Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Star

2013-01-07T01:56:59Z

IshmealD: /* Spectral Type */

[[Image:Moooghj.jpg|300px|right]]'''Stars''' are extremely large, luminous bodies of gas. They are the most obvious features found in the [[universe]]. They are principally composed of [[hydrogen]] that is undergoing nuclear [[fusion]] to become [[helium]]. Our sun, ([[Sol]]), is the nearest star to Earth, at a distance averaging 93 million miles. The Earth orbits the sun in a period of approximately 365.25 days, and this defines the [[year]]. The diameter of the sun, which is a typical star, is about 870,000 miles and its power output is about 1026 watts. The temperature inside the sun is estimated to be in excess of ten million degrees, and this is hot enough for [[nuclear reactions]] to occur.

In Genesis, the stars were made in the fourth day<ref>[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Gen 1:14]</ref>, and their number is compared to the number of descendants of Abraham<ref>[Genesis 9-16 (Translated)|Gen 15:5]; an earlier count of the number of descendants of Abraham was the number of grains of dust of the Earth (Gen 13:16)</ref>.

The [[Bible]] implies that the number of stars is virtually countless<ref>[Jeremiah 27-34 (Translated)|Jeremiah 33:22]; similarly to Genesis, the number of descendants of David is compared to the number of stars and the number of grains of sand</ref>, but for many years this was not accepted. [[Hipparchus]] in 128 B.C. stated there were 1,026 stars in the sky. [[Kepler]] in 1600 A.D. did his own count and found the number to be 1,005. Today, thanks to telescopes (especially the [[Hubble Telescope]]) showing many stars previously too dim to be seen, the current estimate is 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (7*1025).<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey Star survey reaches 70 sextillion</ref>

==Measuring stellar positions==
=== Distances ===
The oldest method of measuring the distance from our solar system to a distant star is the parallax method. To use this method, astronomers measure the right ascension on the sky of the star at two times of the year, half a year apart. The two measurements will differ by a small angle with respect to the most distant stars in that region of the sky. Exactly half this angle is the ''parallax angle'', having symbol ''p''. This is the angle that the star makes with the [[sun]] and the position of the [[earth]] at a right angle with that star.<ref name=Britannica3>"[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-52809/star Star: Determining stellar distances]." ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Accessed 21 Apr. 2008</ref> The distance s of the star, in astronomical units (AU), is:

<math>\,\!s = \cot p</math>

In the range of the very small angles typically encountered, the cotangent of the angle measure (in radians) is very nearly equal to the reciprocal, and thus:

<math>\,\!s \approx \frac {180 \times 3600}{p \times \pi}</math>

where p is measured in seconds of arc.

The cotangent of one second (1/3600 of a degree) of arc is approximately 206,264.81. No parallax angle for any star will be larger than one second. Therefore astronomers initially defined a unit of stellar distance, the ''parsec'' (symbol pc), from this relationship. One parsec is the distance corresponding to a parallax angle of one second of arc. Hence:

<math>1 pc \approx 206,264.81 AU</math>

However, the error of measurement of parallax angle is 0.005 arc seconds, and beyond a distance of 100 parsecs, this error becomes significant. 700 stars are near enough to measure their distances directly by using parallax.<ref name=Britannica3/> To measure distances further out than this, astronomers typically use absolute and relative magnitudes, or they apply [[Hubble Law|Hubble's Law]] to the star's estimated [[redshift]].

=== Positions in sky ===
The most common system for describing the position of a star in the sky is the equatorial system. This system uses two coordinates:
# Right ascension on the sky, or the number of hours required for the earth to rotate before an observer can see the star at its highest point in the sky. The zero for right ascension is midnight on the day of the vernal equinox.<ref name=WeissteinRA>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/RightAscension.html Right Ascension]." ''Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy'', 2007. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>
# Declination, or the north-south angle between the star and the celestial equator.<ref name=WeissteinD>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/Declination.html Declination]." ''Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy'', 2007. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>

===Proper motion===
All stars move, but the most distant stars are considered "fixed" because their motion would be undetectable. The ''proper motion'' (symbol m) of any star is the angular velocity of its position across the sky. This describes the motion at right angles to the line of sight of the observer. To convert this to actual ''tangential velocity'', multiply the tangent of this angular velocity by the star's distance.

The motion ''in'' line of sight, or ''radial velocity'', is currently determined from spectral shift.

== Measuring stellar magnitudes ==
The visual magnitude system is defined as follows: a star of any given magnitude is about 2.512 times as bright as is a star of the next magnitude. [[Hipparchus]] devised the magnitude system, and [[Ptolemy]] refined it further. By convention, an arbitrary sample of the twenty brightest stars that they could observe were assigned to the first magnitude, and the stars that they could barely observe were assigned to the sixth. Sixth-magnitude stars are actually 100 times less bright than first-magnitude stars. Magnitude levels between these extremes are assigned on a logarithmic scale. Thus, given two stars of brightness l1 and l2, their magnitude difference (V2 - V1) relates to their respective brightnesses in this way:<ref name=Haworth>Haworth, David. "[http://www.stargazing.net/david/constel/magnitude.html Star Magnitudes]." ''[http://www.stargazing.net/david/index.html Observational Astronomy]'', 2003. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>

<math>\,\!V_2 - V_1 = 2.5 \times \log \frac{l_1}{l_2}</math>

The ''absolute'' magnitude of any star is the visual magnitude that it would have if it were ten parsecs distant. To convert apparent magnitude V to actual magnitude M, use this formula:

<math>\,\!M = V + 5 \times \log \frac{s_0}{s}</math>

where s0 is the standard distance. This distance is ten parsecs, or about 2,062,650 AU.

Brightness declines with the square of distance, and squares correspond to doubling of logarithms. One must then multiply that result by 2.5 to stay within the magnitude scale.

== Stellar colors and spectra ==
The ''color'' of a star is objectively quantifiable. To determine color, astronomers view the star through a variety of colored filters and compute ''color indices'' as the differences in apparent magnitudes through the various filters. Stellar colors vary, in order from the coolest to the hottest, from red to yellow to white to blue-white to blue or violet. This is the same gamut of colors that a black body shows as its temperature rises.

In addition, each star has a unique ''spectrum'', which depends on the gases and other elements that it contains, and their distribution. A spectrum can serve two purposes:
# It can serve as a unique signature for the star, to distinguish it from other stars.
# It can provide information on the star's radial velocity vis-à-vis the earth.

To accomplish the latter, astronomers note the placement of various lines in the spectrum and then determine the star's likely constituent elements from the spacing of those lines. Lines that are out of ''place'' are shifted, either toward the blue or toward the red. Nearly all stellar spectra are shifted toward the red; this [[redshift]] indicates a recession, either of the star or of the part of space where the star resides.<ref>Some [[cosmology|cosmological]] models call for an expansion of space itself, not merely the matter in it. According to these models, a redshifted star is in a part of space that was still expanding as the incident light was generated.</ref>

=== Spectral Type ===
[[Image:Hertzsprung-Russell.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram]]
In the late nineteenth century, astronomers at the [[Harvard University]] observatory developed the first classification scheme for stellar spectra that would become known as the '''Harvard spectral classification'''. In 1924, Annie Jump Cannon<ref name=Cannon>"[http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/teachers/lifecycles/LC_main_p8.html Life Cycles of Stars]." ''Goddard Space Flight Center'', November 21, 2002. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref> refined the classification from the original A-Q gamut to the familiar "OBAFGKM" gamut. Astronomers have since added classes to this range at the high end and the low.<ref name=Swinburne>"[http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/H/Harvard+Spectral+Classification Harvard Spectral Classification]." ''Study Astronomy Online at Swinburne University''. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref><ref name=Seattle>Irizarry, David. "[http://www.seattleastro.org/webfoot/feb00/pg2.htm The Secrets of the Harvard Classification Revealed]." ''The Webfooted Astronomer'', Seattle Astronomical Society, February 2000. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref>

The classic Harvard spectral classes are O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. Each of these has ten subclasses, varying from 0 to 9 in order of decreasing stellar temperature. Thus, for example, the next class after an F9 star is a G0 star. Recently astronomers recognized one class of stars hotter than the O stars (the very hot Wolf-Rayet stars) and three classes of stars (the N, R, and S stars) cooler than the M stars. (Some astronomers include the N and R stars in one class, the C stars, for the carbon compounds that their spectra exhibit). There is an additional spectral class for the smallest and dimmest stars (Class L), that still fuse hydrogen, although warmer [[brown dwarf|brown dwarfs]] also fall into this class (but referred to as L dwarfs instead of L stars). Cooler still methane dwarfs are classified as [[Brown_dwarf#Spectral_class_T|T dwarfs]].<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007arXiv0704.1522K</ref> A proposed spectral class Y has been suggested for the coolest brown dwarfs, which also have a different spectra from T class dwarfs.<ref>http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0607305</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Class
! [[Temperature]]
! Color
! [[Element]]s
! Notes
|-
| W
| 106,000 K
| Violet
| Ionized [[helium]], [[carbon]], [[oxygen]], [[nitrogen]]
| Wolf-Rayet stars. Additional subclasses include WC (overabundant carbon and oxygen) and WN (overabundant nitrogen)
|-
| O
| 30,000 K
| Blue
| Ionized [[Helium]], [[nitrogen]], [[oxygen]]
| Weak Balmer lines ([[hydrogen]]) at higher subclasses.
|-
| B
| 13,000 K to 20,000 K
| Blue
| Neutral helium; ionized [[silicon]], oxygen and [[magnesium]].
| [[Hydrogen]] (Balmer lines) appear in strength
|-
| A
| 75,00 to 10,000 K
| Blue-white
| [[Hydrogen]], [[calcium]], [[helium]]
| Balmer lines dominant. K lines (calcium) now appearing.
|-
| F
| 7,000K to 9,000K
| White-yellow
| [[Hydrogen]], [[calcium]], [[iron]], [[manganese]], [[sodium]]
| Balmer lines weakening. K lines stronger.
|-
| G
| 5,200 to 6,000K
| Yellow
| [[Calcium]], [[hydrogen]], other [[metal]]s
| Balmer lines weaker still. K lines dominant. Metals now appearing. Contains the sun. <ref>www.astrometry.org/starclassification.php

</ref>
|-
| K
| 4000K to 5100K
| Orange
| [[Calcium]], neutral metals, [[titanium oxide]]
|
|-
| M
| 3000K
| Red
| [[Titanium oxide]], [[iron iodide]]
| Strong molecular bands
|-
| N,R
| 2300K to 2600K
| Red
| [[Carbon]] compounds
|
|-
| S
| 2300K to 2600K
| Red
| [[Hydrogen]], [[zirconium oxide]]
|
|}

In the early twentieth century, astronomers Ejnar Hertzsprung and Henry Norris Russell prepared the first plot of stellar temperature as a function of luminosity, or brightness. Other astronomers have since prepared versions of the diagram showing absolute magnitude as a function of color. This diagram shows a "main sequence" of stars for which brightness declines as temperature increases, but also shows a "white dwarf" population of very hot but dim stars, and the population of giants and supergiants that are far brighter than their temperatures would indicate.<ref name=HR>"[http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/H/Hertzsprung-Russell+Diagram Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram]." ''Study Astronomy Online at Swinburne University''. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref>

===Luminosity Class===

In addition to the spectral type, astronomers today add a ''luminosity class'', which varies from 0 to VII in order of decreasing brightness. This is known as the '''Yerkes spectral classification'''. This classification was first developed by astronomers William Wilson Morgan, Phillip C. Keenan and Edith Kellman at the [[Yerkes Observatory]] in 1943.<ref>Morgan, William Wilson; Keenan, Philip Childs; Kellman, Edith (1943), "An atlas of stellar spectra, with an outline of spectral classification", Chicago, Ill., The University of Chicago press</ref> Adding a luminosity classification added a second dimension to the single dimensional [[Harvard University|Harvard]] spectral sequence. Today the two classifications of temperature and luminosity is used to give the spectral sequence for a star.<ref>http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1973ARA%26A..11...29M&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=449aa1cc7c02014</ref> For example, the [[sun]]'s spectral type is G2 and its luminosity class is V (five).

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Luminosity Class
! Star Type
|-
| 0 - 0Ia - Ia0
| hypergiants
|-
| Ia - Iab - Ib
| [[Supergiant|supergiants]]
|-
| IIa - IIab - IIb
| bright giants
|-
| IIIa - IIIab - IIIb
| giants
|-
| IVa - IVab - IVb
| subgiants
|-
| Va - Vab - Vb
| main sequence stars (dwarfs)
|-
| VI
| subdwarfs
|-
| VII
| [[white dwarf|white dwarfs]]
|}

==Variable stars==

Some stars vary in brightness and are known as variable stars. The star [[Algol]] in the constellation of Perseus can drop from its normal magnitude of 2.3 to magnitude 3.5. This is now known to be caused by a dim companion star orbiting Algol, which occasionally passes between Algol and the Earth, blocking some of the light. Other variable stars vary in brightness due to actual variations in the luminosity of the star itself. The time taken from one maximum brightness to the next one is called the '''period'''. The most famous of the variable stars is delta Cepheus, the first-found member of the [[Cepheid]] group of variable stars. In 1908 [[Henrietta Swan Leavitt]] noticed that the variable stars in the [[Magellenic Clouds]] (two nearby galaxies in the [[Local Group]]) had a relationship between their period and their apparent brightness. At that time galaxies outside our own (the [[Milky Way]]) had been discovered, but it was not possible to measure the distances to them. It was soon realized that the variable stars in the Magellenic Cloud were of the Cepheid type. Since Cepheid variables also occur in our [[galaxy]] it was possible measure their distances and thus convert (using the inverse square law) Leavitt's relationship between apparent brightness and period to one of actual brightness and period. Once this formula was discovered, it became possible to apply to Cepheids of unknown distance. By observing their periods, their actual brightness can be calculated and, by the inverse square law, their distance. Through observations of Cepheids in [[globular cluster]]s (compact bunches of stars) in our galaxy it was shown that our galaxy is about 300,000 light-years in diameter.

== Energy production ==
[[Image:CNO_Cycle.png|300px|thumb|CNO cycle]]The [[Sun]], and stars as massive as the Sun or less massive, commonly use a [[nuclear fusion]] process called the '''proton-proton chain reaction''' to produce [[energy]]. A full description of that process appears [[Sun#Energy production and transport|here]].

In 1938 and 1989, two physicists, Carl F. von Weizsäcker<ref name=Weiz>Von Weizsäcker, Carl F. ''Physik. Zeitsch.'' 39:633, 1938.</ref> and Hans Bethe<ref name=Bethe>Bethe, Hans A. "[http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v55/i5/p434_1 Energy Production in Stars]." ''Physics Review'' 55(5):434-456, 1939. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.55.434}} Accessed June 27, 2008.</ref> independently proposed a [[nuclear fusion]] process, the '''Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle''', by which stars more massive than the [[sun]] produce energy. In this process, stars convert [[hydrogen]] to [[helium]] using [[carbon]], [[nitrogen]], and [[oxygen]] as catalysts. The reaction also produces two [[positron]]s and two [[electron neutrino]]s.<ref name=Krane>Krane, Kenneth S. ''Introductory Nuclear Physics''. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988, p. 537. ISBN 9780471805533</ref>

The equations for the cycle are as follows:

<math>{}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{13}_7\!\mbox{N} + \gamma + \mbox{1.95 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{13}_7\!\mbox{N} \to {}^{13}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^0_1\!e^+ + {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{2.22 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{13}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{14}_7\!\mbox{N} + \gamma + \mbox{7.54 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{14}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{15}_8\!\mbox{O} + \gamma + \mbox{7.35 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{15}_8\!\mbox{O} \to {}^{15}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^0_1\!e^+ + {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{2.75 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{15}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^4_2\!\mbox{He} + \mbox{4.96 MeV}</math>

The last reaction reproduces the <math>{}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C}</math> nucleus that the first reaction consumes. The end result of this process is:

<math>\mbox{4} {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^4_2\!\mbox{He} + \mbox{2} {}^0_1\!e^+ + \mbox{2} {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{3} \gamma + \mbox{26.8 MeV}</math>

Rarely, this cycle branches into a somewhat different cycle involving [[fluorine]], and that second cycle is thought to branch again in some of the most massive stars.

==Origins==
Christian scientists assert that [[materialism|materialistic]] explanations of the origin of stars are errant and contra-evidence and reports of stars forming are invalid. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/403/</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/stars.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences21.html</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/399.asp#55</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i1/feedback.asp</ref> In addition, creationists cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of star formation are inadequate:

“We don’t understand how a single star forms, yet we want to understand how 10 billion stars form.” Carlos Frenk, as quoted by Robert Irion, “Surveys Scour the Cosmic Deep,” Science, Vol. 303, 19 March 2004, p. 1750. <ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/303/5665/1750</ref>

“Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” Rogier A. Windhorst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, “A Matter of Timing,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p. 30. <ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992SciAm.267Q..26P</ref>

==References==
<references/>

==Other References==
The ''Observer's Book of Astronomy'', by Patrick Moore. Published by Frederick Warne and Co. 1967.

The ''Cosmological Distance Ladder'', by Michael Rowan-Robinson. Published by Freeman. 1985.

[[category:astronomy]]

Star

2013-01-07T01:56:39Z

IshmealD: /* Spectral Type */

[[Image:Moooghj.jpg|300px|right]]'''Stars''' are extremely large, luminous bodies of gas. They are the most obvious features found in the [[universe]]. They are principally composed of [[hydrogen]] that is undergoing nuclear [[fusion]] to become [[helium]]. Our sun, ([[Sol]]), is the nearest star to Earth, at a distance averaging 93 million miles. The Earth orbits the sun in a period of approximately 365.25 days, and this defines the [[year]]. The diameter of the sun, which is a typical star, is about 870,000 miles and its power output is about 1026 watts. The temperature inside the sun is estimated to be in excess of ten million degrees, and this is hot enough for [[nuclear reactions]] to occur.

In Genesis, the stars were made in the fourth day<ref>[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Gen 1:14]</ref>, and their number is compared to the number of descendants of Abraham<ref>[Genesis 9-16 (Translated)|Gen 15:5]; an earlier count of the number of descendants of Abraham was the number of grains of dust of the Earth (Gen 13:16)</ref>.

The [[Bible]] implies that the number of stars is virtually countless<ref>[Jeremiah 27-34 (Translated)|Jeremiah 33:22]; similarly to Genesis, the number of descendants of David is compared to the number of stars and the number of grains of sand</ref>, but for many years this was not accepted. [[Hipparchus]] in 128 B.C. stated there were 1,026 stars in the sky. [[Kepler]] in 1600 A.D. did his own count and found the number to be 1,005. Today, thanks to telescopes (especially the [[Hubble Telescope]]) showing many stars previously too dim to be seen, the current estimate is 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (7*1025).<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey Star survey reaches 70 sextillion</ref>

==Measuring stellar positions==
=== Distances ===
The oldest method of measuring the distance from our solar system to a distant star is the parallax method. To use this method, astronomers measure the right ascension on the sky of the star at two times of the year, half a year apart. The two measurements will differ by a small angle with respect to the most distant stars in that region of the sky. Exactly half this angle is the ''parallax angle'', having symbol ''p''. This is the angle that the star makes with the [[sun]] and the position of the [[earth]] at a right angle with that star.<ref name=Britannica3>"[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-52809/star Star: Determining stellar distances]." ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Accessed 21 Apr. 2008</ref> The distance s of the star, in astronomical units (AU), is:

<math>\,\!s = \cot p</math>

In the range of the very small angles typically encountered, the cotangent of the angle measure (in radians) is very nearly equal to the reciprocal, and thus:

<math>\,\!s \approx \frac {180 \times 3600}{p \times \pi}</math>

where p is measured in seconds of arc.

The cotangent of one second (1/3600 of a degree) of arc is approximately 206,264.81. No parallax angle for any star will be larger than one second. Therefore astronomers initially defined a unit of stellar distance, the ''parsec'' (symbol pc), from this relationship. One parsec is the distance corresponding to a parallax angle of one second of arc. Hence:

<math>1 pc \approx 206,264.81 AU</math>

However, the error of measurement of parallax angle is 0.005 arc seconds, and beyond a distance of 100 parsecs, this error becomes significant. 700 stars are near enough to measure their distances directly by using parallax.<ref name=Britannica3/> To measure distances further out than this, astronomers typically use absolute and relative magnitudes, or they apply [[Hubble Law|Hubble's Law]] to the star's estimated [[redshift]].

=== Positions in sky ===
The most common system for describing the position of a star in the sky is the equatorial system. This system uses two coordinates:
# Right ascension on the sky, or the number of hours required for the earth to rotate before an observer can see the star at its highest point in the sky. The zero for right ascension is midnight on the day of the vernal equinox.<ref name=WeissteinRA>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/RightAscension.html Right Ascension]." ''Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy'', 2007. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>
# Declination, or the north-south angle between the star and the celestial equator.<ref name=WeissteinD>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/Declination.html Declination]." ''Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy'', 2007. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>

===Proper motion===
All stars move, but the most distant stars are considered "fixed" because their motion would be undetectable. The ''proper motion'' (symbol m) of any star is the angular velocity of its position across the sky. This describes the motion at right angles to the line of sight of the observer. To convert this to actual ''tangential velocity'', multiply the tangent of this angular velocity by the star's distance.

The motion ''in'' line of sight, or ''radial velocity'', is currently determined from spectral shift.

== Measuring stellar magnitudes ==
The visual magnitude system is defined as follows: a star of any given magnitude is about 2.512 times as bright as is a star of the next magnitude. [[Hipparchus]] devised the magnitude system, and [[Ptolemy]] refined it further. By convention, an arbitrary sample of the twenty brightest stars that they could observe were assigned to the first magnitude, and the stars that they could barely observe were assigned to the sixth. Sixth-magnitude stars are actually 100 times less bright than first-magnitude stars. Magnitude levels between these extremes are assigned on a logarithmic scale. Thus, given two stars of brightness l1 and l2, their magnitude difference (V2 - V1) relates to their respective brightnesses in this way:<ref name=Haworth>Haworth, David. "[http://www.stargazing.net/david/constel/magnitude.html Star Magnitudes]." ''[http://www.stargazing.net/david/index.html Observational Astronomy]'', 2003. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>

<math>\,\!V_2 - V_1 = 2.5 \times \log \frac{l_1}{l_2}</math>

The ''absolute'' magnitude of any star is the visual magnitude that it would have if it were ten parsecs distant. To convert apparent magnitude V to actual magnitude M, use this formula:

<math>\,\!M = V + 5 \times \log \frac{s_0}{s}</math>

where s0 is the standard distance. This distance is ten parsecs, or about 2,062,650 AU.

Brightness declines with the square of distance, and squares correspond to doubling of logarithms. One must then multiply that result by 2.5 to stay within the magnitude scale.

== Stellar colors and spectra ==
The ''color'' of a star is objectively quantifiable. To determine color, astronomers view the star through a variety of colored filters and compute ''color indices'' as the differences in apparent magnitudes through the various filters. Stellar colors vary, in order from the coolest to the hottest, from red to yellow to white to blue-white to blue or violet. This is the same gamut of colors that a black body shows as its temperature rises.

In addition, each star has a unique ''spectrum'', which depends on the gases and other elements that it contains, and their distribution. A spectrum can serve two purposes:
# It can serve as a unique signature for the star, to distinguish it from other stars.
# It can provide information on the star's radial velocity vis-à-vis the earth.

To accomplish the latter, astronomers note the placement of various lines in the spectrum and then determine the star's likely constituent elements from the spacing of those lines. Lines that are out of ''place'' are shifted, either toward the blue or toward the red. Nearly all stellar spectra are shifted toward the red; this [[redshift]] indicates a recession, either of the star or of the part of space where the star resides.<ref>Some [[cosmology|cosmological]] models call for an expansion of space itself, not merely the matter in it. According to these models, a redshifted star is in a part of space that was still expanding as the incident light was generated.</ref>

=== Spectral Type ===
[[Image:Hertzsprung-Russell.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram]]
In the late nineteenth century, astronomers at the [[Harvard University]] observatory developed the first classification scheme for stellar spectra that would become known as the '''Harvard spectral classification'''. In 1924, Annie Jump Cannon<ref name=Cannon>"[http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/teachers/lifecycles/LC_main_p8.html Life Cycles of Stars]." ''Goddard Space Flight Center'', November 21, 2002. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref> refined the classification from the original A-Q gamut to the familiar "OBAFGKM" gamut. Astronomers have since added classes to this range at the high end and the low.<ref name=Swinburne>"[http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/H/Harvard+Spectral+Classification Harvard Spectral Classification]." ''Study Astronomy Online at Swinburne University''. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref><ref name=Seattle>Irizarry, David. "[http://www.seattleastro.org/webfoot/feb00/pg2.htm The Secrets of the Harvard Classification Revealed]." ''The Webfooted Astronomer'', Seattle Astronomical Society, February 2000. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref>

The classic Harvard spectral classes are O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. Each of these has ten subclasses, varying from 0 to 9 in order of decreasing stellar temperature. Thus, for example, the next class after an F9 star is a G0 star. Recently astronomers recognized one class of stars hotter than the O stars (the very hot Wolf-Rayet stars) and three classes of stars (the N, R, and S stars) cooler than the M stars. (Some astronomers include the N and R stars in one class, the C stars, for the carbon compounds that their spectra exhibit). There is an additional spectral class for the smallest and dimmest stars (Class L), that still fuse hydrogen, although warmer [[brown dwarf|brown dwarfs]] also fall into this class (but referred to as L dwarfs instead of L stars). Cooler still methane dwarfs are classified as [[Brown_dwarf#Spectral_class_T|T dwarfs]].<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007arXiv0704.1522K</ref> A proposed spectral class Y has been suggested for the coolest brown dwarfs, which also have a different spectra from T class dwarfs.<ref>http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0607305</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Class
! [[Temperature]]
! Color
! [[Element]]s
! Notes
|-
| W
| 106,000 K
| Violet
| Ionized [[helium]], [[carbon]], [[oxygen]], [[nitrogen]]
| Wolf-Rayet stars. Additional subclasses include WC (overabundant carbon and oxygen) and WN (overabundant nitrogen)
|-
| O
| 30,000 K
| Blue
| Ionized [[Helium]], [[nitrogen]], [[oxygen]]
| Weak Balmer lines ([[hydrogen]]) at higher subclasses.
|-
| B
| 13,000 K to 20,000 K
| Blue
| Neutral helium; ionized [[silicon]], oxygen and [[magnesium]].
| [[Hydrogen]] (Balmer lines) appear in strength
|-
| A
| 75,00 to 10,000 K
| Blue-white
| [[Hydrogen]], [[calcium]], [[helium]]
| Balmer lines dominant. K lines (calcium) now appearing.
|-
| F
| 7,000K to 9,000K
| White-yellow
| [[Hydrogen]], [[calcium]], [[iron]], [[manganese]], [[sodium]]
| Balmer lines weakening. K lines stronger.
|-
| G
| 5,200 to 6,000K
| Yellow
| [[Calcium]], [[hydrogen]], other [[metal]]s
| Balmer lines weaker still. K lines dominant. Metals now appearing.Contains the sun. <ref>www.astrometry.org/starclassification.php

</ref>
|-
| K
| 4000K to 5100K
| Orange
| [[Calcium]], neutral metals, [[titanium oxide]]
|
|-
| M
| 3000K
| Red
| [[Titanium oxide]], [[iron iodide]]
| Strong molecular bands
|-
| N,R
| 2300K to 2600K
| Red
| [[Carbon]] compounds
|
|-
| S
| 2300K to 2600K
| Red
| [[Hydrogen]], [[zirconium oxide]]
|
|}

In the early twentieth century, astronomers Ejnar Hertzsprung and Henry Norris Russell prepared the first plot of stellar temperature as a function of luminosity, or brightness. Other astronomers have since prepared versions of the diagram showing absolute magnitude as a function of color. This diagram shows a "main sequence" of stars for which brightness declines as temperature increases, but also shows a "white dwarf" population of very hot but dim stars, and the population of giants and supergiants that are far brighter than their temperatures would indicate.<ref name=HR>"[http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/H/Hertzsprung-Russell+Diagram Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram]." ''Study Astronomy Online at Swinburne University''. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref>

===Luminosity Class===

In addition to the spectral type, astronomers today add a ''luminosity class'', which varies from 0 to VII in order of decreasing brightness. This is known as the '''Yerkes spectral classification'''. This classification was first developed by astronomers William Wilson Morgan, Phillip C. Keenan and Edith Kellman at the [[Yerkes Observatory]] in 1943.<ref>Morgan, William Wilson; Keenan, Philip Childs; Kellman, Edith (1943), "An atlas of stellar spectra, with an outline of spectral classification", Chicago, Ill., The University of Chicago press</ref> Adding a luminosity classification added a second dimension to the single dimensional [[Harvard University|Harvard]] spectral sequence. Today the two classifications of temperature and luminosity is used to give the spectral sequence for a star.<ref>http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1973ARA%26A..11...29M&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=449aa1cc7c02014</ref> For example, the [[sun]]'s spectral type is G2 and its luminosity class is V (five).

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Luminosity Class
! Star Type
|-
| 0 - 0Ia - Ia0
| hypergiants
|-
| Ia - Iab - Ib
| [[Supergiant|supergiants]]
|-
| IIa - IIab - IIb
| bright giants
|-
| IIIa - IIIab - IIIb
| giants
|-
| IVa - IVab - IVb
| subgiants
|-
| Va - Vab - Vb
| main sequence stars (dwarfs)
|-
| VI
| subdwarfs
|-
| VII
| [[white dwarf|white dwarfs]]
|}

==Variable stars==

Some stars vary in brightness and are known as variable stars. The star [[Algol]] in the constellation of Perseus can drop from its normal magnitude of 2.3 to magnitude 3.5. This is now known to be caused by a dim companion star orbiting Algol, which occasionally passes between Algol and the Earth, blocking some of the light. Other variable stars vary in brightness due to actual variations in the luminosity of the star itself. The time taken from one maximum brightness to the next one is called the '''period'''. The most famous of the variable stars is delta Cepheus, the first-found member of the [[Cepheid]] group of variable stars. In 1908 [[Henrietta Swan Leavitt]] noticed that the variable stars in the [[Magellenic Clouds]] (two nearby galaxies in the [[Local Group]]) had a relationship between their period and their apparent brightness. At that time galaxies outside our own (the [[Milky Way]]) had been discovered, but it was not possible to measure the distances to them. It was soon realized that the variable stars in the Magellenic Cloud were of the Cepheid type. Since Cepheid variables also occur in our [[galaxy]] it was possible measure their distances and thus convert (using the inverse square law) Leavitt's relationship between apparent brightness and period to one of actual brightness and period. Once this formula was discovered, it became possible to apply to Cepheids of unknown distance. By observing their periods, their actual brightness can be calculated and, by the inverse square law, their distance. Through observations of Cepheids in [[globular cluster]]s (compact bunches of stars) in our galaxy it was shown that our galaxy is about 300,000 light-years in diameter.

== Energy production ==
[[Image:CNO_Cycle.png|300px|thumb|CNO cycle]]The [[Sun]], and stars as massive as the Sun or less massive, commonly use a [[nuclear fusion]] process called the '''proton-proton chain reaction''' to produce [[energy]]. A full description of that process appears [[Sun#Energy production and transport|here]].

In 1938 and 1989, two physicists, Carl F. von Weizsäcker<ref name=Weiz>Von Weizsäcker, Carl F. ''Physik. Zeitsch.'' 39:633, 1938.</ref> and Hans Bethe<ref name=Bethe>Bethe, Hans A. "[http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v55/i5/p434_1 Energy Production in Stars]." ''Physics Review'' 55(5):434-456, 1939. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.55.434}} Accessed June 27, 2008.</ref> independently proposed a [[nuclear fusion]] process, the '''Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle''', by which stars more massive than the [[sun]] produce energy. In this process, stars convert [[hydrogen]] to [[helium]] using [[carbon]], [[nitrogen]], and [[oxygen]] as catalysts. The reaction also produces two [[positron]]s and two [[electron neutrino]]s.<ref name=Krane>Krane, Kenneth S. ''Introductory Nuclear Physics''. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988, p. 537. ISBN 9780471805533</ref>

The equations for the cycle are as follows:

<math>{}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{13}_7\!\mbox{N} + \gamma + \mbox{1.95 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{13}_7\!\mbox{N} \to {}^{13}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^0_1\!e^+ + {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{2.22 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{13}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{14}_7\!\mbox{N} + \gamma + \mbox{7.54 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{14}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{15}_8\!\mbox{O} + \gamma + \mbox{7.35 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{15}_8\!\mbox{O} \to {}^{15}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^0_1\!e^+ + {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{2.75 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{15}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^4_2\!\mbox{He} + \mbox{4.96 MeV}</math>

The last reaction reproduces the <math>{}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C}</math> nucleus that the first reaction consumes. The end result of this process is:

<math>\mbox{4} {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^4_2\!\mbox{He} + \mbox{2} {}^0_1\!e^+ + \mbox{2} {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{3} \gamma + \mbox{26.8 MeV}</math>

Rarely, this cycle branches into a somewhat different cycle involving [[fluorine]], and that second cycle is thought to branch again in some of the most massive stars.

==Origins==
Christian scientists assert that [[materialism|materialistic]] explanations of the origin of stars are errant and contra-evidence and reports of stars forming are invalid. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/403/</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/stars.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences21.html</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/399.asp#55</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i1/feedback.asp</ref> In addition, creationists cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of star formation are inadequate:

“We don’t understand how a single star forms, yet we want to understand how 10 billion stars form.” Carlos Frenk, as quoted by Robert Irion, “Surveys Scour the Cosmic Deep,” Science, Vol. 303, 19 March 2004, p. 1750. <ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/303/5665/1750</ref>

“Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” Rogier A. Windhorst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, “A Matter of Timing,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p. 30. <ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992SciAm.267Q..26P</ref>

==References==
<references/>

==Other References==
The ''Observer's Book of Astronomy'', by Patrick Moore. Published by Frederick Warne and Co. 1967.

The ''Cosmological Distance Ladder'', by Michael Rowan-Robinson. Published by Freeman. 1985.

[[category:astronomy]]

Star

2013-01-07T01:55:33Z

IshmealD: /* Spectral Type */

[[Image:Moooghj.jpg|300px|right]]'''Stars''' are extremely large, luminous bodies of gas. They are the most obvious features found in the [[universe]]. They are principally composed of [[hydrogen]] that is undergoing nuclear [[fusion]] to become [[helium]]. Our sun, ([[Sol]]), is the nearest star to Earth, at a distance averaging 93 million miles. The Earth orbits the sun in a period of approximately 365.25 days, and this defines the [[year]]. The diameter of the sun, which is a typical star, is about 870,000 miles and its power output is about 1026 watts. The temperature inside the sun is estimated to be in excess of ten million degrees, and this is hot enough for [[nuclear reactions]] to occur.

In Genesis, the stars were made in the fourth day<ref>[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Gen 1:14]</ref>, and their number is compared to the number of descendants of Abraham<ref>[Genesis 9-16 (Translated)|Gen 15:5]; an earlier count of the number of descendants of Abraham was the number of grains of dust of the Earth (Gen 13:16)</ref>.

The [[Bible]] implies that the number of stars is virtually countless<ref>[Jeremiah 27-34 (Translated)|Jeremiah 33:22]; similarly to Genesis, the number of descendants of David is compared to the number of stars and the number of grains of sand</ref>, but for many years this was not accepted. [[Hipparchus]] in 128 B.C. stated there were 1,026 stars in the sky. [[Kepler]] in 1600 A.D. did his own count and found the number to be 1,005. Today, thanks to telescopes (especially the [[Hubble Telescope]]) showing many stars previously too dim to be seen, the current estimate is 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (7*1025).<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey Star survey reaches 70 sextillion</ref>

==Measuring stellar positions==
=== Distances ===
The oldest method of measuring the distance from our solar system to a distant star is the parallax method. To use this method, astronomers measure the right ascension on the sky of the star at two times of the year, half a year apart. The two measurements will differ by a small angle with respect to the most distant stars in that region of the sky. Exactly half this angle is the ''parallax angle'', having symbol ''p''. This is the angle that the star makes with the [[sun]] and the position of the [[earth]] at a right angle with that star.<ref name=Britannica3>"[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-52809/star Star: Determining stellar distances]." ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Accessed 21 Apr. 2008</ref> The distance s of the star, in astronomical units (AU), is:

<math>\,\!s = \cot p</math>

In the range of the very small angles typically encountered, the cotangent of the angle measure (in radians) is very nearly equal to the reciprocal, and thus:

<math>\,\!s \approx \frac {180 \times 3600}{p \times \pi}</math>

where p is measured in seconds of arc.

The cotangent of one second (1/3600 of a degree) of arc is approximately 206,264.81. No parallax angle for any star will be larger than one second. Therefore astronomers initially defined a unit of stellar distance, the ''parsec'' (symbol pc), from this relationship. One parsec is the distance corresponding to a parallax angle of one second of arc. Hence:

<math>1 pc \approx 206,264.81 AU</math>

However, the error of measurement of parallax angle is 0.005 arc seconds, and beyond a distance of 100 parsecs, this error becomes significant. 700 stars are near enough to measure their distances directly by using parallax.<ref name=Britannica3/> To measure distances further out than this, astronomers typically use absolute and relative magnitudes, or they apply [[Hubble Law|Hubble's Law]] to the star's estimated [[redshift]].

=== Positions in sky ===
The most common system for describing the position of a star in the sky is the equatorial system. This system uses two coordinates:
# Right ascension on the sky, or the number of hours required for the earth to rotate before an observer can see the star at its highest point in the sky. The zero for right ascension is midnight on the day of the vernal equinox.<ref name=WeissteinRA>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/RightAscension.html Right Ascension]." ''Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy'', 2007. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>
# Declination, or the north-south angle between the star and the celestial equator.<ref name=WeissteinD>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/Declination.html Declination]." ''Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy'', 2007. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>

===Proper motion===
All stars move, but the most distant stars are considered "fixed" because their motion would be undetectable. The ''proper motion'' (symbol m) of any star is the angular velocity of its position across the sky. This describes the motion at right angles to the line of sight of the observer. To convert this to actual ''tangential velocity'', multiply the tangent of this angular velocity by the star's distance.

The motion ''in'' line of sight, or ''radial velocity'', is currently determined from spectral shift.

== Measuring stellar magnitudes ==
The visual magnitude system is defined as follows: a star of any given magnitude is about 2.512 times as bright as is a star of the next magnitude. [[Hipparchus]] devised the magnitude system, and [[Ptolemy]] refined it further. By convention, an arbitrary sample of the twenty brightest stars that they could observe were assigned to the first magnitude, and the stars that they could barely observe were assigned to the sixth. Sixth-magnitude stars are actually 100 times less bright than first-magnitude stars. Magnitude levels between these extremes are assigned on a logarithmic scale. Thus, given two stars of brightness l1 and l2, their magnitude difference (V2 - V1) relates to their respective brightnesses in this way:<ref name=Haworth>Haworth, David. "[http://www.stargazing.net/david/constel/magnitude.html Star Magnitudes]." ''[http://www.stargazing.net/david/index.html Observational Astronomy]'', 2003. Accessed April 21, 2008.</ref>

<math>\,\!V_2 - V_1 = 2.5 \times \log \frac{l_1}{l_2}</math>

The ''absolute'' magnitude of any star is the visual magnitude that it would have if it were ten parsecs distant. To convert apparent magnitude V to actual magnitude M, use this formula:

<math>\,\!M = V + 5 \times \log \frac{s_0}{s}</math>

where s0 is the standard distance. This distance is ten parsecs, or about 2,062,650 AU.

Brightness declines with the square of distance, and squares correspond to doubling of logarithms. One must then multiply that result by 2.5 to stay within the magnitude scale.

== Stellar colors and spectra ==
The ''color'' of a star is objectively quantifiable. To determine color, astronomers view the star through a variety of colored filters and compute ''color indices'' as the differences in apparent magnitudes through the various filters. Stellar colors vary, in order from the coolest to the hottest, from red to yellow to white to blue-white to blue or violet. This is the same gamut of colors that a black body shows as its temperature rises.

In addition, each star has a unique ''spectrum'', which depends on the gases and other elements that it contains, and their distribution. A spectrum can serve two purposes:
# It can serve as a unique signature for the star, to distinguish it from other stars.
# It can provide information on the star's radial velocity vis-à-vis the earth.

To accomplish the latter, astronomers note the placement of various lines in the spectrum and then determine the star's likely constituent elements from the spacing of those lines. Lines that are out of ''place'' are shifted, either toward the blue or toward the red. Nearly all stellar spectra are shifted toward the red; this [[redshift]] indicates a recession, either of the star or of the part of space where the star resides.<ref>Some [[cosmology|cosmological]] models call for an expansion of space itself, not merely the matter in it. According to these models, a redshifted star is in a part of space that was still expanding as the incident light was generated.</ref>

=== Spectral Type ===
[[Image:Hertzsprung-Russell.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram]]
In the late nineteenth century, astronomers at the [[Harvard University]] observatory developed the first classification scheme for stellar spectra that would become known as the '''Harvard spectral classification'''. In 1924, Annie Jump Cannon<ref name=Cannon>"[http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/teachers/lifecycles/LC_main_p8.html Life Cycles of Stars]." ''Goddard Space Flight Center'', November 21, 2002. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref> refined the classification from the original A-Q gamut to the familiar "OBAFGKM" gamut. Astronomers have since added classes to this range at the high end and the low.<ref name=Swinburne>"[http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/H/Harvard+Spectral+Classification Harvard Spectral Classification]." ''Study Astronomy Online at Swinburne University''. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref><ref name=Seattle>Irizarry, David. "[http://www.seattleastro.org/webfoot/feb00/pg2.htm The Secrets of the Harvard Classification Revealed]." ''The Webfooted Astronomer'', Seattle Astronomical Society, February 2000. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref>

The classic Harvard spectral classes are O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. Each of these has ten subclasses, varying from 0 to 9 in order of decreasing stellar temperature. Thus, for example, the next class after an F9 star is a G0 star. Recently astronomers recognized one class of stars hotter than the O stars (the very hot Wolf-Rayet stars) and three classes of stars (the N, R, and S stars) cooler than the M stars. (Some astronomers include the N and R stars in one class, the C stars, for the carbon compounds that their spectra exhibit). There is an additional spectral class for the smallest and dimmest stars (Class L), that still fuse hydrogen, although warmer [[brown dwarf|brown dwarfs]] also fall into this class (but referred to as L dwarfs instead of L stars). Cooler still methane dwarfs are classified as [[Brown_dwarf#Spectral_class_T|T dwarfs]].<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007arXiv0704.1522K</ref> A proposed spectral class Y has been suggested for the coolest brown dwarfs, which also have a different spectra from T class dwarfs.<ref>http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0607305</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Class
! [[Temperature]]
! Color
! [[Element]]s
! Notes
|-
| W
| 106,000 K
| Violet
| Ionized [[helium]], [[carbon]], [[oxygen]], [[nitrogen]]
| Wolf-Rayet stars. Additional subclasses include WC (overabundant carbon and oxygen) and WN (overabundant nitrogen)
|-
| O
| 30,000 K
| Blue
| Ionized [[Helium]], [[nitrogen]], [[oxygen]]
| Weak Balmer lines ([[hydrogen]]) at higher subclasses.
|-
| B
| 13,000 K to 20,000 K
| Blue
| Neutral helium; ionized [[silicon]], oxygen and [[magnesium]].
| [[Hydrogen]] (Balmer lines) appear in strength
|-
| A
| 75,00 to 10,000 K
| Blue-white
| [[Hydrogen]], [[calcium]], [[helium]]
| Balmer lines dominant. K lines (calcium) now appearing.
|-
| F
| 7,000K to 9,000K
| White-yellow
| [[Hydrogen]], [[calcium]], [[iron]], [[manganese]], [[sodium]]
| Balmer lines weakening. K lines stronger.
|-
| G
| 5,200 to 6,000K
| Yellow
| [[Calcium]], [[hydrogen]], other [[metal]]s
| Balmer lines weaker still. K lines dominant. Metals now appearing.Contains the sun.
|-
| K
| 4000K to 5100K
| Orange
| [[Calcium]], neutral metals, [[titanium oxide]]
|
|-
| M
| 3000K
| Red
| [[Titanium oxide]], [[iron iodide]]
| Strong molecular bands
|-
| N,R
| 2300K to 2600K
| Red
| [[Carbon]] compounds
|
|-
| S
| 2300K to 2600K
| Red
| [[Hydrogen]], [[zirconium oxide]]
|
|}

In the early twentieth century, astronomers Ejnar Hertzsprung and Henry Norris Russell prepared the first plot of stellar temperature as a function of luminosity, or brightness. Other astronomers have since prepared versions of the diagram showing absolute magnitude as a function of color. This diagram shows a "main sequence" of stars for which brightness declines as temperature increases, but also shows a "white dwarf" population of very hot but dim stars, and the population of giants and supergiants that are far brighter than their temperatures would indicate.<ref name=HR>"[http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/H/Hertzsprung-Russell+Diagram Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram]." ''Study Astronomy Online at Swinburne University''. Accessed April 22, 2008.</ref>

===Luminosity Class===

In addition to the spectral type, astronomers today add a ''luminosity class'', which varies from 0 to VII in order of decreasing brightness. This is known as the '''Yerkes spectral classification'''. This classification was first developed by astronomers William Wilson Morgan, Phillip C. Keenan and Edith Kellman at the [[Yerkes Observatory]] in 1943.<ref>Morgan, William Wilson; Keenan, Philip Childs; Kellman, Edith (1943), "An atlas of stellar spectra, with an outline of spectral classification", Chicago, Ill., The University of Chicago press</ref> Adding a luminosity classification added a second dimension to the single dimensional [[Harvard University|Harvard]] spectral sequence. Today the two classifications of temperature and luminosity is used to give the spectral sequence for a star.<ref>http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1973ARA%26A..11...29M&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=449aa1cc7c02014</ref> For example, the [[sun]]'s spectral type is G2 and its luminosity class is V (five).

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Luminosity Class
! Star Type
|-
| 0 - 0Ia - Ia0
| hypergiants
|-
| Ia - Iab - Ib
| [[Supergiant|supergiants]]
|-
| IIa - IIab - IIb
| bright giants
|-
| IIIa - IIIab - IIIb
| giants
|-
| IVa - IVab - IVb
| subgiants
|-
| Va - Vab - Vb
| main sequence stars (dwarfs)
|-
| VI
| subdwarfs
|-
| VII
| [[white dwarf|white dwarfs]]
|}

==Variable stars==

Some stars vary in brightness and are known as variable stars. The star [[Algol]] in the constellation of Perseus can drop from its normal magnitude of 2.3 to magnitude 3.5. This is now known to be caused by a dim companion star orbiting Algol, which occasionally passes between Algol and the Earth, blocking some of the light. Other variable stars vary in brightness due to actual variations in the luminosity of the star itself. The time taken from one maximum brightness to the next one is called the '''period'''. The most famous of the variable stars is delta Cepheus, the first-found member of the [[Cepheid]] group of variable stars. In 1908 [[Henrietta Swan Leavitt]] noticed that the variable stars in the [[Magellenic Clouds]] (two nearby galaxies in the [[Local Group]]) had a relationship between their period and their apparent brightness. At that time galaxies outside our own (the [[Milky Way]]) had been discovered, but it was not possible to measure the distances to them. It was soon realized that the variable stars in the Magellenic Cloud were of the Cepheid type. Since Cepheid variables also occur in our [[galaxy]] it was possible measure their distances and thus convert (using the inverse square law) Leavitt's relationship between apparent brightness and period to one of actual brightness and period. Once this formula was discovered, it became possible to apply to Cepheids of unknown distance. By observing their periods, their actual brightness can be calculated and, by the inverse square law, their distance. Through observations of Cepheids in [[globular cluster]]s (compact bunches of stars) in our galaxy it was shown that our galaxy is about 300,000 light-years in diameter.

== Energy production ==
[[Image:CNO_Cycle.png|300px|thumb|CNO cycle]]The [[Sun]], and stars as massive as the Sun or less massive, commonly use a [[nuclear fusion]] process called the '''proton-proton chain reaction''' to produce [[energy]]. A full description of that process appears [[Sun#Energy production and transport|here]].

In 1938 and 1989, two physicists, Carl F. von Weizsäcker<ref name=Weiz>Von Weizsäcker, Carl F. ''Physik. Zeitsch.'' 39:633, 1938.</ref> and Hans Bethe<ref name=Bethe>Bethe, Hans A. "[http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v55/i5/p434_1 Energy Production in Stars]." ''Physics Review'' 55(5):434-456, 1939. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.55.434}} Accessed June 27, 2008.</ref> independently proposed a [[nuclear fusion]] process, the '''Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle''', by which stars more massive than the [[sun]] produce energy. In this process, stars convert [[hydrogen]] to [[helium]] using [[carbon]], [[nitrogen]], and [[oxygen]] as catalysts. The reaction also produces two [[positron]]s and two [[electron neutrino]]s.<ref name=Krane>Krane, Kenneth S. ''Introductory Nuclear Physics''. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988, p. 537. ISBN 9780471805533</ref>

The equations for the cycle are as follows:

<math>{}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{13}_7\!\mbox{N} + \gamma + \mbox{1.95 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{13}_7\!\mbox{N} \to {}^{13}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^0_1\!e^+ + {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{2.22 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{13}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{14}_7\!\mbox{N} + \gamma + \mbox{7.54 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{14}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{15}_8\!\mbox{O} + \gamma + \mbox{7.35 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{15}_8\!\mbox{O} \to {}^{15}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^0_1\!e^+ + {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{2.75 MeV}</math>

<math>{}^{15}_7\!\mbox{N} + {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C} + {}^4_2\!\mbox{He} + \mbox{4.96 MeV}</math>

The last reaction reproduces the <math>{}^{12}_6\!\mbox{C}</math> nucleus that the first reaction consumes. The end result of this process is:

<math>\mbox{4} {}^1_1\!\mbox{H} \to {}^4_2\!\mbox{He} + \mbox{2} {}^0_1\!e^+ + \mbox{2} {}^0_0\!\nu_e + \mbox{3} \gamma + \mbox{26.8 MeV}</math>

Rarely, this cycle branches into a somewhat different cycle involving [[fluorine]], and that second cycle is thought to branch again in some of the most massive stars.

==Origins==
Christian scientists assert that [[materialism|materialistic]] explanations of the origin of stars are errant and contra-evidence and reports of stars forming are invalid. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/403/</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/stars.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences21.html</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/399.asp#55</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i1/feedback.asp</ref> In addition, creationists cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of star formation are inadequate:

“We don’t understand how a single star forms, yet we want to understand how 10 billion stars form.” Carlos Frenk, as quoted by Robert Irion, “Surveys Scour the Cosmic Deep,” Science, Vol. 303, 19 March 2004, p. 1750. <ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/303/5665/1750</ref>

“Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” Rogier A. Windhorst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, “A Matter of Timing,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p. 30. <ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992SciAm.267Q..26P</ref>

==References==
<references/>

==Other References==
The ''Observer's Book of Astronomy'', by Patrick Moore. Published by Frederick Warne and Co. 1967.

The ''Cosmological Distance Ladder'', by Michael Rowan-Robinson. Published by Freeman. 1985.

[[category:astronomy]]

Neanderthal

2013-01-07T01:28:22Z

IshmealD:

A '''Neanderthal''', ''Homo sapiens neanderthalensis'' or ''Homo neanderthalensis'', is a member of a species of extinct hominid of which many fossils have been found.
The first fossil hominid to be identified as such, and the best known, it was named after remains found in the [[Neander]] valley in western [[Germany]] in 1856. ''Neanderthal'' is found throughout [[Europe]] and the [[Near East]]. Neanderthals are associated with the Middle [[Palaeolithic]] [[Mousterian]] tool tradition. <ref>Thieme, Hartmut, "Lower to Middle Paleolithic Hunting Spears, and Lithic Tool Traditions" Archaeology, 13, 2003.</ref>

==Anatomy==
[[Image:Human_Skeleton.jpg|right|thumb|310px|Neanderthal (left) and modern human (right) skeletons, showing both the similarities and the differences between the two.]]
A Neanderthal was a fully erect biped of stocky build, with a long low skull, prominent brow ridges and [[occiputs]], and a jutting face.
Neanderthals were on average more muscular than modern humans and lacked a chin. Presumably, they were social creatures living in small tribes, like other humans of their time. Neanderthals also possessed the skull features required for speech <ref>Neanderthal Myths ''Neanderthal, Channel 4'' [http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/N/neanderthal/]</ref>.
The popular impression of them as stooping brutes is incorrect and derives from the original poor reconstruction in the Neander valley. It has also been suggested that the first individual found suffered from vitamin D deficiency ([[rickets]]) or [[syphilis]].
Whether Neanderthals did interbreed with anatomically modern humans, or if this was even possible, is not agreed.
Neantherthals had a gene associated with language and speech, that had the same variation as found in modern humans but is different from the equivalent gene found in [[chimpanzee]]s.<ref>Swaminathan, N., [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=cave-speak-did-neandertal Cave speak: Did Neandertals talk?], Scientific American News, 19th October 2007</ref>

Neanderthal also had an average brain size of 1,450 cc with a range from 1,125cc to 1,750cc. The average modern human brain size is 1,330cc. Many Neanderthal fossils have been recovered showing massive amounts of wear on the teeth, which to many physical anthropologists suggests that the teeth were regularly used for gripping skins during stretching and working.<ref>Klein, Richard. The Dawn of Human Culture. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 2002.</ref>

==Society==

The [[Institute for Creation Research]] (ICR) wrote the following regarding Neanderthal man:
{{cquote|No other organisms, either living or fossil, made tools to make other complex tools, buried their dead, had controlled use of fire, practiced religious ceremonies, used complex syntax in their spoken grammar, and played musical instruments, yet we know from their fossils that Neanderthal engaged in all.<ref>http://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}}

Neanderthals were probably about as intelligent as an average modern human, they were social creatures living in small tribes, like the other human species of their time. Studies suggest that Neanderthal tribes interacted less with each other than other tribes did. {{fact}}

Neanderthals had the ability to make fire. They never invented projectile weapons, but relied on spears with limited range, even when facing large animals. It was likely their robust bodies that enabled them to use this hunting style that was considered far too dangerous by other humans. {{fact}} A common hunting technique was to drive prey animals off a cliff, or to corner their prey and finish them off with spears, much like today's [[Pygmy|Pygmies]] hunt elephants.{{fact}}

Evidence of care for the elderly and the sick has been found in the Shanidar Caves in Iraq,<ref>Neanderthals on Trial ''University of Minnesota, Duluth'' [http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth1602/video/On_Trial.html]</ref> they also used medicinal plants, made clothes out of animal skins and used stone tools. A find at rock shelters in La Ferrassie, [[France]] indicates elaborate burials, suggesting some sort of [[religion]]<ref>Early Man ''Andy Simmons'' [http://www-staff.it.uts.edu.au/~simmonds/Sophy/early_man.htm]</ref>.
Interestingly archaeologists have never found Neanderthal cave drawings, although hand-crafted art has been found.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3256228.stm Neanderthal 'face' found in Loire], ''BBC News''</ref>

==History according to Creationists==

[[Young Earth Creationism|Young Earth Creationists]] and scientists believe that Neanderthals were as fully human as we are.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n2/worthy-ancestors</ref> This is based on evidence such as:

* The brain size of Neanderthal meets or exceeds that of modern humans.
* There is no evidence to suggest that Neanderthals could '''not''' speak like modern humans.
* The skeletons of modern humans and Neanderthal are identical in bone count and types. The size differences between the two can be seen today in humans.
* DNA evidence shows Neanderthals to be very similar to humans.
-Some DNA from Neanderthals is believed to make up all non-african [[genomes]]. <ref>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100506-science-neanderthals-humans-mated-interbred-dna-gene/</ref>

The Institute for Creation Research explains about the DNA evidence:
{{cquote|The recent recovery of mitochondrial DNA from the right humerus of the Neanderthal remains from Neander Valley near Düsseldorf, Germany, has been of great interest to evolutionists and creationists alike (Krings et al., 1997). Based on the comparison of modern human mt DNA and that taken from the Neanderthal, evolutionists have argued that the "Neanderthal line" diverged from the line of "hominids" leading to modern humans about 600,000 years B.P. without contributing mt DNA to modern Homo sapiens populations. This strongly implies that Neanderthals were a different species from modern humans. However, the above noted interpretation is not scientifically justified. Lubenow (1998) has pointed out that the use of a statistical average of a large modern human sample (994 sequences from 1669 modern humans) compared with the mt DNA sequence from one Neanderthal is not appropriate. Furthermore, the mt DNA sequence differences among modern humans range from 1 to 24 substitutions, with an average of eight substitutions, whereas, the mt DNA sequence differences between modern man and the Neanderthal specimen range from 22 to 36 substitutions, placing Neanderthals, at worst, on the fringes of the modern range. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}}

Harsh conditions due to the [[Ice Age]] after the [[flood|Great flood]] caused human groups to migrate and splinter off to survive. Neanderthal type traits were best suited for the harsh cold. Malnutrition and longer life spans could cause features similar to those seen in Neanderthal skeletons. <ref>Neanderthals are still human [http://www.icr.org/article/468/]</ref>

== History according to Evolutionists ==
[[Image:Neanderthal_sites.gif|right|thumb|350px|The last refuges of the Neanderthals, with evolutionary dates.]]

Evolutionists claim that Neanderthal man developed from ''Homo erectus'', though the widespread distribution of intermediate forms hinders an attempt to resolve any single geographical locality as the place of development. The fate of Neanderthals is equally hard to determine, but they are believed to have gone extinct between 28,000 and 24,000 years ago <ref>Neanderthals' 'last rock refuge' ''BBC News'' [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5343266.stm]</ref>, but how or why is unknown: many theories have been presented, these are the most common ones:
* Climate changes. <ref> Climate Change Pushed Neanderthal Into Extinction In Iberian Peninsula ''GeneticArchaeology.com'' [http://www.geneticarchaeology.com/Research/Climate_Change_Pushed_Neanderthal_Into_Extinction_In_Iberian_Peninsula.asp]</ref>
* Competition with other humans over resources.<ref>Did Use of Free Trade Cause Neanderthal Extinction? ''Newswise'' [http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/510666/]</ref>
* Their reliance on meat.<ref>Meaty appetites may have caused Neanderthal extinction ''Science & Spirit'' [http://www.science-spirit.org/archive_cm_detail.php?new_id=317]</ref>
* Assimilation into the larger human population.<ref>The assimilation model, modern human origins in Europe and the extinction of Neanderthals ''Fred H. Smith, Ivor Jankovic, Ivor Karavanic'' [http://www.ffzg.hr/arheo/prap/the%20assimilation%20model.pdf]</ref>
* Being genocidally wiped out by other humans.<ref>Odd man out: Neanderthals and modern humans ''British Archaeology'' [http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba51/ba51feat.html]</ref>
* [http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100506-science-neanderthals-humans-mated-interbred-dna-gene/]

Evolutionists consider it likely that a combination of at least some of these factors led to the extinction of the Neanderthals.

Neanderthal Man is not considered to be a direct ancestor of modern humans, but its remains are examples of [[transitional fossil]]s along a subsidiary branch, an evolutionary dead end.{{fact}}

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

[[Category:Primates]]
[[Category:Hominid]]

Neanderthal

2013-01-07T01:27:47Z

IshmealD:

Neanderthal

2013-01-07T01:14:29Z

IshmealD:

A '''Neanderthal''', ''Homo sapiens neanderthalensis'' or ''Homo neanderthalensis'', is a member of a species of extinct hominid of which many fossils have been found.
The first fossil hominid to be identified as such, and the best known, it was named after remains found in the [[Neander]] valley in western [[Germany]] in 1856. ''Neanderthal'' is found throughout [[Europe]] and the [[Near East]]. Neanderthals are associated with the Middle [[Palaeolithic]] [[Mousterian]] tool tradition. <ref>Thieme, Hartmut, "Lower to Middle Paleolithic Hunting Spears, and Lithic Tool Traditions" Archaeology, 13, 2003.</ref>

==Anatomy==
[[Image:Human_Skeleton.jpg|right|thumb|310px|Neanderthal (left) and modern human (right) skeletons, showing both the similarities and the differences between the two.]]
A Neanderthal was a fully erect biped of stocky build, with a long low skull, prominent brow ridges and [[occiputs]], and a jutting face.
Neanderthals were on average more muscular than modern humans and lacked a chin. Presumably, they were social creatures living in small tribes, like other humans of their time. Neanderthals also possessed the skull features required for speech <ref>Neanderthal Myths ''Neanderthal, Channel 4'' [http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/N/neanderthal/]</ref>.
The popular impression of them as stooping brutes is incorrect and derives from the original poor reconstruction in the Neander valley. It has also been suggested that the first individual found suffered from vitamin D deficiency ([[rickets]]) or [[syphilis]].
Whether Neanderthals did interbreed with anatomically modern humans, or if this was even possible, is not agreed.
Neantherthals had a gene associated with language and speech, that had the same variation as found in modern humans but is different from the equivalent gene found in [[chimpanzee]]s.<ref>Swaminathan, N., [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=cave-speak-did-neandertal Cave speak: Did Neandertals talk?], Scientific American News, 19th October 2007</ref>

Neanderthal also had an average brain size of 1,450 cc with a range from 1,125cc to 1,750cc. The average modern human brain size is 1,330cc. Many Neanderthal fossils have been recovered showing massive amounts of wear on the teeth, which to many physical anthropologists suggests that the teeth were regularly used for gripping skins during stretching and working.<ref>Klein, Richard. The Dawn of Human Culture. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 2002.</ref>

==Society==

The [[Institute for Creation Research]] (ICR) wrote the following regarding Neanderthal man:
{{cquote|No other organisms, either living or fossil, made tools to make other complex tools, buried their dead, had controlled use of fire, practiced religious ceremonies, used complex syntax in their spoken grammar, and played musical instruments, yet we know from their fossils that Neanderthal engaged in all.<ref>http://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}}

Neanderthals were probably about as intelligent as an average modern human, they were social creatures living in small tribes, like the other human species of their time. Studies suggest that Neanderthal tribes interacted less with each other than other tribes did. {{fact}}

Neanderthals had the ability to make fire. They never invented projectile weapons, but relied on spears with limited range, even when facing large animals. It was likely their robust bodies that enabled them to use this hunting style that was considered far too dangerous by other humans. {{fact}} A common hunting technique was to drive prey animals off a cliff, or to corner their prey and finish them off with spears, much like today's [[Pygmy|Pygmies]] hunt elephants.{{fact}}

Evidence of care for the elderly and the sick has been found in the Shanidar Caves in Iraq,<ref>Neanderthals on Trial ''University of Minnesota, Duluth'' [http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth1602/video/On_Trial.html]</ref> they also used medicinal plants, made clothes out of animal skins and used stone tools. A find at rock shelters in La Ferrassie, [[France]] indicates elaborate burials, suggesting some sort of [[religion]]<ref>Early Man ''Andy Simmons'' [http://www-staff.it.uts.edu.au/~simmonds/Sophy/early_man.htm]</ref>.
Interestingly archaeologists have never found Neanderthal cave drawings, although hand-crafted art has been found.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3256228.stm Neanderthal 'face' found in Loire], ''BBC News''</ref>

==History according to Creationists==

[[Young Earth Creationism|Young Earth Creationists]] and scientists believe that Neanderthals were as fully human as we are.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n2/worthy-ancestors</ref> This is based on evidence such as:

* The brain size of Neanderthal meets or exceeds that of modern humans.
* There is no evidence to suggest that Neanderthals could '''not''' speak like modern humans.
* The skeletons of modern humans and Neanderthal are identical in bone count and types. The size differences between the two can be seen today in humans.
* DNA evidence shows Neanderthals to be very similar to humans.

The Institute for Creation Research explains about the DNA evidence:
{{cquote|The recent recovery of mitochondrial DNA from the right humerus of the Neanderthal remains from Neander Valley near Düsseldorf, Germany, has been of great interest to evolutionists and creationists alike (Krings et al., 1997). Based on the comparison of modern human mt DNA and that taken from the Neanderthal, evolutionists have argued that the "Neanderthal line" diverged from the line of "hominids" leading to modern humans about 600,000 years B.P. without contributing mt DNA to modern Homo sapiens populations. This strongly implies that Neanderthals were a different species from modern humans. However, the above noted interpretation is not scientifically justified. Lubenow (1998) has pointed out that the use of a statistical average of a large modern human sample (994 sequences from 1669 modern humans) compared with the mt DNA sequence from one Neanderthal is not appropriate. Furthermore, the mt DNA sequence differences among modern humans range from 1 to 24 substitutions, with an average of eight substitutions, whereas, the mt DNA sequence differences between modern man and the Neanderthal specimen range from 22 to 36 substitutions, placing Neanderthals, at worst, on the fringes of the modern range. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}}

Harsh conditions due to the [[Ice Age]] after the [[flood|Great flood]] caused human groups to migrate and splinter off to survive. Neanderthal type traits were best suited for the harsh cold. Malnutrition and longer life spans could cause features similar to those seen in Neanderthal skeletons. <ref>Neanderthals are still human [http://www.icr.org/article/468/]</ref>

== History according to Evolutionists ==
[[Image:Neanderthal_sites.gif|right|thumb|350px|The last refuges of the Neanderthals, with evolutionary dates.]]

Evolutionists claim that Neanderthal man developed from ''Homo erectus'', though the widespread distribution of intermediate forms hinders an attempt to resolve any single geographical locality as the place of development. The fate of Neanderthals is equally hard to determine, but they are believed to have gone extinct between 28,000 and 24,000 years ago <ref>Neanderthals' 'last rock refuge' ''BBC News'' [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5343266.stm]</ref>, but how or why is unknown: many theories have been presented, these are the most common ones:
* Climate changes. <ref> Climate Change Pushed Neanderthal Into Extinction In Iberian Peninsula ''GeneticArchaeology.com'' [http://www.geneticarchaeology.com/Research/Climate_Change_Pushed_Neanderthal_Into_Extinction_In_Iberian_Peninsula.asp]</ref>
* Competition with other humans over resources.<ref>Did Use of Free Trade Cause Neanderthal Extinction? ''Newswise'' [http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/510666/]</ref>
* Their reliance on meat.<ref>Meaty appetites may have caused Neanderthal extinction ''Science & Spirit'' [http://www.science-spirit.org/archive_cm_detail.php?new_id=317]</ref>
* Assimilation into the larger human population.<ref>The assimilation model, modern human origins in Europe and the extinction of Neanderthals ''Fred H. Smith, Ivor Jankovic, Ivor Karavanic'' [http://www.ffzg.hr/arheo/prap/the%20assimilation%20model.pdf]</ref>
* Being genocidally wiped out by other humans.<ref>Odd man out: Neanderthals and modern humans ''British Archaeology'' [http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba51/ba51feat.html]</ref>

Evolutionists consider it likely that a combination of at least some of these factors led to the extinction of the Neanderthals.

Neanderthal Man is not considered to be a direct ancestor of modern humans, but its remains are examples of [[transitional fossil]]s along a subsidiary branch, an evolutionary dead end.{{fact}}

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

[[Category:Primates]]
[[Category:Hominid]]

Asparagus

2013-01-07T00:59:58Z

IshmealD: Created page with "Asparagus refers either to the culinary vegetable, or to the perennial plant origination from Europe which produces it. The early-spring stalks are harvested, at about eight ..."

Asparagus refers either to the culinary vegetable, or to the perennial plant origination from [[Europe]] which produces it. The early-spring stalks are harvested, at about eight inches in height.

Source:

Ogden, Shepherd. The New American Kitchen Garden. Minneapolis, MN: National Home Gardening Club, 1997. Print.

Anti-Americanism

2013-01-06T23:33:51Z

IshmealD: Removal of likely vandalism, and recommend checking by editors for continuing cleanup.

'''Anti-Americanism''' is hostility towards the people, policies and culture of [[United States of America]].

Many Islamist regimes are noted for their anti-American sentiments- often disguised as criticism of the War on Terror. Those with anti-American sentiments often lack the liberty celebrated in America and therefore hate America because of the freedoms available to the American people, and many are liberals who believe that other nations are equal to or beyond America in their achievements.

"Anti-Americanism is not only the world’s most pernicious and ubiquitous ideology — it is also the most tenacious. In fact, it has taken on some aspects of a religion." <ref>[http://www.nysun.com/news/america-s-moral-authority</ref> America’s Moral Aut''Anti-Americanism''' is deserved hostility towards the people, policies and culture of damned [[United States of America]].

"Anti-Americanism is not only the world’s most pernicious and ubiquitous ideology — it is also the most tenacious. In fact, it has taken on some aspects of a religion." <ref>[http://www.nysun.com/news/america-s-moral-authority America’s Moral Authority], Daniel Johnson, ''[[New York Sun|The New York Sun]]'', May 1, 2008</ref> It has has not - money grubbing is condemned by the bible

"Anti-Americanism is the prevailing disease of intellectuals today." <ref>[http://www.forbes.com/global/2003/0721/017.html Anti-Americanism Is Racist Envy], Paul Johnson, ''[[Forbes|Forbes.com]]'', July 21, 2003</ref> Rightfully so. Americans are loudmouthed, stupid idiots whose nation is cursed by the Lord forever

We can only pray that Washington and the other gods of the Yankees suffer as much in hell as they inflicted upon the Earth - oathbreakers.

YET EVEN AMERICANS CAN BE SAVED, REPENT YE AND BELIEVE THE GOSPEL.
==References==
{{reflist|2}}

==External Links==
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/anti-americanism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Anti-Americanism], [[Accuracy In Media]]

[[Category:United States]]
[[Category:Liberalism]]