<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Nine</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Nine"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Nine"/>
	<updated>2026-10-30T01:59:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:2012_Summer_Olympics&amp;diff=1000324</id>
		<title>Talk:2012 Summer Olympics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:2012_Summer_Olympics&amp;diff=1000324"/>
		<updated>2012-08-15T01:23:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Team Sports */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &amp;quot;1 Nations That Impose Same-sex marriage/ 2 Nations that are increasingly atheistic/ 3 Sports that have been ravaged by feminist Title IX in the U.S.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice. Great way to cover all your bases. When the US does well, you can crow about the same-sex marriage and the atheism. When the US doesn't do well, you can pile on Title IX and the feminists. Win-Win. [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 10:52, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, it's curious that you are focused on reasons for failure, not reasons for success. Why not divide up the matrix by, say, &amp;quot;Countries with a record of supporting young athletes&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Countries with a strong cultural tradition of teamwork&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Countries with a strong tradition of individual accomplishment&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Countries where fitness is held as an important value&amp;quot;? [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 11:06, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Category 3 is sports-specific in the [[U.S.]], so there is no contradiction with categories 1 and 2, which are nation-specific.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:54, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Which is exactly why your matrix allows you to frame both US victories and US defeats in terms of your political agenda. It's an awesome rhetorical move. But I'm still curious as to why you are more focused on reasons for failure than on reasons for success. [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 12:15, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::There is nothing &amp;quot;rhetorical&amp;quot; about this.  Ideologies obviously have consequences, and this is a prediction of those consequences beforehand, with an evaluation as the results occur.  Surely we shouldn't pretend that every contestant is a winner, and every ideology is a winner too?  (Except, of course, [[Christianity]], which [[liberals]] never want to credit).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:22, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Of course it's a rhetorical move--you are narrowing your analysis to focus on the political points that you are most interested in. Of course we shouldn't pretend that every contestant is a winner, so why not focus on reasons why people win, as opposed to why they lose--and surely Christianity is not the only reason, otherwise Jews, Muslims, atheists, Shintoists, Mormons, Moonies, Buddhists etc would never win any medals. It would be worthwhile to account for non-divine, or at least non-Christian   reasons for success. Your focus on failure is really disheartening. Do you enjoy pointing out other's shortcomings, or are you projecting? [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 12:29, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I'm fine with focusing on the winners - a entire entry called [[Greatest Conesrvative Sports Stars]] has been doing that for months.  If you'd like to add a section to [[Olympics 2012]] that focuses on winners, that would be welcome.  In fact, I'll start it for you now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:46, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Again, a great rhetorical move on your part--what about the non-conservative winners? If they're not conservative, they can't be winners. If they're winners, they must be conservative. If Tim Thomas doesn't lead the Boston Bruins to another Stanley Cup, hockey falls off the front page of the website; if the Miami Heat win, it's because they were somehow &amp;quot;taught a lesson&amp;quot; by a team they went on to beat soundly. Well played, sir. Well played. [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 12:52, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::Your objection reminds me of the editor who thought it significant that [[Tim Tebow]], after winning a spectacular upset in the first game of last year's [[NFL]] playoffs, then lost in the second round to a much stronger team.  My response then is similar to now:  people usually don't look for a miracle to occur ever single time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:34, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Euro 2012 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly off-topic, I admit, but I was wondering, whether Andy had any comments on the final of the European Cup final (soccer) that takes place tonight between Spain and Italy? Maybe even a prediction who might win? If you haven't followed the tournament so far, atheistic England went out in the quarter finals, while the liberal Netherlands didn't make it past the first round (same as catholic, pro-life Poland, incidentally). --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 13:31, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The [[Netherlands]] is a big [[same-sex marriage]] country, so no surprise there.  Both [[Spain]] and [[Italy]] are very [[liberal]], so that's a tough choice.  Poland was under communist martial law until about 20-25 years ago, so I don't think it's far to expect it to do as well.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:34, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::So gay marriage, political culture, and form of government matter more that the relative skill of the players, their histories in recent match-ups, their style of play, the depth of their squads, coaching, or any other soccer-related questions? So when you sit down to watch a given sports contest, you analyze the game through the lens of politics and religion, and not through the lenses of ability, strategy, or any other sports-related concept. Amazing. Absolutely amazing. [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 15:06, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Deny it all you like, but ideologies do have consequences.  Show me a sports team of atheists and I'll show you a team that's not going to win the championship.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:20, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::So all of those Soviet medal wins in the Olympics, or in international hockey, all of the medal wins by Chinese teams--they were all believers of one sort or another? [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 15:26, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if Spain and Italy are both &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;, that means a liberal team is guaranteed to win the championship. Guess it pays to be &amp;quot;very liberal!&amp;quot;  [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 15:30, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Meh.... In the first Euro championship (1960), the USSR, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia finished 1-2-3 respectively. All were communist. At least two communist nations made the semifinals for each of the next 3 Euros. In 1980, the Czechoslovakians finished third. In 1984, no Communist nations finished in the Top 4, but that was the only time that happened. The Soviets came in second in 1988, and then the communists fell. Since then (6 Euros), the Czechs have two Top 4 apppearances, the Russians have one, and other communist nations or their successor states have none. Of course, this is misleading because a combined Yugoslavia team consisting of the Serbian, Montenegrin, Croatian, etc. teams might have done well, and of those nations, only Croatia qualified and they did fairly well considering they were in a group with Italy and Spain. Most of the Yugoslavian players were Serbian, and most of the Soviet players were Russian. So it appears Serbia and Russia suffered. But Croatia and Montenegro have done well since independence (and a unified Serbia and Montenegro team qualified for the World Cup in 2006, but was placed in the group of death and eliminated in the first round. It also didn't help that the World Cup was held after the two nations separated). Also, Bosnia and Herzigovina has improved, coming within a playoff against Portugal of qualifying for both the World Cup and Euro, but they lost both.&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Ukraine has improved significantly since the USSR breakup. Although they only qualified this year because they were hosts, they qualified for the World Cup in 2006 and almost again in 2010. Latvia qualified for Euro 2004, even though there were pretty much no Latvian Soviet soccer players. Estonia also came within a playoff of qualifying for Euro this year, a marked improvement over their Soviet days, but lost. Same with Bosnia-Herzigovinia and Montenegro. Additionally, either Slovakia or the Czech Republic has qualified almost always for the World Cup and Euro, and a combined team would likely have done better. In team sports, it is hard to compare stats from before and after, because while the USSR may have done better than any of the new nations, we don't know how the new nations would do if they competed together as they did when they were the USSR. Andre Szevchenko is one of the best players in Europe for Ukraine, but he doesn't have much support. If he had the support of Russian players, Estonian players, and Latvian players on his team, then that team would probably have done better. The same could be said of a combined team for Czech Republic and Slovakia. &lt;br /&gt;
As an example of the opposite, the new German team has done far better than the old East German team, including some players from Berlin who would have competed for East Gemrany 25 years ago. Their performance is slightly better than the West German performance, although this is probably just because they have more people now, since they were both capitalist. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, Germany is the only country in the Netherlands' group that does not have same-sex marriage (Portugal and Denmark also do). At least one of them by rule HAD to advance (Portugal did), but it was the Germans who won the group with a perfect record. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 05:20, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Evidence that Christianity increases a countries  Olympic medals while atheism and liberalism reduce gold medals won ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy, although it is true that Communist/authoritarian countries have gone out of their way in the past to pour money in the Olympic gold winning efforts (Soviet Union)[http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&amp;amp;context=econ_honproj&amp;amp;sei-redir=1&amp;amp;referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3Dgdp%2520population%2520freedom%2520and%2520olympic%2520medals%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26ved%3D0CEoQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdigitalcommons.iwu.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D1004%2526context%253Decon_honproj%26ei%3DbsLwT5fpO-Hq0gHpidj6Ag%26usg%3DAFQjCNGA2tePIDTqdOmM8p42uwGhpzkVhA#search=%22gdp%20population%20freedom%20olympic%20medals%22], it is also true that a higher population size and a higher GDP positively affect the number of gold medals that a country wins.[http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/andrew.bernard/olymp60restat_finaljournalversion.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheism reduces a countries population size while religiosity increases a countries birth rate: http://conservapedia.com/Decline_of_atheism#Decline_of_atheism_in_terms_of_global_adherents_is_expected_to_accelerate See also: [[Decline of atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the journal article ''Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications'' psychologists McCullough and Willoughby theorize that many of the positive links of religiousness with health and social behavior may be caused by religion's beneficial influences on self-control/self-regulation.[http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/Papers/Relig_self_control_bulletin.pdf][http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19210054] Athletes with more self-control have more mental toughness.[http://www.nmnathletics.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=8800&amp;amp;ATCLID=926652] Athletes with more mental toughness tend to perform at higher levels.[http://vimeo.com/23328555]  See also: [[Psychology, obesity, religiosity and atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, all other things remaining equal, religion in the Western world tends to promote more self-discipline and healthier behaviors when it comes to mental and physical health: See: [[Atheism and health]] and [[Psychology, obesity, religiosity and atheism]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, while it is true that a country that is doing well can have &amp;quot;fat and sassy&amp;quot; atheists as a result. On the other hand,  if there is religious freedom in a country a country can have high levels of religiosity even with high incomes such as the United States. See effects of prosperity on rates of atheism: http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/atheism-research#Effect_of_prosperity_on_rate_of_atheism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am sure you can find data to support that capitalism causes a country to have higher incomes than socialism/liberalism over the long term. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, liberalism promotes abortion and small family sizes where conservative religion does not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Summary: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPLEAWsX0qk Jesus is the winnamon and Christians are on the winning side!] Christians are winners and atheists tend to lose again! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go for the gold America! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! (where atheists are the least trusted group of individuals. See: [[Views on atheists]]) :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:07, 1 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
=== No doubt Bible believers achieve more gold medals than atheists all other things being equal ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a study listed in Who's Who in Who's Who, it took 5,000 Presbyterian ministers to produce one child listed in Who's Who. Among lawyers the ratio was 5,000 to 1; dentists 2,500 to 1. But for every seven Christian missionary families from the United States, one of their children would be listed in Who's Who.[http://www.wentworthbaptist.ca/old/sermontexts/Leaving%20the%20past%20behind_Phil%203.1-14_071230.htm] See also: [[Atheism and depression]] and [[Atheism and health]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:33, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you have a link to that actual study? One in seven seems high. How big is this &amp;quot;Who's Who&amp;quot; list and how many missionary families are there in the USA?&lt;br /&gt;
::::Come on, everybody knows the formula to winning the gold. Preparation and conceive, believe and achieve! :) Doubters have a harder time believing than believers! Atheists are pessimists and have higher rates of depression. See: [[Atheism and depression]] and [[Atheism and suicide]]. Bible believers who are realists and optimists are more upbeat and win more gold medals. Plus, conservative Bible believing Protestants with the Protestant work ethic, are more able to outwork atheists and achieve more gold medals. Secular Europe is filled lazy doubters who love socialism. Lazy people are less likely to win gold medals.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 10:08, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::yeah, that's good, really I just want to see how the study explains it&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::We know that per capita GDP increases Olympic medals. Therefore, when the shortsighted measures holding together the [http://www.care2.com/causes/euro-zone-crisis-banks-lower-rates-but-confidence-stays-low.html troubled Eurozone economy] stop working, they will win less gold medals than countries which were more prudent. The lazy secular Europeans should have listened to the Bible about hard work and not getting heavy into debt. The gold medal counts of secular Europe are going to be lower than they needed to be in 2016. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 10:24, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gfmag.com/tools/global-database/economic-data/10394-public-debt-by-country.html#axzz1zqxAoMmm&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I think it is self explanatory that those who have faith will have the discipline and the belief to achieve something extraordinary--[[User:OconnorM|OconnorM]] 12:46, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do know that post 1950 the USA became more secular and United States became less financially prudent. Socialism and communism do not have great track records over the long term and atheists have tended to like these systems more.  Countries which adopted a Protestant work ethic have benefited and even those with a legacy of a Protestant work ethic culture have benefited.[http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/oct/31/economics-religion-research] The Bible also mentions sharpening the axe (Ecclesiastes 10:10), good stewardship of resources and orderliness. [http://www.openbible.info/topics/orderliness]  No doubt the legacy of Protestantism in the country of Germany (birth place of Protestantism), helped to create the efficiency and orderliness that their society is known for. Athletes who train more efficiently using the best methods and get better nutrition, gain more medals. See also: [[Christianity and science]]. Christianity has one of the highest rates of creationism in the world and despite Darwinist persecution of creationists and intelligent design proponents (see: [[Expelled]]) manages to be leader in technological innovation. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:48, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== One fair way to analyze ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to give a fair analysis, information needs to be compiled before the Games for the countries/sports listed for both pre/post same-sex marriage/girls playing sports and then add this year's results. As far as I can see, that would be the only way to objectively assess any trend regarding medals/performance. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 10:14, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It would still make no case for any causal relationship between same-sex marriage, atheism etc. and performance at the Olympics. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 19:54, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Baseball not an Olympic sport in 2012 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baseball is removed from the list, because both baseball and softball have been dropped for the program for the 2012 Olympics. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/08/sports/08iht-oly.html?_r=1 [[User:MaartenG|MaartenG]] 11:43, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Baseball being removed from list ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe baseball (and softball) have been removed because they are not included in the 2012 Olympics. [http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/8504326/] &amp;quot;They'rrre out! Olympics drop baseball, softball: Sports eliminated for 2012 Games, but could win way back in 2016&amp;quot; AP, nbcsports.com, July 9, 2005, retrieved July 2, 2012. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 11:43, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Baseball]] was dropped from the 2012 Olympics???  That's a disappointment!  Is the sport considered too [[conservative]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:43, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If it is, why did [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_at_the_Summer_Olympics#Medal_table Cuba win most of the gold medals?] (And the most medals overall?) [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 15:47, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Same sex marriage and underachievement. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While a rationale is given for the relationship between atheism and underperformance, none is given for the relationship between same sex marriage and underperformance. Can somebody who understands the relationship please provide a rationale in the relevant section? Thanks. [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 12:25, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::A factor in winning gold medals is the population size of a country. How does same sex marriage help increase the population size of a country? The Russians seem to think that it doesn't. Also, Olympic athletes have to be in top physical condition. See: [[Homosexuality and health]].  In addition, mental toughness is important in sports and &amp;quot;Nancy boys&amp;quot; lack this characteristic!  Also, there is the issue of [[Homosexuality and obesity]]. If you could show us that the town of Ereses on the Greek Island of [[Lesbos]] has produced an inordinate amount of Olympic women gymnasts instead of higher incidence of obese lesbians, it would be greatly appreciated (See: [[Lesbianism and obesity]]).[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:16, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the town is called Eresos (Greek: Ερεσός), no? --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 15:21, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! Corrected. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:26, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This isn't a good argument against same-sex marriage, you know. It's just not logical. If a marriage is for population growth, then why are marriages that can't/won't produce children permitted? My dad's on his second marriage since my mother passed away - no half-siblings yet. You need to think through your arguments. If these non-productive marriages ''are'' permitted, under what reason? Companionship? That can be applied to same-sex couples as well. Tax benefits? Ditto. The argument doesn't stand up very well. &lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh, and there you go - you just can't get away from negatively portraying fat people. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:24, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why an ancient Greek myth should be applicable to today is something only you would know.&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for homosexuals at the Olympics - and &amp;quot;nancy boys&amp;quot; is a very derogatory term, much like using the n-word. One would think a site like this would be above that sort of thing, but obviously not - how about Mark Spitz (7 gold) and Greg Louganis (4 gold), who was also the the most outstanding amateur athlete in the United States in 1984. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Once again, your tired old arguments don't hold any water - obese people - gay or straight are hardly likely to be participating at the games, so trying to make a correlation between a country's political decisions and the performance of individual athletes is - quite frankly - stupid. But I have a feeling that you still can't grasp the idea. [[User:MaartenG|MaartenG]] 15:26, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There's a legal precedent - &amp;quot;He Who Asserts Must Prove&amp;quot;... so, let's see your proof that a government passing same-sex marriage laws affects individual sportsmens' performance. Hint: the drivel you wrote above is not proof. [[User:MaartenG|MaartenG]] 15:34, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Homosexuality related tourism occurs in this town today. Second, re: lower amount of mental toughness issue: [[Mental Health and Homosexuality]] Third, the birth rate of heterosexual marriages will always exceed homosexual &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:37, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Your first point - totally not relevant. What the hell does tourism have to do with athletes at the Olympic Games? Second people - people who are not mentally tough - gay or straight wouldn't last at any level of competitive sport and thus wouldn't appear at the Games, so your point is invalid. Third point is equally invalid - birth rates have nothing to do with how individuals perform at the Games. Care to try again? [[User:MaartenG|MaartenG]] 15:40, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
It is relevant: Homosexuality related tourism occurs in the Greek town today. In 1976, Gwen J. Proude and Sarah J. Green published a study in the journal Ethnology which showed a positive correlation between cultures which accepted or ignored homosexuality in their cultures and cultures which were more likely to have homosexuality be more common. (see: [[Homosexuality]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:43, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Birth rates, already covered above: &amp;quot;A factor in winning gold medals is the population size of a country. How does same sex marriage help increase the population size of a country? The Russians seem to think that it doesn't.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nope. Still has absolutely no relevance to the performance of individual athletes at the Games. In fact, on rereading your reasons, you seem to be stuck on the thought that countries that allow same-sex marriage would only send gay athletes to the Games. That is bizarre. &lt;br /&gt;
:::Just how many people of the same gender do you think are going to be married? To say it'll affect a country's population growth is double bizarre. Japan's population growth is going backwards and they don't have same-sex marriage. [[User:MaartenG|MaartenG]] 15:49, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Your [[last wordism]] isn't impressing anyone - especially since you conveniently ignored the [[Homosexuality and health]] issue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:08, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Chuck norris.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|It is no coincidence that the fit and healthy Bible believing martial artist [[Chuck Norris]] lives in the state of [[Texas]] and not the city of San Francisco! Chuck Norris is no &amp;quot;Nancy boy&amp;quot; and he is the embodiment of mental toughness. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Wouldn't there be just as many homosexuals whether same-sex marriage is legal or not? Legalizing same-sex marriage wouldn't turn the existing athletes into homosexuals. So we're barking up the wrong tree here. Even if there were a correlation between homosexuality and athletic performance, it would have nothing to do with the legal status of same-sex marriage. Tim Tebow will be playing his home games in New York next year (ok, fine, New Jersey, but I'm a Jets fan and I consider them to be from New York). Same-sex marriage is legal in New York. It was not legal in Colorado or Florida. It is ridiculous to suggest that this would somehow hurt Tebow's performance. He will be just as faithful, Christian, and heterosexual as he ever was. Even if the NFL adds a franchise in atheistic London (as they are foolishly considering) and Tebow winds up there, nothing will change. Even if the Bills move to Toronto and Tebow plays for them, nothing will change. So supposing there is a correlation, we're looking for it in the wrong place, in my opinion. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 07:13, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::To be fair, legalization of homosexual relationships may be a proxy for a jurisdiction's attitudes for homosexuality.  I don't think it's a very good proxy; it would probably be a better idea to examine sexual orientations of athletes themselves rather than attitudes about homosexuality held  by residents the places they represent.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:13, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: But it's not the ''attitudes'' of the athletes that [[User:Conservative]] says are relevant. It's the actual ''orientation'' of the athletes. He posted a number of references to homosexuality and health problems. Without commenting one way or the other on their merits, they only apply if the athlete himself is a homosexual. So I'm inclined to agree with GregG here. Perhaps Conservative's theory is right, but if it is, he's going about proving it the wrong way. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 14:08, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Evidence pointing to same sex marriage acceptance negatively affecting Olympic medal counts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that bigger populations tend to gain more Olympic medals.[http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/andrew.bernard/olymp60restat_finaljournalversion.pdf] Show me that societies which accept homosexuality tend to have higher birth rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that atheists are more accepting of homosexuality and also more liberal (see: [[Atheism and morality]]). We know that liberals are more accepting of homosexuality. See: [[Views on Homosexuality]].  We also know atheists tend to have lower birth rates. See: [[Decline of atheism]].  My educated guess is that liberal countries have lower birth rates (abortion, birth control, etc.). [http://erlc.com/article/death-of-liberalism/] There is also evidence pointing to societies which accept homosexuality having more of it. In 1976, Gwen J. Proude and Sarah J. Green published a study in the journal Ethnology which showed a positive correlation between cultures which accepted or ignored homosexuality in their cultures and cultures which were more likely to have homosexuality be more common. (see: [[Homosexuality]]). My educated guess therefore is that societies accepting of same sex marriage have lower birth rates and achieve less medals as a result. I do understand that societies which have more material wealth can grow morally lax and thus more accepting of homosexuality and those societies tend to be more prone to falling (Roman Empire for example). Therefore, we should not confuse higher GDP per capita and achieving more medals and a societies acceptance of homosexuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Athletes with higher degrees of mental toughness achieve more. I would think that societies with higher degrees of mental toughness would have lower suicide rates. We know that atheists tend to be more accepting of homosexuality (plus more liberal) and they have higher suicide rates than the general population. See: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and suicide]]. Also, compare the suicide rates of countries and their acceptance of homosexuality as a possible benchmark for the mental toughness of the societies.  Of course, you would have to do statistical analysis to examine the relationship between societies accepting homosexuality and their suicide rates so you do not count other factors which cause suicides.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, show me societies accepting of homosexuality tend to score high on mental toughness tests such as Peter Cough's test. Also, [http://psychology.about.com/library/quiz/bl_eq_quiz.htm Emotional intelligence (EQ) test] score and a person's [http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_index/articles/501-550/article517_body.html &amp;quot;Adversity quotient&amp;quot;] test score would be possible benchmarks as far as measuring mental toughness, but obviously the latter would be better. EQ is popular in management circles and perhaps different societies have been measured in terms of their EQ test scores. My guess is that perhaps EQ is only somewhat popular in the USA and Spain perhaps.[http://danielgoleman.info/2008/can-there-be-an-emotionally-intelligent-society/] With that being said, I think there is far more detailed information on suicide rates of countries and that is probably a better benchmark of mental toughness. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:13, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Canada's medal haul went UP by 50% after they allowed same-sex marriage. (12 in 2004, 18 in 2008) [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 08:54, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anecdotal and too tied to them hosting the Olympics and starting a drive to win more gold. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:58, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They didn't host the Olympics in 2008, and anyways, the medal drive was focused on the winter games, not the summer games. [[User:JeffreyB|JeffreyB]] 09:03, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
It takes time to develop winning programs and I am guessing they knew in advance they were going to host the Olympics. 09:13, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Caribbeans have low suicide rates.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate] They must be pretty mentally tough and not worry. :) Mental toughness increases performance. Hey mon, don't worry, be happy! Hey mon, I think I am going to kick back on a Caribbean beach and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTW0ifgY9zc&amp;amp;playnext=1&amp;amp;list=PLAA6853EB17004E8E listen to Caribbean music] while conservative, Bible believing  families  (which don't approve of homosexuality) keep winning more gold medals per family because they have more kids and have more mental toughness! :) And remember, conservative Bible believers with the Protestant work ethic, work harder to win gold medals than lazy, liberal, obese homosexuals with knee problems on welfare! See: [[Homosexuality and obesity]] and [[Lesbianism and obesity]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:54, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HAHAHA they do talk funny&lt;br /&gt;
:::: That may be so, [[User:Conservative]], but you are still miscorrelating. A conservative Canadian family wouldn't be made liberal by the legalization of same-sex marriage. If anything, the decline in medals should come ''before'' the legalization of same sex-marriage, since liberalization would come ''before'' the legalization of same-sex marriage. So, perhaps a better study would be looking at a country's attitudes towards homosexuality over time (both before and after legalization of same-sex marriage) and try to correlate that. But I honestly doubt the actual act of legalizing same-sex marriage has a magic wand effect. Which is why the evidence shows you are wrong even though your logic may be perfectly correct. It's only your conclusion that's flawed. Liberalization and shift in views on homosexuality take time to occur. They don't happen overnight upon legalization of same-sex marriage. There would only be evidence of what you're saying if it was a magical overnight shift. And it's not. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 16:16, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== More evidence that homosexuality leads to lower medal counts and Bible believing enables more medals to be won ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homosexuals have higher suicide rates than the general population (see: [[Mental Health and Homosexuality]]). Historically, Christians have faced a lot of persecution, but they don't commit suicide. They know that God wants Christians to be strong and not commit suicide and the Bible has many verses about being courageous plus the Bible is against suicide.   Bible believers are more mentally tough than homosexuals. Mental toughness increases athletic performance. Therefore, Bible believers, all other things remaining equal, are able to win more Olympic medals than homosexuals. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:52, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Math'd -- Gay marriage ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A subject about quantifying something?? I accept your challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the following, I am trying to determine the effect of pro-gay legislation on Olympic Medals. Since different countries have hugely different factors, I thought we could use the states of the USA to observe any effects (being labs of democracy, and all). What I did was find a list of all 2008 Olympic Medalists. Then, I got rid of any groups, leaving only individual medalists. Then, I mapped these medalists to their home state. Then, I figured out, based on population, how many medals each state should win out of the total USA medals. Then, I matched states with their same-sex marriage legislation (I assumed if same-sex couples could marry or engage in civil unions, this was a &amp;quot;Pro-Gay&amp;quot; state. No marriage or civil unions, an &amp;quot;Anti-Gay&amp;quot; state.) Then I summed up expected and actuals by these two categories. Here's what I got....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! State Type&lt;br /&gt;
! Expected Medals&lt;br /&gt;
! Actual Medals&lt;br /&gt;
! Over/Under&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pro-Gay&lt;br /&gt;
| 29.8&lt;br /&gt;
| 45&lt;br /&gt;
| 15.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Anti-Gay&lt;br /&gt;
| 42.2&lt;br /&gt;
| 27&lt;br /&gt;
| -15.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total&lt;br /&gt;
| 72.0&lt;br /&gt;
| 72&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we look just at Gold Medals...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! State Type&lt;br /&gt;
! Expected Golds&lt;br /&gt;
! Actual Golds&lt;br /&gt;
! Over/Under&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pro-Gay&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Anti-Gay&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.7&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total&lt;br /&gt;
| 20.0&lt;br /&gt;
| 20&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
(Please note that if a medalist is from another country, they were excluded. Same with two obscure athletes I couldn't find information on)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you can see, &amp;quot;Pro-Gay&amp;quot; states outperform their expected total medal results by over 50%. Conversely, &amp;quot;Anti-Gay&amp;quot; states underperform by 36%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The picture is more extreme only looking at Gold medals - &amp;quot;Pro-Gay&amp;quot; outperformes %69%, while &amp;quot;Anti-Gay' under perform by almost half.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, do I think &amp;quot;imposing&amp;quot; gay marriage has anything to do with Olympic results? Probably not, since states, along any group of people in the Olympics, have a huge number of factors affecting their outcomes. But, to say that gay marriage destroys Olypmic results...well, that just goes against the data.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 15:49, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you are going to have to do regression analysis to isolate the homosexuality issue. It seems as if the wealth and population size are important variables to winning medals as noted above. Cultures which have significant wealth often get morally complacent history shows. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:00, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) This is a regression based on population size. But I don't think a regression could be done on wealth, since it's hard to track the socio-economic movements of dozens of medalists, many of whom are relatively unknown. Also, if you want me to regress based on a group of large, poor states that allow gay marriage...my sample size isn't going to be even close to credible. I agree though, it would be very interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) You didn't provide isolation of the homosexuality issue in your hypothesis, so that's what I based my refutation on.. You said countries with gay marriage would underperform. Not that a country with gay marriage would underperform an identical country without gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Most importantly, why should ''I'' isolate the homosexuality issue? ''You'' should be the one supporting your premise, or at least refuting my data. I spent the time showing why your idea was wrong, now it's your turn to either show where I am wrong, or adjust or reject your hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 16:13, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The liberals are not being realistic and fighting an uphill battle here. You are never going to have people associate homosexuality with athleticism/health. This is a Pickett's charge to say the least - especially at Conservapedia (see: [[Homosexuality and health]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:36, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So...nothing about the Olympics then? [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 16:47, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You still haven't shown me that the homosexual population can clear Olympic hurdles as well as the heterosexual population. See: [[Homosexuality and obesity]] and [[Lesbianism and obesity]]. Are you saying that overweight people are better hurdlers?  If so, I have a hard time believing this. Also, nations with bigger populations earn more medals. How does homosexuality promote procreation? After all, God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And kudos to you, User:Conservative. You once again can't resist bringing up us evil fat people as your argument. And lo and behold, it's even completely off-topic to the above comments. Color me surprised... '''''NOT!''''' [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 13:38, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: [[User:Conservative]], you make valid points, but you are confusing two statistical populations. There is the homosexual population, and if your statistics are correct, they should perform worse. Let's assume that you're right for the purpose of this discussion. However, that would only effect athletes who are homosexual themselves, not entire countries. Legalizing same-sex marriage won't magically make the entire population into homosexuals. So you should be looking at the sexual orientation of the athletes themselves if you want to prove your point. Whether the country/state legalizes same-sex marriage is irrelevant to your point, one way or the other. I'd be interested in seeing your new study which focuses on the athletes themselves and not on the whole country. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 13:54, 6 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative, you said that legalizing gay marriage leads to a country under-performing in the Olympics. I showed that the evidence does not support that, at least in America. I didn't say fat gays make good hurdlers. But, the Olympics usually doesn't draw athletes from the 'out-of-shape' population... [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 22:45, 8 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Expected Medals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello all,&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be fun to track &amp;quot;expected vs actuals&amp;quot; with regards to medals. I was thinking of adding a table giving each partipating country an expected value. However, I'm having trouble deciding it it would be better to do it on a &amp;quot;per capita&amp;quot; basis, or a &amp;quot;per GDP&amp;quot; basis. Any thoughts? [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 17:09, 2 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think ranking on a &amp;quot;per GDP&amp;quot; basis would be fairer.  Competitive sports is an activity of affluent nations.  Any thoughts on this by others?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:14, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added a table, proportioning medals by nominal GDP. I notice that I'm predicting 200 medals for America, which seems high. I wonder why that could be? My thought is that there are a ton of countries with less than 1 medal expected, but a lot of them will probably get one. I'll leave the table, but please let me know if you have any thoughts on modifications. It's a least something to get us thinking! [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 13:43, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added info re same-sex marriage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added more info on same-sex marriage being allowed in certain political subdivisions of a country. I clarified that there are two US States that have legalized same sex marriage but there is a citizen's referendum about it, but that one of them (Washington) already had civil unions. I also noted that in Mexico, same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico City, a Federal District similar to Washington, DC. Also, I noted that several overseas territories of the Netherlands will compete separately and also have different laws regarding same-sex marriage. Aruba does not perform them, but per the Kingdom's requirements must recognize those performed elsewhere. Same with Curacao and Sint Maarten, who will compete as &amp;quot;Independent Olympic Participants&amp;quot; under the Olympic flag after the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles and the loss of recognition for their Olympic committee. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 19:29, 3 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joke sports ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to remove beach volleyball from the list, as it's a very physically demanding sport. Also, while I agree that synchronised swimming is a bit of a joke, I disagree with the description that these are &amp;quot;sports that allow underachieving nations to pad their medal totals&amp;quot;. The USA has won (usually multiple) medals in beach volleyball every year it has been included in the Olympics, synchronised swimming medals ''most'' times and half of all the BMX medals ever awarded! In fact, the only weak nation that has ever won a medal in any of these events (ever) was a Latvian who won the first BMX gold. [[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 00:00, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I realize that the U.S. wins many of these &amp;quot;joke&amp;quot; medals.  I was being objective and fair to other nations in criticizing these medals.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:13, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok fair enough. So what are your thoughts on beach volleyball? What makes it joke...ish? [[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 00:19, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think it's mainly because it's a relatively recent creation, arrived at by taking an existing sport and just playing it on a beach. (I know that teams are smaller and the rules are a bit different etc, but that's basically it.) Why not have beach tennis, beach archery, beach baseball and beach cricket as well??? That and the requirements by the sport's governing body specifying the skimpiness of female competitors' attire.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This isn't to say that it's not demanding to play at the top level, but do the Olympics really need to have two different kinds of volleyball? Regular volleyball is hardly a blue riband event as it is!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 08:33, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Beach volleyball and regular volleyball have different rules. The idea is the same, but the rules are pretty different. A similar situation would be rugby. Starting in 2016 rugby sevens will be in the Olympics. If they also added rugby league (which is fairly similar to rugby sevens, but has a lot of differences too) as well, then that would be too similar. But it just makes them redundant, it doesn't make one of them a &amp;quot;joke&amp;quot;. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 14:04, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Are the nations of Japan increasingly atheistic or increasingly theistic and/or christian? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are the nations of Japan increasingly atheistic or increasingly theistic and/or christian?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gallup poll: Christianity growing in Japan: http://www.breakingchristiannews.com/articles/display_art.html?ID=2278&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pastor Lee in Korea, 2007 - BBC: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;Our church is still growing, so sooner or later Christianity will be the major religion in Korea. All Christians are praying for that right now.&amp;quot;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8322072.stm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Move page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we move this page to [[2012 Olympics]]? That's a more natural title. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 07:16, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How bout a redirect?[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 11:13, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The redirect works.  It's a close call which title is better, but to me starting an entry with a number seems less efficient in conveying meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:24, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You have to have something indicating summer. I retitled the article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:04, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree.  Even though Summer and Winter Olympics never occur in the same year anymore, they historically were both held in the same year.  Having this naming convention will ensure consistency with other Olympics articles we may create.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:11, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I agree. 2012 Olympics may not be ambiguous but [[1984 Olympics]] would be. (Los Angeles Summer Games or Sarajevo Winter Games). Also, with regards to Andy's concern, virtually all press releases refer to these as the 2012 (Summer) Olympics, and/or use the official name &amp;quot;Games of the XXX Olympiad&amp;quot;. (XXX is Roman Numeral 30, not a placeholder) However, since the official Olympiad name is never used except in official releases, and it is commonly referred to as 2012 Summer Olympics everywhere else, I say keep it this way. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 14:01, 4 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agree with Greg. Thirtieth Olympiad is too obscure for a generation that regards 3 month old music as outdated. Better call it the 2012 Olympics. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:26, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tables for medals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add tables showing medals won, and indicate in the table when same-sex marriage was recognized, for each country listed. This will make it easier to identify trends from before and after legalization. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 11:54, 5 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This page is preposterous ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't believe that nearly everything you have to say about this year's Olympic games revolves around your overweening obsession with homosexuality and atheism. Even conservatives--well, normal conservatives--would want more substantive information. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 19:51, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not enough to qualify as trying to improve this page. Are you saying there's no correlation, or are you indirectly registering an objection to this project's campaign against homosexuality and atheism? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:25, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::In my opinion, the way to improve this page would be to delete all the content and start over. I understand that the project is against homosexuality and atheism. But that doesn't mean those things have to be the main focus of ''every'' article. And yes, I ''am'' saying that there is no known correlation between same-sex marriage, homosexuality or atheism and Olympics success, and even if one were demonstrated, it would not establish causality, which is clearly what you are after. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 21:20, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ideas do have consequences on productivity, achievement, happiness, etc.  A high percentage of successful [[NFL]] quarterbacks are devout [[Christians]].  Why?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:17, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Is that so?  What is the percentage?  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 23:57, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where is the UK... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...in the expected medals section?  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 21:02, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whoops, I had it listed as Great Britain. Which I should have known better than to do - I lived in London for a couple years, and got yelled at every time I got the terms wrong... [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 23:18, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aaargh! I checked UK and Britain but neglected to check Great Britain.  Silly me.  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 23:23, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GDP ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If GDP &amp;quot;may be a fair proxy&amp;quot; in relation to how many medals a country will win then why is the main part of the article all about how atheism and gay marriage are going to have such an influence over the results?  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 21:04, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wanted to have a start point for comparisons and trend-spotting. It is my hypothesis that homosexuality and atheism have nothing to do with a country's athletic performance, and the table is my first step in testing. [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 23:21, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I am inclined to agree with you.  Unfortunately it makes the article a little schizophrenic (if I may use that term in such an inaccurate manner).  The top of the article asserts that homosexuality and atheism are solid indicators of Olympic performance for reasons, whereas your section is intended to show otherwise.  An internal tension, if you will.&lt;br /&gt;
::I get the feeling from the ''Nations that are increasingly atheistic'' section that there is supposed to be some reason that atheists are incapable of acting as members of a team (the reason is not explained).  Beyond that, the article is not only utterly unsupported by any study or even by any observations made by eminent persons in the appropriate field, it doesn't even contain a hypothesis as to the means by which the asserted connections operate.  I would suggest deleting and starting again but I have read Ed Poor's comments above and I assume any such similar request from myself would be resisted.  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 23:36, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: We have explained those connections elsewhere, including on this talk page. Perhaps make separate articles and link to them? If we put all the explanations in this article, I think it would get a bit too busy. Also, we'd have to copy them for every future Olympics, which seems like a waste if we can just link to them. What does everyone else think? [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:04, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rowing -&amp;gt; soccer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see Andy that you have reverted my edit which asserted that rowing was the sport requiring the most teamwork.  Apparently soccer is the sport that requires most teamwork (for reasons that are mysterious to me).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is that Andy?  Why not (field) hockey, for example?  Or American football?  I would still assert that rowing is far and away the paramount team sport.  Your edit comment that it is &amp;quot;emulating a machine&amp;quot; really does nothing to detract from that assertion.  So what?  If that means that each crew member must move their body in perfect time with each other then my point is all the stronger isn't it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously if this is a conservative insight then clearly I must be wrong, but if there is an actual reason that soccer is the ultimate team sport over rowing then I would be interested to hear it.  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 23:52, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is no dynamic teamwork of any consequence in rowing - no passing a ball from one player to another, no reactions to defenders, and no mental strategy.  Rowing is great exercise for those who have access to expensive equipment and placid lakes, but it's not dynamic teamwork as soccer is.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:43, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, so it's &amp;quot;dynamic teamwork&amp;quot; that atheists can't perform?  They are capable of acting in perfect harmony with each other in a rowing shell but cannot pass a ball to each other or perform mental strategy?  Interesting.  Is there any evidence to support any of this?  If so, why is it that atheists are incapable of such activities?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::P.S. I performed a couple of Google searches on which (rowing or soccer) is more commonly referred to as &amp;quot;the ultimate team sport&amp;quot;: [https://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&amp;amp;safe=off&amp;amp;sclient=psy-ab&amp;amp;q=%22rowing+the+ultimate+team+sport%22&amp;amp;oq=%22rowing+the+ultimate+team+sport%22&amp;amp;gs_l=serp.3..0i30.71845.74333.0.74873.2.2.0.0.0.0.220.429.2-2.2.0...0.0...1c.IPtkh8308qI&amp;amp;pbx=1&amp;amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&amp;amp;fp=862d766996523d9f&amp;amp;biw=1201&amp;amp;bih=678 rowing] or [https://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&amp;amp;gs_nf=1&amp;amp;pq=soccer%20the%20ultimate%20team%20sport&amp;amp;cp=32&amp;amp;gs_id=e&amp;amp;xhr=t&amp;amp;q=%22soccer+the+ultimate+team+sport%22&amp;amp;pf=p&amp;amp;safe=off&amp;amp;sclient=psy-ab&amp;amp;oq=%22soccer+the+ultimate+team+sport%22&amp;amp;gs_l=&amp;amp;pbx=1&amp;amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&amp;amp;fp=862d766996523d9f&amp;amp;biw=1201&amp;amp;bih=678 soccer].  I think that the hit numbers speak for themselves.  --[[User:QuentinQ|QuentinQ]] 00:57, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rowing is obviously a rich-man's sport, which gives an unfair advantage to a few nations like the [[U.K.]]  While physically challenging, rowing is the only sport where the contestant should think as little as possible and simply act like a robot.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:12, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In rowing, don't you have a coxswain telling you when to row? It requires everyone rowing together, yes, but as long as they all act like robots (as Andy put it) and row when the coxswain says row, that's the only teamwork required. I won't deny it's a difficult sport, but it doesn't require much teamwork when there's a coxswain. The reason it's the ultimate team sport is that, more so than in any other sport, the chain is only as strong as the weakest link. If you put me on a soccer field with the 10 best players in the world (assuming they're of different positions), we could win, even though I'm a terrible soccer player. If you put me in a four-man boat with the three best rowers in the world, we would do terrible, because I'm a terrible rower. That's the difference between rowing and other team sports. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 05:35, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I row 3 times a week and I am a coxswain. It is certainly not a &amp;quot;robot&amp;quot; sport, and it requires intense concentration from the rowers to make sure that the crew is in time, running on perfect technique and drawing through together. A physically stronger crew will often lose to a weaker but more technical crew. The reason that our crews look like robots are because they are concentrating as hard as they can to keep everything technical, and to work against what the body is intuitively telling you to make every single inch of pressure on the water count.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::&lt;br /&gt;
::::::As for being a rich man's sport, I can sympathise. Those boats are bloody expensive, and are often donated through philanthropy. However many of us, myself included, come from very underprivileged backgrounds and are fortunate enough to row in university teams. But getting to Olympic level requires training from a young age, which usually means being brought up at a very expensive private school that has rowing equipment. So I agree to an extent there, but one must not forget the huge benefits that philanthropy gives to broadening the pool of rowers, which is a conservative virtue as far as this website is concerned. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 11:16, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: (edit conflict) Doesn't the above data prove my point?  The wealthiest nations in the world have won nearly all of the rowing medals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Rowing is a grueling sport - I rowed for a bit myself.  But it is a rich man's sport, and it is the only sport that does not use the brain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In reply to Greg's insight comments, I doubt a soccer team with 25% terrible players could win either, if the coaching by the opposing side is good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In reply to HumanGeographer's good comments, I agree that concentration is required and that the sport is terrific exercise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:29, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Andy, soccer teams have 11 players (including goalie). So it would be 9% poor players. And considering that teams have won 10-on-11 after an early red card, it's not inconceivable. But in rowing, it would be impossible. That's where the &amp;quot;team sport&amp;quot; mantra comes from. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:05, 16 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greg, you have missed Andy's point.  If you are one out of the four rowers you now have 25% of a team being terrible, whereas in soccer, as you have put it, missing one player means only 9% of the team is terrible.  What Andy is suggesting is that the better comparison would be if a soccer team had 3 of their players essentially non-effective, and his point in that regard is well-taken.  A soccer team playing 8 against 11 would not fare well either.--[[User:Krayner|Krayner]] 15:23, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Olympics and Economics 2012 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Goldman Sachs]] has some thoughts on the matters discussed above: [http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/topics/global-economic-outlook/olympics-and-economics-.pdf pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Britain has quite high per capita spending on elite sports for a western democracy. Sailing is a perfect example— boats are very costly. For equestrianism, you need a horse. For rowing, you need a boathouse, boats and oars. For track cycling, you don’t really have a chance without a wind tunnel, a velodrome. It’s different with running, where you just need a pair of shoes. There is a dramatic difference between sports that only a tiny group of countries can afford to invest in and the others.|||Matthew Syed, British journalist}}&lt;br /&gt;
They have a forecast for Gold and Total medals, too.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:50, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== During the Modern Olympic Games, the pagan origins of the Olympics have been replaced by faith-based achievement by the participating athletes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This seems to be wishful thinking: the Olympics were for quite a time dominated by nations which didn't allow their athletes the comforts of faith. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:59, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Group of Left ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those who don't get the &amp;quot;Group of Left&amp;quot; reference, it's a play on the phrase &amp;quot;Group of Death&amp;quot;, which refers to an unusually strong group. I doubt Tunisia will finish in the top two and go to the medal round, but anything other than last place would be overperforming for them. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 18:21, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Women's Soccer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why would the US women's soccer team be expected to underachieve? They're not one of the atheist nations, same-sex marriage is only legal in six states, and if Title IX effected them in any way, it would have helped them (albeit at the expense of men's sports). We should either explain it or remove it. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 18:35, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:As I understand it, women's soccer is very strong in the US.  Still, the nature of Soccer means that results are more unpredictable than other sports.  Very often the best team is not able to win.  Its a funny sport in that respect.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 18:44, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I know that. But that still doesn't answer the question. We could say the same about any of the favorites. There's no reason given to expect the US team specifically to underperform. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 08:49, 23 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It seems as though &amp;quot;underperformance&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;failing to live up to expectations&amp;quot; are a preferred theme of the website's management. Maybe it's just a case of projection. [[User:RayM|RayM]] 09:22, 23 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Possibly. If that's all it is, we should remove it. But I'm going to wait and see if anyone has a better explanation before I do so. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 18:07, 23 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[[Politically correct]] teams often underachieve.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:03, 24 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Very well. I removed the part about the coach being a foreigner, since surprisingly it isn't an unusual practice to do something like that. About half the women's soccer coaches this year are from another country (i.e. not the one they coach). And Jurgen Kingsman of Germany coaches the men's US national team, although it's unlikely he'd have coached at the Olympics even if they did qualify, since men's soccer at the Olympics is primarily Under-23 teams. However, I kept the rest of the footnote. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 21:10, 24 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: I don't think it's that common for a prominent sport like soccer.  Germany, of course, has a very strong soccer program.  But a coach from Sweden for the women's team???--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:21, 24 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Ahhh.... Good point. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 21:50, 24 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
The coach in question was the coach when the US won gold in 2008. She took the job in 2007. [[User:RayM|RayM]] 00:14, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Early goal for France in Game 1 for the USA. 1-0. Plenty of time for us to come back. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:13, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: 2-0 France, less than 20 minutes in. A loss wouldn't eliminate the US, but a big loss would make it hard to go through in a tough group. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:15, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: 2-1. US goal came on a corner kick, which requires a lot of teamwork, against, atheist France. Still not even a quarter of the way through. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:20, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
So let me get this straight: If France loses, it's because of atheism. If the US loses, it's because their coach is a foreign-born lesbian, even though she led the team to gold in 2008. Is that correct? [[User:RayM|RayM]] 12:29, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: It's only one game. And one of them had to win (or it could be a tie, I suppose). Let's see how the tournament progresses. It looks like they'll both go to the quarterfinals, but with 8 of the 12 teams advancing, that's not unexpected. Let's see how they do there. Then we can discuss this. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 13:51, 29 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The US girls have won the gold medal! [http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2012/08/09/us-beats-japan-for-third-straight-olympic-gold-in-women-soccer/] --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 17:40, 9 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;No Religion&amp;quot; in census response==&lt;br /&gt;
There are three possible explanations for a citizen refusing to state a religious preference on a government census form: no self-identification with one of the listed denominations, fear of government recording of religious preferences, or protest against government intrusion into a citizen's private spiritual life.  Do we know which is the case in Australia?  I know that if the government were to knock on my door, I would be in the third group.  We don't know if Australia is in a religious decline based on census data, when there are better measures, including church service attendance and audience ratings for religious radio and TV broadcasts.  Are there better data sources for this article? Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 01:08, 23 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 11% of Australians refused to answer the religion question on their census forms.  These people could have a faith. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 08:22, 23 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beckham and the Olympic torch ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest not adding whether Beckham lights the Olympic cauldron until after it airs on NBC, even though we should know around 7:30 PM ET whether he has or not. Some people might not know and might want to not know until NBC shows it on tape delay. It's only a few hours, and since most of our users are American and won't have seen the cauldron lighting yet, I think it's a reasonable courtesy. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 06:41, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Black Power salute controversy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see a connection between the Black Power salute controversy, which was an act of political defiance on the medal stand that hardly anyone remembers (and which the Olympic committee forgave participants for) and [[Tebowing]].  Also, why would the comment be in the &amp;quot;TBD&amp;quot; column anyway?&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that athletes may (understandably) refrain from engaging in overt religious activity due to the precedent set by Smith and Carlos.  The Olympics are a major event, and being banned from them (even wrongly) can seriously affect athletes, especially those competing in sports whose major competition is the Olympics.  That's why I think that athletes will at least think twice before engaging in such behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
:The column where I added my explanation is headed &amp;quot;Answer,&amp;quot; and my explanation is certainly an answer.  Of course, it's just my insight, and maybe it will be proven wrong.  But even if no one does end up doing Tebowing, we can rest assured that Christian athletes have Jesus' words in mind:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.|||Matthew 6:5-8|NIV}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:GregG|GregG]] 14:42, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The &amp;quot;answer&amp;quot; is presumably provided by the results, as for the other issues, all of which is &amp;quot;TBA&amp;quot;.  [[Tebowing]] is not something that would likely be done during the medal ceremony, not even by Tebow himself.  It's done before or after the athletic event, as in the American marathon medalist in 2004 who did the Sign of the Cross right after crossing the finish line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As to the quote from the [[Bible]], the context for that quote is clear:  people should not pray in a hypocritical manner like the liberal Pharisees.  There is nothing hypocritical about [[Tebowing]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:08, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the precedent still applies, or at least it has an ''in terrorem'' effect, to all such displays, regardless of whether they are during a medals ceremony or before or after an event.  I know that this is my opinion, but Tebowing seems to me to be nothing more than a gimmick, a practice designed to whack people over the head with the &amp;quot;HEY, IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW, I'M CHRISTIAN!&amp;quot; hammer.  Such efforts, no matter how sincere they are, are misguided, and Jesus tells us that this sort of public display is not at all required by Christians, just as Jesus goes on to criticize people who make a public display out the pious practice of fasting.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 15:41, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reformat ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone with better formatting skills than me please make the table into a better, cleaner format? It's very hard to read right now. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:42, 30 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public Schools ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the public schools example really that good? There are certain private schools in America that are infamous for training its students like athletes rather than students. More so in basketball and (American) football than other Olympic sports, though. Public schools don't do that. Nor should schools do that, it's called &amp;quot;school&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;training&amp;quot;. I should point out that certain colleges are legendary for that too, including my own school, which is a public college under the State of Connecticut. But don't think that's why we're banned from the tournament next year - we're actually banned for not doing enough to game the system. And half the women's basketball Olympic team went to UConn. We actually care about academics for our women's basketball team, and do very well academically. But don't get me started on that, because it's irrelevant.&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, assuming you mean public high schools (or below), I think it doesn't present a very conservative argument. Private primary schools should not exist for the purpose of training athletes. The fact that some do indicates something is wrong with the system, not that the system is good. Not saying that's enough to make the whole system bad - the vast majority of private schools are very good academically. But these aren't the ones that produce the superstar athletes, for the most part. Also, other than basketball, it wouldn't apply to any of the Olympic sports, since football isn't in the Olympics. And there are only 12 American men's basketball players. I don't know how many of them went to the sham private schools whose main purpose is athletics, but I know LeBron is one of them.  [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:49, 30 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Swiss tweet in  question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.totalprosports.com/2012/07/30/swiss-soccer-player-michel-morganella-sent-home-olympics-racist-tweet/ Here is a link to an image of the tweet]. As you can easily read for yourself, it's directed at &amp;quot;les coréens,&amp;quot; et non pas contre &amp;quot;l'équipe coréen&amp;quot; ou quelque chose de même. [[User:RayM|RayM]] 18:33, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;South Korean&amp;quot; is not a race, and there is no evidence that the tweet was racist as the [[liberals]] claim.  Rather, this incident shows how much liberals oppose [[free speech]], and will NOT defend the rights of others to speak their minds.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:40, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::So, just for the record, you do defend the right of a person to call an entire nation of people &amp;quot;mentally handicapped retards&amp;quot; and think that he should face no consequences for doing so while representing his own country at an international event? [[User:RayM|RayM]] 18:48, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::For the record, I do support [[free speech]], even for statements with which I disagree.  The tweet was not racist and athletes should be able to vent on twitter, just as they do vocally during games.  Fans do also, by the way.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:13, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you believe a private, non-profit organization such as the Swiss and/or Greek Olympic committees has the right to demand and/or expect behavior from its members that reflects well on the organization, and that organization should be allowed to sanction a participant when behavior does not meet those expectations? If you do, where do you think the line is drawn? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 21:27, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::No, I don't think the organizations you mention should be expelling athletes based on what they say on Twitter (and I question whether the organizations are truly private, rather than publicly funded).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There was no evidence that the tweets embarrassed the nations in any way.  Rather, this is [[liberal censorship]] run amok.  Thirty years ago, liberals and the ACLU would have sided with the athletes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:39, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The only NOC that is 100% privately funded is the American one, although the vast majority of them are funded privately in part. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 13:01, 2 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheistic Brits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder...what percentage of the underachieving, God-hating British Olympians are actually Atheists? [[user:Willingham77|Willingham77]] 17:03, 31 July 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The better question is what percentage of the Brits are subjected to an increasingly atheistic media and culture?  Unfortunately, nearly 100%.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:11, 31 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The better better question is why does an &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; country have an established religion (COE)?  Should all of us God-fearing Americans want the same for Christianity?[[User:Emmerich|Emmerich]] 23:23, 1 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Great Britain]] has an established '''''church'''''.  That is something the [[Founders]] opposed - a state supported '''''church'''''.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:42, 1 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow Andy, you should use that statement as an example in a Conservapedia article entitled &amp;quot;Non sequitur&amp;quot;. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 15:43, 6 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposed table entry==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Sport&lt;br /&gt;
!Political issue&lt;br /&gt;
!Answer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Netball&lt;br /&gt;
|Will Netball be played at the 2012 and 2016 Summer Olympics? Wikipedia claims that Netball is an &amp;quot;Olympic sport&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Olympic_sports|title=Category:Olympic sports|accessdate=Aug. 3, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Olympics/Archive_12#Category:Olympic_sports&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; played &amp;quot;at the Olympics&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Netball_at_the_Olympics&amp;amp;action=history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Olympics/Archive_12#Olympic_recognised_sports&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Feminists have been demanding equality in Olympic participation. As a result, women have been playing the same game as men -- five-players-on-each-side basketball in the Olympics since 1976, rather than a watered-down version designed for Victorian women called Netball.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
If there are no objections, I will move this to the table in the article. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 11:19, 3 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: That's not really a question about the Olympics, more a commentary on Wikipedia. Stick it in [[Bias in Wikipedia]], not here. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 17:11, 3 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Wikipedia no longer claims Netball is an Olympic sport, only an &amp;quot;Olympic recognized sport&amp;quot;, which is correct. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 17:17, 3 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::With all due respect to my friend Gregkochuconn, I just looked at the Wikipedia netball article and it is still in category &amp;quot;Olympic sports.&amp;quot;  I admit that the Wikipedia article &amp;quot;Netball and the Olympic Movement&amp;quot; is in category &amp;quot;Olympic recognised sports&amp;quot; but the radical feminists have insisted that Netball stay in the former category.  Please see for yourself. The table entry was an assertion: We say netball will not be played in 2012 and 2016, Wikipedia says it is already an Olympic sport and keeps deleting statements that it could not possibly be added to the Olympic Programme before 2024.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Netball&amp;amp;diff=502656544&amp;amp;oldid=502573324] [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 01:00, 4 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Its a bit hard to see exactly what the issue is.  It is not hard to see that this issue is one for the Wikipedia page and not for the Olympics 2012 page.  Whether or not it is deservedly and &amp;quot;Olympic Sport&amp;quot; or an &amp;quot;Olympic Recognised Sport&amp;quot; (these terms are not synonymous) is an issue for a general Olympics page, and whether Wikipedia is somehow censoring conservative thought is an issue for the Wikipedia page.  Frankly I doubt very many of you even know what netball is.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:52, 4 August 2012 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
:::: That edit seems to be adding the 2024 information, not deleting it. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 13:24, 4 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Promptly reverted.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Netball&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=502668446] [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 03:52, 5 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Probably because it was in the article about the sport at the Olympics, and didn't belong in the main article. The main article doesn't make any claim one way or the other. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 17:54, 5 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netball_at_the_Olympics current version of the page] includes that information. So what you are saying is wrong. In any case, this is not the place for it, as it has absolutely nothing to do with the 2012 Olympics. Wikipedia makes no claim that it will be contested at the 2012 Olympics, even if it is an &amp;quot;Olympic sport&amp;quot;, seeing as that category includes present Olympic sports, past Olympic sports, and Olympic recognized sports. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 13:27, 4 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Note that the article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squash_(sport) squash], which has a far more significant chance of being added to the Olympic program than squash, also does not mention that it could be added no sooner than 2024. As I said above, the article on Netball and the Olympic Movement does mention that it can't be added until 2024. The fact doesn't belong in the main article for the sport, by WP standards, and other articles on Olympic-recognized sports don't mention it either. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:17, 6 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Oh no, the tennis! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look what's happening! One of the greatest conservative sports stars just lost the bronze medal match to an Argentinian who no doubt supports gay marriage, and an overrated Brit is smashing one of the all-time greats in the gold! What is going on?? Not only that, but we all just watched home-schooled gymnast Makayla Maroney underperform, right onto her bum! This page may need a re-write ... [[User:AlanA|AlanA]] 10:43, 5 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While expressing doubt about your guess as to the Argentinian star's political views, I welcome further review of the predictions in the entry as more results pour in ....--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:45, 6 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The predictions represent things that are &amp;quot;likely&amp;quot; to happen, not things that are guaranteed to happen. Murray also had the advantage of the home fans, and Federer was tired from his marathon match with Del Potro. Of course, Del Potro should have been tired too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Will countries that have implemented same-sex marriage underperform? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will someone please explain where the expected total medals figures in this section come from? Thanks. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 15:41, 6 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: The table lower down in the article. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 16:59, 6 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, you mean the one based on GDP, which &amp;quot;cannot be used as a fair proxy&amp;quot;. In other words, they're meaningless. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 22:15, 6 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Find a better proxy and we can use that. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:17, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I have changed the proxy to medals won at the last (Summer) Olympics prior to implementing same-sex marriage. The expected total is virtually unchanged. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:28, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Better, but expected numbers should be corrected for any significant differences in total number of medals available and in a country's number of athletes competing between the base estimate year and 2012. Also, since it's conceded that it's too early to tell how these countries will ultimately perform, the +/- figures are premature. With about 59% of events concluded, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, South Africa and Sweden are on track to meet or exceed their medal count for the base year. The Netherlands and Norway could easily do so as well by the games' end. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 10:53, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hence &amp;quot;too early to tell&amp;quot;. It's unlikely (though not impossible) for the Netherlands and Spain to overperform, while Denmark and Sweden have overperformed already. The rest are too early to tell. That being said, I will remove the +/- totals until the Games are over - they are misleading at this point. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 11:00, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Also, there are only a few more medal events (out of over 300) being contested in 2012 than in previous years, so that shouldn't matter. I think there were 301 in 2008 and 2004 and 302 this year. Insigificant. Since the theory centers around how many exceptional athletes these countries produce, adjusting for the number of athletes is incorrect. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 11:02, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::What is &amp;quot;the theory&amp;quot;? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 09:37, 8 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: See [[User:Conservative]]'s rant somewhere above on this page. It's confusing, and I don't feel like repeating all of it, especially since I don't think it's accurate (though as an empiricist, I'm willing to put it to the test). [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 13:23, 9 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Seems that the highly promiscous gay diver has been eliminated, news article said he has been spending to much time at gay rallies instead of training  [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:33, 11 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: I did not just say that about the gay diver. Who signed my name to that comment? [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 14:53, 11 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Looking through the edit history, it appears to be [[User:Nacacube]], who for some reason decided to affix my username to his comment. I don't even know how he did it, since he obviously didn't copy and paste - the time is different. Strange. Message left on his talk page. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 14:55, 11 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, the &amp;quot;developed nations&amp;quot; took most of the medals in the Modern Olympics.  In fact, because of transportation challenges, the host country had a big advantage in the early years of the Modern Olympics.  Since that time, there has been a long-term trend of spreading the medals to countries throughout the world.  Over time, the portion of the medals going to smaller countries has increased and the number of medals going to France, UK, and Germany have declined.  So, if one had to explain a 4% decline in Olympic medals, could one look to this long-term trend rather than to the gay marriage factor? Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 12:26, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: 4% isn't a significant difference anyway, unless it continues. One sample showing a 4% change doesn't really prove anything by itself. You could be right, but we'd have to analyze it long-term, rather than just one year, given the small change. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 16:14, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Assuming GregG calculated the p-value correctly, he is correct in that there is no statistical significance just from this one test. Generally, you would need a p value of 0.05 or less for it to be significant (or by stricter standards, 0.01). 0.73 is nowhere near that. I'm not going to verify the calculations, but it seems right. And assuming it's right, GregG is correct that it is not significant. However, if repeated tests showed a 4% decrease, that would be significant. We can run it again in 2014 and 2016, and beyond. And possibly we would have more nations to work with in those years. Keep in mind that the Winter Olympics (2014) have fewer total medals, so a 4% drop would be less significant, by itself. But if demonstrated, it could show significance of the trend. Something inonsistent with the 4% decrease, such as a small increase, would indicate no correlation. Bottom line is that this one sample test can't disprove the correlation by itself, but it doesn't prove it either. I'm an actuarial science major at school, so I'm pretty knowledgeable about this stuff. A repeated 4% decrease would be significant. But for the moment, it's not. I'm going to retroactively analyze the 2008 medal data, although we'll have fewer countries. When I'm done, I'll post the results.  [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 16:26, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Here is the medal data from previous years from the original post, omitting any countries that legalized same-sex marriage after 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Belgium - 5 in 2000, 2 in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Canada - 12 in 2004, 18 in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Netherlands - 25 in 2000, 16 in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Norway - 6 in 2004, 9 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa - 6 in 2004, 1 in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Spain - 19 in 2004, 18 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
Total - 73 expected, 64 actual&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a decrease of 9 medals out of 73, a 12.3% decrease.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's look at the countries that legalized same-sex marriage between 2000 and 2004, as far back as we can go. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Belgium - 5 in 2000, 3 in 2004&lt;br /&gt;
Netherlands - 25 in 2000, 22 in 2004&lt;br /&gt;
Total - 30 in 2000, 25 in 2004&lt;br /&gt;
This is a 16.7% decrease, but with far too small a sample size to be significant by itself. [[User:GregG]], care to run the significance test?&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, there appears to be something going on with the Belgians and Dutch, who have seen a consistent decline, while the rest of the nations have not, apparently. Since they are geographically and culturally close, this may be relevant. Ignoring them, we have no data for 2004, a 4.6% INCREASE in 2008, and again a 4.6% increase in 2012, neither of which is statistically significant by itself, and probably still not together. (Note: 4.6% increase is just as statistically significant as 4.6% decrease.  In this case, not very) Of course, we can't just kick the two lowest samples out of the data set. But there seems to be some factor that has steadily brought the Dutch and Belgian totals down, without influencing anyone else. Was something else going on in Belgium and the Netherlands at the same time? Or was the 2000 medals we're using as the baseline simply an anomaly? I'm guessing the latter. 2000 was the Dutch's best Olympics EVER. It wasn't the Belgians', but even the 40% decrease from 2000 to 2004 isn't significant when they only had 5 to begin with. I'm going to rerun this data when I have more time, using totals from the three previous summer Olympics, and totals from all Olympiads thereafter, multiplying the latter by 3 or 1.5 if necessary, where there are fewer years, although I'll note where so as not to effect the significance test. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 16:41, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Going in alphabetical order, &lt;br /&gt;
Belgium - 14 from 1992-2000, 8 from 2004-2012 (no reweighting necessary)&lt;br /&gt;
Canada - 48 from 1996-2004, 36 from 2008-2012, multiply by 1.5 to weight as if there were 3 Olympics = 54 weighted total &lt;br /&gt;
Denmark - 21 from 2000-2008, 9 in 2012, reweights as 27&lt;br /&gt;
Iceland - 2 from 2000-2008, 0 in 2012, reweights as 0&lt;br /&gt;
Netherlands - 59 from 1992-2000, 58 from 2004-2012, no reweighting necessary&lt;br /&gt;
Norway - 23 from 1996-2004, 13 in 2008-2012, reweight as 19.5 due to lack of future data&lt;br /&gt;
Portugal - 7 from 2000-2008, 1 in 2012, reweights as 3&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa - 17 from 1996-2004, 7 from 2008-2012, reweight as 10.5&lt;br /&gt;
Spain - 47 from 1996-2004, 35 from 2008-2012, reweights as 52.5&lt;br /&gt;
Sweden - 24 from 2000-2008, 8 in 2012, reweights as 24&lt;br /&gt;
Total - 262 &amp;quot;baseline&amp;quot;, 256.5 actual+projected, decrease of 5.5, or 2.1%. Smaller percentage, but with a larger sample size, it could have a higher significance. Or the two could cancel out. I can't do the math in my head. [[User:GregG]], do you mind doing the calculations again? [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 16:52, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::First, for countries that implemented same-sex marriage before 2008, I am going to use the 2004 total medals awarded for both 2000 and 2004 (there isn't much of a difference: 928 medals in 2000, 929 in 2004).  The pre-same-sex-marriage proportion of medals won is 7.858%, the post proportion won is 6.681%.  The p-value is 0.3244, which indicates no significance at any common alpha level.&lt;br /&gt;
::Second, for countries implementing same-sex marriage before 2004, we have the proportion of medals won in 2000 by those countries as 3.233%, and the proportion of medals won in 2004 by those countries is 2.691%.  The p-value is 0.4912, which indicates no statistical significance at any common alpha level.&lt;br /&gt;
::I will take a look at how to proceed with your final set of data.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 17:10, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::One would expect some time period before the adoption of the [[same-sex marriage]] and its harmful effect, so I don't think it's meaningful to go back to 2004 and 2000.  The trend line from 2008 to this year is probably a better indicator.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:15, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Using the data for countries that implemented same-sex marriage between 2008 and 2012 (Denmark, Iceland, Portugal, Sweden):&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those countries won 15 medals out of 958 in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those countries won 18 medals out of 962 in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The proportion of medals won by those countries actually went up from 2008 to 2012 (1.566% to 1.871%); the p-value, though, is 0.6068, which indicates no statistical significance at any common alpha level.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 17:21, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The shortness of time between the adoption of same-sex marriage by those nations and their medals at the 2012 Games renders that particular analysis less meaningful.  More significant, I think, would be nations that adopted same-sex marriage before 2008 and how they then trended lower in medal count from 2008 to 2012.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:49, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Using the data for countries that implemented same-sex marriage before 2008 and the medal counts for 2008 and 2012 (Belgium, Canada, Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Belgium: 2 in 2008, 3 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Canada: 18 in 2008, 18 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Netherlands: 16 in 2008, 20 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Norway: 9 in 2008, 4 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::South Africa: 1 in 2008, 6 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Spain: 18 in 2008, 17 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Total: 64 in 2008, 68 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, the proportion of medals won went up from 2008 (6.68%) to 2012 (7.07%).  The p-value is 0.7369, which indicates no statistical significance at any common alpha level.  And, since this data set is rather scant (and, to be fair, we are having to make assumptions that might not exactly hold water but should be good approximations, like the number of medals won being a binomial distribution, in order to draw any conclusions from the data), I would surmise that you're not going to be able to get much evidence from just these data.  Perhaps we will have to wait and see at the 2016 Summer Olympics.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:57, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Netherlands and South Africa seem to distort the results here.  Removing those anomalies results in a decline from 47 to 42 - more than a 10% decrease.  For example, it appears that Netherlands did unusually poorly in 2008, which may result in its analomous increase.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:27, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Now it looks like you're just cherry-picking the data to get the conclusion you want.  ''A priori'', we would expect that such issues would average out.  In fact, you suggested comparing 2008 medal counts to 2012 medal counts.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Also, I haven't run the numbers, but I think that even if you exclude the Netherlands and South Africa, you would still not have statistical significance due to the low number of successes that are expected by those countries.  As an example, if we flip a fair coin 10 times, a result of 3 heads is not statistically significant at any common alpha (p=11/32).  Yet 3 heads is 40% fewer heads than the 5 we would expect.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 00:50, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::If the Netherlands and South Africa are to be excluded then we should exclude Norway as well. I think that leaves 38 and 38? No change. [[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 02:15, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should be comparing two sets of countries - those that implement same-sex marriage and those that prohibit same-sex marriage.  When comparing sets with similar economies and populations, one could find that medal counts when down for both groups.  The question is whether there is a statistically significant difference in the drop in medal count between the same-sex marriage and no same-sex marriage countries.  I would guess that there are so many other factors that have a larger effect on the medal count, that any difference would be insignificant, but I welcome someone to run the numbers. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 18:35, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Nancy boys don't have kids which contributes to decline of populations as does pro-abortion/anti-life policies. see: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZeyYIsGdAA Demographic winter] In 2008, there were 70 countries with sub-replacement levels of fertility. So we look at trend of medals won by countries which adopt same sex marriage. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:06, 13 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Male homosexual couples not being able to have children the natural way is a biological fact. It doesn't depend on them being married or not. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 02:21, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, not many 8-year olds win Olympic medals, so regardless there would be no data for at least a decade or so. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:57, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Medal weighting ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's been pointed out at [[talk:Main Page]] that some sports, notably swimming, are vastly over-rewarded in terms of the number of medals available. We would get a better representation of which nations were actually the best, sporting-wise, if we took this into account in our medals tables. One simple way would be to discount multiple medals won by the same individual, or perhaps to cap the number of medals counted in the same sport at, say, five. What do people think?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Sadly the nation most affected by this would currently be that titan of the swimming pool, the USA.)--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:37, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: That would be hard to do, though. And nearly impossible to keep updating during the Games. I propose keep the current system for now, and discuss further when the Games are over. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 10:53, 7 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Team Sports ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really have the time to finish off this nicely, but I just did a quick count-up of medals across handball, hockey, basketball, volleyball and football. as these are probably the sports best described as '''team''' sports (ie. multiple players on a field working together and reacting to each other). Could someone do it for me and add it to the main page perhaps?&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Country&lt;br /&gt;
! Medals&lt;br /&gt;
! Status&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| United States of America&lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Brazil&lt;br /&gt;
| Christian&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Australia&lt;br /&gt;
| Increasingly Atheist&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| France&lt;br /&gt;
| Increasingly Atheist&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Japan&lt;br /&gt;
| Atheist&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Netherlands&lt;br /&gt;
| Atheist&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Russia&lt;br /&gt;
| Christian&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Spain&lt;br /&gt;
| Christian&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Countries with only 1 medal in team sports are Argentina, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Korea, Mexico, Montenegro, Norway and Sweden.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 02:51, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The criteria seems pretty vague. Water polo? Tenis? Going out on a limb, cycling, and triathlon (The Brits certainly worked as a team to get gold and bronze). [[User:Nine|Nine]] 21:23, 14 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=998712</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=998712"/>
		<updated>2012-08-07T04:05:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Also See */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is the world's largest [[religion]], having 2.1 billion followers with a presence on all seven continents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is a [[monotheistic]] religion that professes belief in [[Jesus]] (in the Hebrew original, &amp;quot;Yeshua HaMashiach&amp;quot;) as the Son of [[God]].  Followers of Jesus are called Christians, meaning &amp;quot;of Christ&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The early Christian faith was sometimes called ''That Way'', (Acts 19:1,9,23; 24:22), and its adherents were also called ''Nazarenes'' (Acts 24:5), evidently after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived. The [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) records that &amp;quot;the disciples were called Christians first in [[Antioch]].&amp;quot; The title ''Christian'' is also used in Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explosive growth of worldwide Christianity ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp.jpg|thumbnail|left|200px|[[Hong Kong]] Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were [[Western World]] Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/mckln/4815046728/in/set-72157624550425162 Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Global Christianity]] and [[Internet evangelism]] and [[Evangelical Christians]] and [[Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christianity has seen tremendous growth over its 2000 year history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/BChristianIncrease12.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Christianity has recently seen explosive growth outside the [[Western World]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://pewforum.org/Christian/Faith-and-Conflict-The-Global-Rise-of-Christianity.aspx The global rise of Christianity - Pew Forum]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077 Is Christianity taking over the planet?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://pewforum.org/Religion-News/The-stunning-growth-of-Christianity-in-China.aspx The stunning growth of Christianity in China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gratefultothedead.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/the-african-apostles-how-christianity-exploded-in-20th-century-africa/ The African apostles: How Christianity exploded in 20th century Africa]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2000, there were twice as many non-Western Christians as Western Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077 Is Christianity taking over the planet?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western Christians as there were [[Western World]] Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are now more non-Western missionaries than Western missionaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, the ''American Spectator'' declared concerning research published in the ''International Bulletin of Missionary Research'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The report estimates about 80,000 new Christians every day, 79,000 new [[Islam|Muslims]] every day, and 300 fewer [[atheism|atheists]] every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the [[Western World|West]], while religion is thriving in the Global South, where [[Charismatic movement|charismatic Christianity]] is exploding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/28/thriving-christianity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Implications of the growth of worldwide Christianity ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Global Christianity]] and [[Internet evangelism]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the increase in the public's access to global communications, it is thought that the more [[theology|theologically]] [[conservative]] non-Western Christian churches could influence Western Christianity to move in a more theologically [[conservative]] direction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18774&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For example, non-Western [[Anglican]]s are exerting influence within the worldwide Anglican Communion against the stance of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Anglican Communion's North American provinces with regard to [[homosexual]] practices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.maravipost.com/malawi-politics/district/5751-bishop-mw-anglicans-totally-against-homosexuality.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2156406/Anglican-church-schism-declared-over-homosexuality.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian Divisions ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Anglican Christ Church.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Anglican Christ Church in Western Australia]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] whom Catholics believe established their church and the succession of [[Pope]]s as the spiritual leaders of Christendom. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) trace their roots back to the Apostles, and are organized in Autocephalous national or regional churches in communion with each other. Differing theological perspectives led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]]: the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 115 million baptized members) and the [[Lutheran]] World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. It broke from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of [[faith]] and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]], as well as other practices of the Catholic Church that Luther saw as unBiblical, were raised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian Beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Christian beliefs [[Christian apologetics|are well supported via a large body of compelling evidence]].  Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of the faith is the [[Nicene Creed| Nicaea-Constantinopolitan Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine while disagreeing on some. According to an online Harris poll from 2003, 99% of all American Christians believe in [[God]], 96% in the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in [[Heaven]], 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in [[Hell]], 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious tenants of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Nicaea-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline and historic standard. Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See the [[Apostles' Creed]] and the Athanasian Creed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|God}}&lt;br /&gt;
God is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Personages: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. While God is tripartite, this does not imply that Christians are polytheists.  The doctrine of the Trinity is central to Christian theology, although several denominations that usually are considered Christian are non-Trinitarian. The God of the Christian is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, and all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major theme of the Bible is [[love]].  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus' Baptism.jpg|180px|left|]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the reign of [[Augustus Caesar|Caesar Augustus]] the Son (i.e. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnated as a man. He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At approximately the age of thirty he was baptised by his cousin [[John the Baptist]] and began to preach in the area of [[Judea]] and [[Galilee]]. About three years later, his teachings and works of mercy prompted the Jewish authorities to plot Jesus' death. Jesus was [[crucified]]. He rose from the dead and was seen by over 500 people. He ascended to Heaven. The four [[Gospels]] contain the basic account of what Jesus did and said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus summarized his moral teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is [[love]] and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been endless debate over how a person should express love for God in his or her moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.&amp;quot; (John 13:35) In trying to understand the reason for the growth of Christianity in a pagan culture, it has been noted that while love of one's neighbor is not an exclusively Christian virtue, it appears that the primitive Christian church practiced it much more effectively than any other group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.R. Dodds, 1970:136-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to sacrificially showing care for those within the community as well as to those without, (cf. Gal. 6:10) the Christians elevated the sanctity of life, opposing abortion, infanticide, child abandonment, suicide, and gladiatorial contests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kenneth Scott Latourette, ''A history of Christianity'' p. 244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, Paul Copan, The Apologetics Study Bible, 274 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  While the primitive church tolerated the existing and pervasive cultural economic institution of slavery in the [[Roman Empire]], the mandate of equal pay and just treatment (Col. 4:1; Eph. 6:9) greatly ameliorated the treatment of slaves, while advising them to seek freedom if possible, (1Cor. 7:21) and requiring that the escape slave Onesimus be received back not &amp;quot;as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved&amp;quot;. (Philemon 1:6)  The Christian ethos of love also motivated a great expansion in the building of hospitals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert John Ochsner, Meyer Joseph Sturm, ''The organization, construction and management of hospitals'', p. 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roderick E. McGrew, ''Encyclopaedia of Medical Care'',  p. 135&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By A.D. 500, most large towns in in the Roman Empire had erected them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George D. Pozgar, ''Legal aspects of health care administration', p. 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Atonement===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dalí The Christ of St. John of the Cross.jpg|thumb|The Christ of St. John of the Cross by [[Salvador Dalí]], 1951.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, in conjunction with His resurrection, is an indispensable event for the reconciliation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to the understanding of His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and persevered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect, i.e. atone for, that development. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.&amp;quot;  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben), or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth..&amp;quot;, it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was for-planned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God&amp;quot; (Romans 3:23). This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4). Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that, by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.&amp;quot; (Mark 2:17).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3).  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often uses the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; to mean conversion, while other Christians, such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot; (Ephesians 5:8-10). Some believe that this is necessary in order to be saved. Others say that this is a common misconception of the text, that it refers instead to the &amp;quot;fruits&amp;quot; of saving faith. Christians in the [[Reformed]] tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer and theologian [[John Calvin]]) say that salvation  cannot be lost. One Bible passage often cited is John 10:28-29 in which Jesus said of his own Apostles that they could not be snatched from his hand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus resurrected.jpg|thumb|left|200px|&amp;quot;The Resurrection&amp;quot; by Carl Heinrich Bloch]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history, [[Gary Habermas]] is considered a leading [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
The fact of the Resurrection of Christ is also believed to produce certain effects on the lives of Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, his sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now-living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life &amp;amp;mdash; as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself, ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully glorified. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and be full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolation, and consider that, even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evangelism==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gleyre The Departure of the Apostles.jpg|thumb|240px|The Departure of the Apostles by [[Charles Gleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Internet Evangelism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see also: [[Internet evangelism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Campus Crusade for Christ International (CCCI) is one of the world's largest evangelism organizations within Christendom and has over 25,000 full time missionaries. In 2006, Alan Beeber of CCCI predicted that internet evangelism will result in more conversion that all other forms of evangelism for CCCI combined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/pdf/issues/LWP0206.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At [[YouTube]], Christians and Christian creationists have faced problems with [[atheist bullying|atheist cyberbullies]], but they [[Essay: Sharing your Christian/creationist videos on the internet|have developed methods to overcome this problem]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: The Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible records that that, at least initially, the church saw itself as united. In the community:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. {43} And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. {44} And all that believed were together, and had all things common; {45} And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. {46} And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.&amp;quot;(Acts 2:42-47; 4:32) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This community was soon &amp;quot;scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles,&amp;quot; due to determined persecution which resulted in the dispersed disciples going &amp;quot;every where preaching the word.&amp;quot; (Acts 8:1,4) Christian communities were primarily to be found in two separate cultural and liguistic entities--the Greek and Latin-speaking empires of Europe and the mid-east, and the Aramaic speaking sphere of the Parthian empire of the mid-east and far-east. This latter sphere encompassed not only the eastern portions of Syria, the Arabian peninsula, and Persia, but also extended to portions of southern India and even China. To this day there are many [[Aramaic Church]] members in the Kerala province of south India.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: the Post-Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Justin martyr  100 A.D. - 165 A.D.   From the &amp;quot;First Apology&amp;quot; (Defense)&lt;br /&gt;
''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to genoito [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion. (Chapt. LXV - administration of the sacraments)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist = the Thanksgiving], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, &amp;quot;This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;&amp;quot; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, &amp;quot;This is My blood;&amp;quot; and gave it to them alone... (Chapt. LXVl - of the Eucharist)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead...(Chapt.LXVll - weekly worship of the Christians)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tertullian (A.D. 160 -220), an Early ecclesiastical leader and writer, in his ''Apology'' (response to pagan charges) in describing the early church community wrote, ca. AD 197: ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are a body knit together by one faith, one discipline and one hope. We meet together as a congregation, uniting together to offer prayer to God. We pray for the emperors and all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for peace and for the delay of the final end. We read our holy scriptures to nourish our faith, hope, steadfastness and good habits. We hear exhortations and rebukes. We take such judging very seriously – as befits those who believe they are in the sight of God – especially seriously when anyone sins so grievously we have to cut them off from our prayer, our congregation and all sacred things. Our elders preside over us, obtaining that honor not by money, but by their established character. There is no buying and selling in the things of God. Though we have a fund, but not because people can buy religion. Once a month, anyone who wants to makes a small donation – but only he who is able and willing; there is no compulsion. It is not spent on feasts, but to support and bury poor people, to provide for orphans, the elderly old persons, victims of shipwreck and those in prison for their faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Defense by Tertullian (39), Trans. Rev. S. Thelwall. Modernized, abridged and introduced by Stephen Tomkins. Edited and prepared for the web by Dan Graves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Pontus &amp;amp; Bithynia  (northern Turkey) from A.D. 111-113, reporting to emperor Trajan of Christians, whom such pagan rulers found intolerable:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food &amp;amp;mdash; but ordinary and innocent food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pliny the Younger Letters, 10.96 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources related to becoming a Christian ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hoffman Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane.jpg|thumbnail|170px|[[Jesus Christ|Christ]] in the Garden of Gethsemane by Heinrich Hofmann.]]&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Below are some resources on becoming a [[Christian]]:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/good-news Good news of Christianity] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.thewordfortoday.org/?page=C2000 Free audio Bible and Bible audio streaming]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutgod.com/ AllAboutGod.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence for Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Video testimonies of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gotquestions.org/repentance.html Repentance]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tips on choosing a Christian church:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutreligion.org/choosing-a-christian-church-faq.htm Choosing a Christian Church]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Spiritual growth as a Christian:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.navpress.com/product/9781576839324/The-Pursuit-of-Holiness-Jerry-Bridges The Pursuit of Holiness] by Jerry Bridges&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.navpress.com/product/9780891099413/The-Practice-of-Godliness-Jerry-Bridges The Practice of Godliness] by Jerry Bridges&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/529785.The_Complete_Book_of_Discipleship The Complete Book of Discipleship: On Being and Making Followers of Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Orthodox churches icon artwork.jpg|thumb|Orthodox Church's icon artwork.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eastern_Orthodoxy|Eastern Churches  -- Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Church of the East]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Anglican]] ([[Church of England]])&lt;br /&gt;
***[[Episcopal Church]] (USA affiliate) &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Congregationalist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Disciples of Christ]] and [[Churches of Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Friends]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Reformed]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Seventh-day Adventist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jehovah's Witnesses]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Unitarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity in the World'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of countries by number of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The earliest Christian Church, a prison in Armageddon]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christians and the Law of Moses: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evangelical Apostolic Church of North America (Syro-Chaldean)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence for Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jewish Biblical way of interpretation: a solution for New Testament understanding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Sign of the Cross: a Jewish invention/ Essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Early Aramaic Jewish Christian prophesying]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Century Aramaic Jewish Christian Gospel and poetry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Judaism, Jewish Aramaic Christianity, and John 1:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[God on earth, the original!: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gates of Hell]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmigration of Words in Religion: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Singing the Hebrew Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christmas in the Holy Land: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Internet evangelism:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Sharing your Christian and creationist videos on YouTube and the internet]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Encyclopedias===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bodensieck, Julius, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church,'' (3 vol 1965), ECLS perspective &lt;br /&gt;
* Brauer, Jerald C. ''The Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' (1971), 880pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newadvent.org/cathen/index.html ''The Catholic Encyyclopedia'' (1907-1913)], old but highly detailed and online&lt;br /&gt;
** '' New Catholic Encyclopedia'', edited by the Catholic University of America, 17 vol. 1967-1979.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cross, F. L., and E. A. Livingstone, eds. ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church''  (3rd ed. 1997), 1840pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Dictionary-Christian-Church/dp/0192802909/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Elwell, Walter A., ed. ''Evangelical Dictionary of Theology‎'' (2001) 1312 pages; articles by over 200 Evangelical or Fundamentalist scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Hastings, Adrian et al. eds. ''The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought'' (2000) 808pp; 600 articles by 260 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0198600240/ref=sib_dp_pt/105-4292297-2766841#reader-link excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), ), major sources of older scholarly articles; mainline Protestant perspective  &lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.toc.html Vol. 1: Aachen - Basilians]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.toc.html Vol. 2: Basilica - Chambers]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.toc.html Vol. 3: Chamier - Draendorf]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04.toc.html Vol. 4: Draeseke - Goa]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05.toc.html Vol. 5: Goar - Innocent]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06.toc.html Vol. 6: Innocents - Liudger]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc07.toc.html Vol. 7: Liutprand - Moralities]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc08.toc.html Vol. 8: Morality - Petersen]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc09.toc.html Vol. 9: Petri - Reuchlin]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc10.toc.html Vol. 10: Reutsch - Son]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc11.toc.html Vol. 11: Son of Man - Tremellius]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc12.toc.html Vol. 12: Trench - Zwingli]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc13.toc.html Vol. 13: Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Histories===&lt;br /&gt;
*Briggs, J. H. Y., Robert D. Linder, and David F. Wright. ''Introduction to the History of Christianity: First Century to the Present Day'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-History-Christianity-Century-Present/dp/0800638123/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*Gonzalez, Justo L. '' A History of Christian Thought: Volume 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon'' (2nd ed. 1987); [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Beginnings-Chalcedon/dp/0687171822/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2: From Augustine to the Eve of the Reformation'' (2nd ed. 1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Augustine-Reformation/dp/0687171830/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 2]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 3: From the Protestant Reformation to the Twentieth Century'' (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Protestant-Reformation/dp/0687171849/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-12 excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Horsley, Richard A. ''Christian Origins: A People's History Of Christianity, Vol. 1'' (2006), 318pp [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Origins-Peoples-History-Christianity/dp/080063411X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200886474&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A History of Christianity'' (2 vol 1975) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-Beginnings-1500-Revised/dp/0060649526/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1, to 1500], by leading Baptist scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A history of the expansion of Christianity'' (7 vol 1939-1970), monumental history of missionary work worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
*MacCulloch, Diarmaid. ''The Reformation'' (2005), influential recent survey [http://www.amazon.com/Reformation-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/014303538X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*McGonigle, Thomas D.,  and James F. Quigley. ''A history of the Christian Tradition: From Its Jewish Orgins to the Reformation'' (1988); ''A History of the Christian Tradition, Vol. II: From the Reformation to the Present'' (1996) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Tradition-Vol-Reformation/dp/0809136481/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine'' (5 vol 1975-91) [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Doctrine-Medieval/dp/0226653757/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search v. 3, 600 AD -1300]]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Reformation-1300-1700/dp/0226653773/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search vol 4, 1300-1700]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-History-Development-Doctrine/dp/0226653803/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 5, 1700-present] This is the standard history of Christian doctrine. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ward, Keith. ''Christianity: A Beginner's Guide'' (2008), 195pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ahlstrom,  Sydney E. ''A religious history of the American people‎'' (1979) 1192 pages; classic history from broad perspective [http://books.google.com/books?id=5kFF6a1viGcC&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ahlstrom&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Balmer, Randall. ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism'' (2nd ed.  2004), 655pp [http://www.questia.com/library/book/encyclopedia-of-evangelicalism-by-randall-balmer.jsp ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism''  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lippy,  Charles H. and Peter W. Williams, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the American religious experience: studies of traditions and movements'' (3 vol 1988) 1872 pages; standard reference work; long essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Noll, Mark A. '' A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada‎'' (1992), by leading Evangelical historian [http://books.google.com/books?id=VGF3wbzzy9QC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:christianity+inauthor:noll&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Queen, Edward L. et al, eds. Encyclopedia of American Religious History'' (3rd ed. 2 vol. 2009) 1200pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Reid, Daniel G. et al. eds., ''Dictionary of Christianity in America'' (199)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wooley,  Davis C. ed. '' Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists‎'' (5 vol 1958-19820; 2565 pages&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.christian.com Christian] Social Network&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Michael_Phelps&amp;diff=998596</id>
		<title>Michael Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Michael_Phelps&amp;diff=998596"/>
		<updated>2012-08-06T13:30:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Michael Phelps.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Michael Phelps''' (born Baltimore, MD, June 30, 1985) is the world record holding Olympic [[swimming]] champion from the United States. Phelps won 8 olympic gold medals and broke 7 world records at the [[Olympics]] in [[Beijing]], [[China]]. Phelps eclipsed [[Mark Spitz]]'s seven-gold performance at the 1972 Munich Games. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,405062,00.html Michael Phelps Wins Record-Breaking 8th Gold Medal at Beijing Games], Associated Press, ''Fox News Channel'', August 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps won eight Olympic medals (6 Gold, 2 Silver) at the 2004 Summer Olympics in [[Athens]], [[Greece]]. Phelps set four individual world records and won seven gold medals at the 2007 World Championships to become the most successful athlete in World Championship history. By winning 6 medals (4 gold, 2 silver) in the 2012 Olympics, Phelps became the individual with the most medals won in Olympic events, with 22 (18 gold, 2 silver, 2 bronze).  He has announced that he will retire after the 2012 Olympics in London. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://swimming.teamusa.org/athlete/athlete/900 USA &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Swimming - Athletes - Michael Phelps], TeamUSA.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2000 Sydney Olympics==&lt;br /&gt;
When he was only 15 years old, Michael Phelps competed at the 2000 Sydney Olympics, placing fifth in the 200m butterfly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Beijing Olympics==&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps won 8 olympic gold medals and broke 7 world records and 1 olympic record at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, China. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Event&lt;br /&gt;
! Date&lt;br /&gt;
! Medal&lt;br /&gt;
! Individual Time&lt;br /&gt;
! Splits &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; ''Position and Time''&lt;br /&gt;
! Relay Time &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; ''Record''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 400m Individual Medley &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73A1/SWM054101.shtml#SWM054101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 10, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 4:03.84 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 4 x 100m Freestyle Relay &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73B1/SWM411101.shtml#SWM411101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 11, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 47.51&lt;br /&gt;
| (2) 47.51&lt;br /&gt;
| 3:08.24 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 200m Freestyle &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73A1/SWM012101.shtml#SWM012101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 12, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1:42.96 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 200m Butterfly &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73A1/SWM022101.shtml#SWM022101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 13,  2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1:52.03 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 4 x 200m Freestyle Relay &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73B1/SWM412101.shtml#SWM412101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 13, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1:43.31&lt;br /&gt;
| (1) 1:43.31&lt;br /&gt;
| 6:58.56 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 200m Individual Medley &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73A1/SWM052101.shtml#SWM052101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 15, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1:54.23 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 100m Butterfly &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73A1/SWM021101.shtml#SWM021101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 50.58 (OR)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Men's 4 x 100m Medley Relay &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/SW/C73B1/SWM451101.shtml#SWM451101]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug 17, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Gold&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 50.15&lt;br /&gt;
| (1) 2:42.58&lt;br /&gt;
| 3:29.34 (WR)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.michaelphelps.com/2004/english.html Official site] Michael Phelps.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://swimming.teamusa.org/athlete/athlete/900 USA Swimming - Athletes - Michael Phelps], TeamUSA.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Phelps, Michael}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Athletes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Olympic Athletes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=991724</id>
		<title>Sarah Palin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=991724"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T23:52:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Sarah Palin&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Sarah Palin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Todd Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
        |number=11th&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 4, 2006 - July 26, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Sean Parnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/mayor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=&lt;br /&gt;
	|city=Wasilla, Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=1996–2002&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=John Stein&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Diane Keller&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Louise Heath Palin''' (pronounced pay'-lynn) (born February 11, 1964) is a [[conservative]] [[Republican Party|Republican]] politician, political commentator, reality television personality and author who served as the 11th [[governor]] of [[Alaska]] from 2006 through 2009. She is both the first woman and the youngest person to hold this office in the state's history. On July 3, 2009 Palin announced that she would resign as governor of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070301738.html Sarah Palin to Resign as Alaska Governor, Citing Probes and Family Needs] Rucker, Philip and Eli Saslow, July 4, 2009, washingtonpost.com, retrieved August 20, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Executive power was transferred to [[Lieutenant Governor]] [[Sean Parnell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin came to the nation's attention as Senator [[John McCain]]'s vice presidential running mate in the [[2008 Presidential Election]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/palins_vp_selection_speech.html Acceptance Speech by Palin] realclearpolitics.com, August 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She is the first woman to appear on a Republican presidential ticket. In an appearance on August 30, 2008 in Washington, Pennsylvania, she was greeted by a surprisingly large crowd as she promoted the new McCain-Palin ticket. She brought a [[populism|populist]] image and a record of cutting wasteful spending and reforming government to McCain's ticket. In the summer of 2007, she was the most popular governor in America, having cut 13% of [[Alaska]]'s budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/851orcjq.asp The Most Popular Governor] Barnes, Fred, Jul 16, 2007, weeklystandard.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is strongly [[pro-life]], and a prominent spokesperson for [[special needs]] children. She favors more competition in health care, and pushed for abolishing the [[certificate of need]] regulations that interfere with opening new medical clinics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090403253.html?referrer=emailarticle Palin's Efforts to Reform Health Care Are Complicated] Mosk, Matthew, September 5, 2008, washingtonpost.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her memoir ''[[Going Rogue]]'' was published in November 2009, with Palin drawing large crowds to book signings around the country. She comments regularly on public affairs via her [[Facebook]] page, having criticized the &amp;quot;death panels&amp;quot; of the health care reform program, and praised President Obama's pro-war speech upon his receiving the [[Nobel]] Peace prize in December 2009. She appears regularly on [[Fox News Channel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/sarah-palin-to-contribute-to-fox-news/?scp=2&amp;amp;sq=Palin&amp;amp;st=cse Sarah Palin to contribute to Fox News] Rutenberg, Jim, January 11, 2011, Media Decoder blog, nytimes.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since her rise to prominence in 2008, Palin has been the subject of demonization by the left-wing mainstream media, including insults to her intellect and various sexist comments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sarah Palin Todd Trig.jpg|thumb|right|250px|In this April 23, 2008 file photo, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband, Todd Palin, hold their baby boy Trig in Anchorage, Alaska.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Photo courtesy of Newsmax.com'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin was born in Sandpoint, [[Idaho]]. Her family moved to Alaska in 1964, when her parents came to teach school in Skagway. Palin attended Wasilla High School where her extracurricular activities included captaining the basketball team  which went on to win the state championship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Rove, Karl, The ''Wall Street Journal'', September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After graduating in 1982, she went on to college, attending several institutions before earning a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism from the [[University of Idaho]] in 1987. To earn money for college, Palin entered beauty pageants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She worked in the media and the utility industry before beginning her career in public service in 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah married [[Todd Palin]], a part Yupik [[Eskimo]] and lifelong Alaskan, on August 29, 1988. Todd formerly worked at a non-management union job in the oil industry, and also as a commercial salmon fisherman. He is a four-time champion of the Iron Dog, the world's longest snowmobile race. Todd was a member of the United Steelworkers Union, and their eldest son Track served in [[Iraq]] while in the [[United States Army]]. The Palins have five children: Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin is a [[Labor union|union]] member, a [[moose]] hunter and holds a [[NRA]] Benefactor Life membership.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nrablog.com/post/2009/08/02/Phil-Schreier-reports-from-Alaska.aspx Phil Schreier reports from Alaska] Sturgis, Danielle, August 2, 2009, nrablog.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She stays active as a marathon runner, sports team mom, hockey manager and school volunteer. Palin enjoys hunting, fishing and Alaskan history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has been widely praised among conservatives for acting on her [[pro-life]] beliefs in the case of her youngest son, Trig, who was diagnosed with [[Down syndrome]] in the fourth month of her pregnancy. After researching the condition, she and her husband agreed to continue to pregnancy. &amp;quot;[My husband Todd said,] we shouldn't be asking 'Why us?' We should be saying 'Well, why not us?' We've both been very vocal about being pro life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential. I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/gov-sarah-palin.html Gov. Sarah Palin discusses son Trig's Down syndrome diagnosis] ''People'' magazine, celebrity baby blog, May 3, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29242 Canadian Doctors 'Fear' Sarah Palin's Choice May Start a Trend] Baklinski, Thaddeus M., September 11, 2008, Catholic Online&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trig was born on April 18, 2008, four months before his mother was announced as the vice-presidential candidate. Palin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;This new person in your life can help everyone put things in perspective and bind us together, and get everyone focused on what really matters ... Those who love him will think less about self and focus less on what the world tells [us] is 'normal' or 'perfect.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://motherjones.com/files/birth_of_trig.pdf Birth of Trig] original PDF, motherjones.com, retrieved August 20, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's a sign of the times to be able to do this,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can think of so many male candidates who watched a families grow while they were in office. There is no reason to believe a woman can't do it with a growing family. My baby will not be at all or in any sense neglected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-10-4082128881_x.htm Alaska governor balances newborn's needs, official duties] Quinn, Steve, May 5, 2008, ''USAToday''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was five months pregnant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/09/01/us-usa-politics-palin-idUSN2944356420080901 Palin rebuts rumors, says daughter pregnant] Holland, Steve, September 1, 2008, reuters.com, retrieved August 20, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After having been given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child. Palin stated &amp;quot;We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-4404184-502163.html Palin's Daughter Pregnant] Ververs, Vaughn, September 1, 2008, cbsnews.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bristol has since gone on to promote abstinence as a realistic choice for teenagers, stating, &amp;quot;[A]bstinence is the only way you can effectively, 100% foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat5025.html Sarah Palin’s Husband Todd, Daughter Bristol Promote Abstinence For Teenagers] Ertelt, Steven, May 6, 2009, lifenews.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early political career==&lt;br /&gt;
===City Councilwoman===&lt;br /&gt;
Palin served two two-year terms on the Wasilla City Council, being first elected in 1992 when she was 28 years old.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996, Palin ran for mayor of Wasilla against 9-year incumbent John Stien in a non-partisan race. She won the race 58% to 42%.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mayor&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2008163431_palin070.html Sarah Palin had turbulent first year as mayor of Alaska town] Armstrong, Ken and Hal Bernton, September 7, 2008, The ''Seattle Times'', retrieved on August 20, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her first months as mayor were rocky, and there was even talk of a recall, but things eventually smoothed out and she was re-elected in 1999. Palin said later of the experience, &amp;quot;I grew tremendously in my early months as mayor.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mayor&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her time as mayor, Palin hired a Washington lobbying firm to help secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, otherwise known as earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-31-palin-bridge_N.htm Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006] Dilanian, Ken, September 1, 2008, USAToday.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ms. Palin's leadership qualities were recognized when she was elected as president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other political experience===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002, she ran for Lieutenant Governor, but came in second in a four-way race. Later that year, when [[Frank Murkowski]] resigned his [[Senate]] seat to become [[governor]], she interviewed for the opening. Instead, Murkowski appointed his daughter [[Lisa Murkowski]] to the seat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, Governor Mukowski appointed Palin to serve as Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska's non-renewable resources of [[oil]] and [[gasoline|gas]]. She resigned in 2004 as a protest over the &amp;quot;lack of ethics&amp;quot; of fellow panelists who had ignored her complaints of legal violations and conflicts of interest. Palin took a great political risk by revealing that Randy Reudrich, chairman of the state Republican Party, was doing political business on state time, fulfilling a [[conflict of interest]] statement that required her to report such things. This action endeared her to the people of Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help cultivate influence and political clout in the state, Palin served from 2003 until June 2005 as one of three directors of the Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc., a 527 group that raised funds from corporate donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html#more Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Ted Stevens's 527 Group] Mosk, Matthew, September 1, 2008, The Trail Blog, washingtonpost.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The stated purpose of the group is, &amp;quot;To increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/527/ted_stevens_excellence_in_public_service_inc.asp Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.] CampaignMoney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has also served on the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She was named one of Alaska's &amp;quot;Top 40 Under 40&amp;quot;, Alaska's Public Works &amp;quot;Person of the Year&amp;quot;, and was inducted into the Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society at Alaska Pacific University. Palin has served on numerous boards and commissions throughout the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Governor of Alaska==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin ran for governor in 2006 on a clean government platform, and accomplished a political rarity in defeating the incumbent Governor [[Frank Murkowski]] in the Republican primary. Palin went on to defeat former Governor [[Tony Knowles]] in the general election. Some of the highlights of her governorship include: cutting expenses of Alaska's government, freezing government hiring, reducing earmarks by 86%, and championing the private sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy and Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin spoke a great deal about harnessing [[oil]] and natural [[gas]] resources, and in March 2007, presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA), a bill promoting the construction of a gas pipeline.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/0001000.shtml Governor gets AGIA] Nelson, Kristen, week of May 20, 2007, petroleumnews.com, retrieved August 20, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill received bipartisan support, and was signed into law by Governor Palin in June. In August of 2008 she signed legislation giving state authority to award TransCanada Corp a license to build and operate a multibillion-dollar pipeline to ship natural gas from the North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2e84b1e8-9a4a-4558-ad05-21b517c50fae Alaska governor signs natgas pipeline license bill] Reuters, August 28, 2008, canada.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Intended to improve Alaska's economy, it instead became a vehicle to pay $37 million to Transcanada, with potential liabilities for the state of up to half a billion dollars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/2011/01/20/1659129/lawmakers-express-frustration.html Lawmakers express frustration over gas pipeline subsidies] Cockerham, Sam, January 21, 2011, adn.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The pipeline will not be profitable for 20 years based on natural gas forecasts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/2010/12/22/1616472/report-leaves-pipeline-out-of.html Gas pipeline to be pushed back, federal agency predicts] Bohner, Becky, December 23rd, 2010, adn.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As of February 2011, Alaska's lawmakers were looking for exit strategies from the plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/2011/02/04/1684449/alaska-lawmakers-propose-ditching.html Alaska lawmakers propose ditching Palin gas line program] Bohner, Becky, February 4, 2011, adn.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As governor, Palin created a new subcabinet that develops policies to reduce greenhouse gases and help the state adapt to [[climate change]]. She supports oil production in ANWR, connecting it with national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc Youtube.com interview with Palin posted August 28, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska was not significantly affected by the 2007 [[housing bubble]] crash, however, the dollar did soften, which raised the price of oil in the global market without raising the costs of production. This led to windfall profits for Alaska. Despite oil companies' objections, Palin worked with the [[Democrats]] in the Alaska state legislature to approve a major increase in taxes on the oil industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008103325_alaskatax07.html Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil] Gonzalez, Angel and Hal Bernton, August 10, 2008, The ''Seattle Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This bill, known as &amp;quot;Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share&amp;quot; (ACES), was lampooned by the conservative talk radio media as Alaskans Clearly Entering Socialism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Rydell Radio Program, 650KENI.com, 2/8/2011, 8:43 AM Alaska Standard Time&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.) The state sent Alaskans a $1200 check to help pay for increased gas prices, using the increased revenues from the tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/ Palin backed Alaskan windfalls-profit tax]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin's successor, Governor Sean Parnell, and Republican Alaska legislatures have criticized ACES, stating the taxes have prevented further oil and gas development in the state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/2011/06/04/v-printer/1899655/palin-flaunts-alaska-alaskans.html Palin flaunts Alaska; Alaskans unsure about her] Cockerham, Sean, June 4, 2011, adn.com, retrieved August 20, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also announced on May 21, 2008 that the state would challenge a recent listing of [[polar bears]] as a threatened species as she and other Alaska elected officials feared such a listing would cripple oil and gas development in prime polar bear habitat off the state's northern and northwestern coasts. Palin's belief is that there is not enough evidence to support a listing, asserting that polar bears are well-managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As governor of Alaska in Jan. 2009, Palin announced support for [[Alternative energy]] programs as she proposed a statewide energy plan that called for 50% of Alaska's power to be generated by renewable resources by 2025.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Dan Joling, &amp;quot;Palin unveils state energy goals,&amp;quot; [http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/657216.html ''Anchorage Daily News'' Jan. 16, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has pointed out how environmentalists are responsible for locking up safer drilling areas on dry land, effectively forcing offshore drilling to become the preferred mode of acquiring oil, and inviting crises like the [[Gulf of Mexico oil spill]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nysun.com/editorials/sarah-palins-way-of-thinking/86988/|work=[[The New York Sun]]|format=HTML|title=Sarah Palin’s Way of Thinking|date=June 5th 2010|language=English|quote=Governor Palin’s point will, we predict, become only more logical in the face of the disaster of the Deepwater Horizon. And she will increasingly come to be seen as having a clear way of thinking. She thinks like an economist. She understands that policies have consequences. If one wants, as the environmentalists have been doing for a decade, to restrict onshore drilling, it is going to incent offshore drilling.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Govp_2008stos_large.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gov. Sarah Palin delivering her 2008 State of the State address]] At first, Palin supported the Gravina Island Bridge Project, otherwise known as the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;quot;. In September 2006, during a stop in [[Ketchikan]] as part of her gubernatorial campaign, Palin stated, &amp;quot;OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere,&amp;quot; Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. &amp;quot;I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html Palin touts stance on 'Bridge to Nowhere']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The $398 million bridge would have connected Ketchikan, on Revillagigedo Island in southern southeast Alaska, to its airport on nearby Gravina island. The Anchorage Daily News also quoted her in an October, 2006 article as saying yes, she would continue state funding for the bridge because she wanted swift action on infrastructure projects. &amp;quot;The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist,&amp;quot; she said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere;_ylt=Am.NkRx1mLWk9A34FLhn8IADW7oF Critics: Palin used 'Bridge to Nowhere' for gain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin announced her opposition to the project in a 2007 press release.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has stated her opposition arose because of the excessive amount of pork-barrel spending in the project, and that she would not fund the $329 million that was short for the budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/22/alaska.bridge.ap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This reversal cost her the support of prominent Alaskan Republicans like Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, who said, &amp;quot;You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it&amp;quot;. Palin instead said that the best option would be to upgrade the ferry system. However, the money that was retained from the earmark was not used for the ferry system, but was spent building a road on Gravina Island that links to the site of the canceled bridge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901 Palin &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; line angers many Alaskans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent Alaskan politicians criticized Palin for not &amp;quot;giving back&amp;quot; money earmarked for the project. These critics included her Republican campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, who stated that &amp;quot;She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, state governments do not &amp;quot;give back&amp;quot; money in the manner proposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three times during Palin's time as mayor, earmark funding for projects in Wasilla were noted in [[John McCain]]'s list of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; spending in 2001 and 2002. McCain's list of spending approved without normal budget scrutiny identified a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in the city and a $1 million earmark for an emergency communications center while $450,000 was set aside for an agricultural processing facility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,6145252.story McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin, of course, as mayor of a small town had no ability to put these items in a Congressional bill, but her town did benefit from earmarked spending given to Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foreign Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ftwainwright_govp_05s.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Governor Sarah Palin visits Strykers at Fort Wainwright, where she is briefed on how the troops are trained and what the training grounds provide.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Palin served as Commander in Chief of the Alaska Army [[National Guard]]. In 2007 she visited troops in [[Germany]] and [[Kuwait]]. According to Major General Craig E. Campbell, the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard who commands the roughly 3,800 state militia members, the Alaskan governor is not in the site's chain of command and has no authority over its operations. He told the Associated Press on August 31st that he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. He went on to state that the entire operation is under federal control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/31/ap/politics/main4401854.shtml GOP Cites Palin's Skill, But How Relevant Is It?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her first major interview, with ABC's [[Charlie Gibson]], Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the &amp;quot;[[Bush Doctrine]]&amp;quot;. Palin responded, &amp;quot;In what respect, Charlie?&amp;quot; Gibson followed, &amp;quot;What do you interpret it to be?&amp;quot; Palin answered with another question, &amp;quot;His world view?&amp;quot; Gibson still refused to answer directly but instead stated it was the doctrine Bush had proposed in September of 2002, before the Iraq war. Palin gave a response concerning Bush's attempt to eradicate Islamic extremism. Gibson then explained that the Bush doctrine refers to the right of anticipatory defense, a right to a [[Preemptive war|preemptive]] strike against any country that we think is going to attack us. What Gibson did not point out is that he himself once gave a definition of the &amp;quot;Bush doctrine&amp;quot; (a concept made up by the press that has no clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislature Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
On July 11th Palin's chief of Staff fired Commissioner of Public Safety Walt Monegan, she was heavily criticized for the action on the 12th in the state newspapers and on the 14th in the conservative talk radio media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Rydell, Mike Porcaro, and Eddy Burke, as well as Shannyn Moore the liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and on the Blog of prominent Alaskan Republican Andrew Halcro on the 17th, because Walt Monegan was a very popular administrator. The outrage was 1.5 months before she was announced for VP. On the 11th of August of 2008, the [[Alaska]] state legislature began an investigation of Palin and her staff for potential abuse of power in regards to a firing of  Monegan, The vote to begin this action was held on July 28th, two weeks and two days after the firing. Legally, Palin could dismiss Monegan at any time as he serves at the pleasure of the governor. Monegan was dismissed from his position in July of 2008, which Palin's political opponents claim was due to Monegan's refusal to fire trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's former brother-in-law who had a history of complaints including tasering his 10 year old stepson.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168861.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin says she released Monegan due to differences on budgeting. In an interview Monegan said that he was never told specifically by Sarah Palin to fire the state trooper Mike Wooten.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has denied the charges and, as is customary, the State of Alaska has hired a lawyer to represent her office in the investigation. August 25th, the Legislative Council voted 12-0 to hire Democratic state senator Hollis French as the investigator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=59d_1220063478 Investigation into Governor Sarah Palin's abuse of powers] CBS 11, August 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 and the House Judiciary Committee voted 7-0. The State's attorney released this statement:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cvn_palin_troopergate Palin hires attorney for Troopergate investigation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The governor of every state gets legal counsel and this attorney is part of a weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges. This legal defense is neither new nor uncommon nor at all political. It is a matter of her job and is not recent and it is not related to her selection on the McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The McCain campaign came out with a picture that includes three lead state Democratic legislators investigating the Branchflower probe, known as ‘Troopergate'. The photo shows the three of them at [[Obama]] headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska in July. The photo did not include any of the Republicans also calling for investigation. The McCain campaign said the whole investigation is politically tainted and compromised. Republican Rep. John Coghill of North Pole called on managing investigator, legislator French to step down from the probe, saying he no longer had confidence in his objectivity. &amp;quot;These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed,” Coghill wrote in a letter calling for French’s replacement. “The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078644/posts McCain Camp has pictures of &amp;quot;troopergate&amp;quot; investigators at Obama Headquarters] FreeRepublic.com, September 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democratic State Senator Kim Elton, head of the legislative council overseeing the investigation, said the decisions made by Sen. Hollis French &amp;quot;have been appropriate, bipartisan ... and unchallenged&amp;quot; and that French has called the comments he made last week &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/08/palin.investigation/ Head of Palin trooper probe will stay, lawmaker says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lawyer Thomas Van Flein called the investigation &amp;quot;unlawful and unconstitutional&amp;quot; and said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he is a friend of the fired commissioner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/522488.html Palin's attorney calls investigator biased] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investigation issued its report for the Alaska State Legislative Council on October 10, 2008, concluding that Monegan's refusal to fire the trooper was not the sole reason he was dismissed, but was likely a contributing factor. The author of the report, Stephen Branchflower, focused on two questions of the inquiry:  did Palin fire Walt Monegan improperly, and was the firing solely because of his refusal to fire her ex brother-in-law. &amp;quot;Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Based on this, Branchflower claims that &amp;quot;I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/DOWNLOAD.pdf Page 8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the second question the report focused on, Branchflower wrote, &amp;quot;I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote. The second finding of the report reads: &amp;quot;In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.&amp;quot;  Branchflower also dismissed the Palins' assertions that they were afraid of Wooten because of threats they said he made. &amp;quot;Such claims of fear were not bona fide and were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons,&amp;quot; he wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10692757?source=most_viewed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A preemptive response to this report was issued by the McCain/Palin campaign on October 9th, in which the campaign's own investigation concluded that Palin &amp;quot;acted within her proper and lawful authority in the reassignment of Walt Monegan&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end the &amp;quot;October Surprise&amp;quot; predicted by the head of the commission came to pass. Although the commission was asked not to release its findings until after the election to avoid political posturing, they refused to do so. Apart from tarring and feathering Palin, the report made no recommendations for any further inquiries or punishment, as it was understood that there was no case to do so. No direct reports of Sarah Palin abusing her power were ever produced or asking for the official to be fired were ever produced, but that didn't stop the report from drawing its conclusions based upon conjecture without evidence. Indeed, after the hoopla over the report subsided, the state personnel board released its finding that exonerated her of any wrongdoing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_el_pr/palin_troopergate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Resignation===&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2009, Governor Palin held a national press conference to announce that she would resign her office effective July 26, 2009. She explained:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|My choice is to take a stand and effect change – not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities – and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php Executive Column: Palin's resignation announcement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That decision was based on the Democrat strategy of filing frivolous court grievances against the governor, more than 13 since November 2008, costing Alaska taxpayers over $1 million. She would be triumphant in all those legal battles not losing once. The [[liberal]] criticism strategy shifted to call her a quitter over her decision not to complete her term of office and for pursuing media and financial opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice Presidential Candidate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin Family..jpg|thumb|right|Palin family members at the announcement of Palin's vice presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol, and Trig.]]&lt;br /&gt;
On August 29, 2008, Republican John McCain announced the selection of Sarah Palin for his vice presidential running mate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/sarah_palin_vp/2008/08/29/126138.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The selection was a surprise, as those in the media were expecting [[Minnesota]] Governor [[Tim Pawlenty]] or former [[Massachusetts]]'s Governor [[Mitt Romney]]. Palin added youth and executive experience to the ticket. She is the first female vice presidential candidate on a Republican ticket, and only the second one from a major political party in U.S. history. [[Democrat]] [[Geraldine Ferraro]] was the first, as [[Walter Mondale]]'s running mate in 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's speech before the Republican convention on Wednesday, September 3rd was watched by over 40 million people. As many people watched her as watched Obama's acceptance speech on the final day of the Democratic convention.&lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat Responses===&lt;br /&gt;
In a possible problem for the Democratic ticket, a majority of people believed that the press was trying to hurt Palin&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/story/rasmussen/20080904/pl_rasmussen/palinmedia20080904;_ylt=AqErk__wZIKdoVvqUXdr44Nh24cA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that type of unwarranted attack could have backfired into more support for the McCain/Palin ticket especially with unaffiliated voters believing the press is purposely attacking Palin by a 49% to 32% margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats had advised the Obama campaign to ignore Palin, fearing that emphasis on her inexperience will backfire against Obama himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/capital/2008/09/05/tips-for-obama-ignore-palin-dis-mccain  Matt Coopoer, &amp;quot;Tips for Obama: Ignore Palin, Dis McCain,&amp;quot; Sept. 5, 2008, ''Conde-Nast Portfoloio.com'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She participated in a debate with the Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on October 2, 2008, ending up being declared the winner by most credible news sources that are not  influenced by liberal bias. Palin &amp;quot;kept Joe Biden on the defensive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ended up dominating [the debate]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14234.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Barack Obama said of the McCain/Palin ticket's similar policies, &amp;quot;...You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94481288&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given the fact that she's stated &amp;quot;The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull (is) lipstick&amp;quot; and the fact that only a female candidate would wear lipstick, the McCain camp released a web ad implying that the comment was targeting Governor Palin. The ad featured video clips of Gov. Palin convention speech, Obama's remarks at the campaign event, and a clip of Katie Couric commenting on pervasive sexism in the campaign. After extensive discussion in the news media, the ad was removed from McCain's website and other video sites following a copyright claim by CBS news.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/CBS_takes_down_McCain_webad_suggests_its_misleading.html?showall]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what prosecutors described as an attempt to derail the campaign, Palin's private email account was hacked by a liberal activist and son of a Democratic lawmaker who was charged with four felonies carrying a maximum of 50 years for criminal privacy rights violations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/18/palin_email_investigation_continues/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The offender, a self described Obama supporter, was convicted and sentenced to one year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin is a lightning rod to the established [[liberal]] women's movement. She, like many high profile conservative females, has taken much abuse from the left. Palin has been forced to set up a legal defense fund to help pay for fees related to an onslaught of ethic complaints, which are always frivolous.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18738 Palin blasts Obama administration: Government wants to &amp;quot;control the people&amp;quot;] CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Because she is retiring from being governor of Alaska, the anti-American liberals pat themselves on the back in glee. Liberals still fail to understand that she is ''the'' typical conservative that the majority of Americans identify with. Her principles and her outlook on Americanism is a model for all future leaders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin said of the people who have filed the complaints:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| '''Those are the folks who want to tell me, they want to tell you, to sit down and shut up. We will not do that. I just can't, because I love my state. I love my country.''' }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on Ticket===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the run-up to the Vice-Presidential debate on October 2, 2008, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center attempted to measure the degree to which Palin impacted the GOP ticket positively or negatively in September.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/456/obama-regains-lead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The survey compared the answers to two identical questions about her qualifications and overall favorable/unfavorable rating between polls taken in early and late September. The results show that public opinion of Palin has fallen significantly since the Republican convention, particularly in the public's opinion of her qualification to be Vice President. Faced with a barrage of negative press attacks after her nomination, some prominent Republicans like [[Mitt Romney]] believe that the isolation of Palin from the media in September was a mistake, and are calling for an increase in unscripted encounters with the press and public to counter that perception. According to Romney, &amp;quot;Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake. I think they’d be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/30/doubts-about-palin-grow-even-among-conservatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Exit polling from the election itself had the final say on the matter of her impact on the ticket. For those who considered her nomination on the ticket to be unimportant, 57% voted for Obama. For those who considered her nomination to be important, 53% voted for Obama, thereby showing a positive overall impact on the ticket. Considering that exit polling tilts Democratic, the actual impact may have been greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When asked during an interview with liberal media pundit Katie Couric what newspapers and magazines Palin read (a classic [[Liberal trap]]), Palin fumbled and was unable to name any particular news source because of the side-swipe. This added fuel to charges that she was not qualified to run for Vice President, when in fact she was clearly qualified by her service as governor. Palin charges back at Couric and other liberal media attacks in her book [[Going Rogue]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Palin in 2012==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has the support of a large, enthusiastic base on the right that is ready to work for her in Republican primaries. She has been coy about announcing plans for 2012, but she is well positioned for a presidential run. Given her personal charisma, dedication to American values, and Reagan-esque connection with average, conservative Americans, she may be able to pull off a resounding victory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.capitalcityweekly.com/stories/120308/new_363163237.shtml Sarah Palin hits Republican talking points while stumping in Georgia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relaunching of Media Attacks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's is under global attack from left wing media.  In June 2011 Palin expressed a desire to meet with Margaret Thatcher, one of Ronald Reagan's staunchest international allies.  There was a false report by the UK Guardian Newspaper that a Thatcher aid had belittled Palin calling her nuts: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/wintour-and-watt/2011/jun/07/margaretthatcher-sarahpalin].  However this was later proven to be false, as Margaret Thatcher's staff denied that any such words came from her office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100092054/margaret-thatcher-did-not-‘snub’-sarah-palin-the-truth-about-the-iron-lady-and-the-former-governor-of-alaska/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A former Thatcher Aid who checked with her office confirmed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''&amp;quot;There was never any snub of Sarah Palin by Lady Thatcher’s office. However, there has been a great deal of mischief-making and unpleasantness from sections of the liberal press in a vain and futile attempt to use Margaret Thatcher’s name to smear a major US politician.&amp;quot;'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Guardian has a dedicated section to Sarah Palin, and participated with staff going to Alaska for the release of her emails and the enlisting of its readership to try and find any dirt.  The Guardian starts most articles with simple errors such as &amp;quot;Ex Governor of the state with the smallest population &amp;quot;, a basic check would show that there are a number of states with smaller populations than Alaska including Vermont the source of 2 presidents. This is a small sample of the false information in all Guardian articles on Sarah Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SarahPAC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, 2009 Palin formed the political action committee (PAC) SarahPAC. The organization supports &amp;quot;energy independence and reform&amp;quot; and will endorse candidates who &amp;quot;share Governor Palin’s ideas and goals.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=azCCxotgdG1E&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Palin believes in [[Real America]] and has referred to it often in her speeches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin filled out a policy questionnaire for the Eagle Forum Alaska during her 2006 gubernatorial race. One question asked, &amp;quot;Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?&amp;quot;  Palin responded, &amp;quot;Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.&amp;quot;  Yet [[public schools]] still resist teaching abstinence and instead promote sexual behavior by teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question asked, &amp;quot;Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the [[Pledge of Allegiance]]? Why or why not?&amp;quot;  Palin replied, &amp;quot;Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the Founding Fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many liberals ignorant of the history of &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an &amp;quot;idiot&amp;quot; for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and George Washington's phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; was added to it in June 1954.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, the origin of the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; is the General Orders of [[George Washington]] on July 2 and 9, 1776: &amp;quot;The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army&amp;quot; (July 2); &amp;quot;the peace and safety of the Country now depends, under God, solely on the success of our arms&amp;quot; (July 9).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George Washington was indeed a [[Founding Father]], and the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the [[Declaration of Independence]] and later writings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also believes that students need to learn of the controversy surrounding the [[Theory of evolution|Theory of evolution]], and that discussing Creationism should not be banned from schools. During the 2006 campaign for the Alaskan Governorship, Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, &amp;quot;Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She later clarified her position by stating &amp;quot;I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&amp;quot;  She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum. As of September 2008 she has kept that pledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an example of liberal mockery, the [[Huffington Post]] attempted to make light of Sarah Palin's creationist beliefs, highlighting the creationism belief that [[dinosaur|dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Saturday Night Live]] likewise did a skit in which they had her refer to the Museum of Natural History as &amp;quot;that evolution museum&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Church Life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin was baptized as a [[Roman Catholic]] and, at age 12, she was rebaptized in the Wasilla Assembly of God church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccainveepbio30-2008aug30,0,2159346.story&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Palin has risen quickly from PTA to VP pick&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Decker, Cathleen and Michael Finnegan,&lt;br /&gt;
|work=Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
|date=August 30, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
| last = Gorsk| first = Eric&lt;br /&gt;
| url = http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g4-w_DCWffagBaQb8Il9a0R2hkPAD92SL7E00&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Evangelicals energized by McCain-Palin ticket&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher =Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
| date = 2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
| accessdate = 2008-08-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin attends the Wasilla Bible Church&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |first=David |last=Pepper |title=Regarding Governor Palin: A Letter from Pastor David Pepper |url=http://churchontherockak.org/Regarding-Sarah-Palin.html |publisher=Church on the Rock |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, an independent congregation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wasillabible.org/faq.htm |title=Wasilla Bible Church FAQ |accessdate=2008-09-05 |work= |publisher= |date= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;miller&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lisa Miller and Amanda Coyne. &amp;quot;[http://www.newsweek.com/id/156679 A Visit to Palin's Church: Scripture and discretion on the program in Wasilla].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. Sept. 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when at home and attended the Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau as governor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Statement Concerning Sarah Palin |url=http://www.jccalaska.com/images/10000/3000/582JU/user/palin.htm |publisher=Juneau Christian Center |date=2008-09-03 |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December of 2008, Palin's church was severely damaged by arson. Damage to the Wasilla Bible Church was estimated at $1 million, authorities said. No one was injured in the fire, which was set Friday night while a handful of people, including two children, were inside. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/13/AR2008121302503.html Palin's Church Severely Damaged by Arson, WaPo, December 14, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is widely believed that leftist Palin-haters were responsible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin earned the highest TV ratings at the Republican convention when she spoke, even surpassing McCain's acceptance speech, and nearly matched Obama's acceptance speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/palin-triggers-rnc-ratings-spike/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, gaining unprecedented attention. Likewise her Vice Presidential debate with [[Joe Biden]] had more viewers than any of the three debates between McCain and Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, her brief appearance on Saturday Night Live in October 2008 gave the show its highest ratings in 14 years, and was actually the third highest ranked show for the week based on the number of people who tuned in originally to watch her, 17 million, even though it ran at midnight in the East Coast Market.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/20/ustelevision-tvratings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Palin's Alaska''' her reality show on The Learning Channel (TLC) drew about 2.5 million viewers on premier Sunday night, dominating its time slot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/12/25/sunday-1219-cable-ratings-sarah-palins-alaska-top-gear-ax-men-leverage-kendra-real-housewives-more/76555&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and breaking TLC records with 5 million viewers having tuned in to watch the first episode.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/15/sarah-palins-alaska-ratings-tlc_n_783740.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Media Disdain==&lt;br /&gt;
Since day one of her nomination as vice president, the [[mainstream media | liberal media]] has sought to demonize Palin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/07/23/crucify-her-crucify-her-journalists-targeted-sarah-palin-in-non-official-campaign/ Crucify Her! Crucify Her! Journalists Targeted Sarah Palin in Non-Official campaign, Newsrealblog, July 23, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former CBS anchor Katie Couric won a journalism award for her involvement in embarrassing Palin with questions related to sources she reads. This is the same media that passes on Obama's gaffes such as Obama's uncle liberated Auschwitz, a tornado in [[Kansas]] killed 10,000 people, his visit to the 57 states of America. Not much has changed in 3-years since becoming the VP nominee. Palin toured the country by bus and [[liberal]]s became infuriated while trying to cover her every move. They went as far as accusing her of causing a &amp;quot;rolling menace&amp;quot; in traffic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2011/06/05/politico-warns-palin-bus-tour-rolling-menace-traffic Politico Warns Palin Bus Tour Is a 'Rolling Menace' in Traffic, Newsbusters.org, June 5, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mainstream journalists have been repeating the lie by calling former Alaska governor Sarah Palin an idiot. Ailes marveled at the frenzy surrounding her tour of historic sites: “She’s so smart she’s got the press corps running up the whole East Coast behind her bus.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''The Undefeated'' movie==&lt;br /&gt;
A nearly two-hour long film titled ''The Undefeated'' portrays Palin's time as Alaska's governor was released in July 2011. Conservative filmmaker Stephen K. Bannon created the film. Palin had no editorial role in the film. She reportedly saw a rough cut of the film and was blown away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/164781-palin-on-the-big-screen Palin on the big screen, The Hill, June 5, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Publications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Palin Book2.jpg|right|125px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''[[Going Rogue: An American Life]]''''', [[Memoir]], published by Harper-Collins:(November 2009) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2009/10/01/amazing-palin%E2%80%99s-book-number-one-on-both-amazon-and-barnes-unprecedented/ Amazing: Palin’s book number one on both Amazon and Barnes &amp;amp; Noble bestseller list, Audacity of Hypocrisy, October 1, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rush Limbaugh. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125120.guest.html Rush Interviews Governor Sarah Palin], ''RushLimbaugh.com'', November 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Shaffer. [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/17/ap-turns-heads-devoting-reporters-palin-book-fact-check/ AP Turns Heads for Devoting 11 Reporters to Palin Book 'Fact Check'], ''FOXNews.com'', November 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  was a record-breaking bestseller. It was the #1 bestseller in its first week&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/25/going-rogue-goes-to-top-of-book-sales-chart/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a million copies had sold by the end of the second week.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/01/print/main5851137.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sales for the year topped two and a half million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/01/print/main5851137.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin pledged to donate royalties from books sold during the day she visited Ft. Hood to families of victims of the Nov. 6, 2009 massacre, estimated to be about $10,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kxxv.com/story/11625002/palins-fort-hood-visit-fun-for-troops?redirected=true&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;I'm joining the efforts of many others by donating my royalties from the book sales during our stop at Fort Hood to the families of the victims whose lives have been forever changed by the tragic events.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2390058/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''&amp;quot;America by Heart; Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag&amp;quot;''''', Harper-Collins, November 2010.  &amp;quot;Palin delivers an intimate and personal look at the woman behind the public servant. In her #1 New York Times bestselling memoir Going Rogue—the bestselling nonfiction book of 2009—Palin gave readers a look at her upbringing, her dynamic career, and her candidacy next to John McCain for the Vice Presidency of the United States. In this inspirational follow-up, her reflections on faith, family, and patriotism will read like a bible of American virtues for anyone hoping to understand the truths that lie at the heart of the nation.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.harpercollins.com/books/America-Heart-Sarah-Palin/?isbn=9780062010964?AA=index_authorIntro_36341 America by Heart; Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag - Harper Collins Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=27200 Project Vote Smart - Governor Sarah H. Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm Sarah Palin On the issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://parentingfreedom.com/2008/09/03/sarah-palin-mother-and-first-female-vice-president-pictures-children-parenting/ Sarah Palin: Mother and First Female Vice President], ''Parenting Freedom'', September 03, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=&amp;amp;w=MA== I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/256099/i-hate-you-bristol-palin-david-kahane?page=1 I Hate You, Bristol Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/05/28/tantaros-schultz-ingraham-affair-hatred-towards-conservative-women-la Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Palin, Sarah}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Mayors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Heroism&amp;diff=985212</id>
		<title>American Heroism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Heroism&amp;diff=985212"/>
		<updated>2012-06-09T15:42:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: adulterer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''American heroes''' are men who represent American values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heroes==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joe Arpaio]] AKA Americas Toughest Sheriff.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Buzz Aldrin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Ashbrook]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Ashcroft]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glenn Beck]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Breitbart]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pat Buchanan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William F. Buckley, Jr.]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Claire Chennault]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dick Cheney]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Douglass]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barry Goldwater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sean Hannity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Herbert Hoover]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mike Huckabee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jack Kemp]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert E. Lee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rush Limbaugh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abraham Lincoln]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Lindbergh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chuck Norris]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bill O'Reilly]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Patton]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rick Perry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pat Robertson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Rove]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Rumsfeld]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rick Santorum]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Savage]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Aschlafly|Andrew Schlafly]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Wayne]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heroines==&lt;br /&gt;
American heroines are women who exemplify American values while maintaining their traditional role in the home.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sharron Angle]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michele Bachmann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anita Bryant]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Megyn Kelly]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michelle Malkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christine O'Donnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States of America]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981277</id>
		<title>Mitt Romney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981277"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T21:10:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Willard Mitt Romney&lt;br /&gt;
|image=MittPortrait.jpg‎&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Ann Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January&amp;amp;nbsp;2, 2003 – January&amp;amp;nbsp;4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Jane Swift]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Deval Patrick]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Willard Mitt Romney''' (born March 12, 1947) is a [[RINO]], former governor of [[Massachusetts]] and a successful U.S. businessman, currently the presumptive [[2012 Republican Primary|presumptive Republican nominee]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].  He was first runner-up for the nomination in 2008. If elected, Romney would become the first [[Mormon]] president. His father [[George Romney]], a former governor of Michigan, ran for the Republican nomination for president in 1968. Mitt Romney challenged incumbent Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] of Massachusetts in 1994 for his seat, but lost by 58-41 percent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/romney/ Romney to the Rescue: Mitt Romney's Got the Right Stuff for 2008] Kessler, Ronald, newsmax.com archives, retrieved April 27, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before entering politics Romney was a businessman in Boston, having served as CEO of Bain &amp;amp; Company, a management consulting firm known for outsourcing American jobs. His political start began during the financially unsteady 2002 Winter Olympics. He gained popularity in Massachusetts, a state known for being extremely liberal, and was elected governor in 2002. As governor he raised taxes several times.  He unashamedly admits creating [[RomneyCare]], which is a complete disaster and forces everyone to buy health insurance and has resulted in long delays for obtaining medical services, such as an ordinary physical, in that state.  [[Ted Kennedy]] and other [[liberals]] supported the bill and probably wrote key parts of it.  Romney declined to run for reelection and announced his candidacy for President.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, Romney was widely but incorrectly supported as a staunch conservative and ran on his business experience in the private sector. Romney fought a rough battle against Senator [[John McCain]] in Florida, Michigan, and other key states, but large losses on the Super Tuesday primaries ended his campaign. Romney dropped out of the race and endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] on February 14, 2008. His name was circulated as a potential running mate for McCain as their relationship improved, though [[Sarah Palin]] eventually became the vice-president nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney has supported many far left positions: Romney has a pro-abortion record and favors big corporations; Romney also continues to believe in liberal propaganda claiming global warming; Romney has been criticized for standing behind his 2005 [[RomneyCare|health care plan in Massachusetts]], which featured a mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance as well as taxpayer-funded abortion. This plan is very similar to the 2010 ObamaCare bill that was adopted on a national level, and may have been the basis for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of criticism of Romney by the mainstream media suggests that they want him to win so that they can defeat him in the general election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flip Flopping==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney's inconsistent track record on issues such as abortion and gay marriage has gotten to the point where he has gotten the nickname '''Multiple Choice Mitt.''' A man dressed as a dolphin calling himself Flipper has appeared at some recent conservative gatherings to bring attention to Romney's inconsistent stands on abortion and gay marriage. Although Romney now identifies himself as pro-life and anti-same sex marriage, he claimed to be pro choice and supported same-sex rights as late as 2002. These swaps coupled with his Mormon affiliation puts him at odds with much of the Evangelical right, but a PollingReport.com chart from September 2007 indicates that Mitt was still polling at approximately 10% within the GOP primary forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney also changed his positions on gun control. He was originally for it, but recently joined the National Rifle Association, an organization opposed to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Following the split of the first three major elections in the 2008 primaries, Ron Kaufman, a top adviser to Romney, stated that the battle between the top three candidates &amp;quot;is going to be like the Bataan Death March.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bataan Death March resulted in the death of approximately 9,000 prisoners of war during World War II, and has been labeled as a war crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MittRomneyYouth05.jpg|thumb|Ann Lois Davies and Willard Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the scion of an old Mormon family. His grandparents were polygamists who fled the United States in the early 20th century when the Mormon Church repudiated polygamy; his father was born in Mexico. The Romneys returned to the U.S. in 1911 when a violent civil war broke out in Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney is a devout member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints]], and spent time as a missionary during his youth converting Catholics and agnostics to Mormonism in France. In fact, his time as a student and missionary helped him defer from military service during the Vietnam draft,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Kranish, &amp;quot;The Making of Mitt Romney: Mormon church obtained Vietnam draft deferrals for Romney, other missionaries&amp;quot; June 24, 2007. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but he stated during interviews that &amp;quot;he had longed to join the soldiers in Vietnam and support the war effort.&amp;quot; His father had stated in 1967 that he felt &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by U.S. officials over the justification of the prolonged Vietnam war. This statement had been very costly in George Romney's 1968 campaign for president against Richard Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to maintains a stable marriage with his wife Ann, with whom he has five children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the son of former [[Michigan]] governor and presidential candidate [[George Romney]], a &amp;quot;Rockefeller Republican,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisa McGirr, ''Suburban Warriors''(2001) pp. 141, 222.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who amassed a large fortune as an automobile industry magnate during World War II. &amp;lt;!-- Unusual statement. What exactly is the reason for introducing it as Mass. Republicans? Is there a significance to this? Many Massachusetts Republicans do not connect the father's politics with the son's, much like Presidents [[George H. W. Bush|George Herbert Walker Bush]] and [[George W. Bush|George Walker Bush]].--&amp;gt; George Romney was popular among moderates during his presidential run and was well-equipped for victory; many of his political advisors had come from [[Nelson Rockefeller]]'s 1964 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business Career==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1978 to 1984, Romney was a vice president of Bain &amp;amp; Company, Inc. a worldwide management consulting firm, and in 1984, Romney co-founded a spin-off called Bain Capital. He invested in or bought many well-known companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino's, Sealy Corporation and Sports Authority.  Critics say he advised corporations to cut their U.S. taxes by reincorporating in Caribbean tax havens such as the Caymen Islands, while maintaining their operations in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney served as governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), with a generally [[conservative]] record that included economic expansion. He balanced the budget every year of his administration with out increasing taxes or increasing state dept. Romney turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $500 million surplus by reducing government spending and added 80,000 new jobs by the end of his term. In 2004, 2005, and 2006 Governor Romney proposed cutting the state income tax from 5.3% to 5.0% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/08/mitt_romneys_record_on_economi.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Although the Democratic super majority in the state legislator refused to budge. Romney vetoed 844 pieces of legislation, with over 700 overridden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Mitt_Romney_Government_Reform.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, saying &amp;quot;there's no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 08/01/06&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Governor Romney the state abolished a retroactive capital gains tax that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay additional taxes and fees. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansformitt.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Massachusetts Citizens For Limited Taxation Executive Director Barbara Anderson praised Romney, saying &amp;quot;There was no one else out on the horizon and with the legislature almost entirely Democratic, we felt it was necessary to have a grown-up in the corner office. … And we were right to back him. He's been a really good friend to the taxpayers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some of the actions Governor Romney took received criticisms from conservatives, such as supporting moderate fee increases and creating and the nation's first universal [[health care]] program. During his 2002 gubernatorial campaign Romney supported [[abortion]], his views evolved and would later take [[pro-life]] positions such as vetoing emergency contraception and vetoing [[stem-cell research]] that would allow cloning of human embryos. In 2006, Governor Romney testified before the [[United States]] [[Senate]] to support the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would limit marriage to one man and one woman. Additionally, Romney filed legislation to reinstate [[capital punishment]], but was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a 99-53 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney made no pardons as governor, &amp;quot;My conclusion was, if somebody has been convicted by a jury of their peers, and they’ve been prosecuted and the police were able to get the evidence necessary to put them behind bars, why in the world would I step in and reverse that sentence?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/04/romney-on-huckabee-unlike-some-people-i-never-pardoned-anyone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[Education]] Romney called for the privatization of the University of Massachusetts medical school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 02/27/03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In 2004, he established the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program, which rewarded the top 25 percent of Massachusetts high school students with tuition-free scholarship to any Massachusetts public [[university]] or [[college]]. In August 2006, Governor Romney refused to allow former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, an outspoken opponent of the [[United States]] and [[Israel]], state police escorts during his speech at [[Harvard University]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/editorials/khatemi-at-harvard/38903/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2006, Romney signed a memorandum of agreement with the federal government that would allow state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=96543&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however was revoked when Democrat Deval Patrict took office as Governor in January 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Romney claims to be pro-life, but his record is very spotty.  At times he has claimed to be pro-infantacide.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am [[pro-life]]. I believe that [[abortion]] is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by [[judicial mandate]].&amp;quot; ([[Boston]] Globe, Mitt Romney Editorial, July 26, 2005) &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Values America's Culture and Values] mittromney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having a largely pro-life record as governor, in a 1994 debate with Senator [[Edward Kennedy]], Romney said that abortion should be legal, declaring that &amp;quot;regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion&amp;quot;, Romney said. &amp;quot;It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his campaign literature for the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Romney expressed a willingness to defend that State's pro-choice status quo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He stated in a live, televised debate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I've been very clear on that, I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil Unions===&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to be opposed to the idea of [[gay marriage]], however he has voiced explicit support for the [[homosexual agenda]]. He has advocated for domestic partnership benefits and equal rights for [[homosexuals]], which is gay marriage in everything but name and an easy stepping stone on the vile gay agenda path towards homosexual recruitment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  He also supports adoption for gay couples&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Romney promised to pursue a conservative, pro-growth economic agenda. His number one economic priority would be to grow the economy — helping to create good jobs, raise incomes and preserve American strength. He says he would work to rein in excessive government spending and reform entitlements. To ensure America's continued economic growth, he promises to cut taxes — such as the Death Tax, savings taxes, corporate taxes and marginal tax rates. Despite these claims, he has supported the [[socialist|socialism]] agenda.  He claimed credit for the government bailout of the union controlled car companies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/07/romney-taking-credit-for-auto-industry-success/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Also his [[RomneyCare]] law started the process of [[socialism|socializing]] medical care in [[Massachusetts]]. He continues to defend this law up to this day, undermining his commitment to repel the similar and equally atrocious  [[ObamaCare]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/romney-defends-romneycare_560953.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney says he would also promote trade, bring market forces to bear in health care, pursue national tort and liability reform, eliminate excessive regulations that put a burden on our economy and strengthen American families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Immigration has been an important part of our nation's success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney supports a strong stance on illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=91722 IowaPolitics.com: Romney Touts Strong Stance On Illegal Immigration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 5/24/07, Romney spoke about how he was tolerant about gays and then he discussed the current illegal immigration bill before Congress:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;He expressed less tolerance for illegal immigrants, and said he and President Bush have a difference of opinions on a bill that would provide a path toward legalization for an estimated 12 million people unlawfully in the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has his view, and other people have their views and I have my own,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;This is for all intents and purposes a form of amnesty in that everyone who is here illegally today will be able to stay under this bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill is unfair to people who are trying to come to the country legally, he said. People here illegally should be able to apply to come to the United States, but under the same terms as everyone else and behind those who have already applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I don't think that we're going to round up 11 or 12 or however many million people and bus them out of the country. That's not what I'm talking about,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;Those who committed felonies, of course, would be deported. Those who require government assistance to stay here would surely need to get off government assistance and ultimately could not remain here on government assistance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,RomneyGays,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stem Cell Research===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney supports the right of scientists to research on embryos created during fertility treatments, which is essentially infantacide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Mitt Romney 2008 Presidential Campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dude and mitt romney.jpg|right|180px]] As chairman of the [[Republican Governors Association]], Romney campaigned nationwide for GOP gubernatorial candidates in 2006, building up a network of allies and supporters. While he did not run for reelection as governor, in 2004 Romney set up a federal political action committee (PAC) called the Commonwealth PAC, which raised $2.71 million during the 2006 election cycle. On January 3, 2007, his next-to-last day in office as governor of Massachusetts, Romney filed to form a presidential exploratory committee with the Federal Election Commission. He officially announced his candidacy for President a month later. Romney was the first candidate in either party to start running television and radio ads. The ads focused mainly on his record as governor, running the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, and his work as a very successful businessman. Romney's five sons had been actively campaigning for their father, traveling around in a campaign bus called the &amp;quot;Mitt Mobile, A Five Brothers Bus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a presidential candidate Romney sought the support of the business community and social conservatives.  He reversed moderate positions on abortion and gay rights to take a hardline conservative position on them, and on opposition to illegal immigrants. Opponents charged he changed too often. Romney was a leader in fund-raising, augmented by over $35 million from his own fortune. However he was little known outside of Massachusetts, so his strategy was to play for early wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, then &amp;quot;sling-shot&amp;quot; the momentum into national visibility.  Romney won the Michigan primary on January 16th, 2008, with 39% of the vote, edging out McCain with 30% and Huckabee with 16%.  Romney was favored to win in the state of his birth, where his father, [[George Romney]] was governor from 1963-1969.  After losing both the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary (to Huckabee and McCain, respectively), Romney won a low-publicized Wyoming caucus. On January 19, Romney easily won the [[Nevada]] caucuses by 37 percentage points when there were seven candidates on the ballot, however, on that same day he placed a distant fourth in the [[South Carolina]] primary. After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Romney announced the suspension of his campaign on Thursday 7th February.  He expressed his wishes not to divide the Republican party and later endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] of [[Arizona]]. Commentators correctly speculated on his chances for a return effort in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fundraising===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney had done well in fund raising. During his first fund raiser as a presidential candidate, he raised $6.5 million dollars compared to an original goal of only $1 million. During the first quarter Romney raised more money then any other Republican presidential candidate with $23 million. However, a substantial portion of his funds ($17 million) came from his own personal wealth. [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/16/top_spender_romney_could_soon_run_short/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mittromney.com Mitt Romney for President 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldslivingonline.com/article.php?articleId=17633 Mitt Romney: proudly, quietly Mormon]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/ Evangelicals for Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2007/03/fresh-mitt-romney-juvenalia-hot-off.html Fresh Mitt Romney Juvenalia] Pics - Comments.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjE4MmMyMzVkZjlhZGQzNzlhZjdmMDEzNjI3MzM4ZTA= Mitt Romney: “I Changed My View. Is that So Difficult to Understand?”] The candidate talks about his efforts to convince voters that his pro-life conversion is real. Byron York, National Review Online, November 20, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2ZkMWNkZDkzOTk1YTM0NTNkNmJlZThmYjJmM2ZmOGE= Did Mitt Romney Push Poll Himself?] Mark Hemingway, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2EzODZjY2UxZTRhMWE2ZDk1ZWE5MGI0ZmRjMDViZTI= Team Romney on Push-Poll Connections] After reading the Hemingway piece, Kevin Madden, Romney for President campaign spokesman replies. Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzliMDgzOWVlOGEwYThlMzc5ZDVlNzM2YjA4M2ZkYTg= Romney Stands for Faith] The candidate pushes back against push-poll attacks. Larry Kudlow, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ4YmM4Y2U3Yjc3MzYzNDQwYzk3YTVjMTI5YTkwNzg= Romney’s Religion], The Editors, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blogs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/ My Man Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://libertariansformitt.wordpress.com/ Libertarians for Romney]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romney, Mitt}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mormons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981205</id>
		<title>Mitt Romney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981205"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T14:58:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Economic Agenda */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Willard Mitt Romney&lt;br /&gt;
|image=MittPortrait.jpg‎&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Ann Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January&amp;amp;nbsp;2, 2003 – January&amp;amp;nbsp;4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Jane Swift]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Deval Patrick]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Willard Mitt Romney''' (born March 12, 1947) is a [[RINO], former governor of [[Massachusetts]] and a successful U.S. businessman, currently the presumptive [[2012 Republican Primary|presumptive Republican nominee]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].  He was first runner-up for the nomination in 2008. If elected, Romney would become the first [[Mormon]] president. His father [[George Romney]], a former governor of Michigan, ran for the Republican nomination for president in 1968. Mitt Romney challenged incumbent Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] of Massachusetts in 1994 for his seat, but lost by 58-41 percent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/romney/ Romney to the Rescue: Mitt Romney's Got the Right Stuff for 2008] Kessler, Ronald, newsmax.com archives, retrieved April 27, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before entering politics Romney was a businessman in Boston, having served as CEO of Bain &amp;amp; Company, a management consulting firm known for outsourcing American jobs. His political start began during the financially unsteady 2002 Winter Olympics. He gained popularity in Massachusetts, a state known for being extremely liberal, and was elected governor in 2002. As governor he raised taxes several times.  He unashamedly admits creating [[RomneyCare]], which is a complete disaster and forces everyone to buy health insurance and has resulted in long delays for obtaining medical services, such as an ordinary physical, in that state.  [[Ted Kennedy]] and other [[liberals]] supported the bill and probably wrote key parts of it.  Romney declined to run for reelection and announced his candidacy for President.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, Romney was widely but incorrectly supported as a staunch conservative and ran on his business experience in the private sector. Romney fought a rough battle against Senator [[John McCain]] in Florida, Michigan, and other key states, but large losses on the Super Tuesday primaries ended his campaign. Romney dropped out of the race and endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] on February 14, 2008. His name was circulated as a potential running mate for McCain as their relationship improved, though [[Sarah Palin]] eventually became the vice-president nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney has supported many far left positions: Romney has a pro-abortion record and favors big corporations; Romney also continues to believe in liberal propaganda claiming global warming; Romney has been criticized for standing behind his 2005 [[RomneyCare|health care plan in Massachusetts]], which featured a mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance as well as taxpayer-funded abortion. This plan is very similar to the 2010 ObamaCare bill that was adopted on a national level, and may have been the basis for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of criticism of Romney by the mainstream media suggests that they want him to win so that they can defeat him in the general election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flip Flopping==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney's inconsistent track record on issues such as abortion and gay marriage has gotten to the point where he has gotten the nickname '''Multiple Choice Mitt.''' A man dressed as a dolphin calling himself Flipper has appeared at some recent conservative gatherings to bring attention to Romney's inconsistent stands on abortion and gay marriage. Although Romney now identifies himself as pro-life and anti-same sex marriage, he claimed to be pro choice and supported same-sex rights as late as 2002. These swaps coupled with his Mormon affiliation puts him at odds with much of the Evangelical right, but a PollingReport.com chart from September 2007 indicates that Mitt was still polling at approximately 10% within the GOP primary forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney also changed his positions on gun control. He was originally for it, but recently joined the National Rifle Association, an organization opposed to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Following the split of the first three major elections in the 2008 primaries, Ron Kaufman, a top adviser to Romney, stated that the battle between the top three candidates &amp;quot;is going to be like the Bataan Death March.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bataan Death March resulted in the death of approximately 9,000 prisoners of war during World War II, and has been labeled as a war crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MittRomneyYouth05.jpg|thumb|Ann Lois Davies and Willard Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the scion of an old Mormon family. His grandparents were polygamists who fled the United States in the early 20th century when the Mormon Church repudiated polygamy; his father was born in Mexico. The Romneys returned to the U.S. in 1911 when a violent civil war broke out in Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney is a devout member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints]], and spent time as a missionary during his youth converting Catholics and agnostics to Mormonism in France. In fact, his time as a student and missionary helped him defer from military service during the Vietnam draft,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Kranish, &amp;quot;The Making of Mitt Romney: Mormon church obtained Vietnam draft deferrals for Romney, other missionaries&amp;quot; June 24, 2007. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but he stated during interviews that &amp;quot;he had longed to join the soldiers in Vietnam and support the war effort.&amp;quot; His father had stated in 1967 that he felt &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by U.S. officials over the justification of the prolonged Vietnam war. This statement had been very costly in George Romney's 1968 campaign for president against Richard Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to maintains a stable marriage with his wife Ann, with whom he has five children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the son of former [[Michigan]] governor and presidential candidate [[George Romney]], a &amp;quot;Rockefeller Republican,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisa McGirr, ''Suburban Warriors''(2001) pp. 141, 222.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who amassed a large fortune as an automobile industry magnate during World War II. &amp;lt;!-- Unusual statement. What exactly is the reason for introducing it as Mass. Republicans? Is there a significance to this? Many Massachusetts Republicans do not connect the father's politics with the son's, much like Presidents [[George H. W. Bush|George Herbert Walker Bush]] and [[George W. Bush|George Walker Bush]].--&amp;gt; George Romney was popular among moderates during his presidential run and was well-equipped for victory; many of his political advisors had come from [[Nelson Rockefeller]]'s 1964 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business Career==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1978 to 1984, Romney was a vice president of Bain &amp;amp; Company, Inc. a worldwide management consulting firm, and in 1984, Romney co-founded a spin-off called Bain Capital. He invested in or bought many well-known companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino's, Sealy Corporation and Sports Authority.  Critics say he advised corporations to cut their U.S. taxes by reincorporating in Caribbean tax havens such as the Caymen Islands, while maintaining their operations in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney served as governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), with a generally [[conservative]] record that included economic expansion. He balanced the budget every year of his administration with out increasing taxes or increasing state dept. Romney turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $500 million surplus by reducing government spending and added 80,000 new jobs by the end of his term. In 2004, 2005, and 2006 Governor Romney proposed cutting the state income tax from 5.3% to 5.0% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/08/mitt_romneys_record_on_economi.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Although the Democratic super majority in the state legislator refused to budge. Romney vetoed 844 pieces of legislation, with over 700 overridden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Mitt_Romney_Government_Reform.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, saying &amp;quot;there's no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 08/01/06&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Governor Romney the state abolished a retroactive capital gains tax that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay additional taxes and fees. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansformitt.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Massachusetts Citizens For Limited Taxation Executive Director Barbara Anderson praised Romney, saying &amp;quot;There was no one else out on the horizon and with the legislature almost entirely Democratic, we felt it was necessary to have a grown-up in the corner office. … And we were right to back him. He's been a really good friend to the taxpayers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some of the actions Governor Romney took received criticisms from conservatives, such as supporting moderate fee increases and creating and the nation's first universal [[health care]] program. During his 2002 gubernatorial campaign Romney supported [[abortion]], his views evolved and would later take [[pro-life]] positions such as vetoing emergency contraception and vetoing [[stem-cell research]] that would allow cloning of human embryos. In 2006, Governor Romney testified before the [[United States]] [[Senate]] to support the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would limit marriage to one man and one woman. Additionally, Romney filed legislation to reinstate [[capital punishment]], but was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a 99-53 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney made no pardons as governor, &amp;quot;My conclusion was, if somebody has been convicted by a jury of their peers, and they’ve been prosecuted and the police were able to get the evidence necessary to put them behind bars, why in the world would I step in and reverse that sentence?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/04/romney-on-huckabee-unlike-some-people-i-never-pardoned-anyone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[Education]] Romney called for the privatization of the University of Massachusetts medical school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 02/27/03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In 2004, he established the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program, which rewarded the top 25 percent of Massachusetts high school students with tuition-free scholarship to any Massachusetts public [[university]] or [[college]]. In August 2006, Governor Romney refused to allow former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, an outspoken opponent of the [[United States]] and [[Israel]], state police escorts during his speech at [[Harvard University]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/editorials/khatemi-at-harvard/38903/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2006, Romney signed a memorandum of agreement with the federal government that would allow state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=96543&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however was revoked when Democrat Deval Patrict took office as Governor in January 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Romney claims to be pro-life, but his record is very spotty.  At times he has claimed to be pro-infantacide.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am [[pro-life]]. I believe that [[abortion]] is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by [[judicial mandate]].&amp;quot; ([[Boston]] Globe, Mitt Romney Editorial, July 26, 2005) &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Values America's Culture and Values] mittromney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having a largely pro-life record as governor, in a 1994 debate with Senator [[Edward Kennedy]], Romney said that abortion should be legal, declaring that &amp;quot;regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion&amp;quot;, Romney said. &amp;quot;It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his campaign literature for the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Romney expressed a willingness to defend that State's pro-choice status quo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He stated in a live, televised debate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I've been very clear on that, I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil Unions===&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to be opposed to the idea of [[gay marriage]], however he has voiced explicit support for the [[homosexual agenda]]. He has advocated for domestic partnership benefits and equal rights for [[homosexuals]], which is gay marriage in everything but name and an easy stepping stone on the vile gay agenda path towards homosexual recruitment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  He also supports adoption for gay couples&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Romney promised to pursue a conservative, pro-growth economic agenda. His number one economic priority would be to grow the economy — helping to create good jobs, raise incomes and preserve American strength. He says he would work to rein in excessive government spending and reform entitlements. To ensure America's continued economic growth, he promises to cut taxes — such as the Death Tax, savings taxes, corporate taxes and marginal tax rates. Despite these claims, he has supported the [[socialist|socialism]] agenda.  He claimed credit for the government bailout of the union controlled car companies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/07/romney-taking-credit-for-auto-industry-success/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Also his [[RomneyCare]] law started the process of [[socialism|socializing]] medical care in [[Massachusetts]]. He continues to defend this law up to this day, undermining his commitment to repel the similar and equally atrocious  [[ObamaCare]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/romney-defends-romneycare_560953.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney says he would also promote trade, bring market forces to bear in health care, pursue national tort and liability reform, eliminate excessive regulations that put a burden on our economy and strengthen American families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Immigration has been an important part of our nation's success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney supports a strong stance on illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=91722 IowaPolitics.com: Romney Touts Strong Stance On Illegal Immigration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 5/24/07, Romney spoke about how he was tolerant about gays and then he discussed the current illegal immigration bill before Congress:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;He expressed less tolerance for illegal immigrants, and said he and President Bush have a difference of opinions on a bill that would provide a path toward legalization for an estimated 12 million people unlawfully in the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has his view, and other people have their views and I have my own,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;This is for all intents and purposes a form of amnesty in that everyone who is here illegally today will be able to stay under this bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill is unfair to people who are trying to come to the country legally, he said. People here illegally should be able to apply to come to the United States, but under the same terms as everyone else and behind those who have already applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I don't think that we're going to round up 11 or 12 or however many million people and bus them out of the country. That's not what I'm talking about,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;Those who committed felonies, of course, would be deported. Those who require government assistance to stay here would surely need to get off government assistance and ultimately could not remain here on government assistance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,RomneyGays,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stem Cell Research===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney supports the right of scientists to research on embryos created during fertility treatments, which is essentially infantacide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Mitt Romney 2008 Presidential Campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dude and mitt romney.jpg|right|180px]] As chairman of the [[Republican Governors Association]], Romney campaigned nationwide for GOP gubernatorial candidates in 2006, building up a network of allies and supporters. While he did not run for reelection as governor, in 2004 Romney set up a federal political action committee (PAC) called the Commonwealth PAC, which raised $2.71 million during the 2006 election cycle. On January 3, 2007, his next-to-last day in office as governor of Massachusetts, Romney filed to form a presidential exploratory committee with the Federal Election Commission. He officially announced his candidacy for President a month later. Romney was the first candidate in either party to start running television and radio ads. The ads focused mainly on his record as governor, running the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, and his work as a very successful businessman. Romney's five sons had been actively campaigning for their father, traveling around in a campaign bus called the &amp;quot;Mitt Mobile, A Five Brothers Bus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a presidential candidate Romney sought the support of the business community and social conservatives.  He reversed moderate positions on abortion and gay rights to take a hardline conservative position on them, and on opposition to illegal immigrants. Opponents charged he changed too often. Romney was a leader in fund-raising, augmented by over $35 million from his own fortune. However he was little known outside of Massachusetts, so his strategy was to play for early wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, then &amp;quot;sling-shot&amp;quot; the momentum into national visibility.  Romney won the Michigan primary on January 16th, 2008, with 39% of the vote, edging out McCain with 30% and Huckabee with 16%.  Romney was favored to win in the state of his birth, where his father, [[George Romney]] was governor from 1963-1969.  After losing both the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary (to Huckabee and McCain, respectively), Romney won a low-publicized Wyoming caucus. On January 19, Romney easily won the [[Nevada]] caucuses by 37 percentage points when there were seven candidates on the ballot, however, on that same day he placed a distant fourth in the [[South Carolina]] primary. After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Romney announced the suspension of his campaign on Thursday 7th February.  He expressed his wishes not to divide the Republican party and later endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] of [[Arizona]]. Commentators correctly speculated on his chances for a return effort in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fundraising===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney had done well in fund raising. During his first fund raiser as a presidential candidate, he raised $6.5 million dollars compared to an original goal of only $1 million. During the first quarter Romney raised more money then any other Republican presidential candidate with $23 million. However, a substantial portion of his funds ($17 million) came from his own personal wealth. [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/16/top_spender_romney_could_soon_run_short/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mittromney.com Mitt Romney for President 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldslivingonline.com/article.php?articleId=17633 Mitt Romney: proudly, quietly Mormon]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/ Evangelicals for Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2007/03/fresh-mitt-romney-juvenalia-hot-off.html Fresh Mitt Romney Juvenalia] Pics - Comments.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjE4MmMyMzVkZjlhZGQzNzlhZjdmMDEzNjI3MzM4ZTA= Mitt Romney: “I Changed My View. Is that So Difficult to Understand?”] The candidate talks about his efforts to convince voters that his pro-life conversion is real. Byron York, National Review Online, November 20, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2ZkMWNkZDkzOTk1YTM0NTNkNmJlZThmYjJmM2ZmOGE= Did Mitt Romney Push Poll Himself?] Mark Hemingway, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2EzODZjY2UxZTRhMWE2ZDk1ZWE5MGI0ZmRjMDViZTI= Team Romney on Push-Poll Connections] After reading the Hemingway piece, Kevin Madden, Romney for President campaign spokesman replies. Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzliMDgzOWVlOGEwYThlMzc5ZDVlNzM2YjA4M2ZkYTg= Romney Stands for Faith] The candidate pushes back against push-poll attacks. Larry Kudlow, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ4YmM4Y2U3Yjc3MzYzNDQwYzk3YTVjMTI5YTkwNzg= Romney’s Religion], The Editors, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blogs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/ My Man Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://libertariansformitt.wordpress.com/ Libertarians for Romney]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romney, Mitt}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mormons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981198</id>
		<title>Mitt Romney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981198"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T14:36:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Willard Mitt Romney&lt;br /&gt;
|image=MittPortrait.jpg‎&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Ann Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January&amp;amp;nbsp;2, 2003 – January&amp;amp;nbsp;4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Jane Swift]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Deval Patrick]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Willard Mitt Romney''' (born March 12, 1947) is a [[RINO]] governor of [[Massachusetts]] and successful U.S. businessman, currently the leader in the [[2012 Republican Primary]].  He was first runner-up for the nomination in 2008. If elected, Romney would become the first [[Mormon]] president. His father [[George Romney]], a former governor of Michigan, ran for the Republican nomination for president in 1968. Mitt Romney challenged incumbent Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] of Massachusetts in 1994 for his seat, but lost by 58-41 percent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/romney/ Romney to the Rescue: Mitt Romney's Got the Right Stuff for 2008] Kessler, Ronald, newsmax.com archives, retrieved April 27, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before entering politics Romney was a businessman in Boston, having served as CEO of Bain &amp;amp; Company, a management consulting firm known for outsourcing American jobs. His political start began during the financially unsteady 2002 Winter Olympics. He gained popularity in Massachusetts, a state known for being extremely liberal, and was elected governor in 2002. As governor he raised taxes several times.  He unashamedly admits creating [[RomneyCare]], which is a complete disaster and forces everyone to buy health insurance and has resulted in long delays for obtaining medical services, such as an ordinary physical, in that state.  [[Ted Kennedy]] and other [[liberals]] supported the bill and probably wrote key parts of it.  Romney declined to run for reelection and announced his candidacy for President.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, Romney was widely but incorrectly supported as a staunch conservative and ran on his business experience in the private sector. Romney fought a rough battle against Senator [[John McCain]] in Florida, Michigan, and other key states, but large losses on the Super Tuesday primaries ended his campaign. Romney dropped out of the race and endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] on February 14, 2008. His name was circulated as a potential running mate for McCain as their relationship improved, though [[Sarah Palin]] eventually became the vice-president nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney has supported many far left positions: Romney has a pro-abortion record and favors big corporations; Romney also continues to believe in liberal propaganda claiming global warming; Romney has been criticized for standing behind his 2005 [[RomneyCare|health care plan in Massachusetts]], which featured a mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance as well as taxpayer-funded abortion. This plan is very similar to the 2010 ObamaCare bill that was adopted on a national level, and may have been the basis for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of criticism of Romney by the mainstream media suggests that they want him to win so that they can defeat him in the general election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flip Flopping==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney's inconsistent track record on issues such as abortion and gay marriage has gotten to the point where he has gotten the nickname '''Multiple Choice Mitt.''' A man dressed as a dolphin calling himself Flipper has appeared at some recent conservative gatherings to bring attention to Romney's inconsistent stands on abortion and gay marriage. Although Romney now identifies himself as pro-life and anti-same sex marriage, he claimed to be pro choice and supported same-sex rights as late as 2002. These swaps coupled with his Mormon affiliation puts him at odds with much of the Evangelical right, but a PollingReport.com chart from September 2007 indicates that Mitt was still polling at approximately 10% within the GOP primary forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney also changed his positions on gun control. He was originally for it, but recently joined the National Rifle Association, an organization opposed to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Following the split of the first three major elections in the 2008 primaries, Ron Kaufman, a top adviser to Romney, stated that the battle between the top three candidates &amp;quot;is going to be like the Bataan Death March.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bataan Death March resulted in the death of approximately 9,000 prisoners of war during World War II, and has been labeled as a war crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MittRomneyYouth05.jpg|thumb|Ann Lois Davies and Willard Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the scion of an old Mormon family. His grandparents were polygamists who fled the United States in the early 20th century when the Mormon Church repudiated polygamy; his father was born in Mexico. The Romneys returned to the U.S. in 1911 when a violent civil war broke out in Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney is a devout member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints]], and spent time as a missionary during his youth converting Catholics and agnostics to Mormonism in France. In fact, his time as a student and missionary helped him defer from military service during the Vietnam draft,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Kranish, &amp;quot;The Making of Mitt Romney: Mormon church obtained Vietnam draft deferrals for Romney, other missionaries&amp;quot; June 24, 2007. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but he stated during interviews that &amp;quot;he had longed to join the soldiers in Vietnam and support the war effort.&amp;quot; His father had stated in 1967 that he felt &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by U.S. officials over the justification of the prolonged Vietnam war. This statement had been very costly in George Romney's 1968 campaign for president against Richard Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to maintains a stable marriage with his wife Ann, with whom he has five children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the son of former [[Michigan]] governor and presidential candidate [[George Romney]], a &amp;quot;Rockefeller Republican,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisa McGirr, ''Suburban Warriors''(2001) pp. 141, 222.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who amassed a large fortune as an automobile industry magnate during World War II. &amp;lt;!-- Unusual statement. What exactly is the reason for introducing it as Mass. Republicans? Is there a significance to this? Many Massachusetts Republicans do not connect the father's politics with the son's, much like Presidents [[George H. W. Bush|George Herbert Walker Bush]] and [[George W. Bush|George Walker Bush]].--&amp;gt; George Romney was popular among moderates during his presidential run and was well-equipped for victory; many of his political advisors had come from [[Nelson Rockefeller]]'s 1964 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business Career==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1978 to 1984, Romney was a vice president of Bain &amp;amp; Company, Inc. a worldwide management consulting firm, and in 1984, Romney co-founded a spin-off called Bain Capital. He invested in or bought many well-known companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino's, Sealy Corporation and Sports Authority.  Critics say he advised corporations to cut their U.S. taxes by reincorporating in Caribbean tax havens such as the Caymen Islands, while maintaining their operations in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney served as governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), with a generally [[conservative]] record that included economic expansion. He balanced the budget every year of his administration with out increasing taxes or increasing state dept. Romney turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $500 million surplus by reducing government spending and added 80,000 new jobs by the end of his term. In 2004, 2005, and 2006 Governor Romney proposed cutting the state income tax from 5.3% to 5.0% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/08/mitt_romneys_record_on_economi.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Although the Democratic super majority in the state legislator refused to budge. Romney vetoed 844 pieces of legislation, with over 700 overridden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Mitt_Romney_Government_Reform.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, saying &amp;quot;there's no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 08/01/06&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Governor Romney the state abolished a retroactive capital gains tax that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay additional taxes and fees. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansformitt.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Massachusetts Citizens For Limited Taxation Executive Director Barbara Anderson praised Romney, saying &amp;quot;There was no one else out on the horizon and with the legislature almost entirely Democratic, we felt it was necessary to have a grown-up in the corner office. … And we were right to back him. He's been a really good friend to the taxpayers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some of the actions Governor Romney took received criticisms from conservatives, such as supporting moderate fee increases and creating and the nation's first universal [[health care]] program. During his 2002 gubernatorial campaign Romney supported [[abortion]], his views evolved and would later take [[pro-life]] positions such as vetoing emergency contraception and vetoing [[stem-cell research]] that would allow cloning of human embryos. In 2006, Governor Romney testified before the [[United States]] [[Senate]] to support the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would limit marriage to one man and one woman. Additionally, Romney filed legislation to reinstate [[capital punishment]], but was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a 99-53 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney made no pardons as governor, &amp;quot;My conclusion was, if somebody has been convicted by a jury of their peers, and they’ve been prosecuted and the police were able to get the evidence necessary to put them behind bars, why in the world would I step in and reverse that sentence?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/04/romney-on-huckabee-unlike-some-people-i-never-pardoned-anyone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[Education]] Romney called for the privatization of the University of Massachusetts medical school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 02/27/03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In 2004, he established the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program, which rewarded the top 25 percent of Massachusetts high school students with tuition-free scholarship to any Massachusetts public [[university]] or [[college]]. In August 2006, Governor Romney refused to allow former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, an outspoken opponent of the [[United States]] and [[Israel]], state police escorts during his speech at [[Harvard University]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/editorials/khatemi-at-harvard/38903/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2006, Romney signed a memorandum of agreement with the federal government that would allow state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=96543&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however was revoked when Democrat Deval Patrict took office as Governor in January 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Romney claims to be pro-life, but his record is very spotty.  At times he has claimed to be pro-infantacide.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am [[pro-life]]. I believe that [[abortion]] is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by [[judicial mandate]].&amp;quot; ([[Boston]] Globe, Mitt Romney Editorial, July 26, 2005) &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Values America's Culture and Values] mittromney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having a largely pro-life record as governor, in a 1994 debate with Senator [[Edward Kennedy]], Romney said that abortion should be legal, declaring that &amp;quot;regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion&amp;quot;, Romney said. &amp;quot;It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his campaign literature for the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Romney expressed a willingness to defend that State's pro-choice status quo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He stated in a live, televised debate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I've been very clear on that, I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil Unions===&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to be opposed to the idea of [[gay marriage]], however he has voiced explicit support for the [[homosexual agenda]]. He has advocated for domestic partnership benefits and equal rights for [[homosexuals]], which is gay marriage in everything but name and an easy stepping stone on the vile gay agenda path towards homosexual recruitment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  He also supports adoption for gay couples&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Romney promised to pursue a conservative, pro-growth economic agenda. His number one economic priority would be to grow the economy — helping to create good jobs, raise incomes and preserve American strength. He says he would work to rein in excessive government spending and reform entitlements. To ensure America's continued economic growth, he promises to cut taxes — such as the Death Tax, savings taxes, corporate taxes and marginal tax rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney says he would also promote trade, bring market forces to bear in health care, pursue national tort and liability reform, eliminate excessive regulations that put a burden on our economy and strengthen American families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Immigration has been an important part of our nation's success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney supports a strong stance on illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=91722 IowaPolitics.com: Romney Touts Strong Stance On Illegal Immigration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 5/24/07, Romney spoke about how he was tolerant about gays and then he discussed the current illegal immigration bill before Congress:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;He expressed less tolerance for illegal immigrants, and said he and President Bush have a difference of opinions on a bill that would provide a path toward legalization for an estimated 12 million people unlawfully in the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has his view, and other people have their views and I have my own,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;This is for all intents and purposes a form of amnesty in that everyone who is here illegally today will be able to stay under this bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill is unfair to people who are trying to come to the country legally, he said. People here illegally should be able to apply to come to the United States, but under the same terms as everyone else and behind those who have already applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I don't think that we're going to round up 11 or 12 or however many million people and bus them out of the country. That's not what I'm talking about,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;Those who committed felonies, of course, would be deported. Those who require government assistance to stay here would surely need to get off government assistance and ultimately could not remain here on government assistance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,RomneyGays,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stem Cell Research===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney supports the right of scientists to research on embryos created during fertility treatments, which is essentially infantacide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Mitt Romney 2008 Presidential Campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dude and mitt romney.jpg|right|180px]] As chairman of the [[Republican Governors Association]], Romney campaigned nationwide for GOP gubernatorial candidates in 2006, building up a network of allies and supporters. While he did not run for reelection as governor, in 2004 Romney set up a federal political action committee (PAC) called the Commonwealth PAC, which raised $2.71 million during the 2006 election cycle. On January 3, 2007, his next-to-last day in office as governor of Massachusetts, Romney filed to form a presidential exploratory committee with the Federal Election Commission. He officially announced his candidacy for President a month later. Romney was the first candidate in either party to start running television and radio ads. The ads focused mainly on his record as governor, running the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, and his work as a very successful businessman. Romney's five sons had been actively campaigning for their father, traveling around in a campaign bus called the &amp;quot;Mitt Mobile, A Five Brothers Bus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a presidential candidate Romney sought the support of the business community and social conservatives.  He reversed moderate positions on abortion and gay rights to take a hardline conservative position on them, and on opposition to illegal immigrants. Opponents charged he changed too often. Romney was a leader in fund-raising, augmented by over $35 million from his own fortune. However he was little known outside of Massachusetts, so his strategy was to play for early wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, then &amp;quot;sling-shot&amp;quot; the momentum into national visibility.  Romney won the Michigan primary on January 16th, 2008, with 39% of the vote, edging out McCain with 30% and Huckabee with 16%.  Romney was favored to win in the state of his birth, where his father, [[George Romney]] was governor from 1963-1969.  After losing both the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary (to Huckabee and McCain, respectively), Romney won a low-publicized Wyoming caucus. On January 19, Romney easily won the [[Nevada]] caucuses by 37 percentage points when there were seven candidates on the ballot, however, on that same day he placed a distant fourth in the [[South Carolina]] primary. After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Romney announced the suspension of his campaign on Thursday 7th February.  He expressed his wishes not to divide the Republican party and later endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] of [[Arizona]]. Commentators correctly speculated on his chances for a return effort in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fundraising===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney had done well in fund raising. During his first fund raiser as a presidential candidate, he raised $6.5 million dollars compared to an original goal of only $1 million. During the first quarter Romney raised more money then any other Republican presidential candidate with $23 million. However, a substantial portion of his funds ($17 million) came from his own personal wealth. [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/16/top_spender_romney_could_soon_run_short/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mittromney.com Mitt Romney for President 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldslivingonline.com/article.php?articleId=17633 Mitt Romney: proudly, quietly Mormon]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/ Evangelicals for Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2007/03/fresh-mitt-romney-juvenalia-hot-off.html Fresh Mitt Romney Juvenalia] Pics - Comments.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjE4MmMyMzVkZjlhZGQzNzlhZjdmMDEzNjI3MzM4ZTA= Mitt Romney: “I Changed My View. Is that So Difficult to Understand?”] The candidate talks about his efforts to convince voters that his pro-life conversion is real. Byron York, National Review Online, November 20, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2ZkMWNkZDkzOTk1YTM0NTNkNmJlZThmYjJmM2ZmOGE= Did Mitt Romney Push Poll Himself?] Mark Hemingway, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2EzODZjY2UxZTRhMWE2ZDk1ZWE5MGI0ZmRjMDViZTI= Team Romney on Push-Poll Connections] After reading the Hemingway piece, Kevin Madden, Romney for President campaign spokesman replies. Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzliMDgzOWVlOGEwYThlMzc5ZDVlNzM2YjA4M2ZkYTg= Romney Stands for Faith] The candidate pushes back against push-poll attacks. Larry Kudlow, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ4YmM4Y2U3Yjc3MzYzNDQwYzk3YTVjMTI5YTkwNzg= Romney’s Religion], The Editors, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blogs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/ My Man Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://libertariansformitt.wordpress.com/ Libertarians for Romney]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romney, Mitt}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mormons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981121</id>
		<title>Mitt Romney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981121"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T00:35:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Civil Unions */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Willard Mitt Romney&lt;br /&gt;
|image=MittPortrait.jpg‎&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Ann Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January&amp;amp;nbsp;2, 2003 – January&amp;amp;nbsp;4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Jane Swift]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Deval Patrick]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Willard Mitt Romney''' (born March 12, 1947) is a former [[RINO]] governor of [[Massachusetts]] and successful U.S. businessman, currently the leader in the [[2012 Republican Primary]].  He was first runner-up for the nomination in 2008. If elected, Romney would become the first [[Mormon]] president. His father [[George Romney]], a former governor of Michigan, ran for the Republican nomination for president in 1968. Mitt Romney challenged incumbent Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] of Massachusetts in 1994 for his seat, but lost by 58-41 percent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/romney/ Romney to the Rescue: Mitt Romney's Got the Right Stuff for 2008] Kessler, Ronald, newsmax.com archives, retrieved April 27, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before entering politics Romney was a businessman in Boston, having served as CEO of Bain &amp;amp; Company, a management consulting firm known for outsourcing American jobs. His political start began during the financially unsteady 2002 Winter Olympics. He gained popularity in Massachusetts, a state known for being extremely liberal, and was elected governor in 2002. As governor he raised taxes several times.  He unashamedly admits creating [[RomneyCare]], which is a complete disaster and forces everyone to buy health insurance and has resulted in long delays for obtaining medical services, such as an ordinary physical, in that state.  [[Ted Kennedy]] and other [[liberals]] supported the bill and probably wrote key parts of it.  Romney declined to run for reelection and announced his candidacy for President.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, Romney was widely but incorrectly supported as a staunch conservative and ran on his business experience in the private sector. Romney fought a rough battle against Senator [[John McCain]] in Florida, Michigan, and other key states, but large losses on the Super Tuesday primaries ended his campaign. Romney dropped out of the race and endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] on February 14, 2008. His name was circulated as a potential running mate for McCain as their relationship improved, though [[Sarah Palin]] eventually became the vice-president nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney has supported many far left positions: Romney has a pro-abortion record and favors big corporations; Romney also continues to believe in liberal propaganda claiming global warming; Romney has been criticized for standing behind his 2005 [[RomneyCare|health care plan in Massachusetts]], which featured a mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance as well as taxpayer-funded abortion. This plan is very similar to the 2010 ObamaCare bill that was adopted on a national level, and may have been the basis for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of criticism of Romney by the mainstream media suggests that they want him to win so that they can defeat him in the general election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flip Flopping==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney's inconsistent track record on issues such as abortion and gay marriage has gotten to the point where he has gotten the nickname '''Multiple Choice Mitt.''' A man dressed as a dolphin calling himself Flipper has appeared at some recent conservative gatherings to bring attention to Romney's inconsistent stands on abortion and gay marriage. Although Romney now identifies himself as pro-life and anti-same sex marriage, he claimed to be pro choice and supported same-sex rights as late as 2002. These swaps coupled with his Mormon affiliation puts him at odds with much of the Evangelical right, but a PollingReport.com chart from September 2007 indicates that Mitt was still polling at approximately 10% within the GOP primary forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney also changed his positions on gun control. He was originally for it, but recently joined the National Rifle Association, an organization opposed to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Following the split of the first three major elections in the 2008 primaries, Ron Kaufman, a top adviser to Romney, stated that the battle between the top three candidates &amp;quot;is going to be like the Bataan Death March.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bataan Death March resulted in the death of approximately 9,000 prisoners of war during World War II, and has been labeled as a war crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MittRomneyYouth05.jpg|thumb|Ann Lois Davies and Willard Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the scion of an old Mormon family. His grandparents were polygamists who fled the United States in the early 20th century when the Mormon Church repudiated polygamy; his father was born in Mexico. The Romneys returned to the U.S. in 1911 when a violent civil war broke out in Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney is a devout member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints]], and spent time as a missionary during his youth converting Catholics and agnostics to Mormonism in France. In fact, his time as a student and missionary helped him defer from military service during the Vietnam draft,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Kranish, &amp;quot;The Making of Mitt Romney: Mormon church obtained Vietnam draft deferrals for Romney, other missionaries&amp;quot; June 24, 2007. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but he stated during interviews that &amp;quot;he had longed to join the soldiers in Vietnam and support the war effort.&amp;quot; His father had stated in 1967 that he felt &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by U.S. officials over the justification of the prolonged Vietnam war. This statement had been very costly in George Romney's 1968 campaign for president against Richard Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to maintains a stable marriage with his wife Ann, with whom he has five children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the son of former [[Michigan]] governor and presidential candidate [[George Romney]], a &amp;quot;Rockefeller Republican,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisa McGirr, ''Suburban Warriors''(2001) pp. 141, 222.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who amassed a large fortune as an automobile industry magnate during World War II. &amp;lt;!-- Unusual statement. What exactly is the reason for introducing it as Mass. Republicans? Is there a significance to this? Many Massachusetts Republicans do not connect the father's politics with the son's, much like Presidents [[George H. W. Bush|George Herbert Walker Bush]] and [[George W. Bush|George Walker Bush]].--&amp;gt; George Romney was popular among moderates during his presidential run and was well-equipped for victory; many of his political advisors had come from [[Nelson Rockefeller]]'s 1964 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business Career==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1978 to 1984, Romney was a vice president of Bain &amp;amp; Company, Inc. a worldwide management consulting firm, and in 1984, Romney co-founded a spin-off called Bain Capital. He invested in or bought many well-known companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino's, Sealy Corporation and Sports Authority.  Critics say he advised corporations to cut their U.S. taxes by reincorporating in Caribbean tax havens such as the Caymen Islands, while maintaining their operations in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney served as governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), with a generally [[conservative]] record that included economic expansion. He balanced the budget every year of his administration with out increasing taxes or increasing state dept. Romney turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $500 million surplus by reducing government spending and added 80,000 new jobs by the end of his term. In 2004, 2005, and 2006 Governor Romney proposed cutting the state income tax from 5.3% to 5.0% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/08/mitt_romneys_record_on_economi.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Although the Democratic super majority in the state legislator refused to budge. Romney vetoed 844 pieces of legislation, with over 700 overridden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Mitt_Romney_Government_Reform.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, saying &amp;quot;there's no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 08/01/06&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Governor Romney the state abolished a retroactive capital gains tax that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay additional taxes and fees. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansformitt.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Massachusetts Citizens For Limited Taxation Executive Director Barbara Anderson praised Romney, saying &amp;quot;There was no one else out on the horizon and with the legislature almost entirely Democratic, we felt it was necessary to have a grown-up in the corner office. … And we were right to back him. He's been a really good friend to the taxpayers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some of the actions Governor Romney took received criticisms from conservatives, such as supporting moderate fee increases and creating and the nation's first universal [[health care]] program. During his 2002 gubernatorial campaign Romney supported [[abortion]], his views evolved and would later take [[pro-life]] positions such as vetoing emergency contraception and vetoing [[stem-cell research]] that would allow cloning of human embryos. In 2006, Governor Romney testified before the [[United States]] [[Senate]] to support the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would limit marriage to one man and one woman. Additionally, Romney filed legislation to reinstate [[capital punishment]], but was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a 99-53 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney made no pardons as governor, &amp;quot;My conclusion was, if somebody has been convicted by a jury of their peers, and they’ve been prosecuted and the police were able to get the evidence necessary to put them behind bars, why in the world would I step in and reverse that sentence?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/04/romney-on-huckabee-unlike-some-people-i-never-pardoned-anyone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[Education]] Romney called for the privatization of the University of Massachusetts medical school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 02/27/03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In 2004, he established the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program, which rewarded the top 25 percent of Massachusetts high school students with tuition-free scholarship to any Massachusetts public [[university]] or [[college]]. In August 2006, Governor Romney refused to allow former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, an outspoken opponent of the [[United States]] and [[Israel]], state police escorts during his speech at [[Harvard University]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/editorials/khatemi-at-harvard/38903/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2006, Romney signed a memorandum of agreement with the federal government that would allow state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=96543&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however was revoked when Democrat Deval Patrict took office as Governor in January 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Romney claims to be pro-life, but his record is very spotty.  At times he has claimed to be pro-infantacide.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am [[pro-life]]. I believe that [[abortion]] is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by [[judicial mandate]].&amp;quot; ([[Boston]] Globe, Mitt Romney Editorial, July 26, 2005) &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Values America's Culture and Values] mittromney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having a largely pro-life record as governor, in a 1994 debate with Senator [[Edward Kennedy]], Romney said that abortion should be legal, declaring that &amp;quot;regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion&amp;quot;, Romney said. &amp;quot;It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his campaign literature for the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Romney expressed a willingness to defend that State's pro-choice status quo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He stated in a live, televised debate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I've been very clear on that, I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil Unions===&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to be opposed to the idea of [[gay marriage]], however he has voiced explicit support for the [[homosexual agenda]]. He has advocated for domestic partnership benefits and equal rights for [[homosexuals]], which is gay marriage in everything but name and an easy stepping stone on the vile gay agenda path towards homosexual recruitment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  He also supports adoption for gay couples&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Romney promised to pursue a conservative, pro-growth economic agenda. His number one economic priority would be to grow the economy — helping to create good jobs, raise incomes and preserve American strength. He says he would work to rein in excessive government spending and reform entitlements. To ensure America's continued economic growth, he promises to cut taxes — such as the Death Tax, savings taxes, corporate taxes and marginal tax rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney says he would also promote trade, bring market forces to bear in health care, pursue national tort and liability reform, eliminate excessive regulations that put a burden on our economy and strengthen American families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Immigration has been an important part of our nation's success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney supports a strong stance on illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=91722 IowaPolitics.com: Romney Touts Strong Stance On Illegal Immigration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 5/24/07, Romney spoke about how he was tolerant about gays and then he discussed the current illegal immigration bill before Congress:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;He expressed less tolerance for illegal immigrants, and said he and President Bush have a difference of opinions on a bill that would provide a path toward legalization for an estimated 12 million people unlawfully in the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has his view, and other people have their views and I have my own,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;This is for all intents and purposes a form of amnesty in that everyone who is here illegally today will be able to stay under this bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill is unfair to people who are trying to come to the country legally, he said. People here illegally should be able to apply to come to the United States, but under the same terms as everyone else and behind those who have already applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I don't think that we're going to round up 11 or 12 or however many million people and bus them out of the country. That's not what I'm talking about,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;Those who committed felonies, of course, would be deported. Those who require government assistance to stay here would surely need to get off government assistance and ultimately could not remain here on government assistance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,RomneyGays,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stem Cell Research===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney supports the right of scientists to research on embryos created during fertility treatments, which is essentially infantacide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Mitt Romney 2008 Presidential Campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dude and mitt romney.jpg|right|180px]] As chairman of the [[Republican Governors Association]], Romney campaigned nationwide for GOP gubernatorial candidates in 2006, building up a network of allies and supporters. While he did not run for reelection as governor, in 2004 Romney set up a federal political action committee (PAC) called the Commonwealth PAC, which raised $2.71 million during the 2006 election cycle. On January 3, 2007, his next-to-last day in office as governor of Massachusetts, Romney filed to form a presidential exploratory committee with the Federal Election Commission. He officially announced his candidacy for President a month later. Romney was the first candidate in either party to start running television and radio ads. The ads focused mainly on his record as governor, running the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, and his work as a very successful businessman. Romney's five sons had been actively campaigning for their father, traveling around in a campaign bus called the &amp;quot;Mitt Mobile, A Five Brothers Bus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a presidential candidate Romney sought the support of the business community and social conservatives.  He reversed moderate positions on abortion and gay rights to take a hardline conservative position on them, and on opposition to illegal immigrants. Opponents charged he changed too often. Romney was a leader in fund-raising, augmented by over $35 million from his own fortune. However he was little known outside of Massachusetts, so his strategy was to play for early wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, then &amp;quot;sling-shot&amp;quot; the momentum into national visibility.  Romney won the Michigan primary on January 16th, 2008, with 39% of the vote, edging out McCain with 30% and Huckabee with 16%.  Romney was favored to win in the state of his birth, where his father, [[George Romney]] was governor from 1963-1969.  After losing both the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary (to Huckabee and McCain, respectively), Romney won a low-publicized Wyoming caucus. On January 19, Romney easily won the [[Nevada]] caucuses by 37 percentage points when there were seven candidates on the ballot, however, on that same day he placed a distant fourth in the [[South Carolina]] primary. After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Romney announced the suspension of his campaign on Thursday 7th February.  He expressed his wishes not to divide the Republican party and later endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] of [[Arizona]]. Commentators correctly speculated on his chances for a return effort in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fundraising===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney had done well in fund raising. During his first fund raiser as a presidential candidate, he raised $6.5 million dollars compared to an original goal of only $1 million. During the first quarter Romney raised more money then any other Republican presidential candidate with $23 million. However, a substantial portion of his funds ($17 million) came from his own personal wealth. [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/16/top_spender_romney_could_soon_run_short/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mittromney.com Mitt Romney for President 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldslivingonline.com/article.php?articleId=17633 Mitt Romney: proudly, quietly Mormon]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/ Evangelicals for Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2007/03/fresh-mitt-romney-juvenalia-hot-off.html Fresh Mitt Romney Juvenalia] Pics - Comments.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjE4MmMyMzVkZjlhZGQzNzlhZjdmMDEzNjI3MzM4ZTA= Mitt Romney: “I Changed My View. Is that So Difficult to Understand?”] The candidate talks about his efforts to convince voters that his pro-life conversion is real. Byron York, National Review Online, November 20, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2ZkMWNkZDkzOTk1YTM0NTNkNmJlZThmYjJmM2ZmOGE= Did Mitt Romney Push Poll Himself?] Mark Hemingway, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2EzODZjY2UxZTRhMWE2ZDk1ZWE5MGI0ZmRjMDViZTI= Team Romney on Push-Poll Connections] After reading the Hemingway piece, Kevin Madden, Romney for President campaign spokesman replies. Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzliMDgzOWVlOGEwYThlMzc5ZDVlNzM2YjA4M2ZkYTg= Romney Stands for Faith] The candidate pushes back against push-poll attacks. Larry Kudlow, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ4YmM4Y2U3Yjc3MzYzNDQwYzk3YTVjMTI5YTkwNzg= Romney’s Religion], The Editors, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blogs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/ My Man Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://libertariansformitt.wordpress.com/ Libertarians for Romney]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romney, Mitt}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mormons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981120</id>
		<title>Mitt Romney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&amp;diff=981120"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T00:33:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Civil Unions */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Willard Mitt Romney&lt;br /&gt;
|image=MittPortrait.jpg‎&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Ann Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January&amp;amp;nbsp;2, 2003 – January&amp;amp;nbsp;4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Jane Swift]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Deval Patrick]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Willard Mitt Romney''' (born March 12, 1947) is a former [[RINO]] governor of [[Massachusetts]] and successful U.S. businessman, currently the leader in the [[2012 Republican Primary]].  He was first runner-up for the nomination in 2008. If elected, Romney would become the first [[Mormon]] president. His father [[George Romney]], a former governor of Michigan, ran for the Republican nomination for president in 1968. Mitt Romney challenged incumbent Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] of Massachusetts in 1994 for his seat, but lost by 58-41 percent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/romney/ Romney to the Rescue: Mitt Romney's Got the Right Stuff for 2008] Kessler, Ronald, newsmax.com archives, retrieved April 27, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before entering politics Romney was a businessman in Boston, having served as CEO of Bain &amp;amp; Company, a management consulting firm known for outsourcing American jobs. His political start began during the financially unsteady 2002 Winter Olympics. He gained popularity in Massachusetts, a state known for being extremely liberal, and was elected governor in 2002. As governor he raised taxes several times.  He unashamedly admits creating [[RomneyCare]], which is a complete disaster and forces everyone to buy health insurance and has resulted in long delays for obtaining medical services, such as an ordinary physical, in that state.  [[Ted Kennedy]] and other [[liberals]] supported the bill and probably wrote key parts of it.  Romney declined to run for reelection and announced his candidacy for President.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, Romney was widely but incorrectly supported as a staunch conservative and ran on his business experience in the private sector. Romney fought a rough battle against Senator [[John McCain]] in Florida, Michigan, and other key states, but large losses on the Super Tuesday primaries ended his campaign. Romney dropped out of the race and endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] on February 14, 2008. His name was circulated as a potential running mate for McCain as their relationship improved, though [[Sarah Palin]] eventually became the vice-president nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney has supported many far left positions: Romney has a pro-abortion record and favors big corporations; Romney also continues to believe in liberal propaganda claiming global warming; Romney has been criticized for standing behind his 2005 [[RomneyCare|health care plan in Massachusetts]], which featured a mandate requiring everyone to purchase health insurance as well as taxpayer-funded abortion. This plan is very similar to the 2010 ObamaCare bill that was adopted on a national level, and may have been the basis for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of criticism of Romney by the mainstream media suggests that they want him to win so that they can defeat him in the general election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flip Flopping==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney's inconsistent track record on issues such as abortion and gay marriage has gotten to the point where he has gotten the nickname '''Multiple Choice Mitt.''' A man dressed as a dolphin calling himself Flipper has appeared at some recent conservative gatherings to bring attention to Romney's inconsistent stands on abortion and gay marriage. Although Romney now identifies himself as pro-life and anti-same sex marriage, he claimed to be pro choice and supported same-sex rights as late as 2002. These swaps coupled with his Mormon affiliation puts him at odds with much of the Evangelical right, but a PollingReport.com chart from September 2007 indicates that Mitt was still polling at approximately 10% within the GOP primary forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney also changed his positions on gun control. He was originally for it, but recently joined the National Rifle Association, an organization opposed to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Following the split of the first three major elections in the 2008 primaries, Ron Kaufman, a top adviser to Romney, stated that the battle between the top three candidates &amp;quot;is going to be like the Bataan Death March.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bataan Death March resulted in the death of approximately 9,000 prisoners of war during World War II, and has been labeled as a war crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MittRomneyYouth05.jpg|thumb|Ann Lois Davies and Willard Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the scion of an old Mormon family. His grandparents were polygamists who fled the United States in the early 20th century when the Mormon Church repudiated polygamy; his father was born in Mexico. The Romneys returned to the U.S. in 1911 when a violent civil war broke out in Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney is a devout member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints]], and spent time as a missionary during his youth converting Catholics and agnostics to Mormonism in France. In fact, his time as a student and missionary helped him defer from military service during the Vietnam draft,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Kranish, &amp;quot;The Making of Mitt Romney: Mormon church obtained Vietnam draft deferrals for Romney, other missionaries&amp;quot; June 24, 2007. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but he stated during interviews that &amp;quot;he had longed to join the soldiers in Vietnam and support the war effort.&amp;quot; His father had stated in 1967 that he felt &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by U.S. officials over the justification of the prolonged Vietnam war. This statement had been very costly in George Romney's 1968 campaign for president against Richard Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to maintains a stable marriage with his wife Ann, with whom he has five children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney is the son of former [[Michigan]] governor and presidential candidate [[George Romney]], a &amp;quot;Rockefeller Republican,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lisa McGirr, ''Suburban Warriors''(2001) pp. 141, 222.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who amassed a large fortune as an automobile industry magnate during World War II. &amp;lt;!-- Unusual statement. What exactly is the reason for introducing it as Mass. Republicans? Is there a significance to this? Many Massachusetts Republicans do not connect the father's politics with the son's, much like Presidents [[George H. W. Bush|George Herbert Walker Bush]] and [[George W. Bush|George Walker Bush]].--&amp;gt; George Romney was popular among moderates during his presidential run and was well-equipped for victory; many of his political advisors had come from [[Nelson Rockefeller]]'s 1964 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business Career==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1978 to 1984, Romney was a vice president of Bain &amp;amp; Company, Inc. a worldwide management consulting firm, and in 1984, Romney co-founded a spin-off called Bain Capital. He invested in or bought many well-known companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino's, Sealy Corporation and Sports Authority.  Critics say he advised corporations to cut their U.S. taxes by reincorporating in Caribbean tax havens such as the Caymen Islands, while maintaining their operations in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
Romney served as governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), with a generally [[conservative]] record that included economic expansion. He balanced the budget every year of his administration with out increasing taxes or increasing state dept. Romney turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $500 million surplus by reducing government spending and added 80,000 new jobs by the end of his term. In 2004, 2005, and 2006 Governor Romney proposed cutting the state income tax from 5.3% to 5.0% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/08/mitt_romneys_record_on_economi.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Although the Democratic super majority in the state legislator refused to budge. Romney vetoed 844 pieces of legislation, with over 700 overridden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Mitt_Romney_Government_Reform.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, saying &amp;quot;there's no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 08/01/06&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Governor Romney the state abolished a retroactive capital gains tax that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay additional taxes and fees. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansformitt.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Massachusetts Citizens For Limited Taxation Executive Director Barbara Anderson praised Romney, saying &amp;quot;There was no one else out on the horizon and with the legislature almost entirely Democratic, we felt it was necessary to have a grown-up in the corner office. … And we were right to back him. He's been a really good friend to the taxpayers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some of the actions Governor Romney took received criticisms from conservatives, such as supporting moderate fee increases and creating and the nation's first universal [[health care]] program. During his 2002 gubernatorial campaign Romney supported [[abortion]], his views evolved and would later take [[pro-life]] positions such as vetoing emergency contraception and vetoing [[stem-cell research]] that would allow cloning of human embryos. In 2006, Governor Romney testified before the [[United States]] [[Senate]] to support the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would limit marriage to one man and one woman. Additionally, Romney filed legislation to reinstate [[capital punishment]], but was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a 99-53 vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney made no pardons as governor, &amp;quot;My conclusion was, if somebody has been convicted by a jury of their peers, and they’ve been prosecuted and the police were able to get the evidence necessary to put them behind bars, why in the world would I step in and reverse that sentence?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/04/romney-on-huckabee-unlike-some-people-i-never-pardoned-anyone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [[Education]] Romney called for the privatization of the University of Massachusetts medical school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Telegram &amp;amp; Gazette, 02/27/03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In 2004, he established the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program, which rewarded the top 25 percent of Massachusetts high school students with tuition-free scholarship to any Massachusetts public [[university]] or [[college]]. In August 2006, Governor Romney refused to allow former Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, an outspoken opponent of the [[United States]] and [[Israel]], state police escorts during his speech at [[Harvard University]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/editorials/khatemi-at-harvard/38903/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2006, Romney signed a memorandum of agreement with the federal government that would allow state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=96543&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however was revoked when Democrat Deval Patrict took office as Governor in January 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, Romney claims to be pro-life, but his record is very spotty.  At times he has claimed to be pro-infantacide.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am [[pro-life]]. I believe that [[abortion]] is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by [[judicial mandate]].&amp;quot; ([[Boston]] Globe, Mitt Romney Editorial, July 26, 2005) &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Values America's Culture and Values] mittromney.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having a largely pro-life record as governor, in a 1994 debate with Senator [[Edward Kennedy]], Romney said that abortion should be legal, declaring that &amp;quot;regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion&amp;quot;, Romney said. &amp;quot;It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his campaign literature for the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Romney expressed a willingness to defend that State's pro-choice status quo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He stated in a live, televised debate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I've been very clear on that, I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil Unions===&lt;br /&gt;
Romney claims to be opposed to the idea of [[gay marriage]], however he has voiced explicit support for the [[Homosexual Agenda]]. He has advocated for domestic partnership benefits and equal rights for [[homosexuals]], which is gay marriage in everything but name and an easy stepping stone on the vile gay agenda path towards homosexual recruitment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20021218005104/www.romneyhealey.com/issues/3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  He also supports adoption for gay couples&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
As President, Romney promised to pursue a conservative, pro-growth economic agenda. His number one economic priority would be to grow the economy — helping to create good jobs, raise incomes and preserve American strength. He says he would work to rein in excessive government spending and reform entitlements. To ensure America's continued economic growth, he promises to cut taxes — such as the Death Tax, savings taxes, corporate taxes and marginal tax rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney says he would also promote trade, bring market forces to bear in health care, pursue national tort and liability reform, eliminate excessive regulations that put a burden on our economy and strengthen American families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Immigration has been an important part of our nation's success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Immigration&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romney supports a strong stance on illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=91722 IowaPolitics.com: Romney Touts Strong Stance On Illegal Immigration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 5/24/07, Romney spoke about how he was tolerant about gays and then he discussed the current illegal immigration bill before Congress:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;He expressed less tolerance for illegal immigrants, and said he and President Bush have a difference of opinions on a bill that would provide a path toward legalization for an estimated 12 million people unlawfully in the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has his view, and other people have their views and I have my own,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;This is for all intents and purposes a form of amnesty in that everyone who is here illegally today will be able to stay under this bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill is unfair to people who are trying to come to the country legally, he said. People here illegally should be able to apply to come to the United States, but under the same terms as everyone else and behind those who have already applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I don't think that we're going to round up 11 or 12 or however many million people and bus them out of the country. That's not what I'm talking about,&amp;quot; Romney said. &amp;quot;Those who committed felonies, of course, would be deported. Those who require government assistance to stay here would surely need to get off government assistance and ultimately could not remain here on government assistance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,RomneyGays,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stem Cell Research===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney supports the right of scientists to research on embryos created during fertility treatments, which is essentially infantacide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Mitt Romney 2008 Presidential Campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dude and mitt romney.jpg|right|180px]] As chairman of the [[Republican Governors Association]], Romney campaigned nationwide for GOP gubernatorial candidates in 2006, building up a network of allies and supporters. While he did not run for reelection as governor, in 2004 Romney set up a federal political action committee (PAC) called the Commonwealth PAC, which raised $2.71 million during the 2006 election cycle. On January 3, 2007, his next-to-last day in office as governor of Massachusetts, Romney filed to form a presidential exploratory committee with the Federal Election Commission. He officially announced his candidacy for President a month later. Romney was the first candidate in either party to start running television and radio ads. The ads focused mainly on his record as governor, running the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, and his work as a very successful businessman. Romney's five sons had been actively campaigning for their father, traveling around in a campaign bus called the &amp;quot;Mitt Mobile, A Five Brothers Bus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a presidential candidate Romney sought the support of the business community and social conservatives.  He reversed moderate positions on abortion and gay rights to take a hardline conservative position on them, and on opposition to illegal immigrants. Opponents charged he changed too often. Romney was a leader in fund-raising, augmented by over $35 million from his own fortune. However he was little known outside of Massachusetts, so his strategy was to play for early wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, then &amp;quot;sling-shot&amp;quot; the momentum into national visibility.  Romney won the Michigan primary on January 16th, 2008, with 39% of the vote, edging out McCain with 30% and Huckabee with 16%.  Romney was favored to win in the state of his birth, where his father, [[George Romney]] was governor from 1963-1969.  After losing both the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary (to Huckabee and McCain, respectively), Romney won a low-publicized Wyoming caucus. On January 19, Romney easily won the [[Nevada]] caucuses by 37 percentage points when there were seven candidates on the ballot, however, on that same day he placed a distant fourth in the [[South Carolina]] primary. After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Romney announced the suspension of his campaign on Thursday 7th February.  He expressed his wishes not to divide the Republican party and later endorsed Senator [[John McCain]] of [[Arizona]]. Commentators correctly speculated on his chances for a return effort in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fundraising===&lt;br /&gt;
Mitt Romney had done well in fund raising. During his first fund raiser as a presidential candidate, he raised $6.5 million dollars compared to an original goal of only $1 million. During the first quarter Romney raised more money then any other Republican presidential candidate with $23 million. However, a substantial portion of his funds ($17 million) came from his own personal wealth. [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/16/top_spender_romney_could_soon_run_short/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mittromney.com Mitt Romney for President 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ldslivingonline.com/article.php?articleId=17633 Mitt Romney: proudly, quietly Mormon]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/ Evangelicals for Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2007/03/fresh-mitt-romney-juvenalia-hot-off.html Fresh Mitt Romney Juvenalia] Pics - Comments.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjE4MmMyMzVkZjlhZGQzNzlhZjdmMDEzNjI3MzM4ZTA= Mitt Romney: “I Changed My View. Is that So Difficult to Understand?”] The candidate talks about his efforts to convince voters that his pro-life conversion is real. Byron York, National Review Online, November 20, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2ZkMWNkZDkzOTk1YTM0NTNkNmJlZThmYjJmM2ZmOGE= Did Mitt Romney Push Poll Himself?] Mark Hemingway, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2EzODZjY2UxZTRhMWE2ZDk1ZWE5MGI0ZmRjMDViZTI= Team Romney on Push-Poll Connections] After reading the Hemingway piece, Kevin Madden, Romney for President campaign spokesman replies. Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online, November 19, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzliMDgzOWVlOGEwYThlMzc5ZDVlNzM2YjA4M2ZkYTg= Romney Stands for Faith] The candidate pushes back against push-poll attacks. Larry Kudlow, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ4YmM4Y2U3Yjc3MzYzNDQwYzk3YTVjMTI5YTkwNzg= Romney’s Religion], The Editors, National Review Online, November 16, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blogs==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/ My Man Mitt]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://libertariansformitt.wordpress.com/ Libertarians for Romney]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romney, Mitt}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mormons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=980388</id>
		<title>Conservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=980388"/>
		<updated>2012-05-09T01:12:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | [[Previous_Breaking_News/Conservatives| Previous Breaking News:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
A '''conservative''' is someone who adheres to principles of personal [[responsibility]], moral values, and [[limited government]], agreeing with [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that &amp;quot;[[religion]] and [[morality]] are indispensable supports&amp;quot; to political prosperity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Merriam-Webster]]'s Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: &amp;quot;tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL&amp;quot;[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative]  Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former President [[Ronald Reagan]] said, &amp;quot;The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aaag.jpg|thumb|Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, is the epitome of American conservatism according to some.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''sine qua non'' of a conservative is someone who rises above his personal self-interest and promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all.  Alternatively, a conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of [[economics]] and the morality of the [[Bible]] for the benefit of all, recognizing that the Bible is the most [[logic]]al book ever written.  Specifically, conservatives seek or support:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Limited government]] and balanced budgets&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]] and [[free market|free markets]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classroom prayer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for human life and prohibition of [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[death penalty]] for heinous murders proven beyond reasonable doubt&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Abstinence]] education&lt;br /&gt;
* Traditional [[marriage]], not [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Family values]], including traditional relationships and division of labor within the household&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for differences between men and women, boys and girls&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws against [[pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Second Amendment]] right to keep and bear arms&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity)&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental control of education ([[parental rights]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Private medical care and retirement plans&lt;br /&gt;
* Canceling failed social support programs&lt;br /&gt;
* No [[world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforcement of current laws regarding [[immigration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for our military ... past and present&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of [[junk science]] such as [[evolution]] and [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Minimal taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federalism]] (Separation of powers among the National, State and Local governments)&lt;br /&gt;
* Favoring [[states' rights]] over federal power, while accepting the Constitutional role of the federal government&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong national defense&lt;br /&gt;
* An [[Originalism|Originalist]] interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A dedication to the truth, and an ability to seek it&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Hall of Fame==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rossiter, &amp;quot;The Giants of American Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''American Heritage'' 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; names [[Alexander Hamilton]], [[John Adams]], [[John Marshall]], [[Daniel Webster]], [[John C. Calhoun]], [[Elihu Root]], and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to the &amp;quot;Conservative's Hall of Fame,&amp;quot;'' with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Presidents===&lt;br /&gt;
Periodically a conservative has been elected president of the United States.  The most prominent conservative presidents include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Washington]] (1789-1797)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Monroe]] (1817-1825)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889, 1893-1897) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Warren G. Harding]] (1921-1923)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-1929)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]] (1981-1989)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009) (with respect to taxes and Supreme Court nominations)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most prominent conservative Congresses have been:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)&lt;br /&gt;
*The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Movement===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Movement conservatives]] are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite [[liberal]] ridicule.  Movement conservative activists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]], opposed [[ERA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]], Congressman, on board [[KAL 007]] when shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Helms]], Senator, specialist in foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pat Buchanan]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jerry Falwell]], religion&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michele Bachmann]], congresswoman&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ann Coulter]], columnist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rush Limbaugh]], radio&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michelle Malkin]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glenn Beck]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Key leaders===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barry Goldwater]] - 1964 Republican candidate, lost to liberal Democrat [[Lyndon Johnson]] but revived the conservative movement inside the GOP&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russell Kirk]] - Theorist &amp;amp; intellectual&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irving Kristol|Irving]] and [[William Kristol]] - Notable [[neoconservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Thatcher]] - British prime minister between 1979 and 1990, held views similar to Reagan's&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Milton Friedman]] - Chicago-school [[libertarian]] [[economist]], influential during Reagan administration; leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==US Voters==&lt;br /&gt;
In America, most conservatives support the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for [[John McCain]] and 20% for [[Barack Hussein Obama]], with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1 Presidential 2008 Exit Poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative-republican-brain.jpg|thumb|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals===&lt;br /&gt;
The Barna poll conducted in November  2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others --50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/258-survey-shows-how-liberals-and-conservatives-differ-on-matters-of-faith on line results] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some findings: &lt;br /&gt;
Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that [[Satan]] is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Note: &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in this survey are based on politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
*their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives); &lt;br /&gt;
*a person cannot earn their way into [[Heaven]] by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%); &lt;br /&gt;
*the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%); &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:&lt;br /&gt;
*read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively) &lt;br /&gt;
*attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[pray]] to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%) &lt;br /&gt;
*share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment) &lt;br /&gt;
*have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were [[atheist]] or [[agnostic]] &lt;br /&gt;
*15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were [[Evangelical Christians|Christian evangelicals]] &lt;br /&gt;
*conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as [[born again]], based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%) &lt;br /&gt;
*21% of conservatives were associated with the [[Roman Catholic Church]], compared to 30% among the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama and American Conservatism Backlash ==&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the [[Britain|British]] newspaper ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This week’s striking [[Gallup]] poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under [[Barack Obama]]. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative news organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Conservative news organizations]] and [[Conservative media]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsMax]].  [[Fox News]], though often called conservative, tends to be more [[neoconservative]] than [[conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative magazines and blogs ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Conservative media]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Well known conservative magazines in the United States include ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Policy Review]]'', ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'' and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some notable [[Conservative blogs|conservative political blogs]] include the [[Heritage Foundation]]'s Policy Weblog, ''[[Human Events]]'', [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= &amp;quot;What Is a 'Conservative'?&amp;quot;], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of [[limited government]].&lt;br /&gt;
# A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Patriotism]], [[nationalism]], and support of a strong defense.&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of the institution of [[marriage]]. &lt;br /&gt;
# Emphasis on social values, like [[prayer]] and [[pro-life]] principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, neoconservatives generally support [[Big government|bigger government]] and [[globalism]], and tend to downplay the significance of social values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Paleoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American sovereignty, and are suspicious of both big government and big business. They also lean against foreign interventionalism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of &amp;quot;[[isolationism]],&amp;quot; as they believe in promoting [[democracy]] worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among paleoconservatives was Democratic Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the [[Soviet Union|Soviets]] near [[Moneron Island]] in 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fiscal Conservatism vs. Social Conservatism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For further details on the two related philosophies, see [[Fiscal conservatism]] and [[Social conservatism]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, a division has been created between fiscal conservatism and social conservatism. Fiscal conservatism centers around a low and [[Balanced budget|balanced]] government [[budget]], and generally is opposed to programs such as [[Social Security]] and [[Medicare]]. Its primary goal is to reduce government spending significantly. Social Conservatism, on the other hand, focuses on the moral issues of conservatism. A social conservative will oppose [[same-sex marriage]], [[abortion]], and the teaching of [[evolution]] in schools. The majority of Conservatives (including most of the [[Republican Party]]) fall into both categories, however some fall into one or the other, but not both. Notably, [[Libertarians]] are strong fiscal conservatives but are not socially conservative. For instance, the [[Libertarian Party]] Platform &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lp.org/platform]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; expresses support for the fiscally conservative principles of ending publicly funded [[welfare]] and [[healthcare]] programs as well as reducing government spending overall significantly. However, it also expresses support for [[same-sex marriage]] (with some libertarians leaning towards the ultimate goal of total [[marriage privatization]]) as well as maintaining the legal status of abortion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Republicans and [[Democratic Party|Democrats]] also fit one category but not the other. Former [[New Mexico]] governor [[Gary Johnson]], who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, was deemed &amp;quot;the most fiscally conservative governor&amp;quot; while he was in office (and probably earned that honor given all the spending cuts he made) but at the same time, he supports [[marriage privatization]] and [[abortion]] (though he believes ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' should be overturned on Constitutional grounds). Also, several Democrats have expressed opposition to same-sex marriage and/or abortion, but still support liberal fiscal programs such as Social Security. They would be the opposite of Johnson - socially conservative but fiscally liberal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expected growth of social conservatism and religious conservatism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western Christianity and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will begin to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as [[abortion]]. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/03/question-evolution-campaign-is-reaching.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
==History of American conservatism==&lt;br /&gt;
===Textbook problems===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Textbook bias]]''&lt;br /&gt;
College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a &amp;quot;liberal state paradigm&amp;quot;--that is, [[textbook]]s usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism--especially the [[New Deal]], the [[welfare state]], [[labor union]]s, and [[Civil Rights Movement|Civil Rights]] for blacks and [[equality]] for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a [[free market]] reply to the growth of [[big government]]; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality.  Where the violent Wobblies ([[Industrial Workers of the World|IWW]]) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing [[Communist]] subversion by [[Joe McCarthy]] is denounced as the nadir of political morality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Leonard Moore, &amp;quot;Approaching Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''OAH Magazine of History,'' 17 (January 2003) [http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/moore.html online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Loyalists===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Loyalists]] of the [[American Revolution]] were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer [[Joseph Galloway]] and governor-historian [[Thomas Hutchinson]]. However when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. [[Samuel Seabury]] was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the [[Episcopal]] religion, a stronghold of conservative social values.  While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Founding Fathers===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Founding Fathers]] created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as [[Republicanism]], which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from.  Two parties were named &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot;-- the one founded in 1794 by [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[James Madison]] (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[First Party System]] (1790s-1820s) the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting [[monarchy]] and [[aristocracy]], they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. [[George Washington]] was their great hero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On many issues American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and his followers, especially [[John Randolph of Roanoke]] and his &amp;quot;Old Republicans&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;[[Quids]].&amp;quot;  They idealized the [[yeoman]] farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to [[corruption]], that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called &amp;quot;[[judicial activism]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1030.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Jeffersonians stressed small government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster===&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Second Party System]] (1830-54) the [[Whig Party]] attracted most conservatives, such as [[Daniel Webster]] of New England. [[Daniel Webster]] and other leaders of the [[Whig Party]], called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The word was originally used in the [[French Revolution]]. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot; in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, ''American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary'' (1962) 94-97.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   [[John C. Calhoun]], a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. [[Richard Hofstadter]] (1948) called him &amp;quot;The [[Karl Marx|Marx]] of the Master Class.&amp;quot;  Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a &amp;quot;majority dictatorship&amp;quot; because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by [[Edmund Burke]], the founder of British conservatism, in ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with [[Civil Rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus [[William J. Bennett]] (2006), a prominent conservative leader, warns conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, [[Know-Nothings]], [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] and 20th century [[isolationist]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lincoln to Cleveland===&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1865 the [[Republican Party]] has identified itself with President [[Abraham Lincoln]], who was the ideological heir of the [[Whig Party|Whigs]] and of both [[Thomas Jefferson|Jefferson]] and [[Alexander Hamilton|Hamilton]]. As the [[Gettysburg Address]] shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's [[Declaration of Independence|Declaration]]. The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] of the [[American Civil War|Civil War]] reflected a [[reactionary]] opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 19th century the [[Bourbon Democrat]]s, led by President [[Grover Cleveland]], preached against corruption, high taxes (protective [[tariff]]s), and [[imperialism]], and supported the [[gold standard]] and business interests. They were overthrown by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the [[Democratic Party]] permanently to the left.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican [[William McKinley]] won using the pro-business slogan &amp;quot;[[sound money]] and protection,&amp;quot; while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Graham Sumner]], [[Yale University|Yale]] professor (1872-1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with [[Social Darwinism]] under the influence of [[Herbert Spencer]], he rejected [[evolution]] in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and [[paternalism]] in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Curtis, Bruce. &amp;quot;William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'&amp;quot; Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early 20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Progressive Era]] (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator [[Nelson Aldrich]] of [[Rhode Island]] were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the [[Federal Reserve System]] in 1913. [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a liberal he took a tough [[Regulation|regulatory]] approach toward businesses and [[trust]]s, and (post-presidency) fought for social insurance for the elderly. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into [[World War I]] to stop what he saw as the [[German Empire|German]] attacks on civilization. [[William Howard Taft]] promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921-30, the only former president ever to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President [[Warren G. Harding]]. The presidency of [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes ''Democracy and Leadership'' (1924) by Irving Babbitt and [[H.L. Mencken]]'s magazine ''American Mercury'' (1924-33). The [[Efficiency Movement]] attracted many conservatives such as [[Herbert Hoover]] with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Great Depression]], other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high [[property tax]]es. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in [[Chicago]] which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important intellectual movement, calling itself [[Southern Agrarians]] and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American [[Republicanism]] and civic virtue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Depression brought [[liberal]]s to power under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1933). Indeed the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now came to mean a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and Roosevelt's powerful [[New Deal Coalition]]. In 1934 [[Al Smith]] and pro-business Democrats formed the [[American Liberty League]] to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democratic party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal [[Alf Landon]], who carried only [[Maine]] and [[Vermont]]. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal [[Conservative Coalition]] of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator [[Robert Taft]], a Republican of [[Ohio]], and Senator [[Richard Russell]], Democrat of [[Georgia]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the [[Old Right]], also called the Old Guard, was a group of [[libertarianism|libertarian]], free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were [[isolationist]]s in 1939-41, (see [[America First]]), and later opposed [[NATO]] and U.S. military intervention in the [[Korean War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Later 20th century: Goldwater, Buckley, the Dixiecrats===&lt;br /&gt;
By 1950, [[American liberalism]] was so dominant intellectually that liberal critic  [[Lionel Trilling]] could dismiss contemporary conservatism as &amp;quot;irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lapham 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like [[Russell Kirk]]'s ''The Conservative Mind'' (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine ''[[National Review]]'', founded by [[William F. Buckley]] in 1955.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas Taft's [[Old Right]] had been [[isolationist]] the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose [[communism]]. It looked to the [[Founding Fathers]] for historical inspiration as opposed to [[John C. Calhoun|Calhoun]] and the antebellum South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The success of the [[Civil Rights movement]] came in the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] and the [[Voting Rights Act]] of 1965. Most conservatives supported both, but [[Barry Goldwater]] opposed them.  Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democratic party. That lock was now broken and southern conservatives started voting for Republican candidates for president in 1964-68, and by the 1990s they were also voting for GOP candidates for state and local office. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and they became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democratic party.  The region favored the GOP heavily in presidential elections, but split in state contests.  In 2008, however, the [[Barack Hussein Obama|Obama]] campaign broke into the solid Republican South, carrying [[Florida]], [[Virginia]] and [[North Carolina]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all [[New Deal]] programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of [[Ronald Reagan]] in [[California]], and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for [[Richard Nixon]] in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion [[Hubert Humphrey]], and southern demagogue [[George Wallace]]. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the [[Northeast]] who supported many New Deal programs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nixon, Reagan, and Bush===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican administrations of President [[Richard Nixon]] in the [[1970s]] were characterized more by their emphasis on ''[[realpolitik]]'', [[détente]], and economic policies such as [[wage and price controls]], than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the eight years of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and [[conservative principles]] dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with [[supply side economics]] as well as a strict opposition to [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Communism]].  Reagan promised to cut [[welfare]] spending but failed to do so.  He did cut taxes, but raised [[military spending]] and created large [[federal deficit]]s that turned out working to our advantage, because at that time, deficits didn't matter. It should be known that the Republicans also [[Balanced budget|balanced]] the [[budget]] in the late 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply side economic policies, known as &amp;quot;[[Reaganomics]],&amp;quot; foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reactions to Obama==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Forty percent of Americans now self-identify as conservatives — double the amount of self-professed liberals — largely because independents are beginning to take sides.&amp;quot; [http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/onprin/winter11/spalding.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare [[Progressive liberalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Australia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping [[gun control]] laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade.  In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged [[global warming]] galvanized conservatives there and they led the [[Liberal Party of Australia]] to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the [[Family First Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Britain==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United Kingdom]], the [[Conservative Party]] is the major partner in the governing coalition.  The party's current leader, [[David Cameron]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservatives.com Conservative party UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has been [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] of the UK since May 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunners of the Conservatives were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it.  Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for [[abortion]] on demand, gay [[civil partnership]], the [[Kyoto Treaty]] and to oppose [[capital punishment]] (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830'', (2nd ed. 2008) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Margaret Thatcher]] revolutionized the British conservatives much like Reagan revolutionized American conservatives. During her tenure as Prime Minister, she cut taxes, trimmed back at government waste, and exercised a strong national defense abroad (including the [[Falklands War]] of 1982).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in [[England]] and [[Wales]] than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse.  However, religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The broadcast media (dominated by the [[BBC]]) is almost exclusively [[liberal]] in tone. The print media is different with pro-Conservative newspapers like the ''[[Daily Mail]]'', ''[[Daily Express]]'' and ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' selling more copies than their rivals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediauk.com/the_knowledge/i.muk/An_introduction_to_newspapers_in_the_UK Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservatism and the French Revolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatism in France and the continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the [[French Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benefits of Conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy.  Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the [[best of the public]] to rise to their natural level of achievement.  Conservatives recognize that [[big government]] fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement--and thus, weakens society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes [[individual responsibility]].  In the absence of a hand-holding [[nanny state]], it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion.  Thus, [[social conservatism]] is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of [[morality]], duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Also See ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Filler, Louis. ''Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events'' (1987), useful older encyclopedia&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal perspective [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/080507774X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685789&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Frohnen, Bruce et al eds. ''American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), the most detailed reference&lt;br /&gt;
* Judis, John B. ''William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives'' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/William-F-Buckley-Jr-Conservatives/dp/0743217977/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207759425&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kirk, Russell. ''The Conservative Mind''. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, William A. ''Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism'' (2008) 643 pages &lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''The Right Nation,'' (2004) influential survey [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205919226&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Nash, George. ''The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945'' (2006), excellent scholarly history. [http://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241925238&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/exit-with-honor-the-life-and-presidency-of-ronald-reagan-by-william-e-pemberton.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2004) on 1964 [http://www.amazon.com/Before-Storm-Goldwater-Unmaking-Consensus/dp/0809028581/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193684721&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Nixonland-Rise-President-Fracturing-America/dp/074324303X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241924189&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schneider, Gregory L. ed. ''Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader'' (2003) &lt;br /&gt;
*Schoenwald; Jonathan . ''A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104931191 online edition] also [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. ''Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Landmark-Speeches-American-Conservative-Movement/dp/1585445983/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685365&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/user/rescueKAL007#p/a/FD3DE4F0642C350C/0/1c8v-kgLvhM Pat Buchanan's &amp;quot;Crossfire&amp;quot; interview with [[Larry McDonald]] 3 months before downing of [[KAL 007]], Ron Paul intro]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservativedirectory.com Directory of Conservative Websites - Category: Conservatives], [[Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Financial_Crisis_of_2008&amp;diff=980387</id>
		<title>Financial Crisis of 2008</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Financial_Crisis_of_2008&amp;diff=980387"/>
		<updated>2012-05-09T01:06:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Financial Crisis of 2008''', continuing into 2009, is an ongoing worldwide financial crisis that is the worst the world has seen since 1933 with the [[Great Depression]]. Drastic measures to confront seemingly insurmountable financial calamity resulted in the creation of '''TARP''' (Troubled Assets Relief Program), $700 billion safety net by the U.S. Government.  The National Bureau of Economic Research&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NBER is a private organization that follows its own standards as set by eminent economists such as [[Milton Friedman]]; its dating of business cycles is widely accepted by conservatives.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has identified the peak of the last expansion in December 2007; the U.S. economy has been in decline ever since.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Text of the NBER's statement on the recession and FAQ's&amp;quot; [http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-12-01-recession-nber-statement_N.htm ''USA Today'' Dec 1, 2008]. &amp;quot;The U.S. economy entered a recession in December 2007, a committee of economists at the private National Bureau of Economic Research said,&amp;quot; at [http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/US-recession-began-December-2007/story.aspx?guid={7DCF90E4-D61A-4014-83CE-45E938CD632C} Rex Nutting] - MarketWatch&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Image:CRASH08.JPG|thumb|330px|Oct 11, 2008 editorial; cartoon by Horsey stresses the global collapse]]  The crisis has caused the [[Recession of 2008]], which reached bottom in summer 2009, causing a worldwide economic decline that is the most severe since the 1930s.  Proponents of [[free market]] capitalism declare that  [[Federal Reserve]] Chairman [[Ben Bernanke]] should not have bailed out failing firms and instead should have allowed free market capitalism to quickly recover as it did in the depression of 1920 without government intervention (free market capitalists assert that government intervention merely drags out recessions and depressions).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzTXaAXusiI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A 2005 study found that government corporate bailouts are often done for mere political considerations and the economic resources allocated exhibit significantly worse economic performance than resources allocated using purely business considerations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=676905&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF) calculates that the global financial crisis will produce $3.4 trillion in losses for financial institutions around the world between 2007 and 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Peter Dattels and Laura Kodres, &amp;quot;Global Financial System Shows Signs of Recovery, IMF Says,&amp;quot; [http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/RES093009A.htm ''IMF Survey Magazine'' Sept. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
Negative economic news has spread outward from financial institutions to depress housing, construction, office buildings, automobiles, retail sales, state and local government, and vitually every other sector of the economy. Consumer spending has plunged, and banks have been very reluctant to loan money. Major banks and corporations have gone bankrupt. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recession is worldwide.  In recent months governments across the world have spent huge sums of money to reverse the crisis, but thus far the results have been inconclusive and the declines continue. The U.S. government provided cash bailouts of several hundred billion dollars and long-term loan guarantees of over $7 trillion dollars (compared to a GDP of $15 trillion a year in the U.S.).  Conservatives have been as dismayed and baffled by the crisis as everyone else.  Rush Limbaugh, for example, blames Obama. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike crises in the mid 1970s and early 1980s, this one began in the financial sector with devastating effects on many very large financial companies worldwide, especially in September 2008.  The negative effects by October 2008 began spreading to all other sectors of the economy, and forecasts for the next year show little likely of a quick recovery anywhere. For the effects on the broader economy (outside of finance and autos) see [[Recession of 2008]].&lt;br /&gt;
The crisis originated in the United States and Western Europe, and has impacted every country in the world. Banks and financial companies have reported losses of over one trillion dollars; investors have suffered [[paper loss|&amp;quot;paper losses&amp;quot;]] of many trillions. U.S. stocks are down 50% from their peak in 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; For most people the loss is a &amp;quot;paper&amp;quot; loss because they still own the stock and it might go up, or down. If they bought stock in 2003 for $1000, watched it go to $1500 in 2008, then drop to $1000 again in 2008, their &amp;quot;paper loss&amp;quot; is $500 but their real loss is zero since they are back where they started. People who bought at $800 still have made a $200 paper profit. People who bought at $1200, say, have a paper loss of $200. The paper loss or gain becomes real when they finally sell the stock. See [[Paper loss]] for more details&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Paper losses for owners of stock in major financial institution have been over 70%, and owners of some have lost 99% as major [[bank]]s closed down. The [[stock market]] has declined 50-70% in major countries and [[pension]] funds have large paper losses.  Paper losses in real estate have been in the trillions; the average price of American houses fell 20%, with 30% and higher declines in California and Florida.  However, thus far ordinary depositors with cash in the bank have suffered no losses. Owners of stocks in the 5000 largest U.S. corporations have paper losses of $10 trillion dollars in 2008, dropping to $10 trillion in October from $20 trillion in late 2007. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late September the crisis focused on liquidity--financial companies owned hundreds of billions of dollars of &amp;quot;toxic&amp;quot; securities, mostly based on U.S. [[mortgage]]s; they could not sell the toxic securities because no one knew how much they were worth, and large scale loans between major institutions stopped flowing as the system lost liquidity and froze up. A $800 billion rescue plan became law in the U.S. October 3, but its impact will not be clear for a while. Meanwhile Europe's economic crisis continues to deteriorate, as trillions of dollars in losses accumulate there and in Russia, China and India and in many smaller countries.  International agencies such as the International Monetary Fund are arranging emergency bailouts for medium-sized countries, like Pakistan and Ukraine.  All around the world people are sending their money to the U.S. and Japan because the banks there are safer than their own banks.  The price of oil, which reached $145 a barrel in the summer, plunged to under $50. That plunge eased the gasoline crisis, helped commuters, and helped the airline industry.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BRIDGE.JPG|thumb|400px|Tom Toles cartoon lampoons Federal bailout efforts as a badly designed [[bridge to nowhere]], Dec. 1, 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
Both parties have expressed anger at the crisis, and have promised extensive new regulations of the financial industry. However the Republicans have blocked additional bailout aid to General Motors, which is on the verge of bankruptcy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Treasury Secretary Paulson told Congress on Nov. 18 that the Bush administration remains &amp;quot;firmly opposed&amp;quot; to using any of the $700 billion financial bailout fund to help rescue Detroit's Big Three, &amp;quot;no matter how badly they need the help.&amp;quot; [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/11/18/paulson-rejects-bailout-money-automakers-senate-considers-legislation/ Fox news report] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democratic Congressional leaders and President-elect [[Barack Obama]] have pushed for a [[bailout]] of the auto industry and are expected to move it forward in January, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bush administration undertook a program in which it took control of several of the largest financial institutions (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG insurance), forced the mergers of others, purchased $125 billion of ownership in the 9 largest banks in the U.S., and provided relief to the largest bank, Citigroup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until October the crisis had little impact on the non-financial sectors of the world economy, but then negative impacts started appearing.  Companies could not borrow money for expansion or in some cases for routine operations, and had to cut back. Consumer spending fell and unemployment started to rise sharply.  By November pessimistic reports were coming in daily from practically every sector of the  American economy. There were no bright spots, and with tax revenues down, state governments began large-scale cutbacks, especially in New York and California.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By late October it appeared the financial crisis was slowing down the economies of all countries of the world, leading perhaps to a serious recession with widespread unemployment and loss of business. The major countries have been taking aggressive steps to dissolve the liquidity freeze and get money flowing again, and to stimulate economies that are headed downward.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Causes==&lt;br /&gt;
As hundreds of billions of dollars poured into the U.S. from abroad, financiers looked for imaginative ways to make a profit. They turned to [[real estate]], with the philosophy &amp;quot;Buy high--sell higher!&amp;quot;  The higher price paid for a house the more profit would be made when it was resold (&amp;quot;flipped&amp;quot;) in six or 12 months; prices were certain to keep going up and up. Salesmen made big money by phoning prospective buyers, promising to get them Bog Money Quick.  People who owned a house whose value had doubled could and did refinance their mortgage for the higher amount, and keep the difference.  In the early 2000s, U.S. interest rates were low and demand for housing was high, as housing prices soared, especially in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona. Mortgage companies and banks were very eager to lend, especially to people with mediocre [[credit]] who would not previously have been eligible for mortgages and to speculators. Speculators were ordinary people who already had a house and who were hoping to make a large profit on the purchase and quick resale (&amp;quot;flip&amp;quot;) of another house or condominium, which no one ever lived in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The only money the speculators had at risk was a down payment; sometimes the construction company paid for the down payment and closing costs, so the risk to the speculator was zero.  Mortgages in the U.S. are &amp;quot;non-recourse&amp;quot; which means that borrowers cannot be sued for stopping payments.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The expectation was that continuously rising house prices would cover the mortgage payments through refinancing. Many of the mortgages involved very low down payments and low monthly payments for the first year or two, after which the payments would start soaring. Sometimes the monthly payment at first was zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Bush and Clinton administrations made it a national priority to encourage more people to buy houses, assuming this social engineering would be good for everyone. In 2000 [[Howard Husock]] warned that the [[Community Reinvestment Act]] of 1977 and its expansion in 1995 would prove expensive; but President Bush strongly endorsed the program. Despite widespread misunderstanding they did not cause the great crisis since CRA loans to poor neighborhoods comprised only about 6% of the toxic mortgages. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_the_trillion_dollar.html The Trillion-Dollar Bank Shakedown That Bodes Ill for Cities], Howard Husock, ''City Journal'', Winter 2000; Governor Randall S. Kroszner, &amp;quot;The Community Reinvestment Act and the Recent Mortgage Crisis,&amp;quot; (December 3, 2008) [http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/kroszner20081203a.htm online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Option adjustable rate mortgages&amp;quot; (nick-named &amp;quot;Pick-A-Pay&amp;quot;) allowed borrowers to vary their monthly payments; they could be so so small they did not cover their interest charges. That meant the total principal grows over time, compared to normal mortgages where the debt owed shrinks over 30 years to zero and the borrower owns the house free and clear. By 2008 banks sold these dangerous &amp;quot;option adjustable rate&amp;quot; mortgages to two million customers.  They made sense if and only if the price of houses kept going up and the borrower could sell it in a year ot two at a huge profit. But if house prices declined, the borrower could stop paying and the bank was left with the loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Timeline video showing Democrats opposing regulating housing market financing. President Bush, Senator McCain and Alan Greenspan all predicting financial  collapse and offering regulation. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&amp;amp;NR=1 See video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[NYTimes]] says Senator [[Charles Schumer]] D-NY, is the most responsible for Wall Street's collapse. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/business/14schumer.html A Champion of Wall Street Reaps Benefits] NYTimes, December 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Schumer as a member of the Banking and Finance Committees, led efforts to regulate credit-rating agencies, shield financial institutions from government oversight and tougher regulations, and saved key industry players billions of dollars in taxes and fees.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Selling mortgage packages to big investors===&lt;br /&gt;
Americans owed some $10 trillion on their mortgages, most of which were sound with payments made on time. However financiers bundled the mortgages into very complicated packages called &amp;quot;'''collateralized debt obligations''''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; That is, homeowners were obligated to pay the debts and the collateral behind them was the physical house.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or CDOs. Hundreds of billions of dollars worth of CDO's were sold to banks, pension funds and financiers in the U.S. and Europe. Generally they borrowed cash to buy the CDOs.  The risk was that if the CDO's declined in value, they would not be able to repay those loans.  The CDOs were especially attractive because they were not regulated by the government; experts are not sure how many trillions of dollars are involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many mortgages were held by mortgage companies like [[Countrywide]] and [[Washington Mutual]], as well as investment banks such as [[Bear Stearns]], [[Merrill Lynch]], [[Lehman Brothers]], [[Morgan Stanley]] and [[Goldman Sachs]], as well as commercial banking chains like [[Wachovia]] and [[Bank of America]], which have thousands of local offices.&lt;br /&gt;
===Commercial real estate===&lt;br /&gt;
The speculative [[housing bubble|real-estate bubble]] went far beyond individual homes, it infected as well as  kinds of commercial real estate, such as office buildings, shopping centers, apartment complexes, hotels, casinos and even and empty lots. People bought high expecting to  sell higher, and were stunned when the market collapsed. People who loaned money to real estate firms were confident of a 20% return, but more likely lost 25%. The value of office buildings plunged 43% after the peak in Nov. 2007.  Most investors who bought in 2007 probably lost all their investment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 2006 at the top of the market Tishman Speyer Properties and BlackRock Realty invested $5.4 billion to buy the largest apartment complex in the country, in downtown New York City. Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, with 110 buildings and 11,227 apartments housed middle class families. The plan was to spend billions in upgrades and as tenants moved out to raise the rents.  The plan was wildly overoptimistic and the monthly rent did not cover the debt payments. In Jan. 2010 Tishman Speyer and BlackRock turned over the property to creditors, taking a 100% loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles V. Bagli, &amp;quot;Huge Housing Complex in N.Y. Returned to Creditors,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/nyregion/25stuy.html?hp ''New York Tomes'' Jan. 25, 2010] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Misuse of Credit Default Swaps===&lt;br /&gt;
Another key contributing factor to the credit market meltdown was the misuse of Credit Default Swaps, or CDSs, which are contracts between entities designed to mitigate against risk of a credit default.  A CDS is essentially an insurance policy designed to protect the insured party against excessive losses in a separate financial transaction.  However, by structuring the contract as a derivative swap instead of a traditional insurance policy, companies other than regulated insurers could offer them.  This created two critical risk exposures to the insured companies, and collectively to the overall market.  First, traditional insurers are required to maintain a sufficient level of capital to pay on losses, while companies issuing CDSs were not.  Since investments in pooled mortgages were viewed as unlikely to devalue or fail, major issuers of CDSs like AIG and Lehman Brothers found themselves over-exposed to losses.  The second risk was that CDSs issued by one firm were typically hedged, or backed up financially, by CDSs with other companies.  The strategy of minimizing risk by dividing it into collections of smaller exposures with other companies is a sound practice, but when the original risk is overexposed that overexposure is then spread across the companies that participate in the secondary risk markets.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[AIG]], the world's largest insurance company, was a major player in the financial crisis because it sold $441 billion in unhedged and undercapitalized insurance on securitized debt, much of it tied to mortgage values.  Normally an insurance company &amp;quot;lays off&amp;quot; some of the risk by taking out insurance with another company.  AIG neglected to do this because it never expected the securities to turn toxic, which they did.  Either someone paid the insurance or the nation's financial system would colapse, so the government stepped in, seized AIG, and paid the insurance.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effect of these risks manifested themselves in two key ways.  First, when major players in the CDS market like Bear Sterns and AIG were found to be insolvent, or failed outright like Lehman Brothers, the default conditions that were tied to the risk-spreading CDS's were triggered, and many companies found themselves obligated to pay out on contracts they never expected to.  These sudden exposures led to capital and liquidity shortages at scores of firms involved in the secondary credit markets, and the default pattern started repeating on itself in an echo-like manner.  Since the complex, interdependent nature of the CDS market made it difficult for firms to assess their true exposure to loss in this unprecedented market, they refrained from both short-term and long-term lending to guard against further losses.  This essentially led to a freezing up of credit in the marketplace, as lenders refusing to give credit to other lenders translated into businesses and consumers being unable to get short-term operating loans, or borrow for homes, autos, student loans or credit-card accounts as before.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This freezing of the markets to avoid loss was the primary incentive for the U.S. government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which injected billions of dollars of government-backed funds into the credit markets to restore trust and liquidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bubble bursts==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Houses$.jpg|thumb|300px|Left|Crash of U.S. housing prices in 2007-09]]&lt;br /&gt;
The housing &amp;quot;bubble&amp;quot; burst in 2006-07, as prices plunged downward in the Sunbelt. Many speculators and homeowners could not meet their payments, especially those who had &amp;quot;[[sub-prime]]&amp;quot; mortgages because their income was too low to support the eventual monthly payments, or who had adjustable rate mortgages where the monthly payments started small then escalated.   [[Foreclosure]]s skyrocketed. With housing prices falling few people risked buying a new house (because it would soon be worth less than they paid for it). Construction firms had built millions of new houses that could not be sold but which glutted the market.  By late 2008 half the home sales in the U.S. were by banks selling houses they had foreclosed on at low prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problem was that no one could figure out what CDOs were now worth, so very few were willing to buy them.  One major investment bank, Merrill Lynch, sold its CDOs for 22 cents on the dollar--a &amp;quot;[[fire sale]]&amp;quot; price that was less than they were worth in the long run, because in the long run the great majority of people will make their scheduled mortgage payments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 crises==&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple crises started pulling down major financial players.  Countrywide, which originated 20% of all American mortgages in 2006, collapsed and was bought up by Bank of America.  Bear Stearns, a large investment bank, went under; the government arranged a sale to JPMorgan Chase; stock holders lost about 90% of their investment, and the confidence in other banks was undermined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 7, 2008, the government took control of the two largest mortgage holders, &amp;quot;[[Fannie Mae]]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;[[Freddie Mac]]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The two had lost $15 billion on the $5.4 trillion in mortgages they owned, and their notes were widely held in [[China]] and many other countries.  The fear was that if the Treasury did not act the world's confidence in the US financial system would collapse.  However the rest of the world was in trouble too.  The stock markets in China and [[Russia]] plunged 50%, and the [[United Kingdom|British]] Treasury had to take over its largest mortgage company, [[Northern Rock]].  Vast sums of money flowed into the US because it was safer there than anywhere else.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:PANIC08.jpg|thumb|300px|Panic in Wall Street, Sept. 2008; the &amp;quot;bull&amp;quot; is the symbol of optimism on Wall Street and the &amp;quot;bear&amp;quot; is the symbol of pessimism.  Here the bull panics.]]&lt;br /&gt;
By September the major banks were no longer lending money and most reported huge losses as they wrote down the value of the CDOs and other assets. Short sellers sold large amounts of stock in threatened companies, causing further panic and driving down share prices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The short sellers did not own the shares; the practice was stopped on Sept. 19, 2008, by the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] because it destabilized markets.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lehman Brothers]], one of the oldest and largest banks in New York, went bankrupt on Sept. 15 with no one to rescue it.  The collapse of Lehman with its $639 billion in assets had a multiplier effect worldwide, severely weakening other big banks and sharply increasing the level of fear and distrust inside the system that caused bankers to sharply reduce their lending.  Many large firms and hedge funds had borrowed billions of dollars from lenders and had pledged assets they owned as collateral. When the value of their collateral plummeted, the lenders demanded more collateral to make up the difference, so the borrowers had to sell assets to raise emergency cash.  The price of the assets they sold was falling, and large additional sales further depressed prices, creating a downward spiral. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America for $50 billion, about half its value a few months before. Investors realized that AIG could no longer honor the insurance policies it wrote. It lost $13 billion in the first half of 2008 and its shares fell 95% in value. AIG was &amp;quot;too big&amp;quot; to be allowed to fail, so it was given an $85 billion loan from the government; in return the government received 80% of its stock. The government had to add another $38 billion to the AIG rescue in October.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Barry Meier and Mary Williams Walsh, &amp;quot;A.I.G. to get Additional $37.8 Billion,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/business/economy/09insure.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=business&amp;amp;oref=slogin ''New York Times,'' Oct. 8, 2008] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In effect AIG, along with GSE (government-sponsored enterprises) Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac were nationalized.  The Federal Reserve, with $800 billion in assets, was assisted by the Treasury, which gave it more funds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/business/02crisis.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp=&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;pagewanted=all&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1222952525-cWL0bOgQjxNvxNo+OH1qAw Joe Nocera, &amp;quot;36 Hours of Alarm and Action as Crisis Spiraled,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' (Oct. 1, 2008)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===European crises===&lt;br /&gt;
Heavy borrowing by European banks meant the crisis immediately affected Britain and other countries as well, as the British housing bubble burst about the same time as the U.S. The British government had to take over major mortgage lenders, including Northern Rock in February, 2008.  Northern Rock's loans (£25 billion) and guarantees (£30 billion) extended by the Bank of England, together with the value of the company's mortgages (£55 billion), or £100 billion in all, were added to the British national debt.  Bradford &amp;amp; Bingley, half the size of Northern Rock, held £40 billion in toxic mortgages, and was nationalized in late September. &lt;br /&gt;
====Fortis====&lt;br /&gt;
In late September, the Fortis bank, the world's 20th largest business, was partially nationalized by three governments who injected $16 billion in emergency funds. In 2007 Fortis borrowed heavily for its $100 billion takeover of rival bank ABN Amro; the deal came at the market’s peak, and Fortis now cannot pay its debts. The [[Belgium|Belgian]], [[Netherlands|Dutch]] and [[Luxembourg]] governments tried to inject capital but as consumer confidence plunged, Netherlands nationalized the Dutch wing of the company and the rest was sold in early October to the French bank BNP Paribas for €14.5 billion euros ($19 billion dollars). &lt;br /&gt;
====Germany====&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Germany]] Hypo Real Estate was given €50 billion euros ($68 billion dollars) bailout by the government.  The government of [[Iceland]] took over its large banks, as the entire island economy verged on bankruptcy because it depended so much on large foreign loans. Most of the European countries hurriedly announced guarantees of personal bank deposits to avert further drop in consumer confidence and runs on the banks.  Stock markets around the world continue to decline as pessimism worsens.&lt;br /&gt;
====Central banks====&lt;br /&gt;
The European Central Bank aggressively lent money to banks trying to ensure that banks would have adequate cash. The moves have not reassured savers or investors, and European stock markets have fallen even further than the American stock markets, as have the stock markets in China and Russia.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 13, France, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and Austria committed €1.3 trillion euros ($1.8 trillion dollars) to guarantee bank loans and take stakes in banks, in an emergency effort to head off the collapse of their financial systems. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carter Dougherty, Nelson Schwartz and Floyd Norris, &amp;quot;Financial Crises Spread in Europe,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/business/06markets.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin ''New York Times,'' Oct 6, 2008]; Gregory Viscusi, [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=azerJ573HcbI&amp;amp;refer=home &amp;quot;EU Nations Commit 1.3 Trillion Euros to Bank Bailouts,&amp;quot; ''Bloomberg.com'' Oct. 13. 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Britain====&lt;br /&gt;
Britain on October 8 announced a gigantic £400 billion ($680 billion) rescue plan for its banks; the government would partially own them.  Prime Minister [[Gordon Brown]] said banks would still be run by their old managers, but that the government would have to be &amp;quot;satisfied&amp;quot; on matters of salaries, [[dividend]]s and lending activities.  The money involved is about a third of Britain's annual [[Gross Domestic Product|GDP]] (comparable to $5 trillion in the U.S. economy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 13, Britain announced it would spend £50 billion ($85 billion) to nationalize two of the five largest banks, HBOS (Halifax Bank of Scotland) and RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland), while taking partial ownership of a third, Lloyds TSB. A fourth, Barclays will remain private if it can raise an additional £7 billion. The fifth, HSBC is based in Hong Kong and will remain private.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Financial crisis: HBOS and RBS 'to be nationalised' in £50 billion state intervention,&amp;quot; [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/3185120/Financial-crisis-HBOS-and-RBS-to-be-nationalised-in-50-billion-state-intervention.html?source=EMC-new_12102008 London ''Telegraph'' Oct 13, 2008] The existing stockholders were not bought out. They will continue to hold shares in the banks, but they will be outvoted by the new stock owned by the government.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Switzerland====&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2008, the Swiss central bank and the big UBS bank reached an agreement to transfer as much as $60 billion of troubled securities and other assets from UBS’s to a separate entity. UBS will put up $6 billion in equity. The Swiss central bank will control the new entity and loan it $54 billion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Asia===&lt;br /&gt;
The crisis swept across the Middle East and Asia as well, with South Korea especially hard hit.  China, which had been the world's major growth machine in recent years, seemed to slow down. In November China's government announced it would spend 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) through the end of 2010 to stimulate its economy. It specifically targeted people's livelihood in an effort to offset the impact of slowing global demand for its exports and unlock the spending power of its vast population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We're in the midst of a serious financial crisis,&amp;quot; [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] warned the nation on Sept. 25, 2008.:&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|Major financial institutions have teetered on the edge of collapse, and some have failed. As uncertainty has grown, many banks have restricted lending. Credit markets have frozen. And families and businesses have found it harder to borrow money....without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic, and a distressing scenario would unfold: More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically. And if you own a business or a farm, you would find it harder and more expensive to get credit. More businesses would close their doors, and millions of Americans could lose their jobs. Even if you have good credit history, it would be more difficult for you to get the loans you need to buy a car or send your children to college. And ultimately, our country could experience a long and painful recession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/09/20080924-10.html Bush speech online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
On September 19, 2008, the Treasury and Federal Reserve proposed a major rescue plan--the largest government intervention in the economy since [[World War II]]. The plan was for the Treasury to purchase $700 billion of the CDOs. The buyout was needed, Bush said, to avert a major disaster for the economy.  Most (but not all) Democrats signed on to the plan, adding provisions for Congressional oversight and caps on CEO compensation; but at the last moment on Sept 25, 2008 House Republicans said no, and GOP presidential nominee [[John McCain]] held off endorsement.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives were split on what to do.  Many agreed with Bush that the program proposed by Treasury Secretary [[Henry M. Paulson]] was urgently needed. Large banks and corporations strongly endorsed the it.  The [[American Bankers Association]] and the [[Mortgage Bankers Association]] are fighting against any amendment that would reduce mortgage obligations for people in bankruptcy, while directing all the government funds to the banking industry.The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, normally an outspoken advocate of big corporate interests, instead stressed the crisis's impact on small and midsize businesses. &amp;quot;We're looking at an economy that was slipping toward recession even before this crisis culminated in a market lockup last week,&amp;quot; said Chamber economist Martin Regalia. The debate in Congress, he said, &amp;quot;is costing every American taxpayer money, directly.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Williamson, &amp;quot;Big Business Wants Deal, Setbacks and All,&amp;quot; [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122238988380577457.html ''Wall Street Journal'' Sept. 26, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democratic nominee Senator [[Barack Obama]] endorsed the plan, as amended by Congressional Democrats. On the other hand, ordinary taxpayers and &amp;quot;Main Street&amp;quot;, that is businessmen who operated at the local level, were highly suspicious of [[Wall Street]]. McCain, blaming the crisis on &amp;quot;the corruption and manipulation of our home mortgage system&amp;quot;, rejected the bailout as a favor for Wall Street and little help to Main Street. Advocates of the market economy insisted that the market should run its course, and opposed the government intervention.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See comments from a range of economists at [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/business/26assess.html?ref=business Peter S. Goodman, &amp;quot;Credit Enters a Lockdown,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' Sept. 25, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The fiscally irresponsible TARP program increased the [[national debt]] by $300 million in 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;amp;id=2894&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A compromise was agreed to by leaders of both parties but the &amp;quot;Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008&amp;quot; (EESA)  was voted down in the House on Sept. 29.   Democrats favored the Bush bill 60%-40%, but Republicans voted no by  65-35%. The stock market lost a trillion dollars in value in one day as uncertainty reigned.  Finally a large majority passed a more expensive bill, that added $100 billion in new subsidies to the original $700 billion, plus tax breaks and a rise in FDIC insurance to $250,000 from $100,000, intended to reassure ordinary depositors. Both Obama and McCain voted for this version of the bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Treasury TARP program proved erratic and had to be radically modified several times. The Treasury dropped the original plan to buy toxic securities and instead has used $250 billion to prop up major banks. In October Paulson and Bernanke used their new powers to take an ownership stake in the nine largest U.S. banks, of $7 to $25 billion each. These banks are now partly owned and controlled by the government. However those banks are keeping the money and not lending it out. The price of bank stocks has fallen sharply since the relief program was passed. The world's largest bank, Citigroup, was on the verge of collapse in late November and received a second loan of $20 billion (in addition to $25 billion in October), and a federal guarantee to cover most of its toxic investments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In mid-December Bush announced that $17.4 billion of TARP funds would be given to the automobile industry in the form of bridge loans&amp;lt;ref name=bushremarksautobailout&amp;gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/autoshow/2008/12/19/bushs-remarks-on-the-auto-rescue-plan/ Wall Street Journal, &amp;quot;Bush’s Remarks on the Auto Rescue Plan&amp;quot;, December 19, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, just enough to prevent the companies from going bankrupt for a few weeks&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122969367595121563.html Wall Street Journal, &amp;quot;U.S. Throws Lifeline to Detroit&amp;quot;, December 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Bush defended the move by saying &amp;quot;if we were to allow the [[free market]] to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=bushremarksautobailout /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By mid-November the market had lost confidence in Treasury Secretary Paulson, who indicated he was baffled and would let the incoming Obama administration handle the unspent $450 billion.  The stock market jumped 6% on the news that Obama had picked New York banker [[Timothy Geithner]] to replace Paulson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Theo Francis, &amp;quot;Obama to Nominate New York Fed Chief Timothy Geithner as Treasury Secretary,&amp;quot; [http://www.businessweek.com/election/2008/blog/archives/2008/11/obama_to_nomina.html?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_top+story ''Business Week'' Nov. 21, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In late November the Federal Reserve announced it will buy up to $600 billion in mortgage-related assets from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, hoping to restart the housing and credit markets.  Under the new &amp;quot;Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility&amp;quot;, or '''TALF''', the Federal Reserve will loan up to $200 billion to financial companies that hold securities backed by consumer and small-business loans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hedge funds are private investment companies with a combined $1.7 trillion in assets. They have lost $180 billion since July and some are near collapse. Investors are demanding their money back, and Wall Street in late October is bracing for a shake-out in the industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Louise Story, &amp;quot;Citadel Chief denies rumors of trouble&amp;quot;  [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/business/25hedge.html?ref=business ''New York Times,'' Oct 24, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late November the government announced an $800 billion plan to boost consumer credit and the market for mortgage-related securities. Plans call for the Federal Reserve in early 2009 to extend up to $200 billion in non-recourse loans to holders of asset-backed securities backed by highly-rated consumer and small business loans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Non-recourse&amp;quot; loans means that if they are not paid back the borrowers cannot be sued for their other assets. Mortgages fall in this category, so that if people default they just walk away from the debt and never have to repay it. However it damages their credit rating.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Treasury will contribute $20 billion in funds through its Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The Federal Reserve also announced it will purchase up to $100 billion in GSE (government-sponsored enterprises, especially Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac) debt through a series of competitive auctions starting in December, 2008. The Federal Reserve starting in December will purchase up to $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities backed by GSEs such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the Fed is preparing to launch new liquidity programs to support the economy in addition to further slashing interests rates.  The total commitments by the government in relief and loan guarantees exceeded $7 trillion dollars, but the economy nevertheless continued to slip downward.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Maya Jackson Randall, &amp;quot;Paulson Says Treasury Actively Mulling New Rescue Programs,&amp;quot; [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816189458369851.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy ''Wall Street Journal'' Dec. 1, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Deepening recession===&lt;br /&gt;
By early December the entire economy was heading downward with no bright spots. The recession that began in Dec. 2007 intensified, as retail sales plunged. In November 2008 Americans, their confidence shaken, saved their money and sharply reduced their credit card purchases. Auto sales were down 37% in November (compared to Nov. 2007) to the lowest rate in 26 years. GM sales fell 41% Ford fell 31% and the foreign cars were down just as much, with Toyota down 34%, Nissan down 42% and Honda down 32%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Stephanie Rosenbloom, &amp;quot;In November, Shoppers Cut Spending Even More,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/business/economy/03shop.html?ref=business ''New York Times'' Dec. 2, 2008]; Nick Bunkley, &amp;quot;Another Month of Miserable Auto Sales,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/business/03sales.html?ref=business ''New York Times'' Dec. 2, 2008].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Retailers rang up the lowest November sales in more than 30 years, as holiday shopping not only failed to lift the economy but showed that the crisis is further distressing everyday consumers. Thirty major companies -- including Macy's, Sears, Abercrombie &amp;amp; Fitch and Target -- posted sales declines; Wal-Mart, anchoring the bottom of the price chain, sawincreased sales.  Retail sales in November fell 2.7 percent compared with the same month last year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ylan Q. Mui, &amp;quot;Retailers Report a Crisis in All Aisles: November Sales Slump as Shoppers Stow Credit Cards,&amp;quot; [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/04/AR2008120404347.html?hpid=topnews ''Washington Post'' Dec. 5, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jobloss.jpg|thumb|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Federal Reserve reported on Dec. 3, 2008, that every region reported sales declines, drops in manufacturing activity, weakening real estate markets, tighter lending, and deteriorating labor marketsThose sectors that had been strong until recently -- especially as agriculture and energy -- also softened as commodity prices declined.  November saw 533,000 jobs disappear in the worst one-month decline in 34 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shadow TARP===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, it was revealed that the Federal Reserve secretly propped up elite bankers all the way from Wall Street to Brussels to the Central Bank of [[Libya]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://teamdemint.com/site/post/2142/the-feds-shadow-tarp The Fed's Shadow TARP, TeamDeMint, August 31, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was the Fed covertly operating its own bailout program. The names of those involved were revealed by Bloomberg News and it took several years of Freedom of Information Act court battles to unearth Fed actions. The Fed would have never revealed its secret bailout on its own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Collapse of #6 and #4 largest banks, rescue of #1==&lt;br /&gt;
===Washington Mutual collapses===&lt;br /&gt;
On Sept. 25, Washington Mutual, the 6th largest bank in the US with $310 billion in assets, went [[bankrupt]] after a run in which depositors withdrew $17 billion in a few days. Its stockholders lost all their money, the US government took it over (through the [[FDIC]], which insures ordinary bank deposits), and resold it the same day to the biggest New York bank, JPMorgan Chase. It was the largest commercial bank failure in American history, by far.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In the [[Great Depression]], only one major bank failed (New York's Bank of United States, in late 1930), although over 6000 small neighborhood and rural banks went under; depositors eventually received on average 85% of their deposits.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
===Wachovia collapses===&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile the #4 U.S. bank, Wachovia, burdened by $120 billion in toxic securities,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; At the height of the bubble in 2006 Wachovia purchased  Golden West Financial, a California lender specializing in &amp;quot;pay-option&amp;quot; mortgages that enabled speculators to buy houses and pay very little a month for a year or two (at which time they expected to sell it for a profit). [http://www.brokeroutpost.com/reference/22657.htm explanation of pay-option loans]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was bought out by Citigroup on Sept. 29 in a deal engineered by the FDIC.  However Wachovia then broke its deal and merged into Wells Fargo. The result is that four major banks now dominate the American economy (Bank of America, Citibank, JP Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo), along with dozens of regional chains and thousands of small local banks.&lt;br /&gt;
===Bank of America renegotiates mortgages===&lt;br /&gt;
In early October, Bank of America, the new owner of Countrywide, reached a settlement with 11 states that sued it over fraudulent practices. The state of Illinois accused Countrywide of relaxing underwriting standards, structuring loans with risky features, and misleading consumers with hidden fees and fake marketing claims, like a false promise of a &amp;quot;no closing costs loan.&amp;quot; Countrywide gave special incentives to its brokers for selling impossible loans by paying higher commissions on them. In reviewing one Illinois mortgage broker’s sales, the Illinois complaint said the &amp;quot;vast majority of the loans had inflated income, almost all without the borrower’s knowledge.&amp;quot;  Bank of America did not deny the charges and instead agreed to pay out $8.4 billion to 400,000 Countrywide customers. Countrywide will reduce principal balances for some people and cut interest rates for others. Rates for some people could decline to as low as 2.5% and remain at that level for five years.  Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and IndyMac, now all owned by the federal government, have begun their own programs to modify mortgage terms for some hard-pressed borrowers.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Gretchen Morgenson, &amp;quot;Countrywide to Set Aside $8.4 Billion in Loan Aid,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/business/06countrywide.html?ref=business ''New York Times'' Oct. 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
===Largest bank rescued===&lt;br /&gt;
Citigroup, the world's largest bank was tottering in late November despite its receipt of $25 billion in TARP funding. Its value on the stock market plunged to $21 billion, down from $244 billion two years ago.  Round after round of layoffs have ended 75,000 jobs in 2008 out of 375,000 employees a year ago.  Very heavy exposure to toxic mortgages is the main culprit.  The government stepped in with the largest relief effort yet, including $20 billion in new cash, and guarantees of toxic assets by the Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At all times Citigroup used elaborate mathematical risk models that looked at mortgages in particular geographical areas, but never included the possibility of a national housing downturn, or the prospect that millions of mortgage holders would default on their mortgages. The prevailing approach at Citigroup and the other big banks was to make money as fast as possible (generating annual bonuses of $10 to $30 million for senior executives), which assigning zero to the risk of a system-wide downturn. Such a downturn came with disastrous consequences for Citigroup and its rivals on Wall Street.  Even after Bear Stearns ran into serious trouble in summer 2007, Citigroup decided the possibility of trouble with its CDO’s was so tiny (less than 1/100 of 1%) that they excluded them from their risk analysis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite two federal efforts Citigroup is still wobbly. It holds $20 billion of mortgage-linked securities that have been marked down to between 21 cents and 41 cents on the dollar. It has billions of dollars of giant buyout and corporate loans of dubious value. And it also faces a potential massive losses on auto, mortgage and credit card loans as the economy worsens.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eric Dash and Julie Creswell, &amp;quot;Citigroup Pays for a Rush to Risk,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/business/23citi.html?ref=business&amp;amp;pagewanted=all ''New York'' Times,’’ Nov. 22, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of 2009 most big banks were in much better shape and the Treasury expects to recover all but $42 billion of the $370 billion it lent to ailing companies, with the portion lent to banks actually showing a slight profit.  Meanwhile over 120 small and medium banks have been shut as insolvent; in most cases the FDIC picks up the losses and another bank takes over the operations and branches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackie Calmes, [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/business/07tarp.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp=&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1260187849-MV96Nnjzom3OwAchzjIqrg &amp;quot;U.S. Forecasts Smaller Loss From Bailout of Banks,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' Dec. 6, 2009]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Auto stimulus==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 a series of damaging blows drove the &amp;quot;Big Three&amp;quot; (GM, Ford and Chrysler) to the verge of bankruptcy. Part of the cause was very high labor costs (much higher than the foreign plants in the U.S.), and lack of consumer demand for their products. The Big Three had in recent years stressed expensive, fuel-guzzling SUVs and large pickups. They were much more profitable than smaller, fuel-efficient cars. When gasoline prices shot past $4 in 2008, Americans stopped buying the big cars, and the Big Three saw their sales plummet.  The Financial Crisis played a role as no one was willing to loan GM the money to buy Chrysler. Consumer credit has tightened and it became much harder for people with average or poor credit to obtain a bank loan to buy a car, so sales fell further.  Stock prices plummeted as shareholders worried about bankruptcy; GM's shares fell to 1946 levels. Intense debate ensued about a massive bailout, that would be in addition to a $25 billion loan Congress passed in September 2008 to assist in increasing fuel efficiency. President Bush proposed changing the terms of that loan so it could be used to cover daily operating expenses, but Congress rejected that. Republicans in Congress in mid-November blocked Democratic proposals to underwrite a new bailout of the auto industry, as industry leaders made an unconvincing case before Congress.  President Obama and Democrats in Congress have demanded the Big Three come up with a highly specific plan with some chance of long-term viability. Critics claimed the proposals would lead to unnecessary job loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the Big Three hundreds of large suppliers of parts are in financial crisis as well; most would go under if the Big Three go bankrupt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intense debate in December 2008 focused on allowing bankruptcy or injecting billions more of federal aid; it would be in addition to a $25 billion loan Congress passed in September 2008 to assist in increasing fuel efficiency.  The Democrats in Congress supported president Bush's proposal to use the fuel-efficiency loans to help with the immediate problem. It passed the House but Senate Republicans broke with Bush and it failed.  The opponents called for a bankruptcy that would allow GM to get out of its contracts to pay union members high wages, as well as generous pensions and medical benefits to retired workers.  Bush then acted unilaterally and decided to make TARP loans to  GM and Chrysler, on December 19. GM and Chrysler will get $13.4 billions in loans they can use to pay their suppliers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; GM and Chrysler will receive $4 billion each when they sign the loan agreements with the Treasury. GM will have access to an addition $5.4 billion on Jan. 16 and another $4 billion on Feb. 17 provided that Congress has released the remaining $350 billion for the Treasury’s TARP rescue program. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; GM can receive another $4 billion in February, but by then the Obama administration will be in charge, and it is emphasizing the need for a long-range solution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David E. Sanger, David M. Herszenhorn and Bill Vlasic, “Bush Aids Detroit, but Hard Choices Wait for Obama,” [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/business/20auto.html?hp ''New York Times'' Dec. 19, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bankruptcy scenario===&lt;br /&gt;
Bankruptcy of Chrysler and GM took place in the second quarter of 2009. Chrysler's sale to Italian automaker Fiat has been finalized. GM received billions more dollars to prevent bankruptcy but fell none-the-less. In addition, GM will require $30 billion in the first stage of bankruptcy. The Obama Administration is the single largest shareholder with the UAW second at 17% ownership. Also, many auto dealerships have been shuttered, thousands of workers have been [[laidoff]], assembly plants closed, and product lines dissolved or sold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama Administration==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Geithner1.jpg|thumb|330px|Critics feared Geithner's vague plans would crash]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Obama Administration]], taking office on Jan. 20, 2009,  moved to handle the crisis on two fronts.  Working with Democrats in Congress (and three moderate Republican Senators), it passed the &amp;quot;[[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]]&amp;quot;, calling for $500 billion of new spending and nearly $300 billion in new tax cuts. The new law began operations in mid-February, 2009, and supporters hoped it would slow and turn around the nosediving economy.  Conservative critics feared it would be ineffective in the short run and add to the national debt and tax burdens in the long run. As of late March no results are visible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With major banks on the verge of failure, Treasury Secretary [[Timothy Geithner]] unveiled yet another massive [[bailout]] program in mid-February. Trillions would be spent to move toxic assets out of the banks, but few details were provided. The widespread reaction was very negative, and Geithner lost more of his credibility as a problem solver.  Geither finally came back with a plan on March 23 that will not need additional funding or approval by Congress.  The Treasury will use $100 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), as well as new capital from private investors, in order to generate $500 billion in purchasing power to buy toxic loans and assets. The program could potentially expand to $1 trillion over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Criticisms===&lt;br /&gt;
:The nations banks now lend 25% less than when the financial bailout was announced. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The USA relies on China to buy our U.S. Treasury bonds to fund the increased spending. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:America is a debtor nation, we spend more than we save. The dollars value has plummeted against world currencies. Gold prices remain at record levels.The money that we don't have, but spend, will be a debt that future generations will have to worry about. This has brought rise to the term 'Generational Theft' in describing Obama policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's time to terminate the TARP program,&amp;quot; Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, told reporters on Monday. &amp;quot;TARP is increasingly not being a vehicle for economic stability and taxpayer protection but is evolving into 700 billion dollar revolving slush fund that the administration can use to advance economic, social and political agenda items far and apart from what Tarp was ever designed to do.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/08/house-republican-moves-terminate-tarp/ House Republican Moves to 'Terminate the TARP'] Fox News,  June 08, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the view of 51 mostly conservative economists polled by the ''Wall Street Journal'' in July 2009, the Obama administration's performance is problematic. President Obama and Treasury Secretary Geithner both got an average grade of 70 out of 100 for their handling of the financial crisis, but those grades varied widely. Former President Bush and ex-Treasury chief Paulson got average grades of 50 and 60, respectively, when economists were asked how they handled the crisis while in office. By contrast, Fed chairman Bernanke scores much better, with an average grade of 85; in addition 93% of respondents said he should be reappointed by Obama when Bernanke's term expires early next year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Izzo, &amp;quot;Few Economists Favor More Stimulus,&amp;quot; [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124708099206913393.html ''Wall Street Journal'' July 10, 2009] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Recession of 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry M. Paulson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paper loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://ow.ly/3klF The Bailout In Images]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*John Samples, [http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa660.pdf Lawless Policy:TARP as Congressional Failure], ''Policy Analysis'' No. 660, [[CATO Institute]], February 4, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://baselinescenario.com/2010/03/15/senator-kaufman-fraud-still-at-the-heart-of-wall-street/ Senator Kaufman:Fraud Still At The Heart Of Wall Street]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://baselinescenario.com/2010/04/18/john-paulson-needs-a-good-lawyer/ The Baseline Scenario]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/02/great-depression-quotes-1929-vs-2008-have-we-learned-anything/ Great Depression Quotes 1929 vs 2008: Have We Learned Anything?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Posner, Richard. ''A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of '08 and the Descent into Depression'' (2009), by a leading conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Taylor, John B. ''Getting Off Track: How Government Actions and Interventions Caused, Prolonged, and Worsened the Financial Crisis'' (2009), 92pp; by a leading conservative&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====References====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Finance]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economic history]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Nine&amp;diff=980385</id>
		<title>User:Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Nine&amp;diff=980385"/>
		<updated>2012-05-09T01:00:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: Created page with &amp;quot;Just a fiscal conservative, hoping to restore the America of old, where businesses thrived by their own merits in free market..&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Just a fiscal conservative, hoping to restore the America of old, where businesses thrived by their own merits in free market..&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fair_Minimum_Wage_Act_of_2007&amp;diff=980384</id>
		<title>Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fair_Minimum_Wage_Act_of_2007&amp;diff=980384"/>
		<updated>2012-05-09T00:58:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: Created page with &amp;quot;The '''Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007''' is a US Act of Congress that amended the Fair Labor Standards Act to gradually raise the federal minimum wage from $5.15 per hour to $...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007''' is a US Act of Congress that amended the Fair Labor Standards Act to gradually raise the federal [[minimum wage]] from $5.15 per hour to $7.25 per hour. It was signed into law on May 25, 2007 as part of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007.  The act raises the federal minimum wage in 3 increments: to $5.85 per hour 60 days after enactment (2007-07-24), to $6.55 per hour 12 months after that (2008-07-24), and finally to $7.25 per hour 12 months after that (2009-07-24). In addition, the act provides for the Northern Mariana Islands and [[American Samoa]] to make the transition to the federal minimum wage on alternate timetables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of 2008, 13 states already had minimum wage rates at or above $7.25 per hour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.laborlawcenter.com/t-State-Minimum-Wage-Rates.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These states were therefore unaffected by the increase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legislative history==&lt;br /&gt;
The act was a component of the new [[Democratic]] majority's 100-Hour Plan in the [[United States House of Representatives]]. It was introduced into the House on January 5, 2007, by [[George Miller]] (D-CA) and it was passed by the House on January 10.  All 233 House Democrats voted &amp;quot;Aye,&amp;quot; and 82 [[Republican Party (United States)|Republicans]] joined them.  116 Republican representatives voted &amp;quot;No,&amp;quot; and 4 representatives did not vote.  President Bush advised that the bill should include tax cuts for small businesses that could be harmed by the wage increase, and on January 24, 2007, a [[cloture]] motion in the Senate failed as 43 Republican Senators (all but 5) rejected the bill without the tax cuts, opposing all 47 Democrats who were present for the vote. Despite the [[socialist]] nature of the bill, the Senate passed the amended bill 94-3 (3 Republicans opposed and 1 did not vote; 2 Democrats did not vote) on February 1, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The act initially did not amend the Fair Labor Standards Act in regards to [[American Samoa]]—its minimum wage would have continued to be set by a committee appointed by the [[U.S. Department of Labor]] until changes were made to the act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2: Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/americanSamoa/ASminwage.htm Wage Rates in American Samoa]. Retrieved on 2007-01-14. See also: [http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode29/usc_sec_29_00000205----000-.html Special industry committees for American Samoa].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After accusations by [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] lawmakers that [[Speaker of the House]] [[Nancy Pelosi]] was unethical because Del Monte (parent company of StarKist Tuna which owns one of the two tuna canneries in Samoa) is based in her district, she instructed a House committee to have Samoa be included. Samoa's representative Eni Faleomavaega noted that the territory has not been subject to the mainland minimum wage and said, &amp;quot;...the global tuna industry is so competitive that it is no longer possible for the federal government to demand mainland minimum wage rates for American Samoa without causing the collapse of our economy...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/as00_faleomavaega/minimumwage2007.html Faleomavaega Comments on Minimum Wage Bill Now Before Congress]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Final passage===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum wage was passed by the House and the Senate on May 24, 2007 as part of HR 2206, the supplemental aid to the [[Iraq War]].  As part of the deal, $4.8 billion worth of tax breaks are going to be given to small business over a 10-year period to offset the wage increase.  The bill was thus ultimately enacted as a rider to the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007.  President [[George W. Bush]] signed the bill on the next day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May24/0,4670,MinimumWage,00.html Fox News.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Omissions==&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum wage increase did not change the wage for tipped employees.  Originally, it was automatically increased by being pegged to a percentage of the regular minimum wage.  However, that changed during the 1990s.  The federal tipped employee wage, therefore, remains at $2.13.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.restaurant.org/legal/law_minwage.cfm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&amp;diff=980383</id>
		<title>George W. Bush</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&amp;diff=980383"/>
		<updated>2012-05-09T00:49:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nine: /* Economy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=George W. Bush&lt;br /&gt;
|image=George_w_bush.jpeg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Laura Bush&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[United Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=43rd&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 20, 2001 – January 20, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Dick Cheney]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Bill Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=46th&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Texas&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 17, 1995 – December 21, 2000&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Ann Richards]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Rick Perry]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Walker Bush''' (born New Haven, [[Connecticut]] 1946) was the Governor of [[Texas]] (1995-2000) and served as the 43rd [[President of the United States of America]] from 2001 to 2009. Campaigning on a theme of &amp;quot;compassionate conservatism&amp;quot;  and promising &amp;quot;to restore honor and dignity&amp;quot; to the office of President after the Clinton years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E3DC153FF931A2575BC0A9669C8B63&amp;amp;sec=&amp;amp;spon=&amp;amp;pagewanted=all THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: THE TEXAS GOVERNOR; Bush Calls on Gore to Denounce Clinton Affair,] By Frank Bruni, The New York Times'', August 12, 2000. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he won the office by a narrow margin in the decisive State of [[Florida]] in the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential election]]. Legal challenges to the certified vote count went all the way to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] when liberal Democratic contender [[Al Gore]] contested the outcome for weeks until the Supreme Court case [[Bush v. Gore]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States presidential election, 2004|2004 Presidential election]] Bush won re-election, helped in part by a 300,000 vote victory (5%) in the State of Florida, where the outcome had been so close in 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://election.dos.state.fl.us/elections/resultsarchive/SummaryRpt.asp?ElectionDate=11/2/2004&amp;amp;Race=PRE&amp;amp;DATAMODE= Florida Election Records], ''[[Florida Dept. of State]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Leftist]] Democratic candidate [[John Kerry]] conceded defeat the day after the election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bush's presidency was defined by [[foreign policy]] because of the [[September 11, 2001 attacks|September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks]], which eventually resulted in the liberation of the countries of [[Iraq]] and [[Afghanistan]]. Bush named two conservatives to the Supreme Court. He reformed K12 education with a major new program, [[No Child Left Behind]], and pushed a series of major tax cuts through Congress. Conservatives cheered. All this happened in his first term, aiding his easy reelection.  His performance in dealing with [[Hurricane Katrina]] in 2005 were widely ridiculed, though some Republicans argued that local Democrats did an even worse job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the [[Financial Crisis of 2008]] smashed into the banking system and the nation plunged into the [[Recession of 2008]], Bush responded by proposing a massive aid program of $700 billion to banks, and loan guarantees amounting to the trillions of dollars. Conservatives were dismayed as he proposed a traditional [[Keynesian]] [[stimulus]] which Democrats lauded. Above all, he made one of the most dramatic federal interventions in American history by his aid to the financial system.  Bruce Bartlett, a Republican economist, says, &amp;quot;Bush clearly is not a Reaganite or &amp;quot;small 'c' conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives and [[libertarian]]s have criticized Bush for greatly increased domestic spending, creating a new entitlement program for prescription drugs, failing to veto a single bill, and expanding both the size and scope of government. The man made extremely difficult decisions under extraordinary circumstances. Unlike any president before him, he was subjected to an all out attack by the terrorist group Al-Qaeda. Bush's last year in office was a combination of Democrat [[Alinsky]] tactics and abandonment by his own Republican party. Lobbyists and Congress contributed greatly to the collapsing financial markets. Mistakes, questionable interests, Federal Reserve lack of transparency, Liberal Media, Unions, Homeland Security and you understand why the Bush team was to falter, they were in over their heads. Bush is a man with convictions that didn't cower from protecting America and putting America first. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See www.honorfreedom.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George would engineer two government rebate checks, giving back to the people. Average unemployment over eight-years of the [[Bush Administration]] was 5.3%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://scottstanzel.com/2010/06/04/unemployment-rate-during-president-bush/ Scottstanzel.com, Unemployment During President George W. Bush’s Two Terms]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and he can be credited for having the most [[pro-life]] policies of any president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bushfamily.JPG|left|thumb|275px|George W. Bush and his family in 1981]] George W. Bush was born on July 6, 1946, in New Haven, [[Connecticut]], and grew up in Midland and Houston, Texas. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/biography.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He earned a BA in history from [[Yale University]] and attended [[Harvard]] Business School as well. He later served in the [[Air National Guard|Texas Air National Guard]] as an F-102 Delta Dagger pilot. Bush grew up around politics, as his father [[George H. W. Bush]] had been a member of the [[U.S. House of Representatives]], American Ambassador to the [[United Nations]], Director of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]](CIA) and [[Vice President of the United States|Vice President]] of the United States under President [[Ronald Reagan]]. In 1988, George W. Bush worked for his father's successful presidential campaign. Afterward Bush purchased the Texas Rangers [[baseball]] franchise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Governor of Texas==&lt;br /&gt;
Bush declared his candidacy for Governor of Texas in 1994. He defeated incumbent [[Democrat]] Governor [[Ann Richards]] 53.5 percent to 45.9 percent. Bush advocated and signed the two largest tax cuts to date in Texas history, totaling over $3 billion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/tslac/40078/tsl-40078.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He supported and signed legislation emphasizing local control of [[school]]s, higher standards, and a revised curriculum. Bush was easily reelected Governor in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2000 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[United States presidential election, 2000]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican nominee for the 2000 Presidential nomination came down to Texas Governor George W. Bush and [[Arizona]] Senator [[John McCain]], a maverick Republican and ex-POW. Most social conservatives endorsed Bush. Despite early primary wins in [[New Hampshire]] and [[Michigan]] for McCain, Bush eventually won after sweeping 9 out of the 13 states on Super Tuesday. McCain withdrew in March after a bitter primary fight. Bush then chose former U.S. Defense Secretary [[Richard Cheney]] as his running mate. Vice President [[Al Gore]] was the Democratic nominee. Consumer Advocate [[Ralph Nader]], a strong supporter of [[environment]]al protection and critic of large corporations entered the race in the [[United States Green Party|green party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a historically close race, Gore edged out Bush in the popular vote 48.4 percent to 47.9 percent. However, Bush won the majority of electoral votes, 271 to 266, because of Bush's victory in Florida, winning its 25 electoral votes that both candidates desperately needed. The race in Florida was so close that state law required a recount of the ballots. There were, however, thousands of thrown out ballots that were discredited because the counting machines could not discern them. After the machine recounts still showed Bush ahead, Gore asked for a hand recount of ballots in counties that favored Democrats. On November 26th, Florida officials certified that Bush won the state of Florida by 537 votes. Gore conceded December 13th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2004 Reelection Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[United States presidential election, 2004]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In President Bush's reelection campaign in 2004, national security, the invasion of Iraq and social issues dominated the campaign. The Democrat nominee was [[Massachusetts]] Senator [[John Kerry]]. Bush won the popular vote, 51% to 48%. With 120 million Americans voting (15 million more then in 2000) Bush received more votes than any other presidential candidate in history. Among the swing states, Kerry took [[Pennsylvania]], [[New Hampshire]], [[Michigan]], [[Minnesota]], [[Wisconsin]] and [[Oregon]], while Bush took [[Ohio]], [[Florida]], [[Missouri]], [[Iowa]], [[Colorado]], [[New Mexico]], and [[Nevada]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Republicans also picked up seats in both chambers of [[Congress]].    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidency (2001-2009)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In foreign and security areas, his terms included the 9-11 terrorist attack, the passage of the PATRIOT Act, the invasion of Afghanistan (2001-present) and Iraq (2003-present), the expansion of NATO to the Russian border, financial aid to fight disease (especially AIDS) in Africa, and improved relations with India. The Iraq was was the focus of intense partisan debate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 midterm election saw a GOP gain of seats in the House of Representatives and governorships, However the 2006 elections showed sharp GOP losses across the board, and loss of control of the House for the first time since its capture in 1994. He played a minor role in the 2008 election, which the GOP lost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In domestic legislation he partnered with Sen. [[Ted Kennedy]] to pass the No Child Left Behind education act, and tried--but failed--to pass immigration reform. Early on he secured large-scale tax cuts, which helped the economic recovery in 2002. The boom (and later collapse) in real estate boosted the economy then pulled it down. Liberals criticized his handling of the 2005 Hurricane Katrina relief, and the dismissals of U.S. Attorneys for political reasons. His proposed &amp;quot;Vision for Space Exploration&amp;quot; went nowhere, and he failed to make headway in Social Security reform. Conservatives hailed his appointments of conservatives to the Supreme Court and Federal Reserve chairmanship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Administration and Cabinet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Office&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! Term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[President]]&lt;br /&gt;
| George W. Bush&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Vice President of the United States|Vice President]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Richard Cheney]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of State]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Colin Powell]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Condoleezza Rice]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Treasury]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Paul O'Neill]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[John W. Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Henry Paulson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Donald Rumsfeld]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Robert Gates]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Attorney General]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[John Ashcroft]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Alberto Gonzales]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Michael Mukasey]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of the Interior&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Gale Norton]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Dirk Kempthorne]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Agriculture&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Ann Veneman]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Mike Johanns]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Ed Schafer]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2008-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Commerce&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Donald Evans]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Carlos Gutierrez]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Labor&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Elaine Chao]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Tommy Thompson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Michael Leavitt]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Education&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Rod Paige]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Margaret Spellings]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Housing and Urban Development&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Mel Martinez]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2003&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Alphonso Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003-2008&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Steve Preston]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2008-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Norman Mineta]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Mary Peters]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Energy&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Spencer Abraham]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Samuel Bodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Veterans Affairs&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Anthony Principi]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Jim Nicholson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[James Peake]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Secretary of Homeland Security&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Tom Ridge]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Michael Chertoff]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Chief of Staff&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Andrew Card]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Joshua Bolten]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Christine Todd Whitman]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2003&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Michael Leavitt]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Stephen Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Director of the Office of Management and Budget&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Mitch Daniels]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2003&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Joshua Bolten&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Rob Portman]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Jim Nussle]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy&lt;br /&gt;
| [[John Walters]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| United States Trade Representative&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Robert Zoellick]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Rob Portman&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Susan Schwab&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[CIA]] Director&lt;br /&gt;
| [[George Tenet]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2004&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[John E. McLaughlin]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2004&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Porter J. Goss]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2004-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Michael Hayden]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| FBI Director&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Louis Freeh]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Thomas J. Pickard]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Robert S. Mueller]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| National Security Advisor&lt;br /&gt;
| Condoleezza Rice&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Stephen Hadley&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| White House Counsel&lt;br /&gt;
| Alberto R. Gonzales&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2005&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Harriet Miers]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Fred Fielding]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| White House Press Secretary&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Ari Fleischer]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2001-2003&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Scott McClellan]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003-2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Tony Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006-2007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Dana Perino]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007-2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Response to the 9-11 Terrorist Attacks===&lt;br /&gt;
The September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks resulted in George W. Bush becoming a self-described war time President. On that morning President Bush had traveled to Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, [[Florida]] to promote his [[education]]al agenda, when 19 Islamic terrorists connected with [[Al-Qaeda]] hijacked four commercial airplanes. Two of them crashed into the [[World Trade Center]] in [[New York City]], the third in [[The Pentagon]] in [[Washington, D.C.]] and the fourth in Somerset County, [[Pennsylvania]], after passengers of the flight successfully stopped the hijackers from hitting Washington D.C., possibly the [[White House]] or [[Capital]]. As a resulted over 3,000 Americans were killed, and over 6,000 injured, the largest terrorist attack in American history. After [[White House]] Chief of Staff [[Andrew Card]] had whispered in the President's ear that the United States was under attack, President Bush addressed the public in the Booker school's media center, saying a brief four paragraph statement that &amp;quot;Terrorism against our nation will not stand. This will not stand.&amp;quot; Which was a formation that President George H. W. Bush used in August 1990 after [[Iraq]] invaded [[Kuwait]]. President Bush would later say that &amp;quot;This is my reminder of lives that ended, and a task that does not end. . . . I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:20010912-4-1.jpg|left|thumb|300px|President George W. Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Hugh Shelton, talk with the press about the previous day's terrorist attacks during a cabinet meeting Sept. 12, 2001. White House photo by Tina Hager.]] Although the attacks may have been an attempt from Al-Qaeda to divide the United States, they were unsuccessful. Across the nation Americans had donated blood and raised money for reconstruction in New York City. Within weeks Americans had raised over one billion dollars. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The American Vision from National Geographic, pg. 1033 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On September 14th President Bush declared a national emergency. [[CIA]] Director [[George Tenent]] and the FBI identified the attacks from Al-Qaeda and [[Osama Bin Laden]] in [[Afghanistan]]. As [[Secretary of State]] [[Colin Powell]] begin to build an international coalition with over 90 countries to support the United States global [[War on Terrorism]], [[Secretary of Defense]] [[Donald Rumsfeld]] began to redeploy troops and aircraft's to the [[Middle East]]. On September 24th, President Bush issued an executive order freezing all funding to financial assets to individuals and groups suspected of terrorism, and over 80 other nations soon followed. Bush then established the Department of Homeland Security to coordinate federal agencies working to prevent terrorism. The President appointed [[Pennsylvania]] [[Governor]] [[Tom Ridge]] to the office. In October President Bush signed into law the U.S. [[Patriot Act]], which allowed authorities to obtain a signal nationwide search warrant that could be used anywhere on suspected terrorists. It also made it easier to wiretap terrorists and track their [[email]]. The mastermind of the 9/11 attacks—[[Khalid Sheikh Mohammed]] has been captured.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 5th, a new [[anthrax]] scare from terrorists began. Anthrax—a deadly bacteria—had been sent in the mail to news organizations in New York City and Washington, D.C. and [[United States Senate|Senate]] Majority Leader [[Tom Daschle]]'s office. The FBI investigated the anthrax attacks, although no suspects were identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War in Afghanistan===      &lt;br /&gt;
*''Main Article: [[Afghanistan War]]              &lt;br /&gt;
Afghanistan housed and protected al-Qaeda as it planned the 9-11 attacks.  It then refused to turn over al-Qaeda leaders. With UN and NATO approval, Bush went to war to overthrow the Taliban. On October 7th, 2001, he ordered bombing of al-Qaeda's camps and the [[Taliban]]'s military forces in Afghanistan. &amp;quot;We will not waver, we will not tire, we will not falter, we will not fail, freedom will prevail&amp;quot;, President Bush explained. The attack quickly shattered the [[Taliban]]'s defenses, and by early December the Taliban regime had collapsed. The United States, its allies and the UN then helped Afghanistan create a new government under [[Hamid Karzai]]. By March 2002, the Taliban and al-Qaeda were beginning to regroup again in the mountain's of the [[Pakistan]] border. President Bush responded by launching Operation Anaconda, where Al-Qaeda troops were defeated.  Al-Qaeda was largely destroyed, but the Taliban rebuilt using secure sanctuaries in Pakistan from which it launched terror attacks inside Afghanistan (and inside Pakistan as well)..&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Fred Barnes, ''Rebel-in-Chief: Inside the Bold and Controversial Presidency of George W. Bush'' (2006); Seth Jones, ''In the Graveyard of Empires: America's War in Afghanistan'' (2009)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a candidate in 2008 Obama criticized Bush for neglecting the Afghanistan, and tripled the number of American troops from 31,000 when Bush left office to over 100,000 in early 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2002 Mid-Term Elections===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats wanted the focus of the 2002 mid term elections to be on the [[economy]], which was growing slowly after the September 11th terrorist attacks. However, because Congress voted to authorized military force in Iraq in mid-October, national security was the top issue. Republicans increased their majority in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] and took back control of the [[United States Senate]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2002-2003 build up of the War in Iraq===&lt;br /&gt;
In his infamous January 2002 State of the Union speech, President Bush declared an &amp;quot;Axis of Evil&amp;quot; made up of [[Iraq]], [[Iran]], and [[North Korea]], countries that posed a grave threat to the world and were suspected of supporting terrorism. Considering it a more dangerous and urgent threat then North Korea, President Bush began putting pressure on Iraq throughout 2002 for a regime [[change]]. Iraq's dictator [[Saddam Hussein]] had used chemical weapons against Iran and the Kurds, an ethnic minority in Iraq. Considering that Iraq may had been building Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's) and was a threat to the United States and its allies, On September 12, 2002 President Bush tried to gain U.N. support for a U.S. led invasion of Iraq and asked for a resolution that Iraq gave up it's Weapons of Mass Destruction. While the U.N. Security Council approved a resolution that demanded Saddam Hussein declare all of it's WMD's, stop supporting terrorism and oppressing his people, Congress authorized the use of military force against Iraq. The United States, [[Great Britain]] and about 30 other countries began to prepare for war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aftermath of the Invasion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:20031127_dsc2048-515h.jpg|Right|thumb|300px|President George W. Bush meets with troops and serves Thanksgiving Dinner at the Bob Hope Dining Facility, Baghdad International Airport, Iraq,, Thursday, November 27, 2003. White House photo by Tina Hager.]] On March 23rd, 2003, U.S. led coalition forces began an attack on Iraq. Most of the Iraqi army dissolved and coalition forces quickly took control of the country. However, sectarian violence worsened through [[bomb]]ings and sniper attacks. On Thanksgiving 2003 President Bush and U.S. National Security Adviser [[Condoleezza Rice]] visited troops in Iraq to boost moral. Saddam Hussein was captured in December 2003 while little evidence had shown that he had obtained Weapons of Mass Destruction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 30, 2005 Iraq had it's first general election since the liberation. They voted for a 275-member Iraqi National Assembly which later drafted a constitution. In December Iraq elected a permanent 275-member Council of Representatives. There were low levels of violence during the voting. In a show down with Congressional Democrats after taking control of the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] and [[U.S. Senate|Senate]] in the 2006 Congressional Midterm elections, Democrats retreated on their pledge to end the [[Iraq War]] early and bring the troops home. Democrats had threatened to withhold funding for the troops unless a date certain for withdrawal was set.   After the final vote, 280-142 in the House and 80-14 in the Senate, the anti-War movement was defeated.  The deal cut with Democratic leaders in exchange for their acquiescing to fund the troops calls for the President to sign legislation raising the [[minimum wage]].  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070525-122215-4854r.htm Congress OKs war bill sans time-line,] By S.A. Miller, The Washington Times'', May 25, 2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One commentator remarked, &amp;quot;Despite all the talk of standing up to George W. Bush, despite all the bravado about taking control of Congress, despite the so-called mandate to change direction, Democrats caved....They claim that the majority of Americans are with them on the Iraq issue, but...President Bush, at the weakest moment of his presidency, still bested his Democratic rivals.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/phyrillas/05292007.htm Democrats Show True Colors],  Tony Phyrillas, ''New Media journal'', May 29, 2007, &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2007 Troop Surge===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:20061228-1_p122706pm-0144-515h.jpg‎|Right|thumb|300px|President George W. Bush meets with National Security team, from left to right, Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Peter Pace Thursday, Dec. 28, 2006, at Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford, Texas. White House photo by Paul Morse]]&lt;br /&gt;
On January 23, 2007 President Bush ordered an additional 30,000 troops to Iraq. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make progress toward this goal, the Iraqi government must stop the sectarian violence in its capital. But the Iraqis are not yet ready to do this on their own. So we're deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq. The vast majority will go to Baghdad, where they will help Iraqi forces to clear and secure neighborhoods, and serve as advisers embedded in Iraqi Army units. With Iraqis in the lead, our forces will help secure the city by chasing down the terrorists, insurgents, and the roaming death squads. And in Anbar Province, where al Qaeda terrorists have gathered and local forces have begun showing a willingness to fight them, we're sending an additional 4,000 United States Marines, with orders to find the terrorists and clear them out.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/603653/the_iraq_war_troop_surge_one_year_later.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The surge was opposed by a majority of the United States Congress. However, it has resulted in significantly reduced sectarian violence. According to U.S. Central Command [[General]] [[David Petraeus]], violence in Iraq by December 2008 was at a 5 year low. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE4B86G720081209&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humanitarian aid===&lt;br /&gt;
President Bush has worked to stop the spread of the [[HIV/AIDS]] epidemic in [[Africa]]. In the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) $15 billion dollars over five years (2003–2008) was spent on fighting global HIV/AIDS and improving treatment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon gaining office in 2001, Bush signed into law a $1.35 trillion cut in taxes over 10 years. The plan included the objectives of doubling the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reducing the tax penalty on [[marriage|married couples]] and fully repealing the [[Estate tax|tax on estates]]. A [[United States Senate]] Finance Committee Report estimated that with all the planned reductions fully phased in, the average family of four making $50,000 would save $1,825 per year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/06/07/bush.taxes/ $1.35 trillion tax cut becomes law], CNN, 21 June 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:20080919-2_p091908jb-0025-1-515h.jpg‎|Right|thumb|300px|President George W. Bush stands with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, SEC Chairman Chris Cox, right, and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson as he delivers a statement on the economy Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden. White House photo by Joyce N. Boghosian]] Since the tax cuts, IRS revenues increased from $1.78 trillion in 2003 to $2.56 trillion in 2007 with a 46.3% increase of individual income tax receipts. Surging $785 billion since the 2003 investment tax cuts, it is the largest four-year revenue increase in U.S. history&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119189497675953035.html?mod=googlenews_wsj&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this same time period, spending mandated by Congress has also increased by more than 29% in inflation-adjusted dollars, representing an 11.4% increase in federal spending as a percentage of [[Gross domestic product|GDP]]. This spending has doubled the federal debt, increasing it from 58% to 66% of GDP. Defense spending increased 61%, and non-defense by 23% during the eight years since 2000.  The largest non-defense spending increase has been for federally-funded medical expenses, at 54 percent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aier.org/research/commentaries/750-big-government-under-the-bush-administration Big Government Under The Bush Administration], AIER, 16 November 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In total, Bush has increased government expenditures by the largest percentage of any president since Lyndon Johnson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article944806.ece Some think Bush was too liberal], Wes Allison, Tampa Bay Times December 21, 2008 quoting Gleaves Whitney, director of the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies at Grand Valley State University and author of a new paper, &amp;quot;Anatomy of a Divorce: Conservatives versus George W. Bush.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bush presided over a period of unreal economic growth that reflected a bubble that burst in 2008. The [[housing bubble]] allowed people to cash in the rising value of houses; low interest rates that led to massive borrowing. Money flowed into the U.S. from around the world. The stock market that hit a record high in 2007, then plunged relentlessly downward, losing $8 trillion in value in 2008. Unemployment hit an all time low in March 2007, but started rapidly increasing after January 2008. Bush signed into law a minimum wage increase, one of the platforms for the Democrats in the 2006 Congressional elections, after the House and Senate included Bush's request of provisions for small-business tax breaks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/20/AR2006122001784.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001666.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tax policies have been favorable to reducing the [[Capital Gains Tax]], with a subsequent surge in investment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Financial Crisis of 2008]] and [[Recession of 2008]],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[socialist]] [[Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007]] was signed by Bush into law on April 25, 2009 as a rider to the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, despite conservative opposition &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/opposing_minimum_wage_hike_is_1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  This measure hurt businesses and decreased America's competitiveness in the global marketplace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Supreme Court Appointments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], President Bush nominated U.S. Court of Appeals Judge [[John Roberts]] to fill the vacancy. He was confirmed on September 29, 2005 by a 78-22 vote. To replace the retiring Associate Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] Bush nominated Judge [[Samuel Alito]], after his original nomination of Chief White House Council [[Harriet Miers]] was withdrawn because of widespread opposition due to lack of experience. After an unsuccessful filibuster attempt from [[United States Senate|Senate]] [[liberal]]s, Alito was confirmed on a 58-42 vote and was sworn in on January 31, 2006. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5181091&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Involvement in the 2008 Presidential election===&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2008, Bush endorsed his one-time rival [[John McCain]] as the Republican candidate for President of the United States. However, due to the President's declining popularity in polls, McCain distanced himself from Mr. Bush on the campaign trail. At the same time, Democratic candidate [[Barack Obama]] tried to portray a McCain presidency as four more years of George W. Bush. The President spoke by videolink at the 2008 [[Republican National Convention]], while his wife Laura appeared on stage with McCain's wife [[Cindy McCain|Cindy]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:George Laura Bush2008.jpg|thumb|left|300px|President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush pose for their last official holiday portrait, Dec. 7, 2008, in the Blue Room of the White House.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Future Plans==&lt;br /&gt;
John McCain lost the election to Senator Obama, and President Bush met with the new president-elect to discuss the presidential transition between his administration and Obama's, which he promised would be efficient and without problems. George W. Bush's term ended at noon on January 20, 2009, at which point President-elect Obama was inaugurated. In an interview with ABC's [[Charles Gibson]] in December 2008, Bush said his retirement plans included moving back to his home state of Texas and writing a book. He also wants to build an institute at the Southern Methodist University to serve as a non-partisan public policy forum, to debate issues and run volunteer projects from.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family ==&lt;br /&gt;
George W. Bush is the son of [[George H. W. Bush]], who served as vice-president from 1981 to 1989 and as president from 1989 to 1993, and [[Barbara Bush]]. President Bush is married to [[Laura Bush|Laura Welch Bush]], a former teacher and librarian, and they have twin daughters, Barbara and Jenna. John Ellis &amp;quot;Jeb&amp;quot; Bush, Neil Bush and Marvin Bush are his brothers. Dorothy Bush Koch is his only surviving sister, as Pauline Robinson Bush died at age four of [[leukemia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George W. Bush is a member of the [[United Methodist Church]], and most people feel that George W. Bush's faith is sincere and profound. ''The Faith of George W. Bush'', a non-political book by author Stephen Strang, made the [[New York Times]] best-sellers list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianlifemissions.org/ministries/georgewbush.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
When asked where he would be without the influence of family friend [[Billy Graham]], George W. Bush said &amp;quot;I wouldn't be president.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;It was just a conversation,&amp;quot; said the younger Bush about a talk with Graham in the mid-'80s that changed his life. During the pivotal conversation Bush recalled saying, &amp;quot;'You know, Billy, I'm longing for something.' And I know that he sent me a Bible I still have. All I can tell you is that as a result of being inspired by Billy Graham, I started reading the Bible and shortly after, I quit drinking.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billy Graham and the White House [http://religion.beloblog.com/archives/2007/08/billy_graham_and_the_white_hou_1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bush's faith led him to veto a bill which would have provided for [[federal funding]] of immoral embryonic stem cell research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an interview with ABC's &amp;quot;Nightline&amp;quot; on 12/8/08, the president also said he probably is not a literalist when reading the Bible although an individual can learn a great deal from it, including the New Testament teaching that [[God]] sent his only son.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his presidential career, George W Bush often consulted God when making important decisions. For example, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, reported that President Bush said that God told him 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan' and 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about creation and evolution, Bush said: &amp;quot;I think you can have both. I think evolution can -- you're getting me way out of my lane here. I'm just a simple president. But it's, I think that God created the earth, created the world; I think the creation of the world is so mysterious it requires something as large as an almighty and I don't think it's incompatible with the scientific proof that there is evolution.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=6418908&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/09/bush-says-creation-incompatible-evolution/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.onenewsnow.com/Business/Default.aspx?id=347242&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
He added:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''''I happen to believe that evolution doesn't fully explain the mystery of life.'''''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polls==&lt;br /&gt;
When Bush entered office, his popularity rating was near 50%.  However, after the [[September 11]] attacks, his popularity rose significantly, reaching an all-time high of 90%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/07/usatgallup-po-1.html USAT Gallup Poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Since, then, though, it declined as some of his policies have become unpopular (largely due to the media's persistently negative -- and [[liberal bias|biased]] -- reporting on the [[Iraq War]] and misrepresentation of his policies).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Historical Bush Approval Ratings from University of Minnesota [http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2007, Bush had an approval rating of only 24%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1624620720071017?feedType=RSS&amp;amp;feedName=topNews&amp;amp;rpc=22&amp;amp;sp=true Voters unhappy with Bush and Congress], Reuters, October 17 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The same poll gave the Democratic controlled Congress an approval rating of only 11%). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell Speech ==&lt;br /&gt;
*''Delivered January 15, 2009 at the White House. His audience in the East Room included family, friends, Cabinet and some selected Americans President Bush had met in his eight years in office.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Fellow citizens:  For eight years, it has been my honor to serve as your President.  The first decade of this new century has been a period of consequence – a time set apart.  Tonight, with a thankful heart, I have asked for a final opportunity to share some thoughts on the journey we have traveled together and the future of our Nation.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BushSpeech.jpg|Right|thumb|300px|President George W. Bush reaches into the audience to shake hands with invited guests and staff members following his farewell address to the nation Thursday evening, Jan. 15, 2009 in the East Room of the White House, where President Bush thanked the American people for their support and trust. White House photo by Joyce N. Boghosian]] '''Five days from now, the world will witness the vitality of American democracy.  In a tradition dating back to our founding, the presidency will pass to a successor chosen by you, the American people.  Standing on the steps of the Capitol will be a man whose story reflects the enduring promise of our land.  This is a moment of hope and pride for our whole Nation.  And I join all Americans in offering best wishes to President-elect Obama, his wife Michelle, and their two beautiful girls.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tonight I am filled with gratitude – to Vice President Cheney and members of the Administration; to Laura, who brought joy to this house and love to my life; to our wonderful daughters, Barbara and Jenna; to my parents, whose examples have provided strength for a lifetime.  And above all, I thank the American people for the trust you have given me.  I thank you for ....'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''...the prayers that have lifted my spirits.  And I thank you for the countless acts of courage, generosity, and grace that I have witnessed these past eight years.  ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This evening, my thoughts return to the first night I addressed you from this house – September 11, 2001.  That morning, terrorists took nearly 3,000 lives in the worst attack on America since Pearl Harbor.  I remember standing in the rubble of the World Trade Center three days later, surrounded by rescuers who had been working around the clock.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I remember talking to brave souls who charged through smoke-filled corridors at the Pentagon and to husbands and wives whose loved ones became heroes aboard Flight 93.  I remember Arlene Howard, who gave me her fallen son’s police shield as a reminder of all that was lost.  And I still carry his badge.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''As the years passed, most Americans were able to return to life much as it had been before Nine-Eleven.  But I never did.  Every morning, I received a briefing on the threats to our Nation.  And I vowed to do everything in my power to keep us safe.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Over the past seven years, a new Department of Homeland Security has been created.  The military, the intelligence community, and the FBI have been transformed.  Our Nation is equipped with new tools to monitor the terrorists’ movements, freeze their finances, and break up their plots.  And with strong allies at our side, we have taken the fight to the terrorists and those who support them.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Afghanistan has gone from a nation where the Taliban harbored al Qaeda and stoned women in the streets to a young democracy that is fighting terror and encouraging girls to go to school.  Iraq has gone from a brutal dictatorship and a sworn enemy of America to an Arab democracy at the heart of the Middle East and a friend of the United States.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''There is legitimate debate about many of these decisions.  But there can be little debate about the results.  America has gone more than seven years without another terrorist attack on our soil.  This is a tribute to those who toil day and night to keep us safe – law enforcement officers, intelligence analysts, homeland security and diplomatic personnel, and the men and women of the United States Armed Forces.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Our Nation is blessed to have citizens who volunteer to defend us in this time of danger.  I have cherished meeting these selfless patriots and their families.  America owes you a debt of gratitude.  And to all our men and women in uniform listening tonight:  There has been no higher honor than serving as your Commander in Chief.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The battles waged by our troops are part of a broader struggle between two dramatically different systems.  Under one, a small band of fanatics demands total obedience to an oppressive ideology, condemns women to subservience, and marks unbelievers for murder.  The other system is based on the conviction that freedom is the universal gift of Almighty God and that liberty and justice light the path to peace.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the belief that gave birth to our Nation.  And in the long run, advancing this belief is the only practical way to protect our citizens.  When people live in freedom, they do not willingly choose leaders who pursue campaigns of terror.  When people have hope in the future, they will not cede their lives to violence and extremism.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''So around the world, America is promoting human liberty, human rights, and human dignity.  We are standing with dissidents and young democracies, providing AIDS medicine to bring dying patients back to life, and sparing mothers and babies from malaria.  And this great republic born alone in liberty is leading the world toward a new age when freedom belongs to all nations.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''For eight years, we have also strived to expand opportunity and hope here at home.  Across our country, students are rising to meet higher standards in public schools.  A new Medicare prescription drug benefit is bringing peace of mind to seniors and the disabled.  Every taxpayer pays lower income taxes.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The addicted and suffering are finding new hope through faith-based programs.  Vulnerable human life is better protected.  Funding for our veterans has nearly doubled.  America’s air, water, and lands are measurably cleaner.  And the Federal bench includes wise new members like Justice Sam Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''When challenges to our prosperity emerged, we rose to meet them.  Facing the prospect of a financial collapse, we took decisive measures to safeguard our economy.  These are very tough times for hardworking families, but the toll would be far worse if we had not acted.  All Americans are in this together.  And together, with determination and hard work, we will restore our economy to the path of growth.  We will show the world once again the resilience of America’s free enterprise system.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Like all who have held this office before me, I have experienced setbacks.  There are things I would do differently if given the chance.  Yet I have always acted with the best interests of our country in mind.  I have followed my conscience and done what I thought was right.  You may not agree with some tough decisions I have made.  But I hope you can agree that I was willing to make the tough decisions.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The decades ahead will bring more hard choices for our country, and there are some guiding principles that should shape our course.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''While our Nation is safer than it was seven years ago, the gravest threat to our people remains another terrorist attack.  Our enemies are patient and determined to strike again.  America did nothing to seek or deserve this conflict.  But we have been given solemn responsibilities, and we must meet them.  We must resist complacency.  We must keep our resolve.  And we must never let down our guard.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''At the same time, we must continue to engage the world with confidence and clear purpose.  In the face of threats from abroad, it can be tempting to seek comfort by turning inward.  But we must reject isolationism and its companion, protectionism.  Retreating behind our borders would only invite danger.  In the 21st century, security and prosperity at home depend on the expansion of liberty abroad.  If America does not lead the cause of freedom, that cause will not be led.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''As we address these challenges – and others we cannot foresee tonight – America must maintain our moral clarity.  I have often spoken to you about good and evil.  This has made some uncomfortable.  But good and evil are present in this world, and between the two there can be no compromise.  Murdering the innocent to advance an ideology is wrong every time, everywhere.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Freeing people from oppression and despair is eternally right.  This Nation must continue to speak out for justice and truth.  We must always be willing to act in their defense and to advance the cause of peace.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''President Thomas Jefferson once wrote, “I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.”  As I leave the house he occupied two centuries ago, I share that optimism.  America is a young country, full of vitality, constantly growing and renewing itself.  And even in the toughest times, we lift our eyes to the broad horizon ahead.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I have confidence in the promise of America because I know the character of our people.  This is a Nation that inspires immigrants to risk everything for the dream of freedom.  This is a Nation where citizens show calm in times of danger and compassion in the face of suffering.   We see examples of America’s character all around us.  And Laura and I have invited some of them to join us in the White House this evening.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''We see America’s character in Dr. Tony Recasner, a principal who opened a new charter school from the ruins of Hurricane Katrina.  We see it in Julio Medina, a former inmate who leads a faith-based program to help prisoners returning to society.  We see it in Staff Sergeant Aubrey McDade, who charged into an ambush in Iraq and rescued three of his fellow Marines.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''We see America’s character in Bill Krissoff, a surgeon from California. His son Nathan, a Marine, gave his life in Iraq.  When I met Dr. Krissoff and his family, he delivered some surprising news:  He told me he wanted to join the Navy Medical Corps in honor of his son.  This good man was 60 years old – 18 years above the age limit.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''But his petition for a waiver was granted, and for the past year he has trained in battlefield medicine.  Lieutenant Commander Krissoff could not be here tonight, because he will soon deploy to Iraq, where he will help save America’s wounded warriors and uphold the legacy of his fallen son.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''In citizens like these, we see the best of our country – resilient and hopeful, caring and strong.  These virtues give me an unshakable faith in America.  We have faced danger and trial, and there is more ahead.  But with the courage of our people and confidence in our ideals, this great Nation will never tire … never falter … and never fail.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''It has been the privilege of a lifetime to serve as your President.  There have been good days and tough days.  But every day I have been inspired by the greatness of our country and uplifted by the goodness of our people.  I have been blessed to represent this Nation we love.  And I will always be honored to carry a title that means more to me than any other: citizen of the United States of America.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''And so, my fellow Americans, for the final time:  Good night.  May God bless this house and our next President.  And may God bless you and our wonderful country.&amp;quot;'''&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Everywhere that freedom stirs, let tyrants fear.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
==''Decision Points==&lt;br /&gt;
''Decision Points'' is a memoir written by Bush and was released on November 9, 2010. Bush also went on a national tour after releasing his book. After two months, the book sold very well, surpassing two million copies sold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The book is 481 pages long and is broken into 14 chapters, with the first two being about Bush before his presidency, covering events such as when he quit drinking alcohol and was governor of [[Texas]]. The remaining twelve are about events during his presidency, such as the War on Terror, the September 11, 2001 attacks, and Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Publications==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.amazon.com/Decision-Points-George-W-Bush/dp/0307590615/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1279195424&amp;amp;sr=8-1 Decision Points by George W. Bush], released November 9, 2010. ISBN 0307590615&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
;Academic&lt;br /&gt;
* Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. ''Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections'' (2007), 324pp [http://www.amazon.com/Change-Continuity-2004-2006-Elections/dp/0872894150/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1206001659&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Allard, Scott W. &amp;quot;The Changing Face of Welfare During the Bush Administration.&amp;quot; ''Publius'' 2007 37(3): 304-332. Issn: 0048-5950 &lt;br /&gt;
* Barone, Michael. ''The Almanac of American Politics'' (2004, 2006, 2008, 2010), highly detailed coverage of electoral politics and Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Berggren, D. Jason, and Nicol C. Rae. &amp;quot;Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush: Faith, Foreign Policy, and an Evangelical Presidential Style.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly.'' 36#4 2006. pp 606+.  [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=5018322436 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Campbell, Colin, Bert A. Rockman, and Andrew Rudalevige, eds.. ''The George W. Bush Legacy'' Congressional Quarterly Press, 2007, 352pp; 14 essays by scholars  [http://www.amazon.com/George-W-Bush-Legacy/dp/0872893464/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1206001536&amp;amp;sr=1-1  excerpts and online search from Amazon.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* Congressional Quarterly. ''CQ Almanac Plus'' highly detailed annual compilation of events in Congress, White House, Supreme Court, summarizing the weekly &amp;quot;Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report&amp;quot;. (annual, 2002-2009) &lt;br /&gt;
* Conlan, Tim and John Dinan. &amp;quot;Federalism, the Bush Administration, and the Transformation of American Conservatism.&amp;quot; ''Publius'' 2007 37(3): 279-303. Issn: 0048-5950 &lt;br /&gt;
*  Corrado, Anthony, E. J. Dionne Jr., Kathleen A. Frankovic. ''The Election of 2000: Reports and Interpretations'' (2001) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99208680 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Daynes, Byron W. and Glen Sussman. &amp;quot;Comparing the Environmental Policies of Presidents George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush.&amp;quot; ''White House Studies'' 2007 7(2): 163-179. Issn: 1535-4738 &lt;br /&gt;
* Desch, Michael C. &amp;quot;Bush and the Generals.&amp;quot; ''Foreign Affairs'' 2007 86(3): 97-108. Issn: 0015-7120 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Eckersley, Robyn. &amp;quot;Ambushed: the Kyoto Protocol, the Bush Administration's Climate Policy and the Erosion of Legitimacy.&amp;quot; ''International Politics'' 2007 44(2-3): 306-324. Issn: 1384-5748 &lt;br /&gt;
* Edwards III, George C.  and Philip John Davies, eds. ''New Challenges for the American Presidency'' New York: Pearson Longman, 2004. 245 pp. articles from ''Presidential Studies Quarterly''&lt;br /&gt;
* Edwards III, George C.  and Desmond King, eds. ''The Polarized Presidency of George W. Bush'' (2007), 478pp; essays by scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0199217971/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and online search from Amazon.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fortier, John C. and Norman J. Ornstein, eds. ''Second-term Blues: How George W. Bush Has Governed'' (2007), 146pp  [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0815728840/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and online search from Amazon.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greenstein, Fred I. ed. ''The George W. Bush Presidency: An Early Assessment'' Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003&lt;br /&gt;
* Greenstein, Fred I.  “The Contemporary Presidency: The Changing Leadership of George W. Bush A Pre- and Post-9/11 Comparison” in ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' v 32#2 2002 pp 387+. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=5000773171  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregg II, Gary L.  and Mark J. Rozell, eds. ''Considering the Bush Presidency'' Oxford University Press, 2004. 210 pp. British perspectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Hendrickson, Ryan C., and Kristina Spohr Readman, &amp;quot;From the Baltic to the Black Sea: Bush's NATO Enlargement.&amp;quot; ''White House Studies.'' (2004)  4#3 pp: 319+. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=5008838303 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hilliard, Bryan, Tom Lansford, and Robert P Watson, eds. ''George W. Bush: Evaluating the President at Midterm'' SUNY Press 2004&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacobson, Gary C. “The Bush Presidency and the American Electorate” ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' v 33 #4 2003 pp 701+. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=5002052614 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacobson, Gary C. &amp;quot;Referendum: the 2006 Midterm Congressional Elections.&amp;quot; ''Political Science Quarterly'' 2007 122(1): 1-24. Issn: 0032-3195 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Milkis, Sidney M. and Jesse H.Rhodes.  &amp;quot;George W. Bush, the Party System, and American Federalism.&amp;quot; ''Publius'' 2007 37(3): 478-503. Issn: 0048-5950 &lt;br /&gt;
* Moens, Alexander ''The Foreign Policy of George W. Bush: Values, Strategy, and Loyalty.'' Ashgate, 2004. 227 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Rabe, Barry. &amp;quot;Environmental Policy and the Bush Era: the Collision Between the Administrative Presidency and State Experimentation.&amp;quot; ''Publius'' 2007 37(3): 413-431. Issn: 0048-5950 &lt;br /&gt;
*  Sabato, Larry J. ed. ''The Sixth Year Itch: The Rise and Fall of the George W. Bush Presidency'' (2007), experts on the 2006 elections in major states&lt;br /&gt;
* Strozeski, Josh, et al. &amp;quot;From Benign Neglect to Strategic Interest: the Role of Africa in the Foreign Policies of Bush 41 and 43.&amp;quot; ''White House Studies'' 2007 7(1): 35-51. Issn: 1535-4738 &lt;br /&gt;
* Wekkin, Gary D. &amp;quot;George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush: Puzzling Presidencies, or the Puzzle of the Presidency?&amp;quot; ''White House Studies'' 2007 7(2): 113-124. Issn: 1535-4738 &lt;br /&gt;
* Wong, Kenneth and Gail Sunderman. &amp;quot;Education Accountability as a Presidential Priority: No Child Left Behind and the Bush Presidency.&amp;quot;  ''Publius'' 2007 37(3): 333-350. Issn: 0048-5950 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Pro-Bush&lt;br /&gt;
* Barnes, Fred. ''Rebel-in-Chief: How George W. Bush Is Redefining the Conservative Movement and Transforming America'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Draper, Robert. ''Inside the Bush White House: The Presidency of George W. Bush'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Hughes, Karen. ''George W. Bush: Portrait of a Leader,'' (2005) &lt;br /&gt;
* Gerson, Michael J. ''Heroic Conservatism: Why Republicans Need to Embrace America's Ideals (And Why They Deserve to Fail If They Don't)'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Heroic-Conservatism-Republicans-Embrace-Americas/dp/006134950X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1206001391&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bob Woodward|Woodward, Bob]]. ''Plan of Attack'' (2003) on Iraq war [http://www.amazon.com/Plan-Attack-Bob-Woodward/dp/074325547X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1206001508&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Anti-Bush&lt;br /&gt;
* Bartlett, Bruce. ''Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy'' (2006), conservative attack by former aide&lt;br /&gt;
* Ferguson, Michaele L. and Lori Jo Marso. ''W Stands for Women: How the George W. Bush Presidency Shaped a New Politics of Gender'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greenspan, Alan. ''The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World,'' (2007), memoir by powerful chairman of the Federal Reserve&lt;br /&gt;
* Moore, James. and Wayne Slater. ''Bush's Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential.'' 2003. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=107370497 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Suskind, Ron. ''The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill'' (2004), complaints of ex Treasury Secretary [http://www.amazon.com/Price-Loyalty-George-Education-ONeill/dp/0743255461/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1188802463&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpts and online search from Amazon.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Bush aides&lt;br /&gt;
* Stephen F. Hayes. ''Cheney: The Untold Story of America's Most Powerful and Controversial Vice President'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Cheney-Americas-Powerful-Controversial-President/dp/0060723467/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1188802328&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpts and online search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mabry, Marcus. ''Twice as Good: Condoleezza Rice and Her Path to Power'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
; Primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/publications/ERP/ Council of Economic Advisors, ''Economic Report of the President'' (annual 1947- )], complete series online; important analysis of current trends and policies, plus statistical tables&lt;br /&gt;
* George W. Bush. ''George W. Bush on God and Country: The President Speaks Out About Faith, Principle, and Patriotism'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/George W. Bush|Articles about '''George W. Bush''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bush Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bush Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bush-hater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bushism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Texas Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bush, George W.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Neoconservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Iraq War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Veterans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bushcenter.com/ The George W. Bush Presidential Center]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://warrioropen.com/ Warrior Open, Dallas, Texas, on October 10 and 11, 2011]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.facebook.com/georgewbush George W. Bush on Facebook]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.facebook.com/clintonbushhaitifund?v=wall Clinton Bush Haiti Fund]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.honorfreedom.com HonorFreedom.com - a nationwide effort to correct the historical record about President Bush and the Bush foreign policy doctrine]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nine</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>