<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Josek</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Josek"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Josek"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T23:20:10Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dungeons_and_Dragons&amp;diff=753820</id>
		<title>Dungeons and Dragons</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dungeons_and_Dragons&amp;diff=753820"/>
		<updated>2010-02-12T17:33:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Josek: /* Possible Areas of Concern for Christians */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons''' (D&amp;amp;amp;D or DnD) is a [[role-playing]] game with a medieval theme featuring [[myth]]ical creatures such as [[elf|elves]], [[dwarf (mythology)|dwarves]], [[orc]]s, and [[dragon]]s. Players take the role of characters who solve a series of heroic adventures or quests. Largely considered harmless fantasy, the game has attracted some criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Players typically do not compete against one another; rather, the players cooperate to achieve goals and objectives while a referee, in this case called the ''dungeon master'' (DM) or ''game master'' (GM), interprets rules and adjudicates the success or failure of the players' efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game was first published in 1974 by Tactical Studies Rules (TSR). Most of those rules and many of the subsequent rules were authored by [[Gary Gygax]]. There are some who claim that [[Dave Arneson]] was the actual &amp;quot;inventor&amp;quot; of D&amp;amp;D, but this claim is disputed, not least by the fact that many references were authored by Gygax.  The game was eventually sold to [[Wizards of the Coast]], a division of Hasbro.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wizards of the Coast's [http://www.wizards.com/dnd D&amp;amp;amp;D site]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late seventies the game's popularity exploded and it can rightly be said that the game is now a part of American culture. ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' spawned countless variations and permutations, but during the earliest days of the game's growth, there were accusations that the game contributed to Satanic worship, teen suicide and general moral depravity.  These criticisms have largely been addressed and the game remains controversial to only a tiny minority of Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4th Edition of the game is the most recent, released in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D&amp;amp;D Terminology==&lt;br /&gt;
Because D&amp;amp;D was a revolutionary game, it developed its own unique set of terminology to describe certain concepts in the game. Here's a quick list of important game terms which may be important to understand the game and its impact on American society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Dungeon Master'' --- The Dungeon Master (DM) is not the player's opponent or ally, but is the game's referee. As the referee, it is the DM's responsibility to adjudicate the results player's actions. Additionally, the DM must play the role of monsters and the player's opponents. The DM has a duty to make the game fair, fun and playable.  Many derivative games refer to this player as the Game Master or GM.&lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Player'' --- Any participant in the game that is not the DM.&lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Player Character'' --- The player character (or character) is the player's in-game persona. The character is most usually a heroic archetype such as a warrior, priest, wizard or rogue of some kind.  The game allows for each archetype (called a &amp;quot;class&amp;quot;) to possess unique skills and powers. If the player character survives the game session, the character can advance in experience and acquire higher levels and powers. &lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Monster'' --- A monster is any creature or in game character who may provide a challenge to the player characters. Many ''monsters'' like dragons or giants are monstrous, but others are fantastic such as pixies or unicorns. The DM chooses the actions of monsters. &lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Campaign'' --- In traditional games, the game ends and the game session ends. In D&amp;amp;D, the game continues through multiple sessions with the game always picking up where the last session ended. A series of game sessions that have some internal logic or structure is called a ''campaign''.&lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Spells'' --- In D&amp;amp;D, the term ''spells'' describe imaginary powers bestowed to certain player characters.  This would be analogous to [[Gandalf]]'s fireworks or [[Merlin]]'s enchantments.  In the game, spells are designed to mimic the powers and abilities found in fantasy literature and have no further relation to [[witchcraft]] or anything occult. &lt;br /&gt;
::* ''Experience Points'' --- Experience Points or XP are a metric representing the number of the heroic actions of a player character has achieved in a given campaign.  The more XP a character acquires, the more powers and abilities the character has in the game. [[Image:dnddice.jpg|thumb|right|Some of the unusual dice required to play Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::* ''d20'' --- Actions and combat in D&amp;amp;D are most often resolved by rolling polyhedral [[dice]]. While standard dice are six-sided cubes, polyhedral dice have can have 20, 12, 10, 8, 6, or 4 sides. To distinguish between dice the standard nomenclature is ''d#'' where the # indicates the number of sides on the die. The d20 is the most commonly rolled die in D&amp;amp;D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Game play==&lt;br /&gt;
''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' is a free-form game in which a referee (the Dungeon Master) describes a situational problem to the players and then the players reply with any imaginable response. The exploits of players can occur in any fantasy setting but at some point the adventure often occurs in a ''dungeon'' or subterranean locale not unlike ''[[Khazad-dûm|Moria]]'' in [[Tolkien]]'s ''[[The Lord of the Rings]]''.  For example a DM might say to the players, &amp;quot;You have arrived the edge of a deep pit. The pit is so deep as to prevent you from seeing the bottom and so wide as to look impossible to jump. Far below you hear hissing and rustling as if a thousand poisonous snakes await you in the darkness.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending upon how motivated the players are to continue in this direction, the players might ask the DM various interrogatories such as &amp;quot;Is it possible to walk along the edge of the pit and continue down the passage?&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Is there anything on the opposite side of the pit to which we might be able to tie a rope?&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next the players will decide what course of actions their characters will take. Each player tries to take advantage of his character's unique talents. For example, the player of the rogue will know that his character is skilled at climbing walls. By jamming his fingers and toes into the cracks in the mortar, the rogue can negotiate along the wall to the opposite side. If the character's actions are reasonable and relatively easy to accomplish the DM allows for them to happen without further comment. If the action is more outrageous, or risky, the DM consults rules and conventions to determine which dice will govern the success of the action. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of each gaming sessions, the DM grants all players a number of Experience Points (XP's) to represent the player accomplishments.  When the character has acquired enough Experience Points, the character can gain more powers and abilities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Alignment System===&lt;br /&gt;
Because D&amp;amp;D players can basically do &amp;quot;anything&amp;quot; there are moral implications to the choices players make. To provide a frame of reference and to help the game make sense Gygax devised an alignment system.  All characters are required to choose an ''alignment'' and the character must adhere to the beliefs of that alignment. Similarly, all monsters have alignments and thus their actions can be predictable and make sense.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Good&amp;quot; characters strive to do acts of goodness and while avoiding actions which are hurtful to others. &amp;quot;Evil&amp;quot; characters think only of their own needs. Animals and certain other creatures don't care much about good or evil.  At the same time &amp;quot;Lawful&amp;quot; characters believe that it is important to adhere to the rule of law, while &amp;quot;Chaotic&amp;quot; characters are more concerned with personal freedoms than with laws. Some characters do not care whether an action is lawful or chaotic, but only whether it is good or evil.  By combining these two frameworks, we arrive at the nine alignments: lawful good, neutral good, chaotic good, lawful neutral, true neutral (&amp;quot;neutral neutral&amp;quot;), chaotic neutral, lawful evil, neutral evil, or chaotic evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These alignments help a player separate what the player or referee would do in a given situation from how the character or monster might react in the same situation. Some DMs forbid evil characters as they are often disruptive to the game, though the rules do not expressly require that players choose good characters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original versions of the game, only the &amp;quot;ethical&amp;quot; (Law/Chaos) axis of morality was present.  The &amp;quot;moral&amp;quot; (good/evil) axis was added in later editions.  4th Edition removes the axis concept, resulting in the alignments lawful good, good, unaligned, evil, and chaotic evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Components of a Character===&lt;br /&gt;
A character is described in detail on a &amp;quot;character sheet&amp;quot; where the player records important facts about the character. This includes the character's &amp;quot;race&amp;quot;, vocation, unique skills, and numerical ratings of the character's attributes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;quot;race&amp;quot; refers to a race from fantasy such as an elf, dwarf, gnome or halfling--effectively used as an archaic term for &amp;quot;species&amp;quot;. The races which are allowed in the game vary from DM to DM according to the tastes of players and the setting that the DM has devised. The vocation or &amp;quot;class&amp;quot; of the character refers to the fantasy archetype the player wishes to play, e.g. wizard, barbarian, rogue, cleric, etc. The selection of race and class will impact skills and attributes which are available to the character as well as the strengths and weaknesses the character. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Magic System ===&lt;br /&gt;
The magic system used in Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons was originally adopted very roughly from the writing of fantasy and science fiction author [[Jack Vance]]. In the Vancian system, magic-users such as wizards must prepare all of their spells in advance for that day by memorizing them and a spell leaves the wizard's memory upon being cast. To cast the spell again, the magic-user must once again memorize the spell. The Vancian system was chosen for a variety of reasons such as its originality compared to pre-existing magical systems, its avoidance any connection with systems of magic described in any religion or occult theory, and it being the creation one of Gygax's favorite authors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Forum discussion: [http://enworld.cyberstreet.com/printthread.php?t=182603 &amp;quot;Is D&amp;amp;amp;D magic purely Vancian?&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;RPGnet: [http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10222.phtml Review of &amp;quot;The Primer of Practical Magic&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Novices and those who have never played the game should note that in this case, the player doesn't actually memorize anything.  The character &amp;quot;memorization&amp;quot; is really just a mechanic to help limit the number of spells a player can use per gaming episode.  The 4th Edition makes significant changes to the system, basing most abilities on &amp;quot;per encounter&amp;quot; uses (as in, how many times per battle or event an ability can be used).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Combat System ===&lt;br /&gt;
To determine the outcome of combat, players roll dice to determine if an attack &amp;quot;hits&amp;quot; and then if the attack hits how much damage the attack does. Damage reduces the defender's &amp;quot;hit points&amp;quot;. When a combatant's hit points are depleted that combatant is &amp;quot;dead&amp;quot; or incapacitated.  This combat system was developed from a ship-to-ship naval combat game that Gygax adapted to describe medieval man-to-man combat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History and Development==&lt;br /&gt;
To many Americans ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' seemed to appear from nothingness as a wholly born concoction of occult elements and hypnotic game play. The truth is that the game evolved from mundane roots in a quite corner of Wisconsin outside Milwaukee. The origins of D&amp;amp;D are found in a prior generation of [[miniatures games]] such as [[H.G. Wells]]' [[Little Wars]]. ''Little Wars'' is a set of rules which describe how to play a game with toy soldiers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wells' rules were themselves were based upon a earlier games which were primarily played by nobility and royals to teach warfare strategy. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=6040&amp;amp;pageno=2 Foreword to Little Wars by ''H.G. Wells''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. With the publication of ''Little Wars'', H.G. Wells hoped to bring a game previously known only to kings to the common man. Because tin soldiers do not bleed and do not leave widows, it was Wells hope that men could settle differences by little wars rather than real wars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miniature gaming such as ''Little Wars'' was nearly unknown in America, although there were pockets of hobbyists such as &amp;quot;International Federation of Gamers&amp;quot;, a tiny group near Milwaukee Wisconsin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wizards.com/dnd/DnDArchives_History.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Gary Gygax]] and [[Dave Arneson]] were members of that gaming group. It can rightly be said that Gygax and Arneson are the fathers of modern role-playing games, but the contributions of other local gamers are muddied into this mix as well.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gygax &amp;amp; Arneson===&lt;br /&gt;
In the earliest days, the International Federation of Gamers was possessed of a grand name, but little more. Of course few records were kept at that time.  Thus, there is some dispute about who exactly invented what aspects of the game.  In 1969, Gary Gygax adapted rules meant to govern wooden ship combat into a medieval combat game which was published by Guidon Games under the name ''Chainmail''. The game was very popular locally and grew organically over the next few years.  At the same time, ''[[The Lord of the Rings]]'' was gaining mass appeal in the United States. This inspired players to incorporate elements of fantasy into their wargames.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1970, Dave Arneson adapted these and other club rules into something generally referred to as ''the fantasy game'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jovianclouds.com/blackmoor/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. ''The fantasy game'' had several key innovations --- many of which were of Arneson's devising. In previous wargames, players generally led an army of toy soldiers. But in ''the fantasy game'', each player had only one soldier, described as a ''character'' or ''player character''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further the game evolved to include the concept that at the next game session would pick up where the last game session ended.  Another evolutionary concept was the idea of a referee or game master. The referee, often played by Arneson or Gygax, had the job of making final judgments and augmenting the rules as necessary to keep the game going. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jovianclouds.com/blackmoor/rpg2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is some question as to who exactly designed what in ''the fantasy game'' with at times Gygax and Arneson jointly and severably claiming to have &amp;quot;invented the game&amp;quot;. There is no doubt that both many, and many gamers, where involved in the evolution of the game.  Arneson's chief claims rest on his evolution of certain key concepts that would constitute all role-playing games to follow.  Gygax's claim rests upon the fact that most of the early reference works were authored by Gygax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===OD&amp;amp;D===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1972, Gary Gygax and others formed a partnership called Tactical Studies Rules and in 1974 Tactical Studies Rules published Gary Gygax' version of &amp;quot;the Fantasy Game&amp;quot;, later named ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wizards.com/dnd/DnDArchives_History.asp#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This version of the game --- often called ''Original Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'', ''Old Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' or ''OD&amp;amp;D'' --- was printed in staple-bound paperback form from folded sheets of 8.5 x 11 paper and sold as a boxed set. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By many accounts, ''OD&amp;amp;D'' was a clunky game, sparse on rules, but in this game one would find all the elements of a modern role-playing game: player characters, a game master, serial adventures, and the opportunity for character growth.  Several print runs of this version sold out quickly and went on to exceed the expectations of everyone involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the tremendous success of the D&amp;amp;D paperbacks, Tactical Studies Rules reorganized with partners Gary Gygax, Don Kaye and Brian Blume under the name TSR Hobbies Inc. In 1975, TSR Hobbies published OD&amp;amp;D supplements, Gygax's ''[[Greyhawk]]'' and Arneson's ''[[Blackmoor]]''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dadsdnd.com/greyhawk.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dadsdnd.com/blackmoor.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' began to be noticed by American culture at about the same time the company released ''Eldritch Wizardry'' and ''God, Demigods &amp;amp; Heroes''.  The cover of ''Eldritch Wizardry'' featured an nude dress female strewn over an altar. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deigames.com/eldwiz2.JPG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ''Gods, Demigods &amp;amp; Heroes'' was a mythological reference with gods and heroes from the legends and lore of Greeks, Egyptians, Indians, Norse and more.  Many of these mythological gods are considered creatures of human invention, but some are now considered demons by the Christian Church.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the game was gaining popularity, the works served as a lightning rod for criticism. Although some of the art in these and later editions would violate the [[Comics Code]], the publishers at TSR failed to appreciate the danger of ignoring these rules. Some of TSR's management believed that D&amp;amp;D was marketed toward adult males, not teens and preteens, and thus the Comics Code did not apply.  It soon became evident that D&amp;amp;D's popularity reached beyond college-age males.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===First Edition===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1977, TSR Hobbies published the Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons Basic Set, a boxed set containing revised and abbreviated rules for easier introduction to the game.  This was followed in 1978 by the publication of the &amp;quot;core rule books&amp;quot; of D&amp;amp;D: the ''Players Handbook'', the ''Dungeon Masters Guide'' and the ''Monster Manual''. (Later editions of this game would follow this pattern.)  Taken as a whole with several other reference books this version of the game is alternatively referred to as Advanced Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons, AD&amp;amp;D, 1E, 1ED&amp;amp;D. This version of the game revised and organized the notes from OD&amp;amp;D into a single playable whole in hardback books.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the art found in the books is hardly obscene and does not approach what is found regularly in American culture today, there were a handful of depictions that did not meet the Comics Code. For example, a harpy, a creature from Greek mythology, that is half-woman half-vulture was depicted with nipples revealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Monster Manual'' by Gary Gygax published by TSR Hobbies 1978&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And a mermaid was depicted topless with her hair covering parts of the chest. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Dungeon Masters Guide'' by Gary Gygax published by TSR Hobbies 1979&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally the game had references to many demons and devils (intended as adversaries). Also the game had a polytheist mythos with some players playing the part of clerics, or priests, of these imaginary or mythical gods.  (See backlash below.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second Edition===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1983, TSR Hobbies changed its name to TSR, Inc. For the next several years, TSR, Inc. released supplements and adventures for AD&amp;amp;D, along with reprints of the AD&amp;amp;D core books.  Typical adventure supplements sold 10,000 to 100,000 units, while each print run of the AD&amp;amp;D core rules sold 40,000 copies. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.acaeum.com/library/printrun.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While the company continue to sell respectable amounts of product, internal disorganization, in-fighting and corporate inefficiencies limited profitability. After a bitter fight with partners, Gygax was forced from the board of directors and eventually left the company.  With Arneson gone since First Edition, the game was now in the hands of a second generation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1989, TSR Inc. released Second Edition Advanced Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons.  This version of the game was largely a rewrite of the previous edition that was nearly fully compatible with First Edition AD&amp;amp;D.  The game was largely sanitized and edited, but not so much reborne. For example, the art of Second Edition achieved a more professional standard. The art did not violate the Comics Code. Second Edition removed all references to &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; gods, devils and demons and inserted divas and angelic creatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the umbrella of Second Edition D&amp;amp;D, TSR, Inc. released some of its most enduring and popular titles. Ravenloft, Forgotten Realms and Dragonlance were all second edition products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Third Edition===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, TSR, Inc. was purchased by [[Wizards of the Coast]].  (Wizards is often called WotC, and this acronym is pronounced ''what-see''.) Wizards (eventually acquired by Hasbro) continued to improve the art and graphics of D&amp;amp;D and in 2000 released ''Third Edition Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' to supplant second edition.  While preserving the concepts of RPGing and many of the archetypes of AD&amp;amp;D, Third Edition (3E) would do what Second Edition had not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition rewrote many of the basic constructs of the game in an effort to &amp;quot;modernize&amp;quot; the game and streamline some of D&amp;amp;D's clumsiest and clunkiest mechanics.  Third Edition rules and supplements broke from the tradition of improving an existing system. Rather third edition replaced the previous system with &amp;quot;new and better&amp;quot; mechanics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time of the release of Third Edition, most of the controversy associated with D&amp;amp;D had dissipated as secular culture had digressed far beyond anything found in previous D&amp;amp;D.  With little controversy or fanfare, D&amp;amp;D reintroduced demons and many of the darker concepts of ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons''.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now based in Seattle Washington, rather than Lake Geneva Wisconsin, the editors at WotC seem to exhibit the cultural norms found in Seattle rather than the heartlands. For example, rather than using the pronoun ''he'' in non-gender specific rules, Third Edition D&amp;amp;D bypasses the clumsy but [[political_correctness | politically correct]] construct ''he/she'', and describes rules based on hypothetical characters.  For example, the 3rd Edition &amp;quot;iconic&amp;quot; paladin was a woman named Alhandra, so the rules text describing the paladin's abilities used &amp;quot;she&amp;quot;; 3rd Edition's &amp;quot;iconic&amp;quot; cleric was a man named Jozan, so the rules text describing the cleric's abilities used &amp;quot;he&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D&amp;amp;D ethos traditionally favored ''good'' characters, but Third Edition seems to subscribe to a &amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot; view as the idea.  For example, many of the more evil creatures in Dungeons and Dragons prey on each other as much as on good people (the iconic example being lawful evil devils and chaotic evil demons); some of the text in the game indicates that they should be left to do this, rather than someone trying to destroy one or the other and uniting them, however briefly, in a struggle against the interloper. This is a troubling symptom of our cultural drift from conservative values but not the cause of that drift. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fourth Edition===&lt;br /&gt;
With much fanfare, the Fourth Edition of the game was recently announced. Coveting the tremendous revenue of miniatures games like [[Games Workshop]]'s ''[[Warhammer]]'', Fourth Edition is compatible with the new D&amp;amp;D Miniatures game. Fourth Edition also uses many of the conventions wildly accepted in online computer games following widely successful games like Blizzard's [[World_of_Warcraft | World of Warcraft]] and [[Diablo]].  The game makes several other adjustments; see above for some such changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====D&amp;amp;D Online====&lt;br /&gt;
There is now a Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Game (MMORPG) known as ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons Online: Stormreach'' which takes place in the ''Eberron'' campaign setting.  Online and computer games are similar to D&amp;amp;D in many respects, but the play of these games is entirely different. D&amp;amp;D is characterized by a human referee and complete freedom of action. Without these key components, the game is a mere shadow of D&amp;amp;D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' is nothing more or less than a formalized game of pretend, similar to imaginary adventures that children everywhere play. But, the simplicity of this concept was not immediately evident to players of  ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' or the public at large. Although D&amp;amp;D has a fantasy theme and many rules for resolving actions, ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' is at its core a game of pretend like &amp;quot;cops and robbers&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;cowboys and Indians&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concerns and Criticisms==&lt;br /&gt;
In the late seventies and early eighties, the sudden popularity of ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' resulted in a cultural and religious backlash against perceived dangers from the game. ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' was linked to the occult, witchcraft &amp;amp; demonology. Additionally there was some criticism about the art depicted in the earliest versions of the game. Much of this criticism came from the natural tendency of people to fear the unknown and to fear new ideas, but some of this criticism was valid and affected later versions of what was published under the name ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Demons and Devils===&lt;br /&gt;
In D&amp;amp;D, player characters (the player's in game persona) are constantly gaining strength and power. Therefore, they are forever seeking more powerful adversaries and more difficult challenges.  For example, at the start of a campaign player characters may be doing battle with creatures short of stature with few may limitations (low intelligence, fear of sunlight) such as [[goblin]]s or [[kobold]]s. But as the player character's power increases, so to increases the deadliness of their opponents. In the search for ever more powerful opponents game designers eventually developed attributes for demons and devils.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The publishers of the game had imagined that they would sell a few hundred copies to college-aged males and never imagined that the game would experience explosive popularity, especially among teens as young as thirteen. Therefore, no thought or planning was invested into the potential impact of defining the powers and abilities of demons and devils. To the game's designers and players, killing a demon (in game) was no more controversial than killing a bishop in a game of chess.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But to bystanders the very inclusion of demons and devils was enough to cast suspicion upon the entire game--particularly since the game's much-touted freedom might allow a character to side with them. Additionally, the inclusions of demons and devils in the game raised other questions, such as why there are no angels in the game.  There were no angels in the earliest editions of the game, because there was no reason to have an angel in the role of a ''monster''. (See terminology above.) By late First Edition and early Second Edition, the game included and defined [[angels]], [[devas]] and other highly powerful creatures of good; sometimes these were presented as allies for good characters, sometimes enemies for evil ones. This led to the criticism that religious icons were being disrespected by inclusion in the reference works.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Second Edition, the publishers tried to sanitize D&amp;amp;D by removing demons and devils, but many players (who enjoyed the challenge of destroying demons) resisted this effort. Later editions removed many references to &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; demons. Additionally, the terms &amp;quot;devil&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;demon&amp;quot; were replaced with the terms &amp;quot;baatezu&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;tanar'ri&amp;quot;, respectively, and &amp;quot;the Nine Hells&amp;quot; (the outer planar home of devils/baatezu) was renamed &amp;quot;Baator&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, in Third Edition, the game's original terms were readopted and blended--colloquially, for example, creatures from the Nine Hells (also called Baator) were called devils, but the most dominant species of the devils called themselves baatezu. An entire &amp;quot;mature&amp;quot; supplement (though there is no legal restriction on who may buy it, a large sticker is on the cover of most copies, stating it is for mature gamers only), known as the Book of Vile Darkness&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/881610000 &amp;quot;Book of Vile Darkness&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was produced to introduce more overtly evil concepts into the game, ostensibly in ways for the DM to make the most horrific enemies possible for their players.  A follow-up, the Book of Exalted Deeds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/880260000 &amp;quot;Book of Exalted Deeds&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, was created as a way for players to explore the philosophy and morality of good, and to make a good alignment more than a line on their character sheet.  (The titles of both books are based on magic items in the game, both of which are extremely useful to a person of the proper alignment.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Edition Player's Handbook contains a &amp;quot;Warlock&amp;quot; class, which allows the player to make a pact with a certain creature to gain power. One option is the &amp;quot;Infernal Pact&amp;quot;, allowing the player to literally make a deal with the devil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D&amp;amp;D and the Occult===&lt;br /&gt;
The game includes fictional depictions of supernatural abilities called magic, evil monsters called demons and devils, and fictional deities along with their followers. Christians are divided on how this interacts with their faith. A minority of Christians believe that fictional depictions of fantasy elements such as those found in ''[[The Chronicles of Narnia]]'', ''[[The Lord of the Rings]]'', ''[[Harry Potter]]'', or ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' are blasphemous, but most Christians see no problem with such fictional works. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in the late 1970s the game and others like it came under attack mainly from some fundamentalist Christians as promoting occult and criminal activity. The game's dangers were alleged in the ''Dark Dungeons'' tract by [[Jack Chick]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jack Chick: [http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0046/0046_01.asp &amp;quot;Dark Dungeons&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which portrays D&amp;amp;D players committing suicide when their characters are killed or joining secret witches' covens and learning to cast real magic spells when their characters reach a high enough level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is that ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' designers and players had nothing to do with occult or criminal activity and thirty years later it may be hard to understand how people could confuse D&amp;amp;D with occult activities. In the earliest days of D&amp;amp;D it was easy for an uninformed bystander to draw faulty conclusions based upon a limited knowledge of the game. In its earliest days, OD&amp;amp;D often sold out due to low print runs, leaving bystanders with little access to the rules and little direct knowledge of the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, bystanders knew the game was developing a devoted cult-following. There is an important distinction between a cult-following and a cult itself, but this was lost on some bystanders. As a cult-following, D&amp;amp;D developed an insular fraternity of fans who were plugged into something exciting and new.  Each day the world of D&amp;amp;D expanded and every player everywhere had a hand in the growth of the game. The players were developing their own lexicon and making new and ever expanding rules.  This close bond and strange lexicon was easily misunderstood by those with limited exposure to the game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late seventies the game's popularity was preceded by rumors that players were involved in some strange occult activities. Bystanders knew that D&amp;amp;D players were talking about fantastic creatures, magical spells and even demons because the game often includes descriptions of [[occult]] elements like [[magic]], [[ghost]]s, [[spirit]]s, [[demon]]s and [[devil]]s. To an uninformed bystander this may be pretty scary stuff. But, the truth was significantly less mysterious and sensational.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These misperceptions have largely evaporated, both because of the game's popularity and better information about the product.  Critics became aware that players were not involved in anything occult but were gaming in a fantasy setting. Most everyone in America knows someone who has played ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'', so these days it's all but impossible to blur the line between occult activity and role-playing games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God and gods===&lt;br /&gt;
One item of concern for conservative Christians is that players' characters do not usually worship [[God]], but instead choose a [[patron]] deity from a fictional [[polytheistic]] pantheon. The game settings manufactured by [[Wizards of the Coast]] (''Greyhawk'', ''Faerun'', ''Eberron'', etc.) expressly adopt a polytheistic [[pantheon]] of fictional deities and reject real-world [[religion]]s as a part of the game.  (The Deities and Demigods&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/881650000 &amp;quot;Deities and Demigods&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; supplement offers several different takes on religion, including rules for a monotheistic game world, but deliberately sidesteps the question of any modern religion--Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, etc.--even as it brings up pantheons of old myths, such as the Greek or Norse gods.  It's likely they used only &amp;quot;dead&amp;quot; religions in order to avoid controversy.)  The question of what extent and form of religion should be depicted in the game has been a question since the earliest days of the game. In an in depth look at monotheism in fantasy games, Joseph R.Ravitts raised some of the problems and benefits for a born-again Christian's point of view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Monotheism in Gaming&amp;quot; by Joseph R. Ravitts, Pegasus Magazine Issue #4 published in 1981 by Judges' Guild&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ravitts already understood the power of role-playing, which is now well known. Namely, role-playing is a powerful behavior modification tool. If you pretend that you believe something, eventually you will believe that something.  For this reason, he posited that it was important to avoid role-playing in a polytheistic world. Referencing the classic argument from ''[[Mere Christianity]]'' by [[C.S._Lewis | C.S. Lewis]], Ravitts explained how polytheism is really just [[atheism]] or [[monotheism]] in disguise. He believed that if players and DM's actively played in an atheistic world, they would eventually become atheists.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He then pointed out the difficulties of importing Christianity or other religions into D&amp;amp;D. Ravitts pointed out it is a simple matter to import mythological gods like [[Zeus]] or [[Thor]] into a fantasy setting. One simply imagines these gods are in the fantasy world and begins playing.  But this is much more difficult with religious figures like [[Jesus]], [[Muhammad]] or [[Buddha]]. Each of these three men were real historic personages.  For example, Jesus lived, died and rose again in the Middle East at a specific time and place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ravitts proposed two simple work-arounds, for those who care about their spiritual well-being.  Firstly, one could assume that all humans are teleported from Earth or descended from folks who were teleported from Earth. These humans have preserved their religious identities and thus Christianity is an option for players without tampering with the historical nature of Jesus. Secondly Ravitts proposed altering the game's mythos to allow for an all-powerful detached God reigning over the &amp;quot;gods, demigods and devils&amp;quot;.  In this way the &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; are not gods at all, but just ultra-powerful beings who distract souls from worshiping the one true God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is worth noting that novels and &amp;quot;sourcebooks&amp;quot; make occasional references to a &amp;quot;God of gods&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course there are alternatives such as ''[http://www.greenronin.com/catalog/grr1019 Testament]'' a D&amp;amp;D type game set in the Biblical Era. Further, many of the game worlds portray certain gods and religions as being metaphors for modern ones.  (Even the incredibly polytheistic Forgotten Realms, where more than a hundred deities exist, features a triad of gods that could be based on the Holy Trinity.)  But ultimately, D&amp;amp;D is a game of fantasy and players are encouraged to alter the game world to better suit their tastes, and many Christian players and DMs alter the game world so that it better fits their personal beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The art of D&amp;amp;D===&lt;br /&gt;
Another criticism is that illustrations in the rule books for ''Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons'' often contain images of immodestly dressed women. For example, in the First Edition ''Monster Manual'' a number of drawings depicted topless creatures of fantasy such as the harpy (half-vulture half-woman) or the succubus (a demoness). The OD&amp;amp;D reference ''Eldritch Wizardry'' featured the profile of a nude woman. Most of these images are fairly crudely rendered and are not particularly racy by today's standards, but they did exceed the limitations of the [[Comics Code]] of the time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.geocities.com/Athens/8580/cca3.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the publication of Second Edition, the art and layout of the D&amp;amp;D game was managed by professionals. As a result the quality of the art increased significantly and anything racy was eliminated from the art work. There was some minor controversy with the revised Third Edition ''Monster Manual'''s artwork of the succubus and nymph (a water spirit in the form of a beautiful woman), but aside from these there is nothing particularly shocking in the art for a child or adult of any age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unchristian Activities===&lt;br /&gt;
Although Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons does not present itself as either pro-Christian or anti-Christian, the game features many elements which can be considered to agree with or go against the teachings of Christ. The game has drawn criticism for allowing players to undertake the roleplaying of un-Christian activities: the rules allow a player to have their character perform evil acts, including the summoning or worshiping of demons and devils. Certain fundamentalists disagree with the very format of the game in that player characters can pretend to cast imaginary spells while playing the game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some feel that the primary action of the game involves the fictional slaying of monsters and the fictional accumulation of wealth, some Christians feel that this goes against the teachings of Christ regarding [[pacifism]] ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 5:38-42) and the accumulation of [[wealth]] (Matthew 19:24). Others see these actions as heroic endeavors and wealth is a byproduct of doing good things. Either way, the game and it's choices are a matter of free will. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former [[United Methodist Church]] minister James Wyatt wrote an essay comparing the freedom of a Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons player to choose his own actions, to the Christian concept of Free Will. As in real life, a player may, when presented with a moral choice, decide for himself whether to do good or evil. If the player was not able to do evil, he would be forced to do good, removing his freedom. Similarly, God allows human beings to choose between good and evil in real life, and people must accept the consequences of their choice.  The supplements that deal specifically with demons and devils make it quite clear that the afterlife for characters who are condemned to the Abyss or the Nine Heels is in no way pleasant, and may even be short.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracy Hickman, one of the main authors of the Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons Dragonlance book series, and a Christian with conservative politics and theology, has written a number of articles defending and discussing D&amp;amp;D from a Christian perspective. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Waldron&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture: [http://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art9-roleplaying.html &amp;quot;Role-Playing Games and the Christian Right&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others within the Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons community responded by writing other defenses from rationalist perspectives or other perspectives or by writing parodies such as &amp;quot;Chess: The Subtle Sin: Should Christians play chess?&amp;quot;. Some argue that  in response to the perceived Christian persecution of the Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons, darker themed, deliberately counter-cultural games appeared in reaction such as [[Call of Cthulhu]] which is based on the horror writing of [[H.P. Lovecraft]] and set in the [[Cthulhu|Cthulhu Mythos]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Waldron&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, or [[Vampire: the Masquerade]], where players act the roles of undead vampires.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Possible Areas of Concern for Christians====&lt;br /&gt;
D&amp;amp;D is a &amp;quot;game of pretend&amp;quot; whereby players pretend to take certain actions and the DM adjudicates the results of those actions. By its very nature, this leaves players open to experiment with various moral quandaries and social dilemmas. This is a valuable tool for players to learn the implications and results of playing both good and evil characters.  However, the possibility exists that such an experience may not be beneficial or appropriate for everyone--in particular, persons who already have difficulty separating fantasy with reality might be able to be helped by the game, but it could also make things worse.  Due to the nature of roleplaying games, a great deal depends upon the individual group in question; a given game of Dungeons and Dragons might be benign from a Christian standpoint, or it might involve activities and ideas that a Christian would find profoundly distasteful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Role playing is dangerous and it is possible the participates will take it to far and eat your unborn childern!  Most likely target christians first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://aquela.com/roleplaying/r&amp;amp;r/index.html Religion and Roleplaying]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.fansforchrist.org/new/articles/article03a.htm Christians Playing Dungeons and Dragons] - An informed Christian's perspective on Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons. &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.trhickman.com/Intel/Essays/Ethic2.html Ethics in Fantasy: Morality and D&amp;amp;D] - Tracey Hickman's essay concerning Christian perspectives and common misunderstandings about Role-Playing Games&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3691 Full text of H.G. Wells ''Little Wars; a game for boys from twelve years of age to one hundred and fifty'] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Games]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josek</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tea_Party_Movement&amp;diff=753762</id>
		<title>Tea Party Movement</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tea_Party_Movement&amp;diff=753762"/>
		<updated>2010-02-12T16:33:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Josek: /* February 27th Tea Parties */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tea-Party-Express-2-Million-Attend.jpg‎|thumb|right|375px|9/12 Tea Party March on Washington.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''TEA Party Movement''' (TEA an acronym for Taxed Enough Already) is an ongoing, nationwide effort by [[grassroots]] protesters, a collection of individuals and self-organizing groups, all united in accomplishing a single goal: returning fiscal responsibility and limited government to the [[United States]] through the exercise of political [[activist|activism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/15/morning-bell-the-tea-party-movement/ Morning Bell: The Tea Party Movement], heritage.org, April 15th, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The main focus of the TEA Party Movement is a rebuke of outrageous mandates, overreaching and out of control spending by an out of touch federal government. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/24073/ What the Tea Parties Are About], April 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dick Armey]] of [[FreedomWorks]] is a prime mover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the rallies are in protest of the [[generational theft]] of public tax monies, the tremendous extensions of United States Federal debt and authority, the apparent restructuring of the Federal government with the intent to contravene the system of checks and balances for which the Constitution provides, and the attempt, which some movement leaders say has been in progress for several decades, to sacrifice [[liberty]] for permanent dependency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.americansolutions.com/directupload/pdf/TeaPartyOnePagers.pdf American Solutions for Winning the Future (PDF)], American Solutions, April 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bret Baier. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,509445,00.html Taxpayers Strike Back With 'Tea Parties'], ''[[Fox News]]'', March 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Tea Party Guide&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://taxdayteaparty.com/guide/ Tax Day Tea Party Resources ], April 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement held its first scheduled nationwide protest on April 15, 2009, a day that became known as the [[Tax Day Tea Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;WSJ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975867505519363.html Tax Day Becomes Protest Day], ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', April 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the spirit of the founding fathers [[Boston Tea Party]], the rallies have used themes from the [[American Revolution]] and also adopted the &amp;quot;American Tea Party Anthem,&amp;quot; a song first performed during a March 21, 2009 Orlando, Florida Tea Party that drew over 4,000 people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michelle Malkin. [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/21/tea-party-usa-the-movement-grows/ Tea Party U.S.A.: The movement grows], February 21, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsblaze.com/story/20090323074552zzzz.nb/topstory.html &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot; Song Becomes YouTube Hit]. ''Newsblaze'', March 23, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andrea Shea King. [http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/asking/2009/04/14/american-tea-party-anthem-singer-lloyd-marcus-this-whole-thing-is-rush-limbaughs-fault/ American Tea Party Anthem Singer Lloyd Marcus: &amp;quot;This whole thing is Rush Limbaugh’s fault.&amp;quot;], ''Big Hollywood'', April 14, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Beginnings ==&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, radio talk-show host [[Rush Limbaugh]] criticized the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]], commenting, &amp;quot;This 'porkulus' bill is designed to repair the Democratic Party's power losses from the 1990s forward, and to cement the party's majority power for decades.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rush Limbaugh. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123318906638926749.html Rush Limbaugh: My Bipartisan Stimulus], WSJ.com, January 29, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 10, a Cape Coral woman named Mary Rakovich led a small protest outside President Barack Obama's townhall meeting in Fort Myers, [[Florida]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news-press.com/article/20090211/OBAMA/90210068 Those outside Harborside in Fort Myers had plenty to see, say], ''The News-Press'', February 11, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Then in late March of 2009, faced with the prospect of heavy fines from the city for not having the proper permitting or insurance, Mary Rakovich moved forward with future protests but with the backing of national organization ''FreedomWorks''. Rakovich said ''FreedomWorks'' offered to provide the insurance per the city's rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cape-coral-daily-breeze.com/page/content.detail/id/504707.html?nav=5011 Tea party finds new life, broadens cause], cape-coral-daily-breeze.com, March, 31, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first anti-spending protest, organized by Liberty Belle, occurred in [[Seattle]], Washington on February 16, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Derek Erwin. [http://derekerwin.blogspot.com/2009/04/dozen-ring-liberty-belles-sound-800.html A 'Dozen' Ring Liberty Belle's Sound, 800 Cities Ring-Back], ''A 1-In-100 Blogger'', accessed April 18, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds. [http://www.pjtv.com/video/Pajamas_TV/Tea_Party_Protests%3A_Mesa%2C_Seattle%2C_Denver_%28Michelle_Malkin_and_Glenn_Reynolds%29/1406/ Tea Party Protests: Mesa, Seattle, Denver], PJTV, February 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another protest was held the following day, held in [[Denver]] on February 17,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/18732002/detail.html President Signs Massive Stimulus In Denver], accessed April 2, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a protest in Mesa, [[Arizona]] on February 18 brought 500 protesters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary Grado, Sonu Munshi, Hayley Ringle. [http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/135640/ More than 500 protest Obama's arrival], accessed April 2, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shout Heard 'Round the World===&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement gained support when on February 19, on live [[Television|TV]], [[CNBC]] reporter [[Rick Santelli]] argued about the bailouts and shouted, &amp;quot;The government is promoting bad behavior.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2009/02/rick-santelli-tea-party.html Transcript of Rick Santelli's speech], February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnbc.com/id/29283701 Rick Santelli's Shout Heard 'Round the World], CNBC.com, February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Standing in the middle of the Chicago Stock Exchange, Santelli declared that America needed &amp;quot;a new kind of tea party,&amp;quot; so that citizens can express their discontent with &amp;quot;the government's support of fiscal irresponsibility.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jennifer Rubin. [http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/mr-president-turn-back-while-theres-still-time/ Mr. President: Turn Back While There’s Still Time], ''Pajamas Media'', February 20, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matt Drudge. [http://www.streetinsider.com/Insiders+Blog/Rick+Santelli+-+The+Rant+Heard+Round+the+World/4419854.html Rick Santelli - The Rant Heard 'Round the World'], streetinsider.com, February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=myfoxchicago&amp;gt;Andy Roesgen. [http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/TeaParty Protestors Gather for Self-Styled Tea Party], myfoxchicago.com, February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With the help of ''DontGo'', ''Top Conservatives on Twitter'' (TCOT), ''[[Smart Girl Politics]]'' (SGP), ''The American Spectator'', ''Americans for Tax Reform'', ''[[FreedomWorks]]'', and ''The Heartland Institute'', the Chicago Tea Parties were scheduled to happen nationwide on February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dontgomovement.com/blog/2009/02/23/the-chicago-tea-party-is-on/ The Chicago Tea Party is on!], February 23, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===February 27th Tea Parties===&lt;br /&gt;
Americans across the country gathered in 50 cities to protest the newly-passed Stimulus Bill of 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tcotreport.com/Talking_Points.htm Talking Points and Theme for the Nationwide Chicago Tea Party], ''[[The TCOT Report]]'', February 24, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Over 30,000 people made it to this event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teri Christoph. [http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/video/video/show?id=2488056%3AVideo%3A24070&amp;amp; SGP.TeaParty], ''[[Smart Girl Politics]]'', February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many at the event were upset over the economic stimulus packages and bailouts for [[Wall Street]] pushed through by both [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] and President Obama's administrations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.raleigh3.com/default.asp?sdetail=1849&amp;amp;sc=2724 Raleigh Holds 'Tea Party' To Protest Government], ''Raleigh Telegram'', March 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=myfoxchicago/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background:#ccc; text-align:center;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! Sponsors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=page&amp;amp;page-id=68 Schedule of American Tea party Protests (with Sponsors)], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; !! Details&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atlanta, Georgia || TCOT, SGP, Don'tGo || A reported 300 to 400 protesters gathered outside the Georgia Capitol in protest of a $787 billion recovery bill.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/02/27/budget-debate-launches-new-tea-party/ Budget debate launches new tea party], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/71521/ Tea Party from Atlanta], pajamasmedia.com, February 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Chicago, Illinois]] || Don'tGo&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dontgomovement.com/blog/2009/02/19/chicago-tea-party/ Don'tGo Movement: Pledge to Have a Representation at Chicago Tea Party], February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; || Approximately 300 people braved the 25 degree cold and wind in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;illinios&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2009/02/breaking-chicago-tea-party-pictures/ BREAKING - Chicago Tea Party (Pictures) UPDATED Now With Video!], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dontgomovement.com/blog/2009/02/27/the-birth-of-a-new-revolution/ The Birth of a New Revolution], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=myfoxchicago/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas || Americans for Prosperity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.redcounty.com/texas/2009/02/the-tea-parties-were-successfu/ The Tea Parties were successful - here's the proof], February 23, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; TCOT, SGP, Don'tGo, Dallas County Young Republicans || A &amp;quot;Texas-sized Tea Party&amp;quot; of 300 or more Texans met in Fort Worth, protesting big government and taxes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fortworth&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://txtcot.ning.com/video/tea-party-09-made-the-world Tea Party '09 made the world news], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One sponsor, TCOT, collected over 800 signatures during the event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://txtcot.ning.com/profiles/blogs/tea-party-09 Tea Party '09], February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Denver, Colorado || TCOT, SGP, Don'tGo || At the East Capitol Steps, 100 &amp;quot;[[Atlas Shrugged]]&amp;quot; fans braved cold temperatures for a &amp;quot;Nationwide Chicago Tea Party&amp;quot; to protest the Obama Administration's bailout plan.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dcolorado1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://coloradoindependent.com/23026/ayn-rand-stars-at-denver-stimulus-tea-party-protest Ayn Rand stars at Denver stimulus ‘tea party’ protest], ''Colorado Independent'', February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dcolorado2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://colorado.newsplatoon.com/2009/02/24/denver-tea-party/ Denver Tea Party], [[colorado]], February 24, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Houston, Texas]] || TBD || Large groups, not entirely made up of Republicans, tried to create a modern day version of the Boston Tea Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://houstontps.org/?page_id=163 Houston Tea Party Society, In the News, Audio, Video], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.khou.com/video/topstories-index.html?nvid=352345&amp;amp;shu=1 Houston's Tax Day tea party], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Washington, D.C.]] || Americans for Prosperity, Americans for Tax Reform, Young Conservatives Coalition, The Heartland Institute || The American Tea Party made some noise outside the White House.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dc_examiner&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/New-American-Tea-Party-40442172.html DC Tea Party thrown at the White House], ''The Washington Examiner'', February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freedomworks.org/petition/iamwithrick/index.html 2009 Taxpayer Tea party], February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several hundred taxpayers showed up at the DC Tea Party protest in Lafayette Park,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;michellemalkin&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Michelle Malkin]]. [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/scenes-from-the-tea-party/ Scenes from the D.C. Tea Party], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dcfreedomworks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/bstein80/video-from-the-dc-tea-party Video from the DC Tea Party], ''Freedom Works'', February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including &amp;quot;Joe the Plumber.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hotair&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/27/joe-the-plumber-at-dc-tea-party-no-one-on-the-hill-gives-a-rip-about-you/ Joe the Plumber at D.C. Tea Party: No one on the Hill gives a rip about you], ''[[Hot Air]]'', February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement is a Hoax, started by liberals to corrupt your unborn childern.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Schedule ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Headnew.jpg|right|380px|right|Tax Day Tea Party poster]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tax Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Tax Day Tea Party]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Success from the Chicago Tea Parties on February 27, as part of a concerted nationwide effort, led to the Tax Day Tea Party rallies held on April 15, 2009. Following the Chicago Tea Party protests, a group called ''Americans for Prosperity'' of [[North Carolina]] began implementing plans for a &amp;quot;Tax Day&amp;quot; Tea Party rally in Raleigh on the tax filing deadline.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.raleigh3.com/default.asp?sdetail=1849&amp;amp;sc=2724 Raleigh Holds 'Tea Party' To Protest Government], ''Raleigh Telegram'', March 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leading up to the Tax Day Tea Parties, the events were organized and promoted by volunteers, activists, and [[Political action committee]]s across the [[United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/freedomworks-co-sponsoring-taxpayer-tea-parties-ac&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By taking advantage of online viral [[marketing]] to get the word out,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;investorsnews&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=470054&amp;amp;Ntt=tea+party 'Tea Party' Protests In 35 Cities], March 2, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the speed and scope with which the Tax Day Tea Party protests were organized can be attributed to the use of [[Twitter]] [[TCOT Report|#TCOT feeds]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://tcotreport.com/ TCOT Report], ''[[The TCOT Report]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on [[blog|blogs]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marc Ambinder. [http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/tea_parties_pajamas_and_mediaevent_symbiotics.php Tea Parties, Pajamas, and Media/Event Symbiotics], ''The Atlantic'', February 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the social networking [[Web site]] [[Facebook]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;facebook&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/04/going-galt-and-the-next-tea-party-wave/ “Going Galt” and the next Tea Party wave], [[Michelle Malkin]], March 4, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Commemorations ====&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama is seen to have responded to the tea parties with requested budget cuts of $100 million on April 20, 2009.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rushlimbaugh&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_042109/content/01125107.guest.html Obama Responded to Tea Parties with $100 Million in &amp;quot;Budget Cuts&amp;quot;], RushLimbaugh.com, April 21, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rush Limbaugh contended, &amp;quot;I'm sure they've got internal polling data that shows these tea parties are successful and these tea parties are a problem. So they're responding to the tea parties here. That's all this is.&amp;quot; According to a Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey on April 20, 2009, the poll found that fifty-one percent (51%) of Americans had a favorable view of the tea parties held nationwide, including 32% who said their view of the events were &amp;quot;Very favorable.&amp;quot; Thirty-three percent (33%) held an unfavorable opinion of the tea parties. Fifteen percent (15%) were not sure.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rasmussenreports&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics2/51_view_tea_parties_favorably_political_class_strongly_disagrees 51% View Tea Parties Favorably, Political Class Strongly Disagrees], ''Rasmussen Reports'', April 20, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Independence Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Independence Day Tea Party]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same organizations decided to repeat their performance on [[Independence Day]] (July 4, 2009). Even more people attended; the largest such rally was held on the grounds of the Southfork Ranch (scene of the [[television]] series ''Dallas '), in [[Plano]], [[Texas]], which drew 37,000 attendees. The themes that organizers and participants sounded at these events were much the same as were those at the Tax Day events: advocacy of limited government, decrying of high levels of taxation, and refusal to countenance plans for [[socialism]] and especially socialized [[medicine]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Labor Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
Several organizations also organized Tea Parties on [[Labor Day]], once again sounding the same limited-government, low-tax, and anti-socialistic themes. Those organizations that did not plan such events often referred people to those that did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== September 12 March on Washington ===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[September 12 March on Washington]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gadsden_snake.jpg|250px|right]]The largest TEA Party event thus far has been the September 12 March on [[Washington, DC]]. This was an event organized initially by the FreedomWorks Foundation, but nearly all Tea Party organizations decided to participate in this event, primarily by chartering buses and registering people for transportation to Washington. FreedomWorks estimates that 600,000 to 800,000 persons attended, and they base that estimate on the number of persons who responded when their Master of Ceremonies asked all attendees within earshot to send the text message &amp;quot;Freedom&amp;quot; to a designated five-digit telephone number. However, the [[London]] ''Daily Mail'' estimates attendance at as many as a million persons, on the basis of eyewitness accounts and aerial-photographic evidence.&amp;lt;ref name=dailymail&amp;gt;Gardner D, &amp;quot;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1213056/Up-million-march-US-Capitol-protest-Obamas-spending-tea-party-demonstration.html A million march to US Capitol to protest against 'Obama the socialist'],&amp;quot; ''The London Daily Mail'', September 14, 2009. Accessed September 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Estimates of total attendance are difficult to obtain, primarily because the size of the crowd far exceeded the estimates by the event planners, with the result that many attendees were never able to get within earshot of the stage or even the sound system, and the temporary sanitary facilities were hopelessly jammed, with fifty persons standing in line to use each portable &amp;quot;necessary.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Operation: Can You Hear us Now? ===&lt;br /&gt;
TEA party demonstrations have targeted local and national media outs across the country to oppose massive government spending. In a press release, the movement was led by FaxDC in about 100 cities across the U.S. on September 17th. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2009/10/tea-party-movement-denounces-media-corrupton/ Tea Party Movement Denounces Media Corruption], Lookingattheleft.com, October 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Rush Limbaugh]] has previously spoke for the need for such media targeted TEA protests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* NBC studios in Burbank &lt;br /&gt;
* CNN in Atlanta and &lt;br /&gt;
* Affiliate stations of NBC, ABC and CBS&lt;br /&gt;
* The New York Times&lt;br /&gt;
* Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
* Other prominent newspapers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Canyouhearusnow.jpg|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===TEA Party Movie===&lt;br /&gt;
''TEA PARTY: The Documentary Film'' was released Thanksgiving Day 2009, is a documentary of five grassroots activists. The story line ''&amp;quot;from home town rally goers and rally organizers to national activists taking part in the 912 Taxpayer March on Washington.&amp;quot;'' The theme is about principles, a call for a return to constitutionally limited government, personal responsibility, and fiscal restraint at the Federal level. [http://www.teapartymovie.com/ TEA Party the Movie]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pink Slips Campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
Organized in part by Joseph Farah from [[WorldNetDaily]], they had a goal of sending each and every member of Congress more than 5,000,000 pink slips. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Each pink slip reads '''YOU ARE BEING PUT ON NOTICE''' and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*government health care&lt;br /&gt;
*cap and trade&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;hate crimes&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*any more spending&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;If you vote for any of these, your real pink slip will be issued in the next election&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of November 2009, 8 million pink slips have been sent to Congress at a cost of $29 each &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=117136 True grass-roots effort? The 'pink slips' campaign, WND.com, November 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Themes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement began with a protest against two aspects of current public policy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Excessive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
# Special privilege&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rick Santelli specifically cited the mortgage bailout policies of early 2009 as a prize example of the government doing special favors for certain classes of voters, in return for their continued support, and also of the &amp;quot;moral hazard&amp;quot; in which such policies inevitably place anyone who &amp;quot;buys on time,&amp;quot; i.e., buys any sort of asset, from a home appliance to a parcel of [[real estate]], using borrowed money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the movement has progressed, it has begun to sound broader themes, which one may best summarize as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Self-responsibility&lt;br /&gt;
# Self-autonomy&lt;br /&gt;
# Limited government&lt;br /&gt;
# A requirement that government live within its own means, just as individuals must live within theirs&lt;br /&gt;
# Capitalism&lt;br /&gt;
# Freedom of all varieties of production and trade&lt;br /&gt;
# Respect for the [[United States Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Characteristics ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Autonomy of local organizers ===&lt;br /&gt;
Most organization of Tea Parties and similar events is local. Typical of the movement is the Morristown Tea Party Organization ([[Morristown]], [[New Jersey]]), which has a five-member board of trustees and about fifty dedicated volunteers who handle operations, communication, and logistics without assistance or direction from any regional or other organization. State-wide co-ordinating bodies do exist (for example, New Jersey Tea Parties United), but local organizations are responsible for most of their activities, fund-raising, and legal functioning. In this regard, the Tea Party Movement is similar to the Independent Baptist Fellowship of North America, which never seeks to dictate to individual churches how they must conduct their affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Individual comportment and deportment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Event participants, and especially event planners, are urged to comport themselves in a manner respectful of the rights and feelings of others. Organizational leaders consciously endeavor to distinguish their movement from many [[liberal]] protest movements, which often characterize themselves by rude behavior, [[vandalism]], and even physical assaults against their opponents. Any person who persistently suggests that Tea Party Movement participants engage in activities remotely similar to this may usually consider themselves excluded, and in some cases organizers have summoned law-enforcement authorities to deal with provocative behavior by attendees at planning and other meetings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Symbols ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gadsden_flag.png|200px|right]]By far the most prominent symbol at Tea Parties today is the [[Rattlesnake (American symbol)|Gadsden Rattlesnake Flag]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Heraldric'': Or a rattlesnake sable and or coiled as to strike, facing sinister, on a bed of grass vert; motto &amp;quot;Don't Tread On Me&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ''[[American historical flags|Come And Take It]]'' Flag has also appeared, most notably at the September 12 March on Washington. Tea Party participants have almost always used home-made and home-decorated signs and other artifacts, in sharp contrast to the uniform, professionally printed signs carried at [[liberal]] demonstrations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the signs bear lampoons of the most highly publicized Obama Administration policies, from &amp;quot;Czars&amp;quot; to socialized medicine; moreover, Barack Obama is not the only target of criticism, the [[MSM]] has also been challenged in some rallies, both for their failings in covering the Tea Party Movement and also for what most participants regard as a collective decision by Mainstream Media organs to function as ''de facto'' government and/or [[Democratic Party]] as organs rather than the objective and disinterested commentators that they pretend to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the signs that have been seen and photographed at these events have provoked cries of outrage from Tea Party Movement opponents, alleging bad taste, e.g. a picture of Barack Obama with the square mustache affected by [[Adolf Hitler]] and bearing the caption &amp;quot;I've Changed,&amp;quot; and a sign bearing the message &amp;quot;Bury ObamaCare with [[Edward M. Kennedy|Kennedy]].&amp;quot; After the liberal Mainstream Media quickly blamed conservatives and even [[Rush Limbaugh]], some research was done to find the true source of the Hitler poster. It was later uncovered that the provocative Hitler signs were from a group of far-left [[Lyndon LaRouche]] supporters, as they were infiltrating the Tea Party rallies as a means to spread their extreme visions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Seton Motley. [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2009/08/12/nbc-cnn-msnbc-all-assign-communist-larouches-obama-hitler-poster-conse NBC, CNN and MSNBC All Assign Communist LaRouche's Obama-Hitler Poster to Conservatives, Limbaugh], ''NewsBusters'', August 12, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News coverage ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSMbyTEA.jpg|thumb|150px|right|Attitude of Tea Party Movement participants toward four MSM outlets]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most industrious news organ that has covered the Tea Party Movement has been [[Fox News Channel]], and especially its commentators Neil Cavuto and [[Glenn Beck]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coverage by the [[Mainstream Media]] of the Tea Party events has been lacking, both in quantity and in quality. The three traditional broadcast networks ([[ABC]], [[CBS]], [[NBC]]) have attempted to discredit these events as corporate-sponsored or sponsored by the [[Republican Party]] and other conservative or reactionary groups, and have generally censored the movement by refusing to cover major events.&amp;lt;ref name=baker&amp;gt;Baker B, &amp;quot;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2009/04/16/abc-cbs-nbc-try-discredit-tea-party-protests ABC, CBS and NBC Try to Discredit 'Tea Party' Protests],&amp;quot; ''NewsBusters'', 16 April 2009. Accessed September 16, 2009. Baker does a side-by-side comparison of coverage of the Tax Day Tea Parties and of several pro-immigration rallies held on 1 May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, several news anchors working for [[CNN]] and [[MSNBC]] coined the phrase &amp;quot;tea-baggers,&amp;quot; a crude term used to slur [[conservatives]], which has an off-color connotation attempting to mock Tea Party Movement leaders and participants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Patrick Leahy. [http://www.tcotreport.com/obamaslur.html In Pep Talk to Democrats Yesterday, Obama Used Crude Term to Slur Conservatives], ''[[The TCOT Report]]'', November 8, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tea Party organizers are not controlled or funded by the Republican Party or any established interest group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Polls===&lt;br /&gt;
In latge 2009 the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showed 41% of Americans have a positive view of the tea party movement, and 24% had a negative view . By contrast, only 35% of Americans have a positive view of the Democrats and only 28% have a positive view of the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/12/16/wsjnbc-news-poll-tea-party-tops-democrats-and-republicans/ &amp;quot;WSJ/NBC News Poll: Tea Party Tops Democrats and Republicans,&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal'' Dec. 16, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tax Day Tea Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Independence Day Tea Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[9/12 March on Washington D.C.]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Boston Tea Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tax Revolts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josek</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tea_Party_Movement&amp;diff=753761</id>
		<title>Tea Party Movement</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tea_Party_Movement&amp;diff=753761"/>
		<updated>2010-02-12T16:32:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Josek: /* Beginnings */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tea-Party-Express-2-Million-Attend.jpg‎|thumb|right|375px|9/12 Tea Party March on Washington.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''TEA Party Movement''' (TEA an acronym for Taxed Enough Already) is an ongoing, nationwide effort by [[grassroots]] protesters, a collection of individuals and self-organizing groups, all united in accomplishing a single goal: returning fiscal responsibility and limited government to the [[United States]] through the exercise of political [[activist|activism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/15/morning-bell-the-tea-party-movement/ Morning Bell: The Tea Party Movement], heritage.org, April 15th, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The main focus of the TEA Party Movement is a rebuke of outrageous mandates, overreaching and out of control spending by an out of touch federal government. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/24073/ What the Tea Parties Are About], April 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dick Armey]] of [[FreedomWorks]] is a prime mover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the rallies are in protest of the [[generational theft]] of public tax monies, the tremendous extensions of United States Federal debt and authority, the apparent restructuring of the Federal government with the intent to contravene the system of checks and balances for which the Constitution provides, and the attempt, which some movement leaders say has been in progress for several decades, to sacrifice [[liberty]] for permanent dependency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.americansolutions.com/directupload/pdf/TeaPartyOnePagers.pdf American Solutions for Winning the Future (PDF)], American Solutions, April 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bret Baier. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,509445,00.html Taxpayers Strike Back With 'Tea Parties'], ''[[Fox News]]'', March 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Tea Party Guide&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://taxdayteaparty.com/guide/ Tax Day Tea Party Resources ], April 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement held its first scheduled nationwide protest on April 15, 2009, a day that became known as the [[Tax Day Tea Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;WSJ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975867505519363.html Tax Day Becomes Protest Day], ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', April 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the spirit of the founding fathers [[Boston Tea Party]], the rallies have used themes from the [[American Revolution]] and also adopted the &amp;quot;American Tea Party Anthem,&amp;quot; a song first performed during a March 21, 2009 Orlando, Florida Tea Party that drew over 4,000 people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michelle Malkin. [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/21/tea-party-usa-the-movement-grows/ Tea Party U.S.A.: The movement grows], February 21, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsblaze.com/story/20090323074552zzzz.nb/topstory.html &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot; Song Becomes YouTube Hit]. ''Newsblaze'', March 23, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andrea Shea King. [http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/asking/2009/04/14/american-tea-party-anthem-singer-lloyd-marcus-this-whole-thing-is-rush-limbaughs-fault/ American Tea Party Anthem Singer Lloyd Marcus: &amp;quot;This whole thing is Rush Limbaugh’s fault.&amp;quot;], ''Big Hollywood'', April 14, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Beginnings ==&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, radio talk-show host [[Rush Limbaugh]] criticized the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]], commenting, &amp;quot;This 'porkulus' bill is designed to repair the Democratic Party's power losses from the 1990s forward, and to cement the party's majority power for decades.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rush Limbaugh. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123318906638926749.html Rush Limbaugh: My Bipartisan Stimulus], WSJ.com, January 29, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 10, a Cape Coral woman named Mary Rakovich led a small protest outside President Barack Obama's townhall meeting in Fort Myers, [[Florida]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news-press.com/article/20090211/OBAMA/90210068 Those outside Harborside in Fort Myers had plenty to see, say], ''The News-Press'', February 11, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Then in late March of 2009, faced with the prospect of heavy fines from the city for not having the proper permitting or insurance, Mary Rakovich moved forward with future protests but with the backing of national organization ''FreedomWorks''. Rakovich said ''FreedomWorks'' offered to provide the insurance per the city's rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cape-coral-daily-breeze.com/page/content.detail/id/504707.html?nav=5011 Tea party finds new life, broadens cause], cape-coral-daily-breeze.com, March, 31, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first anti-spending protest, organized by Liberty Belle, occurred in [[Seattle]], Washington on February 16, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Derek Erwin. [http://derekerwin.blogspot.com/2009/04/dozen-ring-liberty-belles-sound-800.html A 'Dozen' Ring Liberty Belle's Sound, 800 Cities Ring-Back], ''A 1-In-100 Blogger'', accessed April 18, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds. [http://www.pjtv.com/video/Pajamas_TV/Tea_Party_Protests%3A_Mesa%2C_Seattle%2C_Denver_%28Michelle_Malkin_and_Glenn_Reynolds%29/1406/ Tea Party Protests: Mesa, Seattle, Denver], PJTV, February 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another protest was held the following day, held in [[Denver]] on February 17,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/18732002/detail.html President Signs Massive Stimulus In Denver], accessed April 2, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a protest in Mesa, [[Arizona]] on February 18 brought 500 protesters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary Grado, Sonu Munshi, Hayley Ringle. [http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/135640/ More than 500 protest Obama's arrival], accessed April 2, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shout Heard 'Round the World===&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement gained support when on February 19, on live [[Television|TV]], [[CNBC]] reporter [[Rick Santelli]] argued about the bailouts and shouted, &amp;quot;The government is promoting bad behavior.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2009/02/rick-santelli-tea-party.html Transcript of Rick Santelli's speech], February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnbc.com/id/29283701 Rick Santelli's Shout Heard 'Round the World], CNBC.com, February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Standing in the middle of the Chicago Stock Exchange, Santelli declared that America needed &amp;quot;a new kind of tea party,&amp;quot; so that citizens can express their discontent with &amp;quot;the government's support of fiscal irresponsibility.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jennifer Rubin. [http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/mr-president-turn-back-while-theres-still-time/ Mr. President: Turn Back While There’s Still Time], ''Pajamas Media'', February 20, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matt Drudge. [http://www.streetinsider.com/Insiders+Blog/Rick+Santelli+-+The+Rant+Heard+Round+the+World/4419854.html Rick Santelli - The Rant Heard 'Round the World'], streetinsider.com, February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=myfoxchicago&amp;gt;Andy Roesgen. [http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/TeaParty Protestors Gather for Self-Styled Tea Party], myfoxchicago.com, February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With the help of ''DontGo'', ''Top Conservatives on Twitter'' (TCOT), ''[[Smart Girl Politics]]'' (SGP), ''The American Spectator'', ''Americans for Tax Reform'', ''[[FreedomWorks]]'', and ''The Heartland Institute'', the Chicago Tea Parties were scheduled to happen nationwide on February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dontgomovement.com/blog/2009/02/23/the-chicago-tea-party-is-on/ The Chicago Tea Party is on!], February 23, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===February 27th Tea Parties===&lt;br /&gt;
Americans across the country gathered in 50 cities to protest the newly-passed Stimulus Bill of 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tcotreport.com/Talking_Points.htm Talking Points and Theme for the Nationwide Chicago Tea Party], ''[[The TCOT Report]]'', February 24, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Over 30,000 people made it to this event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teri Christoph. [http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/video/video/show?id=2488056%3AVideo%3A24070&amp;amp; SGP.TeaParty], ''[[Smart Girl Politics]]'', February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many at the event were upset over the economic stimulus packages and bailouts for [[Wall Street]] pushed through by both [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] and President Obama's administrations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.raleigh3.com/default.asp?sdetail=1849&amp;amp;sc=2724 Raleigh Holds 'Tea Party' To Protest Government], ''Raleigh Telegram'', March 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=myfoxchicago/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background:#ccc; text-align:center;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! Sponsors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=page&amp;amp;page-id=68 Schedule of American Tea party Protests (with Sponsors)], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; !! Details&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atlanta, Georgia || TCOT, SGP, Don'tGo || A reported 300 to 400 protesters gathered outside the Georgia Capitol in protest of a $787 billion recovery bill.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;georgia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/02/27/budget-debate-launches-new-tea-party/ Budget debate launches new tea party], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/71521/ Tea Party from Atlanta], pajamasmedia.com, February 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Chicago, Illinois]] || Don'tGo&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dontgomovement.com/blog/2009/02/19/chicago-tea-party/ Don'tGo Movement: Pledge to Have a Representation at Chicago Tea Party], February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; || Approximately 300 people braved the 25 degree cold and wind in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;illinios&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2009/02/breaking-chicago-tea-party-pictures/ BREAKING - Chicago Tea Party (Pictures) UPDATED Now With Video!], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dontgomovement.com/blog/2009/02/27/the-birth-of-a-new-revolution/ The Birth of a New Revolution], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=myfoxchicago/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas || Americans for Prosperity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.redcounty.com/texas/2009/02/the-tea-parties-were-successfu/ The Tea Parties were successful - here's the proof], February 23, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; TCOT, SGP, Don'tGo, Dallas County Young Republicans || A &amp;quot;Texas-sized Tea Party&amp;quot; of 300 or more Texans met in Fort Worth, protesting big government and taxes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fortworth&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://txtcot.ning.com/video/tea-party-09-made-the-world Tea Party '09 made the world news], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One sponsor, TCOT, collected over 800 signatures during the event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://txtcot.ning.com/profiles/blogs/tea-party-09 Tea Party '09], February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Denver, Colorado || TCOT, SGP, Don'tGo || At the East Capitol Steps, 100 &amp;quot;[[Atlas Shrugged]]&amp;quot; fans braved cold temperatures for a &amp;quot;Nationwide Chicago Tea Party&amp;quot; to protest the Obama Administration's bailout plan.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dcolorado1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://coloradoindependent.com/23026/ayn-rand-stars-at-denver-stimulus-tea-party-protest Ayn Rand stars at Denver stimulus ‘tea party’ protest], ''Colorado Independent'', February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dcolorado2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://colorado.newsplatoon.com/2009/02/24/denver-tea-party/ Denver Tea Party], [[colorado]], February 24, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Houston, Texas]] || TBD || Large groups, not entirely made up of Republicans, tried to create a modern day version of the Boston Tea Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://houstontps.org/?page_id=163 Houston Tea Party Society, In the News, Audio, Video], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.khou.com/video/topstories-index.html?nvid=352345&amp;amp;shu=1 Houston's Tax Day tea party], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Washington, D.C.]] || Americans for Prosperity, Americans for Tax Reform, Young Conservatives Coalition, The Heartland Institute || The American Tea Party made some noise outside the White House.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dc_examiner&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/New-American-Tea-Party-40442172.html DC Tea Party thrown at the White House], ''The Washington Examiner'', February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freedomworks.org/petition/iamwithrick/index.html 2009 Taxpayer Tea party], February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several hundred taxpayers showed up at the DC Tea Party protest in Lafayette Park,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;michellemalkin&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Michelle Malkin]]. [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/scenes-from-the-tea-party/ Scenes from the D.C. Tea Party], February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dcfreedomworks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/bstein80/video-from-the-dc-tea-party Video from the DC Tea Party], ''Freedom Works'', February 28, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including &amp;quot;Joe the Plumber.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hotair&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/27/joe-the-plumber-at-dc-tea-party-no-one-on-the-hill-gives-a-rip-about-you/ Joe the Plumber at D.C. Tea Party: No one on the Hill gives a rip about you], ''[[Hot Air]]'', February 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement is a Hoax, started by liberals to corrupt you unborn childern.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Schedule ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Headnew.jpg|right|380px|right|Tax Day Tea Party poster]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tax Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Tax Day Tea Party]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Success from the Chicago Tea Parties on February 27, as part of a concerted nationwide effort, led to the Tax Day Tea Party rallies held on April 15, 2009. Following the Chicago Tea Party protests, a group called ''Americans for Prosperity'' of [[North Carolina]] began implementing plans for a &amp;quot;Tax Day&amp;quot; Tea Party rally in Raleigh on the tax filing deadline.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.raleigh3.com/default.asp?sdetail=1849&amp;amp;sc=2724 Raleigh Holds 'Tea Party' To Protest Government], ''Raleigh Telegram'', March 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leading up to the Tax Day Tea Parties, the events were organized and promoted by volunteers, activists, and [[Political action committee]]s across the [[United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/freedomworks-co-sponsoring-taxpayer-tea-parties-ac&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By taking advantage of online viral [[marketing]] to get the word out,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;investorsnews&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=470054&amp;amp;Ntt=tea+party 'Tea Party' Protests In 35 Cities], March 2, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the speed and scope with which the Tax Day Tea Party protests were organized can be attributed to the use of [[Twitter]] [[TCOT Report|#TCOT feeds]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://tcotreport.com/ TCOT Report], ''[[The TCOT Report]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on [[blog|blogs]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marc Ambinder. [http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/tea_parties_pajamas_and_mediaevent_symbiotics.php Tea Parties, Pajamas, and Media/Event Symbiotics], ''The Atlantic'', February 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the social networking [[Web site]] [[Facebook]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;facebook&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/04/going-galt-and-the-next-tea-party-wave/ “Going Galt” and the next Tea Party wave], [[Michelle Malkin]], March 4, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Commemorations ====&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama is seen to have responded to the tea parties with requested budget cuts of $100 million on April 20, 2009.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rushlimbaugh&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_042109/content/01125107.guest.html Obama Responded to Tea Parties with $100 Million in &amp;quot;Budget Cuts&amp;quot;], RushLimbaugh.com, April 21, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rush Limbaugh contended, &amp;quot;I'm sure they've got internal polling data that shows these tea parties are successful and these tea parties are a problem. So they're responding to the tea parties here. That's all this is.&amp;quot; According to a Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey on April 20, 2009, the poll found that fifty-one percent (51%) of Americans had a favorable view of the tea parties held nationwide, including 32% who said their view of the events were &amp;quot;Very favorable.&amp;quot; Thirty-three percent (33%) held an unfavorable opinion of the tea parties. Fifteen percent (15%) were not sure.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rasmussenreports&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics2/51_view_tea_parties_favorably_political_class_strongly_disagrees 51% View Tea Parties Favorably, Political Class Strongly Disagrees], ''Rasmussen Reports'', April 20, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Independence Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Independence Day Tea Party]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same organizations decided to repeat their performance on [[Independence Day]] (July 4, 2009). Even more people attended; the largest such rally was held on the grounds of the Southfork Ranch (scene of the [[television]] series ''Dallas '), in [[Plano]], [[Texas]], which drew 37,000 attendees. The themes that organizers and participants sounded at these events were much the same as were those at the Tax Day events: advocacy of limited government, decrying of high levels of taxation, and refusal to countenance plans for [[socialism]] and especially socialized [[medicine]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Labor Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
Several organizations also organized Tea Parties on [[Labor Day]], once again sounding the same limited-government, low-tax, and anti-socialistic themes. Those organizations that did not plan such events often referred people to those that did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== September 12 March on Washington ===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[September 12 March on Washington]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gadsden_snake.jpg|250px|right]]The largest TEA Party event thus far has been the September 12 March on [[Washington, DC]]. This was an event organized initially by the FreedomWorks Foundation, but nearly all Tea Party organizations decided to participate in this event, primarily by chartering buses and registering people for transportation to Washington. FreedomWorks estimates that 600,000 to 800,000 persons attended, and they base that estimate on the number of persons who responded when their Master of Ceremonies asked all attendees within earshot to send the text message &amp;quot;Freedom&amp;quot; to a designated five-digit telephone number. However, the [[London]] ''Daily Mail'' estimates attendance at as many as a million persons, on the basis of eyewitness accounts and aerial-photographic evidence.&amp;lt;ref name=dailymail&amp;gt;Gardner D, &amp;quot;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1213056/Up-million-march-US-Capitol-protest-Obamas-spending-tea-party-demonstration.html A million march to US Capitol to protest against 'Obama the socialist'],&amp;quot; ''The London Daily Mail'', September 14, 2009. Accessed September 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Estimates of total attendance are difficult to obtain, primarily because the size of the crowd far exceeded the estimates by the event planners, with the result that many attendees were never able to get within earshot of the stage or even the sound system, and the temporary sanitary facilities were hopelessly jammed, with fifty persons standing in line to use each portable &amp;quot;necessary.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Operation: Can You Hear us Now? ===&lt;br /&gt;
TEA party demonstrations have targeted local and national media outs across the country to oppose massive government spending. In a press release, the movement was led by FaxDC in about 100 cities across the U.S. on September 17th. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2009/10/tea-party-movement-denounces-media-corrupton/ Tea Party Movement Denounces Media Corruption], Lookingattheleft.com, October 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Rush Limbaugh]] has previously spoke for the need for such media targeted TEA protests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* NBC studios in Burbank &lt;br /&gt;
* CNN in Atlanta and &lt;br /&gt;
* Affiliate stations of NBC, ABC and CBS&lt;br /&gt;
* The New York Times&lt;br /&gt;
* Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
* Other prominent newspapers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Canyouhearusnow.jpg|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===TEA Party Movie===&lt;br /&gt;
''TEA PARTY: The Documentary Film'' was released Thanksgiving Day 2009, is a documentary of five grassroots activists. The story line ''&amp;quot;from home town rally goers and rally organizers to national activists taking part in the 912 Taxpayer March on Washington.&amp;quot;'' The theme is about principles, a call for a return to constitutionally limited government, personal responsibility, and fiscal restraint at the Federal level. [http://www.teapartymovie.com/ TEA Party the Movie]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pink Slips Campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
Organized in part by Joseph Farah from [[WorldNetDaily]], they had a goal of sending each and every member of Congress more than 5,000,000 pink slips. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Each pink slip reads '''YOU ARE BEING PUT ON NOTICE''' and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*government health care&lt;br /&gt;
*cap and trade&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;hate crimes&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*any more spending&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;If you vote for any of these, your real pink slip will be issued in the next election&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of November 2009, 8 million pink slips have been sent to Congress at a cost of $29 each &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=117136 True grass-roots effort? The 'pink slips' campaign, WND.com, November 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Themes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party Movement began with a protest against two aspects of current public policy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Excessive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
# Special privilege&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rick Santelli specifically cited the mortgage bailout policies of early 2009 as a prize example of the government doing special favors for certain classes of voters, in return for their continued support, and also of the &amp;quot;moral hazard&amp;quot; in which such policies inevitably place anyone who &amp;quot;buys on time,&amp;quot; i.e., buys any sort of asset, from a home appliance to a parcel of [[real estate]], using borrowed money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the movement has progressed, it has begun to sound broader themes, which one may best summarize as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Self-responsibility&lt;br /&gt;
# Self-autonomy&lt;br /&gt;
# Limited government&lt;br /&gt;
# A requirement that government live within its own means, just as individuals must live within theirs&lt;br /&gt;
# Capitalism&lt;br /&gt;
# Freedom of all varieties of production and trade&lt;br /&gt;
# Respect for the [[United States Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Characteristics ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Autonomy of local organizers ===&lt;br /&gt;
Most organization of Tea Parties and similar events is local. Typical of the movement is the Morristown Tea Party Organization ([[Morristown]], [[New Jersey]]), which has a five-member board of trustees and about fifty dedicated volunteers who handle operations, communication, and logistics without assistance or direction from any regional or other organization. State-wide co-ordinating bodies do exist (for example, New Jersey Tea Parties United), but local organizations are responsible for most of their activities, fund-raising, and legal functioning. In this regard, the Tea Party Movement is similar to the Independent Baptist Fellowship of North America, which never seeks to dictate to individual churches how they must conduct their affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Individual comportment and deportment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Event participants, and especially event planners, are urged to comport themselves in a manner respectful of the rights and feelings of others. Organizational leaders consciously endeavor to distinguish their movement from many [[liberal]] protest movements, which often characterize themselves by rude behavior, [[vandalism]], and even physical assaults against their opponents. Any person who persistently suggests that Tea Party Movement participants engage in activities remotely similar to this may usually consider themselves excluded, and in some cases organizers have summoned law-enforcement authorities to deal with provocative behavior by attendees at planning and other meetings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Symbols ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gadsden_flag.png|200px|right]]By far the most prominent symbol at Tea Parties today is the [[Rattlesnake (American symbol)|Gadsden Rattlesnake Flag]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Heraldric'': Or a rattlesnake sable and or coiled as to strike, facing sinister, on a bed of grass vert; motto &amp;quot;Don't Tread On Me&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ''[[American historical flags|Come And Take It]]'' Flag has also appeared, most notably at the September 12 March on Washington. Tea Party participants have almost always used home-made and home-decorated signs and other artifacts, in sharp contrast to the uniform, professionally printed signs carried at [[liberal]] demonstrations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the signs bear lampoons of the most highly publicized Obama Administration policies, from &amp;quot;Czars&amp;quot; to socialized medicine; moreover, Barack Obama is not the only target of criticism, the [[MSM]] has also been challenged in some rallies, both for their failings in covering the Tea Party Movement and also for what most participants regard as a collective decision by Mainstream Media organs to function as ''de facto'' government and/or [[Democratic Party]] as organs rather than the objective and disinterested commentators that they pretend to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the signs that have been seen and photographed at these events have provoked cries of outrage from Tea Party Movement opponents, alleging bad taste, e.g. a picture of Barack Obama with the square mustache affected by [[Adolf Hitler]] and bearing the caption &amp;quot;I've Changed,&amp;quot; and a sign bearing the message &amp;quot;Bury ObamaCare with [[Edward M. Kennedy|Kennedy]].&amp;quot; After the liberal Mainstream Media quickly blamed conservatives and even [[Rush Limbaugh]], some research was done to find the true source of the Hitler poster. It was later uncovered that the provocative Hitler signs were from a group of far-left [[Lyndon LaRouche]] supporters, as they were infiltrating the Tea Party rallies as a means to spread their extreme visions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Seton Motley. [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2009/08/12/nbc-cnn-msnbc-all-assign-communist-larouches-obama-hitler-poster-conse NBC, CNN and MSNBC All Assign Communist LaRouche's Obama-Hitler Poster to Conservatives, Limbaugh], ''NewsBusters'', August 12, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News coverage ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSMbyTEA.jpg|thumb|150px|right|Attitude of Tea Party Movement participants toward four MSM outlets]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most industrious news organ that has covered the Tea Party Movement has been [[Fox News Channel]], and especially its commentators Neil Cavuto and [[Glenn Beck]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coverage by the [[Mainstream Media]] of the Tea Party events has been lacking, both in quantity and in quality. The three traditional broadcast networks ([[ABC]], [[CBS]], [[NBC]]) have attempted to discredit these events as corporate-sponsored or sponsored by the [[Republican Party]] and other conservative or reactionary groups, and have generally censored the movement by refusing to cover major events.&amp;lt;ref name=baker&amp;gt;Baker B, &amp;quot;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2009/04/16/abc-cbs-nbc-try-discredit-tea-party-protests ABC, CBS and NBC Try to Discredit 'Tea Party' Protests],&amp;quot; ''NewsBusters'', 16 April 2009. Accessed September 16, 2009. Baker does a side-by-side comparison of coverage of the Tax Day Tea Parties and of several pro-immigration rallies held on 1 May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, several news anchors working for [[CNN]] and [[MSNBC]] coined the phrase &amp;quot;tea-baggers,&amp;quot; a crude term used to slur [[conservatives]], which has an off-color connotation attempting to mock Tea Party Movement leaders and participants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Patrick Leahy. [http://www.tcotreport.com/obamaslur.html In Pep Talk to Democrats Yesterday, Obama Used Crude Term to Slur Conservatives], ''[[The TCOT Report]]'', November 8, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tea Party organizers are not controlled or funded by the Republican Party or any established interest group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Polls===&lt;br /&gt;
In latge 2009 the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showed 41% of Americans have a positive view of the tea party movement, and 24% had a negative view . By contrast, only 35% of Americans have a positive view of the Democrats and only 28% have a positive view of the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/12/16/wsjnbc-news-poll-tea-party-tops-democrats-and-republicans/ &amp;quot;WSJ/NBC News Poll: Tea Party Tops Democrats and Republicans,&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal'' Dec. 16, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tax Day Tea Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Independence Day Tea Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[9/12 March on Washington D.C.]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Boston Tea Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tax Revolts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josek</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rapture&amp;diff=753758</id>
		<title>Rapture</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rapture&amp;diff=753758"/>
		<updated>2010-02-12T16:14:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Josek: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Rapture''' is a noun meaning ''&amp;quot;A state of being carried away by overwhelming emotion&amp;quot;''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most modern Christian ministries imply &amp;quot;rapture&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;harpazo&amp;quot; which specifically points to &amp;quot;caught up&amp;quot; in 1 Thessalonians 4:17.&lt;br /&gt;
:''Then we which are alive and remain shall be '''caught up''' together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.''&lt;br /&gt;
The word '''rapture''' is not found in the Bible, but rather taken from the New Greek word &amp;quot;harpazo&amp;quot; (pronounced har-pad'-zo). &amp;quot;Harpazo&amp;quot; is found 13 times in the New Testament including Revelation 12:5 which addresses Jesus' ascent described in the Book of Acts. &amp;quot;Harpazo&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;to seize (in various applications): - catch (away, up), pluck, pull, take (by force).&amp;quot; according to Strong's Greek Dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Rapture''' (from the Greek word έκσταση, ekstasi) is a hypothetical event to take place in the [[Last Days]] according to a mid-19th century preacher John Nelson Darby. John Nelson Darby interpreted 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 in the New Testament of the Bible as which present future believers in Jesus Christ will be suddenly taken away prior to the events of the war of Armageddon and the ushering in of the Millennial Kingdom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.'' &lt;br /&gt;
:''For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.'' &lt;br /&gt;
:''For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.'' &lt;br /&gt;
:''For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Then we which are alive and remain shall be '''caught up''' together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.'' &lt;br /&gt;
:''Wherefore comfort one another with these words.'' (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical commentators '''suggest''' that the following events need to occur prior to the Rapture taking place:&lt;br /&gt;
* Lawless conditions in the world, as in the days of Noah (Matthew 24:36-41)&lt;br /&gt;
* The rise of a powerful government in Europe with its origins in the Roman Empire (Daniel 9, Revelation 13)&lt;br /&gt;
* The rise of powerful countries to the north, south, and east of Israel (Daniel 11)&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel living in peace with its neighbors (Ezekiel 38)&lt;br /&gt;
* A peace treaty between Israel and the Arabs for seven years (Daniel 9)&lt;br /&gt;
* The commencement of the rebuilding of the Jewish temple on it's original site in Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The website 'Rapture Ready'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.raptureready.com/rap2.html Rapture Ready]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; maintains an index of how close we are claimed to be to the Rapture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is some debate in such circles over whether the Rapture will occur before, during or after the reign of the [[Antichrist]], but the original reference by St [[Paul]] that &amp;quot;we which are alive [and] remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air&amp;quot; at I Thessalonians 4:17 clearly dates it to the time of the [[Second Coming]], and does not suggest in any way that it will result in Christians being spared in advance the horrors of the [[Last Times]], as is sometimes proposed.  Matthew 24:29-35 seems to favor the post-tribulation position, however:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible quote|Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer [is] nigh: So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, [even] at the doors. Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.|book=Matthew|chap=24|verses=29-35|version=KJV}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Premillennial Dispensationalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nyu.edu/fas/projects/vcb/ChristianMedia/prophecy_premdisp.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Postmillennial Dispensationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Midmillennial Dispensationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;Come the Rapture Heathens will finally be able to live in peace&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
* Armstrong, K., ''The Battle for God'' (Harper Perennial, 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cruden, A., ''Complete Concordance to the Old and New Testaments'' (Lutterworth, 1930)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Holy Bible'' (King James Version)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New English Bible'' (Oxford &amp;amp; Cambridge University Presses, 1970)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New Jerusalem Bible'' (Darton, Longman &amp;amp; Todd, 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peake, A.S., ''Commentary on the Bible'' (Nelson, 1962)&lt;br /&gt;
* Young, R., ''Analytical Concordance to the Holy Bible'' (Lutterworth, 1939)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian Theology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josek</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Landmark_College&amp;diff=729143</id>
		<title>Landmark College</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Landmark_College&amp;diff=729143"/>
		<updated>2009-12-11T02:11:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Josek: Created page with 'Landmark College is a junior liberal arts college located in Putney, Vermont.  Founded in 1985 by Charles Drake.  The School is specifically designed for students with learning d...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Landmark College is a junior liberal arts college located in Putney, Vermont.  Founded in 1985 by Charles Drake.  The School is specifically designed for students with learning disabilities and ADHD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landmark Mission Statement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Landmark College's mission is to transform the way students learn, educators teach and the public thinks about education. We provide highly accessible approaches to learning that empower individuals who learn differently to exceed their aspirations and to achieve their greatest potential. Through the Landmark College Institute for Research and Training, the College aims to extend its mission across the nation and throughout the world.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.landmark.edu/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josek</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Hinduism&amp;diff=728959</id>
		<title>Talk:Hinduism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Hinduism&amp;diff=728959"/>
		<updated>2009-12-10T20:34:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Josek: /* Contradiction */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Wikiproject Religion}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Middlegray's edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
I removed Middlegray's edit with the edit comment, &amp;quot;''Thanks for the source. That allowed me to determine that the source, and therefore the para., was scurrilous misinformation, so I've removed it.''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Middlegray reinstated his edit, with the edit comment, &amp;quot;''Dear Philip J. Rayment, I am from India, I am Hindu and you are niether, so your judgment of authenticity of my sources is as good as my judgement about KKK''&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True, I'm not from India, and I'm not Hindu, but I am from Australia and I am a Christian, so that makes me competent to judge what that anti-Christian Hindu site was saying, particularly when it said, &amp;quot;The terrorists [Christians] receive military aid from extremist Christian groups in Australia and New Zealand&amp;quot;.  This is either utter nonsense, or at best an extremely atypical situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karajou reverted the reinstatement.  Nevertheless, the reinstatement did provide a different source, and the second part of the edit at least is supported there, so I am reinstating that bit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:50, 20 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would just like to note that it is said in this article that Hinduism in not a polytheistic religion.  But if you click on the &amp;quot;polytheism&amp;quot; link, it says otherwise.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josek</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>