<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=KurtCobain</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=KurtCobain"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/KurtCobain"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T12:07:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Can_conservapedia_become_the_next_Wikipedia,_is_this_good_or_bad&amp;diff=774583</id>
		<title>Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Can_conservapedia_become_the_next_Wikipedia,_is_this_good_or_bad&amp;diff=774583"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:13:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: Replaced content with 'no, good'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;no, good&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_Conservapedia_a_%27Trustworthy_Encyclopedia%27%3F&amp;diff=774582</id>
		<title>Debate:Is Conservapedia a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia'?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_Conservapedia_a_%27Trustworthy_Encyclopedia%27%3F&amp;diff=774582"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:12:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: Replaced content with 'no'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;no&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lynx&amp;diff=774581</id>
		<title>Lynx</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lynx&amp;diff=774581"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:08:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Lynx.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Lynx]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''For the plain text web browser, please see [[Lynx (web browser)]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''lynx''' (''Lynx canadensis'') is a [[carnivorous]] mammal that is a member of the Felidae family. The lynx lives in the northern forests of [[NoI am my own parasite&lt;br /&gt;
I don't need a host to live&lt;br /&gt;
We feed off of each other&lt;br /&gt;
We can share our endorphins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doll steak&lt;br /&gt;
Test meat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look on the bright side is suicide&lt;br /&gt;
Lost eyesight I'm on your side&lt;br /&gt;
Angel left wing, right wing, broken wing&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of iron and not sleeping&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I own my own pet virus&lt;br /&gt;
I get to pet and name her&lt;br /&gt;
Her milk is my shit&lt;br /&gt;
My shit it is her milk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Test meat&lt;br /&gt;
Doll steak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look on the bright side is suicide&lt;br /&gt;
Lost eyesight I'm on your side&lt;br /&gt;
Angel left wing, right wing, broken wing&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of iron and not sleeping&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doll steak&lt;br /&gt;
Test meat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look on the bright side is suicide&lt;br /&gt;
Lost eyesight I'm on your side&lt;br /&gt;
Angel left wing, right wing, broken wing&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of iron and not sleeping&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protector of the kennel&lt;br /&gt;
Ectoplasma, ectoskeletal&lt;br /&gt;
Obituary birthday&lt;br /&gt;
Your scent is still here in my place of recovery&lt;br /&gt;
© PRIMARY WAVE TUNES; THE END OF MUSIC;&lt;br /&gt;
rth America]], [[Europe]], and [[Asia]] and is a solitary cat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/lynx.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb_zl_felines}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North America]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Europe]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_v._Wheeler&amp;diff=774580</id>
		<title>United States v. Wheeler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_v._Wheeler&amp;diff=774580"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:08:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In '''''United States v. Wheeler''''', 435 U.S. 313, 323-324 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes have a sovereign right that is &amp;quot;inherent&amp;quot;, which includes the right to prosecute tribal members for crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This power, hoBroken heart and broken bones&lt;br /&gt;
Think of how a castrated horse feels&lt;br /&gt;
One more quirky cliche'd phrase&lt;br /&gt;
You're the one I wanna refill&lt;br /&gt;
wever, is not immune to abrogation by Congress.  ''Id.'' at 323 (&amp;quot;the sufferance of Congress&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Indian Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gestation&amp;diff=774579</id>
		<title>Gestation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gestation&amp;diff=774579"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:06:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Gestation''' is the period of time during which an [[embryo]] develops before being born.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With Biology''. Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[maFace to face, with an unamed mouth&lt;br /&gt;
Hey! Hey! Heyyyy! Hey! hey! Heyyyy!&lt;br /&gt;
Feel the spirit form, in his eyes was loving for&lt;br /&gt;
And his lion's were raging high, hunts himself &amp;amp; fears his ripemmals]] the period of gestation can range from as short as 15 days for a Golden [[Hamster]] to as long as 645 days for an [[Elephant]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://encarta.msn.com/media_701500881_761572784_-1_1/Average_Animal_Gestation_Periods_and_Incubation_Times.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reproduction]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franchise_Tax_Bd._v._Alcan_Aluminium&amp;diff=774578</id>
		<title>Franchise Tax Bd. v. Alcan Aluminium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franchise_Tax_Bd._v._Alcan_Aluminium&amp;diff=774578"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:06:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In '''''Franchise Tax Bd. v. Alcan Aluminium''''', 493 U.S. 331 (1990), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[Tax Injunction Act]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This case presented two questions.  First, whether a foreign company, sole shareholder of an [[American]] subsidiary, has standing to challenge in federal court, on Foreign [[Commerce Clause]] grounds, the accounting method by which the State of [[California]] determines the locally taxable income of that subsidiary. Second, whether such a federal action for injunctive and declaratory relief is barred by the [[Tax Injunction Act]], 28 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982 ed.). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court of Appeals for the [[Seventh Circuit]] held that the foreign companies involved in this case had alleged injuries sufficiently diEven if you have, even if you need&lt;br /&gt;
I don't mean to stare, we don't have to breed&lt;br /&gt;
We can plant a house, we can build a tree&lt;br /&gt;
I don't even care, we could have all three&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
rect andEven if you have, even if you need&lt;br /&gt;
I don't mean to stare, we don't have to breed&lt;br /&gt;
We can plant a house, we can build a tree&lt;br /&gt;
I don't even care, we could have all three&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 independent of the injuries to their subsidiaries to confer both Article III and stockholder standing, and that their federal actions were not barred by the [[Tax Injunction Act]] or the principle of comity that underlies that Act. 860 F.2d 688 (1988). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court concluded that there is an [[Article III]] case or controversy, and assumed that respondents have standing as stockholders.  But the Court held that these actions are barred by the [[Tax Injunction Act]], and reversed the decision of the [[Seventh Circuit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice [[Byron White]] wrote the opinion for a unanimous Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:jurisdiction]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franchise_Tax_Bd._v._Alcan_Aluminium&amp;diff=774577</id>
		<title>Franchise Tax Bd. v. Alcan Aluminium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franchise_Tax_Bd._v._Alcan_Aluminium&amp;diff=774577"/>
		<updated>2010-05-02T12:05:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;KurtCobain: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In '''''Franchise Tax Bd. v. Alcan Aluminium''''', 493 U.S. 331 (1990), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[Tax Injunction Act]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This case presented two questions.  First, whether a foreign company, sole shareholder of an [[American]] subsidiary, has standing to challenge in federal court, on Foreign [[Commerce Clause]] grounds, the accounting method by which the State of [[California]] determines the locally taxable income of that subsidiary. Second, whether such a federal action for injunctive and declaratory relief is barred by the [[Tax Injunction Act]], 28 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982 ed.). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court of Appeals for the [[Seventh Circuit]] held that the foreign companies involved in this case had alleged injuries sufficiently direct andEven if you have, even if you need&lt;br /&gt;
I don't mean to stare, we don't have to breed&lt;br /&gt;
We can plant a house, we can build a tree&lt;br /&gt;
I don't even care, we could have all three&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 independent of the injuries to their subsidiaries to confer both Article III and stockholder standing, and that their federal actions were not barred by the [[Tax Injunction Act]] or the principle of comity that underlies that Act. 860 F.2d 688 (1988). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court concluded that there is an [[Article III]] case or controversy, and assumed that respondents have standing as stockholders.  But the Court held that these actions are barred by the [[Tax Injunction Act]], and reversed the decision of the [[Seventh Circuit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice [[Byron White]] wrote the opinion for a unanimous Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:jurisdiction]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KurtCobain</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>