<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JackHT</id>
		<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JackHT"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JackHT"/>
		<updated>2026-05-19T21:34:02Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nationalization&amp;diff=770684</id>
		<title>Nationalization</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nationalization&amp;diff=770684"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T22:42:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: National socialism pic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg‎|thumb|215px|right|Leader of the German [[Nazi|'''National Socialist''']] party]]‎'''Nationalization''' means the permanent takeover of a private business by the government. Sometimes it is voluntary with full payment to the previous owners, and sometimes it is involuntary with no payment or worthless bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Socialist]] governments nationalized industry in Britain, France and other countries after World War II.  In most cases they have been privatized, that is returned to private ownership. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temporary seizures during an emergency is not usually considered nationalization.&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
After World War II socialist governments came to power in several countries and set about nationalizing heavy industry, especially coal. The goal was not efficiency but to put the union leaders (who had a loud voice in socialist parties) in a position to dictate terms for the benefit of the workers, rather than the nation as a whole.  In no case were the workers put in control, though [[Tito]] talked of that in Yugoslavia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After World War II many Europeans wanted strong state action to insure economic development since they blamed the timidity and conservatism of private capital for the economic dislocations of the 1930s. Nationalization in Britain, concerted economic planning in France, and a low-key economic management in Germany all grew out of this same impulse. Many of the smaller nations also utilized central economic planning in some form. The common features of all the planning systems were an increase in cooperation between government and the private sector, and the guiding of the economy along selected growth lines. Economic planning became the province of the technocrats rather than of the political &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Sima Lieberman, &amp;quot;The Ideological Foundations of Western European Planning&amp;quot; ''Journal of European Economic History'' 1981 10(2): 343-371. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
The history of British nationalization began with 1) program formation during the 1930s and World War II; 2)  widespread implementation in 1945-47; 3) scaled-back activities in 1947-51; 4) stagnation and program retreat in 1951-79; 5) privatization under [[Margaret Thatcher]]'s government after 1979-1990; 6) Labour acceptance of privitization under [[Tony Blair]]. &lt;br /&gt;
====Planning====&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : '''[[Economic planning]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 1900-18 demands for nationalization were a byword of the British Left, especially socialist organizations. The dominant influences were Fabianism and syndicalism. The interwar period saw a number of demands for nationalization and redefinitions of proposals. However, the Labour governments of 1924 and 1929-31 failed to implement nationalization. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the end of the 19th century, British miners had loudly advocated the nationalization of mines. Before the 1930s the Miners' Federation supported a workers' control model; however, between 1931 and 1936, it abandoned this model of nationalization and adopted a public corporation model. Political pragmatism, efficiency, and the existence of a public corporation model induced the Miners' Federation to favor such a switch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====World War II and after====&lt;br /&gt;
The mobilization of the national economy during World War II was immediately followed by the ascendancy of the Labour Party from 1945 to 1951. The Labour platform of nationalization, planning, and creation of a welfare state was translated into the nationalization of national and local transport, coal, oil and gas, electricity generation and distribution, iron and steel, automotive industries, aerospace, air and sea ports, and many other less high profile industries such as sugar distribution, hotel chains and the then fledgling semiconductor industry in the mid to late 1970s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This program led to stagnation and inefficiencies in the economy that led to nationalized industries requiring grater and grater subsidies to stay in business, often despite the same sector in free-market countries booming at the same time. Such subsidies were sometimes disguised as market loans or investments. These inefficiencies played a large part in the labour defeat, and the beginning of conservative rule and Margaret Thatchers reforms at the close of the 1970's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nationalization===&lt;br /&gt;
The guiding principle in [[nationalization]] was that  industry would be operated just like a private business using &amp;quot;public corporations&amp;quot; and not directly by government departments. The old pre-1930 ideas of workers' control were rejected. The old management remained in place. The old owners received treasury bonds covering the full market value of their holdings. The role of labour was unchanged; collective bargaining remained the basis of negotiation with management and the right to strike was unaffected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nationalization was voted by Parliament for  the Bank of England, the coal mining industry, hospitals, the iron and steel industry, communications, gas and electricity production, and railways. The owners were compensated.  He began a comprehensive system of social security in 1948 with the National Insurance Act; the Industrial Injuries Act; the National Assistance Act (ending the old Poor Law); and the National Health Service Act, which provided free medical care for all.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debate over iron and steel in 1947, however, marked the start of a retreat for the idea of nationalization. It confirmed the government's reluctance to move into manufacturing industry. Thereafter, there were no major new proposals until 1951, and the question did not return to the forefront of politics until after 1974. British nationalization operated in a very different political context and arose from somewhat different ideological roots than that in France or Austria for example, although in each country it was much affected by external financial pressures after 1945. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The postwar nationalization programme fell far short of the ideals of the leftists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1951 to 1979 Britain experienced an economic decline while nationalizations increased and the [[welfare state]] was expanded. Significantly, however, a number of denationalizations also occurred during this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Coal===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of Europe's coal mines passed into effective government control, with the British coal mines being nationalised under the control of the National Coal Board.  The plan to nationalize the coal mines had been accepted in principle by owners and miners alike before the elections of 1945. The owners were paid £165,000,000. The government set up the National Coal Board to manage the coal mines; and it loaned it £150,000,000 to modernize the system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general condition of the coal industry has been unsatisfactory for many years, with poor productivity. In 1945 there were 28% more workers in the coal mines than in 1890, but the annual output was only 8% greater. Young people avoided the pits; between 1931 and 1945 the percentage of miners more than 40 years old rose from 35% to 43%, and 24,000 over 65 years old. The number of surface workers decreased between 1938 and 1945 by only 3,200, but in that same time the number of underground workers declined by 69,600, substantially altering the balance of labor in the mines. That accidents, breakdowns, and repairs in the mines were nearly twice as costly in terms of production in 1945 as they had been in 1939 was probably a by-product of the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Output in 1946 averaged 3,300,000 tons weekly. By summer 1946 it was clear that Britain was facing a coal shortage for the upcoming winter with stock piles 5 million tons too low.  Nationalization exposed both a lack of preparation for public ownership and a failure to stabilize the industry in advance of the change. Also lacking were any significant incentives to maintain or increase coal production to meet demand.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark Tookey, &amp;quot;Three's a Crowd? Government, Owners, and Workers During the Nationalization of the British Coalmining Industry 1945-47.&amp;quot; ''Twentieth Century British History'' 2001 12(4): 486-510. Issn: 0955-2359 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===West Germany===&lt;br /&gt;
In Eastern Europe, the Communist governments nationalized all the mines and factories after 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Germany did not nationalize industry after 1945, even though the Labour party in Britain favored it and Britain controlled much of the industrial region. The American military governor, General Lucius Clay, apart from a basic distaste for socialization, opposed nationalization of the coal mines and of other basic industries on pragmatic grounds. One german state, controlled by the Socialists (SPD) passed a bill in North Rhine-Westphalia in 1948 to nationalize basic industries. The occupation powers vetoed it, reserving the decision for a future German parliament. But it was not only the Americans who stopped socialization. There was no overwhelming German popular support for nationalization. During the federal election of 1949 Socialist advocates could not offer a concept which was able to secure a national majority for their ideas, because of fears that they would hinder recovery. The ability to meet this concern - &amp;quot;Recovery Now!&amp;quot; - is what made the neo-liberalism of Chancellor [[Konrad Adenauer]] and his economics minister [[Ludwig Erhard]] so appealing at the end of the forties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Co-operation on coal trading was the impetus for forming the &amp;quot;European Coal and Steel Community&amp;quot; in 1951.   Integrationists like French foreign minister [[Robert Schuman]] realized that coordinating the coal and steel markets of Germany, France, Italy and the Low Countries  could lead to &amp;quot;spillover&amp;quot; in other policy areas; the ECSC indeed morphed into the [[EEC]] and [[European Union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  J. Gillingham, ''Coal, steel, and the rebirth of Europe, 1945-1955'' (1991); Derek W. Urwin, ''The Community of Europe: A History of European Integration since 1945.'' (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Privitization==&lt;br /&gt;
Privatization has been one of the central planks of economic and industrial policy pursued by British Conservative governments since 1979, and endorsed by [[Tony Blair]]'s Labour party as well. &lt;br /&gt;
===Railways===&lt;br /&gt;
see [[British Rail]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Shipbuilding===&lt;br /&gt;
The privatization on the state-owned entity British Shipbuilders (BS) was a major event. With the huge expansion of maritime industries between 1945 and 1975, British shipbuilding endured a sustained period of competitive and comparative failure, so that during the slump of the mid-1970s the industry was only saved from total failure by nationalization. British policy, however, had to act within the parameters of broader European Community (EC) legislation which was often contradictory, supporting the industry in the expectation of an upturn in demand while reducing capacity as markets remained weak. Subsidy and capacity reduction were supported by the Shipbuilding Intervention Fund (SIF), which attempted to bridge the price gap between European and Asian prices, and Counterpart Funding, designed to assist those areas where shipbuilding closed, but only on condition that no future shipbuilding be conducted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1971 the Conservative government decided to close the Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Company and laid off 6,000 workers. Led by Communists, the workers continued to work, running the company themselves from July 1971 to November 1972. This strike-in-reverse, a work-in, became a powerful form of class struggle. It forced the government to reject plans for mass layoffs. All of the workers were able to keep their jobs. In 1975 the [[Labour Party]] under [[Harold Wilson]] nationalized the shipbuilding industry in response to the demands of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of nationalization BS established a tripartite divisional structure serving the merchant, warship, and offshore sectors. With the weak market continuing into the 1980s, both the merchant and offshore sectors were heavy loss-makers, whereas the warship sector enjoyed reasonable profits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1984 privatization had been decided upon - initially, the warship yards were put up for sale - and BS had decided to pull out of the unprofitable offshore sector. Seven yards were privatized as warship yards; although this seemed (and did) meet a major criteria of injecting competitive tendering into the naval sector, the combined impact of the end of the Cold War and the inability of designated warship yards to access the SIF led to the closure of four of the yards by 1994. The merchant sector fared little better; under a tight financial regime a program of closures and dispersals was carried through between 1984 and 1989. This process was conducted against a background of criticism that the government favored closure. Moreover, there was concern that it had accepted EC Counterpart Funding as its only policy and had made little attempt to forecast either the size or nature of the market for British shipbuilding in the future. Of the 17 extant shipbuilding companies on the British mainland in 1979, only six remain open in 1996, while shipbuilding employment has fallen from 65,063 in 1979 to 12,100 in 1996. The stated aims of privatization - increasing efficiency, wider share ownership, and a reduction in public borrowing - have proven tenuous gains for British shipbuilding. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Johnman, Lewis, &amp;quot;The Privatisation of British Shipbuilders&amp;quot; ''International Journal of Maritime History'' 1996 8(2): 1-31.&amp;lt;/Ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Airlines====&lt;br /&gt;
In the airline industry there was a mix of the two nationalized corporations (BOAC and BEA) and numerous privately owned operations that had evolved by late 1951. The planning includes the Civil Aviation Act of 1946, the Swinton Plan, the Labour blueprint &amp;quot;Wings for Peace&amp;quot;, and the implications for independent airlines of the formation of British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC), British European Airways Corporation (BEA), and British South American Airways (BSAA). The widespread participation of the independent airlines in the Berlin airlift persuaded the Labour government of the value of the privately owned airlines as a military transport reserve. The government thus allowed them to operate selected scheduled services as associates of BEA. Through 1949 and early 1950 the charter market, hampered by the inability to obtain more modern equipment, was unable to receive sufficient work at economic rates. By late 1950, however, with increased government use of charters for troop transports, the market began to recover.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; B. K. Humphreys, &amp;quot;Nationalization and the Independent Airlines in the United Kingdom, 1945-51.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Transport History'' 1976 3(4): 265-281. &amp;lt;/Ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1974 the Labour government nationalized all the airlines and merged them into British Airways. It was privatized by Thatcher in 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Abromeit, Heidrun. ''British Steel: An Industry Between the State and the Private Sector.'' (1986). 328 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashworth, William. ''The History of the British Coal Industry, Volume 5, 1946-1982: The Nationalised Industry'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
* Foreman-Peck, James. ''Public and Private Ownership of British Industry, 1820-1990.'' (1994). 386 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gourvish, Terry, and Mike Anson, ''British Rail, 1974-1997: From Integration To Privatisation,'' (2004) 700 pages; [http://books.google.com/books?id=vAlCWxoV1NYC&amp;amp;dq=%22british+rail%22&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hannah, Leslie. ''Engineers, Managers, and Politicians: The First Fifteen Years of Nationalised Electricity Supply in Britain.'' (1982). 336 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Millward, Robert. &amp;quot;The 1940s Nationalizations in Britain: Means to an End or the Means of Production?&amp;quot; ''Economic History Review'' 1997 50 (2): 209-234. &lt;br /&gt;
* Millward, Robert and Singleton, John, eds. ''The Political Economy of Nationalisation in Britain, 1920-1950.'' (1995). 325 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Webster, Charles. ''The Health Services since the War. Vol. 1: Problems of Health Care: The National Health Service before 1957'' (1988), on nationalizing medicine in britain&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Labor Unions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Business History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=770678</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=770678"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T22:20:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Impact on 20th century&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Darwin1.jpg|right|thumb|225px|Charles Darwin]] &lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1882) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the theory of [[Evolution|evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General Biography of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin was born in [[Shrewsbury]], [[England]] in 1809 to his parents Dr. Robert Darwin and Susannah Wedgewood. Darwin's mother was a religious woman but his father was, for the most part, a weak deist. Despite his lack of theistic religious belief, the Darwin's father allowed Charles to be baptized into the Anglican Church and encouraged him to become a clergyman. Darwin's mother died in 1817. In 1825 Charles Darwin went on to study medicine at the University of Edinburgh. There, he became horrified with the brutality of surgery before anesthesia was invented and quit his medical studies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1831 Charles Darwin graduated from Christ's College at Cambridge with a BA degree in the classics and theology. On December 27 of the same year Charles Darwin departed on the ''HMS Beagle'' for a five year voyage of exploration. The ''Beagle'' returned to English shores on October 2 1836. In 1837, Charles Darwin drew his now famous depiction of [[common ancestry]] in the form of a branching tree.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles Darwin, Transmutation Notebook B 1837:36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The following year he discovered the concept of ''[[natural selection]].'' Darwin insists that naturally occurring phenomena and factors working together in blind tandem have produced nature and eventually mankind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Charles Darwin originally based the idea of human evolution on a racist assumption&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Milton, Richard ''Shattering the Myths of Darwinism'' 1997:186,287 says &amp;quot;Darwin [was] openly racist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [after God was rejected as Creator], made in the late 1830s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barlow, Nora (editor) ''The Autobiography of Charles Darwin'' 1958:130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that Fuegians (natives of Tierra del Fuego) resembled primates that he had observed in the London zoo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larson, Edward J. ''Evolution: The Remarkable History Of A Scientific Theory'' 2004:66,67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 1842 he wrote out a ''sketch'' of his theory but did not publish it. Again, in 1844 Charles Darwin produced what is known today as an ''essay'' of the same theory more developed but he still chose not to publish. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his famous theory about how the species may have been produced without any aid from a Divine Creator. He titled his book ''On [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life''. In 1871, well after his theory enjoyed widespread success, Darwin published his ideas on human evolution in a two-volume book titled ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Do not change this heading without also changing the link to it in [[Creationism]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CharlesDarwin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Charles Darwin in 1880 at the age of 71.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin likely abandoned [[Christianity]] as a student when he disappointed his father by refusing to become a minister.  In his autobiography Charles Darwin wrote about the diminishment of his religious faith and Darwin stated that he was an [[agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin wrote the following: &amp;quot;The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble to us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, Darwin stated in his private notebooks that he was a [[materialism|materialist]], which is a type of [[atheism|atheist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the 1996 ''British Journal for the Philosophy of Science'' Kim Sterelny wrote in a book review the following: &amp;quot;I have no doubt that Darwin was a [[Materialism|materialist]] and a mechanist...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/view/00070882/ap020188/02a00130/1?frame=noframe&amp;amp;userID=80cdbf39@buffalo.edu/01cce4405c00501c2c38a&amp;amp;dpi=3&amp;amp;config=jstor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 47, 1996, page 641&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Furthermore, Charles Darwin’s casual mentioning of a ‘creator’ in earlier editions of The Origin of Species appears to have been a merely a ploy to downplay the implications of his [[materialism|materialistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Creation Ministries International]] states the following regarding why it is maintained that Charles Darwin was privately a materialist:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Mayr]]’s recent book on Darwin, One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Evolutionary Thought, Harvard, 1991, also acknowledges that Darwin’s references to purpose were to appease both the public and his wife. His early, private notebooks show his materialism well established. For instance, in one of them he addresses himself as, ‘O, you materialist!’ and says, ‘Why is thought, being a secretion of [[brain]], more wonderful than [[gravity]] as a property of matter?’ He clearly already believed that the idea of a separate realm of the spirit was nonsense, as is further shown when he warns himself not to reveal his beliefs, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘to avoid saying how far I believe in materialism, say only that emotions, instincts, degrees of talent which are hereditary are so because brain of child resembles parent stock.’&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scholars refer to the private notebook in which Charles Darwin stated he was a materialist as the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; notebook of 1838.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote that &amp;quot;It is apparent that Darwin lost his faith in the years 1836-39, much of it clearly prior to the reading of [[Robert Malthus|Malthus]]. In order not to hurt the feelings of his friends and of his wife, Darwin often used deistic language in his publications, but much in his Notebooks indicates that by this time he had become a 'materialist' (more or less = atheist)&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the best explanation of Darwin's worldview from 1836 onwards was that Darwin was a [[weak atheism|weak atheist]] who often had overwhelming thoughts that nature was the product of a mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/site/c.muI1LaMNJrE/b.2548839/k.2A55/Is_Darwinism_Atheistic_an_Examination_of_the_Beliefs_and_Practices_of_Charles_Darwin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, Darwin wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Dr. Aveling has published an account of a conversation with my father. I think that the readers of this pamphlet ('The Religious Views of Charles Darwin,' Free Thought Publishing Company, 1883) may be misled into seeing more resemblance than really existed between the positions of my father and Dr. Aveling: and I say this in spite of my conviction that Dr. Aveling gives quite fairly his impressions of my father's views. Dr. Aveling tried to show that the terms &amp;quot;Agnostic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot; were practically equivalent-that an atheist is one who, without denying the existence of God, is without God, inasmuch as he is unconvinced of the existence of a Deity. My father's replies implied his preference for the unaggressive attitude of an Agnostic. Dr. Aveling seems (page 5) to regard the absence of aggressiveness in my father's views as distinguishing them in an unessential manner from his own. But, in my judgment, it is precisely differences of this kind which distinguish him so completely from the class of thinkers to which Dr. Aveling belongs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' states the following regarding Charles Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of [[Orchid]]s, and upon The [[Earthworm]]s, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.”(Argyll 1885, 244] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Scientism]] can also be seen in Darwin's worldview. The scientism in Darwins's worldview can be seen in the following quote of Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It appears to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments against Christianity and theism produce hardly any effect on the public; and freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men's minds which follows from the advance of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianitytoday.com/books/features/bccorner/020204.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Charles Darwin the &amp;quot;manifestly false history of the world&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recorded in the Old Testament and New Testament miracles led him to reject Biblical veracity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85-87.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Eminent Darwin biographer, Professor Janet Browne, sums up Darwin's views concerning religion: Darwin &amp;quot;mapped out a comparative evolution of the religious sense, proposing that religious belief was ultimately nothing more than a primitive urge to bestow a cause on otherwise inexplicable natural events...In short, he made no secret of his view that he did not believe religion to have any rational foundation at all&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Browne, Janet  ''Charles Darwin The Power of Place'' 2002:341&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. When he died in 1882 at the age of seventy-three, Darwin was buried at Westminster Abbey next to Sir [[Isaac Newton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There exists in hostile Darwin literature a story about a Christian called Lady Hope who visited and spoke with a dying Charles Darwin.  This appears to be merely a legend, and there is no evidence that Lady Hope ever converted or even visited Darwin on his deathbed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carm.org/evo_questions/deathbed.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Darwin and Pangenesis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Theories of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pangenesis]] was an [[evolution|evolutionary]] notion that was developed by Charles Darwin. [[Creation science|Creation scientist]] Dr. [[Jerry Bergman]] wrote concerning pangenesis:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Pangenesis is based on the idea that all somatic cells produce ‘gemmules’ or gene material that is ‘thrown off’ into the body’s circulatory system. These gemmules multiply by dividing, and eventually collect in the organism’s eggs and sperm (the gametes). Consequently, the experiences of their bearers are imprinted in the gemmules, and then can be passed on to the organism’s offspring. Darwin discussed his pangenesis idea in great detail, and felt confident that it would provide a feasible mechanism to produce new genetic information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite there being devastating experimental evidence against the notion of pangenesis provided by [[Francis Galton]], Charles Darwin stubbornly held to the notion of pangenesis as he had no [[naturalism|naturalistic]] explanation on how genetic information could be formed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary evolutionary biology strongly agrees that Lamarckian inheritance and spontaneous generation never or almost never occur.  The early 20th century synthesis between Mendelian genetics and natural selection provides a non-Lamarckian basis for inheritance of biological characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who was also his cousin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1152536/The-descent-man-We-trace-claim-Charles-Darwin-ancestor.html The descent of man] Mail Online, February 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Social effects of the theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work  ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|At some future period not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes...will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest Allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as the baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aim.org/wls/90/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DoM6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext00/dscmn10.txt The Descent of Man], chapter VI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/24/feedback-female-inferiority&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charles Darwin and the Cult of Personality==&lt;br /&gt;
There is a cult of personality and type of religiousity currently surrounding Charles Darwin.  [[Stephen Jay Gould]] wrote the following in 1978: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;... all theories [of natural selection] cite God in their support, and ... Darwin comes close to this status among evolutionary biologists ...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2002, Michael White similarly wrote: &amp;quot;Of course today, for biologists, Darwin is second only to God, and for many he may rank still higher.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact of Darwin on the 20th century==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg‎|thumb|175px|right|Nazi leader [[Adolf Hitler]] was inspired by Darwin's work]]Charles Darwin's work was strongly embraced by many [[atheistic]] regimes of the 20th century, with the expected [[holocaust|catastrophic results]]. It was noted by respected author Dr. Robert E.D. Clark in ''Darwin, Before and After'' that: {{cquote|Adolf Hitler’s mind was captivated by evolutionary teaching — probably since the time he was a boy. Evolutionary ideas — quite undisguised — lie at the basis of all that is worst in Mein Kampf — and in his public speeches.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;courier&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_holocaust_why_did_it_happen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/12/deseno_darwin/ Darwin's Day for Dummies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_eugenics&amp;diff=770673</id>
		<title>Abortion and eugenics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_eugenics&amp;diff=770673"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T22:04:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Added see also, cats and pic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg‎|thumb|400px|right|[[Abortion]] supporter and [[eugenics]] enthusiast [[Adolf Hitler]]]]'''Abortion and eugenics''' are often very strongly related.  [[Abortion]] is commonly used to kill those babies who happen to suffer from [[Down Syndrome]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10521836&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and other physical and mental issues, to remove said physical and mental issues from the human race.  [[Eugenics]] is essentially the unethical removal of those with physical and mental issues to &amp;quot;purify&amp;quot; the human race.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Evolutionists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=770612</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=770612"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T17:00:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Undo revision 770611 by Ion445 (Talk) No, they support it.  And that fact should not be censored&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]], and like in Europe. [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberals_and_abortion&amp;diff=770606</id>
		<title>Liberals and abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberals_and_abortion&amp;diff=770606"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T15:46:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: A start&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberals and abortion''' refers to the central tenant of [[liberal values]] that abortion is acceptable, namely that the 'right' of a pregnant woman to abort her unborn child trumps the genuine right of said unborn child to live.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are very vocal about their pro-abortion views, and are often insulting towards those who hold [[pro-life]] views.  Given that liberals also seek to deny the rights of citizens to defend themselves by implementing [[gun control]], is it not surprising that they deny the right to life to the unborn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to liberals' lack of concern for unborn children, they also seek to [[liberal censorship|censor]] information regarding the long-term health risks to woman that abortion brings, including [[breast cancer]] and [[depression]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal values]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal myths]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pornography&amp;diff=770585</id>
		<title>Pornography</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pornography&amp;diff=770585"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T13:37:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: /* Legal aspects */ Euphemism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{etymology|[[Greek]] πορνή (''porné'')) a prostitute and γράΦω (''grapho'') I write}}[[Image:Pornography.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pornography''' is the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity used for the intent of stimulation.&lt;br /&gt;
It usually consists of images depicting the satisfaction of the sort of &amp;quot;unnatural lust&amp;quot; which leads to damnation. ({{Bible ref|book=Jude|chap=1|verses=6-7}})  It destroys the mind as [[gambling]] does and, even worse, '''pornography''' leads to terrible crimes against women and children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.un.org/rights/dpi1772e.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Christ said &amp;quot;any man who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart,&amp;quot; He made it clear that chastity -- and unchastity -- don't begin with what we do, but rather in what we think. And deliberately seeking such stimulation outside a committed marriage, even via the imagination, constitutes a sin against [[chastity]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/se0051.html Banishing Unchaste Thoughts]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pornographic images have been proliferating at a remarkable rate. What was a $5 million-a-year enterprise merely 25 years ago has boomed to a $7 billion to $10 billion-a-year industry today... the fastest growing sectors of the industry are pornographic DVDs, cable television, and phone sex. Pornography is no longer confined to the seedier sections of town. With the advent of the Internet, it has become readily available to all, including children, and in the privacy of our own homes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=759 Censorship or Education?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Human psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Jerry Bergman (scientist)|Jerry Bergman]] (Ph.D.) wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pornography distorts the natural development of personality. If the early stimulus is pornographic photographs, the [[adolescent]] can be [[conditioning|conditioned]] to become aroused through photographs.  Once this pairing is rewarded a number of times, it is likely to become permanent.  The result to the individual is that it becomes difficult for the person to seek out relations with appropriate persons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Jerry Bergman, Ph.D., The Influence of Pornography on Sexual Development: Three Case Histories, IX ''Family Therapy'' 3, 1982, pg. 265. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Illusion and addiction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pornography provides the illusion of intimacy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-f016.html (Christian Answers)] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but this is a [[satan]]ic trap (see [[sexual addiction]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Pornography consumption is not something that can easily be stopped. Once the appetite for it has developed, it actually increases. In his 1988 study ''Pornography Effects: Empirical and Clinical Evidence'', [[Victor Cline]], then with the [[University of Utah]]'s Department of Psychology noted that studies show pornography is progressive and addictive for many. It often leads to the user acting out his fantasy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Internet is the &amp;quot;crack cocaine&amp;quot; of sexual addiction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.soundvision.com/Info/life/porn/pornfacts.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;People often act in accordance with the images and patterns they find around them,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;At the crux of this issue is whether written pornography might have a causal effect in eroticizing criminal activities. One case that dealt with this issue indirectly is American Booksellers Association v. Hudnut, ... the court conceded that it saw some evidence of a causal relationship between pornography and anti-social behaviors.... People often act in accordance with the images and patterns they find around them. . . . Depictions of subordination tend to perpetuate subordination.&amp;quot; 771 F.2d at 328-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so looking at pornography is a dangerous practice; although being around a loving christian family for most of the day, and instead acting in accordance with those images and patterns seems to negate this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porn says that happiness is found by having the same experience over and over again with lots of different women; true ''eros'' says that happiness is found by having different experiences over and over again with the same person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nopornnorthampton.org/2007/05/02/schwyzer-on-porn-pursuit-of-novelty-is-enemy-of-relationship.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Departure from the norm==&lt;br /&gt;
Viewing or reading pornography day in and day out has a negative effect. It desensitizes a person, makes him more withdrawn, and makes him view others (of the opposite sex) like objects rather than the people they are.&lt;br /&gt;
Although some people have argued that &amp;quot;erotica&amp;quot; is okay, in the history of erotic literature it is rare to find any depiction of normal marital relations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cary Tennis wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:And naturally whether you approve of porn in theory or not, its effect will be to displace you. Like crack, it tends to take over, to push out other hungers that tend to nurture the human community by making us dependent on one another. Since we are dependent on each other we must be civil and loving. If we are not dependent on each other then we needn't be civil and loving. We needn't have community and family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2007/04/11/porn/ (Salon magazine)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is debate whether it is truly moral to be 'civil and loving' purely because it is necessary, as Cary Tennis seems to say here. Other Christians argue that to be 'civil and loving' purely because we are dependent on others is actually immoral and manipulative. These Christians argue that to be self-contained, independent and yet still warm and loving is a greater virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debbie Nathan wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:Porn is everywhere today, everyone is looking, and the media responds with little more than gloom-and-doom talk about evils like Internet sex addiction, or rah-rah promotion of Brazilian waxing and Jenna Jameson’s fame and fortune. Meanwhile, few know the real history of this explosive media, or the truth about its business practices, working conditions, politics and actual effects on people. [http://debbienathan.com/buy-the-books/ Pornography: A Groundwork Guide.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a series of [[liberal]] decisions beginning with the [[Warren Court]], pornography is aggressively sold and distributed in the United States without meaningful law enforcement.  It is a $7-10 billion industry that affects and harms 40 million Americans.  Pornography destroys relationships and exploits young people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''National Catholic Register'' p. 8 (Apr. 22, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
Pornography is often marketed using the misleading and [[deceit]]ful name of [[Adult (euphemism)|adult material]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anthony Comstock]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social effects of pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://unitedfamilies.org/default.asp?contentID=34 Guide to Family Issues: The Harms of Pornography] : United Families Intl&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-f016.html How can I tell if I'm getting addicted to sex or pornography?] - ChristianAnswers.Net&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.soundvision.com/Info/life/porn/getrid.asp Pornography &amp;amp;amp; Islam] : A 12-step guide To Fight Pornography Addiction&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nopornnorthampton.org/ NoPornHampton] - an anti-pornography organization with an extensive, blog-style website&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=759 Censorship or Education? Feminist Views on Pornography]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldsmag.com//LDSMariageNetwork/090306woman.html What's A Woman To Do? How Pornography Affects Women and What They Can Do],  Geoff Steurer, ''Meridian Magazine''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/news/HowAdultPornographyHarmsChildren.pdf  How Adult Pornography Contributes To Sexual Exploitation of Children], by Robert Peters,  President of Morality in Media (September 2009)   &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social Problems]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adult_(euphemism)&amp;diff=770584</id>
		<title>Talk:Adult (euphemism)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adult_(euphemism)&amp;diff=770584"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T13:36:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Thanks Ed!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'd like to label this an essay, since it's one contributor's personal opinion. Is that okay? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I understand what you mean, I have not yet cited why I have such opinions about pornography, but I think an article (maybe not this one!) is needed for this term as the world is awash with so-called 'adult' material.  [[User:JackHT|JackHT]] 09:16, 19 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Euphemism==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks Ed, I knew there was a better term than 'pseudonym'! [[User:JackHT|JackHT]] 09:36, 19 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adult_(euphemism)&amp;diff=770575</id>
		<title>Talk:Adult (euphemism)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adult_(euphemism)&amp;diff=770575"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T13:16:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: reply&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'd like to label this an essay, since it's one contributor's personal opinion. Is that okay? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I understand what you mean, I have not yet cited why I have such opinions about pornography, but I think an article (maybe not this one!) is needed for this term as the world is awash with so-called 'adult' material.  [[User:JackHT|JackHT]] 09:16, 19 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pornography&amp;diff=770566</id>
		<title>Pornography</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pornography&amp;diff=770566"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T12:03:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: /* Legal aspects */ 'Adult' material&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{etymology|[[Greek]] πορνή (''porné'')) a prostitute and γράΦω (''grapho'') I write}}[[Image:Pornography.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pornography''' is the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity used for the intent of stimulation.&lt;br /&gt;
It usually consists of images depicting the satisfaction of the sort of &amp;quot;unnatural lust&amp;quot; which leads to damnation. ({{Bible ref|book=Jude|chap=1|verses=6-7}})  It destroys the mind as [[gambling]] does and, even worse, '''pornography''' leads to terrible crimes against women and children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.un.org/rights/dpi1772e.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Christ said &amp;quot;any man who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart,&amp;quot; He made it clear that chastity -- and unchastity -- don't begin with what we do, but rather in what we think. And deliberately seeking such stimulation outside a committed marriage, even via the imagination, constitutes a sin against [[chastity]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/se0051.html Banishing Unchaste Thoughts]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pornographic images have been proliferating at a remarkable rate. What was a $5 million-a-year enterprise merely 25 years ago has boomed to a $7 billion to $10 billion-a-year industry today... the fastest growing sectors of the industry are pornographic DVDs, cable television, and phone sex. Pornography is no longer confined to the seedier sections of town. With the advent of the Internet, it has become readily available to all, including children, and in the privacy of our own homes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=759 Censorship or Education?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Human psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Jerry Bergman (scientist)|Jerry Bergman]] (Ph.D.) wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pornography distorts the natural development of personality. If the early stimulus is pornographic photographs, the [[adolescent]] can be [[conditioning|conditioned]] to become aroused through photographs.  Once this pairing is rewarded a number of times, it is likely to become permanent.  The result to the individual is that it becomes difficult for the person to seek out relations with appropriate persons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Jerry Bergman, Ph.D., The Influence of Pornography on Sexual Development: Three Case Histories, IX ''Family Therapy'' 3, 1982, pg. 265. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Illusion and addiction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pornography provides the illusion of intimacy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-f016.html (Christian Answers)] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but this is a [[satan]]ic trap (see [[sexual addiction]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Pornography consumption is not something that can easily be stopped. Once the appetite for it has developed, it actually increases. In his 1988 study ''Pornography Effects: Empirical and Clinical Evidence'', [[Victor Cline]], then with the [[University of Utah]]'s Department of Psychology noted that studies show pornography is progressive and addictive for many. It often leads to the user acting out his fantasy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Internet is the &amp;quot;crack cocaine&amp;quot; of sexual addiction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.soundvision.com/Info/life/porn/pornfacts.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;People often act in accordance with the images and patterns they find around them,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;At the crux of this issue is whether written pornography might have a causal effect in eroticizing criminal activities. One case that dealt with this issue indirectly is American Booksellers Association v. Hudnut, ... the court conceded that it saw some evidence of a causal relationship between pornography and anti-social behaviors.... People often act in accordance with the images and patterns they find around them. . . . Depictions of subordination tend to perpetuate subordination.&amp;quot; 771 F.2d at 328-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so looking at pornography is a dangerous practice; although being around a loving christian family for most of the day, and instead acting in accordance with those images and patterns seems to negate this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porn says that happiness is found by having the same experience over and over again with lots of different women; true ''eros'' says that happiness is found by having different experiences over and over again with the same person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nopornnorthampton.org/2007/05/02/schwyzer-on-porn-pursuit-of-novelty-is-enemy-of-relationship.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Departure from the norm==&lt;br /&gt;
Viewing or reading pornography day in and day out has a negative effect. It desensitizes a person, makes him more withdrawn, and makes him view others (of the opposite sex) like objects rather than the people they are.&lt;br /&gt;
Although some people have argued that &amp;quot;erotica&amp;quot; is okay, in the history of erotic literature it is rare to find any depiction of normal marital relations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cary Tennis wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:And naturally whether you approve of porn in theory or not, its effect will be to displace you. Like crack, it tends to take over, to push out other hungers that tend to nurture the human community by making us dependent on one another. Since we are dependent on each other we must be civil and loving. If we are not dependent on each other then we needn't be civil and loving. We needn't have community and family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2007/04/11/porn/ (Salon magazine)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is debate whether it is truly moral to be 'civil and loving' purely because it is necessary, as Cary Tennis seems to say here. Other Christians argue that to be 'civil and loving' purely because we are dependent on others is actually immoral and manipulative. These Christians argue that to be self-contained, independent and yet still warm and loving is a greater virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debbie Nathan wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:Porn is everywhere today, everyone is looking, and the media responds with little more than gloom-and-doom talk about evils like Internet sex addiction, or rah-rah promotion of Brazilian waxing and Jenna Jameson’s fame and fortune. Meanwhile, few know the real history of this explosive media, or the truth about its business practices, working conditions, politics and actual effects on people. [http://debbienathan.com/buy-the-books/ Pornography: A Groundwork Guide.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a series of [[liberal]] decisions beginning with the [[Warren Court]], pornography is aggressively sold and distributed in the United States without meaningful law enforcement.  It is a $7-10 billion industry that affects and harms 40 million Americans.  Pornography destroys relationships and exploits young people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''National Catholic Register'' p. 8 (Apr. 22, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
Pornography is often marketed using the misleading and [[deceit]]ful name of [[Adult (pseudonym)|adult materal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anthony Comstock]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social effects of pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://unitedfamilies.org/default.asp?contentID=34 Guide to Family Issues: The Harms of Pornography] : United Families Intl&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-f016.html How can I tell if I'm getting addicted to sex or pornography?] - ChristianAnswers.Net&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.soundvision.com/Info/life/porn/getrid.asp Pornography &amp;amp;amp; Islam] : A 12-step guide To Fight Pornography Addiction&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nopornnorthampton.org/ NoPornHampton] - an anti-pornography organization with an extensive, blog-style website&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=759 Censorship or Education? Feminist Views on Pornography]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldsmag.com//LDSMariageNetwork/090306woman.html What's A Woman To Do? How Pornography Affects Women and What They Can Do],  Geoff Steurer, ''Meridian Magazine''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/news/HowAdultPornographyHarmsChildren.pdf  How Adult Pornography Contributes To Sexual Exploitation of Children], by Robert Peters,  President of Morality in Media (September 2009)   &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social Problems]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adult_(euphemism)&amp;diff=770565</id>
		<title>Adult (euphemism)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adult_(euphemism)&amp;diff=770565"/>
				<updated>2010-04-19T12:00:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: This one has always annoyed me - why can't they just be honest about what they're selling?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The term '''adult''' is used by [[liberals]] as a [[pseudonym]] for [[pornography|'pornographic']], in the forlorn hope that such terminology will soften or even excuse the immoral and damaging nature of the material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to [[google|liberal internet companies]], it can be seen that they often promote 'adult' material, with the above preimise that such vile material is acceptable if refered to by such a pseudonym.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal dilution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal myths]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Media]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Men%27s_views_on_abortion&amp;diff=770344</id>
		<title>Men's views on abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Men%27s_views_on_abortion&amp;diff=770344"/>
				<updated>2010-04-18T17:37:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: New article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Mens's views on abortion''' unsurprisingly depend on whether they are [[liberal]] or [[conservative]].  Due to [[liberal logic]], liberal men think that the 'rights' of women to enjoy decadent unhealthy lifestyles and engage in random sexual relationships outweigh the rights of unborn children.  Conservative men however hold the right to life in a much higher regard, along with concerns for the health of women, resulting in them taking a [[pro-life]] stance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770330</id>
		<title>Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770330"/>
				<updated>2010-04-18T17:18:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: /* Hitler and the Theory of Evolution */  wikilinks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitler7.JPG|right|300px|thumb|The [[Evolution|evolutionary]] [[racism|racist]] Adolf Hitler in the 1930s.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Adolf Hitler''' was the Austrian-born Chancellor and President of [[Germany]] from January 30, 1933 until his death on April 30, 1945.  He was also the leader (German: ''Der Führer'') of the [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (''National-sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'', or [[Nazi]] Party) which gained political power through threat, intimidation, and outright violence throughout Germany in the aftermath of the [[First World War]]. Adolf Hitler was an [[Evolution|evolutionary]] [[racist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=268&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hitler’s policies and beliefs resulted in the [[Genocide|mass extermination]] of the [[Jews]], [[Gypsies]], and other peoples he considered “[[Racial Supremacy|inferior]]” throughout central and eastern [[Europe]] and were directly responsible for the outbreak of [[World War II]], which caused the deaths of untold millions on and off the battlefield and ended only after Hitler's [[suicide]] in his Berlin bunker. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hitler Roses.jpg|thumb|Roses by Adolf Hitler.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler was born on April 20, 1889, in Braunau am Inn, [[Austria]].  Hitler's father, Alois (born 1837), was a customs official who was himself born illegitimate, carrying for a time his mother's name, Schicklgruber. By 1876 he had his baptismal entry corrected in his church records, establishing his father as Johan Heidler, which was altered slightly to Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When his father retired the family moved to Linz, Austria, where it remained a favorite for young Adolf for the rest of his life, and where he gave his wish to be buried.  When Alois died in 1903 he left enough of a pension to support his wife and children; Adolf would take his and live off of it in Vienna after leaving school, dreaming of becoming an artist.  Although somewhat competent as a painter of landscapes and architecture, his renderings of humans were considered “lifeless” and “crude” by the standards of the Academy of Fine Arts, and his application was rejected twice.  Remaining in [[Vienna]], he moved from one cheap flop house to another, painting postcards and advertisements to earn a meager living after his allowance had dried up.  By then he had developed traits which characterized his life as a whole: secretiveness, loneliness, a Spartan mode of everyday life, and a hatred of the cosmopolitan, multinational character that was the makeup of Vienna. ''He never sought a proper job or regular employment. Instead he immersed himself in the works of [[Hegel]], [[Nietzsche]], and the anti-Semitic writings of the Englishman Houston Stewart Chamberlain. He loved the operas of Wagner, and the stories of the Nordic Gods... In early 1910, he entered a shelter for the homeless, populated in the main by poor Jews, on Meldemenstrasse, and was eating at soup kitchens. By this time he had pawned all his belongings. '' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://socyberty.com/history/young-adolf-the-adolescent-hitler-and-beyond/ Young Adolf: The Adolescent Hitler and Beyond.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Who And What He Was==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote famously, and most eloquently about Hitler in 1998:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;At the same time that he terrorized his adversaries, he knew how to please, impress and charm the very interlocutors from whom he wanted support. Diplomats and journalists insist as much on his charm as they do on his temper tantrums. The savior admired by his own as he dragged them into his madness, the Satan and exterminating angel feared and hated by all others, Hitler led his people to a shameful defeat without precedent. That his political and strategic ambitions have created a dividing line in the history of this turbulent and tormented century is undeniable: there is a before and an after. By the breadth of his crimes, which have attained a quasi-ontological dimension, he surpasses all his predecessors: as a result of Hitler, man is defined by what makes him inhuman. With Hitler at the head of a gigantic laboratory, life itself seems to have changed.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;How did this Austrian without title or position manage to get himself elected head of a German nation renowned for its civilizing mission? How to explain the success of his cheap demagogy in the heart of a people so proud of having inherited the genius of a Wolfgang von Goethe and an Immanuel Kant?&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Was there no resistance to his disastrous projects? There was. But it was too feeble, too weak and too late to succeed. German society had rallied behind him: the judicial, the educational, the industrial and the economic establishments gave him their support. Few politicians of this century have aroused, in their lifetime, such love and so much hate; few have inspired so much historical and psychological research after their death. Even today, works on his enigmatic personality and his cursed career are best sellers everywhere. Some are good, others are less good, but all seem to respond to an authentic curiosity on the part of a public haunted by memory and the desire to understand.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;We think we know everything about the nefarious forces that shaped his destiny: his unhappy childhood, his frustrated adolescence; his artistic disappointments; his wound received on the front during World War I; his taste for spectacle, his constant disdain for social and military aristocracies; his relationship with [[Eva Braun]], who adored him; the cult of the very death he feared; his lack of scruples with regard to his former comrades of the SA, whom he had assassinated in 1934; his endless hatred of [[Jews]], whose survival enraged him — each and every phase of his official and private life has found its chroniclers, its biographers.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;And yet. There are, in all these givens, elements that escape us. How did this unstable paranoid find it within himself to impose gigantic hope as an immutable ideal that motivated his nation almost until the end? Would he have come to power if Germany were not going through endless economic crises, or if the winners in 1918 had not imposed on it conditions that represented a national humiliation against which the German patriotic fiber could only revolt? We would be wrong to forget: Hitler came to power in January 1933 by the most legitimate means. His [[Nationalist Socialist Party]] won a majority in the parliamentary elections. The aging [[Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg]] had no choice but to allow him, at age 43, to form the new government, marking the end of the Weimar Republic. And the beginning of the [[Third Reich]], which, according to Hitler, would last 1,000 years.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;From that moment on, events cascaded. The burning of the [[Reichstag]] came only a little before the openings of the first concentration camps, established for members of the opposition. Fear descended on the country and squeezed it in a vise. Great writers, musicians and painters went into exile to France and the U.S. Jews with foresight emigrated toward Palestine. The air of Hitler's Germany was becoming more and more suffocating. Those who preferred to wait, thinking that the Nazi regime would not last, could not last, would regret it later, when it was too late.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The fact is that Hitler was beloved by his people — not the military, at least not in the beginning, but by the average Germans who pledged to him an affection, a tenderness and a fidelity that bordered on the irrational. It was idolatry on a national scale. One had to see the crowds who acclaimed him. And the women who were attracted to him. And the young who in his presence went into ecstasy. Did they not see the hateful mask that covered his face? Did they not divine the catastrophe he bore within himself?&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;time&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/time100/leaders/profile/hitler.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cupid Complaining to Venus by Lucas Cranach.jpg|120px|left]]''One of the best-loved paintings in the National Gallery - an exquisite vision of Venus and Cupid by the greatest artist of the Reformation - once belonged to Hitler, it has been revealed. New evidence has come to light that Lucas Cranach's Cupid Complaining to Venus, currently on loan to an exhibition in Bristol, hung on the sitting-room wall of his flat in Munich.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/mar/28/art.secondworldwar Hitler owned painting now in National Gallery]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler munich1914.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Hitler in the crowd in Munich, 1914, reacting to the news of Germany's entry in the First World War.]]&lt;br /&gt;
By 1913 Hitler was in Munich, Germany, with war clouds on the horizon.  Classified as unfit for service in the Austrian army (possibly by faking, as he did not like the thought of serving Austria) in 1914, he volunteered for the German army, joining the 16th Bavarian Reserve Infantry Regiment, greeting the war with enthusiasm, and finding the military discipline and comradeship satisfying.  He served during the entire [[First World War]] as a messenger carrying dispatches between units, and often at the front lines under fire; he was wounded in 1916, and gassed in 1918.  His bravery during this time earned him the [[Iron Cross]], 2nd Class, in December, 1914, and in August 1918 he was awarded the Iron Cross, 1st Class – a rare decoration for a corporal.  But the gassing would take him out of the war and into a hospital, where he would be told the heart-wrenching news of Germany’s defeat the following November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Path to power==&lt;br /&gt;
After the war ended, Hitler's future seemed uncertain. There was much discontent among demobilized veterans because of the lack of employment. The German military had felt it had not been defeated; indeed, the German Army stood on foreign soil when the Armistice was signed November 11, 1918 and not a square inch of German soil had been occupied. This was despite the fact that the German Army's strongest position, the Hindenburg line, had been broken by the Allies, and the German Army itself was in full retreat. However, the Army felt they had done their job, and the nation had been &amp;quot;stabbed in the back&amp;quot; by a gang of traitors who sought to lay hands on the Fatherland.  The &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot; that Germany had been defeated was the &amp;quot;big lie&amp;quot; Hitler spoke of, as if repeating it often enough would cause people to believe it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After his discharge from the hospital, Hitler acted as an army political agent, assigned in Munich to gather information on the various political parties which had spring up amid the social chaos following Germany’s defeat.  In September, 1919, he was given orders to investigate the relatively-minor German Workers’ Party (''Deutsche Arbeiterpartei''); intrigued by the party’s apparatus and its racial, pan-German nationalism, he joined, becoming its 55th member; he left the army soon after and devoted himself to improving the party’s propaganda, as well as his own position within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions in Germany fostered the development of the party.  Economic woes brought widespread discontent, added to the furor surrounding the loss of the war and the harsh terms heaped upon Germany by the Allied Powers in the Versailles Peace Treaty.  Bavaria’s traditional separatism from the central government in Berlin made current conditions especially sharp, and Hitler was savvy enough to take full advantage of them.  When he joined, he found the party ineffective in leadership and uncertain as to its aims; he accepted the party program, but regarded it as a means to an end.  He caused friction with other members of the party, and their attempts to control him caused a threat of resignation; realizing that the future of the party now depended on Hitler, who clearly had a talent of organization, fund collecting, and above all, speaking, they declined to accept it; from July, 1921 Hitler was regarded as the party leader with nearly unlimited power.  From his party newspaper, ''Völkischer Beobachter'' (“Popular Observer”), he spewed out endless propaganda.  His meetings where he spoke grew from handfuls to hundreds, and then on to thousands.  A man of charismatic personality, he quickly attracted a circle of loyal and devoted followers: Julius Streicher, Alfred Rosenberg, Hermann Göring, and Rudolf Hess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Munich was also a gathering place for former servicemen dissatisfied with conditions in the country; members of the Freikorps, which had been organized after the war from army units that refused to return to civilian life; and those civilians who plotted against the republic. Many of these men joined the Nazi Party. Among them was a staff member of the district command who had joined the German Workers’ Party before Hitler, Ernst Röhm, a pudgy man with a scared face who saw his own ambition in helping further Hitler’s rise within the party.  Röhm recruited what came to be known as the “Brown Shirts”, the violent squads used to attack socialists and communists, and to protect party meetings whenever Hitler was speaking. By 1921 they were organized into a private army called the ''Sturmabteilung'', abbreviated to S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Beer Hall Putsch==&lt;br /&gt;
Germany in 1923 was marked by social and political unrest caused by hyperinflation. In this time Hitler was able convince [[Erich Ludendorff]], an accomplished  general and leader of the German forces in the first World War, to join him in a coup d'etat (''Putsch'' in German). When Hitler learned that the nationalist prime minister of Bavaria was giving a speech to 3000 officials in one of Munich's biggest beer halls (the Haufbrau Haus), he ordered his paramilitaries to surround the building. Hitler went inside and took the prime minister hostage, announced a revolution, and attempted to convince him to join the coup against Berlin and become member in his new administration. The Bavarian prime minister agreed under pressure, but informed the nation via radio later that night that he did not support Hitler. The prime minister also informed the federal government in Berlin; the putsch had begun to fail.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next morning, 9 November 1923, Hitler and Ludendorff were marching with approximately 2000 partly armed supporters through Munich in a show of strength to regain the momentum. In the ensuing fight between Hitler's marchers and a cordon of police and army units at least 14 Nazi supporters and three policemen were killed and hundreds wounded. Ludendorff handed himself over to the authorities, while Hitler fled soon after the fighting began. Hitler was arrested a few days later at a friend's house, were had been in hiding since the failed coup. Ludendorff was acquitted of all charges, while Hitler was sentenced to 5 years in prison (he would do eight months). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://history1900s.about.com/cs/thirdreich/a/beerhallputsch_2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/putsch2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Bavarian prime minister, who foiled the plan, was killed in 1934 in the &amp;quot;Night of the Long Knives&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''Mein Kampf''===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler had his inner circle as frequent visitors in his prison cell, which was made more comfortable due to his celebrity.  While there, he dictated to Rudolf Hess the first volume of ''Mein Kampf'' (“My Struggle”), his political autobiography and a compendium of his many ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler believed in the inequality of the races, nations, and individuals as part of the natural order of mankind, and chief among them was the exalted “Aryan race”, and the greatest of the Aryans were the Germans.   It was the German, according to Hitler, that gave the world civilization and the arts; to safeguard the German people as a race (the “Volk”), they would need to be united under a single leader (the Führer), where they would be protected from their three principle enemies: Marxism, which included social democracy as well as communism; democracy and its mob-rule, as shown by the failings of the Weimar Republic; and above all what Hitler called the poisoners of humanity, the Jews.  “Rational anti-Semitism must lead to systematic legal opposition,” he wrote in 1919. “Its final objective must be the removal of the Jews altogether.” In Mein Kampf, he told the world that the Jew was the “destroyer of culture,” “a parasite within the nation,” and “a menace.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From &amp;quot;My Struggle&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Jew &amp;quot;... he blares out his merits to the rest of the world until people really begin to believe in them. Anyone who does not believe in them is doing him a bitter injustice. In a short time he begins to twist things around to make it look as if all the injustice in the world had always been done to him and not the other way around.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch11.html Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| Hitler portrays Jews as leaders in politics and banking, both groups seeking to strengthen their cause, [[Zionism]], to ensure Jewish domination. From his Social Darwinist perspective, Hitler perceived a racial war as inevitable and he sought to halt the &amp;quot;[[Jewish]] drive towards world conquest&amp;quot;... As Berlin collapsed around him, Adolf asserted: &amp;quot;Out of the ruins of our towns and monuments hatred will grow against those finally responsible for everything, International Jewry.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.historytoday.com/MainArticle.aspx?m=32043&amp;amp;amid=30237234 Mein Kampf – The Text, its Themes and Hitler’s Vision] Robert Carr dissects a book frequently referred to but seldom read. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rebuilding the Nazi Party==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Hitler speaking; he would often employ physical gesturing to emphasize a point.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler-3.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in car, saluting passing S.A. at one of many parades.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Internal dissension within the party caused it to languish while Hitler was in prison.  When he was released he saw difficulties in the country that had not existed before the Putsch, namely currency reform that brought economic stability, and the scaling back of the war reparations as a result of the Dawes Plan.  Hitler was also forbidden to speak in public, which remained in force until 1928; however, he wasn’t about to stop his rebuilding of the party nor of his re-establishing his own position within it as leader, despite Gregor Strasser’s opposition in northern Germany.  By 1927 the number of Nazis was in the hundreds of thousands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new period of political and economic instability with the onset of the Great Depression which threw millions out of work in Europe and North America.  To campaign against the [[Young Plan]] (a second renegotiation of war reparations payments) Hitler made an alliance with one of Germany’s leading nationalists, Alfred Hugenberg, whose newspapers enabled Hitler to reach a national audience for the first time. The alliance also had another advantage: it enabled him to seek support from many in business and industry who controlled funds going into politics, and who themselves were desirous of seeing Germany under the control of a strong anti-Soviet and anti-Communist regime.  The subsidies Hitler received placed the Nazy Party on a strong financial footing, enabling him to make his emotional appeal to the lower middle class and the unemployed in his faith that Germany would recover from its suffering and be a great nation once more. The alliance with the industrialists also demonstrated another aspect of Hitler, a skill of effectively using those that would use him, which many would discover when it was too late.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electoral strength of the Nazis grew during the Depression, as unceasing propaganda accused the government of failing to improve conditions for the working man.  By the fall of 1930 the Nazis captured more than 18 percent of the vote, compared to just 2.6 percent in 1928.  Hitler captured 36.8 percent of the vote when he opposed Paul von Hindenburg in the 1932 presidential election; his mass following put him in such a strong position that he entered a series of closed-door intrigues with Franz von Papen, Oskar Hindenburg, and Otto Meissner, all sharing a fear and loathing of a communist government.  Despite the party losing votes in the November, 1932 election, Hitler insisted on nothing less than the office of chancellor for himself.  For him, it was all or nothing.  Hindenburg offered it to him on January 30, 1933.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In power==&lt;br /&gt;
Almost immediately, Hitler established himself as dictator.  Less than a month after taking office, on February 27 the Reichstag building was set on fire under mysterious circumstances (but officially blamed on a feeble-minded Dutch communist, Marinus van der Lubbe); Hitler soon after succeeded in getting several decrees passed removing much of the guarantees of freedom in the name of state security, and which also allowed an intensified campaign of violence against dissidents.  Incredibly, in a special election set in those conditions on March 5, the Nazis pulled 43.9 percent of the vote.  On March 21, the new Reichstag assembled at the Potsdam Church, as much a show of unity between the old guard under Hindenburg and the Nazis as it was a show of peace.  Two days later the Enabling Act was passed, giving Hitler full powers; with the exception of the Nazis, all other political parties, including those which had helped pass the Enabling Act, ceased to exist within three months.  Many of their leaders were tossed in concentration camps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Night of the Long Knives===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HitlerRohm1933.JPG|right|200px|thumb|Hitler with Ernst Röhm in 1933]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler, however, did not wish to start an immediate revolution.  He still needed the support of the one agency he needed to implement his ideas: the army.  But he did have one growing problem that was a thorn in the army’s side, the million-plus men of the S.A. and their leader, Ernst Röhm, who wanted nothing less than the merger of the S.A. into the army, with himself in overall command.  At first, Hitler tried getting Röhm’s support by persuasion, but Hitler’s inner circle was for removing him by any means possible.  On June 29, 1934, Hitler ordered a purge, flew towards a resort near Munich where a number of S.A. leaders were vacationing, and had them all arrested; many would be shot without trial.  Refusing to shoot himself when offered, Röhm was killed in his cell at Dachau, his last words, ironically, “Mein Führer, mein Führer!” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/roehm.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/nsdap/Rohm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/nazi/innenpolitik/roehm/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, Hitler gave speech in the Reichstag, announcing that some seventy-four individuals had been shot for threatening the stability of the Reich.&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;If anyone reproaches me and asks why I did not resort to the regular courts of justice, then all I can say is this: In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people…It was no secret that this time the revolution would have to be bloody; when we spoke of it we called it 'The Night of the Long Knives.' Everyone must know for all future time that if he raises his hand to strike the State, then certain death is his lot.&amp;quot; ''&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also used this event to settle his account with other opponents, such as Georg Strasser, who stood for a more socialist and less racist national socialism, and the former Bavarian prime minister who foiled the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923. Satisfied that the S.A. leadership was thoroughly broken up (thousands of S.A. members were either arrested or killed that night), the army approved of Hitler’s actions.  Hindenburg died a few days later on August 2, and Hitler merged the office of president with the chancellorship, and with it the supreme command of the German armed forces.  During this time the world was slowly recovering economically from the Depression, but it quickened in Germany, coincidently with Hitler’s rise to power.  Taking credit for the recovery made him very popular, bringing him a 90 percent approval rating in a voter  plebiscite that year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Beginnings of expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
In matters of state, the running of domestic affairs was left to subordinates, which was something Hitler had little attention for. Foreign policy always peaked his interest, in so much as to the advantages of a “Greater Germany”, which was his chief ambition.  The first part of realizing this, according to ''Mein Kampf'', was to be a reunion of the German peoples within Europe; the second would be an expansion of Germany to the east (lebensraum).  Expanding would mean a renewed conflict with the Slavic peoples, whom Hitler intended to serve as slaves to the “New German Order.”  To follow through on his ambitions, he would have to remove Poland and the Soviet Union as countries; France also would have to be stabilized in the west, as she was Germany’s enemy for more than a century.  He counted as possible allies Italy, with its fascist government under [[Benito Mussolini]], and Britain, whom he regarded as having a similar, Teutonic heritage.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler6-thumb.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Hitler with his dog, Blondie.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Before any of his ambitions could take place, there was one thing he detested which needed immediate removal: the restrictions placed upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I.  Posing as a man of peace to allay suspicions, he insisted that he was a champion of Europe wishing only for the removal of the inequalities leveled by the treaty, and  posturing as a shield against Bolshevism.  In October, 1933, he had Germany withdraw from the [[League of Nations]].  The following January he signed a non-aggression treaty with Poland.  His individual repudiations of parts of the treaty were followed by offers of negotiations for new agreements, while maintaining Germany’s limited ambitious nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this was going on, Germany was steadily building up the armed forces.  Rigorous training using wooden guns and trucks marked as “tanks” got needed battlefield training for officers.  Potential fighter pilots began their training in gliders at public demonstrations – Germany, under terms of the treaty, was not allowed an air force – and later they would fly in new civilian stunt planes and transports, which on the drawing board were designed to be rapidly turned into fighters and bombers.  Conscription was introduced in January, 1935, and in June of that year Hitler successfully signed a naval treaty with Britain, giving him rights to a respectable navy; but even while the ink was drying, Germany was secretly building a large U-boat fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matter of reuniting the German peoples came into being in July, 1934, and here Hitler overreached.  German organizations were covertly aiding Austrian Nazis in the overthrow of their government, culminating in an attempted revolt as well as murdering Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss.  When the attempt clearly failed, Hitler denied involvement.  In January, 1935, a plebecite was introduced in the Saarland; more than 90 percent voted to return the territory to Germany.  Then in March, 1936, came his greatest slap to the Versailles Treaty: against the advice of his generals, and in open defiance of France and Britain, he ordered troops into the demilitarized Rhineland.  Germany was once again becoming the leading power in continental Europe.  By October, 1936, Germany had signed an alliance with Italy, proclaiming a “Rome-Berlin axis,” followed by the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan.  All three countries would sign a single, mutual alliance pact, the following year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health care in Nazi Germany===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Michael H. Kater &amp;quot;physicians became Nazified more thoroughly and much sooner than any other profession, and as Nazis they did more in the service of the nefarious regime than any of their extra-professional peers.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=lDMIHDTLEN4C&amp;amp;pg=PA18&amp;amp;lpg=PA18&amp;amp;dq=Reich+Minister+of+the+Interior%2Bhealth%2Bcivilian+patient&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=2lLhun_7PE&amp;amp;sig=olfzxYKJAswVjjIEqjBcZPKhCXM&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=3D2MSsrZAZGeMLeq7JMO&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=7#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;f=false Doctors Under Hitler] By Michael H. Kater, pp. 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=NnPBlkKk8AQC&amp;amp;pg=PA110&amp;amp;lpg=PA110&amp;amp;dq=physicains+became+nazified+much+thoroughly+and+sooner&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=sWUPklUojC&amp;amp;sig=fAJrGFwHYn-0gJDKPWLERHikAY4&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=GUaMStjmKIfaNb66rZMO&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;f=false Atrocities on trial: historical perspectives on the politics of prosecuting war crimes]&lt;br /&gt;
By Patricia Heberer, Jürgen Matthäus], p. 110.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/bulletin_of_the_history_of_medicine/v073/73.1marrus.html The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context] Michael Robert Marrus, Bulletin of the History of Medicine,Volume 73, Number 1, Spring 1999, pp. 106-123, E-ISSN: 1086-3176 Print ISSN: 0007-5140 [http://www.faculty.umb.edu/gary_zabel/Courses/Moral%20Issues%20in%20Medicine/Human%20Experimentation/Nuremberg%20Doctors%27%20Trial.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After 1933, physicians joined the Nazi Party in greater numbers than did any other profession. By 1935, almost a third of the non-Jewish German physicians belonged to the Nazi Party. From 1925 to 1944, the per cent of doctors in the party was almost three times as high as in the population as a whole. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael H. Kater, ‘’The Nazi Party: A Social Profile of Members and Leaders 1919-1945’’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Association of Sickness Fund Physicians [http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/04/24/health-care-around-the-world-germany/] was established in 1933 as a national bargaining unit to replace the numerous, more local, associations with which sickness funds had negotiated in the past. Thus, several thousand sickness funds were forced to deal with a single organization, or [[single payer]], that held a legal monopoly over medical services. The drive by the medical profession to transform the organization and delivery of [[health care]] services from self-governing sickness funds to physician-controlled services was complete.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ajph.org/cgi/reprint/76/1/78.pdf Social Medicine vs Professional Dominance: The German Experience], Donald W. Light, PhD, Stephan Liebfried, PhD, and Floran Tennstedt, PhD.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anschluss==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed from their offices in January 1938 were Hjalmar Schacht (economic ministry); Werner von Fritsch (soldiers’ representative); and Konstantin von Neurath (foreign office); the reason being was they were not fully accepting of Nazism.  Beginning his plans of German conquest, he started with Austria.  Kurt von Schuschnigg, the Austrian chancellor, was invited to Berchtesgaden in February, where he was browbeaten and forced to sign an agreement placing Austrian Nazis in the government.   When Schuschnigg resisted and announced a plebiscite for Austrian voters concerning independence, Hitler ordered German troops into Austria, completely taking over the country within days.  His return to Vienna was in triumph; enthusiastic crowds greeted him by the tens of thousands, in sharp contrast to the scenes of privation he had gone through there in his youth.  Austria was annexed (Anschluss) to the Reich a short time later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Anschluss was going on, Hitler was speaking in friendly terms with Czechoslovakia; nearly as soon as Austria ceased to exist, Hitler proceeded with his plans against the Czechs.  The northwestern region of Czechoslovakia was the Sudetenland, inhabited by a German minority, and the leader of them, Konrad Henlein, was instructed to make impossible demands for those Germans on the Czech government.  In the interest of preventing a general war (which Hitler wanted), Mussolini and British prime minister Neville Chamberlain concluded a peaceful agreement in Munich on September 30, giving Hitler the Sudetenland without firing a shot.  Chamberlain would return to Britain, waving the agreement signed between himself and Hitler, declaring it to be “peace for our time”, but his act of appeasement would ensure the peace would last only a few more months.  Despite assurances that the Sudetenland was his last territorial demands, “Czechia”, as the remainder of Czechoslovakia was called, became a German protectorate on March 15, 1939, when Hitler ordered it occupied.  Just over a week later, Lithuania was forced to cede to Germany the territory of Memel (Klaipeda), on the border of East Prussia.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Poland==&lt;br /&gt;
Poland’s turn was next, and listening to the rumblings was France and Britain, which signed guarantees of mutual assistance to the Polish nation should it be attacked by Germany.  Hitler also signed pacts: a “Pact of Steel” with Italy, strengthening the alliance between Rome and Berlin, and then a treaty that caught many off-guard: a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union on August 23.  A secret clause in the pact allowed for the simultaneous invasion of Poland, and the division of the country in the center from north to south.  Poland was invaded on September 1; two days later, Britain and France declared war on Germany.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler assumed his own war strategy.  Poland was conquered within weeks, and when a desired peace accord with Britain failed to materialize, he ordered the army to prepare for a western offensive.  Norway was invaded and occupied, forestalling a British move on that country; Denmark was occupied by April, 1940.  Hitler than adopted General Erich von Manstien’s plan for an offensive against France itself, which would move through neutral Belgium’s Ardenne Forest on May 10, taking that country as a matter of convenience, as well as avoiding the static fortifications of France’s Maginot Line.  The German forces, extremely successful in their operations, reached the coastal ports on the English Channel in 10 days; Holland and Belgium both surrendered within days.  But south of Dunkirk was where the army was ordered to halt.  Hitler had hoped even at this stage in the battle that Britain would commit to peace; instead, the halting of the German army allowed the British to remove 170,000 fighting men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 10, Italy entered the war as German tanks were sweeping across northern France.  Hitler signed an armistice with France on June 22, the signing taking place in the same rail car at the same site where the Germans surrendered in 1918.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having failed in getting the British to sign an armistice, Hitler prepared his forces for “Operation Sea Lion,” the invasion of Britain. However, the Luftwaffe was defeated in its attempt to gain air superiority over British airspace, also known as the Battle Of Britain, which forced the permanent postponement of Sealion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Facing the failure of the British to give in, Hitler started to prepare to double-cross his erstwhile partner in the Poland conquest, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union.  Then Mussolini invaded Greece, got bogged down in the Balkans, and the threat loomed that he would lose his whole army there.  Hitler found it necessary to come to his aid, while at the same time taking direct control of Yugoslavia in the wake of the overthrow of the pro-Nazi government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbarossa==&lt;br /&gt;
The attack on Soviet Russia began June 22, 1941.  Rapid in its advancement, the German army captured a large swath of territory between the Baltic and Black seas, and captured close to 3,000,000 prisoners.  But Hitler, already micro-managing military operations, became overbearing to his generals; he preferred to go after many targets, while his generals argued for a single objective.  A few miles in front of Moscow, the German army was halted by a Russian offensive in December, as well as something he had absolutely no control over: the severe Russian winter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the lands already occupied by German forces, S.S. chief Heinrich Himmler was preparing the ground for Hitler’s new German order.  Expelling the Jews from Germany was the first step, and this was carried out by laws and decrees beginning in 1933; the Germans would switch to outright force in 1939, as Jews were first deported en-masse to Poland, then walled into ghettos after the occupation began.  By 1941, a policy crafted under S.S. general Reinhard Heydrich had changed expulsion for extermination in what was called &amp;quot;a final solution to the Jewish question&amp;quot; (''die Endlösung der Judenfrage'').  The system of concentration camps was supplemented by the creation of specialized killing centers in the occupied countries, especially in Poland, where camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzac “processed” thousands of victims daily.  Some six million Jews died during what was called the [[Holocaust]], as well as an additional five million Slavs, Gypsies, the handicapped, the aged, and many others that the Nazis considered “subhuman” in accordance with German racial policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beginning of the end==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Adolf_hitler6.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in 1944, by now looking tired and strained.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler grew increasingly strained by the end of 1942, depending on large amounts of drugs supplied by his physician, Theodor Morell, as a result of the twin defeats of El Alamein (which he lost the bulk of his Afrika corps to British general Montgomery), and Stalingrad (where he lost an entire army of 250,000 men to the Russians).  He spent more time in his headquarters in East Prussia, and his time in the public eye ceased to exist.  He refused to visit bombed German cities, and, as with Stalingrad, refused to allow German armies to withdraw from the battlefield when the situation was lost.  Still, he could make stunning, decisive decisions when called for, such as the commando raid that resulted in the rescue of Benito Mussolini from Italian partisans in July, 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the defeat of Germany in the war was looming closer.  Hitler’s relations with his leading commanders grew strained, the more so as he allowed units of the S.S. to take positions traditionally held by the army.  The line at the eastern front was slowly being pushed back by the Soviets, while in the Atlantic his U-boats campaign had faltered.  German cities were constantly being bombed, and a successful invasion on the Normandy coast of France in June, 1944 marked the beginning of the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Assassination attempt===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:NWT Hitler dead.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Hitler's death as covered by the ''New York Times'', May 2, 1945.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Seeing Germany’s chances of surviving the war were desperate, a group of officers plotted to assassinate Hitler, planning several attempts in 1943-44, but nearly successful on July 20, 1944, when a bomb hidden in a briefcase by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg went off under a table that Hitler and others were leaning over; four were killed outright, several suffered injuries, but Hitler escaped relatively unharmed (the bomb itself was set down away from Hitler behind a solid oak table leg, saving him).  The conspirators were quickly rounded up; Stauffenberg was shot.  The remainder were put on show trials and condemned to hang on meat hooks with piano wire.  It was said that Hitler enjoyed watching film of their executions.  As a result of the bomb, Nazi members were employed at key positions within the army, removing any trace of the army’s independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within months nearly all of the territory occupied by Germany was now in Allied hands.  A last offensive in December, 1944 to take the port of Antwerp, Belgium, failed.  Hitler had by them grown ill; his hopes for a German victory bordered on the fantastical and the imagination.  By January, 1945 he had moved into his command bunker in Berlin, where he gave orders deploying fictional divisions to counter the ever-closer Soviets.  When all seemed lost, he gave out his final orders: first, appointing Admiral Karl Dönitz as head of the state and his successor, and Josef Goebbels as chancellor; and second, dictating his last political will which was an attempt to justify his life’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 29, he committed the one truly-chivalrous act of his life: he married Eva Braun, his long-time mistress.  After retiring to his room in the bunker the next day, Eva took poison, and Hitler put a bullet in his head.  In accordance with his wishes, both bodies were burned.  His Third Reich would outlive him for another week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote the following in [[Time Magazine]] regarding Hitler: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Adolf Hitler or the incarnation of absolute evil; this is how future generations will remember the all-powerful Fuehrer of the criminal Third Reich. Compared with him, his peers [[Mussolini]] and [[Franco]] were novices. Under his hypnotic gaze, humanity crossed a threshold from which one could see the abyss. &amp;quot;Before Hitler, we thought we had sounded the depths of human nature,&amp;quot; argues Ron Rosenbaum, author of &amp;quot;Explaining Hitler.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;He showed how much lower we could go, and that's what was so horrifying. It gets us wondering not just at the depths he showed us but whether there is worse to come. The power of Hitler was to confound the modernist notion that judgments about good and [[evil]] were little more than matters of taste, reflections of social class and power and status. Although some modern scholars drive past the notion of evil and instead explain Hitler's conduct as a reflection of his childhood and self-esteem issues, for most survivors of the 20th century he is confirmation of our instinctive sense that evil does exist. It moves among us; it leads us astray and deploys powerful, subtle weapons against even the sturdiest souls.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;time&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hitler and the Theory of Evolution==&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see:'' [[Evolutionary racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerrisetopower.jpg|right|225px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
The staunch [[evolution|evolutionist]] Stephen Gould admitted the following: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Haeckel|[Ernst] Haeckel]] was the chief apostle of evolution in [[Germany]].... His evolutionary racism; his call to the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to a &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; state; his belief that harsh, inexorable laws of evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring upon favored races the right to dominate others; the irrational mysticism that had always stood in strange communion with his brave words about objective science - all contributed to the rise of Nazism. -  Stephen J. Gould, &amp;quot;Ontogeny and Phylogeny,&amp;quot; Belknap Press: Cambridge MA, 1977, pp.77-78).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/social.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In regards to evolutionary racism, Hitler wrote the following in his work ''[[Mein Kampf]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Germans were the higher race, destined for a glorious evolutionary future. For this reason it was essential that the [[Jew]]s should be segregated, otherwise mixed marriages would take place. Were this to happen, all nature’s efforts “to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being may thus be rendered futile.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1675&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200601.txt ''Mein Kampf,'' from Project Gutenberg Australia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also wrote in ''Mein Kampf'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=268&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Robert E.D. Clark wrote in his work ''Darwin, Before and After'' the following regarding Hitler and the theory of evolution: “Adolf Hitler’s mind was captivated by evolutionary teaching — probably since the time he was a boy. Evolutionary ideas — quite undisguised — lie at the basis of all that is worst in Mein Kampf — and in his public speeches”.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;courier&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_holocaust_why_did_it_happen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:5712dawkins.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|right|thumbnail|200px|[[Richard Dawkins]] is a prominent [[atheism|atheist]] and [[evolution|evolutionist]]. [[Richard Dawkins]] stated in an interview: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Richard Hickman in his work ''Biocreation'' concurs and wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It is perhaps no coincidence that Adolf Hitler was a firm believer in and preacher of evolutionism. Whatever the deeper, profound, complexities of his [[psychosis]], it is certain that [the concept of struggle was important for]. . . his book, Mein Kampf clearly set forth a number of evolutionary ideas, particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival of the fittest and extermination of the weak to produce a better society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationism.org/csshs/v08n3p24.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Noted evolutionary [[anthropology|anthropologist]] Sir [[Arthur Keith]] conceded the following in regards to Hitler: “The German Fuhrer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practices of Germany conform to the theory of evolution”.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;courier&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pulitzer Prize]]-winning author [[Marilynne Robinson]] wrote the following regarding Hitler's racism in the November 2006 issue of ''[[Harper’s]]'' magazine:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|While it is true that persecution of the Jews has a very long history in [[Europe]], it is also true that science in the twentieth century revived and absolutized persecution by giving it a fresh rationale — Jewishness was not religious or cultural, but genetic. Therefore no appeal could be made against the brute fact of a Jewish grandparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Richard Dawkins|[Richard] Dawkins]] deals with all this in one sentence. Hitler did his evil &amp;quot;in the name of ... an insane and unscientific [[eugenics]] theory.&amp;quot; But eugenics is science as surely as totemism is religion. That either is in error is beside the point. Science quite appropriately acknowledges that error should be assumed, and at best it proceeds by a continuous process of criticism meant to isolate and identify error. So bad science is still science in more or less the same sense that bad religion is still religion. That both of them can do damage on a huge scale is clear. The prestige of both is a great part of the problem, and in the modern period the credibility of anything called science is enormous. As the history of eugenics proves, science at the highest levels is no reliable corrective to the influence of cultural prejudice but is in fact profoundly vulnerable to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is indeed historical precedent in the [[Spanish Inquisition]] for the notion of hereditary Judaism. But the fact that the worst religious thought of the sixteenth century can be likened to the worst scientific thought of the twentieth century hardly redounds to the credit of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://solutions.synearth.net/2006/10/20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/someone-finally-said-it-dawkinss-hysterical-scientism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Evolution|Evolutionist]] and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] stated in an interview: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The interviewer wrote, regarding the Hitler comment, &amp;quot;I was stupefied. He had readily conceded that his own [[philosophy|philosophical]] position did not offer a rational basis for moral judgments. His intellectual honesty was refreshing, if somewhat disturbing on this point.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hitler Siegestor Munich Victory Gate.jpg|thumb|Watercolor of the Arch of Triumph in Munich by Hitler.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.eucontest.org/go.php?pdf=www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%201994.pdf Extracts From Mein Kampf by Hitler]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/ Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.] Full text.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.snyderstreasures.com/pages/hartworks.htm Adolf Hitler ORIGINAL Watercolor Artworks.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/medical.htm STATE MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE THIRD REICH], FROM THE OPENING STATEMENT BY TELFORD TAYLOR,  Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949–1953.] Retrieved from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/profile-index.htmlA Psychological Analysis of Adolf Hitler, His Life and Legend], Walter C. Langer, Office of Strategic Services, Washington, D.C.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Hitler, Adolf}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mass Murderers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nazis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770328</id>
		<title>Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770328"/>
				<updated>2010-04-18T17:15:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Added category&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitler7.JPG|right|300px|thumb|The [[Evolution|evolutionary]] [[racism|racist]] Adolf Hitler in the 1930s.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Adolf Hitler''' was the Austrian-born Chancellor and President of [[Germany]] from January 30, 1933 until his death on April 30, 1945.  He was also the leader (German: ''Der Führer'') of the [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (''National-sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'', or [[Nazi]] Party) which gained political power through threat, intimidation, and outright violence throughout Germany in the aftermath of the [[First World War]]. Adolf Hitler was an [[Evolution|evolutionary]] [[racist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=268&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hitler’s policies and beliefs resulted in the [[Genocide|mass extermination]] of the [[Jews]], [[Gypsies]], and other peoples he considered “[[Racial Supremacy|inferior]]” throughout central and eastern [[Europe]] and were directly responsible for the outbreak of [[World War II]], which caused the deaths of untold millions on and off the battlefield and ended only after Hitler's [[suicide]] in his Berlin bunker. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hitler Roses.jpg|thumb|Roses by Adolf Hitler.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler was born on April 20, 1889, in Braunau am Inn, [[Austria]].  Hitler's father, Alois (born 1837), was a customs official who was himself born illegitimate, carrying for a time his mother's name, Schicklgruber. By 1876 he had his baptismal entry corrected in his church records, establishing his father as Johan Heidler, which was altered slightly to Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When his father retired the family moved to Linz, Austria, where it remained a favorite for young Adolf for the rest of his life, and where he gave his wish to be buried.  When Alois died in 1903 he left enough of a pension to support his wife and children; Adolf would take his and live off of it in Vienna after leaving school, dreaming of becoming an artist.  Although somewhat competent as a painter of landscapes and architecture, his renderings of humans were considered “lifeless” and “crude” by the standards of the Academy of Fine Arts, and his application was rejected twice.  Remaining in [[Vienna]], he moved from one cheap flop house to another, painting postcards and advertisements to earn a meager living after his allowance had dried up.  By then he had developed traits which characterized his life as a whole: secretiveness, loneliness, a Spartan mode of everyday life, and a hatred of the cosmopolitan, multinational character that was the makeup of Vienna. ''He never sought a proper job or regular employment. Instead he immersed himself in the works of [[Hegel]], [[Nietzsche]], and the anti-Semitic writings of the Englishman Houston Stewart Chamberlain. He loved the operas of Wagner, and the stories of the Nordic Gods... In early 1910, he entered a shelter for the homeless, populated in the main by poor Jews, on Meldemenstrasse, and was eating at soup kitchens. By this time he had pawned all his belongings. '' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://socyberty.com/history/young-adolf-the-adolescent-hitler-and-beyond/ Young Adolf: The Adolescent Hitler and Beyond.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Who And What He Was==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote famously, and most eloquently about Hitler in 1998:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;At the same time that he terrorized his adversaries, he knew how to please, impress and charm the very interlocutors from whom he wanted support. Diplomats and journalists insist as much on his charm as they do on his temper tantrums. The savior admired by his own as he dragged them into his madness, the Satan and exterminating angel feared and hated by all others, Hitler led his people to a shameful defeat without precedent. That his political and strategic ambitions have created a dividing line in the history of this turbulent and tormented century is undeniable: there is a before and an after. By the breadth of his crimes, which have attained a quasi-ontological dimension, he surpasses all his predecessors: as a result of Hitler, man is defined by what makes him inhuman. With Hitler at the head of a gigantic laboratory, life itself seems to have changed.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;How did this Austrian without title or position manage to get himself elected head of a German nation renowned for its civilizing mission? How to explain the success of his cheap demagogy in the heart of a people so proud of having inherited the genius of a Wolfgang von Goethe and an Immanuel Kant?&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Was there no resistance to his disastrous projects? There was. But it was too feeble, too weak and too late to succeed. German society had rallied behind him: the judicial, the educational, the industrial and the economic establishments gave him their support. Few politicians of this century have aroused, in their lifetime, such love and so much hate; few have inspired so much historical and psychological research after their death. Even today, works on his enigmatic personality and his cursed career are best sellers everywhere. Some are good, others are less good, but all seem to respond to an authentic curiosity on the part of a public haunted by memory and the desire to understand.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;We think we know everything about the nefarious forces that shaped his destiny: his unhappy childhood, his frustrated adolescence; his artistic disappointments; his wound received on the front during World War I; his taste for spectacle, his constant disdain for social and military aristocracies; his relationship with [[Eva Braun]], who adored him; the cult of the very death he feared; his lack of scruples with regard to his former comrades of the SA, whom he had assassinated in 1934; his endless hatred of [[Jews]], whose survival enraged him — each and every phase of his official and private life has found its chroniclers, its biographers.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;And yet. There are, in all these givens, elements that escape us. How did this unstable paranoid find it within himself to impose gigantic hope as an immutable ideal that motivated his nation almost until the end? Would he have come to power if Germany were not going through endless economic crises, or if the winners in 1918 had not imposed on it conditions that represented a national humiliation against which the German patriotic fiber could only revolt? We would be wrong to forget: Hitler came to power in January 1933 by the most legitimate means. His [[Nationalist Socialist Party]] won a majority in the parliamentary elections. The aging [[Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg]] had no choice but to allow him, at age 43, to form the new government, marking the end of the Weimar Republic. And the beginning of the [[Third Reich]], which, according to Hitler, would last 1,000 years.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;From that moment on, events cascaded. The burning of the [[Reichstag]] came only a little before the openings of the first concentration camps, established for members of the opposition. Fear descended on the country and squeezed it in a vise. Great writers, musicians and painters went into exile to France and the U.S. Jews with foresight emigrated toward Palestine. The air of Hitler's Germany was becoming more and more suffocating. Those who preferred to wait, thinking that the Nazi regime would not last, could not last, would regret it later, when it was too late.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The fact is that Hitler was beloved by his people — not the military, at least not in the beginning, but by the average Germans who pledged to him an affection, a tenderness and a fidelity that bordered on the irrational. It was idolatry on a national scale. One had to see the crowds who acclaimed him. And the women who were attracted to him. And the young who in his presence went into ecstasy. Did they not see the hateful mask that covered his face? Did they not divine the catastrophe he bore within himself?&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;time&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/time100/leaders/profile/hitler.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cupid Complaining to Venus by Lucas Cranach.jpg|120px|left]]''One of the best-loved paintings in the National Gallery - an exquisite vision of Venus and Cupid by the greatest artist of the Reformation - once belonged to Hitler, it has been revealed. New evidence has come to light that Lucas Cranach's Cupid Complaining to Venus, currently on loan to an exhibition in Bristol, hung on the sitting-room wall of his flat in Munich.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/mar/28/art.secondworldwar Hitler owned painting now in National Gallery]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler munich1914.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Hitler in the crowd in Munich, 1914, reacting to the news of Germany's entry in the First World War.]]&lt;br /&gt;
By 1913 Hitler was in Munich, Germany, with war clouds on the horizon.  Classified as unfit for service in the Austrian army (possibly by faking, as he did not like the thought of serving Austria) in 1914, he volunteered for the German army, joining the 16th Bavarian Reserve Infantry Regiment, greeting the war with enthusiasm, and finding the military discipline and comradeship satisfying.  He served during the entire [[First World War]] as a messenger carrying dispatches between units, and often at the front lines under fire; he was wounded in 1916, and gassed in 1918.  His bravery during this time earned him the [[Iron Cross]], 2nd Class, in December, 1914, and in August 1918 he was awarded the Iron Cross, 1st Class – a rare decoration for a corporal.  But the gassing would take him out of the war and into a hospital, where he would be told the heart-wrenching news of Germany’s defeat the following November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Path to power==&lt;br /&gt;
After the war ended, Hitler's future seemed uncertain. There was much discontent among demobilized veterans because of the lack of employment. The German military had felt it had not been defeated; indeed, the German Army stood on foreign soil when the Armistice was signed November 11, 1918 and not a square inch of German soil had been occupied. This was despite the fact that the German Army's strongest position, the Hindenburg line, had been broken by the Allies, and the German Army itself was in full retreat. However, the Army felt they had done their job, and the nation had been &amp;quot;stabbed in the back&amp;quot; by a gang of traitors who sought to lay hands on the Fatherland.  The &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot; that Germany had been defeated was the &amp;quot;big lie&amp;quot; Hitler spoke of, as if repeating it often enough would cause people to believe it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After his discharge from the hospital, Hitler acted as an army political agent, assigned in Munich to gather information on the various political parties which had spring up amid the social chaos following Germany’s defeat.  In September, 1919, he was given orders to investigate the relatively-minor German Workers’ Party (''Deutsche Arbeiterpartei''); intrigued by the party’s apparatus and its racial, pan-German nationalism, he joined, becoming its 55th member; he left the army soon after and devoted himself to improving the party’s propaganda, as well as his own position within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions in Germany fostered the development of the party.  Economic woes brought widespread discontent, added to the furor surrounding the loss of the war and the harsh terms heaped upon Germany by the Allied Powers in the Versailles Peace Treaty.  Bavaria’s traditional separatism from the central government in Berlin made current conditions especially sharp, and Hitler was savvy enough to take full advantage of them.  When he joined, he found the party ineffective in leadership and uncertain as to its aims; he accepted the party program, but regarded it as a means to an end.  He caused friction with other members of the party, and their attempts to control him caused a threat of resignation; realizing that the future of the party now depended on Hitler, who clearly had a talent of organization, fund collecting, and above all, speaking, they declined to accept it; from July, 1921 Hitler was regarded as the party leader with nearly unlimited power.  From his party newspaper, ''Völkischer Beobachter'' (“Popular Observer”), he spewed out endless propaganda.  His meetings where he spoke grew from handfuls to hundreds, and then on to thousands.  A man of charismatic personality, he quickly attracted a circle of loyal and devoted followers: Julius Streicher, Alfred Rosenberg, Hermann Göring, and Rudolf Hess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Munich was also a gathering place for former servicemen dissatisfied with conditions in the country; members of the Freikorps, which had been organized after the war from army units that refused to return to civilian life; and those civilians who plotted against the republic. Many of these men joined the Nazi Party. Among them was a staff member of the district command who had joined the German Workers’ Party before Hitler, Ernst Röhm, a pudgy man with a scared face who saw his own ambition in helping further Hitler’s rise within the party.  Röhm recruited what came to be known as the “Brown Shirts”, the violent squads used to attack socialists and communists, and to protect party meetings whenever Hitler was speaking. By 1921 they were organized into a private army called the ''Sturmabteilung'', abbreviated to S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Beer Hall Putsch==&lt;br /&gt;
Germany in 1923 was marked by social and political unrest caused by hyperinflation. In this time Hitler was able convince [[Erich Ludendorff]], an accomplished  general and leader of the German forces in the first World War, to join him in a coup d'etat (''Putsch'' in German). When Hitler learned that the nationalist prime minister of Bavaria was giving a speech to 3000 officials in one of Munich's biggest beer halls (the Haufbrau Haus), he ordered his paramilitaries to surround the building. Hitler went inside and took the prime minister hostage, announced a revolution, and attempted to convince him to join the coup against Berlin and become member in his new administration. The Bavarian prime minister agreed under pressure, but informed the nation via radio later that night that he did not support Hitler. The prime minister also informed the federal government in Berlin; the putsch had begun to fail.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next morning, 9 November 1923, Hitler and Ludendorff were marching with approximately 2000 partly armed supporters through Munich in a show of strength to regain the momentum. In the ensuing fight between Hitler's marchers and a cordon of police and army units at least 14 Nazi supporters and three policemen were killed and hundreds wounded. Ludendorff handed himself over to the authorities, while Hitler fled soon after the fighting began. Hitler was arrested a few days later at a friend's house, were had been in hiding since the failed coup. Ludendorff was acquitted of all charges, while Hitler was sentenced to 5 years in prison (he would do eight months). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://history1900s.about.com/cs/thirdreich/a/beerhallputsch_2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/putsch2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Bavarian prime minister, who foiled the plan, was killed in 1934 in the &amp;quot;Night of the Long Knives&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''Mein Kampf''===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler had his inner circle as frequent visitors in his prison cell, which was made more comfortable due to his celebrity.  While there, he dictated to Rudolf Hess the first volume of ''Mein Kampf'' (“My Struggle”), his political autobiography and a compendium of his many ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler believed in the inequality of the races, nations, and individuals as part of the natural order of mankind, and chief among them was the exalted “Aryan race”, and the greatest of the Aryans were the Germans.   It was the German, according to Hitler, that gave the world civilization and the arts; to safeguard the German people as a race (the “Volk”), they would need to be united under a single leader (the Führer), where they would be protected from their three principle enemies: Marxism, which included social democracy as well as communism; democracy and its mob-rule, as shown by the failings of the Weimar Republic; and above all what Hitler called the poisoners of humanity, the Jews.  “Rational anti-Semitism must lead to systematic legal opposition,” he wrote in 1919. “Its final objective must be the removal of the Jews altogether.” In Mein Kampf, he told the world that the Jew was the “destroyer of culture,” “a parasite within the nation,” and “a menace.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From &amp;quot;My Struggle&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Jew &amp;quot;... he blares out his merits to the rest of the world until people really begin to believe in them. Anyone who does not believe in them is doing him a bitter injustice. In a short time he begins to twist things around to make it look as if all the injustice in the world had always been done to him and not the other way around.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch11.html Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| Hitler portrays Jews as leaders in politics and banking, both groups seeking to strengthen their cause, [[Zionism]], to ensure Jewish domination. From his Social Darwinist perspective, Hitler perceived a racial war as inevitable and he sought to halt the &amp;quot;[[Jewish]] drive towards world conquest&amp;quot;... As Berlin collapsed around him, Adolf asserted: &amp;quot;Out of the ruins of our towns and monuments hatred will grow against those finally responsible for everything, International Jewry.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.historytoday.com/MainArticle.aspx?m=32043&amp;amp;amid=30237234 Mein Kampf – The Text, its Themes and Hitler’s Vision] Robert Carr dissects a book frequently referred to but seldom read. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rebuilding the Nazi Party==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Hitler speaking; he would often employ physical gesturing to emphasize a point.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler-3.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in car, saluting passing S.A. at one of many parades.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Internal dissension within the party caused it to languish while Hitler was in prison.  When he was released he saw difficulties in the country that had not existed before the Putsch, namely currency reform that brought economic stability, and the scaling back of the war reparations as a result of the Dawes Plan.  Hitler was also forbidden to speak in public, which remained in force until 1928; however, he wasn’t about to stop his rebuilding of the party nor of his re-establishing his own position within it as leader, despite Gregor Strasser’s opposition in northern Germany.  By 1927 the number of Nazis was in the hundreds of thousands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new period of political and economic instability with the onset of the Great Depression which threw millions out of work in Europe and North America.  To campaign against the [[Young Plan]] (a second renegotiation of war reparations payments) Hitler made an alliance with one of Germany’s leading nationalists, Alfred Hugenberg, whose newspapers enabled Hitler to reach a national audience for the first time. The alliance also had another advantage: it enabled him to seek support from many in business and industry who controlled funds going into politics, and who themselves were desirous of seeing Germany under the control of a strong anti-Soviet and anti-Communist regime.  The subsidies Hitler received placed the Nazy Party on a strong financial footing, enabling him to make his emotional appeal to the lower middle class and the unemployed in his faith that Germany would recover from its suffering and be a great nation once more. The alliance with the industrialists also demonstrated another aspect of Hitler, a skill of effectively using those that would use him, which many would discover when it was too late.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electoral strength of the Nazis grew during the Depression, as unceasing propaganda accused the government of failing to improve conditions for the working man.  By the fall of 1930 the Nazis captured more than 18 percent of the vote, compared to just 2.6 percent in 1928.  Hitler captured 36.8 percent of the vote when he opposed Paul von Hindenburg in the 1932 presidential election; his mass following put him in such a strong position that he entered a series of closed-door intrigues with Franz von Papen, Oskar Hindenburg, and Otto Meissner, all sharing a fear and loathing of a communist government.  Despite the party losing votes in the November, 1932 election, Hitler insisted on nothing less than the office of chancellor for himself.  For him, it was all or nothing.  Hindenburg offered it to him on January 30, 1933.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In power==&lt;br /&gt;
Almost immediately, Hitler established himself as dictator.  Less than a month after taking office, on February 27 the Reichstag building was set on fire under mysterious circumstances (but officially blamed on a feeble-minded Dutch communist, Marinus van der Lubbe); Hitler soon after succeeded in getting several decrees passed removing much of the guarantees of freedom in the name of state security, and which also allowed an intensified campaign of violence against dissidents.  Incredibly, in a special election set in those conditions on March 5, the Nazis pulled 43.9 percent of the vote.  On March 21, the new Reichstag assembled at the Potsdam Church, as much a show of unity between the old guard under Hindenburg and the Nazis as it was a show of peace.  Two days later the Enabling Act was passed, giving Hitler full powers; with the exception of the Nazis, all other political parties, including those which had helped pass the Enabling Act, ceased to exist within three months.  Many of their leaders were tossed in concentration camps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Night of the Long Knives===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HitlerRohm1933.JPG|right|200px|thumb|Hitler with Ernst Röhm in 1933]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler, however, did not wish to start an immediate revolution.  He still needed the support of the one agency he needed to implement his ideas: the army.  But he did have one growing problem that was a thorn in the army’s side, the million-plus men of the S.A. and their leader, Ernst Röhm, who wanted nothing less than the merger of the S.A. into the army, with himself in overall command.  At first, Hitler tried getting Röhm’s support by persuasion, but Hitler’s inner circle was for removing him by any means possible.  On June 29, 1934, Hitler ordered a purge, flew towards a resort near Munich where a number of S.A. leaders were vacationing, and had them all arrested; many would be shot without trial.  Refusing to shoot himself when offered, Röhm was killed in his cell at Dachau, his last words, ironically, “Mein Führer, mein Führer!” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/roehm.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/nsdap/Rohm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/nazi/innenpolitik/roehm/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, Hitler gave speech in the Reichstag, announcing that some seventy-four individuals had been shot for threatening the stability of the Reich.&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;If anyone reproaches me and asks why I did not resort to the regular courts of justice, then all I can say is this: In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people…It was no secret that this time the revolution would have to be bloody; when we spoke of it we called it 'The Night of the Long Knives.' Everyone must know for all future time that if he raises his hand to strike the State, then certain death is his lot.&amp;quot; ''&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also used this event to settle his account with other opponents, such as Georg Strasser, who stood for a more socialist and less racist national socialism, and the former Bavarian prime minister who foiled the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923. Satisfied that the S.A. leadership was thoroughly broken up (thousands of S.A. members were either arrested or killed that night), the army approved of Hitler’s actions.  Hindenburg died a few days later on August 2, and Hitler merged the office of president with the chancellorship, and with it the supreme command of the German armed forces.  During this time the world was slowly recovering economically from the Depression, but it quickened in Germany, coincidently with Hitler’s rise to power.  Taking credit for the recovery made him very popular, bringing him a 90 percent approval rating in a voter  plebiscite that year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Beginnings of expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
In matters of state, the running of domestic affairs was left to subordinates, which was something Hitler had little attention for. Foreign policy always peaked his interest, in so much as to the advantages of a “Greater Germany”, which was his chief ambition.  The first part of realizing this, according to ''Mein Kampf'', was to be a reunion of the German peoples within Europe; the second would be an expansion of Germany to the east (lebensraum).  Expanding would mean a renewed conflict with the Slavic peoples, whom Hitler intended to serve as slaves to the “New German Order.”  To follow through on his ambitions, he would have to remove Poland and the Soviet Union as countries; France also would have to be stabilized in the west, as she was Germany’s enemy for more than a century.  He counted as possible allies Italy, with its fascist government under [[Benito Mussolini]], and Britain, whom he regarded as having a similar, Teutonic heritage.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler6-thumb.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Hitler with his dog, Blondie.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Before any of his ambitions could take place, there was one thing he detested which needed immediate removal: the restrictions placed upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I.  Posing as a man of peace to allay suspicions, he insisted that he was a champion of Europe wishing only for the removal of the inequalities leveled by the treaty, and  posturing as a shield against Bolshevism.  In October, 1933, he had Germany withdraw from the [[League of Nations]].  The following January he signed a non-aggression treaty with Poland.  His individual repudiations of parts of the treaty were followed by offers of negotiations for new agreements, while maintaining Germany’s limited ambitious nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this was going on, Germany was steadily building up the armed forces.  Rigorous training using wooden guns and trucks marked as “tanks” got needed battlefield training for officers.  Potential fighter pilots began their training in gliders at public demonstrations – Germany, under terms of the treaty, was not allowed an air force – and later they would fly in new civilian stunt planes and transports, which on the drawing board were designed to be rapidly turned into fighters and bombers.  Conscription was introduced in January, 1935, and in June of that year Hitler successfully signed a naval treaty with Britain, giving him rights to a respectable navy; but even while the ink was drying, Germany was secretly building a large U-boat fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matter of reuniting the German peoples came into being in July, 1934, and here Hitler overreached.  German organizations were covertly aiding Austrian Nazis in the overthrow of their government, culminating in an attempted revolt as well as murdering Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss.  When the attempt clearly failed, Hitler denied involvement.  In January, 1935, a plebecite was introduced in the Saarland; more than 90 percent voted to return the territory to Germany.  Then in March, 1936, came his greatest slap to the Versailles Treaty: against the advice of his generals, and in open defiance of France and Britain, he ordered troops into the demilitarized Rhineland.  Germany was once again becoming the leading power in continental Europe.  By October, 1936, Germany had signed an alliance with Italy, proclaiming a “Rome-Berlin axis,” followed by the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan.  All three countries would sign a single, mutual alliance pact, the following year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health care in Nazi Germany===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Michael H. Kater &amp;quot;physicians became Nazified more thoroughly and much sooner than any other profession, and as Nazis they did more in the service of the nefarious regime than any of their extra-professional peers.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=lDMIHDTLEN4C&amp;amp;pg=PA18&amp;amp;lpg=PA18&amp;amp;dq=Reich+Minister+of+the+Interior%2Bhealth%2Bcivilian+patient&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=2lLhun_7PE&amp;amp;sig=olfzxYKJAswVjjIEqjBcZPKhCXM&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=3D2MSsrZAZGeMLeq7JMO&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=7#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;f=false Doctors Under Hitler] By Michael H. Kater, pp. 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=NnPBlkKk8AQC&amp;amp;pg=PA110&amp;amp;lpg=PA110&amp;amp;dq=physicains+became+nazified+much+thoroughly+and+sooner&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=sWUPklUojC&amp;amp;sig=fAJrGFwHYn-0gJDKPWLERHikAY4&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=GUaMStjmKIfaNb66rZMO&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;f=false Atrocities on trial: historical perspectives on the politics of prosecuting war crimes]&lt;br /&gt;
By Patricia Heberer, Jürgen Matthäus], p. 110.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/bulletin_of_the_history_of_medicine/v073/73.1marrus.html The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context] Michael Robert Marrus, Bulletin of the History of Medicine,Volume 73, Number 1, Spring 1999, pp. 106-123, E-ISSN: 1086-3176 Print ISSN: 0007-5140 [http://www.faculty.umb.edu/gary_zabel/Courses/Moral%20Issues%20in%20Medicine/Human%20Experimentation/Nuremberg%20Doctors%27%20Trial.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After 1933, physicians joined the Nazi Party in greater numbers than did any other profession. By 1935, almost a third of the non-Jewish German physicians belonged to the Nazi Party. From 1925 to 1944, the per cent of doctors in the party was almost three times as high as in the population as a whole. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael H. Kater, ‘’The Nazi Party: A Social Profile of Members and Leaders 1919-1945’’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Association of Sickness Fund Physicians [http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/04/24/health-care-around-the-world-germany/] was established in 1933 as a national bargaining unit to replace the numerous, more local, associations with which sickness funds had negotiated in the past. Thus, several thousand sickness funds were forced to deal with a single organization, or [[single payer]], that held a legal monopoly over medical services. The drive by the medical profession to transform the organization and delivery of [[health care]] services from self-governing sickness funds to physician-controlled services was complete.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ajph.org/cgi/reprint/76/1/78.pdf Social Medicine vs Professional Dominance: The German Experience], Donald W. Light, PhD, Stephan Liebfried, PhD, and Floran Tennstedt, PhD.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anschluss==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed from their offices in January 1938 were Hjalmar Schacht (economic ministry); Werner von Fritsch (soldiers’ representative); and Konstantin von Neurath (foreign office); the reason being was they were not fully accepting of Nazism.  Beginning his plans of German conquest, he started with Austria.  Kurt von Schuschnigg, the Austrian chancellor, was invited to Berchtesgaden in February, where he was browbeaten and forced to sign an agreement placing Austrian Nazis in the government.   When Schuschnigg resisted and announced a plebiscite for Austrian voters concerning independence, Hitler ordered German troops into Austria, completely taking over the country within days.  His return to Vienna was in triumph; enthusiastic crowds greeted him by the tens of thousands, in sharp contrast to the scenes of privation he had gone through there in his youth.  Austria was annexed (Anschluss) to the Reich a short time later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Anschluss was going on, Hitler was speaking in friendly terms with Czechoslovakia; nearly as soon as Austria ceased to exist, Hitler proceeded with his plans against the Czechs.  The northwestern region of Czechoslovakia was the Sudetenland, inhabited by a German minority, and the leader of them, Konrad Henlein, was instructed to make impossible demands for those Germans on the Czech government.  In the interest of preventing a general war (which Hitler wanted), Mussolini and British prime minister Neville Chamberlain concluded a peaceful agreement in Munich on September 30, giving Hitler the Sudetenland without firing a shot.  Chamberlain would return to Britain, waving the agreement signed between himself and Hitler, declaring it to be “peace for our time”, but his act of appeasement would ensure the peace would last only a few more months.  Despite assurances that the Sudetenland was his last territorial demands, “Czechia”, as the remainder of Czechoslovakia was called, became a German protectorate on March 15, 1939, when Hitler ordered it occupied.  Just over a week later, Lithuania was forced to cede to Germany the territory of Memel (Klaipeda), on the border of East Prussia.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Poland==&lt;br /&gt;
Poland’s turn was next, and listening to the rumblings was France and Britain, which signed guarantees of mutual assistance to the Polish nation should it be attacked by Germany.  Hitler also signed pacts: a “Pact of Steel” with Italy, strengthening the alliance between Rome and Berlin, and then a treaty that caught many off-guard: a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union on August 23.  A secret clause in the pact allowed for the simultaneous invasion of Poland, and the division of the country in the center from north to south.  Poland was invaded on September 1; two days later, Britain and France declared war on Germany.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler assumed his own war strategy.  Poland was conquered within weeks, and when a desired peace accord with Britain failed to materialize, he ordered the army to prepare for a western offensive.  Norway was invaded and occupied, forestalling a British move on that country; Denmark was occupied by April, 1940.  Hitler than adopted General Erich von Manstien’s plan for an offensive against France itself, which would move through neutral Belgium’s Ardenne Forest on May 10, taking that country as a matter of convenience, as well as avoiding the static fortifications of France’s Maginot Line.  The German forces, extremely successful in their operations, reached the coastal ports on the English Channel in 10 days; Holland and Belgium both surrendered within days.  But south of Dunkirk was where the army was ordered to halt.  Hitler had hoped even at this stage in the battle that Britain would commit to peace; instead, the halting of the German army allowed the British to remove 170,000 fighting men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 10, Italy entered the war as German tanks were sweeping across northern France.  Hitler signed an armistice with France on June 22, the signing taking place in the same rail car at the same site where the Germans surrendered in 1918.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having failed in getting the British to sign an armistice, Hitler prepared his forces for “Operation Sea Lion,” the invasion of Britain. However, the Luftwaffe was defeated in its attempt to gain air superiority over British airspace, also known as the Battle Of Britain, which forced the permanent postponement of Sealion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Facing the failure of the British to give in, Hitler started to prepare to double-cross his erstwhile partner in the Poland conquest, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union.  Then Mussolini invaded Greece, got bogged down in the Balkans, and the threat loomed that he would lose his whole army there.  Hitler found it necessary to come to his aid, while at the same time taking direct control of Yugoslavia in the wake of the overthrow of the pro-Nazi government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbarossa==&lt;br /&gt;
The attack on Soviet Russia began June 22, 1941.  Rapid in its advancement, the German army captured a large swath of territory between the Baltic and Black seas, and captured close to 3,000,000 prisoners.  But Hitler, already micro-managing military operations, became overbearing to his generals; he preferred to go after many targets, while his generals argued for a single objective.  A few miles in front of Moscow, the German army was halted by a Russian offensive in December, as well as something he had absolutely no control over: the severe Russian winter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the lands already occupied by German forces, S.S. chief Heinrich Himmler was preparing the ground for Hitler’s new German order.  Expelling the Jews from Germany was the first step, and this was carried out by laws and decrees beginning in 1933; the Germans would switch to outright force in 1939, as Jews were first deported en-masse to Poland, then walled into ghettos after the occupation began.  By 1941, a policy crafted under S.S. general Reinhard Heydrich had changed expulsion for extermination in what was called &amp;quot;a final solution to the Jewish question&amp;quot; (''die Endlösung der Judenfrage'').  The system of concentration camps was supplemented by the creation of specialized killing centers in the occupied countries, especially in Poland, where camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzac “processed” thousands of victims daily.  Some six million Jews died during what was called the [[Holocaust]], as well as an additional five million Slavs, Gypsies, the handicapped, the aged, and many others that the Nazis considered “subhuman” in accordance with German racial policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beginning of the end==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Adolf_hitler6.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in 1944, by now looking tired and strained.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler grew increasingly strained by the end of 1942, depending on large amounts of drugs supplied by his physician, Theodor Morell, as a result of the twin defeats of El Alamein (which he lost the bulk of his Afrika corps to British general Montgomery), and Stalingrad (where he lost an entire army of 250,000 men to the Russians).  He spent more time in his headquarters in East Prussia, and his time in the public eye ceased to exist.  He refused to visit bombed German cities, and, as with Stalingrad, refused to allow German armies to withdraw from the battlefield when the situation was lost.  Still, he could make stunning, decisive decisions when called for, such as the commando raid that resulted in the rescue of Benito Mussolini from Italian partisans in July, 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the defeat of Germany in the war was looming closer.  Hitler’s relations with his leading commanders grew strained, the more so as he allowed units of the S.S. to take positions traditionally held by the army.  The line at the eastern front was slowly being pushed back by the Soviets, while in the Atlantic his U-boats campaign had faltered.  German cities were constantly being bombed, and a successful invasion on the Normandy coast of France in June, 1944 marked the beginning of the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Assassination attempt===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:NWT Hitler dead.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Hitler's death as covered by the ''New York Times'', May 2, 1945.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Seeing Germany’s chances of surviving the war were desperate, a group of officers plotted to assassinate Hitler, planning several attempts in 1943-44, but nearly successful on July 20, 1944, when a bomb hidden in a briefcase by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg went off under a table that Hitler and others were leaning over; four were killed outright, several suffered injuries, but Hitler escaped relatively unharmed (the bomb itself was set down away from Hitler behind a solid oak table leg, saving him).  The conspirators were quickly rounded up; Stauffenberg was shot.  The remainder were put on show trials and condemned to hang on meat hooks with piano wire.  It was said that Hitler enjoyed watching film of their executions.  As a result of the bomb, Nazi members were employed at key positions within the army, removing any trace of the army’s independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within months nearly all of the territory occupied by Germany was now in Allied hands.  A last offensive in December, 1944 to take the port of Antwerp, Belgium, failed.  Hitler had by them grown ill; his hopes for a German victory bordered on the fantastical and the imagination.  By January, 1945 he had moved into his command bunker in Berlin, where he gave orders deploying fictional divisions to counter the ever-closer Soviets.  When all seemed lost, he gave out his final orders: first, appointing Admiral Karl Dönitz as head of the state and his successor, and Josef Goebbels as chancellor; and second, dictating his last political will which was an attempt to justify his life’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 29, he committed the one truly-chivalrous act of his life: he married Eva Braun, his long-time mistress.  After retiring to his room in the bunker the next day, Eva took poison, and Hitler put a bullet in his head.  In accordance with his wishes, both bodies were burned.  His Third Reich would outlive him for another week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote the following in [[Time Magazine]] regarding Hitler: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Adolf Hitler or the incarnation of absolute evil; this is how future generations will remember the all-powerful Fuehrer of the criminal Third Reich. Compared with him, his peers [[Mussolini]] and [[Franco]] were novices. Under his hypnotic gaze, humanity crossed a threshold from which one could see the abyss. &amp;quot;Before Hitler, we thought we had sounded the depths of human nature,&amp;quot; argues Ron Rosenbaum, author of &amp;quot;Explaining Hitler.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;He showed how much lower we could go, and that's what was so horrifying. It gets us wondering not just at the depths he showed us but whether there is worse to come. The power of Hitler was to confound the modernist notion that judgments about good and [[evil]] were little more than matters of taste, reflections of social class and power and status. Although some modern scholars drive past the notion of evil and instead explain Hitler's conduct as a reflection of his childhood and self-esteem issues, for most survivors of the 20th century he is confirmation of our instinctive sense that evil does exist. It moves among us; it leads us astray and deploys powerful, subtle weapons against even the sturdiest souls.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;time&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hitler and the Theory of Evolution==&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see:'' [[Evolutionary racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerrisetopower.jpg|right|225px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
The staunch [[evolution|evolutionist]] Stephen Gould admitted the following: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Haeckel|[Ernst] Haeckel]] was the chief apostle of evolution in [[Germany]].... His evolutionary racism; his call to the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to a &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; state; his belief that harsh, inexorable laws of evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring upon favored races the right to dominate others; the irrational mysticism that had always stood in strange communion with his brave words about objective science - all contributed to the rise of Nazism. -  Stephen J. Gould, &amp;quot;Ontogeny and Phylogeny,&amp;quot; Belknap Press: Cambridge MA, 1977, pp.77-78).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/social.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In regards to evolutionary racism, Hitler wrote the following in his work ''[[Mein Kampf]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Germans were the higher race, destined for a glorious evolutionary future. For this reason it was essential that the [[Jew]]s should be segregated, otherwise mixed marriages would take place. Were this to happen, all nature’s efforts “to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being may thus be rendered futile.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1675&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200601.txt ''Mein Kampf,'' from Project Gutenberg Australia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also wrote in ''Mein Kampf'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=268&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Robert E.D. Clark wrote in his work ''Darwin, Before and After'' the following regarding Hitler and the theory of evolution: “Adolf Hitler’s mind was captivated by evolutionary teaching — probably since the time he was a boy. Evolutionary ideas — quite undisguised — lie at the basis of all that is worst in Mein Kampf — and in his public speeches”.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;courier&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_holocaust_why_did_it_happen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:5712dawkins.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|right|thumbnail|200px|Richard Dawkins is a prominent [[atheism|atheist]] and [[evolution|evolutionist]]. Richard Dawkins stated in an interview: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Richard Hickman in his work ''Biocreation'' concurs and wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It is perhaps no coincidence that Adolf Hitler was a firm believer in and preacher of evolutionism. Whatever the deeper, profound, complexities of his [[psychosis]], it is certain that [the concept of struggle was important for]. . . his book, Mein Kampf clearly set forth a number of evolutionary ideas, particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival of the fittest and extermination of the weak to produce a better society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationism.org/csshs/v08n3p24.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Noted evolutionary [[anthropology|anthropologist]] Sir [[Arthur Keith]] conceded the following in regards to Hitler: “The German Fuhrer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practices of Germany conform to the theory of evolution”.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;courier&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pulitzer Prize]]-winning author [[Marilynne Robinson]] wrote the following regarding Hitler's racism in the November 2006 issue of ''[[Harper’s]]'' magazine:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|While it is true that persecution of the Jews has a very long history in [[Europe]], it is also true that science in the twentieth century revived and absolutized persecution by giving it a fresh rationale — Jewishness was not religious or cultural, but genetic. Therefore no appeal could be made against the brute fact of a Jewish grandparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Richard Dawkins|[Richard] Dawkins]] deals with all this in one sentence. Hitler did his evil &amp;quot;in the name of ... an insane and unscientific [[eugenics]] theory.&amp;quot; But eugenics is science as surely as totemism is religion. That either is in error is beside the point. Science quite appropriately acknowledges that error should be assumed, and at best it proceeds by a continuous process of criticism meant to isolate and identify error. So bad science is still science in more or less the same sense that bad religion is still religion. That both of them can do damage on a huge scale is clear. The prestige of both is a great part of the problem, and in the modern period the credibility of anything called science is enormous. As the history of eugenics proves, science at the highest levels is no reliable corrective to the influence of cultural prejudice but is in fact profoundly vulnerable to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is indeed historical precedent in the [[Spanish Inquisition]] for the notion of hereditary Judaism. But the fact that the worst religious thought of the sixteenth century can be likened to the worst scientific thought of the twentieth century hardly redounds to the credit of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://solutions.synearth.net/2006/10/20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/someone-finally-said-it-dawkinss-hysterical-scientism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Evolution|Evolutionist]] and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] stated in an interview: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The interviewer wrote, regarding the Hitler comment, &amp;quot;I was stupefied. He had readily conceded that his own [[philosophy|philosophical]] position did not offer a rational basis for moral judgments. His intellectual honesty was refreshing, if somewhat disturbing on this point.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hitler Siegestor Munich Victory Gate.jpg|thumb|Watercolor of the Arch of Triumph in Munich by Hitler.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.eucontest.org/go.php?pdf=www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%201994.pdf Extracts From Mein Kampf by Hitler]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/ Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.] Full text.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.snyderstreasures.com/pages/hartworks.htm Adolf Hitler ORIGINAL Watercolor Artworks.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/medical.htm STATE MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE THIRD REICH], FROM THE OPENING STATEMENT BY TELFORD TAYLOR,  Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949–1953.] Retrieved from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/profile-index.htmlA Psychological Analysis of Adolf Hitler, His Life and Legend], Walter C. Langer, Office of Strategic Services, Washington, D.C.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Hitler, Adolf}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mass Murderers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nazis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770327</id>
		<title>Abortion and Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770327"/>
				<updated>2010-04-18T17:14:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: add category&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg‎|thumb|300px|right|Abortionist views are very similar to those of [[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎'''Abortion''' shares many similarities to the ideas of '''Adolf Hitler'''.  [[Hitler]] believed in the forced &amp;quot;[[evolution]]&amp;quot; of humanity through the death of all those who were not Aryan, most notably including Jews.  He viewed non-Aryans as inferior.  One of the most common reasons for [[abortion]] is to kill those who suffer from physical and mental issues, in a form of [[eugenics]].  This is a lot like Hitler's attempts to murder of those he considered inferior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_promiscuity&amp;diff=770293</id>
		<title>Abortion and promiscuity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_promiscuity&amp;diff=770293"/>
				<updated>2010-04-18T13:06:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Started article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Abortion and promiscuity''' refers to the [[liberal]] trait of using using [[abortion]] as a way to deal with unwanted pregnancies caused by promiscuous sexual behaviour.  Due to immoral [[public school]] sex 'education', many liberal youths view [[contraception]] and [[abortion]] as a license to engage in unhealthy premarital sexual relationships.  As well as killing the unborn baby, the young mother will also risk [[abortion and breast cancer|severe damage]] to her own health.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770292</id>
		<title>Abortion and Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_and_Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=770292"/>
				<updated>2010-04-18T12:56:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JackHT: Added image&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg‎|thumb|300px|right|Abortionist views are very similar to those of [[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎'''Abortion''' shares many similarities to the ideas of '''Adolf Hitler'''.  [[Hitler]] believed in the forced &amp;quot;[[evolution]]&amp;quot; of humanity through the death of all those who were not Aryan, most notably including Jews.  He viewed non-Aryans as inferior.  One of the most common reasons for [[abortion]] is to kill those who suffer from physical and mental issues, in a form of [[eugenics]].  This is a lot like Hitler's attempts to murder of those he considered inferior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JackHT</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>