<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=NoMonkey</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=NoMonkey"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/NoMonkey"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T18:54:58Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nancy_Reagan&amp;diff=85798</id>
		<title>Nancy Reagan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nancy_Reagan&amp;diff=85798"/>
		<updated>2007-04-04T22:45:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;NoMonkey: Fix link syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nancy Reagan is the wife of the former President of the United States [[Ronald Reagan]], and First Lady from 1981-1989.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NoMonkey</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nancy_Reagan&amp;diff=85795</id>
		<title>Nancy Reagan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nancy_Reagan&amp;diff=85795"/>
		<updated>2007-04-04T22:44:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;NoMonkey: Fix link syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nancy Reagan is the wife of the former President of the United States [Ronald Reagan], and First Lady from 1981-1989.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NoMonkey</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=52917</id>
		<title>Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=52917"/>
		<updated>2007-03-21T00:14:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;NoMonkey: /* Prejudice Against Atheists */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Atheism''' is disbelief in the existence of a [[God|god]] or gods.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Well-known atheists include [[Stephen Hawking]], [[Stephen Jay Gould]], [[Carl Sagan]], [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Douglas Adams]], [[William Borden]],[[Sam Harris]], [[Jeremey Alliadiaere]], [[Gary Neville]] and [[Ricky Gervais]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheist morality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists often base their [[moral code]] upon [[emotion]], [[experience]], empirically derived ethics, or some combination thereof.{{fact}} It is important to note, however, that just as many religions disagree on specific moral points, and there is sharp disagreement within many religions (e.g. denominational disputes within Christianity), atheists differ substantially from each other in the details of their moral beliefs.  Thus, it is difficult at best to summarize the beliefs of the &amp;quot;average atheist.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists typically hold that no religious text can be our only source of morality although all of them may contain useful ideas or principles. As atheists do not believe in any form of deity, books purported to be based upon the wishes of such deities are inherently suspect. Additionally, many atheists point out that all religious texts contain, and often ascribe to God, extremely immoral acts such as the Israelite expulsion of heathen nations from Canaan (i.e. [[ethnic cleansing]]), the stoning of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm homosexuals] to death, questionable treatment of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/19.html#1 women] and the institution of [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/slavery.html slavery]. Additionally, atheists often point to a large number of prominent [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_name.html contradictions] present in the bible and other religious texts.  The presence of such contradictions challenges claims that these works are the infallible word of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists sometimes subscribe to the secular humanist idea that it is far more desirable to do what is right because you believe that it is right, rather than because you fear divine punishment or desire divine reward.  This view is illustrated by celebrated atheist [[Albert Einstein]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary.  Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists sometimes condemn religious desires for exclusive reward (and the punishment of others) such as are found in all religious texts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origins ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many atheists claim that atheism has existed for as long as man and that religion was invented by man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Christian would claim it can be traced back to specific date, as Adam and Eve believed in God so at some point somebody must have stopped believing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Christian View of Origins ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to trace the origins of atheism as a result of the incomplete historic record. It is known that ancient Greece produced a theory of materialism as early as the 5th century BC.  Materialism is a philosophical position that the material is all that exists. Therefore, it automatically excludes immaterial beings. In addition to materialism the Greeks also considered Spiritualism, in which the material world is an illusion and only spirit exists, as well as dualism, in which both the material and the spiritual exist (e.g. Christianity). It is important to note that while many atheists are strict materialists, some are not. As an example, some philosophical systems generally regarded as religions (i.e. Buddhism) lack deities and thus could be regarded as &amp;quot;atheistic faiths,&amp;quot; or forms of non-materialistic atheism. In any case, it is likely impossible to determine the true origins of atheism as it was presumably the default belief of most humans prior to the development of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writer of the Book of Psalms knew of atheists and atheism and registered disapproval in Psalm 14:  &amp;quot;The Fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.&amp;quot; The book of Psalms precedes the 5th century BC by hundreds of years {{fact}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prejudice Against Atheists ==&lt;br /&gt;
Research by Penny Edgell, Joseph Gerteis and Douglas Hartman in the American Sociological Review [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asoca/asr/2006/00000071/00000002/art00003 indicates] that most Americans would be more willing to vote for a gay or Muslim presidential candidate than an atheist. The same study indicates that 47.6% of Americans would disapprove of their child marrying an atheist. More recent [http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=26611&amp;amp;pg=1 Gallup polls] confirm this finding and indicate that atheists are among the most disliked minorities in the United States. In addition to discrimination in voting practices and marriage, former President George H.W. Bush has previously [http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/ghwbush.htm stated] that he does not believe atheists should be considered citizens of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Penny, Edgell &amp;amp; Hartmann 2006- Table 1 (Percentage of respondents answering affirmatively):&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &lt;br /&gt;
! This Group Does Not At All Agree with My Vision of American Society:&lt;br /&gt;
! I Would Disapprove if My Child Wanted to Marry a Member of This Group:&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atheist&lt;br /&gt;
| 39.6%&lt;br /&gt;
| 47.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Muslim&lt;br /&gt;
| 26.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| 33.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
| 22.6%&lt;br /&gt;
| NA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservative Christian&lt;br /&gt;
| 13.5%&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Recent Immigrant&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.5%&lt;br /&gt;
| Not Asked&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hispanic&lt;br /&gt;
| 7.6%&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Jew&lt;br /&gt;
| 7.4%&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Asian American&lt;br /&gt;
| 7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|African American&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.6%&lt;br /&gt;
| 27.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| White American&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.2%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However this may not be the case in all nations, in the Great Britain 2001 census, 15.5% of the population identify themselves as having no religious beliefs [http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=293 2001 Census]. It is important to note, however, that those who report having no religious beliefs are not necessarily atheists. Instead, to say that one has &amp;quot;no religion&amp;quot; can simply mean that one does not participate in any established religion while, nonetheless, believing in God. Similarly, some atheists consider atheism to be a religion and will not respond that they have &amp;quot;no religion&amp;quot; on surveys. As an example, 14.39% of the respondents to the 2004 General Social Survey in the United States claim to have &amp;quot;no religion.&amp;quot; Of a subsample (197 respondents) of those persons with no religion who answered a second question on the origins of man, 19.80% believe that God created man while an additional 43.15% believe that God created man by guiding evolution over time. Thus, cumulatively 62.95% of those with &amp;quot;no religion&amp;quot; still believe that God was directly responsible for the creation of man in some fashion. These data are available and can be analyzed online [http://sda.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/hsda?harcsda+gss04 GSS Data Online].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specific research on atheists conducted in 2006 [http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=1131 suggests] that the true proportion of Atheists is 4% in the United States and 17% in Great Britain.  However, the Christian research organization, the Barna Group, [http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=160 reports] that 12% of Americans are atheist or agnostic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Problem of Evil==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One argument against belief in all-powerful entities ('gods') is the problem of evil. First identified by the philosopher and materialist Epicurus (341-270 BC), this problem points out the difficulty created by the mere existence of evil:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent. &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? &lt;br /&gt;
:Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of responses to this logical paradox have been put forth including those which assert human ignorance as the culprit, the concept of free will and the specific writings in some faiths which discuss the co-existence of good and evil (such as the book of Job in the Christian and Jewish faiths).[http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/evil-log.htm] Many atheists, however, do not regard such evasions as convincing solutions to the underlying problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creationwiki.org/Decline_of_atheism Decline of Atheism -CreationWiki]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NoMonkey</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Massachusetts_liberal&amp;diff=50009</id>
		<title>Massachusetts liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Massachusetts_liberal&amp;diff=50009"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T02:04:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;NoMonkey: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A [[Liberal]] from [[Massachusetts]], in many ways the most liberal state in the [[United States of America|United States]]. It is the only state where it is a crime, with a mandatory prison sentence of at least one year, for transporting a lawfully owned gun for a lawful purpose in an automobile without a special permit. Out-of-state drivers traveling to hunting or gun competitions in the Northeast have to choose between going hours out of their way to avoid Massachusetts, or spending hours attempting to obtain a permit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Massachusetts is also the only state that has [[same-sex marriage]]. Two of the most liberal senators in the entire [[U.S. Senate]], [[Teddy Kennedy]] and [[John Kerry]], represent Massachusetts.  Massachusetts has the lowest [[divorce]] rate in the country at 2.4 divorces per 1,000 people per annum, according to the Barna Research Group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[John Kerry]] lost by nearly three million votes nationwide in the 2004 election against [[George W. Bush]], yet Kerry won Massachusetts by a margin of about 62-38%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NoMonkey</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fatimid&amp;diff=49958</id>
		<title>Fatimid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fatimid&amp;diff=49958"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T01:49:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;NoMonkey: God should be capitalized only when the true God is named.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Fatimid [[Caliphate]] was a rival [[Shiite]] caliphate to the [[Abbasids]], and flourished in North [[Africa]] from the 10th century until the 12th. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They began in what is now [[Tunisia]] and conquered [[Egypt]] in 972, thereafter becoming an important power in the middle east, reaching a zenith in the early 11th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most notable Fatimid caliph is Al-Hakim, who was (and still is) worshipped as a god by the [[Druze]] sect of [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fatimid state was an early example of a [[meritocracy]] - whilst officially Shiite, [[Sunnis]], [[Christians]] and [[Jews]] were all able to ascend to high office.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NoMonkey</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kangaroo&amp;diff=49948</id>
		<title>Kangaroo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kangaroo&amp;diff=49948"/>
		<updated>2007-03-20T01:46:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;NoMonkey: /* Origins */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kangaroo-bree.png|right|Eastern Grey Kangaroo (''Macropus giganteus'')]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kangaroos''' are the largest [[Marsupials]] alive today. They currently are native to the continent of [[Australia]]. There are four different sub-kinds in the kangaroo [[baramin]]: the Western Grey Kangaroo, the Eastern Grey Kangaroo, the Red Kangaroo, and the Antilopine Kangaroo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kangaroos have large ears on top of their small heads, a long snout, and short arms with clawed fingers. Their legs are strong and powerful, good for leaping. Their feet have four toes at the end of elongated metatarsi that they rest on when standing. They also have a powerful, thick tail that is used as support when standing, a third-leg when walking slowly, and for counterbalance while leaping. Like all Marsupials, female kangaroos have a pouch on their stomachs in which they carry their young.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Diet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kangaroos are [[herbivores]], eating grass, roots, and shrubs. They have a chambered stomach similar to [[sheep]] and [[cattle]]. They are able to regurgitate their food, chew it again as [[cud]], and then swallow it for digestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Social Order===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kangaroos travel in [[mob | mobs]] of about ten or more males and females. The leader of the mob, called a &amp;quot;boomer&amp;quot;, is a male determined by age and size. The boomer has access to females in his mob for mating and will wander around the mob intimidating any other males who try to mate with his harem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reproduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Male kangaroos will go around the mob checking the females’ [[cloaca]]. Many times, males are rejected by the females because of size if they are small. In other cases, if a larger male is checking a female out, she may just move away. Sometimes, when a male is checking out a female, the female will urinate for the male, who will sniff the urine. Some studies show that this ritual is for the male to see if the female kangaroo is receptive to him or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the female is responsive to the male, she raises her tail and the male will follow her. Sometimes the kangaroos will scratch each other’s tails or the male will give the female a back rub before mating. When the female is ready to mate she will arch her tail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Female kangaroos usually only have one baby kangaroo (called a &amp;quot;joey&amp;quot;) at a time. The newborn joey weigh as little as .03 ounces when first born, after which it crawls into its mothers pouch where it will nurse, grow, and develop. They spend a lot of time in their mothers pouch developing. The Red Kangaroo joey will stay in their mothers pouch for about eight months and Grey Kangaroo joeys stay in there for about a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Development of the Young in the Pouch===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kangaroos have adapted to the varied conditions across Australia in many ways. One of the most unusual, is the way females of some species can delay the progress of pregnancy. In this way the female is ready to give birth to a replacement for the young in her pouch if it dies early, or within a week of when it permanently leaves the pouch. This ability to delay births means that there can be up to 12 months between a mating and the birth of the young one resulting from that mating (when the normal gestation period is less than 35 days). It also means that the species can best respond to periods of drought and plenty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Species which have this unusual ability normally mate again soon after the female gives birth. The tiny newly born kangaroo (less than 25 mm long) moves unaided into its mother's pouch and attaches itself to one of four teats. During the early stages of pouch life the young is permanently attached to the teat, but as it matures and begins to grow hair it also develops the ability to release and reattach itself to the teat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late stages of pouch life, once it has a thin covering of fur, the young one begins to explore the outside world for increasing lengths of time until eventually it is old enough to be excluded permanently from the pouch. Complete weaning may take a number of months more after the young has permanently left the pouch. If the mother gives birth during this time, the newborn young will attach itself to a different teat to that being used by the older young. It is remarkable that when this happens the mother produces two different kinds of milk for the two different-aged young.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/wild-harvest/kangaroo/biology.html#kanfam&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Creationism|creationist]] organization [[Answers in Genesis]] states the following regarding the [[Theory of evolution|evolutionary view]] of kangaroo origin:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Macropod family is alleged to have evolved from either the Phalangeridae (possums) or Burramyidae (pygmy-possums)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, there are no fossils of animals which appear to be intermediate between possums and kangaroos. Wabularoo naughtoni, supposed ancestor of all the macropods, was clearly a kangaroo (it greatly resembles the potoroos which dwell in Victoria’s forests). If modern kangaroos really did come from it, all this shows is the same as we see happening today, namely that kangaroos come from kangaroos, ‘after their kind.’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/kangaroos.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists believe that there is a lack of transitional fossils showing that the origin of the kangaroo was the result of evolution. They believe that this is not surprising given their view that the fossil record as a whole does not not support the evolutionary position. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationwiki.org/Fossil_record_quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/fossils.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the origins theory model used by [[creation science | creation scientists]], modern kangaroos, like all modern animals, originated in the [[Middle East]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://biblicalstudies.qldwide.net.au/cs-kangaroos_dinosaurs_and_eden.html &amp;quot;Kangaroos, Dinosaurs, and Eden&amp;quot;], Ken Ham.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard [[Noah's Ark]] prior to the [[Great Flood]]. It has not yet been determined by [[baraminology | baraminologists]] whether kangaroos form a [[holobaramin]] with the [[wallaby]], [[tree-kangaroo]], [[wallaroo]], [[pademelon]] and [[quokka]], or if all these species are in fact [[apobaramin | apobaraminic]] or [[polybaramin | polybaraminic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also according to creation science theories, after the Flood, kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia. There is debate whether this migration happened over land&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ca1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c006.html &amp;quot;How did animals get from the Ark to isolated places, such as Australia?&amp;quot;], ChristianAnswers.net.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- as Australia was still for a time connected to Europe by a land bridge similar to the one that connected Asia to America&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://biblicalstudies.qldwide.net.au/cs-kangaroos_dinosaurs_and_eden.html &amp;quot;Kangaroos, Dinosaurs, and Eden&amp;quot;], Ken Ham.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- or if they [[rafting (ecology) | rafted]] on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ca1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Another theory is that God simply generated kangaroos into existence there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other views on kangaroo origins include the belief of some Australian [[aborigines]] that kangaroos were sung into existence by their ancestors during the &amp;quot;[[Dreamtime]]&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.painsley.org.uk/RE/signposts/y8/1-1creationandenvironment/c-abor.htm &amp;quot;An Aborigine Creation Story&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the evolutionary view that kangaroos and the other marsupials evolved from a common marsupial ancestor which lived millions of years ago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.accessexcellence.org/AE/AEPC/WWC/1995/australia.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/migration.asp How did animals get from the Ark to places such as Australia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.exzooberance.com/virtual%20zoo/they%20walk/kangaroo/kangaroo.htm Kangaroo facts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.christiananswers.net/kids/kangaroos.html Answers About Kangaroos]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NoMonkey</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>