<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jonecc</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jonecc"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Jonecc"/>
	<updated>2026-11-10T17:20:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circumference&amp;diff=21881</id>
		<title>Circumference</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circumference&amp;diff=21881"/>
		<updated>2007-03-09T13:28:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonecc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The distance around a circle, equal to 3.1416 times the circle's diameter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Christian commentators have questioned this, on Biblical grounds. In 1 Kings 7:23-26 and 2 Chronicles 4:2-5, the Bible describes how Solomon built the house of the Lord. In both passages, it says that he made a molten sea, round all about, ten cubits across and thirty cubits around. By this reasoning, it is hard to see how the secular value of pi can be maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With General Science''. Anderson: Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonecc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circumference&amp;diff=21880</id>
		<title>Circumference</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circumference&amp;diff=21880"/>
		<updated>2007-03-09T13:27:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonecc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The distance around a circle, equal to 3.1416 times the circle's diameter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Christian commentators have questioned this, on Biblical grounds. In 1 Kings 7:23-26 and 2 Chronicles 4:2-5, the Bible describes how Solomon built the house of the Lord. In both passages, it says that he made a molten sea, round all about, ten cubits across and thirty cubits around. By this reasoning, it is hard to see how the secular value of pi can be maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With General Science''. Anderson: Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonecc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circumference&amp;diff=21879</id>
		<title>Circumference</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circumference&amp;diff=21879"/>
		<updated>2007-03-09T13:26:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonecc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The distance around a circle, equal to 3.1416 times the circle's diameter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With General Science''. Anderson: Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Christian commentators have questioned this, on Biblical grounds. In 1 Kings 7:23-26 and 2 Chronicles 4:2-5, the Bible describes how Solomon built the house of the Lord. In both passages, it says that he made a molten sea, round all about, ten cubits across and thirty cubits around. By this reasoning, it is hard to see how the secular value of pi can be maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonecc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Baraminology&amp;diff=20093</id>
		<title>Baraminology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Baraminology&amp;diff=20093"/>
		<updated>2007-03-08T01:33:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonecc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Baraminology''' is the study of '''baramins''', also known by the Biblical term '''kinds'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A baramin is a lineage of earthly [[life]] which is believed by creationists to be created by [[God]] during the [[Creation Week]], and corresponds in some functional aspects to the secular concept of [[species]]. However, unlike species concepts that are based on Darwinian thinking, the baraminic barrier is inviolable, as baramins do not change into other baramins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''baramin'' was coined in 1941 by [[Frank Marsh]] from the [[Hebrew]] words ''bara'' (create) and ''min'' (kind).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was resurrected in 1990 by [[Kurt Wise]] for use as the unit of creation in his discontinuous biosystematical system. From this came the term ''baraminology''. That same year at the Second International Conference on [[Creationism]] in [[Pittsburgh]], [[Walter ReMine]] introduced additional sub-terms to help clarify baraminological discourse: ''holobaramin'', ''monobaramin'', ''apobaramin'', and ''polybaramin''.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frair&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-crs/baraminology.html &amp;quot;Baraminology -- Classification of Created Organisms&amp;quot;], by Wayne Frair, Ph.D, Originally published in ''CRS Quarterly'', Vol. 37, Num. 2, Sept. 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Baraminological Terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Holobaramin''': A Holobaramin is a grouping that contains all organisms related by descent, not excluding any. For example, Humans are a holobaramin, but a group containing only [[Caucasian | Caucasians]] and [[Negro | Negroes]] is not a holobaramin since it excludes [[Mongoloid | Mongoloids]] and other races. Another example would be [[dog | Dogs]], which is a holobaramin since [[wolf | wolves]], [[coyote | coyotes]], domesticated dogs and other [[canid | canids]] are all descended from two individuals taken aboard the [[Noah's Ark | Ark]], and there are no other creatures that are genetically continuous with them. This term is synonymous with the use of &amp;quot;baramin&amp;quot; above and is the primary term in baraminology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Monobaramin''': A monobaramin is an ''ad hoc'' group of organisms who share common descent. Caucasians and Negros are a monobaramin, as are any group of specific members of a holobaramin such as wolves, poodles, and terriers or the humans Tom, Dick, and Harry. Holobaramins contain monobaramins; for instance, wolves are a monobaramin of the Dog holobaramin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Apobaramin''': An apobaramin is a group of holobaramins. Humans and Dogs are an apobaramin since both members are holobaramins. A group containing Negros and wolves is not an apobaramin since both members are monobaramins. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Polybaramin''': A polybaramin is an ''ad hoc'' group of organisms where at least one of the members must not be a holobaramin and must be unrelated to any or all of the others. For example: Humans, wolves and a [[duck]] are a polybaraminic group. This term is useful for describing such hodgepodge mixtures of creatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three additional terms introduced by Wise:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frair&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Archaebaramin''': An archaebaramin is the originally-created individual(s) of a given holobaramin. For instance, Adam and Eve form the archaebaramin of the holobaramin of Humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Neobaramin &amp;amp;amp; Paleobaramin''': A neobaramin is the living population of a given holobaramin, whereas a paleobaramin represents older forms of a given holobaramin. Neobaramins have undergone genetic degradation from their perfectly created forms (archaebaramin) and so may differ from their paleobaramins in notable ways. For example, the neobaramin of Humanity has a much shorter lifespan and greater prevalence of genetic diseases than the Human paleobaramin (i.e. Adam lived for 930 years and his children could interbreed without fear of deformity).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonecc</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>