https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=MF 2026-10-08T06:15:38Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Pie&diff=290397 2007-09-11T02:39:06Z

<p>MF: ?</p> <hr /> <div>I think the chant at many soccer matches to players who seem to have piled on weight (&quot;Who ate all the pies?) might appear here?<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> :Uh, is a topcrust really necessary for it to be a pie? I've seen lots of things called &quot;pie&quot; which definitely did not have a top crust. Just checking... [[User:MF|MF]] 22:39, 10 September 2007 (EDT)</div>

MF https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:General_disclaimer&diff=290394 2007-09-11T02:37:07Z

<p>MF: /* Plagiarism */ huh, yeah. Now that you mention it...</p> <hr /> <div>== No Disclaimer? ==<br /> <br /> I don't get it. If this site is, and [[Conservapedia:About|I quote]], &quot;one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind&quot;, why does it have that &quot;not-complete&quot; feel to it. I thought it was just the articles at first... but this is a project page for heaven's sake! <br /> <br /> I shall be back. [[User:O2mcgovem|O2mcgovem]] 19:21, 21 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :At the bottom of each page there is a link to [[Conservapedia:General_disclaimer|Disclaimers]]. It links here to an empty page.<br /> :At [[Conservapedia:Disclaimer]] one can find a discalimer. It includes the sentence:<br /> <br /> ::''Nothing here has necessarily been reviewed or checked by anyone with expertise to ensure that it is accurate or reliable.''<br /> <br /> :I suggest that be inserted on this page. It could even be added to the bottom of every page.<br /> :[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 08:04, 3 April 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Plagiarism ==<br /> <br /> This general disclaimer is largely plagiarized from Wikipedia's general disclaimer. That's not a good example to set; in college you get expelled for plagiarism. Luckily, solving the problem is as easy as crediting Wikipedia. Then all will be dandy. [[User:GOPfan77|GOPfan77]] 22:16, 8 September 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Yeah, I just noticed this too. Isn't that a copyright violation? I mean, Wikipedia's GDFL requires attribution... [[User:MF|MF]] 22:37, 10 September 2007 (EDT)</div>

MF