https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=MiloK 2026-09-24T07:02:53Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:_Should_the_United_States_defund_the_National_Science_Foundation%3F&diff=890469 2011-07-18T03:49:41Z

<p>MiloK: Undo revision 890468 by FergusE (talk)</p> <hr /> <div>{{debate}}<br /> <br /> Should the United States defund scientific research?<br /> <br /> == YES ==<br /> Science has yet to fully explain many basic things, such as how gravity or magnets work. With a budget of $6.87 billion and so little to show for it and with the Bible being a rich and ready-made source of much [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge|scientific knowledge]], the US should completely defund all scientific research and use that money to fund other more immediate needs. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 23:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> :Ummmm, I know how both gravity and magnetism work. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> ::Lies! Gravity doesn't work on [[Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge#Wave-Particle_Duality|Quantum Jesus]]. --[[User:MiloK|MiloK]] 23:30, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> :::You might have an idea about what science says this week, but science is always changing. Secular researchers really have no idea how they work. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 23:37, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> ::::Magnetism and gravity are very well understood forces. I think you are just pulling our legs. I am going to keep an eye on you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:39, 17 July 2011 (EDT)</div>

MiloK https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:_Should_the_United_States_defund_the_National_Science_Foundation%3F&diff=890465 2011-07-18T03:45:18Z

<p>MiloK: Reinsert edit removed by FergusE</p> <hr /> <div>{{debate}}<br /> <br /> Should the United States defund scientific research?<br /> <br /> == YES ==<br /> Science has yet to fully explain many basic things, such as how gravity or magnets work. With a budget of $6.87 billion and so little to show for it and with the Bible being a rich and ready-made source of much [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge|scientific knowledge]], the US should completely defund all scientific research and use that money to fund other more immediate needs. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 23:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> :Ummmm, I know how both gravity and magnetism work. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> ::Lies! Gravity doesn't work on [[Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge#Wave-Particle_Duality|Quantum Jesus]]. --[[User:MiloK|MiloK]] 23:30, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> :::You might have an idea about what science says this week, but science is always changing. Secular researchers really have no idea how they work. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 23:37, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> ::::Magnetism and gravity are very well understood forces. I think you are just pulling our legs. I am going to keep an eye on you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:39, 17 July 2011 (EDT)</div>

MiloK https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:_Should_the_United_States_defund_the_National_Science_Foundation%3F&diff=890455 2011-07-18T03:30:13Z

<p>MiloK: /* YES */</p> <hr /> <div>{{debate}}<br /> <br /> Should the United States defund scientific research?<br /> <br /> == YES ==<br /> Science has yet to fully explain many basic things, such as how gravity or magnets work. With a budget of $6.87 billion and so little to show for it and with the Bible being a rich and ready-made source of much [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge|scientific knowledge]], the US should completely defund all scientific research and use that money to fund other more immediate needs. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 23:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> :Ummmm, I know how both gravity and magnetism work. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)<br /> ::Lies! Gravity doesn't work on [[Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge#Wave-Particle_Duality|Quantum Jesus]]. --[[User:MiloK|MiloK]] 23:30, 17 July 2011 (EDT)</div>

MiloK https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Suggestions_on_Promoting_Conservapedia&diff=890451 2011-07-18T03:18:56Z

<p>MiloK: /* Share the following Conservapedia Video */ Remove broken links. Correct description.</p> <hr /> <div>Below are some suggestions regarding letting more people know about [[Conservapedia]]:<br /> <br /> ==Members of social networking sites==<br /> Are you a member of a social networking website like [[Myspace]], [[Facebook]], [[Friendster]], [[Twitter]], [http://www.myichthus.com/ myIchthus], or [http://www.mychurch.org/ MyChurch]? Spread the word about [[Conservapedia]]!<br /> <br /> ==Members of internet forums and discussion groups==<br /> Are you a member of a internet forum or discussion group? If you are a member of a internet forum or discussion group and see an article at Conservapedia that would be helpful to share with others then please share the article from Conservapedia to your fellow forum or discussion group members. Introducing a Conservapedia article into a forum or discussion group can often provide useful feedback in regards to a Conservapedia article in terms of providing useful changes. One of Conservapedia's most viewed articles was improved after it was introduced into some internet forums which provided quick feedback in regards to article content.<br /> <br /> ==Suggestion to bloggers==<br /> Are you a blogger or do you participate in a blog? If you participate in blogs and see an article from Conservapedia that would be helpful to share with others then please share the article from Conservapedia to your fellow bloggers. The website [http://technorati.com/ Technorati] is very helpful in regards to finding blogs about various subjects and also in regards to finding out what is going on in the blogging community.<br /> <br /> ==Share with people articles that have been written about Conservapedia==<br /> There have been [[Conservapedia:Articles mentioning Conservapedia|articles written by conservatives which have favorably mentioned Conservapedia.]] Please share these articles with your friends. <br /> <br /> ==Tangle and YouTube fans==<br /> Are you active on [http://www.tangle.com/ Tangle] or [http://www.youtube.com/ YouTube]? Create a video on your experiences at Conservapedia!<br /> <br /> Secondly, [[Conservapedia]] has launched a [[YouTube]] channel! The channel is located at [http://www.youtube.com/conservapediavideos conservapediavideos]. Subscribe to the channel [http://www.youtube.com/conservapediavideos conservapediavideos] today and tell all your friends to subscribe as well! <br /> <br /> ===Share the following Conservapedia Video===<br /> Below is a video on Conservapedia that you can share with others:<br /> <br /> *[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg48ZmNLpJ0&amp;feature=channel_page Conservapedia on The Hour] (at [[YouTube]] )<br /> <br /> *[http://www.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=86f9fbf5139a97121edc Conservapedia on The Hour] (at [http://www.tangle.com/ Tangle] )<br /> <br /> The information section for this video cites Conservapedia's evolution article:<br /> <br /> *[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1lmrBsW-sc&amp;feature=channel_page Evolution Part I]<br /> <br /> ==Your email account==<br /> <br /> Would you like more people about [[Conservapedia]], but are not on a email list? Not a problem! Email everyone in your contacts and tell them about Conservapedia. Provide a link to this page and let them know how ''they'' can spread the word about Conservapedia.<br /> <br /> ===Email list subscribers===<br /> Are you on a email list? Please forward a message to your fellow subscribers inviting them to take part in Conservapedia or to look at our articles!<br /> <br /> ==See also==<br /> *[[Conservapedia:Articles mentioning Conservapedia]]<br /> *[[Conservapedia:Videos on Conservapedia]]<br /> *[[Conservative links]]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Conservapedia Publicity]]</div>

MiloK