<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Konserve</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Konserve"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Konserve"/>
	<updated>2026-09-24T02:33:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_v._Darrington&amp;diff=380368</id>
		<title>United States v. Darrington</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_v._Darrington&amp;diff=380368"/>
		<updated>2008-01-26T02:39:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In United States v. Darrington, the Court of Appeals for the [[Fifth Circuit]] upheld the &amp;quot;felon in possession statute,&amp;quot; 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits possession in interstate commerce of a firearm or ammunition by a felon (one convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Fifth Circuit]] panel unanimously rejected the argument that this statute violates the [[Second Amendment]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Relying on ''[[United States v. Emerson]]'', 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001), Darrington argues that section 922(g)(1) violates his individual right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment. Emerson recognized that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to privately possess and bear firearms. Id. at 260. Emerson is a carefully worded decision, and we do not address the contention that its recognition of a individual right to keep and bear arms is dicta. 2 For our purposes, Emerson itself explained that the individual right it recognized does not preclude the government from prohibiting the possession of firearms by felons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although, as we have held, the Second Amendment does protect individual rights, that does not mean that those rights may never be made subject to any limited, narrowly tailored specific exceptions or restrictions for particular cases that are reasonable and not inconsistent with the right of Americans generally to individually keep and bear their private arms as historically understood in this country. Indeed, Emerson does not contend, and the district court did not hold, otherwise. As we have previously noted, it is clear that felons, infants and those of unsound mind may be prohibited from possessing firearms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Id. at 261. Emerson also discusses authority that legislative prohibitions on the ownership of firearms by felons are not considered infringements on the historically understood right to bear arms protected by the Second Amendment. Id. at 226 n.21. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Circuit Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Second Amendment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Drugs&amp;diff=380355</id>
		<title>Talk:Drugs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Drugs&amp;diff=380355"/>
		<updated>2008-01-26T02:26:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: /* Mainstreaming Drugs */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I added medicinal drugs, the section could use a bit more info, like the dates and people involved in the discovery of penicillin and the synthesis of aspirin.  Also, what the heck are those new pain killers called?  My memory fails me... [[User:Human|Human]] 17:36, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What was &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Drugs&amp;amp;diff=379987&amp;amp;oldid=266075 this] that you removed.  It looks pretty factual to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:31, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It created an impression that drugs are a good thing, and in its introduction blurred the distinction between prescription medication and illegal drugs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:50, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well, ''some'' drugs are a good thing (taken properly).  But surely any problems in that regard could have been fixed by some rewording or rearrangement, rather than outright deletion which makes it look like there's no such thing as medicinal drugs.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:21, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Philip on this manner. Aren't just regular form of medicine considered drugs? We could move the entry on illegal drugs to [[illegal drugs]]. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:45, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I have another idea. We could put a disambiguation message at the top that says &amp;quot;for medicine, see [[Medicine]].&amp;quot; [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:46, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Illegal drugs]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We already have a page on illegal drugs.  This one should include information about other kinds of drugs. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  [[User:CPAdmin1/Election08|Vote for President]] 13:32, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mainstreaming Drugs == &lt;br /&gt;
Is the legality of marijuana in the [[Netherlands]] notable? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:46, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Most likely, but I'm not positive it's actually legal de jure there. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:48, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::How do you mean? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:49, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought that marijuana was technically still illegal there, but that it was officially non-enforced. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:50, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh-- You're right, I'm sorry. It's still banned due to the [[Opium Act]]. It's tolerated in small amounts, though. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:51, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The term &amp;quot;drugs&amp;quot; typically refers to things like marijuana, cocaine, heroin, etc., and not only is it prohibited in the [[United States]] for good reason, but possession of it is even more harshly punished in other countries, again for good reason.  Attempts to paint a different and misleading picture in this entry should not be allowed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:11, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::... what does that have to do with anything under this heading? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:13, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Wait, what reason was that, again? [[User:Konserve|Konserve]] 20:14, 25 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The connection isn't obvious?  Barikada started this thread by saying, &amp;quot;Is the legality of marijuana in the Netherlands notable?&amp;quot;  The answer is, as suggested by my comment above: first talk about how it is illegal nearly everywhere else and, apparently, illegal in the Netherlands also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Call me old-fashioned, but I like having direct answers to my questions. In this case, a &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;no,&amp;quot; with a citation, would have been fine. The point wasn't to discuss the legality of it anywhere else but Holland. For the sake of the article being fair and balanced -- and ''trustworthy,'' it's important to fully explain other country's stance on drugs. There are other countries beyond America. [[User:Konserve|Konserve]] 20:26, 25 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Genius_bias&amp;diff=380343</id>
		<title>Talk:Genius bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Genius_bias&amp;diff=380343"/>
		<updated>2008-01-26T02:16:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: Re-adding valid point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm confused by &amp;quot;more qualified.&amp;quot; What exactly does this mean?  {{unsigned|Americanscientist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;More qualified&amp;quot; is a clear term.  Do you have access to a dictionary?  A scientist with 2 PhD's like [[Richard Sternberg]] is &amp;quot;more qualified&amp;quot; than one without any PhD's, like most evolution promoters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:25, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And a scientist with one PhD relevant to the subject is &amp;quot;more qualified&amp;quot; than one with two unrelated ones. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 16:44, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New bias? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Schlafly, Is this a term that you coined? Never heard of it before and google search does not come out with any thing significant. Can we also please coin new terms and introduce them via the encyclopedia?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 12:49, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:See [[Conservapedia terms]] --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 16:26, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Drugs&amp;diff=380339</id>
		<title>Talk:Drugs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Drugs&amp;diff=380339"/>
		<updated>2008-01-26T02:15:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: /* Mainstreaming Drugs */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I added medicinal drugs, the section could use a bit more info, like the dates and people involved in the discovery of penicillin and the synthesis of aspirin.  Also, what the heck are those new pain killers called?  My memory fails me... [[User:Human|Human]] 17:36, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What was &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Drugs&amp;amp;diff=379987&amp;amp;oldid=266075 this] that you removed.  It looks pretty factual to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:31, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It created an impression that drugs are a good thing, and in its introduction blurred the distinction between prescription medication and illegal drugs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:50, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well, ''some'' drugs are a good thing (taken properly).  But surely any problems in that regard could have been fixed by some rewording or rearrangement, rather than outright deletion which makes it look like there's no such thing as medicinal drugs.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:21, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Philip on this manner. Aren't just regular form of medicine considered drugs? We could move the entry on illegal drugs to [[illegal drugs]]. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:45, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I have another idea. We could put a disambiguation message at the top that says &amp;quot;for medicine, see [[Medicine]].&amp;quot; [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:46, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Illegal drugs]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We already have a page on illegal drugs.  This one should include information about other kinds of drugs. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  [[User:CPAdmin1/Election08|Vote for President]] 13:32, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mainstreaming Drugs == &lt;br /&gt;
Is the legality of marijuana in the [[Netherlands]] notable? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:46, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Most likely, but I'm not positive it's actually legal de jure there. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:48, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::How do you mean? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:49, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought that marijuana was technically still illegal there, but that it was officially non-enforced. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:50, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh-- You're right, I'm sorry. It's still banned due to the [[Opium Act]]. It's tolerated in small amounts, though. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:51, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The term &amp;quot;drugs&amp;quot; typically refers to things like marijuana, cocaine, heroin, etc., and not only is it prohibited in the [[United States]] for good reason, but possession of it is even more harshly punished in other countries, again for good reason.  Attempts to paint a different and misleading picture in this entry should not be allowed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:11, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::... what does that have to do with anything under this heading? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:13, 25 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Wait, what reason was that, again? [[User:Konserve|Konserve]] 20:14, 25 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=377394</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=377394"/>
		<updated>2008-01-20T21:00:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: Fixed a number of grammatical errors, and removed slants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''Liberal''' may believe in one or many of the following political positions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* denial of inherent [[gender differences]] and wanting men and women to have the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* taxpayer-funded health care&lt;br /&gt;
* [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* support of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* support of [[political correctness]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/27429.html Politically Correct Terrorism] ''The Conservative Voice'', August 21, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[censorship]] of [[prayer]] in classrooms from any religion&lt;br /&gt;
* compelled taxpayer funding of government [[school]]s for nearly all ages&lt;br /&gt;
* government-controlled medical care&lt;br /&gt;
* labor [[union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* elimination of [[abstinence]]-only program funding &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* a &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted rather than an unchanging Constitution as written&lt;br /&gt;
* support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[environmentalism]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[Greenpeace]] engages in environmentalism.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* opposition to a strong American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* limit [[conservative]] talk radio by reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;One satirist's conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub|section}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and some media outlets in the [[U.S.]] often have [[liberal bias]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each Congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is.  In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is an organization that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, such as the Liberal Party of Australia[http://www.liberal.org.au/].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians that promote lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal | neoliberals]]. Thus, just like in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is often used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, this is usually a way of calling them [[rightist | right-wing]], exactly the opposite of the meaning in the US.&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the meaning of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in the United States is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy | social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block (citation needed), which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Style]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceit]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lies&amp;diff=375617</id>
		<title>Lies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lies&amp;diff=375617"/>
		<updated>2008-01-19T19:03:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: New page: Lies are things that aren't true, whether intentionally or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Lies are things that aren't true, whether intentionally or not.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Konserve&amp;diff=375611</id>
		<title>User:Konserve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Konserve&amp;diff=375611"/>
		<updated>2008-01-19T19:00:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Please don't castrate my page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#039 |id-s=12 |id-fc=#fff |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=UNA |info=&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;This user supports the United Nations of Ava's Elite Fighting Force, the Invincible White Stars!&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Konserve&amp;diff=375609</id>
		<title>User:Konserve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Konserve&amp;diff=375609"/>
		<updated>2008-01-19T19:00:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Please don't castrate my page.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Finland&amp;diff=375596</id>
		<title>Finland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Finland&amp;diff=375596"/>
		<updated>2008-01-19T18:47:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Suomi'' &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; ''Finland''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Finland rel96.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Finland.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Finland.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Helsinki&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Parliamentary Democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Finnish, Swedish&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Tarja Halonen&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Matti Vanhanen&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =130,558 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =5,296,128 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$193.491 billion (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$40,197 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=euro&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Republic of Finland''' (''Suomi'' or ''Suomen tasavalta'' in Finnish, ''Republiken Finland'' in Swedish) is a country of northern [[Europe]] known for its largely [[social democracy|social democratic]] economic system. The Finnish [[conservative]] party, the [[National Coalition]] led by [[Jyrki Katainen]], is its principal conservative organization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state capital is [[Helsinki]] and the principal exports are machines, electronics (for example mobile phones) and forestry products. [[Finnish]] is the principal language spoken, a [[Finno-Ugric]] language, it is difficult for speakers of English and Romance languages to learn, so many Finns speak English to facilitate communication with other countries. The second official language is Swedish, which has the same status as Finnish in the country. Finland is known as &amp;quot;the land of lakes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
The area of Finland is approximately 338 000 square kilometers, with a north-south axis of 890 kilometers. Most of the landscape is covered with lakes, glaciers and forests. Finland is often called the &amp;quot;Land of Thousands of Lakes&amp;quot;, which is true, because the number of lakes in the country exceeds 188 000, of which about 56 000 have an area of one hectare or more. In the sea there are more than 3 000 islands. In the North there are many glaciers, the most famous of which is [[Saana]]. Cultivated land and habitation only account for 17% of the land area, rest being mainly [[Norway spruce]] forests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finland is bound by [[Sweden]] in the Northwest, [[Norway]] in the North, [[Russia]] in the East, the [[Gulf of Finland]] in the South and the [[Gulf of Bothnia]] in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (September 2007): 5.29 million (Insane ducks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Population growth rate (2006): 0.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Finns, Swedes, Lapps, Sami, Roma, Tatars.&lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: Lutheran 82.5%, Orthodox 1.1%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Languages: Finnish 91.5%, Swedish 5.5% (both official); small Lapp- (0.03%) and Russian-speaking (0.8%) minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory--9. Attendance--almost 100%. Literacy--almost 100%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate--2.8/1,000 (2006). Life expectancy--males 75.8 yrs., females 82.8 yrs.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (2.65 million; of which 2.44 million are employed): Public services--32.8%; industry--19%; commerce--15.6%; finance, insurance, and business services--13.8%; agriculture and forestry--4.7%; transport and communications--7.4%; construction--6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Culture===&lt;br /&gt;
Finnish people are known for their love of nature. Nature is prominent in the works of Finnish artists, such as [[Jean Sibelius]], [[Aki Kaurismäki]], [[Alvar Aalto]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The great masters of Finnish literature include [[Mika Waltari]], [[Väinö Linna]], [[Johan Ludvig Runeberg]]. Finland is a bi-lingual country and has produced its literary heritage in both Finnish and Swedish. The beloved Moomintrolls were created by the writer and graphic artist Tove Jansson. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Finland has a mixed presidential/parliamentary system with executive powers divided between the president, who has primary responsibility for national security and foreign affairs, and the prime minister, who has primary responsibility for all other areas, including EU issues. Under the constitution that took effect in March 2000, the established practice for managing foreign policy is that the president keeps in close touch with the prime minister, the minister for foreign affairs, and other ministers responsible for foreign relations. Constitutional changes strengthened the prime minister--who must enjoy the confidence of the parliament (Eduskunta)--at the expense of the president. Finns enjoy individual and political freedoms, and suffrage is universal at 18. The country's population is relatively ethnically homogeneous. Immigration to Finland has significantly increased over the past decade, although the foreign-born population, estimated at only 2.2% of the total population, is still much lower than in any other EU country. Few tensions exist between the Finnish-speaking majority and the Swedish-speaking minority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====President and cabinet====&lt;br /&gt;
Elected for a 6-year term, the president: &lt;br /&gt;
*Handles foreign policy, except for certain international agreements and decisions of peace or war, which must be submitted to parliament, and EU relations, which are handled by the prime minister; &lt;br /&gt;
*Is commander in chief of the armed forces and has wide decree and appointive powers; &lt;br /&gt;
*May initiate legislation, block legislation by pocket veto, and call extraordinary parliamentary sessions; and &lt;br /&gt;
*Appoints the prime minister and the rest of the cabinet (Council of State). The Council of State is made up of the prime minister and ministers for the various departments of the central government as well as an ex officio member, the Chancellor of Justice. Ministers are not obliged to be members of the Eduskunta and need not be formally identified with any political party. &lt;br /&gt;
The president may, upon proposal of the prime minister and after having heard the parliamentary groups, order parliament to be dissolved, and a new election held. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Parliament====&lt;br /&gt;
Constitutionally, the 200-member, unicameral Eduskunta is the supreme authority in Finland. It may alter the constitution, bring about the resignation of the Council of State, and override presidential vetoes; its acts are not subject to judicial review. Legislation may be initiated by the president, the Council of State, or one of the Eduskunta members. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Eduskunta is elected on the basis of proportional representation. All persons 18 or older, except military personnel on active duty and a few high judicial officials, are eligible for election. The regular parliamentary term is 4 years; however, the president may dissolve the Eduskunta and order new elections at the request of the prime minister and after consulting the speaker of parliament. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Judicial system====&lt;br /&gt;
The judicial system is divided between courts with regular civil and criminal jurisdiction and special courts with responsibility for litigation between the public and the administrative organs of the state. Finnish law is codified. Although there is no writ of habeas corpus or bail, the maximum period of pretrial detention has been reduced to 4 days. The Finnish court system consists of local courts, regional appellate courts, a Supreme Court, and a Supreme Administrative Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Administrative divisions====&lt;br /&gt;
Finland consists of five provinces and the self-ruled province of the Aland Islands. Below the provincial level, the country is divided into cities, townships, and communes administered by municipal and communal councils elected by proportional representation once every 4 years. At the provincial level, the five mainland provinces are administered by provincial boards composed of civil servants, each headed by a governor. The boards are responsible to the Ministry of the Interior and play a supervisory and coordinating role within the provinces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The island province of Aland is located near the 60th parallel between Sweden and Finland. It enjoys local autonomy and demilitarized status by virtue of an international convention of 1921, implemented most recently by the Act on Aland Self-Government of 1951. The islands are further distinguished by the fact that they are entirely Swedish-speaking. Government is vested in the provincial council, which consists of 30 delegates elected directly by Aland's citizens. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Military====&lt;br /&gt;
Finland's defense forces consist of 35,000 persons in uniform (26,000 army; 5,000 navy; and 4,000 air force). The country's defense budget equals about 1.3% of GDP. There is universal male conscription under which all men serve from six to 12 months. As of 1995, women were permitted to serve as volunteers. A reserve force ensures that Finland can field 490,000 trained military personnel in case of need. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Political parties====&lt;br /&gt;
Finland's proportional representation system encourages a multitude of political parties and has resulted in many coalition governments. Political activity by communists was legalized in 1944, and although four major parties have dominated the postwar political arena, none now has a majority position. In elections held in 2007, the Center Party (Keskusta), traditionally representing rural interests, kept its position as the biggest party. The then-opposition Conservative Party, however, came away as the biggest winner, gaining 10 seats and becoming the second-largest political party in the country. The Center then formed a four-party governing coalition with the Conservatives and the Swedish People's Party and the Greens. The Social Democratic Party (SDP) suffered a defeat in these elections and fell to the third position among the big parties. Of the other parties, the True Finns, the Green League, and the Swedish People’s Party were able to gain seats in parliament. The Conservative Party received the portfolios of foreign minister, finance minister, and defense minister, among others, and became an important player after a long interval. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*President--Tarja Halonen&lt;br /&gt;
*Prime Minister--Matti Vanhanen&lt;br /&gt;
*Foreign Minister--Ilkka Kanerva&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United States--Pekka Lintu&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United Nations--Kirsti Lintonen &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
Finland's basic foreign policy goal from the end of the Continuation War with the U.S.S.R. in 1944 until 1991 was to avoid great-power conflicts and to build mutual confidence with the Soviet Union. Although the country was culturally, socially, and politically Western, Finns realized they must live in peace with the U.S.S.R. and take no action that might be interpreted as a security threat. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 opened up dramatic new possibilities for Finland and has resulted in the Finns actively seeking greater participation in Western political and economic structures. Finland joined the European Union in 1995. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Previous relations with the Soviet Union, and today with Russia==== &lt;br /&gt;
The principal architect of the post-1944 foreign policy of neutrality was J.K. Paasikivi, who was President from 1946 to 1956. Urho Kekkonen, President from 1956 until 1981, further developed this policy, stressing that Finland should be an active rather than a passive neutral. This policy is now popularly known as the &amp;quot;Paasikivi-Kekkonen Line.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finland and the U.S.S.R. signed a peace treaty at Paris in February 1947 limiting the size of Finland's defense forces and providing for the cession to the Soviet Union of the Petsamo area on the Arctic coast, the Karelian Isthmus in southeastern Finland, and other territory along the former eastern border. Another provision, terminated in 1956, leased the Porkkala area near Helsinki to the U.S.S.R. for use as a naval base and gave free access to this area across Finnish territory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1947 treaty also called for Finland to pay to the Soviet Union reparations of 300 million gold dollars (amounting to an estimated $570 million in 1952, the year the payments ended). Although an ally of the Soviet Union in World War II, the United States was not a signatory to this treaty because it had not been at war with Finland. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 1948, Finland signed an Agreement of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance with the Soviet Union. Under this mutual assistance pact, Finland was obligated--with the aid of the Soviet Union, if necessary--to resist armed attacks by Germany or its allies against Finland or against the U.S.S.R. through Finland. At the same time, the agreement recognized Finland's desire to remain outside great-power conflicts. This agreement was renewed for 20 years in 1955, in 1970, and again in 1983 to the year 2003, although the subsequent dissolution of the Soviet Union led to the agreement's abrogation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Finns responded cautiously in 1990-91 to the decline of Soviet power and the U.S.S.R.'s subsequent dissolution. They unilaterally abrogated restrictions imposed by the 1947 and 1948 treaties, joined in voicing Nordic concern over the coup against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, and gave increasing unofficial encouragement to Baltic independence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time, by replacing the Soviet-Finnish mutual assistance pact with treaties on general cooperation and trade, Finns put themselves on an equal footing while retaining a friendly bilateral relationship. Finland now is boosting cross-border commercial ties and touting its potential as a commercial gateway to Russia. It has reassured Russia that it will not raise claims for Finnish territory seized by the U.S.S.R. and continues to reaffirm the importance of good bilateral relations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Multilateral Relations====&lt;br /&gt;
Finnish foreign policy emphasizes its participation in multilateral organizations. Finland joined the United Nations in 1955 and the EU in 1995. As noted, the country also is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Partnership for Peace as well as a member in the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council. As a NATO partner, Finland had 100 troops in Afghanistan as of September 2007. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finland is well represented in the UN civil service in proportion to its population and belongs to several of its specialized and related agencies. Finnish troops have participated in UN peacekeeping activities since 1956, and the Finns continue to be one of the largest per capita contributors of peacekeepers in the world. Finland is an active participant in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and in early 1995 assumed the co-chairmanship of the OSCE's Minsk Group on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cooperation with the other Scandinavian countries also is important to Finland, and it has been a member of the Nordic Council since 1955. Under the council's auspices, the Nordic countries have created a common labor market and have abolished immigration controls among themselves. The council also serves to coordinate social and cultural policies of the participating countries and has promoted increased cooperation in many fields. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the organizations already mentioned, Finland became a member of the following organizations: Bank for International Settlements, 1930; International Monetary Fund, 1948; International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1948; General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), 1950; International Finance Corporation, 1956; International Development Association, 1960; European Free Trade Association, 1961; Asian Development Bank, 1966; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1969; Inter-American Development Bank, 1977; African Development Bank, 1982; Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1988; the Council of Europe, 1989; European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1991; World Trade Organization, 1995; and INTELSAT, 1999. Finland entered Stage Three of EMU (the European Monetary Union) in 1999. All the Nordic countries, including Finland, joined the Schengen area in March 2001. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
Finland has an industrial economy based on abundant forest resources, capital investments, and high technology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Finnish economy has made enormous strides since the severe recession of the early 1990s. Finland successfully joined the euro zone and has outperformed euro-area partners in terms of economic growth and public finance. In the last few years, the Finnish economy has performed reasonably well. Total output was 5% higher in 2006 than in 2005, but economic activity leveled off in the latter half of the year. GDP is predicted to grow by 4.4% in 2007, while 2008 is likely to show a slower rate of growth, estimated at 3.3%. Despite the current favorable outlook, there is a degree of uncertainty in the Finnish economy caused by the large fluctuations in electronics industry production, together with resource constraints. Cost and price pressures have increased, and there is a threat of industry’s price competitiveness starting to weaken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unemployment decreased significantly from 1994 to 7.7% in 2006 and is expected to drop to 6.7% in 2007. A relatively inflexible labor market and high employer-paid social security taxes hamper growth in employment. Labor bottlenecks are becoming more common in certain sectors, and this will increasingly restrict growth in output in the future. The main constraint to medium-term economic growth will be the drop in the population of working age once the post-war baby boomers reach retirement age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exports of goods and services contribute 32% of Finland's GDP. Metals and engineering (including electronics) and timber (including pulp and paper) are Finland's main industries. The United States is Finland's third most important trading partner outside of Europe. With a 3.8% share of imports in 2006, the United States was Finland's seventh-largest supplier. The total value of U.S. exports to Finland in 2006 was $2.6 billion. Major exports from the United States to Finland continue to be machinery, telecommunications equipment and parts, aircraft and aircraft parts, computers, peripherals and software, electronic components, chemicals, medical equipment, and some agricultural products. The primary competition for American companies comes from Russia, Germany, Sweden, and China. The main export items from Finland to the United States are electronics, machinery, ships and boats, paper and paperboard, refined petroleum products, telecommunications equipment and parts. In 2006, the United States was Finland's fourth-largest customer after Germany (11.3%), Sweden (10.5%), and Russia (10.1%), with an export share of 6.5%, or $5 billion. However, trade is only part of the totality: the 10 biggest Finnish companies in the United States have a combined turnover that is three times the value of Finland's total exports to the United States. About 2.3% of the Finnish GDP comes from exports to the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for timber and several minerals, Finland depends on imported raw materials, energy, and some components for its manufactured products. Farms tend to be small, but farmers own sizable timber stands that are harvested for supplementary income in winter. The country's main agricultural products are dairy, meat, and grains. Finland's EU accession has accelerated the process of restructuring and downsizing of this sector. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP: $210.8 billion (EUR 167.9 billion).&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP growth rate: 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita income: $40,036 (EUR 31,886).&lt;br /&gt;
*Inflation rate: 1.6% (2006 average); 2.6% (September 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Forests, minerals (copper, zinc, iron), farmland.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (2.9% of GDP): Products--meat (pork and beef), grain (wheat, rye, barley, oats), dairy products, potatoes, rapeseed. &lt;br /&gt;
*Industry (30.1% of GDP): Types--metal (including electronics and electrical equipment) and engineering, forest products, chemicals, shipbuilding, foodstuffs, textiles.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trade: Exports--$77.08 billion. Major markets--EU 56.9%, Russia 10.1%, U.S. 6.5%, China 3.2%. Imports--$68.9 billion. Major suppliers--EU 55.3%, Russia 14.1%, China 7.5%, U.S. 3.8%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The origins of the Finnish people are still a matter of conjecture, although many scholars argue that their original home was in what is now west-central Siberia. The Finns arrived in their present territory thousands of years ago, pushing the indigenous Lapps into the more remote northern regions. Finnish and Lappish--the language of Finland's small Lapp minority--both are Finno-Ugric languages and are in the Uralic rather than the Indo-European family. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finland's nearly 700-year association with the Kingdom of Sweden began in 1154 with the introduction of Christianity by Sweden's King Eric. During the ensuing centuries, Finland played an important role in the political life of the Swedish-Finnish realm, and Finnish soldiers often predominated in Swedish armies. Finns also formed a significant proportion of the first &amp;quot;Swedish&amp;quot; settlers in 17th-century America. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following Finland's incorporation into Sweden in the 12th century, Swedish became the dominant language, although Finnish recovered its predominance after a 19th-century resurgence of Finnish nationalism. Publication in 1835 of the Finnish national epic, The Kalevala--a collection of traditional myths and legends--first stirred the nationalism that later led to Finland's independence from Russia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1809, Finland was conquered by the armies of Czar Alexander I and thereafter remained an autonomous grand duchy connected with the Russian Empire until the end of 1917. On December 6, 1917, shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, Finland declared its independence. In 1918, the country experienced a brief but bitter civil war that colored domestic politics for many years. During World War II, Finland fought the Soviet Union twice--in the Winter War of 1939-40 and again in the Continuation War of 1941-44. This was followed by the Lapland War of 1944-45, when Finland fought against the Germans as they withdrew their forces from northern Finland. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Continuation War (1941-1944) Finland was a co-belligerent with Germany. However, Finnish Jews were not persecuted. Of the approximately 500 Jewish refugees who arrived in Finland, eight were handed over to the Germans, for which Finland submitted an official apology in 2000. Also during the war, approximately 2,600 Soviet prisoners of war were exchanged for 2,100 Finnish prisoners of war from Germany. In 2003, the Simon Wiesenthal Center submitted an official request for a full-scale investigation by the Finnish authorities of the prisoner exchange. It was established there were about 70 Jews among the extradited prisoners but none was extradited as a result of ethnic background or religious belief.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Treaties signed in 1947 and 1948 with the Soviet Union included obligations and restraints on Finland vis-a-vis the U.S.S.R. as well as territorial concessions by Finland; both have been abrogated by Finland since the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Template:Copyright_Details_%28US_Government%29 Copyright Details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Finland]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:EU Members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nordic Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Konserve&amp;diff=374262</id>
		<title>User:Konserve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Konserve&amp;diff=374262"/>
		<updated>2008-01-18T04:42:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: New page: Konserve has a penis. Yes, it's true.  {{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#039 |id-s=12 |id-fc=#fff |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=UNA |info=&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;This user supports th...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Konserve has a penis. Yes, it's true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#039 |id-s=12 |id-fc=#fff |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=UNA |info=&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;This user supports the United Nations of Ava's Elite Fighting Force, the Invincible White Stars!&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sin&amp;diff=374249</id>
		<title>Sin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sin&amp;diff=374249"/>
		<updated>2008-01-18T04:33:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: /* Summary */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Sin]] (from [[Old English]] ''synn'', from either [[Old Norse]] ''synd'' or [[German]] ''Sünde'', from ''sun(d)jo'' it is true, from [[Sanskrit]](?) ''es-'' it is) is any failure to conform to the letter of a given code of [[morality]], or the state of being of one so failing to conform, or the state of the world that results from such failure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meaning of sin ==&lt;br /&gt;
The root meaning of the [[English]] word ''sin'' is actually, &amp;quot;He is guilty as charged.&amp;quot; This in turn implies that the person committing the offense knew, or ought to have known, that his act would ''be'' an offense before he committed it. This word actually captures the meaning that many religious traditions ascribe to sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Greek]] word used in the original [[New Testament]] and translated &amp;quot;sin&amp;quot; in English is '''ἁμαρτία''' (''hamartia'') (whence ''[[hamartoma]]'' a malformation of [[cell]]s that are within their usual place in the body). This word captures the ''[[Christian]]'' meaning of sin much better. ''Hamartia'' means ''missing a target.'' Thus sin does not require bad intentions, but might result from a misunderstanding. This is not to say that the consequences are any less dire, however. It does mean that sin need not be intentional; it can be a knowing (but not intentional), reckless, or negligent act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Required: a moral context ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sin, which is a moral failure, cannot exist in the absence of a code of [[morality]]. [[Objectivism]] defines morality as &amp;quot;a code of values accepted by choice.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not to say that sin requires a context of ''divinity.'' Objectivism, for example, refuses to admit [[God]], while still prescribing a standard of value and a code of morality that follows from it. (Whether such a code can properly stand, by the rules of Objectivism itself, is another matter.) The context in which sin ceases to have meaning is not [[atheism]] ''per se'' but rather [[amoralism]]--the doctrine that says that no person may properly define what is moral for another, because no two people will ever value the same thing to the same degree, or value the same collection of things by the same rank structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether any man ''ever'' lives without some form of moral code--even if that code is, &amp;quot;I denounce as sin any disagreement with myself or any attempt to stand in my way&amp;quot;--is [[Can any man live without some code of morality?|debatable]]. Nevertheless, without ''some'' form of moral context, sin has no meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Differing views of sin ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== Jewish ====&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Judaism]], and certainly in ancient practice, the preferred method of atonement for sin was [[blood sacrifice]]. The Book of [[Leviticus]] prescribed multiple animal sacrifices for atonement for various types of sin. But by far the most important atonement--on the [[Day of Atonement]] (''Yowm Kippur'')--was made by the high priest of the [[Hebrew]] people (originally [[Aaron]], brother of [[Moses]]). This involved making a blood sacrifice, entering the [[Holy of Holies]] (in [[Latin]], ''sanctum sanctorum''), and sprinkling some of the blood from the sacrifice on the [[Ark of the Covenant]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Animal sacrifice has not been part of Jewish practice since the destruction of the [[Temple of Jerusalem]] by the future [[Rome|Roman]] [[Emperor]] [[Titus]] in [[70 AD]]. But the [[Old Testament]] did not imply that animal sacrifice was the sole ''necessary'' measure for reconciliation. Simple repentance and prayer sufficed numerous times in [[Bible]] history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, though animal sacrifices are no longer observed, Jews do observe ''Yom Kippur'' and other festivals related to repentance and reconciliation. But a movement now exists to attempt to regain exclusive control of the [[Temple Mount]] area in [[Jerusalem]], rebuild the Temple, and resume the burnt offerings, sin offerings, and guilt offerings prescribed in the [[Torah]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Jewish thought, sin may be balanced by the good deeds one performs throughout life; the image of scales weighing one's life are prominent in folklore, similar to other ancient Middle Eastern religions such as ancient Egypt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Christian views ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Roman Catholic ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] doctrine distinguishes [[original sin]], or the sin of [[Adam]], from ''personal'' sins, which require individual reconciliation with [[God]]. A personal sin may be ''mortal'' (a particularly grave matter that the perpetrator commits by deliberate intent) or ''venial'' (a less grave matter that could result from a misunderstanding). The RCC distinction is: Mortal sins cut a person off from the grace of God; venial sins do not, but still injure one's relationship to God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one mortal sin that, to a Catholic, would be unforgivable (because its successful commission leaves no opportunity for reconciliation later), is [[suicide]]. Beyond that, a person may receive reconciliation for a mortal sin by making [[Confession (Catholic)|confession]] to a [[Priest (Catholic)|priest]] and receiving the ceremony of [[Absolution from sin|absolution]]. One can reconcile from a venial sin by the sacrament of reconciliation, or by receiving communion, or [[Holy Eucharist]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roman Catholic doctrine historically included two other controversial holdings. One is [[purgatory]], a place where the soul must be held to &amp;quot;purge&amp;quot; him of all traces of sin before he can gain entry to [[heaven]]. Redemption from purgatory allegedly required the payment of a monetary fee by the deceased's relatives to the Church. The other is the [[indulgence]], a fee paid to the church by the perpetrator in advance. Indulgences have not been sold for centuries, and recently [[Pope]] [[Benedict XVI]] issued an [[encyclical]] casting doubt on the entire concept of purgatory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Encyclical Letter, Spe Salvi, Of The Supreme Pontiff, Benedict XVI, To The Bishops, Priests, Deacons, Men And Women Religious, And All The Lay Faithful, On Christian Hope'' 30 November 2007 [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20071130_spe-salvi_en.html Vatican website] Accessed 3 January 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Virgin Mary =====&lt;br /&gt;
Roman Catholic doctrine holds that not only was [[Jesus]] sinless, but so, also, was His Mother, [[Virgin Mary|Mary]]. The belief that the Virgin Mary was sinless at conception is called the Immaculate Conception. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] teaches that the Virgin Mary was born with Original Sin but that she was cleansed of this sin at the time of the Annunciation. The Church also teaches that by free will she did not commit any actual sin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This doctrine, called ''Marianism'', is not ''universally'' held by all Catholics, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Anglican Communion ====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Anglican Communion]], essentially the breakaway church of the [[United Kingdom]], retains the Roman Catholic tradition of confession and absolution of sin. But instead of an individual process, confession in Anglican churches is a group activity, and absolution is pronounced by a [[Minister (Protestant)|minister]] to the entire church-going group. Purgatory and indulgences have no place in Anglican doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Eastern and Oriental Orthodox ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] there are no &amp;quot;categories&amp;quot; of sin as found in the Christian West. In the pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic catechism, sins were categorized as &amp;quot;mortal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;venial.&amp;quot;  These categories do not exist in the Orthodox Church.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Orthodoxy believes that, while everyone bears the consequences of the first sin, the foremost of which is death, only Adam and Eve are guilty of that sin. Roman Catholicism teaches that everyone bears not only the consequence, but also the guilt, of that sin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Orthodox churches, including Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox, differ little from [[Judaism]] in their holding of what sin is and how to reconcile it--except that animal sacrifices have never been part of Orthodox tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The Reformation ====&lt;br /&gt;
In [[1517]], [[Martin Luther]] led the most serious break from Roman Catholic doctrine and tradition, the [[Protestant Reformation]]. This occurred at about the time that King [[Henry VIII]], then of the [[Kingdom of England]], formed the Church of England, the forerunner of the Anglican Communion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Luther is most famous for his &amp;quot;95 precepts nailed to the church-house door.&amp;quot; The most important of these is the principle that he stated in Latin as ''Sola Scriptura''--literally, &amp;quot;Scripture only.&amp;quot; Luther rejected out-of-hand most of the various categories of sin, and the elaborate rituals that attended its so-called reconciliation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To Luther, and to his intellectual heirs in the [[Lutheran Church]] and the [[Dutch Reformed Church]], the Bible tells all one needs to know about sin. Sin, according to Luther, is any failure to observe God's commandments or other Godly precepts that one may determine from the actual teachings of [[Jesus]] and of His [[Apostle]]s (especially [[Paul]], the most prolific writer among them). ''Reconciliation'' from sin was a ''private'' matter between God and any of His followers. A priest or minister ''was not'' required, because that would imply that a human being, of whatever office, could stand in the place of God--a thing Luther regarded as an insult to God, which is the definition of [[blasphemy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nor was any animal sacrifice required, because [[Jesus]] Himself made the One Total and Complete Sacrifice of His own life for the sin condition of the world (see below) and for the sins of individual people, past, present ''and future''. Salvation was strictly by faith and strictly by grace. Luther drew directly on the letters of [[Paul]] that addressed this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The Baptist Tradition ====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Baptist|Baptists]] would generally agree with Luther. Like him, Baptists hold that sin is an act or omission that displeases God, and the state of being that the perpetrator falls into, and remains in until he has confessed this sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baptist churches do not tend to engage in corporate, collective confessions. Rather, Baptist practice depends heavily on {{Bible ref|book=Matthew|chap=18|verses=15-20|version=KJV}}, which prescribes this procedure for the handling of sin that gives offense to a fellow believer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The aggrieved person, or the minister if the aggrieved person has asked him to, tries to encourage the perpetrator to repent. ''Repentance'' (Greek ''metanoia'') means a change of mind, or a change of heart.&lt;br /&gt;
# Failing that, whoever tried to talk to the perpetrator the first time, tries a second time and brings a witness.&lt;br /&gt;
# If this still does not bring repentance, and a cessation of the behavior, then and only then does the matter come before the entire church. The minister lays out the case, and puts the matter to a vote as to whether the offender ought to be allowed to remain in fellowship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not all Baptist churches practice this discipline, however. In such environments, sin is a matter between the offender and God (and the person or persons to whom the offender might have given offense). Some observers suggest that churches suffer when they fail to practice discipline as they should.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Fundamentalists ====&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Sin (Fundamentalism)]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above article is a comprehensive theory of sin, and its effects on the offender, on mankind as a whole, and on the entire world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Islam ===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Islam]], sin is very simple: anything that runs counter to the will of [[Allah]] (Arabic for [[God]]). In Islam, sin is simply an act, never a state of being.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islam recognizes five gradations of sin, in order of severity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
# Immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
# Transgressions.&lt;br /&gt;
# Wickedness and depravity.&lt;br /&gt;
# Ascribing a partner to God. Thus this one special instance of [[blasphemy]] is held worse than any other sin a man can commit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Islam, permanent reconciliation cannot come in life. Instead, at death, a person has his &amp;quot;good deeds&amp;quot; measured against his &amp;quot;bad deeds&amp;quot; (sins). If the good outweighs the bad, then the person must walk a tightrope over a lake of fire in order to cross into heaven. Islam, however, offers one important exception: any person who dies ''in the course of an act that advances the Muslim faith'' gains automatic entry into heaven, regardless of any prior sins he has committed. The usual, and some Muslims (particularly the [[Wahhabism|Wahabbi]] sect) say the only, context for such a death is ''[[jihad]]'', literally ''holy [[war]]''. Furthermore, ''jihad'' is a ''physical'' war against non-adherents to Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Muslims will say that ''jihad'' is not physical at all, but refers instead to a personal struggle that every Muslim must engage in continually against sin and the temptations thereto.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still others state that two forms of Jihad are known:&lt;br /&gt;
# The greater Jihad, which is the internal struggle within a person against sin.&lt;br /&gt;
# The lesser Jihad, physical war against the infidel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who make that distinction state that what they call the &amp;quot;lesser jihad&amp;quot; is practiced only by fanatical holders to Islam. A ''fanatic'' is one who holds to a set of beliefs uncritically--that is, without being willing to judge them. Since the [[World Trade Center incident]], a number of Muslims ''have'' begun a critical analysis of Muslim doctrine (both verbal and written) and the place of Islam in the civilized world. Whether those voices can find sufficent logical support in the written texts that define Islam is debatable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Objectivism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Objectivism does not admit to any kind of divinity, but it still has its own code of morality. Though a student of Objectivism does not normally use the word ''sin'', one may best infer what Objectivism considers sinful by examining what it teaches man to value. A basic, but by no means exhaustive, list would include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Failure to be relentlessly rational in everything one does.&lt;br /&gt;
# Coveting the fruits of another's labor without being willing to pay for those fruits.&lt;br /&gt;
# Failure to give value for value received.&lt;br /&gt;
# Violation of another person's right to pursue his life in a non-offensive manner.&lt;br /&gt;
# Initiating the use of force against another person or group of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
# Accepting as real anything one cannot see.&lt;br /&gt;
# Refusing to accept reality.&lt;br /&gt;
# Attempting to create one's own reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconciliation for sin, beyond restitution to another to whom one has brought material loss by his sin, is not generally required. In the Objectivist model, one pays the consequences of his particular sins in the form of loss of trade, loss of respect, ''et cetera.'' Because Objectivism admits no heaven, it admits no [[hell]], either, and therefore all of the consequences of sin ''must'' occur in this life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Cults and cult figures ===&lt;br /&gt;
A [[cult]], properly speaking, is a belief system centered on one person, or the group of persons led by that person. In the context of a cult, sin is any refusal to uphold the decisions or obey the orders of the leader, and anything else that gives offense to the leader. Reconciliation is generally at the leader's own discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarianism ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Totalitarianism]] is a [[philosophy]] of [[government]] that holds that the government ''must'' have absolute authority over ''all'' aspects of life. [[Communist]]s are totalitarians, just as the [[Nazi]]s were.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Totalitarian authorities and their apologists have their concept of sin as well: it is anything that works against the government, or tries to thwart its goals. This is true even in a regime that is explicitly [[Atheism|atheistic]] in world view. Reconciliation generally requires recantation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Socialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Socialism]], whether as a system of government or as a school of philosophy, has a definite standard of value, known as Utilitarianism: &amp;quot;the greatest good for the greatest number of people.&amp;quot; Sin under socialism is anything that undermines this. Theoretically, sin might also include ''conspicuous consumption'' at a level beyond that attainable by &amp;quot;the average person.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Environmentalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Environmentalism]] also has a standard of value: ''the good of the planet as a wild system.'' Anything that harms the earth or makes it less wild is sinful in this system. The controversy surrounding [[global warming]] is, at root, a controversy about environmentalism as a source of moral values, and the allegation that humans in general, and/or some humans in particular, have transgressed against the environmentalist moral standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some religious and philosophical traditions consider sin to be a deliberate act; others say that it can be merely a mistake. Some say that reconciliation for sin requires a certain work; others that reconciliation is by the grace of [[God]] (or, for some, a cult leader), and still others (most notably the Objectivists) say that reconciliation is not required, except perhaps to any particular affronted person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned, [[atheism|atheists]] do not lack a concept of sin (though they might not call it by that name). But ''amoral'' individuals, if such exist, cannot understand sin, because sin presupposes a moral code that someone might breach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://creationwiki.org/Sin Sin] by [[CreationWiki]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.oca.org Orthodox Church in America]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sin]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom_of_speech&amp;diff=374248</id>
		<title>Freedom of speech</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom_of_speech&amp;diff=374248"/>
		<updated>2008-01-18T04:32:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Konserve: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Freedom of speech''' in American law refers to the recognition by the Founders that government interference in the reporting of facts and expression of opinions in lectures, speeches, sermons, street harangues and private conversation frequently does more harm than good. They therefore prevented Congress from enacting any law that would curtail this freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As originally intended, the freedom of speech never meant a perversion of conventions of polite society. You can't insult someone or disturb a religious service with impunity, for example. And of course deliberately creating a panic by falsely shouting fire in crowded theatre is no more a freedom of speech issue than [[incitement to riot]]. The principle refers to what you can say, not how or when you can say it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American concept of verbal freedom contrasted sharply with that of England and other monarchies of the time, where to make a disloyal public statement was punished as [[treason]]. [[Communist]] countries in modern times, likewise, define treason or [[sedition]] as any criticism of government policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1734, John Peter Zenger, the owner of the New York Weekly Journal, published a series of articles critical of the royal governor of New York. Zenger was charged with criminal libel. At trial, the defense showed that the criticisms of the governor were true, and argued that no one should be punished for truthful criticism of public officials. The jury found Zenger “not guilty.” Ever since, the case has stood as an early American assertion that freedom of press is, and ought to be, a principle of law. [http://usinfo.state.gov/dd/democracy_dialogues/freedom_speech/free_speech_essay.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://usinfo.state.gov/dd/democracy_dialogues/freedom_speech/free_speech_essay.html Free Speech in America - An Overview&lt;br /&gt;
By Robert S. Barker, Duquesne University]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:law]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Constitution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Konserve</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>