<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jancuvw</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jancuvw"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Jancuvw"/>
	<updated>2026-10-08T10:23:14Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Ask_questions&amp;diff=23467</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Ask questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Ask_questions&amp;diff=23467"/>
		<updated>2007-03-10T23:52:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jancuvw: A question asked on the question page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hi! Leave any questions you have for us here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If wikipedia is &amp;quot;liberal biased&amp;quot; I assume it would be because thats the way the world is biased because the people who write for it are not censored unless it is blatently wrong. I came to this site and thought that as the homepage calls it &amp;quot;more accurate&amp;quot; info. Unfortunatly, I seemed to have stumbled on less accurate information. Note, that some articles leave out anything that doesn't have to do with a specific biased message. (Example: the abortion article doesn't even explain what it is, just why it's bad.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My real question is, why will this be deleated, instead of talked about and adressed on your site?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jancuvw</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>