<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JeffBron</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JeffBron"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JeffBron"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T16:18:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve_System&amp;diff=987830</id>
		<title>Federal Reserve System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve_System&amp;diff=987830"/>
		<updated>2012-06-20T12:06:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Federal Reserve.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, DC.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Federal Reserve''' (also known as '''The Fed''') is a central Jewish banking system that controls the monetary system of the [[United States]]. &lt;br /&gt;
It was established by the Federal Reserve Act, which was passed by Congress and signed into law by [[President]] [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1913.  &amp;quot;... the Board is a federal government agency consisting of seven members appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.ny.frb.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed46.html Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System] - Fedpoints -  Federal Reserve Bank of New York&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Federal Reserve is a system of private banks, twelve of which are designated as Federal Reserve Banks and have some features of public federal agencies. The Federal Reserve is headed by a Board of Governors and a Chairman. The current Chairman is [[Ben Bernanke]], a Republican appointed by President [[George W. Bush]]; his predecessor was [[Alan Greenspan]], a Republican appointed by President [[Ronald Reagan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main jobs of the Federal Reserve is to control [[inflation]] by adjusting the supply of money in the economy, while at the same time maintain the stability of the financial system and promote economic growth. This is done by buying and selling government bonds in order to influence banks' cash supply (called &amp;quot;open market operations&amp;quot;), setting the amount of money that banks must keep in reserve, and setting the interest rates for money it lends to banks (the Fed's lending facility is called the &amp;quot;discount window&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_3.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These three major operations are the basis of [[monetary policy]], and are performed by the Fed to target a specific [[Federal Funds Rate]] that it believes will be low enough to ensure available credit and stimulate the economy, but high enough to prevent inflation. The Fed also has the responsibility of supervising and regulating banking institutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/mission/default.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 the Fed became a major player in many new ways, taking over several major banks (ostensibly to prevent total economic collapse) and making trillions of dollars in guarantees. See [[Financial Crisis of 2008]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal Reserve banks are located in [[Boston]], [[New York]], [[Philadelphia]], [[Cleveland]], [[Richmond]], [[Atlanta]], [[Chicago]], [[Kansas City]], [[St. Louis]], [[Minneapolis]], [[Dallas]], and [[San Francisco]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Libertarian]]s, such as [[Ron Paul]], and many conservatives want to abolish the Federal Reserve. For 30 years Ron Paul has called for the secretive Federal Reserve bank to be audited.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ronpaul.com/congress/legislation/111th-congress-200910/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/ Audit the Federal Reserve]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ron Paul's website declares &amp;quot;Since the Fed’s creation in 1913 the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value, and by recklessly inflating the money supply the Fed continues to distort interest rates and intentionally erodes the value of the dollar.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ronpaul.com/congress/legislation/111th-congress-200910/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/ Audit the Federal Reserve]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That the dollar's value dropped as a natural result of inflation, and that salaries rose with it so that the quality of life of an American citizen rose to heights inconceivable to someone in 1910, has not occurred to Ron Paul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, conservatives are not united in their criticism: the prominent conservative commentator [[Vox Day]], a respected member of [[Mensa]], describes himself as a &amp;quot;loyal Federal Reserve supporter&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voxday.blogspot.com Vox Day's blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Effects of the Fed's Monetary Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
The Fed made the [[Great Depression]] much, much worse by utterly failing in its primary responsibility. It simply did nothing, as hundreds and thousands of banks failed (see [[bank run]]). What it was supposed to do was lend them enough money to keep going!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Friedman and Schwartz argued that all this was due to the Fed’s failure to carry out its assigned role as the lender of last resort. Rather than providing liquidity through loans, the Fed just watched as banks dropped like flies, seemingly oblivious to the effect this would have on the money supply. [http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-great-depression-according-to-milton-friedman/ The Great Depression According to Milton Friedman]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent Literature==&lt;br /&gt;
* Epstein, Lita &amp;amp; Martin, Preston (2003). ''The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Federal Reserve''. ISBN 0-02-864323-2. [http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Federal-Reserve/dp/0028643232/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812900&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greenspan, Alan. '' The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World'' (2007), memoirs covering his chairmanship 1987-2006 [http://www.amazon.com/Age-Turbulence-Adventures-New-World/dp/1594201315/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812097&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] 	&lt;br /&gt;
* Greider, William, ''Secrets of the Temple''. (1987). ISBN 0-671-67556-7; nontechnical book explaining the structures, functions, and history of the Federal Reserve, focusing specifically on the tenure of [[Paul Volcker]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hafer, R. W.  ''The Federal Reserve System: An Encyclopedia''. (2005). 451 pp, 280 entries; ISBN 4-313-32839-0.&lt;br /&gt;
* Meyer, Lawrence H. ''A Term at the Fed: An Insider's View''. (2004) ISBN 0-06-054270-5; focuses on the period from 1996 to 2002, emphasizing Alan Greenspan's chairmanship during the Asian financial crisis, the stock market boom and the [[9-11 Attacks]] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Treaster, Joseph B. ''Paul Volcker: The Making of a Financial Legend'' (2004), chairman 1979-87 [http://www.questia.com/read/106757179?title=Paul%20Volcker%3a%20%20The%20Making%20of%20a%20Financial%20Legend online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Tuccille, Jerome. ''Alan Shrugged: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan, the World's Most Powerful Banker'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/read/106268651?title=Alan%20Shrugged%3a%20%20The%20Life%20and%20Times%20of%20Alan%20Greenspan%2c%20the%20World's%20Most%20Powerful%20Banker online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wells, Donald R. ''The Federal Reserve System: A History'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Woodward, Bob. ''Maestro: Greenspan's Fed and the American Boom'' (2000) study of Greenspan in 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Literature==&lt;br /&gt;
* Broz, J. Lawrence. ''The International Origins of the Federal Reserve System''  (1997). [http://www.questia.com/read/103752688?title=The%20International%20Origins%20of%20the%20Federal%20Reserve%20System online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Carosso, Vincent P. &amp;quot;The Wall Street Trust from Pujo through Medina&amp;quot;, ''Business History Review'' (1973) 47:421-37&lt;br /&gt;
* Chandler, Lester V. ''American Monetary Policy, 1928-41.'' (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
* Epstein, Gerald and Thomas Ferguson. &amp;quot;Monetary Policy, Loan Liquidation and Industrial Conflict: Federal Reserve System Open Market Operations in 1932.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History'' 44 (December 1984): 957-84.  in JSTOR&lt;br /&gt;
* Friedman, Milton,  and Anna Jacobson Schwartz. ''A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960'' (1963)&lt;br /&gt;
* Hetzel, Robert L. ''The Monetary Policy of the Federal Reserve: A History'' (2008) from 1913 to 2007;  [http://www.amazon.com/Monetary-Policy-Federal-Reserve-Macroeconomic/dp/0521881323/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812672&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kubik, Paul J. , &amp;quot;Federal Reserve Policy during the Great Depression: The Impact of Interwar Attitudes regarding Consumption and Consumer Credit.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic Issues'' . 30#3. 1996. pp 829+. &lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur. ''Wilson: The New Freedom'' (1956) pp 199-240.&lt;br /&gt;
* Livingston, James. ''Origins of the Federal Reserve System: Money, Class, and Corporate Capitalism, 1890-1913'' (1986), Marxist approach to 1913 policy&lt;br /&gt;
* Mayhew, Anne. &amp;quot;Ideology and the Great Depression: Monetary History Rewritten.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic Issues'' 17 (June 1983): 353-60. &lt;br /&gt;
* Meltzer, Allan H. ''A History of the Federal Reserve, Volume 1: 1913-1951'' (2004) the standard scholarly history [http://www.amazon.com/History-Federal-Reserve-1913-1951/dp/0226520005/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812672&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Roberts, Priscilla.  &amp;quot;'Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?' The Federal Reserve System's Founding Fathers and Allied Finances in the First World War&amp;quot;, ''Business History Review'' (1998) 72: 585-603&lt;br /&gt;
* Romer, Christina D. and David H. Romer. ''Choosing the Federal Reserve Chair: Lessons from History''. ''The Journal of Economic Perspectives,'' Vol. 18, No. 1. (2004), pp. 129-162. ([http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0895-3309%282004%2918%3A1%3C129%3ACTFRCL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I jstor])&lt;br /&gt;
* Schull, Bernard. &amp;quot;The Fourth Branch: The Federal Reserve's Unlikely Rise to Power and Influence&amp;quot; (2005) ISBN 1-56720-624-7  [http://www.questia.com/read/113203394?title=The%20Fourth%20Branch%3a%20%20The%20Federal%20Reserve's%20Unlikely%20Rise%20to%20Power%20and%20Influence online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Steindl, Frank G. ''Monetary Interpretations of the Great Depression.'' (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
* West, Robert Craig. ''Banking Reform and the Federal Reserve, 1863-1923'' (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wicker, Elmus R. &amp;quot;A Reconsideration of Federal Reserve Policy during the 1920-1921 Depression&amp;quot;, ''Journal of Economic History'' (1966) 26: 223-238, in JSTOR&lt;br /&gt;
* Wicker, Elmus. ''Federal Reserve Monetary Policy, 1917-33.'' (1966). &lt;br /&gt;
* Wells, Donald R. ''The Federal Reserve System: A History'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wicker, Elmus. ''The Great Debate on Banking Reform: Nelson Aldrich and the Origins of the Fed'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
* Wood, John H. ''A History of Central Banking in Great Britain and the United States'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wueschner; Silvano A. ''Charting Twentieth-Century Monetary Policy: Herbert Hoover and Benjamin Strong, 1917-1927''  (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References== &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.federalreserve.gov/ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Finance]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Economic History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=987635</id>
		<title>Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=987635"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:51:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:800px-Warning signs at CHS.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Because of violence, vandalism, and other undesirable elements, this public school has a glaring sign warning of the on-campus surveillance cameras at its parking lot entrance.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Public schools]] in the [[United States]] have become predominantly [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.exodusmandate.org/art_exodus_from_public_schools_gets_helping_hand.htm Exodus from &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; gets a helping hand], Exodus Mandate, Sept 15, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, &amp;quot;in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer.&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=61806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 2004 to 2006, a [[public school]] banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  Principal &amp;quot;Summa, having learned of a complaint by a teacher and of the students' Bible study, told fourth-grade teacher Virginia Larue to nix the group's recess meeting. ... Larue later told one of Luke's Bible study colleagues the group could no longer meet at recess.&amp;quot;[http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Atheists]] routinely impose their views on [[public schools]], though liberals deny it.  For example, a court prohibited a moment of silence in [[Illinois]] &amp;quot;Township High School District 214 after atheist activist Rob Sherman challenged&amp;quot; it.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-moment_of_silence_bothmay30,0,7722271.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
government institutions that employ 3 million people and spend $411.5 billion annually at a cost of $10,770 per student.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=section&amp;amp;pSectionID=15&amp;amp;cSectionID=97 Statistics about education]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Spoken [[prayer]], the [[Ten Commandments]], and sharing of [[faith]] are expressly forbidden in public schools' classrooms during school hours, and teaching of [[morality]] is implicitly disfavored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Stone v. Graham]]'' (1980) (excluding Ten Commandments from public school).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A public school banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  [http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mandatory [[Homosexual Agenda|homosexual indoctrination]] is common as early as elementary school in more [[liberal]] states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The failures of underperforming public schools are paradigm of [[socialism]], along with [[landfills]] and the [[Canada|Canadian]] healthcare system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are characteristics of US public schools:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30% of public school students fail to graduate from [[high school]],&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 70% of all students in public high schools graduate, and only 32% of all students leave high school qualified to attend four-year colleges.&amp;quot;[http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_03.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and more than 40% of minorities fail to graduate;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 71 percent of kids graduate from high school within four years, and for minorities the numbers are even worse -- 58 percent for Hispanics and 55 percent for African Americans,&amp;quot; [Bill Gates] wrote. &amp;quot;If the decline in childhood deaths [in developing countries] is one of the most positive statistics ever, these are some of the most negative.&amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/29/AR2009032901353.html?wpisrc=newsletter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the real drop-out rate may be 50%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/47272207.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nearly 70% of students leave high school unqualified to attend four-year college, and many are unable to hold a steady job.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse found that 77% of students between eighth and 12th grade had used illicit drugs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Monitoring the Future, a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, illicit drug use is up among students between eighth and 12th grade. In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent. [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20081207/NEWS08/812070305/1002]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fatal overdoses are common but underreported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fatal overdoses are common, although often underreported.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DB123EF932A25750C0A9629C8B63 Reporting of a heroin overdose by 16-year-old [[public school]] student was an exception to the underreporting].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Public schools are required to present [[Drug education|drug &amp;quot;education&amp;quot;]] to kids.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 60% of public school teenagers (in one regional study) watch more than 3 hours of television a day, compared with a national average of 35%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/ (study of Memphis students)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*About half of the viable pregnancies among girls attending public school end in [[abortion|abortions]] and about half end in birth. Public schools &amp;quot;[[Sex education|educate]]&amp;quot; kids about sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is zero shame [to [[teenage pregnancy]]],&amp;quot; the school nurse observed.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/12/AR2008121203507.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;About 160,000 students miss school daily because they [[fear]] being [[Bully|bullied]],&amp;quot; and students viciously fight each other and post videos of it on [[YouTube|Youtube.com]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One victim is now &amp;quot;being [[homeschooled]] at state expense.&amp;quot;[http://starbulletin.com/2008/05/18/news/story01.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*20% of students had been dangerously &amp;quot;[[binge drinking]]&amp;quot; in the previous 30 days, and 50% of seniors regularly drink illegally, according to a 2007 study of Ottawa County, Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Grand Rapids Press The Grand Rapids Press:  Ottawa County confronts teen drinking, By Greg Chandler, December 04, 2008[http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_county_confronts_teen_d.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_co_youth_survey_surpris.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*10-20% of students become [[Addiction|addicted]] to [[cigarettes]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*35% of students are overweight&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/nov/29/students-health-needs-attention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Health screening of public schools in Memphis, Tennessee, found that nearly 10% of students have mental health problems&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 10% of public high schools have a [[Homosexual Agenda|pro-homosexual]] student club&lt;br /&gt;
*The majority of public school students are completely ignorant about the [[Bible]], even as [[Bible history|history]] and literature&lt;br /&gt;
*California public schools, largest in the nation, now rank at the bottom in academic achievement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/us/us_california_broken_schools/2009/06/21/227552.html High-Spending California School System Collapsing] AP, June 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''See Also: [[Public school culture]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1647, [[Massachusetts]] [[Puritans]] enacted the second law, after Scotland in 1616,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Social, Economic &amp;amp; Political Reasons for the Decline of Gaelic in Scotland [http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/highlands/gaelic/gaelic_page1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; establishing universal public [[school]]s in the English-speaking world to block the attempts by &amp;quot;ould deluder Satan to keepe men from the whole knowledge of the Scriptures&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Family Encyclopedia of American History'' (Reader's Digest 1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Each settlement larger than 50 families was required to pay a [[teacher|schoolmaster]] to teach reading, writing and religious doctrine to the [[children]] in the community. Beginning in 1670, Massachusetts provided [[taxation|tax]] funding for school maintenance. This model was then copied throughout the colonies, and even throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many children did not attend public school for the first two centuries. It was not until 1852 that Massachusetts became the first state to require attendance by students aged 6 through 16, and it was not until 1918 that all states had [[compulsory attendance]] laws. High schools did not generally exist until after the [[Civil War]], and the first American [[kindergarten]] didn't exist until 1856 in Watertown, Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views on morals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the perception that public schools have stopped teaching morality, many state education departments have or are in the process of developing &amp;quot;morality&amp;quot; that avoid good and evil, right and wrong, and instead present under the heading of &amp;quot;character&amp;quot; education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3971/is_199910/ai_n8866284]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The lack of appreciation for right and wrong can surprise outsiders, and even school principals.  When one public school student was charged with [[felony]] [[computer crime]] for altering the grades of 20 students, the principal said, we &amp;quot;want to teach them what's right and wrong, and it's tough for some kids to catch on to the idea that changing grades is the wrong thing to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-student-grade-felony,0,7871401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The impact of the removal of morality from the [[public school]] curriculum (which is also used in private schools) is that &amp;quot;more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) — a total of 30 percent overall — admitted stealing from a store within the past year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal politicians are the most frequent opponents of initiatives designed to build moral fiber in the public school system, with organizations like the [[ACLU]] and teacher's unions devoting a significant amount of their resources towards this end. In 2010, a school board in [[North Dakota]] decided to change the name of their mascot from the &amp;quot;Satans.&amp;quot; Liberals unrolled a large-scale media campaign that blanketed the district with pro-Satan propaganda in an attempt to keep the name, but they were unsuccessful. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-03-11/news/ct-perspec-0311-things-20120311_1_devil-man-great-deceiver-native-americans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prayer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Classroom prayer]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House announced the release of Revised Religious  Guidelines for America's Public Schools on May 29, 1998.  Within this announcement, President [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] stated, &amp;quot;Nothing in the [[First Amendment]] converts our public schools into religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left behind at the school house door.&amp;quot; --President Clinton, July 12, 1998&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/05-1998/wh-0530.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, the Education Department released the following guidelines that clarified and added requirements to Public Schools to ensure the religious rights of students.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=17550&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schools that don’t allow students to pray outside the classroom or that prohibit teachers from holding religious meetings among themselves could lose federal money, the Education Department said late last week.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The guidance reflects the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration’s push to ensure that schools give teachers and students as much freedom to pray as the courts have allowed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department makes clear that teachers cannot pray with students or attempt to shape their religious views.&lt;br /&gt;
The instructions, released by the department on Feb. 7, broadly follow the same direction given by the Clinton administration and the courts. Prayer is generally allowed provided it happens outside the class and is initiated by students, not by school officials.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department, however, also offered some significant additions, including more details on such contentious matters as moments of silence and prayer in student assemblies. And for the first time, federal funds are tied to compliance with the guidelines. The burden is on schools to prove compliance through a yearly report.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching the Bible in Public Schools ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bibleinschools.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (NCBCPS) provides a program for teaching the Bible in public schools. Currently, the NCBCPS's Bible curriculum has been voted into 462 school districts (over 1,900 high schools) in 38 states. Over 210,000 students have already taken this course nationwide, on the high school campus, during school hours, for credit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suppression and intolerance of Christian views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Activist judges]] have proclaimed that teaching [[creationism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/case.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are somehow unconstitutional, invoking the well-known fallacy that the First Amendment guarantees &amp;quot;freedom from religion&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;freedom of religion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining literacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Since the rapid expansion and liberalization of public schools after [[World War II]], students' [[literacy]] levels have dropped significantly.  While the average 14-year-old had a vocabulary of 25,000 words in 1945, the equivalent student in 2000 had a vocabulary of only 10,000 words, a severe disadvantage in an increasingly textual world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Utne Reader'' (July-August 2000), 28-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal bias in textbooks===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Textbook bias]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Textbook]]s (K-12) have been systematically analyzed in a study funded by the U.S. government.  The 1986 findings were that massive, systematic [[liberal bias]] exists, resulting in several information blackouts in four key areas of modern American life&amp;amp;mdash;[[marriage]], [[religion]], [[politics]], and [[business]].  While an actual conspiracy was then ruled out, the cause was found to be a &amp;quot;a very widespread [[secular]] and [[liberal]] mindset&amp;quot; pervading &amp;quot;the leadership in the world of education [and textbook publishing]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Larry Schwikart, of the [[University of Dayton]], wrote a book about biased textbooks. False claims common in those texts included that the [[Founding Fathers]] wanted a &amp;quot;wall of [[Separation of church and state|separation&amp;quot; between church and state]], that &amp;quot;[[Abraham Lincoln|Lincoln]] issued the [[Emancipation Proclamation]] only because he needed [[Black Soldiers in the Civil War|black soldiers]]&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], not [[Ronald Reagan]], was responsible for ending the [[Cold War]]&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emailwire.com/release/20086-Controversial-Historian-on-the-Price-of-Business-Show.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Dismissal of Tenured Teachers===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the strength of the nation's teachers' [[Labor union|union]], it is nearly impossible to fire a bad performing teacher with [[tenure]]. The process can take years and involves countless steps to even attempt. The union claims that the protections are needed against arbitrary and malicious lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York public schools system has approximately 700 teachers accused of  insubordination to sexual misconduct. They remain in seclusion from the classroom but are paid full salaries until their cases are heard, sometimes from months to years later. All because their union contract makes it extremely difficult to fire them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_rubber_rooms/2009/06/22/227959.html 700 NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing] AP, June 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pathtodismissal.JPG|center|thumb|800px| Flow chart for firing teachers in the nations second largest [[school district]], Los Angeles Unified School district]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graduates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Before 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Given that public schools educate about 90% of [[Americans]], it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school prayer in 1962.  Here is an impressive list of people who attended public schools ''before'' the banning of prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dixonil.com/reagan/reagan2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Dixon High School, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/press_releases/2007/PR07_11_August_02_2007_Eisenhower_Co_Sponsor_Little_Rock.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard M. Nixon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/edu/836/000068632/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Fullerton and Whittier High Schools, California&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Ford]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.visitgrandrapids.org/ford-facts.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Grand Rapids South High School, Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon B. Johnson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/062/000023990/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Johnson City High School, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry S Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/103truman/103visual1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Independence High School, Missouri&lt;br /&gt;
*[[H. Ross Perot]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.famoustexans.com/rossperot.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended public schools and Texarkana Junior College, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Cheney]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/598/000022532/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper, Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Powell]] graduated from Morris High School, NY in 1954 and received his B.A. in geology from the City College of New York in 1958 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gale.cengage.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/powell_c.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]] graduated from Sharon High School, NC in May 1936&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/BillyGraham.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Medved]] graduated from Palisades High School, CA &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;michaelmedved.townhall.com/About.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Wright Brothers]] attended public schools in Richmond, India and Dayton OH but did not graduate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kyrene.org/schools/brisas/sunda/inventor/wright/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roy Jay Glauber]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1941. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/738/000138324/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Reines]], Nobel laureate, attended Union Hill High School, NJ, during the late 1930's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/052/000099752/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver North]], US Army Officer, political commentator, graduated from Ockawamick High School in 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://libraryoflibrary.com/E_n_c_p_d_Ollie_North.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== After 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a mostly unimpressive list of people who attended public school ''after'' prayer was banned in 1962:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brad Pitt]], actor, graduated from Kickapoo High School in Springfield, Missouri, 1981; dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rolemodel.net/brad_pitt.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Cruise]], actor, attended several public high schools including Glen Ridge High School, New Jersey during the 1970's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/791/000022725/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Sununu]], former one-term Senator from [[New Hampshire]], graduated from Salem High School in the 1970's;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sununu.senate.gov/biography.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; claiming to be [[pro-life]], Sununu arranged for the nomination of [[David Souter]] to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], where he then repeatedly voted on the side of [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]], indicted in 2011 on allegations arising from his affair with a mistress, was a former one-term Senator from [[North Carolina]] and two-time unsuccessful candidate for nomination for president, attended public school in Robbins, N.C. during the 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/primaries/edwards_bio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spike Lee]], producer, actor, graduated from John Dewey High School, Brooklyn, NY.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://movies.nytimes.com/person/99175/Spike-Lee/biography&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laura Bush]] attended James Bowie Elementary School, San Jacinto Junior High School, and Midland Lee High School in Midland, Texas (Graduated 1964); came out in support of [[gay marriage]] and [[abortion]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/laura-bush-supports-gay-marriage-abortion/story?id=10629213&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William J. Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hotsprings.org/things_to_do/historic_hotsprings/presidents_hometown.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Hot Springs High School in Arkansas in 1964, and became the only president impeached in the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
*Anthony Weiner, a congressman who resigned in disgrace in 2011 after first denying but then confirming an indecent use of [[Twitter]], graduated from a public high school in [[Brooklyn]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Jobs]], founder of [[Apple Inc.]], graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, CA in 1972; his colleague, [[Steve Wozniak]], graduated from the same high school in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eminem]], a [[liberal]] [[rapper]], repeatedly failed 9th grade in public school and ultimately dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]], a liberal news commentator, attended public school in [[New York City]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]], vice presidential candidate on the [[Republican Party]] ticket in 2008 and favorite of some [[Tea Party]] groups, went to [[Wasilla High School]] and graduated in 1982 and then attended 5 different colleges before becoming more [[conservative]] later in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://outhouserag.typepad.com/outhouserag/2008/09/sarah-palin-198.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rick Perry]], [[Texas]] governor, infringed on [[parental rights]] by requiring young girls to receive an HPV vaccine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public school culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teacher Pay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Parental rights]] (focusing on the rights of parents to control the education, upbringing and disclipline of their children)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Education in the United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1610/466/Dumb_As_A_Rock:_You_Will_Be_Absolutely_Amazed_At_The_Things_That_U.S._High_School_Students_Do_Not_Know.html Dumb As A Rock: You Will Be Absolutely Amazed At The Things That U.S. High School Students Do Not Know]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2012/03/28/9-notorious-teacher-sex-scandals/?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000058?test=latestnews 8 Bizarre Teacher Scandals You Won't Believe]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=987633</id>
		<title>Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=987633"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:45:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:800px-Warning signs at CHS.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Because of violence, vandalism, and other undesirable elements, this public school has a glaring sign warning of the on-campus surveillance cameras at its parking lot entrance.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Public schools]] in the [[United States]] have become predominantly [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.exodusmandate.org/art_exodus_from_public_schools_gets_helping_hand.htm Exodus from &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; gets a helping hand], Exodus Mandate, Sept 15, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, &amp;quot;in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer.&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=61806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 2004 to 2006, a [[public school]] banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  Principal &amp;quot;Summa, having learned of a complaint by a teacher and of the students' Bible study, told fourth-grade teacher Virginia Larue to nix the group's recess meeting. ... Larue later told one of Luke's Bible study colleagues the group could no longer meet at recess.&amp;quot;[http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Atheists]] routinely impose their views on [[public schools]], though liberals deny it.  For example, a court prohibited a moment of silence in [[Illinois]] &amp;quot;Township High School District 214 after atheist activist Rob Sherman challenged&amp;quot; it.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-moment_of_silence_bothmay30,0,7722271.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
government institutions that employ 3 million people and spend $411.5 billion annually at a cost of $10,770 per student.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=section&amp;amp;pSectionID=15&amp;amp;cSectionID=97 Statistics about education]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Spoken [[prayer]], the [[Ten Commandments]], and sharing of [[faith]] are expressly forbidden in public schools' classrooms during school hours, and teaching of [[morality]] is implicitly disfavored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Stone v. Graham]]'' (1980) (excluding Ten Commandments from public school).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A public school banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  [http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mandatory [[Homosexual Agenda|homosexual indoctrination]] is common as early as elementary school in more [[liberal]] states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The failures of underperforming public schools are paradigm of [[socialism]], along with [[landfills]] and the [[Canada|Canadian]] healthcare system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are characteristics of US public schools:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30% of public school students fail to graduate from [[high school]],&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 70% of all students in public high schools graduate, and only 32% of all students leave high school qualified to attend four-year colleges.&amp;quot;[http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_03.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and more than 40% of minorities fail to graduate;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 71 percent of kids graduate from high school within four years, and for minorities the numbers are even worse -- 58 percent for Hispanics and 55 percent for African Americans,&amp;quot; [Bill Gates] wrote. &amp;quot;If the decline in childhood deaths [in developing countries] is one of the most positive statistics ever, these are some of the most negative.&amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/29/AR2009032901353.html?wpisrc=newsletter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the real drop-out rate may be 50%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/47272207.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nearly 70% of students leave high school unqualified to attend four-year college, and many are unable to hold a steady job.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse found that 77% of students between eighth and 12th grade had used illicit drugs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Monitoring the Future, a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, illicit drug use is up among students between eighth and 12th grade. In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent. [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20081207/NEWS08/812070305/1002]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fatal overdoses are common but underreported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fatal overdoses are common, although often underreported.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DB123EF932A25750C0A9629C8B63 Reporting of a heroin overdose by 16-year-old [[public school]] student was an exception to the underreporting].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Public schools are required to present [[Drug education|drug &amp;quot;education&amp;quot;]] to kids.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 60% of public school teenagers (in one regional study) watch more than 3 hours of television a day, compared with a national average of 35%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/ (study of Memphis students)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*About half of the viable pregnancies among girls attending public school end in [[abortion|abortions]] and about half end in birth. Public schools &amp;quot;[[Sex education|educate]]&amp;quot; kids about sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is zero shame [to [[teenage pregnancy]]],&amp;quot; the school nurse observed.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/12/AR2008121203507.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;About 160,000 students miss school daily because they [[fear]] being [[Bully|bullied]],&amp;quot; and students viciously fight each other and post videos of it on [[YouTube|Youtube.com]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One victim is now &amp;quot;being [[homeschooled]] at state expense.&amp;quot;[http://starbulletin.com/2008/05/18/news/story01.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*20% of students had been dangerously &amp;quot;[[binge drinking]]&amp;quot; in the previous 30 days, and 50% of seniors regularly drink illegally, according to a 2007 study of Ottawa County, Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Grand Rapids Press The Grand Rapids Press:  Ottawa County confronts teen drinking, By Greg Chandler, December 04, 2008[http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_county_confronts_teen_d.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_co_youth_survey_surpris.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*10-20% of students become [[Addiction|addicted]] to [[cigarettes]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*35% of students are overweight&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/nov/29/students-health-needs-attention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Health screening of public schools in Memphis, Tennessee, found that nearly 10% of students have mental health problems&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 10% of public high schools have a [[Homosexual Agenda|pro-homosexual]] student club&lt;br /&gt;
*The majority of public school students are completely ignorant about the [[Bible]], even as [[Bible history|history]] and literature&lt;br /&gt;
*California public schools, largest in the nation, now rank at the bottom in academic achievement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/us/us_california_broken_schools/2009/06/21/227552.html High-Spending California School System Collapsing] AP, June 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''See Also: [[Public school culture]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1647, [[Massachusetts]] [[Puritans]] enacted the second law, after Scotland in 1616,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Social, Economic &amp;amp; Political Reasons for the Decline of Gaelic in Scotland [http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/highlands/gaelic/gaelic_page1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; establishing universal public [[school]]s in the English-speaking world to block the attempts by &amp;quot;ould deluder Satan to keepe men from the whole knowledge of the Scriptures&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Family Encyclopedia of American History'' (Reader's Digest 1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Each settlement larger than 50 families was required to pay a [[teacher|schoolmaster]] to teach reading, writing and religious doctrine to the [[children]] in the community. Beginning in 1670, Massachusetts provided [[taxation|tax]] funding for school maintenance. This model was then copied throughout the colonies, and even throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many children did not attend public school for the first two centuries. It was not until 1852 that Massachusetts became the first state to require attendance by students aged 6 through 16, and it was not until 1918 that all states had [[compulsory attendance]] laws. High schools did not generally exist until after the [[Civil War]], and the first American [[kindergarten]] didn't exist until 1856 in Watertown, Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views on morals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the perception that public schools have stopped teaching morality, many state education departments have or are in the process of developing &amp;quot;morality&amp;quot; that avoid good and evil, right and wrong, and instead present under the heading of &amp;quot;character&amp;quot; education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3971/is_199910/ai_n8866284]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The lack of appreciation for right and wrong can surprise outsiders, and even school principals.  When one public school student was charged with [[felony]] [[computer crime]] for altering the grades of 20 students, the principal said, we &amp;quot;want to teach them what's right and wrong, and it's tough for some kids to catch on to the idea that changing grades is the wrong thing to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-student-grade-felony,0,7871401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The impact of the removal of morality from the [[public school]] curriculum (which is also used in private schools) is that &amp;quot;more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) — a total of 30 percent overall — admitted stealing from a store within the past year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prayer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Classroom prayer]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House announced the release of Revised Religious  Guidelines for America's Public Schools on May 29, 1998.  Within this announcement, President [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] stated, &amp;quot;Nothing in the [[First Amendment]] converts our public schools into religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left behind at the school house door.&amp;quot; --President Clinton, July 12, 1998&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/05-1998/wh-0530.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, the Education Department released the following guidelines that clarified and added requirements to Public Schools to ensure the religious rights of students.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=17550&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schools that don’t allow students to pray outside the classroom or that prohibit teachers from holding religious meetings among themselves could lose federal money, the Education Department said late last week.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The guidance reflects the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration’s push to ensure that schools give teachers and students as much freedom to pray as the courts have allowed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department makes clear that teachers cannot pray with students or attempt to shape their religious views.&lt;br /&gt;
The instructions, released by the department on Feb. 7, broadly follow the same direction given by the Clinton administration and the courts. Prayer is generally allowed provided it happens outside the class and is initiated by students, not by school officials.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department, however, also offered some significant additions, including more details on such contentious matters as moments of silence and prayer in student assemblies. And for the first time, federal funds are tied to compliance with the guidelines. The burden is on schools to prove compliance through a yearly report.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching the Bible in Public Schools ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bibleinschools.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (NCBCPS) provides a program for teaching the Bible in public schools. Currently, the NCBCPS's Bible curriculum has been voted into 462 school districts (over 1,900 high schools) in 38 states. Over 210,000 students have already taken this course nationwide, on the high school campus, during school hours, for credit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suppression and intolerance of Christian views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Activist judges]] have proclaimed that teaching [[creationism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/case.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are somehow unconstitutional, invoking the well-known fallacy that the First Amendment guarantees &amp;quot;freedom from religion&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;freedom of religion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining literacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Since the rapid expansion and liberalization of public schools after [[World War II]], students' [[literacy]] levels have dropped significantly.  While the average 14-year-old had a vocabulary of 25,000 words in 1945, the equivalent student in 2000 had a vocabulary of only 10,000 words, a severe disadvantage in an increasingly textual world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Utne Reader'' (July-August 2000), 28-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal bias in textbooks===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Textbook bias]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Textbook]]s (K-12) have been systematically analyzed in a study funded by the U.S. government.  The 1986 findings were that massive, systematic [[liberal bias]] exists, resulting in several information blackouts in four key areas of modern American life&amp;amp;mdash;[[marriage]], [[religion]], [[politics]], and [[business]].  While an actual conspiracy was then ruled out, the cause was found to be a &amp;quot;a very widespread [[secular]] and [[liberal]] mindset&amp;quot; pervading &amp;quot;the leadership in the world of education [and textbook publishing]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Larry Schwikart, of the [[University of Dayton]], wrote a book about biased textbooks. False claims common in those texts included that the [[Founding Fathers]] wanted a &amp;quot;wall of [[Separation of church and state|separation&amp;quot; between church and state]], that &amp;quot;[[Abraham Lincoln|Lincoln]] issued the [[Emancipation Proclamation]] only because he needed [[Black Soldiers in the Civil War|black soldiers]]&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], not [[Ronald Reagan]], was responsible for ending the [[Cold War]]&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emailwire.com/release/20086-Controversial-Historian-on-the-Price-of-Business-Show.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Dismissal of Tenured Teachers===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the strength of the nation's teachers' [[Labor union|union]], it is nearly impossible to fire a bad performing teacher with [[tenure]]. The process can take years and involves countless steps to even attempt. The union claims that the protections are needed against arbitrary and malicious lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York public schools system has approximately 700 teachers accused of  insubordination to sexual misconduct. They remain in seclusion from the classroom but are paid full salaries until their cases are heard, sometimes from months to years later. All because their union contract makes it extremely difficult to fire them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_rubber_rooms/2009/06/22/227959.html 700 NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing] AP, June 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pathtodismissal.JPG|center|thumb|800px| Flow chart for firing teachers in the nations second largest [[school district]], Los Angeles Unified School district]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graduates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Before 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Given that public schools educate about 90% of [[Americans]], it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school prayer in 1962.  Here is an impressive list of people who attended public schools ''before'' the banning of prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dixonil.com/reagan/reagan2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Dixon High School, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/press_releases/2007/PR07_11_August_02_2007_Eisenhower_Co_Sponsor_Little_Rock.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard M. Nixon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/edu/836/000068632/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Fullerton and Whittier High Schools, California&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Ford]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.visitgrandrapids.org/ford-facts.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Grand Rapids South High School, Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon B. Johnson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/062/000023990/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Johnson City High School, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry S Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/103truman/103visual1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Independence High School, Missouri&lt;br /&gt;
*[[H. Ross Perot]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.famoustexans.com/rossperot.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended public schools and Texarkana Junior College, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Cheney]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/598/000022532/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper, Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Powell]] graduated from Morris High School, NY in 1954 and received his B.A. in geology from the City College of New York in 1958 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gale.cengage.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/powell_c.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]] graduated from Sharon High School, NC in May 1936&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/BillyGraham.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Medved]] graduated from Palisades High School, CA &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;michaelmedved.townhall.com/About.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Wright Brothers]] attended public schools in Richmond, India and Dayton OH but did not graduate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kyrene.org/schools/brisas/sunda/inventor/wright/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roy Jay Glauber]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1941. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/738/000138324/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Reines]], Nobel laureate, attended Union Hill High School, NJ, during the late 1930's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/052/000099752/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver North]], US Army Officer, political commentator, graduated from Ockawamick High School in 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://libraryoflibrary.com/E_n_c_p_d_Ollie_North.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== After 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a mostly unimpressive list of people who attended public school ''after'' prayer was banned in 1962:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brad Pitt]], actor, graduated from Kickapoo High School in Springfield, Missouri, 1981; dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rolemodel.net/brad_pitt.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Cruise]], actor, attended several public high schools including Glen Ridge High School, New Jersey during the 1970's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/791/000022725/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Sununu]], former one-term Senator from [[New Hampshire]], graduated from Salem High School in the 1970's;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sununu.senate.gov/biography.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; claiming to be [[pro-life]], Sununu arranged for the nomination of [[David Souter]] to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], where he then repeatedly voted on the side of [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]], indicted in 2011 on allegations arising from his affair with a mistress, was a former one-term Senator from [[North Carolina]] and two-time unsuccessful candidate for nomination for president, attended public school in Robbins, N.C. during the 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/primaries/edwards_bio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spike Lee]], producer, actor, graduated from John Dewey High School, Brooklyn, NY.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://movies.nytimes.com/person/99175/Spike-Lee/biography&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laura Bush]] attended James Bowie Elementary School, San Jacinto Junior High School, and Midland Lee High School in Midland, Texas (Graduated 1964); came out in support of [[gay marriage]] and [[abortion]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/laura-bush-supports-gay-marriage-abortion/story?id=10629213&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William J. Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hotsprings.org/things_to_do/historic_hotsprings/presidents_hometown.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Hot Springs High School in Arkansas in 1964, and became the only president impeached in the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
*Anthony Weiner, a congressman who resigned in disgrace in 2011 after first denying but then confirming an indecent use of [[Twitter]], graduated from a public high school in [[Brooklyn]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Jobs]], founder of [[Apple Inc.]], graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, CA in 1972; his colleague, [[Steve Wozniak]], graduated from the same high school in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eminem]], a [[liberal]] [[rapper]], repeatedly failed 9th grade in public school and ultimately dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]], a liberal news commentator, attended public school in [[New York City]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]], vice presidential candidate on the [[Republican Party]] ticket in 2008 and favorite of some [[Tea Party]] groups, went to [[Wasilla High School]] and graduated in 1982 and then attended 5 different colleges before becoming more [[conservative]] later in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://outhouserag.typepad.com/outhouserag/2008/09/sarah-palin-198.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rick Perry]], [[Texas]] governor, infringed on [[parental rights]] by requiring young girls to receive an HPV vaccine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public school culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teacher Pay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Parental rights]] (focusing on the rights of parents to control the education, upbringing and disclipline of their children)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Education in the United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1610/466/Dumb_As_A_Rock:_You_Will_Be_Absolutely_Amazed_At_The_Things_That_U.S._High_School_Students_Do_Not_Know.html Dumb As A Rock: You Will Be Absolutely Amazed At The Things That U.S. High School Students Do Not Know]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2012/03/28/9-notorious-teacher-sex-scandals/?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000058?test=latestnews 8 Bizarre Teacher Scandals You Won't Believe]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Peripatric_speciation&amp;diff=987631</id>
		<title>Peripatric speciation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Peripatric_speciation&amp;diff=987631"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:41:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Peripatric.gif|thumb|300px|left|Peripatric Speciation]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Peripatric speciation''' is a version of the [[allopatric]] [[speciation]] mode and happens when one of the isolated populations has very few individuals.  In peripatric speciation, small population size would make full-blown speciation a more likely result of the geographic isolation because genetic drift acts more quickly in small populations. Genetic drift, and perhaps strong selective pressures, would cause rapid genetic change in the small population. This genetic change could lead to speciation. This is the mechanism by which the initial [[baraminology|kinds]] of animals survived aboard the [[Noah's Ark|Ark]] and were able to undergo speciation by [[microevolution]] after the [[Flood]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relative over-representation of rare alleles in such species is called the Founder Effect. This simply states that any rare alleles possessed by the small number of founding individuals will increase disproportionately in the population, and thus the species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:evolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elevatorgate&amp;diff=987630</id>
		<title>Elevatorgate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elevatorgate&amp;diff=987630"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:38:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* Uphill battle of Rebecca Watkins and female atheists combatting atheist misogny */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Richard Dawkins pic.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|[[Richard Dawkins]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Elevatorgate''' is a term commonly used to describe a scandal involving [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]]' inappropriate comments made to fellow atheist [[Rebecca Watson]]. In 2011, Richard Dawkins was widely criticized within the atheist community and in various press outlets for his insensitive comments made to atheist Rebecca Watson about an incident which occurred in an elevator (see: [[Richard Dawkins' Elevatorgate comments]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting Richard Dawkins: Skeptic of women? - Salon, July 8, 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gawker.com/5818993/richard-dawkins-torn-limb-from-limbby-atheists Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From Limb—By Atheists - Gawker]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-09-15/atheist-sexism-women/50416454/1 Atheists address sexism issues - USA Today]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Specifically,  Watson was propositioned after an atheist event in an elevator by a man who apparently was a fellow atheist during the early hours of the morning and she was upset about the incident.  Watson has written about widespread [[misogny]] within the atheist community and she has received threats of rape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skepchick.org/2011/07/the-privilege-delusion/ The Privilege Delusion by Rebecca Watson - Skepchick]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to the Elevatorgate incident, ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men (see also: [[Atheism and women]] and [[Atheism and rape]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''New Statesman'' reporter and fellow [[Philosophical skepticism|skeptic]] [[David Allen Green]] said he believed Dawkins was a [[sexism|mysoginist]] and a racist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Green wrote: &amp;quot;Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Rebecca Watson and Elevatorgate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rebecca-watson.jpg|thumbnail|200px|[[Rebecca Watson]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rebecca_watson_geek.jpg Wikimedia commons], see: [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of Elevatorgate, atheist Rebecca Watson wrote concerning Richard Dawkins:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This person who I always admired for his intelligence and compassion does not care about my experience as an atheist woman and therefore will no longer be rewarded with my money, my praise, or my attention. I will no longer recommend his books to others, buy them as presents, or buy them for my own library. I will not attend his lectures or recommend that others do the same. There are so many great scientists and thinkers out there that I don't think my reading list will suffer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/07/richard-dawkins-draws-feminist-wrath-over-sexual-harassment-comments/39637/ Richard Dawkins Gets into a Comments War with Feminists by Caitlin Dickson - The Atlantic Wire, Jul 06, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Allegation that Rebecca Watson was behaving hypocritically ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amanda Read wrote in the ''[[Washington Times]]'' that she believed Watson was behaving hypocritically and declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The point is that because the issue is [[sexism]] in the atheist movement, perceptions of sexism are not based on absolute principle, but on relative emotion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watson speaks out against the sexual objectification of women, but she apparently sees nothing wrong with the pinup calendars that she and her female atheist friends publish. [[PZ Myers|Myers]] defended her views on his blog, but only last year he linked to an interesting interview with Nina Hartley, a feminist atheist who sees nothing wrong with women performing as sex workers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You see, sexism and the exploitation of women are not immoral to godless women as long as such things are on their terms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/not-your-average-read/2011/jul/16/sexism-atheism-Dawkins-Watson-feminists-Skepchick/ Of sexism and atheism: Richard Dawkins gets in trouble with feminists, Washington Times, July 16, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Previous incident of Richard Dawkins being unkind to a woman ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2010, Richard Dawkins became nasty towards a woman in an audience he spoke before.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/richard-dawkins-i-never-meet-people-who-disagree-with-me-2080451.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please see: [[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aftermath of Elevatorgate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2404429188 ea8f1fc48b.jpg|thumb|250px|Survey data and website tracking data of prominent atheist websites indicate that in the Western World, [[Atheism and women|atheism appears to be significantly less appealing to women]]. According to the website tracking firms [[Alexa]] and Quantcast women frequent the website of richarddawkins.net significantly less than men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/richarddawkins.net&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.quantcast.com/richarddawkins.net#demographics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, [[Vox Day]] and ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be [[Atheism and women|quarrelsome, socially changed men.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([http://www.flickr.com/photos/constantweader/2404429188/ Flickr] photo, see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although major press outlets have covered Elevatorgate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting Richard Dawkins: Skeptic of women? - Salon, July 8, 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gawker.com/5818993/richard-dawkins-torn-limb-from-limbby-atheists Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From L&lt;br /&gt;
imb—By Atheists - Gawker]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-09-15/atheist-sexism-women/50416454/1 Atheists address sexism issues - USA Today]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, most of the commentary surrounding the events of Elevatorgate has been in the atheist blogosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning post Elevatorgate events one atheist blogger wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There was then lots and lots and lots of [[Argybargy|argybargy]], and now it's being said gallons of misogynist men over the net are trying to shout down Rebecca Watson; that is explicitly so presented in this very recent broadcast [http://wearecitizenradio.com/2011/07/11/20110711-rebecca-watson-on-richard-dawkins-sexist-comments-and-the-atheist-community/ on Citizen Radio] featuring an interview of Watson (the part with Watson starts only a bit after 20 minutes into the recording, so skip the first 20 minutes).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://heathen-hub.com/blog.php?bt=5857 ElevatorGate: Rebecca Watson &amp;amp; Richard Dawkins are not the droids you're looking for - Heathen Hub]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequent to Elevatorgate there was 3 weeks of infighting within the atheist community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://synapses.co.za/elevatorgate-power-words/ Elevatorgate - the power of words]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Uphill battle of Rebecca Watkins and female atheists combatting atheist misogyny ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and rape]] and [[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another atheist blogger wrote about Rebecca and her fellow female bloggers at the website Skepchick:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The fatal decision was to extend the fight to tackle the greatest problem remaining in modern skepticism – socially awkward male [[nerd]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak - [[Sun Tzu]] “&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The skepchick army, marshalling their forces, decided to attack the nerds their presumed weakest point – on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, and apparently a surprise for some, the internet is the perfect natural environment of the socially awkward nerd.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sneerreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/elevatorgate-dawkins-strikes-back.html Elevatorgate: Dawkins strikes back]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted earlier, prior to the Elevatorgate incident, ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Conflict at TAM 9===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At &amp;quot;The Amazing Meeting 9&amp;quot;, organised by skeptic and homosexual atheist [[James Randi]], Dawkins and Watson walked out of each other's talks in protest at each other's behaviour during the incident. Dawkins also announced that in future he would pay for childcare at Amazing Meetings, probably as a dig at Watson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abundance of vitriol and a lack of calm and reasoned discussion post Elevatorgate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blog Freethought Kampala described the aftermath of Elevergate thusly:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Elevatorgate is the unprecedented INTERNET WAR that erupted after Rebecca Watson (above) posted a video in which she discussed an ordeal she experienced in an elevator while attending the World Atheist Convention which took place in Dublin, Ireland, from June 3rd to June 5th, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the months of July and August 2011, the atheist-skeptic blogosphere was ablaze with accusations, counter-accusations, verbal fights, moral declarations and insults as hundreds of bloggers and millions of their readers tried to determine whose assessment of the events narrated by Watson best represented the facts at hand.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://freethoughtkampala.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/elevatorgate/#more-2383 Elevatorgate - Freethought Kampala]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequently the blog Freethought Kampala wrote in a blog post entitled ''Elevatorgate – Part 2 – The Failure of Skepticism'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|You would think that being skeptics, whatever disagreements arising from how the events surrounding and following from Elevatorgate were to be interpreted would be done calmly, rationally, and above all, skeptically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But this is not what happened at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My concern is not so much about whether someone takes one view or another with regards to Elevatorgate. Indeed, even among the members of Freethought Kampala, there are different opinions on various aspects of the matter. My concern is about how the matter has been handled, the poor quality of arguments that have been advanced, the astounding amounts of hypocrisy on display, and above all the intolerant attitude towards viewpoints that don’t tow the radical gender [[feminism|feminist]] line – all this, among people that call themselves skeptics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://freethoughtkampala.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/elevatorgate-part-2-the-failure-of-skepticism/ Elevatorgate – Part 2 – The Failure of Skepticism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disharmony, factionalism and global decline of atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp.jpg|thumbnail|right|250px|[[Hong Kong]] Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were [[Western World]] Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077 Is Christianity taking over the planet?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Global Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/mckln/4815046728/in/set-72157624550425162 Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheist factions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacques Rousseau wrote in the Daily Maverick concerning Elevatorgate, &amp;quot;Some might observe that we indulge in these squabbles fairly frequently.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2011-07-13-sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-words-can-rip-my-soul Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can rip my soul]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An ex-atheist wrote: &amp;quot;As an Atheist for 40 years, I noticed that there is not just a wide variety of Atheist positions, but there exists an actual battle between certain Atheist factions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atheism-analyzed.net/The%20Reasoning%20Atheist.htm http://www.atheism-analyzed.net/The%20Reasoning%20Atheist.htm Atheism Analyzed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Decline of atheism and the explosive growth of global Christianity ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Global Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, the ''American Spectator'' declared concerning research published in the ''International Bulletin of Missionary Research'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The report estimates about 80,000 new [[Christianity|Christians]] every day, 79,000 new [[Islam|Muslims]] every day, and 300 fewer [[atheism|atheists]] every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the [[Western World|West]], while religion is thriving in the Global South, where [[Charismatic movement|charismatic Christianity]] is exploding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/28/thriving-christianity Thriving Christianity]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheist leaders and immoral relationships]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and rape]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and marriageability]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Dawkins, atheist atrocities, and historical revisionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Dawkins and pseudoscience]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Comedy and satire:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Ponies vs. atheism - Ponies win|Ponies vs. atheism - Ponies win]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The atheist and evolutionist helpline|The atheist and evolutionist helpline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Atheists say the darnedest things!|Atheists say the darnedest things!]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: 10 telltale signs you are on your way to becoming an atheist nerd|10 telltale signs you are on your way to becoming an atheist nerd]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Essays:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Atheism: A house divided and in global decline|Atheism: A house divided and in global decline]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: New Atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elevatorgate&amp;diff=987629</id>
		<title>Elevatorgate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elevatorgate&amp;diff=987629"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:36:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Richard Dawkins pic.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|[[Richard Dawkins]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Elevatorgate''' is a term commonly used to describe a scandal involving [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]]' inappropriate comments made to fellow atheist [[Rebecca Watson]]. In 2011, Richard Dawkins was widely criticized within the atheist community and in various press outlets for his insensitive comments made to atheist Rebecca Watson about an incident which occurred in an elevator (see: [[Richard Dawkins' Elevatorgate comments]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting Richard Dawkins: Skeptic of women? - Salon, July 8, 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gawker.com/5818993/richard-dawkins-torn-limb-from-limbby-atheists Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From Limb—By Atheists - Gawker]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-09-15/atheist-sexism-women/50416454/1 Atheists address sexism issues - USA Today]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Specifically,  Watson was propositioned after an atheist event in an elevator by a man who apparently was a fellow atheist during the early hours of the morning and she was upset about the incident.  Watson has written about widespread [[misogny]] within the atheist community and she has received threats of rape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skepchick.org/2011/07/the-privilege-delusion/ The Privilege Delusion by Rebecca Watson - Skepchick]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to the Elevatorgate incident, ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men (see also: [[Atheism and women]] and [[Atheism and rape]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''New Statesman'' reporter and fellow [[Philosophical skepticism|skeptic]] [[David Allen Green]] said he believed Dawkins was a [[sexism|mysoginist]] and a racist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Green wrote: &amp;quot;Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Rebecca Watson and Elevatorgate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rebecca-watson.jpg|thumbnail|200px|[[Rebecca Watson]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rebecca_watson_geek.jpg Wikimedia commons], see: [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of Elevatorgate, atheist Rebecca Watson wrote concerning Richard Dawkins:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This person who I always admired for his intelligence and compassion does not care about my experience as an atheist woman and therefore will no longer be rewarded with my money, my praise, or my attention. I will no longer recommend his books to others, buy them as presents, or buy them for my own library. I will not attend his lectures or recommend that others do the same. There are so many great scientists and thinkers out there that I don't think my reading list will suffer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/07/richard-dawkins-draws-feminist-wrath-over-sexual-harassment-comments/39637/ Richard Dawkins Gets into a Comments War with Feminists by Caitlin Dickson - The Atlantic Wire, Jul 06, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Allegation that Rebecca Watson was behaving hypocritically ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amanda Read wrote in the ''[[Washington Times]]'' that she believed Watson was behaving hypocritically and declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The point is that because the issue is [[sexism]] in the atheist movement, perceptions of sexism are not based on absolute principle, but on relative emotion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watson speaks out against the sexual objectification of women, but she apparently sees nothing wrong with the pinup calendars that she and her female atheist friends publish. [[PZ Myers|Myers]] defended her views on his blog, but only last year he linked to an interesting interview with Nina Hartley, a feminist atheist who sees nothing wrong with women performing as sex workers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You see, sexism and the exploitation of women are not immoral to godless women as long as such things are on their terms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/not-your-average-read/2011/jul/16/sexism-atheism-Dawkins-Watson-feminists-Skepchick/ Of sexism and atheism: Richard Dawkins gets in trouble with feminists, Washington Times, July 16, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Previous incident of Richard Dawkins being unkind to a woman ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2010, Richard Dawkins became nasty towards a woman in an audience he spoke before.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/richard-dawkins-i-never-meet-people-who-disagree-with-me-2080451.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please see: [[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aftermath of Elevatorgate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2404429188 ea8f1fc48b.jpg|thumb|250px|Survey data and website tracking data of prominent atheist websites indicate that in the Western World, [[Atheism and women|atheism appears to be significantly less appealing to women]]. According to the website tracking firms [[Alexa]] and Quantcast women frequent the website of richarddawkins.net significantly less than men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/richarddawkins.net&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.quantcast.com/richarddawkins.net#demographics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, [[Vox Day]] and ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be [[Atheism and women|quarrelsome, socially changed men.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([http://www.flickr.com/photos/constantweader/2404429188/ Flickr] photo, see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although major press outlets have covered Elevatorgate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting Richard Dawkins: Skeptic of women? - Salon, July 8, 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gawker.com/5818993/richard-dawkins-torn-limb-from-limbby-atheists Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From L&lt;br /&gt;
imb—By Atheists - Gawker]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-09-15/atheist-sexism-women/50416454/1 Atheists address sexism issues - USA Today]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, most of the commentary surrounding the events of Elevatorgate has been in the atheist blogosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning post Elevatorgate events one atheist blogger wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There was then lots and lots and lots of [[Argybargy|argybargy]], and now it's being said gallons of misogynist men over the net are trying to shout down Rebecca Watson; that is explicitly so presented in this very recent broadcast [http://wearecitizenradio.com/2011/07/11/20110711-rebecca-watson-on-richard-dawkins-sexist-comments-and-the-atheist-community/ on Citizen Radio] featuring an interview of Watson (the part with Watson starts only a bit after 20 minutes into the recording, so skip the first 20 minutes).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://heathen-hub.com/blog.php?bt=5857 ElevatorGate: Rebecca Watson &amp;amp; Richard Dawkins are not the droids you're looking for - Heathen Hub]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequent to Elevatorgate there was 3 weeks of infighting within the atheist community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://synapses.co.za/elevatorgate-power-words/ Elevatorgate - the power of words]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Uphill battle of Rebecca Watkins and female atheists combatting atheist misogny ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and rape]] and [[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another atheist blogger wrote about Rebecca and her fellow female bloggers at the website Skepchick:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The fatal decision was to extend the fight to tackle the greatest problem remaining in modern skepticism – socially awkward male [[nerd]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak - [[Sun Tzu]] “&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The skepchick army, marshalling their forces, decided to attack the nerds their presumed weakest point – on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, and apparently a surprise for some, the internet is the perfect natural environment of the socially awkward nerd.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sneerreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/elevatorgate-dawkins-strikes-back.html Elevatorgate: Dawkins strikes back]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted earlier, prior to the Elevatorgate incident, ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Conflict at TAM 9===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At &amp;quot;The Amazing Meeting 9&amp;quot;, organised by skeptic and homosexual atheist [[James Randi]], Dawkins and Watson walked out of each other's talks in protest at each other's behaviour during the incident. Dawkins also announced that in future he would pay for childcare at Amazing Meetings, probably as a dig at Watson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abundance of vitriol and a lack of calm and reasoned discussion post Elevatorgate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blog Freethought Kampala described the aftermath of Elevergate thusly:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Elevatorgate is the unprecedented INTERNET WAR that erupted after Rebecca Watson (above) posted a video in which she discussed an ordeal she experienced in an elevator while attending the World Atheist Convention which took place in Dublin, Ireland, from June 3rd to June 5th, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the months of July and August 2011, the atheist-skeptic blogosphere was ablaze with accusations, counter-accusations, verbal fights, moral declarations and insults as hundreds of bloggers and millions of their readers tried to determine whose assessment of the events narrated by Watson best represented the facts at hand.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://freethoughtkampala.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/elevatorgate/#more-2383 Elevatorgate - Freethought Kampala]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequently the blog Freethought Kampala wrote in a blog post entitled ''Elevatorgate – Part 2 – The Failure of Skepticism'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|You would think that being skeptics, whatever disagreements arising from how the events surrounding and following from Elevatorgate were to be interpreted would be done calmly, rationally, and above all, skeptically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But this is not what happened at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My concern is not so much about whether someone takes one view or another with regards to Elevatorgate. Indeed, even among the members of Freethought Kampala, there are different opinions on various aspects of the matter. My concern is about how the matter has been handled, the poor quality of arguments that have been advanced, the astounding amounts of hypocrisy on display, and above all the intolerant attitude towards viewpoints that don’t tow the radical gender [[feminism|feminist]] line – all this, among people that call themselves skeptics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://freethoughtkampala.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/elevatorgate-part-2-the-failure-of-skepticism/ Elevatorgate – Part 2 – The Failure of Skepticism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disharmony, factionalism and global decline of atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp.jpg|thumbnail|right|250px|[[Hong Kong]] Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were [[Western World]] Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077 Is Christianity taking over the planet?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Global Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/mckln/4815046728/in/set-72157624550425162 Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheist factions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacques Rousseau wrote in the Daily Maverick concerning Elevatorgate, &amp;quot;Some might observe that we indulge in these squabbles fairly frequently.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2011-07-13-sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-words-can-rip-my-soul Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can rip my soul]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An ex-atheist wrote: &amp;quot;As an Atheist for 40 years, I noticed that there is not just a wide variety of Atheist positions, but there exists an actual battle between certain Atheist factions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atheism-analyzed.net/The%20Reasoning%20Atheist.htm http://www.atheism-analyzed.net/The%20Reasoning%20Atheist.htm Atheism Analyzed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Decline of atheism and the explosive growth of global Christianity ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Global Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, the ''American Spectator'' declared concerning research published in the ''International Bulletin of Missionary Research'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The report estimates about 80,000 new [[Christianity|Christians]] every day, 79,000 new [[Islam|Muslims]] every day, and 300 fewer [[atheism|atheists]] every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the [[Western World|West]], while religion is thriving in the Global South, where [[Charismatic movement|charismatic Christianity]] is exploding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/28/thriving-christianity Thriving Christianity]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheist leaders and immoral relationships]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and rape]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and marriageability]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Dawkins, atheist atrocities, and historical revisionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Dawkins and pseudoscience]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Comedy and satire:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Ponies vs. atheism - Ponies win|Ponies vs. atheism - Ponies win]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The atheist and evolutionist helpline|The atheist and evolutionist helpline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Atheists say the darnedest things!|Atheists say the darnedest things!]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: 10 telltale signs you are on your way to becoming an atheist nerd|10 telltale signs you are on your way to becoming an atheist nerd]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Essays:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Atheism: A house divided and in global decline|Atheism: A house divided and in global decline]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: New Atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=987627</id>
		<title>Mitt Romney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=987627"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:31:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* Flip Flopping */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Willard Mitt Romney&lt;br /&gt;
|image=MittPortrait.jpg‎&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Ann Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January&amp;amp;nbsp;2, 2003 – January&amp;amp;nbsp;4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Jane Swift]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Deval Patrick]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Willard Mitt Romney''' (born March 12, 1947) is a [[RINO]], former governor of [[Massachusetts]] and a successful U.S. businessman, currently portrayed in the mainstream media as the [[2012 Republican Primary|presumptive Republican nominee]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].  He was first runner-up for the nomination in 2008. If elected, Romney would become the first [[Mormon]] president. His father [[George Romney]], a former governor of Michigan, ran for the Republican nomination for president in 1968. In 1994, Mitt Romney proved to be the most difficult challenger that incumbent Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] of Massachusetts ever faced for reelection, causing Kennedy to pour far more money into the race than he expected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/romney/ Romney to the Rescue: Mitt Romney's Got the Right Stuff for 2008] Kessler, Ronald, newsmax.com archives, retrieved April 27, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney leads Obama among many key segments of the electorate: &amp;quot;Romney leads [[Barack Obama|Obama]] 58%-34% among [[veteran]]s, who make up about 13% of the [[electorate]]&amp;quot; and influence many other voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/05/gallup-romney-tops-obama-with-veterans/1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One national poll showed Romney with a 7-point lead over [[Obama]], 50-43%, in early May.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/polls/226943-poll-romney-opens-up-big-lead-nationally&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other polls show different results,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in swing states like Ohio,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/oh/ohio_romney_vs_obama-1860.html &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Virginia&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/va/virginia_romney_vs_obama-1774.html &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Wisconsin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/wi/wisconsin_romney_vs_obama-1871.html &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before entering politics Romney was a businessman in Boston, having served as CEO of Bain &amp;amp; Company, a management consulting firm known for outsourcing American jobs. His political start began during the financially unsteady 2002 Winter Olympics. He gained popularity in Massachusetts, a state known for being extremely liberal, and was elected governor in 2002. As governor he raised taxes several times.  He unashamedly admits creating [[RomneyCare]], which is a complete disaster and forces everyone to buy health insurance and has resulted in long delays for obtaining medical services, such as an ordinary physical, in that state.  [[Ted Kennedy]] and other [[liberals]] supported the bill and probably wrote key parts of it.  Romney declined to run for reelection and announced his candidacy for President.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, Romney was widely but incorrectly supported as a staunch conservative and ran on his business experience in the private sector. Romney fought a rough battle against Senator [[John McCain]] in Florida, Michigan, and other key states, but large losses on the Super Tuesday primaries ended his campaign. Romney dropped out of the race and endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] on February 14, 2008. His name was circulated as a potential running mate for McCain as their relationship improved, though [[Sarah Palin]] eventually became the vice-president nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney has supported many far left positions: Romney has a pro-abortion record and favors big corporations; Romney also continues to believe in liberal propaganda claiming global warming; Romney has been criticized for standing behind his 2005 [[RomneyCare|health care plan in Massachusetts]], which featured a mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance as well as taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]. This plan is very similar to the 2010 ObamaCare bill that was adopted on a national level, and may have been the basis for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of criticism of Romney by the mainstream media suggests that they want him to win so that they can defeat him in the general election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flip Flopping==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney's inconsistent track record on issues such as abortion and gay marriage has gotten to the point where he has gotten the nickname '''Multiple Choice Mitt.''' A man dressed as a dolphin calling himself Flipper has appeared at some recent conservative gatherings to bring attention to Romney's inconsistent stands on abortion and gay marriage. Although Romney now identifies himself as pro-life and anti-same sex marriage, he claimed to be pro choice and supported same-sex rights as late as 2002. These swaps coupled with his Mormon affiliation puts him at odds with much of the Evangelical right, but a PollingReport.com chart from September 2007 indicates that Mitt was still polling at approximately 10% within the GOP primary forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney also changed his positions on gun control. He was originally for it, but recently joined the National Rifle Association, an organization opposed to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Following the split of the first three major elections in the 2008 primaries, Ron Kaufman, a top adviser to Romney, stated that the battle between the top three candidates &amp;quot;is going to be like the Bataan Death March.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Romney changed his position on immigration shortly before the [[2012 Presidential Election]]. He originally supported amnesty for certain illegals and moratoriums on criminal prosecution for drug dealing by illegal immigrants. It is possible that Romney is trying to erode President Obama's support in the Latin community in places like [[Nevada]], where immigration is a hot-button issue and Obama's victory in 2008 was by only a few percentage points.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bataan Death March resulted in the death of approximately 9,000 prisoners of war during World War II, and has been labeled as a war crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MittRomneyYouth05.jpg|thumb|Ann Lois Davies and Willard Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the scion of an old Mormon family. His grandparents were polygamists who fled the United States in the early 20th century when the Mormon Church repudiated polygamy; his father was born in Mexico. The Romneys returned to the U.S. in 1911 when a violent civil war broke out in Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney is a devout member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints]], and spent time as a missionary during his youth converting Catholics and agnostics to Mormonism in France. In fact, his time as a student and missionary helped him defer from military service during the Vietnam draft,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Kranish, &amp;quot;The Making of Mitt Romney: Mormon church obtained Vietnam draft deferrals for Romney, other missionaries&amp;quot; June 24, 2007. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but he stated during interviews that &amp;quot;he had longed to join the soldiers in Vietnam and support the war effort.&amp;quot; His father had stated in 1967 that he felt &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by U.S. officials over the justification of the prolonged Vietnam war. This statement had been very costly in George Romney's 1968 campaign for president against Richard Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to maintains a stable marriage with his wife Ann, with whom he has five children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the son of former [[Michigan]] governor and presidential candidate [[George Romney]], a &amp;quot;Rockefeller Republican,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisa McGirr, ''Suburban Warriors''(2001) pp. 141, 222.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who amassed a large fortune as an automobile industry magnate during World War II. &amp;lt;!-- Unusual statement. What exactly is the reason for introducing it as Mass. Republicans? Is there a significance to this? Many Massachusetts Republicans do not connect the father's politics with the son's, much like Presidents [[George H. W. Bush|George Herbert Walker Bush]] and [[George W. Bush|George Walker Bush]].--&amp;gt; George Romney was popular among moderates during his presidential run and was well-equipped for victory; many of his political advisors had come from [[Nelson Rockefeller]]'s 1964 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business Career==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1978 to 1984, Romney was a vice president of Bain &amp;amp; Company, Inc. a worldwide management consulting firm, and in 1984, Romney co-founded a spin-off called Bain Capital. He invested in or bought many well-known companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino's, Sealy Corporation and Sports Authority.  Critics say he advised corporations to cut their U.S. taxes by reincorporating in Caribbean tax havens such as the Caymen Islands, while maintaining their operations in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney served as governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), with a generally [[conservative]] record that included economic expansion. He balanced the budget every year of his administration with out increasing taxes or increasing state dept. Romney turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $500 million surplus by reducing government spending and added 80,000 new jobs by the end of his term. In 2004, 2005, and 2006 Governor Romney proposed cutting the state income tax from 5.3% to 5.0% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/08/mitt_romneys_record_on_economi.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Although the Democratic super majority in the state legislator refused to budge. Romney vetoed 844 pieces of legislation, with over 700 overridden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Mitt_Romney_Government_Reform.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, saying &amp;quot;there's no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 08/01/06&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Governor Romney the state abolished a retroactive capital gains tax that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay additional taxes and fees. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansformitt.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Massachusetts Citizens For Limited Taxation Executive Director Barbara Anderson praised Romney, saying &amp;quot;There was no one else out on the horizon and with the legislature almost entirely Democratic, we felt it was necessary to have a grown-up in the corner office. … And we were right to back him. He's been a really good friend to the taxpayers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some of the actions Governor Romney took received criticisms from conservatives, such as supporting moderate fee increases and creating and the nation's first universal [[health care]] program. During his 2002 gubernatorial campaign Romney supported [[abortion]], his views evolved and would later take [[pro-life]] positions such as vetoing emergency contraception and vetoing [[stem-cell research]] that would allow cloning of human embryos. In 2006, Governor Romney testified before the [[United States]] [[Senate]] to support the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would limit marriage to one man and one woman. Additionally, Romney filed legislation to reinstate [[capital punishment]], but was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a 99-53 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney made no pardons as governor, &amp;quot;My conclusion was, if somebody has been convicted by a jury of their peers, and they’ve been prosecuted and the police were able to get the evidence necessary to put them behind bars, why in the world would I step in and reverse that sentence?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/04/romney-on-huckabee-unlike-some-people-i-never-pardoned-anyone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[Education]] Romney called for the privatization of the University of Massachusetts medical school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 02/27/03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In 2004, he established the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program, which rewarded the top 25 percent of Massachusetts high school students with tuition-free scholarship to any Massachusetts public [[university]] or [[college]]. In August 2006, Governor Romney refused to allow former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, an outspoken opponent of the [[United States]] and [[Israel]], state police escorts during his speech at [[Harvard University]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/editorials/khatemi-at-harvard/38903/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2006, Romney signed a memorandum of agreement with the federal government that would allow state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=96543&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however was revoked when Democrat Deval Patrict took office as Governor in January 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Romney claims to be pro-life, but his record is very spotty.  At times he has claimed to be pro-infantacide.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am [[pro-life]]. I believe that [[abortion]] is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by [[judicial mandate]].&amp;quot; ([[Boston]] Globe, Mitt Romney Editorial, July 26, 2005) &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Values America's Culture and Values] mittromney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having a largely pro-life record as governor, in a 1994 debate with Senator [[Edward Kennedy]], Romney said that abortion should be legal, declaring that &amp;quot;regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion&amp;quot;, Romney said. &amp;quot;It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his campaign literature for the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Romney expressed a willingness to defend that State's pro-choice status quo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He stated in a live, televised debate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I've been very clear on that, I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil Unions===&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to be opposed to the idea of [[gay marriage]], however he has voiced explicit support for the [[homosexual agenda]]. He has advocated for domestic partnership benefits and equal rights for [[homosexuals]], which is gay marriage in everything but name and an easy stepping stone on the vile gay agenda path towards homosexual recruitment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  He also supports adoption for gay couples&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Romney promised to pursue a conservative, pro-growth economic agenda. His number one economic priority would be to grow the economy — helping to create good jobs, raise incomes and preserve American strength. He says he would work to rein in excessive government spending and reform entitlements. To ensure America's continued economic growth, he promises to cut taxes — such as the Death Tax, savings taxes, corporate taxes and marginal tax rates. Despite these claims, he has supported the [[socialist|socialism]] agenda.  He claimed credit for the government bailout of the union controlled car companies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/07/romney-taking-credit-for-auto-industry-success/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Also his [[RomneyCare]] law started the process of [[socialism|socializing]] medical care in [[Massachusetts]]. He continues to defend this law up to this day, undermining his commitment to repel the similar and equally atrocious  [[ObamaCare]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/romney-defends-romneycare_560953.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney says he would also promote trade, bring market forces to bear in health care, pursue national tort and liability reform, eliminate excessive regulations that put a burden on our economy and strengthen American families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Immigration has been an important part of our nation's success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney supports a strong stance on illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=91722 IowaPolitics.com: Romney Touts Strong Stance On Illegal Immigration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 5/24/07, Romney spoke about how he was tolerant about gays and then he discussed the current illegal immigration bill before Congress:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;He expressed less tolerance for illegal immigrants, and said he and President Bush have a difference of opinions on a bill that would provide a path toward legalization for an estimated 12 million people unlawfully in the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has his view, and other people have their views and I have my own,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;This is for all intents and purposes a form of amnesty in that everyone who is here illegally today will be able to stay under this bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill is unfair to people who are trying to come to the country legally, he said. People here illegally should be able to apply to come to the United States, but under the same terms as everyone else and behind those who have already applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I don't think that we're going to round up 11 or 12 or however many million people and bus them out of the country. That's not what I'm talking about,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;Those who committed felonies, of course, would be deported. Those who require government assistance to stay here would surely need to get off government assistance and ultimately could not remain here on government assistance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,RomneyGays,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stem Cell Research===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney supports the right of scientists to research on embryos created during fertility treatments, which is essentially infantacide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Mitt Romney 2008 Presidential Campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dude and mitt romney.jpg|right|180px]] As chairman of the [[Republican Governors Association]], Romney campaigned nationwide for GOP gubernatorial candidates in 2006, building up a network of allies and supporters. While he did not run for reelection as governor, in 2004 Romney set up a federal political action committee (PAC) called the Commonwealth PAC, which raised $2.71 million during the 2006 election cycle. On January 3, 2007, his next-to-last day in office as governor of Massachusetts, Romney filed to form a presidential exploratory committee with the Federal Election Commission. He officially announced his candidacy for President a month later. Romney was the first candidate in either party to start running television and radio ads. The ads focused mainly on his record as governor, running the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, and his work as a very successful businessman. Romney's five sons had been actively campaigning for their father, traveling around in a campaign bus called the &amp;quot;Mitt Mobile, A Five Brothers Bus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a presidential candidate Romney sought the support of the business community and social conservatives.  He reversed moderate positions on abortion and gay rights to take a hardline conservative position on them, and on opposition to illegal immigrants. Opponents charged he changed too often. Romney was a leader in fund-raising, augmented by over $35 million from his own fortune. However he was little known outside of Massachusetts, so his strategy was to play for early wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, then &amp;quot;sling-shot&amp;quot; the momentum into national visibility.  Romney won the Michigan primary on January 16th, 2008, with 39% of the vote, edging out McCain with 30% and Huckabee with 16%.  Romney was favored to win in the state of his birth, where his father, [[George Romney]] was governor from 1963-1969.  After losing both the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary (to Huckabee and McCain, respectively), Romney won a low-publicized Wyoming caucus. On January 19, Romney easily won the [[Nevada]] caucuses by 37 percentage points when there were seven candidates on the ballot, however, on that same day he placed a distant fourth in the [[South Carolina]] primary. After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Romney announced the suspension of his campaign on Thursday 7th February.  He expressed his wishes not to divide the Republican party and later endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] of [[Arizona]]. Commentators correctly speculated on his chances for a return effort in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fundraising===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney had done well in fund raising. During his first fund raiser as a presidential candidate, he raised $6.5 million dollars compared to an original goal of only $1 million. During the first quarter Romney raised more money then any other Republican presidential candidate with $23 million. However, a substantial portion of his funds ($17 million) came from his own personal wealth. [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/16/top_spender_romney_could_soon_run_short/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mittromney.com Mitt Romney for President 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldslivingonline.com/article.php?articleId=17633 Mitt Romney: proudly, quietly Mormon]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/ Evangelicals for Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2007/03/fresh-mitt-romney-juvenalia-hot-off.html Fresh Mitt Romney Juvenalia] Pics - Comments.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjE4MmMyMzVkZjlhZGQzNzlhZjdmMDEzNjI3MzM4ZTA= Mitt Romney: “I Changed My View. Is that So Difficult to Understand?”] The candidate talks about his efforts to convince voters that his pro-life conversion is real. Byron York, National Review Online, November 20, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2ZkMWNkZDkzOTk1YTM0NTNkNmJlZThmYjJmM2ZmOGE= Did Mitt Romney Push Poll Himself?] Mark Hemingway, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2EzODZjY2UxZTRhMWE2ZDk1ZWE5MGI0ZmRjMDViZTI= Team Romney on Push-Poll Connections] After reading the Hemingway piece, Kevin Madden, Romney for President campaign spokesman replies. Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzliMDgzOWVlOGEwYThlMzc5ZDVlNzM2YjA4M2ZkYTg= Romney Stands for Faith] The candidate pushes back against push-poll attacks. Larry Kudlow, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ4YmM4Y2U3Yjc3MzYzNDQwYzk3YTVjMTI5YTkwNzg= Romney’s Religion], The Editors, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blogs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/ My Man Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://libertariansformitt.wordpress.com/ Libertarians for Romney]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romney, Mitt}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mormons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Worst_College_Majors&amp;diff=987626</id>
		<title>Worst College Majors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Worst_College_Majors&amp;diff=987626"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:25:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* Courses */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''worst college majors''' are fields of study that leave the student with relatively few job opportunities and often a distorted or ultra-[[liberal]] view of the world.  Students incur an average debt in excess of $25,000 for attending college, and these college majors can leave such students without the ability to pay off their loans, which are typically not dischargeable in bankruptcy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding insult to injury, [[liberal]] colleges have begun charging students more if they decline one of the '''Worst College Majors''', and study something of value instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/story/2012-04-24/differential-tuition-increase-major/54513940/1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Majors==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Feminism|Women's studies]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Women’s studies ... is disappearing from British universities. ... Students have begun to realise, too, that women’s studies is useless for getting you a job. It’s no coincidence that the subject’s collapse coincided with the introduction of tuition fees. The moment you start paying for something is the moment you consider whether it’s really worthwhile.&amp;quot; [http://www.theinsider.com/news/639292_The_End_Of_Women_s_Studies_And_Other_Useless_Qualifications]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boundless.org/2000/features/a0000225.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/why-is-gender-studies-dominated-by-one-gender-1.289830&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; sometimes included as part of &amp;quot;gender studies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitman.edu/content/genderstudies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism|Secularism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/08/us/08secular.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Homosexuality|LGBT]] studies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.yale.edu/lgbts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lgbts.umd.edu/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Black studies &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/the-most-persuasive-case-for-eliminating-black-studies-just-read-the-dissertations/46346, The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 30, 2012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Film&amp;lt;ref name=georgetown&amp;gt;[http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf What's It Worth?] Georgetown University, July 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Puppetry&lt;br /&gt;
# English [[Literature]]/Literary Criticism&lt;br /&gt;
# Music Therapy&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Dance&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Interior Design&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Art History&amp;lt;ref name=yahoolist&amp;gt;[http://finance.yahoo.com/college-education/article/110196/20-worst-paying-college-degrees-in-2010 20 Worst-Paying College Degrees in 2010] Yahoo! Finance, 08/12/2010&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Sequential Art&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scad.edu/sequential-art/index.cfm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Surf Science and Technology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www1.plymouth.ac.uk/courses/undergraduate/1645/Pages/CourseOverview.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Golf Management – University of Birmingham / Florida Gulf Coast University&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Evolution|Evolutionary biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Journalism &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxbusiness.com/slideshow/personal-finance/2010/06/28/worst-fields-graduates/#slide=4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Psychology&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Fashion Design&lt;br /&gt;
# Theater&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Horticulture&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Human Resources&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Photography&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Video Game Design&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One observer noted that not even the video game industry typically hires people who majored in video game design.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Forestry/Range Management/Wildlife Management&lt;br /&gt;
# Environmental Studies&lt;br /&gt;
# Outdoor Recreation&lt;br /&gt;
# Fine Arts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.artcareer.net/faqs/job-market-outlook-for-artists-and-designers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
# Anthropology&lt;br /&gt;
# Sociology&lt;br /&gt;
# History of Music&lt;br /&gt;
# Climatology&lt;br /&gt;
# Comparative Religion &lt;br /&gt;
# Gaming Management&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cat&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.umac.mo/iscg/courses/gmdiphome.html 10 Worst College Majors for Employment]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Geology&lt;br /&gt;
#Ceramic Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
#Creative Writing&lt;br /&gt;
#Ethnic Studies&lt;br /&gt;
#Art History&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Courses==&lt;br /&gt;
# Understanding Obama - Harvard Law School &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/harvard-law-offering-understanding-obama-course-taught-by-obama-mentor/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Revolutionary Marxism - Portland State University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/portland-state-university-offering-revolutionary-marxism-course-and-wait-until-you-see-the-syllabus/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Why Occupy Wall Street? The History and Politics of Debt and Finance - New York University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://weaselzippers.us/2011/12/09/n-y-u-to-offer-classes-on-occupy-wall-street/ N.Y.U. To Offer Classes On Occupy Wall Street, Weasel Zippers, December 9, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Occupy the Field: Global Finance, Inequality, Social Movement - Columbia University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://michellemalkin.com/2012/01/02/occupy-101/ Columbia University to Offer ‘Occupy 101′ Course, January 2, 2012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Football Culture&lt;br /&gt;
# Queer Musicology – UCLA&lt;br /&gt;
# The Science of Harry Potter – Frostburg University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CBS News: ''Harry Potter Goes To College:  Professor Uses Boy Wizard To Explores Links Between Magic, Science'', by Bootie Cosgrove-Mather, Sept. 26, 2003 [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/19/national/main584456.shtml] ''...Frostburg State President Catherine R. Gira said she isn't worried that some may view a Harry Potter class as trivial.  &amp;quot;Irrespective of the specific title of the course, the 'magic' in the fiction is being analyzed by applying concepts of physics, chemistry, biology and engineering. This honors course creatively packages scientific principles in a contemporary way that will interest today's students,&amp;quot; Gira said.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Native American Feminism - University of Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
# Cyber Feminism - Cornell University&lt;br /&gt;
# Feminist New Black Man - Occidental College &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvlL_lDk4ko Jason Mattera At CPAC, YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Philosophy and Star Trek – Georgetown University in Washington &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://courses.georgetown.edu/index.cfm?Action=View&amp;amp;CourseID=PHIL-180 Georgetown University Course Listing]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The Sociology of Hip-Hop: The Odyssey of Jay-Z – Georgetown University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/#ixzz1fPkYhzqX Jay-Z's street rhymes a Georgetown college course]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Emotional Literacy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1076368/Schools-councils-waste-300-000-useless-emotional-literacy-course-faraway-island-sun.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Media Genres, the study of zombies - University of Baltimore &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/article/university-of-baltimore-pop-culture-class-focuses-on-zombies/19625044?test=latestnews College Course Preps Pupils for Zombie Apocalypse, AOL News, September 9, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The Science of Superheroes - UC Irvine &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/11/14/the-top-8-california-schools-that-are-like-totally-wasting-your-money/ The Top 8 California Schools that Are, Like, Totally Wasting Your Money, NewsRealBlog, November 14, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Field Equipment Operation (tractor driving) - UC Davis&lt;br /&gt;
# Hip Hop: The Politics of Culture - UC San Diego&lt;br /&gt;
# History of Surfing - UC Santa Barbara&lt;br /&gt;
# Labor Studies - UM Saint Louis &amp;amp; UM Kansas City &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thehotjoints.com/2011/04/25/video-college-course-teaches-violent-union-tactics/ Video: College Course Teaches Violent Union Tactics, The Hot Joints, April 25, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing with Judge Judy - UC Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
# Self-Esteem - Cal State Fresno&lt;br /&gt;
# Gaga for Lady Gaga: Sex, Gender, and Identity- University of Virginia-Charlottesville&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/10/lady-gaga-college-class_n_712540.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pilot Brewery (brewmaster) - UC Davis&lt;br /&gt;
# Search for Extraterrestial Intelligence - UC Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
# Ecology of Renewable Natural Resources - Texas Tech University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.depts.ttu.edu/officialpublications/courses/NRM.php Texas Tech University Course Listing]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Introduction to social networking&lt;br /&gt;
#The Mythology of Harry Potter-UCLA&lt;br /&gt;
#History of Weaving-UC Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
#The Simpsons and the American Family-Hampshire College&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/Unemployment.Final.update1.pdf Unemployment rates and earnings for college majors - Georgetown University report - 2012]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf What's It Worth? The Economic Value of College Majors] - Comprehensive report at [[Georgetown University]] website&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://learnfinancialplanning.com/best-worst-college-majors-degree/ Best and Worst College Majors]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.toptenz.net/to-10-useless-college-classes-degrees.php Top 10 Useless College Degrees &amp;amp; Classes]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/10-college-majors-lowest-unemployment-rates-163049193.html College majors with lowest unemployment]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:college]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:education]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Worst_College_Majors&amp;diff=987625</id>
		<title>Worst College Majors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Worst_College_Majors&amp;diff=987625"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:22:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* Majors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''worst college majors''' are fields of study that leave the student with relatively few job opportunities and often a distorted or ultra-[[liberal]] view of the world.  Students incur an average debt in excess of $25,000 for attending college, and these college majors can leave such students without the ability to pay off their loans, which are typically not dischargeable in bankruptcy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding insult to injury, [[liberal]] colleges have begun charging students more if they decline one of the '''Worst College Majors''', and study something of value instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/story/2012-04-24/differential-tuition-increase-major/54513940/1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Majors==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Feminism|Women's studies]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Women’s studies ... is disappearing from British universities. ... Students have begun to realise, too, that women’s studies is useless for getting you a job. It’s no coincidence that the subject’s collapse coincided with the introduction of tuition fees. The moment you start paying for something is the moment you consider whether it’s really worthwhile.&amp;quot; [http://www.theinsider.com/news/639292_The_End_Of_Women_s_Studies_And_Other_Useless_Qualifications]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boundless.org/2000/features/a0000225.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/why-is-gender-studies-dominated-by-one-gender-1.289830&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; sometimes included as part of &amp;quot;gender studies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitman.edu/content/genderstudies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism|Secularism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/08/us/08secular.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Homosexuality|LGBT]] studies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.yale.edu/lgbts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lgbts.umd.edu/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Black studies &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/the-most-persuasive-case-for-eliminating-black-studies-just-read-the-dissertations/46346, The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 30, 2012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Film&amp;lt;ref name=georgetown&amp;gt;[http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf What's It Worth?] Georgetown University, July 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Puppetry&lt;br /&gt;
# English [[Literature]]/Literary Criticism&lt;br /&gt;
# Music Therapy&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Dance&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Interior Design&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Art History&amp;lt;ref name=yahoolist&amp;gt;[http://finance.yahoo.com/college-education/article/110196/20-worst-paying-college-degrees-in-2010 20 Worst-Paying College Degrees in 2010] Yahoo! Finance, 08/12/2010&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Sequential Art&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scad.edu/sequential-art/index.cfm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Surf Science and Technology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www1.plymouth.ac.uk/courses/undergraduate/1645/Pages/CourseOverview.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Golf Management – University of Birmingham / Florida Gulf Coast University&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Evolution|Evolutionary biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Journalism &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxbusiness.com/slideshow/personal-finance/2010/06/28/worst-fields-graduates/#slide=4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Psychology&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Fashion Design&lt;br /&gt;
# Theater&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Horticulture&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Human Resources&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Photography&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgetown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Video Game Design&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One observer noted that not even the video game industry typically hires people who majored in video game design.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Forestry/Range Management/Wildlife Management&lt;br /&gt;
# Environmental Studies&lt;br /&gt;
# Outdoor Recreation&lt;br /&gt;
# Fine Arts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.artcareer.net/faqs/job-market-outlook-for-artists-and-designers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;yahoolist&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
# Anthropology&lt;br /&gt;
# Sociology&lt;br /&gt;
# History of Music&lt;br /&gt;
# Climatology&lt;br /&gt;
# Comparative Religion &lt;br /&gt;
# Gaming Management&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cat&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.umac.mo/iscg/courses/gmdiphome.html 10 Worst College Majors for Employment]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Geology&lt;br /&gt;
#Ceramic Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
#Creative Writing&lt;br /&gt;
#Ethnic Studies&lt;br /&gt;
#Art History&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to the list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Courses==&lt;br /&gt;
# Understanding Obama - Harvard Law School &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/harvard-law-offering-understanding-obama-course-taught-by-obama-mentor/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Revolutionary Marxism - Portland State University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/portland-state-university-offering-revolutionary-marxism-course-and-wait-until-you-see-the-syllabus/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Why Occupy Wall Street? The History and Politics of Debt and Finance - New York University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://weaselzippers.us/2011/12/09/n-y-u-to-offer-classes-on-occupy-wall-street/ N.Y.U. To Offer Classes On Occupy Wall Street, Weasel Zippers, December 9, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Occupy the Field: Global Finance, Inequality, Social Movement - Columbia University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://michellemalkin.com/2012/01/02/occupy-101/ Columbia University to Offer ‘Occupy 101′ Course, January 2, 2012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Football Culture&lt;br /&gt;
# Queer Musicology – UCLA&lt;br /&gt;
# The Science of Harry Potter – Frostburg University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CBS News: ''Harry Potter Goes To College:  Professor Uses Boy Wizard To Explores Links Between Magic, Science'', by Bootie Cosgrove-Mather, Sept. 26, 2003 [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/19/national/main584456.shtml] ''...Frostburg State President Catherine R. Gira said she isn't worried that some may view a Harry Potter class as trivial.  &amp;quot;Irrespective of the specific title of the course, the 'magic' in the fiction is being analyzed by applying concepts of physics, chemistry, biology and engineering. This honors course creatively packages scientific principles in a contemporary way that will interest today's students,&amp;quot; Gira said.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Native American Feminism - University of Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
# Cyber Feminism - Cornell University&lt;br /&gt;
# Feminist New Black Man - Occidental College &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvlL_lDk4ko Jason Mattera At CPAC, YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Philosophy and Star Trek – Georgetown University in Washington &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://courses.georgetown.edu/index.cfm?Action=View&amp;amp;CourseID=PHIL-180 Georgetown University Course Listing]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The Sociology of Hip-Hop: The Odyssey of Jay-Z – Georgetown University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/#ixzz1fPkYhzqX Jay-Z's street rhymes a Georgetown college course]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Emotional Literacy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1076368/Schools-councils-waste-300-000-useless-emotional-literacy-course-faraway-island-sun.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Media Genres, the study of zombies - University of Baltimore &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/article/university-of-baltimore-pop-culture-class-focuses-on-zombies/19625044?test=latestnews College Course Preps Pupils for Zombie Apocalypse, AOL News, September 9, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The Science of Superheroes - UC Irvine &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/11/14/the-top-8-california-schools-that-are-like-totally-wasting-your-money/ The Top 8 California Schools that Are, Like, Totally Wasting Your Money, NewsRealBlog, November 14, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Field Equipment Operation (tractor driving) - UC Davis&lt;br /&gt;
# Hip Hop: The Politics of Culture - UC San Diego&lt;br /&gt;
# History of Surfing - UC Santa Barbara&lt;br /&gt;
# Labor Studies - UM Saint Louis &amp;amp; UM Kansas City &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thehotjoints.com/2011/04/25/video-college-course-teaches-violent-union-tactics/ Video: College Course Teaches Violent Union Tactics, The Hot Joints, April 25, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Arguing with Judge Judy - UC Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
# Self-Esteem - Cal State Fresno&lt;br /&gt;
# Gaga for Lady Gaga: Sex, Gender, and Identity- University of Virginia-Charlottesville&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/10/lady-gaga-college-class_n_712540.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Pilot Brewery (brewmaster) - UC Davis&lt;br /&gt;
# Search for Extraterrestial Intelligence - UC Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
# Ecology of Renewable Natural Resources - Texas Tech University &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.depts.ttu.edu/officialpublications/courses/NRM.php Texas Tech University Course Listing]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Introduction to social networking&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/Unemployment.Final.update1.pdf Unemployment rates and earnings for college majors - Georgetown University report - 2012]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf What's It Worth? The Economic Value of College Majors] - Comprehensive report at [[Georgetown University]] website&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://learnfinancialplanning.com/best-worst-college-majors-degree/ Best and Worst College Majors]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.toptenz.net/to-10-useless-college-classes-degrees.php Top 10 Useless College Degrees &amp;amp; Classes]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/10-college-majors-lowest-unemployment-rates-163049193.html College majors with lowest unemployment]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:college]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:education]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Flogging&amp;diff=987624</id>
		<title>Flogging</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Flogging&amp;diff=987624"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:18:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Flogging''' was a punishment for crimes most common in ancient times.  It involved whipping, usually on the back, with long strands of leather hide sometimes embedded with bone or glass to rip flesh.  In the Jewish custom, 40 lashes was the most that was allowed as anything beyond this was considered to put the life of the recipient in danger.  In practice Jews stopped at 39 lashes in case there was a miscount.  Roman flogging knew no such limits and it was not uncommon for prisoners to die from flogging alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] was flogged by the Romans.  The number of lashes received is unknown. Under Roman law, scourging was a preliminary to crucifixion in every case, and its primary purpose was to weaken the prisoner, lessen his resistance, and hasten his death.  The only practical limitation on the number of lashes was that he had to be kept alive for the crucifixion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last U.S. state to abolish whipping as a punishment for crime was Delaware, which eliminated the practice in 1972.  The last flogging occurred in 1952, when John P. Barbieri, then about 21, received 20 lashes of the cat-o-nine tails on his bare back for breaking and entering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 1960's, there was talk of reinstituting whipping in Delaware, and Barbieri's case was mentioned in the newspapers.  Naturally, he was chagrined and embarrassed to have all his neighbors and friends find out that he was last person to be horsewhipped in the State of Delaware, so he sued the newspaper for invasion of privacy.  The Supreme Court of Delaware ruled against him, holding that his punishment was a matter of public concern, both at the time he received it and later on, when the practice was being discussed in the newspaper and elsewhere.  Barbieri v. News-Journal Co., 56 Del. 67, 189 A.2d 773 (1963).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For various offenses, the Delaware statute authorized or directed the court to impose a sentence of &amp;quot;stripes,&amp;quot; consisting of not less than five nor more than sixty lashes to be &amp;quot;well laid&amp;quot; on the prisoner's bare back.  In jurisdictions where whipping was imposed as a punishment, the prisoner typically was required to strip to the waist and was bound by his wrists to a post or other device while the whipping was administered.  Whipping was commonly used in the 19th century, particularly in frontier jurisdictions that had inadequate jail facilities. It is possible that a lack of respect for the Constitution allowed a liberal state like Delaware to continue violating the [[Eighth Amendment]]. Conservative newspapers and politicians were some of the most vocally opposed to the practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Punishment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=987623</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=987623"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:15:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: new conservative word idea&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''[[/archive1 | Archive 1 ]]'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[/archive2 | Archive 2 ]]'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[/archive3 | Archive 3 ]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional liberal terms? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about &amp;quot;ethnocentrism&amp;quot; (1905-1910) and &amp;quot;multiculturalism&amp;quot; (1960-1965)?  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 09:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Superb suggestions.  Please add as you think best!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:37, 16 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Refudiate==&lt;br /&gt;
Even though liberal dictionaries added this word, Palin admitted it was an error on her part. If it stays then we must add Corpse men for lib terms.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:01, 23 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not necessarily--no dictionaries made &amp;quot;corpse man&amp;quot; a [http://www.execdigital.com/business/leader/who-s-laughing-now-sarah-palin-s-refudiate-oxford-s-top-word-2010 word of the year]. Moreover, the word seems to be getting some leverage and use on its own terms. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 14:43, 23 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps time will tell.  The term &amp;quot;Big Bang&amp;quot; was born of mockery also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:15, 23 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, could that explain the perceived scarcity of conservative words dating from the 21st century? Because I think the notion that a word can &amp;quot;mature&amp;quot; to be conservative is a fascinating and powerful insight. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 23:10, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charisma? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have doubts that charisma, despite its etymology, is a conservative term.  It seems to elevate style over substance -- a definite [[liberal]] trait.  Nowhere does the Bible refer to Jesus as having charisma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect the original meaning of charisma was for religious charisma.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:59, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I would suggest, (if we do ''indeed,'' keep it), to change the phrasing to something more on the order of:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is the quality of a person imbued by God to leadership, often found in [[conservative]] public figures.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:This nixes the &amp;quot;magic&amp;quot; from the sentence since as wonderful as a gift from God is, it isn't &amp;quot;magic&amp;quot;. [[User:DevonJ|DevonJ]] 20:20, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Andy, that's a good point. I prefer to think of charisma as ''the style of substance'', but that's definitely not the case for everyone (especially liberals). While the etymology is undoubtedly conservative, perhaps &amp;quot;difficult to classify&amp;quot; may be a better resting place for charisma. Devon, either way, definitely an improvement on your part, thanks. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 22:21, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==New words added==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I have added 4 new words: deference (1660), idealist (1701), god-fearing (1835) &amp;amp; Rogue state (1993). If everyone accepts these, they will fill out the doubling pattern for those centuries. Shall I change the numbers in the summary at the top of the page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have also added 'liberal creep' (2008). [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 01:08, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:All your additions look superb except &amp;quot;deference,&amp;quot; which I'm not sure is [[conservative]].  Please do update the counts the top (I already did increment the 1800s count for &amp;quot;God-fearing&amp;quot;).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:05, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added 'deference' because CP has 'giving those in authority due respect' listed as a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_values Conservative Value]. I will tweak the definition a bit to emphasis the necessary legitimacy of the superior. Thanks for the positive feedback. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 02:21, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But look at the remainder of the chat quote:  &amp;quot;giving those in authority due respect, but not to the point of accepting orders or assertions that are contrary to logic or morality.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:34, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Let's continue this discussion later Monday morning.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:40, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi again. Firstly, let me tell you that I am an Aussie and my timezone is GMT+10. This makes me 12-15 hours ahead of you. Our conversations may be a bit disjointed because of this. Right now it is my bedtime, so I will post this comment &amp;amp; then go, leaving it for your consideration. (Editing has been switched off for a while, is that correct? I realise that you do this most nights. I didn't expect it to be on again tonight.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To return to 'deference': to me the word embodies respect and consideration which I would regard as being conservative values, but not necessarily 'giving in'. However, I do not have the right American nuances to interpret this as you do and will not push this strongly and am happy to remove it from the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a couple of alternatives for consideration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
atheistic (1625-35) An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
secularize (1611) To make secular; to transfer from ecclesiastical to civil or lay use, possession, or control&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me, these are useful words for conservatives. They do not describe conservatives. My reading of the list suggests that useful words are acceptable eg alarmist. Anyway, goodnight for now, catch up with you tomorrow. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 08:32, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; is good.  Let's go with that.  I didn't see why &amp;quot;patriarchy&amp;quot; was conservative, so I removed that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:04, 18 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::No worries. I'll add 'atheistic'. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 22:36, 18 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Copacetic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure how conservative this word is. There's no reasoning given for its inclusion, apart from the fact that Bojangles Robinson supposedly created it (and even that is extremely weak evidence and I'm not sure what it adds. I'm going to remove it from the list if no one raises any opposition. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 22:37, 19 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Copacetic&amp;quot; is the very satisfactory result of conservative values.  It is associated with good and honest living.  I do object to removal of this conservative term.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:32, 20 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Moral Majority - A suggestion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy, I saw your addition &amp;quot;silent majority&amp;quot; and it made me immediately think of &amp;quot;Moral Majority&amp;quot;. [http://www.answers.com/topic/moral-majority This page credits it to Jerry Falwell in 1979]. Although in it's strictest sense it describes a movement it is still has greater symbolism. Thanks, [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:30, 21 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great suggestion.  Please included it ... and increment the total near the beginning for the 1900s.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:04, 21 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Done! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:22, 21 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obambulate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe it's just my public school education at work, but I fail to see how obambulate is conservative. Apart from its obvious similarities with &amp;quot;Obama&amp;quot;, it simply means &amp;quot;to walk around&amp;quot;. I know that Obama has been bumbling and whatnot, but it's an innocuous word that is being assigned a special significance due to coincidence. I'm not sure it belongs on this list. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 22:05, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is probably as a result of it being mentioned on Rush Limbaugh's show and the liberal reactions to it during the past week.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:08, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What was the reaction? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:14, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Denny, your comment is a valid one, but the modern usage of the term &amp;quot;obambulate&amp;quot; is to criticize the directionless wandering characteristic of liberal leadership.  None of the terms in the list should be viewed in a vacuum independent of their usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Hey, my response used another candidate:  &amp;quot;directionless&amp;quot;.  ''Trying to find its date of origin next ....''--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:35, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agitprop ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I get the etiquette wrong, first time commenting. I was just wondering if there was a source for Agitprop? I always understood it to be derived from Soviet Russian institutions, so would be quite keen to see the conservative routes of it. Everything I have tried so far has turned up the term as being derived from Russian e.g. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=agitprop&amp;amp;searchmode=none , and I would be surprised if the internal machinations of the USSR would come up with something conservative, so would be keen to find out the alternative you uncovered&amp;quot;[[User:JTpldl|JTlpdl]] 09:18, 28 March 2011 (EDT)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Page dividing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the success of this essay, it's really slow, so can I split it into pages by century of origin? This would allow the page to load faster and be easier to navigate. Any thoughts on the idea? [[User:BenDylan|BenDylan]] 20:09, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd like to see it be broken up by century and automatically numbered. I'm not sure that breaking it up into many pages would facilitate more than inconvenience. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 23:55, 26 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Audit==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm getting 25,48,100,201,17 as the counts. If so, this wouldn't be the first time I've seen them wrong. As I mentioned above, we should consider breaking the list up by century to help avoid counting errors. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 18:37, 27 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Word for 1700's ==&lt;br /&gt;
Could belittle be the word we are looking for to perfect the list? It was coined in 1785 by Thomas Jefferson himself, and is certainly a way to describe an action often done by liberals to protect their ideas. [[User:JoshuaL|JoshuaL]] 19:34, 28 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Joshua, I'm inclined to agree, as Jefferson likely coined the term in response to critics trying to deceptively minimize issues he raised. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 02:07, 29 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not sure &amp;quot;belittle&amp;quot; is conservative.  But how about &amp;quot;axiomatic&amp;quot;?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:20, 30 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
If you're still looking for an 18th century word, 'nationalist' would fit well - it's a core conservative value, synonymous with 'patriot', the antithesis of 'internationalist', and one of the defining features of the 18th century. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:17, 5 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal creep ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we reconcile this with liberal creep? If language is becoming more conservative, why is opinion and perception becoming more liberal? Do liberals or conservatives dictate the terms of the national conversation? If someone could take a look at the two phenomena and find out what makes one move in one direction and the other in the opposite, it would make a great essay. [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 15:05, 8 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also brought this up for discussion [[Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's_Law#Putting_Conservapedia.27s_Law_in_perspective|here]]. Conservapedia's Law, the observation that conservative insights double over time, is clearly incomplete, perhaps even flawed. I agree that there could be a complex relationship between liberal creep and Conservapedia's Law and it is worth investigating. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 15:15, 8 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Graph of words over time ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I was drawing graphs, I wrote a quick script to generate a graph of the data in this page. [http://static.inky.ws/image/405/image.jpg This graph] shows the growth in conservative terms year-by-year, rather than just per-century. The red line is the data from this page, the green line is a quadratic curve. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 20:59, 18 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, that's a spectacular graph!  Can you give permission for me to include it in the entry page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The graph disproves the theory that there were bursts of new words during certain periods.  I'll remove that from the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:43, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please do use the graph as you see fit. I can generate new graphs from the latest data with no trouble at all, so if you'd like it can be updated periodically. I'm currently trying to find a suitably analogous source of data for liberal words/ideas, which would allow comparative analysis. This kind of data is very interesting as it seems to avoid the short-term political cycles which characterize much of popular discourse, focusing on the really significant point of the growth of ideas. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 08:59, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I posted the graph and your idea is marvelous.  However, I don't think the graph is completely accurate: the curve for the actual data should intersect the predicted curve at each turning of the centuries.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:45, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Is the green curve really a fit for the data according to Aschlafly's theory? I mean, Jcw says ''the green line is a quadratic curve'' - at best it's a second approximation for the geometric curve...&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Personally, I find quite hard to judge the existance of ''bursts'' from a [[cdf]]. Perhaps Jcw could create a histogram - perhaps for decades?&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:30, 20 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You both raise valid points, which hopefully will be answered soon. Andy and August both mention that the x^2 curve isn't a perfect fit - it certainly isn't, and I'm pretty sure a 2^x curve with appropriate constants will fit better; I'm planning to do that tonight. August mentions different ways of representing the data - I'll happily produce a histogram of the data if that'd be interesting, but the reason for plotting it as I have is to produce a curve that I can use for my more grandiose scheme, of which more later. My background is not so much in statistics - although I've done a fair bit of that - but in purer maths, so my thinking is mostly based around the relationships between smooth(-ish) functions. That may not be the best way to deal with these data qua data, but to extract patterns for further, more abstract work, it's ideal. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 12:43, 20 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://static.inky.ws/image/412/image.jpg Et voila], a better fit. This is an exponential curve fitted to the same data. Note that it fits much better in the region with the most words, but is a bit out for the earlier period where there are fewer words in the list. This is because we can more easily find suitable words from more recent periods, so naturally the pattern is most exact there. No doubt if we could go through a large, representative corpus and extract words uniformly, it would fit nicely all the way along. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:25, 20 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''@Aschlafly: ''' Could you recount the words? My count gave me 26-51-103-210-18 (Sum: 408) instead of 26-52-103-208-18 (Sum: 407). Perhaps a fourth column for the century (or even better, the decade) could be added? That would make it much easier to keep track of the numbers!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''@Jcw: ''' I don't think that your ''better fit'' is the function which Aschlafly has in mind: it should be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where ''#words'' is the number of words created before 2000, i.e., 390. This function touches/intersects the empirical cdf at the turn of each century, a fact which betrays the biased method of looking for these words.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:12, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::August, so you've constructed a function which you claim 'betrays the biased method of looking for these words'? I'd be interested to see a more thorough explanation of that point. Another editor has attempted a similar argument above, but without success. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 15:42, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::August, I have an open mind about this.  I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.  But please explain if you think that is in error.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:27, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope we can agree on the function ''F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;theo&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;'' - it should be uncontroversial:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*one layer exists from 1 - 2 - 4 - 8 words, i.e., 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;,2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*the partial sums are 1 - 3 - 7 - 15, i.e., 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1, 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1, 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1, and 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1&lt;br /&gt;
*so, with the turn of the n-th century, there should be 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n+1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1 words&lt;br /&gt;
*for K layers, the number is K * (2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n+1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1). Each layer has 15 words, thus, if there are '''N''' feasible words, the number of layers is '''N'''/15&lt;br /&gt;
*now adjust for years instead of centuries, and don't start with the first, but with the 17th, and you get the formula &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@jcw: ''' ''Another editor has attempted a similar argument above, but without success.'' I read the sections above, and I ''was'' convinced by the argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Aschlafly:''' ''I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.''  The effects of the miscount ([[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words#PERFECTION: 20-40-80-160 BY CENTURY]]) have shown that you are able to match any   pattern you were looking for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:11, 22 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
August's contrary theory aside, here's an interesting consequence of this trend: [http://static.inky.ws/image/421/image.jpg this graph] shows the curve from above in green, an hypothetical linear growth of liberalism ([liberal creep], in blue) and the effect of the latter on the former (in red). Note how the red line - the net effect of liberal and conservative ideas - falls for a while, reaching a minimum in the twentieth century before shooting up. This is because the exponential growth of conservatism is slower at first that the linear growth of liberalism, but gets very much faster later on, easily overtaking the linear function and increasing to infinity. Obviously the liberalism line is hypothetical, but it's interesting nonetheless. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 12:41, 24 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's remarkably insightful.  In other words, the combination of linear [[liberal creep]] and the geometric growth rate of [[Best New Conservative Words]] results in a liberal trend for a while (until the [[Great Depression]]), and then a rapidly increasing conservative trend thereafter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:16, 24 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Exactly. The precise shape of the final curve depends on the values assumed for the [[liberal creep]] line, but any reasonable values give a final curve with much the same shape. It agrees rather remarkably with the observed facts, especially as nothing in the calculations refers to historical events at all. Purely linguistic inputs produce an undeniably historical result, demonstrating the power of language very clearly. As ever, feel free to use the graph however you please. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 13:48, 24 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I am skeptical that the complexities of human society and political philosophies can be summed up simply as an exponential function minus a linear function. What evidence is there that this [[liberal creep]] is linear? How is that even quantified? Does this hypothesis make any specific predictions, in order to make it [[falsifiable]] and thus scientific? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 02:09, 25 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Good questions.  I'll consider them (as others probably will also) and reply after some thought.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:15, 25 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Good questions indeed. The immediate answer is 'no': of course all the complexities of human society can't be summed up as simply as this. Quantifying complex abstract phenomena is a very rough business, most especially on a short timescale. The goal of my graphs isn't to present concrete mathematical laws, or anything like them, but just to illustrate a conceptual relationship using mathematics. &lt;br /&gt;
:::: To answer your specific questions: &lt;br /&gt;
:::: * 'how is that even quantified?': Crudely and by guesswork, like many first attempts in all sciences, especially those relating to human activity. The crude guess is justified by the answer to:&lt;br /&gt;
:::: * 'Does this hypothesis make any specific predictions...': In one way, the hypothesis is supported by the same kind of evidence as is used to defend evolution - the hypothesis I've produced now gives results which agree with events in the past. As we all agree, that's not the best kind of evidence, but in this case it's rather compelling. Secondly, it does make concrete predictions - indeed, it makes an inescapable prediction which can't be fudged or avoided - the 'conservatism' curve increases very rapidly to infinity, rather than going up and down or settling into a steady state. This suggests a discontinuity in the future, where the level of conservatism rises to something quite outside our experience. I'm not sure what that would look like, but I think we'd recognize it if we saw it. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 20:49, 25 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: In furtherance of Jcw's remarks, it is perhaps easier to study the development of language and politics, which are closely related to each other, than it is to study and predict ... the weather.  Nobody had a problem with [[Al Gore]] trying to predict the weather, so why object when a simpler task is undertaken?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:01, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: @Jcw How specifically does your graph &amp;quot;agree with events in the past&amp;quot;? Also, the claim that &amp;quot;the level of conservatism rises to something quite outside our experience&amp;quot; is not a specific prediction. I'm not even sure what that means. Finally, in [http://static.inky.ws/image/421/image.jpg your graph] what does the y-axis represent? Words? Aschlafly above links the exponential function to the growth of conservative terms.  If so, why is [[liberal creep]] linear? Is there any empirical or theoretical reason to believe this? Looking at [[Essay:New_Liberal_Terms|liberal terms]] by century it seems like liberal terms are also growing exponentially, even though the article claims they don't grow &amp;quot;geometrically&amp;quot; and are &amp;quot;heavily influenced by culture&amp;quot;. In any case, it doesn't look linear. Wouldn't the diminishing intelligence of humans mean liberal terms would be growing quickly?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: @Aschlafly Weather and climate are distinct things. I don't think anyone believes Al Gore is a climate scientist qualified to make scientific predictions, only a spokesman. Many people do have a problem with him and the whole idea of climate change.  &lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Also, human beings are extremely complicated and it isn't obvious to me that accurately predicting and quantifying the political philosophy of a complex society is much simpler than either meteorology or climatology. Even if the development of politics and language are closely related (I'm not sure they are),  why would studying them be necessarily be a simpler task than studying climates?--[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 01:39, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(unindent)Matthew: now you're asking questions that have already been answered or are clear from the context. I note that your edits on this site are almost exclusively to talk pages; may we assume that you are here simply to argue rather than to contribute? [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 08:44, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interesting question is, what would an (effectively) infinite level of conservatism look like? I'm afraid I don't know enough about the US to answer that: over here 'conservatism' looks a great deal like US liberalism... [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 12:32, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: One characteristic of infinite conservatism might be when it is impossible to notice a difference in the level of service and attitude between government and a perfectly competitive industry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:18, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: In a perfectly conservative society, would there be any need for government as we now know it? I suppose there are limits to how conservative a society can be in a fallen world... [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:52, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Conservatives aren't [[libertarian]]s or [[anarchist]]s, so a '''''limited''''' government would exist ....--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:48, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'm sorry, I still don't understand what 'infinite conservatism' means. Perhaps an article detailing how conservatism can be quantified and what happens in the limit as it approaches infinity would help. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 21:32, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: That's an interesting idea, Matthew. I think that in the US conservatism is closely correlated with Evangelical Christianity, which is not at all the case here in the UK, where our conservatives are more likely to belong to the Church of England - a decidedly liberal institution by US standards. Andy's suggestion above is concise, but if you think about it it's a very acute description of a hypothetical perfectly conservative government. I shudder to think what a perfectly liberal government would be like. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:33, 27 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Jcw, your description of US conservatism compared with the UK is interesting, and I've thought about it.  While certainly there are more evangelicals here than there, not all are conservative.  Moreover, the cause-and-effect is less than clear:  does the conservative nature of America allow evangelicalism to develop more fully than in a liberal nation?  If so, there still remains an underlying mystery of why America is more conservative than the UK.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:41, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Yes, a very interesting question. Our two nations have a great deal of shared history, but today are vastly different in fundamental ways. I think the Reformation is particularly important in this context - the UK experienced it directly, while the nascent US only experienced the aftereffects; the US was never a Catholic nation in the Mediaeval sense. Another - perhaps related - aspect is the persistence of monarchy in the UK compared to its outright rejection by the US. There's a lot to be said on this topic, so I'll begin an essay with some of my thoughts and see how it compares with a US view. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 18:39, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Please do start an essay on this, hopefully here so that I can contribute to it too!  Religious differences between the US and the UK are surely part of the explanation for the political differences, but I think there is more to it than that.  [[Federalism]], for example, prevents [[liberals]] from gaining control over the US, while that protection does not exist in the UK.  I will say this:  the UK media is much more free with respect to American politics than the American press is!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:13, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Jcw: ''' What are the parameters of your interpolating function? And how did you calculate them? Could you also display: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And why not use these paramaters - they are the direct result of applying Aschlafly's rule of doubling-by-century...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:08, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
August, if you'd like to do those calculations, please feel free - the data isn't kept secret, it's right there on the page. If you'd like to see another presentation of it, go ahead. I'm very happy to explain things - and to justify my choices! - to well-meaning editors with genuine questions, but you seem to be on the wrong side of every argument around here, as if you're deliberately disagreeing for the sake of it. The amount of time and attention you're willing to give to criticizing other people's ideas is remarkable. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:35, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Well put, Jcw.  Actually, the entries begin with the year 1612, after the publication of the [[KJV]] and the completion of nearly all of [[Shakespeare]]'s works.  So August's date in his exponent appears wrong, but your graph is correct in show an intersection with the x-axis over a decade after 1600.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:45, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Jcw:''' ''August, if you'd like to do those calculations, please feel free - the data isn't kept secret, it's right there on the page.'' I can't reproduce your calculations as there is not enough data: You say that it is a fit, but you don't explain how you fitted it:&lt;br /&gt;
::#How did you treat words like ''atheistic'' (1625-1635), ''deadweight loss''     (1930s) and ''design by committee'' (before 1958)&lt;br /&gt;
::#Which kind of fit did you use? For me, Maximum-Likelihood would be an obvious choice.  &lt;br /&gt;
::#Which family of functions did you look at? Obviously a*2^x. Why not a*2^x+b?&lt;br /&gt;
::#Did you use any weights? Which ones (or why not)?&lt;br /&gt;
All these choices result in different interpolating functions. So, which choices did you make and what was your result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you'd like to see another presentation of it, go ahead. I'm very happy to explain things - and to justify my choices! - to well-meaning editors with genuine questions'' Obviously I won't promise  ''not'' to criticize your choices. Does this make me a not-well-meaning editor?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''You seem to be on the wrong side of every argument around here'' I seem to be constantly on the other side than you are. Doesn't make my side always wrong!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Aschlafly: ''' ''Well put, Jcw.'' Do you condone the policy to share data only with those who you expect not to criticize it? When reading [[Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog]] and its talk page, I got quite another impression! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''So August's date in his exponent appears wrong, but your graph is correct in show an intersection with the x-axis over a decade after 1600'' Jcw's graph (the green line!) doesn't intersect the x-axis at ~1610. I doubt that it intersects the x-axis at all! The red line shows the empirical data, so of course it begins at 1612 with the first word found - though ''obambulate''  (1600) is the oldest word in the table, and seems to be always counted in the ''perfect counts''. OTOH, the graph which I proposed intersects the x-axis at the turn of the 16th century, and crosses the empirical curve at the turn of each century (whether you shift the function by 1599 or 1600 is just a matter of taste...).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Americanadians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about 'Americanadians'? I've observed many good Americans being influenced by the blatant propaganda of our socialist neighbors, and starting to espouse their flawed line of thought. What do others think? Let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Claptrap ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest &amp;quot;claptrap.&amp;quot;  I'm surprised it's not on the list already. --[[User:AndyJ|AndyJ]] 00:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Superb suggestion!  I'll add it now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:45, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was already on the list.  I added an 1800s term instead.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:10, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== free speech ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps I simply fail to understand the context you provided, but is free speech really a &amp;quot;conservative word?&amp;quot;  Terms like &amp;quot;political correctness&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;obamacare&amp;quot; are undeniably conservative (to the point where liberals won't use them), but free speech is at best non-partisan, and at worst (I am attempting to write from a conservative viewpoint- I may fail miserably at this) a term co-opted by liberals to justify their perversions and excesses. &amp;lt;/attempt to write from conservative viewpoint&amp;gt;--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 01:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You raise a valid point.  But isn't it the conservatives who protect, for example, corporate and many other types of expenditures in elections as &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot;?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:28, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Indeed, you are correct.  But I think it's fair to say now that it is a word used by conservatives as well as liberals to represent their agendas.  I do not know how this factors into this particular list--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 02:13, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll continue to think about your valid criticism.  Maybe I can search Supreme Court opinions and see who is using the term &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot; most.  I don't think [[liberals]] are using it as much as [[conservatives]] are today.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:30, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Decades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a column for the decades (rather than for the centuries). I hope this will help to keep the count of the words up-to-date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:05, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure how that will help - surely the decade is already contained in the 'year' column? If you'd like a more accurate count, I suggest doing what I do - use a perl script to parse the wikitext and print out whatever information you want. To me the decade column looks annoyingly redundant, but perhaps I've missed something... [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:27, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I wanted to facilitate the count: as some of the dates are not purely numeric (1950s, before 1958, 1625-1635), it's hard to sort the table by the column ''date''. If there is a purely numeric column, the table can be easily copied into a spreadsheet and recounted even by those who don't know anything about regular expressions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If you have a script, please use it to keep an eye on the count: I'm surprised that you didn't spot the miscount earlier on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll add the column for the decades again, this time at the last place. This should be more pleasing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:07, 29 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how to upload a picture, so here is an ascii-graphic for the distribution by decades:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1600: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1610: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1620: *****&lt;br /&gt;
*1630: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1640: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*1650: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1660: **&lt;br /&gt;
*1670:&lt;br /&gt;
*1680: **&lt;br /&gt;
*1690: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1700: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1710: ***&lt;br /&gt;
*1720: *****&lt;br /&gt;
*1730: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1740: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1750: *****&lt;br /&gt;
*1760: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*1770: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*1780: ********&lt;br /&gt;
*1790: *********&lt;br /&gt;
*1800: ********&lt;br /&gt;
*1810: *********&lt;br /&gt;
*1820: ***************&lt;br /&gt;
*1830: ***************&lt;br /&gt;
*1840: *********&lt;br /&gt;
*1850: **********&lt;br /&gt;
*1860: **********&lt;br /&gt;
*1870: *******&lt;br /&gt;
*1880: ************&lt;br /&gt;
*1890: **********&lt;br /&gt;
*1900: ***********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1910: ***********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1920: **********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1930: *******************&lt;br /&gt;
*1940: ***************************&lt;br /&gt;
*1950: **************************&lt;br /&gt;
*1960: *************************&lt;br /&gt;
*1970: ****************&lt;br /&gt;
*1980: **********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1990: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*2000: ***************&lt;br /&gt;
*2010: ***&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1820/1830,1900/1910, and 1940/1950 seem to be decades in which significantly more conservative terms were created than one would have expected... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:15, 29 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggested additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eurabia - what Europe will become if people don't stand up for themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamofascism - repressive muslim shariah regimes/totalitarian islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MeganH|MeganH]] 01:01, 30 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Go ahead and add if you have some dates of origin, even if only approximate.  I hadn't heard of the first one (&amp;quot;Eurabia&amp;quot;) before.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:04, 30 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dumpster diving ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was 'dumping diving' added because food is not going to waste, or am I misunderstanding why it's conservative? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 09:54, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a stab at it. Conservative words can describe liberal actions. I am not saying dumpster divers are liberal, those poor folks maybe hungry. Dumpster Diving is not limited to food. It's also a method to get trade secrets from companies or dig up dirt against somebody. Most likely, Dumpster Diving is used for deceitful purposes for example gaining a social security number from discarded bills used for the creation of fraudulent IDs. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:06, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great points.  This is a list of [[conservative]] terms, often insightful, about activities that may be conservative or liberal, harmful or helpful, or none of the above.  Evidently this term was developed by small businessmen to describe an unhelpful activity outside their restaurants and other stores.  Dumpster diving may sometimes be the equivalent of recycling or getting a hungry person some food, but in any event '''the term''' is a perfect description of the activity.  And once there is a good term for something, then the activity can be understood and addressed better.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:39, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Good analysis. But is dumpster diving a conservative act? --[[User:GeorgeZ|GeorgeZ]] 15:53, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Read Andy's post. He specifically says that that does not matter. It was created by conservatives. Therefore it is a conservative word. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right that it does not matter whether it is a conservative act.  In the case of dumpster diving, whether it is ever conservative depends on what the purpose and effect are.  It also doesn't matter if a conservative coined it; a liberal can sing a [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Songs|conservative song]].  The point is whether the insight is conservative.  In this case, small businessmen (a conservative line of work) coined the term to criticize how homeless people were digging through their trash.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:19, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I see Andy. Thanks for explaining. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:22, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Indeed, one might suggest that liberals have indirectly contributed to the increase in conservative terms by constantly inventing new ways to avoid work and personal responsibility.  Conservatives are then, naturally, obligated to develop terms for these behaviors.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:18, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2000s ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's fascinating how the new Conservative words and insights do seem to grow geometrically by century, but I'm curious as to why the 2000s seem to be pretty far behind.  We're 11 years in, so you'd expect there to be roughly 40 new words so far, but we've got less than half that many.  With the rise of the TEA Party, I'd expect to be much closer. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 15:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Excellent point. Possible reasons could include that it is too soon to recognize new words in the most recent decade ... or maybe there has been a short-term decline in conservative intellectualism?  At any rate, I've been meaning to add the term &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot; itself with its etymology in the last decade!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:12, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have to agree with you, Andy. Even though we're in 2011 now, it might be too early to be able to fully appreciate all the new conservative words created last decade. I think &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot; might just be one of the most important words to add and I think the movement itself will produce a lot of new, conservative words in its own right! [[User:BobSherman|BobSherman]] 19:58, 20 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Very perceptive, Andy.  It takes time for the gatekeepers of knowledge to acknowledge the validity of new terms; therefore, while the public production of new conservative insights and terms may be quite rapid, the assimilation of those insights and terms into formal reference works is likely to be much slower.  This is, I would suggest, exacerbated by reliance on archaic forms of knowledge dissemination such as print dictionaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting side project might be to evaluate dictionaries (both online and print) to see how rapidly they accept and incorporate new conservative words versus new liberal words.  In this way, it might be possible to determine which dictionaries are reliable and which are liberally biased.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 12:19, 22 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to archive the page - at least the parts which were from last year, but I totally botched it: my browser can't handle long pages, I have difficulties with the captchas &amp;amp; I created the wrong page for an archive [[Archive 3]] instead of [[Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words/Archive 3]] ([[Archive 3]] should be moved there...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I give up... [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 11:58, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I archived 2010... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:44, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you -  I had problems with the captchas! [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 15:26, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Maybe these two ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here's two possibilities I found in [[Federal debt limit]], &amp;quot;leveraged loss&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debt spiral&amp;quot;, but I'm not sure how to fit them in.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:01, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== More possibilities... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constructionist (1835-45)&lt;br /&gt;
Inalienable (1635-45)&lt;br /&gt;
Hubris (1880-1885)&lt;br /&gt;
Scientism (1875-1880)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 14:11, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trickle-down? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a descriptor for the trickle-down theory of economics, it dates to 1950-1955.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 21:43, 31 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think &amp;quot;trickle-down&amp;quot; is pejorative, and thus more a [[liberal]] term than a [[conservative]] one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:47, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If trickle-down is the pejorative would the standard, conservative, phrase be &amp;quot;supply-side&amp;quot;? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:53, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, it would - and &amp;quot;supply side&amp;quot; is already on the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:56, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::ah, excellent. my work here is done! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:00, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Civil body politic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Civil body politic&amp;quot; is an interesting bit of history but does not seem to have caught on as widely used term, and hence would not seem to warrant inclusion in this list.  Does anyone disagree?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:43, 8 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Medal of Honor (and other proper names) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure that a proper name given to an award is inherently conservative-- the Medal itself reflects conservative values of course, but would do so even if had been called, say, the Award of Bravery or the Citation of Courage. &amp;quot;Coolant,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;transistor&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;greasy spoon&amp;quot; are all truly conservative both in terms of content and syntax. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 19:50, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your point is valid.  Perhaps it does not fit this particular list, but I'm reluctant to delete it.  Isn't there something conservative about simply recognizing &amp;quot;honor&amp;quot;, and calling the medal after the concept, rather than after, say, a liberal politician?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:15, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==alcoholism ?==&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please explain how alcoholism is a conservative word ? Alcoholism is more of a liberal trait.--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:24, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Alcoholism&amp;quot; is a criticism of excessive drinking, and thus is a conservative word.  Words that end in &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot; are often pejoratives, as in &amp;quot;alarmism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;collectivism&amp;quot; (which are also on the list).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:41, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And do you feel the same way about the word &amp;quot;liberalism&amp;quot;?--[[User:JeanB|JeanB]] 21:49, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Word that end in -ism are not always pejorative, capitalism is good. And when the words socialism or communism were invented, they were meant to be good.--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:53, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Handout==&lt;br /&gt;
1882, I wanted to add this to best new conservative words as it describes a liberal policy of government giveaways. But it also could be the conservative position of helping the poor through charity. Either way it is a conservative word but the proper way to describe alludes me. Op?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:28, 25 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That would a superb addition!  It would also leave the list only two 20-century words shy of another perfect doubling by century.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:48, 25 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Level Playing Field ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added the term &amp;quot;level playing field&amp;quot; for two main reasons: 1) It is an intuitive metaphor used in its [http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/228650.html first recorded use] to describe how markets usually work best when they are fair for all participants and free of interference. 2) The term has since been used by liberals to describe policies such as affirmative action, progressive taxation, and government handouts, but it obvious to anyone who looks at these policies objectively that they actually distort the playing field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe that is enough for the term to stand on its own merits, but it looks even more conservative if we compare it to other words on the list such as &amp;quot;motivation,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;quantify,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;coolant.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe I have overlooked something and the word does not belong on the list. Comments are welcome. --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 21:03, 8 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As you point out, the term is often used by liberals, so that makes it a doubtful candidate for &amp;quot;best&amp;quot; new conservative words.  The term seems to imply that government is needed to level the playing field.  Level playing fields rarely occur in nature, for example.  The term almost sounds like the famous &amp;quot;life's not fair&amp;quot; expression ... which is not conservative either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Motivation&amp;quot; is a far more conservative term - one can find motivation whether the playing field islevel or not.  &amp;quot;Quantify&amp;quot; is logic, which is an essential difference between conservative and liberal approaches.  &amp;quot;Coolant&amp;quot; is an essential part of nuclear energy -- which liberals loathe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:51, 8 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A.M. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This entry is an abbreviation for ''ante meridiem'', which originates from 1563 [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ante%20meridiem].  I'm not clear on whether the abbreviation is being claimed as a new conservative word or the phrase for which it stands.  Additionally, it is unclear where the given date of origin in the article of 1762 comes from.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:43, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The online etymology dictionary gives a date of 1762.  Perhaps it's referring to common usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While you're right that the &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; in A.M. is from a Latin word that is different from the &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; in A.D., the popularity of &amp;quot;A.D.&amp;quot; could have led to the popularity of &amp;quot;A.M.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:37, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Just seen this catch my attention on the mainpage. I highly doubt that the two could be related in any conservative sense. Of course &amp;quot;AD&amp;quot; refers to &amp;quot;In the year of our lord&amp;quot;. But back in the 18th century, Latin was still being routinely taught in schools (especially in [[Britain]]), bring us many other Latin abbreviations, such as eg, etc, ie, RIP (from 'requiescat in pace', and later backronymed into 'rest in peace'). I highly doubt the link between any apparent 'popularity' of AD spurred the formation of AM, and personally I'd remove it. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 15:57, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But what percentage of the overall British population learned Latin in school in the 1700s?  Perhaps only 10%?  Most Latin appreviations did not catch on with the general population the way that &amp;quot;A.M.&amp;quot; did.  The most plausible explanation is its proximity to &amp;quot;[[A.D.]]&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:19, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Nonetheless etymological creation power lies not with those who use the language the most. One must remember that our records of language from the 1700s (both Britain and America) are not vernacular English of the working classes but written English of those who were educated. This was before widespread adoption of clocks and timepieces, which came later with the [[industrial revolution]] and the railways. Again, I highly disagree that likeness to AM would be a significant contributor. Those that would have used the world in our written records would have been educated in Latin, and would therefore be aware of the etymological roots of '''both''' AM and AD. Since the A stands for '''anno''' and '''ante''' respectively, there is no etymological proximity at all between the two. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 18:35, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::But &amp;quot;A.D.&amp;quot; did gain widespread currency with the masses, and then &amp;quot;A.M.&amp;quot; became popular in a similar manner. Many other Latin abbreviations, like &amp;quot;Q.E.D.&amp;quot;, did not follow in their footsteps.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:54, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You mean, the masses had a choice whether to use &amp;quot;A.M&amp;quot; or something else? It wasn't determined by the use of that convention by those few who created, say, railroad timetables or other documents? Incidentally, do we know what that date of &amp;quot;1762&amp;quot; refers to? Refering to some &amp;quot;online etymology dictionary&amp;quot; seems a bit like relying on hearsay. --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 02:44, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I still maintain that Mr Schlafly is assuming correlation from causation. While of course nowadays we might view AD in a more conservative light since the introduction (especially amongst the humanities communities) of [[CE]], then back in the case it certainly wasn't the case and due to the pervasiveness of the Christian terms I highly doubt that its religious connotations had any contributing factor over its use as a year marker. If it's another conservative word that's being looked for, I can have a think over the next few days for an alternative word that might not be as debatable. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 17:27, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It Really Is Amazing... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It really is amazing that the pattern of perfect doubling by century is so strong that almost every &amp;quot;layer&amp;quot; is complete before the next layer starts, even though words are added to the list pretty much randomly whenever a user thinks of one. --[[User:AndreaM|AndreaM]] 17:47, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great discoveries are rarely random.  In this case, it would not be possible to discover such a perfect geometric fit unless the underlying pattern existed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:12, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't actually believe in this theory, but I think it's interesting nonetheless to think about the etymologies of such words and why we might consider them conservative or not. Thus this essay has potential for insights, whether or not one believes in the underlying theory. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 17:33, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You know this list is contrived. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you can see, [[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] is actively trying to make it a perfect doubling by century. [[User:DavidCalman|David]][[User talk:DavidCalman|Calman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It would be impossible to discover such a perfect doubling of conservative words by century unless it existed.  If someone discovered oil, would anyone say, &amp;quot;well, that's no big deal, because you looked for it there!&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:00, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Intelligent design ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure where your date of 1991 is coming from.  I know that the Kitzmiller trial uncovered a 1987 draft of ''Of Pandas and People'' that used intelligent design in the origins context:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency, with their distinctive features already intact. Fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks, wings, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:GregG|GregG]] 00:39, 16 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Teamwork ==&lt;br /&gt;
In a liberal society, true team work is impossible because nothing bets done without an overarching authority to control and monitor and meddle in activity. The ideas of equals respecting each other and working for the good of the country is a conservative value, and I think that teamwork should be made a Conservative Word. What do you think? [[User:JeffBron|JeffBron]] 15:15, 19 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=987621</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=987621"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T19:03:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* HIV/AIDS */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Russia location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian language&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =138,739,000 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$2.3 trillion (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$15,100 (2009 est.) https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, almost all of which broke away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality, it has a highly centralized government, largely due to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Saint Petersburg Russia.jpg|thumb|Saint Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million). Numerous other cities over 1 million inhabitants.&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Huge variation from humid sub-tropical in Krasnodar krai, to desert/semi-desert in the Altai republic, and arctic tundra in north eastern Siberia, which is one of the coldest areas on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cathedral of Christ the Savior.jpg|thumb|left|Cathedral of Christ the Savior.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Roma children in Russia.jpg|thumb|360px|Roma children in Russia.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Collecting the census in Russia.jpg|thumb|left|220px|Collecting the census.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====AIDS and other STDs====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. Russians are also known for frequent syphilis infections&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3519003.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, resulting from lack of proper [[abstinence education]] in Russian schools, and government suppression of religious activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the communist era, the government ban on religious worship precipitated the worst outbreak of STDs in modern Russian Histories, and left hundreds of thousands of young Russians hospitalized and crippled. As public morals crumbled, amoral Soviet propaganda was substituted in order to brainwash the public into buying the [[Communist]] line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Novosibirsk Karimov - Cossacks.jpg|left|140px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|220px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russian unemployment.jpg|thumb|Russian unemployment, 2009.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Moscow]] is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). [[Moscow]] is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable [[cathedral]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|240px|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''Leningrad'''), which was established by [[Tsar]] [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during [[World War I]] and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After [[Lenin]] moved the capital back to [[Moscow]] in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Duma Parliament building Moscow Russia.jpg|thumb|340px|Duma Parliament building, Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is no longer Communist, but it is increasingly an authoritarian state where democracy is weak. It has an increasingly centralized political system, with power concentrated in the hands of [[Vladimir Putin]] and his choices for top offices. International observers concluded that the December 2007 State Duma election (for parliament) was not fair, and neither was the March 2, 2008, election for president.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Human rights]] problems and abuses continued in 2008, though at a far lower level than the days of Communism (which ended in 1991). Putin's human rights record remained poor in the North Caucasus, where governments in Ingushetiya and Dagestan faced increased opposition from disaffected social groups and insurgencies, and the Chechen government forcibly reined in the Islamist insurgency that replaced the separatist insurgency as the main source of conflict. Russian security forces engaged in killings, torture, abuse, violence, and other brutal or humiliating treatment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human rights]] record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some specific areas of human rights violations of the Soviet era continued on into the late 1990's and even have been reported up to 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
These involved experimentation on humans and the use of imported foreign forced labor, particularly from North Korea, to work in forestry in gulag type camps of Siberia (for Russian and other newspaper accounts, see [[KAL 007 Survivors and Gulags of Russia]]). Experimentation on humans have been noted by Russian rights activists in connection with certain medical facilities. The Serbsky Institute and Mental Hospital figuring in as a center for mind altering experiments receives startling confirmation from Emilia Cherkover, former Deputy of the Zelenograd Soviet and member of the Russian Federation Human Rights Commission. Cherkover maintains that, along with Vladivostok and Moscow prisons and the mental hospital in Oryal, microwave (psychotronic and electromagnetic application) experiments had been conducted on humans between 1989 and 1990 at the Serbsky Institute in Moscow (see [[The Stavitski Account]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Journalist Yury Vorobyovsky has been investigating the top secret program of &amp;quot;psychotronic&amp;quot; brainwashing techniques developed by the KGB and the Ministry for three years. He notes Emilia Cherkova's claim that there are over a million victims. Her group, Ecology and Living Environment had filed damages against the Federal Security Service (FSB). The newspaper reports, &amp;quot;there is strong evidence that some kind of psychotronic warfare program did exist in the Soviet period, and that the technology may be falling into the wrong hands&amp;quot; (From Moscow Times, 7-11-95).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
====Prisons====&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
====Chechnya====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Evstafiev palace gunman Chechnya.jpg|thumb|280px|Government palace building in Grozny, Chechnya.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Chechnya]] has seen continuing violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. In [[Chechnya]], Ingushetiya, and Dagestan, security forces were involved in unlawful killings and politically motivated kidnappings. Chechen President Kadyrov continued his repressive control as federal forces withdrew. Federal and local security forces in Chechnya targeted families of suspected insurgents with impunity, and Kadyrov's private militia allegedly engaged in kidnapping and torture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eur/119101.htm Country Report 2008] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Religion - Human rights====&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Media====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia press cartoon Russian journalists.jpg|thumb|280px|Press cartoon - Russian journalists.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure from Putin's regime weakened freedom of expression and media independence, particularly of the major television networks. Five journalists were assassinated in 2008. As some print and Internet media reflected a widening range of views, the government restricted media freedom through direct ownership of media outlets, pressuring the owners of major media outlets to abstain from critical coverage, and harassing and intimidating journalists into practicing self-censorship. Local governments limited freedom of assembly, and police sometimes used violence to prevent groups from engaging in peaceful protest. The government limited freedom of association. The government restricted religious groups in some regions, and there were incidents of societal discrimination, harassment, and violence against religious minorities, including anti-Semitism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eur/119101.htm Country Report 2008] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil Society====&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control [[civil society]], that is, private organizations. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px|Vladimir Putin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major focus of increased government spending has been the military, with large increases being spent on overhauling and updating equipment, as well as increasing salaries of military personnel, though a huge backlog of problems remain from the chaotic Yeltsin era and almost two decades of chronic underinvestment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much needed investment in national infrastructure, including railways and waterways, which are much more important in transportation in Russia than in the US and Europe has been insignificant, leading to bottlenecks that hamper growth and development. Telecoms and electricity production and distribution also remain run-down and outdated from the post-Soviet collapse. As a result of this, Russia remains dependent on energy exports for income, with the domestic economy effectively held back by capacity restraints or neglected facilities, a fact which has left Russia vulnerable to a collapse in fuel prices, such as that experienced at the beginning the global financial crisis, when crude oil prices dropped from over $100 per barrel to less than $60. Currently, Russian development of railways and highways in terms of new/renewed miles of route lies at around 1/10 that of China, despite having a much larger landmass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign Relations==&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former [[Warsaw Pact]] and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Anna Chapman Russian.jpg|thumb|left|120px|Anna Chapman.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of [[weapons of mass destruction]] and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite large increases in the budget, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's large military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is both the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking, and Russian geography, which demands a sizable force simply to patrol and maintain normal defensive readiness across Russia's huge, remote and sparsely populated territory. Furthermore, unrest in Russia's souther regions demands a substantial military force at a high level of readiness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Though, the army provides all necessities, the quality of accommodation is low, though the situation has improved considerably since the Yeltsin era when the military establishment almost totally collapsed, and some soldiers actually starved when provisions to remote bases went undelivered for months on end. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing remain common, however. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem both in and outside the military, affecting the fitness of recruits.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SU-24.jpg|thumb|Fighter jet Su-24.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete decisions, due to internal political considerations and a backlog of other issues soaking up increased funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia continues to maintain a sizable strategic nuclear force equipped with global reach, with land, sea and air based nuclear launch facilities, though maintenance issues continue to affect the readiness of the system due to a flight of skilled personnel from the military, and financial and organization pressures in the post-Soviet era. For this reason, Russia has sought a renewed START treaty with the United States for a mutual reduction of strategic nuclear forces. This agreement was reached between Presidents Obama and Medvedev in April 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Znamensk Russia.jpg|thumb|280px|left|Street in Znamensk.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|right|180px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russian Federation Central Bank.jpg|left|thumb|330px|Russian Federation Central Bank.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow International Business Centre 2008.jpg|thumb|400px|Moscow International Business Centre, 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin Self Portrait 1878.jpg|thumb|[[Ilya Repin]], Self Portrait, 1878.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] 1983 shootdown incident that intensified &amp;quot;2nd Cold War&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]] only U.S. congressman killed by the Russians during Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://russiatrek.org Russian cities and regions guide]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former Soviet Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=987617</id>
		<title>Abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=987617"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T18:58:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Baby.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A two-month old fetus in the womb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Abortion''' is the induced termination of a [[pregnancy]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Heritage Dictionary definition, [http://www.bartleby.com/61/7/A0020700.html abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; often causing [[fetal pain]]. As of 2012, it is estimated there has been over 54 million babies murdered by abortion in the [[United States]] since 1973. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion is a billion-dollar industry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Dr. George Tiller &amp;quot;estimated that he performed 250 to 300 late-term abortions in 2003, each costing an average of $6,000.&amp;quot;[http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090327/D976JVSG4.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the [[United States]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Over 52,000,000 babies have been aborted in the United States since 1973.[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?/library/view.php&amp;amp;articleid=1042]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Western Europe except for [[Ireland]], [[Malta]] and [[Poland]], where it has been abolished.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=50451&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Abortion in Poland]] declined by 99% after [[communism]] was overthrown, and women's health has dramatically improved there due to fewer abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-poland.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''About 80% of women who see an ultrasound of their fetus (unborn child) decide not to abort'''''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/145703/abortion_foes_use_ultrasound__focus_on_the_family_budgets/ .  Note, however, that other variables such as abortion-coercive settings may reduce this percentage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Millions of women who had an abortion later suffer psychologically or physically from it, and support groups exist to help.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.post-gazette.com/regionstate/20020120abortion0120p3.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many victims of abortion find healing by speaking out against, and discouraging, similar harm to other mothers and their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born,&amp;quot; observed President [[Ronald Reagan]].  He also observed, &amp;quot;With me, abortion is not a problem of religion, it's a problem of the Constitution. I believe that until and unless someone can establish that the unborn child ''is not a living human being'', then that child is already protected by the Constitution, which guarantees life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to all of us.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''''Abortion doesn't solve your problems, it only creates different ones''''',&amp;quot; warned a full-page ad by many women who had abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org/signaturead/ad.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''''Many women begin regretting their abortion before they even leave the abortion clinic'''''.  In some cases, women begin regretting their abortion just before it is performed,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In one case where a woman changed her mind from inside the abortion clinic, she &amp;quot;called her friend from inside the abortion clinic and arranged for her to come 'rescue' her.&amp;quot; [http://www.40daysforlife.com/southfield/index.cfm?load=page&amp;amp;page=30]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but are told by abortionists that it is too late to change their mind because they already signed a consent form (which is a lie - it is never too late to withdraw consent for an abortion).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by dismemberment.  Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, mental illness, and other long-term health problems for the mother''''', as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Documented Incidents of 365 Women Who Have Been Killed by &amp;quot;Safe&amp;quot; and Legal Abortion.&amp;quot; [http://abortionviolence.com/DEATHS.HTM 365 women who have been killed by 'Legal' abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since abortion is deliberate and thought about in advance, it is comparable to a premeditated killing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First-degree murder is defined as &amp;quot;a killing which is deliberate and premeditated.&amp;quot; [http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/first+degree+murder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mental Health Risks From Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
A comprehensive review of literature, published in the ''British Journal of Psychiatry'' suggests that &amp;quot;there is a significant increase in mental health problems after abortion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;BJP&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/199/3/A11.full#sec-3|title =Abortion, mental health and dental disease|publisher = [[British Journal of Psychiatry]]|quote=A comprehensive review of the literature suggests that there is a significant increase in mental health problems after abortion. Coleman (pp. 180–186) suggests that these risks need to be reflected in the delivery of abortion services, and raises the thorny issue that 90% of UK abortions are justified on the presumption that abortion actually reduces the risk to mental health associated with continuing the pregnancy. There is an increasing awareness of increased comorbid physical illness in patients with severe mental illness. Kisely and colleagues (pp. 187–193) found that the levels of advanced dental disease were increased threefold in patients with severe mental illness. The authors suggest that there needs to be improved recognition of this problem – reflected in a more proactive approach to dental hygiene in these patients.|accessdate = 01 September 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DavenportMD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/major_study_links_suicide_and_other_mental_health_problems_to_abortion.html|title =Major Study Links Suicide and Other Mental Health Problems to Abortion|publisher = [[American Thinker]]|quote=An important meta-analysis published today in the prestigious British Journal of Psychiatry demonstrates that nearly 10% of mental health problems in women are directly attributable to abortion.  &amp;quot;Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009,&amp;quot; by Priscilla Coleman of Bowling Green University, shows that women with an abortion history have an 81% increased risk of mental health problems and 155% increased risk of suicide.  This meta-analysis combines 22 studies of 877,181 women, 163, 831 of whom have had abortions.  A meta-analysis is an especially powerful type of study because it includes a large number of subjects, and by combining studies is much more reliable than a single study.|author=Mary L. Davenport, MD|accessdate = 01 September 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion and Breast Cancer ==&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;A new study coming from researchers in [[Sri Lanka]] finds women who had abortions ... [had a] 3.42 [increased risk] ... compared with those who kept their baby. ... The Sri Lankan study is the fourth epidemiological study in fourteen months to report an abortion-breast cancer link, including studies from the U.S., China and Turkey.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat6451.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  LifeNews also reported in 2010 that a [[National Cancer Institute]] researcher admitted there was a link between abortion and breast cancer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5850.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A study at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center published in 2009 confirmed a 40% increase in risk in breast cancer from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/01/breast-cancer-oral-contraceptives-abortion-and-lies.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It is undisputed that childbirth protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Tobacco-ChronologyJul98.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Abortion Hurts Women.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Walk for Life rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
A new study on breast cancer in Turkey published in April 2009 in the peer-reviewed World Journal of Surgical Oncology found, through a surveying process, that induced abortion was a statistically significant cause of breast cancer risk. The study concludes, “Our findings suggest that age and induced abortion were found to be significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk….”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wjso.com/content/7/1/37&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, the study found that Turkish women who received one or more induced abortions had a 66% higher risk of breast cancer than women who never had an abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09072903.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/090728/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Janet Daling, who considers herself supportive of a right to perform abortions, brought the abortion-breast cancer link into the mainstream with her federally funded research on the topic.  Her report, released in 1994, found a 50% increase in breast cancer risk due to induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Janet R. Daling et al., &amp;quot;Risk of Breast Cancer Among Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,&amp;quot; 86 Journal of the National Cancer Institute; (1994);1584&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/032801.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She said, &amp;quot;I have three sisters with breast cancer and I resent people messing with the scientific data to further their own agenda, be they pro-choice or pro-life.  I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid and our data is accurate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;L.A. Daily News, Sept. 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Similarly, an early study published in Japan in 1957 showed that women who have abortions have a much higher risk of breast cancer than those who decide to keep their baby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Segi M, et al. An epidemiological study on cancer in Japan. GANN. 1957; 48:1-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a peer-reviewed medical journal, Karen Malec observed that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirty-eight epidemiological studies exploring an independent link [between abortion and] breast cancer have been published.  Twenty-nine report risk elevations.  Thirteen out of 15 American studies found risk elevations.  Seventeen studies are statistically significant, 16 of which report increased risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S., a specialist in breast cancer an a clinical assistant professor of surgery at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, has explained the physiology and epidemiology of the abortion-breast cancer link.  She made the following observation:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S, &amp;quot;The breast physiology and the epidemiology of the abortion breast cancer link,&amp;quot; 12 Imago Hominis, No. 3, 228 (2005) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This past August in Minneapolis, Patrick Carroll, director of the Pension and Population Research Institute of London, presented a paper to the largest gathering of statisticians in North America.  '''He showed that abortion was the best predictor of breast cancer in Britain.'''  Breast cancer is the only cancer in Britain which has its highest incidence and mortality rate among the upper rather than lower social classes.  Abortion before a full term pregnancy and late pregnancy were the best explanations for this incidence.  He also found that there had been a 70% increase risk of breast cancer between 1971 and 2002 and that for women between 50 and 54 years of age incidence was highly correlated with abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of abortion causing breast cancer includes the following.  Breast cancer rates are far lower in Western countries that prohibited abortion than in those that promoted it.  Ireland, which virtually bans abortion, reportedly has a lifetime rate of breast cancer of only 1 in 13, nearly half the rate of 1 in 7.5 in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Probability of breast cancer in American Women,&amp;quot; National Cancer Institute (Apr. 15, 2005);  K. O'Flaherty, R. Oakley, &amp;quot;Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight,&amp;quot; Sunday Tribune (Ireland), at 8 (Oct. 6, 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rate of breast cancer increases steadily as one travels from Ireland, where abortion is illegal, to Northern Ireland, where abortion is legal but rare, to England, where abortion is common. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; R. O'Reilly, &amp;quot;New weapon in war against breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Press Association Limited (Dec. 17, 1998); &amp;quot;Portugal-abortion referendum,&amp;quot; Associated Press Worldstream (June 27, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Romania, abortion was illegal under two decades of rule by the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and the country enjoyed one of the lowest breast cancer rates in the entire world during that time, far lower than comparable Western countries. Romania's breast cancer rate was an astounding one-sixth the rate of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A. Khan, &amp;quot;The role of fat in breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Independent (May 18, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But after the execution of Ceausescu on Christmas Day, 1989, Romania has taken the opposite approach, embracing abortion to the point that Romania now has one of the highest abortion rates in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Abdullaev, &amp;quot;Russians are quickest to marry and divorce,&amp;quot; Moscow Times (Dec 8, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One Romanian observer decried, &amp;quot;The liberalization of abortions in Romania in 1990, the significant increase of the number of abortions at relatively short intervals, determined a rise in the incidence of breast and uterine cervix cancer in my country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Information packet, Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) World Conference on Breast Cancer (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies on rats, which are an accepted method for identifying causes of cancer in humans,  further confirm that abortion does indeed increase the risk of breast cancer.  As Dr. [[Joel Brind]] observed, &amp;quot;Researchers also widely admit to the biological plausibility of abortion as an independent cause of breast cancer, through the estrogen-mediated stimulation of breast growth in the absence of differentiation. This was demonstrated experimentally in rats in the landmark experiments of Russo and Russo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Joel Brind]], &amp;quot;Induced Abortion as an Independent Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Critical Review of Recent Studies Based on Prospective Data,&amp;quot; J. of Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 105 (Winter 2005) [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no4/brind.pdf] (citing Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to&lt;br /&gt;
carcinogenesis. 1980;100:497-512).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additional scientific information on the abortion-breast cancer link is available [http://www.bcpinstitute.org here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An expert (Dr. Lynn Rosenberg) hired to defend abortion felt compelled to admit, under cross-examination, that a woman increases her risk for breast cancer by having an abortion compared to carrying her pregnancy to childbirth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/rosenbergs_testimony.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question by the attorney: 'So in other words, a woman who finds herself pregnant at age 15 will have a higher breast cancer risk if she chooses to abort that pregnancy, than if she carries the pregnancy to term, [is that] correct?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'Probably, yes.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question: 'Looking at that another way, let's compare two women. Let's say both got pregnant at age 15-- one terminates the pregnancy, but the other carries the pregnancy to term. And both women go on to get married and have two kids, say, at age 30 and age 35. Is the risk of breast cancer higher for the woman who had an abortion at age 15 or the woman who had a baby at age 15, all other things being equal?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'It's probably higher for the one who had an abortion at age 15.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the overwhelming evidence -- and inescapable logic -- for abortion increasing breast cancer, promoters of abortion cite flawed articles in an attempt to deny the link.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The flaws in these articles are exposed in [[Harvard abortion study]] and [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Dr. Lanfranchi has explained:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well-documented breast physiology accounts for the fact that oral contraceptives and abortion are risk factors for breast cancer.  There is an effort to suppress this information by federal agencies and those in academic medicine.  Without this information, women cannot make a fully informed choice about their method of fertility control or about whether to maintain an unplanned pregnancy.  Medical ethics demands that they be informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-choice should include ''informed'' choice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Archdiocese of St. Louis, for example, remarked about abortions and increased risk for breast cancer: &amp;quot;To dismiss that link is irresponsible.&amp;quot; [http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5620863.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet efforts continue to suppress awareness that abortion increases breast cancer.  Pro-life scientists were almost entirely barred from the National Cancer Institute's &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of the link, and its resulting statements were fatally flawed as explained in  [[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as organizations denied or failed to disclose the connection between smoking and lung cancer, many organizations aligned with [[liberal]] politicians deny the correlation between abortion and breast cancer despite numerous studies published in peer reviewed journals indicating a likely connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smelliesdoublecrochet.jpg|right|thumb|250px| The Smellie's double crochet abortion tool was used to grab and forcibly remove the fetus from the womb.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Causes Future Harm with Premature Births ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At least 49 studies have demonstrated a statistically significant increase in premature births (PB) or low birth weight (LBW) risk in women with prior induced abortions (IAs).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney and Byron C. Calhoun, &amp;quot;Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births,&amp;quot; 8 J. Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 46 (Summer 2003). [http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Premature birth tragically causes brain damage, and an array of other severe, lifelong injuries ranging from Cerebral Palsy to blindness, or even death, and few mothers would knowingly increase the risk of that happening.  &amp;quot;There are at least seventeen (17) studies that have found that previous induced abortions increase preterm birth risk” and thereby increase debilitating Cerebral Palsy in children.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney, Letter, 96 European Journal of Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 239 (2001) (citations omitted).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the generally pro-abortion British medical journal, ''The Lancet'', admitted that a procedure often used in abortion increase the risk of premature birth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr, Jay D. Iams, Dr. Robert Romero, Jennifer F. Culhane (PhD), Dr. Robert L. Goldenberg.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet   2008;371:164-175.  While the text of this article conceals the connection with abortion, it cites as support for its claims two studies showing how abortion increases risk of premature birth: the 2004 'Ancel' study of ten (10) European countries and the 2005 'Moreau' study that used French subjects.  Ancel P-Y,  Lelong  N,  Papiernik  E, Saurel-Cubizoilles M-J, Kaminski M.  History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Human Reproduction. 2004;112:734-740.  Moreau C, Kaminski M, Ancel PY et al.  Previous I induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery; Results of the EPIPAGE study.  British J Obstetrics Gynaecology 2005; 112:430-437.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;For example, greater public and professional awareness of evidence that repeated uterine instrumentation--eg, uterine curettage or endometrial biopsy--is associated with increased risk of subsequent preterm birth might over time influence decision-making about the procedure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers Rooney and Calhoun observed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Large studies have reported a doubling of [early premature birth] EPB risk from two prior IAs.  Women who had four or more IAs experienced, on average, nine times the risk of [extremely early premature births] XPB, an increase of 800 percent.  These results suggest that women contemplating IA should be informed of this potential risk to subsequent pregnancies, and that physicians should be aware of the potential liability and possible need for intensified prenatal care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of how abortion increases premature birth includes the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): &amp;quot;[T]he abortion rate for black women has been approximately '''three times''' as high as that for white women (range: 2.6--3.1) since 1991&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Science Daily'''s report on a study by the Washington University School of Medicine: &amp;quot;African-American women are '''three times''' more likely to deliver babies three to 17 weeks prematurely than Caucasian women&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070209074144.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 an article entitled &amp;quot;Preterm Birth: A Continuing Challenge&amp;quot; noted that premature births are abnormally high in the United States, citing a study that observed that a previous abortion is a &amp;quot;risk factor[] for both infertility and preterm birth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1595132/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of premature birth is elevated by the same amount as the abortion rate, as expected if abortion increases the risk of premature birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Health Risks from Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled in 2007 that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 127 S. Ct. 1610, 1634 (2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained. See Brief for Sandra Cano ''et al.'' as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380, pp 22-24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow. See ''ibid.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study published in the Southern Medical Journal observed that there are higher death rates association with women who have abortion, and that these higher death rates persist over time and across socioeconomic boundaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;D.C. Reardon, P.G. Ney, F.J. Scheuren, J.R. Cougle, P.K. Coleman, T. Strahan, &amp;quot;Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women,&amp;quot; 95 Southern Medical Journal 8, at 834-41 (August 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[England]], the &amp;quot;Royal College of Psychiatrists says women should not be allowed to have an abortion until they are counselled on the possible risk to their mental health.&amp;quot;  The medical royal college warned that women who have abortions may be at risk of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3559486.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A New Zealand study found that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=pubmed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=16405636&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The researcher in this study, who was not pro-life, was shaken by the study and had to go to four journals before he could find one who would publish it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The study concludes with the following statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|These findings are inconsistent with the current consensus on the psychological effects of abortion. In particular, in its 2005 statement on abortion, the American Psychological Association concluded that “well-designed studies of psychological responses following abortion have consistently shown that risk of psychological harm is low...the percentage of women who experience clinically relevant distress is small and appears to be no greater than in general samples of women of reproductive age” (American Psychological Association, 2005). This relatively strong conclusion about the absence of harm from abortion was based on a relatively small number of studies which had one or more of the following limitations: a) absence of comprehensive assessment of mental disorders; b) lack of comparison groups; and c) limited statistical controls. Furthermore, the statement appears to disregard the findings of a number of studies that had claimed to show negative effects for abortion (Cougle et al., 2003; Gissler et al., 1996; Reardon &amp;amp; Cougle, 2002). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor David Fergusson, lead author of the New Zealand study stated: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It borders on scandalous that one of the most common surgical procedures performed on young women is so poorly researched and evaluated. If this were Prozac or Vioxx, reports of associated harm would be taken much more seriously with more careful research and monitoring procedures.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060120-091648-6456r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another study published in the OB/GYN Survey detailed long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J.M. Thorp, Jr., K.E. Hartmann, and E.M. Shadigian, &amp;quot;Long-Term Physical &amp;amp; Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence,&amp;quot; 58 OB/GYN Survey 1, at 67-79 (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suicide rates among women who had abortions are six times higher than women who gave birth in the prior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionrecoverycounseling.com/Page8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Overall, deaths from suicide, homicide and accidents were 248% higher after an abortion, as found by a 13-year study in Finland of its entire population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, only one state (Missouri) requires that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mo. Rev. Stat. § 188.080 prohibits an abortion by a physician &amp;quot;who does not have clinical privileges at a hospital which offers obstetrical or gynecological care located within thirty miles of the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the other 49 states, an abortion patient can and often is left without prompt medical care by the treating physician.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the largest abortion providers in the United States, the Metropolitan Medical Associates of New Jersey, was shut down in 2007 by state health officials after one of its botched abortions left a 20-year-old woman in a coma for more than four weeks.  She &amp;quot;became severely ill following the abortion and was transferred to Newark Beth Israel Medical Center where she needed blood transfusions and had her uterus removed. She also suffered a stroke due to the serious blood loss and had one of her lungs collapse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/state2137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The State of New Jersey had shut down the same facility in 1993 also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Optionline]] provides consultants that connects individuals to nearby pregnancy centers that offer the following services: free pregnancy tests and pregnancy information; Information about the risks of abortion and the morning after pill; medical services, including [[STD]] tests; early ultrasounds and pregnancy confirmation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, some of these centers provide information regarding free housing to women who are facing housing concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary alternative to abortion is adoption. [[Liberty Godparent Foundation]] is a [[Christian]] organization focused on improving the lives of unwed pregnant teens, babies and adoptive families by providing two alternatives, The Liberty Godparent Maternity Home and Family Life Services Adoption Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godparent.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=20&amp;amp;Itemid=59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Catholic Social Services]] provides adoption assistance to people of all beliefs in addition to supporting families in need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Industry and How It Targets Minority Communities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:4287336112 d3f9126c99.jpg|right|thumb|325px|According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of [[Planned Parenthood]] abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/muriel215/4287336112/ Flickr, see Creative commons license agreement)]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Each day '''1,786''' African American children are aborted.&amp;quot; According to the [[U.S.]] Census of 2006, African Americans are at 1.96 birth rate which is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;beneath&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the replacement level of 2.1. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html African American Pro-Life Group Holds Protest at NAACP] Christian News Network, July 13, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the continued rate, [[racism]] by abortion will decimate the black population of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to writer George Grant, the author of ''Killing Angel'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During the 1980s when [[Planned Parenthood]] shifted its focus from community-based clinics to school-based clinics, it again targeted inner-city minority neighborhoods...Of the more than 100 school-based clinics that have opened nationwide in the last decade [1980s], none has been at substantially all-white schools....None has been at suburban middle-class schools. All have been at black, minority or ethnic schools.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/special_issues/population/the_negro_project.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planned Parenthood itself reported that its abortions on minorities in 1991 was 42.7% of its total abortions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  However, during that time period, minorities comprised only 19.7% of the U.S. population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Support of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most powerful political action committee (PAC) is EMILY’s List.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emilyslist.org/newsroom/releases/20070201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; EMILY's List contributes money to Democratic candidates who support abortion-on-demand, including forced taxpayer funding of abortion.  EMILY's List candidates also oppose regulations such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing health information to abortion patients;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:requiring that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital in case there is a complication; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing parental notification if the patient is a teenager.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the influence of the abortion industry and EMILY's List, nearly every Democratic presidential candidate and senatorial candidate supports abortion-on-demand.  &amp;quot;EMILY's List, the nation's largest political action committee, continues to be the dominant financial resource for Democratic candidates,&amp;quot; its above-referenced website declares.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no comparably funded organization opposing abortion, because there are no monetary rewards to defending human life.  Instead, candidates and supporters who oppose abortion are motivated by religious and ethical principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Politics, demographics and expected tipping point in 2020 for pro-life cause in America ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Global atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will begin to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:115523-004-FA619CA3.jpg|thumb|right|250px| The perverse and cruel [[atheism|atheist]] [[Marquis de Sade]] advocated induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''Please also see:'' [[History of abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The father of [[medicine]], [[Hippocrates]], expressly prohibited abortion in his ethical [[Oath]] long before [[Christianity]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' article declared concerning the [[atheism|atheist]] and [[sadism|sadist]] [[Marquis de Sade]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1795 the Marquis de Sade published his La Philosophic dans le boudoir, in which he proposed the use of induced abortion for social reasons and as a means of population control. It is from this time that medical and social acceptance of abortion can be dated, although previously the subject had not been discussed in public in modern times. It is suggested that it was largely due to de Sade's writing that induced abortion received the impetus which resulted in its subsequent spread in western society.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Population control]] is based on [[pseudoscience]] and ill founded [[economics|economic]] assumptions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/11/pz_myers_on_abortion040971.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1973 abortion was illegal in most of the United States, though a few states (such as Hawaii and New York) allowed it with restrictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A Timeline of Reproductive Rights'' [http://ecampus.bentley.edu/org/wc/reproductiverights.html The Women's Center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 [[Roe v. Wade]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Online text of [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;amp;court=US&amp;amp;vol=410&amp;amp;page=113 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decision ruled that abortions are lawful under the [[U.S. Constitution]] up to the point at which the fetus becomes able to survive outside the womb, and an accompanying decision issued the same day captioned [[Doe v. Bolton]] essentially legalized abortion in the unlimited discretion of the abortionist at any time during pregnancy, up to and including birth.  Conservatives immediately criticized these decisions as examples of [[Judicial Activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, worldwide there were approximately 115,000 abortions done per day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008, approximately 83% of all abortions were performed in developing countries and 17% occurred in developed countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States may regulate abortion, such as requiring a 24-hour waiting period and parental consent for minors.  Abortion clinics often fail to comply with the health standards of surgical facilities, and States can require compliance (but often do not, resulting in discomfort and harm to the victims of abortion).  Many abortionists lack hospital admitting privileges at nearby facilities, so women having complications must go on their own to emergency rooms to see physicians unfamiliar with what actually happened.  For any other operation the cost of treating complications is included in the cost of the operation, but for abortions the abortion clinics take their money and typically do not pay for the care of complications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more pro-abortion the State regulations are, the larger the number of abortion clinics it will have.  [[Arizona]], though a pro-life State, has a regulatory system that results in twelve abortion clinics operating within its borders.  In contrast, [[Mississippi]] has only one abortion clinic, and [[Missouri]] has only two.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Adolf Hitler and Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information see:'' [[Abortion and Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg|thumb|290px|right|[[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎In 1942 [[Adolf Hitler]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-[[German]] population multiply…We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman's health… It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists and abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barna Group]] found concering [[Atheism and Morality|atheism and morality]] that those who hold to the worldviews of [[atheism]] or [[agnosticism]] in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in [[homosexuality]]/[[bisexuality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American Liberals and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Pew Research Center, American [[liberal]]s are more likely to support pro-abortion views. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/283/pragmatic-americans-liberal-and-conservative-on-social-issues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolutionary Thought and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theory of evolution and liberalism|Liberals are more likely to advocate the evolutionary paradigm than conservatives]].  [[Creation Ministries International]] has written that [[evolution|evolutionary]] thinking has contributed to the [[eugenics|eugenic]] idea of aborting babies with defects and has also contributed to erroneous and immoral justifications for abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/human-life-questions-and-answers-abortion-and-euthanasia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Poll on Reasons for Abortions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AbortionReasons.jpg‎|thumb|400px| Primary reasons women reported for undergoing abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is not a [[conservative]] or [[pro-life]] organization, conducted a poll of more than 1,200 patients undergoing induced abortions at 11 large-scale [[abortion facilities]] in the United States. The women were asked to identify reasons for seeking abortion, singling out the primary reason. An additional 38 women at four sites were interviewed in-depth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf Lawrence Finer, et al., &amp;quot;Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives&amp;quot;, ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health'', September 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The poll omitted any reference to whether the women were able to see an ultrasound of their unborn children before choosing to have an abortion.  For the vast majority of women who have abortion, the reason is a lack of knowledge about the unborn child as displayed by an ultrasound. Because a large part of their campaign funds are bankrolled by the abortion industry, liberals are frequent opponents to laws making available ultrasound treatment for patients not certain of the decision. Some physicians have been reported intimidating and pressuring patients to continue with an abortion after the patient has had a change of heart, either on the operating table or before surgery. One doctor, who was also employed as a spokesman for a prominent liberal pro-abortion think tank, reportedly forced a patient to undergo the procedure in order to fill a quota on insurance claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among reasons provided to the women as part of the poll, the two most common selections were &amp;quot;Having a baby would dramatically change my life&amp;quot; (74%) and &amp;quot;I can't afford a baby now&amp;quot; (73%).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Concerns about their own health were mentioned by only 13% of the women, while only 12% mentioned concerns about the baby's health, though only 3% and 4% respectively gave those as their primary reason for seeking abortion.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, only 14% indicated &amp;quot;[[husband]] or partner wants me to have an abortion&amp;quot; as a reason, down from 24% in a previous survey in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This conflicts with research on women post-abortion, among whom 64% reported feeling pressured by others to abort.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reardon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.theunchoice.com/pdf/FactSheets/ForcedAbortionFactSheet.pdf David Reardon, &amp;quot;Forced Abortion in America&amp;quot;, April 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is often ignored in studies of why women submit to abortions is an ambivalence by some in early pregnancy. Such ambivalence typically resolves when the mother becomes more aware of her unborn child, as displayed by an [[ultrasound]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lederman, ''Psychosocial Adaptation in Pregnancy'', 1984&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Unwanted Pregnancy,&amp;quot; ''Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology'', 1970, Cited in Gardner, ''Abortion: The Personal Dilemma'', 1972&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nichols and Humenick, ''Childbirth Education: Practice, Research, and Theory'', 1988&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statistics on abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As of 2012, it is estimated there has been over 54 million babies murdered by abortion since the Supreme Court handed down its 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. After reaching 25 percent from a high of over 1.6 million in the year 1990, the number of abortions performed annually in the U.S. has leveled off at about 1.2 million infants murdered by abortion a year, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?5511 National Right to Life Factsheet], January 2012, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). The CDC ordinarily develops its annual report on the basis of data received from 52 central health agencies (50 states plus New York City and District of Columbia). AGI obtains its numbers from direct surveys of abortionists conducted every few years.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Privacy laws and likely desire to keep this silent holocaust from raising alarm hinders data collection on abortion. CDC researchers have admitted it probably undercounts the total number of abortions because reporting laws vary from state to state and some abortionists probably do not report or under-report the abortions they perform. Abortions from CA and NH have not been counted by the CDC since 1998, and  reports from other states are also missing for some years.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[]http://www.christianliferesources.com/?5511 National Right to Life Factsheet, January 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Approximately 22% of all U.S. pregnancies ended in abortion (excluding miscarriages).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones RK and Kooistra, K., Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2011, 43(1):41-50.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only about 1 percent each year are attributed to rape and incest. 40% of women ages 15 to 44 have had at least one abortion. 4 out of 10 teen pregnancies end in murder by abortion. Based on the rate of abortion, it was estimated (2000) that 43 percent of American women would  have at least one abortion by the age of 45. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 7 out of 10 U.S. women are sexually active (usually as fornicators) but do not want to become pregnant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Guttmacher Institute, Facts in Brief,Induced Abortion, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Women who have never married and are not cohabiting account for 45% of all abortions. 57% of all women having abortions between 15-44 are in their 20’s. 36% of non-Hispanic women are abortions were white, 30% are non-Hispanic black, and 25% are hispanic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones RK, Finer LB and Singh S, Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients, 2008, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 37% of women killing babies by abortion were Protestant, (include those who identified as “Christian” but who did not specify a denomination) while 28% were Catholic, and 20% identified themselves as born-again, evangelical, charismatic or fundamentalist (in 2000, some 13% of abortion patients aged 18 and older identified as born-again or evangelical before the question was reworded slightly for the 2008 survey), while 27% gave no religious affiliation, increasing from 22% in 2000. (Protestants, were underrepresented among those committing abortion (In proportion to the total number of Protestants nationwide), and the relative abortion rate for this group was lower than the rate for all women.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/US-Abortion-Patients.pdf,  Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients], 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Although 66% of women having abortions had some type of health insurance, 57% paid for their abortion out of pocket. Among women with private health insurance, 63% paid out of pocket.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/US-Abortion-Patients.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scientist on abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Vladimir Krčméry, Rector of the University of St.Elizabeth and the holder of two honorary doctorates made following public claim regarding abostion:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|I consider abortion for being a deliberate killing of an unborn child who cannot defend itself, and therefore it is medically and ethically unjustifiable and absurd. My opinion is not based on any religious reasons, but on the civil and scientific ones. It is the opinion of a member of the Royal College of physicians, a member of the American College of physicians and a candidate for the Nobel Prize.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Vladimír Krčméry&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Stanovisko-Krcmery (public claim by Krcmery)&lt;br /&gt;
|publisher=CBR Europe&lt;br /&gt;
|location=Slovakia&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://web.pravonazivot.sk/stanovisko-krcmery/&lt;br /&gt;
|language=Slovak&lt;br /&gt;
|access date=06.05.2012&lt;br /&gt;
|quote=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ultrasound images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/frames.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/drakelelane/388759116/&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/13_weeks.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/ultrasound_3d.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/triple_jump.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Pro-life Project|Conservapedia Pro-life Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Abortion Directory of abortion related articles]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.investigatemagazine.com/mar3abrt.htm Abortion and breast cancer in New Zealand]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion genocide]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion procedures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion rates by US state]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortionist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Abortion|Articles about '''Abortion''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Separate Life|Essay on abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fetus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harvard abortion study]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion breast cancer studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexual activists and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/abrpt/2006abrpt.pdf Minnesota official abortion statistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Right to Life Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partial birth abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sanctity of life]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Silent scream]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Taxpayer-funded abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.abortionfacts.com/ Abortion Facts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.carm.org/abortion.htm Abortion] by [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ProLifeOnCampus.com/ Pro Life on Campus]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/abortion/ What Liberals Say - Category: Abortion], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Abortion}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=987615</id>
		<title>Abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=987615"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T18:57:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* A Poll on Reasons for Abortions */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Baby.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A human fetus in the womb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Abortion''' is the induced termination of a [[pregnancy]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Heritage Dictionary definition, [http://www.bartleby.com/61/7/A0020700.html abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; often causing [[fetal pain]]. As of 2012, it is estimated there has been over 54 million babies murdered by abortion in the [[United States]] since 1973. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion is a billion-dollar industry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Dr. George Tiller &amp;quot;estimated that he performed 250 to 300 late-term abortions in 2003, each costing an average of $6,000.&amp;quot;[http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090327/D976JVSG4.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the [[United States]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Over 52,000,000 babies have been aborted in the United States since 1973.[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?/library/view.php&amp;amp;articleid=1042]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Western Europe except for [[Ireland]], [[Malta]] and [[Poland]], where it has been abolished.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=50451&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Abortion in Poland]] declined by 99% after [[communism]] was overthrown, and women's health has dramatically improved there due to fewer abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-poland.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''About 80% of women who see an ultrasound of their fetus (unborn child) decide not to abort'''''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/145703/abortion_foes_use_ultrasound__focus_on_the_family_budgets/ .  Note, however, that other variables such as abortion-coercive settings may reduce this percentage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Millions of women who had an abortion later suffer psychologically or physically from it, and support groups exist to help.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.post-gazette.com/regionstate/20020120abortion0120p3.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many victims of abortion find healing by speaking out against, and discouraging, similar harm to other mothers and their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born,&amp;quot; observed President [[Ronald Reagan]].  He also observed, &amp;quot;With me, abortion is not a problem of religion, it's a problem of the Constitution. I believe that until and unless someone can establish that the unborn child ''is not a living human being'', then that child is already protected by the Constitution, which guarantees life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to all of us.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''''Abortion doesn't solve your problems, it only creates different ones''''',&amp;quot; warned a full-page ad by many women who had abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org/signaturead/ad.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''''Many women begin regretting their abortion before they even leave the abortion clinic'''''.  In some cases, women begin regretting their abortion just before it is performed,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In one case where a woman changed her mind from inside the abortion clinic, she &amp;quot;called her friend from inside the abortion clinic and arranged for her to come 'rescue' her.&amp;quot; [http://www.40daysforlife.com/southfield/index.cfm?load=page&amp;amp;page=30]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but are told by abortionists that it is too late to change their mind because they already signed a consent form (which is a lie - it is never too late to withdraw consent for an abortion).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by dismemberment.  Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, mental illness, and other long-term health problems for the mother''''', as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Documented Incidents of 365 Women Who Have Been Killed by &amp;quot;Safe&amp;quot; and Legal Abortion.&amp;quot; [http://abortionviolence.com/DEATHS.HTM 365 women who have been killed by 'Legal' abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since abortion is deliberate and thought about in advance, it is comparable to a premeditated killing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First-degree murder is defined as &amp;quot;a killing which is deliberate and premeditated.&amp;quot; [http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/first+degree+murder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mental Health Risks From Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
A comprehensive review of literature, published in the ''British Journal of Psychiatry'' suggests that &amp;quot;there is a significant increase in mental health problems after abortion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;BJP&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/199/3/A11.full#sec-3|title =Abortion, mental health and dental disease|publisher = [[British Journal of Psychiatry]]|quote=A comprehensive review of the literature suggests that there is a significant increase in mental health problems after abortion. Coleman (pp. 180–186) suggests that these risks need to be reflected in the delivery of abortion services, and raises the thorny issue that 90% of UK abortions are justified on the presumption that abortion actually reduces the risk to mental health associated with continuing the pregnancy. There is an increasing awareness of increased comorbid physical illness in patients with severe mental illness. Kisely and colleagues (pp. 187–193) found that the levels of advanced dental disease were increased threefold in patients with severe mental illness. The authors suggest that there needs to be improved recognition of this problem – reflected in a more proactive approach to dental hygiene in these patients.|accessdate = 01 September 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DavenportMD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/major_study_links_suicide_and_other_mental_health_problems_to_abortion.html|title =Major Study Links Suicide and Other Mental Health Problems to Abortion|publisher = [[American Thinker]]|quote=An important meta-analysis published today in the prestigious British Journal of Psychiatry demonstrates that nearly 10% of mental health problems in women are directly attributable to abortion.  &amp;quot;Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009,&amp;quot; by Priscilla Coleman of Bowling Green University, shows that women with an abortion history have an 81% increased risk of mental health problems and 155% increased risk of suicide.  This meta-analysis combines 22 studies of 877,181 women, 163, 831 of whom have had abortions.  A meta-analysis is an especially powerful type of study because it includes a large number of subjects, and by combining studies is much more reliable than a single study.|author=Mary L. Davenport, MD|accessdate = 01 September 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion and Breast Cancer ==&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;A new study coming from researchers in [[Sri Lanka]] finds women who had abortions ... [had a] 3.42 [increased risk] ... compared with those who kept their baby. ... The Sri Lankan study is the fourth epidemiological study in fourteen months to report an abortion-breast cancer link, including studies from the U.S., China and Turkey.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat6451.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  LifeNews also reported in 2010 that a [[National Cancer Institute]] researcher admitted there was a link between abortion and breast cancer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5850.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A study at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center published in 2009 confirmed a 40% increase in risk in breast cancer from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/01/breast-cancer-oral-contraceptives-abortion-and-lies.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It is undisputed that childbirth protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Tobacco-ChronologyJul98.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Abortion Hurts Women.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Walk for Life rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
A new study on breast cancer in Turkey published in April 2009 in the peer-reviewed World Journal of Surgical Oncology found, through a surveying process, that induced abortion was a statistically significant cause of breast cancer risk. The study concludes, “Our findings suggest that age and induced abortion were found to be significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk….”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wjso.com/content/7/1/37&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, the study found that Turkish women who received one or more induced abortions had a 66% higher risk of breast cancer than women who never had an abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09072903.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/090728/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Janet Daling, who considers herself supportive of a right to perform abortions, brought the abortion-breast cancer link into the mainstream with her federally funded research on the topic.  Her report, released in 1994, found a 50% increase in breast cancer risk due to induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Janet R. Daling et al., &amp;quot;Risk of Breast Cancer Among Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,&amp;quot; 86 Journal of the National Cancer Institute; (1994);1584&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/032801.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She said, &amp;quot;I have three sisters with breast cancer and I resent people messing with the scientific data to further their own agenda, be they pro-choice or pro-life.  I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid and our data is accurate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;L.A. Daily News, Sept. 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Similarly, an early study published in Japan in 1957 showed that women who have abortions have a much higher risk of breast cancer than those who decide to keep their baby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Segi M, et al. An epidemiological study on cancer in Japan. GANN. 1957; 48:1-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a peer-reviewed medical journal, Karen Malec observed that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirty-eight epidemiological studies exploring an independent link [between abortion and] breast cancer have been published.  Twenty-nine report risk elevations.  Thirteen out of 15 American studies found risk elevations.  Seventeen studies are statistically significant, 16 of which report increased risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S., a specialist in breast cancer an a clinical assistant professor of surgery at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, has explained the physiology and epidemiology of the abortion-breast cancer link.  She made the following observation:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S, &amp;quot;The breast physiology and the epidemiology of the abortion breast cancer link,&amp;quot; 12 Imago Hominis, No. 3, 228 (2005) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This past August in Minneapolis, Patrick Carroll, director of the Pension and Population Research Institute of London, presented a paper to the largest gathering of statisticians in North America.  '''He showed that abortion was the best predictor of breast cancer in Britain.'''  Breast cancer is the only cancer in Britain which has its highest incidence and mortality rate among the upper rather than lower social classes.  Abortion before a full term pregnancy and late pregnancy were the best explanations for this incidence.  He also found that there had been a 70% increase risk of breast cancer between 1971 and 2002 and that for women between 50 and 54 years of age incidence was highly correlated with abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of abortion causing breast cancer includes the following.  Breast cancer rates are far lower in Western countries that prohibited abortion than in those that promoted it.  Ireland, which virtually bans abortion, reportedly has a lifetime rate of breast cancer of only 1 in 13, nearly half the rate of 1 in 7.5 in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Probability of breast cancer in American Women,&amp;quot; National Cancer Institute (Apr. 15, 2005);  K. O'Flaherty, R. Oakley, &amp;quot;Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight,&amp;quot; Sunday Tribune (Ireland), at 8 (Oct. 6, 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rate of breast cancer increases steadily as one travels from Ireland, where abortion is illegal, to Northern Ireland, where abortion is legal but rare, to England, where abortion is common. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; R. O'Reilly, &amp;quot;New weapon in war against breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Press Association Limited (Dec. 17, 1998); &amp;quot;Portugal-abortion referendum,&amp;quot; Associated Press Worldstream (June 27, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Romania, abortion was illegal under two decades of rule by the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and the country enjoyed one of the lowest breast cancer rates in the entire world during that time, far lower than comparable Western countries. Romania's breast cancer rate was an astounding one-sixth the rate of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A. Khan, &amp;quot;The role of fat in breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Independent (May 18, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But after the execution of Ceausescu on Christmas Day, 1989, Romania has taken the opposite approach, embracing abortion to the point that Romania now has one of the highest abortion rates in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Abdullaev, &amp;quot;Russians are quickest to marry and divorce,&amp;quot; Moscow Times (Dec 8, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One Romanian observer decried, &amp;quot;The liberalization of abortions in Romania in 1990, the significant increase of the number of abortions at relatively short intervals, determined a rise in the incidence of breast and uterine cervix cancer in my country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Information packet, Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) World Conference on Breast Cancer (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies on rats, which are an accepted method for identifying causes of cancer in humans,  further confirm that abortion does indeed increase the risk of breast cancer.  As Dr. [[Joel Brind]] observed, &amp;quot;Researchers also widely admit to the biological plausibility of abortion as an independent cause of breast cancer, through the estrogen-mediated stimulation of breast growth in the absence of differentiation. This was demonstrated experimentally in rats in the landmark experiments of Russo and Russo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Joel Brind]], &amp;quot;Induced Abortion as an Independent Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Critical Review of Recent Studies Based on Prospective Data,&amp;quot; J. of Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 105 (Winter 2005) [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no4/brind.pdf] (citing Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to&lt;br /&gt;
carcinogenesis. 1980;100:497-512).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additional scientific information on the abortion-breast cancer link is available [http://www.bcpinstitute.org here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An expert (Dr. Lynn Rosenberg) hired to defend abortion felt compelled to admit, under cross-examination, that a woman increases her risk for breast cancer by having an abortion compared to carrying her pregnancy to childbirth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/rosenbergs_testimony.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question by the attorney: 'So in other words, a woman who finds herself pregnant at age 15 will have a higher breast cancer risk if she chooses to abort that pregnancy, than if she carries the pregnancy to term, [is that] correct?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'Probably, yes.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question: 'Looking at that another way, let's compare two women. Let's say both got pregnant at age 15-- one terminates the pregnancy, but the other carries the pregnancy to term. And both women go on to get married and have two kids, say, at age 30 and age 35. Is the risk of breast cancer higher for the woman who had an abortion at age 15 or the woman who had a baby at age 15, all other things being equal?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'It's probably higher for the one who had an abortion at age 15.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the overwhelming evidence -- and inescapable logic -- for abortion increasing breast cancer, promoters of abortion cite flawed articles in an attempt to deny the link.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The flaws in these articles are exposed in [[Harvard abortion study]] and [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Dr. Lanfranchi has explained:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well-documented breast physiology accounts for the fact that oral contraceptives and abortion are risk factors for breast cancer.  There is an effort to suppress this information by federal agencies and those in academic medicine.  Without this information, women cannot make a fully informed choice about their method of fertility control or about whether to maintain an unplanned pregnancy.  Medical ethics demands that they be informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-choice should include ''informed'' choice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Archdiocese of St. Louis, for example, remarked about abortions and increased risk for breast cancer: &amp;quot;To dismiss that link is irresponsible.&amp;quot; [http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5620863.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet efforts continue to suppress awareness that abortion increases breast cancer.  Pro-life scientists were almost entirely barred from the National Cancer Institute's &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of the link, and its resulting statements were fatally flawed as explained in  [[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as organizations denied or failed to disclose the connection between smoking and lung cancer, many organizations aligned with [[liberal]] politicians deny the correlation between abortion and breast cancer despite numerous studies published in peer reviewed journals indicating a likely connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smelliesdoublecrochet.jpg|right|thumb|250px| The Smellie's double crochet abortion tool was used to grab and forcibly remove the fetus from the womb.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Causes Future Harm with Premature Births ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At least 49 studies have demonstrated a statistically significant increase in premature births (PB) or low birth weight (LBW) risk in women with prior induced abortions (IAs).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney and Byron C. Calhoun, &amp;quot;Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births,&amp;quot; 8 J. Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 46 (Summer 2003). [http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Premature birth tragically causes brain damage, and an array of other severe, lifelong injuries ranging from Cerebral Palsy to blindness, or even death, and few mothers would knowingly increase the risk of that happening.  &amp;quot;There are at least seventeen (17) studies that have found that previous induced abortions increase preterm birth risk” and thereby increase debilitating Cerebral Palsy in children.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney, Letter, 96 European Journal of Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 239 (2001) (citations omitted).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the generally pro-abortion British medical journal, ''The Lancet'', admitted that a procedure often used in abortion increase the risk of premature birth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr, Jay D. Iams, Dr. Robert Romero, Jennifer F. Culhane (PhD), Dr. Robert L. Goldenberg.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet   2008;371:164-175.  While the text of this article conceals the connection with abortion, it cites as support for its claims two studies showing how abortion increases risk of premature birth: the 2004 'Ancel' study of ten (10) European countries and the 2005 'Moreau' study that used French subjects.  Ancel P-Y,  Lelong  N,  Papiernik  E, Saurel-Cubizoilles M-J, Kaminski M.  History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Human Reproduction. 2004;112:734-740.  Moreau C, Kaminski M, Ancel PY et al.  Previous I induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery; Results of the EPIPAGE study.  British J Obstetrics Gynaecology 2005; 112:430-437.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;For example, greater public and professional awareness of evidence that repeated uterine instrumentation--eg, uterine curettage or endometrial biopsy--is associated with increased risk of subsequent preterm birth might over time influence decision-making about the procedure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers Rooney and Calhoun observed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Large studies have reported a doubling of [early premature birth] EPB risk from two prior IAs.  Women who had four or more IAs experienced, on average, nine times the risk of [extremely early premature births] XPB, an increase of 800 percent.  These results suggest that women contemplating IA should be informed of this potential risk to subsequent pregnancies, and that physicians should be aware of the potential liability and possible need for intensified prenatal care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of how abortion increases premature birth includes the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): &amp;quot;[T]he abortion rate for black women has been approximately '''three times''' as high as that for white women (range: 2.6--3.1) since 1991&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Science Daily'''s report on a study by the Washington University School of Medicine: &amp;quot;African-American women are '''three times''' more likely to deliver babies three to 17 weeks prematurely than Caucasian women&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070209074144.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 an article entitled &amp;quot;Preterm Birth: A Continuing Challenge&amp;quot; noted that premature births are abnormally high in the United States, citing a study that observed that a previous abortion is a &amp;quot;risk factor[] for both infertility and preterm birth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1595132/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of premature birth is elevated by the same amount as the abortion rate, as expected if abortion increases the risk of premature birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Health Risks from Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled in 2007 that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 127 S. Ct. 1610, 1634 (2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained. See Brief for Sandra Cano ''et al.'' as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380, pp 22-24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow. See ''ibid.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study published in the Southern Medical Journal observed that there are higher death rates association with women who have abortion, and that these higher death rates persist over time and across socioeconomic boundaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;D.C. Reardon, P.G. Ney, F.J. Scheuren, J.R. Cougle, P.K. Coleman, T. Strahan, &amp;quot;Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women,&amp;quot; 95 Southern Medical Journal 8, at 834-41 (August 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[England]], the &amp;quot;Royal College of Psychiatrists says women should not be allowed to have an abortion until they are counselled on the possible risk to their mental health.&amp;quot;  The medical royal college warned that women who have abortions may be at risk of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3559486.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A New Zealand study found that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=pubmed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=16405636&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The researcher in this study, who was not pro-life, was shaken by the study and had to go to four journals before he could find one who would publish it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The study concludes with the following statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|These findings are inconsistent with the current consensus on the psychological effects of abortion. In particular, in its 2005 statement on abortion, the American Psychological Association concluded that “well-designed studies of psychological responses following abortion have consistently shown that risk of psychological harm is low...the percentage of women who experience clinically relevant distress is small and appears to be no greater than in general samples of women of reproductive age” (American Psychological Association, 2005). This relatively strong conclusion about the absence of harm from abortion was based on a relatively small number of studies which had one or more of the following limitations: a) absence of comprehensive assessment of mental disorders; b) lack of comparison groups; and c) limited statistical controls. Furthermore, the statement appears to disregard the findings of a number of studies that had claimed to show negative effects for abortion (Cougle et al., 2003; Gissler et al., 1996; Reardon &amp;amp; Cougle, 2002). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor David Fergusson, lead author of the New Zealand study stated: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It borders on scandalous that one of the most common surgical procedures performed on young women is so poorly researched and evaluated. If this were Prozac or Vioxx, reports of associated harm would be taken much more seriously with more careful research and monitoring procedures.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060120-091648-6456r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another study published in the OB/GYN Survey detailed long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J.M. Thorp, Jr., K.E. Hartmann, and E.M. Shadigian, &amp;quot;Long-Term Physical &amp;amp; Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence,&amp;quot; 58 OB/GYN Survey 1, at 67-79 (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suicide rates among women who had abortions are six times higher than women who gave birth in the prior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionrecoverycounseling.com/Page8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Overall, deaths from suicide, homicide and accidents were 248% higher after an abortion, as found by a 13-year study in Finland of its entire population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, only one state (Missouri) requires that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mo. Rev. Stat. § 188.080 prohibits an abortion by a physician &amp;quot;who does not have clinical privileges at a hospital which offers obstetrical or gynecological care located within thirty miles of the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the other 49 states, an abortion patient can and often is left without prompt medical care by the treating physician.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the largest abortion providers in the United States, the Metropolitan Medical Associates of New Jersey, was shut down in 2007 by state health officials after one of its botched abortions left a 20-year-old woman in a coma for more than four weeks.  She &amp;quot;became severely ill following the abortion and was transferred to Newark Beth Israel Medical Center where she needed blood transfusions and had her uterus removed. She also suffered a stroke due to the serious blood loss and had one of her lungs collapse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/state2137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The State of New Jersey had shut down the same facility in 1993 also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Optionline]] provides consultants that connects individuals to nearby pregnancy centers that offer the following services: free pregnancy tests and pregnancy information; Information about the risks of abortion and the morning after pill; medical services, including [[STD]] tests; early ultrasounds and pregnancy confirmation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, some of these centers provide information regarding free housing to women who are facing housing concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary alternative to abortion is adoption. [[Liberty Godparent Foundation]] is a [[Christian]] organization focused on improving the lives of unwed pregnant teens, babies and adoptive families by providing two alternatives, The Liberty Godparent Maternity Home and Family Life Services Adoption Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godparent.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=20&amp;amp;Itemid=59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Catholic Social Services]] provides adoption assistance to people of all beliefs in addition to supporting families in need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Industry and How It Targets Minority Communities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:4287336112 d3f9126c99.jpg|right|thumb|325px|According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of [[Planned Parenthood]] abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/muriel215/4287336112/ Flickr, see Creative commons license agreement)]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Each day '''1,786''' African American children are aborted.&amp;quot; According to the [[U.S.]] Census of 2006, African Americans are at 1.96 birth rate which is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;beneath&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the replacement level of 2.1. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html African American Pro-Life Group Holds Protest at NAACP] Christian News Network, July 13, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the continued rate, [[racism]] by abortion will decimate the black population of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to writer George Grant, the author of ''Killing Angel'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During the 1980s when [[Planned Parenthood]] shifted its focus from community-based clinics to school-based clinics, it again targeted inner-city minority neighborhoods...Of the more than 100 school-based clinics that have opened nationwide in the last decade [1980s], none has been at substantially all-white schools....None has been at suburban middle-class schools. All have been at black, minority or ethnic schools.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/special_issues/population/the_negro_project.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planned Parenthood itself reported that its abortions on minorities in 1991 was 42.7% of its total abortions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  However, during that time period, minorities comprised only 19.7% of the U.S. population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Support of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most powerful political action committee (PAC) is EMILY’s List.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emilyslist.org/newsroom/releases/20070201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; EMILY's List contributes money to Democratic candidates who support abortion-on-demand, including forced taxpayer funding of abortion.  EMILY's List candidates also oppose regulations such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing health information to abortion patients;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:requiring that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital in case there is a complication; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing parental notification if the patient is a teenager.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the influence of the abortion industry and EMILY's List, nearly every Democratic presidential candidate and senatorial candidate supports abortion-on-demand.  &amp;quot;EMILY's List, the nation's largest political action committee, continues to be the dominant financial resource for Democratic candidates,&amp;quot; its above-referenced website declares.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no comparably funded organization opposing abortion, because there are no monetary rewards to defending human life.  Instead, candidates and supporters who oppose abortion are motivated by religious and ethical principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Politics, demographics and expected tipping point in 2020 for pro-life cause in America ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Global atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will begin to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:115523-004-FA619CA3.jpg|thumb|right|250px| The perverse and cruel [[atheism|atheist]] [[Marquis de Sade]] advocated induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''Please also see:'' [[History of abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The father of [[medicine]], [[Hippocrates]], expressly prohibited abortion in his ethical [[Oath]] long before [[Christianity]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' article declared concerning the [[atheism|atheist]] and [[sadism|sadist]] [[Marquis de Sade]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1795 the Marquis de Sade published his La Philosophic dans le boudoir, in which he proposed the use of induced abortion for social reasons and as a means of population control. It is from this time that medical and social acceptance of abortion can be dated, although previously the subject had not been discussed in public in modern times. It is suggested that it was largely due to de Sade's writing that induced abortion received the impetus which resulted in its subsequent spread in western society.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Population control]] is based on [[pseudoscience]] and ill founded [[economics|economic]] assumptions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/11/pz_myers_on_abortion040971.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1973 abortion was illegal in most of the United States, though a few states (such as Hawaii and New York) allowed it with restrictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A Timeline of Reproductive Rights'' [http://ecampus.bentley.edu/org/wc/reproductiverights.html The Women's Center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 [[Roe v. Wade]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Online text of [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;amp;court=US&amp;amp;vol=410&amp;amp;page=113 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decision ruled that abortions are lawful under the [[U.S. Constitution]] up to the point at which the fetus becomes able to survive outside the womb, and an accompanying decision issued the same day captioned [[Doe v. Bolton]] essentially legalized abortion in the unlimited discretion of the abortionist at any time during pregnancy, up to and including birth.  Conservatives immediately criticized these decisions as examples of [[Judicial Activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, worldwide there were approximately 115,000 abortions done per day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008, approximately 83% of all abortions were performed in developing countries and 17% occurred in developed countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States may regulate abortion, such as requiring a 24-hour waiting period and parental consent for minors.  Abortion clinics often fail to comply with the health standards of surgical facilities, and States can require compliance (but often do not, resulting in discomfort and harm to the victims of abortion).  Many abortionists lack hospital admitting privileges at nearby facilities, so women having complications must go on their own to emergency rooms to see physicians unfamiliar with what actually happened.  For any other operation the cost of treating complications is included in the cost of the operation, but for abortions the abortion clinics take their money and typically do not pay for the care of complications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more pro-abortion the State regulations are, the larger the number of abortion clinics it will have.  [[Arizona]], though a pro-life State, has a regulatory system that results in twelve abortion clinics operating within its borders.  In contrast, [[Mississippi]] has only one abortion clinic, and [[Missouri]] has only two.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Adolf Hitler and Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information see:'' [[Abortion and Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg|thumb|290px|right|[[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎In 1942 [[Adolf Hitler]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-[[German]] population multiply…We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman's health… It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists and abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barna Group]] found concering [[Atheism and Morality|atheism and morality]] that those who hold to the worldviews of [[atheism]] or [[agnosticism]] in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in [[homosexuality]]/[[bisexuality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American Liberals and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Pew Research Center, American [[liberal]]s are more likely to support pro-abortion views. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/283/pragmatic-americans-liberal-and-conservative-on-social-issues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolutionary Thought and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theory of evolution and liberalism|Liberals are more likely to advocate the evolutionary paradigm than conservatives]].  [[Creation Ministries International]] has written that [[evolution|evolutionary]] thinking has contributed to the [[eugenics|eugenic]] idea of aborting babies with defects and has also contributed to erroneous and immoral justifications for abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/human-life-questions-and-answers-abortion-and-euthanasia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Poll on Reasons for Abortions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AbortionReasons.jpg‎|thumb|400px| Primary reasons women reported for undergoing abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is not a [[conservative]] or [[pro-life]] organization, conducted a poll of more than 1,200 patients undergoing induced abortions at 11 large-scale [[abortion facilities]] in the United States. The women were asked to identify reasons for seeking abortion, singling out the primary reason. An additional 38 women at four sites were interviewed in-depth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf Lawrence Finer, et al., &amp;quot;Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives&amp;quot;, ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health'', September 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The poll omitted any reference to whether the women were able to see an ultrasound of their unborn children before choosing to have an abortion.  For the vast majority of women who have abortion, the reason is a lack of knowledge about the unborn child as displayed by an ultrasound. Because a large part of their campaign funds are bankrolled by the abortion industry, liberals are frequent opponents to laws making available ultrasound treatment for patients not certain of the decision. Some physicians have been reported intimidating and pressuring patients to continue with an abortion after the patient has had a change of heart, either on the operating table or before surgery. One doctor, who was also employed as a spokesman for a prominent liberal pro-abortion think tank, reportedly forced a patient to undergo the procedure in order to fill a quota on insurance claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among reasons provided to the women as part of the poll, the two most common selections were &amp;quot;Having a baby would dramatically change my life&amp;quot; (74%) and &amp;quot;I can't afford a baby now&amp;quot; (73%).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Concerns about their own health were mentioned by only 13% of the women, while only 12% mentioned concerns about the baby's health, though only 3% and 4% respectively gave those as their primary reason for seeking abortion.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, only 14% indicated &amp;quot;[[husband]] or partner wants me to have an abortion&amp;quot; as a reason, down from 24% in a previous survey in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This conflicts with research on women post-abortion, among whom 64% reported feeling pressured by others to abort.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reardon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.theunchoice.com/pdf/FactSheets/ForcedAbortionFactSheet.pdf David Reardon, &amp;quot;Forced Abortion in America&amp;quot;, April 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is often ignored in studies of why women submit to abortions is an ambivalence by some in early pregnancy. Such ambivalence typically resolves when the mother becomes more aware of her unborn child, as displayed by an [[ultrasound]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lederman, ''Psychosocial Adaptation in Pregnancy'', 1984&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Unwanted Pregnancy,&amp;quot; ''Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology'', 1970, Cited in Gardner, ''Abortion: The Personal Dilemma'', 1972&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nichols and Humenick, ''Childbirth Education: Practice, Research, and Theory'', 1988&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statistics on abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As of 2012, it is estimated there has been over 54 million babies murdered by abortion since the Supreme Court handed down its 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. After reaching 25 percent from a high of over 1.6 million in the year 1990, the number of abortions performed annually in the U.S. has leveled off at about 1.2 million infants murdered by abortion a year, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?5511 National Right to Life Factsheet], January 2012, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). The CDC ordinarily develops its annual report on the basis of data received from 52 central health agencies (50 states plus New York City and District of Columbia). AGI obtains its numbers from direct surveys of abortionists conducted every few years.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Privacy laws and likely desire to keep this silent holocaust from raising alarm hinders data collection on abortion. CDC researchers have admitted it probably undercounts the total number of abortions because reporting laws vary from state to state and some abortionists probably do not report or under-report the abortions they perform. Abortions from CA and NH have not been counted by the CDC since 1998, and  reports from other states are also missing for some years.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[]http://www.christianliferesources.com/?5511 National Right to Life Factsheet, January 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Approximately 22% of all U.S. pregnancies ended in abortion (excluding miscarriages).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones RK and Kooistra, K., Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2011, 43(1):41-50.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only about 1 percent each year are attributed to rape and incest. 40% of women ages 15 to 44 have had at least one abortion. 4 out of 10 teen pregnancies end in murder by abortion. Based on the rate of abortion, it was estimated (2000) that 43 percent of American women would  have at least one abortion by the age of 45. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 7 out of 10 U.S. women are sexually active (usually as fornicators) but do not want to become pregnant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Guttmacher Institute, Facts in Brief,Induced Abortion, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Women who have never married and are not cohabiting account for 45% of all abortions. 57% of all women having abortions between 15-44 are in their 20’s. 36% of non-Hispanic women are abortions were white, 30% are non-Hispanic black, and 25% are hispanic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones RK, Finer LB and Singh S, Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients, 2008, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 37% of women killing babies by abortion were Protestant, (include those who identified as “Christian” but who did not specify a denomination) while 28% were Catholic, and 20% identified themselves as born-again, evangelical, charismatic or fundamentalist (in 2000, some 13% of abortion patients aged 18 and older identified as born-again or evangelical before the question was reworded slightly for the 2008 survey), while 27% gave no religious affiliation, increasing from 22% in 2000. (Protestants, were underrepresented among those committing abortion (In proportion to the total number of Protestants nationwide), and the relative abortion rate for this group was lower than the rate for all women.) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/US-Abortion-Patients.pdf,  Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients], 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Although 66% of women having abortions had some type of health insurance, 57% paid for their abortion out of pocket. Among women with private health insurance, 63% paid out of pocket.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/US-Abortion-Patients.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scientist on abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Vladimir Krčméry, Rector of the University of St.Elizabeth and the holder of two honorary doctorates made following public claim regarding abostion:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|I consider abortion for being a deliberate killing of an unborn child who cannot defend itself, and therefore it is medically and ethically unjustifiable and absurd. My opinion is not based on any religious reasons, but on the civil and scientific ones. It is the opinion of a member of the Royal College of physicians, a member of the American College of physicians and a candidate for the Nobel Prize.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Vladimír Krčméry&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Stanovisko-Krcmery (public claim by Krcmery)&lt;br /&gt;
|publisher=CBR Europe&lt;br /&gt;
|location=Slovakia&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://web.pravonazivot.sk/stanovisko-krcmery/&lt;br /&gt;
|language=Slovak&lt;br /&gt;
|access date=06.05.2012&lt;br /&gt;
|quote=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ultrasound images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/frames.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/drakelelane/388759116/&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/13_weeks.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/ultrasound_3d.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/triple_jump.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Pro-life Project|Conservapedia Pro-life Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Abortion Directory of abortion related articles]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.investigatemagazine.com/mar3abrt.htm Abortion and breast cancer in New Zealand]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion genocide]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion procedures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion rates by US state]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortionist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Abortion|Articles about '''Abortion''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Separate Life|Essay on abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fetus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harvard abortion study]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion breast cancer studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexual activists and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/abrpt/2006abrpt.pdf Minnesota official abortion statistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Right to Life Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partial birth abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sanctity of life]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Silent scream]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Taxpayer-funded abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.abortionfacts.com/ Abortion Facts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.carm.org/abortion.htm Abortion] by [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ProLifeOnCampus.com/ Pro Life on Campus]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/abortion/ What Liberals Say - Category: Abortion], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Abortion}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=UFO&amp;diff=987609</id>
		<title>UFO</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=UFO&amp;diff=987609"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T18:23:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The word 'UFO' stands for 'Unidentified Flying Object', but has come in general usage to mean a spaceship from outer space, piloted by [[aliens]], or non-human [[Extraterrestrial life|extraterrestrials]]. UFOs are often believed to be in the shape of flying saucers, but many other shapes have been reported, such as cigar shapes and triangles. The first modern sighting was made in 1947 by US pilot Kevin Arnold. Arnold's description of &amp;quot;flying saucers&amp;quot; entered the public imagination. That summer a flying saucer was alleged to have crashed at a town called [[Roswell]], complete with miniature humanoid occupants.  “Lights in the sky” however have been observed for centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many alleged sightings have been made, with about 150 sightings reported every day.  90 to 95 percent of these can be explained as natural or man-made phenomena.  The remaining 5 to 10 percent (8 to 15 reported sightings every day) cannot. Many people report abduction experiences as well. However, these individuals are often influenced by the media's portrayal of aliens in such shows as [[Star Trek]], and may base their reconstructed memories on these mental images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many alternative explanations for the abduction phenomena have been put forward by a number of people. Among the most prominent of these is &amp;quot;sleep paralysis,&amp;quot; a sleep-related disorder which can induce sensations very similar to those reported in abductions, posited by [[Carl Sagan]], well-known for his thoughts on [[extraterrestrial life]]. Many conservative Christians believe that UFOs can be explained by 'false messiahs and false prophecies' as predicted to come by Christ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanations given for UFO sightings and belief ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two major hypotheses attempting to explain UFOs are the Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis (ETH) which posits that UFOs contain beings from elsewhere in space, and the Inter-Dimensional Hypothesis (IDH) which posits that the “visitors” are not part of our physical universe but are from another dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lynn Cato, senior bibliographer for the library of Congress, created a 1600 entry on [[UFO]] bibliography for the [[United States Air Force]] Office of Scientific Research. After a two year investigation, in which she reviewed thousands of documents, Catoe stated:&amp;lt;ref name=Reason&amp;gt;Authors unknown. &amp;quot;[http://www.letusreason.org/NAM25.htm A UFO 2nd Coming].&amp;quot; Let Us Reason Ministries, 2007. Retrieved November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Gleghorn&amp;gt;Gleghorn, Michael. &amp;quot;[http://www.probe.org/cults-and-world-religions/cults-and-world-religions/ufos-and-alien-beings.html UFO's and Alien Beings].&amp;quot; Probe Ministries. Retrieved November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; {{Cquote|A large part of the available UFO literature...deals with subjects like mental telepathy, automatic writing and invisible entities...poltergeist manifestations and 'possession'....Many of the UFO reports now being published in the popular press recount alleged incidents that are strikingly similar to demonic possession and psychic phenomenon which have long been known to [[Theology|theologians]] and parapsychologists.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent UFO researcher John Keel concurred. After surveying the literature on [[demonology]] Keel stated,&amp;lt;ref name=Gleghorn/&amp;gt;{{Cquote|The manifestations and occurrences described in this imposing literature are similar if not entirely identical to the UFO phenomenon itself.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gary Bates of [[Creation Ministries International]] also makes the case that UFO’s and alien visitors are in fact demonic visitations.  He states that ETH is invalidated due to our knowledge of our own solar system and the physical diffulties of interstellar travel.  He applies the IDH to include the supernatural, and thus says that the IDH fits the position that &amp;quot;visitors&amp;quot; are demonic.  He shows from abduction and encounter reports that the &amp;quot;visitors&amp;quot; are known to lie.  They have claimed to be from various planets in our own solar system; only abandoning such claims as scientific research and observation show the claims to be deceitful.  He has also drawn parallels with the &amp;quot;visitors&amp;quot; activities and the activities of demons known from scripture and history.  This activity includes regularly attacking scripture.  Bates relates some of the names given by &amp;quot;visitors&amp;quot; and shows the similarity to names of false gods in the Old Testament and fallen angels in the aprochyphal book of Enoch.  Bates also reports that Christians do not experience &amp;quot;alien abductions&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alienintrusion.com| Alien Intrusion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Astronomy|Astronomer]] Dr. [[Hugh Ross]] states that ninety-nine percent of what people have told him were UFOs, experienced astronomers can identify as a [[star]], cluster, or other object in the night sky. The 1 percent of sightings, which he calls residual UFOs, have attracted his attention. &amp;lt;ref name=Blade&amp;gt;Tarjanyi, Judy. &amp;quot;[http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?SearchID=73122266402007&amp;amp;Avis=TO&amp;amp;Dato=20030104&amp;amp;Kategori=NEWS10&amp;amp;Lopenr=101040052&amp;amp;Ref=AR Astronomer links UFOs to Occultism].&amp;quot; ''The Toledo Blade'', January 4, 2003. Retrieved November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to Dr. Ross very few astronomers have seen residual UFOs.&amp;lt;ref name=Blade/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following newspaper excerpt&amp;lt;ref name=Blade/&amp;gt; summarizes Dr. Ross's findings:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1969, however, Dr. Ross met two astronomers who were having regular UFO encounters. Both also happened to be involved in occult activity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon investigation, Dr. Ross consistently found a connection between occult involvement and residual UFO encounters. For example, he said, countries with a high degree of occult activity such as Russia during the Soviet era, France, and certain parts of Brazil also had high percentages of UFO encounters. During Russia?s Soviet period when every expression of religion except occult activity had been outlawed, he said, “Russians were seeing UFOs at five to eight times the rate Americans were.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] who reject naturalistic explanations of life such as the [[theory of evolution]] argue that difficult to explain UFOs are spiritual in nature and not amenable to naturalistic explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4217643/k.5903/UFOs_and_Alien_Beings.htm UFOs and Alien Beings]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.letusreason.org/NAM25.htm A UFO 2nd coming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/lifemars.html Are We Alone in the Universe?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.creation.com/content/view/2995/ Alien Life/UFO Questions and Answers UFO Questions and Answers]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/alien.asp Alien Life/UFO Questions and Answers UFO Questions and Answers]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gary Bates of [[Creation Ministries International]] wrote a book entitled ''Alien Intrusion'' which gives a biblical Christian perspective on the unscientific notions of extraterrestial life and UFUlogy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alienintrusion.com/main.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public speculation on ET's and UFO's ==&lt;br /&gt;
Public discussion of the subject is mostly confined to the margins, but several scientists and celebrities have expressed opinions, as have a few politicians.&lt;br /&gt;
Former [[President of the United States]] [[Jimmy Carter]] has openly speculated on the existence of extraterrestrial nation-states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carter claims to have witnessed an unidentified flying object in 1969; he remains the only U.S. President to have formally reported a [[UFO]]. He filed a report with the International UFO Bureau in [[Oklahoma City]] after a request from that organization.[http://www.presidentialufo.com/carter_ufo_report.htm]  See [[Jimmy Carter]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More recently, [[United States House of Representatives|US Representative]] and Presidential candidate [[Dennis Kucinich]] [[Democratic Party|D]]-[[Ohio|OH]]) was asked in a primary debate whether he had, as earlier alleged, seen a UFO--and answered in the affirmative.&amp;lt;ref name=Kucinich&amp;gt;User &amp;quot;nikbaron&amp;quot;. [http://youtube.com/watch?v=gSRWRbuMqyc Representative Dennis Kucinich UFO].&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;http://youtube.com&amp;gt;,'' posted October 31, 2007. Retrieved November 17, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Feagler&amp;gt;Feagler, Dick. &amp;quot;[http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/stories/index.ssf?/base/opinion-0/1193474407233790.xml&amp;amp;coll=2&amp;amp;thispage=1 So Dennis Kucinich saw a UFO; what's the big deal]?&amp;quot; ''The Plain Dealer'' (Cleveland), October 28, 2007. Retrieved November 17, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even more recently, [[Project Apollo]] [[Astronaut]] Edgar Mitchell, who flew as Lunar Module Pilot for [[Apollo 14]], declared that [[NASA]] has known for sixty years (as of July 24, 2008) that extraterrestrial scouts have contacted various governments of Earth, yet no government has ever dared admit this. NASA does not stand by Astronaut Mitchell's statements.&amp;lt;ref name=Mitchell&amp;gt;Authors unknown. &amp;quot;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1037471/Apollo-14-astronaut-claims-aliens-HAVE-contact--covered-60-years.html Apollo 14 astronaut claims aliens HAVE made contact - but it has been covered up for 60 years].&amp;quot; ''The Daily Mail'' ([[London]], [[England]], [[UK]]), July 24, 2008. Accessed July 24, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discussion of the religious implications of extraterrestrial life has been intermittent.  The subject is sometimes are referred to as [[Exotheology]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===UFO sightings in the Bible===&lt;br /&gt;
It has been claimed&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.uforc.com/research121404/uforc_research-FECarlisle_120404.html Solving the Riddle of Ezekiel's Wheels: The Chariots from the Cherubim/The Chariots of God]; Carlisle, Frank E. UFO Research Centre&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that there is a description of a UFO visitation in the Old Testament&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ezekiel 1:5-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. However, this does not have credible support in theological study.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve_System&amp;diff=987608</id>
		<title>Federal Reserve System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve_System&amp;diff=987608"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T18:20:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: /* Criticism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Federal Reserve.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, DC.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Federal Reserve''' (also known as '''The Fed''') is a central banking system that controls the monetary system of the [[United States]]. &lt;br /&gt;
It was established by the Federal Reserve Act, which was passed by Congress and signed into law by [[President]] [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1913.  &amp;quot;... the Board is a federal government agency consisting of seven members appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.ny.frb.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed46.html Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System] - Fedpoints -  Federal Reserve Bank of New York&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Federal Reserve is a system of private banks, twelve of which are designated as Federal Reserve Banks and have some features of public federal agencies. The Federal Reserve is headed by a Board of Governors and a Chairman. The current Chairman is [[Ben Bernanke]], a Republican appointed by President [[George W. Bush]]; his predecessor was [[Alan Greenspan]], a Republican appointed by President [[Ronald Reagan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main jobs of the Federal Reserve is to control [[inflation]] by adjusting the supply of money in the economy, while at the same time maintain the stability of the financial system and promote economic growth. This is done by buying and selling government bonds in order to influence banks' cash supply (called &amp;quot;open market operations&amp;quot;), setting the amount of money that banks must keep in reserve, and setting the interest rates for money it lends to banks (the Fed's lending facility is called the &amp;quot;discount window&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_3.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These three major operations are the basis of [[monetary policy]], and are performed by the Fed to target a specific [[Federal Funds Rate]] that it believes will be low enough to ensure available credit and stimulate the economy, but high enough to prevent inflation. The Fed also has the responsibility of supervising and regulating banking institutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/mission/default.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 the Fed became a major player in many new ways, taking over several major banks (ostensibly to prevent total economic collapse) and making trillions of dollars in guarantees. See [[Financial Crisis of 2008]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal Reserve banks are located in [[Boston]], [[New York]], [[Philadelphia]], [[Cleveland]], [[Richmond]], [[Atlanta]], [[Chicago]], [[Kansas City]], [[St. Louis]], [[Minneapolis]], [[Dallas]], and [[San Francisco]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Libertarian]]s, such as [[Ron Paul]], and many conservatives want to abolish the Federal Reserve. For 30 years Ron Paul has called for the secretive Federal Reserve bank to be audited.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ronpaul.com/congress/legislation/111th-congress-200910/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/ Audit the Federal Reserve]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ron Paul's website declares &amp;quot;Since the Fed’s creation in 1913 the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value, and by recklessly inflating the money supply the Fed continues to distort interest rates and intentionally erodes the value of the dollar.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ronpaul.com/congress/legislation/111th-congress-200910/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/ Audit the Federal Reserve]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That the dollar's value dropped as a natural result of inflation, and that salaries rose with it so that the quality of life of an American citizen rose to heights inconceivable to someone in 1910, has not occurred to Ron Paul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, conservatives are not united in their criticism: the prominent conservative commentator [[Vox Day]], a respected member of [[Mensa]], describes himself as a &amp;quot;loyal Federal Reserve supporter&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voxday.blogspot.com Vox Day's blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Effects of the Fed's Monetary Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
The Fed made the [[Great Depression]] much, much worse by utterly failing in its primary responsibility. It simply did nothing, as hundreds and thousands of banks failed (see [[bank run]]). What it was supposed to do was lend them enough money to keep going!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Friedman and Schwartz argued that all this was due to the Fed’s failure to carry out its assigned role as the lender of last resort. Rather than providing liquidity through loans, the Fed just watched as banks dropped like flies, seemingly oblivious to the effect this would have on the money supply. [http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-great-depression-according-to-milton-friedman/ The Great Depression According to Milton Friedman]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent Literature==&lt;br /&gt;
* Epstein, Lita &amp;amp; Martin, Preston (2003). ''The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Federal Reserve''. ISBN 0-02-864323-2. [http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Federal-Reserve/dp/0028643232/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812900&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greenspan, Alan. '' The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World'' (2007), memoirs covering his chairmanship 1987-2006 [http://www.amazon.com/Age-Turbulence-Adventures-New-World/dp/1594201315/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812097&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] 	&lt;br /&gt;
* Greider, William, ''Secrets of the Temple''. (1987). ISBN 0-671-67556-7; nontechnical book explaining the structures, functions, and history of the Federal Reserve, focusing specifically on the tenure of [[Paul Volcker]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hafer, R. W.  ''The Federal Reserve System: An Encyclopedia''. (2005). 451 pp, 280 entries; ISBN 4-313-32839-0.&lt;br /&gt;
* Meyer, Lawrence H. ''A Term at the Fed: An Insider's View''. (2004) ISBN 0-06-054270-5; focuses on the period from 1996 to 2002, emphasizing Alan Greenspan's chairmanship during the Asian financial crisis, the stock market boom and the [[9-11 Attacks]] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Treaster, Joseph B. ''Paul Volcker: The Making of a Financial Legend'' (2004), chairman 1979-87 [http://www.questia.com/read/106757179?title=Paul%20Volcker%3a%20%20The%20Making%20of%20a%20Financial%20Legend online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Tuccille, Jerome. ''Alan Shrugged: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan, the World's Most Powerful Banker'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/read/106268651?title=Alan%20Shrugged%3a%20%20The%20Life%20and%20Times%20of%20Alan%20Greenspan%2c%20the%20World's%20Most%20Powerful%20Banker online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wells, Donald R. ''The Federal Reserve System: A History'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Woodward, Bob. ''Maestro: Greenspan's Fed and the American Boom'' (2000) study of Greenspan in 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Literature==&lt;br /&gt;
* Broz, J. Lawrence. ''The International Origins of the Federal Reserve System''  (1997). [http://www.questia.com/read/103752688?title=The%20International%20Origins%20of%20the%20Federal%20Reserve%20System online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Carosso, Vincent P. &amp;quot;The Wall Street Trust from Pujo through Medina&amp;quot;, ''Business History Review'' (1973) 47:421-37&lt;br /&gt;
* Chandler, Lester V. ''American Monetary Policy, 1928-41.'' (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
* Epstein, Gerald and Thomas Ferguson. &amp;quot;Monetary Policy, Loan Liquidation and Industrial Conflict: Federal Reserve System Open Market Operations in 1932.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History'' 44 (December 1984): 957-84.  in JSTOR&lt;br /&gt;
* Friedman, Milton,  and Anna Jacobson Schwartz. ''A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960'' (1963)&lt;br /&gt;
* Hetzel, Robert L. ''The Monetary Policy of the Federal Reserve: A History'' (2008) from 1913 to 2007;  [http://www.amazon.com/Monetary-Policy-Federal-Reserve-Macroeconomic/dp/0521881323/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812672&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kubik, Paul J. , &amp;quot;Federal Reserve Policy during the Great Depression: The Impact of Interwar Attitudes regarding Consumption and Consumer Credit.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic Issues'' . 30#3. 1996. pp 829+. &lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur. ''Wilson: The New Freedom'' (1956) pp 199-240.&lt;br /&gt;
* Livingston, James. ''Origins of the Federal Reserve System: Money, Class, and Corporate Capitalism, 1890-1913'' (1986), Marxist approach to 1913 policy&lt;br /&gt;
* Mayhew, Anne. &amp;quot;Ideology and the Great Depression: Monetary History Rewritten.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic Issues'' 17 (June 1983): 353-60. &lt;br /&gt;
* Meltzer, Allan H. ''A History of the Federal Reserve, Volume 1: 1913-1951'' (2004) the standard scholarly history [http://www.amazon.com/History-Federal-Reserve-1913-1951/dp/0226520005/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1212812672&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Roberts, Priscilla.  &amp;quot;'Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?' The Federal Reserve System's Founding Fathers and Allied Finances in the First World War&amp;quot;, ''Business History Review'' (1998) 72: 585-603&lt;br /&gt;
* Romer, Christina D. and David H. Romer. ''Choosing the Federal Reserve Chair: Lessons from History''. ''The Journal of Economic Perspectives,'' Vol. 18, No. 1. (2004), pp. 129-162. ([http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0895-3309%282004%2918%3A1%3C129%3ACTFRCL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I jstor])&lt;br /&gt;
* Schull, Bernard. &amp;quot;The Fourth Branch: The Federal Reserve's Unlikely Rise to Power and Influence&amp;quot; (2005) ISBN 1-56720-624-7  [http://www.questia.com/read/113203394?title=The%20Fourth%20Branch%3a%20%20The%20Federal%20Reserve's%20Unlikely%20Rise%20to%20Power%20and%20Influence online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Steindl, Frank G. ''Monetary Interpretations of the Great Depression.'' (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
* West, Robert Craig. ''Banking Reform and the Federal Reserve, 1863-1923'' (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wicker, Elmus R. &amp;quot;A Reconsideration of Federal Reserve Policy during the 1920-1921 Depression&amp;quot;, ''Journal of Economic History'' (1966) 26: 223-238, in JSTOR&lt;br /&gt;
* Wicker, Elmus. ''Federal Reserve Monetary Policy, 1917-33.'' (1966). &lt;br /&gt;
* Wells, Donald R. ''The Federal Reserve System: A History'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wicker, Elmus. ''The Great Debate on Banking Reform: Nelson Aldrich and the Origins of the Fed'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
* Wood, John H. ''A History of Central Banking in Great Britain and the United States'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wueschner; Silvano A. ''Charting Twentieth-Century Monetary Policy: Herbert Hoover and Benjamin Strong, 1917-1927''  (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References== &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.federalreserve.gov/ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Finance]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Economic History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Econometrics&amp;diff=987607</id>
		<title>Econometrics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Econometrics&amp;diff=987607"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T18:16:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Econometrics''' is a field of economics that uses [[statistics]] to analyze [[economics|economic]] data for patterns. It is frequently used by liberal influences in economic think tanks, like the [[Brookings Institution]], to justify increased government deficit spending in order to weaken America's currency advantage in world trade. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/2003/05/18705/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Econometrics&amp;diff=987606</id>
		<title>Econometrics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Econometrics&amp;diff=987606"/>
		<updated>2012-06-19T18:16:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JeffBron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Econometrics''' is a field of economics that uses [[statistics]] to analyze [[economics|economic]] data for patterns. It is frequently used by liberal influences in economic think tanks, like the [[Brookings Institution]], to justify increased government deficit spending in order to weaken America's currency advantage in world trade. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/2003/05/18705/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/referencse&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JeffBron</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>