<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Inmidata</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Inmidata"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Inmidata"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T21:55:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=950701</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=950701"/>
		<updated>2012-01-02T20:36:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: Cited 1979 Supreme Court decision that cancels out defenses in the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) filed a motion declaring former TSA Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistle-blowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
In her August 25, 2011 motion, U.S. Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner of the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] (MSPB) filed an amicus curiae with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board in support of Robert MacLean. It requested that the MSPB reverse its June 22, 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= June 22, 2009 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=423155&amp;amp;version=424160&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2009-06-22 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and July 25, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 25, 2011 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=628202&amp;amp;version=630085&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2011-07-25 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Special Counsel Lerner wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [unclassified sensitive security information] and therefore should not be disclosed. Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No specific statute exists that would allow the TSA to negate [Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)] whistleblower protections. The statute that the TSA relied upon to '''retroactively designate MacLean's protected disclosure''' as SSl does not establish particular criteria for withholding and does not refer to particular types of matters to be withheld&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
The Board’s expansion of the exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing is contrary to the plain meaning and intent of the statute and significantly expands what Congress intended to be a very narrow exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing, '''thereby chilling would-be whistleblowers'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel MSPB amicus curiae in support of Robert MacLean | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/US-Office-of-Special-Counsel-MSPB-amicus-curiae-Robert-MacLean-v-DHS-20110825.pdf | date=2011-08-25 | work=[http://www.cuacalifornia.com/ Clean Up America] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security Whistleblower==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) declared former [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistleblowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two days after the [[Department of Homeland Security]] issued a July 26, 2003 [[al-Qaeda]] suicidal hijacking warning&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 26, 2003 Department of Homeland Security al-Qaeda suicidal hijacking warning | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/dhs-advisory-20030726.pdf | date=July 26, 2006 | work=[http://www.pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2011-12-19|format=PDF}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for cross-Atlantic U.S. flights, MacLean made a disclosure exposing the TSA's cost-cutting plan that would have specifically violated federal law 49 USC § 44917(b). Eleven members of the [[108th United States Congress]] publicly supported MacLean's actions that led to the TSA canceling its plans. Over three years after the fact, the TSA backdated MacLean's 2003 whistleblower disclosure with a TSA-regulated unclassified information marking. The TSA applied its marking and then charged MacLean for violating it after investigating him for appearing in a 2004 [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] anniversary national television news special regarding the TSA's failure to protect the identities of Federal Air Marshals. A year before MacLean's July 2003 disclosure, the TSA implemented dress code, airport security checkpoint bypass, and pre-boarding policies which routinely exposed Federal Air Marshal identities. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal program in disarray, insiders say | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2002/2002-08-15-air-marshals.htm | date=2002-08-16 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2009-05-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 25, 2011, the [[United States Merit Systems Protection Board]] (MSPB) ― an [[Executive (government)]] branch panel currently made up of one [[George W. Bush]] and two [[Barack Obama]] appointees limited to a 5 or 7-year term ― defended the TSA's actions of backdating MacLean's 2003 disclosure with its unclassified marking regulations. This board ruled that a 1979 [[Supreme Court of the United States]] decision, Chrysler Corp. v. Brown&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;49 U.S.C § 44917&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 1979, U.S. Supreme Court | url=http://supreme.justia.com/us/441/281/case.html | date=1979-04-18 | work=[http://supreme.justia.com/ Cornell Law School] | accessdate=2012-01-02}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, cancels out MacLean's [[Whistleblower Protection Act]] of 1989 defenses. MacLean has filed a Petition For Review of this executive branch decision to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert MacLean was a U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]] [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] air marshal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Whistleblowers May Have a Friend in the Oval Office | url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/10/AR2008121003364.html | date=2008-12-11 | work=[[The Washington Post]] | accessdate=2008-12-28}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was fired on April 11, 2006 for making a disclosure that protected aviation and national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Robert MacLean: Homeland Security Whistleblower | url=http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2011/08/robert-maclean-homeland-security-whistleblower.html | date=2011-08-10 | work=[http://www.pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a year went by that the U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]]'s (TSA) dress code&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Natty air marshals discover it's hard to stay undercover / In the casual skies, crew cuts and ties stand out&lt;br /&gt;
 | url=http://articles.sfgate.com/2004-06-01/news/17429852_1_air-marshals-traveler-s-creed-air-pound-pups | date=2006-06-01 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2011-09-05 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and boarding procedures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal program in disarray, insiders say | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2002/2002-08-15-air-marshals.htm | date=2002-08-16 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2009-05-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; were routinely exposing the identities of U.S. Federal Air Marshals, and two days after a terrorist suicide hijacking plot was discovered by U.S. and foreign intelligence agencies in the summer of 2003, the TSA formulated an operational plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights—the type of flight used for the [[September 11 attacks]] in 2001.  TSA formulated the plan after facing a budget shortfall; the purpose was to cut the costs due to air marshals having to lodge overnight at hotels after a full duty day of long distance missions traveling away from their duty stations.  Air marshals would have been absent from nonstop long-distance flights for the two months until the new federal Fiscal Year 2004.  Immediately after congressional outrage the day after MacLean's disclosure, the plan was rescinded: air marshal coverage of long haul flights was not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on September 11, 2001, should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as UNclassified &amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot; (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] from New York, now Secretary of State, wrote a letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]] about MacLean's disclosure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I also want to reiterate my '''extreme concern''' with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) proposal, in the face of these serious threats, to cut the number of air marshals by canceling critical flight missions because those missions would have required air marshals to spend the night at a hotel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/clinton-press-release-20030730.pdf | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman Hal Rogers (Republican) of Kentucky told Fox News:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Federal Air Marshal program is absolutely critical to fighting terrorism and keeping the flying public safe. Given new warnings from DHS about possible hijacking attempts, it is foolish to even consider cutting back the number of air marshals on commercial flights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= DHS: No Plan to Cut Number of Air Marshals | url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93311,00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.foxnews.com/ ''Fox News''] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Barbara Boxer]] from California wrote this provision into ATSA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Calls Administration's Plan To Reduce Air Marshals 'Unacceptable,' Calls On Ridge To Fully Fund Homeland Security Needs  | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2004-03-09 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official senatorial biography | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official campaign biography | url=http://www.barbaraboxer.com/about/ | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.barbaraboxer.com/ ''Official Campaign Website for Barbara Boxer''] | accessdate=2008-11-16}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Senator Boxer also called for better protection of the identities of Federal Air Marshals and greater oversight of the Federal Air Marshal Service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Amendments to Strengthen Homeland Security Included in Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill   | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 | date=2004-09-14 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080731050031/http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean was rebuffed by his TSA managers and a [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG) field agent, so he warned the public by going to NBC News. MacLean was quoted, anonymously, along with other unnamed sources, in a story written by Brock N. Meeks, Chief Washington correspondent for MSNBC.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Whistleblowers hit turbulence; TSA ex-employees say they've been blackballed for revealing problems  | url=http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/printer.jsp?id=14960 | date=2007-10-14 | work=[http://www.nj.com/ ''New Jersey Star Ledger''] | accessdate=2007-12-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That article broke the story and set off a chain reaction among national media outlets resulting in dozens of articles and televised broadcasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message MacLean disclosed was not marked as Sensitive Security Information (SSI), the often abused UNclassified information control mark used to protect information within the DHS's [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Ex-air marshal fired over leak sues TSA | url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/oct/31/nation/na-marshal31 | date=2006-10-31 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2009-06-18 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given that text message was sent nationally to all FAMS employees' unencrypted and password-protected cellular phones and did not contain SSI marking, MacLean was unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional CLASSIFIED Information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean's disclosure helped draw public scrutiny and bipartisan congressional outrage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to TSA's plan which rapidly led to its reversal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/29/20061029-115609-8718r/?page=all#pagebreak | date=2006-10-30 | work=[[The Washington Times]] | accessdate=2011-06-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, U.S. Senators [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] (New York), [[Barbara Boxer]] (California), and [[Charles Schumer]] (New York)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Team Bush Scrubs Plan to Cut Air Marshal Force | url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2003/07/31/2003-07-31_team_bush_scrubs_plan_to_cut.html | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.nydailynews.com/ New York Daily News] | accessdate=2007-07-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; held video press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to reverse its plan before going into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= July 30, 2003 CNN Television Transcripts | url=http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/30/asb.00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.cnn.com/ CNN] | accessdate=2008-11-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] of New Jersey was &amp;quot;furious&amp;quot; and issued this July 30, 2003 press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;You have to ask yourself: What are they thinking? First, the Administration issues an alarming statement that puts fear into the public, then they want to scale back security on airplanes. Does the left arm know what the right arm is doing over at the Department of Homeland Security?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Lautenberg Furious Over Initial Plan by Bush to Slash Federal Air Marshals, Shocked That Budget Cuts to Homeland Security Occurring as New Al Qaeda Threats Emerge | url=http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=254074 | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2009-08-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Given the potential fallout of another attack that intelligence reports suggest is on the way, it is incredible that the TSA would consider reducing the air marshal presence on these flights simply to save the cost of an overnight hotel room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Officials deny cuts to air marshal program | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-air-marshal.htm | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York also called on DHS Secretary Ridge to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;immediately reverse reported plans to cut air marshal service on coast-to-cost and international flights … in light of intelligence indicating that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups may have stepped up plans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Flip-flop on air marshal schedules | url=http://www.urondisplay.com/airmarshal/MSNBC%20Flip-flop%20on%20Air%20Marshal%20schedules%207-30-2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.grangier.fr MSNBC] | accessdate=2009-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fearful that fewer air marshals might travel on cross-country flights into San Francisco, Senator Boxer told reporter Edward Epstein of the [[San Francisco Chronicle]] that she had offered to send the TSA a list of hotels near San Francisco International Airport where air marshals could book rooms for well under $100 a night.  In a discussion with Senator Schumer, DHS Assistant Secretary of Border &amp;amp; Transportation Asa Hutchinson also admitted the plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights was an error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;'[DHS Assistant Secretary Hutchinson] said it was a mistake,' said Schumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal cutbacks denied | url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/31/MN251331.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.sfgate.com/ San Francisco Chronicle] | accessdate=2009-01-10 | first=Edward | last=Epstein}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts told the Wall Street Journal that President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy caused the TSA to consider implementing the plan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;President [[George W. Bush]] should exercise some leadership by realizing that tax cuts for the wealthy take money away from the protection of the American people&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Agency Overseeing Air Marshals Asks to Divert Program's Funds | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/WSJ_FAMS_high_risk_flight_31_JULY_2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://online.wsj.com/home-page The Wall Street Journal] | accessdate=2009-08-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney of New York issued a press release on her official congressional website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;One day its taking air marshals off the flights to avoid hotel costs at Motel 6, the next its holding back on training for them to do their jobs, all in the name of cost-cutting. I don't know what to expect next - they'll probably make air marshals fly stand-by. It's clear that they are playing a shell game with homeland security programs. It is essential that they tell us which programs are next to be cut. We shouldn't have to wake up one day to find out that airliners, ports, cargo or any other targets are unguarded because they have decided to cut the programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= FIRST, AIR MARSHALS WERE TO BE REMOVED, NOW, TRAINING TO BE CUT: TASK FORCE CHAIR ASK WHAT CUTS ARE NEXT? | url=http://www.maloney.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=52&amp;amp;id=418&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view | date=2003-08-11 | work=[http://maloney.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Official Website] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressmen Bill Pascrell, Jim Turner, and James Langevin together issued press releases about their letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman Bill Pascrell:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The sheer idiocy of this determination is mind blowing. Only four days ago the TSA issued an urgent memo to all U.S. airlines and airport security managers detailing very specific intelligence related to hijacking and suicide missions by terrorists this summer.  So now is a good time to pull air marshals from cross-country flights. The four planes hijacked on September 11th were all scheduled cross-country flights. Couple this knowledge with the new intelligence warnings-the most specific to date-about current hijacking plots, and there is absolutely no excuse for the TSA to scale back security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= PASCRELL: AIR MARSHAL DECISION AN ABOMINATION | url=http://pascrell.house.gov/list/press/nj08_pascrell/pr_030731_airmarshal.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://pascrell.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Bill Pascrell''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman James Langevin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As reports of potential terrorist attacks on commercial airliners surface, homeland security officials should be strengthening the air marshal program, not weakening it. We cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to protecting the safety of Americans.   At a time of heightened alert, the thought of curbing the air marshal program to save costs on overnight hotel stays is absurd. Your statement today that 'every air marshal is being deployed' does not answer the question of whether air marshals are being removed from flights that would result in overnight hotel stays.  We note that such flights would typically be cross-country routes, like those hijacked on September 11.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Langevin to Ridge: Removing Federal Air Marshals at a Time of Heightened Threat Defies Reason | url=http://langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2003/07/pr071803marshals.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://langevin.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Jim Langevin''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The word came categorically down from the White House they've got a scheme and a plan on course, 'Let's cut the taxes, cut the taxes, cut the taxes,' and then to sort of make it look legitimate, cut all spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Favorable news article into the Congressional Record==&lt;br /&gt;
From the House floor, U.S. Congressmen Ken Calvert introduced a favorable news article into the Congressional Record:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Friday, July 10, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did fired OC Air Marshal endanger flying public or protect it?&lt;br /&gt;
:Hon. Ken Calvert of California in the House of Representatives&lt;br /&gt;
:Friday, July 10, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mr. Calvert:&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Madam Speaker, I rise today to discuss the'' [Orange County Register] ''article titled 'Did Fired OC Air Marshal Endanger Flying Public, or Protect It?'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Did O.C. air marshal endanger public, or protect it? | url=http://www.ocregister.com/articles/maclean-69628-air-federal.html | date=2009-05-15 | work=[http://www.ocregister.com/ Orange County Register ] | accessdate=2009-05-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;'' The article was posted online on May 8, 2009 and I believe my colleagues in Congress will benefit from the article and the topic of whistleblower protection.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Congressional Record: &amp;quot;Did Fired OC Air Marshal Endanger Flying Public, or Protect It?&amp;quot; | url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2009-07-10/pdf/CREC-2009-07-10-pt1-PgE1721.pdf | date=2009-07-10 | work=[http://www.gpo.gov/ ''U.S. House of Representatives Congressional Record''] | accessdate=2010-09-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, &amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided to continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:MacLean, Robert}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913082</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913082"/>
		<updated>2011-09-11T00:47:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: Added Republican Congressman Ken Calvert introduction into the Congressional Record&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) filed a motion declaring former TSA Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistle-blowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
In her August 25, 2011 motion, U.S. Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner of the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] (MSPB) filed an amicus curiae with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board in support of Robert MacLean. It requested that the MSPB reverse its June 22, 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= June 22, 2009 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=423155&amp;amp;version=424160&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2009-06-22 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and July 25, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 25, 2011 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=628202&amp;amp;version=630085&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2011-07-25 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Special Counsel Lerner wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [unclassified sensitive security information] and therefore should not be disclosed. Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No specific statute exists that would allow the TSA to negate [Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)] whistleblower protections. The statute that the TSA relied upon to '''retroactively designate MacLean's protected disclosure''' as SSl does not establish particular criteria for withholding and does not refer to particular types of matters to be withheld&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
The Board’s expansion of the exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing is contrary to the plain meaning and intent of the statute and significantly expands what Congress intended to be a very narrow exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing, '''thereby chilling would-be whistleblowers'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel MSPB amicus curiae in support of Robert MacLean | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/US-Office-of-Special-Counsel-MSPB-amicus-curiae-Robert-MacLean-v-DHS-20110825.pdf | date=2011-08-25 | work=[http://www.cuacalifornia.com/ Clean Up America] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, '''Robert MacLean''' (born on March 8, 1970, in Torrejon Air Base, Madrid, Spain) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the U.S. Border Patrol and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security Whistleblower==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on September 11, 2001, should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as UNclassified &amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot; (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] from New York, now Secretary of State, wrote a letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]] about MacLean's disclosure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I also want to reiterate my '''extreme concern''' with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) proposal, in the face of these serious threats, to cut the number of air marshals by canceling critical flight missions because those missions would have required air marshals to spend the night at a hotel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/clinton-press-release-20030730.pdf | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman Hal Rogers (Republican) of Kentucky told Fox News:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Federal Air Marshal program is absolutely critical to fighting terrorism and keeping the flying public safe. Given new warnings from DHS about possible hijacking attempts, it is foolish to even consider cutting back the number of air marshals on commercial flights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= DHS: No Plan to Cut Number of Air Marshals | url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93311,00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.foxnews.com/ ''Fox News''] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Barbara Boxer]] from California wrote this provision into ATSA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Calls Administration's Plan To Reduce Air Marshals 'Unacceptable,' Calls On Ridge To Fully Fund Homeland Security Needs  | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2004-03-09 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official senatorial biography | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official campaign biography | url=http://www.barbaraboxer.com/about/ | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.barbaraboxer.com/ ''Official Campaign Website for Barbara Boxer''] | accessdate=2008-11-16}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Senator Boxer also called for better protection of the identities of Federal Air Marshals and greater oversight of the Federal Air Marshal Service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Amendments to Strengthen Homeland Security Included in Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill   | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 | date=2004-09-14 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080731050031/http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean was rebuffed by his TSA managers and a [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG) field agent, so he warned the public by going to NBC News. MacLean was quoted, anonymously, along with other unnamed sources, in a story written by Brock N. Meeks, Chief Washington correspondent for MSNBC.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Whistleblowers hit turbulence; TSA ex-employees say they've been blackballed for revealing problems  | url=http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/printer.jsp?id=14960 | date=2007-10-14 | work=[http://www.nj.com/ ''New Jersey Star Ledger''] | accessdate=2007-12-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That article broke the story and set off a chain reaction among national media outlets resulting in dozens of articles and televised broadcasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message MacLean disclosed was not marked as Sensitive Security Information (SSI), the often abused UNclassified information control mark used to protect information within the DHS's [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Ex-air marshal fired over leak sues TSA | url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/oct/31/nation/na-marshal31 | date=2006-10-31 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2009-06-18 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given that text message was sent nationally to all FAMS employees' unencrypted and password-protected cellular phones and did not contain SSI marking, MacLean was unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional CLASSIFIED Information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean's disclosure helped draw public scrutiny and bipartisan congressional outrage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to TSA's plan which rapidly led to its reversal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/29/20061029-115609-8718r/?page=all#pagebreak | date=2006-10-30 | work=[[The Washington Times]] | accessdate=2011-06-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, U.S. Senators [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] (New York), [[Barbara Boxer]] (California), and [[Charles Schumer]] (New York)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Team Bush Scrubs Plan to Cut Air Marshal Force | url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2003/07/31/2003-07-31_team_bush_scrubs_plan_to_cut.html | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.nydailynews.com/ New York Daily News] | accessdate=2007-07-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; held video press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to reverse its plan before going into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= July 30, 2003 CNN Television Transcripts | url=http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/30/asb.00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.cnn.com/ CNN] | accessdate=2008-11-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] of New Jersey was &amp;quot;furious&amp;quot; and issued this July 30, 2003 press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;You have to ask yourself: What are they thinking? First, the Administration issues an alarming statement that puts fear into the public, then they want to scale back security on airplanes. Does the left arm know what the right arm is doing over at the Department of Homeland Security?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Lautenberg Furious Over Initial Plan by Bush to Slash Federal Air Marshals, Shocked That Budget Cuts to Homeland Security Occurring as New Al Qaeda Threats Emerge | url=http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=254074 | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2009-08-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Given the potential fallout of another attack that intelligence reports suggest is on the way, it is incredible that the TSA would consider reducing the air marshal presence on these flights simply to save the cost of an overnight hotel room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Officials deny cuts to air marshal program | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-air-marshal.htm | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York also called on DHS Secretary Ridge to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;immediately reverse reported plans to cut air marshal service on coast-to-cost and international flights … in light of intelligence indicating that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups may have stepped up plans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Flip-flop on air marshal schedules | url=http://www.urondisplay.com/airmarshal/MSNBC%20Flip-flop%20on%20Air%20Marshal%20schedules%207-30-2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.grangier.fr MSNBC] | accessdate=2009-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fearful that fewer air marshals might travel on cross-country flights into San Francisco, Senator Boxer told reporter Edward Epstein of the [[San Francisco Chronicle]] that she had offered to send the TSA a list of hotels near San Francisco International Airport where air marshals could book rooms for well under $100 a night.  In a discussion with Senator Schumer, DHS Assistant Secretary of Border &amp;amp; Transportation Asa Hutchinson also admitted the plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights was an error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;'[DHS Assistant Secretary Hutchinson] said it was a mistake,' said Schumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal cutbacks denied | url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/31/MN251331.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.sfgate.com/ San Francisco Chronicle] | accessdate=2009-01-10 | first=Edward | last=Epstein}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts told the Wall Street Journal that President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy caused the TSA to consider implementing the plan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;President [[George W. Bush]] should exercise some leadership by realizing that tax cuts for the wealthy take money away from the protection of the American people&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Agency Overseeing Air Marshals Asks to Divert Program's Funds | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/WSJ_FAMS_high_risk_flight_31_JULY_2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://online.wsj.com/home-page The Wall Street Journal] | accessdate=2009-08-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney of New York issued a press release on her official congressional website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;One day its taking air marshals off the flights to avoid hotel costs at Motel 6, the next its holding back on training for them to do their jobs, all in the name of cost-cutting. I don't know what to expect next - they'll probably make air marshals fly stand-by. It's clear that they are playing a shell game with homeland security programs. It is essential that they tell us which programs are next to be cut. We shouldn't have to wake up one day to find out that airliners, ports, cargo or any other targets are unguarded because they have decided to cut the programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= FIRST, AIR MARSHALS WERE TO BE REMOVED, NOW, TRAINING TO BE CUT: TASK FORCE CHAIR ASK WHAT CUTS ARE NEXT? | url=http://www.maloney.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=52&amp;amp;id=418&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view | date=2003-08-11 | work=[http://maloney.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Official Website] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressmen Bill Pascrell, Jim Turner, and James Langevin together issued press releases about their letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman Bill Pascrell:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The sheer idiocy of this determination is mind blowing. Only four days ago the TSA issued an urgent memo to all U.S. airlines and airport security managers detailing very specific intelligence related to hijacking and suicide missions by terrorists this summer.  So now is a good time to pull air marshals from cross-country flights. The four planes hijacked on September 11th were all scheduled cross-country flights. Couple this knowledge with the new intelligence warnings-the most specific to date-about current hijacking plots, and there is absolutely no excuse for the TSA to scale back security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= PASCRELL: AIR MARSHAL DECISION AN ABOMINATION | url=http://pascrell.house.gov/list/press/nj08_pascrell/pr_030731_airmarshal.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://pascrell.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Bill Pascrell''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman James Langevin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As reports of potential terrorist attacks on commercial airliners surface, homeland security officials should be strengthening the air marshal program, not weakening it. We cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to protecting the safety of Americans.   At a time of heightened alert, the thought of curbing the air marshal program to save costs on overnight hotel stays is absurd. Your statement today that 'every air marshal is being deployed' does not answer the question of whether air marshals are being removed from flights that would result in overnight hotel stays.  We note that such flights would typically be cross-country routes, like those hijacked on September 11.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Langevin to Ridge: Removing Federal Air Marshals at a Time of Heightened Threat Defies Reason | url=http://langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2003/07/pr071803marshals.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://langevin.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Jim Langevin''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The word came categorically down from the White House they've got a scheme and a plan on course, 'Let's cut the taxes, cut the taxes, cut the taxes,' and then to sort of make it look legitimate, cut all spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Favorable news article into the Congressional Record==&lt;br /&gt;
From the House floor, U.S. Congressmen Ken Calvert introduced a favorable news article into the Congressional Record:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Friday, July 10, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did fired OC Air Marshal endanger flying public or protect it?&lt;br /&gt;
:Hon. Ken Calvert of California in the House of Representatives&lt;br /&gt;
:Friday, July 10, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mr. Calvert:&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Madam Speaker, I rise today to discuss the'' [Orange County Register] ''article titled 'Did Fired OC Air Marshal Endanger Flying Public, or Protect It?'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Did O.C. air marshal endanger public, or protect it? | url=http://www.ocregister.com/articles/maclean-69628-air-federal.html | date=2009-05-15 | work=[http://www.ocregister.com/ Orange County Register ] | accessdate=2009-05-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;'' The article was posted online on May 8, 2009 and I believe my colleagues in Congress will benefit from the article and the topic of whistleblower protection.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Congressional Record: &amp;quot;Did Fired OC Air Marshal Endanger Flying Public, or Protect It?&amp;quot; | url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2009-07-10/pdf/CREC-2009-07-10-pt1-PgE1721.pdf | date=2009-07-10 | work=[http://www.gpo.gov/ ''U.S. House of Representatives Congressional Record''] | accessdate=2010-09-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, &amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided to continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:MacLean, Robert}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913081</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913081"/>
		<updated>2011-09-11T00:43:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: /* Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions */ Removed red links&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) filed a motion declaring former TSA Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistle-blowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
In her August 25, 2011 motion, U.S. Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner of the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] (MSPB) filed an amicus curiae with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board in support of Robert MacLean. It requested that the MSPB reverse its June 22, 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= June 22, 2009 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=423155&amp;amp;version=424160&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2009-06-22 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and July 25, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 25, 2011 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=628202&amp;amp;version=630085&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2011-07-25 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Special Counsel Lerner wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [unclassified sensitive security information] and therefore should not be disclosed. Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No specific statute exists that would allow the TSA to negate [Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)] whistleblower protections. The statute that the TSA relied upon to '''retroactively designate MacLean's protected disclosure''' as SSl does not establish particular criteria for withholding and does not refer to particular types of matters to be withheld&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
The Board’s expansion of the exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing is contrary to the plain meaning and intent of the statute and significantly expands what Congress intended to be a very narrow exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing, '''thereby chilling would-be whistleblowers'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel MSPB amicus curiae in support of Robert MacLean | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/US-Office-of-Special-Counsel-MSPB-amicus-curiae-Robert-MacLean-v-DHS-20110825.pdf | date=2011-08-25 | work=[http://www.cuacalifornia.com/ Clean Up America] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, '''Robert MacLean''' (born on March 8, 1970, in Torrejon Air Base, Madrid, Spain) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the U.S. Border Patrol and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security Whistleblower==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on September 11, 2001, should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as UNclassified &amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot; (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] from New York, now Secretary of State, wrote a letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]] about MacLean's disclosure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I also want to reiterate my '''extreme concern''' with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) proposal, in the face of these serious threats, to cut the number of air marshals by canceling critical flight missions because those missions would have required air marshals to spend the night at a hotel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/clinton-press-release-20030730.pdf | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Barbara Boxer]] from California wrote this provision into ATSA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Calls Administration's Plan To Reduce Air Marshals 'Unacceptable,' Calls On Ridge To Fully Fund Homeland Security Needs  | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2004-03-09 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official senatorial biography | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official campaign biography | url=http://www.barbaraboxer.com/about/ | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.barbaraboxer.com/ ''Official Campaign Website for Barbara Boxer''] | accessdate=2008-11-16}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Senator Boxer also called for better protection of the identities of Federal Air Marshals and greater oversight of the Federal Air Marshal Service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Amendments to Strengthen Homeland Security Included in Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill   | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 | date=2004-09-14 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080731050031/http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean was rebuffed by his TSA managers and a [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG) field agent, so he warned the public by going to NBC News. MacLean was quoted, anonymously, along with other unnamed sources, in a story written by Brock N. Meeks, Chief Washington correspondent for MSNBC.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Whistleblowers hit turbulence; TSA ex-employees say they've been blackballed for revealing problems  | url=http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/printer.jsp?id=14960 | date=2007-10-14 | work=[http://www.nj.com/ ''New Jersey Star Ledger''] | accessdate=2007-12-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That article broke the story and set off a chain reaction among national media outlets resulting in dozens of articles and televised broadcasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message MacLean disclosed was not marked as Sensitive Security Information (SSI), the often abused UNclassified information control mark used to protect information within the DHS's [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Ex-air marshal fired over leak sues TSA | url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/oct/31/nation/na-marshal31 | date=2006-10-31 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2009-06-18 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given that text message was sent nationally to all FAMS employees' unencrypted and password-protected cellular phones and did not contain SSI marking, MacLean was unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional CLASSIFIED Information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean's disclosure helped draw public scrutiny and bipartisan congressional outrage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to TSA's plan which rapidly led to its reversal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/29/20061029-115609-8718r/?page=all#pagebreak | date=2006-10-30 | work=[[The Washington Times]] | accessdate=2011-06-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, U.S. Senators [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] (New York), [[Barbara Boxer]] (California), and [[Charles Schumer]] (New York)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Team Bush Scrubs Plan to Cut Air Marshal Force | url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2003/07/31/2003-07-31_team_bush_scrubs_plan_to_cut.html | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.nydailynews.com/ New York Daily News] | accessdate=2007-07-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; held video press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to reverse its plan before going into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= July 30, 2003 CNN Television Transcripts | url=http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/30/asb.00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.cnn.com/ CNN] | accessdate=2008-11-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] of New Jersey was &amp;quot;furious&amp;quot; and issued this July 30, 2003 press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;You have to ask yourself: What are they thinking? First, the Administration issues an alarming statement that puts fear into the public, then they want to scale back security on airplanes. Does the left arm know what the right arm is doing over at the Department of Homeland Security?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Lautenberg Furious Over Initial Plan by Bush to Slash Federal Air Marshals, Shocked That Budget Cuts to Homeland Security Occurring as New Al Qaeda Threats Emerge | url=http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=254074 | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2009-08-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Given the potential fallout of another attack that intelligence reports suggest is on the way, it is incredible that the TSA would consider reducing the air marshal presence on these flights simply to save the cost of an overnight hotel room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Officials deny cuts to air marshal program | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-air-marshal.htm | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York also called on DHS Secretary Ridge to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;immediately reverse reported plans to cut air marshal service on coast-to-cost and international flights … in light of intelligence indicating that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups may have stepped up plans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Flip-flop on air marshal schedules | url=http://www.urondisplay.com/airmarshal/MSNBC%20Flip-flop%20on%20Air%20Marshal%20schedules%207-30-2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.grangier.fr MSNBC] | accessdate=2009-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fearful that fewer air marshals might travel on cross-country flights into San Francisco, Senator Boxer told reporter Edward Epstein of the [[San Francisco Chronicle]] that she had offered to send the TSA a list of hotels near San Francisco International Airport where air marshals could book rooms for well under $100 a night.  In a discussion with Senator Schumer, DHS Assistant Secretary of Border &amp;amp; Transportation Asa Hutchinson also admitted the plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights was an error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;'[DHS Assistant Secretary Hutchinson] said it was a mistake,' said Schumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal cutbacks denied | url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/31/MN251331.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.sfgate.com/ San Francisco Chronicle] | accessdate=2009-01-10 | first=Edward | last=Epstein}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts told the Wall Street Journal that President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy caused the TSA to consider implementing the plan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;President [[George W. Bush]] should exercise some leadership by realizing that tax cuts for the wealthy take money away from the protection of the American people&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Agency Overseeing Air Marshals Asks to Divert Program's Funds | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/WSJ_FAMS_high_risk_flight_31_JULY_2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://online.wsj.com/home-page The Wall Street Journal] | accessdate=2009-08-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney of New York issued a press release on her official congressional website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;One day its taking air marshals off the flights to avoid hotel costs at Motel 6, the next its holding back on training for them to do their jobs, all in the name of cost-cutting. I don't know what to expect next - they'll probably make air marshals fly stand-by. It's clear that they are playing a shell game with homeland security programs. It is essential that they tell us which programs are next to be cut. We shouldn't have to wake up one day to find out that airliners, ports, cargo or any other targets are unguarded because they have decided to cut the programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= FIRST, AIR MARSHALS WERE TO BE REMOVED, NOW, TRAINING TO BE CUT: TASK FORCE CHAIR ASK WHAT CUTS ARE NEXT? | url=http://www.maloney.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=52&amp;amp;id=418&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view | date=2003-08-11 | work=[http://maloney.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Official Website] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressmen Bill Pascrell, Jim Turner, and James Langevin together issued press releases about their letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman Bill Pascrell:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The sheer idiocy of this determination is mind blowing. Only four days ago the TSA issued an urgent memo to all U.S. airlines and airport security managers detailing very specific intelligence related to hijacking and suicide missions by terrorists this summer.  So now is a good time to pull air marshals from cross-country flights. The four planes hijacked on September 11th were all scheduled cross-country flights. Couple this knowledge with the new intelligence warnings-the most specific to date-about current hijacking plots, and there is absolutely no excuse for the TSA to scale back security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= PASCRELL: AIR MARSHAL DECISION AN ABOMINATION | url=http://pascrell.house.gov/list/press/nj08_pascrell/pr_030731_airmarshal.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://pascrell.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Bill Pascrell''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman James Langevin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As reports of potential terrorist attacks on commercial airliners surface, homeland security officials should be strengthening the air marshal program, not weakening it. We cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to protecting the safety of Americans.   At a time of heightened alert, the thought of curbing the air marshal program to save costs on overnight hotel stays is absurd. Your statement today that 'every air marshal is being deployed' does not answer the question of whether air marshals are being removed from flights that would result in overnight hotel stays.  We note that such flights would typically be cross-country routes, like those hijacked on September 11.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Langevin to Ridge: Removing Federal Air Marshals at a Time of Heightened Threat Defies Reason | url=http://langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2003/07/pr071803marshals.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://langevin.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Jim Langevin''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman Hal Rogers of Kentucky told Fox News:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Federal Air Marshal program is absolutely critical to fighting terrorism and keeping the flying public safe. Given new warnings from DHS about possible hijacking attempts, it is foolish to even consider cutting back the number of air marshals on commercial flights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= DHS: No Plan to Cut Number of Air Marshals | url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93311,00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.foxnews.com/ ''Fox News''] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The word came categorically down from the White House they've got a scheme and a plan on course, 'Let's cut the taxes, cut the taxes, cut the taxes,' and then to sort of make it look legitimate, cut all spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, &amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided to continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:MacLean, Robert}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913080</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913080"/>
		<updated>2011-09-11T00:38:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: /* Aviation Security Whistleblower */ Removed red links&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) filed a motion declaring former TSA Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistle-blowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
In her August 25, 2011 motion, U.S. Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner of the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] (MSPB) filed an amicus curiae with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board in support of Robert MacLean. It requested that the MSPB reverse its June 22, 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= June 22, 2009 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=423155&amp;amp;version=424160&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2009-06-22 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and July 25, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 25, 2011 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=628202&amp;amp;version=630085&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2011-07-25 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Special Counsel Lerner wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [unclassified sensitive security information] and therefore should not be disclosed. Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No specific statute exists that would allow the TSA to negate [Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)] whistleblower protections. The statute that the TSA relied upon to '''retroactively designate MacLean's protected disclosure''' as SSl does not establish particular criteria for withholding and does not refer to particular types of matters to be withheld&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
The Board’s expansion of the exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing is contrary to the plain meaning and intent of the statute and significantly expands what Congress intended to be a very narrow exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing, '''thereby chilling would-be whistleblowers'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel MSPB amicus curiae in support of Robert MacLean | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/US-Office-of-Special-Counsel-MSPB-amicus-curiae-Robert-MacLean-v-DHS-20110825.pdf | date=2011-08-25 | work=[http://www.cuacalifornia.com/ Clean Up America] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, '''Robert MacLean''' (born on March 8, 1970, in Torrejon Air Base, Madrid, Spain) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the U.S. Border Patrol and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security Whistleblower==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on September 11, 2001, should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as UNclassified &amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot; (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] from New York, now Secretary of State, wrote a letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]] about MacLean's disclosure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I also want to reiterate my '''extreme concern''' with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) proposal, in the face of these serious threats, to cut the number of air marshals by canceling critical flight missions because those missions would have required air marshals to spend the night at a hotel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/clinton-press-release-20030730.pdf | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Barbara Boxer]] from California wrote this provision into ATSA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Calls Administration's Plan To Reduce Air Marshals 'Unacceptable,' Calls On Ridge To Fully Fund Homeland Security Needs  | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2004-03-09 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official senatorial biography | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official campaign biography | url=http://www.barbaraboxer.com/about/ | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.barbaraboxer.com/ ''Official Campaign Website for Barbara Boxer''] | accessdate=2008-11-16}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Senator Boxer also called for better protection of the identities of Federal Air Marshals and greater oversight of the Federal Air Marshal Service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Amendments to Strengthen Homeland Security Included in Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill   | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 | date=2004-09-14 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080731050031/http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean was rebuffed by his TSA managers and a [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG) field agent, so he warned the public by going to NBC News. MacLean was quoted, anonymously, along with other unnamed sources, in a story written by [[Brock N. Meeks]], Chief Washington correspondent for MSNBC.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Whistleblowers hit turbulence; TSA ex-employees say they've been blackballed for revealing problems  | url=http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/printer.jsp?id=14960 | date=2007-10-14 | work=[http://www.nj.com/ ''New Jersey Star Ledger''] | accessdate=2007-12-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That article broke the story and set off a chain reaction among national media outlets resulting in dozens of articles and televised broadcasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message MacLean disclosed was not marked as [[Sensitive Security Information]] (SSI), the often abused unclassified information control mark used to protect information within the DHS's [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Ex-air marshal fired over leak sues TSA | url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/oct/31/nation/na-marshal31 | date=2006-10-31 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2009-06-18 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given that text message was sent nationally to all FAMS employees' unencrypted and password-protected cellular phones and did not contain SSI marking, MacLean was unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional [[Classified Information]], which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean's disclosure helped draw public scrutiny and bipartisan congressional outrage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to TSA's plan which rapidly led to its reversal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/29/20061029-115609-8718r/?page=all#pagebreak | date=2006-10-30 | work=[[The Washington Times]] | accessdate=2011-06-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, U.S. Senators [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] (New York), [[Barbara Boxer]] (California), and [[Charles Schumer]] (New York)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Team Bush Scrubs Plan to Cut Air Marshal Force | url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2003/07/31/2003-07-31_team_bush_scrubs_plan_to_cut.html | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.nydailynews.com/ New York Daily News] | accessdate=2007-07-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; held video press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to reverse its plan before going into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= July 30, 2003 CNN Television Transcripts | url=http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/30/asb.00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.cnn.com/ CNN] | accessdate=2008-11-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] of New Jersey was &amp;quot;furious&amp;quot; and issued this July 30, 2003 press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;You have to ask yourself: What are they thinking? First, the Administration issues an alarming statement that puts fear into the public, then they want to scale back security on airplanes. Does the left arm know what the right arm is doing over at the Department of Homeland Security?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Lautenberg Furious Over Initial Plan by Bush to Slash Federal Air Marshals, Shocked That Budget Cuts to Homeland Security Occurring as New Al Qaeda Threats Emerge | url=http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=254074 | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2009-08-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Given the potential fallout of another attack that intelligence reports suggest is on the way, it is incredible that the TSA would consider reducing the air marshal presence on these flights simply to save the cost of an overnight hotel room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Officials deny cuts to air marshal program | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-air-marshal.htm | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York also called on DHS Secretary Ridge to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;immediately reverse reported plans to cut air marshal service on coast-to-cost and international flights … in light of intelligence indicating that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups may have stepped up plans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Flip-flop on air marshal schedules | url=http://www.urondisplay.com/airmarshal/MSNBC%20Flip-flop%20on%20Air%20Marshal%20schedules%207-30-2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.grangier.fr MSNBC] | accessdate=2009-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fearful that fewer air marshals might travel on cross-country flights into San Francisco, Senator Boxer told reporter Edward Epstein of the [[San Francisco Chronicle]] that she had offered to send the TSA a list of hotels near San Francisco International Airport where air marshals could book rooms for well under $100 a night.  In a discussion with Senator Schumer, DHS Assistant Secretary of Border &amp;amp; Transportation Asa Hutchinson also admitted the plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights was an error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;'[DHS Assistant Secretary Hutchinson] said it was a mistake,' said Schumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal cutbacks denied | url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/31/MN251331.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.sfgate.com/ San Francisco Chronicle] | accessdate=2009-01-10 | first=Edward | last=Epstein}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts told the Wall Street Journal that President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy caused the TSA to consider implementing the plan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;President [[George W. Bush]] should exercise some leadership by realizing that tax cuts for the wealthy take money away from the protection of the American people&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Agency Overseeing Air Marshals Asks to Divert Program's Funds | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/WSJ_FAMS_high_risk_flight_31_JULY_2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://online.wsj.com/home-page The Wall Street Journal] | accessdate=2009-08-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congresswoman [[Carolyn B. Maloney]] of New York issued a press release on her official congressional website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;One day its taking air marshals off the flights to avoid hotel costs at Motel 6, the next its holding back on training for them to do their jobs, all in the name of cost-cutting. I don't know what to expect next - they'll probably make air marshals fly stand-by. It's clear that they are playing a shell game with homeland security programs. It is essential that they tell us which programs are next to be cut. We shouldn't have to wake up one day to find out that airliners, ports, cargo or any other targets are unguarded because they have decided to cut the programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= FIRST, AIR MARSHALS WERE TO BE REMOVED, NOW, TRAINING TO BE CUT: TASK FORCE CHAIR ASK WHAT CUTS ARE NEXT? | url=http://www.maloney.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=52&amp;amp;id=418&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view | date=2003-08-11 | work=[http://maloney.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Official Website] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressmen [[Bill Pascrell]], [[Jim Turner]], and [[James Langevin] together issued press releases about their letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[Bill Pascrell]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The sheer idiocy of this determination is mind blowing. Only four days ago the TSA issued an urgent memo to all U.S. airlines and airport security managers detailing very specific intelligence related to hijacking and suicide missions by terrorists this summer.  So now is a good time to pull air marshals from cross-country flights. The four planes hijacked on September 11th were all scheduled cross-country flights. Couple this knowledge with the new intelligence warnings-the most specific to date-about current hijacking plots, and there is absolutely no excuse for the TSA to scale back security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= PASCRELL: AIR MARSHAL DECISION AN ABOMINATION | url=http://pascrell.house.gov/list/press/nj08_pascrell/pr_030731_airmarshal.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://pascrell.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Bill Pascrell''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[James Langevin]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As reports of potential terrorist attacks on commercial airliners surface, homeland security officials should be strengthening the air marshal program, not weakening it. We cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to protecting the safety of Americans.   At a time of heightened alert, the thought of curbing the air marshal program to save costs on overnight hotel stays is absurd. Your statement today that 'every air marshal is being deployed' does not answer the question of whether air marshals are being removed from flights that would result in overnight hotel stays.  We note that such flights would typically be cross-country routes, like those hijacked on September 11.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Langevin to Ridge: Removing Federal Air Marshals at a Time of Heightened Threat Defies Reason | url=http://langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2003/07/pr071803marshals.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://langevin.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Jim Langevin''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[Hal Rogers]] of Kentucky told Fox News:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Federal Air Marshal program is absolutely critical to fighting terrorism and keeping the flying public safe. Given new warnings from DHS about possible hijacking attempts, it is foolish to even consider cutting back the number of air marshals on commercial flights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= DHS: No Plan to Cut Number of Air Marshals | url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93311,00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.foxnews.com/ ''Fox News''] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The word came categorically down from the White House they've got a scheme and a plan on course, 'Let's cut the taxes, cut the taxes, cut the taxes,' and then to sort of make it look legitimate, cut all spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, &amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided to continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:MacLean, Robert}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913079</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913079"/>
		<updated>2011-09-11T00:36:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: /* U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean */ Removed red links&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) filed a motion declaring former TSA Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistle-blowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
In her August 25, 2011 motion, U.S. Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner of the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] (MSPB) filed an amicus curiae with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board in support of Robert MacLean. It requested that the MSPB reverse its June 22, 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= June 22, 2009 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=423155&amp;amp;version=424160&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2009-06-22 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and July 25, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 25, 2011 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=628202&amp;amp;version=630085&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2011-07-25 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Special Counsel Lerner wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [unclassified sensitive security information] and therefore should not be disclosed. Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No specific statute exists that would allow the TSA to negate [Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)] whistleblower protections. The statute that the TSA relied upon to '''retroactively designate MacLean's protected disclosure''' as SSl does not establish particular criteria for withholding and does not refer to particular types of matters to be withheld&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
The Board’s expansion of the exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing is contrary to the plain meaning and intent of the statute and significantly expands what Congress intended to be a very narrow exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing, '''thereby chilling would-be whistleblowers'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel MSPB amicus curiae in support of Robert MacLean | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/US-Office-of-Special-Counsel-MSPB-amicus-curiae-Robert-MacLean-v-DHS-20110825.pdf | date=2011-08-25 | work=[http://www.cuacalifornia.com/ Clean Up America] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, '''Robert MacLean''' (born on March 8, 1970, in Torrejon Air Base, Madrid, Spain) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the U.S. Border Patrol and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on September 11, 2001, should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] from New York, now Secretary of State, wrote a letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]] about MacLean's disclosure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I also want to reiterate my '''extreme concern''' with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) proposal, in the face of these serious threats, to cut the number of air marshals by canceling critical flight missions because those missions would have required air marshals to spend the night at a hotel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/clinton-press-release-20030730.pdf | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Barbara Boxer]] from California wrote this provision into ATSA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Calls Administration's Plan To Reduce Air Marshals 'Unacceptable,' Calls On Ridge To Fully Fund Homeland Security Needs  | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2004-03-09 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official senatorial biography | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official campaign biography | url=http://www.barbaraboxer.com/about/ | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.barbaraboxer.com/ ''Official Campaign Website for Barbara Boxer''] | accessdate=2008-11-16}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Senator Boxer also called for better protection of the identities of Federal Air Marshals and greater oversight of the Federal Air Marshal Service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Amendments to Strengthen Homeland Security Included in Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill   | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 | date=2004-09-14 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080731050031/http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean was rebuffed by his TSA managers and a [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG) field agent, so he warned the public by going to NBC News. MacLean was quoted, anonymously, along with other unnamed sources, in a story written by [[Brock N. Meeks]], Chief Washington correspondent for MSNBC.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Whistleblowers hit turbulence; TSA ex-employees say they've been blackballed for revealing problems  | url=http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/printer.jsp?id=14960 | date=2007-10-14 | work=[http://www.nj.com/ ''New Jersey Star Ledger''] | accessdate=2007-12-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That article broke the story and set off a chain reaction among national media outlets resulting in dozens of articles and televised broadcasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message MacLean disclosed was not marked as [[Sensitive Security Information]] (SSI), the often abused unclassified information control mark used to protect information within the DHS's [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Ex-air marshal fired over leak sues TSA | url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/oct/31/nation/na-marshal31 | date=2006-10-31 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2009-06-18 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given that text message was sent nationally to all FAMS employees' unencrypted and password-protected cellular phones and did not contain SSI marking, MacLean was unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional [[Classified Information]], which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean's disclosure helped draw public scrutiny and bipartisan congressional outrage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to TSA's plan which rapidly led to its reversal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/29/20061029-115609-8718r/?page=all#pagebreak | date=2006-10-30 | work=[[The Washington Times]] | accessdate=2011-06-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, U.S. Senators [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] (New York), [[Barbara Boxer]] (California), and [[Charles Schumer]] (New York)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Team Bush Scrubs Plan to Cut Air Marshal Force | url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2003/07/31/2003-07-31_team_bush_scrubs_plan_to_cut.html | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.nydailynews.com/ New York Daily News] | accessdate=2007-07-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; held video press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to reverse its plan before going into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= July 30, 2003 CNN Television Transcripts | url=http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/30/asb.00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.cnn.com/ CNN] | accessdate=2008-11-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] of New Jersey was &amp;quot;furious&amp;quot; and issued this July 30, 2003 press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;You have to ask yourself: What are they thinking? First, the Administration issues an alarming statement that puts fear into the public, then they want to scale back security on airplanes. Does the left arm know what the right arm is doing over at the Department of Homeland Security?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Lautenberg Furious Over Initial Plan by Bush to Slash Federal Air Marshals, Shocked That Budget Cuts to Homeland Security Occurring as New Al Qaeda Threats Emerge | url=http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=254074 | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2009-08-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Given the potential fallout of another attack that intelligence reports suggest is on the way, it is incredible that the TSA would consider reducing the air marshal presence on these flights simply to save the cost of an overnight hotel room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Officials deny cuts to air marshal program | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-air-marshal.htm | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York also called on DHS Secretary Ridge to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;immediately reverse reported plans to cut air marshal service on coast-to-cost and international flights … in light of intelligence indicating that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups may have stepped up plans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Flip-flop on air marshal schedules | url=http://www.urondisplay.com/airmarshal/MSNBC%20Flip-flop%20on%20Air%20Marshal%20schedules%207-30-2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.grangier.fr MSNBC] | accessdate=2009-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fearful that fewer air marshals might travel on cross-country flights into San Francisco, Senator Boxer told reporter Edward Epstein of the [[San Francisco Chronicle]] that she had offered to send the TSA a list of hotels near San Francisco International Airport where air marshals could book rooms for well under $100 a night.  In a discussion with Senator Schumer, DHS Assistant Secretary of Border &amp;amp; Transportation Asa Hutchinson also admitted the plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights was an error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;'[DHS Assistant Secretary Hutchinson] said it was a mistake,' said Schumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal cutbacks denied | url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/31/MN251331.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.sfgate.com/ San Francisco Chronicle] | accessdate=2009-01-10 | first=Edward | last=Epstein}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts told the Wall Street Journal that President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy caused the TSA to consider implementing the plan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;President [[George W. Bush]] should exercise some leadership by realizing that tax cuts for the wealthy take money away from the protection of the American people&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Agency Overseeing Air Marshals Asks to Divert Program's Funds | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/WSJ_FAMS_high_risk_flight_31_JULY_2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://online.wsj.com/home-page The Wall Street Journal] | accessdate=2009-08-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congresswoman [[Carolyn B. Maloney]] of New York issued a press release on her official congressional website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;One day its taking air marshals off the flights to avoid hotel costs at Motel 6, the next its holding back on training for them to do their jobs, all in the name of cost-cutting. I don't know what to expect next - they'll probably make air marshals fly stand-by. It's clear that they are playing a shell game with homeland security programs. It is essential that they tell us which programs are next to be cut. We shouldn't have to wake up one day to find out that airliners, ports, cargo or any other targets are unguarded because they have decided to cut the programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= FIRST, AIR MARSHALS WERE TO BE REMOVED, NOW, TRAINING TO BE CUT: TASK FORCE CHAIR ASK WHAT CUTS ARE NEXT? | url=http://www.maloney.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=52&amp;amp;id=418&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view | date=2003-08-11 | work=[http://maloney.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Official Website] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressmen [[Bill Pascrell]], [[Jim Turner]], and [[James Langevin] together issued press releases about their letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[Bill Pascrell]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The sheer idiocy of this determination is mind blowing. Only four days ago the TSA issued an urgent memo to all U.S. airlines and airport security managers detailing very specific intelligence related to hijacking and suicide missions by terrorists this summer.  So now is a good time to pull air marshals from cross-country flights. The four planes hijacked on September 11th were all scheduled cross-country flights. Couple this knowledge with the new intelligence warnings-the most specific to date-about current hijacking plots, and there is absolutely no excuse for the TSA to scale back security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= PASCRELL: AIR MARSHAL DECISION AN ABOMINATION | url=http://pascrell.house.gov/list/press/nj08_pascrell/pr_030731_airmarshal.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://pascrell.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Bill Pascrell''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[James Langevin]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As reports of potential terrorist attacks on commercial airliners surface, homeland security officials should be strengthening the air marshal program, not weakening it. We cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to protecting the safety of Americans.   At a time of heightened alert, the thought of curbing the air marshal program to save costs on overnight hotel stays is absurd. Your statement today that 'every air marshal is being deployed' does not answer the question of whether air marshals are being removed from flights that would result in overnight hotel stays.  We note that such flights would typically be cross-country routes, like those hijacked on September 11.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Langevin to Ridge: Removing Federal Air Marshals at a Time of Heightened Threat Defies Reason | url=http://langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2003/07/pr071803marshals.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://langevin.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Jim Langevin''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[Hal Rogers]] of Kentucky told Fox News:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Federal Air Marshal program is absolutely critical to fighting terrorism and keeping the flying public safe. Given new warnings from DHS about possible hijacking attempts, it is foolish to even consider cutting back the number of air marshals on commercial flights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= DHS: No Plan to Cut Number of Air Marshals | url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93311,00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.foxnews.com/ ''Fox News''] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The word came categorically down from the White House they've got a scheme and a plan on course, 'Let's cut the taxes, cut the taxes, cut the taxes,' and then to sort of make it look legitimate, cut all spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, &amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided to continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:MacLean, Robert}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913042</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=913042"/>
		<updated>2011-09-10T18:48:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: Added news of August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel motion, and July 2003 press releases and statements from eleven U.S. members of Congress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On August 25, 2011, the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] ( OSC ) filed a motion declaring former TSA Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean a whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Decision to fire air marshal risks silencing whistle-blowers, OSC says | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110826/DEPARTMENTS03/108260301/ | date=2011-08-26 | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com Federal Times ] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Office of Special Counsel intervenes in support of Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
In her August 25, 2011 motion, U.S. Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner of the [[United States Office of Special Counsel]] (MSPB) filed an amicus curiae with the [[United States Merit Systems Protection Board]] in support of Robert MacLean. It requested that the MSPB reverse its June 22, 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= June 22, 2009 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=423155&amp;amp;version=424160&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2009-06-22 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and July 25, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= July 25, 2011 U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board decision MacLean v. DHS | url=http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=628202&amp;amp;version=630085&amp;amp;application=ACROBAT | date=2011-07-25 | work=[http://www.mspb.gov/ Official website of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Special Counsel Lerner wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [unclassified [[sensitive security information]]] and therefore should not be disclosed. Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No specific statute exists that would allow the TSA to negate [ [[Civil Service Reform Act of 1978]] (CSRA)] whistleblower protections. The statute that the TSA relied upon to '''retroactively designate MacLean's protected disclosure''' as SSl does not establish particular criteria for withholding and does not refer to particular types of matters to be withheld&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .&lt;br /&gt;
The Board’s expansion of the exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing is contrary to the plain meaning and intent of the statute and significantly expands what Congress intended to be a very narrow exception to CSRA protected whistleblowing, '''thereby chilling would-be whistleblowers'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= August 25, 2011 U.S. Office of Special Counsel MSPB amicus curiae in support of Robert MacLean | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/US-Office-of-Special-Counsel-MSPB-amicus-curiae-Robert-MacLean-v-DHS-20110825.pdf | date=2011-08-25 | work=[http://www.cuacalifornia.com/ Clean Up America] | accessdate=2011-08-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, '''Robert MacLean''' (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on September 11, 2001, should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] and ten other members of Congress supported MacLean's actions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] from New York, now Secretary of State, wrote a letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]] about MacLean's disclosure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I also want to reiterate my '''extreme concern''' with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) proposal, in the face of these serious threats, to cut the number of air marshals by canceling critical flight missions because those missions would have required air marshals to spend the night at a hotel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/clinton-press-release-20030730.pdf | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Barbara Boxer]] from California wrote this provision into ATSA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Calls Administration's Plan To Reduce Air Marshals 'Unacceptable,' Calls On Ridge To Fully Fund Homeland Security Needs  | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2004-03-09 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official senatorial biography | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://boxer.senate.gov/en/senator/biography.cfm &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Barbara Boxer's official campaign biography | url=http://www.barbaraboxer.com/about/ | date=2008-11-16 | work=[http://www.barbaraboxer.com/ ''Official Campaign Website for Barbara Boxer''] | accessdate=2008-11-16}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Senator Boxer also called for better protection of the identities of Federal Air Marshals and greater oversight of the Federal Air Marshal Service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Boxer Amendments to Strengthen Homeland Security Included in Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill   | url=http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 | date=2004-09-14 | work=[http://www.boxer.senate.gov/ Website of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2008-11-15 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080731050031/http://boxer.senate.gov/news/releases/record.cfm?id=226143 &amp;lt;!-- Bot retrieved archive --&amp;gt; |archivedate = 2008-07-31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean was rebuffed by his TSA managers and a [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG) field agent, so he warned the public by going to NBC News. MacLean was quoted, anonymously, along with other unnamed sources, in a story written by [[Brock N. Meeks]], Chief Washington correspondent for MSNBC.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Whistleblowers hit turbulence; TSA ex-employees say they've been blackballed for revealing problems  | url=http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/printer.jsp?id=14960 | date=2007-10-14 | work=[http://www.nj.com/ ''New Jersey Star Ledger''] | accessdate=2007-12-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That article broke the story and set off a chain reaction among national media outlets resulting in dozens of articles and televised broadcasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message MacLean disclosed was not marked as [[Sensitive Security Information]] (SSI), the often abused unclassified information control mark used to protect information within the DHS's [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Ex-air marshal fired over leak sues TSA | url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/oct/31/nation/na-marshal31 | date=2006-10-31 | work=[http://www.latimes.com/ Los Angeles Times] | accessdate=2009-06-18 | first=Nicole | last=Gaouette}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given that text message was sent nationally to all FAMS employees' unencrypted and password-protected cellular phones and did not contain SSI marking, MacLean was unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional [[Classified Information]], which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAM Robert MacLean's disclosure helped draw public scrutiny and bipartisan congressional outrage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to TSA's plan which rapidly led to its reversal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/29/20061029-115609-8718r/?page=all#pagebreak | date=2006-10-30 | work=[[The Washington Times]] | accessdate=2011-06-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, U.S. Senators [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] (New York), [[Barbara Boxer]] (California), and [[Charles Schumer]] (New York)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Team Bush Scrubs Plan to Cut Air Marshal Force | url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2003/07/31/2003-07-31_team_bush_scrubs_plan_to_cut.html | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.nydailynews.com/ New York Daily News] | accessdate=2007-07-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; held video press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to reverse its plan before going into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= July 30, 2003 CNN Television Transcripts | url=http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/30/asb.00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.cnn.com/ CNN] | accessdate=2008-11-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] of New Jersey was &amp;quot;furious&amp;quot; and issued this July 30, 2003 press release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;You have to ask yourself: What are they thinking? First, the Administration issues an alarming statement that puts fear into the public, then they want to scale back security on airplanes. Does the left arm know what the right arm is doing over at the Department of Homeland Security?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Lautenberg Furious Over Initial Plan by Bush to Slash Federal Air Marshals, Shocked That Budget Cuts to Homeland Security Occurring as New Al Qaeda Threats Emerge | url=http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=254074 | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2009-08-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Given the potential fallout of another attack that intelligence reports suggest is on the way, it is incredible that the TSA would consider reducing the air marshal presence on these flights simply to save the cost of an overnight hotel room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Officials deny cuts to air marshal program | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-air-marshal.htm | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York also called on DHS Secretary Ridge to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;immediately reverse reported plans to cut air marshal service on coast-to-cost and international flights … in light of intelligence indicating that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups may have stepped up plans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Flip-flop on air marshal schedules | url=http://www.urondisplay.com/airmarshal/MSNBC%20Flip-flop%20on%20Air%20Marshal%20schedules%207-30-2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.grangier.fr MSNBC] | accessdate=2009-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fearful that fewer air marshals might travel on cross-country flights into San Francisco, Senator Boxer told reporter Edward Epstein of the [[San Francisco Chronicle]] that she had offered to send the TSA a list of hotels near San Francisco International Airport where air marshals could book rooms for well under $100 a night.  In a discussion with Senator Schumer, DHS Assistant Secretary of Border &amp;amp; Transportation Asa Hutchinson also admitted the plan to remove air marshals from nonstop, long distance flights was an error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;'[DHS Assistant Secretary Hutchinson] said it was a mistake,' said Schumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Air marshal cutbacks denied | url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/31/MN251331.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.sfgate.com/ San Francisco Chronicle] | accessdate=2009-01-10 | first=Edward | last=Epstein}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts told the Wall Street Journal that President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy caused the TSA to consider implementing the plan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;President [[George W. Bush]] should exercise some leadership by realizing that tax cuts for the wealthy take money away from the protection of the American people&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Agency Overseeing Air Marshals Asks to Divert Program's Funds | url=http://www.cuacalifornia.com/WSJ_FAMS_high_risk_flight_31_JULY_2003.pdf | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://online.wsj.com/home-page The Wall Street Journal] | accessdate=2009-08-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congresswoman [[Carolyn B. Maloney]] of New York issued a press release on her official congressional website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;One day its taking air marshals off the flights to avoid hotel costs at Motel 6, the next its holding back on training for them to do their jobs, all in the name of cost-cutting. I don't know what to expect next - they'll probably make air marshals fly stand-by. It's clear that they are playing a shell game with homeland security programs. It is essential that they tell us which programs are next to be cut. We shouldn't have to wake up one day to find out that airliners, ports, cargo or any other targets are unguarded because they have decided to cut the programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= FIRST, AIR MARSHALS WERE TO BE REMOVED, NOW, TRAINING TO BE CUT: TASK FORCE CHAIR ASK WHAT CUTS ARE NEXT? | url=http://www.maloney.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=52&amp;amp;id=418&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view | date=2003-08-11 | work=[http://maloney.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Official Website] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressmen [[Bill Pascrell]], [[Jim Turner]], and [[James Langevin] together issued press releases about their letter to DHS Secretary [[Tom Ridge]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[Bill Pascrell]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The sheer idiocy of this determination is mind blowing. Only four days ago the TSA issued an urgent memo to all U.S. airlines and airport security managers detailing very specific intelligence related to hijacking and suicide missions by terrorists this summer.  So now is a good time to pull air marshals from cross-country flights. The four planes hijacked on September 11th were all scheduled cross-country flights. Couple this knowledge with the new intelligence warnings-the most specific to date-about current hijacking plots, and there is absolutely no excuse for the TSA to scale back security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= PASCRELL: AIR MARSHAL DECISION AN ABOMINATION | url=http://pascrell.house.gov/list/press/nj08_pascrell/pr_030731_airmarshal.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://pascrell.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Bill Pascrell''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[James Langevin]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As reports of potential terrorist attacks on commercial airliners surface, homeland security officials should be strengthening the air marshal program, not weakening it. We cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to protecting the safety of Americans.   At a time of heightened alert, the thought of curbing the air marshal program to save costs on overnight hotel stays is absurd. Your statement today that 'every air marshal is being deployed' does not answer the question of whether air marshals are being removed from flights that would result in overnight hotel stays.  We note that such flights would typically be cross-country routes, like those hijacked on September 11.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Langevin to Ridge: Removing Federal Air Marshals at a Time of Heightened Threat Defies Reason | url=http://langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2003/07/pr071803marshals.shtml | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://langevin.house.gov ''Official Congressional website of Honorable Jim Langevin''] | accessdate=2011-09-06}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congressman [[Hal Rogers]] of Kentucky told Fox News:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Federal Air Marshal program is absolutely critical to fighting terrorism and keeping the flying public safe. Given new warnings from DHS about possible hijacking attempts, it is foolish to even consider cutting back the number of air marshals on commercial flights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= DHS: No Plan to Cut Number of Air Marshals | url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93311,00.html | date=2003-07-30 | work=[http://www.foxnews.com/ ''Fox News''] | accessdate=2011-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The word came categorically down from the White House they've got a scheme and a plan on course, 'Let's cut the taxes, cut the taxes, cut the taxes,' and then to sort of make it look legitimate, cut all spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news | title= Uproar Over Air Marshal Cuts | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/31/terror/main566052.shtml?source=search_story | date=2003-07-31 | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBS News] | accessdate=2008-08-01}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, &amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided to continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:MacLean, Robert}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=226730</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=226730"/>
		<updated>2007-07-11T16:44:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: updated link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  '''''“Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”'''''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.airportbusiness.com/web/online/Airline-and-Airport-Security-News/Ex-Air-Marshal-to-Sue-over-SSI-Label/5$8684 Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=224642</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=224642"/>
		<updated>2007-07-10T14:13:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: update link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  '''''“Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”'''''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3161282 U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=224623</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=224623"/>
		<updated>2007-07-10T13:55:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  '''''“Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”'''''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=224622</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=224622"/>
		<updated>2007-07-10T13:54:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  '''“Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”'''''Italic text''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA retroactively labeled the July 2003 information he disclosed as SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=206604</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=206604"/>
		<updated>2007-06-23T17:53:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists with the smuggled weapons would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205791</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205791"/>
		<updated>2007-06-23T00:28:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205298</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205298"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T18:06:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals&amp;quot;'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205296</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205296"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T18:04:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''Title 49 of the United States Code § 44917 &amp;quot;Deployment of Federal Air Marshals''', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205293</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205293"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:57:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]] (DHS/OIG), so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://groups.google.com/group/fams-whistleblower-robert-maclean Website Archive of all Case Documents and Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Department_of_Homeland_Security_Office_of_Inspector_General&amp;diff=205277</id>
		<title>Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Department_of_Homeland_Security_Office_of_Inspector_General&amp;diff=205277"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:36:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: new entry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The United States Congress enacted the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, to ensure integrity and efficiency in government. The Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended, established an Office of Inspector General (OIG) in the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS). The Inspector General is appointed by the President and subject to Senate confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Inspector General is responsible for conducting and supervising audits, investigations, and inspections relating to the programs and operations of the DHS. The OIG is to examine, evaluate and, where necessary, critique these operations and activities, recommending ways for the Department to carry out its responsibilities in the most effective, efficient, and economical manner possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mission Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To serve as an independent and objective inspection, audit, and investigative body to promote effectiveness, efficiency, and economy in the Department of Homeland Security's programs and operations, and to prevent and detect fraud, abuse, mismanagement, and waste in such programs and operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/ DHS Office of Inspector General website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transportation_Security_Administration&amp;diff=205273</id>
		<title>Transportation Security Administration</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transportation_Security_Administration&amp;diff=205273"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:33:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: new entry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Transportation Security Administration was formed immediately following the [[September 11, 2001 Attacks]].  The agency is a component of the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) and is responsible for security of the nation's transportation systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With state, local and regional partners, TSA oversees security for the highways, railroads, buses, mass transit systems, ports and the 450 U.S. airports.  TSA employs approximately 50,000 people from Alaska to Puerto Rico to ensure your travels – by plane, train, automobile or ferry – are safe and secure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tsa.gov/ TSA website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205267</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205267"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:30:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Transporation Security Administration]] (TSA) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the TSA on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transporation Security Administration and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TSA and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Air_Marshal_Service&amp;diff=205266</id>
		<title>Federal Air Marshal Service</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Air_Marshal_Service&amp;diff=205266"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:26:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: new entry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS) is a program within the [[Department of Homeland Security]]'s (DHS) [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Federal Air Marshal Service promotes confidence in the nation’s civil aviation system through the effective deployment of [[Federal Air Marshals]] (FAMs) to detect, deter, and defeat hostile acts targeting U.S. air carriers, airports, passengers, and crews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal Air Marshals must operate independently without backup, and rank among those Federal law enforcement officers that hold the highest standard for handgun accuracy.  They blend in with passengers and rely on their training, including investigative techniques, criminal terrorist behavior recognition, firearms proficiency, aircraft specific tactics, and close quarters self-defense measures to protect the flying public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal Air Marshals have an ever expanding role in homeland security and work closely with other law enforcement agencies to accomplish their mission.  Currently, air marshals staff several positions at different organizations such as the [[National Counterterrorism Center]], the [[National Targeting Center]], and on the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces.  In addition, they are also distributed among other law enforcement and homeland security liaison assignments during times of heightened alert or special national events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Successful accomplishment of the Federal Air Marshal’s mission is critical to civil aviation and homeland security.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tsa.gov/lawenforcement/programs/fams.shtm Transportation Security Administration website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205256</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205256"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:16:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S. (''Minute 10:53 of video'')], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205253</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205253"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:12:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html President Bush Discusses Top Priorities for the U.S.], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205247</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205247"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:03:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Termination for Disclosure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 31, 2006, a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205243</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=205243"/>
		<updated>2007-06-22T17:02:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: President Bush comments added&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The plan would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''&amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House Reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''&amp;quot;The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=204237</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=204237"/>
		<updated>2007-06-21T17:49:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Code_of_Federal_Regulations&amp;diff=203329</id>
		<title>Code of Federal Regulations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Code_of_Federal_Regulations&amp;diff=203329"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T18:46:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government.  It is divided into 50 titles that represent broad areas subject to Federal regulation.  Each volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar year and is issued on a quarterly basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 1-16 are updated as of January 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 17-27 are updated as of April 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 28-41 are updated as of July 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 42-50 are updated as of October 1st&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each title is divided into chapters, which usually bear the name of the issuing agency. Each chapter is further subdivided into parts that cover specific regulatory areas. Large parts may be subdivided into subparts. All parts are organized in sections, and most citations in the CFR are provided at the section level. A list of agencies and where they appear in the CFR may be found in Appendix C of the U.S. Government Manual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The online CFR is a joint project authorized by the publisher, the [[National Archives and Records Administration]]'s (NARA) [[Office of the Federal Register]] (OFR), and the [[Government Printing Office]] (GPO) to provide the public with enhanced access to Government information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CFR volumes are added to GPO Access concurrent with the release of the paper editions. When revised CFR volumes are added, the prior editions remain on GPO Access as a historical set. Some CFR records on GPO Access date back to 1996; all titles are available from 1997 to the current year. Documents are available as ASCII text and PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/about.html Government Printing Office - Code of Federal Regulations]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Code_of_Federal_Regulations&amp;diff=203328</id>
		<title>Code of Federal Regulations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Code_of_Federal_Regulations&amp;diff=203328"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T18:45:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: added reference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government.  It is divided into 50 titles that represent broad areas subject to Federal regulation.  Each volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar year and is issued on a quarterly basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 1-16 are updated as of January 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 17-27 are updated as of April 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 28-41 are updated as of July 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 42-50 are updated as of October 1st&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each title is divided into chapters, which usually bear the name of the issuing agency. Each chapter is further subdivided into parts that cover specific regulatory areas. Large parts may be subdivided into subparts. All parts are organized in sections, and most citations in the CFR are provided at the section level. A list of agencies and where they appear in the CFR may be found in Appendix C of the U.S. Government Manual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The online CFR is a joint project authorized by the publisher, the [[National Archives and Records Administration]]'s (NARA) [[Office of the Federal Register]] (OFR), and the [[Government Printing Office]] (GPO) to provide the public with enhanced access to Government information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CFR volumes are added to GPO Access concurrent with the release of the paper editions. When revised CFR volumes are added, the prior editions remain on GPO Access as a historical set. Some CFR records on GPO Access date back to 1996; all titles are available from 1997 to the current year. Documents are available as ASCII text and PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/about.html Government Printing Office - Code of Federal Regulations]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Code_of_Federal_Regulations&amp;diff=203321</id>
		<title>Code of Federal Regulations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Code_of_Federal_Regulations&amp;diff=203321"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T18:41:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: new entry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/about.html Government Printing Office - Code of Federal Regulations]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government.  It is divided into 50 titles that represent broad areas subject to Federal regulation.  Each volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar year and is issued on a quarterly basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 1-16 are updated as of January 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 17-27 are updated as of April 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 28-41 are updated as of July 1st&lt;br /&gt;
    * Titles 42-50 are updated as of October 1st&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each title is divided into chapters, which usually bear the name of the issuing agency. Each chapter is further subdivided into parts that cover specific regulatory areas. Large parts may be subdivided into subparts. All parts are organized in sections, and most citations in the CFR are provided at the section level. A list of agencies and where they appear in the CFR may be found in Appendix C of the U.S. Government Manual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The online CFR is a joint project authorized by the publisher, the [[National Archives and Records Administration]]'s (NARA) [[Office of the Federal Register]] (OFR), and the [[Government Printing Office]] (GPO) to provide the public with enhanced access to Government information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CFR volumes are added to GPO Access concurrent with the release of the paper editions. When revised CFR volumes are added, the prior editions remain on GPO Access as a historical set. Some CFR records on GPO Access date back to 1996; all titles are available from 1997 to the current year. Documents are available as ASCII text and PDF files.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203299</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203299"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T18:04:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: added reference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wi36t4B2OV4 Federal Air Marshal Fired for Exposing Dangerous Policy], ''CNN Lou Dobbs'', November 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203295</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203295"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T17:59:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings based on a July 26, 2006 DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on March 8, 1970, in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203290</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203290"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T17:55:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Aviation Security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGIwYzc2MTQ4YTBlMTg3YjJmZGVhODc4NmJhYjg4YjY TITLE], AUTHOR, ''NAME OF MEDIA'', May 9, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings based on a [[July 26]], [[2003]] DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's [[August 31]], [[2006]] Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on [[March 8]], [[1970]], in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203289</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203289"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T17:55:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: removal of WP format&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Aviation security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGIwYzc2MTQ4YTBlMTg3YjJmZGVhODc4NmJhYjg4YjY TITLE], AUTHOR, ''NAME OF MEDIA'', May 9, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings based on a [[July 26]], [[2003]] DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html 2001 Aviation &amp;amp; Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71)], ''United States Code'', November 19, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's [[August 31]], [[2006]] Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on [[March 8]], [[1970]], in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit], Stephen Losey, ''Federal Times'', November 7, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203223</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203223"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T16:57:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: process of removing WP format&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Aviation security [[Whistleblower]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGIwYzc2MTQ4YTBlMTg3YjJmZGVhODc4NmJhYjg4YjY TITLE], AUTHOR, ''NAME OF MEDIA'', May 9, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings based on a [[July 26]], [[2003]] DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks], Mimi Hall and Kevin Johnson, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets], Sara Kehaulani Goo and Susan Schmidt, ''The Washington Post'', July 30, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= 49 U.S.C § 44917 | url=http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html | date=[[2001-11-19]] | work=[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ Cornell Law School] | accessdate=2007-05-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to its reversal&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r | date=[[2006-10-30]] | work=[http://www.washingtontimes.com/ The Washington Times] | accessdate=2007-05-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://clinton.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air marshals back to long flights | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm | date=[[2003-08-01]] | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ USA Today] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive' | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ Associated Press] | accessdate=2007-05-10}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= TSA's [[August 31]], [[2006]] Final Order on Sensitive Security Information | url=http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://www.pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information | url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf | date=[[2005-07-01]] | work=[http://www.gao.gov/ Government Accountability Office] | accessdate=2007-05-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security | url=http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on [[March 8]], [[1970]], in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 | date=[[2006-11-07]] | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com/ Federal Times] | accessdate=2006-11-07}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Uncategorized people]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Inmidata&amp;diff=203172</id>
		<title>User talk:Inmidata</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Inmidata&amp;diff=203172"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T16:40:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: /* Robert MacLean */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Robert MacLean==&lt;br /&gt;
I welcome this new online encyclopedia.  I apologize if I wrote the same entry in Wikipedia.  The entry is very informative and well balanced giving both views.  The history about Robert MacLean is very important to national security. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;comment added by [[user:Inmidata]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:I have taken the speedy delete tag off the article, but there are a couple of issues you will need to straighten out with the site admins - firstly, the format will have to be corrected to remove WP's templates and so on, and secondly you will need to verify that you are the same user from WP (anyone could claim to be anyone). Perhaps a small note on your WP talk page to confirm? Anyway, welcome to the site and I hope this all gets straightened out asap :) [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:26, 20 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will add that note ASAP and I will start working on removing the WP templates.  Thanks for the speedy response!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Inmidata&amp;diff=203098</id>
		<title>User talk:Inmidata</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Inmidata&amp;diff=203098"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T16:09:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: New page: I welcome this new online encyclopedia.  I apologize if I wrote the same entry in Wikipedia.  The entry is very informative and well balanced giving both views.  The history about Robert M...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I welcome this new online encyclopedia.  I apologize if I wrote the same entry in Wikipedia.  The entry is very informative and well balanced giving both views.  The history about Robert MacLean is very important to national security.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203091</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203091"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T16:04:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{db|copied from wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you read the history, the Wikipedia entry was written by me.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203085</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203085"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T16:00:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Robert MacLean''' is an aviation security [[whistleblower]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings based on a [[July 26]], [[2003]] DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm | date=[[2003-08-01]] | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets | url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ The Washington Post] | accessdate=2003-07-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= 49 U.S.C § 44917 | url=http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html | date=[[2001-11-19]] | work=[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ Cornell Law School] | accessdate=2007-05-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to its reversal&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r | date=[[2006-10-30]] | work=[http://www.washingtontimes.com/ The Washington Times] | accessdate=2007-05-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://clinton.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air marshals back to long flights | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm | date=[[2003-08-01]] | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ USA Today] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive' | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ Associated Press] | accessdate=2007-05-10}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= TSA's [[August 31]], [[2006]] Final Order on Sensitive Security Information | url=http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://www.pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information | url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf | date=[[2005-07-01]] | work=[http://www.gao.gov/ Government Accountability Office] | accessdate=2007-05-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security | url=http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on [[March 8]], [[1970]], in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 | date=[[2006-11-07]] | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com/ Federal Times] | accessdate=2006-11-07}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Uncategorized people]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203081</id>
		<title>Robert MacLean</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_MacLean&amp;diff=203081"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T15:59:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Inmidata: new entry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Robert MacLean''' is an aviation security [[whistleblower]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal (FAM) Robert MacLean tried to blow the whistle within the [[Department of Homeland Security]] (DHS) on a plan to reduce air marshal coverage of nonstop, long distance flights amidst heightened warnings based on a [[July 26]], [[2003]] DHS Advisory describing intelligence of an [[al-Qaeda]] suicide hijack plan &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= U.S. warns of 9/11-style plane attacks | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/30-hijackings.htm | date=[[2003-08-01]] | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ ''USA Today''] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that would exploit a U.S. immigration loophole enabling a terrorist, without a U.S. visa, to take a flight from a country with less-stringent security to a U.S. airport and roam that U.S. airport during a layover before taking a second connecting flight to the destination country.  Once inside a U.S. airport, terrorists would smuggle weapons onto aircraft by hiding weapons inside camera equipment and children's toys.  During flight, the terrorists would overpower the crew, take control, and fly the hijacked aircraft into U.S. east coast targets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Memo Warns Of New Plots To Hijack Jets | url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64871-2003Jul29?language=printer | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ The Washington Post] | accessdate=2003-07-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The plan was in direct violation of the [[Aviation and Transportation Security Act]] (Public Law 107–71), Title 49 of the [[United States Code]] Section 44917:  “Deployment of Federal Air Marshals... [on] nonstop, long distance flights, such as those targeted on [[September 11]], [[2001]], should be a priority.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= 49 U.S.C § 44917 | url=http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode49/usc_sec_49_00044917----000-.html | date=[[2001-11-19]] | work=[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ Cornell Law School] | accessdate=2007-05-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights' | url=http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ NBC News] | accessdate=2006-10-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [[&amp;quot;Sensitive Security Information&amp;quot;]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to its reversal&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label | url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r | date=[[2006-10-30]] | work=[http://www.washingtontimes.com/ The Washington Times] | accessdate=2007-05-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports | url=http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&amp;amp;&amp;amp; | date=[[2003-07-30]] | work=[http://clinton.senate.gov/ Official Site of the U.S. Senate] | accessdate=2007-06-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed.  The TSA's spokeman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, &amp;quot;Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air marshals back to long flights | url=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm | date=[[2003-08-01]] | work=[http://www.usatoday.com/ USA Today] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive' | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://www.cbsnews.com/ Associated Press] | accessdate=2007-05-10}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= TSA's [[August 31]], [[2006]] Final Order on Sensitive Security Information | url=http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://www.pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information | url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf | date=[[2005-07-01]] | work=[http://www.gao.gov/ Government Accountability Office] | accessdate=2007-05-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as &amp;quot;sensitive&amp;quot; to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security | url=http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html | date=[[2007-05-10]] | work=[http://pogo.org/ Project On Government Oversight] | accessdate=2007-05-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
After four years of active duty, Robert MacLean (born on [[March 8]], [[1970]], in [[Torrejon Air Base]], [[Madrid, Spain]]) elected not to reenlist and was honorably discharged from the [[U.S. Air Force]].  MacLean then entered the [[U.S. Border Patrol]] and served almost six years until he transferred to the U.S. [[Federal Air Marshal Service]] (FAMS) immediately after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].  MacLean was in the first FAMS class to graduate after the [[September 11]], [[2001]] Attacks&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title= Air marshal’s firing prompts whistleblower suit | url=http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2331806 | date=[[2006-11-07]] | work=[http://www.federaltimes.com/ Federal Times] | accessdate=2006-11-07}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice's Arguments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DHS and DOJ make four general arguments:  1) That Robert MacLean was trained in the safeguarding of SSI and that the information he disclosed did not require any markings despite [[Code of Federal Regulations]] (CFRs) that mandate the contrary.  2) He caused the TSA to disrupt their operations in order to cancel their plan to remove FAMs from nonstop, long distance flights.  3) Had TSA decided continue with their plan despite public and congressional outrage, MacLean's disclosure would have alerted all terrorists that nonstop, long distance flight would not be staffed with FAMs. (4) Finally, the government argues that front-line law enforcement field officers do not have the authority, education or experience to determine if policies endanger public safety and national security - that such determinations can only be made by the agency's senior executives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Uncategorised people]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Inmidata</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>