<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Johnthurloe</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Johnthurloe"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Johnthurloe"/>
	<updated>2026-10-19T21:41:21Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Freemasonry&amp;diff=546214</id>
		<title>Talk:Freemasonry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Freemasonry&amp;diff=546214"/>
		<updated>2008-10-31T16:49:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Johnthurloe: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Frankly, most of this info is bunk.  It goes on weird, irrelevant tangents, and is biased.--[[User:Adon|Adon]] 03:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps at one point but as it stands now it is quite concise and to the point, and might I add the most fair and informative article I've seen on Freemasonry on the internet in a long time.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 19:36, 19 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hmm no, I've changed my mind. It's rather skimpy to be certain.[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 20:28, 24 August 2008 (EDT)  Still though it's nice to see it not being trashed.&lt;br /&gt;
no mention is made in this article that freemasonry is regarded as an anti-christian organisation. john thurloe 31 10 08&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Johnthurloe</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>