Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Absorption

2007-06-29T20:49:14Z

Hellionzod:

Absorption is a scientific term which refers to to the the movement of dissolved substances into [[cell]]s.
There is no proof however that [[God]] dose not move these particles himself.

[[Category:Biology]]
[[Category:Chemistry]]

Abiogenesis

2007-06-29T20:44:19Z

Hellionzod:

'''Abiogenesis''' is the study of how [[life]] could have arisen from non-life. While the term is used today generally to refer to "[[chemical]] [[evolution]],"[http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.html] how early life might have formed from various non-living compounds, this does not explicitly rule out [[supernatural]] intervention. For example, some interpret the [[Bible|Biblical]] story of [[Genesis]] as describing an abiogenesis event or series of abiogenetic events caused by [[God]].Also,the story of how [[Ra]] gave birth to himself and all the other gods could be ""Abiogenesis""

[[Category:Origins debate]]

Abiogenesis

2007-06-29T20:43:18Z

Hellionzod:

'''Abiogenesis''' is the study of how [[life]] could have arisen from non-life. While the term is used today generally to refer to "[[chemical]] [[evolution]],"[http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.html] how early life might have formed from various non-living compounds, this does not explicitly rule out [[supernatural]] intervention. For example, some interpret the [[Bible|Biblical]] story of [[Genesis]] as describing an abiogenesis event or series of abiogenetic events caused by [[God]].Also,the story of how [[RA]] gave birth to himself and all the other gods could be ""Abiogenesis""

[[Category:Origins debate]]

Abiogenesis

2007-06-29T20:41:59Z

Hellionzod:

'''Abiogenesis''' is the study of how [[life]] could have arisen from non-life. While the term is used today generally to refer to "[[chemical]] [[evolution]],"[http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.html] how early life might have formed from various non-living compounds, this does not explicitly rule out [[supernatural]] intervention. For example, some interpret the [[Bible|Biblical]] story of [[Genesis]] as describing an abiogenesis event or series of abiogenetic events caused by [[God]].Also,the story of how RA, an Egyptian god,gave birth to himself could be ""Abiogenesis""

[[Category:Origins debate]]

Talk:Abiogenesis

2007-06-29T20:39:15Z

Hellionzod: NPOV

{{stub}}
God doesn't count as "Alive"? That doesn't sound right... --[[User:Fullmetajacket|Fullmetajacket]] 16:58, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

:"Sound right" or not, I would argue that God, as a purely spiritual being, is not "alive" in the '''biological''', '''scientific''' sense -- that is, he doesn't have a physical flesh-and-bone body, made of cells, DNA, and such (Mormons' God notwithstanding). Therefore, even within evolutionary theory, it can be argued that the original "spark" of life was initiated by God, but that would still fit the definition of abiogenesis. As to whether God is '''living''' (in a non-biological, supernatural sense) is another discussion entirely... <carefully avoiding turning this into a rant /> [[User:Pharos|Pharos]] 15:54, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

== NPOV ==

I'm editing for NPOV,we need to include some non-Christian religions takes on creation