Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:NSmyth

2007-03-21T06:26:37Z

Maxpower:

==User Complaints==

I think 1 week is a little weak considering the massive amounts of vandalism done by Liberatarian. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 06:45, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I didn;t see it, I\\\'m probably going to expand it shortly.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 06:47, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:Take a look at the past 100 changes or so. I\\\'m just glad a sysop showed up and blocked him. Users Sam, Jpaffett, and Bmn2008 were all vandalizing earlier too. I tried to mark each time they vandalized in the summary of changes. Thanks! [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 06:49, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I\\\'ll reblock him when the week is up, he\\\'ll probably have forgotten about the site by then anyway. .[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 06:50, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

::: '''Thanks for your blocks'''. For obscenity or clear vandals, I suggest blocks of infinite duration. We don't want those folks returning. Someone will tell us if we made a mistake and we can then undo an infinite block. But such mistakes are less than 1%. Thanks much.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:31, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

[[User:Ilove69]] is a vandal.

I\\\'m just sitting here patiently waiting for him to come back with a new account. But the infinite ban might just stick. [[USer:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 07:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
*lol that comment was the only reason i made those last 4 accounts. anyway as i said before, i\'m done, so i guess you\'re right the infinite ban will stick. I\'d love to find a way to do some serious mass vandalism, but yeah you\'ve got it locked down fairly well - i was actualy impressed with your response time on that last one! you got me before the minute was out! nice work [[User:Kfactor|Kfactor]] 09:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Sam is a vandal also. He keeps trying to edit the censorship page. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 07:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

If you\\\'re still online, Darrenissa is a vandal also. See Rudy Giuliani and NATO pages for explanation. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 07:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I saw that and have put a warning on her page.

==Vandal==
Hey man i\'m your vandal:
*Libertarian
*ilove69
*Water_cracker
*Planner
*Teratactile
*lesbian sex lover
But yeah game over man. Good luck in the future - I reckon due to the nature of the website you\'ll end up receiving way more vandalism than i could ever hope to dish out - and possibly not in the light hearted manner of my edits, but serious bot based vandalism. .I\'ll look into it. [[User:Kfactor|Kfactor]] 09:06, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

==I understand... but==

I understand your frustration and removal of the post that was placed on the Conservapedia Talk page. However, it was perfectly acceptable. I have restored it. If something is posted on a talk page it should really only be deleted if it violates the Commandments. Thanks [[User:Conservapedia Webmaster|Conservapedia Webmaster]] 09:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

:Yeah, I was about leave you a comment about that after I saw that you had changed it back. I didn't look at where I was before I wiped it. I thought it was another part of the spam attack I've been dealing with. My mistake, sorry. [[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 09:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

For catching that idiot vandal on the Rudy page! When it happens, please post your actions on the talk page there, so we can all know whats been happening, ok? --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:28, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

==A Liberal Editor?==

Because I am so amazingly awsome I feel i should get my own area so I have taken the liberty of making one. Speaking of Liberty, I'm surprised that there's a liberal sysop on this site. Wouldn't joining something like conservapedia go against what you believe in? I mean after all, you're liberal, you should hate everything conservatives stand for. I think you're just a hypocrit, you say you're one thing but side with the other, how can anyone respect you? You can even stay true to your political beliefs, you're a traitor and you should be despised. Something like this would be considered treason and do you know what they used to do to people who committed treason? They would be executed... maybe we should adopt this into our times

:I am a socialist, I actually have spent a good portion of my time removing bias(for either side) from pages and even more(almost all of it actually) time fighting the vandalism that goes on here. I don't know if you're one of those vandals or if you actually plan on making a difference here. I'm just here to help keep things factual.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]]01:18, 21 March 2007 (EDT) P.S. I changed the name of this to something a touch more intelligent.

:I can see why your here and that's all fine, but what would draw you to a conservative site to begin with? There is something wrong with that picture, I could understand if it was wikipedia or something like that but conservapedia? You can do better than that i'm sure. I lean more towards anarchy than anything but I have nothing else better to do. Good luck keeping things factual and dealing with vandals, I'm not here to vandalise anything, just here to challenge people's opinions and see if they can truly back up what they believe. Once again good luck...

[[User:Maxpower|Maxpower]]

::If you want the truth(I mean, I base my existence on this site on it) I originally came here intending to be a vandal, but found that I could do good and make this a viable site unlike others. Please voice your opinions, just don't post them in the articles and it's all good. Post your opinions on the discussion pages and we won't have a problem.[[User:Nsmyth|Nsmyth]]01:27, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

:::Thanks for helping me out when I was blocked, much appreciated
[[User:Maxpower|Maxpower]]

User talk:NSmyth

2007-03-21T05:24:51Z

Maxpower: /* A Liberal Editor? */

User talk:NSmyth

2007-03-21T05:24:29Z

Maxpower: /* A Liberal Editor? */

==User Complaints==

I think 1 week is a little weak considering the massive amounts of vandalism done by Liberatarian. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 06:45, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I didn;t see it, I\\\'m probably going to expand it shortly.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 06:47, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:Take a look at the past 100 changes or so. I\\\'m just glad a sysop showed up and blocked him. Users Sam, Jpaffett, and Bmn2008 were all vandalizing earlier too. I tried to mark each time they vandalized in the summary of changes. Thanks! [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 06:49, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I\\\'ll reblock him when the week is up, he\\\'ll probably have forgotten about the site by then anyway. .[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 06:50, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

::: '''Thanks for your blocks'''. For obscenity or clear vandals, I suggest blocks of infinite duration. We don't want those folks returning. Someone will tell us if we made a mistake and we can then undo an infinite block. But such mistakes are less than 1%. Thanks much.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:31, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

[[User:Ilove69]] is a vandal.

I\\\'m just sitting here patiently waiting for him to come back with a new account. But the infinite ban might just stick. [[USer:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 07:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
*lol that comment was the only reason i made those last 4 accounts. anyway as i said before, i\'m done, so i guess you\'re right the infinite ban will stick. I\'d love to find a way to do some serious mass vandalism, but yeah you\'ve got it locked down fairly well - i was actualy impressed with your response time on that last one! you got me before the minute was out! nice work [[User:Kfactor|Kfactor]] 09:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Sam is a vandal also. He keeps trying to edit the censorship page. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 07:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

If you\\\'re still online, Darrenissa is a vandal also. See Rudy Giuliani and NATO pages for explanation. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 07:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I saw that and have put a warning on her page.

==Vandal==
Hey man i\'m your vandal:
*Libertarian
*ilove69
*Water_cracker
*Planner
*Teratactile
*lesbian sex lover
But yeah game over man. Good luck in the future - I reckon due to the nature of the website you\'ll end up receiving way more vandalism than i could ever hope to dish out - and possibly not in the light hearted manner of my edits, but serious bot based vandalism. .I\'ll look into it. [[User:Kfactor|Kfactor]] 09:06, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

==I understand... but==

I understand your frustration and removal of the post that was placed on the Conservapedia Talk page. However, it was perfectly acceptable. I have restored it. If something is posted on a talk page it should really only be deleted if it violates the Commandments. Thanks [[User:Conservapedia Webmaster|Conservapedia Webmaster]] 09:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

:Yeah, I was about leave you a comment about that after I saw that you had changed it back. I didn't look at where I was before I wiped it. I thought it was another part of the spam attack I've been dealing with. My mistake, sorry. [[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 09:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

For catching that idiot vandal on the Rudy page! When it happens, please post your actions on the talk page there, so we can all know whats been happening, ok? --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:28, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

==A Liberal Editor?==

Because I am so amazingly awsome I feel i should get my own area so I have taken the liberty of making one. Speaking of Liberty, I'm surprised that there's a liberal sysop on this site. Wouldn't joining something like conservapedia go against what you believe in? I mean after all, you're liberal, you should hate everything conservatives stand for. I think you're just a hypocrit, you say you're one thing but side with the other, how can anyone respect you? You can even stay true to your political beliefs, you're a traitor and you should be despised. Something like this would be considered treason and do you know what they used to do to people who committed treason? They would be executed... maybe we should adopt this into our times
:I am a socialist, I actually have spent a good portion of my time removing bias(for either side) from pages and even more(almost all of it actually) time fighting the vandalism that goes on here. I don't know if you're one of those vandals or if you actually plan on making a difference here. I'm just here to help keep things factual.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]]01:18, 21 March 2007 (EDT) P.S. I changed the name of this to something a touch more intelligent.
:I can see why your here and that's all fine, but what would draw you to a conservative site to begin with? There is something wrong with that picture, I could understand if it was wikipedia or something like that but conservapedia? You can do better than that i'm sure. I lean more towards anarchy than anything but I have nothing else better to do. Good luck keeping things factual and dealing with vandals, I'm not here to vandalise anything, just here to challenge people's opinions and see if they can truly back up what they believe. Once again good luck...

[[User:Maxpower|Maxpower]]

User talk:NSmyth

2007-03-21T05:14:47Z

Maxpower:

==User Complaints==

I think 1 week is a little weak considering the massive amounts of vandalism done by Liberatarian. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 06:45, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I didn;t see it, I\\\'m probably going to expand it shortly.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 06:47, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:Take a look at the past 100 changes or so. I\\\'m just glad a sysop showed up and blocked him. Users Sam, Jpaffett, and Bmn2008 were all vandalizing earlier too. I tried to mark each time they vandalized in the summary of changes. Thanks! [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 06:49, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I\\\'ll reblock him when the week is up, he\\\'ll probably have forgotten about the site by then anyway. .[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 06:50, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

::: '''Thanks for your blocks'''. For obscenity or clear vandals, I suggest blocks of infinite duration. We don't want those folks returning. Someone will tell us if we made a mistake and we can then undo an infinite block. But such mistakes are less than 1%. Thanks much.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:31, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

[[User:Ilove69]] is a vandal.

I\\\'m just sitting here patiently waiting for him to come back with a new account. But the infinite ban might just stick. [[USer:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 07:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
*lol that comment was the only reason i made those last 4 accounts. anyway as i said before, i\'m done, so i guess you\'re right the infinite ban will stick. I\'d love to find a way to do some serious mass vandalism, but yeah you\'ve got it locked down fairly well - i was actualy impressed with your response time on that last one! you got me before the minute was out! nice work [[User:Kfactor|Kfactor]] 09:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Sam is a vandal also. He keeps trying to edit the censorship page. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 07:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

If you\\\'re still online, Darrenissa is a vandal also. See Rudy Giuliani and NATO pages for explanation. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 07:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I saw that and have put a warning on her page.

==Vandal==
Hey man i\'m your vandal:
*Libertarian
*ilove69
*Water_cracker
*Planner
*Teratactile
*lesbian sex lover
But yeah game over man. Good luck in the future - I reckon due to the nature of the website you\'ll end up receiving way more vandalism than i could ever hope to dish out - and possibly not in the light hearted manner of my edits, but serious bot based vandalism. .I\'ll look into it. [[User:Kfactor|Kfactor]] 09:06, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

==I understand... but==

I understand your frustration and removal of the post that was placed on the Conservapedia Talk page. However, it was perfectly acceptable. I have restored it. If something is posted on a talk page it should really only be deleted if it violates the Commandments. Thanks [[User:Conservapedia Webmaster|Conservapedia Webmaster]] 09:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

:Yeah, I was about leave you a comment about that after I saw that you had changed it back. I didn't look at where I was before I wiped it. I thought it was another part of the spam attack I've been dealing with. My mistake, sorry. [[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 09:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

For catching that idiot vandal on the Rudy page! When it happens, please post your actions on the talk page there, so we can all know whats been happening, ok? --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:28, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

==Max Power's Corner==

Because I am so amazingly awsome I feel i should get my own area so I have taken the liberty of making one. Speaking of Liberty, I'm surprised that there's a liberal sysop on this site. Wouldn't joining something like conservapedia go against what you believe in? I mean after all, you're liberal, you should hate everything conservatives stand for. I think you're just a hypocrit, you say you're one thing but side with the other, how can anyone respect you? You can even stay true to your political beliefs, you're a traitor and you should be despised. Something like this would be considered treason and do you know what they used to do to people who committed treason? They would be executed... maybe we should adopt this into our times...

Pokémon

2007-03-21T04:17:53Z

Maxpower: /* POKEMON VS DIGIMON */

There az bean
== Headline text ==
much contraversity over thee 2nd line of thee infamos pokemon theme tune it reads
''POKEMON GOTTA CATCH EM/THEM ALL SO TRUE
I KNOW ITS MY DESTINY''
IT IS ARGUED THE 2ND LINE IS SAID CATCH EM ALL NOT THEM ALL.[[Image:darth-vader-dog.jpg]]
this tramp was a pikachu

== POKEMON AND CHRISTIANITY ==
ALL POKEMON EVOLVED FROM TWO MEWS WHICH WAS COMIN OF KNOWAS ARK. THEY LATER KIGRATED TO POKEMON LAND CONSIDERED TO BE SITUATED NEAR DISNEY LAND PARIS.

== PIKACHU ==
IS YELLOW

== GAMES ==
THERE HAVE BEEN BARE POKEMONZ GAME AND THEY R ALL VRY SIMLAR BUT 1 IS BEETER THAN ALL THE REST. ALL THE GAMES R DIFFERENT COLOURS LIKE PEOPLE.

== POKEMON JOKES ==
POKEMON IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF MILLIONS OF TERRIFIED PEOPLE AT THE HANDS OF ITS POKEM'ON JOKY THIS WAS NOT FUNNY!

POKEMON POKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOK
EMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMON
POKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKE
MONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMONPOKEMON

== POKEMON VS DIGIMON ==

DIGIMONS is far better than pokemon because there is an actual story and not some creature walking around going "pika pikachu" DEVIMON SHOULDNT BE CONFUSED WITH SATAN.

In Mexico we call them El Chupacabra!