Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Talk:Biblical Law Discussions

2007-04-07T15:54:23Z

Jdmeans:

Interesting... Every reading that I have heard, and the way I have always understood these two sets of verses understands that the "uncleanness" mentioned by Moses is the "fornication" mentioned by Jesus. In fact, here's the latest and greatest translation we have:
:Deuteronomy 24:1-4, NASU
:24:1 Law of Divorce

:"When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house, 2 and she leaves his house and goes and becomes another man's wife, 3 and if the latter husband turns against her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife, 4 then her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her again to be his wife, since she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the LORD, and you shall not bring sin on the land which the LORD your God gives you as an inheritance.
NASU

In light of what Jesus says in Matthew, we understand that the second man in the Deuteronomy scenario actually commits adultery, so the wife is by association unclean; more than this, if the second man, too, finds cause to divorce his wife - only by infidelity on part of the wife, then the wife is unclean again - the wife would have to be called unclean, because both men found her out.

Any ideas? [[User:Jdmeans|Jdmeans]] 00:53, 7 April 2007 (EDT)

:What recourse did the woman so situated have? Both husbands found "some indecency" in her, but we're not told what that actually means, was there anyways to restore her name and reputation?
:I think, though, the point of the article is missed, as it seems to infer that Jesus thought the Bible of His day was flawed (in, at least) this one area. This could be bad for people of a fundamental outlook on the Bible, that is the "all or nothing" crowd. [[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 01:41, 7 April 2007 (EDT)

:Not at all. The problem with cases like this is that you lose the whole picture of what the Bible says, or in this case, what the Torah says. It's very clear elsewhere that this, "some indencency", is infidelity. It's the same language employed earlier and later in deuteronomy, with the same implications as the picture of salvation in Ezekiel, as well as the same implications as "doing evil" in the sight of the Lord in Judges. The Article simply asks for opinions. My opinion is that it's generally a bad idea to take snipits of the Bible, (Old or New Testament) when there's clearly an order to the thing. First, we establish -why- we need a messiah, then we get Jesus. It's like comparing directions for a cake: where in one instance, we have an instruction to say, "Bake the cake at 400*F," and at another instance, "Let cake cool." They're different stages of the very same process. And, if you look at earlier parts of Deuteronomy, ((Please, not in the KJV. KJV is a TERRIBLE translation for the modern era)) and even relook at this passage, you'll see what the point and thrust is. And no, the wife does not have any recourse. If she is found 'indecent', or to be an 'adulteress', there must be witnesses. This kind of 'putting out' can't just be an arbitrary thing. See Dueteronomy 17 at, i think, verse 6 and 7.. it's around there. [[User:Jdmeans|Jdmeans]] 11:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)

Talk:Biblical Law Discussions

2007-04-07T05:08:16Z

Jdmeans: my response, changed.

2007-04-07T03:24:46Z

Jdmeans:

Adultery

2007-04-07T03:22:18Z

Jdmeans:

Adultery
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the act of adultery. For the music album, see Adultery (album).

Family law
Entering into marriage
Prenuptial agreement · Marriage
Common-law marriage
Same-sex marriage
Legal states similar to marriage
Cohabitation · Civil union
Domestic partnership
Registered partnership
Dissolution of marriage
Annulment · Divorce · Alimony
Issues affecting children
Paternity · Legitimacy · Adoption
Legal guardian · Ward
Emancipation of minors
Parental responsibility
Contact (including Visitation)
Residence in English law
Custody · Child support
Areas of possible legal concern
Spousal abuse · Child abuse
Child abduction
Adultery · Bigamy · Incest
Conflict of Laws Issues
Marriage · Nullity · Divorce
Adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse between a man and a married woman who is not his spouse. Some legal jurisdictions have defined it as a "crime against marriage",[1] opposed to infidelity.

Contents [hide]
1 Definitions
2 Informal penalties
3 Legal penalties for adultery
4 Adultery in selected cultural and religious traditions
4.1 Historical views
4.2 Judaism
4.3 Christianity
4.4 Islam
5 See also
6 Sources and references

[edit] Definitions
Although the definition of "adultery" seems to differ in nearly every legal system, the common theme is sexual relations outside of marriage, in one form or another.

For example, New York defines an adulterer as a person who "engages in sexual intercourse with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse."[2] While in North Carolina adultery is when any a man and woman who "lewdly and lasciviously associate, bed and cohabit together."[3] Minnesota defines adultery as: "when a married woman has sexual intercourse with a man other than her husband, whether married or not, both are guilty of adultery".[4]

Adultery was known in earlier times by the legalistic term "criminal conversation" (another term, alienation of affection, is used when one spouse deserts the other for a third person). The term originates not from adult, which is from Latin a-dolescere, to grow up, mature, a combination of a, "to", dolere, "work", and the processing combound sc), but from the Latin ad-ulterare (to commit adultery, adulterate/falsify, a combination of ad, "at", and ulter, "above", "beyond", "opposite", meaning "on the other side of the bond of marriage").[5]

A marriage in which both spouses agree that it is acceptable for the husband or wife to have sexual relationships with other people other than their spouse is a form of nonmonogamy. The resulting sexual relationships the husband or wife has with other people, although could be considered to be adultery in some legal jurisdictions, are not treated as such by the spouses.

Close Relationships
Affinity • Attachment • Bisexuality • Bonding • Cohabitation • Compersion • Concubinage • Courtship • Divorce • Friendship • Family • Homosexuality • Heterosexuality • Incest • Infatuation • Intimacy • Jealousy • Limerence • Love • Marriage • Monogamy • Nonmonogamy • Passion • Partner • Pederasty • Platonic love • Psychology of Monogamy • Relational aggression • Sexuality • Separation • Widowhood •

v • d • e
Some cultures have a distinguished interpretation of the term infidelity: in some legal systems, it might be tolerated by the jurisdiction, while in others the same act is adultery and a crime. Still another matter is the reaction of the betrayed; if, on the other hand, he gives his consent, in the case of adultery this is called a cuckold, but in the case of infidelity a contented cuckold is a wittol (now an archaic term).[6] On the other hand, infidelity is not only a sexual term, but is the Latin word "unfaithful" (fides: faith). Having no faith can also mean the religious belief.[7]

[edit] Informal penalties
Apart from formal punishment, historically adulterers have suffered from society's disapproving attitudes toward them. The nature of these attitudes vary widely depending on local culture, religion and values, and how seriously the adulterer regards the opinions of others. Often adultery might be overlooked and tacitly accepted by others aware.

[edit] Legal penalties for adultery
Historically, adultery has been subject to severe sanctions, including the death penalty, and has been grounds for divorce under fault-based divorce laws. In some places, the method of punishment for adultery is stoning to death.[1]

In the original Napoleonic Code, a man could ask to be divorced from his wife if she committed adultery, but the philandery of the husband was not a sufficient motive for divorce unless he had kept his concubine in the family home.

In some jurisdictions, including Korea and Taiwan, adultery is illegal. In the United States, laws vary from state to state. For example, in Pennsylvania, adultery is technically punishable by 2 years of imprisonment or 18 months of treatment for insanity (for history, see Hamowy)(criminal statute repealed 1972), while in Michigan the Court of Appeals, the state's second-highest court, ruled that a little-known provision of state criminal law means that adultery carries a potential life sentence.[2] In Maryland, adultery is punishable by a fine of ten dollars. That being said, such statutes are typically considered blue laws and are rarely, if ever, enforced. In the U.S. Military, adultery is a court-martialable offense only if it was "to the prejudice of good order and discipline" or "of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces" [3]. This law has been applied to cases where both partners were members of the military, particularly where one was in command of the other, or one partner and the other's spouse. The enforceability of criminal sanctions for adultery is questionable in light of Supreme Court decisions since 1965 relating to privacy and sexual intimacy, and particularly in light of Lawrence v. Texas, which protected the right of privacy for consenting adults.

In Canadian law, adultery is defined under the Divorce Act. Though the written definition sets it as extramarital relations with someone of the opposite sex, the recent change in the definition of marriage gave grounds for a British Columbia judge to strike that definition down. In a 2005 case of a woman filing for divorce, her husband had cheated on her with another man, which the judge felt was equal reasoning to dissolve the union.

[edit] Adultery in selected cultural and religious traditions

Man and woman undergoing public exposure for adultery in Japan, around 1860Main article: Religious views on sexual intercourse
For a broad overview, see Religion and sexuality.

[edit] Historical views
Historically, adultery was rigorously condemned and punished, usually only as a violation of the husband's rights. Among such peoples the wife was commonly reckoned as the property of her spouse, and adultery was therefore identified with theft. But it was theft of an aggravated kind, as the property which it would spoliate was more highly appraised than other chattels. In some parts of Africa the seducer is punished with the loss of one or both hands, as one who has perpetrated a robbery upon the husband (Reade, Savage Africa, p. 61). It is not the seducer alone who suffers. Dire penalties are visited upon the offending wife by her wronged spouse, and in many instances she is made to endure a bodily mutilation which will, in the mind of the aggrieved husband, prevent her from ever being a temptation to other men again (Schoolcraft, Historical and Statistical Information Respecting the History, Condition and Prospects of the Indian Tribes of the United States, I, 236; V, 683, 684, 686; also H.H. Bancroft, The Native Races of the Pacific States of North America, I, 514). If, however, the wronged husband could visit swift and terrible retribution upon the adulterous wife, the latter was allowed no cause against the unfaithful husband; and this discrimination found in the practices of ancient peoples is moreover set forth in nearly all ancient codes of law. The Laws of Manu are striking on this point: in ancient India, "though destitute of virtue or seeking pleasure elsewhere, or devoid of good qualities, yet a husband must be constantly worshipped as a god by a faithful wife"; on the other, hand, "if a wife, proud of the greatness of her relatives or [her own] excellence, violates the duty which she owes to her lord, the king shall cause her to be devoured by dogs in a place frequented by many" (Laws of Manu, V, 154; VIII, 371).

In the Greco-Roman world there were stringent laws against adultery, but this applied to those having sex with a married women. A married man having sex with a slave or an un-married woman was not a crime. The lending of wives practiced among some peoples was, as Plutarch tells us, encouraged also by Lycurgus, though from a motive other than that which actuated the practice (Plutarch, Lycurgus, XXIX). The recognized license of the Greek husband may be seen in the following passage of the Oration against Neaera, the author of which is uncertain, though it has been attributed to Demosthenes: "We keep mistresses for our pleasures, concubines for constant attendance, and wives to bear us legitimate children and to be our faithful housekeepers. Yet, because of the wrong done to the husband only, the Athenian lawgiver Solon allowed any man to kill an adulterer whom he had taken in the act" (Plutarch, Solon).

In the early Roman Law the jus tori belonged to the husband. There was, therefore, no such thing as the crime of adultery on the part of a husband towards his wife. Moreover, this crime was not committed unless one of the parties was a married woman (Dig., XLVIII, ad leg. Jul.). It is well known that the Roman husband often took advantage of his legal immunity. Thus we are told by the historian Spartianus that Verus, the imperial colleague of Marcus Aurelius, did not hesitate to declare to his reproaching wife: "Uxor enim dignitatis nomen est, non voluptatis." (Verus, V).

Later in Roman history, as the late William E.H. Lecky has shown, the idea that the husband owed a fidelity similar to that demanded of the wife must have gained ground, at least in theory. This Lecky gathers from the legal maxim of Ulpian: "It seems most unfair for a man to require from a wife the chastity he does not himself practice" (Codex Justin., Digest, XLVIII, 5-13; Lecky, History of European Morals, II, 313).

[edit] Judaism
In Judaism, adultery was forbidden in the seventh commandment of the Ten Commandments, but this did not apply to a married man having relations with an unmarried woman. Only a married woman engaging in sexual intercourse with another man counted as adultery, in which case both the woman and the man were considered guilty [4].

In the Mosaic Law, as in the old Roman Law, adultery meant only the carnal intercourse of a wife with a man who was not her lawful husband. The intercourse of a married man with a single woman was not accounted adultery, but fornication. The penal statute on the subject, in Leviticus, xx, 10, makes this clear: "If any man commit adultery with the wife of another and defile his neighbor's wife, let them be put to death both the adulterer and the adulteress" (see also Deuteronomy 22:22). This was quite in keeping with the prevailing practice of polygamy among the Israelites.

In halakha (Jewish Law) the penalty for adultery is stoning for both the man and the woman, but this is only enacted when there are two independent witnesses who warned the offenders prior to the crime being committed. Today, Jewish law forbids a man to continue living with a wife who cheated on him; he is obliged to give her a get or bill of divorce written by a sofer or scribe. Neither is the adulteress permitted to the adulterer, who must also give her a bill of divorce.

[edit] Christianity
Throughout the Old Testament, adultery is forbidden in the Ten Commandments, and punished by death. In the New Testament, Jesus took a softer stance on adultery, although he preached that it was a sin. In one story (John 8:1-11), some Pharisees brought Jesus a woman accused of committing adultery. After reminding Jesus that her punishment should be stoning, the Pharisees asked Jesus what should be done. Jesus responded, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." Jesus forgave the woman and told her not to commit adultery.

In the sixteenth century, the Catechism of the Council of Trent[8] defines adultery as follows: "To begin with the prohibitory part (of the Commandment), adultery is the defilement of the marriage bed, whether it be one's own or another's. If a married man have intercourse with an unmarried woman, he violates the integrity of his marriage bed; and if an unmarried man have intercourse with a married woman, he defiles the sanctity of the marriage bed of another."[9]

[edit] Islam
Main article: Zina (Arabic)
According to Islam, adultery is a violation of a marital contract and one of the major sins. In Islam, adultery includes both pre-marital and extramarital sex. Fornication and adultery are both included in the Arabic word 'Zina'. As they belong primarily to the same category of crimes, entail the same social implications and have the same effects on the spiritual personality of a human being, both, in principle, have been given the same status by the Qur'an.

"Do not go near to adultery. Surely it is a shameful deed and evil, opening roads (to other evils)" (Quran 17:32).

"Say, 'Verily, my Lord has prohibited the shameful deeds, be it open or secret, sins and trespasses against the truth and reason"' (Quran 7:33).

"Women impure are for men impure, and men impure are for women impure and women of purity are for men of purity, and men of purity are for women of purity." (Quran 24:26)

In Pakistan, adultery has been criminalized by a law called the Hudood Ordinance, which specifies a maximum penalty of death, although only imprisonment and corporal punishment have ever actually been used. It has been particularly controversial because a woman making an accusation of rape must provide extremely strong evidence to avoid being charged under it herself. The same kinds of laws have been in effect in some other Muslim countries, such as Saudi Arabia. However, in recent years high-profile rape cases in Pakistan have given the Hudood Ordinance more exposure than similar laws in other countries.[10]

[edit] See also
Look up Adultery in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.Adultery in literature
Incidence of Monogamy
Fornication
Mistress
Affair
Emotional affair

[edit] Sources and references
^ Germany: § 1353 Abs. 1 S. 2 BGB
^ MinnesNew York section 255.17.
^ North Carolina Statute 14-184.
^ Minnesota Statute section 609.36.
^ Longman Dictionary of Latin, Berlin 1950
^ Bartleby
^ Merriam-Webster
^ The Catechism of Trent. Nazareth Resource Library. Retrieved on February 26, 2007.
^ The Catechism of Trent. Nazareth Resource Library..
^ [http://www.dawn.com/2005/07/13/nat2.htm Hudood laws open to change in Pakistan, July 2005
Best Practices: Progressive Family Laws in Muslim Countries (August 2005} [5]
Hamowy, Ronald. Medicine and the Crimination of Sin: "Self-Abuse" in 19th Century America. pp2/3 [6]
Moultrup, David J. (1990). Husbands, Wives & Lovers. New York: Guilford Press.
Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 361-387.
Pittman, F. (1989). Private Lies. New York: W. W. Norton Co.
Rubin, A. M., & Adams, J. R. (1986). Outcomes of sexually open marriages. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 311-319.
Vaughan, P. (1989). The Monogamy Myth. New York: New Market Press.
INFIDELITY IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIPS II: A SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Apr 2005 by Blow, Adrian J, Hartnett, Kelley
INFIDELITY IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIPS I: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Apr 2005 by Blow, Adrian J, Hartnett, Kelley

Adultery

2007-04-07T03:18:12Z

Jdmeans: /* Biblical History */

== Definition ==

Adultery(noun)
(s.)a·dul'·ter·y ; Pronunciation: (ə-dŭl'tə-rē, -trē)
(pl.) a·dul·ter·ies

Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse.

adultery. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition.
Retrieved April 06, 2007, from Dictionary.com website:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adultery

== Biblical History ==

Insofar as [[Protestant]] and [[Catholic]] [[Scripture]] is concerned, [[adultery]] is a physical manifestation of the [[sin nature]]; its concept includes actions and thoughts like [[fornication]], [[lust]], or physical/emotional intimacy beyond what is "appropriate" for a married man or woman. In the Bible, adultery is a physical manifestation of the [[sin nature]], where any married person engages in sexual activity with anyone other than his/her spouse. The [[Torah]] forbids adultery most notably in the [[Ten Commandments]] - its punishment: death. Sexual activity before the context of [[marriage]] is known as [[fornication]]. "Imaginary" sexual activity outside the context of [[marriage]] is known as [[lust]]. A supplemental note: this [[sin nature]], according to the [[Protestant]] and [[Catholic]] [[Bible]], is forgiven for all mankind, on an individual basis, forever, via the death, burial, and [[resurrection]] of [[Jesus Christ]], predicated on belief in [[Him]] as the [[Son of God]], and willingness to [[repent]], or turn, from the [[sin nature]].

== American Social Morés ==

As American morés are concerned,[[adultery]] is any kind of unnatural activity between a married person and a partner other than his/her lawful spouse. It is a legal violation of the legal contract "[[marriage]]". Furthermore, in America, [[adultery]] is a concept dependent upon one or both individuals involved currently being in a lawfully recognized, contractual, love relationship known as [[marriage]].

Talk:Adultery

2007-04-07T03:15:25Z

Jdmeans:

I'm new here. I just registered because of the filth that I saw that users 'Conservative' and 'JDMeans' were spreading. I looked in the 'Recent Changes' and saw that he was adding sexual terms here instead of the well-put and benign 'unnatural' that had been there before. I'm disappointed - I thought this was meant to be a purer option than the rest of the revolting internet filth I see all the time? New user, 50something.

:And now JDMeans is reverting my complaint. I think this is a perfectly reasonable complaint. Sysops?

:What kind of filth was I spreading? I thought I was helping. :-) --- JDMeans

All this use of the word 'sexual', and explicit references to sexual things. It's not what I wanted to find here, I can tell you that. I came across Conservapedia on some web link just recently and was hoping there would be less fllth than elsewhere on the web. 50something.

:: As far as I'm concerned, the concept "Adultery" is inherently 'sexual'. I really think the topic can't be adequately discussed or explained without the use of the word, "sexual". If you have any suggestions, let me know and I'll change the entry. What's the complaint that I'm "reverting"? JDMeans ...

Well, I certainly think the ENTIRE TOPIC shouldn't be discussed here. I have a limited amount of experience on the internet, and I can't figure out how to delete an article. But I would like to delete this one. Do we really want our children knowing about adultery? Do we really want them to listen to this filth? When a man and a woman (and no damn faggots) marry, that is a contract for LIFE. Adulterers, and mention of the Sin, should not be mentioned here. You and that user Conservative are spreading VILE FILTH. 50something.

This is an encyclopedia. Aspects of life, like Sin and Adultery, don't just go away with lack of mention. The word "sexual" is not dirty. From a Christian perspective, it is something that the Bible actually encourages: see Song of Solomon, chapter 4 and on. Insofar as homosexuality is concerned, it is as much as sin as adultery, and as much a part the darker side of life as adultery.--- JDMeans

Adultery

2007-04-07T03:10:27Z

2007-04-07T02:33:48Z

2007-04-07T01:30:06Z

Jdmeans: /* Censorship and Christain perspective */

'''Harry Potter''' is the hero of a series of novels written by [[J. K. Rowling]]. Harry is an orphan child who finds that he is a wizard. Potter then goes to Hogwarts, a boarding school for young wizards, and has many adventures there learning magic and using it to fight the forces of the evil Lord Voldemort who killed Potter's parents when he was an infant. Along the way, Potter learns about life and death and grapples with questions of morality and friendship. As of 2007, the series is projected to consist of seven novels, of which six have been published, with the seventh to be released in July of 2007.

The books have been fabulously successful, selling three hundred million copies, and Forbes estimates that they have made Rowling a billionnaire, the first billion-dollar author in history.<ref>[http://www.forbes.com/maserati/billionaires2004/cx_jw_0226rowlingbill04.html J. K. Rowling And The Billion-Dollar Empire].</ref> To date, four of them have been made into movies.

==Censorship and Christain perspective==

The English "public" schools Hogwarts resembles are Protestant institutions; but at Hogwarts, chapel is conspicuously absent. A failure to mention Christianity, combined with the presence of wizardry, have led some to wonder whether Rowling is substituting paganism for Christianity. The books have even been accused of promoting witchcraft.[http://www.chick.com/catalog/videos/potter.asp] [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/1735623.stm] [http://www.chick.com/catalog/videos/0127.asp] [http://www.cesnur.org/recens/potter_06.htm] Some evangelical Christians have attempted to ban the books in public schools[http://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/index.php?s=&url_channel_id=32&url_subchannel_id=&url_article_id=14074&change_well_id=2]. On October 3rd, 2006, A [[Georgia]] mother Laura Mallory attempted to get the books banned from schools because she felt they promote witchcraft.<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15127464/ Georgia mom seeks ban on Harry Potter]</ref>
However the Board of Education denied Mrs. Mallory's request, as the banning of Harry Potter would necessitate in the banning of all books with reference to witches, including plays like[[Macbeth]] and even a children's story like [[Cinderella]].

In 2003, a [[Vatican]] representative said the books, "aren't serving as the banner for an anti-Christian theology.... I don't think there's anyone in this room who grew up without fairies, magic, and angels in their imaginary world." <ref>Sink, Mindy (2003), "The Split Verdict on Harry Potter,"
''The New York Times,'' March 8, 2003, p. B6; representative quoted is Rev. Don Peter Fleetwood, who "helped draft a Vatican document on New Age phenomena."</ref>

"Harry Potter" has inspired hundreds of thousands of children across the globe to love reading. The Harry Potter novels, particularly the later ones, are long. The 870 pages of "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," even though printed in large type, contain 255,000 words—about twice as long as ''A Tale of Two Cities.'' The "Lexile" measure of reading level puts the series between 880L and 950L,<ref>For comparison: Charlotte's Web 680L, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 890L, Moby Dick 1200L</ref> comparable to sixth-grade texts<ref>[http://www.lexile.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?view=fa&tabindex=4&tabid=22 The Lexile framework for reading].</ref> Also, on July 20, 2005, at [[Prime Minister's Questions]], the Right Honourable [[Tony Blair]], Prime Minister at the time, joined the [[House of Commons]] in lauding [[J.K. Rowling]] for her contribution to the education of British young minds.

Some expect childrens' literature to present characters that are idealized role models, and to teach simple, explicit life lessons. However, like other classics of children's literature, the world of Harry Potter is one in which adult authority figures are complex, imperfect, and occasionally ludicrous (as they are in ''Alice in Wonderland.''); and some of their teachers are boring or outright incompetent.

Harry, like most epic heroes since, and arguably before, Greek tragedy, is a "good" person. However, he sometimes displays [[hubris]] in what can be called petty-minded, jealous, or mischievous (like Tom Sawyer, or Holden Caulfield) behavior. As a whole, students at Hogwarts display tenacious study habits, but are not above cheating or goofing off.

==Series titles==
*Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (original title as published in England and all other english speaking countries other than U.S.A: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone)
*Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
*Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
*Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
*Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
*Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
*Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (announced)

==References==
<references/>