<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mja</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mja"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Mja"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T07:01:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Gender_politics&amp;diff=203461</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Gender politics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Gender_politics&amp;diff=203461"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T20:55:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mja: New page: The terms childlike, gentle, pretty, willowy, and submissive used in this definition of femininity seem to describing children rather than women, even given that femininity is a cultural r...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The terms childlike, gentle, pretty, willowy, and submissive used in this definition of femininity seem to describing children rather than women, even given that femininity is a cultural rather than biological term. In particular, 'willowy' strikes me as odd, since the imagery suggested is tall and slender. Many of the most striking physical differences between men and women, such as women's larger breasts, wider hips and greater body-fat ratio, argue to me that it would be men who could best be described as 'willowy'.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mja</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>