<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jumbuckjim</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jumbuckjim"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Jumbuckjim"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T18:38:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;diff=739445</id>
		<title>Bible</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;diff=739445"/>
		<updated>2009-12-30T13:09:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jumbuckjim: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:800px-Crop Book of Isaiah 2006-06-06.jpg|thumb|300px|right|The Holy Bible, opened to the Book of Isaiah.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
Stephen Colbert is God, He is the original creator who created the world in six days. He is the God of all beings in this universe. He has other names such as Yahweh and Jesus. He has again arrives at earth and brings salvation to people. Lord Stephen has three parts, The Balls, The Finger, and the Eyebrow, which is called Trinity. The Balls, each of the two are bigger and weights more than the universe combine, symbolizes the infinity power of Him. The Finger, with each wag, symbolizes the punishment and condemnation of sinfulness. The Eyebrow is his message to Earth, with each rise and fall, the will of Lord and God Stephen is being heard by his followers. Lord Stephen is a vengeful God, with his purgatory-On Notice Board, and his hell-Dead To Me Board, he chastises the sinful. But he is also a merciful God, pray to him, and he will answer your prayers. Honor him, and you will go to His Heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The place where Lord and God Stephen, and His angles and faithful follower lives, which is commonly known as Heaven. It is a place where His glory is being honored and His messages being heard. It is the show which is crucial to Salvation, it is a Holy Show. Watch it, and the road toward the Pearl Gate will be cleared for you, and you shall be greeted by Saint Jon Stewart to the Heaven and world of Lord Stephen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Holy Show, Colbert Report, has given convenience to the unfortunates who cannot access a TV or computer, by producing its own Holy Book, millions of times holier than The Bible, called I AM AMERICAN AND SO CAN YOU! To the children of impoverished who could not hear the message of Lord Stephen, they now shall have the equal chance to enter the Heaven as rest of us do. There is no need to wonder about life anymore, because, Lord Stephen has answered all your questions in that book; read it, and you will be blessed by His Eternal Light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being the Holy Show, it is the only show worth watching, its book and its website are also the only book and website one should see. Anything else is heresy, and are condemned as sinful, whose viewers are considered as traitors and will be send to Hell with Satan Andrew Schlafly&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such words are of the faituful followers of Lord Stephen Colbert, and any change to it, by anyone whose master and commands are not from Lord Stephen or Saint Jon Stewart, will face Eternal Fire of Hell in The Judgment Day&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; had its origins in an ancient [[Phoenicia]]n seaport called [[Byblos]], which was so-named as a result of the trade and manufacture of writing material based on the [[papyrus]] or byblos reed, used extensively in antiquity for making [[scroll]]s and [[book]]s.  The [[Greek language|Greek]] word ''biblos'' was based upon this, and it came to be the word for ''book'' (a small book was termed ''biblion''), and by the 2nd century A.D. Greek [[Christianity|Christians]] had called the Scriptures ''ta Biblia'' ('''τα βιβλία''' ''the books''), which was transferred to [[Latin]] by dropping the ''ta''; the word made its way to [[Old French]] where the plural was dropped in favor of the singular, hence becoming the [[English]] word ''Bible''. (Unger, pg 143; Moulton; Blass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Books of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
===The Old Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;360&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Old Testament layout&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Jewish&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Judges&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The Minor Prophets&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Job&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Songs&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|Esther&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations&lt;br /&gt;
|Job&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ecclesiastes&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ester&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|Ecclesiastes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Solomon&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The Minor Prophets&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Dates of each Book&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Old Testament&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|New Testament&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Matthew, A.D. 60-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Mark, A.D. 60-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke, A.D. 58-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|John, A.D. 95&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Acts, A.D. 58-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua, 1400-1360 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Romans, A.D. 58&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Judges, c. 1020 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Corinthians, A.D. 57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth, c. 1090 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Corinthians, A.D. 57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Galatians, A.D. 56&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Ephesians, A.D. 62-63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Kings, 609-600 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Philippians, A.D. 58-60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Kings, 609-600 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Colosians, A.D. 61-63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Chronicles, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Thessalonians, A.D. 52&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Chronicles, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Thessalonians, A.D. 53&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Timothy, A.D. 62-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Timothy, A.D. 65-66&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Esther, 464-425 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Titus, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Job, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Philemon, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms, 1004-965 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;
|Hebrews, A.D. 63-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|James, A.D. 63-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eccleisiastes, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Peter, A.D. 64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Solomon, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Peter, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah, 785-697 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah, 587-538 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations, 587-538 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|3rd John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel, 592-572 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Jude, c. A.D. 70-75&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel, 539-520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Revelation, A.D. 96-98&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hosea, 753-731 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joel, 835-796 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Amos, 787-747 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Obadiah, 848-841 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonah, 771-754 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Micah, 715-687 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nahum, 661-612 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Habbakuk, 625-608 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zephaniah, 621-608 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Haggai, 520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zechariah, 520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Malachi, 455 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament]], also called the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh, consists of thirty-nine books. The books themselves were originally written in [[Hebrew]], and later on in the [[Aramaic]] language of Palestine; the Greek language version written after the conquest of [[Alexander the Great]] is known as the [[Septuagint]].  [[Melito]], a bishop of [[Sardis]] in [[Lydia]] (in what is now [[Turkey]]), is said to have coined the phrase ''Old Testament'' about A.D. 170.  The Old Testament is divided in three parts (hence, &amp;quot;Tanakh&amp;quot;) within the Jewish community: the [[Torah]] (&amp;quot;Law&amp;quot;), or [[Pentateuch]], the five books of [[Moses]]; [[Nevi'im]] (&amp;quot;Prophets&amp;quot;), and [[Ketuvim]] (&amp;quot;Writings,” or [[Hagiographa]]). Here the arrangement of the books differs somewhat from the Old Testament as used by Christians, however the actual writing of each book remains the same. The Christian order of the the books of the Bible follow the Chronology of the events and the personages being related, while in the Jewish order, though there is a chronological framework, the order follows more the importance, influence, &amp;quot;weight of usage&amp;quot; within Judaism. Thus, for orthodox Judaism, The Torah of Moses (the 5 books of Moses) come first, and are the most authoritative of all Scripture. Under the Pharasaic theory that the Moses was given the Oral law explicating how the written law was to be applied, at the same time as he was given the written law contained in the Bible, and that oral law passed on through the generations, the Mishna and the Gemara composing the Talmud is equally authoritative with the Torah of Moses. Then the Prophets come next in authority. But the Prophets are broader than considered by the Christian ordering. The Prophets do include what Christians call the Former and the Latter, or the Major and the Minor prophets, but it also includes what Christinns consider History - such as the books of the Kings. The last in authority for every day life of the Jew in terms of &amp;quot;regulation&amp;quot;, actually form  a great influence in the Synagogue worship - the Writings, with a heavy emphasis on the Psalms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Torah====&lt;br /&gt;
The Five books of Moses, in their Hebrew and English names:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bereisheet (&amp;quot;in the beginning&amp;quot;), or [[Genesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Shemot (“names”), or [[Exodus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Vayikra (“and God called”), or [[Leviticus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Bemidbar (“in the Wilderness”), or [[Numbers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Devarim (“words”), or [[Deuteronomy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first eleven chapters of ''Genesis'' provide the account of the [[Creation]], the history of God's early relationship with humanity, and the [[Deluge]] of [[Noah]]. The remaining thirty-nine chapters detail the account of God's covenant with the early Hebrew nation, led by the patriarchs [[Abraham]], [[Isaac]] and [[Jacob]] (or Israel), and one of Jacob's children, [[Joseph]]. It tells the beginnings of God's chosen people, of how God commanded Abraham to leave his family and home to settle in the land of [[Canaan]], and how the Children of Israel later moved to Egypt.  The remainder of the Torah, beginning with ''Exodus'', tells the story of the great Hebrew leader [[Moses]], and of the Hebrews through their sojourn and slavery in Egypt, their escape from bondage, and their wanderings in the desert until they finally enter the Promised Land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nevi'im====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Nevi'im]] (&amp;quot;Prophets&amp;quot;) is the story of the rise toward, and ultimately reaching, the Hebrew monarchy; the sad period of anarchy and revolt leading to the division into the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel; and the prophets who judged the kings of both in God's name. It ends with the conquest of both kingdoms and the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. The Minor Prophets are considered a single book in the Nevi'um; in Christianity they have been split into twelve separate books and named for their authors.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joshua (Biblical book)|Joshua]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Judges (Biblical book)|Judges]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Samuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Samuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Kings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Kings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Isaiah (Biblical book)|Isaiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeremiah (Biblical book)|Jeremiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ezekiel (Biblical book)|Ezekiel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Minor Prophets]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hosea (Biblical book)|Hosea]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joel (Biblical book)|Joel]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Amos (Biblical book)|Amos]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Obadiah (Biblical book)|Obadiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jonah (Biblical book)|Jonah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Micah (Biblical book)|Micah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nahum (Biblical book)|Nahum]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Habakkuk (Biblical book)|Habakkuk]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zephaniah (Biblical book)|Zephaniah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Haggai (Biblical book)|Haggai]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zechariah (Biblical book)|Zechariah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Malachi (Biblical book)|Malachi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Ketuvim====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ketuvim]], or &amp;quot;Writings,&amp;quot; contain lyrical poetry, philosophical reflections on life, and the writings of the prophets and other Jewish leaders during the exile in [[Babylon]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psalms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Proverbs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Job]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Song of Songs]], also called [[Song of Solomon]] in the Christian Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Ruth]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lamentations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ecclesiastes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel (Biblical book)|Daniel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ezra]], divided into the two books of Ezra and [[Nehemiah]] in the Christian Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Books of Chronicles]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[David]] has been named as the author of the ''Psalms''; [[Solomon]] is believed to have written ''Song of Songs'' in his youth, the ''Proverbs'' in his prime, and ''Ecclesiastes'' during his old age.  The prophet [[Jeremiah]] is thought to have written the aptly-named ''Lamentations'' at the beginning of the exile in Babylon. The ''Book of Ruth'' is the only biblical book that centers entirely on a non-Jew, a [[Moabite]] who married a Jew and became an ancestor of both David and [[Jesus Christ]]. ''Esther'' is unique as it is the only book in the Bible not to mention God.  [[Moses]] is considered to be the author of ''Job''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The melodies of the Old Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
The Hebrew of the present day Old Testament is composed of the Hebrew consonents and, added on at a later stage, the vowels. Along with these two elements, other signs were added which indicated the melodies that were sung along with the words or phrases. Some of the signs were positioned above the individual consonents, some below, and some to the side. Some of these melody signs were associated with others providing a musical pattern that corresponds with the opening of a thought, similar to the beginning of a sentence (ex. &amp;quot;merkha&amp;quot;), the continuation of a thought (ex. &amp;quot;munakh&amp;quot;), tying in one word with the following, as one melody flowed into the next, the &amp;quot;resting&amp;quot; or completion of a thought, much in &amp;quot;the same way that a comma (ex. &amp;quot;azla&amp;quot;), though not ending a sentence, makes for the &amp;quot;semi&amp;quot;-ending or minor completion of a thought, a major break in the run of thoughts (&amp;quot;etnachta&amp;quot;), though  the run of thought would be resumed until the major completion (&amp;quot;sof pasuq&amp;quot;), much in the same way the a period brings to a stop and a completion as a sentence ends. Thus the musical signs in the Hebrew text also provide an interpretion of the text current to the times in which the signs were incorporated as part of the text. The signs that tie one word to another providing one thought are called &amp;quot;conjunctive&amp;quot; signs and the signs that separate words and the thought of them are called &amp;quot;disjuctive&amp;quot;. An example of the use of these signs to interprete the Hebrew text is the well known prophesy of the One to come. The Hebrew letters can either be understood to read &amp;quot;His name shall be called Wonderful counsellor of the mighty God&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;His name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God.&amp;quot; The melody signs (called in Hebrew &amp;quot;Ta'mei HaMikra) decide for the latter. After &amp;quot;Wonderful&amp;quot; there is a disjuctive, after &amp;quot;Counsellor&amp;quot; there is a disjuctive, and after &amp;quot;Mighty&amp;quot; (but adj. after the noun in Hebrew order) there is a conjunctive. It is possible to reconstruct to some extent the melody and the interpretation of the Old Testament current in the first century and therefore the melody and the interpretation of Jesus Himself. This is because of the following: the present day melodies of the various dispersions of the Jews are to a great extent different one from the other. Some of these dispersions are the Ashkenazi, representing the Jews exiled from Israel by the Romans in 70 A.D. and then on to the Rhine Valley,and then onto parts of Eastern Europe, Western Europe, America, etc. the Sephardim who saw the beginnings of their disperion from Spain in the 15th Century and then on to Greece, Turkey, North Aftrica. Holland, and America, the Yemenites, the Bnei Israel of India, the Jews of Ethiopia, etc. etc, Yet, with the diversity in melodies of the Scriptures, there are certain features which are either identical or strikingly similar. Musicologist, Joel Segal, pointed out over 40 years ago, that that could only have been possible if these dispersions were at one time together in the same place. The only time that all these dispersions were together in the same place was prior to the great dispersion of the first century and the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Old Testament Apocrypha===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Apocrypha]] was written during the four hundred years between the last book of the Old Testament and the birth of Christ.  The term itself comes from the Greek word ''apokruphos'' (&amp;quot;hidden&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;concealed&amp;quot;), and although they have an actual history and literary value, the fourteen books which make up the Apocrypha have been rejected as canonical by both the Jewish faith and most denominations of the Christian church due to historical, geographical, or literal inaccuracies; the teaching of doctrines which contradict inspired Scripture; and a lack of elements and structure which give genuine Scripture its unique characteristic (Unger, pg. 70). The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches, among others, include the Apocrypha in their versions of the Bible, considering them to be canonical.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Apocryphal books had been used in both Israel and Egypt and are part of the Old Testament in the Greek language used by Jews all over the Greek speaking world - particularly Alexandria, Egypt. This version is called the Septuaginta. The Septuaginta fell into disuse among Jews for two reasons - 1. Greek speaking Christians were using the Septuaginta in their efforts to bring Jews to faith in Jesus Christ 2. A number of the Apocryphal books were also apocalyptic, that is, focusing on the last days, the KIngdom of God in battle against the kingdoms of this world and the downfall of this world's empires. This was considered dangerous and liable to provoke Rome against the Jews. Alternative Greek translations to the Septuaginta, which was considered &amp;quot;loose&amp;quot;, were adopted by the Rabbis. These were the translations of three proselytes to Judaism, Theodosious, Aquillas, and Symmachus. The Jewish Rabbinic &amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; of Jamnia (Yavneh on the Mediterraenian coast of Israel) in 90 A.D., under the leadership of Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai, effectively excluded the Apocraphal books (along with the Septuaginta) from the Jewish Canon by requiring, for a book to be considered canonical, that it have been written in Hebrew (and Aramaic). Actually, a number of the apocryphal books, or portions thereof,  had been written originally in Hebrew, most notably, the Book of Ben Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) found in Hebrew at Qumran with the rest of the Dead Sea Scrolls, but this was unknown to Yohanan Ben Zakkai and the Council of Jamnia in the first century. Under the impetus of Renaissance learning, Protestant scholars, now able to translate the Bible directly from the original languages of Hebrew and Greek, instead of having to go through the Latin Vulgate, went directly to the Hebrew text. But this was the Hebrew text (eventually to be called the &amp;quot;Massoretic text&amp;quot;) of the canon of books that had been authorized by the Council of Jamnia. In this way, most Protestant churches came to not include the Apocryphal books in their Canon of Scripture.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are the books which are most frequently referred to by the title ''Apocrypha'':&lt;br /&gt;
*[[1 Esdras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2 Esdras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[1 Maccabees]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2 Maccabees]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Tobit]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Judith]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Wisdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ecclesiasticus]], also known as Sirach&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Baruch]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Epistle of Jeremiah]] is sometimes listed as separate book or the last chapter of Baruch &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prayer of Manasseh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Greek language additions to the [[Book of Esther]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additions to the book of Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Story of Susanna]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bel and the Dragon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 90-95 A.D. the Jewish [[Council of Jamnia]] revised the canon of the Old Testament, ensuring that the books involved conformed to the Torah, were written in the Hebrew language, written in Palestine, and written before 400 B.C.  As a result, the Apocrypha was removed from the canon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q2_bible_english.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The New Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Testament]] is a collection of twenty-seven books and letters, written by the early Christian community, and written primarily in [[Greek]]. The emphasis of the New Testament is the life, teachings, and gift of salvation from the central figure of the whole work, Jesus of Nazareth.  These books are grouped into the following:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
====[[Gospels|The Gospels]]====&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Gospels'' contain the history of Jesus.  The ''Acts of the Apostles'' are a continuance of the Gospels, documenting the history of the early church, beginning immediately following Jesus' death and resurrection.  Of the authors, only Matthew and John had met Jesus; they were among His disciples during His earthly ministry.  Mark was a companion of Peter, and his gospel was the first to be written down, about A.D. 50.  Luke is considered the author of both his gospel and the ''Acts''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Matthew]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Mark]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Luke]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acts of the Apostles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[[Pauline Epistles]]====&lt;br /&gt;
The Pauline Epistles are letters (epistles) written to early Christian communities written by the [[Apostle Paul]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Romans]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to the Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to the Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Galatians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Philippians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to Philemon]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to the Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to the Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Ephesians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Colossians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to Titus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''Possibly the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] Bible scholarship over the last two centuries has denied that Paul wrote Ephesians, 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus; and doubted that he wrote Colossians and 2 Thessalonians.  However, all the epistles listed above except Hebrews say they are written by Paul.  As they are authoritative Scripture which &amp;quot;cannot lie&amp;quot;, their claims should be believed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is speculation that Paul may have written the ''Epistle to the Hebrews'', which does not mention an author; however, it could easily have been written by any early Christian except for Timothy, who is mentioned by name in the final chapter.  The controversy, however, does not affect the genuineness of the epistle. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Unger, pg. 748; Eusebius ''The History of the Church'' 3:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[[General Epistles]]====&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle of James]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle of Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle of Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Third Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle of Jude]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Revelation====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Book of Revelation]] is the last work in the New Testament as well as the whole Bible, written close to A.D. 100 by the [[Apostle John]] during his exile on the Greek island of [[Patmos]]. Revelation is concerned with the condition of the [[Seven Churches of Asia]] before going deeply into a description of the [[Last Days]] prior to the beginning of the [[Millennial Age]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most [[Fundamentalism|Fundamentalists]] hold to &amp;quot;[[Dispensationalism]]&amp;quot;, a theory of the meaning of Revelations and other prophecies that was developed in the 19th century and is summarized in the ''Scofield Reference Bible'' (1909, 1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Non-uniformity of language and style of original Scriptures==&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Old Testament and the New Testament, in the original languages of Hebrew (and Aramaic) and Greek, exhibit a non uniformity of style and language. This is in sharp contrast to most modern translations which treat the Scriptures throughout as if it was one book instead the many books they are. Modern translations can be erudite, dignified, folksy and common, clear and geared for the &amp;quot;common man&amp;quot;, or replete with language resonant with literary associations for the &amp;quot;accomplished&amp;quot; reader.  But they are that way througout. The Biblical originals, on the other hand, for example in the Hebrew, have imbedded within narrative of one period, as the narrative of the deeds of the prophets Debora, a similar poetic recounting in a much more ancient and even archaic Hebrew, probably emanating from a chant from the time of Deborah herself. The same with the narrative and poetic portions concerning Moses. There are even different Hebrew languages from the same period but different authors, having come from different origins and cultural levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the New Testament, an example of non-uniformity can be found in the stark differences of languages in the Gospel of Luke, written by Luke the physician. The early accounts, those concerning the birth of Jesus and early life, are written in a stilted and often crude Greek while the rest of the Gospel is written in fine Greek befitting of the background and ability of a learned physician. But when the stilted and crude Greek is retranslated, word for word and phrase for phrase, into the Hebrew current in the first century in most parts of Israel, it becomes excellent Hebrew - Mishnaic Hebrew. This is because of the intent and fastidiousness of Luke, who derived his material, as he says,  from people that had been &amp;quot;on the scene&amp;quot; , and his success in transmitting it faithfully as he had received it. Both the Old and New Testaments, for various reasons, exhibit little or no concern to &amp;quot;level through&amp;quot; or override the content of what they are saying by stylistic considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inspiration===&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Old Testament is written by many [[homo sapiens|human]] authors, New Testament authors know that these men were writing under the inspiration of God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apostle [[Paul]] wrote that &amp;quot;All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness&amp;quot; (2 Timothy 3:16).&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly the apostle [[Saint Peter|Peter]] wrote, &amp;quot;Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit&amp;quot; (2 Peter 1:20-21).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Formation of New Testament and Jewish technical transmission====&lt;br /&gt;
In the first century and prior, the ear was more important than the eye, as far as retaining in memory. Jews would receive orally, that is, from hearing, the laws that they believed originated with Moses and then passed them on to others, down through the generations.It was important to link the present rabbis by names who taught it with the rabbis by name who had passed it on to them, on back as far as possible to Moses on Mt. Sinai. This was the startling difference of Jesus.  By saying &amp;quot;You have heard it said, but I say unto you...&amp;quot; , He was by-passing Moses and the others after and getting His teaching direct from the Father. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Jewish way of receiving (QBL) and handing on (MSR) is summed up in the lead saying of the &amp;quot;Ethics of the Fathers&amp;quot;  tractate of the [[Mishna]], &amp;quot;Moses received Torah from God at Sinai. He transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, the elders to the prophets, the prophets to the members of the Great Assembly [Sanhedrin] (1:1).&amp;quot;  The teaching thus transmitted was memorized word for word by groups of disciples (Talmidim) together, thereby minimizing, by the common knowledge and plublic repetitions, all innovations and errors, though there might well have been &amp;quot;stylizing&amp;quot; for ease of retention and recall. receiving and handing on (transmission), receiving and handing on. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This methodology, with its technical Hebrew terminology appears in the New Testament with the same technical meaning and purpose, for how the earliest Christian teaching was carried on prior to the formation of the New Testament and during the time of its formation. This ensured the validity of the teaching and its authenticity going back, not to Moses, but to the time of Jesus Himself. &amp;quot;For I handed over  (Gk. pare'doka, Heb. MSR) to you at the first what I also received (Gk. pare'labon, Heb. QBL) that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures, and that He was raised on the third day, according to the Scriptures...&amp;quot; l Cor. 15:3. Paul knew all of the &amp;quot;deposit of faith&amp;quot; three ways, in the usual &amp;quot;collaborative&amp;quot; way of God - from Scriptures (the Old Testament), from experience (seeing the living Christ on the road to Damascas), and from authenticated oral tradition/transmission involving &amp;quot;receiving&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;handing on&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Authority of Bible in religious communities==&lt;br /&gt;
The role of the Bible in the life of differing communities varies widely by both the inner tenents of the community and the outer influences bearing on the community. &lt;br /&gt;
===Judaism===&lt;br /&gt;
Orthodox Judaism through the centuries, while it was only marginally affected by growing secularization and modern learning, held to a &amp;quot;differing level of  level of authority&amp;quot; understanding of the authority of the Hebrew Bible. This did not imply a different level of inspiration, but rather that importance to the regulation of life was prime for the Torah of Moses, the 5 books of the Law. But the Pharasaic teaching also posited an Oral Law given to Moses by God that was passed on through the centuries through Joshua, the prophets, pairs of Rabbis, until this day.  The Oral law is found in the Talmud (Mishna and the Gemara together) The oral law became the decisive interpreter, teacher and regulator of the Written Law and determined the course of Jewish Orthodox life. The second section of the Old Testament, the Prophets, is known to the Jewish Community primarily through the synagogue readings of the prophets, the Haftorah, that are assigned to conclude the weekly reading of the Law. The Psalms, the most formative of all  the Writings, besides being common throughout the synagogue services, are used in various devotional prayer contexts. Orthodox Judaism has little been affected by modern Higher Criticism of the Bible. Reformed Judaism, originally developed in Germany, and Conservative Judaism, to a lesser extent, have been greatly affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mainline Protestants===&lt;br /&gt;
Mainline Protestantism, represented in the major churches and their seminaries, has greatly been affected by &amp;quot;modernism&amp;quot; based on advanced scholarly research, especially from Germany in the 19th century. The &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; ignored God's participation in the production of Scripture. Prime among these theories is the Documentary theory of  Penteteuch  origins (Wellhausen- Graff) that posit that Moses wrote little or nothing, Instead the Bible originated in four sources coming from various periods. These are sources are termed J (for the use of &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; for the name of God), E (for the use of &amp;quot;Elohim&amp;quot;), P (priestly), and D (Deutoronomic). The spirit of the New Testament is far more important than the text of either Testament for modern Protestant theology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Orthodox Jewish critique of Documentary theory====  &lt;br /&gt;
Jewish Orthodox scholars have pointed to flaws of the Documentary Hypothesis. For instance, Orthodox Jewish Scholar Cassuto  has pointed out that rather than the names for God varying according to author and period, they vary according to emphasis from the same period, that of Moses - &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; being used for the God in his dealing with His covenental people Israel, and &amp;quot;Elohim&amp;quot; being use when His dealing with mankind are emphasis. Likewise the two terms usually translated &amp;quot;making a covenant&amp;quot;, lkhrot brit (to &amp;quot;cut&amp;quot; a covenant) and lehaqim brit (to &amp;quot;raise&amp;quot; a covenenat) are not from two sources but mean different things - to initiate a covenant and to fulfill a covenant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evangelical Protestants===&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical Protestantism belives strongly in the divine inspiration and inerrancy of the whole Bible and has been the most receptive of Biblical Authority. Believing in full inspiration of the all Scripture does not mean to evangelicalism equal importance of all Scriptures for the healthy growth of the Christian community. This is because Evangelicalism, following Scripture's own understanding, believes in progressive revelation throughout Biblical time, culminating in Jesus Christ, and no further (thus obviating the role of Tradition). Thus Evangelicalism, does not hold to the application of Mosaic Legislation, and other biblical elements that Orthodox Judaism holds to. This applies to faith and to morals. The Mosaic regulation on executing a rebellious child does not present a problem to evangelical thought as, according to Paul and Hebrews, the Law has been rendered obsolete by the New Covenant. The Destruction of the Temple and the place for sacrifice of all kinds, present no problem for evangelicalism, as they did for Judasim, as Christ's sacrifice on the cross has now &amp;quot;fulfilled&amp;quot; the proscriptions of the Law and the ceremonials attached. Thus there is a sort of Levels of Authority understanding for evangelicalism similar (but for different reasons)  to the levels of authority of Judaism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical Churches vigorously promote the reading of Scripture through Sunday sermons and Bible study programs. Emphasis is placed on &amp;quot;each one understanding&amp;quot;. Coupled with American individualism, and lack of tradional vehicles of authority, this sometimes leads to spinterring and each man's interpretation &amp;quot;is as good as any other&amp;quot;. Nevertheless, the &amp;quot;Fiundamentals&amp;quot; defined in 1910 are strongly retained by the Evangelical Churches - the divinity of Christ, His death for sins and Resurrection from the dead, His second coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Eastern Orthodox===&lt;br /&gt;
The Orthodox Churches througout the world, whether of Greek, Russian, Rumanian, the various middle eastern varieties, emphasis the synod (Council) of Bishops, basis on the example of the &amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; of Jerusalem in the book of Acts, as the God authorized agent of interpretation and application of the Scriptures. Understanding that Jesus' words, &amp;quot; He (the Holy Spirit) wil lead you into all truth&amp;quot;, Orthodoxy believes that the synod of bishops, none of whom are individually infallible, are given guidance from the Holy Spirit so that the Scriptures are rightly applied to the Christian Community enabling the Church to never stray from Christ. That is, the Church is given &amp;quot;indefectability&amp;quot;. A minority Orthodox Church thought  holds to &amp;quot;infallibility&amp;quot; in synodal decision rather than or instead of &amp;quot;indefectability&amp;quot;. Scripture in the Orthodox churches are butressed by creedal formulations, the decisions of belief of past synods, and are less susceptible to the modern Higher Criticism. The Resurrection of Christ, virgin birth, return of Christ from Heaven to Earth, are all part and parcel of these churches. Individual interpretation of Scripture and manner of life are limited then by the teaching authority (the magisterium) granted to the Epsicopate - the Synod of bishops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Roman Catholic===&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church, like the Orthodox Churches have a strong sense of the Authority given to the Bishops by Christ to teach, interpret, defend the Faith and therefore to exercise the responsibility to interprete Scripture to the Faithful. But since Vatican ll, there has been an increased effort to bring Scripture knowledge to the laity and now there has been an increase of Scripture reading and study programs throughout most sections of the Church. This as been abetted by the Catholic Charismatic movement which has had the effect of promoting individual appropriation of the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit and with that, the devotional and intellectual use of  Holy Scriptures. However, the role of &amp;quot;Majesterium&amp;quot;, that is the Teaching Authority, strongly sets limits to individual interpretation. The Roman Catholic church understands that though the Majesterium is given to all the bishops, the definitive exercise is limited to one bishop - the bishop ov Rome, the Pope. Further, it is believed that the Pope, when declaring dogma (teaching) ex-Cathedra (from the chair) speaks infaillibly (on matters of faith and morals). The first time the Pope has promulgated dogma ex-cathedra was to promulgate the doctrine itself of Papal Infallibility. The Pope , through the Vatican prelates and all the bishops can regulate much of Catholic community life, and some of the regualtion based on the interpretation of Scripture or the application of interporetation of Scripture. An example of this is the prohibition of abortion. The Church has accepted most of the modern Higher Critical methodology of Scripture, including the Documentary theory of origins first developed within German Protestantism. But the effects of this on the tenents of the Christian Faith  are much mitigated due to the creedal affirmations of the Church developed centuries ago and Papal authority. This the Roman Catholic Church does not waver on the Deity of Christ, the Trinity, the death and resurrection of Christ, and the second comming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evangelical Understanding of the History of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
Rejecting the &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; accepted by the mainline Protestant denominations, Evangelicals and many Catholics hold to a more traditional history of the Bible.  This section summarizes their views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gospel of Luke in Arab.gif|thumb|This tenth-century Egyptian codex was donated to Pope Eugenius IV by the Coptic delegates at the Council of Ferrara-Florence. Translated from a Coptic original, it is one of the earliest Arabic versions of any part of the New Testament, none of which can be dated before the late eighth or ninth centuries.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest books of the Bible are certainly the five books of the Torah and ''Job''.  In ''1st Kings'' 6:1, Solomon is stated to have begun building the Temple &amp;quot;''in the 480th year after the children of Israel were come up out of the land of Egypt''&amp;quot;.  It had been established by scholars and historians that Solomon had begun building the Temple in the fourth year of his reign, or 961 B.C., making the [[date of the Exodus]] under Moses to have been 1441 B.C.  During the following forty years Moses wrote the Torah and ''Job'', completing them before his death at [[Mt. Nebo]] about 1400 B.C.  According to Biblical scholar and historian Robert D. Wilson the Torah as it stands dates from the time of Moses, the five books constitute one continuous work, and was written by a single individual, Moses himself (Wilson, pg 11).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remaining books of the Old Testament were written at various times since the death of Moses, with ''Malachi'', the last Old Testament book, being written about 455 B.C.  During this period each of the books was written and re-written on parchment or papyrus, with the editors taking great care in their work; a single Biblical book hand-written today can take weeks to complete.  The older scrolls were disposed of by burial or systematic destruction when worn from normal usage; as a result, the oldest surviving examples of Biblical manuscripts are those which have been carefully preserved either by direct actions of people (such as monasteries), or by removal from forces of decay.  Currently, the oldest surviving manuscripts are those found within the caves of Qumran in 1948 and known as the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]], dating between 250 B.C. to A.D. 70; the complete ''Isaiah'' scroll of this collection dates to 150 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around 200 B.C. the [[Septuagint]], a Greek-language version of the Old Testament, was completed.  This was due to the Hellenization of large areas of the Middle East after the conquest of Alexander the Great, making Greek the de-facto language for everyday communications and business.  The Septuagint marks the first time in history that the Bible was translated into a foreign language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early New Testament history===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1st Timothy 5:8, Paul quoted as scripture ''&amp;quot;the laborer is worthy of his hire.&amp;quot;''  This line is found nowhere else in the Bible except Matthew 10:10 and Luke 5:7.  In 2nd Peter 3:15-16, Peter classes Paul's letters with &amp;quot;other scriptures&amp;quot;.  Both lines are indicative of the writing down and general use of the New Testament prior to A.D. 60 (Halley, pg. 741-742).  Spurious &amp;quot;gospels&amp;quot; which are known to have appeared by A.D. 100, make references to the New Testament.  [[Clement of Rome]], writing in his own letter to the Corinthians in A.D. 95, refers to ''Matthew'', ''Luke'', ''Corinthians'', ''Hebrews'', ''1st Timothy'', and ''1st Peter'' (Halley, pg. 743).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest surviving New Testament fragment of which there is a reliable date is the [[John Rylands Fragment]] (P52) of the ''Gospel of John'', dating from 117-138 A.D., just decades from when the Gospel was first written. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biblefacts.org/history/oldtext.html N.T. Ancient Manuscripts]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The time span between the writing of the New Testament and the oldest surviving fragments are well under two hundred years.  By comparison, Greek classics such as [[Herodotus]], [[Plato]], [[Euripides]], and [[Homer]] have a time span well over a thousand years each between the date of the oldest known fragment of writing and the time period they were first written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Translations==&lt;br /&gt;
===The Peshitta===&lt;br /&gt;
The second translated version of the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament (after the Greek Septuaginta) was the Aramaic language Peshitta.  In 36 A.D., both the Queen of Adiabene (the last existing Province of the hated and feared by the Jews Assyrian Empire), known in Greek as Queen Helena (not the mother of Constantine) and known to the Jews as Queen ShlomZion (&amp;quot;Peace of Zion&amp;quot;), and her son King Ezad were converted to Judaism. Queen Helena's conversion, as wiell as others of the Kingdom, furthered the already developing translation of the Hebrew Scriptures in her Kingdom's language -Aramaic. That developing translation came to be known as the Peshitta - meaning simple or common speech, in much the same way as the Hebrew Bible would be translated into Latin by Jerome, with extensive help from a Rabbi,and the resultant translation would be called the Vulgate - meaning simple or common speech. The Peshitta, retaining elements of the then Jewish &amp;quot;[[Targum]]ic&amp;quot; (interpretive) and other Jewish understandings of the Hebrew Bible (see[[Midrash]]), is primarily based on the Pre-Masoretic Hebrew Scriptures - though certain books, such as the Prophet Isaiah,are translations primarily from the Septuagint  The development of the Old Testament Peshitta translation is held by some to have taken place alternatively in Adiabene's nearby neighbor Edessa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Thomas and his followers went to India, others (possibly Adai (Thaddeus), the Galilean from Caesarea Phillipi among them) arrived in [[Adiabene]], and having gone probaly to the synagogues first, as did the Apostle Paul), they found already, if not a populous, then an elite governmental element, conversant with the Biblical message in Aramaic. From these people, hearing the preaching of the messengers from Israel ,came believers in Jesus Christ, and soon after, came the translation of the Greek New Testament Scriptures into Aramaic, and so the Peshitta was added to by inclusion of the New Testament in Aramaic. Unlike the Greek canon of the New Testament Scriptures, the Peshitta originally did not include the following books: the Second Epistle of Peter, the Second Epistle of John, the Third Epistle of John, the Epistle of Jude and the Book of Revelation. But these books translated into the Syriac (as Christian Aramaic is known) are part of the Peshitta now and used by the Aramaic based churches, primarily in India and the Middle East - the Syrian Catholic Church, the Assyrian Church of the East (Holy Apostolic and Catholic Church of the East), the Indian Orthodox Church, the Chaldean Catholic Church, the Maronite Church, the Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church, the Syro-Malabar Church and the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adiabene and its surroundings then became the sending center for a mission to the East that would eventually, taking advantage of the newly rediscovered monsoon winds blowing for months across the Arabian sea, making it possible for ships to no longer hug the coasts, and taking advantage of the &amp;quot;Silk Road&amp;quot; all the way from Antioch in Syria to China, take the message of Jesus Christ to India (bringing about the Aramaic (Syriac) language churches of Kerala) and even to China itself. And so, the Peshitta, written in the Middle East, become the Scriptures, for a while, of the Far East Churches of Jesus Christ, particularly in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Vulgate===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jerome]], a Latin scholar deeply interested in the study of the Scriptures, completed the second edition of the Bible in the Latin language.  The ''[[Vulgate]]'' was meant to replace the inaccuracies of the earlier ''[[Vetus Latina]]'', the standard Bible of the early Catholic Church.  Jerome had moved to [[Jerusalem]] in 382, and set to work on what eventually became a fresh translation of the Bible from the Greek of the ''Septuagint'' to translating the New Testament into Latin; from 390-405 he decided to re-translate his Old Testament directly from the Hebrew then in use by the Jewish community.  The ''Vulgate'' had a marked influence in church history, and remained the standard Latin Bible in the Roman Catholic Church for centuries; such was the length of time in use that it was finally replaced by the ''[[Nova Vulgata]]'' in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
==Printing==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gutenburg1.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Printers copy of a page from a Gutenberg Bible, printed in Germany about 1469.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Johannes Gutenberg]] of [[Mainz]], [[Germany]] invented the first mechanical printing press in 1448.  His machine consisted of a large press which when cranked down, pressed a sheet of paper upon a platform in which were set thousands of inked metal letter typefaces (called &amp;quot;movable type&amp;quot;), set in place to read for a particular page.  The first book in history printed by this method was the [[Gutenberg Bible]], in the ''Vulgate'' Latin version, of which 180 were printed, and approximately 50 survive today in varying conditions around the world.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gutenberg Bible marked another first: printed Bibles could be mass produced to get into the hands of many people at a low cost. They first had to be translated out of Latin into a common language, and [[Martin Luther]] made the great German translation, 1522-1534.  The Protestant Reformers emphasized that laymen should study the Bible, and printing made it possible to go beyond the interpretationsd shown in stained glass windows to the actual text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==English language versions of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wycliff's Bible===&lt;br /&gt;
The first translation of the Bible into English was made under the supervision of the English cleric [[John Wyclif]] in the 1380's, with the assistance of Nicholas Hereford and John Purvey.  Wyclif held that the Bible should be placed directly in the hands of the people, but was this was opposed by the English Church hierarchy of his day; indeed, one of Wyclif's opponents, Henry Knighton, compared giving the Bible to the people in English to &amp;quot;casting pearls before swine&amp;quot;.  Archbishop Arundel of Canterbury promulgated a ban on all English Bibles in 1407, and possession of one was considered evidence of [[heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wyclif's was a scholarly translation, based on the [[Latin]], [[Greek]], and [[Hebrew]] texts, but was found to be unweildy due to its adherence to Latin grammar (in which, for instance, verbs tend to be at the end of sentences).  A second Wycliffite translation was prepared late in this period, which avoided this problem, but due to the fact that it could only be distributed in manuscript form, it was an expensive volume.  Outside of the nobility and gentry, it was more common to see only a single [[The Gospels|Gospel]], or  a copy of the Psalms, than an entire Bible, which cost more than the average working person could earn in a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the next century, its form of English gradually became antiquated, leading English Protestants such as [[William Tyndale]] to feel that an entirely new translation was needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tyndale===&lt;br /&gt;
During the middle of the 16th century there was a renewed sense of the need to get the Bible directly into the hands of the common man; prior to that the Bible was restricted to readings in the Church alone.  The Reformers were a group of people who were shocked at the differences between what the Roman Catholic Church was practicing as opposed to what the Bible stated can or cannot be done (this was one of the causes of the [[Reformation]]).  At great cost to themselves, the Reformers began the work of translating the Bible in the various languages of Europe; the printing press would ensure the newly-translated Bibles would be mass-produced.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Tyndale]] was committed to getting the Bible in the hands of his English countrymen.  Expressing open defiance of the Pope, Tyndale declared that if God would spare his life he would make it possible for even an ordinary farmer to know more about the Scriptures than the Pope. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/tyndale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tyndale's translation of the New Testament was completed by 1525.  By April, 1526, 6,000 copies were printed and delivered to England. Official opposition led to the destruction of most of them.  Nevertheless, the printing press rendered it impossible to completely suppress such a book, and new copies were printed and smuggled into [[England]] Tyndale was arrested and charged with heresy for his efforts on May 21, 1536, and was executed the following year.  His efforts at translating the Bible led to the Matthews and Bishop's Bibles, then finally to the [[King James Version]], where ninety percent of the text closely follows Tyndale's translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Authorised or King James Version===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:E-sword.jpg|thumb|200px|right|The internet has increased the availability of the Bible world-wide.  Shown here is a screenshot to [[E-Sword]], a freely-downloadable Bible study program. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.e-sword.net E-Sword]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Rick Meyers, 2007)]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1601 King [[James I]] selected forty-seven of the ablest scholars in [[England]] to undertake the creation of a standard Bible in English, based upon careful translations of the [[Masoretic Text]] used by the Jewish community, and the best Greek translations (especially the ''[[Textus Receptus]]'') then available.  The scholars were divided into six committees in [[Oxford]], [[Westminster]], and [[Cambridge]], with each scholar had dedicating himself to doing a portion of the Bible, often consulting each other to check the flow and harmony of the work in progress.  The result was the 1611 Authorised Version, known in [[United States of America|America]] as the [[King James Bible|King James Version]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of the Authorised Version were profound.  Using less than 2,500 different words in its vocabulary, this Bible was written in a poetic style matched by few.  The work influenced the writings of [[Shakespeare]].  [[John Milton]] has numerous images taken from this Bible in his ''[[Paradise Lost]]''.  The direct style of writing caused it to be easily available to the common man.  Poets and writers, such as [[Herman Melville]], [[Walt Whitman]], [[Emily Dickinson]] and many others were deeply inspired by it.  It altered the course of English history, with England growing to a world power since the book's publication; when asked by a visiting dignitary what made England great, [[Queen Victoria]] pulled out her copy of the Bible and declared &amp;quot;This is the secret of England's greatness.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other versions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the Bible is available in many versions across the English-speaking world, and has been translated into languages spoken by the vast majority of people on Earth, and even portions into a recently-created language from the fictional world of [[Star Trek]], [[Klingon]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kli.org/wiki/index.php?Klingon%20Bible%20Translation%20Project Klingon Bible Translation Project]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The past two decades saw the emergence of [[Internet]] use; the creation of the Bible as a software program was inevitable, and several, such as [[E-Sword]] and Theophilos, are available at no cost with a wealth of Bible-study material as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible Scientific Foreknowledge==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bible scientific foreknowledge]] holds that the Bible shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed.  Many Christian scientists and apologists such as the Christian scientists and apologists at [[Creation Ministries International]], [[Answers in Genesis]],  and [[CreationWiki]] assert that the [http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge Bible contains knowledge that shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge  Bible Scientific Foreknowledge]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1718/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/medicine.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Humor in the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Humor in the Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, especially the Old Testament, contains irony, puns, sarcasm, etc. It may be noted that the sense of what is humorous varies from people to people and from nation to nation, as well as varying from age to age. What caused a chuckle, smile, or laughter in the biblical &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot; was more connected with ''satisfaction'' at the vindication of righteousness among men. Thus to our day and age, and the commonality of people, for believers and non believers, the meaning of the spewing up of Jonah on the shores (even the great fish could not stomach him!) might be viewed as God working out His original will in history, Jonah flight from responsiblity being aborted, for the &amp;quot;days and ages&amp;quot; of the Bible, there was the added satisfaction derived from the understanding that God was not mocked by the rebellion of Jonah. Likewise that the &amp;quot;many cattle&amp;quot; also found repentence and acceptance by God, would not have brought the smile of glee, mingled with doubt,  but the smile of satisfaction that God's wide heart found its exultant victory over the measly, narrow perspective of the renagade prophet. There was no shame to stifle the Biblical chuckle at the &amp;quot;hows&amp;quot; of the vindication of God's justice. Yet, what we consider humorous also appears:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After noticing that his father-in-law Laban was not treating him as in the past, Jacob decided to flee with his family. Rachel, one of Jacob’s wives, stole her father Laban’s teraphim (statues used for idolatry and/or divination). Laban pursued them and intercepted them in the Gilead mountains (Genesis 31:30): &amp;quot;Why have you stolen my gods?&amp;quot; Laban said to Jacob. The Midrash comments that it cannot be much of a god if it can be stolen (Midrash Genesis Rabbah 74:8). Jonsson (1985, 44-45) suggests that there is humor (albeit &amp;quot;rough&amp;quot; humor) in the fact that, not only was Laban deceived, but his idols were actually underneath his daughter Rachel’s posterior while she claimed that the &amp;quot;manner of women&amp;quot; was upon her. This idol did not get much respect. [http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/economic/friedman/bibhumor.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible Translations==&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible has been translated many times and in many ways so anyone, from the youngest child to the learned scholar, can read the entire scpripture in their language and reading level. A Latin version is the [[Latin Vulgate]] Bible.  Here are some common English versions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amplified Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Douey-Rheims]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Good News Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Living Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New American Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New English Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revised Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revised Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Septuagint]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible]] - still a work-in-progress here at Conservapedia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible versions==&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from Bibles that include the [[Apocrypha]],  The [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]] is a distinct version that was produced to justify many of the unique doctrines of [[Jehovah's Witnesses]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible exegesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biblical Exegesis the wiki way]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biblical accuracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous Bible paintings]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Midrash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Targum]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messianic Prophecies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
===Bible societies ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.americanbible.org/ American Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biblesociety.org/ United Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibs.org/ The International Bible Society (New York/Colorado Springs)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wbtc.com/site/PageServer World Bible Translation Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wycliffe.org/home.htm Wycliffe Bible Translators]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.labibliaweb.com/ La Biblia] In Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Online, internet, and downloadable Bibles===&lt;br /&gt;
====Hebrew====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0.htm Hebrew-English Bible] ([[Jewish Publication Society of America|JPS]] 1917 translation; includes Hebrew audio)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tanakhml2.alacartejava.net/cocoon/tanakhml/d13.php2xml?sfr=1&amp;amp;prq=1&amp;amp;pnt=tru&amp;amp;acc=tru&amp;amp;dia=tru&amp;amp;enc=heb XML Hebrew-English (KJV) Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/Hebrew_OT/ Old Testament in Hebrew]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Greek====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccel.org/w/westcott/gnt/toc.htm Koine Greek New Testament]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.htmlbible.com/sacrednamebiblecom/moderngreek/ Modern Greek Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Latin====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.LatinVulgate.com/ Latin Vulgate] — Latin Vulgate with parallel Douay-Rheims and King James English translations&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sacredbible.org/ SacredBible.org] — Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/Vulgate/ Jerome's Latin Vulgate (405 A.D.)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====English====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.audio-bible.com/bible/bible.html AudioBible] — Audio version of the King James Version.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blueletterbible.org/ Blue Letter Bible] — On-line interactive reference library continuously updated from the teachings and commentaries of selected pastors and teachers who hold to the conservative, historical Christian faith.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.e-sword.net E-sword] — Downloadable Bible for Windows.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.onlinebible.net/ The Online Bible North America] — Downloadable Bible for Windows.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.theophilos.sk/ Theophilos Bible program]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/ASB/ American Standard Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/ English Standard Version] from Good News/Crossway (the publisher).&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.verselink.org/ King James Version with dictionary].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/KJV/ King James Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.newlivingtranslation.com New Living Translation]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.oremus.org/ New Revised Standard Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.europepourchrist.org/biblesite/WEB/ World English Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dynamicbible.com/ King James Version built using AJAX technologies], with Strongs and Greek Morphological Codes by Robinson.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/index.htm#index The Hypertext Bible] with side-by-side translations in English, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew at the [[Internet Sacred Text Archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblegateway.com/ Bible Gateway at GospelCom.net] text search in any one of many translations in numerous languages.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblereadthrough.com/ Bible Read-Through] — read through the Bible in a year aid.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.TheFreeBible.com/ TheFreeBible.com] Bible software downloads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.scripture4all.org/ Interlinear (word-by-word) translation of the Christian Bible] Hebrew and Koine Greek&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.aramaicpes&amp;lt;!-- spam filter --&amp;gt;hitta.com/aramaic_nt_resources.htm - Aramaic New Testament resources&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/en/versions.php Over 40 versions of the Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.armenianchurchlibrary.com/Bibletranslationsandstudies.html Eastern and Western Armenian Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible9.com/ Online Bible (King James Version &amp;amp; Old Testament)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/LSG_FR/ Bible — Louis Segond de 1910]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.latinvulgate.com/christverse.aspx Complete Sayings of Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.crosswalk.com/ParallelBible/ Crosswalk.com Parallel Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blueletterbible.org/search.html#verse Blue Letter Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://recoveryversion.org/ Recovery Version Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Spanish====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wbtc.com/site/PageServer?pagename=downloads_spanish Spanish Bible] PDT version&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.labibliaweb.com/cid/1 Versiones de la Biblia] In Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Turkish====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.incil.info Turkish Bible] (Turkish Old and New Testament)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Finnish====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.raamattu-kirja.com Finnish Bible] (Finnish Old and New Testament)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://vastaus.net Raamattu] (Study Finnish Bible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Japanese====&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibsstl.org/bibles/japanese/index.php On-line version hosted by the International Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bible.or.jp/e/index.html Japan Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Others====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q2_bible_english.html Bible Timeline]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.myjewishlearning.com/texts/bible/TO_Torah_880.htm?OVRAW=Torah&amp;amp;OVKEY=torah&amp;amp;OVMTC=standard My Jewish Learning.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://search.americanbible.org/ American Bible Society] to search NASB, KJV, CEV, ASV and others.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://etext.virginia.edu/kjv.browse.html University of Virginia Library] KJV word proximity search.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.1enormousidea.com/Default.aspx?tabid=42 Many translations in English, verse by verse]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible-marathi.com Nava Karar] NT Translation from Greek to Marathi &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible-researcher.com/links12.html Gender-neutral Bible translations].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.evangelicalbible.com/why.htm Word-for-Word vs.Thought-for-Thought translation] Outlines the difference between formal and dynamic equivalent translation philosopy.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.kli.org/wiki/index.php?Klingon%20Bible%20Translation%20Project  Klingon Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commentaries and analysis===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ldolphin.org/icc-am.html Biblical chronology] by Alan Montgomery, B.Sc.(Hon)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dinur.org/resources/resourceCategoryDisplay.aspx?categoryID=411&amp;amp;rsid=478 Biblical History], The Jewish History Resource Center — Dinur Center for Research in Jewish History, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chabad.org/article.asp?aid=63255 Judaica Press Translation] — online Jewish translation of the Tanakh.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.angdatingdaan.org/biblicaltopics/bib_bible_1.htm Reading and Understanding the Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.bibleinfo.com/ Source for Bible Answers].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.amazingfacts.org/school/af_logon.asp Amazing Facts Bible Studies].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.iishj.org/images/Bible.pdf Learning Bible Today] — a historical approach the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://eword.gospelcom.net/comments/gill/ John Gill's Exposition of the Bible] — verse by verse commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/henry/mhc.i.html/ Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible] — unabridged.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.verselink.org/ Topical References]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.verselink.org/ Bible Dictionaries and Encyclopedia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wikis===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.tmtm.com BibleWiki]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wikible.org Wikible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Achtemeier, Paul J., ed. ''Harper's Bible Dictionary'' (1985), 1190pp;  mainstream scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
* Ackroyd, P.R., ed. ''The Cambridge History of the Bible: From the Beginnings to Jerome; the West from the Fathers to the Reformation; the West from the Reformation to the Present Day'' (3 vol 1978), standard summary of scholarship; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Beginnings-Jerome/dp/0521099730/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Fathers-Reformation/dp/0521290171/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search vol 2]; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Reformation-Present/dp/0521290163/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 3] &lt;br /&gt;
* Coggins, R.J. ''Introducing the Old Testament'' (Oxford University Press: 1990), 172pp. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=22765464 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Robert, and John Barton. ''Biblical Interpretation'' (Oxford University Press: 1988), 342 pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=74356941 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sakenfeld, Katharine Doob, ed.  ''The New Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible'' ('''NIDB''') (5 vol 2009), the latest mainstream scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
*Unger, Merril F. ''Unger's Bible Dictionary'', Moody Press, Chicago, IL (1966; new edition 2006); Evangelical&lt;br /&gt;
**Unger, Merril F. ''The New Unger's Bible Dictionary'', (2006); 1416pp; Evangelical&lt;br /&gt;
*Unger, Merril F. ''Unger's Bible Handbook'', Moody Press, Chicago, IL (1967);  Evangelical.&lt;br /&gt;
*Halley, Henry H. ''Halley's Bible Handbook'', Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI (1965); Evangelical &lt;br /&gt;
* Sandys-Wunsch, John. ''What Have They Done to the Bible: A History of Modern Biblical Interpretation'' 2005) Scholarly history of transations and interpretations to 1900; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0814650287 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Williamspn, Peter. ''Catholic principles for interpreting scripture: a study of the Pontifical Biblical Commission's The interpretation of the Bible in the Church'' (2001); Catholic; [http://books.google.com/books?id=kooFtFGQsfsC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:bible+intitle:interpretation&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=b&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=2000&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Wilson, Robert D. ''A Scientific Investigation of the Old Testament'', Sunday School Times, Inc, Philadelphia, PA (1926).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Language===&lt;br /&gt;
*Blass, Frederich, and others. ''A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and other early Christian literature,'' translated by Robert W. Funk; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1961); German edition ''Grammatik des Neutestamentlichen Griechisch'' Friedrich Rehkopf, editor, 14th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &amp;amp; Ruprecht, 1976. &lt;br /&gt;
*Moulton, James H., and others. ''A Grammar of New Testament Greek'' (two volumes), edited by Wilbert Francis Howard, T&amp;amp;T Clark Publishers, Harrisburg, PA (1985); originally published 1920, Edinburgh, Scotland.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bauer, Walter. ''Griechisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch zu den Scriften des Neuen Testaments und der frühchristlichen Litteratur''. Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland, editors; 6th edition. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (1988). Heading βιβλίον, columns 281-82.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Book of Worship]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jumbuckjim</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=739444</id>
		<title>Dinosaur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=739444"/>
		<updated>2009-12-30T13:07:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jumbuckjim: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Dinosaur&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Fdt566e4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|caption=&lt;br /&gt;
|superkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom= Animalia&lt;br /&gt;
|subkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|superphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|phylum=Chordata&lt;br /&gt;
|subphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|microphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|superdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|division=&lt;br /&gt;
|subdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|superclass=&lt;br /&gt;
|class=Sauropsida&lt;br /&gt;
|subclass=Diapsida&lt;br /&gt;
|infraclass=Archosauromorpha&lt;br /&gt;
|superorder=Dinosauria&lt;br /&gt;
|order=Ornithischia; Saurischia &lt;br /&gt;
|suborder=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraorder=&lt;br /&gt;
|superfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|family=&lt;br /&gt;
|subfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|supertribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|tribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|subtribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|genera=&lt;br /&gt;
|genus=&lt;br /&gt;
|subgenus=&lt;br /&gt;
|species=&lt;br /&gt;
|binomialname=&lt;br /&gt;
|sub=&lt;br /&gt;
|alt=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
HURR IM A CONSERVATIVE JEBUS IS GOOD, FAGS ARE GAY. STUPID HONKEY FAGS, NIGGERS SUCK LOLOLOL &lt;br /&gt;
LETS KILL EVERYONE AND LET MOTHERS NOT ABORT BABYS! CAUSE THEY AINT SMART ENOUGH TO DANGEROUSLY DO IT THEMSEEELVES YEHAWWWW LETS HAVE GUNS, CAUSE THEY DONT KILL PEOPLE HURRRDURRRR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IM A STUPID CONSERVATIVE LETS NOT ADVANCE SOCIETY JESUS WOULDNT WANT IT! LETS KILL PEOPLE EVEN THOUGH YOUR 'GOD' SAID THAT HE CAN ONLY DO IT! WAIT, THE BIBLE IS FULL OF SHIT!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs are classified into two orders based upon differences in pelvic structure: ''Saurischia'' (&amp;quot;lizard-hipped&amp;quot;), in which the ''pubis'' is pointed forward and down; and ''Ornithischia'' (&amp;quot;bird-hipped&amp;quot;), in which the ''pubis'' is pointed towards the rear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Saurischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Herbivorous species were almost all quadrupedal.  They carried peg-like teeth which cut, rather than chewed, plant material; grinding of food was aided by gastroliths.  Carnivorous species were exclusively bipedal. &lt;br /&gt;
*Sauropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder are characterized by long necks and tails, barrel-shaped bodies, and column-like legs.  In three families (notably Diplodocidae, Brachiosauridae, and Titanosauroidea) there are species which are of extreme size, in excess of 125 feet in length and 100 tons, making them the largest animals to have walked the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Apatosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Brachiosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ultrasaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Seismosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Argentinosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Diplodocus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Theropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Exclusively bipedal; forearms meant for grasping or holding.  Fossil evidence for several species indicate pack hunting. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Coelophysis]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ornithomimus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Allosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Tyrannosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Deinonychus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Velociraptor]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Giganotosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Ornithischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Species of this group were all herbivorous; most were quadrupedal.  Front teeth were lacking, while a predentary bone was present in the front of the lower jaw.  Several species (mainly within ''Ceratopsia'') had a distinctive parrot-like beak.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ceratopsia&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder carried one or more horns on their heads, as well as a shield-like frill to protect the neck.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Triceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachyrhinosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Torosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Protoceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Styracosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Stegosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Large dinosaurs with a row of bony plates on top of their backs, and several spikes used as a defensive weapon at the end of their tails.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Stegosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Huayangosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Kentrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ankylosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Heavily-armored dinosaurs, some with a row of spikes along each side, and possessing a bony tail club.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ankylosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Euoplocephalus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontonia]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Ornithopods&lt;br /&gt;
::Large, herd-dwelling dinosaurs that could run bipedaly.  Several species had a &amp;quot;boss&amp;quot; of bone on their heads (Pachycephalosaurs) which may have been used for head-butting similar to bighorn sheep; others a crest of bone (hadrosaurs) which may have been sound resonators. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Camptosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Iguanodon]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachycephalosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Parasaurolophus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Bactrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Maiasaura]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Highlights of the history of dinosaur paleontology==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Osborn.jpg‎‎|200px|thumb|right|[[Henry Fairfield Osborn]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States during the 1900s, the public imagination was caught by the discoveries of [[Henry Fairfield Osborn]] (1857-1935) and the great competitive dinosaur hunters, [[Edward Drinker Cope]] (1847-1897) and [[Othniel Charles Marsh]] (1831-1899). Exploring in Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico, they found numerous fossil dinosaurs. Their museums worked out the techniques for mounting and displaying them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Osborn was a proponent of ''orthogenesis,'' as were many paleontologists up through the middle of the twentieth century. These paleontologists interpreted the fossil record as showing sustained, continuing, unidirectional trends in [[Theory of evolution|evolution]], which they felt required some kind of driving principle in addition to natural selection. As the author of an encyclopedia article on variation and selection put it in 1911,&lt;br /&gt;
:Selection cannot create the materials on which it is supposed to operate... Both sides concur in the position assumed by Darwin, that the word &amp;quot;chance&amp;quot; in such a phrase as &amp;quot;chance variation&amp;quot; does not mean that the occurrences are independent of natural causation and so far undetermined, but covers in the first place our ignorance of the exact causation.... No doubt a large amount of variation is truly indefinite, so that many meaningless or useless variations arise... But there are several directions in which the field of variation appears to be not only limited but defined in a certain direction.... When beetles, or medusae, or cats vary, the range of possible variation is limited and determined by the beetle, medusa or cat constitution, and any possible further differentiation or specialization must be in a sense at least orthogenetic - that is to say, a continuation of the line along which the ancestors of the individual in question have been forced. Darwin himself showed that different species in a genus, or varieties in a species, tended to show parallel variations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mitchell, Peter Chalmers (1911), ''Variation and Selection,'' ''Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition,'' volume 27 (TON-VES), p. 906&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Roy Chapman Andrews]] (1884–1960), said to be the prototype for the fictional Indiana Jones, is famous for his discovery of fossil dinosaur eggs in Outer Mongolia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1970, Robert Bakker catalyzed a new era of dinosaur paleontology with evidence that dinosaurs were fully warm-blooded ([[endotherms]]) and fast-moving.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benton, Michael J. (2000), ''Vertebrate Paleontology'' [http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632056142&amp;amp;id=PQuKO7xqjNQC&amp;amp;pg=PA217&amp;amp;lpg=PA217&amp;amp;dq=%22robert+bakker%22&amp;amp;sig=imoHNyurTTCpztNV0Pp2EU7Fj6c p. 217]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur Species==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were immensely varied, and included both herbivores and carnivores.  Although many have been found in the fossil record, paleontologists expect that they have barely scratched the surface of the vast superorder that the dinosaurs encompassed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060905-dinosaurs_2.html Vast Majority of Dinosaurs Still to Be Found, Scientists Say], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Different Perspectives ==   &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Ever since the discovery of dinosaur fossils, there has been debate about whether and how dinosaurs fit into the history of life on Earth. Young-Earth creationists reject the [[uniformitarian]] time-scale, and therefore believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed. Creationists also reject the now-popular idea that dinosaurs evolved into birds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Creationary Perspective===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelangeloflood.jpg|thumb|250px|left|''The [[Great Flood|Flood]]'', by [[Michaelangelo]], detail from the [[Sistine Chapel]], 1509.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Young earth creationists]] believe, from the biblical account, that dinosaurs were created on day 6 of the [[creation week]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; approximately 6,000 years ago, along with other land animals, and therefore co-existed with humans.&lt;br /&gt;
As such, they reject the [[Theory of Evolution]] and the beliefs of evolutionary scientists about the age of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They believe that dinosaurs lived in harmony with other animals, (probably including in the [[Garden of Eden]]) eating only plants&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:29-30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that pairs of each dinosaur [[kind]] were taken onto [[Noah's Ark]] during the [[Great Flood]] and were preserved from drowning&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3967/ Were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that many of the fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/219/ Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really?], ''Creation'', vol. 21 No. 1 p. 54&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; and that possibly some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark are still around today.&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Robert Doolan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/833/ Are dinosaurs alive today?], ''Creation'', vol. 15 No. 4 p. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They use [[archaeological]], [[fossil]], and documentary evidence to argue that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the [[Bible]] does not use the word &amp;quot;dinosaur.&amp;quot;  However, they are alleged to be mentioned in numerous places throughout the biblical account. For example, the [[behemoth]] in [[Job]]  and the [[leviathan]] in [[Isaiah]] are sometimes said to be references to dinosaurs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allan K. Steel, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1799 Could Behemoth have been a dinosaur?], ''Journal of Creation'' vol. 15 No. 2 p. 42.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm], ''Answers in Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, although others have claimed that Behemoth and Leviathan are references to a hippopotamus or elephant and a crocodile respectively.  Young-Earth creationists point out that the descriptions don't fit these creatures, including that hippopotamuses and elephants don't have a &amp;quot;tail like a cedar&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Extinction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists reject the &amp;quot;Great Impact Theory&amp;quot;, pointing out multiple problems with this theory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists assert that evolutionists are frequently coming out with  a &amp;quot;New Theory of Dinosaur Extinction&amp;quot; and that their theories are laden with false assumptions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1115dinosaur.asp Dinosaur demise theory, version #451], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaur-like creatures in history and modern sightings====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists cite a number of reasons to believe that dinosaurs have existed until relatively recent times, and perhaps still survive.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AZ_RockArtDino1a.jpg‎|right|150|thumb|right|Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* There have been a number of claimed sightings of dinosaur-like creatures.&lt;br /&gt;
** A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Locals in the Congo have reported a creature they name ''Mokele-mbembe''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mokelembembe.com/ Mokele-mbembe The Living Dinosaur!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and from its description it appears to be a small plant-eating dinosaur.  The reports have been taken seriously enough that a biologist from the [[University of Chicago]] has made several expeditions to find the creature.  Another biologist has reported seeing the creature.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dinosaur-like creatures have been seen by several people in two different parts of [[Papua New Guinea]] since 1990.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anon., [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/381 A living dinosaur?], ''Creation'' 23(1):56, December 2000.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Irwin, Brian, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5847 Theropod and sauropod dinosaurs sighted in PNG?] 1st July, 2008 (Creation Ministries International).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* There are drawings of creatures resembling dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationism.org/swift/DohenyExpedition/Doheny01Main.htm Doheny Scientific Expedition, Hava Supai Canyon, Arizona], ''Creationism.org''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving The Hava Supai Dinosaur Carving], ''ChristianCourier.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
** The [[Nile Mosaic of Palestrina]], a second century BC piece of art, contains a portion which depicts a group of Ethiopians hunting what some claim appears to be a dinosaur; there is much debate on this, however, and most modern art historians consider the mysterious animal to be a lion or a crocodile (the latter theory is supported by the presence of the Greek word for &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; written near the image of the mysterious animal). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.s8int.com/dinolit2.html Dinosaurs in Literature, Art &amp;amp; History-- Page 2], ''s8int.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palestrina1.jpg|right|thumb|A portion of the [[Nile Mosaic of Palestrina]], depicting the hunting of an animal which is often said to resemble a dinosaur (but which appears to be labelled &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; in Greek).]] &lt;br /&gt;
** Engravings in the floor of [[Carlisle Cathedral]] appear to be of dinosaurs.  They are on the tomb of bishop Richard Bell, who died in 1496.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See picture on page 241 of Batten, Don, et. al., 2007, ''The Creation Answers Book''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Creatures matching dinosaurs and similar creatures have been described by various people groups.&lt;br /&gt;
** The description of the &amp;quot;[[Thunder bird]]&amp;quot; of [[American Indian]]s matches the descriptions of [[pterosaur]]s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Descriptions of [[dragon]]s are widespread and match descriptions of dinosaurs, suggesting that dragons were real creatures and were actually dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** The World Book Encyclopedia states that: &amp;quot;The [[dragon]]s of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted in [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ25.html What about the Dinosaurs?], ''CreationScience.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Dragons exist in the folklore of many European and Asian cultures.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Dragon'' entry in World Book Millennium 2000 CD ROM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  World Book Encyclopedia says, &amp;quot;In Europe, dragons are traditionally portrayed as ferocious beasts that represent the evils fought by human beings.  But in Asia, especially in China and Japan, the animals are generally considered friendly creatures that ensure good luck and wealth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dragons appear in the flag of [[Wales]], in traditional [[China|Chinese]] [[New Years' Day]] celebrations, and in the Chinese [[calendar]].  Every other creature on the calendar is a real creature.&lt;br /&gt;
* That dinosaurs are not known from the fossil record above the [[Cretaceous]] strata is not reason to believe that they have not survived until more recent times.&lt;br /&gt;
** Living specimens of orders of animals that were believed to have been extinct for millions of years have been found before, such as the Diatomyidae Squirrel &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Diatomyidae]] Squirrel [http://news.softpedia.com/news/They-Thought-It-Went-Extinct-11-Million-Years-Ago-19557.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the [[Wollemi Pine]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wollemi Pine ''Biotechnology Australia'' [http://www.biotechnologyonline.gov.au/enviro/wollemi.cfm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[Coelacanth]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sulawesi Coelacanth. ''University Of California, Berkeley''[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vertebrates/coelacanth/coelacanths.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;More on the Coelacanth ''marinebio.org''[http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=54]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The recent dinosaur tissue find is a strong rebuttal of the claim that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3042 Still soft and stretchy], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The Coelacanth are from a group that had previously been thought to have rudimentary limbs and so be the ancestor of land creatures, but this idea was dropped when living Coelacanths were discovered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/coelacanth.html Coelacanth: the world’s oldest fish?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Biologists see this as merely a minor adjustment to the story of evolution. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dinosaurs and birds ====&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists contend that the idea that birds are descendants of dinosaurs is not demonstrated by the evidence &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3833/106/ Bird evolution?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andy McIntosh, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/540/ 100 years of airplanes—but these weren’t the first flying machines!], ''Creation'' vol. 26 No. 1 p. 44&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and that the dinosaur-bird connection is even disputed by some evolutionists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his article, &amp;quot;Fifteen ways to refute materialistic bigotry&amp;quot;, Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] wrote regarding dinosaurs being descendants of birds:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“The same logic applies to the dinosaur-[[bird]] debate. It is perfectly in order for creationists to cite [[Alan Feduccia|Feduccia]]’s devastating criticism against the idea that birds evolved ‘ground up’ from running dinosaurs (the cursorial theory). But the dino-to-bird advocates counter with equally powerful arguments against Feduccia’s ‘trees-down’ (arboreal) theory. The evidence indicates that the critics are ''both'' right — birds did not evolve either from running dinos or from tree-living mini-crocodiles. In fact, birds did not evolve from non-birds at all!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2610 15 ways to refute materialistic bigotry], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists also cite the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Ernst Mayr]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthews, Michael, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/1208mayr.asp 99 and still fighting God], 8th December, 2003 (Answers in Genesis).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random mutations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes10.html In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood], ''Center for Scientific Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The March 2003 issue of ''Scientific American'' is also cited by creationists:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Of all the body coverings nature has designed, feathers are the most various and the most mysterious...The origin of feathers is a specific instance of the much more general question of the origin of evolutionary novelties--structures that have no clear antecedents in ancestral animals and no clear related structures (homologues) in contemporary relatives. Although evolutionary theory provides a robust explanation for the appearance of minor variations in the size and shape of creatures and their component parts, it does not yet give as much guidance for understanding the emergence of entirely new structures, including digits, limbs, eyes and feathers....&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0313sciam.asp Scientific American admits creationists hit a sore spot], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CD7F6-B16F-1E41-89E0809EC588EEDF Which Came First, the Feather or the Bird?], ''Scientific American''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists also assert that the comparative anatomy analysis done by evolutionists comparing bird bones and dinosaur bones is flawed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. David N. Menton, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0328discovery.asp &amp;quot;Ostrich-osaurus&amp;quot; Discovery?], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evolutionary/Old Earth Perspective===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The view of [[Theory of evolution|evolutionists]] and others who accept the uniformitarian timescale is that dinosaurs existed on earth from 230 million years ago to 65 million years ago. In this view, the entire population of dinosaurs were wiped out by a mass extinction event (usually thought to be a meteorite) about 65 million years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
This precludes humans and dinosaurs co-existing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Extinction====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to most scientists, close to 65 million years ago, at the end of the [[Cretaceous]] period, and the beginning of what is called the [[Tertiary]] period, an event occurred which has come to be known as the [[K-T Event]].  This event would have obliterated most life on Earth, plunging the world into something that would now be likened to global nuclear winter, through which few extant species could survive.  Although these scientists dispute the nature of the K-T Event (selecting among any number of catastrophes that could have caused the significant global cooling that resulted), most find that the claimed K-T Event was caused by the collision of a massive asteroid with the Earth, the dust and debris from which would have shrouded the sky for thousands of years, cooling Earth considerably.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kevin O Pope, &amp;quot;Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary,&amp;quot; Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, available at [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/19/11028]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to this view, the dinosaurs did not survive this cataclysm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0823_020823_asteroid.html Prehistoric Asteroid &amp;quot;Killed Everything&amp;quot;], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A layer of rock containing high concentrations&amp;lt;!-- &amp;quot;High&amp;quot;, or just &amp;quot;higher than normal&amp;quot;? --&amp;gt; of [[Iridium]], a metal that is extremely rare on earth but common in asteroids, is said to be due to the vaporization and then fall of dust from the meteorite's impact, and its compression within the subsequent geological record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The evidence of a large impact crater can be found in rocks of the [[Yucatán]] Peninsula of the supposed age of this layer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0307_030307_impactcrater.html &amp;quot;Dinosaur-Killer&amp;quot; Asteroid Crater Imaged for First Time], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/education/events/cowen1b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists assert that the assumptions underpinning the methods used by modern geologists are incorrect, and even though the validity of a large impact is accepted, this does not consitute proof that the impact caused the extinction of the dinosaurs&amp;amp;mdash;although the abundance of dinosaur fossils in rocks found higher in the rock layers than the impact is drastically less than their abundance in rocks lower down.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====An Explosion of new species ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mass extinction of the dinosaurs removed a major food competitor, and predator, of smaller animals.  As a result of a new &amp;quot;vacancy&amp;quot; in the food chain, following the [[K-T Event]], vast speciation occurred, as the evolutionary pressure of a new cold age propelled animal species to adapt or die out.  According to this view, [[mammals]] were some of the main beneficiaries of this explosion: their fur allowed them to adapt to the cold, and their small size allowed them to conserve energy relative to the huge dinosaurs of the previous age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennet, Shostak, Jakotsky, &amp;quot;Life in the Universe,&amp;quot; viewable at [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Universe-Jeffrey-Bennett/dp/0805385770]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaurs and Birds====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a number of feathered fossils (claimed to be dinosaurs) have been discovered, and evolutionary scientists claim the similarity in the bone structure between birds and dinosaurs show that modern birds are a descendants of dinosaurs.  This is often cited as an example of [[macroevolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/10/1006_041006_feathery_dino.html New Dinosaur Discovered: T. Rex Cousin Had Feathers], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cladists place modern birds within the clade dinosauria, meaning that they consider all bird species today as, technically, dinosaurs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://tolweb.org/Dinosauria/14883/1999.01.01 Tree of Life Web Project.] 1999. Dinosauria. Version 01 January 1999 (temporary). Accessed 30 May 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur fossils and Human Fossils and Geological Strata ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some evolutionary scientists assert that if human bones aren’t found with dinosaur bones, then dinosaurs and man didn’t live together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/humans-and-dinosaurs If humans and dinosaurs lived together, why don’t we find human fossils with dinosaur fossils?] ''Answers'' 1(1):52, May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH710.html Claim CH710] (The TalkOrigins Archive)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creation scientists point out that this is a false assumption; if human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren't buried together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists point out that [[radiometric dating]] of rocks containing dinosaur bones shows them to have formed between 65 million years ago and 250 million years ago, whereas rocks with human bones in them are dated as being much newer (less than 5 million years old). Young Earth Creationists believe that these methods of dating rocks provide false results, and therefore reject this argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists note that the fossil record contains mainly marine organisms and that a small sliver of the fossil record contains vertebrates and thus assert that we shouldn't expect to find many human fossils at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, as the biblical [[Great Flood|Flood]] would be a marine catastrophe, it would be expected that marine fossils would dominate the fossil record.  This is in fact what we find.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/pdfs/SampleChapter/10-2-267.pdf Why Don’t We Find Human &amp;amp; Dinosaur Fossils Together?] (chapter 13 of the New Answers Book), 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 70% of the Earth is covered in salt water which would also explain the dominance of marine fossils. In addition, creation scientists assert there may have been a small pre-flood human population and that massive amounts of flood sediment are why we haven’t found human fossils in pre-biblical flood sediments.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Also, creation scientists point out that we don't find human bones buried with [[coelacanth]]s yet humans and coelacanths coexist today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==	 &lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jumbuckjim</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>