<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jesuz4Lif</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jesuz4Lif"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Jesuz4Lif"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T00:17:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_logic&amp;diff=1181923</id>
		<title>Homosexual logic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_logic&amp;diff=1181923"/>
		<updated>2015-11-14T05:18:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jesuz4Lif: Made some editions to increase accuracy.  May still have some untrustworthy bias by extremist conservatives trying to destroy the trustworthiness of our reasonably conservative site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Homosexual logic''' is a collection of coherent arguments justifying the persuit of [[Homosexual Agenda|equal rights for homosexuals]].  Like [[liberal logic]] generally, homosexual logic relies on statements that very logical and almost entirely devoid of [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]].  Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
#Demonstrating how all people should have [[Equal Protection Clause|equal protection]] under the law, and refuting the claim that giving homosexuals rights somehow installs them with [[special rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Showing how homosexuality is not a choice, and refuting ridiculous claims to the contrary.&lt;br /&gt;
#Defeating [[slippery slope]] arguments in which bigoted conservatives argue that acceptance of homosexuality will lead to a series of bad results that actually will not follow or that have nothing to do with homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
#Calling out how homophobes [[Cafeteria Christianity|cherry-pick]] those parts of the [[Bible]] that suit their purposes, while the same bigots argue that any parts of Scripture--such as [http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Genocide/ genocide by Jews and Christians]--that are inconvenient to them [[Christianity|need to be &amp;quot;interpreted&amp;quot; correctly]] or were &amp;quot;[[Mosaic Law|nailed to the Cross]],&amp;quot; or that just by mentioning them, you are &amp;quot;twisting&amp;quot; them in some unspecified way.&lt;br /&gt;
#Noting how social conservatives assume that any book with an anti-homosexual slant must be true, and how such people would do better to critically assess whether that book is credible.&lt;br /&gt;
#Appealing to [[public opinion]] and the growing acceptance of homosexuality--especially among the younger generations, and disproving conservative claims that Americans want homosexuals to shut up.&lt;br /&gt;
#Demanding that the conservative interpretation (or misinterpretation) of the Bible be exposed and rejected, and demonstrating how conservative attempts to oppress homosexuals based on Christian principles violates the [[establishment clause]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Demonstrating how conservatives support [[limited government]], but only when it suits them, while supporting government oppression of anyone they don't like.&lt;br /&gt;
#Demonstrating a long history of [[persecution]], and disproving the ridiculous claims that a democratic republic of an overwhelmingly Christian population cannot possibly experience [[Christian persecution]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jesuz4Lif</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>