<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=KevinO</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=KevinO"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/KevinO"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T08:14:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=796171</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=796171"/>
		<updated>2010-07-20T15:17:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: +1 2000s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to Harry Hopkins like a well-fitted suit.]]Each year the English language develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and many good words have developed since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms are being generated at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms are.  This implies an inevitable conservative triumph over liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful, insightful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For every insightful new conservative term originating in the 1600s, there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  Implications of a geometric increase for new conservative terms include a more conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  The year 1612 is our starting point: the King James Version of the Bible had just been published in 1611, and [[William Shakespeare]] had written virtually all of his plays.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Most Prolific Periods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|20&lt;br /&gt;
|period following publication of [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Great Awakening|Great Awaken.]], [[American Revolution|Am. Revol.]], [[Constitutional Convention|Const. Conv.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|80&lt;br /&gt;
|1820s - political transition and conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|159&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s - [[World War II|WWII]] and postwar transition&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|14 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein criticized this concept as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the Christian Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help, revolutionary program to improve health, he entitled his ground-breaking book in 1968 ''Aerobics''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alcoholism&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that one’s work should be rewarding.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|thirty-three million sites turn up in a Google search, yet the Merriam-Webster dictionary doesn't recognize this important term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|critical term describing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that the baby boom actually started before World War II, contrary to what textbooks teach. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; a favorite term of President John Adams, who wrote the Massachusetts Constitution and played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his liberal claptrap&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[comparative advantage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www-personal.umich.edu/~alandear/glossary/orig.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|developed by the classical economist [[David Ricardo]], this reflects the insight that each country should &amp;quot;do what it does best&amp;quot; in deciding which goods to produce&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|MW states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term 'globalism'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting politics for racial, ethnic, gender equality.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Sarah Palin]] coined the term as she wrote about the construction of a [[mosque]] at Ground Zero.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|1787 HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underemployed&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster February 2, 2009 Obama ends use of the conservative lexicon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;force times distance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limousine liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
|hypocrite&lt;br /&gt;
|rich promoting causes which they themselves don't adhere to&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Liberal Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New liberal words often have deceptive, or nonsensical, meanings.  Here are some new words created by liberals to combat [[conservatism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[agnosticism|agnostic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who claims to not know whether [[God]] exists but still lives like an [[atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism|atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1571&lt;br /&gt;
|useful and often deceptive alternative name for an anti-Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Big Bang theory|big bang]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|term invented by the leading [[British]] physicist Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] to ''mock'' this suggestion of how the universe was formed, but later accepted as a serious term rather than mockery;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Compare this migration with that of &amp;quot;politically correct,&amp;quot; which started out as a serious term but then adopted a sense of mockery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it's liberal because it trivializes the beauty and the [[faith]] of the moment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bilingual education&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism describing a costly and hurtful program that hinders the learning of English by foreign-born children in American [[public school]]s, which hurts their future opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carbon footprint]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/carbon%20footprint&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|this term indicates an individual human's effect on the environment by production of carbon dioxide &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chairperson&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|even Alice Sturgis, the leading parliamentarian of the 20th century, rejected this cumbersome form of political correctness.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|check-off&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|automatic deduction of union dues by the employer from the employee's paycheck, so he has no choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|first entered the political lexicon primarily as an attack by liberals against conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030115.html The art of &amp;quot;class warfare&amp;quot;], Ben Fritz, Spinsanity.org, January 15, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compassionate-care clinics&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|a term describe pot-shops that dispense medical marijuana &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/11/magazines/fortune/medical_marijuana_legalizing.fortune/?postversion=2009091116 How marijuana became legal, CNN, September 11, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compassion fatigue&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals, driven by materialistic self-interest, are likely to suffer from this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[condescension]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1647&lt;br /&gt;
|treating another person as though they are inferior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|like most &amp;quot;isms&amp;quot;, creationism is a derogatory term coined preferred most by opponents of it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dark Ages]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1730&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined in the so-called [[enlightenment]] to disparage the period between the fall of the [[Roman Empire]] and c.1000, when the Christian faith, and its learning and culture, spread across Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dead white males|dead white males]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term used of significant figures from previous generations by those who wish to undermine [[Cultural Literacy|cultural literacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of interpretation of texts that looks beyond the plain meaning of the text in order to infer or accuse the writers of social bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|diva&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|modern use to describe female Hollywood/media personalities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Détente|detente]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism referring to pacifist policy re. the Soviet Union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|distributive justice&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used to redefine socialist abridgment of rights as &amp;quot;just&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1669&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Environmentalist|environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|a mixture of [[pseudoscience]] and neo-[[paganism]] used to justify the imposition of [[socialist]]ic controls.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[exclusionary rule]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|an invented rule that requires censoring and withholding from the jury certain incriminating evidence about a criminal defendant, simply based on how the evidence was obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|planning intended to determine the number and spacing of one's children through birth control &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mw1.m-w.com/dictionary/family%20planning Family Planning, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freethinker&lt;br /&gt;
|1692&lt;br /&gt;
|the euphemism &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; hides the hostility towards faith, which is not free&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fundamentalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; From a series of pamphlets called &amp;quot;The Fundamentals&amp;quot; which outlined the movement.  Perjorative usage started when the liberal [[Harry Emerson Fosdick]] began using the term in a straw man attack against [[Conservative Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[feminism]]   &lt;br /&gt;
|1895   &lt;br /&gt;
|notionally, &amp;quot;the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes&amp;quot;; in reality, the attempt to destroy traditional family, societal and religious values by erasing or undermining natural gender differences.  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gay rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the movement for civil rights for homosexuals&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|the notion that an invisible barrier prevents women and ethnic minorities from reaching high office; an excuse for [[feminist]]s and others to demand [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the baseless [[environmentalist]] mantra that the earth's temperature is rising, and that human intervention is the cause.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[goth]]&lt;br /&gt;
|?&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a style of rock music, noted especially for somber or ethereal tones and lugubrious lyrics&amp;quot;, or someone who performs or listens to this style of music.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Goths often &amp;quot;dress in black with heavy jewelry&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth rock'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth%20rock]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term is taken from the name of &amp;quot;a Germanic people who invaded the Roman Empire in the early centuries of the Christian era&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gun control&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for restricting the right to keep and bear arms &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[homophobia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Liberals to describe a failure to subscribe 100% to the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[humanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1808 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newhumanist.org.uk/1740&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|a clever term later used by liberals to interfere with Christian missionaries and stopping anti-Christian tyranny&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[isolationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term that is critical of American politicians putting America first in priorities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Keynesianism&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|advocacy of 'tax and spend' policies as elaborated by the economist [[John Maynard Keynes]]; a [[euphemism]] for back-door [[Socialism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Living Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|a continually evolving Constitution (first used by presidential candidate Al Gore, title of a 1936 book by Howard McBain)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|main squeeze&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|one's romantic partner, typically in an unmarried relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|McCarthyism&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|originally, investigations by Sen. Joe McCarthy of Communists working in sensitive USA government jobs. Later, it more broadly refers to holding radical leftists accountable for their beliefs and loyalties.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[metrosexual]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|fashion and glamour man&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moderate&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|the original term dates from the French Revolution, but its meaning today is a euphemism for someone who favors abortion and/or supports censorship of Christianity in some ways.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[moving the goalposts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|a sports analogy designed to avoid answering a logical follow-up question; this is a favorite term of evolutionists to avoid addressing obvious deficiencies in their theory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nationalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for the government taking over ownership and control of a large company or entire industry, as in socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|natural selection&lt;br /&gt;
|1857&lt;br /&gt;
|a misleading and euphemistic term for the theory that genetic advantages and conflict dictate survival&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Nihilism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&lt;br /&gt;
|a rejection of the values system, independently anarchist from society norms.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[population control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|the issue of population dates back to Confucius. Liberals promoted the term after the book The Population Bomb by Paul R. Ehrlich&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-choice]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for insisting on taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]; people who claim to be pro-choice typically oppose ''informed'' choice, which makes the &amp;quot;choice&amp;quot; meaningless&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[progressivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1892&lt;br /&gt;
|the progressive movement was not entirely liberal; it was started by a Republican and shared some goals with conservatives, and still does&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[psychoanalysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|contributed to de-spiritualization of human beings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|public option&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|obfuscate rewording of government control &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[quote mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
|non-existent&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used by [[evolutionists]] to describe taking quotes out of context in order to damage the position of the quoted party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reproductive health&lt;br /&gt;
|1994 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;defined by the United Nations (UN) in 1994 at the Cairo International Conference&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|abortion supporters jargon for rights/justice for pregnant women, no rights/justice for the child.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Sexual Discrimination|sexism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|That which is practiced by those who do not give total support to [[feminism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shovel-ready &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skylineviews.typepad.com/skyline_views/2009/04/is-it-time-to-add-shovelready-to-the-dictionary.html Is it time to add shovel-ready to the dictionary? Skyline Views, April 24, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|jobs and people ready to work if funded&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|situation ethics&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for denying fixed ethical standards&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stimulus packages&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|used by government(s) to be perceived as taking unprecedented measures to stimulate aggregate economic demand; during a crisis on economic growth and private jobs, liberal government entities are known to deceptively take advantage of its subject in the form of &amp;quot;stimulus packages,&amp;quot; as an opportunity to pursue policies that further social and environmental agendas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/62/42555546.pdf For a stronger, cleaner, ''fairer'' world economy], ''Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development'' (OECD), 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict liability&lt;br /&gt;
|1869&lt;br /&gt;
|court-imposed liability even when there is no evidence of any fault by the defendant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sustainability&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|[[environmentalism|environmentalist]] buzzword&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Swift-Boating&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|allegations of unfair campaign tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transforming society&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Obama, Rahm and Axelrod use this term. It dates to [[Saul Alinsky]] and Chicago politics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marklevinshow.com/sectional.asp?id=32930# Mark Levin Show, July 7, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transnationalist&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh in a 2006 law review article:  &amp;quot;The transnationalists view domestic courts as having a critical role to play in domesticating international law into U.S. law ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Penn State Law Review (2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|undocumented immigrant&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|a [[politically correct]] replacement for illegal alien.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unfair&lt;br /&gt;
|1700&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|union shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unitarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|will to power&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Nietzsche]]'s concept of the drive of a superman to perfect himself by exercising creative power; it didn't catch on&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|woman's rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|women equal to men; the defining movement to justify aborting babies in the 20th century&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rate of Generation of Liberal Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of generation of liberal terms is increasing, but not with the enduring value of the conservative terms and not with their geometric rate of increase.  A remarkably high percentage of new liberal terms originated in the 1960s, suggesting that new liberal terms arise in a sporadic manner heavily influenced by culture:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Liberal Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|31 (9 in the 1960s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An estimate; it originated no later than 1983.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by sociologist Daniel Bell, its meaning today is unclear; it is used to urge exporting American-style elections to the rest of the world as urged especially by [[neoconservatives]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=796170</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=796170"/>
		<updated>2010-07-20T15:16:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: /* Conservative words and terms */ Sarah Paslin coins a new conservative word.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to Harry Hopkins like a well-fitted suit.]]Each year the English language develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and many good words have developed since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms are being generated at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms are.  This implies an inevitable conservative triumph over liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful, insightful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For every insightful new conservative term originating in the 1600s, there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  Implications of a geometric increase for new conservative terms include a more conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  The year 1612 is our starting point: the King James Version of the Bible had just been published in 1611, and [[William Shakespeare]] had written virtually all of his plays.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Most Prolific Periods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|20&lt;br /&gt;
|period following publication of [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Great Awakening|Great Awaken.]], [[American Revolution|Am. Revol.]], [[Constitutional Convention|Const. Conv.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|80&lt;br /&gt;
|1820s - political transition and conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|159&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s - [[World War II|WWII]] and postwar transition&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|13 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein criticized this concept as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the Christian Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help, revolutionary program to improve health, he entitled his ground-breaking book in 1968 ''Aerobics''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alcoholism&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that one’s work should be rewarding.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|thirty-three million sites turn up in a Google search, yet the Merriam-Webster dictionary doesn't recognize this important term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|critical term describing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that the baby boom actually started before World War II, contrary to what textbooks teach. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; a favorite term of President John Adams, who wrote the Massachusetts Constitution and played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his liberal claptrap&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[comparative advantage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www-personal.umich.edu/~alandear/glossary/orig.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|developed by the classical economist [[David Ricardo]], this reflects the insight that each country should &amp;quot;do what it does best&amp;quot; in deciding which goods to produce&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|MW states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term 'globalism'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting politics for racial, ethnic, gender equality.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Sarah Palin]] coined the term as she wrote about the construction of a [[mosque]] at Ground Zero.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|1787 HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underemployed&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster February 2, 2009 Obama ends use of the conservative lexicon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;force times distance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limousine liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
|hypocrite&lt;br /&gt;
|rich promoting causes which they themselves don't adhere to&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Liberal Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New liberal words often have deceptive, or nonsensical, meanings.  Here are some new words created by liberals to combat [[conservatism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[agnosticism|agnostic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who claims to not know whether [[God]] exists but still lives like an [[atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism|atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1571&lt;br /&gt;
|useful and often deceptive alternative name for an anti-Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Big Bang theory|big bang]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|term invented by the leading [[British]] physicist Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] to ''mock'' this suggestion of how the universe was formed, but later accepted as a serious term rather than mockery;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Compare this migration with that of &amp;quot;politically correct,&amp;quot; which started out as a serious term but then adopted a sense of mockery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it's liberal because it trivializes the beauty and the [[faith]] of the moment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bilingual education&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism describing a costly and hurtful program that hinders the learning of English by foreign-born children in American [[public school]]s, which hurts their future opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carbon footprint]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/carbon%20footprint&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|this term indicates an individual human's effect on the environment by production of carbon dioxide &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chairperson&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|even Alice Sturgis, the leading parliamentarian of the 20th century, rejected this cumbersome form of political correctness.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|check-off&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|automatic deduction of union dues by the employer from the employee's paycheck, so he has no choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|first entered the political lexicon primarily as an attack by liberals against conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030115.html The art of &amp;quot;class warfare&amp;quot;], Ben Fritz, Spinsanity.org, January 15, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compassionate-care clinics&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|a term describe pot-shops that dispense medical marijuana &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/11/magazines/fortune/medical_marijuana_legalizing.fortune/?postversion=2009091116 How marijuana became legal, CNN, September 11, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compassion fatigue&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals, driven by materialistic self-interest, are likely to suffer from this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[condescension]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1647&lt;br /&gt;
|treating another person as though they are inferior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|like most &amp;quot;isms&amp;quot;, creationism is a derogatory term coined preferred most by opponents of it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dark Ages]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1730&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined in the so-called [[enlightenment]] to disparage the period between the fall of the [[Roman Empire]] and c.1000, when the Christian faith, and its learning and culture, spread across Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dead white males|dead white males]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term used of significant figures from previous generations by those who wish to undermine [[Cultural Literacy|cultural literacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of interpretation of texts that looks beyond the plain meaning of the text in order to infer or accuse the writers of social bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|diva&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|modern use to describe female Hollywood/media personalities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Détente|detente]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism referring to pacifist policy re. the Soviet Union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|distributive justice&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used to redefine socialist abridgment of rights as &amp;quot;just&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1669&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Environmentalist|environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|a mixture of [[pseudoscience]] and neo-[[paganism]] used to justify the imposition of [[socialist]]ic controls.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[exclusionary rule]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|an invented rule that requires censoring and withholding from the jury certain incriminating evidence about a criminal defendant, simply based on how the evidence was obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|planning intended to determine the number and spacing of one's children through birth control &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mw1.m-w.com/dictionary/family%20planning Family Planning, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freethinker&lt;br /&gt;
|1692&lt;br /&gt;
|the euphemism &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; hides the hostility towards faith, which is not free&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fundamentalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; From a series of pamphlets called &amp;quot;The Fundamentals&amp;quot; which outlined the movement.  Perjorative usage started when the liberal [[Harry Emerson Fosdick]] began using the term in a straw man attack against [[Conservative Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[feminism]]   &lt;br /&gt;
|1895   &lt;br /&gt;
|notionally, &amp;quot;the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes&amp;quot;; in reality, the attempt to destroy traditional family, societal and religious values by erasing or undermining natural gender differences.  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gay rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the movement for civil rights for homosexuals&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|the notion that an invisible barrier prevents women and ethnic minorities from reaching high office; an excuse for [[feminist]]s and others to demand [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the baseless [[environmentalist]] mantra that the earth's temperature is rising, and that human intervention is the cause.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[goth]]&lt;br /&gt;
|?&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a style of rock music, noted especially for somber or ethereal tones and lugubrious lyrics&amp;quot;, or someone who performs or listens to this style of music.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Goths often &amp;quot;dress in black with heavy jewelry&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth rock'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth%20rock]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term is taken from the name of &amp;quot;a Germanic people who invaded the Roman Empire in the early centuries of the Christian era&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gun control&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for restricting the right to keep and bear arms &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[homophobia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Liberals to describe a failure to subscribe 100% to the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[humanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1808 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newhumanist.org.uk/1740&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|a clever term later used by liberals to interfere with Christian missionaries and stopping anti-Christian tyranny&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[isolationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term that is critical of American politicians putting America first in priorities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Keynesianism&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|advocacy of 'tax and spend' policies as elaborated by the economist [[John Maynard Keynes]]; a [[euphemism]] for back-door [[Socialism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Living Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|a continually evolving Constitution (first used by presidential candidate Al Gore, title of a 1936 book by Howard McBain)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|main squeeze&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|one's romantic partner, typically in an unmarried relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|McCarthyism&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|originally, investigations by Sen. Joe McCarthy of Communists working in sensitive USA government jobs. Later, it more broadly refers to holding radical leftists accountable for their beliefs and loyalties.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[metrosexual]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|fashion and glamour man&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moderate&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|the original term dates from the French Revolution, but its meaning today is a euphemism for someone who favors abortion and/or supports censorship of Christianity in some ways.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[moving the goalposts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|a sports analogy designed to avoid answering a logical follow-up question; this is a favorite term of evolutionists to avoid addressing obvious deficiencies in their theory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nationalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for the government taking over ownership and control of a large company or entire industry, as in socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|natural selection&lt;br /&gt;
|1857&lt;br /&gt;
|a misleading and euphemistic term for the theory that genetic advantages and conflict dictate survival&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Nihilism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&lt;br /&gt;
|a rejection of the values system, independently anarchist from society norms.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[population control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|the issue of population dates back to Confucius. Liberals promoted the term after the book The Population Bomb by Paul R. Ehrlich&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-choice]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for insisting on taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]; people who claim to be pro-choice typically oppose ''informed'' choice, which makes the &amp;quot;choice&amp;quot; meaningless&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[progressivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1892&lt;br /&gt;
|the progressive movement was not entirely liberal; it was started by a Republican and shared some goals with conservatives, and still does&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[psychoanalysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|contributed to de-spiritualization of human beings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|public option&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|obfuscate rewording of government control &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[quote mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
|non-existent&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used by [[evolutionists]] to describe taking quotes out of context in order to damage the position of the quoted party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reproductive health&lt;br /&gt;
|1994 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;defined by the United Nations (UN) in 1994 at the Cairo International Conference&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|abortion supporters jargon for rights/justice for pregnant women, no rights/justice for the child.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Sexual Discrimination|sexism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|That which is practiced by those who do not give total support to [[feminism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shovel-ready &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skylineviews.typepad.com/skyline_views/2009/04/is-it-time-to-add-shovelready-to-the-dictionary.html Is it time to add shovel-ready to the dictionary? Skyline Views, April 24, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|jobs and people ready to work if funded&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|situation ethics&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for denying fixed ethical standards&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stimulus packages&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|used by government(s) to be perceived as taking unprecedented measures to stimulate aggregate economic demand; during a crisis on economic growth and private jobs, liberal government entities are known to deceptively take advantage of its subject in the form of &amp;quot;stimulus packages,&amp;quot; as an opportunity to pursue policies that further social and environmental agendas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/62/42555546.pdf For a stronger, cleaner, ''fairer'' world economy], ''Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development'' (OECD), 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict liability&lt;br /&gt;
|1869&lt;br /&gt;
|court-imposed liability even when there is no evidence of any fault by the defendant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sustainability&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|[[environmentalism|environmentalist]] buzzword&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Swift-Boating&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|allegations of unfair campaign tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transforming society&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Obama, Rahm and Axelrod use this term. It dates to [[Saul Alinsky]] and Chicago politics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marklevinshow.com/sectional.asp?id=32930# Mark Levin Show, July 7, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transnationalist&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh in a 2006 law review article:  &amp;quot;The transnationalists view domestic courts as having a critical role to play in domesticating international law into U.S. law ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Penn State Law Review (2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|undocumented immigrant&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|a [[politically correct]] replacement for illegal alien.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unfair&lt;br /&gt;
|1700&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|union shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unitarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|will to power&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Nietzsche]]'s concept of the drive of a superman to perfect himself by exercising creative power; it didn't catch on&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|woman's rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|women equal to men; the defining movement to justify aborting babies in the 20th century&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rate of Generation of Liberal Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of generation of liberal terms is increasing, but not with the enduring value of the conservative terms and not with their geometric rate of increase.  A remarkably high percentage of new liberal terms originated in the 1960s, suggesting that new liberal terms arise in a sporadic manner heavily influenced by culture:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Liberal Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|31 (9 in the 1960s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An estimate; it originated no later than 1983.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by sociologist Daniel Bell, its meaning today is unclear; it is used to urge exporting American-style elections to the rest of the world as urged especially by [[neoconservatives]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=789634</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=789634"/>
		<updated>2010-06-24T01:21:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 789623 by OperatingThetan (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical Debates==&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Debate:Can Conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Debate:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Embryonic Stem Cells: Why or why not?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why Reason?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should pharmacists be forced to fill legal prescriptions they personally object to on moral grounds?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What is the real love?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:who created God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Why have conservatives let themselves get a bad name?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Is it possible for God to be timeless?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Is it possible for man to live a moral life without religion?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: How do conservatives view the Open Source movement and software?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: At what point does &amp;quot;Human&amp;quot; life begin?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does God punish sinners for eternity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Should certain books be banned from libraries?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Scientology a false religion?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do Moses, Ezra, Jesus, and Paul all disagree on divorce?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What does Christianity say about homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What is the relationship between religion and the human tendency to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still perform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|Debate:If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why the Bible|Debate:What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Christ a fundamentalist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Atheism vs. Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Atheism vs. Pastafarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are Young Earth Creationists detracting others from the Faith?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is there 1 God or are there many gods?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Can you be a true Christian and believe in evolution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should gay marriage be allowed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is atheism a religion?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Are Catholics Christians?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Do Atheist believe they have a soul?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Were Judas' actions necessary and foreordained?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Is it possible to voluntarily convert one's religion?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Can Christianity exist without Apostles and Prophets?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: What do you think about the violence in the Bible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Could Christian denominations exist without the Catholic Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Which version of the Bible should be used as the authoritative reference on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Should Christians celebrate Christmas?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Creationist]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Did Joan of Arc truly hear voices?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Do ALL suicides go to hell?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Epicurus' Trilemma]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate: Why does God care if we worship Him or not? Is it His ego?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate: Can God explain all of the conspiracy theories and all other phenonmena?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate: Should Christians be more forthright in stating that Allah is not the same being as the Judeo-Christian God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Benjamin Franklin a deist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was the European colonization of the Americas good for the native people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was President George H. W. Bush wrong to leave Saddam in power in 1991?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which was worse? the Civil War and it's effects or slavery?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why are most actors turned politicians Republicans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Did the Founding Fathers intend to apply their personal faith to the nation &amp;quot;As an institution&amp;quot;?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does Abstinence Only Education help or hurt us?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is homosexuality responsible for totalitarianism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Did the Founders have a religious motive?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: To what extent should we have obscenity laws]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still have an embargo on Cuba?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Has Britain Declined?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Debate:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Debate:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Debate:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|Debate:If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Debate:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religious?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?|Debate:Does Single sex schooling promote homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Can a rogue nation be thought of as a sovereign nation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Has Russia reinstalled stealth communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Do we all know what Democrat Presidential candidates stand for yet?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Define Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should gun sales to terror suspects be allowed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Darwinism liberal or is it conservative?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why did God place most of the world's oil in politically unstable places?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Restoring the USA image in the world, just a fancy phrase that means zilch?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Placing the blame on how America got polarized]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is most government criticism really patriotic?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is environmentalism mostly about preserving natural resources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the conservative stance on illegal immigration going to loose the Hispanic vote for the GOP in the 08' election?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Third Party Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Who kills more innocent people: religious believers or atheists?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Preferred Democrat for the White House?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does Republican equal conservative?  Does Democrat equal liberal?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Obama's preacher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the United States begin Colonizing Space?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the federal government have the power to define marriage?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:The Declaration of Independence or Interdependence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the U.S.A. abide by a withdrawal timetable if the Iraqi Parliament votes for one?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should U.S. troops be subject to Iraqi law if that allows our continued presence there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should government restrictions on smoking be tightened or rolled back?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Sarah Palin an asset or a liability to John McCain's candidacy?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is a candidate's military record relevant anymore?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should politicians be allowed to misspeak?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: What is sufficient proof that Obama is a Muslim?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was McCain's threat to pull out of the debates a political stunt?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Obama Was Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What level of Gun Control is appropriate?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the Bush administration's Conscience Rule a step forward or backward for U.S. Healthcare?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Why do political views appear to be correlated with others?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:What should be America's policy toward Islam]]?&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Is the American Occupation of the Hawaiian Islands justified?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Was the American involvement in the Vietnam War justified?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Was the North right to prevent Southern secession in the US Civil War?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Is the 2009 Stimulus Plan the right approach, and if not what would be?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Obama being unfairly criticized, or is too much being expected of our new president?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is it possible to be conservative and know there is no possibility of there ever being a &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and/or higher being?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Obama an Atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Would anybody consider President Barry Soetoro a Muslim?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do we need an amendment to rein in the Supreme Court?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Can there be price controls without shortages?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate: Counterfeiting: A Moral Hazard]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Should Americans be required to buy health insurance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is our freedom to consume what we want whenever we want worth the cost (i.e. environmental, social, economic, etc.)?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing?|Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|Debate:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God?|Debate:If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why are God's works always questioned?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are there any elements of choice, when it comes to carrying out homosexual acts?|Debate:Are there any elements of choice]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Listing the Earth's most pressing needs in urgent order of fixing]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is homosexuality a mental illness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Can the science of evolution be separated from the philosophy of it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Conservapedia representing a conservative POV or a Young Earth Creationist POV?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are there too many debates on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does an encyclopedia define complex subjects, or insert more bias into them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Do sysops block editing on pages when it seems their opponents are making strong points?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Conservapedia a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia'?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does altering the record of debate in a wiki 'Encyclopedia' render the entire thing a farce?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Democrats next move, link more stories of heartache like those from Kansas to Gulf Coast.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Conservapedia blinkered?|Is Conservapedia blinkered?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does Conservapedia censor opponents the way Expelled says ID advocates are censored?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the Conservapedia Logo in violation of US Flag Code?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:The 90/10 rule exists soley to squash debate, and should be eliminated]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What will Conservapedia be like if Barack Obama wins the election?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Which is more important, economic or social conservatism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should the Conservapedia logo be changed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Can/May/Should online wiki encyclopedias copy from each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is it time to propagate Conservapedia in other languages/countries?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are cats just useless Dogs]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Favorite old time radio show]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Rap music torture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Should marijuana be legalized?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What are the lessons that we should take away from the Milgram Experiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does the Theory of Evolution promote atheism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Mall Shootings]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Creationist]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is the Theory of Evolution a conspiricy?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in god?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Does modern music negatively influence children]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Propaganda in childrens' television]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What Is Music?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Why are there so few homosexual athletes]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Debate:Relationship between Socialism and athletic performance]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Other_gods&amp;diff=789632</id>
		<title>Other gods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Other_gods&amp;diff=789632"/>
		<updated>2010-06-24T01:20:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 789629 by OperatingThetan (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Other gods''' describes deities other than the Abrahamic  [[God]] of the Jewish, Christian and Muslim faiths. The term comes from the [[Ten Commandments]], where God said, &amp;quot;You shall have no other gods before me&amp;quot; ({{Bible ref|Exodus|20|3}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the word &amp;quot;god&amp;quot; refers, in a general sense, to any deity that is or has been [[worship|worshipped]] as part of a theistic belief system, when spelled with an upper-case &amp;quot;G,&amp;quot; the term is normally referring to the God of the [[Abrahamic religions]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--This section is off-topic--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, there are even godless religions, that is, religions that worship no gods as such. These include [[Buddhism]] and [[Taoism]], which worship no other god at all, at least not in the sense that [[God]] is defined. Rather than emphasizing worship, whether that of [[God]] or other gods, such religions tend focus on the development of truth, knowledge and individual enlightenment.&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other gods in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament|Jewish]] and [[New Testament|Christian Bible]]s contain references to more than just the Jewish and Christian God, but these gods are seen as false and having no real power, whether it be the [[golden calf]] or the images of [[Baal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Genesis ===&lt;br /&gt;
God in the [[Garden of Eden]] often uses the plural when referring to Himself:&lt;br /&gt;
*'And God said, let us make man in our image.', ([[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] 1:26)&lt;br /&gt;
*'And the Lord God said, Behold, then man is become as one of us, to know good and evil.' (Genesis 3:22)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Let us go down, and there confound their language.'. (Genesis 11:7)&lt;br /&gt;
This is explained as use of the 'Royal We' in [[Judaism]] or foreshadowing of [[The Trinity]] in [[Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exodus ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible refers to Egyptian gods several times, but they are never presented as having real form or power.  For instance, no god is ever discussed taking an action, having a thought, speaking, etc.  There are references to collective worship of other gods, but God always takes out His wrath on the Egyptian people themselves and the consequences of that wrath are seen, since they are real and exist.&lt;br /&gt;
*'And against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment.' ([[Book of Exodus|Exodus]] 12:12)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Who is like unto thee, O LORD, among the gods?' (Exodus 15:11)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods.' (Exodus 18:11).&lt;br /&gt;
* The Magi of Egypt are able to produce plagues of their own, but it is never stated this is due to the power of a god.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ten Commandments|First Commandment]] makes it clear that God will not tolerate the worship of these other deities:&lt;br /&gt;
*'Thou shalt have no other gods before me. ... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.' (Exodus 20:3, 5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other biblical laws express the same idea:&lt;br /&gt;
*'He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed.' (Exodus 22:20)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.' (Exodus 23:13)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.' (Exodus 23:24)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods.' (Exodus 23:32)&lt;br /&gt;
*'For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.' (Exodus 34:14) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also this section on multiple gods: 'Thou shalt not revile the gods.' (Exodus 22:28) This follows from simple logic - how can one revile that which does not exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Psalms ===&lt;br /&gt;
*'God standeth in the congregation of the mighty, he judgeth among the gods.' (Psalm 82:1)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Among the gods there is none like unto thee, O Lord.' ([[Psalms|Psalm]] 86:8)&lt;br /&gt;
*'For the Lord ... is to be feared above all gods.' (Psalm 96:4)&lt;br /&gt;
*'Worship him, all ye gods.' (Psalm 97:7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Psalms are considered to be the poetic writings of [[King David|David]]. In the Near East culture of the time, kings and other men of renown could be called &amp;quot;gods.&amp;quot; There is no Biblical indication in any of the discussions of David or Israel's kings over almost 500 years where any god was ever considered to be real. For instance, no other god was ever said to have caused a storm or shown any other sign of actually existing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The rest of the Bible ===&lt;br /&gt;
None of the 66 Biblical books written over 1500 years of history have any mention of any other gods at all in any form that would grant them living qualities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Short Story==&lt;br /&gt;
Horror writer [[H.P. Lovecraft]] once wrote a short story called &amp;quot;The Other Gods.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical==&lt;br /&gt;
Other gods worshiped historically include the [[Greek mythology|Greek gods]], the [[Norse mythology|Norse gods]], the [[Egyptian mythology|Egyptian gods]], [[Aztec mythology|Aztec gods]] and the [[Sumerian mythology|Sumerian gods]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abrahamic Religions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=789631</id>
		<title>Fox News Channel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=789631"/>
		<updated>2010-06-24T01:19:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 789630 by OperatingThetan (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Fox News Channel''' is a [[United States]] [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[news]] channel. It is part of the Fox Television Stations Group, a subsidiary of [[Australia|Australian]]-born media mogul [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[News Corporation]]. [[Roger Ailes]] was named Chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group on August 15, 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founding==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News was started in 1996 by Murdoch and Roger Ailes. The two of them perceived a need for a news organization that offered more balanced reporting, one where the facts from all sides would be presented. Main-stream media &amp;quot;Political Correctness&amp;quot; was banished, with the news [[anchor]]s calling [[terrorist]]s what they were, (terrorists), instead of referring to them as &amp;quot;militants.&amp;quot;  As of February, 2007, polls show that over 20% of Americans say their main source of news is the Fox News Channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News uses the slogan &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced&amp;quot; and has daily guest pundits from all sides of the [[political spectrum]]. Fox News also is non-hostile to conservative and [[Christian]] values, viewpoints, spokesmen, and ideas. Fox News has gained the reputation for reporting the news in an unbiased manner and then allowing the viewer to decide; &amp;quot;We Report, You Decide&amp;quot; is another of their on-air slogans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News has dominated the [[ratings]] of other cable news outlets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Launched by media [[tycoon]] Rupert Murdoch and former political consultant Roger Ailes as a refuge for viewers fed up with real or perceived liberal bias everywhere in the so-called &amp;quot;[[mainstream media]]&amp;quot;, Fox is the undisputed ratings champion of cable news.  It's been trouncing [[CNN]], [[MSNBC]] and [[CNBC]] for years, and draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, including the three major broadcast news shows, combined. It is by far the most profitable news network in the world, on track to earn more than $700 Million in 2010. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/business/media/10ailes.html New York Times, January 9, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fair and Balanced==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fair_balanced.jpg‎ |thumb|left|Fair And Balanced Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] critics have been known to complain about the &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced&amp;quot; slogan.  Former President [[Bill Clinton]] exploded at ''Fox News Sunday'' anchor [[Chris Wallace]] in September of 2006, accusing him of &amp;quot;a nice little conservative hit job&amp;quot; after being lightly pressed by Wallace about his record on fighting [[Al Qaeda]].   Democratic politicians and advocates have relentlessly attacked the cable network, sometimes accusing it of being a Republican [[propaganda mill]].  Former Vice-President and environmentalist [[Al Gore]] has likened Fox to a right-wing &amp;quot;[[fifth column]].&amp;quot;  Groups, such as [[MoveOn.org]], funded a classic [[schlockumentary]] entitled ''[[Outfoxed]]'', which purports to expose the channel's 'nefarious Republican agenda'.  Some have referred to FOX News as &amp;quot;the propaganda arm of the Republican Party&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Faux News.&amp;quot; In a grandstanding gesture of political theater the group unsuccessfully petitioned the [[Federal Trade Commission]] to stop Fox's from using its slogan as &amp;quot;deceptive advertising&amp;quot;. It was unanimously rejected. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.showbizdata.com/news/36127/FTC-REJECTS-COMPLAINTS-AGAINST-FOX-NEWS  FTC: &amp;quot;It's best to ignore nuts&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fox News spokesman Rob Zimmerman told today's (Tuesday) Wall Street Journal: &amp;quot;If they can attack Fox News to this extreme, ''then all news organizations are at risk to be targeted by similar attacks. ... It's best to ignore nuts.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A recent comprehensive study by [[UCLA]] political scientist Tim Groseclose and University of Missouri-Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Milyo found [[Brit Hume]]'s ''Special Report'' — Fox's most straightforward news show — more centrist than any of the three major networks' evening newscasts, all of which are liberal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rcp.missouri.edu/articles/milyo_media.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The program is a model of smart news television. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is true that the Fox's opinion shows (as opposed to its news shows) are, as they're supposed to be, frequently bombastic and opinionated; it is equally true that Fox's biggest super-star, [[Bill O'Reilly]] is not a mainstream Republican, but a registered [[Independent]] who sides with conservatives. He regularly charges the oil companies with [[price-gouging]] and attacks big business for quashing the little guy. [[Greta Van Susteren]]'s politics are unclear, as she mostly covers the [[crime]]-of-the-day stories. [[Geraldo Rivera]] is traditionally liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for [[sex offender]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal commentators, such as news analyst [[Marvin Kalb]], and [[Eleanor Clift]], are affiliated with the channel. In general, Fox News is closer to mainstream America than [[CBS]], [[ABC]], [[NBC]] or [[CNN]], its founding mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives have criticism for Fox. Their 'Fair and Balanced' motto allows [[liberal]] [[propaganda]], lies, deceit, and half-truths to gain an audience. In reality, Fox was judged to actually provide a more &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; coverage in the 2008 Presidential race than all three MSM networks, who had a decidedly pro-Obama tilt, a study by the ''Center for Media and Public Affairs''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmpa.com/pdf/08summer.pdf Center for Media and Public Affairs: ''How TV News Has Covered McCain, Obama and Hillary'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ratings Dominance ==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News Channel was the 2nd highest rated cable channel on all of television during the first quarter of 2009 in prime time Total Viewers. CNN was 17th and MSNBC 24th for the first three months of the year. FNC beat CNN and MSNBC combined and gained the most compared to the first quarter of 2008, up 24%.  2009's first quarter was FNC's 3rd highest rated quarter in prime time in the network's history — just behind Q4 '08 and Q3 '05. In prime time, ages 25-54 demo, and in total day in both categories, FNC grew more year-to-year than CNN and MSNBC combined. FNC had nine of the top 10 programs on cable news in Total Viewers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bill O'Reilly|The O'Reilly Factor]] has now been #1 on cable news for 100 consecutive months, up 27% in Total Viewers year-over-year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glenn Beck]] has increased the 5pmET time period 90% in Total Viewers and 115% in the demo vs. Q1 '08, ''and is the fastest growing program in cable news for March''. Special Report with Bret Baier is up 39% in Total Viewers and 41% in the demo. [[Sean Hannity|&amp;quot;Hannity&amp;quot;]] is up 36% in Total Viewers and up 35% in the demo since going solo for the hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those three new programs beat CNN and MSNBC ''combined'' in total viewers during their respective time slots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Record with [[Greta Van Susteren]] is up 55% in total viewers and 75% in the demo. Your World with Neil Cavuto is up 60% in Total Viewers and 102% in the demo. Glenn Beck, is up 212% in the demo and up 128% in total viewers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/april_ratings_fnc_beats_cnn_and_msnbc_combined_115179.asp Media Bistro: April Ratings: FNC Beats CNN and MSNBC Combined]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-elitist ==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives argue that Fox's real ethos is not Republican or conservative, but anti-[[elitist]] — a major reason it connects with so many Americans and annoys so many coastal elites. &amp;quot;There's a whole country that elitists will never acknowledge,&amp;quot; Ailes once observed. &amp;quot;What people resent deeply out there are those in the 'blue states' thinking they're smarter.&amp;quot;  This anti-elitism shows itself in Fox's pro-U.S. stance in covering the [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq war]]s and its broadcasters' use of terms such as &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; instead of the politically correct &amp;quot;militant&amp;quot; to refer to terrorists. Since the [[Vietnam War]] era, mainstream [[journalist]]s have tended to see such blunt language and side-taking as unsophisticated, a betrayal of journalistic [[objectivity]], or perhaps their own ingrained biases against government in general.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another aspect of Fox's anti-elitism is the treatment of [[evangelical]] and [[fundamentalist Christian]]s with respect, far from the normal liberal media's depiction as as lunatics or extremists. &amp;quot;We regularly have on the [[Rev. Franklin Graham]], [[Dr. James Dobson]] and other religious leaders, just as we put on [[Pat Ireland]] and Eleanor Clift,&amp;quot; Ailes said, continuing,  ''&amp;quot;Most Americans believe in God and have that as their foundation in life. So why shouldn't we have as guests people that they like, respect and want to hear from?&amp;quot; '' Ailes said he didn't get &amp;quot;too worked up&amp;quot; by a [[Pew Foundation]] study that showed that Fox has more Republican viewers than CNN, CNBC or MSNBC and that his reporters and anchors insert their opinions into stories far more than competitors do. Numbers might have something to do with it: Fox is beating the combined audience of the other three. But Ailes dismissed Pew as a &amp;quot;liberal [[lobbyist|lobbying]] organization.&amp;quot; He said, &amp;quot;Most polls today are not taken to provide information to the public but to get press for the organization taking the polls. I took a poll of Pew, and 98% of my organization found that they were biased&amp;quot;, Ailes said with a wink. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, Project director Tom Rosenstiel said the study &amp;quot;was not a poll. It was a content analysis designed by a four-university research team and executed at the [[University of Alabama]].&amp;quot; ''One plus for Fox, he said, was that researchers found Fox News stories were more forthcoming about sourcing than their cable rivals.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Fringe Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What really frustrates liberals about Fox, though, is simply that, along with [[talk radio]] and the conservative [[blogosphere]], it has helped shatter the left's near-monopoly on news and information. Fox's opinion-driven programming gives conservatives and liberals a chance to get a fair hearing for their ideas. But Democratic politicians and activists who go on Fox also must defend their views, often against tough questioning, something that happens less often on the networks, where most journalists are left-of-center, survey after survey has shown&amp;quot;, said columnist [[Brian Anderson]]. &amp;quot;Even more significant, Fox came on the scene a decade ago as a professional news organization that could define and report news as something different from what the elite consensus says it is. To take one of many examples, the corruption of the [[United Nations]]' [[oil-for-food]] initiative in [[Iraq]], initially downplayed by the mainstream media because of their sympathy for internationalism, was uncovered — deemed newsworthy — on Fox.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this wouldn't matter if Fox News wasn't so influential. But it is. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 20% of Americans now claim to get news from it, and lots of them (37%) are Democrats or independents. The network's success has also sparked a &amp;quot;Fox effect,&amp;quot; leading some competitors to become more open to right-of-center opinions: MSNBC's &amp;quot;Scarborough Country,&amp;quot; hosted by former Republican congressman [[Joe Scarborough]], is a prime example. Until a few years ago, Democrats never had to deal with all these mediatized conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ailes said Fox News has no agenda. His charge to his reporters and anchors is simple: &amp;quot;If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework. Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools. They actually come to the job with some ideas and biases.&amp;quot; When asked whether the media have a &amp;quot;conscious bias,&amp;quot; Ailes said: &amp;quot;I don't know whether it's conscious or not. I think people who are biased to the left and right are by and large honest people who bring their life experience to whatever their beliefs are. I don't think there's some conspiracy of bias to the left, ''but I do think that [[New York]] and [[Los Angeles]] have different views than many people that I know from other parts of the country.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Obama ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Hussein Obama]] has thin skin when it comes to criticism of his policies. The entire [[mainstream media]] has thrown its support to Obama and refuses to questions his policies. Fox News is the lone station that will criticize Obama fairly. Obama said, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/media_critic_fox_news/2009/06/19/227121.html Media Critic: Fox Only Press Doing Its Job] NewsMax, June 19, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|  “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration…That’s a pretty big megaphone. You’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.” }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Media critic David Zurawik said “Thank goodness at least one TV outlet, Fox, is questioning Team Obama as it pushes for the kind of massive change in American life not seen since the era of Franklin Roosevelt,” and &amp;quot;...ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and the others allow their news operations to be used by the White House for partisan political reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roger Ailes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerailes_1.jpg‎ |thumb|right|400px|Roger Ailes, Fox News CEO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205966,00.html This is a transcript] of Ailes speaking to the Television Critics Association, which will be enlightening to readers digging into the Fox take on reporting and its reaction to controversy about its mission.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 20, 2008, [[Roger Ailes]], who now holds the titles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FOX News and Chairman of FOX Television Stations, signed a new five year contract with News Corporation, it was announced by Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The contract will pay him over 23 million dollars in 2009. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/roger_ailes_signs_new_5year_deal_with_news_corp_101312.asp Ailes Inks 5 Year Deal With NewsCorp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Ailes' time with [[News Corporation|News Corp]], [[FNC]] passed [[CNN]] in ratings in all day parts in 2002 to become the number one news network in the country, nearing full distribution with more than 90 million subscribers. In 2007, he launched the [[Fox Business Channel]] which currently reaches more than 40 million homes and served as the biggest launch in cable television history. Throughout Mr. Ailes' tenure, FOX Television Stations has increased its market share each of the last three years with all time record shares in the last two years. In addition, Fox Television Stations has expanded its local news presence by nearly 100 hours a week in a challenging economic climate.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''At a time when the broadcast networks are struggling with diminishing audiences and profits in news, he has built Fox News into the profit engine of the News Corporation. ''Fox News is believed to make more money than CNN, MSNBC and the evening newscasts of NBC, ABC and CBS combined.'' The division is on track to achieve $700 million in operating profit this year, according to analyst estimates.''' &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;--- The New York Times, 1/9/2010 &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/business/media/10ailes.html?pagewanted=all Ailes: Fox News Chief at the Pinnacle of Media and Politics ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tony Snow ==&lt;br /&gt;
In April, 2006 the [[White House]] selected [[Tony Snow]], Fox News Anchorman, to be the new White House Press Secretary. &amp;quot;Snow, who in his roles as a [[pundit]] on Fox News and elsewhere has rapped Bush on several occasions, joined the White House only after extracting a promise that he would become an adviser to the president on day-to-day strategy...the former columnist will be the first outsider to become part of Bush's revamped inner circle.&amp;quot;, said the [[Washington Post]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/26/AR2006042600558.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snow, 50, worked most recently as host for ''Fox News Sunday, with Tony Snow'' and as host of his own radio talk show. He was a director of speech-writing for President [[George H.W. Bush]] and has worked as a [[USA Today]] columnist, Editorial Page Editor of the [[Washington Times]], deputy editorial page editor of the [[Detroit News]] and frequent substitute for radio host [[Rush Limbaugh]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060426.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Snow died July 12, 2008, after an unsuccessful battle with colon cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill O'Reilly==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[O'Reilly Factor]] has been the most watched cable news segment for eight years. [[Bill O'Reilly]] has interviewed Barack Obama and other high profile guests on his show.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;FOX News destroys NBC and CNN on cable every night. We cover the news. We don't ignore it. And we don't denigrate it.&amp;quot; - Bill O'Reilly&lt;br /&gt;
Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent, but sides with Republicans on most issues, excluding several Christian causes.  Bill O'Reilly wrote the best seller &amp;quot;A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity.&amp;quot; Like [[Sean Hannity]] and other commentators on Fox, O'Reilly's role is that of an independent contractor, expressing his own opinions, not those of Fox News, as opposed to the networks news anchors, like Sheppard Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sarah Palin==&lt;br /&gt;
The network confirmed in January of 2010 that the former [[Alaska|Alaskan]] governor [[Sarah Palin]] had signed a multiyear contract to appear on the news station periodically. Potentially in a format similar to LtCol (ret) Oliver L. North's &amp;quot;War stories&amp;quot; documentary series. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/sarah-palin-to-contribute-to-fox-news/?scp=2&amp;amp;sq=Palin&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Red Eye==&lt;br /&gt;
It is a hybrid news / comedic satire show hosted by Greg Gutfeld. The show appears on Fox News at 3:00 a.m. on weekdays. Their ratings are remarkable for the time slot. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediaite.com/online/red-eye-resurgence-more-demo-viewers-watch-fox-at-3am-than-cnn-at-8pm/ Red Eye Resurgence: More Demo Viewers Watch Fox At 3am Than CNN at 8pm, October 5th, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
The ratings came out for September and Red Eye is up over 30% in total viewers and up 50% in the key demo (25-54) since July. They have more overall viewers than every CNBC show, every MSNBC show that is on before Hardball, most of HLN, and American Morning on CNN.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.foxnews.com/ Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cable TV Networks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative news organizations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789158</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789158"/>
		<updated>2010-06-22T04:27:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative movies exist, and some are immensely popular.  Here is our growing list (in no particular order):'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Invasion of the Body Snatchers]]'' (1956), a science fiction condemnation of [[communism]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Exorcist]]'' (1973) (not for children), a portrayal of pure evil with sympathy to only adversary it fears: [[Christianity]].  In its time it became the top-grossing film ever.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Dark Matter'' (2008), a brutally candid portrayal of [[professor values]] along with problems associated with lack of assimilation; liberals first praised the movie, but after realizing its conservative message then panned it.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Spider-Man]]'' (2002), which praises moral virtue (hard-working teenager, devout aunt and well-meaning uncle) and pokes fun at assumed [[liberals]] (entertainers and journalist).  Hero chooses [[abstinence]].  This was one of the most profitable films ever made.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Gone With the Wind]]'' (1939), which celebrates a strongly ''feminine'' heroine who is the antithesis of a modern [[feminist]], and held the record for top-grossing movie for decades.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ben-Hur (film, 1959)|Ben-Hur]]'' (1959), celebrates honor and duty to family and country, with a pro-Christian ending, long held the record for the most [[Academy Awards]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Sound of Music]]'' (1965), solid family entertainment, perhaps Hollywood's last great movie before it turned sharply Left.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Ten Commandments]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Mr. Smith Goes To Washington]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Star Wars]]'' series (1977-2005) - simple truths about the triumph of good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Winning Team'' (1952), starring [[Ronald Reagan]] as a pitcher who overcomes his problems to help his team win. This was one of Reagan's own favorites.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[King of Kings]]'' (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Iron Eagle]]'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[On The Waterfront]]'' (1954) [[Marlon Brando]] plays Terry Malloy, who under the inspiration of a Catholic priest (Father Barry, played by [[Karl Malden]]), becomes a Christ-like figure.  Betrayed by his brother and almost killed by the gang, he finds the strength to overcome and redeem his people from the slavery to the mobsters who run the waterfront.  In stunning contrast to the liberals who kept silent about the Communist subversion in Hollywood, the film portrays the informer as the hero; liberal Hollywood never forgave director [[Elia Kazan]] for his stunning film.  In real life, Kazan, Malden and screenwriter Budd Schulberg all testified before Congress, along with [[Ronald Reagan]].  Together they broke the power of the Reds in Hollywood.  &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Sergeant York]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Knute Rockne: All-American]]'' (1940)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ninotchka]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Forbidden Planet]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rudy]]'' (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Prince of Egypt]]'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Strategic Air Command (film)|Strategic Air Command]]'' (1955). Actor (and Brigadier [[General]]) [[James Stewart]]'s story of the real [[Strategic Air Command]] and its transition from prop planes to jet planes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Gathering of Eagles]]'' (1963). Illustrates duty, honor, and the burden of command.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Red Dawn]]'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Harry's War]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Patriot]]'' (2000) (the one starring Mel Gibson, there are several other movies with this name)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ladder 49]]'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rocky]]'' (1976) (perseverance and talent can overcome all odds)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[October Sky]]'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Amazing Grace (film)|Amazing Grace]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Bruce Almighty]]'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[World Trade Center]]'' (2006) (highlights the bravery of the firemen and police in [[9/11]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Flight 93]]'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Man For All Seasons]]'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Chariots of Fire]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[One Foot In Heaven]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Quo Vadis?]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Lost Weekend]]'' (1945) (dangers of alcohol)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Manchurian Candidate]]'' (1962, 2004 remake) (anti-communist in general, but with a swipe at [[Joseph McCarthy]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Green Berets]]'' (1968)Vivid defense of our troops' conduct in the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[My Son John]]'' (1952). A small-town couple's world is turned upside-down by the discovery that their adult son is a Communist.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[True Lies]]'' (1994), starring the future Republican governor of California, [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. Teaches conservative values like marital loyalty, and political incorrect facts such as the fact that most terrorists are Middle Eastern Arabic speakers who don't value human life.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Island]]'' (2005) Pro-life statement against cloning to harvest organs.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Evelyn]]'' (2002) True story of Irish father's legal struggle to recover his kids from an orphanage.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Shane]]'' (1953) Western about defending a homesteading family.&lt;br /&gt;
#'' [[Lean on Me]]'' (1989) A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hero]]'' (1992) Even those with character flaws can do good.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Day of the Jackal]]'' (1973) celebrates conservative values like honor and duty.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The 6th Day]]'' (2000) Pro-Life, Anti-Cloning movie Featuring Republican Governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]&lt;br /&gt;
#''Ghostbusters'' (1984).  Fitting satire of an environmental regulator.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Facing the Giants]] 2006. Trust in [[God]], let him take over, and good things will happen.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Flash of Genius'' (2008) - the intellectual property of a hard-working, solitary inventor is promoted, and his children stuck by his side through enormous difficulties.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Oh, God!'' (1977) - Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Expelled | Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed]] (2008) - Ben Stein exposes scientific and education system deceit.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hillary: The Movie]]'' (2008) - Citizens United film exposing Hillary Clinton. The movie led to the overturning of McCain-Feingold legislation by the Supreme Court of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Indoctrinate U]]'' (2007) - The film exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Fireproof (film)|Fireproof]]'' (2008) - Highly successful pro-Christian, pro-marriage film created by [[Sherwood Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Courageous]]'' (2011) - Upcoming [[Sherwood Pictures]] film focusing on the role of fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'' (1997) - Positively portrays a strong U.S. president who takes an uncompromising stance against terrorism. Includes positive material about family, authority, the military and sacrifice.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[U-571]]'' (2000) Exalts American war heroism, ingenuity, perseverance and determination in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds and pays tribute to real-life American accomplishments in the Second World War&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Fellowship of the Ring (film, 2001)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2001) - Clear distinction between good and evil with positive themes of friendship, bravery, honor, sacrifice and overcoming temptation.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Two Towers (film, 2002)|The Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers]]'' (2002) - Strong portrayals of redemption and good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World]]'' (2003) - Promotes many positive conservative values including faith in God, patriotism, duty, honor, respect for authority, discipline, bravery, sacrifice, and friendship.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Return of the King (2003 film)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2003) - Bravery, heroism, sacrifice and good ultimately triumphing over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe]]'' (2005) - Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Coach Carter'' (2005) - Promotes the theme that graduating from high school and having proper moral values are more important than becoming famous athletes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian]]'' (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader]]'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Seventh Sign]]'' (1988) - starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Starship Troopers'' (1997). While not entirely family-friendly due to some nudity, this film deals with several important patriotic ideas: the exercise of citizenship should be a right earned through service, not a [[liberal]] [[entitlements|entitlement]]; that a permanent state of war is justified by the threat of [[terrorism|terror]] attacks; and that our enemies are, like the &amp;quot;Bugs&amp;quot; of the film, not entitled to the full set of [[human rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
== Debatable Whether Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004) (downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946) (falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes faith with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[High Noon]]'' (1952) (Bill Clinton saw this movie 20 times, and John Wayne said it was the most un-American movie ever;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[P.C.U.]]'' (1994) - college students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Pillow Talk'' (1959) - a classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading woman, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Blues Brothers]]'' (1980) - comedy musical. A story of redemption, &amp;quot;A mission from God&amp;quot;, raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789157</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789157"/>
		<updated>2010-06-22T04:25:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative movies exist, and some are immensely popular.  Here is our growing list (in no particular order):'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Invasion of the Body Snatchers]]'' (1956), a science fiction condemnation of [[communism]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Exorcist]]'' (1973) (not for children), a portrayal of pure evil with sympathy to only adversary it fears: [[Christianity]].  In its time it became the top-grossing film ever.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Dark Matter'' (2008), a brutally candid portrayal of [[professor values]] along with problems associated with lack of assimilation; liberals first praised the movie, but after realizing its conservative message then panned it.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Spider-Man]]'' (2002), which praises moral virtue (hard-working teenager, devout aunt and well-meaning uncle) and pokes fun at assumed [[liberals]] (entertainers and journalist).  Hero chooses [[abstinence]].  This was one of the most profitable films ever made.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Gone With the Wind]]'' (1939), which celebrates a strongly ''feminine'' heroine who is the antithesis of a modern [[feminist]], and held the record for top-grossing movie for decades.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ben-Hur (film, 1959)|Ben-Hur]]'' (1959), celebrates honor and duty to family and country, with a pro-Christian ending, long held the record for the most [[Academy Awards]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Sound of Music]]'' (1965), solid family entertainment, perhaps Hollywood's last great movie before it turned sharply Left.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Ten Commandments]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Mr. Smith Goes To Washington]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Star Wars]]'' series (1977-2005) - simple truths about the triumph of good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Winning Team'' (1952), starring [[Ronald Reagan]] as a pitcher who overcomes his problems to help his team win. This was one of Reagan's own favorites.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[King of Kings]]'' (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Iron Eagle]]'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[On The Waterfront]]'' (1954) [[Marlon Brando]] plays Terry Malloy, who under the inspiration of a Catholic priest (Father Barry, played by [[Karl Malden]]), becomes a Christ-like figure.  Betrayed by his brother and almost killed by the gang, he finds the strength to overcome and redeem his people from the slavery to the mobsters who run the waterfront.  In stunning contrast to the liberals who kept silent about the Communist subversion in Hollywood, the film portrays the informer as the hero; liberal Hollywood never forgave director [[Elia Kazan]] for his stunning film.  In real life, Kazan, Malden and screenwriter Budd Schulberg all testified before Congress, along with [[Ronald Reagan]].  Together they broke the power of the Reds in Hollywood.  &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Sergeant York]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Knute Rockne: All-American]]'' (1940)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ninotchka]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Forbidden Planet]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rudy]]'' (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Prince of Egypt]]'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Strategic Air Command (film)|Strategic Air Command]]'' (1955). Actor (and Brigadier [[General]]) [[James Stewart]]'s story of the real [[Strategic Air Command]] and its transition from prop planes to jet planes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Gathering of Eagles]]'' (1963). Illustrates duty, honor, and the burden of command.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Red Dawn]]'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Harry's War]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Patriot]]'' (2000) (the one starring Mel Gibson, there are several other movies with this name)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ladder 49]]'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rocky]]'' (1976) (perseverance and talent can overcome all odds)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[October Sky]]'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Amazing Grace (film)|Amazing Grace]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Bruce Almighty]]'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[World Trade Center]]'' (2006) (highlights the bravery of the firemen and police in [[9/11]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Flight 93]]'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Man For All Seasons]]'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Chariots of Fire]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[One Foot In Heaven]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Quo Vadis?]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Lost Weekend]]'' (1945) (dangers of alcohol)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Manchurian Candidate]]'' (1962, 2004 remake) (anti-communist in general, but with a swipe at [[Joseph McCarthy]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Green Berets]]'' (1968)Vivid defense of our troops' conduct in the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[My Son John]]'' (1952). A small-town couple's world is turned upside-down by the discovery that their adult son is a Communist.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[True Lies]]'' (1994), starring the future Republican governor of California, [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. Teaches conservative values like marital loyalty, and political incorrect facts such as the fact that most terrorists are Middle Eastern Arabic speakers who don't value human life.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Island]]'' (2005) Pro-life statement against cloning to harvest organs.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Evelyn]]'' (2002) True story of Irish father's legal struggle to recover his kids from an orphanage.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Shane]]'' (1953) Western about defending a homesteading family.&lt;br /&gt;
#'' [[Lean on Me]]'' (1989) A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hero]]'' (1992) Even those with character flaws can do good.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Day of the Jackal]]'' (1973) celebrates conservative values like honor and duty.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The 6th Day]]'' (2000) Pro-Life, Anti-Cloning movie Featuring Republican Governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]&lt;br /&gt;
#''Ghostbusters'' (1984).  Fitting satire of an environmental regulator.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Facing the Giants]] 2006. Trust in [[God]], let him take over, and good things will happen.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Flash of Genius'' (2008) - the intellectual property of a hard-working, solitary inventor is promoted, and his children stuck by his side through enormous difficulties.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Oh, God!'' (1977) - Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Expelled | Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed]] (2008) - Ben Stein exposes scientific and education system deceit.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hillary: The Movie]]'' (2008) - Citizens United film exposing Hillary Clinton. The movie led to the overturning of McCain-Feingold legislation by the Supreme Court of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Indoctrinate U]]'' (2007) - The film exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Fireproof (film)|Fireproof]]'' (2008) - Highly successful pro-Christian, pro-marriage film created by [[Sherwood Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Courageous]]'' (2011) - Upcoming [[Sherwood Pictures]] film focusing on the role of fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'' (1997) - Positively portrays a strong U.S. president who takes an uncompromising stance against terrorism. Includes positive material about family, authority, the military and sacrifice.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[U-571]]'' (2000) Exalts American war heroism, ingenuity, perseverance and determination in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds and pays tribute to real-life American accomplishments in the Second World War&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Fellowship of the Ring (film, 2001)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2001) - Clear distinction between good and evil with positive themes of friendship, bravery, honor, sacrifice and overcoming temptation.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Two Towers (film, 2002)|The Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers]]'' (2002) - Strong portrayals of redemption and good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World]]'' (2003) - Promotes many positive conservative values including faith in God, patriotism, duty, honor, respect for authority, discipline, bravery, sacrifice, and friendship.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Return of the King (2003 film)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2003) - Bravery, heroism, sacrifice and good ultimately triumphing over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe]]'' (2005) - Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Coach Carter'' (2005) - Promotes the theme that graduating from high school and having proper moral values are more important than becoming famous athletes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian]]'' (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader]]'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Seventh Sign]]'' (1988) - starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Starship Troopers'' (1997). While not entirely family-friendly due to some nudity, this film deals with several important patriotic ideas: the exercise of citizenship should be a right earned through service, not a [[liberal entitlements|liberal entitlement]]; that a permanent state of war is justified by the threat of [[terrorism|terror]] attacks; and that our enemies are, like the &amp;quot;Bugs&amp;quot; of the film, not entitled to the full set of [[human rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
== Debatable Whether Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004) (downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946) (falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes faith with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[High Noon]]'' (1952) (Bill Clinton saw this movie 20 times, and John Wayne said it was the most un-American movie ever;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[P.C.U.]]'' (1994) - college students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Pillow Talk'' (1959) - a classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading woman, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Blues Brothers]]'' (1980) - comedy musical. A story of redemption, &amp;quot;A mission from God&amp;quot;, raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789156</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789156"/>
		<updated>2010-06-22T04:24:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: /* Debatable Whether Conservative */  wrong section! sorry!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative movies exist, and some are immensely popular.  Here is our growing list (in no particular order):'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Invasion of the Body Snatchers]]'' (1956), a science fiction condemnation of [[communism]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Exorcist]]'' (1973) (not for children), a portrayal of pure evil with sympathy to only adversary it fears: [[Christianity]].  In its time it became the top-grossing film ever.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Dark Matter'' (2008), a brutally candid portrayal of [[professor values]] along with problems associated with lack of assimilation; liberals first praised the movie, but after realizing its conservative message then panned it.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Spider-Man]]'' (2002), which praises moral virtue (hard-working teenager, devout aunt and well-meaning uncle) and pokes fun at assumed [[liberals]] (entertainers and journalist).  Hero chooses [[abstinence]].  This was one of the most profitable films ever made.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Gone With the Wind]]'' (1939), which celebrates a strongly ''feminine'' heroine who is the antithesis of a modern [[feminist]], and held the record for top-grossing movie for decades.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ben-Hur (film, 1959)|Ben-Hur]]'' (1959), celebrates honor and duty to family and country, with a pro-Christian ending, long held the record for the most [[Academy Awards]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Sound of Music]]'' (1965), solid family entertainment, perhaps Hollywood's last great movie before it turned sharply Left.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Ten Commandments]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Mr. Smith Goes To Washington]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Star Wars]]'' series (1977-2005) - simple truths about the triumph of good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Winning Team'' (1952), starring [[Ronald Reagan]] as a pitcher who overcomes his problems to help his team win. This was one of Reagan's own favorites.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[King of Kings]]'' (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Iron Eagle]]'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[On The Waterfront]]'' (1954) [[Marlon Brando]] plays Terry Malloy, who under the inspiration of a Catholic priest (Father Barry, played by [[Karl Malden]]), becomes a Christ-like figure.  Betrayed by his brother and almost killed by the gang, he finds the strength to overcome and redeem his people from the slavery to the mobsters who run the waterfront.  In stunning contrast to the liberals who kept silent about the Communist subversion in Hollywood, the film portrays the informer as the hero; liberal Hollywood never forgave director [[Elia Kazan]] for his stunning film.  In real life, Kazan, Malden and screenwriter Budd Schulberg all testified before Congress, along with [[Ronald Reagan]].  Together they broke the power of the Reds in Hollywood.  &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Sergeant York]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Knute Rockne: All-American]]'' (1940)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ninotchka]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Forbidden Planet]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rudy]]'' (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Prince of Egypt]]'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Strategic Air Command (film)|Strategic Air Command]]'' (1955). Actor (and Brigadier [[General]]) [[James Stewart]]'s story of the real [[Strategic Air Command]] and its transition from prop planes to jet planes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Gathering of Eagles]]'' (1963). Illustrates duty, honor, and the burden of command.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Red Dawn]]'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Harry's War]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Patriot]]'' (2000) (the one starring Mel Gibson, there are several other movies with this name)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ladder 49]]'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rocky]]'' (1976) (perseverance and talent can overcome all odds)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[October Sky]]'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Amazing Grace (film)|Amazing Grace]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Bruce Almighty]]'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[World Trade Center]]'' (2006) (highlights the bravery of the firemen and police in [[9/11]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Flight 93]]'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Man For All Seasons]]'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Chariots of Fire]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[One Foot In Heaven]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Quo Vadis?]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Lost Weekend]]'' (1945) (dangers of alcohol)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Manchurian Candidate]]'' (1962, 2004 remake) (anti-communist in general, but with a swipe at [[Joseph McCarthy]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Green Berets]]'' (1968)Vivid defense of our troops' conduct in the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[My Son John]]'' (1952). A small-town couple's world is turned upside-down by the discovery that their adult son is a Communist.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[True Lies]]'' (1994), starring the future Republican governor of California, [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. Teaches conservative values like marital loyalty, and political incorrect facts such as the fact that most terrorists are Middle Eastern Arabic speakers who don't value human life.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Island]]'' (2005) Pro-life statement against cloning to harvest organs.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Evelyn]]'' (2002) True story of Irish father's legal struggle to recover his kids from an orphanage.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Shane]]'' (1953) Western about defending a homesteading family.&lt;br /&gt;
#'' [[Lean on Me]]'' (1989) A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hero]]'' (1992) Even those with character flaws can do good.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Day of the Jackal]]'' (1973) celebrates conservative values like honor and duty.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The 6th Day]]'' (2000) Pro-Life, Anti-Cloning movie Featuring Republican Governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]&lt;br /&gt;
#''Ghostbusters'' (1984).  Fitting satire of an environmental regulator.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Facing the Giants]] 2006. Trust in [[God]], let him take over, and good things will happen.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Flash of Genius'' (2008) - the intellectual property of a hard-working, solitary inventor is promoted, and his children stuck by his side through enormous difficulties.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Oh, God!'' (1977) - Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Expelled | Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed]] (2008) - Ben Stein exposes scientific and education system deceit.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hillary: The Movie]]'' (2008) - Citizens United film exposing Hillary Clinton. The movie led to the overturning of McCain-Feingold legislation by the Supreme Court of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Indoctrinate U]]'' (2007) - The film exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Fireproof (film)|Fireproof]]'' (2008) - Highly successful pro-Christian, pro-marriage film created by [[Sherwood Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Courageous]]'' (2011) - Upcoming [[Sherwood Pictures]] film focusing on the role of fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'' (1997) - Positively portrays a strong U.S. president who takes an uncompromising stance against terrorism. Includes positive material about family, authority, the military and sacrifice.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[U-571]]'' (2000) Exalts American war heroism, ingenuity, perseverance and determination in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds and pays tribute to real-life American accomplishments in the Second World War&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Fellowship of the Ring (film, 2001)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2001) - Clear distinction between good and evil with positive themes of friendship, bravery, honor, sacrifice and overcoming temptation.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Two Towers (film, 2002)|The Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers]]'' (2002) - Strong portrayals of redemption and good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World]]'' (2003) - Promotes many positive conservative values including faith in God, patriotism, duty, honor, respect for authority, discipline, bravery, sacrifice, and friendship.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Return of the King (2003 film)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2003) - Bravery, heroism, sacrifice and good ultimately triumphing over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe]]'' (2005) - Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Coach Carter'' (2005) - Promotes the theme that graduating from high school and having proper moral values are more important than becoming famous athletes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian]]'' (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader]]'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Seventh Sign]]'' (1988) - starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Debatable Whether Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004) (downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946) (falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes faith with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[High Noon]]'' (1952) (Bill Clinton saw this movie 20 times, and John Wayne said it was the most un-American movie ever;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[P.C.U.]]'' (1994) - college students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Pillow Talk'' (1959) - a classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading woman, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Blues Brothers]]'' (1980) - comedy musical. A story of redemption, &amp;quot;A mission from God&amp;quot;, raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789155</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=789155"/>
		<updated>2010-06-22T04:23:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: &amp;quot;Starship Troopers&amp;quot;--a parable for our times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative movies exist, and some are immensely popular.  Here is our growing list (in no particular order):'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Invasion of the Body Snatchers]]'' (1956), a science fiction condemnation of [[communism]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Exorcist]]'' (1973) (not for children), a portrayal of pure evil with sympathy to only adversary it fears: [[Christianity]].  In its time it became the top-grossing film ever.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Dark Matter'' (2008), a brutally candid portrayal of [[professor values]] along with problems associated with lack of assimilation; liberals first praised the movie, but after realizing its conservative message then panned it.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Spider-Man]]'' (2002), which praises moral virtue (hard-working teenager, devout aunt and well-meaning uncle) and pokes fun at assumed [[liberals]] (entertainers and journalist).  Hero chooses [[abstinence]].  This was one of the most profitable films ever made.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Gone With the Wind]]'' (1939), which celebrates a strongly ''feminine'' heroine who is the antithesis of a modern [[feminist]], and held the record for top-grossing movie for decades.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ben-Hur (film, 1959)|Ben-Hur]]'' (1959), celebrates honor and duty to family and country, with a pro-Christian ending, long held the record for the most [[Academy Awards]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Sound of Music]]'' (1965), solid family entertainment, perhaps Hollywood's last great movie before it turned sharply Left.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Ten Commandments]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Mr. Smith Goes To Washington]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Star Wars]]'' series (1977-2005) - simple truths about the triumph of good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Winning Team'' (1952), starring [[Ronald Reagan]] as a pitcher who overcomes his problems to help his team win. This was one of Reagan's own favorites.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[King of Kings]]'' (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Iron Eagle]]'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[On The Waterfront]]'' (1954) [[Marlon Brando]] plays Terry Malloy, who under the inspiration of a Catholic priest (Father Barry, played by [[Karl Malden]]), becomes a Christ-like figure.  Betrayed by his brother and almost killed by the gang, he finds the strength to overcome and redeem his people from the slavery to the mobsters who run the waterfront.  In stunning contrast to the liberals who kept silent about the Communist subversion in Hollywood, the film portrays the informer as the hero; liberal Hollywood never forgave director [[Elia Kazan]] for his stunning film.  In real life, Kazan, Malden and screenwriter Budd Schulberg all testified before Congress, along with [[Ronald Reagan]].  Together they broke the power of the Reds in Hollywood.  &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Sergeant York]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Knute Rockne: All-American]]'' (1940)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ninotchka]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Forbidden Planet]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rudy]]'' (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Prince of Egypt]]'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Strategic Air Command (film)|Strategic Air Command]]'' (1955). Actor (and Brigadier [[General]]) [[James Stewart]]'s story of the real [[Strategic Air Command]] and its transition from prop planes to jet planes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Gathering of Eagles]]'' (1963). Illustrates duty, honor, and the burden of command.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Red Dawn]]'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Harry's War]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Patriot]]'' (2000) (the one starring Mel Gibson, there are several other movies with this name)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ladder 49]]'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rocky]]'' (1976) (perseverance and talent can overcome all odds)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[October Sky]]'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Amazing Grace (film)|Amazing Grace]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Bruce Almighty]]'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[World Trade Center]]'' (2006) (highlights the bravery of the firemen and police in [[9/11]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Flight 93]]'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Man For All Seasons]]'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Chariots of Fire]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[One Foot In Heaven]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Quo Vadis?]]''&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Lost Weekend]]'' (1945) (dangers of alcohol)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Manchurian Candidate]]'' (1962, 2004 remake) (anti-communist in general, but with a swipe at [[Joseph McCarthy]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Green Berets]]'' (1968)Vivid defense of our troops' conduct in the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[My Son John]]'' (1952). A small-town couple's world is turned upside-down by the discovery that their adult son is a Communist.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[True Lies]]'' (1994), starring the future Republican governor of California, [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. Teaches conservative values like marital loyalty, and political incorrect facts such as the fact that most terrorists are Middle Eastern Arabic speakers who don't value human life.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Island]]'' (2005) Pro-life statement against cloning to harvest organs.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Evelyn]]'' (2002) True story of Irish father's legal struggle to recover his kids from an orphanage.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Shane]]'' (1953) Western about defending a homesteading family.&lt;br /&gt;
#'' [[Lean on Me]]'' (1989) A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hero]]'' (1992) Even those with character flaws can do good.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Day of the Jackal]]'' (1973) celebrates conservative values like honor and duty.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The 6th Day]]'' (2000) Pro-Life, Anti-Cloning movie Featuring Republican Governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]&lt;br /&gt;
#''Ghostbusters'' (1984).  Fitting satire of an environmental regulator.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Facing the Giants]] 2006. Trust in [[God]], let him take over, and good things will happen.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Flash of Genius'' (2008) - the intellectual property of a hard-working, solitary inventor is promoted, and his children stuck by his side through enormous difficulties.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Oh, God!'' (1977) - Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Expelled | Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed]] (2008) - Ben Stein exposes scientific and education system deceit.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hillary: The Movie]]'' (2008) - Citizens United film exposing Hillary Clinton. The movie led to the overturning of McCain-Feingold legislation by the Supreme Court of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Indoctrinate U]]'' (2007) - The film exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Fireproof (film)|Fireproof]]'' (2008) - Highly successful pro-Christian, pro-marriage film created by [[Sherwood Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Courageous]]'' (2011) - Upcoming [[Sherwood Pictures]] film focusing on the role of fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'' (1997) - Positively portrays a strong U.S. president who takes an uncompromising stance against terrorism. Includes positive material about family, authority, the military and sacrifice.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[U-571]]'' (2000) Exalts American war heroism, ingenuity, perseverance and determination in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds and pays tribute to real-life American accomplishments in the Second World War&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Fellowship of the Ring (film, 2001)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2001) - Clear distinction between good and evil with positive themes of friendship, bravery, honor, sacrifice and overcoming temptation.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Two Towers (film, 2002)|The Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers]]'' (2002) - Strong portrayals of redemption and good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World]]'' (2003) - Promotes many positive conservative values including faith in God, patriotism, duty, honor, respect for authority, discipline, bravery, sacrifice, and friendship.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Return of the King (2003 film)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2003) - Bravery, heroism, sacrifice and good ultimately triumphing over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe]]'' (2005) - Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Coach Carter'' (2005) - Promotes the theme that graduating from high school and having proper moral values are more important than becoming famous athletes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian]]'' (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader]]'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Seventh Sign]]'' (1988) - starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Debatable Whether Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004) (downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946) (falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes faith with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[High Noon]]'' (1952) (Bill Clinton saw this movie 20 times, and John Wayne said it was the most un-American movie ever;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[P.C.U.]]'' (1994) - college students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Pillow Talk'' (1959) - a classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading woman, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Blues Brothers]]'' (1980) - comedy musical. A story of redemption, &amp;quot;A mission from God&amp;quot;, raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Starship Troopers'' (1997). While not entirely family-friendly due to some nudity, this film deals with several important patriotic ideas: the exercise of citizenship should be a right earned through service, not a [[liberal entitlements|liberal entitlement]]; that a permanent state of war is justified by the threat of [[terrorism|terror]] attacks; and that our enemies are, like the &amp;quot;Bugs&amp;quot; of the film, not entitled to the full set of [[human rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Quantifying_National_Atheism&amp;diff=788127</id>
		<title>Essay: Quantifying National Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Quantifying_National_Atheism&amp;diff=788127"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T04:30:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Fixing egregious math error on my part, and a little clarification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;One of the more important insights to be gained from reading the &amp;quot;In the News&amp;quot; section of Conservapedia is the crucial relationship that exists between [[atheism]] and politics, society, economics, and even sports and recreation on a national level. Atheistic [[England]], it has been demonstrably shown by Conservapedia, has seen everything from its state budget to its performance in international soccer be affected by the country's rampant atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the obvious and direct correlation between atheism and political, social and other outcomes, it would be advantageous to quantify atheism on the national level, much as we can quantify [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]], [[Essay:Quantifying Mental Strength|mental strength]], or [[Essay:Quantifying Liberal Style|liberal style]]. By measuring such key factors as legalized [[abortion]], [[homosexual]] &amp;quot;marriage,&amp;quot; [[classroom prayer]], [[gun control]] poor showings in international sport and national debt, all of which are tied in one way or another to the atheist agenda, we can easily quantify how atheistic a country is. Such a scale, in which &amp;quot;0&amp;quot; would represent an entirely atheistic society and &amp;quot;1&amp;quot; would represent a properly religious (Judeo-Christian) society could act as a valuable learning tool to help people understand the immediate and daily effects of state-supported atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would imagine that once the calculations are done, perfectly atheist countries like [[North Korea]], [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Iran]] would score a 0 on the national atheism scale, [[Canada]] and many [[Europe]]an countries would fall somewhere in the 0.3 (perhaps [[Italy]] and [[Spain]]) to 0.1 (England) range, and the highest results might be found in [[Israel]] and parts of [[Latin America]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[United States]] would present an interesting challenge, with wide variations between the predominantly atheistic Northeast and the more religious areas found in what elites dismissevely call &amp;quot;flyover country.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I look forward to the input of people with more training in statistics to help work out the nuts and bolts of such a project.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Quantifying_National_Atheism&amp;diff=787760</id>
		<title>Essay: Quantifying National Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Quantifying_National_Atheism&amp;diff=787760"/>
		<updated>2010-06-16T18:12:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;One of the more important insights to be gained from reading the &amp;quot;In the News&amp;quot; section of Conservapedia is the crucial relationship that exists between [[atheism]] and politics, society, economics, and even sports and recreation on a national level. Atheistic [[England]], it has been demonstrably shown by Conservapedia, has seen everything from its state budget to its performance in international soccer be affected by the country's rampant atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the obvious and direct correlation between atheism and political, social and other outcomes, it would be advantageous to quantify atheism on the national level, much as we can quantify [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]], [[Essay:Quantifying Mental Strength|mental strength]], or [[Essay:Quantifying Liberal Style|liberal style]]. By measuring such key factors as legalized [[abortion]], [[homosexual]] &amp;quot;marriage,&amp;quot; [[classroom prayer]], [[gun control]] poor showings in international sport and national debt, all of which are tied in one way or another to the atheist agenda, we can easily quantify how atheistic a country is. Such a scale, in which &amp;quot;0&amp;quot; would represent an entirely atheistic society and &amp;quot;1&amp;quot; would represent a properly religious society could act as a valuable learning tool to help people understand the immediate and daily effects of state-supported atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would imagine that once the calculations are done, perfectly atheist countries like [[North Korea]], [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Iran]] would score a 1 on the national atheism scale, [[Canada]] and many [[Europe]]an countries would fall somewhere in the 0.7 (perhaps [[Italy]] and [[Spain]]) to 0.9 (England) range, and the lowest results might be found in [[Israel]] and parts of [[Latin America]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[United States]] would present an interesting challenge, with wide variations between the predominantly atheistic Northeast and the more religious areas found in what elites dismissevely call &amp;quot;flyover country.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I look forward to the input of people with more training in statistics to help work out the nuts and bolts of such a project.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Quantifying_National_Atheism&amp;diff=787759</id>
		<title>Essay: Quantifying National Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Quantifying_National_Atheism&amp;diff=787759"/>
		<updated>2010-06-16T18:09:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Created page with 'One of the more important insights to be gained from reading the &amp;quot;In the News&amp;quot; section of Comservapedia is the crucial relationship that exists between atheism and politics, …'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;One of the more important insights to be gained from reading the &amp;quot;In the News&amp;quot; section of Comservapedia is the crucial relationship that exists between [[atheism]] and politics, society, economics, and even sports and recreation on a national level. Atheistic [[England]], it has been demonstrably shown by Conservapedia, has seen everything from its state budget to its performance in international soccer be affected by the country's rampant atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the obvious and direct correlation between atheism and political, social and other outcomes, it would be advantageous to quantify atheism on the national level, much as we can quantify [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]], [[Essay:Quantifying Mental Strength|mental strength]], or [[Essay:Quantifying Liberal Style|liberal style]]. By measuring such key factors as legalized [[abortion]], [[homosexual]] &amp;quot;marriage,&amp;quot; [[classroom prayer]], [[gun control]] poor showings in international sport and national debt, all of which are tied in one way or another to the atheist agenda, we can easily quantify how atheistic a country is. Such a scale, in which &amp;quot;0&amp;quot; would represent an entirely atheistic society and &amp;quot;1&amp;quot; would represent a properly religious society could act as a valuable learning tool to help people understand the immediate and daily effects of state-supported atheism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would imagine that once the calculations are done, perfectly atheist countries like [[North Korea]], [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Iran]] would score a 1 on the national atheism scale, [[Canada]] and many [[Europe]]an countries would fall somewhere in the 0.7 (perhaps [[Italy]] and [[Spain]]) to 0.9 (England) range, and the lowest results might be found in [[Israel]] and parts of [[Latin America]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[United States]] would present an interesting challenge, with wide variations between the predominantly atheistic Northeast and the more religious areas found in what elites dismissevely call &amp;quot;flyover country.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I look forward to the input of people with more training in statistics to help work out the nuts and bolts of such a project.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=786661</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=786661"/>
		<updated>2010-06-10T23:50:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 786653 by Rifresh (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Why_Conservative%3F&amp;diff=786660</id>
		<title>Why Conservative?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Why_Conservative%3F&amp;diff=786660"/>
		<updated>2010-06-10T23:49:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 786654 by Rifresh (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why [[Conservative]]?  Here are some reasons to embrace -- and teach -- conservative principles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* they give you the power to defeat [[addiction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* they provide a basis for ignoring or rejecting nonsensical [[liberal media]] stories, [[Hollywood values]] and [[professor values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* they welcome and enhance [[faith]]&lt;br /&gt;
* they welcome and apply [[logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* they resist [[deceit]] and [[liberal tricks]]&lt;br /&gt;
* they welcome and encourage [[self-defense]], which is essential to psychological and emotional well-being&lt;br /&gt;
* they minimize [[liberal]] stress felt by teenagers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10717915&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* they welcome and promote fidelity and frugality&lt;br /&gt;
* they encourage self-help and betterment&lt;br /&gt;
* they aid traditional religion by reacting to and addressing modern culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative values]] have a unifying affect on people of [[faith]] despite differences in religion.  Churches have reunited after centuries of division and discord based on an agreement on [[conservative values]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative values]] are powerful in resisting encroachment by the [[entitlement mentality]] on institutions, including churches and church staffs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative values]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=786659</id>
		<title>Conservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=786659"/>
		<updated>2010-06-10T23:48:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 786655 by Rifresh (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | [[Previous_Breaking_News/Conservatives| Previous Breaking News:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
A '''conservative''' adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values, agreeing with [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that &amp;quot;religion and morality are indispensable supports&amp;quot; to political prosperity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: &amp;quot;tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL&amp;quot;[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative]  Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former President [[Ronald Reagan]] said: &lt;br /&gt;
* The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom . . . [http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aaag.jpg|thumb|Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, is the epitome of American conservatism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''sine qua non'' of a conservative is someone who rises above his personal self-interest and promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all.  Alternatively, a conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of economics and the morality of the [[Bible]] for the benefit of all, recognizing that the Bible is the most logical book ever written.  Specifically, conservatives seek or support:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classroom prayer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Abstinence]] education&lt;br /&gt;
* Traditional marriage, not same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for differences between men and women, boys and girls&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws against pornography&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Second Amendment]] right to keep and bear arms&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity)&lt;br /&gt;
* The death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental control of education&lt;br /&gt;
* Private medical care and retirement plans&lt;br /&gt;
* Canceling failed social support programs&lt;br /&gt;
* No world government&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforcement of current laws regarding immigration&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for our military ... past and present&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of [[junk science]] such as [[evolution]] and [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Low taxes, especially for families&lt;br /&gt;
* Conferderationism (less power for the federal government and more for local and state governments)&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong national defense&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Hall of Fame==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rossiter, &amp;quot;The Giants of American Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''American Heritage'' 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; names [[Alexander Hamilton]], [[John Adams]], [[John Marshall]], [[Daniel Webster]], [[John C. Calhoun]], [[Elihu Root]], and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to the &amp;quot;Conservative's Hall of Fame,&amp;quot;'' with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Presidents===&lt;br /&gt;
Periodically a conservative has been elected president of the United States.  The most prominent conservative presidents include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Washington]] (1789-1797)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Monroe]] (1817-1825)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889, 1893-1897) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Warren G. Harding]] (1921-1923)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-1929)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]] (1981-1989)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009) (with respect to taxes, Supreme Court nominations, and national security)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most prominent conservative Congresses have been:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)&lt;br /&gt;
*The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Movement===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Movement conservatives]] are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite liberal ridicule.  Movement conservative activists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]], opposed [[ERA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]], Congressman, on board [[KAL 007]] when shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Helms]], Senator, specialist in foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pat Buchanan]], TV commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jerry Falwell]], religion&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michele Bachmann]], columnist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ann Coulter]], columnist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rush Limbaugh]], radio&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michelle Malkin]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glenn Beck]], TV commentator&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Key leaders===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barry Goldwater]] - 1964 Republican candidate, lost to liberal Democrat [[Lyndon Johnson]] but revived the conservative movement inside the GOP&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russell Kirk]] - Theorist &amp;amp; intellectual&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irving Kristol|Irving]] and [[William Kristol]] - Notable [[neoconservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Thatcher]] - British prime minister between 1979 and 1990, held similar views as Reagan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Milton Friedman]] - Chicago-school [[libertarian]] economist, influential during Reagan administration; leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==US Voters==&lt;br /&gt;
In America, most conservatives support the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for McCain and 20% for Obama, with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1 Presidential 2008 Exit Poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative-republican-brain.jpg|thumb|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals===&lt;br /&gt;
The Barna poll conducted in November  2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others --50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/258-survey-shows-how-liberals-and-conservatives-differ-on-matters-of-faith on line results] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some findings: &lt;br /&gt;
Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that Satan is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Note: &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in this survey are based on politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
*their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives); &lt;br /&gt;
*a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%); &lt;br /&gt;
*the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%); &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:&lt;br /&gt;
*read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively) &lt;br /&gt;
*attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%) &lt;br /&gt;
*pray to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%) &lt;br /&gt;
*share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment) &lt;br /&gt;
*have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were atheist or agnostic &lt;br /&gt;
*15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were Christian evangelicals &lt;br /&gt;
*conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as born again, based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%) &lt;br /&gt;
*21% of conservatives were associated with the Catholic church, compared to 30% among the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama and American Conservatism Backlash ==&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the [[Britain|British]] newspaper ''The Daily Telegraph'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This week’s striking [[Gallup]] poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under [[Barack Obama]]. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative news organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsMax]].  [[Fox News]], though often called conservative, tends to be more [[neoconservative]] than [[conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative magazines and blogs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Well known conservative magazines in the United States include ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Policy Review]]'', ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'' and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some notable [[Conservative blogs|conservative political blogs]] include the [[Heritage Foundation]]'s Policy Weblog, ''[[Human Events]]'', [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= &amp;quot;What Is a 'Conservative'?&amp;quot;], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of limited government.&lt;br /&gt;
# A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.&lt;br /&gt;
# Patriotism, nationalism, and support of a strong defense.&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of the institution of marriage. &lt;br /&gt;
# Emphasis on social values, like prayer and pro-life principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, neoconservatives generally support bigger government and globalism, and tend to downplay the significance of social values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Paleoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American sovereignty, and are suspicious of both big government and big business. They also lean against foreign interventionalism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of &amp;quot;isolationism,&amp;quot; as they believe in promoting [[democracy]] worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among paleoconservatives was Democratic Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]] in 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
==History of American conservatism==&lt;br /&gt;
===Textbook problems===&lt;br /&gt;
College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a &amp;quot;liberal state paradigm&amp;quot;--that is, textbooks usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism--especially the New Deal, the welfare state, labor unions, and Civil Rights for blacks and equality for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a free market reply to the growth of big government; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality.  Where the violent Wobblies (IWW) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing Communist subversion by [[Joe McCarthy]] is denounced as the nadir of political morality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Leonard Moore, &amp;quot;Approaching Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''OAH Magazine of History,'' 17 (January 2003) [http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/moore.html online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Loyalists===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Loyalists]] of the [[American Revolution]] were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer [[Joseph Galloway]] and governor-historian [[Thomas Hutchinson]]. However when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. [[Samuel Seabury]] was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the Episcopal religion, a stronghold of conservative social values.  While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Founding Fathers===&lt;br /&gt;
The Founding Fathers created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as [[Republicanism]], which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from.  Two parties were named &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot;-- the one founded in 1794 by Jefferson and Madison (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[First Party System]] (1790s-1820s) the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting monarchy and aristocracy, they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. [[George Washington]] was their great hero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On many issues American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and his followers, especially [[John Randolph of Roanoke]] and his &amp;quot;Old Republicans&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Quids.&amp;quot;  They idealized the yeoman farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to corruption, that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called &amp;quot;judicial activism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1030.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Jeffersonians stressed small government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster===&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Second Party System]] (1830-54) the [[Whig Party]] attracted most conservatives, such as [[Daniel Webster]] of New England. [[Daniel Webster]] and other leaders of the [[Whig Party]], called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The word was originally used in the French Revolution. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot; in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, ''American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary'' (1962) 94-97.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   [[John C. Calhoun]], a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. Richard Hofstadter (1948) called him &amp;quot;The Marx of the Master Class.&amp;quot;  Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a &amp;quot;majority dictatorship&amp;quot; because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by [[Edmund Burke]], the founder of British conservatism, in ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with Civil Rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus William J. Bennett (2006)  a prominent conservative leader, warns  conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, [[Know-Nothings]], [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] and 20th century isolationists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lincoln to Cleveland===&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1865 the [[History of the United States Republican Party|Republican party]] has identified itself with President [[Abraham Lincoln]], who was the ideological heir of the Whigs and of both Jefferson and Hamilton. As the [[Gettysburg Address]] shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's Declaration. The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] of the Civil War reflected a reactionary opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 19th century the [[Bourbon Democrat]]s, led by President [[Grover Cleveland]], preached against corruption, high taxes (protective tariffs), and imperialism, and supported the [[gold standard]] and business interests. They were overthrown by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the Democratic Party permanently to the left.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican [[William McKinley]] won using the pro-business slogan &amp;quot;[[sound money]] and protection,&amp;quot; while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Graham Sumner]], Yale professor (1872-1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with [[Social Darwinism]] under the influence of [[Herbert Spencer]], he rejected evolution in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and [[paternalism]] in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Curtis, Bruce. &amp;quot;William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'&amp;quot; Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early 20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Progressive Era]] (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator [[Nelson Aldrich]] of Rhode Island were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the [[Federal Reserve System]] in 1913. [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into [[World War I]] to stop what he saw as the German attacks on civilization. [[William Howard Taft]] promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921-30, the only former president ever to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President [[Warren G. Harding]]. The presidency of [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes ''Democracy and Leadership'' (1924) by Irving Babbitt and H.L. Mencken's magazine ''American Mercury'' (1924-33). The [[Efficiency Movement]] attracted many conservatives such as [[Herbert Hoover]] with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Great Depression, U.S.|Great Depression]], other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high [[property tax]]es. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in Chicago which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important intellectual movement, calling itself [[Southern Agrarians]] and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American [[Republicanism]] and civic virtue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Depression brought liberals to power under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1933). Indeed the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now came to mean a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and Roosevelt's powerful [[New Deal Coalition]]. In 1934 [[Al Smith]] and pro-business Democrats formed the [[American Liberty League]] to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democratic party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal [[Alf Landon]], who carried only Maine and Vermont. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal [[Conservative Coalition]] of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator [[Robert Taft]], a Republican of Ohio, and Senator [[Richard Russell]], Democrat of Georgia.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the [[Old Right]], also called the Old Guard, was a group of [[libertarianism|libertarian]], free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were isolationists in 1939-41, (see [[America First]]), and later opposed [[NATO]] and U.S. military intervention in the Korean War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Later 20th century: Goldwater, Buckley, the Dixiecrats===&lt;br /&gt;
By 1950, American liberalism was so dominant intellectually that liberal critic  [[Lionel Trilling]] could dismiss contemporary conservatism as &amp;quot;irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lapham 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like Russell Kirk's ''The Conservative Mind'' (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine ''National Review'', founded by [[William F. Buckley Jr.]] in 1955.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas Taft's [[Old Right]] had been isolationist the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose communism. It looked to the Founding Fathers for historical inspiration as opposed to Calhoun and the antebellum South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The success of the Civil Rights movement came in the Civil Rights Act of 1864 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Most conservatives supported both, but [[Barry Goldwater]] opposed them.  Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democratic party. That lock was now broken and southern conservatives started voting for Republican candidates for president in 1964-68, and by the 1990s they were also voting for GOP candidates for state and local office. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and they became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democratic party.  The region favored the GOP heavily in presidential elections, but split in state contests.  In 2008, however, the Obama campaign broke into the solid Republican South, carrying Florida, Virginia and North Carolina. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all New Deal programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of [[Ronald Reagan]] in California, and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for [[Richard Nixon]] in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion [[Hubert Humphrey]], and southern demagogue [[George Wallace]]. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the Northeast who supported many New Deal programs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nixon, Reagan, and Bush===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican administrations of President [[Richard Nixon]] in the [[1970s]] were characterized more by their emphasis on ''[[realpolitik]]'', [[détente]], and economic policies such as wage and price controls, than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the eight years of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and conservative principles dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with [[supply side economics]] as well as a strict opposition to Soviet Communism.  Reagan promised to cut welfare spending but failed to do so.  He did cut taxes, but raised military spending and created large federal deficits of the sort conservatives had complained about for decades.  They stopped complaining, as the deficit issue switched to favor the Democrats (who did balance the budget in the late 1990s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply side economic policies, known as &amp;quot;[[Reaganomics]],&amp;quot; foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Australia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping [[gun control]] laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade.  In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged [[global warming]] galvanized conservatives there and they led the [[Liberal Party of Australia]] to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the [[Family First Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Britain==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United Kingdom the present parliamentary opposition party since 1997 is the [[Conservative Party]]. Its current leader is [[David Cameron]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservatives.com Conservative party UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunners of the Conservatives were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it.  Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for abortion on demand and gay civil partnership and the Kyoto Treaty and to oppose capital punishment (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830'', (2nd ed. 2008) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in England and Wales than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse.  However, religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The broadcast media (dominated by the [[BBC]]) is almost exclusively liberal in tone. The print media is different with pro-Conservative newspapers like the ''Daily Mail'' , ''Daily Express''  and ''Daily Telegraph'' selling more copies than their rivals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediauk.com/the_knowledge/i.muk/An_introduction_to_newspapers_in_the_UK Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservatism and the French Revolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatism in France and the continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the [[French Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benefits of Conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy.  Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the [[best of the public]] to rise to their natural level of achievement.  Conservatives recognize that [[big government]] fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement--and thus, weakens society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes individual responsibility.  In the absence of a hand-holding [[nanny state]], it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion.  Thus, [[social conservatism]] is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of morality, duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Also See ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Filler, Louis. ''Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events'' (1987), useful older encyclopedia&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal perspective [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/080507774X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685789&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Frohnen, Bruce et al eds. ''American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), the most detailed reference&lt;br /&gt;
* Judis, John B. ''William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives'' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/William-F-Buckley-Jr-Conservatives/dp/0743217977/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207759425&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kirk, Russell. ''The Conservative Mind''. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, William A. ''Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism'' (2008) 643 pages &lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''The Right Nation,'' (2004) influential survey [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205919226&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Nash, George. ''The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945'' (2006), excellent scholarly history. [http://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241925238&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/exit-with-honor-the-life-and-presidency-of-ronald-reagan-by-william-e-pemberton.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2004) on 1964 [http://www.amazon.com/Before-Storm-Goldwater-Unmaking-Consensus/dp/0809028581/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193684721&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Nixonland-Rise-President-Fracturing-America/dp/074324303X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241924189&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schneider, Gregory L. ed. ''Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader'' (2003) &lt;br /&gt;
*Schoenwald; Jonathan . ''A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104931191 online edition] also [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. ''Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Landmark-Speeches-American-Conservative-Movement/dp/1585445983/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685365&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/user/rescueKAL007#p/a/FD3DE4F0642C350C/0/1c8v-kgLvhM Pat Buchanan's &amp;quot;Crossfire&amp;quot; interview with [[Larry McDonald]] 3 months before downing of [[KAL 007]], Ron Paul intro]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservativedirectory.com Directory of Conservative Websites - Category: Conservatives], [[Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Allen_Ginsberg&amp;diff=786658</id>
		<title>Allen Ginsberg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Allen_Ginsberg&amp;diff=786658"/>
		<updated>2010-06-10T23:47:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: Undo revision 786656 by Rifresh (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:UploaddammitGinsberg.jpg|thumb|right|Allen Ginsberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Allen Ginsberg''', one of America's best known poets&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/books/01/04/08/specials/ginsberg-obit.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, was born June 3, 1926, in [[Newark]], [[New Jersey]]. Along with others such as [[Jack Kerouac]] and [[William S. Burroughs]], he became part of what was dubbed the &amp;quot;Beat Generation&amp;quot; of writers.&lt;br /&gt;
Ginsberg was a major advocate for freedom of expression throughout his life, and is most famous for his long poem, &amp;quot;Howl,&amp;quot; which drew national attention in 1956 when it was challenged on obscenity charges.&lt;br /&gt;
He died of liver cancer on April 5, 1997.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/g_l/ginsberg/life.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ginsberg was also a fervent supporter of gay rights, and an anti-war, anti-nuclear and environmental activist, and is known for his controversial behavior.  He was widely criticised, even by friends and allies, when he joined the notorious North American Man-Boy Love Association, or [[NAMBLA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ijn.com/archive/2002%20arch/062102.htm#story8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In &amp;quot;Thoughts on NAMBLA,&amp;quot; Ginsberg explains his reasons for joining the organisation: &amp;quot;NAMBLA's a forum for reform of those laws on youthful sexuality which members deem oppressive, (it is) a discussion society not a sex club.  I joined NAMBLA in defense of free speech.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bill Morgan, ed., ''Deliberate Prose: Selected Essays 1952-1995.'' New York: HarperCollins (2000), ISBN 0-06-093081-0 (p.170)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When he felt his point had been made--that free speech should be afforded even those with unpopular viewpoints--he quit the organisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ginsberg became a student of the well-known [[Tibet]]an [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] teacher Chögyam Trungpa after a chance meeting in [[New York City]] in 1970.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://poetry.about.com/od/20thcenturypoets/p/ginsberg.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His most famous works include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15308 &amp;quot;Howl&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88/america.html &amp;quot;America&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15307 &amp;quot;Kaddish&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He studied at [[Columbia University]] in the 1940s and moved to [[San Fransisco]] in 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Howl and Other Poems'' was published in 1956, and in May of that year, US Customs seized a shipment of the books as they were being sent from the printer (Villiers in London) to City Lights Books in San Francisco.  After federal authorities declined Customs Chief Chester McPhee's urging to pursue obscenity charges, the matter was referred to the [[San Francisco Police Department]], who arrested publisher Lawrence Ferlinghetti, charging him with publishing and selling an obscene and indecent book. The charge was rejected in October 1957 after a widely publicized trial when Judge Clayton Horn ruled that the book had redeeming social value.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/g_l/ginsberg/life.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the trial, Ginsberg was living in [[Paris]] with his partner Peter Orlovsky. They remained together for forty years, until Ginsberg's death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/g_l/ginsberg/life.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ginsberg, Allen}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Poets]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexuals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Buddhists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_Does_Richard_Dawkins_have_machismo%3F&amp;diff=785643</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_Does_Richard_Dawkins_have_machismo%3F&amp;diff=785643"/>
		<updated>2010-06-07T02:46:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: /* Messed up */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Should we not attack his view point than attack the person? This essay does not appear to be in a very good taste. --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 22:28, 22 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Are you saying that an essay cannot comment on a person's behavior or use satire?  If so, please justify.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 01:51, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::No I am not saying that. But I do not have any special knowledge about Richard Dawkin's manhood or machismo. I don't think any information is publicly available about his manhood related behaviour as well, So how do you comment on that? Satire is great if used well. For example Catch 22 is a great satire, but unfortunately your essay is not. It would be rude if I really express what I think about it. --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 15:41, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Perhaps, you should read the essay and the linked resources a few times more and see if you can spot a pattern of cowardice by Richard Dawkins. Anyways, I wrote the essay when I was rather tired and I am made some revisions to it.  By the way,  the Google algorithm loves the essay.  It ranks #1 for Richard Dawkins and Machismo and  ranks #1 for Dawkins and machismo.  However, I am guessing given Dawkins' behavior that many people don't associate the Richard Dawkins with machismo so there is probably not too many searches for this term.   There are a 11,900 Google search results for Richard Dawkins and cowardice, just in case you are looking for further evidence concerning the subject of Richard Dawkins and cowardice.   By the way, could you define &amp;quot;special knowledge&amp;quot;.   Also, do all Conservapedia essays need to pass a &amp;quot;special knowledge&amp;quot; litmus test? [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:12, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I wouldn't use the number of google results to prove a point, it's not a very accurate indicator.[[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 21:22, 28 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so.. are you writing this for google algorithm. Sorry to burst your bubble, but no one is going to search for Dawkins and Machismo. May be you should clear your cache and search it, because when I do that, your page is not even in the top 10. I don't understand what you aim to say by 11900 results for Dawkins and cowardice. conservative and cowardice brings up 287000 results. does that mean anything? I am not sure why you are so much obsessed  about Richard Dawkins' manhood. Shouldn't you be trying to refute his arguments in that precious time? --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 20:24, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I guess you need to take some reading comprehension classes.  I did indicate that I didn't believe there were going to be many searches for the term Dawkins and machismo.  I also noticed you also didn't answer my questions.  I will return the favor and not answer yours.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:57, 23 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was given a link to this essay on youtube, and I can say that it certainly hits the target!  Dawkins is well know for being a coward with regards to avoid all debate with those who don't agree with his worldview, so this kind of hard-hitting satire suits him perfectly!  Keep up the good work Mr Conservative, sadly it's no surprise that the the liberal 'Dawkins Defenders' do nothing but criticize anything that exposes their evolutionist leaders for the frauds that they are. - Andrew.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for the positive review.  Here is something I just put at the bottom of the essay: '''QUICK NOTE:'''  The above essay was produced as part of the [[Conservapedia:Richard Dawkins Project]].  If you like this essay, please feel free to give it three &amp;quot;oles!&amp;quot; by creating a [[YouTube ]] video on it.  Also, feel free to mention it on your blog or [[Facebook]] page.  There are also some tips [[Conservapedia:Richard Dawkins Project - Spreading the News|HERE]] on spreading the word about this essay. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCZYpGzu7rA&amp;amp;feature=related Ole!][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAYSQXSMnss&amp;amp;feature=related Ole!][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQwWvw3uTJM&amp;amp;feature=related Ole!]  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:31, 24 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unconservapedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the point of all those essays about Richard Dawkinds? Is this the embryo of an ''unconservapedia'', parody of ''uncyclopedia'', the ''official'' parody of ''wikipedia''? That would be fun, a parody of a parody. Might as well be called ''liberopedia'', and have articles with the Khaddaffi Peace Prize or the Stalin Human Rights awards. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 10:01, 27 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Messed up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purposefully creating provocative pages and then limiting the editing for such pages is ridiculous.  I can't even fix the spelling errors.&lt;br /&gt;
: First prove yourself by fixing up or writing other articles. We're not here just to talk, talk, talk. --[[User:ReligiousRight|ReligiousRight]] 22:39, 6 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Obviously this user needs to open his mind. He probably doesn't support school prayer and I'm 96% certain he also believes in gun control. [[User:KevinO|KevinO]] 22:46, 6 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Glorious_Revolution&amp;diff=784261</id>
		<title>Glorious Revolution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Glorious_Revolution&amp;diff=784261"/>
		<updated>2010-06-02T20:05:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''The Glorious Revolution''' or '''Bloodless Revolt''', also known as the '''Revolution of 1688''', was a [[coup d'etat]] that took place in [[Britain]], replacing the Catholic King [[James II]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; As King of Scotland, he was styled King James VII &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, with the Protestants [[William and Mary|William of Orange and his wife Mary]], who was James's daughter. Despite the often used title of &amp;quot;Bloodless&amp;quot;, there was some fighting and loss of life, though none of it took place in England itself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cause of the overthrow was a combination of two battles taking place in England at the time; one was a battle between Protestantism and Catholicism, the other between the growing power of [[Parliament]] and the &amp;quot;Divine Right&amp;quot; of the King. James was unpopular and seen as a threat due to his Catholicism and his closeness to King [[Louis XIV]] of France. However attempts to exclude him from becoming King had been unsuccessful.  [[William III]] and [[Mary II]] were effective rulers, Protestantism became firmly established, Parliament gained the upper hand in the government, and a [[English Bill of Rights|Bill of Rights]] was issued to protect the rule of law from arbitrary royal power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Crisis of 1688==&lt;br /&gt;
Harris (2005) shows the monarchy's recovery, following the near-disaster of the Exclusion crisis of 1679-81. Charles used ruthless skill in defeating this attempt, by his Whig opponents, to exploit popular anti-Catholicism in order to keep his brother James from the succession. Charles soundly defeated the Whigs, but at a cost of making the Crown the prisoner of a Tory, Anglican faction, upon whose continuing co-operation it now depended. James' alienation of this group after 1685, through his pro-Catholic policies, caused his downfall and the Glorious Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the death of King [[Charles II]] in 1685, his younger brother [[James II]] became king of England, Scotland and Ireland, alarming many leaders by his pro-Catholic policies. William let it be known he was available if invited by a very broad spectrum of English political leadership. Unrest escalated with the birth of a son to James by his wife, Mary of Modena, a Catholic, on June 10, 1688. Within a few days, an invitation, signed by seven prominent personages, was taken over to William with an assurance of military support if he effected a landing in England. William issued a &amp;quot;Declaration of Reasons&amp;quot;, which immediately won widespread acceptance by the English elite as a statement of his policy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; However Claydon (1996) argues that James's supporters did try to refute it. Once king, the &amp;quot;Declaration&amp;quot; was used to limit William's ambitions. Tony Claydon &amp;quot;William III's Declaration of Reasons and the Glorious Revolution.&amp;quot; ''Historical Journal'' 1996 39(1): 87-108. Issn: 0018-246x Fulltext: [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2639941 in Jstor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  With 50 [[ship of the line |ships of the line]] (very large warships) and 14,000 men William landed on November. 5, 1688, and marched on London. There was no opposition as James' army melted away and the political leadership welcomed William. James in late December fled the country, thereby abdicating the throne. James received protection in France from King [[Louis XIV]] and began plotting schemes for the invasion of England with French and &amp;quot;Jacobite&amp;quot; military help. (&amp;quot;Jacobites&amp;quot; were the English and Scottish supporters of James and his sons.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William insisted he would rule England as king and not merely as his wife's consort; accordingly, in February, 1689, Parliament offered the crown to William and Mary, each to have full sovereign rights. A similar offer was made by the Parliament of Scotland. The first stage of the English Revolution, with its advance toward constitutional monarchy and responsible government was complete with their double coronation on April 11, 1689, and their acceptance of the &amp;quot;Bill of Rights&amp;quot; (1689). It sharply limited royal power, prescribed the line of succession, and gave Parliament control of finances and of the army.  Parliament was now supreme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===World empire or merchant economy?===&lt;br /&gt;
The overthrow of James was hailed at the time, and ever since, as the &amp;quot;[[Glorious Revolution]].&amp;quot;  [[ Edmund Burke]] set the tone for over two centuries of historiographical analysis when he proclaimed that:&lt;br /&gt;
:The Revolution was made to preserve our ancient indisputable laws and liberties, and that ancient constitution of government which is our only security for law and liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many historians have endorsed Burke's view, including Macaulay (1848) and more recently John Morrill, who captured the consensus of contemporary historiography well when he declared that &amp;quot;the Sensible Revolution of 1688—89 was a conservative Revolution.&amp;quot; On the contrary, argues Pincus (2009), it was momentous, especially when looking at the alternative that James was trying to enact of a powerful centralized autocratic state.  England's role in Europe and the country's political economy in the 17th century refutes the view of many late-20th-century historians that nothing revolutionary occurred during the Glorious Revolution of 1688-89. Pincus says it was not a placid turn of events. In diplomacy and economics James II transformed the English state's ideology and policies. This occurred not because James II was an outsider who inflicted foreign notions on England but because foreign affairs and political economy were at the core of the English revolutionaries' agenda. The revolution of 1688-89 cannot be fathomed in isolation. It would have been inconceivable without the transformations resulting from the events of the 1640s and 1650s. Indeed, the ideas accompanying the Glorious Revolution were rooted in the mid-century upheavals. Thus, the 17th century was a century of revolution in England, deserving of the same scholarly attention that 'modern' revolutions attract. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
James II was building a powerful militarized state on the assumption that the world's wealth was necessarily finite, and empires were created by taking land from another state. The [[East India Company]] was thus an ideal tool to create a vast new English imperial dominion by warring with the Dutch and the Mogul Empire in India. After 1689 came an alternative understanding of economics, which saw Britain as a commercial rather than an agrarian society. The proponents of this view, most famously [[Adam Smith]] in 1776, realized that wealth was created by human endeavor and thus potentially infinite.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Pincus (2009)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Barone, Michael. '' Our First Revolution: the Remarkable British Upheaval That Inspired America's Founding Fathers'', Crown Publishers, New York (2007) popular&lt;br /&gt;
* Goodlad, Graham. &amp;quot;Before the Glorious Revolution: The Making of Absolute Monarchy? Graham Goodlad Examines the Controversies Surrounding the Development of Royal Power under Charles II and James II,&amp;quot; ''History Review,'' 2007   [http://www.questia.com/read/5022714365?title=Before%20the%20Glorious%20Revolution%3a%20The%20Making%20of%20Absolute%20Monarchy%3f%20Graham%20Goodlad%20Examines%20the%20Controversies%20Surrounding%20the%20Development%20of%20Royal%20Power%20under%20Charles%20II%20and%20James%20II online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Harris, Tim. ''    Restoration: Charles II and His Kingdoms, 1660-1685'' (2005), 506pp; major scholarly history&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John.  ''The Glorious Revolution,'' (2nd ed. 1997) [http://www.amazon.com/Glorious-Revolution-2nd-John-Miller/dp/0582292220/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1257103761&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search], solid scholarly overview&lt;br /&gt;
* Pincus, Steve. ''1688: The First Modern Revolution'' (2009) [http://www.amazon.com/1688-Modern-Revolution-Walpole-Eighteenth-C/dp/0300115474/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1257104647&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search], major reinterpretation&lt;br /&gt;
* Temperley, H. W. V. &amp;quot;England. (1687—1702)&amp;quot; ''Cambridge Modern History'' (1905) vol 5 [http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/cmh/cmh510.html#255 online], solid older scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Concentration_camp&amp;diff=784259</id>
		<title>Concentration camp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Concentration_camp&amp;diff=784259"/>
		<updated>2010-06-02T20:04:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: copyedit,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Concentration camps''' are camps set up for persons deemed to be opponents of or threats to a  government.  They were most notoriously used by [[Nazi Germany]], in  [[Soviet Union|Soviet Russia]], and Dutch controlled [[South Africa]].  The term &amp;quot;concentration camp&amp;quot; was coined by Soviet Communist Party General Secreary [[Vladimir Lenin]] in a 9 August 1918 letter in which he stated,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|It is essential to organise a reinforced guard of reliable persons to carry out mass terror against [[kulaks]], priests and White Guardists; unreliable elements should be locked up in a concentration camp outside the town&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geoffrey Hosking, A History of the Soviet Union, 1992, p. 71.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Soviet Union]] created the world's first concentration camp system with a network of prisons and labor camps. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dmitri Volkogonov, ''Trotsky: The Eternal Revolutionary'', Translation by Harold Shukman, The Free PRess, New York, 1996.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adolf Hitler, in responding to a question from a German industrial as to how he planned to deal with unemployment prior to assuming power in [[Nazi Germany]], responded, &amp;quot;Concentration camps&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gunther, John, ''Inside Europe'', New York: Harper, 1939.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Soviet [[Gulag]] system was copied in Nazi Germany and raised to profound horrors never before thought imaginable: death factories.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Auschwitz]], for example, achieved [[murder]] on an industrial scale. During [[World War II]], 1.5 million people were systematically starved, [[torture]]d, and murdered there.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although [[Hitler]] was primarily focused on the extermination of the [[Jews]]; [[Christian]]s, [[Gypsy|gypsies]], [[Slavs]], [[homosexuals]], and [[Communism|communists]] also met with similar fates in the Nazi camps. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Soviet gulags were forced labour camps, mainly in the remote regions of [[Siberia]] and the Far North. By 1934, the gulags held several million inmates (political prisoners and ordinary criminals alike) and the Soviet economy was dependent upon this vast pool of [[slave]] labour from the [[lumpen masses]] and counterrevolutionaries. An April 14, 1941 Memorandum from the U.S. Military Attache (G-2) in Moscow, found in the [[Harry Hopkins]] Papers at the FDR Library, entitled &amp;quot;[[NKVD]] of the USSR&amp;quot;, it states in part,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Although the Soviets disclaim [[forced labor]] in this country, the organization of this commissariat is interesting to note.  In it are the means to apprehend (militia), try and sentence (advisory council) and imprison offenders ([[Gulag|corrective labor]]).  Any governmental organization that has a crying need for labor simply calls upon the NKVD to supply it.  If the amount of labor is insufficient to supply the need, it is relatively an easy matter to institute a [[reign of terror]] on any pretext and fill up [[labor colonies]] to meet requirements....Its close supervision over the people, its [[pogroms]], its raids and arrests, has instilled fear...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20040423034159/www.cia.gov/csi/books/venona/5d.gif&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NKVD has every individual under observation from birth to death...its secret agents are everywhere; its actions are swift.  An individual simply disappears in the middle of the night and no one ever sees or hears of him again. ...When Stalin needs scapegoats to cover government mistakes he unleashes his NKVD...The Soviet Union is in itself a prison and the NKVD and State Security are its keepers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20051208125448/www.cia.gov/csi/books/venona/5e.gif&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions were brutal: prisoners received insufficient food and clothing to cope with the long working hours and severe weather, resulting in high death rates from exhaustion and disease. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/archives/gula.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*Gregory L. Freeze, ed, ''Russia: A History'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 253.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Anne Applebaum, [http://www.anneapplebaum.com/gulag/intro.html ''GULAG: A History'',] retrieved from annapplebaum.com 20/05/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dmitri Volkogonov,   [http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.asp?ID=16972&amp;amp;commentID=507436 Lenin: A New Biography-The First Account Using All the Secret Soviet Archives, pages 233-234].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Genocide]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Concentration_camp&amp;diff=784257</id>
		<title>Concentration camp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Concentration_camp&amp;diff=784257"/>
		<updated>2010-06-02T20:03:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KevinO: copyedit, remove demonization of US wartime policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Concentration camps''' are camps set up for persons deemed to be opponents of or threats to a  government.  They were most notoriously used by [[Nazi Germany]], in the [[Soviet Union|Soviet Russia]], and Dutch controlled [[South Africa]].  The term &amp;quot;concentration camp&amp;quot; was coined by Soviet Communist Party General Secreary [[Vladimir Lenin]] in a 9 August 1918 letter in which he stated,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|It is essential to organise a reinforced guard of reliable persons to carry out mass terror against [[kulaks]], priests and White Guardists; unreliable elements should be locked up in a concentration camp outside the town&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geoffrey Hosking, A History of the Soviet Union, 1992, p. 71.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Soviet Union]] created the world's first concentration camp system with a network of prisons and labor camps. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dmitri Volkogonov, ''Trotsky: The Eternal Revolutionary'', Translation by Harold Shukman, The Free PRess, New York, 1996.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adolf Hitler, in responding to a question from a German industrial as to how he planned to deal with unemployment prior to assuming power in [[Nazi Germany]], responded, &amp;quot;Concentration camps&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gunther, John, ''Inside Europe'', New York: Harper, 1939.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Soviet [[Gulag]] system was copied in Nazi Germany and raised to profound horrors never before thought imaginable: death factories.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Auschwitz]], for example, achieved [[murder]] on an industrial scale. During [[World War II]], 1.5 million people were systematically starved, [[torture]]d, and murdered there.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although [[Hitler]] was primarily focused on the extermination of the [[Jews]]; [[Christian]]s, [[Gypsy|gypsies]], [[Slavs]], [[homosexuals]], and [[Communism|communists]] also met with similar fates in the Nazi camps. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Soviet gulags were forced labour camps, mainly in the remote regions of [[Siberia]] and the Far North. By 1934, the gulags held several million inmates (political prisoners and ordinary criminals alike) and the Soviet economy was dependent upon this vast pool of [[slave]] labour from the [[lumpen masses]] and counterrevolutionaries. An April 14, 1941 Memorandum from the U.S. Military Attache (G-2) in Moscow, found in the [[Harry Hopkins]] Papers at the FDR Library, entitled &amp;quot;[[NKVD]] of the USSR&amp;quot;, it states in part,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Although the Soviets disclaim [[forced labor]] in this country, the organization of this commissariat is interesting to note.  In it are the means to apprehend (militia), try and sentence (advisory council) and imprison offenders ([[Gulag|corrective labor]]).  Any governmental organization that has a crying need for labor simply calls upon the NKVD to supply it.  If the amount of labor is insufficient to supply the need, it is relatively an easy matter to institute a [[reign of terror]] on any pretext and fill up [[labor colonies]] to meet requirements....Its close supervision over the people, its [[pogroms]], its raids and arrests, has instilled fear...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20040423034159/www.cia.gov/csi/books/venona/5d.gif&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NKVD has every individual under observation from birth to death...its secret agents are everywhere; its actions are swift.  An individual simply disappears in the middle of the night and no one ever sees or hears of him again. ...When Stalin needs scapegoats to cover government mistakes he unleashes his NKVD...The Soviet Union is in itself a prison and the NKVD and State Security are its keepers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20051208125448/www.cia.gov/csi/books/venona/5e.gif&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions were brutal: prisoners received insufficient food and clothing to cope with the long working hours and severe weather, resulting in high death rates from exhaustion and disease. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/archives/gula.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*Gregory L. Freeze, ed, ''Russia: A History'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 253.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Anne Applebaum, [http://www.anneapplebaum.com/gulag/intro.html ''GULAG: A History'',] retrieved from annapplebaum.com 20/05/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dmitri Volkogonov,   [http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.asp?ID=16972&amp;amp;commentID=507436 Lenin: A New Biography-The First Account Using All the Secret Soviet Archives, pages 233-234].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Genocide]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KevinO</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>