<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=LawrenceA</id>
		<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=LawrenceA"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/LawrenceA"/>
		<updated>2026-06-09T15:17:11Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Slave_Power&amp;diff=557554</id>
		<title>Slave Power</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Slave_Power&amp;diff=557554"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T19:24:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: can't find the subcategory!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Slave Power''' is professor Akhil Reed Amar's pejorative - but deserved, and accurate - description of the corrupting influence that [[slavery]] had on the nascent [[United States of America|American]] [[Republic]]. He references various constitutional structures that either explicitly or implicitly favored the South, and the &amp;quot;slave power&amp;quot; that it represented. The Thirteenth through Fifteenth Amendments represented the final termination of the &amp;quot;slave power&amp;quot; in the United States, after the [[Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Slave_Power&amp;diff=557553</id>
		<title>Slave Power</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Slave_Power&amp;diff=557553"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T19:24:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Slave Power''' is professor Akhil Reed Amar's pejorative - but deserved, and accurate - description of the corrupting influence that [[slavery]] had on the nascent [[United States of America|American]] [[Republic]]. He references various constitutional structures that either explicitly or implicitly favored the South, and the &amp;quot;slave power&amp;quot; that it represented. The Thirteenth through Fifteenth Amendments represented the final termination of the &amp;quot;slave power&amp;quot; in the United States, after the [[Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Slave_Power&amp;diff=557552</id>
		<title>Slave Power</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Slave_Power&amp;diff=557552"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T19:23:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: wanted page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Slave Power''' is professor Akhil Reed Amar's pejorative - but deserved, and accurate - description of the corrupting influence that [[slavery]] had on the nascent [[United States of America|American]] [[Republic]]. He references various constitutional structures that either explicitly or implicitly favored the South, and the &amp;quot;slave power&amp;quot; that it represented. The Thirteenth through Fifteenth Amendments represented the final termination of the &amp;quot;slave power&amp;quot; in the United States, after the [[Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American history]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Unificationism&amp;diff=557286</id>
		<title>Talk:Unificationism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Unificationism&amp;diff=557286"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:53:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as &amp;quot;providing legitimate information&amp;quot;. If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What's &amp;quot;94% voluntary dropout rate&amp;quot; mean? Does it mean that only 6% of the Church is left, or that 94% of dropouts are voluntary? I'm confused.-[[User:LawrenceA|LawrenceA]] 10:53, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nonviolent_activism&amp;diff=557284</id>
		<title>Nonviolent activism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nonviolent_activism&amp;diff=557284"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:50:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''nonviolent activist''' refuses to meet violence with violence but instead seeks to make those who are violent recognize that he and they share the same humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gandhi put this philosophy into practice by developing a technique of militant nonviolence that was intended to force the British to see the humanity of those they oppressed, and the inhumanity of their own actions. [http://www.transparencynow.com/news/preface.htm The News Media's Effort to Hide from Significant Truth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonviolence can take the form of non-cooperation: &amp;quot;Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Attributed to [[Gandhi]], http://quotationsbook.com/quote/17437/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pacifism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nonviolent_activism&amp;diff=557281</id>
		<title>Nonviolent activism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nonviolent_activism&amp;diff=557281"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:49:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: Merge&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{merge|noncooperation}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''nonviolent activist''' refuses to meet violence with violence but instead seeks to make those who are violent recognize that he and they share the same humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gandhi put this philosophy into practice by developing a technique of militant nonviolence that was intended to force the British to see the humanity of those they oppressed, and the inhumanity of their own actions. [http://www.transparencynow.com/news/preface.htm The News Media's Effort to Hide from Significant Truth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good. - [[Gandhi]]}} &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://quotationsbook.com/quote/17437/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pacifism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Noncooperation_with_evil&amp;diff=557279</id>
		<title>Noncooperation with evil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Noncooperation_with_evil&amp;diff=557279"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:47:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: merging&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{speedy}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ignorance_and_disbelief&amp;diff=557275</id>
		<title>Ignorance and disbelief</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ignorance_and_disbelief&amp;diff=557275"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:44:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: category&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ignorance and disbelief''' are often mistaken for one another, particularly by liberals. They frequently claim that Christian disbelief in [[Evolution]] indicates ignorance. This is odd, in view of the enormous number of practicing scientists who disagree with the theory. How can 45% of all scientists be &amp;quot;ignorant&amp;quot;? [http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More likely, they are using the word ''ignorant'' as an epithet; they are just engaging in name-calling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disagreeing with a theory is not the same thing as &amp;quot;being ignorant&amp;quot;, but someone who applies that label is like someone who disagrees with [[President Bush]]'s policies and so calls him &amp;quot;an [[idiot]]&amp;quot;. Taken literally, it's obviously untrue, but liberals are accustomed to having people avoid analyzing what they say closely. Perhaps they think the general public are morons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In science, the cure for ignorance is to be taught the leading theories, along with the opposing theories. Then, as an exercise, the students ought to try and determine which is correct. Teaching them only the leading theory a form of [[indoctrination]] (teaching them what to think rather than how to think). Ironically, what liberals accuse Christians of doing is rather what they do themselves. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an argument from ignorance (or [[circular argument]]) to say&lt;br /&gt;
that the evidence leans to evolution. If there is evidence, it ought simply to be given. &lt;br /&gt;
If it's simply enough for a child to understand, then it can even be taught to schoolchildren.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Evolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Submission&amp;diff=557273</id>
		<title>Submission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Submission&amp;diff=557273"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:42:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: category&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Submission''' in [[Islam]] specifically refers to submitting oneself to the will of [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
* In the light and essence of Islam (Submission) and the Quran, there is no war which is holy; this, under any circumstances whatsoever. In fact the whole text of the Quran and the religion of Islam  (Submission) revolves around the concept of peace, not war. To many people's ignorance, Islam  (Submission) is also a word that share the same root of the Arabic word Salaam meaning peace. To Islam (Submission), war is unholy, Jihad must mean anything but holy war.  [http://www.submission.org/muhammed/jihad.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Confusion has arisen in political discourse because the Arabic word for submission is ''[[jihad]]'', which is more often used to refer to a divinely ordained &amp;quot;[[holy war]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Islam]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marriage_in_the_Unification_Church&amp;diff=557270</id>
		<title>Talk:Marriage in the Unification Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marriage_in_the_Unification_Church&amp;diff=557270"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:40:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;It's easy to see how the UC view of marriage contrasts with the &amp;quot;[[gay marriage]]&amp;quot; idea of homosexuality proponents. Besides the fact that UC marriage is clearly limited to [[heterosexual marriage|one man and one woman]], its purpose is for the larger whole. While [[gay rights]] activists pursue the &amp;quot;same privileges&amp;quot; for homosexual couples as for real married couples, they completely ignore their responsibility to society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the entire [[gay marriage]] campaign is a sham. Homosexual couples do not practice monogamy or chastity. They just live together like any other unmarried couple. Domestic violence and cheating are even worse in the homosexual community than in the heterosexual world. Around 5 to 10 times worse, if I recall the statistics correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the UC calls them out on this, they respond with outrage - rather than doing or saying anything to disprove the charges. Their militancy will only increase if [[hate speech]] laws are passed in the US. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose you insult a man's wife, and he hits you (knocking you down). It would be hard for you to press charges against him for assualt (see [[fighting words]]. Imagine that you saw a same-sex embrace or kiss in public and made a disparaging comment. If an argument ensued, and you were assaulted, your assailant would have the defense of calling your comment a &amp;quot;[[hate crime]]&amp;quot;. Not to say that every gay-straight assault would be legal. But it would certainly have a chilling effect on comments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It might even become illegal to make a public denunciation of homosexuality in general, even from a church pulpit. That would be the beginning of the end for American society. It would only spiral down into hell, like Sodom and Gomorrah.{{unsigned|Ed Poor}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, regarding your working knowledge of the law, it is really quite slim. (1) Insulting someone's wife is not a defense to assault. The fighting words doctrine - as constituting an independent offense, unprotected by free speech - has long since died out. While the laws remain on the books, they're unprosecuted and haven't been validated by the Supreme Court since the 1940s. Similarly, fighting words haven't been used as a defense to an assault prosecution in fifty plus years. If someone called your wife ugly, and you hit him, you WOULD face an assault prosecution, and the fighting words doctrine would NOT save you.&lt;br /&gt;
:Further to this point, the first amendment continues to protect your right to make &amp;quot;disparaging comments&amp;quot; about same-sex couples, even in public. Speech is not - nor has it ever been, in modern times - a hate crime. Read ''R.A.V. v. City of Saint Paul'' if you don't believe me. Hate crime legislation - which actually doesn't yet cover crimes against gay men &amp;amp; women - only applies to ''actual crimes,'' and a speech act isn't a crime except under very limited circumstances (fire in a crowded theater, burning your draft card, &amp;quot;let's kill the president,&amp;quot; etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
:It strikes me that you're speaking from the general conservative fearmongering about how gay rights threatens free speech. You should know that that fear has no basis in fact, nor will it ever. The idea that &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot; should be a crime has been firmly repudiated in the United States, as barred by the First Amendment. Please read up on the law and don't trust Ann Coulter &amp;amp; Human Events to get it right ;-)-[[User:LawrenceA|LawrenceA]] 10:39, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marriage_in_the_Unification_Church&amp;diff=557268</id>
		<title>Talk:Marriage in the Unification Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marriage_in_the_Unification_Church&amp;diff=557268"/>
				<updated>2008-11-14T15:39:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;It's easy to see how the UC view of marriage contrasts with the &amp;quot;[[gay marriage]]&amp;quot; idea of homosexuality proponents. Besides the fact that UC marriage is clearly limited to [[heterosexual marriage|one man and one woman]], its purpose is for the larger whole. While [[gay rights]] activists pursue the &amp;quot;same privileges&amp;quot; for homosexual couples as for real married couples, they completely ignore their responsibility to society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the entire [[gay marriage]] campaign is a sham. Homosexual couples do not practice monogamy or chastity. They just live together like any other unmarried couple. Domestic violence and cheating are even worse in the homosexual community than in the heterosexual world. Around 5 to 10 times worse, if I recall the statistics correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the UC calls them out on this, they respond with outrage - rather than doing or saying anything to disprove the charges. Their militancy will only increase if [[hate speech]] laws are passed in the US. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose you insult a man's wife, and he hits you (knocking you down). It would be hard for you to press charges against him for assualt (see [[fighting words]]. Imagine that you saw a same-sex embrace or kiss in public and made a disparaging comment. If an argument ensued, and you were assaulted, your assailant would have the defense of calling your comment a &amp;quot;[[hate crime]]&amp;quot;. Not to say that every gay-straight assault would be legal. But it would certainly have a chilling effect on comments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It might even become illegal to make a public denunciation of homosexuality in general, even from a church pulpit. That would be the beginning of the end for American society. It would only spiral down into hell, like Sodom and Gomorrah.{{unsigned|Ed Poor}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, regarding your working knowledge of the law is really quite slim. (1) Insulting someone's wife is not a defense to assault. The fighting words doctrine - as constituting an independent offense, unprotected by free speech - has long since died out. While the laws remain on the books, they're unprosecuted and haven't been validated by the Supreme Court since the 1940s. Similarly, fighting words haven't been used as a defense to an assault prosecution in fifty plus years. If someone called your wife ugly, and you hit him, you WOULD face an assault prosecution, and the fighting words doctrine would NOT save you.&lt;br /&gt;
:Further to this point, the first amendment continues to protect your right to make &amp;quot;disparaging comments&amp;quot; about same-sex couples, even in public. Speech is not - nor has it ever been, in modern times - a hate crime. Read ''R.A.V. v. City of Saint Paul'' if you don't believe me. Hate crime legislation - which actually doesn't yet cover crimes against gay men &amp;amp; women - only applies to ''actual crimes,'' and a speech act isn't a crime except under very limited circumstances (fire in a crowded theater, burning your draft card, &amp;quot;let's kill the president,&amp;quot; etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
:It strikes me that you're speaking from the general conservative fearmongering about how gay rights threatens free speech. You should know that that fear has no basis in fact, nor will it ever. The idea that &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot; should be a crime has been firmly repudiated in the United States, as barred by the First Amendment. Please read up on the law and don't trust Ann Coulter &amp;amp; Human Events to get it right ;-)-[[User:LawrenceA|LawrenceA]] 10:39, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=556555</id>
		<title>Liberal bigotry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=556555"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T22:50:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Bigotry''' is the expression of [[hatred]] or [[aggression]] towards those who are different. Examples are: [[racism]], [[religious intolerance]], [[homophobia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bigotry is a common and indeed a defining -  characteristic of [[atheists]], [[liberals]], and [[homosexuals]], who react violently to any who disagree with their views&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_should_atheists_be_barred_from_Conservapedia%3F&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberally indoctrinated students threaten and verbally abuse a student wearing a McCain T-Shirt &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-13-nov13,0,2881384.column?page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Homosexuals attack free speech of the faithful &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mormon-stars-face-backlash-after-gay-marriage-ban-1003967.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Homosexuals threaten the faithful with violence &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80711&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Homosexual pornographic hacking of a Mormon website in response to [[Proposition 8]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081110hate.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal censorship of conservative speech, violating [[First Amendment]] rights. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/11/11/buffalo-news-supporting-silencing-righty-radio-talkers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Homosexual bigots and the [[ACLU]] attempt to stifle a celebration with a Christian band. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80649&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal [[New York Times]] correspondents bigoted, profane writing. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2008/11/03/ny-times-reporters-iat-again-facebook-miller-says-nb-contributor-vadum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal [[Paul Krugman]] calls [[Republican Party]] a haven for racists &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/11/03/krugman-gop-haven-racists-reactionaries&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal Charles Karel Bouley calls for the death of [[Joe the Plumber]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kerry-picket/2008/11/02/lib-radio-host-karel-calls-joe-wurzelbachers-death-air-obscenity-laced&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* An abortion doctor killed by &amp;quot;pro-life&amp;quot; activists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.now.org/nnt/winter-99/aborvio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:psychology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ronald_Wilson_Reagan&amp;diff=556518</id>
		<title>Ronald Wilson Reagan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ronald_Wilson_Reagan&amp;diff=556518"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T22:20:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: wandalism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{President&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Aaag.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=40&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=January 20, 1981&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=January 20, 1989&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://home.comcast.net/~sharonday7/Presidents/AP060301.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|vp=George H. W. Bush&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Jimmy Carter&lt;br /&gt;
|next=George H. W. Bush&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=February 6, 1911&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Tampico, Illinois, USA&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=June 5, 2004&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=Bel Air, California&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Jane Wyman&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2= Nancy Davis Reagan&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Presbyterian&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ronald Wilson Reagan '''(February 6, 1911- June 5, 2004), [[United States]] President and considered by some to be one of the greatest American Presidents, was the 40th [[President of the United States of America]] severing two terms from 1981 to 1989, following [[Democrat]] [[Jimmy Carter]] and preceding [[Republican]] [[George H. W. Bush]]. Ronald Reagan is credited with leading America peacefully through the Cold War, lowering taxes, promoting a free economy, and helping bring about the end of [[communism]] in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. He was known affectionately to Americans as &amp;quot;The Gipper,&amp;quot; harking back to a film where he was cast as All-American George Gip.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200310290853.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In one of his most famous challenges to Soviet communism in Europe, Reagan gave a speech in front of the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin in which he said, &amp;quot;Mr. [[Gorbachev]], tear down this wall.&amp;quot; Reagan's economic policies became known as &amp;quot;Reaganomics&amp;quot; based on the idea that tax cuts will spur savings and investment. Reagan was strongly opposed to the concept of big government, advocating a reduction in the size and budget of the federal government. During his terms in office, he faced a divided Congress split between Republican and Democratic control for six of his eight years as President. Reagan was known for forging alliances with the Democratic [[Speaker of the House]], [[Tip O'Neill]], among others, to effectively pass legislation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan was born and raised in Illinois and attended Eureka College, where he quickly developed a reputation as a &amp;quot;jack of all trades&amp;quot;, excelling in the areas of [[athletics]] and theater. In his first year at Eureka, where Reagan earned a degree in economics, the president of the college tried to cut back the faculty. Reagan immediately helped organize a student strike. Reagan enlisted in the military during [[World War II]], but his eyesight was not good enough for combat duty. He used his acting skills to make military training films and promote the sale of War Bonds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/05/reagan.obit/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan became a radio sports announcer, and then a famous actor, leading the [[Screen Actors Guild]]. Ironically, Reagan was thus the only president to lead a [[labor union]], traditionally considered bastions of liberalism. Reagan himself was a registered Democrat well into the 1950s, but as head of the Screen Actors Guild he fought against Communist infiltration. Peggy Noonan wrote, &amp;quot;Even in his zeal to purge the communist influence from [[Hollywood]], he fought those who engaged in witch hunts and defended those who had been falsely accused of involvement.&amp;quot; Reagan met his second wife, actress [[Nancy Davis]], when she came to Reagan for help as she was concerned because another actress with the same name ended up on the &amp;quot;black list.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F70F1FF9395C17728DDDAF0A94D8415B8084F1D3 The Biggest Role of Nancy's Life]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DavidLimbaugh/2001/11/17/noonan_when_character_was_king]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Governor of California==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1966, he was elected the 33rd Governor of California, succeeding [[Pat Brown]]. In 1970, he was re-elected. But in 1974, he chose not to seek a third term and was succeeded by [[Jerry Brown]]. Events and achievements during his terms included:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Called in the [[National Guard]] to restore order when People's Park protesters began attacking police, and restored order to California's chaotic university campuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://police.berkeley.edu/about_UCPD/ucpdhistory.html#anchor178048&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reagan authorized the use of violent force against the peaceful protesters in Berkeley,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;University of California, Berkeley - Police Department. [http://police.berkeley.edu/about_UCPD/ucpdhistory.html#anchor178048 History Topic: People's Park] August 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; saying, &amp;quot;If there has to be a bloodbath, then let's get it over with.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''San Francisco Chronicle'', early morning edition, May 15 1969&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the resulting chaos, police fired buckshot into the crowd, fatally wounding one bystander and blinding another, and injuring hundreds of others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Led a comprehensive and far-reaching revision of California's massive public assistance programs, actually increasing benefits to the truly needy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Worked well with the Democrats to forge consensus on a variety of issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Opposed the Dos Rios Dam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidency (1981-1989)==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Reaganfamily-red-rr-.jpg|left|thumb|275px|President &amp;amp; Mrs. Reagan with their extended family.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1968, Reagan was a late candidate for president in the Republican primaries. However, [[Richard Nixon]] easily won that nomination. In 1976, Reagan challenged [[Gerald Ford]] for the Republican nomination, before withdrawing his name from consideration. Reagan knew if he continued, he would take the nomination away from Ford, and forever be branded as a Party spoiler. This he did not want, so he signaled his wish to be removed from consideration, and gave a very effective speech at the convention in support of Ford. Then, in 1980, he beat [[George H. W. Bush]] in the Republican primaries, and went on to oppose [[Jimmy Carter]] (incumbent) in the general election with George Herbert Walker Bush as his running mate. A poor economy and the incumbent's failing to deal with several international crises aided Reagan. As he put it, &amp;quot;I'm told I can't use the word depression. Well, I'll tell you the definition. A recession is when your neighbor loses his job; depression is when you lose your job. Recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.&amp;quot; In the general election he received 50.75% of the popular vote, beating Jimmy Carter by almost 10%, and also won 90.9% of the electoral vote.  Riding his strong showing, the Republicans won enough seats in the United States Senate to take control of that chamber for the first time in decades.  The results were a shock as polling had been showing a close contest heading into the day of the election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once in office, Reagan showed he was playing hardball. When the Federal [[Air Traffic Controllers]] struck illegally, Reagan gave them 48 hours before he fired all who hadn't gone back to work (11,359).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Reagan won 49 out of 50 states' electoral votes, and the largest public vote in almost 100 years, 58.77%. During his second term, he helped end the [[Cold War]] with the help of [[Margaret Thatcher]] and some assistance from [[Pope John Paul II]] and [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] by recognizing the weakness of the Soviet economy, and spent them out of existence by not being able to compete with defense spending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/agathon/2661_8.htm#7867The Demise of the Brezhnev Doctrine and the Dismantling of the Warsaw Treaty Organization], &amp;quot; The party leadership gradually came to understand that the sustaining of domestic [[perestroika]] in the USSR was endangered by the inability of an inefficient economy to carry the burdens of excessive overseas military spending in the form of the [[Warsaw Pact]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 30, 1981 there was an unsuccessful assassination attempt on President Reagan at the Washington Hilton Hotel in [[Washington, D.C.]] John Hinckley, Jr. shot Reagan and injured 3 others. Reagan survived and was able to recover quickly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Domestic policy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Reagan_desk.jpg‎|left|thumb|275px|President Reagan working at his desk in the oval office, 05/06/82.]] As President, Ronald Reagan enacted his theory of &amp;quot;Reaganomics.&amp;quot; His four major policy objectives were the following&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Reaganomics.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reduce the growth of government spending.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reduce the marginal tax rates on income from both labor and capital.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reduce government regulation of the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Control the money supply to reduce inflation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fueled by an over spending [[Congress]] that steadfastly refused Reagan's budget proposals, the national debt increased 160% during his two terms in office. However, the economic growth that resulted from tax cuts made deficits as a percentage of [[GDP]] lower than what they had been in during the previous decade of stagflation. The period of high [[inflation]] and [[unemployment]] when Reagan took office was over after eight years of his Presidency. In 1986 Reagan signed the [[Tax Reform Act]], which obtained an overhaul of the income tax code and eliminated many deductions and exempted millions of people with low incomes. The [[income tax]] rates of the top personal tax bracket dropped from 70% to 28% in 7 years. At the end of his administration, the Nation was enjoying its longest recorded period of peacetime prosperity without [[recession]] or [[depression]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/rr40.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Supreme Court Appointments===&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Reagan had maintained the promise he made in his 1980 presidential campaign to appoint the first women to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]]. On July 7, 1981, President Reagan nominated Superior Court judge [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, replacing the retiring [[Potter Stewart]]. There were some concerns by social conservatives and Pro-Life groups over whether she would overturn [[Roe v. Wade]]. Nevertheless, she was confirmed by the Senate by a 99–0 vote on September 21 and took her seat September 25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1987, Reagan nominated [[Washington]] circuit judge, former Solicitor General and former acting [[Attorney General]] [[Robert Bork]] to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice [[Lewis Powell]]. [[Senate]] [[Liberal]]s attacked Bork as being too [[conservative]]. Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] (D-[[Massachusetts]]), criticized him, saying,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the Government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is -- and is often the only -- protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE5DF1E3EF936A35754C0A961948260&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kennedy had voted for Bork's appointment to the Appelate court just a few years before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 23, 1987, the U.S. Senate rejected Bork's confirmation on a 42-58 vote. [[Anthony Kennedy]] was then nominated for the seat, where he was confirmed on a 97-0 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War on Drugs===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Reagan declared a &amp;quot;war on [[drugs]]&amp;quot;, which would be policies put forward by the United States and other countries to reduce illegal drug trade. In 1986, President Reagan signed the very prominent Anti-Drug Abuse Act which granted $97 million to build new [[prison]]s, $200 million for drug [[education]] and $241 million for treatment. Overall, $1.7 billion to fight the drug crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/cron/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; First Lady [[Nancy Reagan]] started a slogan, &amp;quot;Just Say No&amp;quot; to drug use. The term was used in [[television]] advertising, and today there are many &amp;quot;Just Say No&amp;quot; drug clinics. As a result of the policies, [[marijuana]] use went from thirty-three percent of high-school seniors in 1980 to twelve percent in 1991.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/interviews/kleber.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign policy==&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan's 1983 [[Strategic Defense Initiative]] became popularly known as &amp;quot;[[Star Wars]]&amp;quot;, the name given to it by critics because they thought it was pure fantasy like the popular [[George Lucas]] films. This plan was never fully instituted. Although billions of dollars was spent on development, no space-based missile defense was tested successfully during Reagan's terms in office.  However, technologies were developed from the program that had practical uses in society.  For instance lasik eye surgery came about through developments generated by the SDI program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While many academics claim SDI gave the United States a large amount of leverage in its standoff with the [[Soviet Union]], many political scientists and historians believe that Star Wars played a secondary role in the calculus of Soviet policy-making, where internal structural problems were paramount. However, it should be noted that the threat the Soviet Union felt from the initiative was instrumental in making them step-up negotiations, according to many involved with diplomacy at the time and can be seen by following Gorbachev's repeated public insistences that the SDI program be discontinued. [[Henry Kissinger]] wrote: ''I know it's an axiomatic view of the Left around the world that missile defense is sinful, and that it's desirable to keep each nation as vulnerable as possible. But that's a debatable premise. The U.S. must defend itself against ''whoever'' has missiles that would threaten the United States. And you don't have to be able to name an enemy.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.doublestandards.org/dreifus1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:300px-ReaganBerlinWall.jpg‎|right|275px|thumb|&amp;quot;Mr.Gorbachev, tear down this wall!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan was president at the time of the shooting down of [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] by the Soviets on September 1, 1983. He termed the shootown of an innocent straying passenger plane with 269 passengers and crew a &amp;quot;massacre&amp;quot; and the ensuing rage over the tragedy both world-wide and in the U.S. provided support for the deployment of cruise and Pershing ll missiles in West Europe- just six minutes flying time from Moscow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon his death, Margaret Thatcher commented: ''As Prime Minister, I worked closely with Ronald Reagan for eight of the most important years of all our lives. We talked regularly both before and after his presidency. And I have had time and cause to reflect on what made him a great president. Ronald Reagan knew his own mind. He had firm principles - and, I believe, right ones. He expounded them clearly, he acted upon them decisively. When the world threw problems at the White House, he was not baffled, or disorientated, or overwhelmed. He knew almost instinctively what to do. When his aides were preparing option papers for his decision, they were able to cut out entire rafts of proposals that they knew 'the Old Man' would never wear. When his allies came under Soviet or domestic pressure, they could look confidently to Washington for firm leadership. And when his enemies tested American resolve, they soon discovered that his resolve was firm and unyielding. Yet his ideas, though clear, were never simplistic. He saw the many sides of truth. Yes, he warned that the Soviet Union had an insatiable drive for military power and territorial expansion; but he also sensed it was being eaten away by systemic failures impossible to reform. Yes, he did not shrink from denouncing Moscow's 'evil empire'. But he realized that a man of goodwill might nonetheless emerge from within its dark corridors. So the President resisted Soviet expansion and pressed down on Soviet weakness at every point until the day came when communism began to collapse beneath the combined weight of these pressures and its own failures. And when a man of goodwill did emerge from the ruins, President Reagan stepped forward to shake his hand and to offer sincere cooperation. Nothing was more typical of Ronald Reagan than that large-hearted magnanimity - and nothing was more American.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://reagan2020.us/eulogies/thatcher.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soviet Union===&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after taking office in 1981 Reagan issued National Security Decision Directive 11-82, (NSDD 11-82), that explicitly made U.S. defense spending a form of economic warfare against the Soviets. The directive was known more unofficially as the Reagan Initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Photo 4 250.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Reagan and Gorbachev at Reykjavik]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United States would &amp;quot;exploit and demonstrate the enduring economic advantages of the West to develop a variety of [arms] systems that are difficult for the Soviets to counter, impose disproportionate costs, open up new areas of major military competition and obsolesce previous Soviet investment or employ sophisticated strategic options to achieve this end. Reagan's [[Strategic Defense Initiative]] (SDI), or &amp;quot;Star Wars&amp;quot; as the media referred to it, was a costly high tech research and development program designed to make arms spending a &amp;quot;rising burden on the Soviet economy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Schweizer , [http://www.reason.com/news/show/28929.html ''Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism''], New York: Doubleday, 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Reagan Initiative was also concerned with aiding nations in active conflict with the Soviet Union. One such group was the [[mujahideen]] of Afghanistan who were given anti-aircraft missiles to fight the Soviet invaders. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A report by the CIA of the critical domestic economic problems and social discontent Soviet [[CPSU]] General Secretary Gorbachev provided a look what the sources of his principal dilemma-the very reforms needed to deal with the problems would threaten preservation of the [[nomenklatura]] and put at risk Gorbachev’s ability to maintain the power to bring about [[Perestroika]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CIA Assessments of the Soviet Union: [https://www.cia.gov/csi/monograph/russia/enter.html Chapter 5, Enter Gorbachev ], Douglas J. MacEachin, CIA Publications, 1996.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gorbachev requested a Summit with Reagan in Reykjavik in October 1986 to discuss the stresses competition from the Reagan’s defense posture was having on Soviet military spending and economy, and Gorbachev’s ability to carryout his plans of restructuring Communist control. Gorbachev told the [[Politburo]] in preparation for the Summit, &amp;quot;Our goal is to prevent the next round of arms race. If we do not do this ... will pulled into an arms race beyond our power, and we will lose this race, for we are presently at the limit of out capabilities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notes of Politburo Meeting 4 October 1986, [http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/22/documents/reykjavik/ Gorbachev's instructions for the group preparing for Reykjavik]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the late 80s, the Soviet Union began unilateral force cuts and troop withdrawals from Eastern Europe, and by May 1989 an unprecedented series of disclosures by senior Soviet officials revealed actual reductions in defense spending for the 1986-1990 and 1991-1995 Five Year Plan periods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Christopher Wilkinson NATO Review, [http://www.nato.int/docu/review/1991/9102-4.htm Soviet Defense Spending], NATO's Economics Directorate No. 2 - April 1991, Vol. 39 p. 16-22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Genrikh Grofimenko, a former adviser to [[Leonid Brezhnev]], said &amp;quot;Ninety-nine percent of the Russian people believe that [the US] won the Cold War because of your president's insistence on SDI&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Schweizer, ''Reagan’s War''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Containment]] and the [[Iran]]ian initiative===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C26887-26.jpg|right|250px|thumb|President Reagan being sworn in for second term in the rotunda at the U.S. Capitol, 1/21/85]] In 1985, after Reagan won reelection to his second term, the focus turned from reviving the domestic economy to several foreign policy matters which had been lingering throughout the decade. One such matter involved Iran, a long time ally of the Western Allies since 1941 that had experienced an Islamic Revolution in 1979 after President Carter announced [[Human Rights]] had superseded [[Containment]] as the primary focus of American foreign policy{{fact}}. Since 1980, Iran had been enmeshed in a brutal trench war with neighboring Iraq which was emerging as a potent military threat in the region to other allies. Members of the National Security Council staff, along with CIA Director [[William Casey]], persuaded Reagan much could be gained and several problems could be addressed simultaneously with an overture to Iran to restore relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of the plan was fourfold:&lt;br /&gt;
#Take steps to restore good relations with the [[Islamic Republic of Iran]] which was becoming increasingly hostile to the West; &lt;br /&gt;
#Take measures to convince Iran that Israel could become a friend and ally;&lt;br /&gt;
#Insurance against Iraq becoming too strong which would become a threat to [[Kuwait]] or [[Saudi Arabia]]; &lt;br /&gt;
#Provide funding for other operations to continue the policy of containment in the Western Hemisphere, most notably [[Nicaragua]], and the violence the Soviet/Cuban/Nicaragua connection was creating in [[El Salvador]] and [[Honduras]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were humanitarian aspects to the proposal as well; (1) the [[Iran-Iraq War]] had stalemated for nearly six years and Reagan was advised that he was in the unique position as President to help facilitate bringing a senseless war with much suffering to an end; (2) the suffering of the people of the Central American Republics at the hands of Soviet-inspired subversion which had in the decade of the '80s established a beachhead in North America; (3) Iran perhaps could be persuaded to use its good offices to influence hostage takers in [[Lebanon]] who had held several Western prisoners, many of them Christian Missionaries, for several years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reports had filtered back to Reagan that children as young as nine years old had been used by Iran to clear minefields.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), ''Iraqi Retreats, 1982-84''], Globalsecurity.org, retrieved 20 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In weighing Iraq's delicate Sunni/Shia balance and the growing threat of Iranian-sponsored terrorism, the NSC staff and Casey recognized the dangers of an Iraqi collapse as well as the urgent need to dissuade Iran from continuing its ruthless and inhumane tactics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/iraq53.pdf NSDD 139, 5 April 1984].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Boland amendment]], a Vietnam era-style Congressional impingement on the legitimate foreign policy prerogatives of the Executive via the power of the purse, was used to deny Reagan's recommitment to the [[Truman Doctrine]] which had been adhered to by every President, Democratic and Republican alike since Truman, with the exception of [[President Carter]] whose [[human rights]] policy had brought one of the active belligerents, the [[Ayatollah Khomeini]], to power{{fact}}. In three of the active Soviet fronts, [[Afghanistan]], [[Nicaragua]], and [[El Salvador]], some Congressional Democratic leaders were openly sympathetic to Soviet foreign policy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/591eifow.asp ''One Weekend in April, A Long Time Ago ... What John Kerry thought about the Sandinista in Nicaragua''], Hugh Hewitt, The Weekly Standard, 09/09/2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.archive.org/web/20060331222819/www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/6/7/234527.shtml ''Kerry: 'I'm Proud I Stood Against Reagan''] Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff, 7 June 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  So the decision was made to fund [[Containment]] of Soviet objectives on an active front in North America with sales of TOW missiles to Iran.  Israel provided the TOWs because the [[Boland Amendment]] forbade direct US funding and it was a welcome opportunity for Israel to build bridges to a much needed friend in the Middle East.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The operation was known as the &amp;quot;[[Iran-Contra affair]].&amp;quot; After word got out about the operation in November 1986, investigations were made, leading to the convictions of several members of the Reagan administration. President Reagan himself testified before the Tower Commission that he had poor recollection of the details of the operation due in part to the heavy pain medications he had been on in that period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cold War victory===&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan is credited for ending the [[Cold War]] in victory for the United States. Historian Tony Judt in ''Postwar'' credits Soviet leader [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], while the political scientist Jan Kubik presents a viewpoint that credits [[Pope John Paul II]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://praguepost.com/articles/2007/02/28/letters-to-the-editor.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other historians contend structural weaknesses within the Communist bloc meant Reagan's actions were inconsequential to the end of [[communism]]. This is the view adopted by [[Russia]]ns themselves, and many political historians, citing ''[[perestroika]]'' and ''[[glasnost]]'' as beginning an inevitable slow fading of central power, and a collapse by irreconcilable differences between the central Soviet [[Politburo]] and the constituent republics, especially the [[Ukraine]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Remnick, &amp;quot;Lenin's Tomb&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the end, the consensus seems to point to all of the above, that hastened the demise of the Soviet Union; Internal factors, religious pressure brought by the Pope, Gorbachev's &amp;quot;Perestroika&amp;quot; and the united front of Ronald Reagan and [[Margaret Thatcher]], leading [[NATO]] and [[the West]] to embed a [[missile defense system]] in [[Western Europe]], and the economic superiority of [[Capitalism]], which simply out-spent and out-performed that of the Communist one. One thing that cannot be quantified is Reagan's ability to give [[hope]], his never-ending optimism that good would indeed triumph over evil. Many see that as key to bringing extra confidence to those locked behind the &amp;quot;[[Iron Curtain]]&amp;quot; to press even harder for reforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Columnist [[Cal Thomas]] wrote about it like this: ''He proved he was right about the big things. Faced with editorial denunciations at home and massive [[demonstration]]s in [[Europe]] against his plan to put missiles there to offset a [[Soviet threat]], Reagan went ahead and did it anyway. The Soviets could not keep pace with the buildup or Reagan's proposed missile defense system (derided by critics as &amp;quot;[[Star Wars]]&amp;quot;). When those critics could not bring themselves to admit they were wrong, they unpersuasively claimed the Soviet Union fell under its own weight. More accurately, Reagan pushed it onto &amp;quot;the ash heap of history,&amp;quot; with the able assistance of British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and [[Pope John Paul II]]. What Reagan did more than anything else - and it will be his lasting legacy - is replace [[despair]] with hope. Most people, even his detractors, felt a glow from being in his presence. He was the kindest, most gracious president I have met, and I have met them all since JFK. In his presence you felt he was interested in you and not himself. He was a good man.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2004/06/07/ronald_reagans_wonderful_life]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Brian Mulroney]], the Canadian Prime Minister, said of Reagan: ''&amp;quot;Some in the West during the early 1980s believed communism and democracy were equally valid and viable. This was the school of &amp;quot;[[moral equivalence]].&amp;quot; In contrast Ronald Reagan saw [[Soviet communism]] as a menace to be confronted in the genuine belief that its squalid underpinning would fall swiftly to the gathering winds of [[freedom]]. Provided, as he said, that NATO and the [[industrialize]]d democracies stood firm and united. They did. And we know now who was right.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://reagan2020.us/eulogies/mulroney.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Former Reagan speech writer Peggy Noonan paid tribute to the fallen president in a recent ''Wall Street Journal editorial''. In it, Noonan noted: &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan told the truth to a world made weary by lies. He believed truth was the only platform on which a better future could be built. He shocked the world when he called the Soviet Union ‘evil,’ because it was, and an 'empire,' because it was that, too. He never stopped bringing his message to the people of the world, to Europe and China and in the end the Soviet Union. And when it was over, the Berlin Wall had been turned into a million concrete souvenirs, and Soviet communism had fallen. But of course, it didn’t fall. It was pushed. By Mr. Know Nothing Cowboy Gunslinger Dimwit. All presidents should be so stupid.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=1679]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Post-presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:5.jpg|left|thumb|300px|President Bush presents the Medal of Freedom Award to Former President Ronald Reagan in the East Room of the White House, 01/13/93]] Reagan retired to California. He would occasionally involve himself in politics, including a speech at the 1992 Republican National Convention. On January 13, 1993 President George H. W. Bush awarded Reagan the Presidential Medal of Freedom. In 1994, he announced that he had been diagnosed with [[Alzheimer's disease]], a regenerative nerve disorder that annihilates the victim's mental capacity. He died at his Bel-Air home on June 5, 2004 at age 93, making him the second-longest lived president in history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Family==&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan married actress Jane Wyman in 1940 and together they had three children:  [[Maureen Reagan]], [[Michael Reagan]], and [[Christine Reagan]].  Christine was prematurate and died in infancy.  Maureen has passed away from cancer and Michael is a famous conservative talk show host.  Reagan's marriage to Jane ended in divorce in 1948.  In 1952 he married Nancy Davis his wife until the time of his death.  Together they had two children, [[Patti Davis]] and [[Ron Reagan Jr]] both of whom are still living. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Miscellaneous Facts==&lt;br /&gt;
*Reagan was the first and only labor leader and former President of an [[AFL-CIO]] union ever elected US President.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reagan was the first and only divorced president.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reagan was a lifeguard for seven years growing up, and was said to have saved 77 people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2004/reagan/stories/bio.part.one/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Reagan was the first president to break the so-called &amp;quot;[[Curse of Tippecanoe]]&amp;quot;, ie, the first president elected in a twenty year cycle who did not die in office (although an attempt was made on his life in 1981).&lt;br /&gt;
*At 69, Reagan was the oldest man elected to the presidency for a first term.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum is located in Simi Valley, California.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reaganfoundation.org/visitorguide/hours_directions.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Reagan's 1994 announcement that he had Alzheimer's Disease brought large amounts of public attention to the disease.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reagan loved jelly beans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jellybelly-uk.com/pages/q&amp;amp;a/trivia.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The blueberry flavor was made in his honor. [[Jelly Belly]] even created a [http://www.jellybelly-uk.com/pages/q&amp;amp;a/bean_art_gallery.shtml Ronald Reagan [[portraits|portrait]] out of jelly beans].&lt;br /&gt;
*His speech writer [[Peggy Noonan]] is a columnist for the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
*After his death, some of his closest supporters wished to put him on the $10 bill&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://money.cnn.com/2004/06/08/news/economy/reagan_hamilton/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The house we hope to build is not for my generation but for yours. It is your future that matters. And I hope that when you are my age, you will be able to say as I have been able to say: We lived in freedom. We lived lives that were a statement, not an apology.&amp;quot; - January 20, 1981&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever.&amp;quot; - January 20, 1981&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.&amp;quot; - January 20, 1981&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I've learned in Washington, that that's the only place where sound travels faster than light.&amp;quot; - December 12, 1983&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The challenge of statesmanship is to have the vision to dream of a better, safer world and the courage, persistence, and patience to turn that dream into reality.&amp;quot; - March 8, 1985&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have only one thing to say to the tax increasers: Go ahead, make my day.&amp;quot; —March 13, 1985, in a speech threatening to veto legislation raising taxes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3638320/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;A leader, once convinced a particular course of action is the right one, must have the determination to stick with it and be undaunted when the going gets rough.&amp;quot; - December 5, 1990 &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here, to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.&amp;quot; —Speech at the Berlin Wall, June 12, 1987&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3638320/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;...I know it's hard when you're up to your armpits in alligators to remember you came here to drain the swamp.&amp;quot; - February 10, 1982 &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There is no question that we have failed to live up to the dreams of the [[founding fathers]] many times and in many places. Sometimes we do better than others. But all in all, the one thing we must be on guard against is thinking that because of this, the system has failed. The system has not failed. Some human beings have failed the system.&amp;quot; - June 21, 1973&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The work of volunteer groups throughout our country represents the very heart and soul of America. They have helped make this the most compassionate, generous, and humane society that ever existed on the face of this earth.&amp;quot; - Oct. 16, 1973&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In America, our origins matter less than our destination, and that is what democracy is all about.&amp;quot; - August 17, 1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan/quotes/default.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It is freedom itself that still hangs in the balance, and freedom is never more than one generation from extinction.&amp;quot; - Commencement address to The Citadel, 1993&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[How Ronald Reagan won the Cold War]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/Ronald_Reagan%27s_speech_on_KAL_007#Text_of_the_speech Ronald Reagan's Speech on KAL 007]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korean Airlines Flight 007]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
see Bibliography for much more detailed guide.&lt;br /&gt;
* Berman, Larry, ed. ''Looking Back on the Reagan Presidency'' (1990), essays by academics&lt;br /&gt;
* Busch, Andrew E.; &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan and the Defeat of the Soviet Empire&amp;quot; in ''Presidential Studies Quarterly''. Vol: 27. Issue: 3. 1997. pp 451+. [http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst;jsessionid=HhHYNGdT18XmGxylZNJQhdSjrtry2j8zYD2pLstvcnSLFqC9JzvF!-313427117?docId=5000522864  online edition] by conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime '' Public Affairs. (2nd ed 2000) 948 pp. best full-length biography [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=88989671 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''Governor Reagan: His Rise to Power'' detailed biography&lt;br /&gt;
* Hayward, Steven F. ''The Age of Reagan, 1964-1980: The Fall of the Old Liberal Order'' (2001)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Berman William C. ''America's Right Turn: From Nixon to Bush.'' (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
* Brownlee, W. Elliot  and Hugh Davis Graham, eds. ''The Reagan Presidency: Pragmatic Conservatism and Its Legacies'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* Campagna; Anthony S. ''The Economy in the Reagan Years: The Economic Consequences of the Reagan Administrations'' Greenwood Press. 1994 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=28144725 online edition], by conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''Ronald Reagan: The Presidential Portfolio''. (2001) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101553874 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Draper, Theodore. '' A Very Thin Line: The Iran-Contra Affair'' (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
* Ehrman, John. ''The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan.'' (2005), by conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Garthoff, Raymond. ''Detente and Confrontation: American-Soviet relations from Nixon to Reagan'' (1994), by liberal&lt;br /&gt;
* Griscom Tom. &amp;quot;Core Ideas of the Reagan Presidency.&amp;quot; In Thompson, ed., ''Leadership,'' 23-48. &lt;br /&gt;
* Hulten Charles R. and Isabel V. Sawhill, eds. ''The Legacy of Reaganomics: Prospects for Long-Term Growth.'' (1994). &lt;br /&gt;
* Jones, Charles O. ed. ''The Reagan Legacy: Promise and Performance'' (1988) essays by political scientists&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2004/aug/knopfAUG04.asp Jeffrey W. Knopf, &amp;quot;Did Reagan Win the Cold War?&amp;quot;] ''Strategic Insights'', Volume III, Issue 8 (August 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Kyvig, David. ed. ''Reagan and the World'' (1990), scholarly essays on foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
*  Langston, Thomas S. &amp;quot;Reassessing the Reagan Presidency,&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly,'' Vol. 34, 2004 [http://www.questia.com/read/5006516145?title=Reassessing%20the%20Reagan%20Presidency online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Levy, Peter B. ''Encyclopedia of the Reagan-Bush Years'' (1996), short articles [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=77341841 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Matlock, Jack. ''Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended.'' (2004) by the conservative US ambassador to Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
* Pach, Chester. &amp;quot;The Reagan Doctrine: Principle, Pragmatism, and Policy.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly''(1): 75-88. Fulltext in SwetsWise and Ingenta; Reagan declared in 1985 that the U.S. should not &amp;quot;break faith&amp;quot; with anti-Communist resistance groups. However, his policies varied as differences in local conditions and US security interests produced divergent policies toward &amp;quot;freedom fighters&amp;quot; in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Mozambique, Angola, and Cambodia. &lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore.'' (2005), standard scholarly synthesis of the era&lt;br /&gt;
* Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) short, favorable biography by historian [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=49534236 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Ronald. ''An American Life.'' (1990). his second autobiography&lt;br /&gt;
* Reeves, Richard. ''President Reagan: The Triumph of Imagination'' (2005) detailed analysis by historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Sullivan, George.''Mr. President'' (1997). for middle schools&lt;br /&gt;
* Schmertz, Eric J.  et al eds. ''Ronald Reagan's America'' 2 Volumes (1997) articles by scholars and officeholders [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=15343830 vol 1 online][http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=28729700 vol 2 online] &lt;br /&gt;
* Schweizer, Peter. ''Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism'' (2002), by conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas, Tony. ''The Films of Ronald Reagan'' (1980) &lt;br /&gt;
* Troy, Gill. ''Morning in America: How Ronald Reagan Invented the 1980s'' (2004).  Study of Reagan's image.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilentz, Sean. ''The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008'' (2008), major narrative history by liberal historian who says Reagan transformed America&lt;br /&gt;
====notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Benze, Jr. James G. ''Nancy Reagan: On the White House Stage'' (2005), [http://www.amazon.com/Nancy-Reagan-White-Modern-Ladies/dp/070061401X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194317375&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Benze James G. &amp;quot;Nancy Reagan: China Doll or Dragon Lady?&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 20 (fall 1990): 777-90&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime '' Public Affairs. (2nd ed 2000) 948 pp. full-length biography [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=88989671 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* D'Souza, Dinesh. ''Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became an Extraordinary Leader'' (1999), popular. [http://www.amazon.com/Ronald-Reagan-Ordinary-Became-Extraordinary/dp/0684848236/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194317303&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Evans, Thomas W. ''The Education of Ronald Reagan: The General Electric Years'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Education-Ronald-Reagan-Conversion-Conservatism/dp/0231138601/ref=sr_1_5/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194317183&amp;amp;sr=1-5 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morris, ''Edmund. Dutch: A Memoir of Ronald Reagan'' (1999), includes fictional material [http://www.amazon.com/Dutch-Memoir-Ronald-Edmund-Morris/dp/0375756450/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194317223&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) short biography by historian [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=49534236 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reeves, Richard. ''President Reagan: The Triumph of Imagination'' (2005) detailed analysis by historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Sullivan, George.''Mr. President'' (1997). for middle schools&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reagan before 1981===&lt;br /&gt;
* Brennan Mary C. ''Turning Right in the Sixties: The Conservative Capture of the GOP.'' University of North Carolina Press, 1995&lt;br /&gt;
* Burbank, Garin. &amp;quot;Governor Reagan and California Welfare Reform: the Grand Compromise of 1971.&amp;quot; ''California History''  1991 70(3): 278-289. Issn: 0162-2897 &lt;br /&gt;
* Burbank, Garin. &amp;quot;Governor Reagan's Only Defeat: The Proposition 1 Campaign in 1973.&amp;quot; ''California History'' 72 (winter 1993-94): 360-73. &lt;br /&gt;
* Burbank, Garin. &amp;quot;Speaker Moretti, Governor Reagan, and the Search for Tax Reform in California, 1970-1972&amp;quot; ''The Pacific Historical Review'' Vol. 61, No. 2 (May, 1992), pp. 193-214 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-8684%28199205%2961%3A2%3C193%3ASMGRAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E online in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''Governor Reagan: His Rise to Power'' Public Affairs.  detailed biography [http://www.amazon.com/Governor-Reagan-His-Rise-Power/dp/1586480308/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194317275&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dallek, Matthew. ''The Right Moment: Ronald Reagan's First Victory and the Decisive Turning Point in American Politics.'' (2004).  Study of 1966 election as governor.&lt;br /&gt;
* DeGroot, Gerard J. &amp;quot;'A Goddamned Electable Person': the 1966 California Gubernatorial Campaign of Ronald Reagan.&amp;quot; ''History'' 1997 82(267): 429-448. Issn: 0018-2648 Fulltext: in Swetswise, Ingenta and Ebsco &lt;br /&gt;
* DeGroot, Gerard J. &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan and Student Unrest in California, 1966-1970.&amp;quot; ''Pacific Historical Review'' 1996 65(1): 107-129. Issn: 0030-8684 Fulltext: in Jstor &lt;br /&gt;
* Drew, Elizabeth. ''Portrait of an Election: The 1980 Presidential Campaign.''  1981. &lt;br /&gt;
* Ferguson, Thomas and Joel Rogers, eds. ''The Hidden Election: Politics and Economics in the 1980 Presidential Campaign,'' 1981. &lt;br /&gt;
* Germond, Jack W. and Jules Witcover. ''Blue Smoke &amp;amp; Mirrors: How Reagan Won &amp;amp; Why Carter Lost the Election of 1980''.  1981. Detailed journalism.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hayward, Steven F. ''The Age of Reagan, 1964-1980: The Fall of the Old Liberal Order'' (2001)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Hamilton Gary G., and Nicole Woolsey Biggart. ''Governor Reagan, Governor Brown: A Sociology of executive Power.'' (1984). &lt;br /&gt;
* Moore, Glen. &amp;quot;Ronald W. Reagan's Campaign for the Republican Party's 1968 Presidential Nomination.&amp;quot; ''Proceedings and Papers of the Georgia Association of Historians'' (1992) 12[i.e., 13]: 57-70. Issn: 0275-3863 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics and Domestic issues ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. ''Change and Continuity in the 1984 Elections.'' (1987) &lt;br /&gt;
* Amaker Norman C. ''Civil Rights and the Reagan Administration.'' Urban Institute Press, 1988&lt;br /&gt;
*  Berman, Larry, ed. ''Looking Back on the Reagan Presidency'' (1990), essays by academics&lt;br /&gt;
* Berman William C. ''America's Right Turn: From Nixon to Bush.'' Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.&lt;br /&gt;
* Birnbaum Jeffrey H., and Alan S. Murray. ''Showdown at Gucci Gulch: Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and the Unlikely Triumph of Tax Reform.'' 1987. &lt;br /&gt;
* Boskin Michael J. ''Reagan and the Economy: The Successes, Failures, and Unfinished Agenda.'' ICS Press, 1987. &lt;br /&gt;
* Brownlee, W. Elliot  and Hugh Davis Graham, eds. ''The Reagan Presidency: Pragmatic Conservatism and Its Legacies'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Busch, Andrew E. ''Reagan's Victory: The Presidential Election of 1980 and the Rise of the Right,'' (2005) [http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1103/article_detail.asp online review by Michael Barone]&lt;br /&gt;
* Campagna; Anthony S. ''The Economy in the Reagan Years: The Economic Consequences of the Reagan Administrations'' Greenwood Press. 1994 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=28144725 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''Ronald Reagan: The Presidential Portfolio''. Public Affairs. (2001) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101553874 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cook, Daniel M. and Polsky, Andrew J. &amp;quot;Political Time Reconsidered: Unbuilding and Rebuilding the State under the Reagan Administration.&amp;quot; ''American Politics Research''(4): 577-605. ISSN 1532-673X Fulltext in SwetsWise. Argues Reagan slowed enforcement of pollution laws and transformed the national education agenda. &lt;br /&gt;
* Derthick Martha, and Paul J. Quirk. ''The Politics of Deregulation.'' Brookings Institution, 1985&lt;br /&gt;
* Detlefsen, Robert R. ''Civil Rights under Reagan'' Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1991 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=85749844 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Eads George C., and Michael Fix, eds. ''The Reagan Regulatory Strategy: An Assessment.'' Urban Institute Press, 1984&lt;br /&gt;
* Ehrman, John. ''The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan.'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Evans Rowland, and Robert Novak. ''The Reagan Revolution.'' 1991. &lt;br /&gt;
* Ferguson Thomas, and Joel Rogers, ''Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics'' 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
* Germond Jack W., and Jules Witcover. ''Wake Us When It's Over: Presidential Politics of 1984.'' 1985. &lt;br /&gt;
* Marshall R. Goodman; ''Managing Regulatory Reform: The Reagan Strategy and Its Impact'' Praeger Publishers, 1987 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=43165555 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greider William. ''The Education of David Stockman and Other Americans.'' 1982. Stockman was Reagan's budget chief&lt;br /&gt;
* Griscom Tom. &amp;quot;Core Ideas of the Reagan Presidency.&amp;quot; In Thompson, ed., ''Leadership,'' 23-48. &lt;br /&gt;
* Hulten Charles R. and Isabel V. Sawhill, eds. ''The Legacy of Reaganomics: Prospects for Long-Term Growth.'' C.: Urban Institute Press, 1994. &lt;br /&gt;
* Johnson, Haynes.  ''Sleepwalking through History: America in the Reagan Years'' (1991)  [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104836392 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Jones, Charles O. ed. ''The Reagan Legacy: Promise and Performance'' (1988) essays by political scientists&lt;br /&gt;
* Karier, Thomas. ''Great Experiments in American Economic Policy: From Kennedy to Reagan'' (1997) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=15083874 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Laham, Nicholas. ''The Reagan Presidency and the Politics of Race: In Pursuit of Colorblind Justice and Limited Government''  1998. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=14220230 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Levy, Peter B. ''Encyclopedia of the Reagan-Bush Years'' (1996), short articles [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=77341841 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Minarik Joseph J. ''Making America's Budget Policy. From the 1980s to the 1990s.'' M. E. Sharpe, 1990. &lt;br /&gt;
*  Palmer, John L.,  and Isabel V. Sawhill. ''The Reagan Record,'' 1984. economics and sociology&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore.'' (2005), standard scholarly synthesis.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rayack; Elton. ''Not So Free to Choose: The Political Economy of Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan'' (1987) hostile critique[http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24670801 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Sahu, Anandi P.  and  Ronald L. Tracy; ''The Economic Legacy of the Reagan Years: Euphoria or Chaos?'' Praeger Publishers, 1991 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=59361760 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Salamon Lester M., and Michael S. Lund. eds. ''The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America'' 1985.  articles by political scientists&lt;br /&gt;
* Schmertz, Eric J.  et al eds. ''Ronald Reagan's America'' 2 Volumes (1997) articles by scholars and officeholders [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=15343830 vol 1 online][http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=28729700 vol 2 online] &lt;br /&gt;
* Weatherford, M. Stephen and Mcdonnell, Lorraine M. &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan as Legislative Advocate: Passing the Reagan Revolution's Budgets in 1981 and 1982.&amp;quot; ''Congress &amp;amp; the Presidency'' (2005) 32:1 pp 1-29. Fulltext in Ebsco; Argues RR ignored the details but played a guiding role in setting major policies and adjudicating significant trade-offs, and in securing Congressional approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign affairs===&lt;br /&gt;
* Arnson, Cynthia J. ''Crossroads: Congress, the Reagan Administration, and Central America'' Pantheon, 1989. &lt;br /&gt;
* Baucom Donald R. ''The Origins of SDI, 1944-1983.'' University Press of Kansas, 1992. &lt;br /&gt;
* Bell Coral. ''The Reagan Paradox: American Foreign Policy in the 1980s.'' Rutgers University Press, 1989. &lt;br /&gt;
* Beschloss Michael R., and Strobe Talbott. ''At the Highest Levels: The Inside Story of the End of the Cold War.'' 1993&lt;br /&gt;
* Busch, Andrew E.; &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan and the Defeat of the Soviet Empire&amp;quot; in ''Presidential Studies Quarterly''. Vol: 27. Issue: 3. 1997. pp 451+. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dobson, Alan P. &amp;quot;The Reagan Administration, Economic Warfare, and Starting to Close down the Cold War.&amp;quot; ''Diplomatic History''(3): 531-556. Fulltext in SwetsWise, Ingenta and Ebsco. Argues Reagan's public rhetoric against the USSR was harsh and uncompromising, giving rise to the idea that his administration sought to employ a US defense buildup and NATO economic sanctions to bring about the collapse of the USSR. Yet many statements by Reagan and Shultz suggest they desired negotiation with the Soviets from a position of American strength, not the eventual demise of the USSR. &lt;br /&gt;
* Draper, Theodore. '' A Very Thin Line: The Iran-Contra Affair'' (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
* Fitzgerald, Frances. ''Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars and the End of the Cold War''. political history of S.D.I. (2000). ISBN.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ford, Christopher A. and Rosenberg, David A. &amp;quot;The Naval Intelligence Underpinnings of Reagan's Maritime Strategy.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Strategic Studies''(2): 379-409. Fulltext in Ingenta and Ebsco; Reagan's maritime strategy sought to apply US naval might against Soviet vulnerabilities on its maritime flanks. It was supported by a major buildup of US naval forces and aggressive exercising in seas proximate to the USSR; it explicitly targeted Moscow's strategic missile submarines with the aim of pressuring the Kremlin during crises or the early phases of global war. The maritime strategy represents one of the rare instances in history when intelligence helped lead a nation to completely revise its concept of military operations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Garthoff, Raymond L. ''The Great Transition: American-Soviet Relations and the End of the Cold War'' (1994), detailed narrative by a hostile critic [http://www.questia.com/read/29069917?title=The%20Great%20Transition%3a%20American-Soviet%20Relations%20and%20the%20End%20of%20the%20Cold%20War online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Haftendorn, Helga and Jakob Schissler, eds. ''The Reagan Administration: A Reconstruction of American Strength?'' Berlin: Walter de Guyer, 1988. by European scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* Hall, David Locke. ''The Reagan Wars: A Constitutional Perspective on War Powers and the Presidency''  Westview Press, 1991 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=87551275 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2004/aug/knopfAUG04.asp Jeffrey W. Knopf, &amp;quot;Did Reagan Win the Cold War?&amp;quot;] ''Strategic Insights'', Volume III, Issue 8 (August 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Kyvig, David. ed. ''Reagan and the World'' (1990), scholarly essays on foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
* Lagon, Mark P.  ''The Reagan Doctrine: Sources of American Conduct in the Cold War's Last Chapter'' (1994) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=9161896 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* LeoGrande, William M. ''Our Own Backyard: The United States in Central America, 1977-1992'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
* Matlock, Jack. ''Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended.'' (2004) by the US ambassador to Moscow [http://www.amazon.com/Reagan-Gorbachev-How-Cold-Ended/dp/0679463232/ref=sr_1_2/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194316986&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pach, Chester. &amp;quot;The Reagan Doctrine: Principle, Pragmatism, and Policy.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 2006 36(1): 75-88. Issn: 0360-4918 [http://www.questia.com/read/5015817882?title=The%20Reagan%20Doctrine%3a%20Principle%2c%20Pragmatism%2c%20and%20Policy online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Salla, Michael E. and Ralph Summy, eds. ''Why the Cold War Ended: A Range of Interpretations'' (1995). [http://www.questia.com/read/22889072 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schmertz, Eric J.  et al eds. ''Ronald Reagan and the World'' (1997) articles by scholars and officeholders&lt;br /&gt;
* Shultz, George P. ''Turmoil and Triumph My Years As Secretary of State'' (1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Schweizer, Peter. ''Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism'' (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* Suri, Jeremi. &amp;quot;Explaining the End of the Cold War: A New Historical Consensus?&amp;quot; ''Journal of Cold War Studies'' - Volume 4, Number 4, Fall 2002, pp. 60-92 in [[Project Muse]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas W. Walker; ''Reagan Versus the Sandinistas: The Undeclared War on Nicaragua'' (1987) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=65710540 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wallison, Peter J. ''Ronald Reagan: The Power of Conviction and the Success of His Presidency.'' (2003). 282 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Wills, David C. ''The First War on Terrorism: Counter-Terrorism Policy during the Reagan Administration.'' 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rhetoric, media and values===&lt;br /&gt;
* Aden, R. C.  &amp;quot;Entrapment and Escape: Inventional Metaphors in Ronald Reagan's Economic Rhetoric.&amp;quot; ''Southern Communication Journal'' 54 (1989): 384-401 &lt;br /&gt;
* Dallek, Robert. ''Ronald Reagan: The Politics of Symbolism.'' (1999) &lt;br /&gt;
* Denton Jr., Robert E. ''Primetime Presidency of Ronald Reagan: The Era of the Television Presidency'' (1988) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=23088126 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Diggins, John Patrick. ''Ronald Reagan: Fate, Freedom, and the Making of History'' (2007) Reagan as follower of Emerson, by leading historian of ideas&lt;br /&gt;
* Jane Feuer; Seeing through the Eighties: Television and Reaganism'' Duke University Press, 1995 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=98148093 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* FitzWater, Marlin . ''Call the Briefing! Bush and Reagan, Sam and Helen, a Decade with Presidents and the Press''. 1995. Memoir by Reagan's press spokesman.&lt;br /&gt;
* Goodnight, G. Thomas. &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan's Re-formulation of the Rhetoric of War: Analysis of the 'Zero Option,' 'Evil Empire,' and 'Star Wars' Addresses.&amp;quot; ''Quarterly Journal of Speech'' 72 (1986): 390-414. &lt;br /&gt;
* Greffenius, Steven. ''The Last Jeffersonian: Ronald Reagan's Dreams of America''. June, July, &amp;amp; August Books. 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hertsgaard, Mark. ''On Bended Knee: The Press and the Reagan Presidency'' 1988. criticizes the press&lt;br /&gt;
* Hoeveler, J. David. ''Watch on the Right: Conservative Intellectuals in the Reagan Era.'' University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. &lt;br /&gt;
* Houck, Davis, and Amos Kiewe, eds. ''Actor, Ideologue, Politician: The Public Speeches of Ronald Reagan'' (Greenwood Press, 1993) [http://www.questia.com/SM.qst?act=adv&amp;amp;contributors=Davis W. Houck&amp;amp;dcontributors=Davis+W.+Houck online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Jones, John M. &amp;quot;'Until Next Week': The Saturday Radio Addresses of Ronald Reagan&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly.'' Volume: 32. Issue: 1. 2002. pp 84+. &lt;br /&gt;
* Kengor, Paul. ''God and Ronald Reagan: A Spiritual Life'' Regan Books, 2004. ISBN.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kiewe, Amos, and Davis W. Houck. ''A Shining City on a Hill: Ronald Reagan's Economic Rhetoric, 1951-1989.'' 1991. &lt;br /&gt;
* Lewis, William F. &amp;quot;Telling America's Story: Narrative Form and the Reagan Presidency&amp;quot;, ''Quarterly Journal of Speech''): 280–302&lt;br /&gt;
* Longley, Kyle, Jeremy D. Mayer, Michael Schaller, and John W. Sloan. ''Deconstructing Reagan: Conservative Mythology and America’s Fortieth President,'' (M.E. Sharpe, 2007. xviii, 150 pp. isbn 978-0-7656-1591-6.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Meyer, John C. &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan and Humor: A Politician's Velvet Weapon&amp;quot;, ''Communication Studies''   41 (1990): 76-88. &lt;br /&gt;
* Moore, Mark P. &amp;quot;Reagan's Quest for Freedom in the 1987 State of the Union Address.&amp;quot; ''Western Journal of Communication'' 53 (1989): 52-65.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Muir, William Ker. ''The Bully Pulpit: The Presidential Leadership of Ronald Reagan'' (1992), examines his speeches&lt;br /&gt;
* Noonan, Peggy. ''When Character Was King: A Story of Ronald Reagan'' (2001) memoir by a Reagan speechwriter&lt;br /&gt;
* Ormanm John. ''Comparing Presidential Behavior: Carter, Reagan, and the Macho Presidential Style'' Greenwood Press, 1987 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=15388519 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ritter, Kurt W. ''Ronald Reagan: The Great Communicator.'' Greenwood, 1992. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=29047567 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Shogan, Colleen J. &amp;quot;Coolidge and Reagan: The Rhetorical Influence of Silent Cal on the Great Communicator&amp;quot;, ''Rhetoric &amp;amp; Public Affairs'' 9.2 online at Project Muse; argues that Coolidge and Reagan shared a common ideological message, which served as the basis for modern conservatism. Even without engaging in explicitly partisan rhetoric, Reagan's principled speech served an important party-building function. &lt;br /&gt;
* Stuckey, Mary. ''Getting Into the Game: The Pre-Presidential Rhetoric of Ronald Reagan.'' Praeger, 1989 &lt;br /&gt;
* Stuckey, Mary. ''Playing the Game: The Presidential Rhetoric of Ronald Reagan.'' Praeger, 1990. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24414026 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas, Tony. ''The Films of Ronald Reagan'' (1980) &lt;br /&gt;
* Troy, Gill. ''Morning in America: How Ronald Reagan Invented the 1980s'' (2004).  Study of Reagan's image.&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Weiler and W. Barnett Pearce; ''Reagan and Public Discourse in America'' University of Alabama Press, 1992 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=59353372 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Wills, Garry. ''Reagan's America: Innocents at Home''. (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/publications/ERP/ Council of Economic Advisors, ''Economic Report of the President'' (annual 1947- )], complete series online; important analysis of current trends and policies, plus statistcial tables&lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Ronald, and Richard G. Hubler. ''Where's the Rest of Me?'' (1965). first autobiography&lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Ronald. ''An American Life.'' (1990). second autobiography [http://www.amazon.com/American-Life-Ronald-Reagan/dp/0743400259/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194317128&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Ronald. ''The Creative Society: Some Comments on Problems Facing America.'' 1968. &lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Ronald. ''Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation.'' 1984. &lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Ronald. ''Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Ronald Reagan. 1981-1989.'' 8 vols. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1982-91. &lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan, Ronald. ''Reagan, In His Own Hand: The Writings of Ronald Reagan That Reveal His Revolutionary Vision for America'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0743219384/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Skinner, Kiron K. et al, eds. ''Reagan's Path to Victory: The Shaping of Ronald Reagan's Vision: Selected Writings'' (2004), 450 radio talks from late 1970s&lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan, Nancy. ''My Turn: The Memoirs of Nancy Reagan'' (1989)&lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Maureen. ''First Father, First Daughter: A Memoir.'' 1989. &lt;br /&gt;
* Reagan Michael and Joe Hyams. ''On the Outside Looking In.'' 1988. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Primary sources by Reagan aides====&lt;br /&gt;
* Anderson, Martin. ''Revolution: The Reagan Legacy'' (1990) &lt;br /&gt;
* Haig, Alexander. ''Inner Circles: How America Changed the World'' (1994). Haig was Secretary of State 1981-82&lt;br /&gt;
* Deaver, Michael, and Mickey Herskowitz. ''Behind the Scenes''.  1987. Memoir by a top aide.&lt;br /&gt;
* Meese Edwin. ''With Reagan: The Inside Story.'' Regnery Gateway, 1992. &lt;br /&gt;
* Niskanen William A. ''Reaganomics: An Insider's Account of the Policies and the People.'' Oxford University Press, 1988.&lt;br /&gt;
* Regan Donald T. ''For the Record. From Wall Street to Washington.'' 1988; Treasury Secretary and Chief of Staff&lt;br /&gt;
* Shultz, George P. ''Turmoil and Triumph My Years As Secretary of State'' 1993) Schulz was Secretary of State 1982-89&lt;br /&gt;
* Stahl, Lesley. &amp;quot;Reporting Live&amp;quot; (1999) memoir by TV news reporter&lt;br /&gt;
* Stockman David A. ''The Triumph of Politics: How the Reagan Revolution Failed.'' 1986. Stcokman was Budget Director in 1981-82&lt;br /&gt;
* Thompson Kenneth W., ed. ''Foreign Policy in the Reagan Presidency: Nine Intimate Perspectives.'' University Press of America, 1993. &lt;br /&gt;
* Thompson Kenneth W., ed. ''Leadership in the Reagan Presidency: Seven Intimate Perspectives.'' 1992. &lt;br /&gt;
* Thompson Kenneth W., ed. ''Leadership in the Reagan Presidency, Part II: Eleven Intimate Perspectives.'' University Press of America, 1993. &lt;br /&gt;
* Weinberger, Caspar. ''In the Arena: A Memoir of the 20th Century'' (1991), by the Defense Secretary&lt;br /&gt;
===Government documents===&lt;br /&gt;
* Council of Economic Advisors. ''Economic Report of the President,'' (annual, 1981-1988), detailed analysis of economic issues&lt;br /&gt;
* U.S. Census Bureau, ''Statistical Abstract of the United States'' annual compilation of over 1000 tables of data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040614-646317,00.html Time Magazine Article on ''The All-American President'']&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/rr40.html White House Official Page]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=1&amp;amp;pid=537924&amp;amp;agid=2 The Passing of a Conservative] - by [[Alfred Regnery]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/ Reagan's Presidential Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://imdb.com/name/nm0001654/ Actor Bio At IMDB]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ronaldreaganmemorial.com/ Official Memorial]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.reagan.navy.mil/index.html USS ''Ronald Reagan'' CVN 76 official website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Ronald_Reagan Quotations by Ronald Reagan]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://reagan2020.us/ Reagan 2020] Reagan 2020 is the Internet's most comprehensive resource on Ronald Reagan.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.acuf.org/principles/p_philos.asp &amp;quot;Our Philosophy of Government&amp;quot;] Speech by President Ronald Reagan, March 2, 1981&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalreview.com/document/reagan200406101030.asp Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation] While president, Ronald Reagan penned this article for The Human Life Review, unsolicited. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:California Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=556502</id>
		<title>Liberal bigotry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=556502"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T22:06:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: Citing a debate as a source, especially for an inflammatory point, seems inadequate. If you disagree please discuss don't block&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Bigotry''' is the expression of [[hatred]] or [[aggression]] towards those who are different. Examples are: [[racism]], [[religious intolerance]], [[homophobia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:psychology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:LawrenceA&amp;diff=556500</id>
		<title>User:LawrenceA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:LawrenceA&amp;diff=556500"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T22:03:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: New page: Hello!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_37&amp;diff=556495</id>
		<title>Talk:American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 37</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_37&amp;diff=556495"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T22:01:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Your writing is chatty and vapid, yet it says nothing of interest. Sorry, but you asked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want writing lessons from me, we'll have a long row to hoe. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:57, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's interesting commentary, but I'm not sure you're doing anything other than insulting me :). That's not the same as teaching. Could you point to substantive issues? Each answer made a point, you have to admit.-[[User:LawrenceA|LawrenceA]] 16:59, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, keep in mind context: short-answers to essay questions.-[[User:LawrenceA|LawrenceA]] 17:01, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_37&amp;diff=556493</id>
		<title>Talk:American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 37</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_37&amp;diff=556493"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T21:59:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Your writing is chatty and vapid, yet it says nothing of interest. Sorry, but you asked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want writing lessons from me, we'll have a long row to hoe. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:57, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's interesting commentary, but I'm not sure you're doing anything other than insulting me :). That's not the same as teaching. Could you point to substantive issues? Each answer made a point, you have to admit.-[[User:LawrenceA|LawrenceA]] 16:59, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers&amp;diff=556483</id>
		<title>American History Homework Nine Answers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers&amp;diff=556483"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T21:54:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: /* Student Answers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{HS_American_History}}{{DEFAULTSORT:American History Homework Answers 09}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[American History Lecture Nine|Lecture]] - [[American_History_Homework_Nine|Questions]] - [[American History Homework Nine Answers|Student Answers]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Model Answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Model]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Student Answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student One]] - DONE&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - 1.414213562373095048, (2 squared)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Two]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Three]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Four]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Five]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Six]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Nine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Eight]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Nine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Ten]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Eleven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Twelve]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Thirteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Fourteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Fifteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Sixteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Seventeen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Eighteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Nineteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Eighteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Nineteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Twenty]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 21]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 22]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 23]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 24]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 25]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 26]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 27]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 28]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 29]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 30]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 31]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 33]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 34]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 35]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 36]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 37]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_37&amp;diff=556477</id>
		<title>American History Homework Nine Answers - Student 37</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_37&amp;diff=556477"/>
				<updated>2008-11-13T21:52:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LawrenceA: New page: Joining late, just to see how I do...   1. Arguably, it has its similarities to Carter's victory over Ford: Carter rose to victory on a promise that, unlike Nixon, &amp;quot;[he] would never lie to...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Joining late, just to see how I do...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Arguably, it has its similarities to Carter's victory over Ford: Carter rose to victory on a promise that, unlike Nixon, &amp;quot;[he] would never lie to you.&amp;quot; Of course, there are serious differences too: despite, LBJ's passage of the Civil Rights Act, which &amp;quot;lost the South for a generation,&amp;quot; Carter still carried the South, and Carter's victory was quite narrow, both in popular terms and relative to the electoral vote. Obama's victory, on the other hand, was only narrowly due to the South, and was a near electoral landslide. Coupled with Obama's promise of running a post-partisan Presidency, there are trace elements of Clinton (monumental electoral victory; moderate, charismatic Democrat, with less-than-average experience) and elements of Reagan (the latent possibility of realignment). Overall, I think it's too early to judge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Imperialism is a monumental failure, in each of its many iterations (nota bene: I'll confine discussion of the term &amp;quot;imperialism&amp;quot; to actual, rather than &amp;quot;soft&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;cultural&amp;quot; imperialism). In the most recent case, imperialism's failures have only become painstakingly evident in hindsight: European powers left colonized states with ramshackle infrastructure, and failed to adequately secure that each state they created when devolving power was, actually, a &amp;quot;nation-state&amp;quot; with a coherent identity. Many colonial powers grouped different &amp;quot;nations&amp;quot; into one state: see, for example, Nigeria. The result is bloodshed, civil war, and violence, as the decolonized fight to secure for themselves a nation built on imaginary borders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No doubt the progressive movement secured important gains to the populace, from an end to child labor, uniform suffrage, and product safety guidelines (to correct Upton Sinclair's damning judgment of the food industry). The ensuing regulatory framework, however, solicited a judicial backlash that would push the Court and FDR to the brink of constitutional crisis some years later (See: Lochner). It also created separation of powers concerns that linger to this day (what, exactly, is the relationship between the administrative &amp;quot;branch&amp;quot; and the other branches of government?). The end result is unabashedly positive, but it took some time for that outcome to be clear, and it still poses some lingering problems for the legal order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The cartoon addresses the predicament of what America could do about Cuba: fund the potential for revolution, or stay out of the picture, and let the national order of things take its course. The cartoonist is plainly sympathetic to Cuba's plight, and spins American inaction as tantamount to throwing Cuba into the Spanish abyss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H2. It's important to remember that &amp;quot;objectivity&amp;quot; is not &amp;quot;neutrality.&amp;quot; No doubt the media was &amp;quot;biased&amp;quot; against Sarah Palin in its portrayal of her, but, objectively, Palin as a candidate had serious problems. To the extent that the media addressed legitimate shortcomings, it was objective, if not neutral. Where the media really went too far, delving into yellow journalism, was in the immediately post-election week, as Fox News ran with invented stories about additional &amp;quot;gaffes&amp;quot; committed by Sarah Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H3. Regarding the election, we should seriously ponder the question of whether the religious right has lost its death-grip on the Republican Party, and indeed on America. Upon picking John McCain to run for President, it could be said that, for the GOP, &amp;quot;two roads diverged in a forest&amp;quot;: they could have taken to their moderate, bipartisan nominee, and run a moderate campaign, or convinced their moderate nominee to run a far-right, religiously-themed, get-out-the-base Rove-style campaign. No doubt the GOP chose the latter, and they lost. Big. The lesson should probably be that the nation can only stand so much partisanship, or that social issues pale when the possibility of economic disaster is squarely presented. Either way, the religious right may be out of power for some time. Of course, they've been known to mount a comeback before.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LawrenceA</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>