Talk:Al Gore

2007-12-12T13:10:48Z

Nebjy: Biased views

3/20/07 - Intended to do considerable work to correct spelling and grammatical errors, but time flies. Will return when I have more time. In the interim, I have updated some info and worked to maintain the encyclopedic nature of the entry (attempting to resolve some "opinion" matter which had existed).

This entire entry needs to have citations or references or anything. This violates the 2nd commandment...always cite!--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:40, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

==alleged voting irregularities==
I don't think that it is best to say that Gore challenged the 2000 election because of "alleged voting irregularities". Gore's main argument was that the election was very close, and another recount might have favored him. Yes, there were some irregularities in the way that hanging chads were counted, and maybe some other matters, but Gore was really taking a stand on how those should be counted. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 09:25, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

==Gossip==
The entire Criticism section seems to be based on gossip. Discussing Al Gore's electrical bills and monetary practices has nothing to do with his public life. Instead, this section should contain references to public criticism of Gore, not just the criticisms of the user who wrote this section. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]]

It seems this entire website is slamming democrats every chance that is given, even if its not serious. Exploiting their flaws instead of posting any positive effects they might have done. I love the example about pointing out that Al Gore uses a private jet; such a terrible crime. It doesn't state his intentions while using the jet were good or bad it just states that because he uses his jet he is a hypocrite. O and he owns a mine which is "potentially" dangerous. Wasn't aware of a mine that wasn't dangerous. Instead of bashing the democrats so much, why is it not in conservapedia's nature to bash the republicans a bit? Their mission statement is to post neutral articles from a conservative point of view? Then why is it on this page they get pissed at gore for using his JET, but when i look at Nixon's article on this site nothing is mentioned about how poorly he managed the Vietnam war? Guess the whole jet thing is more important huh?

:Take a look a [[Scooter Libby]], then get a chiropractor to help get your foot out of your mouth. As to Nixon's managing the Vietnam War, you are correct. We need more on how the Democrrats protested their own war that they started. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:49, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

::No mention of the fact in the above rant that Gore preaches against all of that engine exhaust causing global warming...but his intentions are good while he's on that private jet spewing all that exhaust so he can get to his destination and preach against global warming. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

I will probably be blocked soon, so i am merely posing this question: how is this an editable encyclopedia? If someone is blocked, they can supposedly discuss it with the admin who blocked them. But any edit on their talk page will be auto-blocked. In addition, close mindedness is stopping the most important articles from being fair.

== Recommend ==

[[Conservapedia:Manual of Style/Politicians]] - [[User:Myk|Myk]] 02:26, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

== Photo ==

So did we go out of our way to find the least flattering Al Gore picture we could find? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 01:45, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:Probably. Just like [[Rosie O'Donnell]]. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 15:31, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
the article need some [[Al Gore]] photo.--[[User:Kádár Tamás|Kádár Tamás]] 04:30, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:: That one at his breakfast's particularly good. --Wikinterpreter'''[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]
I thought that the one with him as Vice President was nice. --[[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 15:00, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

==Media bias==

We can compare the lionization of Al Gore to the favorable treatment given [[Paul Ehrlich]]:

*Despite his lengthy green-left credentials and his terrible track record as a prognosticator, NBC contracted with Ehrlich in 1990 to produce a 12-part series on global ecological issues for [[NBC News]]. NBC cast the radical professor as a disinterested scientist dispassionately explaining global warming and environmental issues. Ehrlich was later nominated for an [[Emmy Award]] for his TV propaganda and received a five-year [[MacArthur Foundation]] fellowship. [[PBS]] subsequently made him the subject of a puff-piece documentary. [http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Expertly+using+%22experts%22:+leftist+media+organs+selectively+use...-a097822451]

== Biased views ==

"An Inconvenient Truth, which won an Oscar despite its blatant scientific inaccuracies."

Proof please? - Nebjy

Heresy

2007-12-12T12:50:08Z

Nebjy: /* See Also */

'''Heresy''' is the act of speaking against the word of the [[Bible]] or an organization, usually a [[Religion|religious]] one.

In early [[Christianity]], '''heresy''' was a recurring problem as people pretending to be [[Christian]]s would advocate doctrines contrary to the [[Bible]]. Combatting '''heresy''' led to a series of [[Councils]].

"Heresy" Is also a song by the industrial-rock group "Nine inch nails" off the album "The Downward Spiral"

== See Also ==

[[Blasphemy]].

[[category:religion]]

Talk:Reincarnation

2007-12-12T12:45:18Z

Nebjy: New page: "Where did this "Estimated 36 percent" come from?- Nebjy

"Where did this "Estimated 36 percent" come from?- Nebjy

User:Nebjy

2007-12-12T12:20:37Z

Nebjy: My page

Lolz hay thar.

I are new user,

I go to church sometimes.

OMG cause I are fly

It just seems to go with my

Circular nature of the word "gone"

Withdrawn was the theory that you and I

We were created not by science

Defiance that the US is a Melting pot but more of a

Right wing gas spring lonely kind of nation.

Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Talk:Al Gore

Heresy

Talk:Reincarnation

User:Nebjy