<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MasManStudios</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MasManStudios"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/MasManStudios"/>
	<updated>2026-10-08T05:22:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Causes_of_Homosexuality&amp;diff=786053</id>
		<title>Talk:Causes of Homosexuality</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Causes_of_Homosexuality&amp;diff=786053"/>
		<updated>2010-06-08T21:53:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MasManStudios: /* I'm looking for a purpose or point here. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;delete this page.  it is a worthless peice of....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
their is no cause of homosexuality.  it just happens[[User:Pastafarian2|Pastafarian2]] 22:31, 8 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm looking for a purpose or point here. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#This page seems to be just a collection of links to Conservative's expansive library of articles on homosexuality.  Can anybody think of a reason not to delete it?&lt;br /&gt;
#The rest of the cited page of Falwell quotations does not cast him in a very positive light, such as quoting him saying that Billy Graham is the chief servant of Satan in American, or something similar.  If that's the intention, then it's fine with me, but I'm guessing that that's not the case  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 16:51, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, a collection of quotes by someone isn't a reference. It basically boils down to [[proof by assertion]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:12, 19 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The above was written before content was added.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 22:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, and we must also continue to address the controversy over the extent to which homosexuality is a condition which is &amp;quot;caused&amp;quot; by physical, inherited factors and or is a lifestyle which one adopts in response to one's social environment. For example, sensitive, &amp;quot;artistic&amp;quot; young men with weak or rejecting fathers appear to have a higher incident of becoming homosexual. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:05, 20 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I belive, due to my own research and opinions, that homosexuality is in gentics. And, plus if you say it is a choice, think of this. Why would someone choose to be an outcast or so diffrent from what is expected they are considered unorthadox.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality and female promiscuity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I remember that I read somewhere that there was a study linking female promiscuity to male  homosexuality. IIRC, the hypothesis was that ''both'' were caused by a mutation in the X-chromosome; it was dominant in females causing a tendency to promiscuity, and, as with other diseases related to the X chromosome, it was the only gene in males causing a tendency to homosexuality. But I can't find this study now (not sure if it was suppressed for being  politically incorrect). [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 10:25, 4 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MasManStudios</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>