https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Jerome 2026-09-23T17:14:44Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Covenant&diff=33919 2007-03-14T06:17:23Z

<p>Jerome: Jesus's &quot;The Way&quot; message</p> <hr /> <div>A covenant is a promise or oath. The word &quot;covenant&quot; is used hundreds of times in some English translations of the Bible to describe God's promises to his people.<br /> <br /> [[Jesus]] proclamed the [[New Covenant]] which replaced his Jewish teachings of the [[Old Testament]] with his message which he termed [[The Way]].</div>

Jerome https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Jerome&diff=33862 2007-03-14T05:35:35Z

<p>Jerome: </p> <hr /> <div>My hero is the fourth century scholar who translated the Hebrew old testament and Greek new testiment into what was known as the Vulgate bible.</div>

Jerome https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Mexico_(country)&diff=33858 2007-03-14T05:33:19Z

<p>Jerome: </p> <hr /> <div>Why is this disambiguated from simply Mexico? [[User:Jerome|Jerome]] 01:33, 14 March 2007 (EDT)</div>

Jerome https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Luke&diff=33849 2007-03-14T05:24:36Z

<p>Jerome: </p> <hr /> <div>This article claims that the author of the Gospel of John witnessed Jesus. So either the author of Luke or John is a liar re: Passover. I prefer to believe that Luke is true and John is 100 years after the fact with a vivid imagination.</div>

Jerome https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Noah%27s_Ark&diff=33840 2007-03-14T05:18:44Z

<p>Jerome: Polar Bears?</p> <hr /> <div>&quot;asswaged&quot;?<br /> :Yes. ''Asswaged'' is the proper Biblical spelling of the modern ''assuaged'', as it is in the original authorized English translation of the Holy Scriptures. Many modern &quot;King James&quot; Bibles actually alter the text, which can lead to confusion and errant exegesis (see [http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/king_james_glossary.htm &quot;King James Glossary&quot;] &amp; [http://www.biblebelievers.com/believers-org/counterfeit-kjv.html &quot;Believers Beware of Counterfeit King James Bibles&quot;] for other spelling alterations).<br /> <br /> :: Um, how can changing the spelling in a translation result in exegetic problems? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 14:57, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :King James-onlyism is not an official position of Conservapedia last I checked. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:01, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> :: Oh my, was that the logic behind the user's comment. *checks link*. Yep, wow. I don't know what to say to that. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 15:08, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> :: In fact, looking at that website in detail it argues for among other things the old-style British spelling of &quot;Savior&quot; as &quot;Saviour&quot; so per Conservapedias rules about British and American English if anything Conservapedia is anti-KJV onlyism. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 15:13, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :::By that reasoning, any edition claiming to be the King James Version that omits the Apocrypha is counterfeit. What do they have to say about the Apocrypha? Is it OK to omit them? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:13, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :::(Sigh) Why do I even ask? Yes, they have [http://www.biblebelievers.com/Gipp/answer/gipp_answer_34.html a pat answer]. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:13, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> :::: Well at least they are aware that the apocrpha was in the original KJV. Many KJVist don't even know that. I can spot at least 4 factual errors in that piece though (ignoring things that aren't factual errors per se but just very odd language choice like the &quot;Jewish Church&quot;). What fun. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> ::::: Conservapedia is obviously '''not''' King-James-only, since the article on the [[Ark of the Covenant]] says it was made of &quot;acacia&quot; wood. :-) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:37, 10 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> <br /> == Dates ==<br /> <br /> Excuse me but where the heck are the Roman calendar dates coming from? There is no way that that was the calendrical system in use. Most likely the system refferred to is a lunar calendar or lunar-solar calendar like that that Jews currently use. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 14:59, 7 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> == Post-Diluvian Content ==<br /> <br /> I am unsure that the explanation of the dispersal of animals from after they exited the Ark is within the scope of this article as it isn't really ''about'' the Ark itself. I think instead a separate article on the Post-Diluvian Diasporas should be created and linked to from here. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 08:34, 10 March 2007 (EST)<br /> : I agree. Started article [[Post-Diluvian Diasporas]]--[[User:AustinM|AustinM]] 11:23, 10 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> == Polar Bears? ==<br /> <br /> Were polar species such as [[Polar Bear]]s and [[Penguin]]s to be found on the ark? I'm guessing they would not be friendly with their cell-mates for 40 days: Feeding regiments must have been tricky, but above all the middle-eastern climate must have been damaging to their well-being.</div>

Jerome