<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JenDMer</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JenDMer"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JenDMer"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T23:16:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:PhilipN&amp;diff=951790</id>
		<title>User talk:PhilipN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:PhilipN&amp;diff=951790"/>
		<updated>2012-01-06T21:13:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JenDMer: /* Letting you off the hook! */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:46, 17 November 2011 (EST)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==City template==&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely on the right track.  Suggestions: add &amp;quot;province&amp;quot; (i.e for Canadian cities); change &amp;quot;mayor&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;current mayor&amp;quot;; add &amp;quot;charter&amp;quot; for date the city was first given a charter.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:20, 27 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Done ! There are many more info we could provide for a city but I think we should keep to the essential. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:29, 27 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Song titles VS album titles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typically, following most style guides, song titles go &amp;quot;in quotation marks,&amp;quot; album titles ''in italics.'' [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 16:46, 27 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi ScottDG, which articles are you referring to ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:47, 27 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Dire Straits]], for one. [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 17:05, 27 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It is true. I did not write this article, I just added the infobox but I will be careful about this now. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:10, 27 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Image requests==&lt;br /&gt;
A slight change from what you requested.  I will look on Flickr for images released for free use via Creative Commons...so far I uploaded two for you.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:42, 28 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks a lot, I will try to be more careful about which images I choose in the future. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:44, 28 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations, your account has been promoted to blocking privileges, and also &amp;quot;rollback&amp;quot; privileges to make it easier to revert vandalism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:19, 29 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks Andy, I will try to use it wisely. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 18:23, 29 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Letting you off the hook! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, it's Bob Servant here. Your website is so sad and pathetic - we're not going to mention you in our new book. Sorry guys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BobGS|BobGS]] 19:37, 1 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmmm. Philip, have a look at [http://bobservant.com/about.html this].--[[User:GFitz|GFitz]] 19:44, 1 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Great catch, good job blocking him, I had my suspicions but I let him a chance.--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:11, 1 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alright. For that, I will refrain from vandalizing. The thing I am trying to achieve is the realization that until people decide to work together instead of warring, that nothing is truly going to be accomplished. However, this is a large goal, I admit. [[User:Mangoluv|Mangoluv]] 16:16, 2 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good luck with that !--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:18, 2 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JenDMer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=951787</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=951787"/>
		<updated>2012-01-06T21:11:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JenDMer: /* Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry… */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JenDMer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:PhilipN&amp;diff=951785</id>
		<title>User:PhilipN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:PhilipN&amp;diff=951785"/>
		<updated>2012-01-06T21:11:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JenDMer: /* My favorite topics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{userboxtop|Philip N.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox|white|white|1000+|This user has made over 1000 edits to Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox|#DC143C|white|12|This user has blocked 12 vandals}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Vandalized|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Christian2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Youngearth}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User KnowsNoEvo}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User GunControLovedByTotalitarians}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{userboxbottom}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About me==&lt;br /&gt;
My name is Philip. I am a married self-made businessman who started a small website agency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My favorite topics==&lt;br /&gt;
While I try to keep an eye on any topics, my favorite topics are:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Geography]] &amp;amp; [[Geopolitics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Music]], and especially [[Rock]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JenDMer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=951784</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=951784"/>
		<updated>2012-01-06T21:09:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JenDMer: /* Archive 2008 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JenDMer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=951779</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=951779"/>
		<updated>2012-01-06T21:04:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JenDMer: /* Archive 2008 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May the gods bless your ignorance, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your servant,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JsEsNsSeEsN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JenDMer</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>