginning. The duchy consisted of lands seized in Russia, Austria, and Prussia; its Grand Duke was Napoleon's ally the king of Saxony, but Napoleon appointed the intendants who ran the country.  The 2.5 million Poles thrilled to the opportunity and by 1814 sent about 200,000 men to  Napoleon's armies, including about 90,000 who marched with him to Moscow.  The Russians strongly opposed any move toward an independent Poland and to punish them Napoleon invaded in 1812.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Riley (2000) p. 27-8. The Grand Duchy was dissolved in 1815 and Poland would not be a state until 1918.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Napoleon's impact on Poland was dramatic, including the Napoleonic legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class bureaucracies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Moscow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Collapse, 1813-1814===&lt;br /&gt;
The fiasco in Russia in 1812 wounded Napoleon's political prestige, emptied his treasury and encouraged his enemies to greater exertions and nations on the fence to turn against France. Diplomatic historians blame Napoleon's inflexibility and unwillingness to compromise when he was winning (before Russia), and, especially, when the odds had turned against him in 1813-14; in January 1813, Napoleon rejected Prussian terms; that summer he mishandled Austria; in early 1814 he fumbled the final offer of peace made at Chatillon in March 1814.   That political failure doomed him.  The Allies then signed a 20 year alliance (the Treaty of Chaumont), stuck together, and switched Bavaria away from Napoleon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Thompson ch 13-14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Military setbacks in Spain further weakened his cause and exposed France to an attack through Spain. While Napoleon could recruit replacement troops, the loss of experienced cavalry in 1812 meant that he could not exploit his victories at Luetzen and Bautzen in  1813.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chandler, ''Campaigns of Napoleon'' ch 77&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His army of raw and ill-equipped recruits was outnumbered and France was war-weary; on the other hand, the Allies were also exhausted, and had longer lines of communications and supply. Man for man, except for Wellington's British, the French probably remained better soldiers than their opponents to the very end.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Schroeder (1996) p. 495-6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon mishandled the campaigns in north Germany in 1813. Instead of concentrating his forces for a decisive battle with the enemy's main force, Napoleon repeatedly detached large numbers of troops under ineffective commanders to capture the Prussian capital of Berlin. The heavy losses and strategic reverses sustained by the French in these questionable undertakings left Napoleon's Grande Armée vulnerable to the massive Allied coalition that met him at [[Leipzig]].  He won at [[Dresden]] but Napoleon's mistakes were uncharacteristic of him at a younger age; he now underestimated the strength of his enemies and overestimated his own, and he was driven less by calculation than by thirst for revenge against Prussia, a onetime ally who switched against him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Michael V. Leggiere, &amp;quot;From Berlin to Leipzig: Napoleon's Gamble in North Germany, 1813.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Military History'' 2003 67(1): 39-84. Issn: 0899-3718 Fulltext: in [[Project Muse]] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon's decisive defeat came at the [[Leipzig, Battle of|Battle of Leipzig]], called &amp;quot;the battle of nations&amp;quot; in October 1813. Napoleon's 180,000 French and Saxon and Württemberg troops were overwhelmed by 320,000 Allies, comprising  Austrian, Russian, and Prussian armies.  It was the biggest battle to date in European history, with 100,000 to 120,000 killed, wounded or captured on both sides.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chandler, ''Campaigns of Napoleon'' ch 80 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Napoleon managed to escape to France with a portion of his army, but the disaster was almost as great as that in Russia in 1812 and even more irreparable; all the German states now joined the Allies, the Dutch expelled the French, and Denmark was forced to accept terms.   In early January, 1814, 200,000 Allied troops invaded France. Napoleon scored some small victories but the Allies took Paris on March 31, his government declared him deposed, and his marshals deserted him. Napoleon abdicated and was sent into exile at Elba (an island north of Rome), as the old monarchy was brought back to France.  The French army, now controlled by [[Louis XVIII]] numbered 460,000 men, but most were still loyal to Napoleon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===100 Days to Waterloo, 1815===&lt;br /&gt;
In March 1815, Napoleon secretly landed in France and rallied his supporters. They flocked to his cause as the French royal officials lost control; Napoleon entered Paris in triumph and raised new armies.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1815waterloo.jpg|thumb|375px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Allies, meeting at a peace conference in [[Vienna]], sent a million soldiers to stop him.  The largest contingents was a multinational force under the command of the Briton, the [[Duke of Wellington]]. Napoleon defeated the German army under Blücher at Ligny but had to turn and stop Wellington before he merged forces with Blücher.  At a very hard and closely fought battle of [[Waterloo, Battle of|Waterloo]] on June 18, 1815, Blücher arrived at the last moment and Napoleon was finally and totally defeated. He surrendered to the British who sent him in exile to the remote island of St. Helena in the south Atlantic, where he died a prisoner in 1821.  His relatives lost their royal positions; his imperial army, and particularly the legendary Imperial Guard, were disbanded, and Europe entered an era of peace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on France==&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon centralized power in Paris, with all the provinces governed by all-powerful prefects whom he selected. They were more powerful than royal intendants of the ancient régime and had a long-term impact in unifying the nation, minimizing regional differences, and shifting all decisions to Paris.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goubert (1991) ch 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
===Law: Code Napoléon ===&lt;br /&gt;
Of permanent importance was the Code Napoléon (1806), created by eminent jurists under Napoleon's supervision. Praised for its Gallic clarity, it spread rapidly throughout Europe and the world in general. The Code recognized the principles of civil liberty, equality before the law, and the secular character of the state. It discarded the old right of primogeniture (where only the eldest son inherited) and ruled that inheritances should be divided equally among all the children.  The court system was standardized, with all judges appointed by Paris.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goubert (1991) ch 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Religion had been a major issue during the [[French Revolution]], and Napoleon resolved most of the outstanding problems. Thereby he moved the clergy and large numbers of devout Catholics from hostility to the government to support for him.  The Catholic system was reestablished by the  [[Concordat of 1801]] (signed with Pope [[Pius VII]]), so that church life returned to normal; the church lands were not restored, but the Jesuits were allowed back in and the bitter fights between the government and Church ended. Protestants and atheists were tolerated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Sutherland (2003) ch 11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Unfortunately, since then France has once again fallen into the hands of atheists and liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Taxes===&lt;br /&gt;
The French taxation system had collapsed in the 1780s. In the 1790s the government seized and sold church lands and lands of exiled aristocrats. Napoleon instituted a modern, efficient tax system that guaranteed a steady flow of revenues and made long-term financing possible.  He kept the system of conscription that had been created in the 1790s, so that every young man served in the army, which could be rapidly expanded even as it was based on a core of careerist sergeants and talented officers.  Before the Revolution the aristocracy formed the officer corps.  Now promotion was by merit and achievement--every private carried a marshal's baton, it was said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goubert (1991) ch 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on Europe==&lt;br /&gt;
Broers (1996) distinguishes the &amp;quot;inner&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;outer&amp;quot; empire. The &amp;quot;Inner&amp;quot; Empire included France itself and Belgium, the Netherlands, the Rhinelands, most of western Germany, Switzerland, and northern Italy. These areas were integrated into an efficiently administered and largely obedient bloc. Napoleon sought to rally hostile political factions of both right and left to his rule (ralliement), as well as to fuse them into a loyal administrative class. In return for their services and obedience, Napoleon offered this new elite social order a coherent legal code and protection of their property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;outer&amp;quot; empire, comprised the German Hanseatic territories, former Papal States, Illyrian provinces, and the kingdom of Spain (ruled by his brother Joseph Bonaparte). It displayed little enthusiasm for French occupation and resented the imposition of high taxes, enforcement of the Continental blockade against trade with England and [[America]], application of the Concordat with the Pope to protect the [[Catholic]] Church, and especially, conscription demands to supply troops for the Grande Armee, such as the 300,000 lost in Russia in 1812. In the Outer Empire banditry flourished, elites refused to cooperate with the occupier, and the forces of counterrevolution remained active.  Napoleonic rule rested on an insecure alliance of local collaborators and French administrators, both of whom were unpopular with their subjects. Grab (1996) shows heart of the French occupation of Europe was a combination of reform and exploitation designed to extract men and money more efficiently from the subject states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Broers (1996) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon lifted all restriction on [[Jews]] in France and its empire. In Germany and Italy, especially, this marked a dramatic liberation from the ghetto.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  Frederic Cople Jaher, ''The Jews and the Nation: Revolution, Emancipation, State Formation, and the Liberal Paradigm in America and France'' (2002) pp 103-37.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After overcoming the forces of the coalition in 1807, Napoleon decided to create a powerful outpost of his empire in Eastern Europe. He established the [[Grand Duchy of Warsaw]], which depended on France from the very beginning. The duchy consisted of lands seized in Russia, Austria, and Prussia. He gave some support to the Polish struggle with Russia, which wanted to keep [[Poland]] within its sphere of power. The addition of west Galicia to the duchy of Warsaw by the peace of Vienna, had caused Czar Alexander anxiety lest the restoration of Poland should be contemplated, and this was a factor that led to Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personality==&lt;br /&gt;
All historians agree that Napoleon's remarkable personality was one key to his influence.Although short and not physically imposing, in one-on-one situations he immediately had a hypnotic impact on people and seemingly bent the strongest leaders to his will. Second his intellectual powers were unrivaled. He had a photographic memory for facts, people, events, numbers, military units and maps. He devoured statistical information and reports, memorized maps, and had a perfect recall of a fantastic stock of information. He had a thorough command of military technology, as well as the financial and diplomatic secrets of France. He could instantly organize and integrate all that information, generating brilliant insights on complex situations.  He could organize his own thoughts and rapidly dictate a series of complex commands to all his subordinates, keeping in mind where each major unit was expected to be at every future point, and like a chess master, &amp;quot;seeing&amp;quot; the best plays many moves ahead. Combined with his inexhaustible energy, he kept relays of staff and secretaries at work. Unlike many generals Napoleon did not turn to history to ask what Hannibal or Alexander or whoever did in a similar situation.   After 1812 Napoleon seems to have lost his old verve. On the great Russian campaign of 1812, with crisis after crisis at hand, he rarely rose to the occasion. After that debacle compatriots noticed a loss of the old flair. Some historians have suggested a physical deterioration, but others note that an impaired Napoleon was still a brilliant general. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Chandler, &amp;quot;General Introduction&amp;quot; to ''The Campaigns of Napoleon'' (1975). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of impact on events, it was more than Napoleon's personality that took effect. He chose outstanding generals, and stood by them. He reorganized France itself to supply the men and money needed for great wars.  Above all he inspired his men--Wellington said his presence on the battlefield was worth 40,000 soldiers,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Thompson, ''Napoleon Bonaparte''  (1951) p 285&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals. The force of his personalities neutralized material difficulties as his soldiers fought with the confidence that with Napoleon in charge they would surely win.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Englund, ''Napoleon'' (2004) pp 379ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon's ambition and drive inspired the term &amp;quot;[[Napoleonic Complex]]&amp;quot;, which is used to describe a person who overcompensates for shortness or other physical deficiencies by excessive aggressiveness or will to dominate other people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He married first [[Josephine Beauharnais]] (9 March 1796) and later Marie-Louise of Austria (11 March 1810). His only son, [[Napoleon II]] (1811 - 1832) the [[King of Rome]], died at the the age of 21. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quote on Jesus ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[[Alexander]], [[Julius Caesar|Caesar]], [[Charlemagne]], and myself founded empires; but what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. [[Jesus Christ]] founded an empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/2505&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Propaganda and memory ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:David-Napoleon I.jpg|right|thumb|The Coronation of Napoleon in Notre Dame by J. L. David]]&lt;br /&gt;
Napoleon's extensive and masterful use of propaganda contributed to his rise to power, legitimated his regime, and established his image for posterity. Strict censorship, controlling every aspect of the press, books, theater, and art, was only part of his propaganda scheme, aimed at portraying him as bringing desperately wanted peace and stability to France. The propagandistic rhetoric changed in relation to events and the atmosphere of Napoleon's reign, focusing first on his role as a general in the army and identification as a soldier, and moving to his role as emperor and a civil leader. Specifically targeting his civilian audience, Napoleon fostered an important, though uneasy, relationship with the contemporary art community, taking an active role in commissioning and controlling all forms of art production to suit his propaganda goals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Forrest (2004) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memory of Napoleon in Poland is highly favorable, for his support for independence and opposition to Russia, his legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class bureaucracies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Andrzej Nieuwazny, &amp;quot;Napoleon and Polish identity.&amp;quot; ''History Today'', May 1998 v48 n5 pp. 50-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Napoleon's Tomb.jpg|thumb|left|280px|The tomb of Napoleon at Les Invalides, in Paris.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hazareesingh (2004) explores how Napoleon's image and memory is best understood as playing a key role in collective political defiance of the Bourbon restoration monarchy in 1815-30. People from all walks of life and all areas of France, particularly Napoleonic veterans, drew on the Napoleonic legacy and its connections with the ideals of the 1789 revolution. They spread rumors of Napoleon's return from St. Helena; many talked openly of Napoleon as the great inspiration for French patriotism and for  individual and collective liberties. A pro-Napoleon political mobilization appeared in open displays of the tricolor and rosettes, as well as celebrations of anniversaries of Napoleon's triumphs. Royal celebrations were disrupted by raucous laughter and buffoonery as the many supporters of Napoleon worked, without any central coordination, to destabilize the Bourbon regime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Hazareesingh (2004) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Datta (2005) shows that following the collapse of militaristic Boulangism in the late 1880s, the Napoleonic legend was divorced from party politics and revived in popular culture. Concentrating on plays and novels from the period 1893-1913, Datta examines how writers and critics of the &amp;quot;Belle Epoque&amp;quot; exploited the Napoleonic legend for diverse political and cultural ends. Reduced to a minor character, the new fictional Napoleon was not a world historical figure but an intimate one fashioned by each individual's needs and consumed as popular entertainment. In their attempts to represent the emperor as a figure of national unity, proponents and detractors of the Third Republic used the legend as a vehicle for exploring anxieties about gender and fears about the processes of democratization that accompanied this new era of mass politics and culture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Venita Datta, &amp;quot;'L'appel Au Soldat': Visions of the Napoleonic Legend in Popular Culture of the Belle Epoque.&amp;quot; ''French Historical Studies'' 2005 28(1): 1-30. Issn: 0016-1071 Fulltext: in Ebsco &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''After being defeated by the British in 1815, the French Emperor was exiled to St. Helena--an island in the South Atlantic Ocean. Six years later, at the age of 52, Bonaparte whispered his last words, &amp;quot;Head of Army!&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.livescience.com/history/070116_napoleon_bonaparte.html Mystery of Napoleon's Death Said Solved] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Horatio Nelson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George C. Marshall]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Porfirio Diaz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Basic further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
See the detailed Bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Emsley, Clive. ''Napoleon'' 2003 142 pp, very succinct coverage of life, France and empire; little on warfare&lt;br /&gt;
* Englund, Steven. ''Napoleon: A Political Life.'' (2004). 575 pages; the best political biography [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Political-Life-Steven-Englund/dp/0674018036/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1197704843&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fisher, Herbert. ''Napoleon''  (1913) 256pp old classic [http://books.google.com/books?vid=04ZJfyyBn9evm4khfD&amp;amp;id=dJcaAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=titlepage&amp;amp;dq=napoleon&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Harold, J. Christopher. ''The Age of Napoleon'' (1963) 480pp, popular history stressing empire and diplomacy &lt;br /&gt;
* Grab, Alexander. ''Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe.'' (2003), pp. 249, maps; excellent synthesis [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Transformation-European-History-Perspective/dp/0333682742/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1210581950&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greiss, Thomas E.  ''West Point Atlas for the Wars of Napoleon'' (1986) 70pp; [http://www.dean.usma.edu/history/web03/atlases/napoleon/napoleon%20war%20index.htm all maps are online]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Johnson, Paul. ''Napoleon'' (Penguin Lives) (2002) 208pp [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Penguin-Lives-Paul-Johnson/dp/0670030783/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1210582016&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Markham, Felix. ''Napoleon'' (1963). 304pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=10369968 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McLynn, Frank. ''Napoleon: A Biography'' (2003) 752pp, stress on military [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Frank-McLynn/dp/1559706317/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1210582016&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Paret, Peter. &amp;quot;Napoleon and the Revolution of War,&amp;quot; in Paret, ed. ''Makers of Modern Strategy'' (1986), Napoleon's ideas on warfare&lt;br /&gt;
* Rose, John Holland. ''The Life of Napoleon I: Including New Materials from the British Official Records,'' (2 vol 1903), old but solid scholarship; [http://books.google.com/books?id=7qIfAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;dq=napoleon+John+Holland+Rose&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online editon vol 1] [http://books.google.com/books?id=DIYfAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;dq=napoleon+John+Holland+Rose&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online editon vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thompson, J. M. ''Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall'' (1954), scholarly, well-balanced in topics, but pro-Britain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Detailed bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Major biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Asprey, Robert.  ''The Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte'' and ''The Reign of Napoleon Bonaparte''. (2002); 2 vol, 1200pp well-written popular biography focusing on the military [http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Napoleon-Bonaparte-Robert-Asprey/dp/0465048811/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190736126&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Barnett, Corelli. ''Bonaparte'' (1978), hostile&lt;br /&gt;
* Dwyer, Philip. ''Napoleon: The Path to Power'' (2008), to 1799 &lt;br /&gt;
* Emsley, Clive. ''Napoleon'' 2003 142 pp, very succinct coverage of life, France and empire; little on warfare&lt;br /&gt;
* Cronin, Vincent. ''Napoleon'' (1971), favorable popular bio&lt;br /&gt;
* Dwyer, Philip. ''Napoleon: The Path to Power'' (2008), 672 pp; vol 1 of major new biography, to 1799 [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Path-Power-Philip-Dwyer/dp/0300137540/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1210582016&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ellis, Geoffry. ''Napoleon'' (1997) &lt;br /&gt;
* Englund, Steven. ''Napoleon: A Political Life.'' (2004). 575 pages; the best (and most advanced) political biography; thin on military [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Political-Life-Steven-Englund/dp/0684871424/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190736235&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fisher, Herbert. ''Napoleon''  (1913) 256pp old classic [http://books.google.com/books?vid=04ZJfyyBn9evm4khfD&amp;amp;id=dJcaAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=titlepage&amp;amp;dq=napoleon&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fournier, August. ''Napoleon the First: A Biography'' (1903);  836 pages; excellent old biography [http://books.google.com/books?vid=02iZ1BDnhyMh95-cSu&amp;amp;id=jI0aAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=titlepage&amp;amp;dq=napoleon&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Herold, J. Christopher.  ''The Age of Napoleon'' (1963) 480pp, popular history stressing empire and diplomacy &lt;br /&gt;
* Johnson, Paul.  ''Napoleon: A Penguin Life.'' (2002). 208 pp.  [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Penguin-Lives-Paul-Johnson/dp/0670030783/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190736352&amp;amp;sr=8-4  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lefebvre, Georges: ''Napoleon,'' 1969, influential French perspective&lt;br /&gt;
* Markham, Felix. ''Napoleon'' 1963. 304pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=10369968 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McLynn, Frank. ''Napoleon: A Biography'' (2003) 752pp, stress on military [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Frank-McLynn/dp/1559706317/ref=sr_1_3/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190736352&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rose, John Holland. ''The Life of Napoleon I: Including New Materials from the British Official Records,'' (2 vol 1903), old but solid scholarship; [http://books.google.com/books?id=7qIfAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;dq=napoleon+John+Holland+Rose&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online editon vol 1] [http://books.google.com/books?id=DIYfAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;dq=napoleon+John+Holland+Rose&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online editon vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schom, Alan. ''Napoleon Bonaparte: A Life'' (1997), 944pp; very hostile; argues Napoleon was a paranoiac psychopath [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Bonaparte-Life-Alan-Schom/dp/0060929588/ref=sr_1_2/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190736422&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thompson, J. M. ''Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall'' (1954), scholarly, well-balanced in topics, but pro-Britain&lt;br /&gt;
* Tulard, Jean. ''Napoleon: The Myth of the Saviour'' (1985), influential French biography&lt;br /&gt;
* Woloch, Isser. '' Napoleon and His Collaborators: the making of a dictatorship'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-His-Collaborators-Making-Dictatorship/dp/0393323412/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190736488&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General reference===&lt;br /&gt;
* Chandler, David. ''Dictionary of the Napoleonic Wars'' (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Esposito, Vincent J. and John R. Elting, ''A Military History and Atlas of the Napoleonic Wars'' (1999); textbook; includes the West Point maps&lt;br /&gt;
* Fremont-Barnes, Gregory. ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars: A Political, Social, and Military History'' (ABC-CLIO: 3 vol 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
* Furet, François and Mona Ozouf, eds. ''A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution'' (1989), 1120pp; long essays by scholars; conservative perspective; stress on history of ideas&lt;br /&gt;
* Greiss, Thomas E.  ''West Point Atlas for the Wars of Napoleon'' (1986) 70pp; [http://www.dean.usma.edu/history/web03/atlases/napoleon/napoleon%20war%20index.htm all maps are online]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Nafziger, George F.  ''Historical Dictionary of the Napoleonic Era.'' 2002. 353 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Nicholls, David.  ''Napoleon: A Biographical Companion.'' 1999. 300 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Pope, Stephen.  ''Dictionary of the Napoleonic Wars.'' (2000). 572 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Digby. ''The Greenhill Napoleonic Wars Data Book'' (1998); 582pp; data on 2000+ individual battles, clashes, sieges, raids, capitulations, and naval engagements&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military studies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Adkin, Mark. ''The Waterloo Companion: The Complete Guide to History's Most Famous Land Battle''  (2002)  448pp [http://www.amazon.com/Waterloo-Companion-Complete-Historys-Famous/dp/0811718549/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735456&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Arnold, James R.  ''Napoleon Conquers Austria: The 1809 Campaign for Vienna.'' (1995). 247 pp.  [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Conquers-Austria-Campaign-Vienna/dp/0275946940/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735487&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chandler, David. ''The Campaigns of Napoleon: the Mind and Method of History's Greatest Soldier'' (1973), 1216pp; experts call it the best military synthesis&lt;br /&gt;
* Cole, Juan. ''Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleons-Egypt-Invading-Middle-East/dp/1403964319/ref=sr_1_5/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1189485491&amp;amp;sr=1-5 excerpts and online search from Amazon.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* Connelly, Owen. ''Blundering to Glory: Napoleon's Military Campaigns'' (2nd ed 2006) negative on Napoleon's skills&lt;br /&gt;
* Coote, Stephen.  ''Napoleon and the Hundred Days.'' (2005). 320 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Dodge, Theodore Ayrault. ''Napoleon; A History of the Art of War'' (1904), old classic [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0N7HWOuEzfsHb6vtWh&amp;amp;id=Y6kfAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=titlepage&amp;amp;dq=napoleon&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Duffy, Christopher. ''Austerlitz, 1805'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
* Duffy, Christopher. ''Borodino and the War of 1812'' (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
* Elting, John R. ''Swords Around a Throne: Napoleon's Grande Armee'' (1997), influential study &lt;br /&gt;
* Epstein, Robert M. ''Napoleon's Last Victory and the Emergence of Modern War'' (1994) on Austrian war of 1809&lt;br /&gt;
* Esdaile, Charles J. ''The Wars of Napoleon'' (1995) &lt;br /&gt;
* Esdaile, Charles J. ''The French Wars 1792-1815.'' (2001). 96pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102715226 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fisher, Todd. ''The Napoleonic Wars'' (2001-4) 3 vol; 96pp, short, well-illustrated operational history [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleonic-Wars-Essential-Histories-Specials/dp/1841768316/ref=sr_1_3/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735873&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 1]; [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleonic-Wars-1805-1807-Essential-Histories/dp/1579583571/ref=sr_1_2/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735873&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search vol 2];  [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleonic-Wars-Empires-Strike-1808-1812/dp/1579583660/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735873&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
* Forrest, Alan.  ''Napoleon's Men: The Soldiers of the Revolution and Empire.'' 2002. 248 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Fortescue, J. W. ''A history of the British army'' (19v 1899-1930) [http://www.archive.org/details/historybritishp202fortuoft full text vol 4 pt2: 1789-1801][http://www.archive.org/download/britisharmy06fortuoft/britisharmy06fortuoft online edition vol 6: 1807-1809]; [http://www.archive.org/download/historyofbritish07fortuoft/historyofbritish07fortuoft full text vol 7: 1809-1810]; [http://www.archive.org/download/historyofbritish08fortuoft/historyofbritish08fortuoft full text vol 8: 1810-1812];  [http://www.archive.org/details/historyofbritish09fortuoft full text vol 9: 1813-1814]; [http://www.archive.org/details/historyofbritish10fortuoft full text vol 10: 1814-1815]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gates, David. ''The Napoleonic Wars, 1803-1815'' (1997) 304pp; attacks Connolly and says N's &amp;quot;brilliance as a military commander has rarely been equalled let alone surpassed&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Gill, John. ''With Eagles to Glory: Napoleon and his German Allies in the 1809 Campaign'' (1992)&lt;br /&gt;
* Goetz, Robert.  ''1805: Austerlitz; Napoleon and the Destruction of the Third Coalition'' (2005). 368pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Griffith, Paddy. ''The Art of War of Revolutionary France 1789-1802,'' (1998); 304 pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Art-War-Revolutionary-France-1789-1802/dp/1853673358/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735789&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hamilton-Williams, David.  ''Waterloo: New Perspectives; The Great Battle Reappraised.'' (1994). 416 pp. [http://www.amazon.com/Waterloo-Perspectives-Great-Battle-Reappraised/dp/0471145718/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735763&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Herold, J. Christopher.  ''Napoleon in Egypt'' (1962) [http://ia331331.us.archive.org/2/items/bonaparteinegypt001528mbp/bonaparteinegypt001528mbp_djvu.txt online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kagan, Frederick W. &amp;quot;Russia's Wars with Napoleon: 1805–1815,&amp;quot; in ''The Military History of Tsarist Russia,'' ed. Frederick W. Kagan and Robin Higham (2002), 106–22. &lt;br /&gt;
* Kagan, Frederick W. ''The End of the Old Order: Napoleon And Europe, 1801-1805'' (2006) first of four promised volumes; covers the strengths and strategies of all the powers [http://www.amazon.com/End-Old-Order-Napoleon-1801-1805/dp/0306815451/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735729&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Leggiere, Michael V.  ''Napoleon and Berlin: The Franco-Prussian War in North Germany, 1813.'' 2002. 384 pp. [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Berlin-Franco-Prussian-Campaigns-Commanders/dp/0806133996/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735699&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Liaropoulos, Andrew N. &amp;quot;Revolutions in Warfare: Theoretical Paradigms and Historical Evidence - the Napoleonic and First World War Revolutions in Military Affairs.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Military History'' 2006 70(2): 363-384. Issn: 0899-3718 Fulltext: in Project Muse &lt;br /&gt;
* Lieven, Dominic. &amp;quot;Russia and the Defeat of Napoleon (1812–14)&amp;quot; ''Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History'' 7#2 (2006) 283-308 online in [[Project Muse]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Luvaas, Jay. '' Napoleon on the Art of War'' (2001) 288 pp. A synthesis, arrangement, and translation of Napoleon's thinking. [http://books.google.com/books?id=zq8GhdLeK_kC&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:luvaas&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;ei=AlNZSLjJErW2iQG1rOH5Bg&amp;amp;sig=knBV3L0vr0dptGr0fOa32pMlZ6k excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn, John A. ''The Bayonets of the Republic: Motivation and Tactics in the Army of Revolutionary France, 1791–94'' (1984); influential analysis [http://www.amazon.com/Bayonets-Republic-History-Warfare/dp/0813329450/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735664&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muir, Rory. ''Tactics and the Experience of Battle in the Age of Napoleon'' (2000), 466pp [http://www.amazon.com/Tactics-Experience-Battle-Age-Napoleon/dp/0300082703/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735639&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nofi, Albert A. ''The Waterloo Campaign, June 1815.'' 1993. 333pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=100857568 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nosworthy, Brent.  ''With Musket, Cannon and Sword: Battle Tactics of Napoleon and His Enemies.'' (1996). 528 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Paret, Peter. &amp;quot;Napoleon and the Revolution of War,&amp;quot; in Paret, ed. ''Makers of Modern Strategy'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
* Pericoli, Ugo.''1815: The Armies at Waterloo'' (1973) &lt;br /&gt;
* Riley, J. P.  &amp;quot;How Good Was Napoleon?&amp;quot; ''History Today,'' (July 2007) 57#7 10pp in [[EBSCO]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Riley, J. P.  ''Napoleon and the World War of 1813: Lessons in Coalition Warfighting.'' (2000). 480 pp &lt;br /&gt;
* Riley, Jonathon. ''Napoleon As a General: Command from the Battlefield to Grand Strategy'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rogers, H.C.B. ''Napoleon's Army'' (1974)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rothenberg, Gunther. ''The Napoleonic Wars'' (2006) 240pp, well illustrated synthesis by leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleonic-Wars-Smithsonian-History-Warfare/dp/006085121X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1190735584&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rothenberg, Gunther. ''The Art of Warfare in the Age of Napoleon'' 1978&lt;br /&gt;
*  Schneid, Frederick C. ''Napoleon's Italian Campaigns: 1805-1815.'' (2002); 229pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101329281 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tarle, Eugene. ''Napoleon's Invasion of Russia, 1812. 1942.'' [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=6522304 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on France===&lt;br /&gt;
* Bergeron, Louis. ''France under Napoleon'' (1981), French viewpoint&lt;br /&gt;
* Forrest, Alan. &amp;quot;Propaganda and the Legitimation of Power in Napoleonic France.&amp;quot; ''French History,'' 2004 18(4): 426-445. Issn: 0269-1191 Fulltext: in OUP journals &lt;br /&gt;
* Furet, François. ''The French Revolution, 1770-1814'' (1996), pp 211-65 on Napoleon&lt;br /&gt;
* Furet, François and Mona Ozouf, eds. ''A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution'' (1989), 1120pp; long essays by scholars; conservative perspective&lt;br /&gt;
* Goubert, Pierre. ''The Course of French History.'' 1991; French textbook; ch. 14  [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=103458094 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lyons, Martyn. ''Napoleon and the Legacy of the Revolution'' (1994) &lt;br /&gt;
* Paxton, John. ''Companion to the French Revolution'' (1987), hundreds of short entries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scott, Samuel F.  and Barry Rothaus. ''Historical Dictionary of the French Revolution, 1789-1799'' (1984), short essays by scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* Sutherland, D.M.G. ''The French Revolution and Empire: The Quest for a Civic Order'' (2nd ed 2003), comprehensive survey &lt;br /&gt;
* Sutherland, D.M.G. ''France 1789–1815. Revolution and Counter-Revolution'' (2nd ed. 2003, 430pp [http://www.amazon.com/French-Revolution-Empire-Quest-Civic/dp/0631233636/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1189597597&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpts and online search from Amazon.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Diplomacy and impact on Europe===&lt;br /&gt;
* Blanning, T.C.W. ''The French Revolutionary Wars 1787-1802'' (1996).&lt;br /&gt;
* Broers, Michael. ''Europe under Napoleon 1799-1815'' (1996) 291pp, covers everything except the battles&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruun, Geoffrey. ''Europe and the French Imperium, 1799-1814'' 1938. excellent survey of all of Europe&lt;br /&gt;
* Dwyer, Philip G. ed.''Napoleon and Europe,'' (2001), essays by scholars on each major power&lt;br /&gt;
* Ellis, Geoffrey. ''The Napoleonic Empire'' (1991) &lt;br /&gt;
* Grab, Alexander. ''Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe.'' (2003), pp. 249, maps; excellent synthesis [http://www.amazon.com/Napoleon-Transformation-European-History-Perspective/dp/0333682742/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1210581950&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hill, Peter P. ''Napoleon's Troublesome Americans: Franco-American Relations, 1804-1815'' (2005) &lt;br /&gt;
* Lyons, Martyn. ''Napoleon and the Legacy of the Revolution'' (1994) &lt;br /&gt;
* Muir, Rory.  ''Britain and the Defeat of Napoleon, 1807-1815.'' (1996). 466 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Parker, Harold T. &amp;quot;Why Did Napoleon Invade Russia? A Study in Motivation and the Interrelations of Personality and Social Structure,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Military History'' 54 (April 1990): 131–46. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0899-3718(199004)54%3A2%3C131%3AWDNIRA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rothenberg, Gunther E. &amp;quot;The Origins, Causes, and Extension of the Wars of the French Revolution and Napoleon,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Interdisciplinary History,'' Vol. 18, No. 4, (Spring, 1988), pp. 771-793 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1953%28198821%2918%3A4%3C771%3ATOCAEO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rude, George F. and Harvey J. Kaye.''Revolutionary Europe, 1783-1815' (2000), scholarly survey&lt;br /&gt;
* Schroeder, Paul W. &amp;quot;Napoleon's Foreign Policy: A Criminal Enterprise,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Military History'' 54 (April 1990): 147–62. Highly negative&lt;br /&gt;
* Schroeder, Paul. ''The Transformation of European Politics, 1763-1848.'' 1996; Elaborate detail; advanced history; very hostile to Napoleon; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=28171953 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Woolf, Stuart. ''Napoleon's Integration of Europe'' (1991) 320pp [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=103462796 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Cambridge Modern History'' (1907) vol 9: Napoleon [http://books.google.com/books?id=gMgFAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=toc&amp;amp;dq=Cambridge+Modern+History+napoleon+waterloo online edition], older articles by scholars, 900pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historiography and Memory==&lt;br /&gt;
* Black, Jeremy. &amp;quot;Why the French Failed: New Work on the Military History of French Imperialism 1792-1815.&amp;quot; ''European History Quarterly'' 2000 30(1): 105-115. Issn: 0265-6914 Fulltext: in Sage journals&lt;br /&gt;
* Dunne, John. &amp;quot;Napoleon: For or against ... and Beyond.&amp;quot; ''History Review.'' Issue: 27. 1997. pp 17+.  [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=5000519459 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Geyl, Pieter. ''Napoleon: For and Against'' (1949) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=59600303 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hazareesingh, Sudhir. &amp;quot;Memory and Political Imagination: the Legend of Napoleon Revisited.&amp;quot; ''French History,'' 2004 18(4): 463-483. Issn: 0269-1191 Fulltext: in Oxford up &lt;br /&gt;
* Lieven, Dominic. &amp;quot;Russia and the Defeat of Napoleon (1812-14).&amp;quot; ''Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History'' 2006 7(2): 283-308. Issn: 1531-023x Fulltext: in Project Muse. Argues Alexander's successful strategy has been neglected&lt;br /&gt;
* Pinkney, David. ed., ''Napoleon: Historical Enigma'' (1969)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary Sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Dwyer, Philip G. and  Peter Mcphee, eds. ''The French Revolution and Napoleon: A Sourcebook.'' (2002) 213pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=108790059 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Online resources==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/military.html#G. Richard Jensen, ed. ''Web Sources for Military History'' annotated links]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/chap7a.html War, terror and Resistance]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://clk.about.com/?zi=1/XJ/Ya&amp;amp;sdn=europeanhistory&amp;amp;cdn=education&amp;amp;tm=10&amp;amp;gps=150_217_766_469&amp;amp;f=10&amp;amp;tt=14&amp;amp;bt=1&amp;amp;bts=0&amp;amp;zu=http%3A//www.napoleonbonaparte.nl/ Napoleon Bonaparte: Internet Guide]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bonaparte, Napoleon}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Military Commanders]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Napoleonic Wars]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:French People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Military History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:French Revolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nikola_Tesla&amp;diff=616018</id>
		<title>Nikola Tesla</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nikola_Tesla&amp;diff=616018"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T13:12:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: coincidence? I think not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Nikola Tesla''' (July 9, 1856-January 7, 1943) was a Croatian-American electrical engineer, inventor and physicist who contributed to many of the developments in the field of [[electricity]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He pioneered the eventual adaptation of the &amp;quot;Alternating Current&amp;quot;, which is more efficient the &amp;quot;Direct Current&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SI unit measuring magnetic flux density or magnetic induction (commonly known as the magnetic field), is named the tesla, in his honor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was [[Thomas Edison]]'s main rival at the end of the 19th century, even surpassing him in fame in the 1890s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the international fame he received as a result of his work involving the alternating current, he died relatively penniless in a [[New York]] hotel room. Interstingly, Tesla was a self-described [[Atheism|atheist]], whereas Edison was a devout Christian, who resisted attempts at conversion.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Inventors|Tesla, Nikola]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:HWessel&amp;diff=616017</id>
		<title>User:HWessel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:HWessel&amp;diff=616017"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T13:07:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: New page: Hi, I'm H.Wessel. A german-american from birth, I am currently on vacation in Old Europe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hi, I'm H.Wessel. A german-american from birth, I am currently on vacation in [[liberal|Old Europe]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&amp;diff=616016</id>
		<title>Islam</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&amp;diff=616016"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T13:06:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: An even bigger threat&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Islam''' is a [[monotheism|monotheistic]] [[Abrahamic religion]] based on the teachings of [[Muhammad]], a seventh century [[Arab]] religious and [[politics|political]] figure. The word &amp;quot;Islam&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;submission [to Allah]&amp;quot; in [[Arabic language|Arabic]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A follower of Islam is called a Muslim or Moslem, a term which means &amp;quot;one who submits (to God)&amp;quot;. The older term [[Mohammedan]] means &amp;quot;follower of Muhammad&amp;quot;, and has been used for centuries. Muslims do not use it today to avoid confusing worship of [[Muhammad]] with worship of [[Allah]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schimmel, Annemarie. ''Islam: An Introduction''. State University of New York Press, 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Muslims follow the teaching of Muhammad, whom they believe to be [[God]]'s last and greatest [[prophet]]. The faith teaches that the [[Archangel]] [[Gabriel]] appeared to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muslims believe that God (&amp;quot;Allah&amp;quot;, '''الله''' in [[Arabic]]) revealed the [[Qur'an]] (or Koran) to Muhammad and, despite his illiteracy, caused him to transcribe it &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Proclaim! (or read!) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created- Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood: Proclaim! And thy Lord is Most Bountiful,- He Who taught (the use of) the pen,- Taught man that which he knew not.(Surah 96:1-5)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The [[Qur'an]] is considered to be the pure and [[holy]] word of God. Like [[Christianity]] and [[Judaism]], Islam originated in the [[Middle East]].  Islam claims to trace its roots back to [[Abraham]]. Muslims do not believe that Muhammad was the founder of Islam, rather that he restored the original faith of Abraham and the prophets, which had been corrupted and/or misinterpreted over time.  Based upon this belief, [[the Bible]], [[Old Testament|Old]] and [[New Testament]], is believed to have become corrupted as well.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mecca.jpg|thumb|right|300px|[[Mecca]], one of the holy cities of Islam.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Islam is the second largest religion in the world, with over 1.4 billion followers, the number of Muslims is rapidly growing, mainly due to high birth rates, in both Muslim-majority and other countries . Conversions to Christianity (from ''any'' faith or lack thereof) outnumber those to Islam, but cannot keep up with the birthrate discrepancy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bible.ca/global-religion-statistics-world-christian-encyclopedia.htm World Christian Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles6/AlJazeerahAfrica.php Translation of AL-Jazeerah interview between Maher Abdallah and Shiekh Ahmed Katani]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many believe that Islam is, with [[Atheism]], currently the greatest threat to [[Christianity]] and [[Christian values]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christianblogs.christianet.com/1134840164.htm Is Islam a Threat to Christianity?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/8/183305.shtml Islam's Threat to the West]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/stock/050413 Why Islam Hates Christianity]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the overwhelming majority of modern [[terrorist|terrorists]] are muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Background==&lt;br /&gt;
According to Islamic belief, in 610 A.D., [[Muhammad]], a 40-year-old merchant of the Quraysh tribe in [[Mecca]], in the Arabian desert (now eastern [[Saudi Arabia]]), was commanded by the angel [[Gabriel]] to &amp;quot;recite&amp;quot; the message of [[Allah]] (Arabic for God). Gabriel said mankind had lost sight of Allah's previous messages to earlier prophets, [[Adam]], [[Noah]], [[Abraham]], [[Moses]], [[Solomon]], and [[Jesus]], among others, and that Muhammad was to spread Allah's message to all people so that mankind would know how to live, how to show respect for Allah, and how to prepare for the judgement day. The message to Muhammad was to be God's last; Muhammad was the &amp;quot;seal of the prophets.&amp;quot; Muhammad won some converts to Islam in his local area, but his [[monotheist]] preaching threatened to undermine the profitable [[polytheist]] pilgrim traffic supporting many Meccan merchants. In 622 A.D., the merchants drove Muhammad and his followers out of Mecca to the city of Yathrib (later renamed [[Medina]], or city - as in the city of the prophet). This flight (hijra) from Mecca to Medina marks the beginning of the Muslim lunar calendar, and is celebrated each year in the hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca. Muhammad's forces starting attacking the trade caravans going in and out of Mecca, cutting off its economic lifeline.  After a series of battles between the Meccans and Muhammad's forces, Mecca finally accepted Muhammad's ultimatum to succumb and convert to Islam.  The city welcomed the prophet back in 630. Muhammad died in 632. It is believed that Muhammed is the last Prophet. Tribal elders elected [[Abu Bakr]] to be Muhammad's successor, or [[Caliph]] (Khalifa). Abu Bakr united the tribes of the Arabian peninsula during his two years as head of the new faith. Upon his death, the elders elected [[Umar ibn al-Khattab]] the next Caliph. During Umar's ten year reign, Islam invaded and spread through the sword into [[Egypt]], [[Syria]], [[Palestine]], [[Iraq]], and parts of [[Iran]]. Umar was assassinated by a Persian (modern day Iran) in 644, and was succeeded by [[Uthman ibn Affan]], who continued the invasions to spread Islam into [[North Africa]], [[Cyprus]], the rest of Iran, [[Afghanistan]], and parts of [[India]] and [[Pakistan]]. Over the next two centuries, Islamic armies continued to expanded Islam's empire into sub-Saharan Africa, [[Spain]], Southeast and Central Asia, and [[Turkey]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divisions Within Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
Uthman was assassinated in 656 A.D. by soldiers who then installed Ali ibn Abu Talib, Muhammad's son-in-law, as [[Caliph]]. Ali's followers believed Muhammad had chosen Ali to be Muhammad's heir, and had disagreed with the selections of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman as Caliphs. Ali's claim to the position was challenged by Muawiyah, a kinsman of the murdered Uthman. Five years later, Ali was assassinated by Kharjites, religious dissidents who broke away from the main body of Muslims because they rejected Ali's accepting arbitration to resolve his leadership dispute with Muawiyah. Ali's supporters, or the Shiah al-Ali (or Shiat Ali, partisans of Ali) believed that Ali was the true Caliph and was, in part, divinely inspired. Ali's sons, Hassan and Husayn followed as [[Shia]] Caliphs, Hassan dying in 669 or 670 A.D., possibly by poisoning, and Husayn slain by soldiers of his rival, the [[Sunni]] Caliph Yazid, in 680 A.D. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Shia Muslim community has divided further as followers coalesced around several of Ali's descendants or successors, called [[Imam]]s. The &amp;quot;twelvers,&amp;quot; predominant in Iran, believe the twelfth Imam is in hiding and will reveal himself just before judgement day. Ismailis rejected the seventh Imam and practice a spirituality that seeks hidden meaning in scripture. Ismailis ruled much of [[North Africa]] as the [[Fatimid Dynasty]] of [[Egypt]] in the tenth through the twelfth centuries, and today are found primarily in [[Pakistan]], [[Afghanistan]], and [[India]]. The Sunni majority reject the premise that men can be divine, including Muhammad, Ali, or Jesus, and did not accept any of the Imams who followed Ali. Sunnis remain more committed to traditions and less inclined to accept Shia mysticism. Today, about 15% of the world's Muslims are Shia and 85% are orthodox Sunni. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are other factions within Islam. Sufis, a name apparently taken from the wool garments they wear, developed around mystical practices and trance-induced revelations. Sufis are found today in [[Turkey]], [[Syria]], and parts of [[Africa]]. Other movements have taken reform tracks, such as the Unitarians of [[Saudi Arabia]], also called [[Wahhabi]]s after their 18th century reformist founder Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. The conservative Wahhabis are found today in Saudi Arabia and [[Qatar]]. Today the Wahhabi line has a tendency to produce extremists, such as [[Osama Bin Laden]]. Some critics would argue that the [[Taliban]] of Afghanistan took conservative reform to an extreme. Other sects or break-away groups include, among others, the Alawis found in Syria and Turkey, the [[Druze]] in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Israel, the Ibadhis (Kharjites) in Oman and Africa, the Ahmadiya of Pakistan, and the Zaydis of Yemen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Guidance==&lt;br /&gt;
During his lifetime, Muhammad's companions learned and later transcribed the verses (surrahs) of the Quran as Muhammad spoke them. In Islam, the teachings of Mohammed were believed to be direct divine revelation from God. Some utterances that Mohammed was unsure about, dubbed the Satanic verses, would later be incorporated in a novel in modern times by [[Salmon Rushdie]] who would then be subject to a death degree from the leader of Iran for his writing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third Caliph, Uthman, collected and codified the various versions of the surrahs into one written [[Quran]] that became the standard Arabic text used by the world's Muslims today.  The Quran is longer than the Bible and written in general order of longest chapters to shortest rather than in any order of when they were spoken, sometimes making the work appear to be confusing. In all there are 114 chapters. Most of the later recorded sayings of Mohammed, which were also more warlike, actually appear earlier in the text.  Present-day Muslims look first to the Quran as a guide to life, then to the [[Sunnah]], or the way of the Prophet (his life as an example for others) as recorded by his early companions, and then to the [[Hadith]], a collection of the Prophet's sayings, comments, advice, and descriptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequently, Muslims disagreed over how to interpret certain passages in the Quran, the Sunnah, or the Hadith in their search for the ideal life and perfect path to heaven. From these interpretations Sunni Muslims developed four schools of law, or interpretations of law, named after their founders or early leaders: the Hanbali, considered the most strict school and predominant today in Saudi Arabia; Shafi, the school of widest acceptance, found in Egypt, parts of Palestine-Syria, south Arabia, and the Far East; Maliki, prevalent in North Africa, Sudan, and Nigeria; and Hanafi, considered the most moderate school, predominant in Ottoman Turkey and today found primarily on the Levant and Indian subcontinent. Frequently, Muslim countries have two separate legal systems, one for civil, criminal, or commercial law, and a second, and separate, system for religious law. Religious courts and their judges (qadis) might handle issues dealing with marriage, divorce, child custody, inheritance, religious education, charitable or religious property (Waqf), or family matters. Among Middle Eastern countries, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Amirates, and Yemen have Shariah courts serving alongside their secular courts or have adopted [[Sharia]]h (Islamic law) as the basis of their legal systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Clergy====&lt;br /&gt;
Sunni Islam does not have a priesthood or clerical hierarchy to conduct religious services or interpret scripture, but it does have prayer leaders, called Imams, and religious scholars, called Ulama, who often are educated men familiar with the Quran and able to offer commentaries on Quranic verses. Sunni Muslims also respect the teachings and interpretations of scholars, judges, and academics who may interpret laws, write treatises on Sharia (religious law) or Hadith, and issue Fatwas, religious declarations intended to enlighten or guide Muslims. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shia Islam has a hierarchy that resembles a priesthood. Mullahs are prayer leaders, but usually do not interpret religious law. Mujtahids are religious scholars who may interpret law or passages from the Quran or Hadith. The lower order of Mujtahids are called Hojjatolislam. Ayat Allah (literally sign of God, also Ayatollah) is a higher order of Mujtahid who may issue Fatwas, or religious edicts, in addition to leading Islamic schools, interpreting religious law and the Quran, and offering sermons or discourses on proper Islamic behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Five Pillars of Islam===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Shahadah (Profession of Faith)''' -The Shahadah is the Muslim profession of faith. 'ašhadu 'al-lā ilāha illā-llāhu wa 'ašhadu 'anna muħammadan rasūlu-llāh, a loose English translation reads &amp;quot;''There is none worthy of worship except God, and [[Muhammad]] is the messenger of God''&amp;quot; This testament can be seen as the foundation of all of the other tenets of Islam.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[Salat]] (Ritual Prayer)''' -All Muslims are required to Pray to God five times each day while facing [[Mecca]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Zakat (Charity)'''  Able Muslims must donate to the poor based on the wealth one has accumulated. In current usage it is interpreted as 2.5% of the value of most valuables and savings held for a full [[lunar year]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sawm (Fasting)''' All able-bodied Muslims (children, the elderly, and the ill are exempt) must fast during daylight hours during the daylight hours of the entire month of [[Ramadan]]. According to Muslims, this purifies the body and soul. Some Muslim sects allow military, police and emergency services personnel to receive an exemption from fasting from an imam, on the grounds that their work supports the community or national good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hajj (Pilgrimage)''' All able-bodied Muslims must make a pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in their lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Aspects of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Quran.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Pages from the Qur'an, the holy book of the Islamic religion.]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Jihad====&lt;br /&gt;
Jihad is the &amp;quot;effort&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;struggle&amp;quot; each Muslim faces in the everyday trials of life, such as the effort to get better grades in school, or the striving to achieve better results from a job, or the struggle to avoid sinful temptations. Jihad also can be applied to warfare; participating in jihad in Allah's cause was the third most important good deed listed in the Hadith, after prayer and honoring one's parents. Jihad often was a rallying cry for the military spread of Islam in the seventh through tenth centuries against non-Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Osama bin Laden and Fundamentalists====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Osama bin Laden]], a follower of a particular brand of Islam popular in Saudi Arabia, has stated that Islam is at war with the United States and its allies. Some observers maintain that the number of Muslims who believe as bin Laden does is growing, and others go further to suggest that all &amp;quot;fundamentalist&amp;quot; Muslims are enemies of the West. But other observers differentiate between conservative &amp;quot;fundamentalists&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;extremists&amp;quot; who follow bin Laden or other terrorists. These observers suggest that the fundamentalists disagree with bin Laden as much as do Westerners.  It is hard to know the truth.  Many westerners are still haunted by the images of cheering crowds dancing in the streets when the 9/11 attacks were announced and were disappointed at the lack of prominent condemnation of the attack from Islamic circles worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====People of the Book====&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Jews are called &amp;quot;people of the Book&amp;quot; in the Koran and are considered earlier forerunners to Islam and viewed as brothers as long as they pay an extra tax when under Islamic rule.  Islam, tracing its roots back to Abraham through his son Ishmael instead of Isaac as the Jews did, believes that they are the descendants of God's promise.  Islam believes that both the Old and New Testament were corrupted and corrected by the Koran, but there is still an earlier link between the three religions.  The view of Jews and Christians varied within different parts of the Koran and Islamic history.  Much of current Islamic culture, even in places that were once very tolerant such as Egypt, has seen an upsurge in persecution and violence against Christians and Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Women in Islam====&lt;br /&gt;
For the most part, the Quran treats men and [[woman|women]] equally, applies the same injunctions and prohibitions to men and women, and grants many of the same privileges and benefits. But women are treated separately in certain instances. For example, women are required to &amp;quot;... draw their outer garments around them ... that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not annoyed (by men).&amp;quot; (Quran 33:59) Covering the head and body in public (hijab) is viewed by many Muslim women as a protection of their modesty, a way to discourage men's covetous eyes. The principle of hijab is applied in different ways: a small scarf around the head and regular &amp;quot;street clothes&amp;quot; may be voluntary and acceptable in Cairo or Damascus but a full length opaque [[Burqa]] was enforced in Taliban Afghanistan. The treatment of women may depend upon rural or urban settings, educational level, society norms, tradition, or other factors. As of 2008, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are the only two Middle Eastern countries where the government requires women to wear some form of modest garb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamic dress is a regular grounds for conflict in multicultural education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of women varies widely by country. In the Islamic state of Saudi Arabia women are forbidden from driving a car, traveling in public without their husband or a male family member as an escort, leaving their home without wearing Islamic dress, working or voting. Though not formally forbidden from owning property, they have no way of obtaining this as work is forbidden and only males are permitted to inherit - should a man die, his brothers, sons and father will all inherit before his wife. These restrictions are part of the criminal law of the country, and enforced by the police and a special Islamic office. Pakistan has similar restrictions, but to a lesser extent. In contrast, Turkey has a majority Muslim population yet still grants women rights near-equal to those of men including property ownership, employment, and education to university level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muslim apologists suggest the extremely repressive policies of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are cultural rather than religious, and point to the more moderate Islam practiced in Turkey as a demonstration that Islam and womens' rights are compatible, and point to past Christian-dominated cultures such as medieval Europe as examples that other religions can be distorted to justify oppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muslim women's status is controversial. Some critics claim that Muslim men oppress Muslim women by compelling them to remain hidden behind the veil, sequestered in the home, and ignorant of the world by denying them access to education and worldly opportunities. Defenders of some practices suggest that many of them, such as the veil, are cultural traditions that pre-date Islam and are intended to protect, not constrict, women, or that many Muslim women adopt the life style of the veil voluntarily. There are Muslim women who agree and disagree with the critics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem====&lt;br /&gt;
Muhammad's home city of Mecca was the site of his earliest preaching and conversions, and is the location of the Kaaba, traditionally held to be the foundation stone of the first mosque built by Adam and later restored by Abraham, and now the focus of the annual pilgrimage (hajj). Some historians suggest that the Kaaba, a black stone probably meteoric in origin, was venerated by pre-Islamic polytheistic religions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first, Jerusalem was Islam's holy city and the focus of prayers, but Mecca became the center of Islam after Muhammad's return in 630. Medina, because of its early association with Muhammad and as the site of Muhammad's tomb, is second in importance to Mecca. Jerusalem is revered by Muslims as the site of Solomon's temple, Abraham's near sacrifice of his son Ishmael, and the scene of Muhammad's miraculous midnight journey, the latter two now enshrined in the Dome of the Rock mosque. According to the Quran (Surrah 17:1, Isra) and Hadith, Muhammad and Gabriel were taken on winged mules from Mecca to Jerusalem, where they ascended through the seven heavens to the presence of Allah. During the visit, Muhammad learned, among other points, that Muslims were to pray five times each day and to honor Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and the other prophets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Restrictions====&lt;br /&gt;
Observant Muslims are not supposed to eat pork and in general do not have dogs as pets; both swine and canines are considered unclean. Muslims are proscribed from drinking alcoholic beverages. Observant Muslims do not collect interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Non-Muslim Practices====&lt;br /&gt;
Some practices have been associated with Islam because they occur in Islamic countries, but actually are not a part of Islam. For example, female circumcision is not mentioned in the Quran, but is mentioned in Hadith as an &amp;quot;honorable&amp;quot; but not obligatory condition. It is a pre-Islamic tradition in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and the Arab world, notably in Eritrea, Yemen, and Egypt. Another example of a practice that has been associated incorrectly with Islam is honor killing, in which a brother, father, or uncle &amp;quot;restores&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;defends&amp;quot; a family's honor by killing the sister, daughter, or niece that dishonored the family through unmarried pregnancy or promiscuous behavior. The &amp;quot;honor killing&amp;quot; is more ancient and possibly tribal in origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Islam and Christianity==&lt;br /&gt;
While Muslims do not believe Jesus to be the Son of God or in the resurrection, they consider him and his mother to be of God's most important prophets (Marian and Isa) otherwise known as Mary and Jesus. However, the Qur'an warns against worshiping Jesus, Muhammad, and other humans for fear of [[idolatry]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ccg.org/_domain/ccg.org/Islam/Islam.htm Christian Churches of God Articles on Islam], March 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Qur'an states that Christians will be punished, though the nature of the punishment is not specified: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Surely, disbelievers are those who said: &lt;br /&gt;
'Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).' But there is no god but One, Allah. &lt;br /&gt;
And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will they not repent to Allah and ask His Forgiveness? For Allah is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Messiah , son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger; many were the Messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a Siddiqah (i.e. she believed in the words of God and His Books ). &lt;br /&gt;
They both used to eat food (as any other human eat). &lt;br /&gt;
Look how We make the signs clear to them, yet look how they are deluded away (from the truth).&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qur'an 5:73-75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Islam does recognize Christians and Jews as &amp;quot;people of the book&amp;quot; since both refer to one God only, and recognize Abraham (Ibrahim in [[Arabic]]) as a founding prophet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islam and Christianity both accept the theory of [[intelligent design]] as correct, and do not recognize [[evolution]]ist views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Islam and Paganism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Muslims profess belief in a single [[God]], some believe Islam has its roots in an earlier polytheistic system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chick.com/information/religions/islam/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By this thinking God is linked to an earlier moon deity, although it should be brought up that there is no mention of this in the Qur'an, where Allah is cited as the God of [[Abraham]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Qur'an, Sura 37 [http://www.amazon.com/Holy-Quran-Allamah-Nooruddin/dp/0963206702]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abramahov, &amp;quot;Islamic Theology&amp;quot;. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, 1988. [http://www.amazon.com/Islamic-Theology-Binyamin-Abrahamov/dp/0748611029/sr=8-4/qid=1172042917/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4/105-1837174-2630046?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sharia==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:StarCresent.png|thumb|right|220px|The Star and Crescent is a symbol of Islam. It is featured in the national flag of [[Algeria]], [[Azerbaijan]], [[Malaysia]], [[Tunisia]], [[Mauritania]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Turkey]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Sharia]] is the body of Islamic law. The term means &amp;quot;way&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;path&amp;quot;; it is the legal framework within which public and some private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legal system based on Muslim principles of jurisprudence. It is not actually part of the canonical Qur'an; that is to say, it is not believed to be the direct word of God by Muslims, but rather the interpretation of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sharia deals with many aspects of day-to-day life, including politics, economics, banking, business law, contract law, sexuality, marriage, divorce, and social issues. Some Islamic scholars accept Sharia as the body of precedent and legal theory established before the 19th century, while other scholars view Sharia as a changing body, and include Islamic legal theory from the contemporary period.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ex-Muslims==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michelle Malkin]] highlights a group of Ex-Muslims hoping to change the terms of debate about Islam in Europe. Maryam Namazie, the head of the British group said &amp;quot;Too many things in the media and government policies have been geared to pandering to the political Islamic movements and Islamic organizations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/20/ex-muslims-stand-up-in-britain/ Ex-Muslims stand up in Britain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
''Some of the text for this article was taken from &amp;quot;Islam: A Primer&amp;quot;, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (2003), a work in the public domain''  [http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/islam.htm#back] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prominent Muslims==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Muhammad]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Muhammad Ali]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ahmed Deedat]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yusef Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prince Naseem Hamed]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rezazadeh Hossein]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ayatollah Khomeini]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ayatollah Khamenei]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mohammad Khatami]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Osama Bin Laden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*President [[Barack Hussein Obama]] (suspected)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Africa islam 87.jpg|thumb|Islam in Africa]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arab American]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Islamic republic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Qur'an]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ramadan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://muslim-canada.org/islam_christianity.html Islam and Christianity] - excellent article comparing and contrasting the two.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/ Quran online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/ Sahih Bukhari (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/ Sahih Muslim (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/abudawud/ Sunan Abu-Dawud (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muwatta/ Malik's Muwatta  (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trade_deficit&amp;diff=616014</id>
		<title>Trade deficit</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trade_deficit&amp;diff=616014"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T13:03:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: better&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''trade deficit''' is the amount by which a [[country]]'s merchandise [[exports]] exceed its merchandise [[imports]]. [[Liberal]] governments are known for expanding the trade deficit, as they would prefer to send mony overseas rather than keep it in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap12.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://crushliberalism.blogspot.com/2007/01/debunking-trade-deficit-myth.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trade_deficit&amp;diff=616013</id>
		<title>Trade deficit</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trade_deficit&amp;diff=616013"/>
		<updated>2009-01-29T13:03:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HWessel: added source and info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''trade deficit''' is the amount by which a [[country]]'s merchandise [[exports]] exceed its merchandise [[imports]]. [[Liberal]] governments are known for expanding the trade deficit, as they would prefer to send mony overseas rather than keep it in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap12.htm&lt;br /&gt;
http://crushliberalism.blogspot.com/2007/01/debunking-trade-deficit-myth.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HWessel</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>