<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MReynolds</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MReynolds"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/MReynolds"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T13:58:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594250</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594250"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T03:20:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MReynolds: /* Logos */ Rewriting comment; misread info previously&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MReynolds</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594249</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594249"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T03:13:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MReynolds: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to the Word, or truth, but to God, a god, divinity and similar terms.  You're off to a great start. [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:13, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MReynolds</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>