<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=LifeHelper</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=LifeHelper"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/LifeHelper"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T12:42:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&amp;diff=938987</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to Relativity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&amp;diff=938987"/>
		<updated>2011-11-20T22:50:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: Changed from 39 examples to 40&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[theory of relativity]] is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions.  It is heavily promoted by [[liberals]] who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., historian Paul Johnson's book about the 20th century, and the article written by liberal law professor Laurence Tribe as allegedly assisted by [[Barack Obama]].  Virtually no one who is taught and believes Relativity continues to read the [[Bible]], a book that outsells ''New York Times'' bestsellers by a hundred-fold.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here is a list of 40 counterexamples: any one of them shows that the theory is incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Conservatives prefer Quantum Physics which Einstein rejected as &amp;quot;God playing dice.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none has ever been found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3781&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ''Sound like [[global warming]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
#The eccentricity of the [[Moon]]'s orbit is increasing contrary to the theory of relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0212&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Subatomic particles have a speed observed to be faster than the speed of light, which contradicts a fundamental assumption of Relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hindustantimes.com/Roll-over-Einstein-Law-of-physics-challenged/Article1-749189.aspx - note that a similar observation of faster-than-light speeds was also made in 2007 (with a larger margin of error).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Italian lab that &amp;quot;shocked the scientific world&amp;quot; has announced more precise results, confirming their previous announcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/18/us-science-neutrinos-light-idUSTRE7AH0T720111118&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The [[Pioneer anomaly]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Anomalies in the locations of spacecraft that have flown by [[Earth]] (&amp;quot;flybys&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23410705/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
#Spiral galaxies confound relativity, and unseen &amp;quot;[[dark matter]]&amp;quot; has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1873&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The acceleration in the expansion of the universe confounds relativity, and unseen &amp;quot;[[dark energy]]&amp;quot; has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.&lt;br /&gt;
#Increasingly precise measurements of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury show a shift greater than predicted by Relativity, well beyond the margin of error.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In a complicated or contrived series of calculations that most physics majors cannot duplicate even after learning them, the theory of general relativity's fundamental formula, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{\mu\nu} = 8 \pi K T_{\mu\nu}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, was conformed to match Mercury's then-observed precession of 5600.0 arc-seconds per century. Subsequently, however, more sophisticated technology has measured a different value of this precession (5599.7 arc-seconds per century, with a margin of error of only 0.01), and leading promoters of Relativity (such as Professor Clifford Will) have omitted this in listing tests confirming Relativity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The discontinuity in momentum as velocity approaches &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; for infinitesimal mass, compared to the momentum of light.&lt;br /&gt;
#The logical problem of a force which is applied at a right angle to the velocity of a relativistic mass - does this act on the rest mass or the relativistic mass?&lt;br /&gt;
#The observed lack of curvature in overall space.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;If space were curved, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be almost precisely flat.  Yet it is.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
#The universe shortly after its creation, when quantum effects dominated and contradicted Relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
#The [[action-at-a-distance]] of [[quantum entanglement]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quantum entanglement has not yet communicated information faster than the speed of light, but has already exhibited action faster than the speed of light.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The [[action-at-a-distance]] by [[Jesus]], described in [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]], [[Matthew 10-19 (Translated)|Matthew 15:28]], and [[Matthew 20-28 (Translated)|Matthew 27:51]].&lt;br /&gt;
#The failure to discover [[gravitons]], despite wasting hundreds of millions in taxpayer money in searching.&lt;br /&gt;
#Newly observed data reveal that the fine-structure constant, α (alpha), actually varies throughout the universe, demonstrating that all inertial frames of reference do '''not''' experience identical laws of physics as claimed by Relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For a report on the data, see a paper submitted in 2010 by John Webb and Julian King of the University of new South Wales, Australia, to the ''Physical Review Letters''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The double star &amp;quot;W13&amp;quot; weighs &amp;quot;40 times as much as the sun—more than enough to form a [[black hole]].  So why is it not a black hole? The only explanation [a leading scientist] can think of ... does not make astrophysical sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.economist.com/node/17035953&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The inability of the theory to lead to other insights, contrary to every verified theory of physics.&lt;br /&gt;
#The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html (&amp;quot;A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, and would undermine much of traditional physics. But some physicists believe it would elegantly explain puzzling cosmological phenomena such as the nearly uniform temperature of the universe.&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous&amp;quot; but observations instead show &amp;quot;inexplicable static&amp;quot; greater than &amp;quot;all artificial sources of&amp;quot; possible background noise.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Cool-Astronomy/2010/1025/Is-the-universe-a-big-hologram-This-device-could-find-out. Hunt for gravitational waves discovers unexpected data instead].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and Relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The theory predicts [[wormholes]] just as it predicts [[black holes]], but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v61/i13/p1446_1 .  The popular science press promotes black holes to a far greater extent than wormholes.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The theory predicts natural formation of highly ordered (and thus low entropy) black holes despite the increase in [[entropy]] required by the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Contrived explanations have been suggested for this dilemma, such as Stephen Hawking proposing that the entropy of matter in a black hole is somehow stored in the surface area of its event horizon to be released back into its surroundings as the black hole decays by radiation, known as &amp;quot;Hawking radiation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Data from the [[PSR B1913 16|PSR B1913+16]] increasingly diverge from predictions of the [[General Theory of Relativity]] such that, despite a Nobel Prize in Physics being awarded for early work on this pulsar, no data at all have been released about it for over five years.&lt;br /&gt;
#The lack of useful devices developed based on any insights provided by the theory; no lives have been saved or helped, and the theory has not led to other useful theories and may have interfered with scientific progress.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Contrary to the claims of Relativists, the GPS system has never been based on Relativity.  The Time Service Department, U.S. Navy, observed that &amp;quot;The Operational Control System (OCS) of the Global Positioning System (GPS) does not include the rigorous transformations between coordinate systems that Einstein’s general theory of relativity would seem to require&amp;quot; in part because &amp;quot;the effects of relativity, where they are different from the effects predicted by classical mechanics and electromagnetic theory, are too small to matter – less than one centimeter, for users on or near the earth.”&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This stands in stark contrast with every verified theory of science.&lt;br /&gt;
#Relativity requires different values for the inertia of a moving object: in its direction of motion, and perpendicular to that direction.  This contradicts the logical principle that the laws of physics are the same in all directions.&lt;br /&gt;
#Relativity requires that anything traveling at the speed of light must have mass zero, so it must have momentum zero.  But the laws of electrodynamics require that light have nonzero momentum.&lt;br /&gt;
#Unlike most well-tested fundamental physical theories, the theory of relativity violates conditions of a conservative field.  Path independence, for example, is lacking under the theory of relativity, as in the &amp;quot;twin paradox&amp;quot; whereby the age of each twin under the theory is dependent on the path he traveled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In defense of the theory, it is noted that it mandates conservation of the matter-stress-energy tensor (the only way to get ''real'' conservation, since matter and energy are interchangeable.)  This follows from the &amp;quot;contracted Bianchi identity.&amp;quot; [http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node14.html]  Also, the curl of the &amp;quot;gravitational field vector&amp;quot; is exactly zero in the absence of moving sources, due to symmetries of [[Riemann]]'s tensor.  It follows, from [[Stokes' Theorem]], that the gravitational field is conservative and has a potential function.  Energy is conserved.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ehrenfest Paradox: Consider a spinning hoop, where the tangential velocity is near the speed of light. In this case, the circumference (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \pi R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) is length-contracted. However, since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is always perpendicular to the motion, it is not contracted. This leads to an apparent paradox: does the radius of the accelerating hoop equal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or is it less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
#The Twin Paradox: Consider twins who are separated with one traveling at a very high speed such that his &amp;quot;clock&amp;quot; (age) slows down, so that when he returns he has a younger age than the twin; this violates Relativity because ''both'' twins should expect the other to be younger, if motion is relative.  Einstein himself admitted that this contradicts Relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Einstein attempted to explain the paradox based on the acceleration that one twin uniquely undergoes, but the length of travel can simply be extended such that any effect from acceleration would be ''de minimis''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Based on Relativity, Einstein predicted in 1905 that clocks at the Earth's equator would be slower than clocks at the North Pole, due to different velocities; in fact, all clocks at sea level measure time at the same rate, and Relativists made new assumptions about the Earth's shape to justify this contradiction of the theory; they also make the implausible claim that relativistic effects from gravitation precisely offset the effects from differences in velocity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v227/n5255/abs/227270a0.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Based on Relativity, Einstein claimed in 1909 that the [[aether (science)|aether]] does not exist, but in order to make subatomic physics work right, theorists had to introduce the aether-like concept of the Higgs field, which fills all of space and breaks symmetries.&lt;br /&gt;
#In [[Genesis (ch.1)|Genesis 1:6-8]], we are told that one of God's first creations was a firmament in the heavens.  This likely refers to the creation of the luminiferous [[aether]].&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Minkowski space]] is predicated on the idea of four-dimensional vectors of which one component is [[time]].  However, one of the properties of a [[vector space]] is that every vector have an inverse.  Time cannot be a vector because it has no inverse.&lt;br /&gt;
#It is impossible to perform an experiment to determine whether Einstein's theory of relativity is correct, or the older Lorentz aether theory is correct.  Believing one over the other is a matter of [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Despite a century of wasting billions of dollars in work on the theory, &amp;quot;No one knows how to solve completely the equations of general relativity that describe gravity; they are simply beyond current understanding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mathunion.org/o/General/Prizes/2006/TaoENG.pdf Statement in awarding the coveted Fields Medal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Experiments in electromagnetic induction contradict Relativity: &amp;quot;Einstein’s Relativity ... can not explain the experiment in graph 2, in which moving magnetic field has not produced electric field.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wbabin.net/weuro/qingping1.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504223&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Relativity breaks down if a [[solenoid]] is traveling at or near the speed of light.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3244279&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(add to list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Relativity}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:physics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Occupy_Wall_Street&amp;diff=934428</id>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Occupy_Wall_Street&amp;diff=934428"/>
		<updated>2011-11-06T20:52:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: /* Supporters, sponsors, and sympathizers that endorse Occupy Wall Street */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Leftist protest '''Occupy Wall Street''' is an ongoing anti-capitalism rally, with beginnings as an [[astroturfing]] campaign funded by a [[George Soros]] group called ''Adbusters''; invoked by [[Bill Ayers]] &amp;quot;Days of Rage,&amp;quot; the first Occupy protest was staged on September 17, 2011 in [[New York City]] after months of planning by co-founder of [[SEIU]] Stephen Lerner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=345861 Protesters begin 'Day of Rage' against capitalism], ''[[WND]]'', September 17, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=SorosMoney&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/video-exposing-occupy-wall-street-was-organized-from-day-one-by-seiu-acorn-front-the-working-family-party-and-how-they-all-tie-to-the-obama-administration-dnc-democratic-socialists-of-america/ Video Exposing How 'Occupy Wall Street' Was Organized From Day One By SEIU/ACORN Fromt – The Working Family Party, And How They All Tie To The Obama Administration, DNC, Democratic Socialists of America Tides And George Soros], ''[[The Blaze]]'', October 7, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/whos-behind-wall-st-protests-110834998.html Who's behind the Wall Street protests?], ''Reuters'' (news.yahoo.com), October 13, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Occupy Wall Street protesters consist of radicals, anarchists, [[Nihilism|nihilists]], college students, hippies, special interest groups, [[labor unions]] and vendors. They dislike [[capitalism]], blame [[greed]], [[Wall Street]] and the [[banks]] for economic hardship, and have been seen spitting on U.S. Military personnel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/occupy-boston-protesters-spit-on-coast-guard-member-20111013 Occupy Boston Protesters Spit On Coast Guard Member], myfoxboston.com, October 13, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Similar 'Occupy' demonstrations have spread to a dozen cities, and has caused thousands of arrests across the [[United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Occupy Wall Street movement was inspired by the Arab Spring protests in Cairo that were organized by the [[Muslim Brotherhood]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40397 “Day of Rage” Obama re-election team in disguise?], ''Canada Free Press'', September 2011 (Accessed October 16, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://biggovernment.com/taylorking/2011/01/29/did-muslim-brotherhood-learn-day-of-rage-egypt-protest-tactics-from-obama-allies-bill-ayers-and-code-pink/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Egyptians camped out in Tahir Square until [[Hosni Mubarak]] resigned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical roots==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Protesters of Occupy Knoxville oct 2011.jpg|thumb|250px|Protesters in Knoxville, Oct 2011.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Inspired by the Arab Spring protests in Cairo that were organized by the [[Muslim Brotherhood]], the Occupy Wall Street protesters dubbed the September 17 rally a &amp;quot;Day of Rage,&amp;quot; which finds its origin in &amp;quot;Days of Rage,&amp;quot; a violent set of riots waged in Chicago in 1969 by the [[Weather Underground]] [[terrorist]]s Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.  Staged by [[ACORN]] and SEIU affiliates, the September 17 US Day of Rage’s mission statement is “To help facilitate state and city level organization, and to organize the federal protest at the U.S. Capitol.”&amp;lt;ref name=SEIUstephenlerner&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/seius-stephen-lerner-invokes-bill-ayers-days-of-rage-to-take-down-wall-street-this-september/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During an interview with ''Chicago Mag'', Ayers, who was featured on a magazine cover while standing on the American flag, with no regrets, summed up his riot’s intended purpose, stating, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents—that‘s where it’s really at.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=SEIUstephenlerner/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/index.php?cparticle=2&amp;amp;siarticle=1#artanc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a display of anti-American hatred, 'Occupy Portland' protesters rallied behind a sort of theme song, called &amp;quot;F*ck the USA.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Warning: Explicit Language used in linked Video recorded at an 'Occupy' rally in Portland, OR.'' [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKzGbgSe8lg&amp;amp;sns=em Occupy Portland Protesters Sing &amp;quot;F*ck the USA&amp;quot;], Recorded and Uploaded to [[YouTube]] on October 15, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* An Occupy Seattle protester was arrested on October 18 for exposing himself at least five times to children at Westlake Park.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.komonews.com/news/local/132064518.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* An “Occupy Cleveland” protester reported to the police that she was raped in her tent over the weekend on October 15 or 16.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/girl-raped-at-occupy-cleveland-protest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A leftist radical at the Occupy Dayton protest declared, “F*** the military, f*** your flag, f*** the police.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/occupy-dayton-protester-f-the-military-f-your-flag-f-the-police/ Occupy Dayton Protester: ‘F*** The Military, F*** Your Flag, F*** The Police'], ''The Blaze'', October 23, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Wall Street is a protest attempting to counter the influence of the real grassroots movement, the [[Tea Party Movement]]. The protest proclaims that thousands of cities in [[America]] will join their cause and that it will spread internationally to hundreds of cities. Many misinformed people see the protests as a worthy cause, with some falsely relating it to the Tea Party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Wall Street is neither worthy, nor is it similar to the Tea Party; although, as Barack Obama reaffirms his commitment to supporting the movement, the president has attempted to discredit the Tea Party by claiming it's related.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-occupy-wall-street-we-are-their-side_598251.html Obama on Occupy Wall Street: 'We Are on Their Side'], ''[[Weekly Standard]]'', October 18, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Tea Party movement is a collection of concerned citizens that care for future generations, fighting for austerity and an honest national government. Wall Street protesters are selfish, make silly demands, and have misguided rage toward job creators. Over 700 Occupy Wall Street protesters have been arrested during its first month; after more than two years, zero arrests have been made in the Tea Party movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike the Tea Party, [[Obama]] was quick to acknowledge Occupy Wall Street, offering it credibility and a share of frustration and support. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.businessinsider.com/white-house-draws-closer-to-occupy-wall-street-says-obama-is-fighting-for-interests-of-the-99-2011-10 White House Draws Closer To Occupy Wall Street, Says Obama Is Fighting For The Interests Of The 99%, Business Insiders, October 16, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, one chant you will not find at these any of these protests is anger directed at Barack Obama. Nancy Pelosi cried upon learning about the Tea Party; she offered her blessings to Occupy Wall Street. [[Rush Limbaugh]] argued that this protest was organized by the [[White House]] and Obama. [[Bill O'Reilly]] says the &amp;quot;Occupy Wall Street&amp;quot; protesters are &amp;quot;far-left loons&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;anarchists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2011/10/09/wapos-wemple-really-disgraceful-oreilly-called-protesters-far-left-lo WaPo's Wemple: 'Really Disgraceful' That O'Reilly Called Protesters 'Far-Left Loons' and 'Anarchists'], ''[[Newsbusters]]'', October 8, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other reports indicate that sanitation is becoming a concern for Occupy Wall Street as the park where the protesters camp hasn't been cleaned since September 16 and [[Michael Bloomberg | Mayor Bloomberg]] indicates that the protests are costing NYC tourism dollars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Media Collaboration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Lamestream media | Democrat Media Complex]] is willfully covering up the violence, [[vandalism]], and anti-Semitism that truly does define the occupy movement. [[Conservative media]] has documented more than 100 incidents of their outrageous and appalling behavior. [http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/2011/10/28/occupywallstreet-the-rap-sheet-so-far/ See the *UPDATED* #OccupyWallStreet: The Rap Sheet, So Far]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Andrew Breitbart]]'s BigJournalism website shows emails from well-known media members trying to facilitate a message for the protesters, insisting on demands so as to further report on the movement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/10/16/journolist-2-0-occupydc-emails-show-msm-dylan-ratigan-working-with-protesters-to-craft-message/ Journolist 2.0: Occupy Wall Street Emails Show MSM, Dylan Ratigan, Working With Protesters To Craft Message, BigJournalism, October 16, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rush Limbaugh says the numbers of people involved in the protest are unusually small, troubling the MSM. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/10/17/journalists_are_advising_protesters Journalists are Advising Protesters, Rush Limbaugh.com, October 17, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Daily Caller]] is reporting that a host for government-funded [[NPR]], Lisa Simeone has emerged as spokeswoman for the “Occupy D.C.” movement&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/10/19/radio-host-with-ties-to-npr-becomes-spokeswoman-for-occupy-dc/?test=latestnews#ixzz1bI7VedDL Host of NPR Show Also Serves as Spokeswoman for 'Occupy D.C.', Fox News, October 19, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[New York Times]] reporter Natasha Lennard is not merely covering the protests, but is also taking part in planning and executing them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/10/24/nyt_reporter_outed_as_protester_occupy_wall_street_caught_putting_its_money_in_an_evil_corporate_bank NYT Reporter Outed as Protester; Occupy Wall Street Caught Putting Its Money in an Evil, Corporate Bank, Rush Limbaugh.com, October 24, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Washington Post]] and the New York Times have generated a total of 224 stories and opinion pieces praising the protest movement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/dan-gainor/2011/10/28/postnyt-182000-words-occupy-wall-street-and-counting Post/NYT: 182,000 Words on Occupy Wall Street and Counting, Newsbusters.org, October 27, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
109 clips, or 87 percent of the coverage by ABC, CBS, &amp;amp; NBC have produced positive protest stories. In addition, they ran 33 stories or segments about &amp;quot;Occupy&amp;quot; within the first 11 days and only 13 stories for the first year of the Tea Party movement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://weaselzippers.us/2011/10/28/study-big-three-tv-networks-have-devoted-more-than-double-the-coverage-to-occupy-wall-street-than-the-tea-party-87-has-been-positive/ Study: Big Three TV Networks Have Devoted More Than Double The Coverage To Occupy Wall Street, Weasel Zippers, October 27, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astroturfing===&lt;br /&gt;
Reports show that Wall Street protesters are being paid to march. Manufactured, professional designed protest signs indicate [[liberal]] money is influencing the protests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9269-big-soros-money-linked-to-occupy-wall-street Big Soros Money Linked to “Occupy Wall Street”], ''New American'', October 5, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A re-branded [[ACORN]] is involved with the 'Occupy' protests.&amp;lt;ref name=SorosMoney/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of Direction===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]]s mock the movement as Occupy Sesame Street, for its childishness. Conservatives know that it's the government devaluing our currency, weakening our economy and plundering money from the next generation -- Wall Street and the banks aren't to blame. Republicans [[Mitt Romney]] and [[Herman Cain]] have denounced the protests as [[class warfare]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/06/congressional-dems-rally-in-support-of-occupy-wall-street/#ixzz1aIny1Ke7 Congressional Dems rally in support of ‘Occupy Wall Street’], Daily Caller, October 6, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out a fundraising email asking supporters to sign a petition in support of the protesters. President Obama said that the movement reflected &amp;quot;broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/186499-poll-finds-more-than-half-of-all-americans-aware-of-occupy-wall-street-protests?utm_campaign=briefingroom&amp;amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitterfeed Poll finds majority of Americans aware of Occupy Wall Street protests], ''The Hill'', October 10, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The 99% Declaration==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of Occupy Wall Street, a [[progressive]]-[[socialist]] organization called the 99 Percent Declaration Working Group issued the following &amp;quot;Declaration&amp;quot; on October 7, 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://sites.google.com/site/the99percentdeclaration/ The99PercentDeclaration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|WHEREAS THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PROVIDES:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BE IT RESOLVED THAT:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WE, THE NINETY-NINE PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in order to form a more perfect Union, by, for and of the PEOPLE, shall elect and convene a NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY beginning on July 4, 2012 in the City Of Philadelphia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. Election of Delegates:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The People, consisting of all United States citizens who have reached the age of 18, regardless of party affiliation and voter registration status, shall elect Two Delegates, one male and one female, by direct vote, from each of the existing 435 Congressional Districts to represent the People at the NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY in Philadelphia. Said Assembly shall convene on July 4, 2012 in the city of Philadelphia.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The office of Delegate shall be open to all United States citizens who have reached the age of 18. Election Committees, elected by local General Assemblies from all over the United States, shall coordinate with the 99 Percent Declaration Working Group (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the99declaration/) to organize, coordinate and fund this national election by direct democratic voting. The Election Committees shall operate like the original Committees of Correspondence did '''before''' the first American Revolution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. Meeting of the National General Assembly and Deliberation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY, the 870 Delegates shall set forth, consider and vote upon a PETITION OF GRIEVANCES to be submitted to all members of Congress, The Supreme Court and President and each of the political candidates running in the nationwide Congressional and Presidential election in November 2012.  The Delegates of the National General Assembly shall vote upon and implement their own agenda, propagate their own rules and elect or appoint committee members as the Delegates see fit to accomplish their goal of presenting a PETITION OF GRIEVANCES from the 99% of Americans before the 2012 elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Proposed Petition for the Redress of Grievances:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PETITION OF GRIEVANCES shall be non-partisan and address the critical issues now confronting the People of the United States. The Delegates shall deliberate and vote upon proposals for the PETITION OF GRIEVANCES in consultation with the People as the delegates to the first two Continental Congresses did. Below is a suggested list of grievances respectfully submitted by the OWS Working Group on the 99% Declaration. The final version of the PETITION OF GRIEVANCES voted upon by the Delegates of the National General Assembly MAY or MAY NOT include the following suggested issues: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Implementing an immediate ban on all private contributions of money and gifts, to all politicians in federal office, from Individuals, Corporations, Political Action Committees, Super Political Action Committees, Lobbyists, Unions and all other private sources of money to be '''replaced by''' the fair and equal '''public financing''' of all federal political campaigns. We categorically REJECT the concept that money is equal to free speech because if that were so, then only the wealthiest would have a voice. These actions must be taken because it has become clear that '''politicians''' in the United States cannot regulate themselves and '''have become the exclusive''' [[Seventeenth Amendment|representatives of corporations, unions]] and the very wealthy who spend vast sums of money on political campaigns to influence the candidates’ decisions and ensure their reelection year after year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The immediate reversal, even if it requires a Constitutional Amendment, of the outrageous and anti-democratic holding in the &amp;quot;Citizens United&amp;quot; case by the Supreme Court, which equates the payment of money by corporations, wealthy individuals and unions to politicians with free speech. We, the People, demand that institutional bribery and corruption not be deemed protected speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Prohibiting all federal public officials and their immediate family members, whether elected or appointed, from EVER being employed by any corporation they regulate while in office and/or holding any stock or shares in any corporation they regulate while in office until a full 5 years after their term is completed.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. A complete lifetime ban on accepting all gifts, services, money, directly or indirectly, to any elected or appointed federal officials or their immediate family members, from any person, corporation, union or other entity that the public official was charged to regulate while in office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.  A complete reformation of the United States Tax Code to require ALL citizens to '''pay''' a fair share of a [[progressive]], graduated [[income tax]] by '''eliminating''' loopholes, unfair '''tax breaks''', exemptions and deductions, subsidies (e.g. oil, gas and farm) and ending all other methods of evading taxes. The current system of taxation favors the wealthiest Americans, many of whom, pay fewer taxes to the United States Treasury than citizens who earn much less and pay a much higher percentage of income in taxes to the United States Treasury. We, like [[Warren Buffett]], find this income tax disparity to be fundamentally unjust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Medicare for all American citizens or another [[socialized medicine|single-payer healthcare system]], adjusted by a means test (i.e. citizens who can afford it may opt-out and pay their own health insurance or opt-in and pay a means tested premium). The Medicaid program, fraught with [[corruption]] and [[fraud]], will be eliminated '''except for the purpose of providing''' emergency room care to [[illegal aliens|indigent non-citizens]] who will not be covered by the '''single-payer program'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. New comprehensive regulations to '''give''' the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] '''expanded powers''' to shut down corporations, businesses or any entities that intentionally or recklessly damage the environment and/or criminally prosecute individuals who intentionally damage the environment. We also demand the immediate adoption of the most recent '''international protocols''', including the &amp;quot;Washington Declaration&amp;quot; to [[Cap and Trade|cap carbon emissions]] and implement new and existing programs to transition away from fossil fuels to reusable or carbon neutral sources of power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Adoption of an immediate plan to reduce the national debt to a sustainable percentage of GDP by 2020. Reduction of the national debt to be achieved by BOTH a cut in spending to corporations engaged in perpetual war for profit, the &amp;quot;healthcare&amp;quot; industry, the pharmaceutical industry and all other sectors that use the federal budget as their income stream AND a truly '''progressive income tax code''' that does not allow the wealthy and corporations to evade taxes through excessive deductions, subsidies and loopholes. We agree that spending cuts are necessary but those cuts must be made to facilitate what is best for the People of the United States of America, not multinational and domestic corporations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. '''Passage of''' a comprehensive job and job-training act like the [[Stimulus bill|American Jobs Act]] to employ our citizens in jobs that are available with specialized training and by putting People to work now by repairing America's crumbling infrastructure. We also recommend the '''establishment of an online international job exchange''' to match employers with skilled workers or employers willing to train workers in 21st century skills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Student loan debt relief. Our young People and students are more than $830 billion in debt from education loans alone. Payment and interest on these debts should be deferred for periods of unemployment and the principal on these loans reduced '''using a corporate tax surcharge.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. Immediate passage of the [[Dream Act]] and comprehensive immigration and border security reform including offering visas, lawful permanent resident status and citizenship to the world’s brightest People to stay and work in our industries and schools after they obtain their education and training in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Recalling all military personnel at all non-essential bases and refocusing national defense goals to address threats posed by the geopolitics of the 21st century, including terrorism and limiting the large scale deployment of military forces to instances where Congressional approval has been granted to counter the Military Industrial Complex's goal of perpetual war for profit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. '''Mandating new educational goals''' to train the American public to perform jobs in a 21st Century economy, '''particularly''' in the areas of technology and '''green energy''', taking into consideration the redundancy caused by technology and the inexpensive cost of labor in China, India and other countries and paying our teachers a competitive salary commensurate with the salaries of employees in the private sector with similar skills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Subject to the elimination of corporate tax loopholes and exploited exemptions and deductions stated above, offering tax incentives to businesses to remain in the United States and hire its citizens rather than outsource jobs and reconstruct the manufacturing capacity of the United States.  In conjunction with a new jobs act, '''reinstitution''' of the Works Progress Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps '''or a similar emergency governmental agency tasked with creating new public works projects''' to provide jobs to the 46 million People living in poverty, the 9.1% unemployed and 10% underemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Implementing of immediate legislation to encourage China and our other trading partners to end currency manipulation and reduce the trade deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Immediate reenactment of the Glass-Steagall Act and '''increased regulation of Wall Street and the financial industry''' by the SEC, FINRA and the other financial regulators, and the commencement of a Justice Department criminal investigations into the Securities and Banking industries practices that led to the collapse of markets, $700 billion bail-out, and financial firm failures in 2007-2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Adoption of a plan similar to President Clinton’s proposal to end the mortgage crisis and instead of the Federal Reserve continuing to lower interest rates for loans to banks who are refusing to loan to small businesses and consumers, '''the Federal Reserve shall buy all underwater or foreclosed mortgages and refinance these debts at 1% or less to be managed by the newly established Consumer Financial Protection Bureau''' (and foreclosure task force described below) because 1% or less is the interest rate the Federal Reserve loans to the banks directly who hoard the cash rather than loan it to the People and small businesses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. An immediate one year freeze on '''all foreclosures to be reviewed by an independent foreclosure task force appointed by Congress and the Executive Branch''' to (in conjunction with the  Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ) determine, on a case by case basis, whether foreclosure proceedings should continue based on the circumstances of each homeowner and propriety of the financial institution's conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Subject to the above ban on all private money and gifts in politics, to enact '''additional campaign finance reform requiring''' free air time and '''public campaign finances''' to all candidates who obtain sufficient petition signatures and/or votes to participate in the primaries and/or electoral process, to shorten the campaign season and to allow voting on weekends and holidays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. An immediate withdrawal of all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and a substantial increase in the amount of funding needed for veteran job placement and the treatment of the physical and emotional injuries sustained by veterans in these wars. Our veterans are committing suicide at an unprecedented rate and we must help now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that IF the PETITION OF GRIEVANCES approved by the 870 Delegates of the NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY in consultation with the PEOPLE, is not acted upon by Congress, the President, and Supreme Court, to the satisfaction of the Delegates of the NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY, said Delegates shall organize a THIRD, COMPLETELY NON-PARTISAN, INDEPENDENT POLITICAL PARTY to run candidates for every available Congressional seat in the mid-term election of 2014 and again in 2016 until all vestiges of the existing corrupt corporatocracy have been removed by the ballot box.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==13 demands==&lt;br /&gt;
The content below is listed on the Occupy Wall Street website by an affiliated protester. OWS has made their intentions known that it is an unofficial post and they do not have an official list of demands. Per their website,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending “Freetrade” by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand four: Free college education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America’s nuclear power plants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the “Books.” World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the “Books.” And I don’t mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Demands===&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21, 2011, an unofficial list of 11 demands (each labeled &amp;quot;our one demand&amp;quot;) was posted on the Occupy Wall Street website from &amp;quot;the fifth communiqué.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://occupywallst.org/article/a-message-from-occupied-wall-street-day-five/ A Message From Occupy Wall Street]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The group claimed the following demands.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|On September 21st, 2011, Troy Davis, an innocent man, was murdered by the state of Georgia. Troy Davis was one of the 99 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending capital punishment is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, the richest 400 Americans owned more wealth than half of the country's population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending wealth inequality is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, four of our members were arrested on baseless charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending police intimidation is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, we determined that Yahoo lied about occupywallst.org being in spam filters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending corporate censorship is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly eighty percent of Americans thought the country was on the wrong track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending the modern gilded age is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly 15% of Americans approved of the job Congress was doing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending political corruption is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly one sixth of Americans did not have work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending joblessness is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly one sixth of America lived in poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending poverty is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly fifty million Americans were without health insurance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending health-profiteering is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, America had military bases in around one hundred and thirty out of one hundred and sixty-five countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending American imperialism is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, America was at war with the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending war is our one demand.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Occupy Wall Street and anti-semitism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several anti-Semitic incidents have been reported during &amp;quot;Occupy Wall Street&amp;quot; demonstrations in New York as Jews were blamed for the turmoil in America's financial markets. In addition, anti-Israel signs were raised against &amp;quot;Israel's occupation of Gaza&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/10/11/occupy-wall-street-has-an-anti-semitism-problem/ Occupy Wall Street Has an Anti-Semitism Problem, Commentary.com, October 11, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Anti-Semitic sign bearers and speakers who have latched onto the Occupy demonstrations have Jewish leaders in Chicago concerned. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4135361,00.html Anti-Semitism tainting Occupy Wall Street protests, Ynet News, October 16, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Boston protest camp marched to the building that houses the Israeli consulate and held a brief sit-in in the building’s lobby. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/11/stunner-jew-bashing-obama-endorsed-occupy-boston-loons-hold-sit-in-protest-at-israeli-consulate-video/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gatewaypundit2+%28Gateway+Pundit%29 Stunner… Jew-Bashing Obama-Endorsed Occupy Boston Loons Hold Sit-in Protest at Israeli Consulate, Gateway Pundit, November 5, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]] and [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal.  A crowd at Occupy Wall Street was led to repeat various chants which included a chant involving bestiality and the incident was videotaped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is an excerpt of the chant:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Everything seems to be possible. [Crowd Parrot Chant] You can travel to the moon.  [CPC] You can become immortal [CPC] by biogenetics.  You can have sex with animals, or whatever. [CPC].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supporters, sponsors, and sympathizers that endorse Occupy Wall Street==&lt;br /&gt;
Official list of Occupy Wall Street’s supporters, sponsors and sympathizers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2011/10/31/the-99-official-list-of-ows/ The 99%: Official list of Occupy Wall Street’s supporters, sponsors and sympathizers, Pajamas media, October 31, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charlie Rangel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nancy Pelosi]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pelosi-supports-occupy-wall-street-movement/story?id=14696893#.Trf44HL4JJE Pelosi Supports Occupy Wall Street Movement - ABC News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-10-11/politics/30265829_1_wall-street-middle-class-republicans It's Official: Obama Has Embraced Occupy Wall Street], bussinessinsider.com, October 10, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Debbie Wasserman Schultz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Communist Party USA]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/the-next-big-step-occupy-chicago-gives-rousing-welcome-to-communist-party-u-s-a/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Nazi Party]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/figures-nazi-party-throws-support-behind-occupy-wall-street-movement/ Nazis and Communists Throw Their Support Behind Occupy Wall Street Movements, Gateway Pundit, October 15, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Gore]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/al-gore-says-hes-cheering-on-the-occupy-wall-street-movement/?utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_source=pulsenews Al Gore Says He's Cheering On The Occupy Wall Street Movement], ''The Blaze'', October 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barney Frank]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66412.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Russel Simmons]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[CNN]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[MSNBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington Post]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Black Panthers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Van Jones]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[SEIU]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Ayers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ACORN]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bernie Sanders]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Russ Feingold]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/russ-feingold-endorses-occupy-wall-street-this-will-make-the-tea-party-look-like--a-tea-party/2011/03/03/gIQANucZNL_blog.html Russ Feingold endorses Occupy Wall Street: “This will make the Tea Party look like ... a tea party.” - Washington Post]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rosanne Barr]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Susan Sarandon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kanye West]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cornel West]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alec Baldwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arianna Huffington]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hugo Chavez]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ben &amp;amp; Jerry's Ice Cream]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barbara Lee]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Raúl Grijalva]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Keith Ellison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louise Slaughter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Adolf Hitler]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;JONATHAN OLSEN &amp;quot;How Green Were the Nazis? Nature, Environment, and Nation in the Third Reich (review)&amp;quot; Technology and Culture – Volume 48, Number 1, January 2007, pp. 207–208&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dennis Kucinich]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peter DeFazio]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Larson]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christiane Amanpour]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daily Kos]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Karger]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/18/karger-praises-occupy-wall-street-proposes-jobs-plan/ Karger praises Occupy Wall Street, proposes jobs plan - Daily Caller]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cindy Sheehan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kcra.com/news/29494989/detail.html 'Occupy Wall Street' Going Global - KCRA]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mumia Abu-Jamal]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.therightscoop.com/occupy-wall-street-snags-coveted-mumia-abu-jamal-endorsement/ Occupy Wall Street snags coveted Mumia Abu-Jamal endorsement - The Right Scoop]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2011/10/late-night-bill-clinton-occupy-wall-street-is-a-positive-thing.html Late Night: Bill Clinton: Occupy Wall Street is 'a positive thing' - LA Times]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lincoln Chafee]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.630wpro.com/Article.asp?id=2323467&amp;amp;spid=38785 Chafee: &amp;quot;Occupy&amp;quot; protestors on the right track - WPRO]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ralph Nader]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/consumer-advocate-ralph-nader-encourages-occupy-wall-street-222413233.html Consumer Advocate Ralph Nader Encourages &amp;quot;Occupy Wall Street&amp;quot; Protesters to Challenge Wall Street Abuses - PR Newswire]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Janeane Garofalo]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/29/garofalo-gop-using-herman-cain-to-keep-the-racism-very-covert/ Garofalo: GOP using Herman Cain ‘to keep the racism very covert’ - The Daily Caller]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayatollah [[Ali Khamenei]], Supreme Leader of [[Iran]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://frontpagemag.com/2011/10/14/khamenei-cheers-on-occupy-wall-street/ Khamenei Cheers On Occupy Wall Street - FrontPage Magazine]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louis Farrakhan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/generation-y-politics-in-national/occupy-wall-street-protestors-nazis Occupy Wall Street protestors Nazis, maybe socialists? - The Examiner]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pete Seeger]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gawker.com/5852365/pete-seeger-joins-occupy-wall-street-with-this-little-light Pete Seeger Joins Occupy Wall Street With ‘This Little Light’ - Gawker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Patrick Leahy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.vpr.net/news_detail/92394/ Leahy Hopes Occupy Movement Plays Role In 2012 Elections - Vermont Public Radio]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Meghan McCain]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://powerwall.msnbc.msn.com/politics/my-day-at-occupy-wall-street-1705384.story - The Daily Beast]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jesse Jackson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/10/jesse_jackson_literally_links.html Jesse Jackson Literally Links Arms With Occupy Wall Street Protesters to Protect Medical Tent - New York Magazine]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[One Nation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Restore Sanity rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Save the American Dream rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://occupywallst.org/ OccupyWallSt.org]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://twitter.com/#!/OccupyArrests Occupy arrests tracker on Twitter]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.breitbart.tv/sick-of-media-comparing-occupy-wall-street-to-tea-party-watch-this/ What is Occupy Wall Street? Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2049137/Occupy-Wall-Street-Violence-erupts-police-clash-protesters.html Occupy Wall Street Violence Erupts]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2011/09/us-day-of-rage-occupy-wall-street-acorn-seiu-robin-hood-tax-new-constitution/ Us Day of Rage, Occupy Wall Street: ACORN, SEIU, Robin Hood Tax, New Constitution]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40397 “Day of Rage” Obama re-election team in disguise?]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/seius-stephen-lerner-invokes-bill-ayers-days-of-rage-to-take-down-wall-street-this-september/ SEIU's Stephen Lerner Invokes Bill Ayers 'Days of Rage' To Take Down Wall Street This September]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/11/04/giuliani-obama-owns-occupy-wall-street Giuliani: &amp;quot;Obama Owns Occupy Wall Street&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anarchists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Occupy_Wall_Street&amp;diff=928827</id>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Occupy_Wall_Street&amp;diff=928827"/>
		<updated>2011-10-16T12:39:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Protesters of Occupy Knoxville oct 2011.jpg|thumb|250px|Protesters in Knoxville, Oct 2011.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Leftist protest '''Occupy Wall Street''' is an ongoing anti-capitalism rally, with beginnings as a small [[astroturfing]] campaign on September 17, 2011 in [[New York City]], that spread to various [[liberal]] cities and is causing thousands of arrests across the [[United States]].&amp;lt;ref name=SorosMoney&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/video-exposing-occupy-wall-street-was-organized-from-day-one-by-seiu-acorn-front-the-working-family-party-and-how-they-all-tie-to-the-obama-administration-dnc-democratic-socialists-of-america/ Video Exposing How 'Occupy Wall Street' Was Organized From Day One By SEIU/ACORN Fromt – The Working Family Party, And How They All Tie To The Obama Administration, DNC, Democratic Socialists of America Tides And George Soros], ''[[The Blaze]]'', October 7, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Occupy Wall Street protesters consist of radicals, anarchists, [[Nihilism|nihilists]], college students, hippies, special interest groups, [[labor unions]] and vendors. They dislike [[capitalism]], blame [[greed]], [[Wall Street]] and the [[banks]] for economic hardship, and have been seen spitting on U.S. Military personnel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/occupy-boston-protesters-spit-on-coast-guard-member-20111013 Occupy Boston Protesters Spit On Coast Guard Member], myfoxboston.com, October 13, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movement was inspired by the Arab Spring protests in Cairo that were organized by the [[Muslim Brotherhood]]. Egyptians camped out in Tahir Square until [[Hosni Mubarak]] resigned. Similar 'Occupy' demonstrations have spread to a dozen cities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sixties radical and icon of the Left [[Bill Ayers]], who was featured on a magazine cover while standing on the American flag,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; wrote concerning Occupy Wall Street, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/obama-administration-in-los-angeles/days-of-rage-coming-to-the-united-states-to-destroy-capitalism Is American terrorist Bill Ayers behind the current &amp;quot;Days of Rage&amp;quot; protests?], ''Washington Examiner'', September 11th 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; {{cquote| Let’s overthrow American capitalism and the American way!!!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Wall Street is a protest attempting to counter the influence of the real grassroots movement, the [[Tea Party Movement]]. The protest proclaims that thousands of cities in [[America]] will join their cause and that it will spread internationally to hundreds of cities. Many misinformed people see the protests as a worthy cause, with some falsely relating it to the Tea Party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Wall Street is neither worthy, nor is it similar to the Tea Party. The Tea Party movement is a collection of concerned citizens that care for future generations, fighting for austerity and an honest national government. Wall Street protesters are selfish, make silly demands, and have misguided rage toward job creators. Over 700 Occupy Wall Street protesters have been arrested during its first month; after more than two years, zero arrests have been made in the Tea Party movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike the Tea Party, [[Obama]] was quick to acknowledge Occupy Wall Street, offering it credibility and a share of frustration and support. Nancy Pelosi cried upon learning about the Tea Party; she offered her blessings to Occupy Wall Street. [[Rush Limbaugh]] argued that this protest was organized by the [[White House]] and Obama. [[Bill O'Reilly]] says the &amp;quot;Occupy Wall Street&amp;quot; protesters are &amp;quot;far-left loons&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;anarchists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2011/10/09/wapos-wemple-really-disgraceful-oreilly-called-protesters-far-left-lo WaPo's Wemple: 'Really Disgraceful' That O'Reilly Called Protesters 'Far-Left Loons' and 'Anarchists'], ''[[Newsbusters]]'', October 8, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other reports indicate that sanitation is becoming a concern for Occupy Wall Street as the park where the protesters camp hasn't been cleaned since September 16 and [[Michael Bloomberg | Mayor Bloomberg]] indicates that the protests are costing NYC tourism dollars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite criticism a majority of Americans are favorable towards the movement with 29% of those polled saying they are somewhat favorable and 25% saying they are very favorable. 10% rated the movement somewhat unfavorable and 13% rated the movement very unfavorable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://swampland.time.com/full-results-of-oct-9-10-2011-time-poll/] Times Poll of Current Views, Time, October 10, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astroturfing===&lt;br /&gt;
Reports show that Wall Street protesters are being paid to march. Manufactured, professional designed protest signs indicate [[liberal]] money is influencing the protests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9269-big-soros-money-linked-to-occupy-wall-street Big Soros Money Linked to “Occupy Wall Street”], ''New American'', October 5, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A re-branded [[ACORN]] is involved with the 'Occupy' protests.&amp;lt;ref name=SorosMoney/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of Direction===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]]s mock the movement as Occupy Sesame Street, for its childishness. Conservatives know that it's the government devaluing our currency, weakening our economy and plundering money from the next generation -- Wall Street and the banks aren't to blame. Republicans [[Mitt Romney]] and [[Herman Cain]] have denounced the protests as [[class warfare]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/06/congressional-dems-rally-in-support-of-occupy-wall-street/#ixzz1aIny1Ke7 Congressional Dems rally in support of ‘Occupy Wall Street’], Daily Caller, October 6, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out a fundraising email asking supporters to sign a petition in support of the protesters. President Obama said that the movement reflected &amp;quot;broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/186499-poll-finds-more-than-half-of-all-americans-aware-of-occupy-wall-street-protests?utm_campaign=briefingroom&amp;amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitterfeed Poll finds majority of Americans aware of Occupy Wall Street protests], ''The Hill'', October 10, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==13 demands==&lt;br /&gt;
The content below is listed on the Occupy Wall Street website by an affiliated protester. OWS has made their intentions known that it is an unofficial post and they do not have an official list of demands. Per their website,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending “Freetrade” by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand four: Free college education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America’s nuclear power plants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the “Books.” World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the “Books.” And I don’t mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Demands===&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21, 2011, an unofficial list of demands was posted on the Occupy Wall Street website from &amp;quot;the fifth communiqué.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://occupywallst.org/article/a-message-from-occupied-wall-street-day-five/ A Message From Occupy Wall Street]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The group claimed the following demands.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|On September 21st, 2011, Troy Davis, an innocent man, was murdered by the state of Georgia. Troy Davis was one of the 99 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending capital punishment is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, the richest 400 Americans owned more wealth than half of the country's population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending wealth inequality is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, four of our members were arrested on baseless charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending police intimidation is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, we determined that Yahoo lied about occupywallst.org being in spam filters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending corporate censorship is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly eighty percent of Americans thought the country was on the wrong track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending the modern gilded age is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly 15% of Americans approved of the job Congress was doing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending political corruption is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly one sixth of Americans did not have work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending joblessness is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly one sixth of America lived in poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending poverty is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly fifty million Americans were without health insurance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending health-profiteering is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, America had military bases in around one hundred and thirty out of one hundred and sixty-five countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending American imperialism is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, America was at war with the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending war is our one demand.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal endorsement for Occupy Wall Street==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charlie Rangel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-10-11/politics/30265829_1_wall-street-middle-class-republicans It's Official: Obama Has Embraced Occupy Wall Street], bussinessinsider.com, October 10, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Debbie Wasserman Schultz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Communist Party USA]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Nazi Party]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/figures-nazi-party-throws-support-behind-occupy-wall-street-movement/ Nazis and Communists Throw Their Support Behind Occupy Wall Street Movements, Gateway Pundit, October 15, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Gore]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/al-gore-says-hes-cheering-on-the-occupy-wall-street-movement/?utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_source=pulsenews Al Gore Says He's Cheering On The Occupy Wall Street Movement], ''The Blaze'', October 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Russel Simmons]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[CNN]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[MSNBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington Post]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Van Jones]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[SEIU]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Ayers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ACORN]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bernie Sanders]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Russ Feingold]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rosanne Barr]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Susan Sarandon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kanye West]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cornel West]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alec Baldwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arianna Huffington]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hugo Chavez]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ben &amp;amp; Jerry's Ice Cream]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barbara Lee]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Raúl Grijalva]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Keith Ellison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louise Slaughter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dennis Kucinich]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peter DeFazio]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Larson]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christiane Amanpour]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daily Kos]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[One Nation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Restore Sanity rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Save the American Dream rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://occupywallst.org/ OccupyWallSt.org]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.breitbart.tv/sick-of-media-comparing-occupy-wall-street-to-tea-party-watch-this/ What is Occupy Wall Street? Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2049137/Occupy-Wall-Street-Violence-erupts-police-clash-protesters.html Occupy Wall Street Violence Erupts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anarchists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Occupy_Wall_Street&amp;diff=928826</id>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Occupy_Wall_Street&amp;diff=928826"/>
		<updated>2011-10-16T12:37:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Protesters of Occupy Knoxville oct 2011.jpg|thumb|250px|Protesters in Knoxville, Oct 2011.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Leftist protest '''Occupy Wall Street''' is an ongoing anti-capitalism rally, with beginnings as a small [[astroturfing]] campaign on September 17, 2011 in [[New York City]], that spread to various [[liberal]] cities and is causing thousands of arrests across the [[United States]].&amp;lt;ref name=SorosMoney&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/video-exposing-occupy-wall-street-was-organized-from-day-one-by-seiu-acorn-front-the-working-family-party-and-how-they-all-tie-to-the-obama-administration-dnc-democratic-socialists-of-america/ Video Exposing How 'Occupy Wall Street' Was Organized From Day One By SEIU/ACORN Fromt – The Working Family Party, And How They All Tie To The Obama Administration, DNC, Democratic Socialists of America Tides And George Soros], ''[[The Blaze]]'', October 7, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Occupy Wall Street protesters consist of radicals, anarchists, nihilists, college students, hippies, special interest groups, [[labor unions]] and vendors. They dislike [[capitalism]], blame [[greed]], [[Wall Street]] and the [[banks]] for economic hardship, and have been seen spitting on U.S. Military personnel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/occupy-boston-protesters-spit-on-coast-guard-member-20111013 Occupy Boston Protesters Spit On Coast Guard Member], myfoxboston.com, October 13, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movement was inspired by the Arab Spring protests in Cairo that were organized by the [[Muslim Brotherhood]]. Egyptians camped out in Tahir Square until [[Hosni Mubarak]] resigned. Similar 'Occupy' demonstrations have spread to a dozen cities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sixties radical and icon of the Left [[Bill Ayers]], who was featured on a magazine cover while standing on the American flag,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; wrote concerning Occupy Wall Street, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/obama-administration-in-los-angeles/days-of-rage-coming-to-the-united-states-to-destroy-capitalism Is American terrorist Bill Ayers behind the current &amp;quot;Days of Rage&amp;quot; protests?], ''Washington Examiner'', September 11th 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; {{cquote| Let’s overthrow American capitalism and the American way!!!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Wall Street is a protest attempting to counter the influence of the real grassroots movement, the [[Tea Party Movement]]. The protest proclaims that thousands of cities in [[America]] will join their cause and that it will spread internationally to hundreds of cities. Many misinformed people see the protests as a worthy cause, with some falsely relating it to the Tea Party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occupy Wall Street is neither worthy, nor is it similar to the Tea Party. The Tea Party movement is a collection of concerned citizens that care for future generations, fighting for austerity and an honest national government. Wall Street protesters are selfish, make silly demands, and have misguided rage toward job creators. Over 700 Occupy Wall Street protesters have been arrested during its first month; after more than two years, zero arrests have been made in the Tea Party movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike the Tea Party, [[Obama]] was quick to acknowledge Occupy Wall Street, offering it credibility and a share of frustration and support. Nancy Pelosi cried upon learning about the Tea Party; she offered her blessings to Occupy Wall Street. [[Rush Limbaugh]] argued that this protest was organized by the [[White House]] and Obama. [[Bill O'Reilly]] says the &amp;quot;Occupy Wall Street&amp;quot; protesters are &amp;quot;far-left loons&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;anarchists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2011/10/09/wapos-wemple-really-disgraceful-oreilly-called-protesters-far-left-lo WaPo's Wemple: 'Really Disgraceful' That O'Reilly Called Protesters 'Far-Left Loons' and 'Anarchists'], ''[[Newsbusters]]'', October 8, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other reports indicate that sanitation is becoming a concern for Occupy Wall Street as the park where the protesters camp hasn't been cleaned since September 16 and [[Michael Bloomberg | Mayor Bloomberg]] indicates that the protests are costing NYC tourism dollars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite criticism a majority of Americans are favorable towards the movement with 29% of those polled saying they are somewhat favorable and 25% saying they are very favorable. 10% rated the movement somewhat unfavorable and 13% rated the movement very unfavorable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://swampland.time.com/full-results-of-oct-9-10-2011-time-poll/] Times Poll of Current Views, Time, October 10, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astroturfing===&lt;br /&gt;
Reports show that Wall Street protesters are being paid to march. Manufactured, professional designed protest signs indicate [[liberal]] money is influencing the protests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9269-big-soros-money-linked-to-occupy-wall-street Big Soros Money Linked to “Occupy Wall Street”], ''New American'', October 5, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A re-branded [[ACORN]] is involved with the 'Occupy' protests.&amp;lt;ref name=SorosMoney/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of Direction===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]]s mock the movement as Occupy Sesame Street, for its childishness. Conservatives know that it's the government devaluing our currency, weakening our economy and plundering money from the next generation -- Wall Street and the banks aren't to blame. Republicans [[Mitt Romney]] and [[Herman Cain]] have denounced the protests as [[class warfare]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/06/congressional-dems-rally-in-support-of-occupy-wall-street/#ixzz1aIny1Ke7 Congressional Dems rally in support of ‘Occupy Wall Street’], Daily Caller, October 6, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out a fundraising email asking supporters to sign a petition in support of the protesters. President Obama said that the movement reflected &amp;quot;broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/186499-poll-finds-more-than-half-of-all-americans-aware-of-occupy-wall-street-protests?utm_campaign=briefingroom&amp;amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitterfeed Poll finds majority of Americans aware of Occupy Wall Street protests], ''The Hill'', October 10, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==13 demands==&lt;br /&gt;
The content below is listed on the Occupy Wall Street website by an affiliated protester. OWS has made their intentions known that it is an unofficial post and they do not have an official list of demands. Per their website,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending “Freetrade” by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand four: Free college education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America’s nuclear power plants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the “Books.” World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the “Books.” And I don’t mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Demands===&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21, 2011, an unofficial list of demands was posted on the Occupy Wall Street website from &amp;quot;the fifth communiqué.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://occupywallst.org/article/a-message-from-occupied-wall-street-day-five/ A Message From Occupy Wall Street]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The group claimed the following demands.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|On September 21st, 2011, Troy Davis, an innocent man, was murdered by the state of Georgia. Troy Davis was one of the 99 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending capital punishment is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, the richest 400 Americans owned more wealth than half of the country's population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending wealth inequality is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, four of our members were arrested on baseless charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending police intimidation is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, we determined that Yahoo lied about occupywallst.org being in spam filters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending corporate censorship is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly eighty percent of Americans thought the country was on the wrong track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending the modern gilded age is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly 15% of Americans approved of the job Congress was doing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending political corruption is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly one sixth of Americans did not have work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending joblessness is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly one sixth of America lived in poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending poverty is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, roughly fifty million Americans were without health insurance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending health-profiteering is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, America had military bases in around one hundred and thirty out of one hundred and sixty-five countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending American imperialism is our one demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21st, 2011, America was at war with the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ending war is our one demand.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal endorsement for Occupy Wall Street==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charlie Rangel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-10-11/politics/30265829_1_wall-street-middle-class-republicans It's Official: Obama Has Embraced Occupy Wall Street], bussinessinsider.com, October 10, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Debbie Wasserman Schultz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Communist Party USA]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Nazi Party]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/figures-nazi-party-throws-support-behind-occupy-wall-street-movement/ Nazis and Communists Throw Their Support Behind Occupy Wall Street Movements, Gateway Pundit, October 15, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Gore]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/al-gore-says-hes-cheering-on-the-occupy-wall-street-movement/?utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_source=pulsenews Al Gore Says He's Cheering On The Occupy Wall Street Movement], ''The Blaze'', October 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Russel Simmons]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[CNN]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[MSNBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington Post]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Van Jones]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[SEIU]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Ayers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ACORN]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bernie Sanders]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Russ Feingold]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rosanne Barr]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Susan Sarandon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kanye West]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cornel West]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alec Baldwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arianna Huffington]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hugo Chavez]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ben &amp;amp; Jerry's Ice Cream]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barbara Lee]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Raúl Grijalva]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Keith Ellison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louise Slaughter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dennis Kucinich]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peter DeFazio]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Larson]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christiane Amanpour]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daily Kos]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[One Nation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Restore Sanity rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Save the American Dream rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://occupywallst.org/ OccupyWallSt.org]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.breitbart.tv/sick-of-media-comparing-occupy-wall-street-to-tea-party-watch-this/ What is Occupy Wall Street? Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2049137/Occupy-Wall-Street-Violence-erupts-police-clash-protesters.html Occupy Wall Street Violence Erupts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anarchists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Virginity&amp;diff=901975</id>
		<title>Virginity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Virginity&amp;diff=901975"/>
		<updated>2011-08-17T00:24:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: Fixed quote template&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Agirls.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Virginity''' as a term is an expression of [[purity]]. It implies pure, unadulterated, chaste. A virgin is a person of either [[gender]] who has not had sex.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Some girls stay secretive about their [[Christianity]] and desire for virginity until marriage. Don’t be ashamed to let others know where you stand. Ask your youth pastor about signing a document proclaiming your purity commitment. Then tell others about it. Consider wearing a purity symbol such as a ring or special necklace — especially on dates. These have no special power, but they can remind you of your plan to remain sexually pure.|20px|20px|[http://www.briomag.com/briomagazine/briobeyond/a0004486.html What's Your Plan for Sexual Purity?] by Elaine Creasman.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Virginity is respected and valued in many societies, especially female virginity, which is often interwoven with personal or family honor and patriarchy in some cultures. Some men place importance on a woman's virginity, especially in a prospective wife.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Virginity.jpg|thumb|This image is based on a [[World War I]] poster of Uncle Sam exhorting men to &amp;quot;protect the nation's honor&amp;quot;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sin is addictive]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sexual purity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com/Hymns_and_Carols/a_virgin_most_pure.htm A Virgin Most Pure] Words &amp;amp; Music. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sexualfables.com/voices_and_saints.php Was Joan of Arc a Virgin?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.passtheword.org/SHAKER-MANUSCRIPTS/Abstinence/shaker-abst-x1.htm A Virgin Life]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://atheism.about.com/od/religiousright/ig/Christian-Propaganda-Posters/Protecting-Girls-Virginity.htm Fathers - Virginity.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ethics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virtues]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=885099</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=885099"/>
		<updated>2011-07-01T18:27:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: /* Regarding &amp;quot;Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform&amp;quot; Essay */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your block policy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was just wondering; why are you blocking people with the reason that they don't give their name?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People can simply say whatever name they wanted and you wouldn't know if it is true or not.&lt;br /&gt;
More importantly the account creation page states that submitting your name is '''optional'''&lt;br /&gt;
Can please explain the reasoning behind your block policy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ps: I'd appreciate you not blocking me merely for asking this question.  I just ask out of curiosity  ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philny|Philny]] 18:20, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just as it is optional for first name last initial, the block policy is of the administrators discretion. It helps eliminate sock accounts used by [troll]]s and if the user is truly interested in contributing in good faith, they will recreate their username as commanded. Do users/trolls use fake names? absolutely. Are you really Phil? I chose not to recreate your account but I could be wrong about you. Time will tell. Hope this is a sufficient answer. Have a great day! --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:28, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Jpatt. In all honesty I don't see how your practice would help eliminate sock accounts. People can simply lie about who they are. Socks are best controlled through an IP range block if you asked me. &lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly I would think that good faith would be assumed for new people until they explicitly become trolls/vandals. but hey that's just me. &lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still trying to get rid of those liberal Wikipepdia ways. [[User:Philny|Philny]] 19:54, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Is it foolproof? No. They are not blocked from contributing just blocked from using that name. So it is of good faith on our part to allow them to recreate a username. I did not create the policy and I was  subject to the same policy when I first joined. We'll banish someone when needed and we will ferret out those fake accounts over time. To obey an administrators request is the first step toward recognizing a good faith contributor.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:18, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hi. My former name was STramp, but you seem to have decided that that cannot be my real name. I'm not quite sure why?[[User:StevenTramp|StevenTramp]] 21:23, 10 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re:Welcome! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome! I'll be sure to read the Editor's Guide ;) --[[User:AznBurger|AznBurger]] 21:36, 19 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative 3737, &amp;quot;everything you say is conservative&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...but really not [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chris_Matthews&amp;amp;curid=10356&amp;amp;diff=846659&amp;amp;oldid=846644 family-friendly.] Thanks for heading him off! [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:32, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The IP is a school and he didn't actually cuss which would cross the line. I am willing to give a second chance if the rules are followed. BTW, I hope no hard feelings for targeting you in the past. Your edits were excellent.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:38, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Life is too short for hard feelings. Good call on the &amp;quot;second chance&amp;quot; thing. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:39, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello, there is a reason I don't use my real name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll write you an email about it if you like, I would have before but you locked the email so I could not. Account creation was also turned off, which makes recreating my account difficult. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy2|AlaskanEconomy2]] 20:43, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I now feel pretty foolish not having checked this account before creating that one. Thanks/sorry. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:52, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for uploading that image yesterday. With regards to my username, I created it before there was any specific username policy on Conservapedia's Guidelines or Commandments page (even though I've only been contributing recently). If it is important that I have username that contains only my name/initials, I will change it. --[[User:Toadaron|Toadaron]] 17:40, 18 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New conservative pages for 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed you were laying down plans for pages to create. I think you might consider making a page on the pence amendment, the recent 240-185 house vote to amend Title X to remove the family planning grants from organizations that perform abortions (like planned parenthood). While I support the decision the issue is outside of my area of specialization and I am afraid of getting some important facts wrong. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:43, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe at some future point. It's too early to determine the outcome. You're welcome to start it.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:45, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== uploading images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can I upload non-political, non-controversial images that I made myself to Conservapedia?  I suppose you or the Conservapedia administration would like to preview images before uploading them?  How do I show them for you to preview?  [[User:HPadleckas|HPadleckas]] 21:34, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Send to conservapedia@zoho.com--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:39, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Celebrity crime==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, Jpatt. I'm wondering how and when we should report (gloat over?) celebrity crime, like a female pop star arrested for being drunk in public, getting a speeding ticket, etc. Are we trying to prove that Hollywood produces (or encourages) self-indulgent behavior, or what? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:53, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I don't have a litmus test for inclusion. I simply take celebrities, be it Democrat or Republican, and post their crimes. As role models, they need to be exposed as to why they make headlines. Their behavior is an example of who &amp;quot;not to follow&amp;quot;. If you have suggestions, of course I would work with you. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:04, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I had nothing in mind, just trying to stimulate thought here. Carry on, my good man! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:21, 5 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Jpatt - I manually copy-pasted move a page from [[Frankfurt school]] to [[Essay:Frankfurt school]] - but upon examining the content it appears that the original author - CharlieO - copy pasted that from another site. Could you delete both pages? Thanks!--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:57, 26 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo upload==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I would like to upload a photo of myself, I don't have the rights, can you do it for me? Thanks.--[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 20:35, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, send to conservapedia@zoho.com --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:19, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. :)--[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 21:23, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just sent it to you. :) --[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 21:32, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. [http://www.conservapedia.com/images/4/42/Me.jpg]--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:41, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you. :)--[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 21:44, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I need you to check your email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
K? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 23:20, 27 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== nice reversions! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're fast, sir.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:50, 2 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you hear? I'm Quick Draw McGraw!--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:54, 2 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the helpful links and the welcome. I hope to become a valuable member of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Editing the Wicca page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to formally request that the &amp;quot;murders&amp;quot; section be removed for the reasons stated on the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a place to smear other people or post inflammatory material. {{unsigned|HarabecW}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I digress, this is a place to educate others and to warn them to stay clear of witchcraft. Find another topic to edit. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:30, 6 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have looked at some of the disputed links, and while I don't know enough about the sources themselves to question their reliability, for most of the stories no causal relationship is established between the person's religious beliefs and their actions. One might just as well divide any story about crime between those where the perpetrator was male or female and argue that their gender was the causal factor. [[User:WilliamB1|WilliamB1]] 22:41, 6 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::A person's beliefs and their actions are always tied together whether you agree or not. If Wiccans start making the news for rape, I will start a new section. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:10, 6 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stubs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we use stub tags here on Conservapedia?-[[User:StevenTramp|StevenTramp]] 23:46, 10 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not really recommended or necessary.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:35, 11 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistake of an email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent you an email raising a question - having seen the new evidence you can safely ignore it - sorry for that!--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ravens==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed you reverted changes made to the Tower of London article that mentioned the legend of the ravens. I know you banned the editor for vandalism, but in this case, the story is true. There is a legend telling that if the ravens at the Tower leave, it portends the downfall of both the Tower and the kingdom. I know it's trivia, but it's fun too and I'd love to see it added back into the article. Here's a link about the story. http://www.hrp.org.uk/TowerOfLondon/stories/theravens.aspx [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 21:32, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem. Go ahead and add it back.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:38, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks! I'll add the reference too.[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 22:36, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Religion headline ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - that's a great news story, but I wonder if I may suggest a small change to the wording? At present is says &amp;quot;study came up with similar findings&amp;quot; but no other findings are listed to be similar too; it's an out of context quote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd suggest saying something like &amp;quot;'''[[Religion]] comes naturally, even instinctively, to human beings,''' says a 3-year, multi-million Pound survey conducted by Oxford University.&amp;quot; Maybe even add that it is a liberal institution, that offered tenure to Richard Dawkins?  [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 12:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Maria Shriver ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - I noticed you added &amp;quot;Schwarzenegger&amp;quot; for Shriver's last name. I don't believe she ever changed her name legally and has never gone by the name &amp;quot;Schwarzenegger&amp;quot;. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 10:25, 20 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I'll remove it. After her divorce she can go from Mrs. Maria Shriver to Ms. Maria Shriver. New age liberals are a joke. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:19, 20 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== user:JimMac ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - this user is vandalising articles and constantly reverting me. Please can you show him the door? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:52, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Raymond Davis Affair]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you know anything of this? The Obama administration evidently invoked Islamic law to circumvent the judicial system in Pakistan to obtain a Blackwater (or whatever) operative in Pakistan only weeks before the Abbotobad raid. People in Pakistan are very upset. The democratically elected regime &amp;amp; military are cooperating with the US because they fear Islamic fundementalism, yet when it suits him, Obama pays $2.3 million in blood money under Koranic law to get a hired mercenary out. Ironic.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:03, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I haven't heard this but it wouldn't surprise me.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:07, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Raymond was CIA--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:07, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== user:Jefferson ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't sure how to contact you other than this, please let me know if there is another way if you would be so kind. I was not aware of the policy against using fact tags, thank you for informing me. I had seen them used in several articles and assumed it was okay. I would appreciate if you would clear something up for me about the citation policy, please: why is it the responsibility of a person who discovers uncited work to find the citation rather than the original poster of the work? I thought it would have been in the spirit of the encyclopedia's &amp;quot;no gossip&amp;quot; rules that statements should be cited and that calling attention to uncited materials would be helpful in clearing the site of gossip. Thanks again for filling me in and not banning me outright to begin with. I appreciate the help![[User:Jefferson|Jefferson]] 23:25, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jefferson, thanks for the mature response. It is the original poster who is supposed to reference. Our suggestion is if you find questionable content, put it on the talk page. If it can be discussed through, then someone can add a citation. If nobody questions the talk page, feel free to delete the questionable content. Unfortunately, this is not spelled out for new users yet. In the scope of ideology, a liberal would find fault with every conservative sentence. So there may be citation requests on other pages but it is not an acceptable form of contribution here. Let me know if I can be of any help. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:47, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps it would be useful to delete the fact tag template all together? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 23:49, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't know why I didn't think of that. For some reason I thought it was built-in to wikimedia but it's a tag, sure it should be deleted. Will discuss with Aschlafly.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:52, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No rules found for editing a new article ==&lt;br /&gt;
The rules encourage discussion of intent of substantial edit of established articles, and discourage taking liberties of simply substantially editing those articles with no prior discussion. But, I have been substantially editing articles which I have created, and which no one else has either edited or commented on ('invisible' editors). Should I discuss with 'invisible' editors my intent of substantial edits of articles in regard to which they are 'invisible'?[[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 21:09, 6 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The short answer is no. Discussions will be made upon disagreements. Substantial edits to established articles need not require approval either. Though if you are deleting content instead of adding to or replacing a viewpoint, then you will face resistance from other contributors and reverts. Hope that helps. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:17, 6 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncited Sentences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;[[Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help#Completely_Uncited_Article_or_Completely_Uncited_Section_of_an_Article|If a sentence needs to be cited please use the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; template at the end of the sentence.]]&amp;quot; I'm only following Conservapedia protocol. -[[User:StudioFire|StudioFire]] 00:14, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also suggest that you reread the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]], which include: &amp;quot;''Everything'' you post must be ''true'' and ''verifiable''.&amp;quot; as well as &amp;quot;''Do not post personal opinion'' on an encyclopedia entry.&amp;quot; There should be a Commandment for Ad hoc reasoning, seeing as how that seems to justify much of the content on this site...[[User:StudioFire|StudioFire]] 00:25, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That includes you, StudioFire. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:56, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the immature response StudioFail which proves the reasoning on the fact tags. We allow content from liberals but if we let them add citation requests- they'll find something wrong with every page.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 10:08, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== revision delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the point of oversighting vandals if all they do is blank the page?--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 15:29, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Aesthetics, red links are messy. Just so you know, France won the 100 year war between England and most of their colonial wars in Africa.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:07, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:D&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;  I've a feeling that French military history is going to be something of a meme around my presence.  Someone who dislikes France might say France took their time kicking the British out during the 100 years war.  Someone who likes France would then refer you to William the Conqueror.  Then we'd be told that William the Conqueror doesn't count, because he wasn't French, he was a Normand.  Never mind that because of his conquest of England English courts spoke French for 300 years after his death.  The whole subject is rather tired to me.  I've never been one for Patriotism, either for France or the USA.  I know better than to associate myself with the failures and achievements of others just because we share an ethnic group or political boundaries.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 16:18, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dike! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What brought on that reversion to a perfectly innocuous edit?  --[[User:XavierC|XavierC]] 21:12, 27 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just curious as to your intentions. Carry on great patron saint.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:14, 27 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for your kind welcome! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate it. =) -Melissa Fox, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding &amp;quot;Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform&amp;quot; Essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was surprised at the boldness of this essay. Have you ever read George Orwell's ''Animal Farm''? If not, I'd like to suggest you at least read a comprehensive synopsis of it. It has the very famous line &amp;quot;All animals are equal, but some animals are ''more'' equal than others.&amp;quot;, and I couldn't help but feel that your essay had the same viewpoint (except with humans, obviously).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another quote from the book for you to consider:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Do not imagine, comrades, that leadership is a pleasure. On the contrary, it is a deep and heavy responsibility. No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?|20px|20px|George Orwell's ''Animal Farm''}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps you can see the slight correlation I made between the your essay and ''Animal Farm''. I do not write this in spite, and I have no malicious intentions...I just thought I'd use my First Amendment right to instigate some casual, intelligent conversation. --[[User:LifeHelper|LifeHelper]] 13:38, 1 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I did read Animal Farm about 25 years ago. Subconscience-based viewpoint? You are what you fill your mind with but I wrote it due to liberals insistence that Conservapedia be fair. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it and the truth is still the truth, even if nobody believes it. To be fair is to give lies equal time. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:59, 1 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Forgive me for quoting Orwell again;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|If all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth.|20px|20px|George Orwell's ''1984''}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food for thought! -[[User:LifeHelper|LifeHelper]] 14:27, 1 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:LifeHelper&amp;diff=885096</id>
		<title>User talk:LifeHelper</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:LifeHelper&amp;diff=885096"/>
		<updated>2011-07-01T18:05:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:03, 1 July 2011 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the welcome, Jpatt! -[[User:LifeHelper|LifeHelper]] 14:05, 1 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=885095</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=885095"/>
		<updated>2011-07-01T18:04:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: Added brief synopsis to October Sky / Slight rephrasing in the Bruce Almighty synopsis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''There have been many superb [[conservative]] films''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''Witness'' (1985) - Highlights the virtues of strong moral values, with more substance and excitement than ''High Noon''.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Atlas Shrugged]]'' (2011) - Big screen adaptation of the classic conservative text.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Invasion of the Body Snatchers]]'' (1956) - A science fiction condemnation of [[communism]], produced for only $420,000 and remade successfully in three additional movies.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Exorcist]]'' (1973) (''not for children'') - A portrayal of pure evil against a positive characterization of [[Christianity]].  It broke the record for movie revenue.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''[[Dark Matter]]'' (2008) - A candid look at [[professor values]] along with problems associated with lack of assimilation; [[liberal]]s first praised the movie, but after realizing its [[conservative]] message then panned it.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Spider-Man]]'' (2002) - Praises moral virtue (hard-working teenager, devout aunt and well-meaning uncle) and pokes fun at [[liberals]] (entertainers and journalist).  Hero chooses [[abstinence]].  This was one of the most profitable films ever made.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Gone With the Wind]]'' (1939) -  Celebrates a strongly ''feminine'' heroine who is the antithesis of a modern [[feminist]], and held the record for top-grossing movie for decades.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ben-Hur (film, 1959)|Ben-Hur]]'' (1959) - Celebrates honor and duty to family and country, with a pro-Christian ending, long held the record for the most [[Academy Awards]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Expelled | Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]'' (2008) - [[Ben Stein]] exposes [[evolution|evolutionists]]' scientific and education system [[deceit]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hillary: The Movie]]'' (2008) - Citizens United film exposing Hillary Clinton. This movie led to the overturning of McCain-Feingold legislation by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Indoctrinate U]]'' (2007) - Exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Fireproof (film)|Fireproof]]'' (2008) - Highly successful pro-Christian, pro-marriage film created by [[Sherwood Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Beauty and the Beast]]'' (1991) - A powerful and immensely popular antidote to [[feminism]], far better than the [[liberal]] movies churned out by [[Disney]] since.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Titanic]]'' (1997) - Every life had value and the most powerful men gave up their seats on lifeboats to women and children first; the media and a young [[RINO]] are rightly criticized; broke the record in movie revenues&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Lives of Others'' (2006) (''not for children'') - This German-language film is a stinging criticism of the [[communist]] [[East Germany]] from a liberal perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Sound of Music]]'' (1965), solid family entertainment, perhaps Hollywood's last great movie before it turned sharply Left.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Ten Commandments]]'' (1956) - The definitive film portrayal of [[Exodus]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Mr. Smith Goes To Washington]]'' (1939) - A tale of a good, simple man rising above the pressures of [[liberals]] to do the right thing. Features perhaps the best defense of the American political system ever committed to film.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Star Wars]]'' series (1977-2005) - Simple truths about the triumph of good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Winning Team'' (1952) - [[Ronald Reagan]] stars as a baseball pitcher who overcomes his problems to help his team win. This was one of Reagan's own favorites.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[King of Kings]]'' (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Iron Eagle]]'' (1986)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[On The Waterfront]]'' (1954) - [[Marlon Brando]] plays Terry Malloy, who under the inspiration of a Catholic priest (Father Barry, played by [[Karl Malden]]), becomes a Christ-like figure.  Betrayed by his brother and almost killed by the gang, he finds the strength to overcome and redeem his people from the slavery to the mobsters who run the waterfront.  In stunning contrast to the liberals who kept silent about the Communist subversion in Hollywood, the film portrays the informer as the hero; liberal Hollywood never forgave director [[Elia Kazan]] for his stunning film.  In real life, Kazan, Malden and screenwriter Budd Schulberg all testified before Congress, along with [[Ronald Reagan]].  Together they broke the power of the Reds in Hollywood.  &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Sergeant York]]'' (1941) - A young American soldier during WWI overcomes an unfounded religious objection to killing and becomes a war hero.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Knute Rockne: All-American]]'' (1940) - Stars [[Ronald Reagan]] as corageous football player George Gipp, who dies before an important game.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ninotchka]]'' (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Forbidden Planet]]'' (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rudy]]'' (1993) - A young man overcomes many obstacles, including dyslexia, to play for the [[Notre Dame]] football team. Shows the value of hard work and never giving up. &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Prince of Egypt]]'' (1998) - A telling of the life of [[Moses]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Strategic Air Command (film)|Strategic Air Command]]'' (1955) - Actor (and Brigadier [[General]]) [[James Stewart]]'s story of the real [[Strategic Air Command]] and its transition from prop planes to jet planes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Gathering of Eagles]]'' (1963) - Illustrates duty, honor, and the burden of command.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Red Dawn]]'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Harry's War]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Patriot]]'' (2000) - A patriot fights for American freedom during the [[American Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Ladder 49]]'' (2004) - Shows the courageousness of firefighters.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Rocky]]'' (1976) - A talented but down-on-his-luck fighter gets a chance to challenge himself to the ends of his ability. This film reinforces man's ability to overcome challenges. &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[October Sky]]'' (1999) - Four high school boys from a rural coal mining town, inspired by Sputnik, set out to build their own rockets and become rocket scientists.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Amazing Grace (film)|Amazing Grace]]'' (2006) - Shows the horrors of slave trade.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Bruce Almighty]]'' (2003) - Shows, in a comedic, accessible way, that no one mortal can successively do [[God]]'s job.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[World Trade Center]]'' (2006) - Highlights the bravery of the firemen and police in [[9/11]])&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Flight 93]]'' (2006) - Shows the bravery of the passengers on Flight 93, which was hijacked on September 11th, 2001, and crashed into a Pennsylvania field. The passengers fought back against the hijackers.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[A Man For All Seasons]]'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Chariots of Fire]]'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[One Foot In Heaven]]'' (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Quo Vadis?]]'' (1951)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Lost Weekend]]'' (1945) - Illustrates the dangers of alcohol abuse.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Manchurian Candidate]]'' (1962, 2004 remake) - Anti-communist in general, but with a swipe at [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Green Berets]]'' (1968) - Vivid defense of our troops' conduct in the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[My Son John]]'' (1952) - A small-town couple's world is turned upside-down by the discovery that their adult son is a Communist.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[True Lies]]'' (1994) - Stars the future Republican governor of California, [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. Teaches conservative values like marital loyalty, and political incorrect facts such as the fact that most terrorists are Middle Eastern Arabic speakers who don't value human life.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Island]]'' (2005) - Pro-life statement against cloning to harvest organs.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Evelyn]]'' (2002) - True story of Irish father's legal struggle to recover his kids from an orphanage.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Shane]]'' (1953) - Western about defending a homesteading family.&lt;br /&gt;
#'' [[Lean on Me]]'' (1989) - A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Hero]]'' (1992-)  Even those with character flaws can do good.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Day of the Jackal]]'' (1973) - Celebrates conservative values like honor and duty.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The 6th Day]]'' (2000) - Pro-Life, Anti-Cloning movie Featuring Republican Governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]&lt;br /&gt;
#''Ghostbusters'' (1984) - Fitting satire of an environmental regulator.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Facing the Giants]] 2006. Trust in [[God]], let him take over, and good things will happen.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Flash of Genius'' (2008) - The intellectual property of a hard-working, solitary inventor is promoted, and his children stuck by his side through enormous difficulties.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Oh, God!'' (1977) - Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Courageous]]'' (2011) - Upcoming [[Sherwood Pictures]] film focusing on the role of fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Air Force One (film)|Air Force One]]'' (1997) - Positively portrays a strong U.S. president who takes an uncompromising stance against terrorism. Includes positive material about family, authority, the military and sacrifice.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Fellowship of the Ring (film, 2001)|The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2001) - Clear distinction between good and evil with positive themes of friendship, bravery, honor, sacrifice and overcoming temptation.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Two Towers (film, 2002)|The Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers]]'' (2002) - Strong portrayals of redemption and good over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World]]'' (2003) - Promotes many positive conservative values including faith in God, patriotism, duty, honor, respect for authority, discipline, bravery, sacrifice, and friendship.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Return of the King (2003 film)|The Lord of the Rings: the Return of the King]]'' (2003) - Bravery, heroism, sacrifice and good ultimately triumphing over evil.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe]]'' (2005) - Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Coach Carter'' (2005) - Promotes the theme that graduating from high school and having proper moral values are more important than becoming famous athletes.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian]]'' (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader]]'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Seventh Sign]]'' (1988) - starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Maafa21]]'' (2009) - This film explores the inception of [[Planned Parenthood]] as an organization created to destroy the Negro population. It exposes the words of its' racist founder [[Margaret Sanger]] and their impact on black genocide more than a century later. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.maafa21.com www.maafa21.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Twelve O'Clock High]]'' (1949) - A thrilling movie about the heroics of fighter pilots during [[World War II]]; used as an educational film for management training seminars&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Escape from Hell]]'' (2001) - Drama about a doctor and near-death experience.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Waiting for Superman]]'' (2010) - Documentary on the failed public school system.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Hurt Locker'' (2008) - A look into the life of an American bomb disposal regiment in Iraq risking their lives for their country and for the innocent by confronting evil. Rated R for violence and language.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Tunnel'' (''Der Tunnel'') (2001)- Based on a true story a group of East Berliners escaping harsh Communist rule and hatch a plan to help others escape that same oppressive regime. &lt;br /&gt;
#''A Charlie Brown Christmas'' (1965) - The real meaning of Christmas is discussed, as Linus quotes Luke 2:8-14. Decries the materialism that can surround the Christmas holiday.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Great Global Warming Swindle]]'' (2007) - Exposing the greatest fraud in the history of science.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Fiddler on the Roof]]'' (1971) - A celebration of tradition, faith, and the importance of family, against a historical background of the persecution of Russian Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Kids Aren't Cars]]'' (2011) - How the teachers' unions are destroying our public schools. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kidsarentcars.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/KACOneSheet.pdf KAC Summary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[How We Should Live]]'' (1976) - Christian film that traces Western history from Ancient Rome until 1976. A study of philosophic, scientific, and religious movements reflecting changing patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Gattaca]]'' (1997) - A condemnation of human genetic engineering, and a wonderful triumph of individualism in an extremely totalitarian regime. Unfortunately the movie ends with a materialistic message: &amp;quot;They say every atom in our bodies was once a part of a star. So, maybe I'm not leaving, maybe I'm going home&amp;quot; (A phrase said when the protagonist finally managed to go to space). &lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Lion King'' (1994) - A main message of the movie is honoring thy father, and the power-hungry main antagonist, once he becomes ruler, favors big government, pushes [[liberal values]] and destroys their territory.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Space Jam'' (1996) - Michael Jackson uses the help of beloved children's characters from the '50s (a simpler time in America's history) to beat back foreign invaders who wish to take away our freedoms.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Contact'' (1997) - The overall message is about how science and faith do not have to be in opposition to one another.&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Sandlot'' (1993) – Honestly depicts 1950s America when boys acted like boys and girls acted like girls, wimps were taught to toughen up, and every boy had a chance to be great. No historical revisionism. &lt;br /&gt;
#''I Confess'' (1953) - In this classic by Alfred Hitchcock, a clergyman honors his sacred vow of confidentiality with respect to a confession despite intense pressure to disclose it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Debatable Whether Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004) - Downplays the [[Resurrection]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer; portrayed nails as through the hands rather than through the wrists as depicted by the [[Shroud of Turin]] and confirmed by modern science.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946) - Falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes [[faith]] with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[High Noon]]'' (1952) - Bill Clinton saw this movie 20 times, and John Wayne said it was the most un-American movie ever;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[P.C.U.]]'' (1994) - College students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Pillow Talk'' (1959) - A classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading lady, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Blues Brothers]]'' (1980) - Comedy musical. A story of redemption, &amp;quot;A mission from God&amp;quot;, raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''The Way We Were'' (1973) - Unique in the way that it appears liberal to liberals while unintentionally sending a [[conservative]] message to young women.&lt;br /&gt;
#''Grease'' (1978) - Some [[conservative]] messages and no [[feminism]] or other [[political correctness]]; mocks [[public school]] and even [[television]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''Fargo'' (1996) - Pregnant sheriff with traditional American family values solves an elaborate criminal embezzlement, kidnapping and murder scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Juno (film)]]'' (2007) - A pregnant teenage woman rejects [[abortion]] and decides for an adoptive birth instead. This movie pushes [[feminism]] and marginalizes the essential role of fatherhood.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[The Dark Knight]]'' (2008) - Christian allegory with message of not giving in to terrorists, but the movie also arguably has some liberal themes as pointed on [[Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]].&lt;br /&gt;
#''Camelot'' - The famous jousting scene is a powerful display of Christian values and chivalry, but the movie seems lost afterward.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:LifeHelper&amp;diff=885090</id>
		<title>User:LifeHelper</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:LifeHelper&amp;diff=885090"/>
		<updated>2011-07-01T17:46:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Cquote|The LORD shall reign for ever and ever.|20px|20px|Exodus 15:18}}&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Cquote|The LORD shall reign for ever and ever.|20px|20px|Exodus 15:18}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=885086</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=885086"/>
		<updated>2011-07-01T17:38:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: /* Regarding &amp;quot;Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform&amp;quot; Essay */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your block policy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was just wondering; why are you blocking people with the reason that they don't give their name?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People can simply say whatever name they wanted and you wouldn't know if it is true or not.&lt;br /&gt;
More importantly the account creation page states that submitting your name is '''optional'''&lt;br /&gt;
Can please explain the reasoning behind your block policy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ps: I'd appreciate you not blocking me merely for asking this question.  I just ask out of curiosity  ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philny|Philny]] 18:20, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just as it is optional for first name last initial, the block policy is of the administrators discretion. It helps eliminate sock accounts used by [troll]]s and if the user is truly interested in contributing in good faith, they will recreate their username as commanded. Do users/trolls use fake names? absolutely. Are you really Phil? I chose not to recreate your account but I could be wrong about you. Time will tell. Hope this is a sufficient answer. Have a great day! --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:28, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Jpatt. In all honesty I don't see how your practice would help eliminate sock accounts. People can simply lie about who they are. Socks are best controlled through an IP range block if you asked me. &lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly I would think that good faith would be assumed for new people until they explicitly become trolls/vandals. but hey that's just me. &lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still trying to get rid of those liberal Wikipepdia ways. [[User:Philny|Philny]] 19:54, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Is it foolproof? No. They are not blocked from contributing just blocked from using that name. So it is of good faith on our part to allow them to recreate a username. I did not create the policy and I was  subject to the same policy when I first joined. We'll banish someone when needed and we will ferret out those fake accounts over time. To obey an administrators request is the first step toward recognizing a good faith contributor.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:18, 4 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hi. My former name was STramp, but you seem to have decided that that cannot be my real name. I'm not quite sure why?[[User:StevenTramp|StevenTramp]] 21:23, 10 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re:Welcome! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome! I'll be sure to read the Editor's Guide ;) --[[User:AznBurger|AznBurger]] 21:36, 19 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative 3737, &amp;quot;everything you say is conservative&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...but really not [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chris_Matthews&amp;amp;curid=10356&amp;amp;diff=846659&amp;amp;oldid=846644 family-friendly.] Thanks for heading him off! [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:32, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The IP is a school and he didn't actually cuss which would cross the line. I am willing to give a second chance if the rules are followed. BTW, I hope no hard feelings for targeting you in the past. Your edits were excellent.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:38, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Life is too short for hard feelings. Good call on the &amp;quot;second chance&amp;quot; thing. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:39, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello, there is a reason I don't use my real name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll write you an email about it if you like, I would have before but you locked the email so I could not. Account creation was also turned off, which makes recreating my account difficult. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy2|AlaskanEconomy2]] 20:43, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I now feel pretty foolish not having checked this account before creating that one. Thanks/sorry. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:52, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for uploading that image yesterday. With regards to my username, I created it before there was any specific username policy on Conservapedia's Guidelines or Commandments page (even though I've only been contributing recently). If it is important that I have username that contains only my name/initials, I will change it. --[[User:Toadaron|Toadaron]] 17:40, 18 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New conservative pages for 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed you were laying down plans for pages to create. I think you might consider making a page on the pence amendment, the recent 240-185 house vote to amend Title X to remove the family planning grants from organizations that perform abortions (like planned parenthood). While I support the decision the issue is outside of my area of specialization and I am afraid of getting some important facts wrong. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:43, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe at some future point. It's too early to determine the outcome. You're welcome to start it.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:45, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== uploading images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can I upload non-political, non-controversial images that I made myself to Conservapedia?  I suppose you or the Conservapedia administration would like to preview images before uploading them?  How do I show them for you to preview?  [[User:HPadleckas|HPadleckas]] 21:34, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Send to conservapedia@zoho.com--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:39, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Celebrity crime==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, Jpatt. I'm wondering how and when we should report (gloat over?) celebrity crime, like a female pop star arrested for being drunk in public, getting a speeding ticket, etc. Are we trying to prove that Hollywood produces (or encourages) self-indulgent behavior, or what? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:53, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I don't have a litmus test for inclusion. I simply take celebrities, be it Democrat or Republican, and post their crimes. As role models, they need to be exposed as to why they make headlines. Their behavior is an example of who &amp;quot;not to follow&amp;quot;. If you have suggestions, of course I would work with you. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:04, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I had nothing in mind, just trying to stimulate thought here. Carry on, my good man! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:21, 5 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Jpatt - I manually copy-pasted move a page from [[Frankfurt school]] to [[Essay:Frankfurt school]] - but upon examining the content it appears that the original author - CharlieO - copy pasted that from another site. Could you delete both pages? Thanks!--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:57, 26 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo upload==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I would like to upload a photo of myself, I don't have the rights, can you do it for me? Thanks.--[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 20:35, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, send to conservapedia@zoho.com --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:19, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. :)--[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 21:23, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just sent it to you. :) --[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 21:32, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. [http://www.conservapedia.com/images/4/42/Me.jpg]--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:41, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you. :)--[[User:SarahWollstone|SarahWollstone]] 21:44, 8 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I need you to check your email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
K? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 23:20, 27 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== nice reversions! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're fast, sir.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:50, 2 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you hear? I'm Quick Draw McGraw!--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:54, 2 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the helpful links and the welcome. I hope to become a valuable member of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Editing the Wicca page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to formally request that the &amp;quot;murders&amp;quot; section be removed for the reasons stated on the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a place to smear other people or post inflammatory material. {{unsigned|HarabecW}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I digress, this is a place to educate others and to warn them to stay clear of witchcraft. Find another topic to edit. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:30, 6 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have looked at some of the disputed links, and while I don't know enough about the sources themselves to question their reliability, for most of the stories no causal relationship is established between the person's religious beliefs and their actions. One might just as well divide any story about crime between those where the perpetrator was male or female and argue that their gender was the causal factor. [[User:WilliamB1|WilliamB1]] 22:41, 6 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::A person's beliefs and their actions are always tied together whether you agree or not. If Wiccans start making the news for rape, I will start a new section. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:10, 6 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stubs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we use stub tags here on Conservapedia?-[[User:StevenTramp|StevenTramp]] 23:46, 10 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not really recommended or necessary.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:35, 11 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistake of an email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent you an email raising a question - having seen the new evidence you can safely ignore it - sorry for that!--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ravens==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed you reverted changes made to the Tower of London article that mentioned the legend of the ravens. I know you banned the editor for vandalism, but in this case, the story is true. There is a legend telling that if the ravens at the Tower leave, it portends the downfall of both the Tower and the kingdom. I know it's trivia, but it's fun too and I'd love to see it added back into the article. Here's a link about the story. http://www.hrp.org.uk/TowerOfLondon/stories/theravens.aspx [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 21:32, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem. Go ahead and add it back.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:38, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks! I'll add the reference too.[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 22:36, 12 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Religion headline ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - that's a great news story, but I wonder if I may suggest a small change to the wording? At present is says &amp;quot;study came up with similar findings&amp;quot; but no other findings are listed to be similar too; it's an out of context quote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd suggest saying something like &amp;quot;'''[[Religion]] comes naturally, even instinctively, to human beings,''' says a 3-year, multi-million Pound survey conducted by Oxford University.&amp;quot; Maybe even add that it is a liberal institution, that offered tenure to Richard Dawkins?  [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 12:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Maria Shriver ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - I noticed you added &amp;quot;Schwarzenegger&amp;quot; for Shriver's last name. I don't believe she ever changed her name legally and has never gone by the name &amp;quot;Schwarzenegger&amp;quot;. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 10:25, 20 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I'll remove it. After her divorce she can go from Mrs. Maria Shriver to Ms. Maria Shriver. New age liberals are a joke. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:19, 20 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== user:JimMac ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - this user is vandalising articles and constantly reverting me. Please can you show him the door? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:52, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Raymond Davis Affair]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you know anything of this? The Obama administration evidently invoked Islamic law to circumvent the judicial system in Pakistan to obtain a Blackwater (or whatever) operative in Pakistan only weeks before the Abbotobad raid. People in Pakistan are very upset. The democratically elected regime &amp;amp; military are cooperating with the US because they fear Islamic fundementalism, yet when it suits him, Obama pays $2.3 million in blood money under Koranic law to get a hired mercenary out. Ironic.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:03, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I haven't heard this but it wouldn't surprise me.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:07, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Raymond was CIA--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:07, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== user:Jefferson ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't sure how to contact you other than this, please let me know if there is another way if you would be so kind. I was not aware of the policy against using fact tags, thank you for informing me. I had seen them used in several articles and assumed it was okay. I would appreciate if you would clear something up for me about the citation policy, please: why is it the responsibility of a person who discovers uncited work to find the citation rather than the original poster of the work? I thought it would have been in the spirit of the encyclopedia's &amp;quot;no gossip&amp;quot; rules that statements should be cited and that calling attention to uncited materials would be helpful in clearing the site of gossip. Thanks again for filling me in and not banning me outright to begin with. I appreciate the help![[User:Jefferson|Jefferson]] 23:25, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jefferson, thanks for the mature response. It is the original poster who is supposed to reference. Our suggestion is if you find questionable content, put it on the talk page. If it can be discussed through, then someone can add a citation. If nobody questions the talk page, feel free to delete the questionable content. Unfortunately, this is not spelled out for new users yet. In the scope of ideology, a liberal would find fault with every conservative sentence. So there may be citation requests on other pages but it is not an acceptable form of contribution here. Let me know if I can be of any help. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:47, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps it would be useful to delete the fact tag template all together? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 23:49, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't know why I didn't think of that. For some reason I thought it was built-in to wikimedia but it's a tag, sure it should be deleted. Will discuss with Aschlafly.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:52, 3 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No rules found for editing a new article ==&lt;br /&gt;
The rules encourage discussion of intent of substantial edit of established articles, and discourage taking liberties of simply substantially editing those articles with no prior discussion. But, I have been substantially editing articles which I have created, and which no one else has either edited or commented on ('invisible' editors). Should I discuss with 'invisible' editors my intent of substantial edits of articles in regard to which they are 'invisible'?[[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 21:09, 6 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The short answer is no. Discussions will be made upon disagreements. Substantial edits to established articles need not require approval either. Though if you are deleting content instead of adding to or replacing a viewpoint, then you will face resistance from other contributors and reverts. Hope that helps. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:17, 6 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncited Sentences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;[[Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help#Completely_Uncited_Article_or_Completely_Uncited_Section_of_an_Article|If a sentence needs to be cited please use the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; template at the end of the sentence.]]&amp;quot; I'm only following Conservapedia protocol. -[[User:StudioFire|StudioFire]] 00:14, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also suggest that you reread the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]], which include: &amp;quot;''Everything'' you post must be ''true'' and ''verifiable''.&amp;quot; as well as &amp;quot;''Do not post personal opinion'' on an encyclopedia entry.&amp;quot; There should be a Commandment for Ad hoc reasoning, seeing as how that seems to justify much of the content on this site...[[User:StudioFire|StudioFire]] 00:25, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That includes you, StudioFire. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:56, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the immature response StudioFail which proves the reasoning on the fact tags. We allow content from liberals but if we let them add citation requests- they'll find something wrong with every page.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 10:08, 11 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== revision delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the point of oversighting vandals if all they do is blank the page?--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 15:29, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Aesthetics, red links are messy. Just so you know, France won the 100 year war between England and most of their colonial wars in Africa.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:07, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:D&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;  I've a feeling that French military history is going to be something of a meme around my presence.  Someone who dislikes France might say France took their time kicking the British out during the 100 years war.  Someone who likes France would then refer you to William the Conqueror.  Then we'd be told that William the Conqueror doesn't count, because he wasn't French, he was a Normand.  Never mind that because of his conquest of England English courts spoke French for 300 years after his death.  The whole subject is rather tired to me.  I've never been one for Patriotism, either for France or the USA.  I know better than to associate myself with the failures and achievements of others just because we share an ethnic group or political boundaries.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 16:18, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dike! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What brought on that reversion to a perfectly innocuous edit?  --[[User:XavierC|XavierC]] 21:12, 27 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just curious as to your intentions. Carry on great patron saint.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:14, 27 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for your kind welcome! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate it. =) -Melissa Fox, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding &amp;quot;Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform&amp;quot; Essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was surprised at the boldness of this essay. Have you ever read George Orwell's ''Animal Farm''? If not, I'd like to suggest you at least read a comprehensive synopsis of it. It has the very famous line &amp;quot;All animals are equal, but some animals are ''more'' equal than others.&amp;quot;, and I couldn't help but feel that your essay had the same viewpoint (except with humans, obviously).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another quote from the book for you to consider:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Do not imagine, comrades, that leadership is a pleasure. On the contrary, it is a deep and heavy responsibility. No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?|20px|20px|George Orwell's ''Animal Farm''}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps you can see the slight correlation I made between the your essay and ''Animal Farm''. I do not write this in spite, and I have no malicious intentions...I just thought I'd use my First Amendment right to instigate some casual, intelligent conversation. --[[User:LifeHelper|LifeHelper]] 13:38, 1 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Guy&amp;diff=884536</id>
		<title>Family Guy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Guy&amp;diff=884536"/>
		<updated>2011-06-30T03:48:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: Added 2 other networks that it's broadcast on&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Family Guy''''' is an animated television program created by [[Seth MacFarlane]] and shown on the Fox television network, although it also has slots on TBS and Cartoon Network's [adult swim].  It documents the life of &amp;quot;the Griffins,&amp;quot; a fictional family who live in Quahog, [[Rhode Island]]. The show, like ''[[The Simpsons]]'' and other cartoon shows on television, explores&amp;amp;mdash;from an extremely [[liberal]] angle&amp;amp;mdash;cultural and political themes that are important in the world today, as well as taking humorous approaches to past and present television shows.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/main.asp Parents' Television Council]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It takes an unfavorable view of creationists, focusing instead on the theory of evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/us/newsletters/0107lead.asp Answers in Genesis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Family Guy'' is known for its constant use of rude and profane speech, violent and crude humor, and [[liberal deceit]]. In that vein, the show has made numerous off-color jokes about teen pregnancy, bestiality, abortion, homosexuality, the Holocaust, mental illness, suicide and religion, among other topics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One notorious episode entitled ''When You Wish Upon a Weinstein,'' was banned due to its offensive stereotyping of Jews.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0576978/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another likened McCain-Palin supporters to Nazis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIWTB8POnkg ''Family Guy'' on YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The show frequently uses jokes referencing Hitler and the Nazis, relying on shock tactics over genuine comedy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another episode introduced a girl with [[Down Syndrome]]. During a conversation, she remarked that [[Sarah Palin|her mother]] was the governer of [[Alaska]], an obvious attempt to smear the reputation of the [[Republican Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another episode featured a repeated catchphrase &amp;quot;[[Laura Bush]] Killed A Guy!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2008/12/08/2008-12-08_family_guy_stirs_controversy_with_laura_.html NY Daily News: &amp;quot;Family Guy&amp;quot; stirs controversy with &amp;quot;Laura Bush killed a guy&amp;quot; catch phrase]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was a misleading statement, mocking a tragic car accident which occurred when she was 17 years old. Laura Welch, as she was known then, ran a stop sign and crashed into another car, killing its only occupant, 17-year-old Michael Douglas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp Snopes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unoriginality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Family Guy'' and its creators have been savaged by media and fans for its lack of originality and, in some cases, outright plagiarism, particularly from the vastly more popular show, ''The Simpsons''. The basic model of the family - a fat, drunk, stupid, yet good-hearted husband with an attractive, yet nagging wife - is a direct copy of Homer and Marge Simpson. The show has stolen numerous plot ideas from ''The Simpsons,'' including the wife developing a gambling addiction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://familyguysteals.blogspot.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character of Stewie is a well-documented theft of the comic book character Jimmy Corrigan, the smartest kid on Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.randomhouse.com/pantheon/graphicnovels/corrigan.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Simpsons'' and ''South Park'' have openly mocked ''Family Guy'' for its lack of creativity and frequent derivative sequences. One episode of ''South Park'' portrayed ''Family Guy'' as being written by manatees who would randomly select balls inscribed with a noun, verb and pop culture reference, thus creating all the jokes for the show.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Television Shows]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&amp;diff=881758</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&amp;diff=881758"/>
		<updated>2011-06-22T13:01:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;LifeHelper: /* Maladaptation */  Added a flaw in the evolutionist's argument&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Darwin_monkey_cartoon.jpg|thumb|180px|Caricature of [[Charles Darwin]].  To date, no fossils of ''H. darwinicus orangutanishicus'' have been found.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[theory of evolution]] does not permit the existence of any counterexamples.  '''If any of the counterexamples listed below is correct, then the theory of evolution fails'''.  Moreover, if there is merely a 5% chance that each of these counterexamples is correct (and the odds are far higher than that&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Many of the counterexamples are indisputable, rendering each of their probabilities of being correct nearly 100%.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), then the odds that these 73 counterexamples are ''all'' incorrect and that evolution is true is only 2.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
==Counterexamples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Logical examples===&lt;br /&gt;
# The annual rate of extinction of species far exceeds any plausible rate of generation of species.  Expanding the amount of time for evolution to occur makes evolution even less likely.&lt;br /&gt;
# Lack of genetic diversity among the ''Homo sapiens'' species.  Were evolution and the Old Earth theory true, the human population would show a much larger genetic variance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[File:Ara macao -on a small bicycle-8.jpg|thumbnail|300px|right|[[Parrot]] feathers are a problem for evolutionists.  For more information, please see [http://creation.com/parrot-fashion parrot feathers]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;see picture source and license [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ara_macao_-on_a_small_bicycle-8.jpg here]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]] &lt;br /&gt;
# Parsimonious repetition of design elements throughout Creation, e.g. the eye's appearance in remarkably different species.  For such complex structures to [[convergent evolution|arise repeatedly via evolution]] is [[statistical_impossibility | impossible]], as evolution is an inherently random and historically contingent process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/homology.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Pleiotropy'', the fact that a change of a single gene can have several different effects, renders the &amp;quot;improvement&amp;quot; of animals by random mutation impossible, as any mutation with a potentially beneficial effect will be coupled with one or more other potentially lethal effects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v4/n1/beneficial-mutations-in-bacteria&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably &amp;quot;grown&amp;quot; from the scales of dinosaurs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/40/4/687.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://palaeoblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/early-evolution-of-feathers.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# For evolution to be true, every male dog, cat, horse, elephant, giraffe, fish and bird had to have coincidentally evolved with a female alongside it (over billions of years) with fully evolved compatible reproductive parts and a desire to mate, otherwise the species couldn't keep going. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=90743&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# There are no historical records of anyone directly observing one species evolving into another, which would certainly be something worth writing about. Surely of the millions of species we have, someone would have witnessed ''one'' come into existence had it evolved.&lt;br /&gt;
# If evolution were to explain where human beings come from, then every personality type should benefit human life. This is clearly untrue because the world is filled with liars, psychopaths, and murderers. These traits clearly do not benefit humanity. &lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution is internally inconsistent.  It posits that all life must continuously improve, but on the other hand, it holds that some creatures, like the horseshoe crab, the alligator, the shark, and the [[coelacanth]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dinofish.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have remained virtually unchanged for improbably long time periods.&lt;br /&gt;
# According to evolutionary theory, cavemen with no scientific or genetic knowledge domesticated the wolf (''canis lupus'') into a different species - the dog (''canis familiaris''). However, many experts on dog genetics have created hundreds of different dog breeds over the years through selective mating, but they are all the same species. If the cavemen could create new species seemingly by accident, it stands to reason that experts could do so with intentional effort. But since this has not been done, the wolf-dog example seems false.&lt;br /&gt;
# The bacterial flagellum has been proven to be useless when missing a single part of the mechanism. It stands to reason that this must have been created fully formed, and cannot have evolved from a simpler form. The term for this phenomenon is [[irreducible complexity]], and it can be seen in countless biological features.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of mechanism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Feather image.jpg|thumb|300px|right|[[Harvard]] biologist [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote: &amp;quot;It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random [[mutation]]s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes9.html Ernst Mayr, Systematics and the Origin of Species (New York: Dover Publications, 1942), p. 296]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Animals flee to high ground ''before'' a deadly tsunami hits their shoreline, defying any plausible [[materialistic]] explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deseretnews.com/article/600105348/Utah-scientific-Did-animals-sense--and-flee--the-tsunamis-in-S-Asia.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Mutations cause a loss of information, rendering it mathematically impossible for mutations to advance the complexity of life.  Similarly, [[entropy]] (disorder) increases over time, making it impossible for order to increase on its own. According to [[Cornell University]] [[genetics|geneticist]] [[John C. Sanford]], not even the energy of the Sun, which might otherwise reduce entropy in a system not thermodynamically isolated such as the Earth, is capable of turning back the inexorable decline of our planet's collected genomes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/respected-cornell-geneticist-rejects-darwinism-in-his-recent-book/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It seems reasonable to infer, then, that the [[End Times]] will come before or during the eventual collapse of the world's [[ecosystems]] that will come as a result of this irreversible deterioration.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;Social insects&amp;quot; such as bees, ants, and termites, which have extremely ornate caste systems.  Where an insect fits is determined by its diet when young.  Evolution requires that both the genetics for the various castes, the genetics for caste determination, and the genetics for ''behavior'' allowing caste determination all appeared simultaneously.  Akin to the concept of [[irreducible complexity]], but on a higher (social) order, this is impossible given random chance.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Ant]]s and other social [[insect]]s, for at least two reasons:  First, their complex social structure is evidence of [[intelligent design]]; second, since the overwhelming majority of individuals are workers and do not reproduce, they cannot perpetuate their genetic material, as evolution requires.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as the brilliant autumn foliage and staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution cannot explain how beauty is in the eye of the beholder, if evolution said that beauty were useful then we would all expect to see the same things as beautiful.&lt;br /&gt;
# The fact that [[cicada]]s appear like clockwork every 13 years for some species, and every 17 years for others&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://inside.msj.edu/academics/faculty/kritskg/cicada/faq.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The extraordinary migration patterns of butterflies and birds, which lack any plausible materialistic explanation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[migration]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution does not account for the immense amount of [[information]] in the genome, as well as the origin of the information-processing systems in the cell. Information always has a sender, who must be God in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
# The manner in which chickens return to their chicken coops at the same time, and enter the chicken coops in the same order, each day&lt;br /&gt;
# Symbiosis - There are many examples where creatures rely on each other to survive which could not arise through evolution. Grass cannot survive without a certain fungus that helps it fix nitrogen from the atmosphere and the fungus can't survive without the grass.  They must have appeared on earth at the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070410084136.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[File:Autumn.jpg|292px|right|thumbnail|The beauty of [[God]]'s [[creation]], such as [[autumn]] foliage, cannot adequately be explained through the evolutionary [[paradigm]]. See: [[Argument from beauty]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalpops/5236103680/ Flickr] picture, see:'' [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Consciousness - No animal displays self-awareness (such as clothing), morality, tool-making, or self-sacrifice to the same extent that man does.  It is unclear how a random mutation could have arisen which accounts for humanity's significantly higher cognitive ability.&lt;br /&gt;
# Humans exhibit behaviors such as performing [[science]], creating [[art]] and [[music]], [[dance|dancing]], and a number of other intellectual and artistic behaviors which could not have been produced by random mutations. There is no known evolutionary reason why these should be favored.&lt;br /&gt;
# Trematode parasites, like many other kinds, lack a plausible evolutionary phylogeny, though they can easily be explained by a teleological design.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/trematodes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# In addition, evolution cannot explain the many complex sex-determining systems. For example, in most mammals, females have two X chromosomes whereas males have an X and Y chromosome, but in birds, many insects, and other organisms, the situation is reversed. In flies, sex is determined the ratio of non-sex chromosomes to X chromosomes (so that males have only one X whereas females have two). It is impossible for evolution to create these new sex-determining systems ''ex nihilo''.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Several species of fish in the Arctic ocean have chemical substances in their blood that essentially act as an anti-freeze.  Evolution requires gradual change, leaving no plausible explanation as to how the fish survived before developing this trait.&lt;br /&gt;
# The blood of tunicates such as the sea squirt is based on the rare element [[vanadium]] instead of the abundant [[iron]] used in other vertebrates, which would have required a complete re-tooling of its entire circulatory biochemistry &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.earthlife.net/inverts/ascidiacea.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Animals exist in isolated places without any plausible motivation or means for getting there, such as on remote islands or more than 1200 feet high on top of the vertical cliffs of [[Devils Tower]].  Even humans (though large and intelligent) were unable to ascend the peak until 1893, and required specialized climbing equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maladaptation===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jellyfish.jpg|right|thumb|[[Jellyfish]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Jellyfish]] in [[Hawaii]] swarm to the beaches roughly 9 to 10 days after each full [[moon]], for no apparent evolutionary reason&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aloha.com/~lifeguards/jelyfish.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Variation in chromosome count (ploidy) is impossible in evolution.  One member of a species with 2 sets of chromosomes cannot mate with a member with 4.  Thus, for the chromosome count of a species to change (and thus account for the variety of counts in nature) a vast portion of a species would have to evolve a new chromosome set simultaneously.&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[human]] [[prostate]] surrounds the [[urethra]] and in doing so provides many benefits.  Evolutionists consider the structure to be poor design, which should mean that natural selection would have eliminated that design.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5757 The Prostate Gland–is it ‘badly designed’?], 1st August 2008 (Creation Ministries International)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Inability to account for widely observed altruism among animals, as it ''reduces'' an animal's ability to survive.  “The existence of altruism between different species — which is not uncommon — remains an obstinate enigma.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood''  [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes12.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Not surprisingly, atheist evolutionists have done their utmost to ''deny'' animal altruism (See especially [[Richard Dawkins]]' ''[[The Selfish Gene]]'', which denies altruism without providing any evidence to back up his enormous claim)&lt;br /&gt;
# Too many deleterious mutations.  Each generation of humans has far more negative mutations than the posited natural selection can remove.  Evolution is thus impossible as species would become nonviable long before they could diverge.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution should have removed HIV from the human race as we would have built an immunity to it, much like bacteria do to anti-biotics, yet we have not. In fact the continued existence of disease is proof against evolution as natural selection would have left only humans who were immune to them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Schizophrenia is a disorder that causes a person to be unable to distinguish fantasy from reality. It is an inherited disorder and affects nearly 1 in 100 people. Scientists still have yet to explain what causes it, but one this is for certain, if evolution were true, it should have eliminated such an obvious disability long ago.&lt;br /&gt;
# Male-pattern [[baldness]] has no evolutionary explanation.  It is not observed in non-human species, and because it decreases the likelihood of finding a mate, it should have been selected out a long time ago.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Menopause]] renders women infertile, but this is clearly counter to evolutionary advantage. Evolutionists claim that only individuals capable of mating are useful to the species (see above discussion regarding social insects), so menopause should have been selected against by now to give women the best chance for producing the maximum number of offspring. However, several theories have been put forward to explain the apparent paradox. Firstly, that since the risks associated of bearing children increase after a certain age, it is little advantage in running the risk, especially as the mother may already have children that rely on her for survival. Secondly, in terms of groups, the menopause leads to 'post-reproductive grandmothers' who can assist their own offspring with raising their children &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11223885&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# PrP, the gene responsible for the protein implicated in causing prion diseases like [[Creutzfeldt-Jacob_Disease]], has ''no beneficial function''. If evolution were correct, this gene could not persist in the population, but would quickly be selected against.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arthritis results in pain, swelling, stiffness, and limited movement, none of which show any evolutionary benefit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wrong predictions===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Harvester-ants.jpg|thumb|205px|right|Ant behavior is the result of [[intelligent design]]. 19th century [[Europe|European]] naturalists were wrong about [[ant]] behavior. The [[Bible]] was correct about ant behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ed5015.tripod.com/BWilliamsvsAnon71to73.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;[T]he loss and addition of large DNA sequence blocks are present in humans and gorillas, but not in chimps&amp;quot; even though &amp;quot;the gorilla is lower on the primate tree than the chimp and supposedly more distant to humans. How could these large blocks of DNA--from an evolutionary perspective--appear first in gorillas, disappear in chimps, and then reappear in humans?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/article/4624/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Lack of any vestigial organs in the human body.  While evolutionists used to claim dozens or even hundreds of human traits and organs were vestigial, useless items disused through evolution, we now know what functions they all have, including the appendix  (the classic example). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ken Ham and Carl Wieland, ''Your Appendix: It's There for a Reason.'' (1997)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Lack of any demonstrable vestigial parts of the human [[genome]]. While evolutionists often claim that regions of the genome are &amp;quot;junk DNA&amp;quot; and would not have been placed there by a designer, none have actually shown this to be true, and much so-called &amp;quot;junk DNA&amp;quot; has been shown to be useful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/junkdna.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# While evolutionists argue that there are examples of &amp;quot;[[argument from poor design|bad design]]&amp;quot; in the bodies of many organisms, such as &amp;quot;flaws&amp;quot; in the human spine and sinus system, evolutionists fail to realize that, by their own theory, natural selection should have removed these things! The simpler explanation, that these represent degeneration from an original, created perfect form, is the superior one.&lt;br /&gt;
# We have the perfect number of [[teeth]] to fit in our [[mouth]]s.  While creationism perfectly accounts for that result, evolutionism predicts a contrary result: As our [[face]]s evolved from chimpanzee-like faces to human faces, the shortening of the muzzle would have caused the teeth to become overcrowded in the mouth.&lt;br /&gt;
# Human fertility is rapidly declining, disproving evolutionary improvement in humans and also suggesting a brief timeline for human existence.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolutionist theory predicts that in the case of [[convergent evolution]], a particular structure such as an eye that evolves in an optimal form in one species can later evolve in a suboptimal form in a different species.  No such result has ever been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
# Constantly mutating, drug-resistant [[pathogen]]s such as [[MRSA]] have been demonstrated to be the result of devolution rather than evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/product/Genesis-of-Germs-The,5181,224.aspx Genesis of Germs], from [[Answers in Genesis]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is the exact opposite of what evolutionary theory predicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Missing fossils===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-Baleen Whale Physical Characteristics svg.png|right|300px|thumbnail|The remarkable [[whale]], which is a [[mammal]], has no plausible evolutionary ancestor.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# The remarkable [[whale]], which is a mammal, has no plausible evolutionary ancestor.&lt;br /&gt;
# No transitional forms appear for horses, instead different and distinct horse-like animals appear in the fossil record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Ray Comfort]], in the Forward to the 150th anniversary edition of &amp;quot;On the Origin of Species&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The enormous gaps and lack of intermediate species in the [[fossils|fossil]] record, once all the frauds are removed.&lt;br /&gt;
# No clear transition from unicellular to multicellular organisms. &lt;br /&gt;
# Mammalian fur and body hair.  There is no known evolutionary pathway for the development of fur, and no fossil evidence of hair evolving from scales, even though it survives very well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/40/40_4/Bergman.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# A lack of any evolution from prehistoric forms has been demonstrated for many species.&lt;br /&gt;
# '''Where are the human ancestors?''' (That is, the ones that weren't [http://www.conservapedia.com/Piltdown_Man frauds].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Paradoxical fossils===&lt;br /&gt;
# The fact that new discoveries, such as ''[[Raptorex]],'' routinely call into question key dogmas of evolutionism and require the &amp;quot;immutable&amp;quot; laws of evolution to be reassessed.  By contrast, creationism has prevailed in the face of scientific discoveries for six thousand years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irreducible Complexity===&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[immune system]] is irreducibly complex, as without one which is thoroughly developed, an organism would not be able to resist any infection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Behe, Michael J. 1996. ''Darwin's Black Box'', New York: The Free Press, pp. 117-139.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://biology.creighton.edu/courses/BIO432/Evolution%2005.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The extraordinarily long neck of the [[giraffe]].  It serves no function (the theory that giraffes use the long neck to eat from high tree branches was never true).  The presence of valves in the neck (which are necessary because of its great length) raises a question of how one could have arisen without the other being there first.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www1.pacific.edu/~e-buhals/GIRAFFE2.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[Image:BacterialFlagellum.jpg|thumb|200px|right|[[flagellum|Bacterial Flagellum]] with rotary motor, courtesy of Access Research Network (Art Battson)]] &lt;br /&gt;
# The long legs of the [[giraffe]]: if a random mutation led to long legs without a long neck or vice versa, the animal would be unable to survive.&lt;br /&gt;
# The development of wings, as intermediary wing stubs would have no use, and be a competitive disadvantage.&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[flagellum]] a multi-part cellular motor which fails to function if a single part is removed is the classic example of [[irreducible complexity]] and cannot arise according to the theory of evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/design2/article.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Many [[bat]]s which live in caves employ a type of sonar in order to navigate and find prey. Evolutionists propose that the bat evolved from a squirrel-like animal, but a squirrel would have no use for a sonar system. The bats can't fly without sonar, and an animal that can't fly doesn't need it. Therefore, bats must have been created with fully functioning sonar and flight.&lt;br /&gt;
# The organ and brain development required for retinal imagery require a base level of complexity, making a primitive form useless and impossible under evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_1/retinal_imagery.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Blood clotting is a unique process unlike any other in the body, without which the smallest cut could be life-threatening. Only a fully developed clotting system is functional and therefore could not have evolved through intermediate stages.&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[ear]] contains three tiny [[bone]]s that transmit sound waves from the eardrum to the cochlea.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/bigear.html Neuroscience for Kids: The Ear]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Because of the complicated arrangement of those bones, transitional forms (which have never been found) would have served no purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
# Bony skeletons represent an example of irreducible complexity, since only a fully formed, complete skeleton is of any use whatsoever, while having only one or some few number of bones in an otherwise invertebrate creature is hardly advantageous. It is inconceivable to think that some random mutation could have resulted in the formation if an entire bone system in a creature which was previously invertebrate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Uncategorized===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|251px|right|There is excellent evidence that [[dinosaur]]s and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/Dinosaur#History_of_dinosuars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During a visit to the [[Creation Museum]], the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[PZ Myers]] had noticeably greater difficulty than others climbing on and off a dinosaur model due to the fact that he was overweight and out of shape.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQQl2TMrgbM VIDEO] See also: [[Atheism and obesity]] and [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/reuvenim/4426093513/ Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en  license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# There is excellent evidence indicating that [[dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/Dinosaur#History_of_dinosuars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution would result in modern languages having one common ancestral language, and for nearly a century linguists insisted that there must be one.  There is not, and linguists now accept that there are completely independent families of languages.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Pterosaurs]]; a scientist recently stated that they could not have flown, but why then did they evolve wings?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.physorg.com/news142086647.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# No other animal exhibits [[religion]]. A far better explanation than random mutations is that humans were given the capacity to be religious by a loving God who wants a relationship with His creations.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution requires that random mutations can cause one [[kind]] to change into another, but this has never been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of two symmetrical kidneys, which are unnecessary in most people, lacks a plausible evolutionary explanation based on functionality alone.  Because evolution falsehoods mislead most people into thinking they need their second kidney, &amp;quot;the average waiting time for the organs from a deceased donor in the United States is five years&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;3,916 patients waiting for a kidney in 2006 died before one became available.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.scienceline.org/2009/03/04/levitan-health-living-kidney-donor-transplant/]  This article observes, &amp;quot;As a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found, living kidney donors live as long or longer and enjoy better quality of life than the general population.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Circadian phenomena -- internal 24-hour clock mechanisms of humans and other living beings -- defy material explanation.  Examples include how some people are unable to change the timing of their need for sleep for each day, and how plants exhibit clock-like behavior regardless of their exposure to sunlight.  In addition, there is a weekly clock cycle for many phenomena, which has a clear biblical basis but defies any materialistic explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/mysterious-seven-day-cycle-in-plants-animals-man-2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# If religion were as harmful as evolutionists claim, natural selection would have phased it out, but it continues, meaning evolutionists are wrong about both evolution and the supposed harmful effects of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
# Scientists have found proof that the first chicken came before the first egg,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38238685/ns/technology_and_science-science/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; consistent with a special creation of chickens but not with a gradual descent with modifications from a proto-chicken and proto-egg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Logical Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
As scientific theories require that their laws be immutable, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule.  Thus, if evolution fails to account for any one of these items (or countless others), it must be discarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{evolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution and atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creation vs. Evolution Videos]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/ Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Evolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>LifeHelper</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>