<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=HolyMoly</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=HolyMoly"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/HolyMoly"/>
	<updated>2026-10-17T13:39:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Politically_correct&amp;diff=663042</id>
		<title>Politically correct</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Politically_correct&amp;diff=663042"/>
		<updated>2009-05-14T14:13:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HolyMoly: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Politically correct''' restrictions on what we can say and how we say it have been imposed by [[liberals]]. These restrictions enforce a regime of '''political correctness''' similar to that of the Nazi and Communist regimes of Europe. Some are linguistic, but all are ideological.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paul Weyrich, founder of the Heritage Foundation, said, &amp;quot;The ideology usually known as ‘Political Correctness,’ which is really the cultural Marxism of the infamous Frankfurt School, is using every type of cultural institution in our country to achieve its purpose, which is the destruction of traditional Western culture and the Christian religion.&amp;quot; [http://www.familyresearchinst.org/Default.aspx?tabid=145]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:PC-PILGRIM.JPG|thumb|400px|Horsey cartoon 11-22-2007 parodies PC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern politically correct movement began at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]]; one of the most [[liberal]] institutions in the [[United States]] and is often viewed as a liberalist degrading of the [[First Amendment|freedom of speech]]. George Orwell's ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'' famously incorporated the notion of limiting thought through language (see [[Newspeak]]).  Words or actions that violate '''political correctness''' are called [[politically incorrect]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At American universities, [[Liberal]]s began imposing '''political correctness''' to prevent recognition of differences among gender, religion, belief system, sexual orientation and nationality.  In the 1960s, [[feminists]] began to demand that the neutral pronouns ''he'', ''him'' and ''his'' be replaced with expressions like &amp;quot;he or she&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;him or her&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;them&amp;quot;, etc. They argued that no one would be able to understand that the masculine gender included the feminine gender in neutral contexts. But this was just part of their campaign to redefine the social roles traditionally associated with masculinity and femininity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political correctness''' or '''P.C.''' also means the alteration of ones choice of words in order to avoid either offending a group of people or reinforcing a stereotype considered to be disadvantageous to the group.  More specifically, groups which (or whose putative &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot; or other activists) claim some status as systemically oppressed or discriminated against will periodically attempt to change the terms by which they are referred to and demand that society as a whole change its usage of words as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of political correctness is the changing terminology used to described handicapped people.  In the past the term &amp;quot;crippled&amp;quot; was perfectly acceptable and not considered offensive.  At some point, somebody decided &amp;quot;crippled&amp;quot; was degrading and the preferred term changed to &amp;quot;handicapped&amp;quot;.  This, too, was eventually deemed offensive and &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot; became the preferred term.  Today, &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot; is now considered degrading and &amp;quot;differently abled&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;physically challenged&amp;quot; are now the politically correct terms.  The same can be said for the changing uses of terms for Black Americans:  &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;colored&amp;quot;, once perfectly acceptable terms, were declared degrading and offensive by some activists during the 1970s and &amp;quot;Afro-American&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Black&amp;quot; came into use, which in turn gave way to &amp;quot;[[African Americans|African-American]]&amp;quot;, and in broader usage, &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinction for example between &amp;quot;colored people&amp;quot; (1950's-60's usage) and &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot; (today) is an important one which illustrates the basis of political correctness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question of politically correct language has spilled over from the use of racially descriptive words and affected the use of traditional language.  In 1999, an aide to the mayor of Washington DC described a budget decision as &amp;quot;niggardly&amp;quot; (a word meaning &amp;quot;stingy,&amp;quot; unrelated to the racial slur).  The aide immediately came under criticism and was forced to resigned even though he had not said anything racially charged. However, his name was cleared within a matter of days and was offered to return to his previous position. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/williams/williams020499.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As well as language, political correctness discourages the use of racial or stereotypes in fiction out of concern that these stereotypes may become self-perpetuating. For example, frequently seeing the image black gang-members decked out in gold chains, carrying guns and listening to rap may pressure young black people into seeing this lifestyle as the more 'acceptable' choice for their racial group. The common image of female-dominated occupations (nurses, secretaries, care workers, etc) and of male-dominated occupations (IT workers, military, machinery operators, mechanics, etc.) can discourage individuals of either gender from considering those occupations traditionally belonging to the other. Additionally films like &amp;quot;The Siege&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;True Lies&amp;quot; have been criticized by pro-Islamic groups as having Muslims portrayed as terrorists, despite the fact that most current terrorists are in fact Muslims.  Thus political correctness becomes the consideration of all public statements and media for their unintentional social impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political correctness can even affect terminology that's viewed by secularists as too &amp;quot;pro-religion&amp;quot; or an alleged &amp;quot;violation of the separation of church and state&amp;quot; in the United States. The best example of this is the active promotion of the use of C.E. and B.C.E. as the abbreviations used after dates (instead of the commonly and traditionally used A.D. and B.C.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homosexuals and other people who choose to live against [[God's will]] object to the terms &amp;quot;fags&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;dykes&amp;quot;, but fags and dykes brought the names upon themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Differing Opinions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demands for politically correct language usage are rooted in the notion widely promoted among left-wing academics and sociologists that Western culture promotes systemic oppression against some groups by marginalizing them and excluding them from the &amp;quot;norm&amp;quot;; the groups thus supposedly systemically marginalized are referred to as &amp;quot;the Other&amp;quot; by these left-wing academics.{{fact}}  The implication is that these groups are systemically excluded from the mainstream.  &amp;quot;Colored people&amp;quot; is therefore deemed offensive because the order of words puts &amp;quot;colored&amp;quot; first, emphasizing their difference from the mainstream, while &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot; is acceptable because putting the term &amp;quot;people&amp;quot; first emphasizes that they are people and thus does not emphasize their difference from the &amp;quot;norm&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people allege that instead of encouraging supposedly marginalized groups to integrate with and assimilate into the mainstream of Western culture, political correctness ironically encourages them to emphasize and indeed to wallow in their marginalization from society, and to make a public display of such.  This is known as [[identity politics]].  According to this view, gays and lesbians are therefore encouraged to label themselves as &amp;quot;queer&amp;quot; and make public displays of &amp;quot;queerness&amp;quot; calculated to disturb the sensibilities of mainstream people, rather than integrate into the mainstream themselves;{{fact}} Black Americans are encouraged to adopt [[Afrocentrism]] and convert to [[Islam]] or to conform to stereotypical black behavior, etc.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Language Police==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar [[Robert Bork]] has charged that the educational system is a battleground where the future of America is being undermined and ill-served. He has counseled against the troubles which will ensue as a result of anti-religious policies in the schools, permissive attitudes toward [[homosexuality]] and [[abortion]], as well as welfare policies that have destroyed families since [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s War on Poverty. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. by Robert Bork published by Harper Collins (c) 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her book &amp;quot;[[The Language Police]]&amp;quot;, [[Diane Ravitch]] documents just how easy it is to get a word, phrase or idea banned from modern textbooks and references.  Textbook producers are beholden to small non-elected liberal educational boards in a few key states such as New York or California. Few citizens know anything about these boards or who holds the seats of power on these boards. It's not a difficult for an interest group to mobilize a campaign to bombard the educational board. Meanwhile, the public is not even aware that their words or values are under attack from this corrupt system, while many ''elected'' Conservatives have rallied against this polocy . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, once a big state makes a textbook purchase, it's very difficult for a small state or any municipality to make any changes.  Thus, profound changes can be inserted into textbooks and reference books by putting pressure on a handful of educational administrators. The work of textbook selection committee's is done privately, to avoid politicizing textbooks, but the reverse has happened. It's easier to pressure a lawmaker who is not beholden to community standards, but instead is enamored with political correctness. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Children Learn by [[Diane Ravitch]] (c) 2003 published by Knopf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ravitch has documented &amp;quot;''bias guidelines''&amp;quot; for major publishers of texts and tests. These &amp;quot;guidelines&amp;quot; consist of advice to writers and editors about words and topics that must be avoided.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110003695&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Totalitarianism and Political Correctness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comprehensive and detailed control of all ideas, beliefs, and statements is one of the most problematic features of [[totalitarian]] regimes.[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-3816(196002)22%3A1%3C68%3ATIAP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political correctness can trace its origins back to the world of 1920's Germany, where [[Communist]] academics sought to impose their [[Marxist]] views on students. It is now acceptable in many Universities to have courses on gender, [[homosexual]] and [[African American]] studies, which, in fact, encourage the mainstream public to become different to avoid criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Postmodernism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Racial censorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.capc.co.uk The Campaign Against Political Correctness]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=8olE_futZogC&amp;amp;pg=PA378&amp;amp;lpg=PA378&amp;amp;dq=communist+%22socially+correct%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=DYD85Lsf1G&amp;amp;sig=pkoUxDOLFJZsme40QO13zakFZw4 The Chinese Have A Word For It]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=218 DiscoverTheNetworks.org - Political Correctness, Appeasement and Speech Codes in Academia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HolyMoly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Discrimination&amp;diff=663041</id>
		<title>Discrimination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Discrimination&amp;diff=663041"/>
		<updated>2009-05-14T14:04:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HolyMoly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Discrimination''' is treatment or consideration based on the [[group]], [[class]], [[sexuality]], or category to which a person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit.&amp;lt;ref name='dictionarydefinition'&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=Dictionary.com|url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discrimination|title=discrimination|format=HTML|language=English|accessdate=2007-09-30|quote=    treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit: racial and religious intolerance and discrimination.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is considered unethical in American society to discriminate against people for actions or attitudes which are unrelated to their job or role. However, it is often not easy to determine what is relevant or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a famous case in New Jersey, [[gay rights activists]] tried to invoke &amp;quot;discrimination&amp;quot; to force the [[Boy Scouts]] to permit homosexual scoutmasters as [[role model]]s for youth. Lower count decisions were favorable to this campaign, but the [[Supreme Court]] sided with the Boy Scouts in 2000.[http://archives.cnn.com/2000/LAW/06/28/scotus.gay.boyscouts/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Affirmative Action]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Affirmative Action]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HolyMoly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun&amp;diff=663038</id>
		<title>Gun</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun&amp;diff=663038"/>
		<updated>2009-05-14T13:40:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;HolyMoly: /* Science Fiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Glock30.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''gun''' is a mechanical [[weapon]] which uses expanding gas to fire a [[bullet]], [[dart]] or other projectile through a tube (its shaft). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four main types of modern [[firearm]]s today are bolt-operated, pump action, semi-automatic, and automatic weapons. In a bolt-action weapon, each new [[round (ordnance)|round]] must be loaded manually, by moving the [[breech]] to eject the empty casing. In pump action guns (usually shotguns) a new round must be manually loaded by pulling back on pump of the gun, located underneath the barrel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In semi-automatic weapons, each pull of the trigger fires a bullet, each shot ejecting spent brass and loading new ammunition until the magazine is depleted. In fully automatic weapons, bullets will be fired as long as the trigger is depressed. Fully automatic fire will cause the gun to heat up very quickly, which can become dangerous as it can burn exposed flesh and because rounds may &amp;quot;cook off&amp;quot; or fire unexpectedly due to the chamber becoming hot enough to ignite the propellant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Gunpowder]] was invented in China around the 800s AD. Firearms appeared after 1200, and became military weapons around 1600. The musket could not hit a small target, so armies fired them in volleys, giving a shotgun effect.  Rifles were indeed accurate but were very slow to reload until the 1850s, when an expanding-base bullet was invented.  Rifles were the main weapon on both sides of the [[American Civil War]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gun control==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Gun control]] consists of limitations on the ownership of firearms, and by extension restricts the fundamental right of self-defense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]]s usually emphasize the individual [[the right to self-defense]] through the use of guns.  [[Liberal]]s more often stress the dangers of unrestricted ownership. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guns are said to be effective at deterring crime and protecting the gun owner.  Police officers often use guns to enforce the law, except in some countries where the police are not armed.   &lt;br /&gt;
===Ireland===&lt;br /&gt;
In the Republic of Ireland, the Garda Síochána has since its foundation held that uniformed officers do not carry guns - &amp;quot;The Garda Síochána will succeed not by force of arms or numbers, but on their moral authority as servants of the people&amp;quot;, as the first Commissioner said&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.garda.ie/faq.html#G4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.   The current Commissioner of the Gardaí has stated that &amp;quot;we do not live in a 'gun culture'&amp;quot;, despite a recent rash of armed crime.   In Iceland, there are no armed forces, including the Police, and all Police only carry a baton on duty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.specialoperations.com/Foreign/Iceland/Default.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In addition, the regular Police forces of the UK&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=535071&amp;amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the Police Force of New Zealand do not carry firearms while on normal patrol, or in the latter case describe themselves as &amp;quot;generally unarmed&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.police.govt.nz/about/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.   However, each of these Police forces also has highly trained specialist teams of armed Police, who are brought into play at time of need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies have repeatedly shown that law-abiding citizens carrying guns are an effective deterrent against crime&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/467988&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://saf.org/kleck1998.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/8926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Further comparison between different states by [[John Lott]] indicates that states that have more conservative gun laws have lower crime rates, violent crime rates, and firearms [[homicide]]s than states with more liberal gun laws. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Science Fiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Science fiction]], such as [[Star Trek]], has postulated many different types of directed energy weapons. These are guns that fire beams, waves, or packets of energy.  Some energy guns can be set to stun, not to wound or kill. Most firearms legislation would not classify these as firearms, so their ownership would be unrestricted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Democratic Party|Democrats]] claim that guns are dangerous, but Conservatives know that only sin is dangerous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Miniguns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual type of gun is a minigun. Despite what you would think from the name, a minigun is the biggest of all small-arms. A minigun has multiple barrels which are driven by a loud electric motor. This allows it to have a very high rate of fire, and is a major difference from the systems of operation described at the top of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miniguns are commonly seen in the movies, notable examples being [[Terminator 2]] and [[Predator]], where miniguns can be seen exploding multiple police cars or cutting down whole areas of forest. In reality miniguns probably cannot actually cut down trees, and standard 7.62mm ball ammunition would not cause a car to explode, although a [[tracer]] round might if it hit the gas tank.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Hess, Earl J. ''The Rifle Musket in Civil War Combat: Reality and Myth.'' (2008) 288 pages, ISBN 978-0-7006-1607-7 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nra.org The National Rifle Association] Everything firearm related. Includes information on Second Amendment rights, NRA Training and Education, Politics and Legislation pertaining to gun rights.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.a-human-right.com/ A Human Right] Discussion of the human right to self defense with a firearm.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.learnaboutguns.com/ Learn About Guns] Firearm information and politics from a pro-firearms perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gunowners.org/ Gun Owners of America] A no-compromise pro-gun lobby in Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HolyMoly</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>