Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:DeanS

2007-09-23T14:55:17Z

LinkedToCommiePlot: http://rationalwiki.com

<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
'''IF YOU NEED IMMEDIATE HELP AND I AM NOT HERE PLEASE GO HERE FOR A LIST OF Administrators/Sysops''': [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop Sysop list]
</blockquote>

{| align=center border=3 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 5px; border-color: #f0c0c0; background: #e0e0e1; margin: 2em;"
! width=40% style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | No Ping-ponging Conversations!
! style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | Archive Policy
|-
| width=40% style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | Conversations are easier to read if they stay on one page. If I leave a message on your talk page, please respond there; I'm watching it. If you start a conversation here, I'll reply here, so please watch this page.
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | Conversations which have not had additions in 14 days ''may'' be archived. Or just deleted and recreation prohibited. My "castle", my rules. A 'conversation' is a group of messages delimited by a heading. Hopefully this will allow conversations to stay in one place long enough for people who are interested to read the whole thing, without leading to an overly long page. Make sure you sign your posts, please.
|}

==Initial edits==
*Thanks for fixing those cites on the mutation page, I haven't had time to figure that out yet. Appreciate it!

*Could you help with [[Brigham Young]]? Geo.[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 02:26, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, I will work on that article. Thanks for the suggestion Geo. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]][[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]] 02:31, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

*Would you care to define [[tolerance]]? The red color on that link, as you may know, indicates an article which has not been written yet. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:20, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, I will start the tolerance article. Thanks for the suggestion Ed. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]][[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]] 13:43, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
::Since the article was started while I was in edit mode, I made additions to the article. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]][[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]] 14:28, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

==article citations==
You're welcome! [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:33, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

== Not quite ==

Sub-pages of your userspace are made with a "/", not a "\". Right now you're technically intruding into other userspaces. It's not urgent, but maybe ask a sysop to move the pages in question to the proper space next time you talk to one. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:08, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

==Moved pages in question==
New pages have the exact title name as before, the exception being the change from \ to /. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:07, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

== Template ==

Hey, if you're ever creating a template, to add it to the template category, add: <nowiki><noinclude>[[Category:Template]]</noinclude></nowiki>. To set templates to automatically add whatever page they're used on to a category put in: <nowiki><includeonly>[[Category:whatever]]</includeonly></nowiki>. Enjoy!

== Thanks for copy editing [[Smithsonian-Sternberg affair]] ==

Just wanted to say thanks for copy editing the contribution. [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 13:12, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

==Crazies to the left...==
I restored the page. There was no copyright violation, as the article tells what the book is about. If you do use actual quotations from the book, dont forget the (Goldberg, pg. 50) at the end of the line in question. If you need a second opinion as well, Aschafly will also be glad to chip in. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:02, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
:I don't agree that there was no copyright violation because "the article tells what the book is about", but probably there was no violation since it was only a limited portion that was quoted for legitimate reasons. Er, except that I'm not sure what those reasons are. Is this meant to be an article about a book, or what? If it is, I think it's more appropriate to actually describe the book in your own words than to have virtually all of the article being the publisher's description. So copyright may not be the issue, but I think it would be better if it was not mostly a quote. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:02, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:P.S. And Conservapedia's desire to not have articles about every little thing makes me wonder if there is justification for articles about books at all (with a few obvious exceptions). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:03, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

== It was not me ==
It was not me. Thats not the first time that someone has tried to frame me see here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Conservapedia&diff=next&oldid=126710147] look who is making the change.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 13:05, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[Cube]] ==

As a mineralogist perhaps you'd like to join the debate. [[User:Gerrard|Gerrard]] 13:08, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
: Gerrard, thanks for the suggestion. I'm an amateur mineralogist and that discussion is a bit over my head. I'm more interested in the actual minerals and less about crystallography. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 13:30, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

==Sysop==
You got my vote as sysop, so I'll be nudging Andy about it over the next few weeks until it happens. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:29, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

== geology stuff ==

Hey, just wanted to touch base with you and let you know what I was doing. I've been categorizing most of your enteries into the Geology category. I also put the Mineral category you created as a subcategory of Geology. I think if we want to come up with any further categories to lump some of these terms in, we should keep placing them as subcategories under Geology. Chances are you will have a much better idea as to how you would want them categorized than I will, I'm just doing some grunt work. :) --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 09:48, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

==Thanks==

Thanks for all your hard work and article creations. It's been much appreciated. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
:I have voiced my support for you.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 23:20, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
::Your on fire! How many new pages is that tonight? [[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 00:05, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Thanks Bohdan - About 56 new pages. That might be it for today ;-) I'm leaving now to take my family to see Shrek 3. Godspeed. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]]) 00:12, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

*Thanks for reverting that Abuse attack! You have your hat in the ring for Sysop? --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 03:49, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, I do.[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Sysop_contest/Nominations/Crocoite] I had to even revert my pages when I got caught in the cross fire. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]]) 05:13, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

*Endorsement by me has always been a mixed blessing among the users, and now even more so being at odds with some CP procedures. But for what it might be worth, I have offered my qualified support. I just will not support promotions for people who do not have/use IM and with no email enabled through this board at a minimum. Not saying that fits you, just saying I don't know. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 05:28, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
*You just cannot imagine what trouble you invite by posting that here, lol. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 05:36, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

== Your template(s) ==

{{TemplateDocRqd|mineral|old=yes|done=yes}}

[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
:I will document this template later today. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]]) 11:41, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
:Done [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]]) 23:03, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
::Thanks. Actually, this has highlighted a problem with the "optional" bit. Typing <nowiki>{{mineral}}</nowiki> (i.e. not supplying any parameters) is not going to work. In that sense, the parameters are not optional at all. There are three cases: (1) can be omitted, (2) can be blank, and (3) must be provided. The Name parameter of {{tl|mineral}} is hardly optional; it must be provided. The rest can be blank, but cannot be omitted. I'll have to think about how to best document this, so don't worry about it for now. By the way, the "cat" field was for the category (if any) that the template applies to pages it is put on, which in this case is "mineral", not "template". Anyway, I've fixed that for you.
::How many uses of this template have pictures? The template should be altered to just require the image name, not the entire <nowiki>[[image:name.jpg]]</nowiki> code, but changing it now will break any that are already used.
::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:56, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

==You're a Sysop now!==
[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]],

Conservapedia’s entry count has reached 10,500, and due to your outstanding contributions, you have been chosen as a winner of the Sysop contest. Congratulations! Here are some links about your new privileges:

*[[Conservapedia:Administrators]]

*[[Conservapedia:Sysops]]

*[[Conservapedia:New Sysops Training Page]]

*[[Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks]]

*[[Conservapedia:Abuse]]

Thank you for your excellent contributions to Conservapedia. We look forward to building this site with your help.

Sincerely,

The Conservapedia Panel

[[User:CPanel]]

:Thank you for this recognition! I will review this material so I can assist you as a Sysop. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 16:24, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Congratulations! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:12, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

:Thanks Dan :) [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 16:24, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
:Well done. [[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 16:52, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

: Congratulations!!! Very well deserved!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:24, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

: You definitely deserved this promotion. It will be great to have you as a Sysop. ~ [[User:SharonS|Sharon]][[User talk:SharonS|Talk]] 18:30, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

*Congratulations. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 20:18, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
:Congratulations!--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 22:14, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
::You've deserved it. [[User:Niandra|Niandra]] [[User talk:Niandra|talk]] 00:21, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Congrats on becoming the newest Sysop...I know it's late but hey! [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:31, 2 June 2007 (EDT)

== Images ==

Crocoite, thanks for all your efforts. By the way, if and when you upload any images, then please make sure you protect them at the Sysop level, so that only Sysops can move or modify them. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:16, 3 June 2007 (EDT)

:Will do. Thanks for your support. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 01:24, 3 June 2007 (EDT)

== Ruining fun..... ==

:-( --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 04:46, 3 June 2007 (EDT)

== G-d ==

Crocoite, I doubt this will happen often, but I did revert your news item about "G-d". That is standard Jewish terminology for God, and there's nothing wrong with it. It's not anti-religious in any way.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:34, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

:I wasn't aware of the Jewish terminology for God, but an explanation seems like an appropriate edit for the [[Jewish]] article. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 00:44, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

Crocoite, you have to send private emails to my same id on aol. For some reason the email here does not forward to me. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 02:10, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

== Vandals ==

Nasty buggers these vandals are!!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 19:28, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

:Yes, they're annoying, but they were even worse with upload privileges ;-) [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 19:34, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
::O ya no doubt!!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 19:36, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

== Email? ==

You posted you were sending some email, but I have not received it. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 08:27, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

:I just sent another email directly from Yahoo, instead of this site. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 09:39, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

*Please answer your Yahoo IM. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 22:34, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

== Christianity template ==

I believe that we will not resolve the Mormon/Christianity template issue between us. Therefore, I appealed to Andy for final resolution. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:26, 7 June 2007 (EDT)

== Vandal Question ==

I'm new here, and have a question. If I see a user vandalizing the place, what's the proper procedure, particularly if the vandalism is ongoing? Should I assume one of the sysops will catch it, or do I contact one of them (and if so, what is the best means when time is of the essence)? (And let me note that "JohnV" seems to be a vandal, and "MikeHunt", while he hasn't done anything yet, has an obviously inappropriate name which stopped being funny in junior high...).--[[User:PeteVan|Pete]] 11:43, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

:Pete, at the bottom of the Main Page is a section titled '''Report vandalism or abuse'''. Click [[Conservapedia:Abuse]]. This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise. Unsigned posts will be removed. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 12:12, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
::Oh, excellent. Thank you.--[[User:PeteVan|Pete]] 14:22, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

== Why so aggressive? ==

I'm curious - why did you come after me so hard and fast? I mean no harm, and you were very aggressive - it seemed I had barely joined and you were trying to ban me? Yes, I had made a few comments, which I thought were very fair and balanced, but your aggresive repsonse does not befit this site [[User:DoggedPersistence|DoggedPersistence]] 18:47, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

:I looked at your edits and they seem like [[troll]] behavior. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 18:56, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

"Seem like" - you might do well to consider your own words. You are guilty of being very judgemental. See [[Limerick]] for a constructive entry, which I hadn't had a chance to post before you slurred me. As to my other entries, I think they were perfectly constructive, and I have yet to see a reason why [[New Ordeal]] should be considered a valid entry - it's clearly just the author's own catchphrase. [[User:DoggedPersistence|DoggedPersistence]] 19:10, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
::Your postings here are starting to look a bit trollish. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 19:16, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

*Perhaps indicative of Liberal [[Deceit]], in my opinion. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 19:27, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Crocoite, I think he should be banned indef for 90/10 & trolling. Do you mind if I do it? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:21, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

:Rob, go ahead. Thanks! [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 20:24, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

:*No block yet. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 20:28, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

Thanks much for your alert efforts tonight, Crocoite. I've just tightened security and you can take a break if you like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:25, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

: You're welcome Andy! I hope you like the new [[Reid Bryson]] article. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 01:30, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
::*Crocoite, I have to go. Good luck with fighting the this vandal. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 00:00, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

== Awesome!!! ==

: Awesome work, Crocoite!!! God bless you!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:19, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Ditto!! They are no match for us, ever! --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 01:47, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

==[[user:Loskids]]==
She is unblocked. The block was due to an IP addy problem. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:59, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

== Vandals ==

(''high five'') nice vandal-fighting! I am laughing over looking at the recent changes list... there are a bunch of new accouts, and a bunch lines of us blocking users... and then a few "[[Young Earth Creationism]]"s highlighted. --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 19:37, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
:Use the [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers Block Log]; hit block, then block again, then go "back" two pages, and repeat... --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 19:42, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

*Email me this one, Hoji...for its news to me. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 19:43, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

== welcome back ==
Thank goodness you reconsidered. It's only been a little while, but I already missed you. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 03:10, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

:Thanks Bohdan! I need to be more patient and de-stress once in awhile. Crocoite 03:15, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

== Quick work ==

Thanks: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Blockip/Conservativesrhomo] You beat me to it. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 22:33, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

== Painting ==

You are welcome! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 00:01, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

I am glad you decided to stay here!

How about being in my team in next contest?

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:38, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

:The page about the contest is [[Conservapedia:Team contest|here]] ~ [[User:SharonS|Sharon]][[User talk:SharonS|Talk]] 09:02, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

You need to make a new page for Contest Personal Record. Take a look [[User:Joaquín Martínez/Contest|here]]. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 18:26, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

:Done. Thanks for your sample page. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 18:35, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

== Internationalisation ==

I'm definitely not complaining, but I see that you've internationalised the breaking news yourself! Great! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:22, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

:I'm trying to incorporate your idea, but sometimes you will still see the need for cleanup. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 21:26, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

==HumanEvoPage==
You could just delete it. --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]][[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']] 09:28, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

:That is true; however, this process prevents the page from being recreated again. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 09:31, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
::What is the problem with a new page of that name being created? For that matter, apart from the pro-evolutionary bias in the article, what was so wrong with it that it needed to be deleted? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:44, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

:::As you saw from the troll/vandal attack, they wanted us to leave those articles in CP, so they can come back later and vandalize them again. Thanks for helping clean up the mess. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 10:33, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
::::Yes, simply deleting them would allow them to recreate them again. But then protecting them didn't really stop them, did it? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:38, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
They are still at it. I'm going to lock the database. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:40, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

== Good work ==

At this rhythm we will win for sure. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 02:53, 10 July 2007 (EDT)

::Thanks, just doing my part. :-) --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 03:00, 10 July 2007 (EDT)

I asked them 2 times. No answer. No answer means YES in legal terms. Something could be gained anyway. Truly in God. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 17:05, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

Excellent work for CP. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:52, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

The table looks fine so far; perhaps we can hack the {{tl|president}} or {{tl|Prime Minister}} later to create a standardized infobox for each governor's details. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 16:29, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Good work! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 14:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)

== Copyright of state government materials ==

The matter I e-mailed you about is at [[User talk:Aschlafly#Copyright of state government materials]]. I didn't mean to cause a commotion over all of this; I just wanted to make sure things got done right so there's no headaches later, you know? [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 15:11, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

*No, I don't know. For someone so experienced in wiki's and their politics, especially a place like WP, I find your comments, at the very least, to be disingenius. '''There is no need for a form letter, unless you can cite one instance of some State or the Governor thereof, objecting to, and instituting legal procedures against, an ''educational site'' for using the picture of their Chief Executive. Can you do this?''' --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 15:34, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

Didn't mean to start this up on your talk page, Crocoite, just wanted to let you know about the thread on Andy's talk. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 15:49, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

*So, you cannot. That is all I was asking about.... --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 16:25, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
:I would rather not get into this in four different places at once. In any event, Andy seems to have resolved the issue. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 17:16, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

:*Yes, as you plainly see, it was resolved just as I repeatedly tried to tell you. You do have a problem with etiquette here. Work on it. Please. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 17:29, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

== Would you please categorize... ==

the article [[Main Page/Previous Conservapedia Breaking News]]? Since you're the protecting sysop I thought you'd like first crack at it. I suggest "conservapedia maintenance" or "conservapedia administration" but as an admin here it's obviously your call. :) [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

:Done. Thanks for your categorizing contributions. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 12:35, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

::My pleasure, thanks for your help! [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:36, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

== Winners ==

Congratulations. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:19, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

:Congratulations!! We won! [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 11:10, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

::Thanks. Great teamwork! --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 11:55, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

== This Just In.... ==

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style "What Not To Add To Articles". Just a FYI, Per Andy. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 18:07, 27 July 2007 (EDT)

:Thanks TK. That makes sense. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 19:20, 27 July 2007 (EDT)

== categorizing articles ==

Hello Crocoite, :) 
I noticed that you've created a number of archives of past breaking news. Would you please categorize them when you create them? We've just about got the uncategorized list licked, but keeping it worked down will be easier if editors place their new articles in to a category. I've put the ones you made so far in cat:conservapedia administration. If you feel there's a better category by all means use it, they're your articles. :D Thanks, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 16:38, 1 August 2007 (EDT)

:Thanks for the cats. Yes, I will add a cat to the new articles. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 17:31, 1 August 2007 (EDT)

::merci! [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 01:05, 2 August 2007 (EDT) ''<-honh honh...''

*I messaged you on Yahoo, and evidently you didn't get the offline? Is there a reason we should be archiving the past news pages? --[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 01:39, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

:I will answer on Yahoo now. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 02:05, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

== Dean ==

Hurricane is coming over our heads...

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 11:48, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

:You're in my prayers. Let me know how you're doing after it passes. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 11:52, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

I WILL...

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 20:55, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

==Interference==

Ahhh...interference on the main page!! I hate that...[[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 12:02, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

:Hi Deborah. That's why I save my edits to notepad first, so I can add them in when the conflict is over ;-). --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 12:06, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

::Yea...at first I thought I lost it, but then I went back a few pages and just control-c'ed it. Same concept :) [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 12:10, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

== request ==

I know we have disagreed on things but I think we have done so amicably. On the other hand, I would appreciate it if you added your two cents regarding my last post to the [[Talk:Atheism‎]] article. I ask this because I know you also believe in the moral depravity of atheism as you stated that atheism is evil at Conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:24, 1 September 2007 (EDT)

:Done. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 15:46, 1 September 2007 (EDT)

== Conservative links ==

Thank you for your comment. Please do whatever you think that could improve the article. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:02, 2 September 2007 (EDT)

:Andy wants us to make explanation for the links set in this article. Could you help? Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 07:45, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

==Contest==
Would you be interested in going after another victory and joining team one (to be named) in the contest? --[[User:Tash|Tash]] 19:04, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

:Thanks for the invite Tash. I would like to join your team with the understanding I'm now working 7 days a week and will have limited time to contribute to the contest. I don't want your team to lose because of me. ;-) --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 19:19, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

No problem, I have SAT's in two weeks... so I;m going to be busy as well... you're in!--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 19:23, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

== Help ==

Could you please unblock. I can't find the way.

08:34, 23 September 2007 Joaquín Martínez (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "'''ConservativeMom''' (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (name)
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Blockip" --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:58, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

:Try this [[Special:Ipblocklist]]. Then unblock.
:I can still do the unblock for you Joaquín if you're still having problems. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 09:03, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

::Done. Thank you my friend. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 09:11, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

== Why the reverts? ==

The '''first''' Conservapedia Commandment states that you shouldn't copy (although public domain sources seem to be excluded from this for some reason) unless it was your own work.

Considering that the articles you created are complete copies of a copyrighted page, I now ask for proof that you are the original author of that page. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 10:43, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

:Jenkins, these articles were not copied from the source you described; however, I am going to delete them until I find the appropriate government reference. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 10:52, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

== http://rationalwiki.com ==

Come on over. --[[User:LinkedToCommiePlot|LinkedToCommiePlot]] 10:55, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

User talk:DanH

2007-09-23T14:54:51Z

LinkedToCommiePlot: http://rationalwiki.com

[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|left|'''DanH''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar for tireless vigilence against fascists, liberals, vandals & trolls.]]

'''Archives:'''

[[User talk:MountainDew]]

[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]

== unicode ==

Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

*I am sure you read all that on that other wiki. Check with them. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 22:57, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

== Vandal? ==
So I'm a "vandal" am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their "fun." Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to "get high" and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country.

When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras "It's just a game," "You're a close minded fanatic," and "Get a life." I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a "vandal."

YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, "Oh, this must be safe," but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we?

The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't "judge" video games based on what "a couple crazy kids did." That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. "Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having "fun") justify the means(the death of the innocent" Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile.

Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the "Magic System" (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose "If it feels good, do it." And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.

My page on "anime," as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick "art" blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.

And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said "I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly." Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these "family friendly" websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising.

That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted "entertainment." How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?

But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said "Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder." But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just "harmless fun" and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer.

I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and "coolest" spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too.

I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth.

(P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.)

: This post wins the internet. Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [http://www.jackthompson.org/] --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
::This might be the funniest thing I have ever read [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:26, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

*He seemed "normal" to me on other issues. But then I have no idea what sparked his post, or anything else.... --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 23:33, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Just to nitpick, at the time the Vandals attacked the Roman empire and took over North Africa, they were Arian Christian, not pagan.--[[User:Epicurius|Steve]] 12:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

== reminder ==

does the word [[Hannibal]] mean anything to you? heh heh heh[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

I'll have to get that tomorrow morning; I'm going out of town for three days. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

== Uh-oh... ==

looks like we have a Jack Thompson impersonator trying to take you out, Dan. Or worse yet, Jack himself... I shudder at the mere thought. Be vigiliant, don't bend, we will defend you, Dan. --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 19:02, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

::There's only one way to tell... [[Jack Thompson|*Creates Article*]].--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:07, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

::*ROFL!! Yeah, like he's something to fear, Thompson! You guys kill me sometimes, giving him the reaction he wants, lol. Good idea, Elamdri! --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 19:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

::::Dunno about you, Terry, but an opportunity to take on Thompson ''mano y mano'' is something I would relish. I hope the article I'm about to write about him attracts his wrath.--[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
:::::::NOOO, you blocked him! How am I gonna have any fun now?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Let's play with this guy - he deserves it. --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 19:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
:::::::::::I somewhat doubt he's Jack Thompson, he even denied it. But still, wouldn't it be something if we got the real Jack Thompson to come sniffing around?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:18, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::::As of today, that's my new goal. We know he'll find us sooner or later (he gave Wikipedia quite a headache), so let's school him quickly and get it over with. Let's move this discussion to the sysop page, agreed? --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 19:21, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

*Hoji, AIM! --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 19:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

== Congratulations Div. Chess Champ! ==

Go Dan! --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 23:50, 15 July 2007 (EDT)

==Ranger Bill==
Sorry, I didn't do that!! My little sister (didn't ask me or anything) just put it up using my user name. Sorry that it happened.--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 15:12, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

== Dan, evolution article ==

Dear Dan,

My sister stated to me that the [[theory of evolution]] article was a very good article but she said, "What about the man-ape fossils?". So I added the [[paleoanthropology]] section which a leading creationist organization is going to publish at their website. I also noticed that [[Wikipedia]] did the social effects of the theory of evolution in their [[evolution]] article so I added that very briefly. I also noticed that a HUGE issue was left out and that was biological information, biological code, and genetic programs so I added a brief section.

As far as today, Andy added some material that I thought needed better footnoting and wording so that is what I was doing today.

I do think the end result was worth it. Out of 112 million articles on Google for the Theory of evolution ours is ranked #34.

[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

== Chess ==

Congratulations on winning. Not bad for a Jayhawk. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 11:03, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

:Yes...congratulations! I was always horrible at chess...I just move a piece and see what happens...the word strategy does not exist in my dictionary :) [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 12:42, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
::Congratulations. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Thanks all. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:35, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

:Belated congrats! --[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]] 13:08, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

== Would you please categorize... ==

the article on [[pornography]]? If I read the history correctly you are the protecting sysop so I figured you'd like first crack at it. May I suggest something simple like "media" for now? I have plans to re-organize many category structures but at the moment that's likely to be your best fit. Of course, you should do as you see fit. Regards, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 18:09, 17 July 2007 (EDT) ''<-I'm just doing them alphabetically, honest!

:Hello again,

:Would you also please categorize [[Main Page/new style]]? Thank you, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:14, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

== Good Catch ==

...On the user name "Bush is retarded" spelt backwards. Of course I guess I should expect that from a chess champion. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

==Hitler's vegetarianism==
Hi. What exactly is your source that Hitler wasn't a vegetarian? I've read numerous places that he was, including, I believe, the memoirs of his friend Albert Speer. Is the argument that he wasn't a ''strict'' vegetarian? Because there are numerous definitions of vegetarianism, and some allow for limited meat ingestion. If I recall, his reasons were health and not animal ights, but I don't think that matters. [[User:PortlyMort|PortlyMort]] 14:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

There's at the very least, enough controversy about whether he was [http://www.slate.com/id/2096259/] that we shouldn't dogmatically say one way or the other. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:38, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

:Hitler's personal chef says his favourite dish was pigeon [http://veg.ca/content/view/171/113/]; it seems from various other sources that while he ''preferred'' a vegetarian diet, he deviated enough from it to not be classed as a vegetarian. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 14:46, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

::Sources are numerous. One source of good criticism cites how Hitler was not sympathetic to German soldiers freezing in Russia who asked for meat. Hitler went into a long spiel about how the Roman legions survived on grains, etc., and probably regarded meat eaters as subversive to the Nazi effort. Ultimately, many meat eaters probably betrayed the Nazi cause because of this--Hitler just didn't care if meat eaters got fed or not, and expected everybody to be like him and make the same sacrifices during the privations of a prolonged war, which of course to a vegetarian of many years, are not sacrifices at all. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:52, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

:::The sources for his meat eating and love of ham and bavarian sausages are numerous also [http://www.foodrevolution.org/askjohn/47.htm]; many commentators also point out that Hitler never claimed to be a vegetarian, outlawed vegetarian organizations and prevented all measures aimed at easing Germany’s food shortages that involved a reduction in meat consumption. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 14:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

== Request ==

I want to put a few more pictures in the [[evolution]] article. Do you know how to do that? I want to put a picture of [[Ernst Haeckel]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Evolutionary_theory_and_Cases_of_Fraud.2C_Hoaxes_and_Speculation.E2.80.8E I also want to put a picture of [[Stephen Gould]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_Punctuated_Equilibrium Please don't use the picture of Stephen Gould used at [[Wikipedia]]. Can you help? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)conservative

== Thanks ==

Thank you for welcoming me, DanH. [[User:BrianJackson|BrianJackson]] 20:37, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

Thank you for unblocking me, it is greatly appreciated -Mr.Random

== Grunge ==
I agree. A lot of post-grunge bands really ruined grunge. Everclear,Third Eye Blind,Matchbox 20, and even Daughtry (he was classified post-grunge too lol) really turned grunge to pop - rock.

(whoops forgot to sign)

--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

Favorite Original Grunge Band: Alice In Chains

Favorite Post-Grunge: Three Days Grace or Breaking Benjamin

--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:06, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

== Great block! ==

Great block! Well done!!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

: Wow, a second great block in the same night!!! Very well done.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

== thanks ==

The user who put those questionable comments was a sock of vandal redhungary, who I think you dealt with earlier. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:04, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

== Noah's ark ==

Heya -- I'm interested in making some changes to Noah's ark -- proposed them on the talk page -- any chance you could try unlocking it for a while and see if revert wars and/or vandalism become a problem? [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 21:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

== Please protect my signature templates ==

The templates in question are:
*[[User:PheasantHunter/TestTalk]]
*[[User:PheasantHunter/FullSig]]
and
*[[User:PheasantHunter/sig]]

I am the only person who has any business editing them (aside from Andy). Other users who edit them are probably vandalizing them. Niandra protected them, but then TK unprotected them (he was probably confused since this is a technical issue.) Could you either take it up with other sysops or just go ahead and protect the above templates? Thanks. {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 12:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

== Vandal blocking ==
:Good job blocking the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=DanH&page= vandals]. [[User:JohnMorrisonBirch|JohnMorrisonBirch]] 21:20, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

== Crop Circles ==

Dear Dan

I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a "crop circle" (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

*Joaquin my friend, I beleive I asked you to post in the sysop area about this, no? Please do so. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 20:03, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

== Deletion Request ==

Hi, you're an admin here, right? Could you delete [[Charlesincharge]]?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 22:31, 27 July 2007 (EDT)

== revert on Guillotine ==

Why is it liberal bias to cite a fact? Capital punishment is indeed contrary to the French constitution following a vote of the French Parliament, in April 2007. I do not understand why you reverted this?[[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 13:15, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

It probably wasn't, but the term First World seems to imply that. Maybe as in most of Europe, or in much of the world would be a way to put it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:16, 29 July 2007 (EDT)
:OK. By the way, thank you for having moved [[Maximilien de Robespierre]]. [[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 13:17, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

== I would appreciate your support ==

Dear DanH,

I am sending you a note about the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]] and how it can substantially increase web traffic to Conservapedia.

The Conservapedia article on [[homosexuality]] is now ranked in the top 10 of http://www.google.com searches. I estimate that the Conservapedia article on homosexuality is giving 300-400 people new people a day to know about Conservapedia who wouldn't otherwise know about it. When the article is in the top 5 of the search engine rankings it will bring in SUBSTANTIALLY more as the top 5 entries get the lion's share of the internet traffic.

Now a main reason why the Conservapedia homosexuality article is ranked in the top 10 is that the search engines highly reward articles with footnotes that link to other internet websites. Accordingly, since our uncited template is successful in getting people to cite their material as Andy Schlafly stated, I made note of the uncited template in the following Conservapedia articles:

Conservapedia:Commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments

Conservapedia Manual of Style: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style

Conservapedia:Footnotes - technical help
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help

Currently about 50% of Conservapedia articles are completely uncited and a high percentage of articles that are cited are poorly cited. If this persist, not many people are going to know about Conservapedia as our articles will be poorly ranked by the search engines. However, I strongly believe that the uncited template will make a substantial difference.

Accordingly, I would appreciate your efforts in supporting the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]].

[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:33, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

'''*Conservative, around here, it is the practice of all Sysops, except you, to discuss changes before implementing them, and asking for support. The Commandments may only be changed upon direct approval from Andy. You did not receive this direct approval, no? Kindly try and act like a mannered person, post your proposals to the Sysops and Andy, then be prepared for discussion and support, not the other way around. ''I could support your idea, except for the encouragement of placing templates without limitiation. We have far too much clutter already, and your failing to limit template placement, by stating some guideline for what a minimum number of citations is, will lead to chaos and endless debate as to how many are too few and how many are "enough". '' Thanks. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|--Talk 2 Me]] 15:58, 29 July 2007 (EDT)'''
:::TK, that is untrue as my message on the indicated pages clearly indicates the template is to be placed on a article or section of an article that are COMPLETELY uncited. It also gives the template for merely indicating a sentence that is uncited. Lastly, my''' cited''' articles are clearly bringing internet traffic and the uncited articles are not only breaking the conservapedia commandment about citing your sources but they are creating Conservapedia articles filled with unverifiable or hard to verify information. Plus uncited articles are not making a significant impact in regards to bringing in search engine traffic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:07, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

== stonehenge ==

DanH, please do not revert me again. My new post states: broke conservapedia commandments. uncited material. please do not allow the conservapedia commandment breakers to reign freely. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:59, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

== Sc/nthorpe ==
Why did you delete this? It is a significant town in the English East Midlands and a major centre of steel production. Just because some people have dirty minds, and CP has an absurdly oversensitive spam filter, is no reason for it not to be listed. [[User:Pachyderm|Pachyderm]] 07:29, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

== revert ==

Sorry Dan, but I had to revert you. The name of the city is Чорнобиль or ''chornobyl'', but in the russian language it is Чернобыль or ''chernobyl''. The city is both Ukrainian and in Ukraine. I have moved the article so now the link works. Its alot like Kyiv the correct way and Kiev the wrong russian way. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

*I shall be informing Putin of your treason. Run! --[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 04:21, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

== [[Mitt Romney]] ==

Thanks for removing the polygamy smear. I was considering removing it, but as a Mormon myself I always get nervous that I'd be accused of trying to cover up the history of my church or something silly like that. I was just about to post on the talk page asking for the opinion of others when I saw your edit; far more efficient. :-) [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 18:39, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
== Flying machine revert ==

Why did you do it? My bit was accurate and on point.[[User:Bafi|Bafi]] 20:57, 4 August 2007 (EDT)

== [[Professional wrestling]] ==

Could you delete [[Professional wrestling]]? It was created by the [[User:Dragonman|vandal]] you just blocked. Thanks. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 17:13, 5 August 2007 (EDT)

==Transcluded text==

Hi, Mountain Dew! I created [[Template:Famine of 1933]] as [[transcluded text]]. You or anyone can edit it easily, because there is a special [[edit link]] in all three articles which invoke the template. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 17:58, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

Ah! That's really cool, and easy to work in. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:00, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

== TO: DanH from Conservative ==

Dear Dan,

Please read the email I just sent you.

[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:47, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

== cabsmith ==

Who is cabsmith? I don't even see a history of any contributions of that user. [[User:DaiseyCutter|DaiseyCutter]] 18:28, 18 August 2007 (EDT)

Somebody who shared your IP with you when you were in Atlanta a week ago, or whatever it may be. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:33, 18 August 2007 (EDT)

:I am lost. But am I not allowed to participate here? [[User:DaiseyCutter|DaiseyCutter]] 18:35, 18 August 2007 (EDT)

== Hurricane ==

Yes, Thank you! I have been working here all the time but very little, except when I went for holidays at the end of July.

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:26, 26 August 2007 (EDT)

== Beetle ==

Umm, okay, why did you revert my edit? Did I do something wrong?

*On every edit screen you see this message:

<blockquote>
"Please note that all contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here."
</blockquote>
--[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 19:41, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

== Laura Ingraham ==

Sorry, I did not see your edit. But...

As I understand, "See also" is a way to promote what we have in CP that is more or less related to the article or that could be interesting to the reader. It is NOT an extension of the subject.

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 11:11, 1 September 2007 (EDT)

==Tancredo Image==
Here is a public domain picture of him that I found (Image:Tom_Tencredo.jpg), but I can't upload it to the page since its locked. The picture still has to be protected also. --[[User:Tash|Tash]] 18:42, 7 September 2007 (EDT)

==Unresponsive==
I emailed you a while ago (like 2 weeks probably) concerning a ban. You either didn't get it because you didn't check your email or you just choose to ignore it (the latter being the more likely). So i'm sorry but should you really be a sysop when you act this rediculous? Anyways, email me back explaining your actions and please dont try to ban me saying that I harrased you or something stupid like that...

--[[User:Maverick|Maverick]] 13:06, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

He might not, but I will. Read the instructions on the block notice. Bye.
* BlakJack (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 18:13, 11 September 2007) (Earliest: 18:13, 11 September 2007) [1]
* Maverick (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 18:07, 11 September 2007) (Earliest: 18:06, 11 September 2007) [2]
204.169.xx.xxx
--[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 14:21, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

hey Dan, why did you take out my [[antichrist]] edit. Those of us who believe that the Lord is returning are seeing the signs. Why can't we put out the view that the antichrist is here?

We are not in the business of gossip here, and determining who the Antichrist is. Only God knows. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:09, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

:Dan, perhaps we need an article called [[Views of the Antichrist]], expressing major denominational perspectives. Some Christian denominations believe a person such as this must appear, as a pre-condition before the second coming. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 16:25, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

*It is good news to see Ed will be quadrupling his on line time here! Of course we would need his help in patrolling that article, and all the flames it would engender...lol. --[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 16:56, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

::Four times 0.01 is only 0.04 ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 17:24, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

*Well, as your official spokesperson, I can chip in an additional 0.04, making an almost thousand-sold increase in your presence! :p --[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 17:33, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

== Alan Keyes ==

You are welcome! My pleasure. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:12, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

== I sent you a important email ==

I sent you a important email. If you could get back to me as soon as possible I would appreciate it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:31, 18 September 2007 (EDT)

== small request ==

Dan, thanks for getting back to me. I cannot understand why you didn't get my email. I would hate to type out another one only to have you not get that one either. Could you send me a email via the conservapedia system? It only has to say, "Hi, Conservative. This is DanH."
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:11, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
:::This way here I would have your email address. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:12, 19 September 2007 (EDT)

== Conservative links ==

Andy wants us to make explanation for the links set in this article. Could you help? Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 07:47, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

==Contest==
How about joining team one (to be named) in the contest?--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 18:54, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

== http://rationalwiki.com ==

Come on over.

Wait, you already did. --[[User:LinkedToCommiePlot|LinkedToCommiePlot]] 10:54, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

User talk:Jenkins

2007-09-23T14:53:21Z

LinkedToCommiePlot: http://rationalwiki.com

{{Welcome|sig=[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]] 20:13, 20 September 2007 (EDT)}}

== http://rationalwiki.com ==

Come on over! --[[User:LinkedToCommiePlot|LinkedToCommiePlot]] 10:53, 23 September 2007 (EDT)