<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Offeep</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Offeep"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Offeep"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T06:48:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanH&amp;diff=253175</id>
		<title>User talk:DanH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanH&amp;diff=253175"/>
		<updated>2007-07-28T02:31:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Deletion Request */  fixing sig&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Archives:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:MountainDew]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== unicode ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter?  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I am sure you read all that on that other wiki.  Check with them.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 22:57, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandal? ==&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm a &amp;quot;vandal&amp;quot; am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their &amp;quot;fun.&amp;quot; Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to &amp;quot;get high&amp;quot; and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras &amp;quot;It's just a game,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;You're a close minded fanatic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Get a life.&amp;quot; I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a &amp;quot;vandal.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, &amp;quot;Oh, this must be safe,&amp;quot; but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; video games based on what &amp;quot;a couple crazy kids did.&amp;quot; That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. &amp;quot;Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having &amp;quot;fun&amp;quot;) justify the means(the death of the innocent&amp;quot; Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the &amp;quot;Magic System&amp;quot; (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose &amp;quot;If it feels good, do it.&amp;quot; And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My page on &amp;quot;anime,&amp;quot; as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, Ed Poor Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said &amp;quot;I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly.&amp;quot; Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these &amp;quot;family friendly&amp;quot; websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted &amp;quot;entertainment.&amp;quot; How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said &amp;quot;Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.&amp;quot; But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just &amp;quot;harmless fun&amp;quot; and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and &amp;quot;coolest&amp;quot; spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This post wins the internet.  Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [http://www.jackthompson.org/] --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::This might be the funniest thing I have ever read [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:26, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He seemed &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; to me on other issues.  But then I have no idea what sparked his post, or anything else.... --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 23:33, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to nitpick, at the time the Vandals attacked the Roman empire and took over North Africa, they were Arian Christian, not pagan.--[[User:Epicurius|Steve]] 12:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
does the word [[Hannibal]] mean anything to you? &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;heh heh heh&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll have to get that tomorrow morning; I'm going out of town for three days. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uh-oh... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
looks like we have a Jack Thompson impersonator trying to take you out, Dan. Or worse yet, Jack himself... I shudder at the mere thought. Be vigiliant, don't bend, we will defend you, Dan. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:02, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's only one way to tell... [[Jack Thompson|*Creates Article*]].--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:07, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*ROFL!!  Yeah, like he's something to fear, Thompson!  You guys kill me sometimes, giving him the reaction he wants, lol.  Good idea, Elamdri!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dunno about you, Terry, but an opportunity to take on Thompson ''mano y mano'' is something I would relish. I hope the article I'm about to write about him attracts his wrath.--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::NOOO, you blocked him! How am I gonna have any fun now?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Let's play with this guy - he deserves it. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I somewhat doubt he's Jack Thompson, he even denied it. But still, wouldn't it be something if we got the real Jack Thompson to come sniffing around?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:18, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::As of today, that's my new goal. We know he'll find us sooner or later (he gave Wikipedia quite a headache), so let's school him quickly and get it over with. Let's move this discussion to the sysop page, agreed? --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:21, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoji, AIM! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations Div. Chess Champ! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go Dan! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 23:50, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ranger Bill==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I didn't do that!! My little sister (didn't ask me or anything) just put it up using my user name. Sorry that it happened.--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 15:12, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dan, evolution article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Dan,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My sister stated to me that the [[theory of evolution]] article was a very good article but she said, &amp;quot;What about the man-ape fossils?&amp;quot;.   So I added the [[paleoanthropology]] section which a leading creationist organization is going to publish at their website.  I also noticed that [[Wikipedia]] did the social effects of the theory of evolution in their [[evolution]] article so I added that very briefly.  I also noticed that a HUGE issue was left out and that was biological information, biological code, and genetic programs so I added a brief section.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as today, Andy added some material that I thought needed better footnoting and wording so that is what I was doing today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think the end result was worth it.  Out of 112 million articles on Google for the Theory of evolution ours is ranked #34.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Chess ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations on winning.  Not bad for a Jayhawk.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 11:03, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes...congratulations! I was always horrible at chess...I just move a piece and see what happens...the word strategy does not exist in my dictionary :) [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 12:42, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations.  [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks all. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:35, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Belated congrats! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:08, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Would you please categorize... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the article on [[pornography]]? If I read the history correctly you are the protecting sysop so I figured you'd like first crack at it. May I suggest something simple like &amp;quot;media&amp;quot; for now? I have plans to re-organize many category structures but at the moment that's likely to be your best fit. Of course, you should do as you see fit.  Regards, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 18:09, 17 July 2007 (EDT) ''&amp;lt;-I'm just doing them alphabetically, honest!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would you also please categorize [[Main Page/new style]]? Thank you, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:14, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Good Catch ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...On the user name &amp;quot;Bush is retarded&amp;quot; spelt backwards.  Of course I guess I should expect that from a chess champion. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hitler's vegetarianism==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. What exactly is your source that Hitler wasn't a vegetarian? I've read numerous places that he was, including, I believe, the memoirs of his friend Albert Speer. Is the argument that he wasn't a ''strict'' vegetarian? Because there are numerous definitions of vegetarianism, and some allow for limited meat ingestion. If I recall, his reasons were health and not animal ights, but I don't think that matters. [[User:PortlyMort|PortlyMort]] 14:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's at the very least, enough controversy about whether he was [http://www.slate.com/id/2096259/] that we shouldn't dogmatically say one way or the other. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:38, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hitler's personal chef says his favourite dish was pigeon [http://veg.ca/content/view/171/113/]; it seems from various other sources that while he ''preferred'' a vegetarian diet, he deviated enough from it to not be classed as a vegetarian. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:46, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sources are numerous. One source of good criticism cites how Hitler was not sympathetic to German soldiers freezing in Russia who asked for meat.  Hitler went into a long spiel about how the Roman legions survived on grains, etc., and probably regarded meat eaters as subversive to the Nazi effort.  Ultimately, many meat eaters probably betrayed the Nazi cause because of this--Hitler just didn't care if meat eaters got fed or not, and expected everybody to be like him and make the same sacrifices during the privations of a prolonged war, which of course to a vegetarian of many years, are not sacrifices at all.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:52, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The sources for his meat eating and love of ham and bavarian sausages are numerous also  [http://www.foodrevolution.org/askjohn/47.htm]; many commentators also point out that Hitler never claimed to be a vegetarian, outlawed vegetarian organizations and prevented all measures aimed at easing Germany’s food shortages that involved a reduction in meat consumption. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to put a few more pictures in the [[evolution]] article.  Do you know how to do that?  I want to put a picture of [[Ernst Haeckel]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Evolutionary_theory_and_Cases_of_Fraud.2C_Hoaxes_and_Speculation.E2.80.8E  I also want to put a picture of [[Stephen Gould]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_Punctuated_Equilibrium   Please don't use the picture of Stephen Gould used at [[Wikipedia]].  Can you help? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)conservative&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for welcoming me, DanH. [[User:BrianJackson|BrianJackson]] 20:37, 20 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Grunge ==&lt;br /&gt;
I agree. A lot of post-grunge bands really ruined grunge. Everclear,Third Eye Blind,Matchbox 20, and even Daughtry (he was classified post-grunge too lol) really turned grunge to pop - rock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(whoops forgot to sign)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Favorite Original Grunge Band: Alice In Chains&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Favorite Post-Grunge: Three Days Grace or Breaking Benjamin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:06, 22 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Great block! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great block! Well done!!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, a second great block in the same night!!! Very well done.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The user who put those questionable comments was a sock of vandal redhungary, who I think you dealt with earlier. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:04, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noah's ark ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heya -- I'm interested in making some changes to Noah's ark -- proposed them on the talk page -- any chance you could try unlocking it for a while and see if revert wars and/or vandalism become a problem?  [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 21:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please protect my signature templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The templates in question are:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:PheasantHunter/TestTalk]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:PheasantHunter/FullSig]]&lt;br /&gt;
and &lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:PheasantHunter/sig]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am the only person who has any business editing them (aside from Andy).  Other users who edit them are probably vandalizing them.  Niandra protected them, but then TK unprotected them (he was probably confused since this is a technical issue.)  Could you either take it up with other sysops or just go ahead and protect the above templates?  Thanks.  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 12:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandal blocking ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Good job blocking the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=block&amp;amp;user=DanH&amp;amp;page= vandals].  [[User:JohnMorrisonBirch|JohnMorrisonBirch]] 21:20, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crop Circles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Dan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a &amp;quot;crop circle&amp;quot; (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate.  --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Joaquin my friend, I beleive I asked you to post in the sysop area about this, no?  Please do so. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:03, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Deletion Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, you're an admin here, right? Could you delete [[Charlesincharge]]?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 22:31, 27 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanH&amp;diff=253172</id>
		<title>User talk:DanH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanH&amp;diff=253172"/>
		<updated>2007-07-28T02:30:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Archives:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:MountainDew]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== unicode ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter?  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I am sure you read all that on that other wiki.  Check with them.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 22:57, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandal? ==&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm a &amp;quot;vandal&amp;quot; am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their &amp;quot;fun.&amp;quot; Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to &amp;quot;get high&amp;quot; and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras &amp;quot;It's just a game,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;You're a close minded fanatic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Get a life.&amp;quot; I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a &amp;quot;vandal.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, &amp;quot;Oh, this must be safe,&amp;quot; but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; video games based on what &amp;quot;a couple crazy kids did.&amp;quot; That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. &amp;quot;Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having &amp;quot;fun&amp;quot;) justify the means(the death of the innocent&amp;quot; Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the &amp;quot;Magic System&amp;quot; (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose &amp;quot;If it feels good, do it.&amp;quot; And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My page on &amp;quot;anime,&amp;quot; as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, Ed Poor Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said &amp;quot;I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly.&amp;quot; Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these &amp;quot;family friendly&amp;quot; websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted &amp;quot;entertainment.&amp;quot; How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said &amp;quot;Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.&amp;quot; But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just &amp;quot;harmless fun&amp;quot; and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and &amp;quot;coolest&amp;quot; spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This post wins the internet.  Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [http://www.jackthompson.org/] --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::This might be the funniest thing I have ever read [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:26, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He seemed &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; to me on other issues.  But then I have no idea what sparked his post, or anything else.... --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 23:33, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to nitpick, at the time the Vandals attacked the Roman empire and took over North Africa, they were Arian Christian, not pagan.--[[User:Epicurius|Steve]] 12:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
does the word [[Hannibal]] mean anything to you? &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;heh heh heh&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll have to get that tomorrow morning; I'm going out of town for three days. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uh-oh... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
looks like we have a Jack Thompson impersonator trying to take you out, Dan. Or worse yet, Jack himself... I shudder at the mere thought. Be vigiliant, don't bend, we will defend you, Dan. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:02, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's only one way to tell... [[Jack Thompson|*Creates Article*]].--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:07, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*ROFL!!  Yeah, like he's something to fear, Thompson!  You guys kill me sometimes, giving him the reaction he wants, lol.  Good idea, Elamdri!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dunno about you, Terry, but an opportunity to take on Thompson ''mano y mano'' is something I would relish. I hope the article I'm about to write about him attracts his wrath.--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::NOOO, you blocked him! How am I gonna have any fun now?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Let's play with this guy - he deserves it. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I somewhat doubt he's Jack Thompson, he even denied it. But still, wouldn't it be something if we got the real Jack Thompson to come sniffing around?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:18, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::As of today, that's my new goal. We know he'll find us sooner or later (he gave Wikipedia quite a headache), so let's school him quickly and get it over with. Let's move this discussion to the sysop page, agreed? --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:21, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoji, AIM! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations Div. Chess Champ! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go Dan! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 23:50, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ranger Bill==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I didn't do that!! My little sister (didn't ask me or anything) just put it up using my user name. Sorry that it happened.--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 15:12, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dan, evolution article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Dan,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My sister stated to me that the [[theory of evolution]] article was a very good article but she said, &amp;quot;What about the man-ape fossils?&amp;quot;.   So I added the [[paleoanthropology]] section which a leading creationist organization is going to publish at their website.  I also noticed that [[Wikipedia]] did the social effects of the theory of evolution in their [[evolution]] article so I added that very briefly.  I also noticed that a HUGE issue was left out and that was biological information, biological code, and genetic programs so I added a brief section.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as today, Andy added some material that I thought needed better footnoting and wording so that is what I was doing today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think the end result was worth it.  Out of 112 million articles on Google for the Theory of evolution ours is ranked #34.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Chess ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations on winning.  Not bad for a Jayhawk.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 11:03, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes...congratulations! I was always horrible at chess...I just move a piece and see what happens...the word strategy does not exist in my dictionary :) [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 12:42, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations.  [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks all. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:35, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Belated congrats! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:08, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Would you please categorize... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the article on [[pornography]]? If I read the history correctly you are the protecting sysop so I figured you'd like first crack at it. May I suggest something simple like &amp;quot;media&amp;quot; for now? I have plans to re-organize many category structures but at the moment that's likely to be your best fit. Of course, you should do as you see fit.  Regards, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 18:09, 17 July 2007 (EDT) ''&amp;lt;-I'm just doing them alphabetically, honest!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would you also please categorize [[Main Page/new style]]? Thank you, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:14, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Good Catch ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...On the user name &amp;quot;Bush is retarded&amp;quot; spelt backwards.  Of course I guess I should expect that from a chess champion. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hitler's vegetarianism==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. What exactly is your source that Hitler wasn't a vegetarian? I've read numerous places that he was, including, I believe, the memoirs of his friend Albert Speer. Is the argument that he wasn't a ''strict'' vegetarian? Because there are numerous definitions of vegetarianism, and some allow for limited meat ingestion. If I recall, his reasons were health and not animal ights, but I don't think that matters. [[User:PortlyMort|PortlyMort]] 14:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's at the very least, enough controversy about whether he was [http://www.slate.com/id/2096259/] that we shouldn't dogmatically say one way or the other. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:38, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hitler's personal chef says his favourite dish was pigeon [http://veg.ca/content/view/171/113/]; it seems from various other sources that while he ''preferred'' a vegetarian diet, he deviated enough from it to not be classed as a vegetarian. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:46, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sources are numerous. One source of good criticism cites how Hitler was not sympathetic to German soldiers freezing in Russia who asked for meat.  Hitler went into a long spiel about how the Roman legions survived on grains, etc., and probably regarded meat eaters as subversive to the Nazi effort.  Ultimately, many meat eaters probably betrayed the Nazi cause because of this--Hitler just didn't care if meat eaters got fed or not, and expected everybody to be like him and make the same sacrifices during the privations of a prolonged war, which of course to a vegetarian of many years, are not sacrifices at all.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:52, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The sources for his meat eating and love of ham and bavarian sausages are numerous also  [http://www.foodrevolution.org/askjohn/47.htm]; many commentators also point out that Hitler never claimed to be a vegetarian, outlawed vegetarian organizations and prevented all measures aimed at easing Germany’s food shortages that involved a reduction in meat consumption. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to put a few more pictures in the [[evolution]] article.  Do you know how to do that?  I want to put a picture of [[Ernst Haeckel]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Evolutionary_theory_and_Cases_of_Fraud.2C_Hoaxes_and_Speculation.E2.80.8E  I also want to put a picture of [[Stephen Gould]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_Punctuated_Equilibrium   Please don't use the picture of Stephen Gould used at [[Wikipedia]].  Can you help? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)conservative&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for welcoming me, DanH. [[User:BrianJackson|BrianJackson]] 20:37, 20 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Grunge ==&lt;br /&gt;
I agree. A lot of post-grunge bands really ruined grunge. Everclear,Third Eye Blind,Matchbox 20, and even Daughtry (he was classified post-grunge too lol) really turned grunge to pop - rock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(whoops forgot to sign)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Favorite Original Grunge Band: Alice In Chains&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Favorite Post-Grunge: Three Days Grace or Breaking Benjamin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:06, 22 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Great block! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great block! Well done!!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, a second great block in the same night!!! Very well done.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The user who put those questionable comments was a sock of vandal redhungary, who I think you dealt with earlier. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:04, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noah's ark ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heya -- I'm interested in making some changes to Noah's ark -- proposed them on the talk page -- any chance you could try unlocking it for a while and see if revert wars and/or vandalism become a problem?  [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 21:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please protect my signature templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The templates in question are:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:PheasantHunter/TestTalk]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:PheasantHunter/FullSig]]&lt;br /&gt;
and &lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:PheasantHunter/sig]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am the only person who has any business editing them (aside from Andy).  Other users who edit them are probably vandalizing them.  Niandra protected them, but then TK unprotected them (he was probably confused since this is a technical issue.)  Could you either take it up with other sysops or just go ahead and protect the above templates?  Thanks.  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 12:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandal blocking ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Good job blocking the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=block&amp;amp;user=DanH&amp;amp;page= vandals].  [[User:JohnMorrisonBirch|JohnMorrisonBirch]] 21:20, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crop Circles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Dan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a &amp;quot;crop circle&amp;quot; (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate.  --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Joaquin my friend, I beleive I asked you to post in the sysop area about this, no?  Please do so. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:03, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Deletion Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, you're an admin here, right? Could you delete [[Charlesincharge]]?--{{SUBST:nosubst|User:Offeep/sig}} 22:30, 27 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Indian_Movement_Grand_Governing_Council&amp;diff=253170</id>
		<title>American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Indian_Movement_Grand_Governing_Council&amp;diff=253170"/>
		<updated>2007-07-28T02:27:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;American Indian Movement is a Red Power organization.  Its stated goals include fostering a sense of unity and solidarity among American Indian and First Nation groups in the United States and Canada, respectively, enforcing treaty rights that up until the 1970s had been ignored, and defending Native people against further depredations by the white government and population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AIM was founded in Minneapolis in 1968 by two urban Ojibwas, Dennis Banks and George Mitchell.  It drew inspiration both from the Civil Rights movement of the previous decade and fishing rights protests in the Pacific Northwest earlier in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AIM is best known for its confrontational protest tactics including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The occupation of Alcatraz Island from 1969 to 1971&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The occupation of a replica of the '''Mayflower''' in 1970&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The occupation of Mount Rushmore in 1971&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The occupation of Gordon, Nebraska in 1972&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Trail of Broken Treaties and the subsequent occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs building in 1972&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The occupation of Wounded Knee in 1973&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These protests generally had one of two goals: to enforce treaty rights, or to raise awareness of an Indian presence or contribution to history.  One landmark victory that considerably raised the stature of AIM among American Indians was the occupation of Gordon, Nebraska in 1972, which eventually forced the authorities to bring the murderers of Lakota Raymond Yellow Thunder to justice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coinciding with the Wounded Knee occupation was a state of civil war on Pine Ridge Lakota Reservation that pitted the government of Tribal Chairman Dick Wilson and his Guardians of the Oglala Naion (GOONs) paramilitary force against a coalition of American Indian Movement members and traditional Lakotas.  The conflict lasted from 1972 to 1976 and eventually drew in Wilson's allies in the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the FBI under both the COINTELPRO and Operation Garden Plot programs.  Wilson's election was highly disputed (he used violence to prevent voting) and eventually over 50 people were killed, mostly AIM and traditionalists but also two FBI agents who died in an FBI-instigated shootout.  AIM member Leonard Peltier was convicted of the shootings in a controversial case where evidence used to acquit his two co-defendents was barred from being introduced in his defense.  He has become an international cause celebré.  FBI Agent David Price, who directed the operation and is accused of personally murdering Anna Mae Aquash Pictou (a Miqmaq AIM member at Wounded Knee) and cutting off her hands to intimidate AIM, has never been brought to justice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Less dramatically, AIM is also infamously known for its opposition to the use of American Indian characters and imagery in college and professional sports.  AIM has also challenged Ward Churchill's claims and accused him of being an FBI infiltrator of AIM under COINTELPRO.  Less well known are its community powwows, its sponsorship of cultural events, and its crucial aid in the rebuilding of the Houma reservation in southern Louisiana following Hurricane Katrina in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AIM is strongest among the Lakota, Ojibwa, Navajo, and other tribes of the Plains, North Woods, and Pacific Northwest that have assimilated badly if at all and retained many aspects of traditional culture.  Conversely, it is weakest among the tribes removed to Oklahoma (in particular the unfortunately named &amp;quot;Five Civilized Tribes&amp;quot;), the Pueblos, and other tribes that have either acculturated or accomodated to being surrounded by whites.  The organization devolved into local autonomous groups in the late 1970s but retains international cultural exchange and solidarity across the United States and Canada.  It has also reached out and created ties to indigenous people of Latin America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources:  American Indian Movement; Vine Deloria's ''Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties:  An Indian Declaration of Independence''; James Wilson's ''The Earth Shall Weep''; Leonard Peltier's ''My Life is My Sun Dance''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movements]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=YouTube&amp;diff=252070</id>
		<title>YouTube</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=YouTube&amp;diff=252070"/>
		<updated>2007-07-26T23:38:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: wikilink&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''YouTube''', a popular internet site that allows users to share videos. The YouTube generation was named Time magazine's Person of the Year for 2006 [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html].  In October 2006, Youtube was purchased by [[Google]] Inc. There was a controversy after people such as [[Michelle Malkin]] came out with reports that it censored conservative content,  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/04/banned-on-youtube-3/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This led the creation of [[QubeTV]], similar to the creation of Conservapedia by people who believed Wikipedia to be liberal, as well as of the Christian alternative [[GodTube]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 23, 2007, YouTube hosted an interactive debate between the [[Democratic]] candidates in the [[2008 Presidential Election]], in which YouTube users submitted videos of themselves asking questions. A similar debate involving the [[Republican]] candidates will follow on September 17.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Information technology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Utahraptor&amp;diff=251748</id>
		<title>User talk:Utahraptor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Utahraptor&amp;diff=251748"/>
		<updated>2007-07-26T19:34:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome|sig=--~~~~}}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 15:34, 26 July 2007 (EDT)}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=251744</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=251744"/>
		<updated>2007-07-26T19:32:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: removing useless template&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in the US today==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern liberalism in the US is typically associated with the left of the political spectrum. The word &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; can mean different things at different times, but is often used as synonym for &amp;quot;Democrat&amp;quot;. In the postwar period, &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; advocated equal rights between races and sexes, and also for sexual freedom. At the same time they supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many Liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy Liberals in the US failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals still support socially liberal positions when it comes to affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the following views are held by Americans who consider themselves 'liberals':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* removal of gender differences, such as treating men and women identically in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* support of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* support of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* reinstate the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[censorship]] of [[prayer]] in classrooms&lt;br /&gt;
* compelled taxpayer funding of government schools for nearly all ages&lt;br /&gt;
* government-controlled medical care&lt;br /&gt;
* labor [[union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* elimination of [[abstinence]]-only program funding &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* a &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted rather than an unchanging Constitution as written&lt;br /&gt;
* support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[environmentalism]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[Greenpeace]] engages in environmentalism.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* opposition to a strong American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is an organization that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, such as the Liberal Party of Australia[http://www.liberal.org.au/].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians that promote lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them 'liberals' or [[neoliberal | neoliberals]]. Thus, just like in the US, 'liberal' is often used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called 'liberal' in Europe, this is usually a way of calling them [[rightist | right-wing]], exactly the opposite of the meaning in the US.&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy | social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: 'Classical liberalism'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original philosophy of liberalism (now sometimes called [[classical liberalism]], or [[libertarianism]] in the US), favors many forms of freedom, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Freedom of speech&lt;br /&gt;
*Freedom of religion&lt;br /&gt;
*The right to form political parties and vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Freedom to invest in and use private property&lt;br /&gt;
*Freedom to work as one chooses&lt;br /&gt;
*Freedom to enter into economic contracts&lt;br /&gt;
*Free trade and freedom of migration&lt;br /&gt;
*Sexual freedom&lt;br /&gt;
*Equal rights independent of race or sex&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This interpretation of liberalism arose during the [[Enlightenment]], and became influential throught the [[American Revolution]] and [[French Revolution]], and was also spread in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries by the [[classical economists]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.economyprofessor.com/economictheories/economic-liberalism.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A prominent publication which promotes liberalism in the original sense of the word is the British newsmagazine [[The Economist]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DNC|DNC - Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NEA|NEA - National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NOW|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceit]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Me2&amp;diff=251741</id>
		<title>User talk:Me2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Me2&amp;diff=251741"/>
		<updated>2007-07-26T19:32:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome|sig=--~~~~}}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 15:32, 26 July 2007 (EDT)}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Songs&amp;diff=251737</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Songs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Songs&amp;diff=251737"/>
		<updated>2007-07-26T19:27:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzZkNDU5MmViNzVjNzkzMDE3NzNlN2MyZjRjYTk4YjE= this]. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 10:04, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The [[neoconservative]] ''National Review'' list is 95% garbage, not [[conservative]] at all.  I only found one tune on the list that should be added ours (&amp;quot;Stand by your man&amp;quot;), and National Review had it at #50.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The contrast here with ''National Review'' illustrates the need for ''Conservapedia''.  But thanks for your link.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:31, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oops... it seems that I added a bunch of songs from that list. Several of mine (Brick, Red Barchetta, I Can't Drive 55, Sweet Home Alabama, and Revolution 1) were on there. That's interesting, though... the NR person and I thought alike on this one. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:16, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sweet Home Alabama? I love that song (and I'm a liberal)! Revolution's great, too.--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 18:29, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry?  Why was my entry for The Fall's Pseud Mag Ed removed? They have always been the great deflators of liberal complacency. What is going on?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Post a link to the lyrics of the song here and we'll see.  Also, please sign your entries by using the signature button in the row above the edit box.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:16, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a song possibly be just a song, rather than a political statement? - BornAgainBrit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Uh, sure, there are songs that lack any meaning at all.  &amp;quot;I wanna hold your hand,&amp;quot; for example, is a pleasant jingle from your homeland.  I trust we'd agree that it is not the most meaningful song in the world.  That tune is fun for reminiscing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But surely you don't deny that many songs do have political meaning.  [[Liberal]] attempts to deny political bias are familiar to us and no one here is fooled.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deletion of Bob Dylan's song was not properly explained.  Observing that people serve either the devil or the Lord is a conservative observation, and of course Bob Dylan was a born-again Christian who expressed his faith in song (but don't expect [[liberals]] to tell you that).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:03, 21 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't mean to step on any toes, but apathy towards devil worship doesn't seem to me like a very conservative trait. Unfortunately, the verses of the songs don't give us ''any'' meaning whatsoever, so the only meaning we can glean from the song are the four lines of the chorus, three of which are essentially the same :/ [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 14:06, 21 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Paradise by the Dashboard light? I know its a song about having pre-marital sex, but the end is about how it screwed up his life.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 04:45, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After reading this list, I've gotta ask, just how do you define a 'conservative' song?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 15:27, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Irish_Republican_Army&amp;diff=241544</id>
		<title>Irish Republican Army</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Irish_Republican_Army&amp;diff=241544"/>
		<updated>2007-07-19T18:13:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: grammar&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:IRA3.jpg|right|thumb|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term IRA is used to refer to two different, historically linked organisations; the Provisional IRA and the Official IRA. The former were formed in 1969 and have been more active since then with a particuarly high profile from their terrorist campaign. The Provisional IRA was formed as a reaction to percieved inactivity of the Offical IRA, who were formed in 1919, but whose profile dropped since the end of the [[Irish Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Provisional IRA, also known as the '''The Irish Republican Army''', '''PIRA''', '''Provos''', or '''IRA''' (Óglaigh na hÉireann in Irish Gaelic) is a republican [[terrorist]] organization that fought against the [[British]] in [[Northern Ireland]], claiming to represent the largely [[Catholic]] nationalist community in Northern Ireland. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation is associated with the political party [[Sinn Féin]] (also known as Provisional Sinn Fein), although a direct association is offically denied. In 1981 an IRA prisoner serving a life sentence, Bobby Sands, was elected to the UK parliament while on Hunger Strike in the infamous [[Maze Prison]]. He died shortly after the election, but this was the beginning of a new strategy of Armalite and Ballot Box, combining politics with the &amp;quot;armed struggle&amp;quot; ([[terrorist]] campaign). The policy of violence was gradually undermined by increased faith in politics together with a number of peace initiatives and a loss of support for a violent program - the conciliatory handling of the situation first by [[John Major]] and later by [[Tony Blair]] is often held up as an example of an effective approach to counter-terrorism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRA terrorists have since been caught helping [[FARC]] terrorists in [[Colombia]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1563119.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two small factions within the IRA broke away from the main organisation to protest its participation in the peace process: these are known as the Real IRA (RIRA), which carried out the Omagh bombing in 1998, the bloodiest single incident in the Troubles (29 people were killed), and the Continuity IRA (CIRA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Origins'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IRA was first formed in 1919 from members of the [[Irish Volunteers]], an armed group formed in 1914 to promote self government in Ireland, which was then part of the [[United Kingdom]], and in response to the formation of the armed Ulster Volunteers, which sought to force exclusion of Ulster from any Home Rule agreement.  While the British parliament passed the Government of Ireland Act in 1914, providing limited powers of self government to the Irish, its implementation was postponed by the outbreak of [[World War I]].  The majority of the approximately 100,000 Irish Volunteers accepted British promises that the act would go into force following the war, and many joined the British Army to fight.  However, approximately 12,000 did not accept the delay.  This group retained the name Irish Volunteers.  They were largely controlled by the secretive [[Irish Republican Brotherhood]], or IRB, which had been seeking to instigate rebellion against British rule since the mid-19th century.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 24, 1916, the [[Easter Rising]] broke out when a significant portion of  Volunteers seized Dublin's General Post Office (where their leader Padraig Pearse read a proclamation of Irish independence) and other points in Dublin. The limited nature of the rising is accounted for by splits in the leadership of the Volunteers and the issuing of orders countermanding the rising. The rebels managed to hold out for a week, but were defeated by British forces, who surrounded and isolated the rebel outpoosts and reduced them using artillery in many cases.  The Rising had initially been unpopular among the Irish people, but this changed when the British executed 16 of its leaders following court-martials in Dublin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anglo-Irish War'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1917, those who had participated in the Rising, as well as many who had been converted to their cause, organized the Irish Republican Army, dedicated to using force to attain independence.  The [[Anglo-Irish War]] began with the killing of two Royal Irish Constabulary men in January 1919.  The IRA was organized into &amp;quot;flying columns&amp;quot; of 20-30 men who attacked British bases and ambushed military and police forces, as well as smaller units carrying out killings of police, army and government personnel.  In July 1921, the IRA and the British agreed to a truce, which was followed by the negotiations for what became the [[Anglo-Irish Treaty]].  By the treaty provisions, Ireland was to become a dominion of the [[United Kingdom]], and the British were to retain possession of several ports on the Irish coastline.  Additionally, members of the Irish Parliament (or Dail,  Eireann) were required to swear an oath of loyalty to the British Crown.  The treaty also led to the partition of the island, as six northern counties (Armagh, Antrim, Tyrone, Fermanagh, Down, Derry) opted to remain part of the UK and became the new state entity of [[Northern Ireland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil War'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IRA leadership as well as its rank and file were deeply divided by the treaty.  Pro-treaty members believed that it was a stepping stone to the independence they had sought, while anti-treaty members felt the treaty was a betrayal of the ideals that had motivated them to fight.  These divisions ultimately led to a split in the IRA and civil war.  The pro-treaty faction was reorganized as the Irish National Army, while the anti-treaty group retained the IRA label.  The split ultimately led to a bloody civil war that ended in 1923 with the pro-treaty forces victorious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''World War II'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the period between the Irish Civil War and [[World War II]], the IRA was largely engaged in social issues, which they approached from a left-wing perspective.  While a number of IRA men joined the socialist and communist [[International Brigades]] in the [[Spanish Civil War]], they engaged in generally non-violent protest in Ireland.  This approach was unpopular, partially due to the influence of the conservative Catholic Church in Ireland, and IRA membership dwindled.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1938, the IRA began preparing plans to return to war with a bombing campaign in England.  The IRA also sought German assistance with the campaign, but in the end the Germans provided little assistance.  The IRA campaign had little effect, largely due to repressive measures taken by the UK and Irish governments.  IRA members were interned without trial in both countries, and several were executed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Border Campaign'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 1950s the IRA began planning for a new campaign, which was intended to reunite [[Northern Ireland]] with the remainder of the island.  The Border Campaign began in 1956 and lasted until 1962.  IRA groups attacked military installations and attempted to disrupt the workings of the Northern Ireland state by damaging its infrastructure.  The governments once again responded by introducing internment, which severely inhibited IRA operations.  Ultimately the Border Campaign ended with an IRA admission that it did not have sufficient popular support to maintain its activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Troubles''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1960s, the IRA again came under socialist and Marxist influences.  This led to a lack of emphasis on military aspects of the organization.  When violent rioting broke out in Belfast, the capital of Northern Ireland, in 1969, the IRA was ill-prepared to assist the Catholic/Nationalist community, to the extent that mocking jokes held that the abbreviation 'IRA' stood for &amp;quot;I Ran Away&amp;quot;.  The lack of focus on defense led to divisions within the IRA between those who favored a movement focused on class issues and those who were motivated to defend their community by armed force, and by extension, use armed struggle to bring about a united Ireland.  The organization split along these lines in 1969, and the group focused on defense and armed struggle against the British became known as the Provisional IRA (PIRA).  The remaining group was referred to as the Official IRA (OIRA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OIRA engaged in some military activity during the early years of the Troubles before calling a ceasefire in 1972.  They have since transformed into a political party, currently known as The Workers’ Party, contesting elections largely in the [[Republic of Ireland]].  PIRA, on the other hand, launched a 30-year campaign of violence against British control of Northern Ireland.  PIRA violence was responsible for approximately 1,800 of the 3,000 deaths during the Troubles.  The PIRA campaign came to an end with a ceasefire in 1997 as a result of the [[Irish Peace Process]], which culminated in the [[Belfast Agreement]], sometimes known as the [[Good Friday Agreement]], in 1998.  In 2005, the IRA officially announced an end to its campaign and decommissioned much of its arms under international supervision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PIRA's terror campaign was largely funded from overseas.  Two significant sources were the Libyan government and sympathisers in the United States. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1563119.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://members.lycos.co.uk/inac/myth.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Northern Ireland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Church&amp;diff=241541</id>
		<title>Roman Catholic Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Church&amp;diff=241541"/>
		<updated>2007-07-19T18:11:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: fixing wikilink&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[Roman Catholic Church]] is headed by the pope, the bishop of Rome, currently [[Pope Benedict XVI]]. It is one of the largest religions in the world, with more than 1 billion adherents (In the United States more than 64 million.) The Roman Catholic Church is the oldest institution in the western world. The Roman Catholic faith teaches the Pope is the successor of [[St. Peter]], the 'rock' (Mat 16:18) upon whom Jesus built his church. The term '''Catholic Church''' is, literally, the ''Universal Church'' of [[Jesus Christ]] (from the Greek ''katholikos'', &amp;quot;universal&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To belong to the Catholic Church one must accept as factually true the gospel of our lord [[Jesus Christ]]. ''&amp;quot;The chief teachings of the Catholic church are: God’s objective existence; God’s interest in individual human beings, who can enter into relations with God (through prayer); the Trinity; the divinity of Jesus; the immortality of the soul of each human being, each one being accountable at death for his or her actions in life, with the award of heaven or hell; the resurrection of the dead; the historicity of the Gospels; and the divine commission of the church. In addition the Roman Catholic Church stresses that since the members, living and dead, share in each other’s merits, the [[Virgin Mary]] and other saints and the dead in purgatory are never forgotten.&amp;quot; '' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.bartleby.com/65/ro/RomanCat.html The Columbia Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The presence of Christ is believed to be present in the Eucharist, the bread and wine is Jesus himself. Another essential belief is the veneration of Mary, the mother of Jesus as the Blessed Virgin Mary and veneration of the saints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal sources for the essential beliefs  of the Catholic Church are the Sacred Scriptures (the Bible), Sacred Tradition, and Living Magisterium of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term Catholic is frequently applied to the Roman Catholic Church, though many Protestants object to Roman Catholics monopolizing the term &amp;quot;Catholic&amp;quot;. Conversely, many Roman Catholics dislike the adjective &amp;quot;Roman&amp;quot; because it implies, contrary to (Roman) Catholic doctrine, that their church is not ''the'' universal Church of Christ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cathpop.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Catholics in the world.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
The original Christian community was founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ and led by the Apostles. St. [[Paul|Paul the Apostle]] was, together with [[Saint Peter]], the most notable of Early Christian missionaries. After an initial period of persecution, Christianity was legalized in the fourth century by Constantine I. In 380, Emperor Theodosius I accepted Catholic Christianity as the official religion of the [[Roman Empire]]. During the [[Middle Ages]] the Church underwent a time of missionary activity and expansion. This Catholic Christian Church underwent in 1054 a great schism that divided the Church into a Western (Latin) branch, which has been called as the Catholic Church and an Eastern branch, which has become known as the [[Orthodox Church]]. The second schism was the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. During the First Vatican Council (1869–1870) and the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) the Catholic Church undertook the most comprehensive reforms. She stretched relations with other Christian communities and other religions.  She also issued directions for a revision of the liturgy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Different churches==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;The Catholic Church&amp;quot; refers to any one of several Rites, but in the United States is often used synonymously for the largest Rite, the [[Roman Catholic Church]]. Other Rites include the Byzantine, Alexandrian, Syriac, Armenian, Maronite, and Chaldean Rites.  Some Eastern rites have significant differences in liturgy, history, discipline and hierarchy from the Roman Catholic Church, but still recognize the primacy of the Bishop of Rome (the Pope) and are in communion with Rome. These Eastern Rite churches are Catholic and do not belong to the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Eastern branches do not have a single umbrella organization. They include the Eastern Orthodox Church and a number of Eastern Catholic Churches. Despite important differences in doctrine, the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern churches recognize each other as part of the universal, or Catholic Church. For example, each of them accepts each others' Holy Orders (priesthood) as valid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church historically regarded [[Protestant]] Christianity as heretical, that is, being against Roman doctrine. However, this changed in the 1960's when Pope John XXIII called the Second Vatican Council, where '''the''' '''doors of the Church were opened wide''', and Protestants referred to as '''&amp;quot;our separated brethren&amp;quot;.''' This was an exciting period for Catholics and Protestants alike as moves were made to bring the separated churches back together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JpII.jpg|right|thumb|John Paul II]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anglican Church (Episcopalian in the United States) occupies an odd situation, because it encompasses within it factions (&amp;quot;Low Church&amp;quot;) that emphasize its Protestant aspects and factions (&amp;quot;High Church&amp;quot;) that emphasize its Catholic aspects. Anglo-Catholics regard the Anglican church as part of the Catholic Church, and in the unbroken line of the Apostolic Succession. The Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern branches take a position that could be described as saying that the Anglican Church is almost but not quite Catholic. There have long been unification overtures, and Anglican priests who wish to adopt Catholic Holy Orders are often provided with an abbreviated path to that goal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Nicene Creed]], the great historical statement of Christian belief, contains the line &amp;quot;I [or we] believe in one holy, catholic and apostolic church&amp;quot;. The [[Apostles' Creed]] contains a similar affirmation. However, Protestants and Catholics place different interpretations on the term &amp;quot;universal&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;catholic&amp;quot;.  Protestants believe that it refers to the general, over-arching spiritual unity of all Christian believers, Jew or gentile, which transcends individual churches and denominations.  Catholics, on the other hand, believe that the [[Roman Catholic Church]], as the single true church founded by Christ, is the universal Catholic Church in which their is neither Jew nor gentile. Some prefer not to refer to their own church as the &amp;quot;Roman&amp;quot; Catholic Church, on the grounds that such formulations implicitly deny this point of doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saint Paul's Writings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paul|St. Paul]] is the second most prolific contributor to the [[New Testament]]. Thirteen letters are attributed to him and fully known as the &amp;quot;Catholic (or Universal) Epistles of Paul&amp;quot;. The letters are written in Greek. The epistles contain the basis of Christian doctrine, interpretation and commentary from earlier scriptures.  They are full of expositions of what Christians should believe and how they should live. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''St. Paul reminded the Christians how they should live. They should think about the things in heaven (Colossians 3:2), because they belong with Christ (Colossians 3:3-4). They should not do evil deeds (Colossians 3:5-11). Instead, they should love other people (Colossians 3:12-14). And they should serve God (Colossians 3:15-17). If we invite Jesus into our lives, we will become friends of God (Colossians 1:15-23).''  &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
St. Paul's influence on Christian thinking has been more significant than any other single New Testament author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fathers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[St. Ambrose]], Bishop of Milan from 374 to 397, was one of the most illustrious Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and fitly chosen, together with [[St. Augustine]], [[St. John Chrysostom]], and [[St. Athanasius]], to uphold the venerable Chair of the Prince of the Apostles in the tribune of St. Peter's at Rome. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01383c.htm St. Ambrose] Catholic Encyclopedia.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cerro_de_Angeles.jpg|right|thumb|Cerro de los Angeles, Madrid, Spain.]]&lt;br /&gt;
There has been much controversy in recent years about Catholic priests in relation to the abuse of children in their care. Cases of pedophilia and ephebophilia have both been discovered in many churches across the world&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religioustolerance.org/clergy_sex.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Many instances of abuse occurred with little or no repercussion for priests involved.  In some cases, bishops were aware of the abuse but did not effectively deal with it, allowing the abusive priest to continue to remain in contact with minors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 15 2007 in Los Angeles, the Catholic church paid a $660 million dollar settlement over a priest abuse scandal.  More than five hundred lawsuits dating back to the 1930's were filed in Los Angeles from abuse victims of over two hundred priests and lay people.  The U.S. Catholic church has paid out more than $2 billion in abuse claims dating back to 1950.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070715/la_archdiocese_070715/20070715?hub=CTVNewsAt11 L.A. Catholic church settlement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vatican City]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pope John Paul II]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dead Sea Scrolls]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Virgen.jpg|right|thumb|Virgin Mary and Child]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/VaticanCouncil2.html The Reasons for the Second Vatican Council]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/vonbalthasarfathers.html The Fathers, the Scholastics, and Ourselves ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/predestination.html  Ruminating on Laughter, Predestination, Mystery ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cua.edu/ The Catholic University of America] Washington, D. C.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11567b.htm St. Paul] Catholic Encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/Marykerygma05.html Mary is not the Kerygma]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/RFK_daughter.html Kathleen Kennedy Townsend: Failing America's Faithful]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/ChristNietzscheIslam.html A Civilization Without the Influence of Jesus Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tcrnews2.com/Birds_Trojan.html Birds of a Feather and Trojan Horse Islam]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc.htm Catechism of the Catholic Church] Saint Charles Borromeo Catholic Church web site.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pellegrinocattolico.com/index.html Al Pellegrino Cattolico] Italian web site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Catholic Church]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SynchonousTurbo&amp;diff=237214</id>
		<title>User talk:SynchonousTurbo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SynchonousTurbo&amp;diff=237214"/>
		<updated>2007-07-17T03:33:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome|sig=--~~~~}}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 23:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT)}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jesus&amp;diff=235671</id>
		<title>Jesus</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jesus&amp;diff=235671"/>
		<updated>2007-07-16T17:02:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Redirecting to Jesus Christ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Jesus Christ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ClioProf&amp;diff=234064</id>
		<title>User talk:ClioProf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ClioProf&amp;diff=234064"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T17:11:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome|sig=--~~~~}}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 13:11, 15 July 2007 (EDT)}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233607</id>
		<title>Talk:Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233607"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T05:18:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Reason for rollback */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Private Tutoring== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does private tutoring really count as homeschooling? I don't see why it should. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:01, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homschoolers at harvard.==&lt;br /&gt;
I read it some were, but it is true that 10% of students in a classroom at Harvard were homseschooled. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:38, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:For a claim like that, I doubt &amp;quot;I read it somewhere&amp;quot; works; finding a citation shouldn't be hard if it's true, though. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will try to find it.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:42, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Great!  Find a citation *first*, then feel free to add it to the article.  Since only about 2% of kids are homeschooled, it would be astounding to find 10% at Harvard.  Also note that 10% in a particular classroom is not the same as 10% of the Harvard student body.  If your statement is true, then it deserves much more prominence in the article.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:45, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alright I found the information, but I was wrong. 10% of the Students accepted are homeschooled.:) so am I.... not going to Harvard though. so if you still want the link i can get it, or if not, no problem. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:53, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::First, make sure it's 10% of accepted students are homeschooled, not 10% of homeschooled applicants are accepted.  Then go ahead and add it, just make sure you quote it properly (very important for statistics) and include the citation, including the title, etc. so it will show up nicely in the references section.  Thanks for adding to this article!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:56, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Who are you by the way mom? I mean you sound like you have been here longer than I have, and thats a long time.ok here is the link: [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked/ homeschoolers at Harvard]  --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:59, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm a homeschooling mom, of course!  &amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;.  Will, the statistic was what I suspected.  It said that homeschoolers have an acceptance rate of 10%, which is the same as the general acceptance rate at Harvard.  On the one hand, it doesn't show homeschoolers doing any better than anyone else, but on the other hand, it does show they can do *as well as* anyone else.  Why don't you do a bit more research and write a paragraph about homeschoolers getting into college?  The one in the article is a good model - I bet you can find a few other sources too, and come up with something quite worthwhile!  Now I'm off to do my housework, but will check back to see what you've come up with!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:04, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Boston Globe article is excellent, it's a real &amp;quot;find.&amp;quot; I'm going to follow Hsmom's lead and let Will N. draft something rather than do something with it myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't figure out exactly what the sentence means: &amp;quot;At Harvard, the acceptance rate of the general applicant pool is about 10 percent, which mirrors the success of home-schoolers.&amp;quot; I read it the same way Hsmom does, but it's not perfectly clear. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it says specifically that the acceptance rate of homeschoolers at ''Williams College'' (a famous, excellent, old, small liberal arts college) is 20 percent. And [http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm this article] says that William's general acceptance rate is 19.2%. In other words, a homeschoolers are exactly as successful in gaining admission to Williams as anyone else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key point to be made, which should be supported with well-chosen quotations from the Globe article, is that homeschoolers are just as successful at being admitted to major colleges as others, and that these days college admissions offices are familiar with homeschooling and have no problem with it. I like the line: &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers' applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not discriminated against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If homeschoolers are about as successful at getting accepted as the general population, and if homeschoolers currently amount to something like 2% of all students, then ''presumably'' the percentage of Harvard students who were homeschooled would be 2%. 2% of 6700 = about 130 in all. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:01, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would dispute saying Patton was a Christian as he believed in reincarnation (show me where this is in line with scripture)&lt;br /&gt;
Brigham Young was a Mormon, not a christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mormons consider themselves to be Christians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The official name of their church is ''The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (&amp;quot;LDS Church&amp;quot; for short). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See material I've just moved to [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Mormons' relationship to Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One dictionary definition of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus.&amp;quot; It seems to me that Mormons meet that definition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who ought to make the judgement, among all the denominations that regard themselves as Christian, which are &amp;quot;really Christian?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:10, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P. S. The question of what Mormons believe is sure to receive a lot of discussion in a year or so, since Mitt Romney, a Mormon, is running for President. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:14, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you a Mormon? Not to be prejudiced against you if you are but just wondering. &lt;br /&gt;
Will N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No, I'm not a Mormon. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:37, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I probably should explain more. I did react to the phrase &amp;quot;a Mormon not a Christian.&amp;quot; What went through my mind, and what I knew ''off the top of my head'' was: &amp;quot;Whoa! That's not right. Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, and the church is even called Church of ''Jesus Christ'' of the Latter-day Saints.&amp;quot; I also got just a little bit of steam up, because there '''is''' some discrimination against Mormons&amp;amp;mdash;assuming Mitt Romney runs I think we'll have plenty of chance to see this soon&amp;amp;mdash;and saying that Mormons aren't Christians sounds a little like an attack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, after I wrote what I knew off the top of my head, from my experience with Wikipedia and with college, etc. I've found that if you want to convince other people, instead of just telling them what you think, it helps if you can show them ''why'' you think that. So I decided to do a bit of very quick research. I figured that Mormons probably get asked this question a lot and that the official LDS church website would probably have something to say about it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First I found the passage I put in quotation marks above, the one that begins &amp;quot;Jesus Christ is the Son of God.&amp;quot; I probably should have stopped there, but when I saw that they actually have a &amp;quot;Frequently Asked Questions&amp;quot; page with answers to the questions &amp;quot;Are you Christians&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a Christian church?&amp;quot; I couldn't resist putting that in, too. I probably put in too much. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ben Franklin was a Deist --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:58, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's right... no time to look further but I'm pretty sure Franklin did not believe in the divinity of Jesus and did not belong to an organized Christian church. Guess the whole list needs checking? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homeschooled or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a minor edit to the Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart entry today reflecting the fact that he was homeschooled. This was almost immediateley changed back by dpbsmith, with the explanation that &amp;quot;he wasn't homeschooled as we know the term today&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, this is all well and good, except that in the article for omeschooling, his name is on the list of famous people who were homeschooled, with an internal link to theMozart article!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So which is it? Was he homeschooled or not?  And please, this is isn't an attempt to start a big discussion of the meaning of homeschooling etc. I'm just asking for some consistency between articles here. Either a person was homeschooled, in which case their entries should be amended to reflect that fact, or they should be removed from the list of &amp;quot;Famous people who were homeschooled.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait a bit to see what the consensus is, but if their names are still on that list in a few days, I'm going to fix those articles to reflect that fact.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TrueReaganConservative|TrueReaganConservative]] 13:40, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds&amp;amp;mdash;Emerson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing is that ''this'' article is sort of a hash. I haven't wanted to take this sorry article entire, shatter it to bits and remould it nearer to my heart's desire because I think it's here as a sort of inspiration to the students who use the site. It looks to me like one of those &amp;quot;X pride&amp;quot; lists where X is any group that is a little out of the mainstream and wants to encourage its members that it's OK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The quickest way to fix ''this'' article would be retitle the actual list something like &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This isn't really a factual article about homeschooling, it's a point-of-view piece that says that being educated at home not only does not put you at a disadvantage vis-a-vis public or private schools, it can be an advantage. ''This is very arguably true'' and the list is evidence in support of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What the list is ''not'' is a list of people who have undergone &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is a sort of movement, mostly in the U. S. I think, that began more or less in the 1970s. Around that time there was a noticable drop in public confidence in the public schools. Maybe I remember it had something to do with John Holt? ''How Children Fail?'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Homeschooling&amp;quot; to me does not mean simply being educated at home. It means that parents have ''actively opted out'' of an ''existing system of compulsory public schooling,'' and educate their children at home in order to assert direct personal supervision of the content and values that their children are being taught.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Calling Mozart (say) &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; is like calling Thomas Jefferson &amp;quot;a Republican&amp;quot; or William Gladstone &amp;quot;a Liberal&amp;quot; or asserting &amp;quot;Jimmy Carter and Joseph Stalin were both Georgians.&amp;quot; Technically true, but confusing at best. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:08, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll defer to the consensus view, but I don't see why Mozart should be eliminated.  He was homeschooled in a Christian manner.  What's the big deal about observing that fact?  I don't think there has to have been compulsory education in his day to make this observation meaningful.  At a minimum, Mozart is an example of someone who learned at home and excelled afterwards.  Probably his home education has something to do with his work.  This is information worth preserving, and let readers debate as they wish.  As Fox News says, &amp;quot;We report.  You decide.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==George Bernard Shaw==&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Bernard Shaw'''... hmmm... I don't think he would have cared for being labelled as a Christian. You can make out a case that he did accept some of the moral teachings of Jesus ''as Shaw, personally'' interpreted them. But in his will, he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My religious convictions and scientific views cannot at present be more specifically defined than as those of a believer in creative revolution. I desire that no public monument or work of art or inscription or sermon or ritual service commemorating me shall suggest that I accepted the tenets peculiar to any established church or denomination nor take the form of a cross or any other instrument of torture or symbol of blood sacrifice.[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,813999,00.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he was a Christian, he was an awfully complicated and unusual Christian. He certainly did not belong to any organized denomination. He wrote that there was “not a single established religion in the world in which an intelligent or educated man could believe.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He did write that &amp;quot;Christianity might be a good thing if anyone ever tried it.&amp;quot; And he wrote that &amp;quot;Christianity as a specific doctrine was slain with Jesus, suddenly and utterly.&amp;quot; That is, he did not think any organized Christian religions actually practiced the teachings of Jesus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wrote a lot about Christianity in his Preface to ''Androcles and the Lion.'' I'm not going to try to summarize it, partly because I haven't read it through in a long time, but also because Shaw's ideas are so very original and unorthodox that they are really hard to pigeonhole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He dealt with religious themes in his plays ''Saint Joan,'' ''Major Barbara,'' and ''Androcles and the Lion,'' and in their prefaces, but if you can tell &amp;quot;which side&amp;quot; he's on after reading those plays, you're better than I am.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also dealt with evolution, in the play ''Back to Methuselah'' and the Preface to it&amp;amp;mdash;in a way which will not please either evolutionists or creationists. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:10, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I question the inclusion of '''Mark Twain,''' similarly. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:32, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harpie Snark recently added John Walker Lindh, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Charles Fletcher Lummis, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Christopher Paolini to the list. I deleted them when reverting some vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm restoring Charles Fletcher Lummis and Christopher Paolini on his say-so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin D. Roosevelt attended Groton, an elite private prep school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Walker Lindh is a Taliban member and Adam Yahiye Gadahn is an Al-Qaeda member. I don't think they should go onto the list without a pretty good source citation, on the grounds that &amp;quot;extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,&amp;quot; or, in this case, surprising claims require good evidence. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:37, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Christopher Paolini is the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased).  I know he was home schooled, but have never seen anything about his beliefs.  I asked to judge by his writing, I would tend to think he is not a Christian based on some elements of his books such as the atheism of the elves.  So if anyone has a source for this, please post it. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 19:45, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Raw results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a source for his being home-schooled, anyway: [http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934 A profile of Christopher Paolini], &amp;quot;He was home-schooled by his parents, Kenneth Paolini and Talita Hodgkinson, through an accredited correspondence course at American School, Chicago, Illinois from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:16, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gadahn apparently was home-schooled: [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/27/CALIF.TMP 'Average American boy' accused as terrorist], Adam was the oldest of four children, all of whom were home-schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A lot of Google hits on Lindh being home-schooled, but it's all blogs... Some stuff about in Google Books about Lindh &amp;quot;beginning life as a Christian&amp;quot; but turning to Islam &amp;quot;in high school.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://knowledgehouse.info/famous.html This page] credits Lummis as begin home-schooled but does not itself cite its sources... No clear whether or not this is supposed to be a list of home-schooled ''Christians...'' FDR listed, Groton not explained... She also lists Paolini... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:27, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources: Adam Yahiye Gadahn: [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian New Yorker] John Walker Lindh: [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org] Franklin D. Roosevelt: [http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm National Park Service] [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 14:30, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good. Thanks. I appreciate it. I'm removing the Wikipedia references because Wikipedia itself does not consider Wikipedia articles reliable sources that can be cited in other articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:FDR: I'm adding a note to the FDR entry, because it seems to me to be a borderline case; I don't think private tutors and Groton would be everyone's idea of what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lindh: I don't really know what to make of the [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org BlessedCause] reference, both because I don't understand what the site is about... but in any case, I do ''not'' see where it identifies Lindh as being ''Christian'' homeschooled. In fact if I understand the article it says there's a dispute about where he went to school, and says that according to Houghton Mifflin, he went to a public middle school in Marin County&amp;amp;mdash;an assertion which the site attacks. The Wikipedia article says he was homeschooled starting at age 12, but does not say he was ''Christian'' homeschooled. Wikipedia's own source for that item (wrongly formatted in the article) is a web page entitled [http://www.rickross.com/reference/islamic/islamic56.htm The Making of John Walker Lindh]. I read it as saying that he was in and out of public schools, and I do not see anything to suggest that his homeschooling resembles what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gadahn: The source you cite says, pretty clearly I think, &amp;quot;Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups. (At the time, nearly all such groups in the region were Christian,&amp;quot; so I don't see any question that ''he'' was &amp;quot;Christian homeschooled.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, there's a problem of definition here... this article has never defined exactly what the criterion is for inclusion in the list. Gadahn would be a good example of someone who clearly did undergo &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling,&amp;quot; and certainly was &amp;quot;homeschooled,&amp;quot; but surely was not &amp;quot;a Christian&amp;quot; and therefore not a &amp;quot;homeschooled Christian.&amp;quot;  I think this could use some discussion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:36, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That strikes me as what will be viewed by our critics as pretty obvious nitpicking and cherrypicking of sources. Reading the sources I provided, it's clear that all three had Christian upbringings and were homeschooled, despite their subsequent failings. As for Adam Gadahn, &amp;quot;''The Gadahns homeschooled Adam''&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;''Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups''&amp;quot; are clear and explicit. There's no ambiguity there; Adam Gadahn was Christian homeschooled. And the source, The New Yorker, is as good as they get. [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] If we'd rather not have in the list those who were homeschooled but may be viewed as casting it in a poor light, then let's just come out and say that and not pretend that sources say something other than they do or rely on turns of semantics to contrive justifications for an incomplete list. If our ideas are indeed that strong and compelling, then they can easily withstand being scrutinized in full light of all facts, and to act otherwise by ignoring or dismissing unfavorable facts only undermines our position and claims and invites greater scrutiny. Better to just put all the cards on the table, deal with them and let the chips fall where they may. As I've said before on my talk page, either CP is going to have an accurate and complete article on homeschooling or it's going to have to censor information from it's articles which may be considered unfavorable to its stated orientation, it can't always have both. This is as good an article as any to choose which it's going be, right here, right now. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree that it is hard given this evidence not to list Gadahn. The others are less persuasive. We need to resolve whether this is a list of Christians who were homeschooled, people who were Christian homeschooled, people who are Christian who happen to have been homeschooled, or Christians who were Christian homseschooled (I think that covers the 4 obvious possibilities). [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:30, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I commented on Harpie's talk page but now realize that the debate is here. I'll only respond here now about this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As anyone familiar with homeschool support groups knows, simply hanging around a loosely affiliated group does not make one a &amp;quot;Christian homeschooler&amp;quot; any more than living in a neighborhood makes one a member of the majority religion.  The description of Gadahn is clear that he attended Christian homeschooling groups out of necessity, not by choice.  This does not make him a Christian homeschooler any more than attending Georgetown Univ. made Bill Clinton a Catholic college student.  As to Lindh, there is nothing Christian about his homeschooling or his own religion, so that's not even close.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Notice that if we can agree to let the title of the actual list be &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home,&amp;quot; that includes Mozart and excludes Lindh and Gadahn. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Frankly the only thing necessary for a run-of-the-mill homeschooler to be a Christian homeschooler is intent on the part of the parents to provide a proper Christian education and action by them to keep them out of school and deliver a superior quality education at home themselves. Reading the New Yorker article it seems clear that this was the intent of the Gadahn's for young &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Azzam&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Adam, no matter how terribly they failed:  [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] Now arguing that Adam Gadahn was not Christian homeschooled because he didn't chose to but rather was compelled to is a red herring; many Christian homeschooled children would prefer to be playing ''Left Behind: Eternal Forces'' rather than studying math, so by that standard not many Christian homeschooled children would qualify as being Christian homeschooled. Meaning this rationale again opens us up to the lefty criticism that we exclude unfavorable facts from our articles, in other words, engaging in partisan, ideologically-motivated censorship. So if Aschlafly as the owner of this site really wants to exclude Gadahn as he seems to, we'd better set to work coming up with a reasonable-appearing justification for doing so that has at least a veneer of scholary fairness; regardless of what our motivations are, I'd think we'd want to avoid appearing to be censoring unfavorable facts in order to further our agenda. Thoughts? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 19:58, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Harpie, there's no &amp;quot;censorship&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;exclu[sion]&amp;quot; here.  The New Yorker article simply does not support the claim that Gadahn was a Christian homeschooler.  The article says that, out of necessity, Gadahn was forced to associate with homeschool &amp;quot;support groups&amp;quot; for some of his teenage years.  That association not necessarily even education.  Every indication is that Gadahn was not Christian then, and is not now either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, I might add, nearly 99% of Christian homeschoolers start early.  It seems to me that both Gadahn and Lindh were latecomers to homeschooling long after their personalities and attitudes had formed.  Often the latecomers are just passing through and are not influenced much by homeschooling.  Contrast that with Mozart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I think Dpbsmith has proposed an ideal solution.  Certainly he captures the intent of the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:28, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Kind of like a book about &amp;quot;Famous Irish That Don't Drink&amp;quot;. This ''is'' a brilliant solution! Now I understand how to handle situations like this. Since we don't engage in censorship or exclusion, we just need to find the right way to frame the issue that by necessity keeps any unfavorable facts out. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 12:25, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love your sarcastic enthusiasm-- it '''''really''''' strengthens your points more than talking straight could ever hope to. Even so, Ashlafly has a good point; Dpbsmith accurately capptured the intent of the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 12:43, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, they say a little bit of honey makes the medicine go down better. Look, I've been in conservative political PR now for nearly 20 years and know a little something about crafting credible, effective messages, and we'd be a lot more credible and better off in the long term were we to follow the rationale I provided above. Our goal should not be to just get out the message, but to get out a credible and compelling one, and this subject and article is just one of many that will face this same issue. If we go around trumpeting our own version of reality while ignoring the one that is shared by all we run the risk of being caricatures of our own cause and ultimately all too easily dismissed by those we hope to convince. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expand this article==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not the person to do it. I know nothing about homeschooling, sent both of my kids to public schools (and state universities), hope I've got stuff sorta-kinda right, hope I haven't stepped on any toes, but, this should be an article where there's ''lots'' of expertise available. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:12, 28 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me be more emphatic. There could be a '''lot''' more factual material about homeschooling here. Resources. Books. Tips on dealing with the authorities and how to jump through the legal hoops (I assume there are still some to jump through). There's an obvious opportunity here for people to add encyclopedic material that is informed by their personal experience and expertise. Say someone wants to homeschool in New Jersey or whereever. What office do you go to? What forms do you fill out? etc. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:39, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think this is a good place to try to compile info about state homeschooling laws.  There are other places that specialize in that.  On the other hand, I agree that the article needs some serious work.  Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Parents take a more active role in the education of their children when they homeschool. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; I'm uncomfortable with this general statement - while in some (many) cases it is true, there are lots of active parents with kids in public or private school (especially small church schools, I'm guessing), and there are homeschooling parents who simply hire a tutor (or several) and let them have at it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The primary reason for homeschooling is to give the child a better education. A close second in reasons, however, is to avoid the culture of public school and its many adverse effects of hostility to Christianity and parental control, political bias, boredom, confusion, depression, etc.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, different families have different reasons for homeschooling, usually more than one.  Religion may (or may not) be a factor; so might the quality of education.  But there are other reasons - a child who is not being well-served by the public schools, a child who has a special talent or interest they wish to focus on, a family who wants to travel with dad on business, a family who lives in a very rural area far from schools (or who is sailing around the world, etc.), and so on.  Various surveys have been done trying to rank the reasons, but I think we'd be better off with a list of possible reasons rather than trying to rank them.  Homeschoolers are notoriously hard to count or survey. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In the United States, opting out of public schools is not new. When Thomas Edison's public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. But because of compulsory education laws—the first was passed in Massachusetts in 1852, and by 1918 every state had them—schooling at home was a violation of truancy laws, and was rare until the 1970s. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, *lots* of kids were educated at home in earlier centuries, and certain cultures (Native American?) may not have had &amp;quot;schools&amp;quot; at all back then.  Also, the 1852 date sounds too late to me, though I could be wrong - can we get a cite there?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just added one. There seemed to be one there already. Another, which reads well but not quite sure of the source, is [http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/compulso.html Compulsory Education]. Apparently Horace Mann&amp;amp;mdash;whose name is instantly familiar to me as an &amp;quot;educator,&amp;quot; but of whom I know little more&amp;amp;mdash;was active in getting them to do it. Massachusetts had ''public'' schools much earlier, but apparently they were not compulsory. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also - is there a reason for listing Christian homeschoolers?  Why not just list people who were educated at home (in one form or another), and then give a brief explaination of their situation - e.g. Sandra Day OConnor, educated at home when she was young as the ranch she lived on was very remote, or whatever.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of thoughts - hope they are helpful.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:49, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent homeschooled Christians? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By your own definition, you have to &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; of formal education to be considered &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;  Thus, I'm curious what system DaVinci, Washington, et al, opted out of.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 13:25, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's why, some time ago, I changed the title of the '''list''' to &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; Homeschooling as we know it in the United States essentially began in the 1970s. This very interesting article on [http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/homeschool/index.html Homeschoolers: Estimating Numbers and Growth] suggests that there were about a million homeschoolers circa 1998. However, in the &amp;quot;late 1970s and early 1980s&amp;quot; it says &amp;quot;about 10,000 to 15,000&amp;quot; children received their education at home. At a very rough guess, today's U. S. adult population probably includes less than 100,000 people over 21, probably less than 25,000 people over 30, and practically none over 40. Not a large population, and not enough time to become spectacularly high achievers... yet. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:34, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I changed the definition part to remove the &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; wording - it is somewhat an attempt to address your concern above, and also an attempt to put the emphasis on what homeschoolers *do* (learn outside of school), than what they *don't do* (go to school).  Not perfect, but a step in the right direction, I think.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:35, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree.  I think that this kind of simplistic list can be a bit meaningless.  Better would be a list of people with unconventional educations or minimal formal education with a brief explanation of their circumstances.  For example, you could say something like &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin - had one year of formal schooling, apprenticed with his brother as a printer.&amp;quot; (Or whatever - not sure of the details on Franklin, but you get the idea.)  I also think that whether the person was Christian could be handled similarly in the brief note, rather than in the heading.  In addition, I don't think *anyone* should be on the list unless there is a *citation* to a source explaining their education.  See my addition of Andrew Wyeth as an example. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nature of the list just boggles my mind.  It ignores the point raised by AmesG (which I still read into it despite the &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot; part) that &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; needs a formal alternative to have a meaningful definition.  Also, why only Christians? I'm still boggled... [[User:Human|Human]] 22:40, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drawbacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm moving this here for discussion. As it stands, it seems to me to be pure, unsupported personal opinion:&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is not without its drawbacks.  Studies have noted that children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts.  [http://justenough.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/homeschoolers-are-indeed-weird/]  This lack of legitimate socialization can produce difficulties in homsechooled childred engaging in meaningful relationships with individuals outside of their family.  Additionally, while the public school playground can be seen as a barbaric atmosphere to most kids who are schooled at home, it is important to note that these exigent circumstances can produce valuable conflict prevention skills that pay dividends in all facets of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt there are drawbacks to homeschooling. The claim that &amp;quot;children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts&amp;quot; is, however, referenced only to a blog entry by someone identified only as &amp;quot;Tammy,&amp;quot; no other identification or credentials&amp;amp;mdash;''and it does not support the statement.'' The title of the entry is &amp;quot;Homeschoolers are indeed weird,&amp;quot; but she does ''not'' say homeschoolers are less socialized&amp;amp;mdash;that's apparently [[User:Huey gunna getcha]]'s ''interpretation.'' She means &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; in a good way: tolerant of different opinions and not afraid to express individuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence about the &amp;quot;public school playground&amp;quot; providing &amp;quot;valuable conflict prevention skills&amp;quot; is plausible but unsupported. (By the way: are parochial school playgrounds, or non-school playgrounds very different?) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A friend once remarked that he was astonished whenever anyone made reference to &amp;quot;the happy sounds of children at play.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Haven't they actually paid attention when they pass a playground?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:19, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch!  I had read that article earlier today and put removing that section on my &amp;quot;to do&amp;quot; list - you beat me to it!  FWIW, when looking at homeschoolers and socialization, it's also important to consider that some children are not odd because they are homeschooled, rather, they are homeschooled because they are odd.  Homeschooling can be an understanding &amp;quot;safe haven&amp;quot; for those odd kids for whom school may be &amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot; indeed. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:48, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i was almost kicked off my baseball team cause i was homeschooled and i was playing for the middle school. i was fortunate to be kept on. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 20:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://learninfreedom.org/socialization.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/zysk1.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/HomeschoolingGrowsUp.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the thousands of references on Homeschooling and Socialization. As an educator and homeschool parent I have searched for years to find data that supports the claim that homeschoolers are lacking in good social skills. Having met hundreds of HS kids from all ages, I never found one that wasn't able in a wide variety of social situations. Indeed ''all'' of the HS teens I met were a delight to talk with and had no problems talking with adults on a wide range of topics, unlike thier Public or Private or Parochial schooled peers who always seem so sullen and distant around adults they don't know - and even those they do. After searching the academic journals and every other source I could look at, I found a lot of research on HS and Socialization and none that found widespread negative effects. While someone may find a kid here and there as an anecdote to say HS is isolating and promotes poor social development, I could probably come up with dozens of Public, private and parochial school kids to show the alleged deliterious effects of those types of schooling on the social skills of kids.   Third Day May 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snipping George Bernard Shaw and Mark Twain==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm removing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both men had complex opinions that varied during the course of their lives, but calling them &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is a stretch. My reasons for excluding Shaw are given above. As for Mark Twain, he did write a sympathetic book about Joan of Arc. However, his writings are replete with sarcastic and dismissive remarks about organized religion. He refused to let &amp;quot;Letters from the Earth&amp;quot; be published until after his death. In Mark Twain's Letters, we read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From a gentleman in Buffalo Clemens one day received a letter inclosing an incompleted list of the world's &amp;quot;One Hundred Greatest Men,&amp;quot; men who had exerted &amp;quot;the largest visible influence on the life and activities of the race.&amp;quot;  The writer asked that Mark Twain examine the list and suggest names, adding &amp;quot;would you include Jesus, as the founder of Christianity, in the list?&amp;quot; To the list of statesmen Clemens added the name of Thomas Paine; to the list of inventors, Edison and Alexander Graham Bell.  The question he answered in detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain's answer was that if the compiler of the list added Jesus, he should also add Satan: &amp;quot;From A.D. 350 to A.D. 1850 these gentlemen exercised a vaster influence over a fifth part of the human race than was exercised over that fraction of the race by all other influences combined.  Ninety-nine hundredths of this influence proceeded from Satan, the remaining fraction of it from Jesus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain has been labelled &amp;quot;deist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;agnostic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;atheist.&amp;quot; Gary Sloan suggests ([http://www.writerscramp.ca/archives/mark_twain.htm Mark Twain's Covert War with his Maker]) that he believed in a ''malignant'' God, and says &amp;quot;Viewing Satan as a heroic rebel against the real Archfiend, Twain came to identify with the fallen cherub and often used him as a mouthpiece.&amp;quot; Perhaps his views were so complex that he was all of these things and a Christian at the same time, but he was certainly not a Christian as the term is ordinarily meant. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:03, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But if they were homeschooled, shouldn't they be in the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; section of the list? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure. That section didn't exist when I removed them; it was a single list of Christians. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:25, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cleaning up the list - putting uncited people on the talk page==&lt;br /&gt;
The list of homeschooled people for whom there are no citations has been here for too long, IMHO.  I am moving these people here, to the discussion page.  I hope this is OK with all of you.  As each person's education is researched and cited, we can add them back to the list, preferably with a brief sentence explaining who they are and what form their education took (as we have now already for several people).  As discussed above, I think it will be easier to describe the religious beliefs of each person individually (if needed in this context), rather than try to decide if they are generically Christian or not. Please jump in and research one of these people so we can build up this article. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I left in Adam Yahiye Gadahn, John Walker Lindh, George Bernard Shaw, and Mark Twain, because their entries had *something* other than their names, and because they were discussed quite a bit here; however these can/should be improved by adding a brief description of who they are/were, adding a brief description of their education, and/or adding citations, preferably ones that describe their education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:29, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cleaned up the George Bernard Shaw entry.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:41, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it were up to me I'd make this list contemporary (20th century, maybe 19th too) personalities.  As it was pointed out earlier, as the homeschooling term is used today, the majority of these wouldn't count.  Also, way back in the day, practically everyone was homeschooled. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do we really need this comprehensive a list? Isn't it enough to point out a few folks who were homeschooled? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 12:28, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Folks, I saw that list from a source and have reinserted.  I took out the ridiculous Lindh reference and other liberal bias.  For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!  Frankly, this entry looked like something one would see on Wikipedia.  We're not trying to be like Wikipedia here.  Thanks and I'll try to find citations for the names I reinserted.  Help is welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I saw that list from &amp;quot;a source,&amp;quot; too, but it was just that: a list. Some homeschooling-related site. It did not say where the list came from nor did it give any sources at all. I think the list may be just bouncing around the Internet. What was ''your'' source? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!''  I'm not sure I agree with this.  It is not supported by the citation given for that paragraph.  In fact, religion was *third* in the list of reasons for homeschooling provided in the citation, with only 29.8% citing it as their most important reason. If you are going to assert this, it would be best to add an additional citation that backs it up. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:14, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html   According to the US Census, 33% cited Religion as a motivation for HS.  My citation is older than the one used in this article. Mine says 33% cite religion (not Christianity, but Religion) and the more recent survey cited by ASchafly says 29% cite Religion. Homeschoolin is becoming more and more popular and common and the fastest growing group of HSers are not citeing religion as thier motivation. This is a very interesting development. May 8 [Third Day]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK, fine, I'll look for citations and add them.  But I've personally taught over 120 homeschoolers, and I'd say religion is the motivation for 100 or so of them.  The other reasons given, such as avoidance of drugs in school, are not even factors for the vast majority of homeschoolers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Also, I will find more citations for the 61 people under the &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot; list and move them to the higher list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm guessing that your classes are taught from an Evangelical Christian perspective, which would make it less likely that non-Christians would sign up for them.  You may also know other Christian homeschoolers from church and other social activities.  In addition, Christian homeschooling groups often ask members to sign a statement of faith, effectively excluding those who aren't Christian - if one of these groups is your main contact with the homeschooling community, you will get a very skewed impression of the homeschooling population.  So it makes sense that the majority of homeschoolers you know are Christian and that they homeschool &amp;quot;to protect the Christian faith of their children and to preserve their family values.&amp;quot;  For many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers, this is a good thing - they want to raise their children in a community of people who share their beliefs and values.  But there have always been homeschoolers who are doing it for reasons of educational philosophy (wanting more of a child-led approach, or stronger academics than their local public school, or logistics (like if the family travels frequently due to Dad's job), or issues with their particular child (like Aspberger's syndrome), etc.), and this category is growing as homeschooling becomes more mainstream.  (Growing Without Schooling, a secular homeschooling magazine, started publication in 1977.)  In addition, some of those who homeschool for religious reasons are not Christian - they may be homeschooling to protect the Jewish faith of their children, for example.  Certainly personal experience is a useful data point, and surveying homeschoolers can be quite difficult.  Perhaps you can find some research to support your claim.  Let's just be careful when we extrapolate based on our own experiences.  We need to set a good example for our students.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:12, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment has some truth but lacks a sense of proportion.  Parents who homeschool to keep their kids off drugs are about 1/1000th as many as parents who homeschool for Christian purposes.  Your comments and edits to the entry seem to avoid recognizing the obvious:  the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  There is a whole college devoted to this market (Patrick Henry College).  How many colleges are there for atheistic homeschoolers?  Our entries need to reflect reality, and reality includes proportions.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I completely agree that keeping kids off of drugs does not, in my experience, drive a lot of parents to homeschool.  (On the other hand, I do not live in the inner city - my experience might be different than families in whose neighborhoods drugs are a more serious presence.)  I would still disagree, though, that the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  I know many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers who are homeschooling to preserve their children's Christian faith.  However, I also know many homeschoolers of other faiths, and many who are Christian or Catholic but for whom faith is not among their reasons for homeschooling.  I wrote the &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot; paragraph based on the study I cited.  I believe someone above cited another study, which also found that it was not the case that a majority of homeschoolers did so for religious reasons.  I am willing to believe that my personal observations and these two studies are not representative of the homeschooling population, if we can find something to back that up.  These are certianly not the only studies out there, and I think it would be good if we can find some other references to compare to them.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:40, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you define homeschooled?  Had some education at home?  A formal school education was available but did not attend?  Dropped out of school at age something? Without such a definition, many of the names on the list are frankly, silly and/or wishful thinking. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of this - Mark Twain is listed on the list.  From the biography of Mark Twain[http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml] it reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;In 1847, when Sam was 11, his father died. Shortly thereafter he left school, having completed the fifth grade, to work as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper. His job was to arrange the type for each of the newspaper's stories, allowing Sam to read the news of the world while completing his work.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 1847, a 5th grade education was quite sufficient for day to day life and working as an apprentice for a local newspaper was a reasonable continuation of his education.  It is not homeschooling.  It would probably be more useful to first put the person on the talk page and figure out if they were homeschooled and then added to the main page rather than put on the main page without refrence and then removed when they don't fit the definition (whatever that may be). --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:24, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, [[User:Mtur|Mtur]].  I have found several times in the past that someone on a list of this kind was not actually educated at home.  I think, if we are going for a high level of accuracy that befits an encyclopedia, we should do the research ourselves first, using the talk page to discuss.  Then we should add the person to the list, and be sure to explain how each person was educated.  I don't think we need to have a strict definition of homeschooling; rather, we should describe each person's experience.  The result will be a list with an interesting variety of approaches to education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added Mark Twain's famous quote, which is proof enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally, these lists abound on the internet.  I've added a cite.  No one really disputes that most or all of these people, and others too, were homeschooled.  We can continue to fill in cites, but there is no need to censor this info in the meantime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot; I don't think this is proof that he was homeschooled, only that he sees the difference between schooling and education, and realizes that education can come from places other than school. I'd like to know more about his education before adding him to the list.  (But your sandbox, etc, so I'll leave him there.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree that lists such as these abound - but here, a higher standard exists.  It is not censorship to be sure something is accurate before adding it to the article proper, and the information is available to all on the talk page while the research is being done.  Students who want to use these people as examples in their work should know enough about the individual's education to be sure it is indeed an example of what they are writing about.  Brief descriptions of the person's education, along with a cite or two about it, will be very useful to our readers.  A list without this information, not so much. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Sam was always a good-hearted boy,&amp;quot; his mother once remarked, &amp;quot;but he was a very wild and mischievous one, and, do what we would, we could never make him go to school.  This used to trouble his father and me dreadfully, and we were convinced that he would never amount to as much in the world as his brothers, because he was not near so steady and sober-minded as they were.&amp;quot;  At school, he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot;; outside of school he was the prototype of his own Huckleberry Finn, mischievous and prankish, playing truant whenever the opportunity afforded.  &amp;quot;Often his father would start him off to school,&amp;quot; his mother once said, &amp;quot;and in a little while would follow him to ascertain his whereabouts.  There was a large stump on the way to the schoolhouse, and Sam would take his position behind that, and as his father went past would gradually circle around it in such a way as to keep out of sight.  Finally, his father and the teacher both said it was of no use to try to teach Sam anything, because he was determined not to learn.  But I never gave up.  He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  I'm not sure that I would consider this to be homeschooling, especially as his truancy was against his parents' wishes, though he certainly had an autodidact's view of education.  I have added a fuller discription of his education to the article, so that readers can decide for themselves.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm breaking my self-imposed examtime exile to ask this question.  Isn't it kind of facetious to say that most of those people were homeschooled, when no formal schooling existed?  It's sort of like making a big fuss out of someone from the 1600s being a creationist - of course he was, there was no alternative!  Or, like saying, &amp;quot;Jesus didn't believe in global warming.&amp;quot;  Well... of course not.  The controversy didn't exist back then.  It creates an idea of conscious choice and rejection of an idea, when there was no such thing.  Example: Joan of Arc?  There were no formal schools in France at the time.  Put another way, could you name someone from before 1700 who was ''not'' homeschooled until college?  Just seems a little facetious to me.  K, back to the books.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 00:59, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point is not to say that someone succeeded by rejecting public school, but that someone succeeded from homeschooling.  The latter observation is true and meaningful regardless of whether public schools existed.  We don't care as much '''why''' someone was homeschooled as whether it was effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sure, I can think of people who lived before 1700 but were not homeschooled:  the illiterate, of whom there were many.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure, that's true.  But the point that others are making is that the tone of the article suggests that you're suggesting that they rejected public schools, or were part of the homeschooling &amp;quot;movement.&amp;quot;  Would you mind if I clarified it, to better express your point, or would you like to?  Perhaps something like, &amp;quot;Even before public schools were active, homeschooling produced many successful people worldwide.  Here are some examples&amp;quot;? -'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 01:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A previous version had such a statement - I think something like that should be included.  I would also argue that the statement &amp;quot;a disproportionate number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled&amp;quot; has not been cited or proved, and I'm not sure it's accurate or (from a historical perspective), even meaningful.  (See the Harvard discussion above, though of course college admittance is not a great measure of success in life - but that's a whole 'nother conversation.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The problem with your approach is that most of the people on the list did reject formal or public school, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think that's true for many of the historical figures.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the list, if it actually describes the education each person had, shows that there are a wide variety of approaches to education which can be successful.  This can be very useful in an age where educational standardization is being pushed - having all kids learn the same material in the same grade, etc.  It's also nice for homeschooled kids to see that they are not so much an oddity as part of a long line of people who did a significant amount of learning outside of school.  There's a reason you often see lists of successful minorities - it is very helpful to members of the minority group to havfe these role models, even if their lives aren't exactly parallel.  I agree that it's problematic to call it &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; before, say, the last 50-100 years, but &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;educated outside of formal schools&amp;quot; usually fits.  At the same time, I think a long list of names without individualized information about their education is not particularly useful, and quite frankly lowers the standard of research and accuracy here.  Again, we are setting an example for the students, homeschooled and not, who we expect will use this information in their work.  If we expect them to present work that is well-researched and cited from credible sources which are themselves clearly well-researched, shouldn't we be doing the same?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In place of the list ''in the article'', how about tagging each person's biography page with [[:Category:Homeschooled]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
#Anyone educated before 1850 was probably not given &amp;quot;[[compulsory education]]&amp;quot; in the Mann or Dewey sense. In ''[[Little Women]]'' Mrs. March kept Amy home and had Jo teach her. Nothing unusual about that. We need an article on [[Primary education]] or [[History of education]] that gets into that. What proportion of children were educated, and how well? When and where? The one-room schoolroom, or a huge mega-school divided into grades by age? How about [[Educational reform]]s or &amp;quot;fads&amp;quot; like [[Whole language]] and its attack on [[phonics]], the [[New math]] and its ineffective ways of teaching [[arithmetic]]? (I'm tutoring some of my friends' kids, and it's a nightmare trying to counter the knuckleheaded strategies they mandate for doing &amp;quot;[[word problem]]s&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's enlightening to have the list in one easy-to-access place.  It's striking.  You might add your Little Women point also.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Arguably, the category would be easier to access than an article and would be dynamically updated as new biographies were added.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 14:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As I said last night, the point is not that these individuals rejected public school (though many did), the point is that they achieved based on homeschooling.  Why they homeschooled is a separate, and less important, issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I like the idea of a &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; category.  However, I also like the list we are beginning to create here, assuming that we are careful to include a brief description of each person's education.  It's very informative and inspiring to see the wide variety of ways these people were educated.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christopher Paolini ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], could you explain why you deleted Christopher Paolini from the list?  He is a modern homeschooler, a best-selling author of a YA book series, and was clearly homeschooled.  The list entry (copied below), was detailed and cited.  Isn't this the kind of thing we want in the list?  I haven't read his books -- perhaps there is an issue with their content I am unaware of?  I'm not trying to challenge this decision, I just want to understand it.  (Or perhaps it was a mistake?) --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased). He was home-schooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Originally, it was a list of &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home&amp;quot; (well, actually it was &amp;quot;homeschooled Christians&amp;quot; but I proposed the title change to bypass issues about the meaning of the word &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;) This was the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;amp;oldid=10078 original list]. Paolini was added later, and there was some issue about whether he was Christian. I don't know whether that's why Aschlafly didn't include him, or whether Aschlafly just wanted to go back to a list whose sincerity he trusts... some people had fun from time to time adding names of individuals educated at home who are better described as &amp;quot;notorious&amp;quot; than as &amp;quot;high-achieving.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The list could have come from [http://www.home4schoolgear.com/famoushomeschooler.html here] or [http://www.christianhomeschoolers.com/hs_famous_homeschoolers.html here] or [http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm here] or [http://www.itwillpass.com/facts_famous_homeschoolers.shtml here]. There's probably one source for all of them but none of them credit it, much less give references for the individuals named being educated at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've seen many of these lists over the years, almost none with explanations.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Of the few I fact-checked, some had problems. All of these Web lists, for example, list Franklin D. Roosevelt without comment, but Groton is not ''my'' idea of being educated at home. Conservapedia's article is currently adequately clear about Roosevelt's education. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:03, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes - exactly.  That's why I keep going on and on about how important it is to give a brief description of each person's education - it shows the Conservapedia reader/user what form the person's education took (leaving the *reader* to decide if it counts as &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; for the reader's purposes), and in researching the brief description, we are also validating the list. I think it's just way more useful if it has been annotated in this way.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference 6==&lt;br /&gt;
I don't understand reference 6 in the article.  What does it refer to? [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 11:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's supposed to say &amp;quot;''ibid.''&amp;quot;  I think there is a wiki markup that can be used to refer to a previously cited link, which is useful in case someone puts another footnote in between the 1st and 2nd cites, screwing up the &amp;quot;''ibid''&amp;quot; concept.  But I forget how to do it. [[User:Human|Human]] 11:59, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;id&amp;quot; is short for &amp;quot;ibid&amp;quot;.  It's supposed to refer to the preceding reference, though it possible another reference was inserted between the two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use the &amp;quot;name&amp;quot; feature of the ref tag. Format the first reference like this, with the actual reference text:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format subsequent references like this:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated instances of the same reference name show up in the text with the same number. In the references section itself, the entry will contain links back to all the places in the text where the named reference appeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Markup:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Result:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disproportionate?==&lt;br /&gt;
There have been two introductory sentences to our list of prominent homeschoolers:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, a disproportionate{{fact}} number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled. Here is a growing list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some high-profile people have been educated at home, though it should be noted that prior to the 19th century most children worldwide were educated within their family. Here is a list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
:I think the first sentence is problematic because it makes a claim that is not supported by any kind of citation (''disproportionate'').  I also think it would be hard to prove such a claim, because people's education was so varied before the twentieth century.  For example, I don't mind including Mark Twain in our list of people educated outside of formal schooling, because I think he is an interesting case of someone who didn't have much of a traditional school-based education, yet went on to become a writer whose works are still in print a century later.  However, I think many people of his time had only a 5th grade education, so if we were going to seriously look at the numbers, I don't think we could count him as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;.  Can we work together here to come up with a sentence we can all agree on?  Here's my first attempt (below) - please feel free to use it as a starting point for creating something better.  Let's work on this here on the talk page until we reach consensus. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:47, 13 May 2007 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some prominent people have received some or all of their education outside of formal schooling.  (Note that prior to the 19th century, many children were educated at home.)  Here is a growing list of people whose educational backgrounds were quite different than today's norm.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling of Homeschooling==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] - Can I get some advice - I think you're probably the best person to ask.  The Williams article uses &amp;quot;''home-schoolers''&amp;quot;, which is largely rejected by the homeschooling community (at least in my experience).  Should it get a (sic), especially since the article here uses ''homeschoolers''?  (This whole spelling thing is a pet peeve of many homeschoolers.)  Oh, and nice job on the college paragraph - and a double super nice job on the Mothers Day article!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:49, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Re the &amp;quot;spelling thing:&amp;quot; it's an issue I was unaware of. What's disliked about the hyphen? For what it's worth, the American Heritage Dictionary says:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''homeschool'''&lt;br /&gt;
::VARIANT FORMS: or home-school&lt;br /&gt;
::VERB: Inflected forms: home·schooled, home·school·ing, home·schools&lt;br /&gt;
::TRANSITIVE VERB: to instruct (a pupil, for example) in an educational program outside of established schools, especially in the home.&lt;br /&gt;
::INTRANSITIVE VERB: To provide educational instruction in a homeschool.&lt;br /&gt;
::NOUN: A school operated outside established educational institutions, especially in a home.&lt;br /&gt;
::OTHER FORMS: homeschooler &lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.bartleby.com/61/30/H0253050.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their giving &amp;quot;home-school&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;variant&amp;quot; would justify a ''[sic]'', so let's do that. Unfortunately there's another question: is a homeschooler a ''teacher,'' as their definition suggests, and, if so, what is the right word for a homeschooled ''pupil?'' &lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, sure, for now let's just put in the [sic] without explanation... until someone feels like writing a section on terminology and usage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:37, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''What's disliked about the hyphen?''  OK - not sure if I can write this well enough to make sense, but here goes.  It's kind of like breastfeeding vs. breast feeding.  It's the difference between a noun modified by an adjective, vs. a noun with a separate meaning.  That is, breastfeeding is more than just feeding at the breast, more than just a different kind of feeding - it also provides antibodies to protect against disease, it has beneficial effects on mom's body, etc.  Thus it deserves a noun all to itself.  Same with homeschooling.  It's more/different than just schooling that happens at home.  Homeschooling includes opportunities and approaches to education that are dramatically different than what you'd find in school.  Homeschooling is also often integrated into family life, so much so that it is often impossible to differentiate between the two.  For example, reading a book for pleasure - for school kids, this is a &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; activity that has nothing to do with school.  For homeschoolers, it is both school and not-school, wrapped up in each other (though of course both sets of kids obviously learn from reading on their own).  In fact, homeschoolers talk about people doing &amp;quot;school at home&amp;quot;, which generally describes trying to re-create the school model in the home without taking advantage of any of the benefits unique to homeschooling.  It is not generally used in a positive context.  &amp;quot;Home schooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;home-schooling&amp;quot; is often seen in articles written *about* homeschoolers by someone else - many spell checkers will flag &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;, and many journalists will insist that their style guidelines don't allow &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  Nonetheless, almost everything written *by* homeschoolers uses the one-word form.  It's one of those &amp;quot;call members of a minority what they want to be called&amp;quot; issues.  (BTW - not trying to make a value judgment here - though I enjoy homeschooling, and it's been good for my kids, I think different kinds of schooling are appropriate for different kids &amp;amp; families - there is no &amp;quot;one best way&amp;quot; to educate children, IMHO.)&lt;br /&gt;
::As to who is the homeschooler, I would use &amp;quot;she is homeschooled&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooler&amp;quot; to refer to the student; &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooling mom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools her kids&amp;quot; to refer to the mom.  &amp;quot;She is a homeschooler&amp;quot; referring to the mom is less common, I think because mom can't homeschool without the kids, but I would hesitate to call it incorrect - I would prefer &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;They are homeschoolers&amp;quot;, referring to the family, is appropriate.  I guess when you're referring to the students and teacher(s) collectively it's right to call them all homeschoolers, but not so much the teacher by herself.  (Excuse the sexist language here!)  &lt;br /&gt;
::Note that in some states there is language that comes from the laws in that state.  In some states, homeschoolers must be enrolled in some kind of &amp;quot;umbrella school&amp;quot; which provides oversight - technically, these are private school students.  In Britain, homeschoolers are &amp;quot;educated otherwise&amp;quot; (if I remember right), from a phrase in their law.  In Pennsylvania law there is no such thing as homeschooling - children are &amp;quot;home educated&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;privately tutored&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;enrolled in a public cyber-charter school&amp;quot; - this last one is very controversial, as most independent homeschoolers insist that students in schools run by the government are not homeschoolers, even if they do school at home.  (Got that?!  Public cyber-charter schools are essentially publicly-funded internet-based correspondence schools.)  The idea here is that we must be careful not to confuse, especially in the mind of the general public and the legislature, traditional self-funded homeschooling and publicly-funded school-at-home.  The concern is that such confusion could lead to more governmental oversight - if government money is being spent, then accountability (and control, and standardization) soon follows, and with accountability homeschoolers tend to be forced into doing things in a very school-at-home way, which many of us feel takes away the most effective parts of homeschooling.  But that's a whole 'nother can of worms.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Got it. Well articulated. The points about publicly-funded officially-supervised schooling at home is interesting. I think these topics ought to be touched on in the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:36, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that all the famous people home schooled are very old or even dead?  Hard to imagine Stephen Hawking being home schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling as a modern phenomenon has only been around for a short time.  As most people who become famous for Great Things do so later in life, it will be a while before the results of this Grand Experiment emerge.  In addition, many Christian homeschoolers aspire to paths that don't typically result in fame, such as missionary work, etc.  Still, point taken - we should add some modern folks.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:39, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Realizing that homeschooling is primarily an alternative to public schools. Most homeschooling parents homeschool their children because for whatever reason they are dissatisfied with the public schools. I think that it harms the credability of this website to smack the label of homeschooling on anyone who predates public schools as we now think of them; ''most'' people back then would fit the loose standard for &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; on this page. For example, Jesus is listed as &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot;. There is really can be no evidence for this and even if ther was his education would probably not fit our idea of homeschooling today--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:49, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daniel Webster - Homeschooled?  Or not so much?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not convinced that Daniel Webster can be described as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;, even though he got some college-prep tutoring.  Here's what I've found about his education, combined with what [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] has written.  FWIW, the Dartmouth site is the most extensive, with lots of useful quotes from primary sources; the Notable Names site ''(&amp;quot;updated as weather permits&amp;quot;)'' seems the least scholarly, but I'm not finding much contradiction.  There is a heck of a lot of schooling here, at a level way beyond most people of his time.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:39, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Daniel Webster]] (1782-1852), prominent U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, recognized as one of the greatest orators in history.  As the author of the first American dictionary, he is considered the father of the English language in America.  Born in Salisbury, N.H., he attended district schools&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biographical Directory of the United States Congress:  Daniel Webster[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=W000238]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a young lad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He attended [[Phillips-Exeter Academy]] for about nine months in 1794. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notable Names Database Weblog:  Daniel Webster[http://www.nndb.com/people/445/000024373/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Webster was then tutored by the Rev. Samuel Wood to prepare him to pass the rigorous oral exam required for entrance to Dartmouth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In August of 1797&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801:  The Road to Dartmouth[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, at the age of 16,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he enrolled in Dartmouth College, from which he graduated in 1801.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/exhibit.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Why doesn't this prove that Daniel Webster was homeschooled for high school?  In addition, the passing reference about attending &amp;quot;district school&amp;quot; before that would not have amounted to much in the 1700s, particularly in New Hampshire.  Those schools were not full-time school like today, and he would likely have learned the basics at home.  The other links to Webster don't even mention the &amp;quot;district schools.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've been a bit confused about when he was at Exeter - looking into it further, according to a biography he wrote in 1829, he entered in May, 1796 and he left in Jan 1797.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE - Online Resource Library:  Daniel Webster, Autobiography, 1829[https://www.osv.org/learning/DocumentViewer.php?Action=View&amp;amp;DocID=1077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was with Rev. Woods for no more than 7 months - he started in Feb 1797 and by Aug 1797 he had entered Dartmouth.  As to the district schools, it sounds like his family went to great lengths to have him attend them.  From the same source:  ''My father seemed to have no higher object in the world, than to educate his children, to the full extent of his very limited ability. No means were within his reach, generally speaking but the small town schools. These were kept by teachers, sufficiently indifferent, in the several neighborhoods of the township, each a small part of the year. To these I was sent, with the other children.  When the school was in our neighborhood, it was easy to attend; when it removed to a more distant district* I followed it, still living at home…When it removed still further, my father sometimes boarded me out*, in a neighboring family, so that I could still be in the school.''  I don't think we can ignore this, even if he, like many &amp;quot;youngest kids&amp;quot;, learned to read from his mother or siblings at home.  I can see your point, but I think it's a stretch to include him.  Let's hear what other folks think.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:27, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The Phillips-Exeter dates look wrong.  People don't start high school in May at age 17.  Nor would it make sense for Rev. Woods to tutor Webster for only a few months.  There is at least a three year gap there to prepare for college, as one would expect, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:25, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He would have been about 14 (1796 minus 1782), which jives with a couple of other sources which mention his age but not the year.  The 1794 date comes from the Notable Names Database Weblog article, which doesn't look particularly scholarly and includes no citations.  We could work it out more accurately if we looked up his birthday.  [Why don't I do that!  He was born January 18, 1782, which would make him 14 in May of 1796 when he entered Exeter (according to the autobiography quote), and 15 (give or take a few days) when he left.  He would have started with Rev. Wood at 15, and been almost 16 (well, 15 1/2) by the time he began Dartmouth in Aug 1797.]  I agree that May sounds like an odd time to start school, but I believe the British system, on which Phillips-Exeter may have been modeled, has different terms (semesters) than we are used to.  14 is the right age for high school today, and I do believe Dartmouth as to the dates he was there.  Perhaps we can find more information to verify or refute the Exeter dates.  Don't forget that Rev. Woods had planned to have Webster for longer:  ''Mr. Wood put me upon Virgil and Tully; and I conceived a pleasure in the study of them, especially the latter, which rendered application no longer a task... In the spring I began the Greek grammar, and at midsummer Mr. Wood said to me: &amp;quot;I expected to keep you till next year, but I am tired of you, and I shall put you into college next month.''  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He also said that he was ''miserably prepared, both in Latin and Greek'', which is not surprising if he only studied for a few months!  (Same source)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, here we go.  Phillips Exeter themselves put the date as May 14, 1796, age 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phillips Exeter Academy:  Academy Chronology[http://www.exeter.edu/libraries/4513_4622.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:59, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wright Brothers - Homeschooled?  Or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says:  &lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[The Wright Brothers|Orville and Wilbur Wright]], inventors of the airplane.  They did attend some school, but also learned at home from their father, who was a conservative minister, and their mother, who was the top mathematician in her college class.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/family.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neither Wright Brother earned a high school diploma, let alone college, and Orville Wright left high school after his junior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/trivia.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking at the sources given, I saw that both brothers went to school, that Wilbur earned a high school diploma (but never picked up his certificate), and Orville left after 11th grade.  While their parents taught them some interesting things (as do all good parents), I didn't see anything that implied that this was ever in lieu of going to school.  While I'd love to claim these two as &amp;quot;one of us&amp;quot; (homeschoolers, that is), the sources given don't seem to give me any grounds to do so.  Am I missing something?  I'd like us to have a strong, well-researched list of people with interesting educational backgrounds.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:22, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
I have cleaned up the two lists of homeschoolers based on the discussions above.  I have removed the Wright Brothers and Daniel Webster - if further research and discussion in the sections above shows them to be homeschoolers, we can add them back in.  I have also moved two people from the first list to the second, because they didn't have any explanation of their education or any references.  Because of our experience with the Wrights and Webster, we must view anyone on a &amp;quot;Famous Homeschooler&amp;quot; list we find on the internet with skepticism - they ''may'' have been homeschooled, but we should be careful to document their actual education before adding them to the first list.  It would probably to be a good idea to change the paragraph introducing the second list to make it clear that these people have not been researched or verified as homeschoolers.  By the way, thanks to everyone who has contributed to this article - I think it is shaping up nicely!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been researching Joan of Arc's education, and I'm not sure it qualifies as homeschooling, at least as we think of homeschooling today.  She was taught religion and domestic skills by her mother, as are most girls, then and now.  She could not read or write, and I found nothing about her going to school or being taught any academic skills.  So while (like most children of her time) she did not go to school, and while I have great respect for traditional women's skills and the way they have been passed from mother to daughter for centuries (regardless of whether the daughters also went to school or not), I don't think I would consider this to be &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; - it is, IMHO, &amp;quot;mothering&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;raising your daughter&amp;quot; - the kinds of things that most mothers do for their daughters.  Below are a few quotes.  Thoughts? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:07, 19 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. Joan would later say, &amp;quot;As for spinning and sewing, I fear no woman in Rouen.&amp;quot; And again, &amp;quot;It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''She never learned to read or write but was skilled in sewing and spinning...''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;It was from my mother that I learned the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, and the Credo&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;to sew linen fabrics and to spin wool, and when it comes to spinning and sewing I fear no woman...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biography of Joan of Arc[http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is homeschooling.  There is no requirement that homeschooling include a particular curriculum.  Joan of Arc should be included.  It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.  I'll revert the deletion of her name, even using your cites above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.''  I'm not sure what you mean here - do you mean that most mothers don't teach religion at all?  Or that most mothers of public-schooled children don't?  I'm talking here of religious families.  If those mothers (and of course fathers) don't teach their children religion, who does?  I think that, in a devout home, most kids learn the Lord's Prayer etc. (or whatever prayers are appropriate for their religion) from their mother or their father - hearing their parents say them daily, during mealtime and bedtime prayers, etc.  They also hear it from other family members and in church.  It's woven into the fabric of their family life.  I think that's even more the case in Joan of Arc's time.  In a devout home, children learn these things even before they are of school age.  In addition, girls throughout history learned spinning and sewing because that was their job in the family - the same way children today learn to load the dishwasher or to mow the lawn.  Is it homeschooling?  I can see both sides of it, and if you feel strongly that Joan of Arc should be included, then that's OK with me.  But in terms of our list of famous homeschoolers, I don't think it makes sense to individually list all those people from earlier times who learned religion and basic life skills (and maybe even a trade) from their parents and never even had the opportunity to go to school.  Perhaps it would be best to address it by writing a paragraph explaining that learning by your parents' side was the norm for the vast majority of people in those days - going to school was only for the elite.  We could rename our list  &amp;quot;Prominent people of the Modern Era who were educated at home&amp;quot; - well, &amp;quot;of the modern era&amp;quot; isn't great, but I'm sure we could think of something better - &amp;quot;Of the last 350 years&amp;quot; perhaps. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:29, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  This isn't complex.  No, most parents of public-schooled children do NOT teach their children the things that Joan of Arc learned at home.  Were most children who went on to achievement homeschooled at the time of Joan of Arc?  I don't know, but that fact does not affect whether Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  She was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:53, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, by this logic you could include every human being prior to about 1700, and even most humans after 1700.  In Joan of Arc's time, there were no public primary schools, therefore nearly everyone was educated by their parents.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 14:42, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, that doesn't follow.  Not everyone who failed to attend a [[public school]] was homeschooled.  Ever heard of [[Plato's Academy]]?  That was a few years before 1700.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point of this entry is not to criticize [[public schools]] anyway.  But if you want to insert a ''supported'' statement that [[public schools]] did not exist before 1700, please go ahead and do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plato's academy was the equivalent of secondary and post secondary education, not primary education.  Children learned to read and write from their parents, and so it follows that if their parents couldn't read or write, then the children almost certainly wouldn't be able to either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even into Joan of Arc's time, formal education was the province of the noble classes and what little group schooling existed was conducted by the church, not the state.  Since most people were not members of a noble family, they would not have been educated in a group setting, but instead instructed by their parents.  It wasn't until the advent of state sponsored public schooling that formal education became more widespread.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I realize that your goal is to present homeschooling as superior to public schooling, and you think that by presenting these towering giants of history as homeschooled that it helps your case, but the truth is that what you call homeschooling was the de facto method of learning for the vast majority of humanity the world over, and the handful of great individuals that arose from it are a measure of statistics, not of the superiority of the home-school.  Certainly, if you're the child of a Bill Gates or a Richard Feynman you might get more at the foot of your parent than in an average public school, but if you're the son of Joe Ditchdigger or Jane Grocery Bagger then you're likely better off in a public school.  A parent who is not well educated themselves is unlikely to be able to instruct their children to become better educated than they are.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 15:56, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== George Washington Carver ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yet again, when researching someone on the &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list, I've come up with little support for the argument.  George Washington Carver, born a slave, didn't go to school until age 10, but I'm not sure I would call his education before this &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  More accurately, his education was delayed until he could attend school.  The lack of schooling is '''not''' the same thing as homeschooling.  What do you all think?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:26, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''Carver was born a slave near Diamond, Missouri, during the American Civil War (1861-1865). Around age ten he left the farm where he was born and traveled through the Midwest doing odd jobs to support his education. Carver studied constantly and attended schools wherever possible, finally graduating from high school in Minneapolis, Kansas, in 1885. That same year he passed the entrance examination at Highland College in northeastern Kansas. But when school officials learned he was black, he was prevented from attending.  In 1891 Carver was admitted to the Iowa State College of Agricultural and Mechanical Arts (now Iowa State University) in Ames. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in 1894, becoming the first black to graduate from the college. After graduation, Carver was appointed to the faculty as an assistant botanist. While teaching, he pursued his master’s degree, studying fungus diseases and classification of plants. In 1896 he received his master’s degree. That year, at the invitation of American educator Booker T. Washington, Carver became the director of agricultural research at Tuskegee Institute, where he remained for the rest of his life.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSN Encarta Encyclopedia - George Washington Carver article[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761574196/Carver_George_Washington.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:''He began his formal education at the age of twelve, which required him to leave the home of his adopted parents. Schools segregated by race at that time with no school available for black students near Carver's home. He moved to Newton County in southwest Missouri, where he worked as a farm hand and studied in a one-room schoolhouse. He went on to attend Minneapolis High School in Kansas. College entrance was a struggle, again because of racial barriers. At the age of thirty, Carver gained acceptance to Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa, where he was the first black student. Carver had to study piano and art and the college did not offer science classes. Intent on a science career, he later transferred to Iowa Agricultural College (now Iowa State University) in 1891, where he gained a Bachelor of Science degree in 1894 and a Master of Science degree in bacterial botany and agriculture in 1897.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Washington Carver, By Mary Bellis[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa041897.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leonardo da Vinci==&lt;br /&gt;
Here is another from the Arguably Homeschooled list for whom I've been able to find little evidence of homeschooling.  Perhaps further searching will turn up more.  Until then, I suggest we take da Vinci off the list.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''In Vinci Leonardo went to school. Vasari told that teachers of Leonardo da Vinci were despaired about all the questions and doubts of Leonardo. Leonardo learned at school to write, to read and to calculate. Also he was taught in geometry and Latin. Later Leonardo tried to improve his knowledge in Latin, because he thought that he didn't learn enough at school in Latin. Perhaps this is the reason why Leonardo did his notes in Italian.  Leonardo lived in Vinci until 1466. With the age of 14 Leonardo moved to Florence where he began an apprenticeship in the workshop of Verrocchio.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leonardo da Vinci[http://www.kausal.com/leonardo/childhood.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Our &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list is proving to be very inaccurate.==&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand the logic of having the list in the article, I am finding so many people on the list to have educational backgrounds that I would not consider to be homeschooling that I think we need to reconsider.  I suggest we move the list back to the talk page - the level of error is just too high to consider this list credible. Once researched, people who are shown to actually have been educated at home can be put on the &amp;quot;Prominent people who were educated at home&amp;quot; list, along with an explanation of their education and citations showing the facts.  Thoughts?  Opinions? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed.  Some very basic fact checking shows that a number of the people on the list were clearly not homeschooled.  Both were added by Mr Schlafly.  Andy, are you just pulling these names from your nether regions, or did you bother to check if what you were posting was actually accurate?  I notice you've removed some of my additions, who were certainly homeschooled since they lived in countries without formal education systems.  Why was this done, Andy?  Because they weren't Christian?  I thought Non Christian Conservatives were welcome here...  that's what your front page says.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 22:11, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Dropouts vs. Famous Homeschoolers==&lt;br /&gt;
This reference &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Education Reform.net - List of Successful Dropouts [http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, currently in the Arguably Homeschooled section, is a list of dropouts, not a list of homeschoolers.  While some overlap is possible, and a few people on the list are indeed arguably homeschooled, most are not.  I do not think we should be equating dropouts with homeschoolers.  I think we should keep the reference here on the talk page, to get ideas for adding to the list of Prominent People who were Educated at Home.  I think it may be a good idea to remove it from the Arguably Homeschooled section.  Thoughts?  Input?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:40, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Henri Poincaré==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a bit confused about Poincare's education.  While I have found several references stating that his mother tutored him, it's unclear whether this was just during his illness with diphtheria.  It's unclear when he was ill, or how long he was ill.  He entered school at age 8 and stayed there 11 years, going on to higher education after that.  Most of the references I found seem to rely on (or copy) the entry from the Encyclopedia Britannica, which is not clear.  Personally, I'm not comfortable calling him &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; without further clarification of his education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:47, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Henri was &amp;quot;... ambidextrous and was nearsighted; during his childhood he had poor muscular coordination and was seriously ill for a time with diphtheria. He received special instruction from his gifted mother and excelled in written composition while still in elementary school.&amp;quot;  In 1862 [when he would have been about 8] Henri entered the Lycée in Nancy (now renamed the Lycée Henri Poincaré in his honour). He spent eleven years at the Lycée and during this time he proved to be one of the top students in every topic he studied. Henri was described by his mathematics teacher as a &amp;quot;monster of mathematics&amp;quot; and he won first prizes in the concours général, a competition between the top pupils from all the Lycées across France.  Poincaré entered the École Polytechnique in 1873, graduating in 1875. He was well ahead of all the other students in mathematics but, perhaps not surprisingly given his poor coordination, performed no better than average in physical exercise and in art. Music was another of his interests but, although he enjoyed listening to it, his attempts to learn the piano while he was at the École Polytechnique were not successful. Poincaré read widely, beginning with popular science writings and progressing to more advanced texts. His memory was remarkable and he retained much from all the texts he read but not in the manner of learning by rote, rather by linking the ideas he was assimilating particularly in a visual way. His ability to visualise what he heard proved particularly useful when he attended lectures since his eyesight was so poor that he could not see the symbols properly that his lecturers were writing on the blackboard.  After graduating from the École Polytechnique, Poincaré continued his studies at the École des Mines.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jules Henri Poincaré[http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is completely clear that he was homeschooled at least until age 8.  The date of entry in the Lycee high school seems too early, and it seems unlikely he spent 11 years in high school.  Regardless, he was homeschooled in learning the fundamentals of reading and math, and likely learned far more from his &amp;quot;gifted&amp;quot; mother.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:49, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Citation needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled...''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], much as I, as a homeschooling mom, would love to believe this, we simply cannot state it in the article without backing it up with a citation.  Everything we post here must be true and verifiable.  We must always cite and give credit to our sources.  We must be careful not to post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry like this.  These are Conservapedia's rules, not mine, and they are good ones. Let's show our students that we are serious about the rules by leading by example - we must stick to the rules if we expect others to do so. Thus, we need a credible citation for this statement. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:59, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That sentence introduces the paragraph and list of examples that support it, with citations.  4 out of the top 4 modern mathematicians were homeschooled.  That's 100% of the smartest group of achievers.  The person considered the greatest president (Abraham Lincoln) was homeschooled.  That's 100% of the top.  The greatest female military leader was homeschooled.  That's 100%.  It's not just one citation that backs up the sentence, it is many citations and examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Hsmom, your repeated objections, like your objection above to the undisputed fact that Joan of Arc was homeschooled, are getting tiresome.  Add some content to the entry rather than object to the facts, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it really accurate to say that Joan of arc was &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; in the sense of the word that this article is about. Not a lot of kids - and even fewer girls - of the lower classes got much schooling of ANY type during the Middle Ages. Most, if not all of children's education, what precious little of it there was for French peasants, would have been at home. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 17:40, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, so Joan of Arc and many others were homeschooled in her class and time period.  That doesn't detract from the point:  Joan of Arc was homeschooled and then became one of the greatest military leaders of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your criticism has been raised by others in the past, all of whom view this entry as tit-for-tat, homeschooling versus alternatives.  But that's not what this entry is about.  This entry simply proves that homeschooling has been extraordinarily successful in its own right, regardless of alternatives.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fair Inclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to add William Bonney (Billy the Kid) and John Wesley Hardin, two famous American outlaws, and they keep getting deleted. I don't understand why. Both are certainly prominent, and both are homeschooled at least to the same extent as inclusions like Lincoln, Twain, and Joan of Arc. Obviously they don't paint a rosy picture of homeschooling, but doesn't blocking their entry present only one side of the argument (the pro-homeschooling side)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Provide some evidence for your claims, as required by our [[rules]].  Homeschooled means schooled at home, not running away from home.  Obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:58, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't be a jerk, dude.  This site lists &amp;quot;prominent&amp;quot; home-schooled individuals, not all of them.  Also, this is not your site.  Why do you think it should play by your rules?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Many of the people on this list were not obviously schooled at home. Twain is a clear example. Lincoln read at home but was not &amp;quot;schooled&amp;quot; by anyone, and people like the Roosevelts and Shaw studied with professional tutors, clearly not an analogy for the parent-lead homeschooling of today. Bonney's school experience is essentially a direct parallel of Twain's, and Hardin was taught by his father, just like Mozart. If your complaint is truly a source issue, I'm happy to go dig up a biography or two, but short of that I can see no reason for not including these two. For most of history people didn't have anything like modern access to public schools, which means that for most of history bad people got their education in pretty much the same way as people like Joan of Arc. Just trying to be fair here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: So you're saying that Lincoln schooled himself at home???  Could be ... but that's still homeschooled.  Private tutors is also homeschooling, as many of us homeschoolers can attest.  You seem to be saying that Hardin and Mozart were taught by their fathers.  That's not homeschooling?  Of course it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm open to unbiased improvements to the article.  I don't know the details of Twain, for example.  I do know that 5 out of the top 5 mathematicians post-Napoleon were homeschooled, and there are few if any errors on this list.  If you can make unbiased improvements by adding information, please do.  If you can't believe the list, then perhaps you want to open your mind a bit first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:37, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reason for rollback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't insert {{fact}} when the statement is supported the sentences that follow it.  When in doubt, use this page to express your opinion rather than senseless inclusion of multiple {{fact}}--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:48, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, since you mention it, I was wondering why you removed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; from the statement saying Ansel Adams is the best photographer of the twentieth century. It's certainly a very bold and opinionated statement (maybe someone is more a fan of [[Alfred Stieglitz]]) and I figured it needed backing up.--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:22, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The next sentence supports the statement.  Open your mind a bit, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:33, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, perhaps we can reach a compromise. Instead of adding a {{fact}}, why don't we just add the word 'arguably' to the sentence. That way, we're both happy. Eh?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:39, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My friend, open your mind instead.  The quote proves that Ansel Adams was homeschooled.  All that is needed is a cite for the quote.  The list of the others is also extremely well supported.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh ho, it seems we have found the root of our contention. You see, I'm not saying that Ansel Adams wasn't homeschooling. I don't doubt that he was. I'm just saying that the statement that he was the 20th century's 'finest artist' is not a fact (in the same way that &amp;quot;Bananas are the tastiest fruit&amp;quot; is not a fact), and should be changed to show it's opinion. It's semantics, I know, but that's how I roll, with mild [[OCD]].--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:55, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Oh how petty.  Your own quote is wrong (&amp;quot;finest artist&amp;quot;) and yet you're going to quibble about Conservapedia's statement here????  Everyone knows that Ansel Adams was the &amp;quot;the finest photographer of the 20th century.&amp;quot;  Nitpick something else, please.  Or improve some entries here first and then return with more experience.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:13, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alright, whatever. Anyway, I found the site the actual quote is from. I think I cited it right, but, you know, I'm inexperienced about the matter.--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 01:18, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=233604</id>
		<title>Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=233604"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T05:16:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 233602 by Special:Contributions/Offeep (User talk:Offeep) as per Ashifly's wishes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Homeschooling''' students get some or all of their [[education]] outside of traditional [[school]]s.  The general term &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; includes a wide range of educational options and philosophies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling [[parent]]s oversee their children's education, usually providing some of the instruction themselves.  In addition, they can mix-and-match other instructional approaches, including hiring a tutor; using a [[correspondence school]] (or the modern video- or [[computer]]-based equivalent); taking classes at local museums or nature centers; joining with other [[family|families]] to share teaching responsibilities in a co-op; and encouraging the student to self-instruct using library books, traditional textbooks or workbooks, knowledgeable mentor's and/or hands-on experiences.  Some homeschoolers also include local &amp;quot;after school&amp;quot; enrichment programs like scouts, 4-H, sports, [[music]] lessons, karate or dance classes, public library programs, and summer camps as part of their educational program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]], as of 2003, an estimated 1.1 million students - about 2.2% of children in grades K-12 - were homeschooled. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/estimated.asp] Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Families who homeschool do so for a number of reasons.  A 2001 study by the [[US Census Bureau]] found that the single largest reason that parents homeschool is that they feel they can give their children a better education at home. This accounted for 50% of the homeschool families; [[religion|religious]] reasons came in second at 33%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Home Schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics, by Kurt J. Bauman, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, August 2001, Working Paper Series No. 53 [http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Other frequently mentioned reasons include dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other schools, the ability to provide religious or moral instruction along with academics, the ability to control what the child is being taught, flexibility in meeting the needs of a child with special needs (such as a physical or mental health problem, a temporary illness, or giftedness), flexibility in scheduling family life, and concern about safety, drugs, and peer pressure at other schools.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/TableDisplay.asp?TablePath=TablesHTML/table_4.asp] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Admissions departments at major [[college]]s are now familiar and comfortable with homeschooling, according to a 2004 [[Boston Globe]] article. The article quotes a [[Liberal Arts college|Williams College]] admission officer as saying &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers'[sic] applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not [[discrimination|discriminated]] against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot; It notes that acceptance rate of homeschoolers at Williams is 20 percent,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked?mode=PF Schoolhouse rocked] &amp;quot;home schooling[sic] has gone main stream[sic], especially in Massachusetts. It's estimated that as many as 20,000 children here have abandoned test-crazy public schools and high-priced private schools for the comfort of the living room couch. But most surprising of all is that Harvard, BU, Brown, and other colleges are welcoming home-schoolers like all other students.&amp;quot; Source for Williams College admission officer's quote, 20% figure.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; virtually identical to its overall acceptance rate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm College acceptance rates]: Williams, 19.2%. U. S. News and World Report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some US states, the law allows homeschooled students to participate in extracurricular activities at their local public schools.  20 states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming) in one way or another expressly allow equal access.  In most other states, participation is worked out on a case-by-case basis.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  State Laws Concerning Participation of Homeschool Students in Public School Activities [http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000000/00000048.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, some states, such as Alabama, are considering equal access legislation.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  Alabama - Legislation for Participation in Public School Activities[http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/al/200705010.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many states, school athletic associations dominated by public schools exclude homeschoolers from participation in athletics, even though they allow students at different charter schools to participate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, opting out of [[public school]]s is not new. When [[Thomas Edison]]'s public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Education at public school year-round from about ages 6 to 18 only became common in the 20th century due to compulsory education laws.  The first [[law]] requiring attendance at public school passed in [[Massachusetts]] in 1852; the second such law passed in [[Washington D.C.]] in 1864; and most states did not pass mandatory schooling laws until between 1870 and 1917.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/educ/CompulsoryEd.htm Compulsory Education], National Conference of State Legislatures: &amp;quot;More than 150 years have passed since Horace Mann helped Massachusetts establish a statewide system of education that eventually led to the requirement that all children attend public school.  In 1852, Massachusetts became the first state to pass compulsory school attendance laws, and by 1918, all states required children to receive an education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/kellmeyer/050428&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But even under compulsory education laws in the late 1800s, the school year was only twelve to twenty weeks long.  Very few stayed in school from ages 6 to 18.  For example, by 1900, only 6% of Americans had graduated from a formal high school.  Moreover, these students did not learn basic skills like reading in school; they learned them at home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An early call for homeschooling in the U.S. was by John Holt and his 1964 book ''How Children Fail.'' Holt was &amp;quot;a left-winger who regarded schools as instruments of the bureaucratic-industrial complex.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge, ''The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America.'' Penguin, 2004. pp. 190-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the movement was also catalyzed when social [[conservative]]s became alarmed at the 1962 [[U. S. Supreme Court]] ruling which banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truancy laws brought pioneering homeschoolers into conflict with local officials. The first [[New York Times]] story on &amp;quot;home schooling&amp;quot; appeared in 1974, and concerned two parents charged with &amp;quot;educational neglect&amp;quot; by the [[Westchester]] County Department of Social Services. Tests showed that they performed at or about grade level &amp;quot;except for one who is a little slow in reading,&amp;quot; and the parents received strong support from a state senator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Parents Accused in Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' July 28, 1974, p. 45&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the mid-1980s the ''Times'' was running articles with titles like &amp;quot;Schooling in the Home: A Growing Alternative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;There Are Benefits In Homeschooling,&amp;quot; and states were legalizing homeschooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Belluck, Pam (1998), &amp;quot;Life After Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' November 1, 1998, p. ED26: &amp;quot;Some 15 years after states began legalizing home schooling in earnest, these early graduates are starting to make their way in the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article said &amp;quot;It's not only [[Christian fundamentalists]] any more&amp;quot; and a 2003 article noted &amp;quot;Unhappy in Class, More Are Learning at Home.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This list of homeschoolers is pretty large and may deserve its own article. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent people who were educated at home ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Please note that this list is in alphabetical order.  If you add someone, please make sure you have put them in the right place alphabetically, you have included a brief description of who they are, you have briefly explained their education, and you have included a citation explaining their education.  If you do not have this information, please add your person to the list on the talk page instead. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled, including all four of the greatest modern (post-[[Napoleon]]) mathematicians.  Here is a growing list of homeschooled achievers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ansel Adams]], (1902-1984), the finest photographer of the 20th century.  &amp;quot;At twelve, unable to stand the confinement and tedium of the classroom, he utterly disrupted his lessons with wild laughter and undisguised contempt for the inept ramblings of his teachers. His father decided that Ansel’s formal education was best ended. From that point forward, the boy was home-schooled in Greek, the English classics, algebra, and the glories of the ocean, inlets, and rocky beaches that surrounded their home very near San Francisco.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wy.essortment.com/anseladamsbio_rjrq.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Adams]] (1735-1826), U.S. President, learned to read at home, and was then taught in the kitchen by a neighbor with a handful of children.  He matriculated to Harvard College at age 15.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Louisa May Alcott]] (1832-1888), the author of ''Little Women'' and other great works, was taught by her father.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clara Barton]] (1821-1912), pioneering nurse during the [[Civil War]], founder of the [[American Association of the International Red Cross]]. Barton was educated at home, and at 15 started teaching school. She later attended the Liberal Institute in Clinton, New York. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Dream Team: Clara Barton[http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/dreamteam/clarabarton.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clara Harlowe Barton, Source: &amp;quot;Historical Times Encyclopedia of the Civil War&amp;quot; edited by Patricia L. Faust&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.civilwarhome.com/bartonbio.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Breckinridge]] (1881-1965), pioneering American midwife and founder of Kentucky's Frontier Nursing Service.  Mary's father was a diplomat, and she was educated in America and abroad by private tutors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frontier Nursing Service[http://www.frontiernursing.org/History/MaryBreckinridge.shtm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Carnegie]] (1835-1919), the brilliant American businessman and philanthropist of the late 1800s, his father was a poor weaver and Andrew dropped out of elementary school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and had only five years of formal schooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/carnegiemedal/background.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] (1789-1857), one of the greatest mathematicians of all time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://james.fabpedigree.com/mathmen.htm#Cauchy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agatha Christie]] (1890-1976), best-selling English mystery writer.  Christie was educated at home by her mother, who encouraged her to write from a very early age. At sixteen she was sent to finishing school in Paris.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PBS Mystery Series &amp;quot;Miss Marple&amp;quot; site: Biography of Agatha Christie[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/mystery/marple/christie.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Edison]] (1804–1896), the most prolific inventor in the history of the world and the holder of 1093 patents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Erdos]] (1913–1996), the most prolific mathematician of the 20th century, was homeschooled by his mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benjamin Franklin]] (1706-1790), a leading [[Founding Father]] and prolific inventor and statesman, only attended part-time school from ages 8 to 10.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evariste Galois]] (1811–1832), among the brightest mathematicians ever and the founder of Galois groups and fields and Galois theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His life was tragically cut short at age 20 in a [[duel]], and his work was published posthumously.[scidiv.bcc.ctc.edu/Math/Galois.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Zac, Taylor, and Isaac Hanson, of the band [[Hanson]].  Educated at home by their mother, and later by a tutor.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hanson:  The All American Boys[http://www.drdrew.com/DrewLive/article.asp?id=1112]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hangin With Presents&lt;br /&gt;
Hanson[http://www.agirlsworld.com/rachel/hangin-with/hanson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Julia Ward Howe]] (1819–1910), abolitionist, writer, and women's rights activist. Julia was educated by tutors at home and in girls' schools until age 16. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Open Connections Program, Women Working 1800-1930, Harvard University Library:  Julia Ward Howe (1819-1910)[http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/people_howe.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joan of Arc]] (1412-1431), one of the greatest military leaders ever.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. ... It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc][http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc][http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html Biography of Joan of Arc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[C.S. Lewis]] (1898-1963), the author of the ''Chronicles of Narnia'' and other famous works, was homeschooled by his mother and a governess until age 10, and later sent to be taught by a tutor to prepare him for [[Oxford]].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abraham Lincoln]] (1809-1865), American president. &amp;quot;Though his [formal] education was limited to a few months in a 1-teacher school, Lincoln avidly read books such as the Bible, ''Pilgrim's Progress'' and Weemss ''Life of Washington''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.civilwarhome.com/lincolnbio.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Countess Augusta [[Ada Lovelace]] (1815-1852), a visionary programmer and namesake of the [[ADA]] programming language, was homeschooled by governesses and tutors hired by her mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benoit Mandelbrot]], Harvard mathematician considered the founder of fractal geometry, was homeschooled by his uncle beginning at the age of 12.{{citation}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yehudi Menuhin]] (1916-1999), noted violinist, was in school a grand total of only one day at age 6.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] (1756-1791), German composer. &amp;quot;He was educated by his father, Leopold Mozart, a violinist of high repute in the service of the archbishop of Salzburg.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the best-selling [[Inheritance Trilogy]] ([[Eragon]], [[Eldest]], and a third book yet unreleased). He was homeschooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Patton]] (1885–1945), one of America's greatest generals.  He was homeschooled until age 11 based on his &amp;quot;father's theory of education&amp;quot; that &amp;quot;youthful mind should be led along a path that parallels the development of the mind of the race&amp;quot; by being read to by elders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pattonhq.com/unknown/chap01.html The Patton Society (&amp;quot;The Early Years&amp;quot;)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freeinfosociety.com/site.php?postnum=517&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Henri Poincaré]] (1854-1912), one of the greatest mathematicians ever and an original developer of the [[Theory of Relativity]], was taught at home by his mother due to a childhood illness (diphtheria).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Priestley]] (1733-1804), the father of modern chemistry and the discoverer of oxygen, dropped out of school as a teenager and privately learned  geometry, algebra and numerous languages.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernhard Riemann]] (1826-1866), a German recognized as the greatest modern mathematician.  He was taught at home by his father, a Lutheran minister, until he was ten.  After that he was tutored by a teacher from a local school until he entered the Lyceum in Hannover at 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland -- Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann, by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson[http://www-groups.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Riemann.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.andrews.edu/~calkins/math/biograph/199899/bioriema.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1882-1945), U.S. President.  He was educated by private tutors at home through age 14, then entered Groton, an elite private school in Massachusetts, in 1896. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers.  &amp;quot;Franklin D. Roosevelt.&amp;quot; Teaching Eleanor Roosevelt, ed. by Allida Black, June Hopkins, et. al. (Hyde Park, New York: Eleanor Roosevelt National Historic Site, 2003). &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1858–1919), U.S. President.  &amp;quot;Roosevelt never enrolled in a public school. He was mostly instructed by private tutors until he entered Harvard College in 1876.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://law.enotes.com/presidential-biography/theodore-roosevelt-administrations/education&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]] (1856-1950), author.  Tutored in the classics by a clerical uncle until he entered school at age 10.  Left school by age 15.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopedia of World Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary of Literary Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw-dlb/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Bernard Shaw, 1856-1950 Biographical Sketch[http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/research/fa/shaw.gb.bio.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]] (real name was Samuel Clemens) (1835-1910), American author and satirist who said, &amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot;  Attended school through the 5th grade, where he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot; and was frequently truant, then worked as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper.  His mother said, &amp;quot;He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mark Twain House and Museum:  Biography of Samuel Clemens/Mark Twain [http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Wyeth]] (1917- ), American artist, was tutored at home until he was 18.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Homeschooling of Andrew Wyeth, A Conversation with the Artist, Gifted Children Monthly, May 1986, Vol 7 No. 5.[http://www.nfgcc.org/51.htm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Lloyd Wright]] (1867-1959), considered the finest architect ever, was homeschooled by his mother who dreamed that he would become an architect.  She used &amp;quot;Froebel's geometric blocks to entertain and educate her son&amp;quot; as his father led the family among various Baptist churches, where he preached.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/a/archs/wright/bio/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wright then attended high school but dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0942394/bio&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a number of prominent people have chosen to homeschool their children.  [[David Guterson]], author of the novel ''Snow Falling on Cedars'' (1994), which won the 1995 [[PEN/Faulkner Award]], also wrote ''Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes Sense'' (1992), an account of his family's homeschooling journey.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.randomhouse.com:  David Guterson [http://www.randomhouse.com/vintage/read/snow/guterson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Actor and recording artist Will Smith and his wife actress Jada Pinikett Smith homeschool their children. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reader's Digest:  Will Power:  Will Smith is One Driven Guy[http://www.rd.com/content/will-smith-interview/1/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Roseanne Barr stated in an interview that she has started to homeschool her 11-year-old son.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reuters Interview - Roseanne Barr says age gives her a louder voice&lt;br /&gt;
[http://in.news.yahoo.com/070322/137/6dlba.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jimmy Wales, co-founder of [[Wikipedia]], also homeschools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reason.com/news/show/119689.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
Lists abound of famous homeschooled achievers, some more accurate than others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eadshome.com/Famoushomeschooled.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The following people have been found on such lists. Their educational background has not yet been researched by Conservapedia editors.  ['''Note: everyone is invited to find citations for these listed below and with the citations move them up to the category above.''']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Military'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stonewall Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Douglas MacArthur]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Inventors and Scientists'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Graham Bell]] (1847-1922), inventor of the telephone.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington Carver]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pierre Curie]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cyrus McCormick]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Louis Montesquieu]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Blaise Pascal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Booker T. Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leaders'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Adams|John Quincy Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[James Madison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Henry Harrison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Tyler]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Clymer]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Livingston]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Mason]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Pickney III]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Wyeth]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patrick Henry]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Penn]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Clay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Jay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Marshall]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Rutledge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Religious Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Cary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jonathan Edwards]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dwight L. Moody]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Newton]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brigham Young]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Writers'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hans Christian Andersen]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Robert Browning]] (1812-1889), a brilliant English poet. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pearl S. Buck]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Dickens]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bret Harte]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[C. S. Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sean O’Casey]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Artists and Social Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leonardo da Vinci]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Claude Monet]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ansel Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Burroughs]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Rogers Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Florence Nightingale]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeschooling in England and Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Education]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.robinsoncurriculum.com/view/rc/s31p54.htm Christian Children Must Have More Than A Fighting Chance] - Four reasons to homeschool your children, by [[Art Robinson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm] - List of homeschooled achievers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=233602</id>
		<title>Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=233602"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T05:14:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Prominent people who were educated at home */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Homeschooling''' students get some or all of their [[education]] outside of traditional [[school]]s.  The general term &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; includes a wide range of educational options and philosophies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling [[parent]]s oversee their children's education, usually providing some of the instruction themselves.  In addition, they can mix-and-match other instructional approaches, including hiring a tutor; using a [[correspondence school]] (or the modern video- or [[computer]]-based equivalent); taking classes at local museums or nature centers; joining with other [[family|families]] to share teaching responsibilities in a co-op; and encouraging the student to self-instruct using library books, traditional textbooks or workbooks, knowledgeable mentor's and/or hands-on experiences.  Some homeschoolers also include local &amp;quot;after school&amp;quot; enrichment programs like scouts, 4-H, sports, [[music]] lessons, karate or dance classes, public library programs, and summer camps as part of their educational program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]], as of 2003, an estimated 1.1 million students - about 2.2% of children in grades K-12 - were homeschooled. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/estimated.asp] Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Families who homeschool do so for a number of reasons.  A 2001 study by the [[US Census Bureau]] found that the single largest reason that parents homeschool is that they feel they can give their children a better education at home. This accounted for 50% of the homeschool families; [[religion|religious]] reasons came in second at 33%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Home Schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics, by Kurt J. Bauman, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, August 2001, Working Paper Series No. 53 [http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Other frequently mentioned reasons include dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other schools, the ability to provide religious or moral instruction along with academics, the ability to control what the child is being taught, flexibility in meeting the needs of a child with special needs (such as a physical or mental health problem, a temporary illness, or giftedness), flexibility in scheduling family life, and concern about safety, drugs, and peer pressure at other schools.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/TableDisplay.asp?TablePath=TablesHTML/table_4.asp] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Admissions departments at major [[college]]s are now familiar and comfortable with homeschooling, according to a 2004 [[Boston Globe]] article. The article quotes a [[Liberal Arts college|Williams College]] admission officer as saying &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers'[sic] applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not [[discrimination|discriminated]] against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot; It notes that acceptance rate of homeschoolers at Williams is 20 percent,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked?mode=PF Schoolhouse rocked] &amp;quot;home schooling[sic] has gone main stream[sic], especially in Massachusetts. It's estimated that as many as 20,000 children here have abandoned test-crazy public schools and high-priced private schools for the comfort of the living room couch. But most surprising of all is that Harvard, BU, Brown, and other colleges are welcoming home-schoolers like all other students.&amp;quot; Source for Williams College admission officer's quote, 20% figure.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; virtually identical to its overall acceptance rate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm College acceptance rates]: Williams, 19.2%. U. S. News and World Report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some US states, the law allows homeschooled students to participate in extracurricular activities at their local public schools.  20 states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming) in one way or another expressly allow equal access.  In most other states, participation is worked out on a case-by-case basis.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  State Laws Concerning Participation of Homeschool Students in Public School Activities [http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000000/00000048.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, some states, such as Alabama, are considering equal access legislation.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  Alabama - Legislation for Participation in Public School Activities[http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/al/200705010.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many states, school athletic associations dominated by public schools exclude homeschoolers from participation in athletics, even though they allow students at different charter schools to participate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, opting out of [[public school]]s is not new. When [[Thomas Edison]]'s public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Education at public school year-round from about ages 6 to 18 only became common in the 20th century due to compulsory education laws.  The first [[law]] requiring attendance at public school passed in [[Massachusetts]] in 1852; the second such law passed in [[Washington D.C.]] in 1864; and most states did not pass mandatory schooling laws until between 1870 and 1917.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/educ/CompulsoryEd.htm Compulsory Education], National Conference of State Legislatures: &amp;quot;More than 150 years have passed since Horace Mann helped Massachusetts establish a statewide system of education that eventually led to the requirement that all children attend public school.  In 1852, Massachusetts became the first state to pass compulsory school attendance laws, and by 1918, all states required children to receive an education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/kellmeyer/050428&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But even under compulsory education laws in the late 1800s, the school year was only twelve to twenty weeks long.  Very few stayed in school from ages 6 to 18.  For example, by 1900, only 6% of Americans had graduated from a formal high school.  Moreover, these students did not learn basic skills like reading in school; they learned them at home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An early call for homeschooling in the U.S. was by John Holt and his 1964 book ''How Children Fail.'' Holt was &amp;quot;a left-winger who regarded schools as instruments of the bureaucratic-industrial complex.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge, ''The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America.'' Penguin, 2004. pp. 190-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the movement was also catalyzed when social [[conservative]]s became alarmed at the 1962 [[U. S. Supreme Court]] ruling which banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truancy laws brought pioneering homeschoolers into conflict with local officials. The first [[New York Times]] story on &amp;quot;home schooling&amp;quot; appeared in 1974, and concerned two parents charged with &amp;quot;educational neglect&amp;quot; by the [[Westchester]] County Department of Social Services. Tests showed that they performed at or about grade level &amp;quot;except for one who is a little slow in reading,&amp;quot; and the parents received strong support from a state senator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Parents Accused in Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' July 28, 1974, p. 45&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the mid-1980s the ''Times'' was running articles with titles like &amp;quot;Schooling in the Home: A Growing Alternative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;There Are Benefits In Homeschooling,&amp;quot; and states were legalizing homeschooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Belluck, Pam (1998), &amp;quot;Life After Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' November 1, 1998, p. ED26: &amp;quot;Some 15 years after states began legalizing home schooling in earnest, these early graduates are starting to make their way in the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article said &amp;quot;It's not only [[Christian fundamentalists]] any more&amp;quot; and a 2003 article noted &amp;quot;Unhappy in Class, More Are Learning at Home.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This list of homeschoolers is pretty large and may deserve its own article. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent people who were educated at home ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Please note that this list is in alphabetical order.  If you add someone, please make sure you have put them in the right place alphabetically, you have included a brief description of who they are, you have briefly explained their education, and you have included a citation explaining their education.  If you do not have this information, please add your person to the list on the talk page instead. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled, including all four of the greatest modern (post-[[Napoleon]]) mathematicians.  Here is a growing list of homeschooled achievers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ansel Adams]], (1902-1984), arguably the finest photographer of the 20th century.  &amp;quot;At twelve, unable to stand the confinement and tedium of the classroom, he utterly disrupted his lessons with wild laughter and undisguised contempt for the inept ramblings of his teachers. His father decided that Ansel’s formal education was best ended. From that point forward, the boy was home-schooled in Greek, the English classics, algebra, and the glories of the ocean, inlets, and rocky beaches that surrounded their home very near San Francisco.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wy.essortment.com/anseladamsbio_rjrq.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Adams]] (1735-1826), U.S. President, learned to read at home, and was then taught in the kitchen by a neighbor with a handful of children.  He matriculated to Harvard College at age 15.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Louisa May Alcott]] (1832-1888), the author of ''Little Women'' and other great works, was taught by her father.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clara Barton]] (1821-1912), pioneering nurse during the [[Civil War]], founder of the [[American Association of the International Red Cross]]. Barton was educated at home, and at 15 started teaching school. She later attended the Liberal Institute in Clinton, New York. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Dream Team: Clara Barton[http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/dreamteam/clarabarton.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clara Harlowe Barton, Source: &amp;quot;Historical Times Encyclopedia of the Civil War&amp;quot; edited by Patricia L. Faust&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.civilwarhome.com/bartonbio.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Breckinridge]] (1881-1965), pioneering American midwife and founder of Kentucky's Frontier Nursing Service.  Mary's father was a diplomat, and she was educated in America and abroad by private tutors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frontier Nursing Service[http://www.frontiernursing.org/History/MaryBreckinridge.shtm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Carnegie]] (1835-1919), the brilliant American businessman and philanthropist of the late 1800s, his father was a poor weaver and Andrew dropped out of elementary school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and had only five years of formal schooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/carnegiemedal/background.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] (1789-1857), one of the greatest mathematicians of all time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://james.fabpedigree.com/mathmen.htm#Cauchy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agatha Christie]] (1890-1976), best-selling English mystery writer.  Christie was educated at home by her mother, who encouraged her to write from a very early age. At sixteen she was sent to finishing school in Paris.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PBS Mystery Series &amp;quot;Miss Marple&amp;quot; site: Biography of Agatha Christie[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/mystery/marple/christie.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Edison]] (1804–1896), the most prolific inventor in the history of the world and the holder of 1093 patents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Erdos]] (1913–1996), the most prolific mathematician of the 20th century, was homeschooled by his mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benjamin Franklin]] (1706-1790), a leading [[Founding Father]] and prolific inventor and statesman, only attended part-time school from ages 8 to 10.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evariste Galois]] (1811–1832), among the brightest mathematicians ever and the founder of Galois groups and fields and Galois theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His life was tragically cut short at age 20 in a [[duel]], and his work was published posthumously.[scidiv.bcc.ctc.edu/Math/Galois.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Zac, Taylor, and Isaac Hanson, of the band [[Hanson]].  Educated at home by their mother, and later by a tutor.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hanson:  The All American Boys[http://www.drdrew.com/DrewLive/article.asp?id=1112]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hangin With Presents&lt;br /&gt;
Hanson[http://www.agirlsworld.com/rachel/hangin-with/hanson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Julia Ward Howe]] (1819–1910), abolitionist, writer, and women's rights activist. Julia was educated by tutors at home and in girls' schools until age 16. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Open Connections Program, Women Working 1800-1930, Harvard University Library:  Julia Ward Howe (1819-1910)[http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/people_howe.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joan of Arc]] (1412-1431), one of the greatest military leaders ever.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. ... It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc][http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc][http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html Biography of Joan of Arc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[C.S. Lewis]] (1898-1963), the author of the ''Chronicles of Narnia'' and other famous works, was homeschooled by his mother and a governess until age 10, and later sent to be taught by a tutor to prepare him for [[Oxford]].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abraham Lincoln]] (1809-1865), American president. &amp;quot;Though his [formal] education was limited to a few months in a 1-teacher school, Lincoln avidly read books such as the Bible, ''Pilgrim's Progress'' and Weemss ''Life of Washington''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.civilwarhome.com/lincolnbio.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Countess Augusta [[Ada Lovelace]] (1815-1852), a visionary programmer and namesake of the [[ADA]] programming language, was homeschooled by governesses and tutors hired by her mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benoit Mandelbrot]], Harvard mathematician considered the founder of fractal geometry, was homeschooled by his uncle beginning at the age of 12.{{citation}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yehudi Menuhin]] (1916-1999), noted violinist, was in school a grand total of only one day at age 6.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] (1756-1791), German composer. &amp;quot;He was educated by his father, Leopold Mozart, a violinist of high repute in the service of the archbishop of Salzburg.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the best-selling [[Inheritance Trilogy]] ([[Eragon]], [[Eldest]], and a third book yet unreleased). He was homeschooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Patton]] (1885–1945), one of America's greatest generals.  He was homeschooled until age 11 based on his &amp;quot;father's theory of education&amp;quot; that &amp;quot;youthful mind should be led along a path that parallels the development of the mind of the race&amp;quot; by being read to by elders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pattonhq.com/unknown/chap01.html The Patton Society (&amp;quot;The Early Years&amp;quot;)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freeinfosociety.com/site.php?postnum=517&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Henri Poincaré]] (1854-1912), one of the greatest mathematicians ever and an original developer of the [[Theory of Relativity]], was taught at home by his mother due to a childhood illness (diphtheria).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Priestley]] (1733-1804), the father of modern chemistry and the discoverer of oxygen, dropped out of school as a teenager and privately learned  geometry, algebra and numerous languages.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernhard Riemann]] (1826-1866), a German recognized as the greatest modern mathematician.  He was taught at home by his father, a Lutheran minister, until he was ten.  After that he was tutored by a teacher from a local school until he entered the Lyceum in Hannover at 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland -- Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann, by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson[http://www-groups.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Riemann.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.andrews.edu/~calkins/math/biograph/199899/bioriema.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1882-1945), U.S. President.  He was educated by private tutors at home through age 14, then entered Groton, an elite private school in Massachusetts, in 1896. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers.  &amp;quot;Franklin D. Roosevelt.&amp;quot; Teaching Eleanor Roosevelt, ed. by Allida Black, June Hopkins, et. al. (Hyde Park, New York: Eleanor Roosevelt National Historic Site, 2003). &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1858–1919), U.S. President.  &amp;quot;Roosevelt never enrolled in a public school. He was mostly instructed by private tutors until he entered Harvard College in 1876.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://law.enotes.com/presidential-biography/theodore-roosevelt-administrations/education&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]] (1856-1950), author.  Tutored in the classics by a clerical uncle until he entered school at age 10.  Left school by age 15.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopedia of World Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary of Literary Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw-dlb/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Bernard Shaw, 1856-1950 Biographical Sketch[http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/research/fa/shaw.gb.bio.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]] (real name was Samuel Clemens) (1835-1910), American author and satirist who said, &amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot;  Attended school through the 5th grade, where he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot; and was frequently truant, then worked as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper.  His mother said, &amp;quot;He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mark Twain House and Museum:  Biography of Samuel Clemens/Mark Twain [http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Wyeth]] (1917- ), American artist, was tutored at home until he was 18.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Homeschooling of Andrew Wyeth, A Conversation with the Artist, Gifted Children Monthly, May 1986, Vol 7 No. 5.[http://www.nfgcc.org/51.htm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Lloyd Wright]] (1867-1959), considered the finest architect ever, was homeschooled by his mother who dreamed that he would become an architect.  She used &amp;quot;Froebel's geometric blocks to entertain and educate her son&amp;quot; as his father led the family among various Baptist churches, where he preached.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/a/archs/wright/bio/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wright then attended high school but dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0942394/bio&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a number of prominent people have chosen to homeschool their children.  [[David Guterson]], author of the novel ''Snow Falling on Cedars'' (1994), which won the 1995 [[PEN/Faulkner Award]], also wrote ''Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes Sense'' (1992), an account of his family's homeschooling journey.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.randomhouse.com:  David Guterson [http://www.randomhouse.com/vintage/read/snow/guterson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Actor and recording artist Will Smith and his wife actress Jada Pinikett Smith homeschool their children. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reader's Digest:  Will Power:  Will Smith is One Driven Guy[http://www.rd.com/content/will-smith-interview/1/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Roseanne Barr stated in an interview that she has started to homeschool her 11-year-old son.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reuters Interview - Roseanne Barr says age gives her a louder voice&lt;br /&gt;
[http://in.news.yahoo.com/070322/137/6dlba.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jimmy Wales, co-founder of [[Wikipedia]], also homeschools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reason.com/news/show/119689.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
Lists abound of famous homeschooled achievers, some more accurate than others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eadshome.com/Famoushomeschooled.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The following people have been found on such lists. Their educational background has not yet been researched by Conservapedia editors.  ['''Note: everyone is invited to find citations for these listed below and with the citations move them up to the category above.''']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Military'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stonewall Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Douglas MacArthur]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Inventors and Scientists'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Graham Bell]] (1847-1922), inventor of the telephone.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington Carver]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pierre Curie]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cyrus McCormick]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Louis Montesquieu]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Blaise Pascal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Booker T. Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leaders'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Adams|John Quincy Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[James Madison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Henry Harrison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Tyler]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Clymer]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Livingston]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Mason]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Pickney III]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Wyeth]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patrick Henry]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Penn]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Clay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Jay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Marshall]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Rutledge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Religious Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Cary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jonathan Edwards]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dwight L. Moody]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Newton]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brigham Young]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Writers'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hans Christian Andersen]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Robert Browning]] (1812-1889), a brilliant English poet. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pearl S. Buck]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Dickens]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bret Harte]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[C. S. Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sean O’Casey]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Artists and Social Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leonardo da Vinci]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Claude Monet]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ansel Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Burroughs]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Rogers Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Florence Nightingale]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeschooling in England and Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Education]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.robinsoncurriculum.com/view/rc/s31p54.htm Christian Children Must Have More Than A Fighting Chance] - Four reasons to homeschool your children, by [[Art Robinson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm] - List of homeschooled achievers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=233601</id>
		<title>Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=233601"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T05:14:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: citation for quote&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Homeschooling''' students get some or all of their [[education]] outside of traditional [[school]]s.  The general term &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; includes a wide range of educational options and philosophies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling [[parent]]s oversee their children's education, usually providing some of the instruction themselves.  In addition, they can mix-and-match other instructional approaches, including hiring a tutor; using a [[correspondence school]] (or the modern video- or [[computer]]-based equivalent); taking classes at local museums or nature centers; joining with other [[family|families]] to share teaching responsibilities in a co-op; and encouraging the student to self-instruct using library books, traditional textbooks or workbooks, knowledgeable mentor's and/or hands-on experiences.  Some homeschoolers also include local &amp;quot;after school&amp;quot; enrichment programs like scouts, 4-H, sports, [[music]] lessons, karate or dance classes, public library programs, and summer camps as part of their educational program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]], as of 2003, an estimated 1.1 million students - about 2.2% of children in grades K-12 - were homeschooled. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/estimated.asp] Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Families who homeschool do so for a number of reasons.  A 2001 study by the [[US Census Bureau]] found that the single largest reason that parents homeschool is that they feel they can give their children a better education at home. This accounted for 50% of the homeschool families; [[religion|religious]] reasons came in second at 33%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Home Schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics, by Kurt J. Bauman, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, August 2001, Working Paper Series No. 53 [http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Other frequently mentioned reasons include dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other schools, the ability to provide religious or moral instruction along with academics, the ability to control what the child is being taught, flexibility in meeting the needs of a child with special needs (such as a physical or mental health problem, a temporary illness, or giftedness), flexibility in scheduling family life, and concern about safety, drugs, and peer pressure at other schools.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/TableDisplay.asp?TablePath=TablesHTML/table_4.asp] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Admissions departments at major [[college]]s are now familiar and comfortable with homeschooling, according to a 2004 [[Boston Globe]] article. The article quotes a [[Liberal Arts college|Williams College]] admission officer as saying &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers'[sic] applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not [[discrimination|discriminated]] against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot; It notes that acceptance rate of homeschoolers at Williams is 20 percent,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked?mode=PF Schoolhouse rocked] &amp;quot;home schooling[sic] has gone main stream[sic], especially in Massachusetts. It's estimated that as many as 20,000 children here have abandoned test-crazy public schools and high-priced private schools for the comfort of the living room couch. But most surprising of all is that Harvard, BU, Brown, and other colleges are welcoming home-schoolers like all other students.&amp;quot; Source for Williams College admission officer's quote, 20% figure.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; virtually identical to its overall acceptance rate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm College acceptance rates]: Williams, 19.2%. U. S. News and World Report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some US states, the law allows homeschooled students to participate in extracurricular activities at their local public schools.  20 states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming) in one way or another expressly allow equal access.  In most other states, participation is worked out on a case-by-case basis.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  State Laws Concerning Participation of Homeschool Students in Public School Activities [http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000000/00000048.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, some states, such as Alabama, are considering equal access legislation.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  Alabama - Legislation for Participation in Public School Activities[http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/al/200705010.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many states, school athletic associations dominated by public schools exclude homeschoolers from participation in athletics, even though they allow students at different charter schools to participate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, opting out of [[public school]]s is not new. When [[Thomas Edison]]'s public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Education at public school year-round from about ages 6 to 18 only became common in the 20th century due to compulsory education laws.  The first [[law]] requiring attendance at public school passed in [[Massachusetts]] in 1852; the second such law passed in [[Washington D.C.]] in 1864; and most states did not pass mandatory schooling laws until between 1870 and 1917.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/educ/CompulsoryEd.htm Compulsory Education], National Conference of State Legislatures: &amp;quot;More than 150 years have passed since Horace Mann helped Massachusetts establish a statewide system of education that eventually led to the requirement that all children attend public school.  In 1852, Massachusetts became the first state to pass compulsory school attendance laws, and by 1918, all states required children to receive an education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/kellmeyer/050428&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But even under compulsory education laws in the late 1800s, the school year was only twelve to twenty weeks long.  Very few stayed in school from ages 6 to 18.  For example, by 1900, only 6% of Americans had graduated from a formal high school.  Moreover, these students did not learn basic skills like reading in school; they learned them at home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An early call for homeschooling in the U.S. was by John Holt and his 1964 book ''How Children Fail.'' Holt was &amp;quot;a left-winger who regarded schools as instruments of the bureaucratic-industrial complex.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge, ''The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America.'' Penguin, 2004. pp. 190-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the movement was also catalyzed when social [[conservative]]s became alarmed at the 1962 [[U. S. Supreme Court]] ruling which banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truancy laws brought pioneering homeschoolers into conflict with local officials. The first [[New York Times]] story on &amp;quot;home schooling&amp;quot; appeared in 1974, and concerned two parents charged with &amp;quot;educational neglect&amp;quot; by the [[Westchester]] County Department of Social Services. Tests showed that they performed at or about grade level &amp;quot;except for one who is a little slow in reading,&amp;quot; and the parents received strong support from a state senator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Parents Accused in Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' July 28, 1974, p. 45&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the mid-1980s the ''Times'' was running articles with titles like &amp;quot;Schooling in the Home: A Growing Alternative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;There Are Benefits In Homeschooling,&amp;quot; and states were legalizing homeschooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Belluck, Pam (1998), &amp;quot;Life After Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' November 1, 1998, p. ED26: &amp;quot;Some 15 years after states began legalizing home schooling in earnest, these early graduates are starting to make their way in the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article said &amp;quot;It's not only [[Christian fundamentalists]] any more&amp;quot; and a 2003 article noted &amp;quot;Unhappy in Class, More Are Learning at Home.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This list of homeschoolers is pretty large and may deserve its own article. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent people who were educated at home ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Please note that this list is in alphabetical order.  If you add someone, please make sure you have put them in the right place alphabetically, you have included a brief description of who they are, you have briefly explained their education, and you have included a citation explaining their education.  If you do not have this information, please add your person to the list on the talk page instead. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled, including all four of the greatest modern (post-[[Napoleon]]) mathematicians.  Here is a growing list of homeschooled achievers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ansel Adams]], (1902-1984), the finest photographer of the 20th century.  &amp;quot;At twelve, unable to stand the confinement and tedium of the classroom, he utterly disrupted his lessons with wild laughter and undisguised contempt for the inept ramblings of his teachers. His father decided that Ansel’s formal education was best ended. From that point forward, the boy was home-schooled in Greek, the English classics, algebra, and the glories of the ocean, inlets, and rocky beaches that surrounded their home very near San Francisco.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wy.essortment.com/anseladamsbio_rjrq.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Adams]] (1735-1826), U.S. President, learned to read at home, and was then taught in the kitchen by a neighbor with a handful of children.  He matriculated to Harvard College at age 15.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Louisa May Alcott]] (1832-1888), the author of ''Little Women'' and other great works, was taught by her father.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clara Barton]] (1821-1912), pioneering nurse during the [[Civil War]], founder of the [[American Association of the International Red Cross]]. Barton was educated at home, and at 15 started teaching school. She later attended the Liberal Institute in Clinton, New York. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Dream Team: Clara Barton[http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/dreamteam/clarabarton.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clara Harlowe Barton, Source: &amp;quot;Historical Times Encyclopedia of the Civil War&amp;quot; edited by Patricia L. Faust&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.civilwarhome.com/bartonbio.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Breckinridge]] (1881-1965), pioneering American midwife and founder of Kentucky's Frontier Nursing Service.  Mary's father was a diplomat, and she was educated in America and abroad by private tutors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frontier Nursing Service[http://www.frontiernursing.org/History/MaryBreckinridge.shtm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Carnegie]] (1835-1919), the brilliant American businessman and philanthropist of the late 1800s, his father was a poor weaver and Andrew dropped out of elementary school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and had only five years of formal schooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/carnegiemedal/background.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] (1789-1857), one of the greatest mathematicians of all time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://james.fabpedigree.com/mathmen.htm#Cauchy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agatha Christie]] (1890-1976), best-selling English mystery writer.  Christie was educated at home by her mother, who encouraged her to write from a very early age. At sixteen she was sent to finishing school in Paris.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PBS Mystery Series &amp;quot;Miss Marple&amp;quot; site: Biography of Agatha Christie[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/mystery/marple/christie.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Edison]] (1804–1896), the most prolific inventor in the history of the world and the holder of 1093 patents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Erdos]] (1913–1996), the most prolific mathematician of the 20th century, was homeschooled by his mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benjamin Franklin]] (1706-1790), a leading [[Founding Father]] and prolific inventor and statesman, only attended part-time school from ages 8 to 10.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evariste Galois]] (1811–1832), among the brightest mathematicians ever and the founder of Galois groups and fields and Galois theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His life was tragically cut short at age 20 in a [[duel]], and his work was published posthumously.[scidiv.bcc.ctc.edu/Math/Galois.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Zac, Taylor, and Isaac Hanson, of the band [[Hanson]].  Educated at home by their mother, and later by a tutor.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hanson:  The All American Boys[http://www.drdrew.com/DrewLive/article.asp?id=1112]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hangin With Presents&lt;br /&gt;
Hanson[http://www.agirlsworld.com/rachel/hangin-with/hanson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Julia Ward Howe]] (1819–1910), abolitionist, writer, and women's rights activist. Julia was educated by tutors at home and in girls' schools until age 16. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Open Connections Program, Women Working 1800-1930, Harvard University Library:  Julia Ward Howe (1819-1910)[http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/people_howe.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joan of Arc]] (1412-1431), one of the greatest military leaders ever.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. ... It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc][http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc][http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html Biography of Joan of Arc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[C.S. Lewis]] (1898-1963), the author of the ''Chronicles of Narnia'' and other famous works, was homeschooled by his mother and a governess until age 10, and later sent to be taught by a tutor to prepare him for [[Oxford]].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abraham Lincoln]] (1809-1865), American president. &amp;quot;Though his [formal] education was limited to a few months in a 1-teacher school, Lincoln avidly read books such as the Bible, ''Pilgrim's Progress'' and Weemss ''Life of Washington''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.civilwarhome.com/lincolnbio.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Countess Augusta [[Ada Lovelace]] (1815-1852), a visionary programmer and namesake of the [[ADA]] programming language, was homeschooled by governesses and tutors hired by her mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benoit Mandelbrot]], Harvard mathematician considered the founder of fractal geometry, was homeschooled by his uncle beginning at the age of 12.{{citation}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yehudi Menuhin]] (1916-1999), noted violinist, was in school a grand total of only one day at age 6.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] (1756-1791), German composer. &amp;quot;He was educated by his father, Leopold Mozart, a violinist of high repute in the service of the archbishop of Salzburg.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the best-selling [[Inheritance Trilogy]] ([[Eragon]], [[Eldest]], and a third book yet unreleased). He was homeschooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Patton]] (1885–1945), one of America's greatest generals.  He was homeschooled until age 11 based on his &amp;quot;father's theory of education&amp;quot; that &amp;quot;youthful mind should be led along a path that parallels the development of the mind of the race&amp;quot; by being read to by elders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pattonhq.com/unknown/chap01.html The Patton Society (&amp;quot;The Early Years&amp;quot;)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freeinfosociety.com/site.php?postnum=517&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Henri Poincaré]] (1854-1912), one of the greatest mathematicians ever and an original developer of the [[Theory of Relativity]], was taught at home by his mother due to a childhood illness (diphtheria).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Priestley]] (1733-1804), the father of modern chemistry and the discoverer of oxygen, dropped out of school as a teenager and privately learned  geometry, algebra and numerous languages.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernhard Riemann]] (1826-1866), a German recognized as the greatest modern mathematician.  He was taught at home by his father, a Lutheran minister, until he was ten.  After that he was tutored by a teacher from a local school until he entered the Lyceum in Hannover at 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland -- Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann, by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson[http://www-groups.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Riemann.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.andrews.edu/~calkins/math/biograph/199899/bioriema.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1882-1945), U.S. President.  He was educated by private tutors at home through age 14, then entered Groton, an elite private school in Massachusetts, in 1896. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers.  &amp;quot;Franklin D. Roosevelt.&amp;quot; Teaching Eleanor Roosevelt, ed. by Allida Black, June Hopkins, et. al. (Hyde Park, New York: Eleanor Roosevelt National Historic Site, 2003). &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1858–1919), U.S. President.  &amp;quot;Roosevelt never enrolled in a public school. He was mostly instructed by private tutors until he entered Harvard College in 1876.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://law.enotes.com/presidential-biography/theodore-roosevelt-administrations/education&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]] (1856-1950), author.  Tutored in the classics by a clerical uncle until he entered school at age 10.  Left school by age 15.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopedia of World Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary of Literary Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw-dlb/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Bernard Shaw, 1856-1950 Biographical Sketch[http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/research/fa/shaw.gb.bio.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]] (real name was Samuel Clemens) (1835-1910), American author and satirist who said, &amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot;  Attended school through the 5th grade, where he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot; and was frequently truant, then worked as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper.  His mother said, &amp;quot;He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mark Twain House and Museum:  Biography of Samuel Clemens/Mark Twain [http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Wyeth]] (1917- ), American artist, was tutored at home until he was 18.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Homeschooling of Andrew Wyeth, A Conversation with the Artist, Gifted Children Monthly, May 1986, Vol 7 No. 5.[http://www.nfgcc.org/51.htm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Lloyd Wright]] (1867-1959), considered the finest architect ever, was homeschooled by his mother who dreamed that he would become an architect.  She used &amp;quot;Froebel's geometric blocks to entertain and educate her son&amp;quot; as his father led the family among various Baptist churches, where he preached.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/a/archs/wright/bio/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wright then attended high school but dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0942394/bio&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a number of prominent people have chosen to homeschool their children.  [[David Guterson]], author of the novel ''Snow Falling on Cedars'' (1994), which won the 1995 [[PEN/Faulkner Award]], also wrote ''Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes Sense'' (1992), an account of his family's homeschooling journey.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.randomhouse.com:  David Guterson [http://www.randomhouse.com/vintage/read/snow/guterson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Actor and recording artist Will Smith and his wife actress Jada Pinikett Smith homeschool their children. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reader's Digest:  Will Power:  Will Smith is One Driven Guy[http://www.rd.com/content/will-smith-interview/1/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Roseanne Barr stated in an interview that she has started to homeschool her 11-year-old son.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reuters Interview - Roseanne Barr says age gives her a louder voice&lt;br /&gt;
[http://in.news.yahoo.com/070322/137/6dlba.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jimmy Wales, co-founder of [[Wikipedia]], also homeschools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reason.com/news/show/119689.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
Lists abound of famous homeschooled achievers, some more accurate than others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eadshome.com/Famoushomeschooled.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The following people have been found on such lists. Their educational background has not yet been researched by Conservapedia editors.  ['''Note: everyone is invited to find citations for these listed below and with the citations move them up to the category above.''']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Military'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stonewall Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Douglas MacArthur]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Inventors and Scientists'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Graham Bell]] (1847-1922), inventor of the telephone.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington Carver]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pierre Curie]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cyrus McCormick]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Louis Montesquieu]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Blaise Pascal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Booker T. Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leaders'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Adams|John Quincy Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[James Madison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Henry Harrison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Tyler]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Clymer]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Livingston]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Mason]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Pickney III]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Wyeth]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patrick Henry]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Penn]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Clay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Jay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Marshall]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Rutledge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Religious Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Cary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jonathan Edwards]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dwight L. Moody]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Newton]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brigham Young]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Writers'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hans Christian Andersen]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Robert Browning]] (1812-1889), a brilliant English poet. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pearl S. Buck]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Dickens]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bret Harte]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[C. S. Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sean O’Casey]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Artists and Social Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leonardo da Vinci]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Claude Monet]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ansel Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Burroughs]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Rogers Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Florence Nightingale]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeschooling in England and Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Education]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.robinsoncurriculum.com/view/rc/s31p54.htm Christian Children Must Have More Than A Fighting Chance] - Four reasons to homeschool your children, by [[Art Robinson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm] - List of homeschooled achievers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Control_panel&amp;diff=233595</id>
		<title>Control panel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Control_panel&amp;diff=233595"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T05:01:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''control panel''' contains instruments, dials, switches, knobs, sliders, etc., to let a person observe and/or control a process or a machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A virtual control panel is a software program which does the same thing for some aspect of a computer system. The Macintosh computer and the Windows operating system come with control panels. Some web site hosts provide control panels, e.g. the free [[cPanel]] application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electronics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233591</id>
		<title>Talk:Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233591"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:55:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Reason for rollback */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Private Tutoring== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does private tutoring really count as homeschooling? I don't see why it should. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:01, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homschoolers at harvard.==&lt;br /&gt;
I read it some were, but it is true that 10% of students in a classroom at Harvard were homseschooled. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:38, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:For a claim like that, I doubt &amp;quot;I read it somewhere&amp;quot; works; finding a citation shouldn't be hard if it's true, though. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will try to find it.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:42, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Great!  Find a citation *first*, then feel free to add it to the article.  Since only about 2% of kids are homeschooled, it would be astounding to find 10% at Harvard.  Also note that 10% in a particular classroom is not the same as 10% of the Harvard student body.  If your statement is true, then it deserves much more prominence in the article.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:45, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alright I found the information, but I was wrong. 10% of the Students accepted are homeschooled.:) so am I.... not going to Harvard though. so if you still want the link i can get it, or if not, no problem. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:53, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::First, make sure it's 10% of accepted students are homeschooled, not 10% of homeschooled applicants are accepted.  Then go ahead and add it, just make sure you quote it properly (very important for statistics) and include the citation, including the title, etc. so it will show up nicely in the references section.  Thanks for adding to this article!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:56, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Who are you by the way mom? I mean you sound like you have been here longer than I have, and thats a long time.ok here is the link: [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked/ homeschoolers at Harvard]  --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:59, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm a homeschooling mom, of course!  &amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;.  Will, the statistic was what I suspected.  It said that homeschoolers have an acceptance rate of 10%, which is the same as the general acceptance rate at Harvard.  On the one hand, it doesn't show homeschoolers doing any better than anyone else, but on the other hand, it does show they can do *as well as* anyone else.  Why don't you do a bit more research and write a paragraph about homeschoolers getting into college?  The one in the article is a good model - I bet you can find a few other sources too, and come up with something quite worthwhile!  Now I'm off to do my housework, but will check back to see what you've come up with!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:04, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Boston Globe article is excellent, it's a real &amp;quot;find.&amp;quot; I'm going to follow Hsmom's lead and let Will N. draft something rather than do something with it myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't figure out exactly what the sentence means: &amp;quot;At Harvard, the acceptance rate of the general applicant pool is about 10 percent, which mirrors the success of home-schoolers.&amp;quot; I read it the same way Hsmom does, but it's not perfectly clear. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it says specifically that the acceptance rate of homeschoolers at ''Williams College'' (a famous, excellent, old, small liberal arts college) is 20 percent. And [http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm this article] says that William's general acceptance rate is 19.2%. In other words, a homeschoolers are exactly as successful in gaining admission to Williams as anyone else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key point to be made, which should be supported with well-chosen quotations from the Globe article, is that homeschoolers are just as successful at being admitted to major colleges as others, and that these days college admissions offices are familiar with homeschooling and have no problem with it. I like the line: &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers' applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not discriminated against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If homeschoolers are about as successful at getting accepted as the general population, and if homeschoolers currently amount to something like 2% of all students, then ''presumably'' the percentage of Harvard students who were homeschooled would be 2%. 2% of 6700 = about 130 in all. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:01, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would dispute saying Patton was a Christian as he believed in reincarnation (show me where this is in line with scripture)&lt;br /&gt;
Brigham Young was a Mormon, not a christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mormons consider themselves to be Christians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The official name of their church is ''The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (&amp;quot;LDS Church&amp;quot; for short). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See material I've just moved to [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Mormons' relationship to Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One dictionary definition of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus.&amp;quot; It seems to me that Mormons meet that definition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who ought to make the judgement, among all the denominations that regard themselves as Christian, which are &amp;quot;really Christian?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:10, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P. S. The question of what Mormons believe is sure to receive a lot of discussion in a year or so, since Mitt Romney, a Mormon, is running for President. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:14, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you a Mormon? Not to be prejudiced against you if you are but just wondering. &lt;br /&gt;
Will N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No, I'm not a Mormon. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:37, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I probably should explain more. I did react to the phrase &amp;quot;a Mormon not a Christian.&amp;quot; What went through my mind, and what I knew ''off the top of my head'' was: &amp;quot;Whoa! That's not right. Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, and the church is even called Church of ''Jesus Christ'' of the Latter-day Saints.&amp;quot; I also got just a little bit of steam up, because there '''is''' some discrimination against Mormons&amp;amp;mdash;assuming Mitt Romney runs I think we'll have plenty of chance to see this soon&amp;amp;mdash;and saying that Mormons aren't Christians sounds a little like an attack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, after I wrote what I knew off the top of my head, from my experience with Wikipedia and with college, etc. I've found that if you want to convince other people, instead of just telling them what you think, it helps if you can show them ''why'' you think that. So I decided to do a bit of very quick research. I figured that Mormons probably get asked this question a lot and that the official LDS church website would probably have something to say about it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First I found the passage I put in quotation marks above, the one that begins &amp;quot;Jesus Christ is the Son of God.&amp;quot; I probably should have stopped there, but when I saw that they actually have a &amp;quot;Frequently Asked Questions&amp;quot; page with answers to the questions &amp;quot;Are you Christians&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a Christian church?&amp;quot; I couldn't resist putting that in, too. I probably put in too much. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ben Franklin was a Deist --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:58, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's right... no time to look further but I'm pretty sure Franklin did not believe in the divinity of Jesus and did not belong to an organized Christian church. Guess the whole list needs checking? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homeschooled or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a minor edit to the Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart entry today reflecting the fact that he was homeschooled. This was almost immediateley changed back by dpbsmith, with the explanation that &amp;quot;he wasn't homeschooled as we know the term today&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, this is all well and good, except that in the article for omeschooling, his name is on the list of famous people who were homeschooled, with an internal link to theMozart article!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So which is it? Was he homeschooled or not?  And please, this is isn't an attempt to start a big discussion of the meaning of homeschooling etc. I'm just asking for some consistency between articles here. Either a person was homeschooled, in which case their entries should be amended to reflect that fact, or they should be removed from the list of &amp;quot;Famous people who were homeschooled.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait a bit to see what the consensus is, but if their names are still on that list in a few days, I'm going to fix those articles to reflect that fact.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TrueReaganConservative|TrueReaganConservative]] 13:40, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds&amp;amp;mdash;Emerson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing is that ''this'' article is sort of a hash. I haven't wanted to take this sorry article entire, shatter it to bits and remould it nearer to my heart's desire because I think it's here as a sort of inspiration to the students who use the site. It looks to me like one of those &amp;quot;X pride&amp;quot; lists where X is any group that is a little out of the mainstream and wants to encourage its members that it's OK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The quickest way to fix ''this'' article would be retitle the actual list something like &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This isn't really a factual article about homeschooling, it's a point-of-view piece that says that being educated at home not only does not put you at a disadvantage vis-a-vis public or private schools, it can be an advantage. ''This is very arguably true'' and the list is evidence in support of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What the list is ''not'' is a list of people who have undergone &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is a sort of movement, mostly in the U. S. I think, that began more or less in the 1970s. Around that time there was a noticable drop in public confidence in the public schools. Maybe I remember it had something to do with John Holt? ''How Children Fail?'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Homeschooling&amp;quot; to me does not mean simply being educated at home. It means that parents have ''actively opted out'' of an ''existing system of compulsory public schooling,'' and educate their children at home in order to assert direct personal supervision of the content and values that their children are being taught.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Calling Mozart (say) &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; is like calling Thomas Jefferson &amp;quot;a Republican&amp;quot; or William Gladstone &amp;quot;a Liberal&amp;quot; or asserting &amp;quot;Jimmy Carter and Joseph Stalin were both Georgians.&amp;quot; Technically true, but confusing at best. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:08, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll defer to the consensus view, but I don't see why Mozart should be eliminated.  He was homeschooled in a Christian manner.  What's the big deal about observing that fact?  I don't think there has to have been compulsory education in his day to make this observation meaningful.  At a minimum, Mozart is an example of someone who learned at home and excelled afterwards.  Probably his home education has something to do with his work.  This is information worth preserving, and let readers debate as they wish.  As Fox News says, &amp;quot;We report.  You decide.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==George Bernard Shaw==&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Bernard Shaw'''... hmmm... I don't think he would have cared for being labelled as a Christian. You can make out a case that he did accept some of the moral teachings of Jesus ''as Shaw, personally'' interpreted them. But in his will, he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My religious convictions and scientific views cannot at present be more specifically defined than as those of a believer in creative revolution. I desire that no public monument or work of art or inscription or sermon or ritual service commemorating me shall suggest that I accepted the tenets peculiar to any established church or denomination nor take the form of a cross or any other instrument of torture or symbol of blood sacrifice.[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,813999,00.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he was a Christian, he was an awfully complicated and unusual Christian. He certainly did not belong to any organized denomination. He wrote that there was “not a single established religion in the world in which an intelligent or educated man could believe.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He did write that &amp;quot;Christianity might be a good thing if anyone ever tried it.&amp;quot; And he wrote that &amp;quot;Christianity as a specific doctrine was slain with Jesus, suddenly and utterly.&amp;quot; That is, he did not think any organized Christian religions actually practiced the teachings of Jesus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wrote a lot about Christianity in his Preface to ''Androcles and the Lion.'' I'm not going to try to summarize it, partly because I haven't read it through in a long time, but also because Shaw's ideas are so very original and unorthodox that they are really hard to pigeonhole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He dealt with religious themes in his plays ''Saint Joan,'' ''Major Barbara,'' and ''Androcles and the Lion,'' and in their prefaces, but if you can tell &amp;quot;which side&amp;quot; he's on after reading those plays, you're better than I am.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also dealt with evolution, in the play ''Back to Methuselah'' and the Preface to it&amp;amp;mdash;in a way which will not please either evolutionists or creationists. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:10, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I question the inclusion of '''Mark Twain,''' similarly. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:32, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harpie Snark recently added John Walker Lindh, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Charles Fletcher Lummis, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Christopher Paolini to the list. I deleted them when reverting some vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm restoring Charles Fletcher Lummis and Christopher Paolini on his say-so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin D. Roosevelt attended Groton, an elite private prep school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Walker Lindh is a Taliban member and Adam Yahiye Gadahn is an Al-Qaeda member. I don't think they should go onto the list without a pretty good source citation, on the grounds that &amp;quot;extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,&amp;quot; or, in this case, surprising claims require good evidence. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:37, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Christopher Paolini is the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased).  I know he was home schooled, but have never seen anything about his beliefs.  I asked to judge by his writing, I would tend to think he is not a Christian based on some elements of his books such as the atheism of the elves.  So if anyone has a source for this, please post it. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 19:45, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Raw results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a source for his being home-schooled, anyway: [http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934 A profile of Christopher Paolini], &amp;quot;He was home-schooled by his parents, Kenneth Paolini and Talita Hodgkinson, through an accredited correspondence course at American School, Chicago, Illinois from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:16, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gadahn apparently was home-schooled: [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/27/CALIF.TMP 'Average American boy' accused as terrorist], Adam was the oldest of four children, all of whom were home-schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A lot of Google hits on Lindh being home-schooled, but it's all blogs... Some stuff about in Google Books about Lindh &amp;quot;beginning life as a Christian&amp;quot; but turning to Islam &amp;quot;in high school.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://knowledgehouse.info/famous.html This page] credits Lummis as begin home-schooled but does not itself cite its sources... No clear whether or not this is supposed to be a list of home-schooled ''Christians...'' FDR listed, Groton not explained... She also lists Paolini... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:27, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources: Adam Yahiye Gadahn: [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian New Yorker] John Walker Lindh: [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org] Franklin D. Roosevelt: [http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm National Park Service] [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 14:30, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good. Thanks. I appreciate it. I'm removing the Wikipedia references because Wikipedia itself does not consider Wikipedia articles reliable sources that can be cited in other articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:FDR: I'm adding a note to the FDR entry, because it seems to me to be a borderline case; I don't think private tutors and Groton would be everyone's idea of what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lindh: I don't really know what to make of the [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org BlessedCause] reference, both because I don't understand what the site is about... but in any case, I do ''not'' see where it identifies Lindh as being ''Christian'' homeschooled. In fact if I understand the article it says there's a dispute about where he went to school, and says that according to Houghton Mifflin, he went to a public middle school in Marin County&amp;amp;mdash;an assertion which the site attacks. The Wikipedia article says he was homeschooled starting at age 12, but does not say he was ''Christian'' homeschooled. Wikipedia's own source for that item (wrongly formatted in the article) is a web page entitled [http://www.rickross.com/reference/islamic/islamic56.htm The Making of John Walker Lindh]. I read it as saying that he was in and out of public schools, and I do not see anything to suggest that his homeschooling resembles what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gadahn: The source you cite says, pretty clearly I think, &amp;quot;Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups. (At the time, nearly all such groups in the region were Christian,&amp;quot; so I don't see any question that ''he'' was &amp;quot;Christian homeschooled.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, there's a problem of definition here... this article has never defined exactly what the criterion is for inclusion in the list. Gadahn would be a good example of someone who clearly did undergo &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling,&amp;quot; and certainly was &amp;quot;homeschooled,&amp;quot; but surely was not &amp;quot;a Christian&amp;quot; and therefore not a &amp;quot;homeschooled Christian.&amp;quot;  I think this could use some discussion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:36, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That strikes me as what will be viewed by our critics as pretty obvious nitpicking and cherrypicking of sources. Reading the sources I provided, it's clear that all three had Christian upbringings and were homeschooled, despite their subsequent failings. As for Adam Gadahn, &amp;quot;''The Gadahns homeschooled Adam''&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;''Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups''&amp;quot; are clear and explicit. There's no ambiguity there; Adam Gadahn was Christian homeschooled. And the source, The New Yorker, is as good as they get. [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] If we'd rather not have in the list those who were homeschooled but may be viewed as casting it in a poor light, then let's just come out and say that and not pretend that sources say something other than they do or rely on turns of semantics to contrive justifications for an incomplete list. If our ideas are indeed that strong and compelling, then they can easily withstand being scrutinized in full light of all facts, and to act otherwise by ignoring or dismissing unfavorable facts only undermines our position and claims and invites greater scrutiny. Better to just put all the cards on the table, deal with them and let the chips fall where they may. As I've said before on my talk page, either CP is going to have an accurate and complete article on homeschooling or it's going to have to censor information from it's articles which may be considered unfavorable to its stated orientation, it can't always have both. This is as good an article as any to choose which it's going be, right here, right now. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree that it is hard given this evidence not to list Gadahn. The others are less persuasive. We need to resolve whether this is a list of Christians who were homeschooled, people who were Christian homeschooled, people who are Christian who happen to have been homeschooled, or Christians who were Christian homseschooled (I think that covers the 4 obvious possibilities). [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:30, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I commented on Harpie's talk page but now realize that the debate is here. I'll only respond here now about this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As anyone familiar with homeschool support groups knows, simply hanging around a loosely affiliated group does not make one a &amp;quot;Christian homeschooler&amp;quot; any more than living in a neighborhood makes one a member of the majority religion.  The description of Gadahn is clear that he attended Christian homeschooling groups out of necessity, not by choice.  This does not make him a Christian homeschooler any more than attending Georgetown Univ. made Bill Clinton a Catholic college student.  As to Lindh, there is nothing Christian about his homeschooling or his own religion, so that's not even close.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Notice that if we can agree to let the title of the actual list be &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home,&amp;quot; that includes Mozart and excludes Lindh and Gadahn. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Frankly the only thing necessary for a run-of-the-mill homeschooler to be a Christian homeschooler is intent on the part of the parents to provide a proper Christian education and action by them to keep them out of school and deliver a superior quality education at home themselves. Reading the New Yorker article it seems clear that this was the intent of the Gadahn's for young &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Azzam&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Adam, no matter how terribly they failed:  [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] Now arguing that Adam Gadahn was not Christian homeschooled because he didn't chose to but rather was compelled to is a red herring; many Christian homeschooled children would prefer to be playing ''Left Behind: Eternal Forces'' rather than studying math, so by that standard not many Christian homeschooled children would qualify as being Christian homeschooled. Meaning this rationale again opens us up to the lefty criticism that we exclude unfavorable facts from our articles, in other words, engaging in partisan, ideologically-motivated censorship. So if Aschlafly as the owner of this site really wants to exclude Gadahn as he seems to, we'd better set to work coming up with a reasonable-appearing justification for doing so that has at least a veneer of scholary fairness; regardless of what our motivations are, I'd think we'd want to avoid appearing to be censoring unfavorable facts in order to further our agenda. Thoughts? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 19:58, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Harpie, there's no &amp;quot;censorship&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;exclu[sion]&amp;quot; here.  The New Yorker article simply does not support the claim that Gadahn was a Christian homeschooler.  The article says that, out of necessity, Gadahn was forced to associate with homeschool &amp;quot;support groups&amp;quot; for some of his teenage years.  That association not necessarily even education.  Every indication is that Gadahn was not Christian then, and is not now either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, I might add, nearly 99% of Christian homeschoolers start early.  It seems to me that both Gadahn and Lindh were latecomers to homeschooling long after their personalities and attitudes had formed.  Often the latecomers are just passing through and are not influenced much by homeschooling.  Contrast that with Mozart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I think Dpbsmith has proposed an ideal solution.  Certainly he captures the intent of the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:28, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Kind of like a book about &amp;quot;Famous Irish That Don't Drink&amp;quot;. This ''is'' a brilliant solution! Now I understand how to handle situations like this. Since we don't engage in censorship or exclusion, we just need to find the right way to frame the issue that by necessity keeps any unfavorable facts out. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 12:25, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love your sarcastic enthusiasm-- it '''''really''''' strengthens your points more than talking straight could ever hope to. Even so, Ashlafly has a good point; Dpbsmith accurately capptured the intent of the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 12:43, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, they say a little bit of honey makes the medicine go down better. Look, I've been in conservative political PR now for nearly 20 years and know a little something about crafting credible, effective messages, and we'd be a lot more credible and better off in the long term were we to follow the rationale I provided above. Our goal should not be to just get out the message, but to get out a credible and compelling one, and this subject and article is just one of many that will face this same issue. If we go around trumpeting our own version of reality while ignoring the one that is shared by all we run the risk of being caricatures of our own cause and ultimately all too easily dismissed by those we hope to convince. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expand this article==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not the person to do it. I know nothing about homeschooling, sent both of my kids to public schools (and state universities), hope I've got stuff sorta-kinda right, hope I haven't stepped on any toes, but, this should be an article where there's ''lots'' of expertise available. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:12, 28 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me be more emphatic. There could be a '''lot''' more factual material about homeschooling here. Resources. Books. Tips on dealing with the authorities and how to jump through the legal hoops (I assume there are still some to jump through). There's an obvious opportunity here for people to add encyclopedic material that is informed by their personal experience and expertise. Say someone wants to homeschool in New Jersey or whereever. What office do you go to? What forms do you fill out? etc. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:39, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think this is a good place to try to compile info about state homeschooling laws.  There are other places that specialize in that.  On the other hand, I agree that the article needs some serious work.  Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Parents take a more active role in the education of their children when they homeschool. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; I'm uncomfortable with this general statement - while in some (many) cases it is true, there are lots of active parents with kids in public or private school (especially small church schools, I'm guessing), and there are homeschooling parents who simply hire a tutor (or several) and let them have at it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The primary reason for homeschooling is to give the child a better education. A close second in reasons, however, is to avoid the culture of public school and its many adverse effects of hostility to Christianity and parental control, political bias, boredom, confusion, depression, etc.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, different families have different reasons for homeschooling, usually more than one.  Religion may (or may not) be a factor; so might the quality of education.  But there are other reasons - a child who is not being well-served by the public schools, a child who has a special talent or interest they wish to focus on, a family who wants to travel with dad on business, a family who lives in a very rural area far from schools (or who is sailing around the world, etc.), and so on.  Various surveys have been done trying to rank the reasons, but I think we'd be better off with a list of possible reasons rather than trying to rank them.  Homeschoolers are notoriously hard to count or survey. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In the United States, opting out of public schools is not new. When Thomas Edison's public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. But because of compulsory education laws—the first was passed in Massachusetts in 1852, and by 1918 every state had them—schooling at home was a violation of truancy laws, and was rare until the 1970s. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, *lots* of kids were educated at home in earlier centuries, and certain cultures (Native American?) may not have had &amp;quot;schools&amp;quot; at all back then.  Also, the 1852 date sounds too late to me, though I could be wrong - can we get a cite there?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just added one. There seemed to be one there already. Another, which reads well but not quite sure of the source, is [http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/compulso.html Compulsory Education]. Apparently Horace Mann&amp;amp;mdash;whose name is instantly familiar to me as an &amp;quot;educator,&amp;quot; but of whom I know little more&amp;amp;mdash;was active in getting them to do it. Massachusetts had ''public'' schools much earlier, but apparently they were not compulsory. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also - is there a reason for listing Christian homeschoolers?  Why not just list people who were educated at home (in one form or another), and then give a brief explaination of their situation - e.g. Sandra Day OConnor, educated at home when she was young as the ranch she lived on was very remote, or whatever.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of thoughts - hope they are helpful.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:49, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent homeschooled Christians? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By your own definition, you have to &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; of formal education to be considered &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;  Thus, I'm curious what system DaVinci, Washington, et al, opted out of.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 13:25, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's why, some time ago, I changed the title of the '''list''' to &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; Homeschooling as we know it in the United States essentially began in the 1970s. This very interesting article on [http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/homeschool/index.html Homeschoolers: Estimating Numbers and Growth] suggests that there were about a million homeschoolers circa 1998. However, in the &amp;quot;late 1970s and early 1980s&amp;quot; it says &amp;quot;about 10,000 to 15,000&amp;quot; children received their education at home. At a very rough guess, today's U. S. adult population probably includes less than 100,000 people over 21, probably less than 25,000 people over 30, and practically none over 40. Not a large population, and not enough time to become spectacularly high achievers... yet. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:34, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I changed the definition part to remove the &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; wording - it is somewhat an attempt to address your concern above, and also an attempt to put the emphasis on what homeschoolers *do* (learn outside of school), than what they *don't do* (go to school).  Not perfect, but a step in the right direction, I think.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:35, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree.  I think that this kind of simplistic list can be a bit meaningless.  Better would be a list of people with unconventional educations or minimal formal education with a brief explanation of their circumstances.  For example, you could say something like &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin - had one year of formal schooling, apprenticed with his brother as a printer.&amp;quot; (Or whatever - not sure of the details on Franklin, but you get the idea.)  I also think that whether the person was Christian could be handled similarly in the brief note, rather than in the heading.  In addition, I don't think *anyone* should be on the list unless there is a *citation* to a source explaining their education.  See my addition of Andrew Wyeth as an example. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nature of the list just boggles my mind.  It ignores the point raised by AmesG (which I still read into it despite the &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot; part) that &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; needs a formal alternative to have a meaningful definition.  Also, why only Christians? I'm still boggled... [[User:Human|Human]] 22:40, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drawbacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm moving this here for discussion. As it stands, it seems to me to be pure, unsupported personal opinion:&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is not without its drawbacks.  Studies have noted that children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts.  [http://justenough.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/homeschoolers-are-indeed-weird/]  This lack of legitimate socialization can produce difficulties in homsechooled childred engaging in meaningful relationships with individuals outside of their family.  Additionally, while the public school playground can be seen as a barbaric atmosphere to most kids who are schooled at home, it is important to note that these exigent circumstances can produce valuable conflict prevention skills that pay dividends in all facets of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt there are drawbacks to homeschooling. The claim that &amp;quot;children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts&amp;quot; is, however, referenced only to a blog entry by someone identified only as &amp;quot;Tammy,&amp;quot; no other identification or credentials&amp;amp;mdash;''and it does not support the statement.'' The title of the entry is &amp;quot;Homeschoolers are indeed weird,&amp;quot; but she does ''not'' say homeschoolers are less socialized&amp;amp;mdash;that's apparently [[User:Huey gunna getcha]]'s ''interpretation.'' She means &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; in a good way: tolerant of different opinions and not afraid to express individuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence about the &amp;quot;public school playground&amp;quot; providing &amp;quot;valuable conflict prevention skills&amp;quot; is plausible but unsupported. (By the way: are parochial school playgrounds, or non-school playgrounds very different?) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A friend once remarked that he was astonished whenever anyone made reference to &amp;quot;the happy sounds of children at play.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Haven't they actually paid attention when they pass a playground?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:19, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch!  I had read that article earlier today and put removing that section on my &amp;quot;to do&amp;quot; list - you beat me to it!  FWIW, when looking at homeschoolers and socialization, it's also important to consider that some children are not odd because they are homeschooled, rather, they are homeschooled because they are odd.  Homeschooling can be an understanding &amp;quot;safe haven&amp;quot; for those odd kids for whom school may be &amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot; indeed. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:48, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i was almost kicked off my baseball team cause i was homeschooled and i was playing for the middle school. i was fortunate to be kept on. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 20:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://learninfreedom.org/socialization.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/zysk1.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/HomeschoolingGrowsUp.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the thousands of references on Homeschooling and Socialization. As an educator and homeschool parent I have searched for years to find data that supports the claim that homeschoolers are lacking in good social skills. Having met hundreds of HS kids from all ages, I never found one that wasn't able in a wide variety of social situations. Indeed ''all'' of the HS teens I met were a delight to talk with and had no problems talking with adults on a wide range of topics, unlike thier Public or Private or Parochial schooled peers who always seem so sullen and distant around adults they don't know - and even those they do. After searching the academic journals and every other source I could look at, I found a lot of research on HS and Socialization and none that found widespread negative effects. While someone may find a kid here and there as an anecdote to say HS is isolating and promotes poor social development, I could probably come up with dozens of Public, private and parochial school kids to show the alleged deliterious effects of those types of schooling on the social skills of kids.   Third Day May 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snipping George Bernard Shaw and Mark Twain==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm removing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both men had complex opinions that varied during the course of their lives, but calling them &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is a stretch. My reasons for excluding Shaw are given above. As for Mark Twain, he did write a sympathetic book about Joan of Arc. However, his writings are replete with sarcastic and dismissive remarks about organized religion. He refused to let &amp;quot;Letters from the Earth&amp;quot; be published until after his death. In Mark Twain's Letters, we read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From a gentleman in Buffalo Clemens one day received a letter inclosing an incompleted list of the world's &amp;quot;One Hundred Greatest Men,&amp;quot; men who had exerted &amp;quot;the largest visible influence on the life and activities of the race.&amp;quot;  The writer asked that Mark Twain examine the list and suggest names, adding &amp;quot;would you include Jesus, as the founder of Christianity, in the list?&amp;quot; To the list of statesmen Clemens added the name of Thomas Paine; to the list of inventors, Edison and Alexander Graham Bell.  The question he answered in detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain's answer was that if the compiler of the list added Jesus, he should also add Satan: &amp;quot;From A.D. 350 to A.D. 1850 these gentlemen exercised a vaster influence over a fifth part of the human race than was exercised over that fraction of the race by all other influences combined.  Ninety-nine hundredths of this influence proceeded from Satan, the remaining fraction of it from Jesus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain has been labelled &amp;quot;deist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;agnostic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;atheist.&amp;quot; Gary Sloan suggests ([http://www.writerscramp.ca/archives/mark_twain.htm Mark Twain's Covert War with his Maker]) that he believed in a ''malignant'' God, and says &amp;quot;Viewing Satan as a heroic rebel against the real Archfiend, Twain came to identify with the fallen cherub and often used him as a mouthpiece.&amp;quot; Perhaps his views were so complex that he was all of these things and a Christian at the same time, but he was certainly not a Christian as the term is ordinarily meant. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:03, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But if they were homeschooled, shouldn't they be in the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; section of the list? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure. That section didn't exist when I removed them; it was a single list of Christians. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:25, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cleaning up the list - putting uncited people on the talk page==&lt;br /&gt;
The list of homeschooled people for whom there are no citations has been here for too long, IMHO.  I am moving these people here, to the discussion page.  I hope this is OK with all of you.  As each person's education is researched and cited, we can add them back to the list, preferably with a brief sentence explaining who they are and what form their education took (as we have now already for several people).  As discussed above, I think it will be easier to describe the religious beliefs of each person individually (if needed in this context), rather than try to decide if they are generically Christian or not. Please jump in and research one of these people so we can build up this article. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I left in Adam Yahiye Gadahn, John Walker Lindh, George Bernard Shaw, and Mark Twain, because their entries had *something* other than their names, and because they were discussed quite a bit here; however these can/should be improved by adding a brief description of who they are/were, adding a brief description of their education, and/or adding citations, preferably ones that describe their education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:29, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cleaned up the George Bernard Shaw entry.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:41, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it were up to me I'd make this list contemporary (20th century, maybe 19th too) personalities.  As it was pointed out earlier, as the homeschooling term is used today, the majority of these wouldn't count.  Also, way back in the day, practically everyone was homeschooled. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do we really need this comprehensive a list? Isn't it enough to point out a few folks who were homeschooled? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 12:28, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Folks, I saw that list from a source and have reinserted.  I took out the ridiculous Lindh reference and other liberal bias.  For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!  Frankly, this entry looked like something one would see on Wikipedia.  We're not trying to be like Wikipedia here.  Thanks and I'll try to find citations for the names I reinserted.  Help is welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I saw that list from &amp;quot;a source,&amp;quot; too, but it was just that: a list. Some homeschooling-related site. It did not say where the list came from nor did it give any sources at all. I think the list may be just bouncing around the Internet. What was ''your'' source? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!''  I'm not sure I agree with this.  It is not supported by the citation given for that paragraph.  In fact, religion was *third* in the list of reasons for homeschooling provided in the citation, with only 29.8% citing it as their most important reason. If you are going to assert this, it would be best to add an additional citation that backs it up. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:14, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html   According to the US Census, 33% cited Religion as a motivation for HS.  My citation is older than the one used in this article. Mine says 33% cite religion (not Christianity, but Religion) and the more recent survey cited by ASchafly says 29% cite Religion. Homeschoolin is becoming more and more popular and common and the fastest growing group of HSers are not citeing religion as thier motivation. This is a very interesting development. May 8 [Third Day]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK, fine, I'll look for citations and add them.  But I've personally taught over 120 homeschoolers, and I'd say religion is the motivation for 100 or so of them.  The other reasons given, such as avoidance of drugs in school, are not even factors for the vast majority of homeschoolers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Also, I will find more citations for the 61 people under the &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot; list and move them to the higher list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm guessing that your classes are taught from an Evangelical Christian perspective, which would make it less likely that non-Christians would sign up for them.  You may also know other Christian homeschoolers from church and other social activities.  In addition, Christian homeschooling groups often ask members to sign a statement of faith, effectively excluding those who aren't Christian - if one of these groups is your main contact with the homeschooling community, you will get a very skewed impression of the homeschooling population.  So it makes sense that the majority of homeschoolers you know are Christian and that they homeschool &amp;quot;to protect the Christian faith of their children and to preserve their family values.&amp;quot;  For many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers, this is a good thing - they want to raise their children in a community of people who share their beliefs and values.  But there have always been homeschoolers who are doing it for reasons of educational philosophy (wanting more of a child-led approach, or stronger academics than their local public school, or logistics (like if the family travels frequently due to Dad's job), or issues with their particular child (like Aspberger's syndrome), etc.), and this category is growing as homeschooling becomes more mainstream.  (Growing Without Schooling, a secular homeschooling magazine, started publication in 1977.)  In addition, some of those who homeschool for religious reasons are not Christian - they may be homeschooling to protect the Jewish faith of their children, for example.  Certainly personal experience is a useful data point, and surveying homeschoolers can be quite difficult.  Perhaps you can find some research to support your claim.  Let's just be careful when we extrapolate based on our own experiences.  We need to set a good example for our students.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:12, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment has some truth but lacks a sense of proportion.  Parents who homeschool to keep their kids off drugs are about 1/1000th as many as parents who homeschool for Christian purposes.  Your comments and edits to the entry seem to avoid recognizing the obvious:  the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  There is a whole college devoted to this market (Patrick Henry College).  How many colleges are there for atheistic homeschoolers?  Our entries need to reflect reality, and reality includes proportions.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I completely agree that keeping kids off of drugs does not, in my experience, drive a lot of parents to homeschool.  (On the other hand, I do not live in the inner city - my experience might be different than families in whose neighborhoods drugs are a more serious presence.)  I would still disagree, though, that the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  I know many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers who are homeschooling to preserve their children's Christian faith.  However, I also know many homeschoolers of other faiths, and many who are Christian or Catholic but for whom faith is not among their reasons for homeschooling.  I wrote the &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot; paragraph based on the study I cited.  I believe someone above cited another study, which also found that it was not the case that a majority of homeschoolers did so for religious reasons.  I am willing to believe that my personal observations and these two studies are not representative of the homeschooling population, if we can find something to back that up.  These are certianly not the only studies out there, and I think it would be good if we can find some other references to compare to them.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:40, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you define homeschooled?  Had some education at home?  A formal school education was available but did not attend?  Dropped out of school at age something? Without such a definition, many of the names on the list are frankly, silly and/or wishful thinking. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of this - Mark Twain is listed on the list.  From the biography of Mark Twain[http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml] it reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;In 1847, when Sam was 11, his father died. Shortly thereafter he left school, having completed the fifth grade, to work as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper. His job was to arrange the type for each of the newspaper's stories, allowing Sam to read the news of the world while completing his work.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 1847, a 5th grade education was quite sufficient for day to day life and working as an apprentice for a local newspaper was a reasonable continuation of his education.  It is not homeschooling.  It would probably be more useful to first put the person on the talk page and figure out if they were homeschooled and then added to the main page rather than put on the main page without refrence and then removed when they don't fit the definition (whatever that may be). --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:24, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, [[User:Mtur|Mtur]].  I have found several times in the past that someone on a list of this kind was not actually educated at home.  I think, if we are going for a high level of accuracy that befits an encyclopedia, we should do the research ourselves first, using the talk page to discuss.  Then we should add the person to the list, and be sure to explain how each person was educated.  I don't think we need to have a strict definition of homeschooling; rather, we should describe each person's experience.  The result will be a list with an interesting variety of approaches to education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added Mark Twain's famous quote, which is proof enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally, these lists abound on the internet.  I've added a cite.  No one really disputes that most or all of these people, and others too, were homeschooled.  We can continue to fill in cites, but there is no need to censor this info in the meantime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot; I don't think this is proof that he was homeschooled, only that he sees the difference between schooling and education, and realizes that education can come from places other than school. I'd like to know more about his education before adding him to the list.  (But your sandbox, etc, so I'll leave him there.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree that lists such as these abound - but here, a higher standard exists.  It is not censorship to be sure something is accurate before adding it to the article proper, and the information is available to all on the talk page while the research is being done.  Students who want to use these people as examples in their work should know enough about the individual's education to be sure it is indeed an example of what they are writing about.  Brief descriptions of the person's education, along with a cite or two about it, will be very useful to our readers.  A list without this information, not so much. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Sam was always a good-hearted boy,&amp;quot; his mother once remarked, &amp;quot;but he was a very wild and mischievous one, and, do what we would, we could never make him go to school.  This used to trouble his father and me dreadfully, and we were convinced that he would never amount to as much in the world as his brothers, because he was not near so steady and sober-minded as they were.&amp;quot;  At school, he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot;; outside of school he was the prototype of his own Huckleberry Finn, mischievous and prankish, playing truant whenever the opportunity afforded.  &amp;quot;Often his father would start him off to school,&amp;quot; his mother once said, &amp;quot;and in a little while would follow him to ascertain his whereabouts.  There was a large stump on the way to the schoolhouse, and Sam would take his position behind that, and as his father went past would gradually circle around it in such a way as to keep out of sight.  Finally, his father and the teacher both said it was of no use to try to teach Sam anything, because he was determined not to learn.  But I never gave up.  He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  I'm not sure that I would consider this to be homeschooling, especially as his truancy was against his parents' wishes, though he certainly had an autodidact's view of education.  I have added a fuller discription of his education to the article, so that readers can decide for themselves.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm breaking my self-imposed examtime exile to ask this question.  Isn't it kind of facetious to say that most of those people were homeschooled, when no formal schooling existed?  It's sort of like making a big fuss out of someone from the 1600s being a creationist - of course he was, there was no alternative!  Or, like saying, &amp;quot;Jesus didn't believe in global warming.&amp;quot;  Well... of course not.  The controversy didn't exist back then.  It creates an idea of conscious choice and rejection of an idea, when there was no such thing.  Example: Joan of Arc?  There were no formal schools in France at the time.  Put another way, could you name someone from before 1700 who was ''not'' homeschooled until college?  Just seems a little facetious to me.  K, back to the books.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 00:59, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point is not to say that someone succeeded by rejecting public school, but that someone succeeded from homeschooling.  The latter observation is true and meaningful regardless of whether public schools existed.  We don't care as much '''why''' someone was homeschooled as whether it was effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sure, I can think of people who lived before 1700 but were not homeschooled:  the illiterate, of whom there were many.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure, that's true.  But the point that others are making is that the tone of the article suggests that you're suggesting that they rejected public schools, or were part of the homeschooling &amp;quot;movement.&amp;quot;  Would you mind if I clarified it, to better express your point, or would you like to?  Perhaps something like, &amp;quot;Even before public schools were active, homeschooling produced many successful people worldwide.  Here are some examples&amp;quot;? -'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 01:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A previous version had such a statement - I think something like that should be included.  I would also argue that the statement &amp;quot;a disproportionate number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled&amp;quot; has not been cited or proved, and I'm not sure it's accurate or (from a historical perspective), even meaningful.  (See the Harvard discussion above, though of course college admittance is not a great measure of success in life - but that's a whole 'nother conversation.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The problem with your approach is that most of the people on the list did reject formal or public school, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think that's true for many of the historical figures.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the list, if it actually describes the education each person had, shows that there are a wide variety of approaches to education which can be successful.  This can be very useful in an age where educational standardization is being pushed - having all kids learn the same material in the same grade, etc.  It's also nice for homeschooled kids to see that they are not so much an oddity as part of a long line of people who did a significant amount of learning outside of school.  There's a reason you often see lists of successful minorities - it is very helpful to members of the minority group to havfe these role models, even if their lives aren't exactly parallel.  I agree that it's problematic to call it &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; before, say, the last 50-100 years, but &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;educated outside of formal schools&amp;quot; usually fits.  At the same time, I think a long list of names without individualized information about their education is not particularly useful, and quite frankly lowers the standard of research and accuracy here.  Again, we are setting an example for the students, homeschooled and not, who we expect will use this information in their work.  If we expect them to present work that is well-researched and cited from credible sources which are themselves clearly well-researched, shouldn't we be doing the same?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In place of the list ''in the article'', how about tagging each person's biography page with [[:Category:Homeschooled]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
#Anyone educated before 1850 was probably not given &amp;quot;[[compulsory education]]&amp;quot; in the Mann or Dewey sense. In ''[[Little Women]]'' Mrs. March kept Amy home and had Jo teach her. Nothing unusual about that. We need an article on [[Primary education]] or [[History of education]] that gets into that. What proportion of children were educated, and how well? When and where? The one-room schoolroom, or a huge mega-school divided into grades by age? How about [[Educational reform]]s or &amp;quot;fads&amp;quot; like [[Whole language]] and its attack on [[phonics]], the [[New math]] and its ineffective ways of teaching [[arithmetic]]? (I'm tutoring some of my friends' kids, and it's a nightmare trying to counter the knuckleheaded strategies they mandate for doing &amp;quot;[[word problem]]s&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's enlightening to have the list in one easy-to-access place.  It's striking.  You might add your Little Women point also.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Arguably, the category would be easier to access than an article and would be dynamically updated as new biographies were added.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 14:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As I said last night, the point is not that these individuals rejected public school (though many did), the point is that they achieved based on homeschooling.  Why they homeschooled is a separate, and less important, issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I like the idea of a &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; category.  However, I also like the list we are beginning to create here, assuming that we are careful to include a brief description of each person's education.  It's very informative and inspiring to see the wide variety of ways these people were educated.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christopher Paolini ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], could you explain why you deleted Christopher Paolini from the list?  He is a modern homeschooler, a best-selling author of a YA book series, and was clearly homeschooled.  The list entry (copied below), was detailed and cited.  Isn't this the kind of thing we want in the list?  I haven't read his books -- perhaps there is an issue with their content I am unaware of?  I'm not trying to challenge this decision, I just want to understand it.  (Or perhaps it was a mistake?) --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased). He was home-schooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Originally, it was a list of &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home&amp;quot; (well, actually it was &amp;quot;homeschooled Christians&amp;quot; but I proposed the title change to bypass issues about the meaning of the word &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;) This was the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;amp;oldid=10078 original list]. Paolini was added later, and there was some issue about whether he was Christian. I don't know whether that's why Aschlafly didn't include him, or whether Aschlafly just wanted to go back to a list whose sincerity he trusts... some people had fun from time to time adding names of individuals educated at home who are better described as &amp;quot;notorious&amp;quot; than as &amp;quot;high-achieving.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The list could have come from [http://www.home4schoolgear.com/famoushomeschooler.html here] or [http://www.christianhomeschoolers.com/hs_famous_homeschoolers.html here] or [http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm here] or [http://www.itwillpass.com/facts_famous_homeschoolers.shtml here]. There's probably one source for all of them but none of them credit it, much less give references for the individuals named being educated at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've seen many of these lists over the years, almost none with explanations.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Of the few I fact-checked, some had problems. All of these Web lists, for example, list Franklin D. Roosevelt without comment, but Groton is not ''my'' idea of being educated at home. Conservapedia's article is currently adequately clear about Roosevelt's education. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:03, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes - exactly.  That's why I keep going on and on about how important it is to give a brief description of each person's education - it shows the Conservapedia reader/user what form the person's education took (leaving the *reader* to decide if it counts as &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; for the reader's purposes), and in researching the brief description, we are also validating the list. I think it's just way more useful if it has been annotated in this way.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference 6==&lt;br /&gt;
I don't understand reference 6 in the article.  What does it refer to? [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 11:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's supposed to say &amp;quot;''ibid.''&amp;quot;  I think there is a wiki markup that can be used to refer to a previously cited link, which is useful in case someone puts another footnote in between the 1st and 2nd cites, screwing up the &amp;quot;''ibid''&amp;quot; concept.  But I forget how to do it. [[User:Human|Human]] 11:59, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;id&amp;quot; is short for &amp;quot;ibid&amp;quot;.  It's supposed to refer to the preceding reference, though it possible another reference was inserted between the two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use the &amp;quot;name&amp;quot; feature of the ref tag. Format the first reference like this, with the actual reference text:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format subsequent references like this:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated instances of the same reference name show up in the text with the same number. In the references section itself, the entry will contain links back to all the places in the text where the named reference appeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Markup:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Result:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disproportionate?==&lt;br /&gt;
There have been two introductory sentences to our list of prominent homeschoolers:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, a disproportionate{{fact}} number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled. Here is a growing list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some high-profile people have been educated at home, though it should be noted that prior to the 19th century most children worldwide were educated within their family. Here is a list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
:I think the first sentence is problematic because it makes a claim that is not supported by any kind of citation (''disproportionate'').  I also think it would be hard to prove such a claim, because people's education was so varied before the twentieth century.  For example, I don't mind including Mark Twain in our list of people educated outside of formal schooling, because I think he is an interesting case of someone who didn't have much of a traditional school-based education, yet went on to become a writer whose works are still in print a century later.  However, I think many people of his time had only a 5th grade education, so if we were going to seriously look at the numbers, I don't think we could count him as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;.  Can we work together here to come up with a sentence we can all agree on?  Here's my first attempt (below) - please feel free to use it as a starting point for creating something better.  Let's work on this here on the talk page until we reach consensus. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:47, 13 May 2007 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some prominent people have received some or all of their education outside of formal schooling.  (Note that prior to the 19th century, many children were educated at home.)  Here is a growing list of people whose educational backgrounds were quite different than today's norm.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling of Homeschooling==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] - Can I get some advice - I think you're probably the best person to ask.  The Williams article uses &amp;quot;''home-schoolers''&amp;quot;, which is largely rejected by the homeschooling community (at least in my experience).  Should it get a (sic), especially since the article here uses ''homeschoolers''?  (This whole spelling thing is a pet peeve of many homeschoolers.)  Oh, and nice job on the college paragraph - and a double super nice job on the Mothers Day article!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:49, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Re the &amp;quot;spelling thing:&amp;quot; it's an issue I was unaware of. What's disliked about the hyphen? For what it's worth, the American Heritage Dictionary says:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''homeschool'''&lt;br /&gt;
::VARIANT FORMS: or home-school&lt;br /&gt;
::VERB: Inflected forms: home·schooled, home·school·ing, home·schools&lt;br /&gt;
::TRANSITIVE VERB: to instruct (a pupil, for example) in an educational program outside of established schools, especially in the home.&lt;br /&gt;
::INTRANSITIVE VERB: To provide educational instruction in a homeschool.&lt;br /&gt;
::NOUN: A school operated outside established educational institutions, especially in a home.&lt;br /&gt;
::OTHER FORMS: homeschooler &lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.bartleby.com/61/30/H0253050.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their giving &amp;quot;home-school&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;variant&amp;quot; would justify a ''[sic]'', so let's do that. Unfortunately there's another question: is a homeschooler a ''teacher,'' as their definition suggests, and, if so, what is the right word for a homeschooled ''pupil?'' &lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, sure, for now let's just put in the [sic] without explanation... until someone feels like writing a section on terminology and usage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:37, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''What's disliked about the hyphen?''  OK - not sure if I can write this well enough to make sense, but here goes.  It's kind of like breastfeeding vs. breast feeding.  It's the difference between a noun modified by an adjective, vs. a noun with a separate meaning.  That is, breastfeeding is more than just feeding at the breast, more than just a different kind of feeding - it also provides antibodies to protect against disease, it has beneficial effects on mom's body, etc.  Thus it deserves a noun all to itself.  Same with homeschooling.  It's more/different than just schooling that happens at home.  Homeschooling includes opportunities and approaches to education that are dramatically different than what you'd find in school.  Homeschooling is also often integrated into family life, so much so that it is often impossible to differentiate between the two.  For example, reading a book for pleasure - for school kids, this is a &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; activity that has nothing to do with school.  For homeschoolers, it is both school and not-school, wrapped up in each other (though of course both sets of kids obviously learn from reading on their own).  In fact, homeschoolers talk about people doing &amp;quot;school at home&amp;quot;, which generally describes trying to re-create the school model in the home without taking advantage of any of the benefits unique to homeschooling.  It is not generally used in a positive context.  &amp;quot;Home schooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;home-schooling&amp;quot; is often seen in articles written *about* homeschoolers by someone else - many spell checkers will flag &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;, and many journalists will insist that their style guidelines don't allow &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  Nonetheless, almost everything written *by* homeschoolers uses the one-word form.  It's one of those &amp;quot;call members of a minority what they want to be called&amp;quot; issues.  (BTW - not trying to make a value judgment here - though I enjoy homeschooling, and it's been good for my kids, I think different kinds of schooling are appropriate for different kids &amp;amp; families - there is no &amp;quot;one best way&amp;quot; to educate children, IMHO.)&lt;br /&gt;
::As to who is the homeschooler, I would use &amp;quot;she is homeschooled&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooler&amp;quot; to refer to the student; &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooling mom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools her kids&amp;quot; to refer to the mom.  &amp;quot;She is a homeschooler&amp;quot; referring to the mom is less common, I think because mom can't homeschool without the kids, but I would hesitate to call it incorrect - I would prefer &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;They are homeschoolers&amp;quot;, referring to the family, is appropriate.  I guess when you're referring to the students and teacher(s) collectively it's right to call them all homeschoolers, but not so much the teacher by herself.  (Excuse the sexist language here!)  &lt;br /&gt;
::Note that in some states there is language that comes from the laws in that state.  In some states, homeschoolers must be enrolled in some kind of &amp;quot;umbrella school&amp;quot; which provides oversight - technically, these are private school students.  In Britain, homeschoolers are &amp;quot;educated otherwise&amp;quot; (if I remember right), from a phrase in their law.  In Pennsylvania law there is no such thing as homeschooling - children are &amp;quot;home educated&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;privately tutored&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;enrolled in a public cyber-charter school&amp;quot; - this last one is very controversial, as most independent homeschoolers insist that students in schools run by the government are not homeschoolers, even if they do school at home.  (Got that?!  Public cyber-charter schools are essentially publicly-funded internet-based correspondence schools.)  The idea here is that we must be careful not to confuse, especially in the mind of the general public and the legislature, traditional self-funded homeschooling and publicly-funded school-at-home.  The concern is that such confusion could lead to more governmental oversight - if government money is being spent, then accountability (and control, and standardization) soon follows, and with accountability homeschoolers tend to be forced into doing things in a very school-at-home way, which many of us feel takes away the most effective parts of homeschooling.  But that's a whole 'nother can of worms.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Got it. Well articulated. The points about publicly-funded officially-supervised schooling at home is interesting. I think these topics ought to be touched on in the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:36, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that all the famous people home schooled are very old or even dead?  Hard to imagine Stephen Hawking being home schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling as a modern phenomenon has only been around for a short time.  As most people who become famous for Great Things do so later in life, it will be a while before the results of this Grand Experiment emerge.  In addition, many Christian homeschoolers aspire to paths that don't typically result in fame, such as missionary work, etc.  Still, point taken - we should add some modern folks.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:39, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Realizing that homeschooling is primarily an alternative to public schools. Most homeschooling parents homeschool their children because for whatever reason they are dissatisfied with the public schools. I think that it harms the credability of this website to smack the label of homeschooling on anyone who predates public schools as we now think of them; ''most'' people back then would fit the loose standard for &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; on this page. For example, Jesus is listed as &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot;. There is really can be no evidence for this and even if ther was his education would probably not fit our idea of homeschooling today--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:49, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daniel Webster - Homeschooled?  Or not so much?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not convinced that Daniel Webster can be described as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;, even though he got some college-prep tutoring.  Here's what I've found about his education, combined with what [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] has written.  FWIW, the Dartmouth site is the most extensive, with lots of useful quotes from primary sources; the Notable Names site ''(&amp;quot;updated as weather permits&amp;quot;)'' seems the least scholarly, but I'm not finding much contradiction.  There is a heck of a lot of schooling here, at a level way beyond most people of his time.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:39, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Daniel Webster]] (1782-1852), prominent U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, recognized as one of the greatest orators in history.  As the author of the first American dictionary, he is considered the father of the English language in America.  Born in Salisbury, N.H., he attended district schools&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biographical Directory of the United States Congress:  Daniel Webster[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=W000238]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a young lad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He attended [[Phillips-Exeter Academy]] for about nine months in 1794. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notable Names Database Weblog:  Daniel Webster[http://www.nndb.com/people/445/000024373/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Webster was then tutored by the Rev. Samuel Wood to prepare him to pass the rigorous oral exam required for entrance to Dartmouth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In August of 1797&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801:  The Road to Dartmouth[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, at the age of 16,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he enrolled in Dartmouth College, from which he graduated in 1801.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/exhibit.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Why doesn't this prove that Daniel Webster was homeschooled for high school?  In addition, the passing reference about attending &amp;quot;district school&amp;quot; before that would not have amounted to much in the 1700s, particularly in New Hampshire.  Those schools were not full-time school like today, and he would likely have learned the basics at home.  The other links to Webster don't even mention the &amp;quot;district schools.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've been a bit confused about when he was at Exeter - looking into it further, according to a biography he wrote in 1829, he entered in May, 1796 and he left in Jan 1797.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE - Online Resource Library:  Daniel Webster, Autobiography, 1829[https://www.osv.org/learning/DocumentViewer.php?Action=View&amp;amp;DocID=1077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was with Rev. Woods for no more than 7 months - he started in Feb 1797 and by Aug 1797 he had entered Dartmouth.  As to the district schools, it sounds like his family went to great lengths to have him attend them.  From the same source:  ''My father seemed to have no higher object in the world, than to educate his children, to the full extent of his very limited ability. No means were within his reach, generally speaking but the small town schools. These were kept by teachers, sufficiently indifferent, in the several neighborhoods of the township, each a small part of the year. To these I was sent, with the other children.  When the school was in our neighborhood, it was easy to attend; when it removed to a more distant district* I followed it, still living at home…When it removed still further, my father sometimes boarded me out*, in a neighboring family, so that I could still be in the school.''  I don't think we can ignore this, even if he, like many &amp;quot;youngest kids&amp;quot;, learned to read from his mother or siblings at home.  I can see your point, but I think it's a stretch to include him.  Let's hear what other folks think.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:27, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The Phillips-Exeter dates look wrong.  People don't start high school in May at age 17.  Nor would it make sense for Rev. Woods to tutor Webster for only a few months.  There is at least a three year gap there to prepare for college, as one would expect, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:25, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He would have been about 14 (1796 minus 1782), which jives with a couple of other sources which mention his age but not the year.  The 1794 date comes from the Notable Names Database Weblog article, which doesn't look particularly scholarly and includes no citations.  We could work it out more accurately if we looked up his birthday.  [Why don't I do that!  He was born January 18, 1782, which would make him 14 in May of 1796 when he entered Exeter (according to the autobiography quote), and 15 (give or take a few days) when he left.  He would have started with Rev. Wood at 15, and been almost 16 (well, 15 1/2) by the time he began Dartmouth in Aug 1797.]  I agree that May sounds like an odd time to start school, but I believe the British system, on which Phillips-Exeter may have been modeled, has different terms (semesters) than we are used to.  14 is the right age for high school today, and I do believe Dartmouth as to the dates he was there.  Perhaps we can find more information to verify or refute the Exeter dates.  Don't forget that Rev. Woods had planned to have Webster for longer:  ''Mr. Wood put me upon Virgil and Tully; and I conceived a pleasure in the study of them, especially the latter, which rendered application no longer a task... In the spring I began the Greek grammar, and at midsummer Mr. Wood said to me: &amp;quot;I expected to keep you till next year, but I am tired of you, and I shall put you into college next month.''  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He also said that he was ''miserably prepared, both in Latin and Greek'', which is not surprising if he only studied for a few months!  (Same source)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, here we go.  Phillips Exeter themselves put the date as May 14, 1796, age 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phillips Exeter Academy:  Academy Chronology[http://www.exeter.edu/libraries/4513_4622.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:59, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wright Brothers - Homeschooled?  Or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says:  &lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[The Wright Brothers|Orville and Wilbur Wright]], inventors of the airplane.  They did attend some school, but also learned at home from their father, who was a conservative minister, and their mother, who was the top mathematician in her college class.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/family.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neither Wright Brother earned a high school diploma, let alone college, and Orville Wright left high school after his junior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/trivia.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking at the sources given, I saw that both brothers went to school, that Wilbur earned a high school diploma (but never picked up his certificate), and Orville left after 11th grade.  While their parents taught them some interesting things (as do all good parents), I didn't see anything that implied that this was ever in lieu of going to school.  While I'd love to claim these two as &amp;quot;one of us&amp;quot; (homeschoolers, that is), the sources given don't seem to give me any grounds to do so.  Am I missing something?  I'd like us to have a strong, well-researched list of people with interesting educational backgrounds.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:22, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
I have cleaned up the two lists of homeschoolers based on the discussions above.  I have removed the Wright Brothers and Daniel Webster - if further research and discussion in the sections above shows them to be homeschoolers, we can add them back in.  I have also moved two people from the first list to the second, because they didn't have any explanation of their education or any references.  Because of our experience with the Wrights and Webster, we must view anyone on a &amp;quot;Famous Homeschooler&amp;quot; list we find on the internet with skepticism - they ''may'' have been homeschooled, but we should be careful to document their actual education before adding them to the first list.  It would probably to be a good idea to change the paragraph introducing the second list to make it clear that these people have not been researched or verified as homeschoolers.  By the way, thanks to everyone who has contributed to this article - I think it is shaping up nicely!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been researching Joan of Arc's education, and I'm not sure it qualifies as homeschooling, at least as we think of homeschooling today.  She was taught religion and domestic skills by her mother, as are most girls, then and now.  She could not read or write, and I found nothing about her going to school or being taught any academic skills.  So while (like most children of her time) she did not go to school, and while I have great respect for traditional women's skills and the way they have been passed from mother to daughter for centuries (regardless of whether the daughters also went to school or not), I don't think I would consider this to be &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; - it is, IMHO, &amp;quot;mothering&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;raising your daughter&amp;quot; - the kinds of things that most mothers do for their daughters.  Below are a few quotes.  Thoughts? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:07, 19 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. Joan would later say, &amp;quot;As for spinning and sewing, I fear no woman in Rouen.&amp;quot; And again, &amp;quot;It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''She never learned to read or write but was skilled in sewing and spinning...''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;It was from my mother that I learned the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, and the Credo&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;to sew linen fabrics and to spin wool, and when it comes to spinning and sewing I fear no woman...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biography of Joan of Arc[http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is homeschooling.  There is no requirement that homeschooling include a particular curriculum.  Joan of Arc should be included.  It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.  I'll revert the deletion of her name, even using your cites above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.''  I'm not sure what you mean here - do you mean that most mothers don't teach religion at all?  Or that most mothers of public-schooled children don't?  I'm talking here of religious families.  If those mothers (and of course fathers) don't teach their children religion, who does?  I think that, in a devout home, most kids learn the Lord's Prayer etc. (or whatever prayers are appropriate for their religion) from their mother or their father - hearing their parents say them daily, during mealtime and bedtime prayers, etc.  They also hear it from other family members and in church.  It's woven into the fabric of their family life.  I think that's even more the case in Joan of Arc's time.  In a devout home, children learn these things even before they are of school age.  In addition, girls throughout history learned spinning and sewing because that was their job in the family - the same way children today learn to load the dishwasher or to mow the lawn.  Is it homeschooling?  I can see both sides of it, and if you feel strongly that Joan of Arc should be included, then that's OK with me.  But in terms of our list of famous homeschoolers, I don't think it makes sense to individually list all those people from earlier times who learned religion and basic life skills (and maybe even a trade) from their parents and never even had the opportunity to go to school.  Perhaps it would be best to address it by writing a paragraph explaining that learning by your parents' side was the norm for the vast majority of people in those days - going to school was only for the elite.  We could rename our list  &amp;quot;Prominent people of the Modern Era who were educated at home&amp;quot; - well, &amp;quot;of the modern era&amp;quot; isn't great, but I'm sure we could think of something better - &amp;quot;Of the last 350 years&amp;quot; perhaps. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:29, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  This isn't complex.  No, most parents of public-schooled children do NOT teach their children the things that Joan of Arc learned at home.  Were most children who went on to achievement homeschooled at the time of Joan of Arc?  I don't know, but that fact does not affect whether Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  She was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:53, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, by this logic you could include every human being prior to about 1700, and even most humans after 1700.  In Joan of Arc's time, there were no public primary schools, therefore nearly everyone was educated by their parents.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 14:42, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, that doesn't follow.  Not everyone who failed to attend a [[public school]] was homeschooled.  Ever heard of [[Plato's Academy]]?  That was a few years before 1700.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point of this entry is not to criticize [[public schools]] anyway.  But if you want to insert a ''supported'' statement that [[public schools]] did not exist before 1700, please go ahead and do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plato's academy was the equivalent of secondary and post secondary education, not primary education.  Children learned to read and write from their parents, and so it follows that if their parents couldn't read or write, then the children almost certainly wouldn't be able to either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even into Joan of Arc's time, formal education was the province of the noble classes and what little group schooling existed was conducted by the church, not the state.  Since most people were not members of a noble family, they would not have been educated in a group setting, but instead instructed by their parents.  It wasn't until the advent of state sponsored public schooling that formal education became more widespread.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I realize that your goal is to present homeschooling as superior to public schooling, and you think that by presenting these towering giants of history as homeschooled that it helps your case, but the truth is that what you call homeschooling was the de facto method of learning for the vast majority of humanity the world over, and the handful of great individuals that arose from it are a measure of statistics, not of the superiority of the home-school.  Certainly, if you're the child of a Bill Gates or a Richard Feynman you might get more at the foot of your parent than in an average public school, but if you're the son of Joe Ditchdigger or Jane Grocery Bagger then you're likely better off in a public school.  A parent who is not well educated themselves is unlikely to be able to instruct their children to become better educated than they are.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 15:56, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== George Washington Carver ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yet again, when researching someone on the &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list, I've come up with little support for the argument.  George Washington Carver, born a slave, didn't go to school until age 10, but I'm not sure I would call his education before this &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  More accurately, his education was delayed until he could attend school.  The lack of schooling is '''not''' the same thing as homeschooling.  What do you all think?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:26, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''Carver was born a slave near Diamond, Missouri, during the American Civil War (1861-1865). Around age ten he left the farm where he was born and traveled through the Midwest doing odd jobs to support his education. Carver studied constantly and attended schools wherever possible, finally graduating from high school in Minneapolis, Kansas, in 1885. That same year he passed the entrance examination at Highland College in northeastern Kansas. But when school officials learned he was black, he was prevented from attending.  In 1891 Carver was admitted to the Iowa State College of Agricultural and Mechanical Arts (now Iowa State University) in Ames. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in 1894, becoming the first black to graduate from the college. After graduation, Carver was appointed to the faculty as an assistant botanist. While teaching, he pursued his master’s degree, studying fungus diseases and classification of plants. In 1896 he received his master’s degree. That year, at the invitation of American educator Booker T. Washington, Carver became the director of agricultural research at Tuskegee Institute, where he remained for the rest of his life.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSN Encarta Encyclopedia - George Washington Carver article[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761574196/Carver_George_Washington.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:''He began his formal education at the age of twelve, which required him to leave the home of his adopted parents. Schools segregated by race at that time with no school available for black students near Carver's home. He moved to Newton County in southwest Missouri, where he worked as a farm hand and studied in a one-room schoolhouse. He went on to attend Minneapolis High School in Kansas. College entrance was a struggle, again because of racial barriers. At the age of thirty, Carver gained acceptance to Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa, where he was the first black student. Carver had to study piano and art and the college did not offer science classes. Intent on a science career, he later transferred to Iowa Agricultural College (now Iowa State University) in 1891, where he gained a Bachelor of Science degree in 1894 and a Master of Science degree in bacterial botany and agriculture in 1897.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Washington Carver, By Mary Bellis[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa041897.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leonardo da Vinci==&lt;br /&gt;
Here is another from the Arguably Homeschooled list for whom I've been able to find little evidence of homeschooling.  Perhaps further searching will turn up more.  Until then, I suggest we take da Vinci off the list.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''In Vinci Leonardo went to school. Vasari told that teachers of Leonardo da Vinci were despaired about all the questions and doubts of Leonardo. Leonardo learned at school to write, to read and to calculate. Also he was taught in geometry and Latin. Later Leonardo tried to improve his knowledge in Latin, because he thought that he didn't learn enough at school in Latin. Perhaps this is the reason why Leonardo did his notes in Italian.  Leonardo lived in Vinci until 1466. With the age of 14 Leonardo moved to Florence where he began an apprenticeship in the workshop of Verrocchio.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leonardo da Vinci[http://www.kausal.com/leonardo/childhood.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Our &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list is proving to be very inaccurate.==&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand the logic of having the list in the article, I am finding so many people on the list to have educational backgrounds that I would not consider to be homeschooling that I think we need to reconsider.  I suggest we move the list back to the talk page - the level of error is just too high to consider this list credible. Once researched, people who are shown to actually have been educated at home can be put on the &amp;quot;Prominent people who were educated at home&amp;quot; list, along with an explanation of their education and citations showing the facts.  Thoughts?  Opinions? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed.  Some very basic fact checking shows that a number of the people on the list were clearly not homeschooled.  Both were added by Mr Schlafly.  Andy, are you just pulling these names from your nether regions, or did you bother to check if what you were posting was actually accurate?  I notice you've removed some of my additions, who were certainly homeschooled since they lived in countries without formal education systems.  Why was this done, Andy?  Because they weren't Christian?  I thought Non Christian Conservatives were welcome here...  that's what your front page says.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 22:11, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Dropouts vs. Famous Homeschoolers==&lt;br /&gt;
This reference &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Education Reform.net - List of Successful Dropouts [http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, currently in the Arguably Homeschooled section, is a list of dropouts, not a list of homeschoolers.  While some overlap is possible, and a few people on the list are indeed arguably homeschooled, most are not.  I do not think we should be equating dropouts with homeschoolers.  I think we should keep the reference here on the talk page, to get ideas for adding to the list of Prominent People who were Educated at Home.  I think it may be a good idea to remove it from the Arguably Homeschooled section.  Thoughts?  Input?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:40, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Henri Poincaré==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a bit confused about Poincare's education.  While I have found several references stating that his mother tutored him, it's unclear whether this was just during his illness with diphtheria.  It's unclear when he was ill, or how long he was ill.  He entered school at age 8 and stayed there 11 years, going on to higher education after that.  Most of the references I found seem to rely on (or copy) the entry from the Encyclopedia Britannica, which is not clear.  Personally, I'm not comfortable calling him &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; without further clarification of his education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:47, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Henri was &amp;quot;... ambidextrous and was nearsighted; during his childhood he had poor muscular coordination and was seriously ill for a time with diphtheria. He received special instruction from his gifted mother and excelled in written composition while still in elementary school.&amp;quot;  In 1862 [when he would have been about 8] Henri entered the Lycée in Nancy (now renamed the Lycée Henri Poincaré in his honour). He spent eleven years at the Lycée and during this time he proved to be one of the top students in every topic he studied. Henri was described by his mathematics teacher as a &amp;quot;monster of mathematics&amp;quot; and he won first prizes in the concours général, a competition between the top pupils from all the Lycées across France.  Poincaré entered the École Polytechnique in 1873, graduating in 1875. He was well ahead of all the other students in mathematics but, perhaps not surprisingly given his poor coordination, performed no better than average in physical exercise and in art. Music was another of his interests but, although he enjoyed listening to it, his attempts to learn the piano while he was at the École Polytechnique were not successful. Poincaré read widely, beginning with popular science writings and progressing to more advanced texts. His memory was remarkable and he retained much from all the texts he read but not in the manner of learning by rote, rather by linking the ideas he was assimilating particularly in a visual way. His ability to visualise what he heard proved particularly useful when he attended lectures since his eyesight was so poor that he could not see the symbols properly that his lecturers were writing on the blackboard.  After graduating from the École Polytechnique, Poincaré continued his studies at the École des Mines.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jules Henri Poincaré[http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is completely clear that he was homeschooled at least until age 8.  The date of entry in the Lycee high school seems too early, and it seems unlikely he spent 11 years in high school.  Regardless, he was homeschooled in learning the fundamentals of reading and math, and likely learned far more from his &amp;quot;gifted&amp;quot; mother.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:49, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Citation needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled...''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], much as I, as a homeschooling mom, would love to believe this, we simply cannot state it in the article without backing it up with a citation.  Everything we post here must be true and verifiable.  We must always cite and give credit to our sources.  We must be careful not to post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry like this.  These are Conservapedia's rules, not mine, and they are good ones. Let's show our students that we are serious about the rules by leading by example - we must stick to the rules if we expect others to do so. Thus, we need a credible citation for this statement. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:59, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That sentence introduces the paragraph and list of examples that support it, with citations.  4 out of the top 4 modern mathematicians were homeschooled.  That's 100% of the smartest group of achievers.  The person considered the greatest president (Abraham Lincoln) was homeschooled.  That's 100% of the top.  The greatest female military leader was homeschooled.  That's 100%.  It's not just one citation that backs up the sentence, it is many citations and examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Hsmom, your repeated objections, like your objection above to the undisputed fact that Joan of Arc was homeschooled, are getting tiresome.  Add some content to the entry rather than object to the facts, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it really accurate to say that Joan of arc was &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; in the sense of the word that this article is about. Not a lot of kids - and even fewer girls - of the lower classes got much schooling of ANY type during the Middle Ages. Most, if not all of children's education, what precious little of it there was for French peasants, would have been at home. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 17:40, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, so Joan of Arc and many others were homeschooled in her class and time period.  That doesn't detract from the point:  Joan of Arc was homeschooled and then became one of the greatest military leaders of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your criticism has been raised by others in the past, all of whom view this entry as tit-for-tat, homeschooling versus alternatives.  But that's not what this entry is about.  This entry simply proves that homeschooling has been extraordinarily successful in its own right, regardless of alternatives.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fair Inclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to add William Bonney (Billy the Kid) and John Wesley Hardin, two famous American outlaws, and they keep getting deleted. I don't understand why. Both are certainly prominent, and both are homeschooled at least to the same extent as inclusions like Lincoln, Twain, and Joan of Arc. Obviously they don't paint a rosy picture of homeschooling, but doesn't blocking their entry present only one side of the argument (the pro-homeschooling side)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Provide some evidence for your claims, as required by our [[rules]].  Homeschooled means schooled at home, not running away from home.  Obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:58, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't be a jerk, dude.  This site lists &amp;quot;prominent&amp;quot; home-schooled individuals, not all of them.  Also, this is not your site.  Why do you think it should play by your rules?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Many of the people on this list were not obviously schooled at home. Twain is a clear example. Lincoln read at home but was not &amp;quot;schooled&amp;quot; by anyone, and people like the Roosevelts and Shaw studied with professional tutors, clearly not an analogy for the parent-lead homeschooling of today. Bonney's school experience is essentially a direct parallel of Twain's, and Hardin was taught by his father, just like Mozart. If your complaint is truly a source issue, I'm happy to go dig up a biography or two, but short of that I can see no reason for not including these two. For most of history people didn't have anything like modern access to public schools, which means that for most of history bad people got their education in pretty much the same way as people like Joan of Arc. Just trying to be fair here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: So you're saying that Lincoln schooled himself at home???  Could be ... but that's still homeschooled.  Private tutors is also homeschooling, as many of us homeschoolers can attest.  You seem to be saying that Hardin and Mozart were taught by their fathers.  That's not homeschooling?  Of course it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm open to unbiased improvements to the article.  I don't know the details of Twain, for example.  I do know that 5 out of the top 5 mathematicians post-Napoleon were homeschooled, and there are few if any errors on this list.  If you can make unbiased improvements by adding information, please do.  If you can't believe the list, then perhaps you want to open your mind a bit first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:37, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reason for rollback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't insert {{fact}} when the statement is supported the sentences that follow it.  When in doubt, use this page to express your opinion rather than senseless inclusion of multiple {{fact}}--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:48, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, since you mention it, I was wondering why you removed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; from the statement saying Ansel Adams is the best photographer of the twentieth century. It's certainly a very bold and opinionated statement (maybe someone is more a fan of [[Alfred Stieglitz]]) and I figured it needed backing up.--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:22, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The next sentence supports the statement.  Open your mind a bit, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:33, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, perhaps we can reach a compromise. Instead of adding a {{fact}}, why don't we just add the word 'arguably' to the sentence. That way, we're both happy. Eh?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:39, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My friend, open your mind instead.  The quote proves that Ansel Adams was homeschooled.  All that is needed is a cite for the quote.  The list of the others is also extremely well supported.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh ho, it seems we have found the root of our contention. You see, I'm not saying that Ansel Adams wasn't homeschooling. I don't doubt that he was. I'm just saying that the statement that he was the 20th century's 'finest artist' is not a fact (in the same way that &amp;quot;Bananas are the tastiest fruit&amp;quot; is not a fact), and should be changed to show it's opinion. It's semantics, I know, but that's how I roll, with mild [[OCD]].--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:55, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ehdrive&amp;diff=233585</id>
		<title>User talk:Ehdrive</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ehdrive&amp;diff=233585"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:43:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:43, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the strong additions you have made to articles.  However, please be careful with dating conventions and presenting the evolutionary viewpoint as fact.  Conservapedia uses B.C. and A.D.  And any discussion of dating is put in a special section under the theory that endorses it.  Thank you for your work. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 00:41, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Thinker50&amp;diff=233584</id>
		<title>User talk:Thinker50</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Thinker50&amp;diff=233584"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:42:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome}}--~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:42, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233581</id>
		<title>Talk:Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233581"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:41:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Reason for rollback */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Private Tutoring== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does private tutoring really count as homeschooling? I don't see why it should. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:01, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homschoolers at harvard.==&lt;br /&gt;
I read it some were, but it is true that 10% of students in a classroom at Harvard were homseschooled. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:38, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:For a claim like that, I doubt &amp;quot;I read it somewhere&amp;quot; works; finding a citation shouldn't be hard if it's true, though. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will try to find it.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:42, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Great!  Find a citation *first*, then feel free to add it to the article.  Since only about 2% of kids are homeschooled, it would be astounding to find 10% at Harvard.  Also note that 10% in a particular classroom is not the same as 10% of the Harvard student body.  If your statement is true, then it deserves much more prominence in the article.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:45, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alright I found the information, but I was wrong. 10% of the Students accepted are homeschooled.:) so am I.... not going to Harvard though. so if you still want the link i can get it, or if not, no problem. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:53, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::First, make sure it's 10% of accepted students are homeschooled, not 10% of homeschooled applicants are accepted.  Then go ahead and add it, just make sure you quote it properly (very important for statistics) and include the citation, including the title, etc. so it will show up nicely in the references section.  Thanks for adding to this article!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:56, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Who are you by the way mom? I mean you sound like you have been here longer than I have, and thats a long time.ok here is the link: [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked/ homeschoolers at Harvard]  --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:59, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm a homeschooling mom, of course!  &amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;.  Will, the statistic was what I suspected.  It said that homeschoolers have an acceptance rate of 10%, which is the same as the general acceptance rate at Harvard.  On the one hand, it doesn't show homeschoolers doing any better than anyone else, but on the other hand, it does show they can do *as well as* anyone else.  Why don't you do a bit more research and write a paragraph about homeschoolers getting into college?  The one in the article is a good model - I bet you can find a few other sources too, and come up with something quite worthwhile!  Now I'm off to do my housework, but will check back to see what you've come up with!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:04, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Boston Globe article is excellent, it's a real &amp;quot;find.&amp;quot; I'm going to follow Hsmom's lead and let Will N. draft something rather than do something with it myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't figure out exactly what the sentence means: &amp;quot;At Harvard, the acceptance rate of the general applicant pool is about 10 percent, which mirrors the success of home-schoolers.&amp;quot; I read it the same way Hsmom does, but it's not perfectly clear. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it says specifically that the acceptance rate of homeschoolers at ''Williams College'' (a famous, excellent, old, small liberal arts college) is 20 percent. And [http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm this article] says that William's general acceptance rate is 19.2%. In other words, a homeschoolers are exactly as successful in gaining admission to Williams as anyone else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key point to be made, which should be supported with well-chosen quotations from the Globe article, is that homeschoolers are just as successful at being admitted to major colleges as others, and that these days college admissions offices are familiar with homeschooling and have no problem with it. I like the line: &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers' applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not discriminated against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If homeschoolers are about as successful at getting accepted as the general population, and if homeschoolers currently amount to something like 2% of all students, then ''presumably'' the percentage of Harvard students who were homeschooled would be 2%. 2% of 6700 = about 130 in all. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:01, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would dispute saying Patton was a Christian as he believed in reincarnation (show me where this is in line with scripture)&lt;br /&gt;
Brigham Young was a Mormon, not a christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mormons consider themselves to be Christians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The official name of their church is ''The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (&amp;quot;LDS Church&amp;quot; for short). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See material I've just moved to [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Mormons' relationship to Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One dictionary definition of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus.&amp;quot; It seems to me that Mormons meet that definition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who ought to make the judgement, among all the denominations that regard themselves as Christian, which are &amp;quot;really Christian?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:10, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P. S. The question of what Mormons believe is sure to receive a lot of discussion in a year or so, since Mitt Romney, a Mormon, is running for President. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:14, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you a Mormon? Not to be prejudiced against you if you are but just wondering. &lt;br /&gt;
Will N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No, I'm not a Mormon. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:37, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I probably should explain more. I did react to the phrase &amp;quot;a Mormon not a Christian.&amp;quot; What went through my mind, and what I knew ''off the top of my head'' was: &amp;quot;Whoa! That's not right. Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, and the church is even called Church of ''Jesus Christ'' of the Latter-day Saints.&amp;quot; I also got just a little bit of steam up, because there '''is''' some discrimination against Mormons&amp;amp;mdash;assuming Mitt Romney runs I think we'll have plenty of chance to see this soon&amp;amp;mdash;and saying that Mormons aren't Christians sounds a little like an attack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, after I wrote what I knew off the top of my head, from my experience with Wikipedia and with college, etc. I've found that if you want to convince other people, instead of just telling them what you think, it helps if you can show them ''why'' you think that. So I decided to do a bit of very quick research. I figured that Mormons probably get asked this question a lot and that the official LDS church website would probably have something to say about it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First I found the passage I put in quotation marks above, the one that begins &amp;quot;Jesus Christ is the Son of God.&amp;quot; I probably should have stopped there, but when I saw that they actually have a &amp;quot;Frequently Asked Questions&amp;quot; page with answers to the questions &amp;quot;Are you Christians&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a Christian church?&amp;quot; I couldn't resist putting that in, too. I probably put in too much. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ben Franklin was a Deist --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:58, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's right... no time to look further but I'm pretty sure Franklin did not believe in the divinity of Jesus and did not belong to an organized Christian church. Guess the whole list needs checking? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homeschooled or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a minor edit to the Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart entry today reflecting the fact that he was homeschooled. This was almost immediateley changed back by dpbsmith, with the explanation that &amp;quot;he wasn't homeschooled as we know the term today&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, this is all well and good, except that in the article for omeschooling, his name is on the list of famous people who were homeschooled, with an internal link to theMozart article!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So which is it? Was he homeschooled or not?  And please, this is isn't an attempt to start a big discussion of the meaning of homeschooling etc. I'm just asking for some consistency between articles here. Either a person was homeschooled, in which case their entries should be amended to reflect that fact, or they should be removed from the list of &amp;quot;Famous people who were homeschooled.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait a bit to see what the consensus is, but if their names are still on that list in a few days, I'm going to fix those articles to reflect that fact.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TrueReaganConservative|TrueReaganConservative]] 13:40, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds&amp;amp;mdash;Emerson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing is that ''this'' article is sort of a hash. I haven't wanted to take this sorry article entire, shatter it to bits and remould it nearer to my heart's desire because I think it's here as a sort of inspiration to the students who use the site. It looks to me like one of those &amp;quot;X pride&amp;quot; lists where X is any group that is a little out of the mainstream and wants to encourage its members that it's OK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The quickest way to fix ''this'' article would be retitle the actual list something like &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This isn't really a factual article about homeschooling, it's a point-of-view piece that says that being educated at home not only does not put you at a disadvantage vis-a-vis public or private schools, it can be an advantage. ''This is very arguably true'' and the list is evidence in support of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What the list is ''not'' is a list of people who have undergone &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is a sort of movement, mostly in the U. S. I think, that began more or less in the 1970s. Around that time there was a noticable drop in public confidence in the public schools. Maybe I remember it had something to do with John Holt? ''How Children Fail?'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Homeschooling&amp;quot; to me does not mean simply being educated at home. It means that parents have ''actively opted out'' of an ''existing system of compulsory public schooling,'' and educate their children at home in order to assert direct personal supervision of the content and values that their children are being taught.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Calling Mozart (say) &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; is like calling Thomas Jefferson &amp;quot;a Republican&amp;quot; or William Gladstone &amp;quot;a Liberal&amp;quot; or asserting &amp;quot;Jimmy Carter and Joseph Stalin were both Georgians.&amp;quot; Technically true, but confusing at best. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:08, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll defer to the consensus view, but I don't see why Mozart should be eliminated.  He was homeschooled in a Christian manner.  What's the big deal about observing that fact?  I don't think there has to have been compulsory education in his day to make this observation meaningful.  At a minimum, Mozart is an example of someone who learned at home and excelled afterwards.  Probably his home education has something to do with his work.  This is information worth preserving, and let readers debate as they wish.  As Fox News says, &amp;quot;We report.  You decide.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==George Bernard Shaw==&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Bernard Shaw'''... hmmm... I don't think he would have cared for being labelled as a Christian. You can make out a case that he did accept some of the moral teachings of Jesus ''as Shaw, personally'' interpreted them. But in his will, he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My religious convictions and scientific views cannot at present be more specifically defined than as those of a believer in creative revolution. I desire that no public monument or work of art or inscription or sermon or ritual service commemorating me shall suggest that I accepted the tenets peculiar to any established church or denomination nor take the form of a cross or any other instrument of torture or symbol of blood sacrifice.[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,813999,00.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he was a Christian, he was an awfully complicated and unusual Christian. He certainly did not belong to any organized denomination. He wrote that there was “not a single established religion in the world in which an intelligent or educated man could believe.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He did write that &amp;quot;Christianity might be a good thing if anyone ever tried it.&amp;quot; And he wrote that &amp;quot;Christianity as a specific doctrine was slain with Jesus, suddenly and utterly.&amp;quot; That is, he did not think any organized Christian religions actually practiced the teachings of Jesus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wrote a lot about Christianity in his Preface to ''Androcles and the Lion.'' I'm not going to try to summarize it, partly because I haven't read it through in a long time, but also because Shaw's ideas are so very original and unorthodox that they are really hard to pigeonhole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He dealt with religious themes in his plays ''Saint Joan,'' ''Major Barbara,'' and ''Androcles and the Lion,'' and in their prefaces, but if you can tell &amp;quot;which side&amp;quot; he's on after reading those plays, you're better than I am.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also dealt with evolution, in the play ''Back to Methuselah'' and the Preface to it&amp;amp;mdash;in a way which will not please either evolutionists or creationists. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:10, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I question the inclusion of '''Mark Twain,''' similarly. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:32, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harpie Snark recently added John Walker Lindh, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Charles Fletcher Lummis, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Christopher Paolini to the list. I deleted them when reverting some vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm restoring Charles Fletcher Lummis and Christopher Paolini on his say-so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin D. Roosevelt attended Groton, an elite private prep school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Walker Lindh is a Taliban member and Adam Yahiye Gadahn is an Al-Qaeda member. I don't think they should go onto the list without a pretty good source citation, on the grounds that &amp;quot;extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,&amp;quot; or, in this case, surprising claims require good evidence. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:37, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Christopher Paolini is the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased).  I know he was home schooled, but have never seen anything about his beliefs.  I asked to judge by his writing, I would tend to think he is not a Christian based on some elements of his books such as the atheism of the elves.  So if anyone has a source for this, please post it. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 19:45, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Raw results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a source for his being home-schooled, anyway: [http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934 A profile of Christopher Paolini], &amp;quot;He was home-schooled by his parents, Kenneth Paolini and Talita Hodgkinson, through an accredited correspondence course at American School, Chicago, Illinois from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:16, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gadahn apparently was home-schooled: [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/27/CALIF.TMP 'Average American boy' accused as terrorist], Adam was the oldest of four children, all of whom were home-schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A lot of Google hits on Lindh being home-schooled, but it's all blogs... Some stuff about in Google Books about Lindh &amp;quot;beginning life as a Christian&amp;quot; but turning to Islam &amp;quot;in high school.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://knowledgehouse.info/famous.html This page] credits Lummis as begin home-schooled but does not itself cite its sources... No clear whether or not this is supposed to be a list of home-schooled ''Christians...'' FDR listed, Groton not explained... She also lists Paolini... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:27, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources: Adam Yahiye Gadahn: [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian New Yorker] John Walker Lindh: [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org] Franklin D. Roosevelt: [http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm National Park Service] [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 14:30, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good. Thanks. I appreciate it. I'm removing the Wikipedia references because Wikipedia itself does not consider Wikipedia articles reliable sources that can be cited in other articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:FDR: I'm adding a note to the FDR entry, because it seems to me to be a borderline case; I don't think private tutors and Groton would be everyone's idea of what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lindh: I don't really know what to make of the [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org BlessedCause] reference, both because I don't understand what the site is about... but in any case, I do ''not'' see where it identifies Lindh as being ''Christian'' homeschooled. In fact if I understand the article it says there's a dispute about where he went to school, and says that according to Houghton Mifflin, he went to a public middle school in Marin County&amp;amp;mdash;an assertion which the site attacks. The Wikipedia article says he was homeschooled starting at age 12, but does not say he was ''Christian'' homeschooled. Wikipedia's own source for that item (wrongly formatted in the article) is a web page entitled [http://www.rickross.com/reference/islamic/islamic56.htm The Making of John Walker Lindh]. I read it as saying that he was in and out of public schools, and I do not see anything to suggest that his homeschooling resembles what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gadahn: The source you cite says, pretty clearly I think, &amp;quot;Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups. (At the time, nearly all such groups in the region were Christian,&amp;quot; so I don't see any question that ''he'' was &amp;quot;Christian homeschooled.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, there's a problem of definition here... this article has never defined exactly what the criterion is for inclusion in the list. Gadahn would be a good example of someone who clearly did undergo &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling,&amp;quot; and certainly was &amp;quot;homeschooled,&amp;quot; but surely was not &amp;quot;a Christian&amp;quot; and therefore not a &amp;quot;homeschooled Christian.&amp;quot;  I think this could use some discussion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:36, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That strikes me as what will be viewed by our critics as pretty obvious nitpicking and cherrypicking of sources. Reading the sources I provided, it's clear that all three had Christian upbringings and were homeschooled, despite their subsequent failings. As for Adam Gadahn, &amp;quot;''The Gadahns homeschooled Adam''&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;''Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups''&amp;quot; are clear and explicit. There's no ambiguity there; Adam Gadahn was Christian homeschooled. And the source, The New Yorker, is as good as they get. [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] If we'd rather not have in the list those who were homeschooled but may be viewed as casting it in a poor light, then let's just come out and say that and not pretend that sources say something other than they do or rely on turns of semantics to contrive justifications for an incomplete list. If our ideas are indeed that strong and compelling, then they can easily withstand being scrutinized in full light of all facts, and to act otherwise by ignoring or dismissing unfavorable facts only undermines our position and claims and invites greater scrutiny. Better to just put all the cards on the table, deal with them and let the chips fall where they may. As I've said before on my talk page, either CP is going to have an accurate and complete article on homeschooling or it's going to have to censor information from it's articles which may be considered unfavorable to its stated orientation, it can't always have both. This is as good an article as any to choose which it's going be, right here, right now. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree that it is hard given this evidence not to list Gadahn. The others are less persuasive. We need to resolve whether this is a list of Christians who were homeschooled, people who were Christian homeschooled, people who are Christian who happen to have been homeschooled, or Christians who were Christian homseschooled (I think that covers the 4 obvious possibilities). [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:30, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I commented on Harpie's talk page but now realize that the debate is here. I'll only respond here now about this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As anyone familiar with homeschool support groups knows, simply hanging around a loosely affiliated group does not make one a &amp;quot;Christian homeschooler&amp;quot; any more than living in a neighborhood makes one a member of the majority religion.  The description of Gadahn is clear that he attended Christian homeschooling groups out of necessity, not by choice.  This does not make him a Christian homeschooler any more than attending Georgetown Univ. made Bill Clinton a Catholic college student.  As to Lindh, there is nothing Christian about his homeschooling or his own religion, so that's not even close.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Notice that if we can agree to let the title of the actual list be &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home,&amp;quot; that includes Mozart and excludes Lindh and Gadahn. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Frankly the only thing necessary for a run-of-the-mill homeschooler to be a Christian homeschooler is intent on the part of the parents to provide a proper Christian education and action by them to keep them out of school and deliver a superior quality education at home themselves. Reading the New Yorker article it seems clear that this was the intent of the Gadahn's for young &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Azzam&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Adam, no matter how terribly they failed:  [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] Now arguing that Adam Gadahn was not Christian homeschooled because he didn't chose to but rather was compelled to is a red herring; many Christian homeschooled children would prefer to be playing ''Left Behind: Eternal Forces'' rather than studying math, so by that standard not many Christian homeschooled children would qualify as being Christian homeschooled. Meaning this rationale again opens us up to the lefty criticism that we exclude unfavorable facts from our articles, in other words, engaging in partisan, ideologically-motivated censorship. So if Aschlafly as the owner of this site really wants to exclude Gadahn as he seems to, we'd better set to work coming up with a reasonable-appearing justification for doing so that has at least a veneer of scholary fairness; regardless of what our motivations are, I'd think we'd want to avoid appearing to be censoring unfavorable facts in order to further our agenda. Thoughts? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 19:58, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Harpie, there's no &amp;quot;censorship&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;exclu[sion]&amp;quot; here.  The New Yorker article simply does not support the claim that Gadahn was a Christian homeschooler.  The article says that, out of necessity, Gadahn was forced to associate with homeschool &amp;quot;support groups&amp;quot; for some of his teenage years.  That association not necessarily even education.  Every indication is that Gadahn was not Christian then, and is not now either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, I might add, nearly 99% of Christian homeschoolers start early.  It seems to me that both Gadahn and Lindh were latecomers to homeschooling long after their personalities and attitudes had formed.  Often the latecomers are just passing through and are not influenced much by homeschooling.  Contrast that with Mozart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I think Dpbsmith has proposed an ideal solution.  Certainly he captures the intent of the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:28, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Kind of like a book about &amp;quot;Famous Irish That Don't Drink&amp;quot;. This ''is'' a brilliant solution! Now I understand how to handle situations like this. Since we don't engage in censorship or exclusion, we just need to find the right way to frame the issue that by necessity keeps any unfavorable facts out. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 12:25, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love your sarcastic enthusiasm-- it '''''really''''' strengthens your points more than talking straight could ever hope to. Even so, Ashlafly has a good point; Dpbsmith accurately capptured the intent of the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 12:43, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, they say a little bit of honey makes the medicine go down better. Look, I've been in conservative political PR now for nearly 20 years and know a little something about crafting credible, effective messages, and we'd be a lot more credible and better off in the long term were we to follow the rationale I provided above. Our goal should not be to just get out the message, but to get out a credible and compelling one, and this subject and article is just one of many that will face this same issue. If we go around trumpeting our own version of reality while ignoring the one that is shared by all we run the risk of being caricatures of our own cause and ultimately all too easily dismissed by those we hope to convince. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expand this article==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not the person to do it. I know nothing about homeschooling, sent both of my kids to public schools (and state universities), hope I've got stuff sorta-kinda right, hope I haven't stepped on any toes, but, this should be an article where there's ''lots'' of expertise available. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:12, 28 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me be more emphatic. There could be a '''lot''' more factual material about homeschooling here. Resources. Books. Tips on dealing with the authorities and how to jump through the legal hoops (I assume there are still some to jump through). There's an obvious opportunity here for people to add encyclopedic material that is informed by their personal experience and expertise. Say someone wants to homeschool in New Jersey or whereever. What office do you go to? What forms do you fill out? etc. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:39, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think this is a good place to try to compile info about state homeschooling laws.  There are other places that specialize in that.  On the other hand, I agree that the article needs some serious work.  Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Parents take a more active role in the education of their children when they homeschool. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; I'm uncomfortable with this general statement - while in some (many) cases it is true, there are lots of active parents with kids in public or private school (especially small church schools, I'm guessing), and there are homeschooling parents who simply hire a tutor (or several) and let them have at it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The primary reason for homeschooling is to give the child a better education. A close second in reasons, however, is to avoid the culture of public school and its many adverse effects of hostility to Christianity and parental control, political bias, boredom, confusion, depression, etc.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, different families have different reasons for homeschooling, usually more than one.  Religion may (or may not) be a factor; so might the quality of education.  But there are other reasons - a child who is not being well-served by the public schools, a child who has a special talent or interest they wish to focus on, a family who wants to travel with dad on business, a family who lives in a very rural area far from schools (or who is sailing around the world, etc.), and so on.  Various surveys have been done trying to rank the reasons, but I think we'd be better off with a list of possible reasons rather than trying to rank them.  Homeschoolers are notoriously hard to count or survey. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In the United States, opting out of public schools is not new. When Thomas Edison's public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. But because of compulsory education laws—the first was passed in Massachusetts in 1852, and by 1918 every state had them—schooling at home was a violation of truancy laws, and was rare until the 1970s. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, *lots* of kids were educated at home in earlier centuries, and certain cultures (Native American?) may not have had &amp;quot;schools&amp;quot; at all back then.  Also, the 1852 date sounds too late to me, though I could be wrong - can we get a cite there?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just added one. There seemed to be one there already. Another, which reads well but not quite sure of the source, is [http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/compulso.html Compulsory Education]. Apparently Horace Mann&amp;amp;mdash;whose name is instantly familiar to me as an &amp;quot;educator,&amp;quot; but of whom I know little more&amp;amp;mdash;was active in getting them to do it. Massachusetts had ''public'' schools much earlier, but apparently they were not compulsory. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also - is there a reason for listing Christian homeschoolers?  Why not just list people who were educated at home (in one form or another), and then give a brief explaination of their situation - e.g. Sandra Day OConnor, educated at home when she was young as the ranch she lived on was very remote, or whatever.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of thoughts - hope they are helpful.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:49, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent homeschooled Christians? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By your own definition, you have to &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; of formal education to be considered &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;  Thus, I'm curious what system DaVinci, Washington, et al, opted out of.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 13:25, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's why, some time ago, I changed the title of the '''list''' to &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; Homeschooling as we know it in the United States essentially began in the 1970s. This very interesting article on [http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/homeschool/index.html Homeschoolers: Estimating Numbers and Growth] suggests that there were about a million homeschoolers circa 1998. However, in the &amp;quot;late 1970s and early 1980s&amp;quot; it says &amp;quot;about 10,000 to 15,000&amp;quot; children received their education at home. At a very rough guess, today's U. S. adult population probably includes less than 100,000 people over 21, probably less than 25,000 people over 30, and practically none over 40. Not a large population, and not enough time to become spectacularly high achievers... yet. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:34, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I changed the definition part to remove the &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; wording - it is somewhat an attempt to address your concern above, and also an attempt to put the emphasis on what homeschoolers *do* (learn outside of school), than what they *don't do* (go to school).  Not perfect, but a step in the right direction, I think.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:35, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree.  I think that this kind of simplistic list can be a bit meaningless.  Better would be a list of people with unconventional educations or minimal formal education with a brief explanation of their circumstances.  For example, you could say something like &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin - had one year of formal schooling, apprenticed with his brother as a printer.&amp;quot; (Or whatever - not sure of the details on Franklin, but you get the idea.)  I also think that whether the person was Christian could be handled similarly in the brief note, rather than in the heading.  In addition, I don't think *anyone* should be on the list unless there is a *citation* to a source explaining their education.  See my addition of Andrew Wyeth as an example. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nature of the list just boggles my mind.  It ignores the point raised by AmesG (which I still read into it despite the &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot; part) that &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; needs a formal alternative to have a meaningful definition.  Also, why only Christians? I'm still boggled... [[User:Human|Human]] 22:40, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drawbacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm moving this here for discussion. As it stands, it seems to me to be pure, unsupported personal opinion:&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is not without its drawbacks.  Studies have noted that children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts.  [http://justenough.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/homeschoolers-are-indeed-weird/]  This lack of legitimate socialization can produce difficulties in homsechooled childred engaging in meaningful relationships with individuals outside of their family.  Additionally, while the public school playground can be seen as a barbaric atmosphere to most kids who are schooled at home, it is important to note that these exigent circumstances can produce valuable conflict prevention skills that pay dividends in all facets of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt there are drawbacks to homeschooling. The claim that &amp;quot;children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts&amp;quot; is, however, referenced only to a blog entry by someone identified only as &amp;quot;Tammy,&amp;quot; no other identification or credentials&amp;amp;mdash;''and it does not support the statement.'' The title of the entry is &amp;quot;Homeschoolers are indeed weird,&amp;quot; but she does ''not'' say homeschoolers are less socialized&amp;amp;mdash;that's apparently [[User:Huey gunna getcha]]'s ''interpretation.'' She means &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; in a good way: tolerant of different opinions and not afraid to express individuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence about the &amp;quot;public school playground&amp;quot; providing &amp;quot;valuable conflict prevention skills&amp;quot; is plausible but unsupported. (By the way: are parochial school playgrounds, or non-school playgrounds very different?) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A friend once remarked that he was astonished whenever anyone made reference to &amp;quot;the happy sounds of children at play.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Haven't they actually paid attention when they pass a playground?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:19, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch!  I had read that article earlier today and put removing that section on my &amp;quot;to do&amp;quot; list - you beat me to it!  FWIW, when looking at homeschoolers and socialization, it's also important to consider that some children are not odd because they are homeschooled, rather, they are homeschooled because they are odd.  Homeschooling can be an understanding &amp;quot;safe haven&amp;quot; for those odd kids for whom school may be &amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot; indeed. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:48, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i was almost kicked off my baseball team cause i was homeschooled and i was playing for the middle school. i was fortunate to be kept on. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 20:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://learninfreedom.org/socialization.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/zysk1.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/HomeschoolingGrowsUp.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the thousands of references on Homeschooling and Socialization. As an educator and homeschool parent I have searched for years to find data that supports the claim that homeschoolers are lacking in good social skills. Having met hundreds of HS kids from all ages, I never found one that wasn't able in a wide variety of social situations. Indeed ''all'' of the HS teens I met were a delight to talk with and had no problems talking with adults on a wide range of topics, unlike thier Public or Private or Parochial schooled peers who always seem so sullen and distant around adults they don't know - and even those they do. After searching the academic journals and every other source I could look at, I found a lot of research on HS and Socialization and none that found widespread negative effects. While someone may find a kid here and there as an anecdote to say HS is isolating and promotes poor social development, I could probably come up with dozens of Public, private and parochial school kids to show the alleged deliterious effects of those types of schooling on the social skills of kids.   Third Day May 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snipping George Bernard Shaw and Mark Twain==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm removing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both men had complex opinions that varied during the course of their lives, but calling them &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is a stretch. My reasons for excluding Shaw are given above. As for Mark Twain, he did write a sympathetic book about Joan of Arc. However, his writings are replete with sarcastic and dismissive remarks about organized religion. He refused to let &amp;quot;Letters from the Earth&amp;quot; be published until after his death. In Mark Twain's Letters, we read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From a gentleman in Buffalo Clemens one day received a letter inclosing an incompleted list of the world's &amp;quot;One Hundred Greatest Men,&amp;quot; men who had exerted &amp;quot;the largest visible influence on the life and activities of the race.&amp;quot;  The writer asked that Mark Twain examine the list and suggest names, adding &amp;quot;would you include Jesus, as the founder of Christianity, in the list?&amp;quot; To the list of statesmen Clemens added the name of Thomas Paine; to the list of inventors, Edison and Alexander Graham Bell.  The question he answered in detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain's answer was that if the compiler of the list added Jesus, he should also add Satan: &amp;quot;From A.D. 350 to A.D. 1850 these gentlemen exercised a vaster influence over a fifth part of the human race than was exercised over that fraction of the race by all other influences combined.  Ninety-nine hundredths of this influence proceeded from Satan, the remaining fraction of it from Jesus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain has been labelled &amp;quot;deist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;agnostic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;atheist.&amp;quot; Gary Sloan suggests ([http://www.writerscramp.ca/archives/mark_twain.htm Mark Twain's Covert War with his Maker]) that he believed in a ''malignant'' God, and says &amp;quot;Viewing Satan as a heroic rebel against the real Archfiend, Twain came to identify with the fallen cherub and often used him as a mouthpiece.&amp;quot; Perhaps his views were so complex that he was all of these things and a Christian at the same time, but he was certainly not a Christian as the term is ordinarily meant. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:03, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But if they were homeschooled, shouldn't they be in the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; section of the list? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure. That section didn't exist when I removed them; it was a single list of Christians. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:25, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cleaning up the list - putting uncited people on the talk page==&lt;br /&gt;
The list of homeschooled people for whom there are no citations has been here for too long, IMHO.  I am moving these people here, to the discussion page.  I hope this is OK with all of you.  As each person's education is researched and cited, we can add them back to the list, preferably with a brief sentence explaining who they are and what form their education took (as we have now already for several people).  As discussed above, I think it will be easier to describe the religious beliefs of each person individually (if needed in this context), rather than try to decide if they are generically Christian or not. Please jump in and research one of these people so we can build up this article. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I left in Adam Yahiye Gadahn, John Walker Lindh, George Bernard Shaw, and Mark Twain, because their entries had *something* other than their names, and because they were discussed quite a bit here; however these can/should be improved by adding a brief description of who they are/were, adding a brief description of their education, and/or adding citations, preferably ones that describe their education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:29, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cleaned up the George Bernard Shaw entry.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:41, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it were up to me I'd make this list contemporary (20th century, maybe 19th too) personalities.  As it was pointed out earlier, as the homeschooling term is used today, the majority of these wouldn't count.  Also, way back in the day, practically everyone was homeschooled. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do we really need this comprehensive a list? Isn't it enough to point out a few folks who were homeschooled? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 12:28, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Folks, I saw that list from a source and have reinserted.  I took out the ridiculous Lindh reference and other liberal bias.  For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!  Frankly, this entry looked like something one would see on Wikipedia.  We're not trying to be like Wikipedia here.  Thanks and I'll try to find citations for the names I reinserted.  Help is welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I saw that list from &amp;quot;a source,&amp;quot; too, but it was just that: a list. Some homeschooling-related site. It did not say where the list came from nor did it give any sources at all. I think the list may be just bouncing around the Internet. What was ''your'' source? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!''  I'm not sure I agree with this.  It is not supported by the citation given for that paragraph.  In fact, religion was *third* in the list of reasons for homeschooling provided in the citation, with only 29.8% citing it as their most important reason. If you are going to assert this, it would be best to add an additional citation that backs it up. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:14, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html   According to the US Census, 33% cited Religion as a motivation for HS.  My citation is older than the one used in this article. Mine says 33% cite religion (not Christianity, but Religion) and the more recent survey cited by ASchafly says 29% cite Religion. Homeschoolin is becoming more and more popular and common and the fastest growing group of HSers are not citeing religion as thier motivation. This is a very interesting development. May 8 [Third Day]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK, fine, I'll look for citations and add them.  But I've personally taught over 120 homeschoolers, and I'd say religion is the motivation for 100 or so of them.  The other reasons given, such as avoidance of drugs in school, are not even factors for the vast majority of homeschoolers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Also, I will find more citations for the 61 people under the &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot; list and move them to the higher list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm guessing that your classes are taught from an Evangelical Christian perspective, which would make it less likely that non-Christians would sign up for them.  You may also know other Christian homeschoolers from church and other social activities.  In addition, Christian homeschooling groups often ask members to sign a statement of faith, effectively excluding those who aren't Christian - if one of these groups is your main contact with the homeschooling community, you will get a very skewed impression of the homeschooling population.  So it makes sense that the majority of homeschoolers you know are Christian and that they homeschool &amp;quot;to protect the Christian faith of their children and to preserve their family values.&amp;quot;  For many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers, this is a good thing - they want to raise their children in a community of people who share their beliefs and values.  But there have always been homeschoolers who are doing it for reasons of educational philosophy (wanting more of a child-led approach, or stronger academics than their local public school, or logistics (like if the family travels frequently due to Dad's job), or issues with their particular child (like Aspberger's syndrome), etc.), and this category is growing as homeschooling becomes more mainstream.  (Growing Without Schooling, a secular homeschooling magazine, started publication in 1977.)  In addition, some of those who homeschool for religious reasons are not Christian - they may be homeschooling to protect the Jewish faith of their children, for example.  Certainly personal experience is a useful data point, and surveying homeschoolers can be quite difficult.  Perhaps you can find some research to support your claim.  Let's just be careful when we extrapolate based on our own experiences.  We need to set a good example for our students.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:12, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment has some truth but lacks a sense of proportion.  Parents who homeschool to keep their kids off drugs are about 1/1000th as many as parents who homeschool for Christian purposes.  Your comments and edits to the entry seem to avoid recognizing the obvious:  the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  There is a whole college devoted to this market (Patrick Henry College).  How many colleges are there for atheistic homeschoolers?  Our entries need to reflect reality, and reality includes proportions.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I completely agree that keeping kids off of drugs does not, in my experience, drive a lot of parents to homeschool.  (On the other hand, I do not live in the inner city - my experience might be different than families in whose neighborhoods drugs are a more serious presence.)  I would still disagree, though, that the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  I know many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers who are homeschooling to preserve their children's Christian faith.  However, I also know many homeschoolers of other faiths, and many who are Christian or Catholic but for whom faith is not among their reasons for homeschooling.  I wrote the &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot; paragraph based on the study I cited.  I believe someone above cited another study, which also found that it was not the case that a majority of homeschoolers did so for religious reasons.  I am willing to believe that my personal observations and these two studies are not representative of the homeschooling population, if we can find something to back that up.  These are certianly not the only studies out there, and I think it would be good if we can find some other references to compare to them.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:40, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you define homeschooled?  Had some education at home?  A formal school education was available but did not attend?  Dropped out of school at age something? Without such a definition, many of the names on the list are frankly, silly and/or wishful thinking. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of this - Mark Twain is listed on the list.  From the biography of Mark Twain[http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml] it reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;In 1847, when Sam was 11, his father died. Shortly thereafter he left school, having completed the fifth grade, to work as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper. His job was to arrange the type for each of the newspaper's stories, allowing Sam to read the news of the world while completing his work.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 1847, a 5th grade education was quite sufficient for day to day life and working as an apprentice for a local newspaper was a reasonable continuation of his education.  It is not homeschooling.  It would probably be more useful to first put the person on the talk page and figure out if they were homeschooled and then added to the main page rather than put on the main page without refrence and then removed when they don't fit the definition (whatever that may be). --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:24, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, [[User:Mtur|Mtur]].  I have found several times in the past that someone on a list of this kind was not actually educated at home.  I think, if we are going for a high level of accuracy that befits an encyclopedia, we should do the research ourselves first, using the talk page to discuss.  Then we should add the person to the list, and be sure to explain how each person was educated.  I don't think we need to have a strict definition of homeschooling; rather, we should describe each person's experience.  The result will be a list with an interesting variety of approaches to education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added Mark Twain's famous quote, which is proof enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally, these lists abound on the internet.  I've added a cite.  No one really disputes that most or all of these people, and others too, were homeschooled.  We can continue to fill in cites, but there is no need to censor this info in the meantime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot; I don't think this is proof that he was homeschooled, only that he sees the difference between schooling and education, and realizes that education can come from places other than school. I'd like to know more about his education before adding him to the list.  (But your sandbox, etc, so I'll leave him there.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree that lists such as these abound - but here, a higher standard exists.  It is not censorship to be sure something is accurate before adding it to the article proper, and the information is available to all on the talk page while the research is being done.  Students who want to use these people as examples in their work should know enough about the individual's education to be sure it is indeed an example of what they are writing about.  Brief descriptions of the person's education, along with a cite or two about it, will be very useful to our readers.  A list without this information, not so much. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Sam was always a good-hearted boy,&amp;quot; his mother once remarked, &amp;quot;but he was a very wild and mischievous one, and, do what we would, we could never make him go to school.  This used to trouble his father and me dreadfully, and we were convinced that he would never amount to as much in the world as his brothers, because he was not near so steady and sober-minded as they were.&amp;quot;  At school, he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot;; outside of school he was the prototype of his own Huckleberry Finn, mischievous and prankish, playing truant whenever the opportunity afforded.  &amp;quot;Often his father would start him off to school,&amp;quot; his mother once said, &amp;quot;and in a little while would follow him to ascertain his whereabouts.  There was a large stump on the way to the schoolhouse, and Sam would take his position behind that, and as his father went past would gradually circle around it in such a way as to keep out of sight.  Finally, his father and the teacher both said it was of no use to try to teach Sam anything, because he was determined not to learn.  But I never gave up.  He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  I'm not sure that I would consider this to be homeschooling, especially as his truancy was against his parents' wishes, though he certainly had an autodidact's view of education.  I have added a fuller discription of his education to the article, so that readers can decide for themselves.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm breaking my self-imposed examtime exile to ask this question.  Isn't it kind of facetious to say that most of those people were homeschooled, when no formal schooling existed?  It's sort of like making a big fuss out of someone from the 1600s being a creationist - of course he was, there was no alternative!  Or, like saying, &amp;quot;Jesus didn't believe in global warming.&amp;quot;  Well... of course not.  The controversy didn't exist back then.  It creates an idea of conscious choice and rejection of an idea, when there was no such thing.  Example: Joan of Arc?  There were no formal schools in France at the time.  Put another way, could you name someone from before 1700 who was ''not'' homeschooled until college?  Just seems a little facetious to me.  K, back to the books.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 00:59, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point is not to say that someone succeeded by rejecting public school, but that someone succeeded from homeschooling.  The latter observation is true and meaningful regardless of whether public schools existed.  We don't care as much '''why''' someone was homeschooled as whether it was effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sure, I can think of people who lived before 1700 but were not homeschooled:  the illiterate, of whom there were many.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure, that's true.  But the point that others are making is that the tone of the article suggests that you're suggesting that they rejected public schools, or were part of the homeschooling &amp;quot;movement.&amp;quot;  Would you mind if I clarified it, to better express your point, or would you like to?  Perhaps something like, &amp;quot;Even before public schools were active, homeschooling produced many successful people worldwide.  Here are some examples&amp;quot;? -'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 01:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A previous version had such a statement - I think something like that should be included.  I would also argue that the statement &amp;quot;a disproportionate number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled&amp;quot; has not been cited or proved, and I'm not sure it's accurate or (from a historical perspective), even meaningful.  (See the Harvard discussion above, though of course college admittance is not a great measure of success in life - but that's a whole 'nother conversation.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The problem with your approach is that most of the people on the list did reject formal or public school, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think that's true for many of the historical figures.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the list, if it actually describes the education each person had, shows that there are a wide variety of approaches to education which can be successful.  This can be very useful in an age where educational standardization is being pushed - having all kids learn the same material in the same grade, etc.  It's also nice for homeschooled kids to see that they are not so much an oddity as part of a long line of people who did a significant amount of learning outside of school.  There's a reason you often see lists of successful minorities - it is very helpful to members of the minority group to havfe these role models, even if their lives aren't exactly parallel.  I agree that it's problematic to call it &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; before, say, the last 50-100 years, but &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;educated outside of formal schools&amp;quot; usually fits.  At the same time, I think a long list of names without individualized information about their education is not particularly useful, and quite frankly lowers the standard of research and accuracy here.  Again, we are setting an example for the students, homeschooled and not, who we expect will use this information in their work.  If we expect them to present work that is well-researched and cited from credible sources which are themselves clearly well-researched, shouldn't we be doing the same?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In place of the list ''in the article'', how about tagging each person's biography page with [[:Category:Homeschooled]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
#Anyone educated before 1850 was probably not given &amp;quot;[[compulsory education]]&amp;quot; in the Mann or Dewey sense. In ''[[Little Women]]'' Mrs. March kept Amy home and had Jo teach her. Nothing unusual about that. We need an article on [[Primary education]] or [[History of education]] that gets into that. What proportion of children were educated, and how well? When and where? The one-room schoolroom, or a huge mega-school divided into grades by age? How about [[Educational reform]]s or &amp;quot;fads&amp;quot; like [[Whole language]] and its attack on [[phonics]], the [[New math]] and its ineffective ways of teaching [[arithmetic]]? (I'm tutoring some of my friends' kids, and it's a nightmare trying to counter the knuckleheaded strategies they mandate for doing &amp;quot;[[word problem]]s&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's enlightening to have the list in one easy-to-access place.  It's striking.  You might add your Little Women point also.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Arguably, the category would be easier to access than an article and would be dynamically updated as new biographies were added.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 14:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As I said last night, the point is not that these individuals rejected public school (though many did), the point is that they achieved based on homeschooling.  Why they homeschooled is a separate, and less important, issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I like the idea of a &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; category.  However, I also like the list we are beginning to create here, assuming that we are careful to include a brief description of each person's education.  It's very informative and inspiring to see the wide variety of ways these people were educated.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christopher Paolini ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], could you explain why you deleted Christopher Paolini from the list?  He is a modern homeschooler, a best-selling author of a YA book series, and was clearly homeschooled.  The list entry (copied below), was detailed and cited.  Isn't this the kind of thing we want in the list?  I haven't read his books -- perhaps there is an issue with their content I am unaware of?  I'm not trying to challenge this decision, I just want to understand it.  (Or perhaps it was a mistake?) --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased). He was home-schooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Originally, it was a list of &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home&amp;quot; (well, actually it was &amp;quot;homeschooled Christians&amp;quot; but I proposed the title change to bypass issues about the meaning of the word &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;) This was the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;amp;oldid=10078 original list]. Paolini was added later, and there was some issue about whether he was Christian. I don't know whether that's why Aschlafly didn't include him, or whether Aschlafly just wanted to go back to a list whose sincerity he trusts... some people had fun from time to time adding names of individuals educated at home who are better described as &amp;quot;notorious&amp;quot; than as &amp;quot;high-achieving.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The list could have come from [http://www.home4schoolgear.com/famoushomeschooler.html here] or [http://www.christianhomeschoolers.com/hs_famous_homeschoolers.html here] or [http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm here] or [http://www.itwillpass.com/facts_famous_homeschoolers.shtml here]. There's probably one source for all of them but none of them credit it, much less give references for the individuals named being educated at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've seen many of these lists over the years, almost none with explanations.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Of the few I fact-checked, some had problems. All of these Web lists, for example, list Franklin D. Roosevelt without comment, but Groton is not ''my'' idea of being educated at home. Conservapedia's article is currently adequately clear about Roosevelt's education. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:03, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes - exactly.  That's why I keep going on and on about how important it is to give a brief description of each person's education - it shows the Conservapedia reader/user what form the person's education took (leaving the *reader* to decide if it counts as &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; for the reader's purposes), and in researching the brief description, we are also validating the list. I think it's just way more useful if it has been annotated in this way.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference 6==&lt;br /&gt;
I don't understand reference 6 in the article.  What does it refer to? [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 11:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's supposed to say &amp;quot;''ibid.''&amp;quot;  I think there is a wiki markup that can be used to refer to a previously cited link, which is useful in case someone puts another footnote in between the 1st and 2nd cites, screwing up the &amp;quot;''ibid''&amp;quot; concept.  But I forget how to do it. [[User:Human|Human]] 11:59, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;id&amp;quot; is short for &amp;quot;ibid&amp;quot;.  It's supposed to refer to the preceding reference, though it possible another reference was inserted between the two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use the &amp;quot;name&amp;quot; feature of the ref tag. Format the first reference like this, with the actual reference text:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format subsequent references like this:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated instances of the same reference name show up in the text with the same number. In the references section itself, the entry will contain links back to all the places in the text where the named reference appeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Markup:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Result:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disproportionate?==&lt;br /&gt;
There have been two introductory sentences to our list of prominent homeschoolers:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, a disproportionate{{fact}} number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled. Here is a growing list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some high-profile people have been educated at home, though it should be noted that prior to the 19th century most children worldwide were educated within their family. Here is a list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
:I think the first sentence is problematic because it makes a claim that is not supported by any kind of citation (''disproportionate'').  I also think it would be hard to prove such a claim, because people's education was so varied before the twentieth century.  For example, I don't mind including Mark Twain in our list of people educated outside of formal schooling, because I think he is an interesting case of someone who didn't have much of a traditional school-based education, yet went on to become a writer whose works are still in print a century later.  However, I think many people of his time had only a 5th grade education, so if we were going to seriously look at the numbers, I don't think we could count him as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;.  Can we work together here to come up with a sentence we can all agree on?  Here's my first attempt (below) - please feel free to use it as a starting point for creating something better.  Let's work on this here on the talk page until we reach consensus. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:47, 13 May 2007 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some prominent people have received some or all of their education outside of formal schooling.  (Note that prior to the 19th century, many children were educated at home.)  Here is a growing list of people whose educational backgrounds were quite different than today's norm.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling of Homeschooling==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] - Can I get some advice - I think you're probably the best person to ask.  The Williams article uses &amp;quot;''home-schoolers''&amp;quot;, which is largely rejected by the homeschooling community (at least in my experience).  Should it get a (sic), especially since the article here uses ''homeschoolers''?  (This whole spelling thing is a pet peeve of many homeschoolers.)  Oh, and nice job on the college paragraph - and a double super nice job on the Mothers Day article!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:49, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Re the &amp;quot;spelling thing:&amp;quot; it's an issue I was unaware of. What's disliked about the hyphen? For what it's worth, the American Heritage Dictionary says:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''homeschool'''&lt;br /&gt;
::VARIANT FORMS: or home-school&lt;br /&gt;
::VERB: Inflected forms: home·schooled, home·school·ing, home·schools&lt;br /&gt;
::TRANSITIVE VERB: to instruct (a pupil, for example) in an educational program outside of established schools, especially in the home.&lt;br /&gt;
::INTRANSITIVE VERB: To provide educational instruction in a homeschool.&lt;br /&gt;
::NOUN: A school operated outside established educational institutions, especially in a home.&lt;br /&gt;
::OTHER FORMS: homeschooler &lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.bartleby.com/61/30/H0253050.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their giving &amp;quot;home-school&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;variant&amp;quot; would justify a ''[sic]'', so let's do that. Unfortunately there's another question: is a homeschooler a ''teacher,'' as their definition suggests, and, if so, what is the right word for a homeschooled ''pupil?'' &lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, sure, for now let's just put in the [sic] without explanation... until someone feels like writing a section on terminology and usage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:37, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''What's disliked about the hyphen?''  OK - not sure if I can write this well enough to make sense, but here goes.  It's kind of like breastfeeding vs. breast feeding.  It's the difference between a noun modified by an adjective, vs. a noun with a separate meaning.  That is, breastfeeding is more than just feeding at the breast, more than just a different kind of feeding - it also provides antibodies to protect against disease, it has beneficial effects on mom's body, etc.  Thus it deserves a noun all to itself.  Same with homeschooling.  It's more/different than just schooling that happens at home.  Homeschooling includes opportunities and approaches to education that are dramatically different than what you'd find in school.  Homeschooling is also often integrated into family life, so much so that it is often impossible to differentiate between the two.  For example, reading a book for pleasure - for school kids, this is a &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; activity that has nothing to do with school.  For homeschoolers, it is both school and not-school, wrapped up in each other (though of course both sets of kids obviously learn from reading on their own).  In fact, homeschoolers talk about people doing &amp;quot;school at home&amp;quot;, which generally describes trying to re-create the school model in the home without taking advantage of any of the benefits unique to homeschooling.  It is not generally used in a positive context.  &amp;quot;Home schooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;home-schooling&amp;quot; is often seen in articles written *about* homeschoolers by someone else - many spell checkers will flag &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;, and many journalists will insist that their style guidelines don't allow &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  Nonetheless, almost everything written *by* homeschoolers uses the one-word form.  It's one of those &amp;quot;call members of a minority what they want to be called&amp;quot; issues.  (BTW - not trying to make a value judgment here - though I enjoy homeschooling, and it's been good for my kids, I think different kinds of schooling are appropriate for different kids &amp;amp; families - there is no &amp;quot;one best way&amp;quot; to educate children, IMHO.)&lt;br /&gt;
::As to who is the homeschooler, I would use &amp;quot;she is homeschooled&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooler&amp;quot; to refer to the student; &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooling mom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools her kids&amp;quot; to refer to the mom.  &amp;quot;She is a homeschooler&amp;quot; referring to the mom is less common, I think because mom can't homeschool without the kids, but I would hesitate to call it incorrect - I would prefer &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;They are homeschoolers&amp;quot;, referring to the family, is appropriate.  I guess when you're referring to the students and teacher(s) collectively it's right to call them all homeschoolers, but not so much the teacher by herself.  (Excuse the sexist language here!)  &lt;br /&gt;
::Note that in some states there is language that comes from the laws in that state.  In some states, homeschoolers must be enrolled in some kind of &amp;quot;umbrella school&amp;quot; which provides oversight - technically, these are private school students.  In Britain, homeschoolers are &amp;quot;educated otherwise&amp;quot; (if I remember right), from a phrase in their law.  In Pennsylvania law there is no such thing as homeschooling - children are &amp;quot;home educated&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;privately tutored&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;enrolled in a public cyber-charter school&amp;quot; - this last one is very controversial, as most independent homeschoolers insist that students in schools run by the government are not homeschoolers, even if they do school at home.  (Got that?!  Public cyber-charter schools are essentially publicly-funded internet-based correspondence schools.)  The idea here is that we must be careful not to confuse, especially in the mind of the general public and the legislature, traditional self-funded homeschooling and publicly-funded school-at-home.  The concern is that such confusion could lead to more governmental oversight - if government money is being spent, then accountability (and control, and standardization) soon follows, and with accountability homeschoolers tend to be forced into doing things in a very school-at-home way, which many of us feel takes away the most effective parts of homeschooling.  But that's a whole 'nother can of worms.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Got it. Well articulated. The points about publicly-funded officially-supervised schooling at home is interesting. I think these topics ought to be touched on in the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:36, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that all the famous people home schooled are very old or even dead?  Hard to imagine Stephen Hawking being home schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling as a modern phenomenon has only been around for a short time.  As most people who become famous for Great Things do so later in life, it will be a while before the results of this Grand Experiment emerge.  In addition, many Christian homeschoolers aspire to paths that don't typically result in fame, such as missionary work, etc.  Still, point taken - we should add some modern folks.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:39, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Realizing that homeschooling is primarily an alternative to public schools. Most homeschooling parents homeschool their children because for whatever reason they are dissatisfied with the public schools. I think that it harms the credability of this website to smack the label of homeschooling on anyone who predates public schools as we now think of them; ''most'' people back then would fit the loose standard for &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; on this page. For example, Jesus is listed as &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot;. There is really can be no evidence for this and even if ther was his education would probably not fit our idea of homeschooling today--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:49, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daniel Webster - Homeschooled?  Or not so much?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not convinced that Daniel Webster can be described as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;, even though he got some college-prep tutoring.  Here's what I've found about his education, combined with what [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] has written.  FWIW, the Dartmouth site is the most extensive, with lots of useful quotes from primary sources; the Notable Names site ''(&amp;quot;updated as weather permits&amp;quot;)'' seems the least scholarly, but I'm not finding much contradiction.  There is a heck of a lot of schooling here, at a level way beyond most people of his time.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:39, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Daniel Webster]] (1782-1852), prominent U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, recognized as one of the greatest orators in history.  As the author of the first American dictionary, he is considered the father of the English language in America.  Born in Salisbury, N.H., he attended district schools&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biographical Directory of the United States Congress:  Daniel Webster[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=W000238]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a young lad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He attended [[Phillips-Exeter Academy]] for about nine months in 1794. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notable Names Database Weblog:  Daniel Webster[http://www.nndb.com/people/445/000024373/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Webster was then tutored by the Rev. Samuel Wood to prepare him to pass the rigorous oral exam required for entrance to Dartmouth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In August of 1797&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801:  The Road to Dartmouth[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, at the age of 16,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he enrolled in Dartmouth College, from which he graduated in 1801.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/exhibit.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Why doesn't this prove that Daniel Webster was homeschooled for high school?  In addition, the passing reference about attending &amp;quot;district school&amp;quot; before that would not have amounted to much in the 1700s, particularly in New Hampshire.  Those schools were not full-time school like today, and he would likely have learned the basics at home.  The other links to Webster don't even mention the &amp;quot;district schools.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've been a bit confused about when he was at Exeter - looking into it further, according to a biography he wrote in 1829, he entered in May, 1796 and he left in Jan 1797.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE - Online Resource Library:  Daniel Webster, Autobiography, 1829[https://www.osv.org/learning/DocumentViewer.php?Action=View&amp;amp;DocID=1077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was with Rev. Woods for no more than 7 months - he started in Feb 1797 and by Aug 1797 he had entered Dartmouth.  As to the district schools, it sounds like his family went to great lengths to have him attend them.  From the same source:  ''My father seemed to have no higher object in the world, than to educate his children, to the full extent of his very limited ability. No means were within his reach, generally speaking but the small town schools. These were kept by teachers, sufficiently indifferent, in the several neighborhoods of the township, each a small part of the year. To these I was sent, with the other children.  When the school was in our neighborhood, it was easy to attend; when it removed to a more distant district* I followed it, still living at home…When it removed still further, my father sometimes boarded me out*, in a neighboring family, so that I could still be in the school.''  I don't think we can ignore this, even if he, like many &amp;quot;youngest kids&amp;quot;, learned to read from his mother or siblings at home.  I can see your point, but I think it's a stretch to include him.  Let's hear what other folks think.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:27, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The Phillips-Exeter dates look wrong.  People don't start high school in May at age 17.  Nor would it make sense for Rev. Woods to tutor Webster for only a few months.  There is at least a three year gap there to prepare for college, as one would expect, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:25, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He would have been about 14 (1796 minus 1782), which jives with a couple of other sources which mention his age but not the year.  The 1794 date comes from the Notable Names Database Weblog article, which doesn't look particularly scholarly and includes no citations.  We could work it out more accurately if we looked up his birthday.  [Why don't I do that!  He was born January 18, 1782, which would make him 14 in May of 1796 when he entered Exeter (according to the autobiography quote), and 15 (give or take a few days) when he left.  He would have started with Rev. Wood at 15, and been almost 16 (well, 15 1/2) by the time he began Dartmouth in Aug 1797.]  I agree that May sounds like an odd time to start school, but I believe the British system, on which Phillips-Exeter may have been modeled, has different terms (semesters) than we are used to.  14 is the right age for high school today, and I do believe Dartmouth as to the dates he was there.  Perhaps we can find more information to verify or refute the Exeter dates.  Don't forget that Rev. Woods had planned to have Webster for longer:  ''Mr. Wood put me upon Virgil and Tully; and I conceived a pleasure in the study of them, especially the latter, which rendered application no longer a task... In the spring I began the Greek grammar, and at midsummer Mr. Wood said to me: &amp;quot;I expected to keep you till next year, but I am tired of you, and I shall put you into college next month.''  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He also said that he was ''miserably prepared, both in Latin and Greek'', which is not surprising if he only studied for a few months!  (Same source)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, here we go.  Phillips Exeter themselves put the date as May 14, 1796, age 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phillips Exeter Academy:  Academy Chronology[http://www.exeter.edu/libraries/4513_4622.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:59, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wright Brothers - Homeschooled?  Or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says:  &lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[The Wright Brothers|Orville and Wilbur Wright]], inventors of the airplane.  They did attend some school, but also learned at home from their father, who was a conservative minister, and their mother, who was the top mathematician in her college class.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/family.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neither Wright Brother earned a high school diploma, let alone college, and Orville Wright left high school after his junior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/trivia.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking at the sources given, I saw that both brothers went to school, that Wilbur earned a high school diploma (but never picked up his certificate), and Orville left after 11th grade.  While their parents taught them some interesting things (as do all good parents), I didn't see anything that implied that this was ever in lieu of going to school.  While I'd love to claim these two as &amp;quot;one of us&amp;quot; (homeschoolers, that is), the sources given don't seem to give me any grounds to do so.  Am I missing something?  I'd like us to have a strong, well-researched list of people with interesting educational backgrounds.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:22, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
I have cleaned up the two lists of homeschoolers based on the discussions above.  I have removed the Wright Brothers and Daniel Webster - if further research and discussion in the sections above shows them to be homeschoolers, we can add them back in.  I have also moved two people from the first list to the second, because they didn't have any explanation of their education or any references.  Because of our experience with the Wrights and Webster, we must view anyone on a &amp;quot;Famous Homeschooler&amp;quot; list we find on the internet with skepticism - they ''may'' have been homeschooled, but we should be careful to document their actual education before adding them to the first list.  It would probably to be a good idea to change the paragraph introducing the second list to make it clear that these people have not been researched or verified as homeschoolers.  By the way, thanks to everyone who has contributed to this article - I think it is shaping up nicely!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been researching Joan of Arc's education, and I'm not sure it qualifies as homeschooling, at least as we think of homeschooling today.  She was taught religion and domestic skills by her mother, as are most girls, then and now.  She could not read or write, and I found nothing about her going to school or being taught any academic skills.  So while (like most children of her time) she did not go to school, and while I have great respect for traditional women's skills and the way they have been passed from mother to daughter for centuries (regardless of whether the daughters also went to school or not), I don't think I would consider this to be &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; - it is, IMHO, &amp;quot;mothering&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;raising your daughter&amp;quot; - the kinds of things that most mothers do for their daughters.  Below are a few quotes.  Thoughts? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:07, 19 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. Joan would later say, &amp;quot;As for spinning and sewing, I fear no woman in Rouen.&amp;quot; And again, &amp;quot;It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''She never learned to read or write but was skilled in sewing and spinning...''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;It was from my mother that I learned the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, and the Credo&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;to sew linen fabrics and to spin wool, and when it comes to spinning and sewing I fear no woman...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biography of Joan of Arc[http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is homeschooling.  There is no requirement that homeschooling include a particular curriculum.  Joan of Arc should be included.  It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.  I'll revert the deletion of her name, even using your cites above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.''  I'm not sure what you mean here - do you mean that most mothers don't teach religion at all?  Or that most mothers of public-schooled children don't?  I'm talking here of religious families.  If those mothers (and of course fathers) don't teach their children religion, who does?  I think that, in a devout home, most kids learn the Lord's Prayer etc. (or whatever prayers are appropriate for their religion) from their mother or their father - hearing their parents say them daily, during mealtime and bedtime prayers, etc.  They also hear it from other family members and in church.  It's woven into the fabric of their family life.  I think that's even more the case in Joan of Arc's time.  In a devout home, children learn these things even before they are of school age.  In addition, girls throughout history learned spinning and sewing because that was their job in the family - the same way children today learn to load the dishwasher or to mow the lawn.  Is it homeschooling?  I can see both sides of it, and if you feel strongly that Joan of Arc should be included, then that's OK with me.  But in terms of our list of famous homeschoolers, I don't think it makes sense to individually list all those people from earlier times who learned religion and basic life skills (and maybe even a trade) from their parents and never even had the opportunity to go to school.  Perhaps it would be best to address it by writing a paragraph explaining that learning by your parents' side was the norm for the vast majority of people in those days - going to school was only for the elite.  We could rename our list  &amp;quot;Prominent people of the Modern Era who were educated at home&amp;quot; - well, &amp;quot;of the modern era&amp;quot; isn't great, but I'm sure we could think of something better - &amp;quot;Of the last 350 years&amp;quot; perhaps. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:29, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  This isn't complex.  No, most parents of public-schooled children do NOT teach their children the things that Joan of Arc learned at home.  Were most children who went on to achievement homeschooled at the time of Joan of Arc?  I don't know, but that fact does not affect whether Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  She was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:53, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, by this logic you could include every human being prior to about 1700, and even most humans after 1700.  In Joan of Arc's time, there were no public primary schools, therefore nearly everyone was educated by their parents.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 14:42, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, that doesn't follow.  Not everyone who failed to attend a [[public school]] was homeschooled.  Ever heard of [[Plato's Academy]]?  That was a few years before 1700.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point of this entry is not to criticize [[public schools]] anyway.  But if you want to insert a ''supported'' statement that [[public schools]] did not exist before 1700, please go ahead and do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plato's academy was the equivalent of secondary and post secondary education, not primary education.  Children learned to read and write from their parents, and so it follows that if their parents couldn't read or write, then the children almost certainly wouldn't be able to either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even into Joan of Arc's time, formal education was the province of the noble classes and what little group schooling existed was conducted by the church, not the state.  Since most people were not members of a noble family, they would not have been educated in a group setting, but instead instructed by their parents.  It wasn't until the advent of state sponsored public schooling that formal education became more widespread.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I realize that your goal is to present homeschooling as superior to public schooling, and you think that by presenting these towering giants of history as homeschooled that it helps your case, but the truth is that what you call homeschooling was the de facto method of learning for the vast majority of humanity the world over, and the handful of great individuals that arose from it are a measure of statistics, not of the superiority of the home-school.  Certainly, if you're the child of a Bill Gates or a Richard Feynman you might get more at the foot of your parent than in an average public school, but if you're the son of Joe Ditchdigger or Jane Grocery Bagger then you're likely better off in a public school.  A parent who is not well educated themselves is unlikely to be able to instruct their children to become better educated than they are.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 15:56, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== George Washington Carver ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yet again, when researching someone on the &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list, I've come up with little support for the argument.  George Washington Carver, born a slave, didn't go to school until age 10, but I'm not sure I would call his education before this &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  More accurately, his education was delayed until he could attend school.  The lack of schooling is '''not''' the same thing as homeschooling.  What do you all think?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:26, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''Carver was born a slave near Diamond, Missouri, during the American Civil War (1861-1865). Around age ten he left the farm where he was born and traveled through the Midwest doing odd jobs to support his education. Carver studied constantly and attended schools wherever possible, finally graduating from high school in Minneapolis, Kansas, in 1885. That same year he passed the entrance examination at Highland College in northeastern Kansas. But when school officials learned he was black, he was prevented from attending.  In 1891 Carver was admitted to the Iowa State College of Agricultural and Mechanical Arts (now Iowa State University) in Ames. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in 1894, becoming the first black to graduate from the college. After graduation, Carver was appointed to the faculty as an assistant botanist. While teaching, he pursued his master’s degree, studying fungus diseases and classification of plants. In 1896 he received his master’s degree. That year, at the invitation of American educator Booker T. Washington, Carver became the director of agricultural research at Tuskegee Institute, where he remained for the rest of his life.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSN Encarta Encyclopedia - George Washington Carver article[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761574196/Carver_George_Washington.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:''He began his formal education at the age of twelve, which required him to leave the home of his adopted parents. Schools segregated by race at that time with no school available for black students near Carver's home. He moved to Newton County in southwest Missouri, where he worked as a farm hand and studied in a one-room schoolhouse. He went on to attend Minneapolis High School in Kansas. College entrance was a struggle, again because of racial barriers. At the age of thirty, Carver gained acceptance to Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa, where he was the first black student. Carver had to study piano and art and the college did not offer science classes. Intent on a science career, he later transferred to Iowa Agricultural College (now Iowa State University) in 1891, where he gained a Bachelor of Science degree in 1894 and a Master of Science degree in bacterial botany and agriculture in 1897.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Washington Carver, By Mary Bellis[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa041897.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leonardo da Vinci==&lt;br /&gt;
Here is another from the Arguably Homeschooled list for whom I've been able to find little evidence of homeschooling.  Perhaps further searching will turn up more.  Until then, I suggest we take da Vinci off the list.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''In Vinci Leonardo went to school. Vasari told that teachers of Leonardo da Vinci were despaired about all the questions and doubts of Leonardo. Leonardo learned at school to write, to read and to calculate. Also he was taught in geometry and Latin. Later Leonardo tried to improve his knowledge in Latin, because he thought that he didn't learn enough at school in Latin. Perhaps this is the reason why Leonardo did his notes in Italian.  Leonardo lived in Vinci until 1466. With the age of 14 Leonardo moved to Florence where he began an apprenticeship in the workshop of Verrocchio.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leonardo da Vinci[http://www.kausal.com/leonardo/childhood.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Our &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list is proving to be very inaccurate.==&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand the logic of having the list in the article, I am finding so many people on the list to have educational backgrounds that I would not consider to be homeschooling that I think we need to reconsider.  I suggest we move the list back to the talk page - the level of error is just too high to consider this list credible. Once researched, people who are shown to actually have been educated at home can be put on the &amp;quot;Prominent people who were educated at home&amp;quot; list, along with an explanation of their education and citations showing the facts.  Thoughts?  Opinions? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed.  Some very basic fact checking shows that a number of the people on the list were clearly not homeschooled.  Both were added by Mr Schlafly.  Andy, are you just pulling these names from your nether regions, or did you bother to check if what you were posting was actually accurate?  I notice you've removed some of my additions, who were certainly homeschooled since they lived in countries without formal education systems.  Why was this done, Andy?  Because they weren't Christian?  I thought Non Christian Conservatives were welcome here...  that's what your front page says.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 22:11, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Dropouts vs. Famous Homeschoolers==&lt;br /&gt;
This reference &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Education Reform.net - List of Successful Dropouts [http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, currently in the Arguably Homeschooled section, is a list of dropouts, not a list of homeschoolers.  While some overlap is possible, and a few people on the list are indeed arguably homeschooled, most are not.  I do not think we should be equating dropouts with homeschoolers.  I think we should keep the reference here on the talk page, to get ideas for adding to the list of Prominent People who were Educated at Home.  I think it may be a good idea to remove it from the Arguably Homeschooled section.  Thoughts?  Input?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:40, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Henri Poincaré==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a bit confused about Poincare's education.  While I have found several references stating that his mother tutored him, it's unclear whether this was just during his illness with diphtheria.  It's unclear when he was ill, or how long he was ill.  He entered school at age 8 and stayed there 11 years, going on to higher education after that.  Most of the references I found seem to rely on (or copy) the entry from the Encyclopedia Britannica, which is not clear.  Personally, I'm not comfortable calling him &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; without further clarification of his education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:47, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Henri was &amp;quot;... ambidextrous and was nearsighted; during his childhood he had poor muscular coordination and was seriously ill for a time with diphtheria. He received special instruction from his gifted mother and excelled in written composition while still in elementary school.&amp;quot;  In 1862 [when he would have been about 8] Henri entered the Lycée in Nancy (now renamed the Lycée Henri Poincaré in his honour). He spent eleven years at the Lycée and during this time he proved to be one of the top students in every topic he studied. Henri was described by his mathematics teacher as a &amp;quot;monster of mathematics&amp;quot; and he won first prizes in the concours général, a competition between the top pupils from all the Lycées across France.  Poincaré entered the École Polytechnique in 1873, graduating in 1875. He was well ahead of all the other students in mathematics but, perhaps not surprisingly given his poor coordination, performed no better than average in physical exercise and in art. Music was another of his interests but, although he enjoyed listening to it, his attempts to learn the piano while he was at the École Polytechnique were not successful. Poincaré read widely, beginning with popular science writings and progressing to more advanced texts. His memory was remarkable and he retained much from all the texts he read but not in the manner of learning by rote, rather by linking the ideas he was assimilating particularly in a visual way. His ability to visualise what he heard proved particularly useful when he attended lectures since his eyesight was so poor that he could not see the symbols properly that his lecturers were writing on the blackboard.  After graduating from the École Polytechnique, Poincaré continued his studies at the École des Mines.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jules Henri Poincaré[http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is completely clear that he was homeschooled at least until age 8.  The date of entry in the Lycee high school seems too early, and it seems unlikely he spent 11 years in high school.  Regardless, he was homeschooled in learning the fundamentals of reading and math, and likely learned far more from his &amp;quot;gifted&amp;quot; mother.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:49, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Citation needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled...''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], much as I, as a homeschooling mom, would love to believe this, we simply cannot state it in the article without backing it up with a citation.  Everything we post here must be true and verifiable.  We must always cite and give credit to our sources.  We must be careful not to post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry like this.  These are Conservapedia's rules, not mine, and they are good ones. Let's show our students that we are serious about the rules by leading by example - we must stick to the rules if we expect others to do so. Thus, we need a credible citation for this statement. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:59, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That sentence introduces the paragraph and list of examples that support it, with citations.  4 out of the top 4 modern mathematicians were homeschooled.  That's 100% of the smartest group of achievers.  The person considered the greatest president (Abraham Lincoln) was homeschooled.  That's 100% of the top.  The greatest female military leader was homeschooled.  That's 100%.  It's not just one citation that backs up the sentence, it is many citations and examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Hsmom, your repeated objections, like your objection above to the undisputed fact that Joan of Arc was homeschooled, are getting tiresome.  Add some content to the entry rather than object to the facts, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it really accurate to say that Joan of arc was &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; in the sense of the word that this article is about. Not a lot of kids - and even fewer girls - of the lower classes got much schooling of ANY type during the Middle Ages. Most, if not all of children's education, what precious little of it there was for French peasants, would have been at home. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 17:40, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, so Joan of Arc and many others were homeschooled in her class and time period.  That doesn't detract from the point:  Joan of Arc was homeschooled and then became one of the greatest military leaders of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your criticism has been raised by others in the past, all of whom view this entry as tit-for-tat, homeschooling versus alternatives.  But that's not what this entry is about.  This entry simply proves that homeschooling has been extraordinarily successful in its own right, regardless of alternatives.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fair Inclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to add William Bonney (Billy the Kid) and John Wesley Hardin, two famous American outlaws, and they keep getting deleted. I don't understand why. Both are certainly prominent, and both are homeschooled at least to the same extent as inclusions like Lincoln, Twain, and Joan of Arc. Obviously they don't paint a rosy picture of homeschooling, but doesn't blocking their entry present only one side of the argument (the pro-homeschooling side)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Provide some evidence for your claims, as required by our [[rules]].  Homeschooled means schooled at home, not running away from home.  Obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:58, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't be a jerk, dude.  This site lists &amp;quot;prominent&amp;quot; home-schooled individuals, not all of them.  Also, this is not your site.  Why do you think it should play by your rules?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Many of the people on this list were not obviously schooled at home. Twain is a clear example. Lincoln read at home but was not &amp;quot;schooled&amp;quot; by anyone, and people like the Roosevelts and Shaw studied with professional tutors, clearly not an analogy for the parent-lead homeschooling of today. Bonney's school experience is essentially a direct parallel of Twain's, and Hardin was taught by his father, just like Mozart. If your complaint is truly a source issue, I'm happy to go dig up a biography or two, but short of that I can see no reason for not including these two. For most of history people didn't have anything like modern access to public schools, which means that for most of history bad people got their education in pretty much the same way as people like Joan of Arc. Just trying to be fair here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: So you're saying that Lincoln schooled himself at home???  Could be ... but that's still homeschooled.  Private tutors is also homeschooling, as many of us homeschoolers can attest.  You seem to be saying that Hardin and Mozart were taught by their fathers.  That's not homeschooling?  Of course it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm open to unbiased improvements to the article.  I don't know the details of Twain, for example.  I do know that 5 out of the top 5 mathematicians post-Napoleon were homeschooled, and there are few if any errors on this list.  If you can make unbiased improvements by adding information, please do.  If you can't believe the list, then perhaps you want to open your mind a bit first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:37, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reason for rollback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't insert {{fact}} when the statement is supported the sentences that follow it.  When in doubt, use this page to express your opinion rather than senseless inclusion of multiple {{fact}}--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:48, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, since you mention it, I was wondering why you removed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; from the statement saying Ansel Adams is the best photographer of the twentieth century. It's certainly a very bold and opinionated statement (maybe someone is more a fan of [[Alfred Stieglitz]]) and I figured it needed backing up.--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:22, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The next sentence supports the statement.  Open your mind a bit, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:33, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, perhaps we can reach a compromise. Instead of adding a {{fact}}, why don't we just add the word 'arguably' to the sentence. That way, we're both happy. Eh?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:39, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233576</id>
		<title>Talk:Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233576"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:39:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Reason for rollback */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Private Tutoring== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does private tutoring really count as homeschooling? I don't see why it should. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:01, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homschoolers at harvard.==&lt;br /&gt;
I read it some were, but it is true that 10% of students in a classroom at Harvard were homseschooled. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:38, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:For a claim like that, I doubt &amp;quot;I read it somewhere&amp;quot; works; finding a citation shouldn't be hard if it's true, though. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will try to find it.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:42, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Great!  Find a citation *first*, then feel free to add it to the article.  Since only about 2% of kids are homeschooled, it would be astounding to find 10% at Harvard.  Also note that 10% in a particular classroom is not the same as 10% of the Harvard student body.  If your statement is true, then it deserves much more prominence in the article.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:45, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alright I found the information, but I was wrong. 10% of the Students accepted are homeschooled.:) so am I.... not going to Harvard though. so if you still want the link i can get it, or if not, no problem. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:53, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::First, make sure it's 10% of accepted students are homeschooled, not 10% of homeschooled applicants are accepted.  Then go ahead and add it, just make sure you quote it properly (very important for statistics) and include the citation, including the title, etc. so it will show up nicely in the references section.  Thanks for adding to this article!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:56, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Who are you by the way mom? I mean you sound like you have been here longer than I have, and thats a long time.ok here is the link: [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked/ homeschoolers at Harvard]  --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:59, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm a homeschooling mom, of course!  &amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;.  Will, the statistic was what I suspected.  It said that homeschoolers have an acceptance rate of 10%, which is the same as the general acceptance rate at Harvard.  On the one hand, it doesn't show homeschoolers doing any better than anyone else, but on the other hand, it does show they can do *as well as* anyone else.  Why don't you do a bit more research and write a paragraph about homeschoolers getting into college?  The one in the article is a good model - I bet you can find a few other sources too, and come up with something quite worthwhile!  Now I'm off to do my housework, but will check back to see what you've come up with!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:04, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Boston Globe article is excellent, it's a real &amp;quot;find.&amp;quot; I'm going to follow Hsmom's lead and let Will N. draft something rather than do something with it myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't figure out exactly what the sentence means: &amp;quot;At Harvard, the acceptance rate of the general applicant pool is about 10 percent, which mirrors the success of home-schoolers.&amp;quot; I read it the same way Hsmom does, but it's not perfectly clear. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it says specifically that the acceptance rate of homeschoolers at ''Williams College'' (a famous, excellent, old, small liberal arts college) is 20 percent. And [http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm this article] says that William's general acceptance rate is 19.2%. In other words, a homeschoolers are exactly as successful in gaining admission to Williams as anyone else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key point to be made, which should be supported with well-chosen quotations from the Globe article, is that homeschoolers are just as successful at being admitted to major colleges as others, and that these days college admissions offices are familiar with homeschooling and have no problem with it. I like the line: &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers' applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not discriminated against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If homeschoolers are about as successful at getting accepted as the general population, and if homeschoolers currently amount to something like 2% of all students, then ''presumably'' the percentage of Harvard students who were homeschooled would be 2%. 2% of 6700 = about 130 in all. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:01, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would dispute saying Patton was a Christian as he believed in reincarnation (show me where this is in line with scripture)&lt;br /&gt;
Brigham Young was a Mormon, not a christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mormons consider themselves to be Christians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The official name of their church is ''The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (&amp;quot;LDS Church&amp;quot; for short). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See material I've just moved to [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Mormons' relationship to Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One dictionary definition of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus.&amp;quot; It seems to me that Mormons meet that definition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who ought to make the judgement, among all the denominations that regard themselves as Christian, which are &amp;quot;really Christian?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:10, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P. S. The question of what Mormons believe is sure to receive a lot of discussion in a year or so, since Mitt Romney, a Mormon, is running for President. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:14, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you a Mormon? Not to be prejudiced against you if you are but just wondering. &lt;br /&gt;
Will N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No, I'm not a Mormon. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:37, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I probably should explain more. I did react to the phrase &amp;quot;a Mormon not a Christian.&amp;quot; What went through my mind, and what I knew ''off the top of my head'' was: &amp;quot;Whoa! That's not right. Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, and the church is even called Church of ''Jesus Christ'' of the Latter-day Saints.&amp;quot; I also got just a little bit of steam up, because there '''is''' some discrimination against Mormons&amp;amp;mdash;assuming Mitt Romney runs I think we'll have plenty of chance to see this soon&amp;amp;mdash;and saying that Mormons aren't Christians sounds a little like an attack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, after I wrote what I knew off the top of my head, from my experience with Wikipedia and with college, etc. I've found that if you want to convince other people, instead of just telling them what you think, it helps if you can show them ''why'' you think that. So I decided to do a bit of very quick research. I figured that Mormons probably get asked this question a lot and that the official LDS church website would probably have something to say about it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First I found the passage I put in quotation marks above, the one that begins &amp;quot;Jesus Christ is the Son of God.&amp;quot; I probably should have stopped there, but when I saw that they actually have a &amp;quot;Frequently Asked Questions&amp;quot; page with answers to the questions &amp;quot;Are you Christians&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a Christian church?&amp;quot; I couldn't resist putting that in, too. I probably put in too much. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ben Franklin was a Deist --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:58, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's right... no time to look further but I'm pretty sure Franklin did not believe in the divinity of Jesus and did not belong to an organized Christian church. Guess the whole list needs checking? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homeschooled or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a minor edit to the Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart entry today reflecting the fact that he was homeschooled. This was almost immediateley changed back by dpbsmith, with the explanation that &amp;quot;he wasn't homeschooled as we know the term today&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, this is all well and good, except that in the article for omeschooling, his name is on the list of famous people who were homeschooled, with an internal link to theMozart article!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So which is it? Was he homeschooled or not?  And please, this is isn't an attempt to start a big discussion of the meaning of homeschooling etc. I'm just asking for some consistency between articles here. Either a person was homeschooled, in which case their entries should be amended to reflect that fact, or they should be removed from the list of &amp;quot;Famous people who were homeschooled.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait a bit to see what the consensus is, but if their names are still on that list in a few days, I'm going to fix those articles to reflect that fact.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TrueReaganConservative|TrueReaganConservative]] 13:40, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds&amp;amp;mdash;Emerson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing is that ''this'' article is sort of a hash. I haven't wanted to take this sorry article entire, shatter it to bits and remould it nearer to my heart's desire because I think it's here as a sort of inspiration to the students who use the site. It looks to me like one of those &amp;quot;X pride&amp;quot; lists where X is any group that is a little out of the mainstream and wants to encourage its members that it's OK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The quickest way to fix ''this'' article would be retitle the actual list something like &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This isn't really a factual article about homeschooling, it's a point-of-view piece that says that being educated at home not only does not put you at a disadvantage vis-a-vis public or private schools, it can be an advantage. ''This is very arguably true'' and the list is evidence in support of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What the list is ''not'' is a list of people who have undergone &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is a sort of movement, mostly in the U. S. I think, that began more or less in the 1970s. Around that time there was a noticable drop in public confidence in the public schools. Maybe I remember it had something to do with John Holt? ''How Children Fail?'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Homeschooling&amp;quot; to me does not mean simply being educated at home. It means that parents have ''actively opted out'' of an ''existing system of compulsory public schooling,'' and educate their children at home in order to assert direct personal supervision of the content and values that their children are being taught.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Calling Mozart (say) &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; is like calling Thomas Jefferson &amp;quot;a Republican&amp;quot; or William Gladstone &amp;quot;a Liberal&amp;quot; or asserting &amp;quot;Jimmy Carter and Joseph Stalin were both Georgians.&amp;quot; Technically true, but confusing at best. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:08, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll defer to the consensus view, but I don't see why Mozart should be eliminated.  He was homeschooled in a Christian manner.  What's the big deal about observing that fact?  I don't think there has to have been compulsory education in his day to make this observation meaningful.  At a minimum, Mozart is an example of someone who learned at home and excelled afterwards.  Probably his home education has something to do with his work.  This is information worth preserving, and let readers debate as they wish.  As Fox News says, &amp;quot;We report.  You decide.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==George Bernard Shaw==&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Bernard Shaw'''... hmmm... I don't think he would have cared for being labelled as a Christian. You can make out a case that he did accept some of the moral teachings of Jesus ''as Shaw, personally'' interpreted them. But in his will, he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My religious convictions and scientific views cannot at present be more specifically defined than as those of a believer in creative revolution. I desire that no public monument or work of art or inscription or sermon or ritual service commemorating me shall suggest that I accepted the tenets peculiar to any established church or denomination nor take the form of a cross or any other instrument of torture or symbol of blood sacrifice.[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,813999,00.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he was a Christian, he was an awfully complicated and unusual Christian. He certainly did not belong to any organized denomination. He wrote that there was “not a single established religion in the world in which an intelligent or educated man could believe.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He did write that &amp;quot;Christianity might be a good thing if anyone ever tried it.&amp;quot; And he wrote that &amp;quot;Christianity as a specific doctrine was slain with Jesus, suddenly and utterly.&amp;quot; That is, he did not think any organized Christian religions actually practiced the teachings of Jesus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wrote a lot about Christianity in his Preface to ''Androcles and the Lion.'' I'm not going to try to summarize it, partly because I haven't read it through in a long time, but also because Shaw's ideas are so very original and unorthodox that they are really hard to pigeonhole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He dealt with religious themes in his plays ''Saint Joan,'' ''Major Barbara,'' and ''Androcles and the Lion,'' and in their prefaces, but if you can tell &amp;quot;which side&amp;quot; he's on after reading those plays, you're better than I am.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also dealt with evolution, in the play ''Back to Methuselah'' and the Preface to it&amp;amp;mdash;in a way which will not please either evolutionists or creationists. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:10, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I question the inclusion of '''Mark Twain,''' similarly. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:32, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harpie Snark recently added John Walker Lindh, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Charles Fletcher Lummis, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Christopher Paolini to the list. I deleted them when reverting some vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm restoring Charles Fletcher Lummis and Christopher Paolini on his say-so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin D. Roosevelt attended Groton, an elite private prep school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Walker Lindh is a Taliban member and Adam Yahiye Gadahn is an Al-Qaeda member. I don't think they should go onto the list without a pretty good source citation, on the grounds that &amp;quot;extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,&amp;quot; or, in this case, surprising claims require good evidence. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:37, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Christopher Paolini is the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased).  I know he was home schooled, but have never seen anything about his beliefs.  I asked to judge by his writing, I would tend to think he is not a Christian based on some elements of his books such as the atheism of the elves.  So if anyone has a source for this, please post it. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 19:45, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Raw results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a source for his being home-schooled, anyway: [http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934 A profile of Christopher Paolini], &amp;quot;He was home-schooled by his parents, Kenneth Paolini and Talita Hodgkinson, through an accredited correspondence course at American School, Chicago, Illinois from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:16, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gadahn apparently was home-schooled: [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/27/CALIF.TMP 'Average American boy' accused as terrorist], Adam was the oldest of four children, all of whom were home-schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A lot of Google hits on Lindh being home-schooled, but it's all blogs... Some stuff about in Google Books about Lindh &amp;quot;beginning life as a Christian&amp;quot; but turning to Islam &amp;quot;in high school.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://knowledgehouse.info/famous.html This page] credits Lummis as begin home-schooled but does not itself cite its sources... No clear whether or not this is supposed to be a list of home-schooled ''Christians...'' FDR listed, Groton not explained... She also lists Paolini... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:27, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources: Adam Yahiye Gadahn: [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian New Yorker] John Walker Lindh: [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org] Franklin D. Roosevelt: [http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm National Park Service] [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 14:30, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good. Thanks. I appreciate it. I'm removing the Wikipedia references because Wikipedia itself does not consider Wikipedia articles reliable sources that can be cited in other articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:FDR: I'm adding a note to the FDR entry, because it seems to me to be a borderline case; I don't think private tutors and Groton would be everyone's idea of what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lindh: I don't really know what to make of the [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org BlessedCause] reference, both because I don't understand what the site is about... but in any case, I do ''not'' see where it identifies Lindh as being ''Christian'' homeschooled. In fact if I understand the article it says there's a dispute about where he went to school, and says that according to Houghton Mifflin, he went to a public middle school in Marin County&amp;amp;mdash;an assertion which the site attacks. The Wikipedia article says he was homeschooled starting at age 12, but does not say he was ''Christian'' homeschooled. Wikipedia's own source for that item (wrongly formatted in the article) is a web page entitled [http://www.rickross.com/reference/islamic/islamic56.htm The Making of John Walker Lindh]. I read it as saying that he was in and out of public schools, and I do not see anything to suggest that his homeschooling resembles what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gadahn: The source you cite says, pretty clearly I think, &amp;quot;Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups. (At the time, nearly all such groups in the region were Christian,&amp;quot; so I don't see any question that ''he'' was &amp;quot;Christian homeschooled.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, there's a problem of definition here... this article has never defined exactly what the criterion is for inclusion in the list. Gadahn would be a good example of someone who clearly did undergo &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling,&amp;quot; and certainly was &amp;quot;homeschooled,&amp;quot; but surely was not &amp;quot;a Christian&amp;quot; and therefore not a &amp;quot;homeschooled Christian.&amp;quot;  I think this could use some discussion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:36, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That strikes me as what will be viewed by our critics as pretty obvious nitpicking and cherrypicking of sources. Reading the sources I provided, it's clear that all three had Christian upbringings and were homeschooled, despite their subsequent failings. As for Adam Gadahn, &amp;quot;''The Gadahns homeschooled Adam''&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;''Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups''&amp;quot; are clear and explicit. There's no ambiguity there; Adam Gadahn was Christian homeschooled. And the source, The New Yorker, is as good as they get. [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] If we'd rather not have in the list those who were homeschooled but may be viewed as casting it in a poor light, then let's just come out and say that and not pretend that sources say something other than they do or rely on turns of semantics to contrive justifications for an incomplete list. If our ideas are indeed that strong and compelling, then they can easily withstand being scrutinized in full light of all facts, and to act otherwise by ignoring or dismissing unfavorable facts only undermines our position and claims and invites greater scrutiny. Better to just put all the cards on the table, deal with them and let the chips fall where they may. As I've said before on my talk page, either CP is going to have an accurate and complete article on homeschooling or it's going to have to censor information from it's articles which may be considered unfavorable to its stated orientation, it can't always have both. This is as good an article as any to choose which it's going be, right here, right now. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree that it is hard given this evidence not to list Gadahn. The others are less persuasive. We need to resolve whether this is a list of Christians who were homeschooled, people who were Christian homeschooled, people who are Christian who happen to have been homeschooled, or Christians who were Christian homseschooled (I think that covers the 4 obvious possibilities). [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:30, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I commented on Harpie's talk page but now realize that the debate is here. I'll only respond here now about this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As anyone familiar with homeschool support groups knows, simply hanging around a loosely affiliated group does not make one a &amp;quot;Christian homeschooler&amp;quot; any more than living in a neighborhood makes one a member of the majority religion.  The description of Gadahn is clear that he attended Christian homeschooling groups out of necessity, not by choice.  This does not make him a Christian homeschooler any more than attending Georgetown Univ. made Bill Clinton a Catholic college student.  As to Lindh, there is nothing Christian about his homeschooling or his own religion, so that's not even close.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Notice that if we can agree to let the title of the actual list be &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home,&amp;quot; that includes Mozart and excludes Lindh and Gadahn. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Frankly the only thing necessary for a run-of-the-mill homeschooler to be a Christian homeschooler is intent on the part of the parents to provide a proper Christian education and action by them to keep them out of school and deliver a superior quality education at home themselves. Reading the New Yorker article it seems clear that this was the intent of the Gadahn's for young &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Azzam&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Adam, no matter how terribly they failed:  [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] Now arguing that Adam Gadahn was not Christian homeschooled because he didn't chose to but rather was compelled to is a red herring; many Christian homeschooled children would prefer to be playing ''Left Behind: Eternal Forces'' rather than studying math, so by that standard not many Christian homeschooled children would qualify as being Christian homeschooled. Meaning this rationale again opens us up to the lefty criticism that we exclude unfavorable facts from our articles, in other words, engaging in partisan, ideologically-motivated censorship. So if Aschlafly as the owner of this site really wants to exclude Gadahn as he seems to, we'd better set to work coming up with a reasonable-appearing justification for doing so that has at least a veneer of scholary fairness; regardless of what our motivations are, I'd think we'd want to avoid appearing to be censoring unfavorable facts in order to further our agenda. Thoughts? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 19:58, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Harpie, there's no &amp;quot;censorship&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;exclu[sion]&amp;quot; here.  The New Yorker article simply does not support the claim that Gadahn was a Christian homeschooler.  The article says that, out of necessity, Gadahn was forced to associate with homeschool &amp;quot;support groups&amp;quot; for some of his teenage years.  That association not necessarily even education.  Every indication is that Gadahn was not Christian then, and is not now either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, I might add, nearly 99% of Christian homeschoolers start early.  It seems to me that both Gadahn and Lindh were latecomers to homeschooling long after their personalities and attitudes had formed.  Often the latecomers are just passing through and are not influenced much by homeschooling.  Contrast that with Mozart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I think Dpbsmith has proposed an ideal solution.  Certainly he captures the intent of the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:28, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Kind of like a book about &amp;quot;Famous Irish That Don't Drink&amp;quot;. This ''is'' a brilliant solution! Now I understand how to handle situations like this. Since we don't engage in censorship or exclusion, we just need to find the right way to frame the issue that by necessity keeps any unfavorable facts out. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 12:25, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love your sarcastic enthusiasm-- it '''''really''''' strengthens your points more than talking straight could ever hope to. Even so, Ashlafly has a good point; Dpbsmith accurately capptured the intent of the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 12:43, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, they say a little bit of honey makes the medicine go down better. Look, I've been in conservative political PR now for nearly 20 years and know a little something about crafting credible, effective messages, and we'd be a lot more credible and better off in the long term were we to follow the rationale I provided above. Our goal should not be to just get out the message, but to get out a credible and compelling one, and this subject and article is just one of many that will face this same issue. If we go around trumpeting our own version of reality while ignoring the one that is shared by all we run the risk of being caricatures of our own cause and ultimately all too easily dismissed by those we hope to convince. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expand this article==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not the person to do it. I know nothing about homeschooling, sent both of my kids to public schools (and state universities), hope I've got stuff sorta-kinda right, hope I haven't stepped on any toes, but, this should be an article where there's ''lots'' of expertise available. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:12, 28 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me be more emphatic. There could be a '''lot''' more factual material about homeschooling here. Resources. Books. Tips on dealing with the authorities and how to jump through the legal hoops (I assume there are still some to jump through). There's an obvious opportunity here for people to add encyclopedic material that is informed by their personal experience and expertise. Say someone wants to homeschool in New Jersey or whereever. What office do you go to? What forms do you fill out? etc. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:39, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think this is a good place to try to compile info about state homeschooling laws.  There are other places that specialize in that.  On the other hand, I agree that the article needs some serious work.  Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Parents take a more active role in the education of their children when they homeschool. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; I'm uncomfortable with this general statement - while in some (many) cases it is true, there are lots of active parents with kids in public or private school (especially small church schools, I'm guessing), and there are homeschooling parents who simply hire a tutor (or several) and let them have at it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The primary reason for homeschooling is to give the child a better education. A close second in reasons, however, is to avoid the culture of public school and its many adverse effects of hostility to Christianity and parental control, political bias, boredom, confusion, depression, etc.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, different families have different reasons for homeschooling, usually more than one.  Religion may (or may not) be a factor; so might the quality of education.  But there are other reasons - a child who is not being well-served by the public schools, a child who has a special talent or interest they wish to focus on, a family who wants to travel with dad on business, a family who lives in a very rural area far from schools (or who is sailing around the world, etc.), and so on.  Various surveys have been done trying to rank the reasons, but I think we'd be better off with a list of possible reasons rather than trying to rank them.  Homeschoolers are notoriously hard to count or survey. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In the United States, opting out of public schools is not new. When Thomas Edison's public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. But because of compulsory education laws—the first was passed in Massachusetts in 1852, and by 1918 every state had them—schooling at home was a violation of truancy laws, and was rare until the 1970s. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, *lots* of kids were educated at home in earlier centuries, and certain cultures (Native American?) may not have had &amp;quot;schools&amp;quot; at all back then.  Also, the 1852 date sounds too late to me, though I could be wrong - can we get a cite there?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just added one. There seemed to be one there already. Another, which reads well but not quite sure of the source, is [http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/compulso.html Compulsory Education]. Apparently Horace Mann&amp;amp;mdash;whose name is instantly familiar to me as an &amp;quot;educator,&amp;quot; but of whom I know little more&amp;amp;mdash;was active in getting them to do it. Massachusetts had ''public'' schools much earlier, but apparently they were not compulsory. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also - is there a reason for listing Christian homeschoolers?  Why not just list people who were educated at home (in one form or another), and then give a brief explaination of their situation - e.g. Sandra Day OConnor, educated at home when she was young as the ranch she lived on was very remote, or whatever.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of thoughts - hope they are helpful.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:49, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent homeschooled Christians? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By your own definition, you have to &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; of formal education to be considered &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;  Thus, I'm curious what system DaVinci, Washington, et al, opted out of.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 13:25, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's why, some time ago, I changed the title of the '''list''' to &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; Homeschooling as we know it in the United States essentially began in the 1970s. This very interesting article on [http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/homeschool/index.html Homeschoolers: Estimating Numbers and Growth] suggests that there were about a million homeschoolers circa 1998. However, in the &amp;quot;late 1970s and early 1980s&amp;quot; it says &amp;quot;about 10,000 to 15,000&amp;quot; children received their education at home. At a very rough guess, today's U. S. adult population probably includes less than 100,000 people over 21, probably less than 25,000 people over 30, and practically none over 40. Not a large population, and not enough time to become spectacularly high achievers... yet. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:34, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I changed the definition part to remove the &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; wording - it is somewhat an attempt to address your concern above, and also an attempt to put the emphasis on what homeschoolers *do* (learn outside of school), than what they *don't do* (go to school).  Not perfect, but a step in the right direction, I think.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:35, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree.  I think that this kind of simplistic list can be a bit meaningless.  Better would be a list of people with unconventional educations or minimal formal education with a brief explanation of their circumstances.  For example, you could say something like &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin - had one year of formal schooling, apprenticed with his brother as a printer.&amp;quot; (Or whatever - not sure of the details on Franklin, but you get the idea.)  I also think that whether the person was Christian could be handled similarly in the brief note, rather than in the heading.  In addition, I don't think *anyone* should be on the list unless there is a *citation* to a source explaining their education.  See my addition of Andrew Wyeth as an example. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nature of the list just boggles my mind.  It ignores the point raised by AmesG (which I still read into it despite the &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot; part) that &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; needs a formal alternative to have a meaningful definition.  Also, why only Christians? I'm still boggled... [[User:Human|Human]] 22:40, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drawbacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm moving this here for discussion. As it stands, it seems to me to be pure, unsupported personal opinion:&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is not without its drawbacks.  Studies have noted that children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts.  [http://justenough.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/homeschoolers-are-indeed-weird/]  This lack of legitimate socialization can produce difficulties in homsechooled childred engaging in meaningful relationships with individuals outside of their family.  Additionally, while the public school playground can be seen as a barbaric atmosphere to most kids who are schooled at home, it is important to note that these exigent circumstances can produce valuable conflict prevention skills that pay dividends in all facets of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt there are drawbacks to homeschooling. The claim that &amp;quot;children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts&amp;quot; is, however, referenced only to a blog entry by someone identified only as &amp;quot;Tammy,&amp;quot; no other identification or credentials&amp;amp;mdash;''and it does not support the statement.'' The title of the entry is &amp;quot;Homeschoolers are indeed weird,&amp;quot; but she does ''not'' say homeschoolers are less socialized&amp;amp;mdash;that's apparently [[User:Huey gunna getcha]]'s ''interpretation.'' She means &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; in a good way: tolerant of different opinions and not afraid to express individuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence about the &amp;quot;public school playground&amp;quot; providing &amp;quot;valuable conflict prevention skills&amp;quot; is plausible but unsupported. (By the way: are parochial school playgrounds, or non-school playgrounds very different?) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A friend once remarked that he was astonished whenever anyone made reference to &amp;quot;the happy sounds of children at play.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Haven't they actually paid attention when they pass a playground?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:19, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch!  I had read that article earlier today and put removing that section on my &amp;quot;to do&amp;quot; list - you beat me to it!  FWIW, when looking at homeschoolers and socialization, it's also important to consider that some children are not odd because they are homeschooled, rather, they are homeschooled because they are odd.  Homeschooling can be an understanding &amp;quot;safe haven&amp;quot; for those odd kids for whom school may be &amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot; indeed. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:48, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i was almost kicked off my baseball team cause i was homeschooled and i was playing for the middle school. i was fortunate to be kept on. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 20:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://learninfreedom.org/socialization.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/zysk1.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/HomeschoolingGrowsUp.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the thousands of references on Homeschooling and Socialization. As an educator and homeschool parent I have searched for years to find data that supports the claim that homeschoolers are lacking in good social skills. Having met hundreds of HS kids from all ages, I never found one that wasn't able in a wide variety of social situations. Indeed ''all'' of the HS teens I met were a delight to talk with and had no problems talking with adults on a wide range of topics, unlike thier Public or Private or Parochial schooled peers who always seem so sullen and distant around adults they don't know - and even those they do. After searching the academic journals and every other source I could look at, I found a lot of research on HS and Socialization and none that found widespread negative effects. While someone may find a kid here and there as an anecdote to say HS is isolating and promotes poor social development, I could probably come up with dozens of Public, private and parochial school kids to show the alleged deliterious effects of those types of schooling on the social skills of kids.   Third Day May 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snipping George Bernard Shaw and Mark Twain==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm removing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both men had complex opinions that varied during the course of their lives, but calling them &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is a stretch. My reasons for excluding Shaw are given above. As for Mark Twain, he did write a sympathetic book about Joan of Arc. However, his writings are replete with sarcastic and dismissive remarks about organized religion. He refused to let &amp;quot;Letters from the Earth&amp;quot; be published until after his death. In Mark Twain's Letters, we read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From a gentleman in Buffalo Clemens one day received a letter inclosing an incompleted list of the world's &amp;quot;One Hundred Greatest Men,&amp;quot; men who had exerted &amp;quot;the largest visible influence on the life and activities of the race.&amp;quot;  The writer asked that Mark Twain examine the list and suggest names, adding &amp;quot;would you include Jesus, as the founder of Christianity, in the list?&amp;quot; To the list of statesmen Clemens added the name of Thomas Paine; to the list of inventors, Edison and Alexander Graham Bell.  The question he answered in detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain's answer was that if the compiler of the list added Jesus, he should also add Satan: &amp;quot;From A.D. 350 to A.D. 1850 these gentlemen exercised a vaster influence over a fifth part of the human race than was exercised over that fraction of the race by all other influences combined.  Ninety-nine hundredths of this influence proceeded from Satan, the remaining fraction of it from Jesus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain has been labelled &amp;quot;deist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;agnostic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;atheist.&amp;quot; Gary Sloan suggests ([http://www.writerscramp.ca/archives/mark_twain.htm Mark Twain's Covert War with his Maker]) that he believed in a ''malignant'' God, and says &amp;quot;Viewing Satan as a heroic rebel against the real Archfiend, Twain came to identify with the fallen cherub and often used him as a mouthpiece.&amp;quot; Perhaps his views were so complex that he was all of these things and a Christian at the same time, but he was certainly not a Christian as the term is ordinarily meant. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:03, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But if they were homeschooled, shouldn't they be in the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; section of the list? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure. That section didn't exist when I removed them; it was a single list of Christians. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:25, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cleaning up the list - putting uncited people on the talk page==&lt;br /&gt;
The list of homeschooled people for whom there are no citations has been here for too long, IMHO.  I am moving these people here, to the discussion page.  I hope this is OK with all of you.  As each person's education is researched and cited, we can add them back to the list, preferably with a brief sentence explaining who they are and what form their education took (as we have now already for several people).  As discussed above, I think it will be easier to describe the religious beliefs of each person individually (if needed in this context), rather than try to decide if they are generically Christian or not. Please jump in and research one of these people so we can build up this article. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I left in Adam Yahiye Gadahn, John Walker Lindh, George Bernard Shaw, and Mark Twain, because their entries had *something* other than their names, and because they were discussed quite a bit here; however these can/should be improved by adding a brief description of who they are/were, adding a brief description of their education, and/or adding citations, preferably ones that describe their education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:29, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cleaned up the George Bernard Shaw entry.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:41, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it were up to me I'd make this list contemporary (20th century, maybe 19th too) personalities.  As it was pointed out earlier, as the homeschooling term is used today, the majority of these wouldn't count.  Also, way back in the day, practically everyone was homeschooled. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do we really need this comprehensive a list? Isn't it enough to point out a few folks who were homeschooled? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 12:28, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Folks, I saw that list from a source and have reinserted.  I took out the ridiculous Lindh reference and other liberal bias.  For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!  Frankly, this entry looked like something one would see on Wikipedia.  We're not trying to be like Wikipedia here.  Thanks and I'll try to find citations for the names I reinserted.  Help is welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I saw that list from &amp;quot;a source,&amp;quot; too, but it was just that: a list. Some homeschooling-related site. It did not say where the list came from nor did it give any sources at all. I think the list may be just bouncing around the Internet. What was ''your'' source? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!''  I'm not sure I agree with this.  It is not supported by the citation given for that paragraph.  In fact, religion was *third* in the list of reasons for homeschooling provided in the citation, with only 29.8% citing it as their most important reason. If you are going to assert this, it would be best to add an additional citation that backs it up. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:14, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html   According to the US Census, 33% cited Religion as a motivation for HS.  My citation is older than the one used in this article. Mine says 33% cite religion (not Christianity, but Religion) and the more recent survey cited by ASchafly says 29% cite Religion. Homeschoolin is becoming more and more popular and common and the fastest growing group of HSers are not citeing religion as thier motivation. This is a very interesting development. May 8 [Third Day]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK, fine, I'll look for citations and add them.  But I've personally taught over 120 homeschoolers, and I'd say religion is the motivation for 100 or so of them.  The other reasons given, such as avoidance of drugs in school, are not even factors for the vast majority of homeschoolers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Also, I will find more citations for the 61 people under the &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot; list and move them to the higher list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm guessing that your classes are taught from an Evangelical Christian perspective, which would make it less likely that non-Christians would sign up for them.  You may also know other Christian homeschoolers from church and other social activities.  In addition, Christian homeschooling groups often ask members to sign a statement of faith, effectively excluding those who aren't Christian - if one of these groups is your main contact with the homeschooling community, you will get a very skewed impression of the homeschooling population.  So it makes sense that the majority of homeschoolers you know are Christian and that they homeschool &amp;quot;to protect the Christian faith of their children and to preserve their family values.&amp;quot;  For many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers, this is a good thing - they want to raise their children in a community of people who share their beliefs and values.  But there have always been homeschoolers who are doing it for reasons of educational philosophy (wanting more of a child-led approach, or stronger academics than their local public school, or logistics (like if the family travels frequently due to Dad's job), or issues with their particular child (like Aspberger's syndrome), etc.), and this category is growing as homeschooling becomes more mainstream.  (Growing Without Schooling, a secular homeschooling magazine, started publication in 1977.)  In addition, some of those who homeschool for religious reasons are not Christian - they may be homeschooling to protect the Jewish faith of their children, for example.  Certainly personal experience is a useful data point, and surveying homeschoolers can be quite difficult.  Perhaps you can find some research to support your claim.  Let's just be careful when we extrapolate based on our own experiences.  We need to set a good example for our students.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:12, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment has some truth but lacks a sense of proportion.  Parents who homeschool to keep their kids off drugs are about 1/1000th as many as parents who homeschool for Christian purposes.  Your comments and edits to the entry seem to avoid recognizing the obvious:  the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  There is a whole college devoted to this market (Patrick Henry College).  How many colleges are there for atheistic homeschoolers?  Our entries need to reflect reality, and reality includes proportions.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I completely agree that keeping kids off of drugs does not, in my experience, drive a lot of parents to homeschool.  (On the other hand, I do not live in the inner city - my experience might be different than families in whose neighborhoods drugs are a more serious presence.)  I would still disagree, though, that the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  I know many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers who are homeschooling to preserve their children's Christian faith.  However, I also know many homeschoolers of other faiths, and many who are Christian or Catholic but for whom faith is not among their reasons for homeschooling.  I wrote the &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot; paragraph based on the study I cited.  I believe someone above cited another study, which also found that it was not the case that a majority of homeschoolers did so for religious reasons.  I am willing to believe that my personal observations and these two studies are not representative of the homeschooling population, if we can find something to back that up.  These are certianly not the only studies out there, and I think it would be good if we can find some other references to compare to them.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:40, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you define homeschooled?  Had some education at home?  A formal school education was available but did not attend?  Dropped out of school at age something? Without such a definition, many of the names on the list are frankly, silly and/or wishful thinking. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of this - Mark Twain is listed on the list.  From the biography of Mark Twain[http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml] it reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;In 1847, when Sam was 11, his father died. Shortly thereafter he left school, having completed the fifth grade, to work as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper. His job was to arrange the type for each of the newspaper's stories, allowing Sam to read the news of the world while completing his work.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 1847, a 5th grade education was quite sufficient for day to day life and working as an apprentice for a local newspaper was a reasonable continuation of his education.  It is not homeschooling.  It would probably be more useful to first put the person on the talk page and figure out if they were homeschooled and then added to the main page rather than put on the main page without refrence and then removed when they don't fit the definition (whatever that may be). --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:24, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, [[User:Mtur|Mtur]].  I have found several times in the past that someone on a list of this kind was not actually educated at home.  I think, if we are going for a high level of accuracy that befits an encyclopedia, we should do the research ourselves first, using the talk page to discuss.  Then we should add the person to the list, and be sure to explain how each person was educated.  I don't think we need to have a strict definition of homeschooling; rather, we should describe each person's experience.  The result will be a list with an interesting variety of approaches to education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added Mark Twain's famous quote, which is proof enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally, these lists abound on the internet.  I've added a cite.  No one really disputes that most or all of these people, and others too, were homeschooled.  We can continue to fill in cites, but there is no need to censor this info in the meantime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot; I don't think this is proof that he was homeschooled, only that he sees the difference between schooling and education, and realizes that education can come from places other than school. I'd like to know more about his education before adding him to the list.  (But your sandbox, etc, so I'll leave him there.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree that lists such as these abound - but here, a higher standard exists.  It is not censorship to be sure something is accurate before adding it to the article proper, and the information is available to all on the talk page while the research is being done.  Students who want to use these people as examples in their work should know enough about the individual's education to be sure it is indeed an example of what they are writing about.  Brief descriptions of the person's education, along with a cite or two about it, will be very useful to our readers.  A list without this information, not so much. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Sam was always a good-hearted boy,&amp;quot; his mother once remarked, &amp;quot;but he was a very wild and mischievous one, and, do what we would, we could never make him go to school.  This used to trouble his father and me dreadfully, and we were convinced that he would never amount to as much in the world as his brothers, because he was not near so steady and sober-minded as they were.&amp;quot;  At school, he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot;; outside of school he was the prototype of his own Huckleberry Finn, mischievous and prankish, playing truant whenever the opportunity afforded.  &amp;quot;Often his father would start him off to school,&amp;quot; his mother once said, &amp;quot;and in a little while would follow him to ascertain his whereabouts.  There was a large stump on the way to the schoolhouse, and Sam would take his position behind that, and as his father went past would gradually circle around it in such a way as to keep out of sight.  Finally, his father and the teacher both said it was of no use to try to teach Sam anything, because he was determined not to learn.  But I never gave up.  He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  I'm not sure that I would consider this to be homeschooling, especially as his truancy was against his parents' wishes, though he certainly had an autodidact's view of education.  I have added a fuller discription of his education to the article, so that readers can decide for themselves.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm breaking my self-imposed examtime exile to ask this question.  Isn't it kind of facetious to say that most of those people were homeschooled, when no formal schooling existed?  It's sort of like making a big fuss out of someone from the 1600s being a creationist - of course he was, there was no alternative!  Or, like saying, &amp;quot;Jesus didn't believe in global warming.&amp;quot;  Well... of course not.  The controversy didn't exist back then.  It creates an idea of conscious choice and rejection of an idea, when there was no such thing.  Example: Joan of Arc?  There were no formal schools in France at the time.  Put another way, could you name someone from before 1700 who was ''not'' homeschooled until college?  Just seems a little facetious to me.  K, back to the books.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 00:59, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point is not to say that someone succeeded by rejecting public school, but that someone succeeded from homeschooling.  The latter observation is true and meaningful regardless of whether public schools existed.  We don't care as much '''why''' someone was homeschooled as whether it was effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sure, I can think of people who lived before 1700 but were not homeschooled:  the illiterate, of whom there were many.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure, that's true.  But the point that others are making is that the tone of the article suggests that you're suggesting that they rejected public schools, or were part of the homeschooling &amp;quot;movement.&amp;quot;  Would you mind if I clarified it, to better express your point, or would you like to?  Perhaps something like, &amp;quot;Even before public schools were active, homeschooling produced many successful people worldwide.  Here are some examples&amp;quot;? -'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 01:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A previous version had such a statement - I think something like that should be included.  I would also argue that the statement &amp;quot;a disproportionate number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled&amp;quot; has not been cited or proved, and I'm not sure it's accurate or (from a historical perspective), even meaningful.  (See the Harvard discussion above, though of course college admittance is not a great measure of success in life - but that's a whole 'nother conversation.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The problem with your approach is that most of the people on the list did reject formal or public school, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think that's true for many of the historical figures.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the list, if it actually describes the education each person had, shows that there are a wide variety of approaches to education which can be successful.  This can be very useful in an age where educational standardization is being pushed - having all kids learn the same material in the same grade, etc.  It's also nice for homeschooled kids to see that they are not so much an oddity as part of a long line of people who did a significant amount of learning outside of school.  There's a reason you often see lists of successful minorities - it is very helpful to members of the minority group to havfe these role models, even if their lives aren't exactly parallel.  I agree that it's problematic to call it &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; before, say, the last 50-100 years, but &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;educated outside of formal schools&amp;quot; usually fits.  At the same time, I think a long list of names without individualized information about their education is not particularly useful, and quite frankly lowers the standard of research and accuracy here.  Again, we are setting an example for the students, homeschooled and not, who we expect will use this information in their work.  If we expect them to present work that is well-researched and cited from credible sources which are themselves clearly well-researched, shouldn't we be doing the same?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In place of the list ''in the article'', how about tagging each person's biography page with [[:Category:Homeschooled]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
#Anyone educated before 1850 was probably not given &amp;quot;[[compulsory education]]&amp;quot; in the Mann or Dewey sense. In ''[[Little Women]]'' Mrs. March kept Amy home and had Jo teach her. Nothing unusual about that. We need an article on [[Primary education]] or [[History of education]] that gets into that. What proportion of children were educated, and how well? When and where? The one-room schoolroom, or a huge mega-school divided into grades by age? How about [[Educational reform]]s or &amp;quot;fads&amp;quot; like [[Whole language]] and its attack on [[phonics]], the [[New math]] and its ineffective ways of teaching [[arithmetic]]? (I'm tutoring some of my friends' kids, and it's a nightmare trying to counter the knuckleheaded strategies they mandate for doing &amp;quot;[[word problem]]s&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's enlightening to have the list in one easy-to-access place.  It's striking.  You might add your Little Women point also.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Arguably, the category would be easier to access than an article and would be dynamically updated as new biographies were added.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 14:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As I said last night, the point is not that these individuals rejected public school (though many did), the point is that they achieved based on homeschooling.  Why they homeschooled is a separate, and less important, issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I like the idea of a &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; category.  However, I also like the list we are beginning to create here, assuming that we are careful to include a brief description of each person's education.  It's very informative and inspiring to see the wide variety of ways these people were educated.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christopher Paolini ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], could you explain why you deleted Christopher Paolini from the list?  He is a modern homeschooler, a best-selling author of a YA book series, and was clearly homeschooled.  The list entry (copied below), was detailed and cited.  Isn't this the kind of thing we want in the list?  I haven't read his books -- perhaps there is an issue with their content I am unaware of?  I'm not trying to challenge this decision, I just want to understand it.  (Or perhaps it was a mistake?) --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased). He was home-schooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Originally, it was a list of &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home&amp;quot; (well, actually it was &amp;quot;homeschooled Christians&amp;quot; but I proposed the title change to bypass issues about the meaning of the word &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;) This was the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;amp;oldid=10078 original list]. Paolini was added later, and there was some issue about whether he was Christian. I don't know whether that's why Aschlafly didn't include him, or whether Aschlafly just wanted to go back to a list whose sincerity he trusts... some people had fun from time to time adding names of individuals educated at home who are better described as &amp;quot;notorious&amp;quot; than as &amp;quot;high-achieving.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The list could have come from [http://www.home4schoolgear.com/famoushomeschooler.html here] or [http://www.christianhomeschoolers.com/hs_famous_homeschoolers.html here] or [http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm here] or [http://www.itwillpass.com/facts_famous_homeschoolers.shtml here]. There's probably one source for all of them but none of them credit it, much less give references for the individuals named being educated at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've seen many of these lists over the years, almost none with explanations.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Of the few I fact-checked, some had problems. All of these Web lists, for example, list Franklin D. Roosevelt without comment, but Groton is not ''my'' idea of being educated at home. Conservapedia's article is currently adequately clear about Roosevelt's education. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:03, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes - exactly.  That's why I keep going on and on about how important it is to give a brief description of each person's education - it shows the Conservapedia reader/user what form the person's education took (leaving the *reader* to decide if it counts as &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; for the reader's purposes), and in researching the brief description, we are also validating the list. I think it's just way more useful if it has been annotated in this way.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference 6==&lt;br /&gt;
I don't understand reference 6 in the article.  What does it refer to? [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 11:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's supposed to say &amp;quot;''ibid.''&amp;quot;  I think there is a wiki markup that can be used to refer to a previously cited link, which is useful in case someone puts another footnote in between the 1st and 2nd cites, screwing up the &amp;quot;''ibid''&amp;quot; concept.  But I forget how to do it. [[User:Human|Human]] 11:59, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;id&amp;quot; is short for &amp;quot;ibid&amp;quot;.  It's supposed to refer to the preceding reference, though it possible another reference was inserted between the two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use the &amp;quot;name&amp;quot; feature of the ref tag. Format the first reference like this, with the actual reference text:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format subsequent references like this:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated instances of the same reference name show up in the text with the same number. In the references section itself, the entry will contain links back to all the places in the text where the named reference appeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Markup:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Result:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disproportionate?==&lt;br /&gt;
There have been two introductory sentences to our list of prominent homeschoolers:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, a disproportionate{{fact}} number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled. Here is a growing list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some high-profile people have been educated at home, though it should be noted that prior to the 19th century most children worldwide were educated within their family. Here is a list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
:I think the first sentence is problematic because it makes a claim that is not supported by any kind of citation (''disproportionate'').  I also think it would be hard to prove such a claim, because people's education was so varied before the twentieth century.  For example, I don't mind including Mark Twain in our list of people educated outside of formal schooling, because I think he is an interesting case of someone who didn't have much of a traditional school-based education, yet went on to become a writer whose works are still in print a century later.  However, I think many people of his time had only a 5th grade education, so if we were going to seriously look at the numbers, I don't think we could count him as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;.  Can we work together here to come up with a sentence we can all agree on?  Here's my first attempt (below) - please feel free to use it as a starting point for creating something better.  Let's work on this here on the talk page until we reach consensus. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:47, 13 May 2007 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some prominent people have received some or all of their education outside of formal schooling.  (Note that prior to the 19th century, many children were educated at home.)  Here is a growing list of people whose educational backgrounds were quite different than today's norm.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling of Homeschooling==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] - Can I get some advice - I think you're probably the best person to ask.  The Williams article uses &amp;quot;''home-schoolers''&amp;quot;, which is largely rejected by the homeschooling community (at least in my experience).  Should it get a (sic), especially since the article here uses ''homeschoolers''?  (This whole spelling thing is a pet peeve of many homeschoolers.)  Oh, and nice job on the college paragraph - and a double super nice job on the Mothers Day article!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:49, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Re the &amp;quot;spelling thing:&amp;quot; it's an issue I was unaware of. What's disliked about the hyphen? For what it's worth, the American Heritage Dictionary says:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''homeschool'''&lt;br /&gt;
::VARIANT FORMS: or home-school&lt;br /&gt;
::VERB: Inflected forms: home·schooled, home·school·ing, home·schools&lt;br /&gt;
::TRANSITIVE VERB: to instruct (a pupil, for example) in an educational program outside of established schools, especially in the home.&lt;br /&gt;
::INTRANSITIVE VERB: To provide educational instruction in a homeschool.&lt;br /&gt;
::NOUN: A school operated outside established educational institutions, especially in a home.&lt;br /&gt;
::OTHER FORMS: homeschooler &lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.bartleby.com/61/30/H0253050.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their giving &amp;quot;home-school&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;variant&amp;quot; would justify a ''[sic]'', so let's do that. Unfortunately there's another question: is a homeschooler a ''teacher,'' as their definition suggests, and, if so, what is the right word for a homeschooled ''pupil?'' &lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, sure, for now let's just put in the [sic] without explanation... until someone feels like writing a section on terminology and usage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:37, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''What's disliked about the hyphen?''  OK - not sure if I can write this well enough to make sense, but here goes.  It's kind of like breastfeeding vs. breast feeding.  It's the difference between a noun modified by an adjective, vs. a noun with a separate meaning.  That is, breastfeeding is more than just feeding at the breast, more than just a different kind of feeding - it also provides antibodies to protect against disease, it has beneficial effects on mom's body, etc.  Thus it deserves a noun all to itself.  Same with homeschooling.  It's more/different than just schooling that happens at home.  Homeschooling includes opportunities and approaches to education that are dramatically different than what you'd find in school.  Homeschooling is also often integrated into family life, so much so that it is often impossible to differentiate between the two.  For example, reading a book for pleasure - for school kids, this is a &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; activity that has nothing to do with school.  For homeschoolers, it is both school and not-school, wrapped up in each other (though of course both sets of kids obviously learn from reading on their own).  In fact, homeschoolers talk about people doing &amp;quot;school at home&amp;quot;, which generally describes trying to re-create the school model in the home without taking advantage of any of the benefits unique to homeschooling.  It is not generally used in a positive context.  &amp;quot;Home schooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;home-schooling&amp;quot; is often seen in articles written *about* homeschoolers by someone else - many spell checkers will flag &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;, and many journalists will insist that their style guidelines don't allow &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  Nonetheless, almost everything written *by* homeschoolers uses the one-word form.  It's one of those &amp;quot;call members of a minority what they want to be called&amp;quot; issues.  (BTW - not trying to make a value judgment here - though I enjoy homeschooling, and it's been good for my kids, I think different kinds of schooling are appropriate for different kids &amp;amp; families - there is no &amp;quot;one best way&amp;quot; to educate children, IMHO.)&lt;br /&gt;
::As to who is the homeschooler, I would use &amp;quot;she is homeschooled&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooler&amp;quot; to refer to the student; &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooling mom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools her kids&amp;quot; to refer to the mom.  &amp;quot;She is a homeschooler&amp;quot; referring to the mom is less common, I think because mom can't homeschool without the kids, but I would hesitate to call it incorrect - I would prefer &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;They are homeschoolers&amp;quot;, referring to the family, is appropriate.  I guess when you're referring to the students and teacher(s) collectively it's right to call them all homeschoolers, but not so much the teacher by herself.  (Excuse the sexist language here!)  &lt;br /&gt;
::Note that in some states there is language that comes from the laws in that state.  In some states, homeschoolers must be enrolled in some kind of &amp;quot;umbrella school&amp;quot; which provides oversight - technically, these are private school students.  In Britain, homeschoolers are &amp;quot;educated otherwise&amp;quot; (if I remember right), from a phrase in their law.  In Pennsylvania law there is no such thing as homeschooling - children are &amp;quot;home educated&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;privately tutored&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;enrolled in a public cyber-charter school&amp;quot; - this last one is very controversial, as most independent homeschoolers insist that students in schools run by the government are not homeschoolers, even if they do school at home.  (Got that?!  Public cyber-charter schools are essentially publicly-funded internet-based correspondence schools.)  The idea here is that we must be careful not to confuse, especially in the mind of the general public and the legislature, traditional self-funded homeschooling and publicly-funded school-at-home.  The concern is that such confusion could lead to more governmental oversight - if government money is being spent, then accountability (and control, and standardization) soon follows, and with accountability homeschoolers tend to be forced into doing things in a very school-at-home way, which many of us feel takes away the most effective parts of homeschooling.  But that's a whole 'nother can of worms.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Got it. Well articulated. The points about publicly-funded officially-supervised schooling at home is interesting. I think these topics ought to be touched on in the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:36, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that all the famous people home schooled are very old or even dead?  Hard to imagine Stephen Hawking being home schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling as a modern phenomenon has only been around for a short time.  As most people who become famous for Great Things do so later in life, it will be a while before the results of this Grand Experiment emerge.  In addition, many Christian homeschoolers aspire to paths that don't typically result in fame, such as missionary work, etc.  Still, point taken - we should add some modern folks.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:39, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Realizing that homeschooling is primarily an alternative to public schools. Most homeschooling parents homeschool their children because for whatever reason they are dissatisfied with the public schools. I think that it harms the credability of this website to smack the label of homeschooling on anyone who predates public schools as we now think of them; ''most'' people back then would fit the loose standard for &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; on this page. For example, Jesus is listed as &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot;. There is really can be no evidence for this and even if ther was his education would probably not fit our idea of homeschooling today--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:49, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daniel Webster - Homeschooled?  Or not so much?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not convinced that Daniel Webster can be described as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;, even though he got some college-prep tutoring.  Here's what I've found about his education, combined with what [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] has written.  FWIW, the Dartmouth site is the most extensive, with lots of useful quotes from primary sources; the Notable Names site ''(&amp;quot;updated as weather permits&amp;quot;)'' seems the least scholarly, but I'm not finding much contradiction.  There is a heck of a lot of schooling here, at a level way beyond most people of his time.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:39, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Daniel Webster]] (1782-1852), prominent U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, recognized as one of the greatest orators in history.  As the author of the first American dictionary, he is considered the father of the English language in America.  Born in Salisbury, N.H., he attended district schools&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biographical Directory of the United States Congress:  Daniel Webster[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=W000238]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a young lad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He attended [[Phillips-Exeter Academy]] for about nine months in 1794. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notable Names Database Weblog:  Daniel Webster[http://www.nndb.com/people/445/000024373/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Webster was then tutored by the Rev. Samuel Wood to prepare him to pass the rigorous oral exam required for entrance to Dartmouth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In August of 1797&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801:  The Road to Dartmouth[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, at the age of 16,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he enrolled in Dartmouth College, from which he graduated in 1801.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/exhibit.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Why doesn't this prove that Daniel Webster was homeschooled for high school?  In addition, the passing reference about attending &amp;quot;district school&amp;quot; before that would not have amounted to much in the 1700s, particularly in New Hampshire.  Those schools were not full-time school like today, and he would likely have learned the basics at home.  The other links to Webster don't even mention the &amp;quot;district schools.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've been a bit confused about when he was at Exeter - looking into it further, according to a biography he wrote in 1829, he entered in May, 1796 and he left in Jan 1797.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE - Online Resource Library:  Daniel Webster, Autobiography, 1829[https://www.osv.org/learning/DocumentViewer.php?Action=View&amp;amp;DocID=1077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was with Rev. Woods for no more than 7 months - he started in Feb 1797 and by Aug 1797 he had entered Dartmouth.  As to the district schools, it sounds like his family went to great lengths to have him attend them.  From the same source:  ''My father seemed to have no higher object in the world, than to educate his children, to the full extent of his very limited ability. No means were within his reach, generally speaking but the small town schools. These were kept by teachers, sufficiently indifferent, in the several neighborhoods of the township, each a small part of the year. To these I was sent, with the other children.  When the school was in our neighborhood, it was easy to attend; when it removed to a more distant district* I followed it, still living at home…When it removed still further, my father sometimes boarded me out*, in a neighboring family, so that I could still be in the school.''  I don't think we can ignore this, even if he, like many &amp;quot;youngest kids&amp;quot;, learned to read from his mother or siblings at home.  I can see your point, but I think it's a stretch to include him.  Let's hear what other folks think.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:27, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The Phillips-Exeter dates look wrong.  People don't start high school in May at age 17.  Nor would it make sense for Rev. Woods to tutor Webster for only a few months.  There is at least a three year gap there to prepare for college, as one would expect, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:25, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He would have been about 14 (1796 minus 1782), which jives with a couple of other sources which mention his age but not the year.  The 1794 date comes from the Notable Names Database Weblog article, which doesn't look particularly scholarly and includes no citations.  We could work it out more accurately if we looked up his birthday.  [Why don't I do that!  He was born January 18, 1782, which would make him 14 in May of 1796 when he entered Exeter (according to the autobiography quote), and 15 (give or take a few days) when he left.  He would have started with Rev. Wood at 15, and been almost 16 (well, 15 1/2) by the time he began Dartmouth in Aug 1797.]  I agree that May sounds like an odd time to start school, but I believe the British system, on which Phillips-Exeter may have been modeled, has different terms (semesters) than we are used to.  14 is the right age for high school today, and I do believe Dartmouth as to the dates he was there.  Perhaps we can find more information to verify or refute the Exeter dates.  Don't forget that Rev. Woods had planned to have Webster for longer:  ''Mr. Wood put me upon Virgil and Tully; and I conceived a pleasure in the study of them, especially the latter, which rendered application no longer a task... In the spring I began the Greek grammar, and at midsummer Mr. Wood said to me: &amp;quot;I expected to keep you till next year, but I am tired of you, and I shall put you into college next month.''  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He also said that he was ''miserably prepared, both in Latin and Greek'', which is not surprising if he only studied for a few months!  (Same source)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, here we go.  Phillips Exeter themselves put the date as May 14, 1796, age 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phillips Exeter Academy:  Academy Chronology[http://www.exeter.edu/libraries/4513_4622.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:59, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wright Brothers - Homeschooled?  Or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says:  &lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[The Wright Brothers|Orville and Wilbur Wright]], inventors of the airplane.  They did attend some school, but also learned at home from their father, who was a conservative minister, and their mother, who was the top mathematician in her college class.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/family.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neither Wright Brother earned a high school diploma, let alone college, and Orville Wright left high school after his junior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/trivia.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking at the sources given, I saw that both brothers went to school, that Wilbur earned a high school diploma (but never picked up his certificate), and Orville left after 11th grade.  While their parents taught them some interesting things (as do all good parents), I didn't see anything that implied that this was ever in lieu of going to school.  While I'd love to claim these two as &amp;quot;one of us&amp;quot; (homeschoolers, that is), the sources given don't seem to give me any grounds to do so.  Am I missing something?  I'd like us to have a strong, well-researched list of people with interesting educational backgrounds.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:22, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
I have cleaned up the two lists of homeschoolers based on the discussions above.  I have removed the Wright Brothers and Daniel Webster - if further research and discussion in the sections above shows them to be homeschoolers, we can add them back in.  I have also moved two people from the first list to the second, because they didn't have any explanation of their education or any references.  Because of our experience with the Wrights and Webster, we must view anyone on a &amp;quot;Famous Homeschooler&amp;quot; list we find on the internet with skepticism - they ''may'' have been homeschooled, but we should be careful to document their actual education before adding them to the first list.  It would probably to be a good idea to change the paragraph introducing the second list to make it clear that these people have not been researched or verified as homeschoolers.  By the way, thanks to everyone who has contributed to this article - I think it is shaping up nicely!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been researching Joan of Arc's education, and I'm not sure it qualifies as homeschooling, at least as we think of homeschooling today.  She was taught religion and domestic skills by her mother, as are most girls, then and now.  She could not read or write, and I found nothing about her going to school or being taught any academic skills.  So while (like most children of her time) she did not go to school, and while I have great respect for traditional women's skills and the way they have been passed from mother to daughter for centuries (regardless of whether the daughters also went to school or not), I don't think I would consider this to be &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; - it is, IMHO, &amp;quot;mothering&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;raising your daughter&amp;quot; - the kinds of things that most mothers do for their daughters.  Below are a few quotes.  Thoughts? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:07, 19 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. Joan would later say, &amp;quot;As for spinning and sewing, I fear no woman in Rouen.&amp;quot; And again, &amp;quot;It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''She never learned to read or write but was skilled in sewing and spinning...''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;It was from my mother that I learned the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, and the Credo&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;to sew linen fabrics and to spin wool, and when it comes to spinning and sewing I fear no woman...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biography of Joan of Arc[http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is homeschooling.  There is no requirement that homeschooling include a particular curriculum.  Joan of Arc should be included.  It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.  I'll revert the deletion of her name, even using your cites above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.''  I'm not sure what you mean here - do you mean that most mothers don't teach religion at all?  Or that most mothers of public-schooled children don't?  I'm talking here of religious families.  If those mothers (and of course fathers) don't teach their children religion, who does?  I think that, in a devout home, most kids learn the Lord's Prayer etc. (or whatever prayers are appropriate for their religion) from their mother or their father - hearing their parents say them daily, during mealtime and bedtime prayers, etc.  They also hear it from other family members and in church.  It's woven into the fabric of their family life.  I think that's even more the case in Joan of Arc's time.  In a devout home, children learn these things even before they are of school age.  In addition, girls throughout history learned spinning and sewing because that was their job in the family - the same way children today learn to load the dishwasher or to mow the lawn.  Is it homeschooling?  I can see both sides of it, and if you feel strongly that Joan of Arc should be included, then that's OK with me.  But in terms of our list of famous homeschoolers, I don't think it makes sense to individually list all those people from earlier times who learned religion and basic life skills (and maybe even a trade) from their parents and never even had the opportunity to go to school.  Perhaps it would be best to address it by writing a paragraph explaining that learning by your parents' side was the norm for the vast majority of people in those days - going to school was only for the elite.  We could rename our list  &amp;quot;Prominent people of the Modern Era who were educated at home&amp;quot; - well, &amp;quot;of the modern era&amp;quot; isn't great, but I'm sure we could think of something better - &amp;quot;Of the last 350 years&amp;quot; perhaps. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:29, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  This isn't complex.  No, most parents of public-schooled children do NOT teach their children the things that Joan of Arc learned at home.  Were most children who went on to achievement homeschooled at the time of Joan of Arc?  I don't know, but that fact does not affect whether Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  She was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:53, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, by this logic you could include every human being prior to about 1700, and even most humans after 1700.  In Joan of Arc's time, there were no public primary schools, therefore nearly everyone was educated by their parents.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 14:42, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, that doesn't follow.  Not everyone who failed to attend a [[public school]] was homeschooled.  Ever heard of [[Plato's Academy]]?  That was a few years before 1700.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point of this entry is not to criticize [[public schools]] anyway.  But if you want to insert a ''supported'' statement that [[public schools]] did not exist before 1700, please go ahead and do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plato's academy was the equivalent of secondary and post secondary education, not primary education.  Children learned to read and write from their parents, and so it follows that if their parents couldn't read or write, then the children almost certainly wouldn't be able to either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even into Joan of Arc's time, formal education was the province of the noble classes and what little group schooling existed was conducted by the church, not the state.  Since most people were not members of a noble family, they would not have been educated in a group setting, but instead instructed by their parents.  It wasn't until the advent of state sponsored public schooling that formal education became more widespread.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I realize that your goal is to present homeschooling as superior to public schooling, and you think that by presenting these towering giants of history as homeschooled that it helps your case, but the truth is that what you call homeschooling was the de facto method of learning for the vast majority of humanity the world over, and the handful of great individuals that arose from it are a measure of statistics, not of the superiority of the home-school.  Certainly, if you're the child of a Bill Gates or a Richard Feynman you might get more at the foot of your parent than in an average public school, but if you're the son of Joe Ditchdigger or Jane Grocery Bagger then you're likely better off in a public school.  A parent who is not well educated themselves is unlikely to be able to instruct their children to become better educated than they are.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 15:56, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== George Washington Carver ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yet again, when researching someone on the &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list, I've come up with little support for the argument.  George Washington Carver, born a slave, didn't go to school until age 10, but I'm not sure I would call his education before this &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  More accurately, his education was delayed until he could attend school.  The lack of schooling is '''not''' the same thing as homeschooling.  What do you all think?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:26, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''Carver was born a slave near Diamond, Missouri, during the American Civil War (1861-1865). Around age ten he left the farm where he was born and traveled through the Midwest doing odd jobs to support his education. Carver studied constantly and attended schools wherever possible, finally graduating from high school in Minneapolis, Kansas, in 1885. That same year he passed the entrance examination at Highland College in northeastern Kansas. But when school officials learned he was black, he was prevented from attending.  In 1891 Carver was admitted to the Iowa State College of Agricultural and Mechanical Arts (now Iowa State University) in Ames. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in 1894, becoming the first black to graduate from the college. After graduation, Carver was appointed to the faculty as an assistant botanist. While teaching, he pursued his master’s degree, studying fungus diseases and classification of plants. In 1896 he received his master’s degree. That year, at the invitation of American educator Booker T. Washington, Carver became the director of agricultural research at Tuskegee Institute, where he remained for the rest of his life.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSN Encarta Encyclopedia - George Washington Carver article[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761574196/Carver_George_Washington.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:''He began his formal education at the age of twelve, which required him to leave the home of his adopted parents. Schools segregated by race at that time with no school available for black students near Carver's home. He moved to Newton County in southwest Missouri, where he worked as a farm hand and studied in a one-room schoolhouse. He went on to attend Minneapolis High School in Kansas. College entrance was a struggle, again because of racial barriers. At the age of thirty, Carver gained acceptance to Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa, where he was the first black student. Carver had to study piano and art and the college did not offer science classes. Intent on a science career, he later transferred to Iowa Agricultural College (now Iowa State University) in 1891, where he gained a Bachelor of Science degree in 1894 and a Master of Science degree in bacterial botany and agriculture in 1897.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Washington Carver, By Mary Bellis[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa041897.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leonardo da Vinci==&lt;br /&gt;
Here is another from the Arguably Homeschooled list for whom I've been able to find little evidence of homeschooling.  Perhaps further searching will turn up more.  Until then, I suggest we take da Vinci off the list.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''In Vinci Leonardo went to school. Vasari told that teachers of Leonardo da Vinci were despaired about all the questions and doubts of Leonardo. Leonardo learned at school to write, to read and to calculate. Also he was taught in geometry and Latin. Later Leonardo tried to improve his knowledge in Latin, because he thought that he didn't learn enough at school in Latin. Perhaps this is the reason why Leonardo did his notes in Italian.  Leonardo lived in Vinci until 1466. With the age of 14 Leonardo moved to Florence where he began an apprenticeship in the workshop of Verrocchio.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leonardo da Vinci[http://www.kausal.com/leonardo/childhood.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Our &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list is proving to be very inaccurate.==&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand the logic of having the list in the article, I am finding so many people on the list to have educational backgrounds that I would not consider to be homeschooling that I think we need to reconsider.  I suggest we move the list back to the talk page - the level of error is just too high to consider this list credible. Once researched, people who are shown to actually have been educated at home can be put on the &amp;quot;Prominent people who were educated at home&amp;quot; list, along with an explanation of their education and citations showing the facts.  Thoughts?  Opinions? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed.  Some very basic fact checking shows that a number of the people on the list were clearly not homeschooled.  Both were added by Mr Schlafly.  Andy, are you just pulling these names from your nether regions, or did you bother to check if what you were posting was actually accurate?  I notice you've removed some of my additions, who were certainly homeschooled since they lived in countries without formal education systems.  Why was this done, Andy?  Because they weren't Christian?  I thought Non Christian Conservatives were welcome here...  that's what your front page says.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 22:11, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Dropouts vs. Famous Homeschoolers==&lt;br /&gt;
This reference &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Education Reform.net - List of Successful Dropouts [http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, currently in the Arguably Homeschooled section, is a list of dropouts, not a list of homeschoolers.  While some overlap is possible, and a few people on the list are indeed arguably homeschooled, most are not.  I do not think we should be equating dropouts with homeschoolers.  I think we should keep the reference here on the talk page, to get ideas for adding to the list of Prominent People who were Educated at Home.  I think it may be a good idea to remove it from the Arguably Homeschooled section.  Thoughts?  Input?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:40, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Henri Poincaré==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a bit confused about Poincare's education.  While I have found several references stating that his mother tutored him, it's unclear whether this was just during his illness with diphtheria.  It's unclear when he was ill, or how long he was ill.  He entered school at age 8 and stayed there 11 years, going on to higher education after that.  Most of the references I found seem to rely on (or copy) the entry from the Encyclopedia Britannica, which is not clear.  Personally, I'm not comfortable calling him &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; without further clarification of his education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:47, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Henri was &amp;quot;... ambidextrous and was nearsighted; during his childhood he had poor muscular coordination and was seriously ill for a time with diphtheria. He received special instruction from his gifted mother and excelled in written composition while still in elementary school.&amp;quot;  In 1862 [when he would have been about 8] Henri entered the Lycée in Nancy (now renamed the Lycée Henri Poincaré in his honour). He spent eleven years at the Lycée and during this time he proved to be one of the top students in every topic he studied. Henri was described by his mathematics teacher as a &amp;quot;monster of mathematics&amp;quot; and he won first prizes in the concours général, a competition between the top pupils from all the Lycées across France.  Poincaré entered the École Polytechnique in 1873, graduating in 1875. He was well ahead of all the other students in mathematics but, perhaps not surprisingly given his poor coordination, performed no better than average in physical exercise and in art. Music was another of his interests but, although he enjoyed listening to it, his attempts to learn the piano while he was at the École Polytechnique were not successful. Poincaré read widely, beginning with popular science writings and progressing to more advanced texts. His memory was remarkable and he retained much from all the texts he read but not in the manner of learning by rote, rather by linking the ideas he was assimilating particularly in a visual way. His ability to visualise what he heard proved particularly useful when he attended lectures since his eyesight was so poor that he could not see the symbols properly that his lecturers were writing on the blackboard.  After graduating from the École Polytechnique, Poincaré continued his studies at the École des Mines.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jules Henri Poincaré[http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is completely clear that he was homeschooled at least until age 8.  The date of entry in the Lycee high school seems too early, and it seems unlikely he spent 11 years in high school.  Regardless, he was homeschooled in learning the fundamentals of reading and math, and likely learned far more from his &amp;quot;gifted&amp;quot; mother.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:49, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Citation needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled...''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], much as I, as a homeschooling mom, would love to believe this, we simply cannot state it in the article without backing it up with a citation.  Everything we post here must be true and verifiable.  We must always cite and give credit to our sources.  We must be careful not to post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry like this.  These are Conservapedia's rules, not mine, and they are good ones. Let's show our students that we are serious about the rules by leading by example - we must stick to the rules if we expect others to do so. Thus, we need a credible citation for this statement. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:59, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That sentence introduces the paragraph and list of examples that support it, with citations.  4 out of the top 4 modern mathematicians were homeschooled.  That's 100% of the smartest group of achievers.  The person considered the greatest president (Abraham Lincoln) was homeschooled.  That's 100% of the top.  The greatest female military leader was homeschooled.  That's 100%.  It's not just one citation that backs up the sentence, it is many citations and examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Hsmom, your repeated objections, like your objection above to the undisputed fact that Joan of Arc was homeschooled, are getting tiresome.  Add some content to the entry rather than object to the facts, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it really accurate to say that Joan of arc was &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; in the sense of the word that this article is about. Not a lot of kids - and even fewer girls - of the lower classes got much schooling of ANY type during the Middle Ages. Most, if not all of children's education, what precious little of it there was for French peasants, would have been at home. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 17:40, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, so Joan of Arc and many others were homeschooled in her class and time period.  That doesn't detract from the point:  Joan of Arc was homeschooled and then became one of the greatest military leaders of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your criticism has been raised by others in the past, all of whom view this entry as tit-for-tat, homeschooling versus alternatives.  But that's not what this entry is about.  This entry simply proves that homeschooling has been extraordinarily successful in its own right, regardless of alternatives.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fair Inclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to add William Bonney (Billy the Kid) and John Wesley Hardin, two famous American outlaws, and they keep getting deleted. I don't understand why. Both are certainly prominent, and both are homeschooled at least to the same extent as inclusions like Lincoln, Twain, and Joan of Arc. Obviously they don't paint a rosy picture of homeschooling, but doesn't blocking their entry present only one side of the argument (the pro-homeschooling side)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Provide some evidence for your claims, as required by our [[rules]].  Homeschooled means schooled at home, not running away from home.  Obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:58, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't be a jerk, dude.  This site lists &amp;quot;prominent&amp;quot; home-schooled individuals, not all of them.  Also, this is not your site.  Why do you think it should play by your rules?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Many of the people on this list were not obviously schooled at home. Twain is a clear example. Lincoln read at home but was not &amp;quot;schooled&amp;quot; by anyone, and people like the Roosevelts and Shaw studied with professional tutors, clearly not an analogy for the parent-lead homeschooling of today. Bonney's school experience is essentially a direct parallel of Twain's, and Hardin was taught by his father, just like Mozart. If your complaint is truly a source issue, I'm happy to go dig up a biography or two, but short of that I can see no reason for not including these two. For most of history people didn't have anything like modern access to public schools, which means that for most of history bad people got their education in pretty much the same way as people like Joan of Arc. Just trying to be fair here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: So you're saying that Lincoln schooled himself at home???  Could be ... but that's still homeschooled.  Private tutors is also homeschooling, as many of us homeschoolers can attest.  You seem to be saying that Hardin and Mozart were taught by their fathers.  That's not homeschooling?  Of course it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm open to unbiased improvements to the article.  I don't know the details of Twain, for example.  I do know that 5 out of the top 5 mathematicians post-Napoleon were homeschooled, and there are few if any errors on this list.  If you can make unbiased improvements by adding information, please do.  If you can't believe the list, then perhaps you want to open your mind a bit first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:37, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reason for rollback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't insert {{fact}} when the statement is supported the sentences that follow it.  When in doubt, use this page to express your opinion rather than senseless inclusion of multiple {{fact}}--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:48, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, since you mention it, I was wondering why you removed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; from the statement saying Ansel Adams is the best photographer of the twentieth century. It's certainly a very bold and opinionated statement (maybe someone is more a fan of [[Alfred Stieglitz]]) and I figured it needed backing up.--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:22, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The next sentence supports the statement.  Open your mind a bit, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:33, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, perhaps we can reach a compromise. Instead of adding a {{fact}}, why don't we just add the word 'arguably' to the sentence. That way, we're both happy--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:39, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kcbarlow22&amp;diff=233561</id>
		<title>User talk:Kcbarlow22</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kcbarlow22&amp;diff=233561"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:31:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome}}--~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:31, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Science&amp;diff=233560</id>
		<title>Science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Science&amp;diff=233560"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:30:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 233558 by Special:Contributions/Jesuslovesyou (User talk:Jesuslovesyou)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Science, unlike other academic fields, is not just a body of knowledge but also a methodology for discovering and classifying knowledge. The scope of science encompasses all physical phenomena, but there is more for scientists to study than the material world and natural processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human mind, considered by some materialists, to be completely determined by natural processes, has what philosophers call ''[[free will]]''. That is, we human beings can decide to believe or not to believe, to perform an action or not to perform it (see Stephen Covey's &amp;quot;Habit #1: [[Be proactive]]&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Physical science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jesuslovesyou&amp;diff=233556</id>
		<title>User talk:Jesuslovesyou</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jesuslovesyou&amp;diff=233556"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:28:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: New page: {{welcome}}--~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:28, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233543</id>
		<title>Talk:Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homeschooling&amp;diff=233543"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T04:22:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Reason for rollback */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Private Tutoring== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does private tutoring really count as homeschooling? I don't see why it should. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:01, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homschoolers at harvard.==&lt;br /&gt;
I read it some were, but it is true that 10% of students in a classroom at Harvard were homseschooled. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:38, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:For a claim like that, I doubt &amp;quot;I read it somewhere&amp;quot; works; finding a citation shouldn't be hard if it's true, though. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will try to find it.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:42, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Great!  Find a citation *first*, then feel free to add it to the article.  Since only about 2% of kids are homeschooled, it would be astounding to find 10% at Harvard.  Also note that 10% in a particular classroom is not the same as 10% of the Harvard student body.  If your statement is true, then it deserves much more prominence in the article.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:45, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alright I found the information, but I was wrong. 10% of the Students accepted are homeschooled.:) so am I.... not going to Harvard though. so if you still want the link i can get it, or if not, no problem. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:53, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::First, make sure it's 10% of accepted students are homeschooled, not 10% of homeschooled applicants are accepted.  Then go ahead and add it, just make sure you quote it properly (very important for statistics) and include the citation, including the title, etc. so it will show up nicely in the references section.  Thanks for adding to this article!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:56, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Who are you by the way mom? I mean you sound like you have been here longer than I have, and thats a long time.ok here is the link: [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked/ homeschoolers at Harvard]  --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:59, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm a homeschooling mom, of course!  &amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;.  Will, the statistic was what I suspected.  It said that homeschoolers have an acceptance rate of 10%, which is the same as the general acceptance rate at Harvard.  On the one hand, it doesn't show homeschoolers doing any better than anyone else, but on the other hand, it does show they can do *as well as* anyone else.  Why don't you do a bit more research and write a paragraph about homeschoolers getting into college?  The one in the article is a good model - I bet you can find a few other sources too, and come up with something quite worthwhile!  Now I'm off to do my housework, but will check back to see what you've come up with!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:04, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Boston Globe article is excellent, it's a real &amp;quot;find.&amp;quot; I'm going to follow Hsmom's lead and let Will N. draft something rather than do something with it myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't figure out exactly what the sentence means: &amp;quot;At Harvard, the acceptance rate of the general applicant pool is about 10 percent, which mirrors the success of home-schoolers.&amp;quot; I read it the same way Hsmom does, but it's not perfectly clear. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it says specifically that the acceptance rate of homeschoolers at ''Williams College'' (a famous, excellent, old, small liberal arts college) is 20 percent. And [http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm this article] says that William's general acceptance rate is 19.2%. In other words, a homeschoolers are exactly as successful in gaining admission to Williams as anyone else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key point to be made, which should be supported with well-chosen quotations from the Globe article, is that homeschoolers are just as successful at being admitted to major colleges as others, and that these days college admissions offices are familiar with homeschooling and have no problem with it. I like the line: &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers' applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not discriminated against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If homeschoolers are about as successful at getting accepted as the general population, and if homeschoolers currently amount to something like 2% of all students, then ''presumably'' the percentage of Harvard students who were homeschooled would be 2%. 2% of 6700 = about 130 in all. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:01, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would dispute saying Patton was a Christian as he believed in reincarnation (show me where this is in line with scripture)&lt;br /&gt;
Brigham Young was a Mormon, not a christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mormons consider themselves to be Christians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The official name of their church is ''The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (&amp;quot;LDS Church&amp;quot; for short). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See material I've just moved to [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Mormons' relationship to Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One dictionary definition of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus.&amp;quot; It seems to me that Mormons meet that definition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who ought to make the judgement, among all the denominations that regard themselves as Christian, which are &amp;quot;really Christian?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:10, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P. S. The question of what Mormons believe is sure to receive a lot of discussion in a year or so, since Mitt Romney, a Mormon, is running for President. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:14, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you a Mormon? Not to be prejudiced against you if you are but just wondering. &lt;br /&gt;
Will N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No, I'm not a Mormon. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:37, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I probably should explain more. I did react to the phrase &amp;quot;a Mormon not a Christian.&amp;quot; What went through my mind, and what I knew ''off the top of my head'' was: &amp;quot;Whoa! That's not right. Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, and the church is even called Church of ''Jesus Christ'' of the Latter-day Saints.&amp;quot; I also got just a little bit of steam up, because there '''is''' some discrimination against Mormons&amp;amp;mdash;assuming Mitt Romney runs I think we'll have plenty of chance to see this soon&amp;amp;mdash;and saying that Mormons aren't Christians sounds a little like an attack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, after I wrote what I knew off the top of my head, from my experience with Wikipedia and with college, etc. I've found that if you want to convince other people, instead of just telling them what you think, it helps if you can show them ''why'' you think that. So I decided to do a bit of very quick research. I figured that Mormons probably get asked this question a lot and that the official LDS church website would probably have something to say about it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First I found the passage I put in quotation marks above, the one that begins &amp;quot;Jesus Christ is the Son of God.&amp;quot; I probably should have stopped there, but when I saw that they actually have a &amp;quot;Frequently Asked Questions&amp;quot; page with answers to the questions &amp;quot;Are you Christians&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a Christian church?&amp;quot; I couldn't resist putting that in, too. I probably put in too much. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ben Franklin was a Deist --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:58, 18 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's right... no time to look further but I'm pretty sure Franklin did not believe in the divinity of Jesus and did not belong to an organized Christian church. Guess the whole list needs checking? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homeschooled or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a minor edit to the Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart entry today reflecting the fact that he was homeschooled. This was almost immediateley changed back by dpbsmith, with the explanation that &amp;quot;he wasn't homeschooled as we know the term today&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, this is all well and good, except that in the article for omeschooling, his name is on the list of famous people who were homeschooled, with an internal link to theMozart article!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So which is it? Was he homeschooled or not?  And please, this is isn't an attempt to start a big discussion of the meaning of homeschooling etc. I'm just asking for some consistency between articles here. Either a person was homeschooled, in which case their entries should be amended to reflect that fact, or they should be removed from the list of &amp;quot;Famous people who were homeschooled.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait a bit to see what the consensus is, but if their names are still on that list in a few days, I'm going to fix those articles to reflect that fact.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TrueReaganConservative|TrueReaganConservative]] 13:40, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds&amp;amp;mdash;Emerson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing is that ''this'' article is sort of a hash. I haven't wanted to take this sorry article entire, shatter it to bits and remould it nearer to my heart's desire because I think it's here as a sort of inspiration to the students who use the site. It looks to me like one of those &amp;quot;X pride&amp;quot; lists where X is any group that is a little out of the mainstream and wants to encourage its members that it's OK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The quickest way to fix ''this'' article would be retitle the actual list something like &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This isn't really a factual article about homeschooling, it's a point-of-view piece that says that being educated at home not only does not put you at a disadvantage vis-a-vis public or private schools, it can be an advantage. ''This is very arguably true'' and the list is evidence in support of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What the list is ''not'' is a list of people who have undergone &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is a sort of movement, mostly in the U. S. I think, that began more or less in the 1970s. Around that time there was a noticable drop in public confidence in the public schools. Maybe I remember it had something to do with John Holt? ''How Children Fail?'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Homeschooling&amp;quot; to me does not mean simply being educated at home. It means that parents have ''actively opted out'' of an ''existing system of compulsory public schooling,'' and educate their children at home in order to assert direct personal supervision of the content and values that their children are being taught.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Calling Mozart (say) &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; is like calling Thomas Jefferson &amp;quot;a Republican&amp;quot; or William Gladstone &amp;quot;a Liberal&amp;quot; or asserting &amp;quot;Jimmy Carter and Joseph Stalin were both Georgians.&amp;quot; Technically true, but confusing at best. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:08, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll defer to the consensus view, but I don't see why Mozart should be eliminated.  He was homeschooled in a Christian manner.  What's the big deal about observing that fact?  I don't think there has to have been compulsory education in his day to make this observation meaningful.  At a minimum, Mozart is an example of someone who learned at home and excelled afterwards.  Probably his home education has something to do with his work.  This is information worth preserving, and let readers debate as they wish.  As Fox News says, &amp;quot;We report.  You decide.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==George Bernard Shaw==&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Bernard Shaw'''... hmmm... I don't think he would have cared for being labelled as a Christian. You can make out a case that he did accept some of the moral teachings of Jesus ''as Shaw, personally'' interpreted them. But in his will, he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My religious convictions and scientific views cannot at present be more specifically defined than as those of a believer in creative revolution. I desire that no public monument or work of art or inscription or sermon or ritual service commemorating me shall suggest that I accepted the tenets peculiar to any established church or denomination nor take the form of a cross or any other instrument of torture or symbol of blood sacrifice.[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,813999,00.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he was a Christian, he was an awfully complicated and unusual Christian. He certainly did not belong to any organized denomination. He wrote that there was “not a single established religion in the world in which an intelligent or educated man could believe.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He did write that &amp;quot;Christianity might be a good thing if anyone ever tried it.&amp;quot; And he wrote that &amp;quot;Christianity as a specific doctrine was slain with Jesus, suddenly and utterly.&amp;quot; That is, he did not think any organized Christian religions actually practiced the teachings of Jesus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wrote a lot about Christianity in his Preface to ''Androcles and the Lion.'' I'm not going to try to summarize it, partly because I haven't read it through in a long time, but also because Shaw's ideas are so very original and unorthodox that they are really hard to pigeonhole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He dealt with religious themes in his plays ''Saint Joan,'' ''Major Barbara,'' and ''Androcles and the Lion,'' and in their prefaces, but if you can tell &amp;quot;which side&amp;quot; he's on after reading those plays, you're better than I am.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also dealt with evolution, in the play ''Back to Methuselah'' and the Preface to it&amp;amp;mdash;in a way which will not please either evolutionists or creationists. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:10, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I question the inclusion of '''Mark Twain,''' similarly. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:32, 20 January 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harpie Snark recently added John Walker Lindh, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Charles Fletcher Lummis, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Christopher Paolini to the list. I deleted them when reverting some vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm restoring Charles Fletcher Lummis and Christopher Paolini on his say-so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin D. Roosevelt attended Groton, an elite private prep school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Walker Lindh is a Taliban member and Adam Yahiye Gadahn is an Al-Qaeda member. I don't think they should go onto the list without a pretty good source citation, on the grounds that &amp;quot;extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,&amp;quot; or, in this case, surprising claims require good evidence. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:37, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Christopher Paolini is the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased).  I know he was home schooled, but have never seen anything about his beliefs.  I asked to judge by his writing, I would tend to think he is not a Christian based on some elements of his books such as the atheism of the elves.  So if anyone has a source for this, please post it. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 19:45, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Raw results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a source for his being home-schooled, anyway: [http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934 A profile of Christopher Paolini], &amp;quot;He was home-schooled by his parents, Kenneth Paolini and Talita Hodgkinson, through an accredited correspondence course at American School, Chicago, Illinois from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:16, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gadahn apparently was home-schooled: [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/27/CALIF.TMP 'Average American boy' accused as terrorist], Adam was the oldest of four children, all of whom were home-schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A lot of Google hits on Lindh being home-schooled, but it's all blogs... Some stuff about in Google Books about Lindh &amp;quot;beginning life as a Christian&amp;quot; but turning to Islam &amp;quot;in high school.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://knowledgehouse.info/famous.html This page] credits Lummis as begin home-schooled but does not itself cite its sources... No clear whether or not this is supposed to be a list of home-schooled ''Christians...'' FDR listed, Groton not explained... She also lists Paolini... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:27, 23 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources: Adam Yahiye Gadahn: [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian New Yorker] John Walker Lindh: [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org] Franklin D. Roosevelt: [http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm National Park Service] [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 14:30, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good. Thanks. I appreciate it. I'm removing the Wikipedia references because Wikipedia itself does not consider Wikipedia articles reliable sources that can be cited in other articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:FDR: I'm adding a note to the FDR entry, because it seems to me to be a borderline case; I don't think private tutors and Groton would be everyone's idea of what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lindh: I don't really know what to make of the [http://www.blessedcause.org/BlessedCause%20Exclusives%20II/ReelingFromLiesofHM.htm blessedcause.org BlessedCause] reference, both because I don't understand what the site is about... but in any case, I do ''not'' see where it identifies Lindh as being ''Christian'' homeschooled. In fact if I understand the article it says there's a dispute about where he went to school, and says that according to Houghton Mifflin, he went to a public middle school in Marin County&amp;amp;mdash;an assertion which the site attacks. The Wikipedia article says he was homeschooled starting at age 12, but does not say he was ''Christian'' homeschooled. Wikipedia's own source for that item (wrongly formatted in the article) is a web page entitled [http://www.rickross.com/reference/islamic/islamic56.htm The Making of John Walker Lindh]. I read it as saying that he was in and out of public schools, and I do not see anything to suggest that his homeschooling resembles what is meant by &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gadahn: The source you cite says, pretty clearly I think, &amp;quot;Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups. (At the time, nearly all such groups in the region were Christian,&amp;quot; so I don't see any question that ''he'' was &amp;quot;Christian homeschooled.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, there's a problem of definition here... this article has never defined exactly what the criterion is for inclusion in the list. Gadahn would be a good example of someone who clearly did undergo &amp;quot;Christian homeschooling,&amp;quot; and certainly was &amp;quot;homeschooled,&amp;quot; but surely was not &amp;quot;a Christian&amp;quot; and therefore not a &amp;quot;homeschooled Christian.&amp;quot;  I think this could use some discussion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:36, 26 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That strikes me as what will be viewed by our critics as pretty obvious nitpicking and cherrypicking of sources. Reading the sources I provided, it's clear that all three had Christian upbringings and were homeschooled, despite their subsequent failings. As for Adam Gadahn, &amp;quot;''The Gadahns homeschooled Adam''&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;''Adam also joined several Christian homeschool support groups''&amp;quot; are clear and explicit. There's no ambiguity there; Adam Gadahn was Christian homeschooled. And the source, The New Yorker, is as good as they get. [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] If we'd rather not have in the list those who were homeschooled but may be viewed as casting it in a poor light, then let's just come out and say that and not pretend that sources say something other than they do or rely on turns of semantics to contrive justifications for an incomplete list. If our ideas are indeed that strong and compelling, then they can easily withstand being scrutinized in full light of all facts, and to act otherwise by ignoring or dismissing unfavorable facts only undermines our position and claims and invites greater scrutiny. Better to just put all the cards on the table, deal with them and let the chips fall where they may. As I've said before on my talk page, either CP is going to have an accurate and complete article on homeschooling or it's going to have to censor information from it's articles which may be considered unfavorable to its stated orientation, it can't always have both. This is as good an article as any to choose which it's going be, right here, right now. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree that it is hard given this evidence not to list Gadahn. The others are less persuasive. We need to resolve whether this is a list of Christians who were homeschooled, people who were Christian homeschooled, people who are Christian who happen to have been homeschooled, or Christians who were Christian homseschooled (I think that covers the 4 obvious possibilities). [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:30, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I commented on Harpie's talk page but now realize that the debate is here. I'll only respond here now about this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As anyone familiar with homeschool support groups knows, simply hanging around a loosely affiliated group does not make one a &amp;quot;Christian homeschooler&amp;quot; any more than living in a neighborhood makes one a member of the majority religion.  The description of Gadahn is clear that he attended Christian homeschooling groups out of necessity, not by choice.  This does not make him a Christian homeschooler any more than attending Georgetown Univ. made Bill Clinton a Catholic college student.  As to Lindh, there is nothing Christian about his homeschooling or his own religion, so that's not even close.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Notice that if we can agree to let the title of the actual list be &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home,&amp;quot; that includes Mozart and excludes Lindh and Gadahn. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:07, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Frankly the only thing necessary for a run-of-the-mill homeschooler to be a Christian homeschooler is intent on the part of the parents to provide a proper Christian education and action by them to keep them out of school and deliver a superior quality education at home themselves. Reading the New Yorker article it seems clear that this was the intent of the Gadahn's for young &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Azzam&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Adam, no matter how terribly they failed:  [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070122fa_fact_khatchadourian] Now arguing that Adam Gadahn was not Christian homeschooled because he didn't chose to but rather was compelled to is a red herring; many Christian homeschooled children would prefer to be playing ''Left Behind: Eternal Forces'' rather than studying math, so by that standard not many Christian homeschooled children would qualify as being Christian homeschooled. Meaning this rationale again opens us up to the lefty criticism that we exclude unfavorable facts from our articles, in other words, engaging in partisan, ideologically-motivated censorship. So if Aschlafly as the owner of this site really wants to exclude Gadahn as he seems to, we'd better set to work coming up with a reasonable-appearing justification for doing so that has at least a veneer of scholary fairness; regardless of what our motivations are, I'd think we'd want to avoid appearing to be censoring unfavorable facts in order to further our agenda. Thoughts? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 19:58, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Harpie, there's no &amp;quot;censorship&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;exclu[sion]&amp;quot; here.  The New Yorker article simply does not support the claim that Gadahn was a Christian homeschooler.  The article says that, out of necessity, Gadahn was forced to associate with homeschool &amp;quot;support groups&amp;quot; for some of his teenage years.  That association not necessarily even education.  Every indication is that Gadahn was not Christian then, and is not now either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Also, I might add, nearly 99% of Christian homeschoolers start early.  It seems to me that both Gadahn and Lindh were latecomers to homeschooling long after their personalities and attitudes had formed.  Often the latecomers are just passing through and are not influenced much by homeschooling.  Contrast that with Mozart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I think Dpbsmith has proposed an ideal solution.  Certainly he captures the intent of the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:28, 27 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Kind of like a book about &amp;quot;Famous Irish That Don't Drink&amp;quot;. This ''is'' a brilliant solution! Now I understand how to handle situations like this. Since we don't engage in censorship or exclusion, we just need to find the right way to frame the issue that by necessity keeps any unfavorable facts out. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 12:25, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love your sarcastic enthusiasm-- it '''''really''''' strengthens your points more than talking straight could ever hope to. Even so, Ashlafly has a good point; Dpbsmith accurately capptured the intent of the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 12:43, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, they say a little bit of honey makes the medicine go down better. Look, I've been in conservative political PR now for nearly 20 years and know a little something about crafting credible, effective messages, and we'd be a lot more credible and better off in the long term were we to follow the rationale I provided above. Our goal should not be to just get out the message, but to get out a credible and compelling one, and this subject and article is just one of many that will face this same issue. If we go around trumpeting our own version of reality while ignoring the one that is shared by all we run the risk of being caricatures of our own cause and ultimately all too easily dismissed by those we hope to convince. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 13:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expand this article==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not the person to do it. I know nothing about homeschooling, sent both of my kids to public schools (and state universities), hope I've got stuff sorta-kinda right, hope I haven't stepped on any toes, but, this should be an article where there's ''lots'' of expertise available. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:12, 28 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me be more emphatic. There could be a '''lot''' more factual material about homeschooling here. Resources. Books. Tips on dealing with the authorities and how to jump through the legal hoops (I assume there are still some to jump through). There's an obvious opportunity here for people to add encyclopedic material that is informed by their personal experience and expertise. Say someone wants to homeschool in New Jersey or whereever. What office do you go to? What forms do you fill out? etc. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:39, 1 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think this is a good place to try to compile info about state homeschooling laws.  There are other places that specialize in that.  On the other hand, I agree that the article needs some serious work.  Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Parents take a more active role in the education of their children when they homeschool. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; I'm uncomfortable with this general statement - while in some (many) cases it is true, there are lots of active parents with kids in public or private school (especially small church schools, I'm guessing), and there are homeschooling parents who simply hire a tutor (or several) and let them have at it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The primary reason for homeschooling is to give the child a better education. A close second in reasons, however, is to avoid the culture of public school and its many adverse effects of hostility to Christianity and parental control, political bias, boredom, confusion, depression, etc.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, different families have different reasons for homeschooling, usually more than one.  Religion may (or may not) be a factor; so might the quality of education.  But there are other reasons - a child who is not being well-served by the public schools, a child who has a special talent or interest they wish to focus on, a family who wants to travel with dad on business, a family who lives in a very rural area far from schools (or who is sailing around the world, etc.), and so on.  Various surveys have been done trying to rank the reasons, but I think we'd be better off with a list of possible reasons rather than trying to rank them.  Homeschoolers are notoriously hard to count or survey. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In the United States, opting out of public schools is not new. When Thomas Edison's public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. But because of compulsory education laws—the first was passed in Massachusetts in 1852, and by 1918 every state had them—schooling at home was a violation of truancy laws, and was rare until the 1970s. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, *lots* of kids were educated at home in earlier centuries, and certain cultures (Native American?) may not have had &amp;quot;schools&amp;quot; at all back then.  Also, the 1852 date sounds too late to me, though I could be wrong - can we get a cite there?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just added one. There seemed to be one there already. Another, which reads well but not quite sure of the source, is [http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/compulso.html Compulsory Education]. Apparently Horace Mann&amp;amp;mdash;whose name is instantly familiar to me as an &amp;quot;educator,&amp;quot; but of whom I know little more&amp;amp;mdash;was active in getting them to do it. Massachusetts had ''public'' schools much earlier, but apparently they were not compulsory. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also - is there a reason for listing Christian homeschoolers?  Why not just list people who were educated at home (in one form or another), and then give a brief explaination of their situation - e.g. Sandra Day OConnor, educated at home when she was young as the ranch she lived on was very remote, or whatever.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of thoughts - hope they are helpful.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:49, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent homeschooled Christians? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By your own definition, you have to &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; of formal education to be considered &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;  Thus, I'm curious what system DaVinci, Washington, et al, opted out of.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 13:25, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's why, some time ago, I changed the title of the '''list''' to &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.&amp;quot; Homeschooling as we know it in the United States essentially began in the 1970s. This very interesting article on [http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/homeschool/index.html Homeschoolers: Estimating Numbers and Growth] suggests that there were about a million homeschoolers circa 1998. However, in the &amp;quot;late 1970s and early 1980s&amp;quot; it says &amp;quot;about 10,000 to 15,000&amp;quot; children received their education at home. At a very rough guess, today's U. S. adult population probably includes less than 100,000 people over 21, probably less than 25,000 people over 30, and practically none over 40. Not a large population, and not enough time to become spectacularly high achievers... yet. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:34, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I changed the definition part to remove the &amp;quot;opt out&amp;quot; wording - it is somewhat an attempt to address your concern above, and also an attempt to put the emphasis on what homeschoolers *do* (learn outside of school), than what they *don't do* (go to school).  Not perfect, but a step in the right direction, I think.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:35, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree.  I think that this kind of simplistic list can be a bit meaningless.  Better would be a list of people with unconventional educations or minimal formal education with a brief explanation of their circumstances.  For example, you could say something like &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin - had one year of formal schooling, apprenticed with his brother as a printer.&amp;quot; (Or whatever - not sure of the details on Franklin, but you get the idea.)  I also think that whether the person was Christian could be handled similarly in the brief note, rather than in the heading.  In addition, I don't think *anyone* should be on the list unless there is a *citation* to a source explaining their education.  See my addition of Andrew Wyeth as an example. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The nature of the list just boggles my mind.  It ignores the point raised by AmesG (which I still read into it despite the &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot; part) that &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; needs a formal alternative to have a meaningful definition.  Also, why only Christians? I'm still boggled... [[User:Human|Human]] 22:40, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drawbacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm moving this here for discussion. As it stands, it seems to me to be pure, unsupported personal opinion:&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling is not without its drawbacks.  Studies have noted that children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts.  [http://justenough.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/homeschoolers-are-indeed-weird/]  This lack of legitimate socialization can produce difficulties in homsechooled childred engaging in meaningful relationships with individuals outside of their family.  Additionally, while the public school playground can be seen as a barbaric atmosphere to most kids who are schooled at home, it is important to note that these exigent circumstances can produce valuable conflict prevention skills that pay dividends in all facets of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt there are drawbacks to homeschooling. The claim that &amp;quot;children who are schooled at home tend to enter the collegiate and working words less socialized than their public and private schooled counterparts&amp;quot; is, however, referenced only to a blog entry by someone identified only as &amp;quot;Tammy,&amp;quot; no other identification or credentials&amp;amp;mdash;''and it does not support the statement.'' The title of the entry is &amp;quot;Homeschoolers are indeed weird,&amp;quot; but she does ''not'' say homeschoolers are less socialized&amp;amp;mdash;that's apparently [[User:Huey gunna getcha]]'s ''interpretation.'' She means &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; in a good way: tolerant of different opinions and not afraid to express individuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence about the &amp;quot;public school playground&amp;quot; providing &amp;quot;valuable conflict prevention skills&amp;quot; is plausible but unsupported. (By the way: are parochial school playgrounds, or non-school playgrounds very different?) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A friend once remarked that he was astonished whenever anyone made reference to &amp;quot;the happy sounds of children at play.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Haven't they actually paid attention when they pass a playground?&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:19, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch!  I had read that article earlier today and put removing that section on my &amp;quot;to do&amp;quot; list - you beat me to it!  FWIW, when looking at homeschoolers and socialization, it's also important to consider that some children are not odd because they are homeschooled, rather, they are homeschooled because they are odd.  Homeschooling can be an understanding &amp;quot;safe haven&amp;quot; for those odd kids for whom school may be &amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot; indeed. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:48, 24 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i was almost kicked off my baseball team cause i was homeschooled and i was playing for the middle school. i was fortunate to be kept on. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 20:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://learninfreedom.org/socialization.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/zysk1.html&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/HomeschoolingGrowsUp.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the thousands of references on Homeschooling and Socialization. As an educator and homeschool parent I have searched for years to find data that supports the claim that homeschoolers are lacking in good social skills. Having met hundreds of HS kids from all ages, I never found one that wasn't able in a wide variety of social situations. Indeed ''all'' of the HS teens I met were a delight to talk with and had no problems talking with adults on a wide range of topics, unlike thier Public or Private or Parochial schooled peers who always seem so sullen and distant around adults they don't know - and even those they do. After searching the academic journals and every other source I could look at, I found a lot of research on HS and Socialization and none that found widespread negative effects. While someone may find a kid here and there as an anecdote to say HS is isolating and promotes poor social development, I could probably come up with dozens of Public, private and parochial school kids to show the alleged deliterious effects of those types of schooling on the social skills of kids.   Third Day May 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snipping George Bernard Shaw and Mark Twain==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm removing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both men had complex opinions that varied during the course of their lives, but calling them &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; is a stretch. My reasons for excluding Shaw are given above. As for Mark Twain, he did write a sympathetic book about Joan of Arc. However, his writings are replete with sarcastic and dismissive remarks about organized religion. He refused to let &amp;quot;Letters from the Earth&amp;quot; be published until after his death. In Mark Twain's Letters, we read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From a gentleman in Buffalo Clemens one day received a letter inclosing an incompleted list of the world's &amp;quot;One Hundred Greatest Men,&amp;quot; men who had exerted &amp;quot;the largest visible influence on the life and activities of the race.&amp;quot;  The writer asked that Mark Twain examine the list and suggest names, adding &amp;quot;would you include Jesus, as the founder of Christianity, in the list?&amp;quot; To the list of statesmen Clemens added the name of Thomas Paine; to the list of inventors, Edison and Alexander Graham Bell.  The question he answered in detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain's answer was that if the compiler of the list added Jesus, he should also add Satan: &amp;quot;From A.D. 350 to A.D. 1850 these gentlemen exercised a vaster influence over a fifth part of the human race than was exercised over that fraction of the race by all other influences combined.  Ninety-nine hundredths of this influence proceeded from Satan, the remaining fraction of it from Jesus.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twain has been labelled &amp;quot;deist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;agnostic,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;atheist.&amp;quot; Gary Sloan suggests ([http://www.writerscramp.ca/archives/mark_twain.htm Mark Twain's Covert War with his Maker]) that he believed in a ''malignant'' God, and says &amp;quot;Viewing Satan as a heroic rebel against the real Archfiend, Twain came to identify with the fallen cherub and often used him as a mouthpiece.&amp;quot; Perhaps his views were so complex that he was all of these things and a Christian at the same time, but he was certainly not a Christian as the term is ordinarily meant. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:03, 11 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But if they were homeschooled, shouldn't they be in the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; section of the list? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure. That section didn't exist when I removed them; it was a single list of Christians. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:25, 4 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cleaning up the list - putting uncited people on the talk page==&lt;br /&gt;
The list of homeschooled people for whom there are no citations has been here for too long, IMHO.  I am moving these people here, to the discussion page.  I hope this is OK with all of you.  As each person's education is researched and cited, we can add them back to the list, preferably with a brief sentence explaining who they are and what form their education took (as we have now already for several people).  As discussed above, I think it will be easier to describe the religious beliefs of each person individually (if needed in this context), rather than try to decide if they are generically Christian or not. Please jump in and research one of these people so we can build up this article. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I left in Adam Yahiye Gadahn, John Walker Lindh, George Bernard Shaw, and Mark Twain, because their entries had *something* other than their names, and because they were discussed quite a bit here; however these can/should be improved by adding a brief description of who they are/were, adding a brief description of their education, and/or adding citations, preferably ones that describe their education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:29, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cleaned up the George Bernard Shaw entry.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:41, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it were up to me I'd make this list contemporary (20th century, maybe 19th too) personalities.  As it was pointed out earlier, as the homeschooling term is used today, the majority of these wouldn't count.  Also, way back in the day, practically everyone was homeschooled. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do we really need this comprehensive a list? Isn't it enough to point out a few folks who were homeschooled? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 12:28, 7 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Folks, I saw that list from a source and have reinserted.  I took out the ridiculous Lindh reference and other liberal bias.  For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!  Frankly, this entry looked like something one would see on Wikipedia.  We're not trying to be like Wikipedia here.  Thanks and I'll try to find citations for the names I reinserted.  Help is welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I saw that list from &amp;quot;a source,&amp;quot; too, but it was just that: a list. Some homeschooling-related site. It did not say where the list came from nor did it give any sources at all. I think the list may be just bouncing around the Internet. What was ''your'' source? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''For example, the entry did not even say that most homeschooling today is done to preserve the Christian faith!''  I'm not sure I agree with this.  It is not supported by the citation given for that paragraph.  In fact, religion was *third* in the list of reasons for homeschooling provided in the citation, with only 29.8% citing it as their most important reason. If you are going to assert this, it would be best to add an additional citation that backs it up. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:14, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html   According to the US Census, 33% cited Religion as a motivation for HS.  My citation is older than the one used in this article. Mine says 33% cite religion (not Christianity, but Religion) and the more recent survey cited by ASchafly says 29% cite Religion. Homeschoolin is becoming more and more popular and common and the fastest growing group of HSers are not citeing religion as thier motivation. This is a very interesting development. May 8 [Third Day]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK, fine, I'll look for citations and add them.  But I've personally taught over 120 homeschoolers, and I'd say religion is the motivation for 100 or so of them.  The other reasons given, such as avoidance of drugs in school, are not even factors for the vast majority of homeschoolers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Also, I will find more citations for the 61 people under the &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot; list and move them to the higher list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm guessing that your classes are taught from an Evangelical Christian perspective, which would make it less likely that non-Christians would sign up for them.  You may also know other Christian homeschoolers from church and other social activities.  In addition, Christian homeschooling groups often ask members to sign a statement of faith, effectively excluding those who aren't Christian - if one of these groups is your main contact with the homeschooling community, you will get a very skewed impression of the homeschooling population.  So it makes sense that the majority of homeschoolers you know are Christian and that they homeschool &amp;quot;to protect the Christian faith of their children and to preserve their family values.&amp;quot;  For many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers, this is a good thing - they want to raise their children in a community of people who share their beliefs and values.  But there have always been homeschoolers who are doing it for reasons of educational philosophy (wanting more of a child-led approach, or stronger academics than their local public school, or logistics (like if the family travels frequently due to Dad's job), or issues with their particular child (like Aspberger's syndrome), etc.), and this category is growing as homeschooling becomes more mainstream.  (Growing Without Schooling, a secular homeschooling magazine, started publication in 1977.)  In addition, some of those who homeschool for religious reasons are not Christian - they may be homeschooling to protect the Jewish faith of their children, for example.  Certainly personal experience is a useful data point, and surveying homeschoolers can be quite difficult.  Perhaps you can find some research to support your claim.  Let's just be careful when we extrapolate based on our own experiences.  We need to set a good example for our students.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:12, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment has some truth but lacks a sense of proportion.  Parents who homeschool to keep their kids off drugs are about 1/1000th as many as parents who homeschool for Christian purposes.  Your comments and edits to the entry seem to avoid recognizing the obvious:  the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  There is a whole college devoted to this market (Patrick Henry College).  How many colleges are there for atheistic homeschoolers?  Our entries need to reflect reality, and reality includes proportions.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I completely agree that keeping kids off of drugs does not, in my experience, drive a lot of parents to homeschool.  (On the other hand, I do not live in the inner city - my experience might be different than families in whose neighborhoods drugs are a more serious presence.)  I would still disagree, though, that the bulk of homeschoolers are doing it for Christian reasons.  I know many Evangelical Christian homeschoolers who are homeschooling to preserve their children's Christian faith.  However, I also know many homeschoolers of other faiths, and many who are Christian or Catholic but for whom faith is not among their reasons for homeschooling.  I wrote the &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot; paragraph based on the study I cited.  I believe someone above cited another study, which also found that it was not the case that a majority of homeschoolers did so for religious reasons.  I am willing to believe that my personal observations and these two studies are not representative of the homeschooling population, if we can find something to back that up.  These are certianly not the only studies out there, and I think it would be good if we can find some other references to compare to them.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:40, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you define homeschooled?  Had some education at home?  A formal school education was available but did not attend?  Dropped out of school at age something? Without such a definition, many of the names on the list are frankly, silly and/or wishful thinking. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of this - Mark Twain is listed on the list.  From the biography of Mark Twain[http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml] it reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;In 1847, when Sam was 11, his father died. Shortly thereafter he left school, having completed the fifth grade, to work as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper. His job was to arrange the type for each of the newspaper's stories, allowing Sam to read the news of the world while completing his work.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 1847, a 5th grade education was quite sufficient for day to day life and working as an apprentice for a local newspaper was a reasonable continuation of his education.  It is not homeschooling.  It would probably be more useful to first put the person on the talk page and figure out if they were homeschooled and then added to the main page rather than put on the main page without refrence and then removed when they don't fit the definition (whatever that may be). --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:24, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, [[User:Mtur|Mtur]].  I have found several times in the past that someone on a list of this kind was not actually educated at home.  I think, if we are going for a high level of accuracy that befits an encyclopedia, we should do the research ourselves first, using the talk page to discuss.  Then we should add the person to the list, and be sure to explain how each person was educated.  I don't think we need to have a strict definition of homeschooling; rather, we should describe each person's experience.  The result will be a list with an interesting variety of approaches to education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added Mark Twain's famous quote, which is proof enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More generally, these lists abound on the internet.  I've added a cite.  No one really disputes that most or all of these people, and others too, were homeschooled.  We can continue to fill in cites, but there is no need to censor this info in the meantime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot; I don't think this is proof that he was homeschooled, only that he sees the difference between schooling and education, and realizes that education can come from places other than school. I'd like to know more about his education before adding him to the list.  (But your sandbox, etc, so I'll leave him there.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree that lists such as these abound - but here, a higher standard exists.  It is not censorship to be sure something is accurate before adding it to the article proper, and the information is available to all on the talk page while the research is being done.  Students who want to use these people as examples in their work should know enough about the individual's education to be sure it is indeed an example of what they are writing about.  Brief descriptions of the person's education, along with a cite or two about it, will be very useful to our readers.  A list without this information, not so much. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Sam was always a good-hearted boy,&amp;quot; his mother once remarked, &amp;quot;but he was a very wild and mischievous one, and, do what we would, we could never make him go to school.  This used to trouble his father and me dreadfully, and we were convinced that he would never amount to as much in the world as his brothers, because he was not near so steady and sober-minded as they were.&amp;quot;  At school, he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot;; outside of school he was the prototype of his own Huckleberry Finn, mischievous and prankish, playing truant whenever the opportunity afforded.  &amp;quot;Often his father would start him off to school,&amp;quot; his mother once said, &amp;quot;and in a little while would follow him to ascertain his whereabouts.  There was a large stump on the way to the schoolhouse, and Sam would take his position behind that, and as his father went past would gradually circle around it in such a way as to keep out of sight.  Finally, his father and the teacher both said it was of no use to try to teach Sam anything, because he was determined not to learn.  But I never gave up.  He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  I'm not sure that I would consider this to be homeschooling, especially as his truancy was against his parents' wishes, though he certainly had an autodidact's view of education.  I have added a fuller discription of his education to the article, so that readers can decide for themselves.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm breaking my self-imposed examtime exile to ask this question.  Isn't it kind of facetious to say that most of those people were homeschooled, when no formal schooling existed?  It's sort of like making a big fuss out of someone from the 1600s being a creationist - of course he was, there was no alternative!  Or, like saying, &amp;quot;Jesus didn't believe in global warming.&amp;quot;  Well... of course not.  The controversy didn't exist back then.  It creates an idea of conscious choice and rejection of an idea, when there was no such thing.  Example: Joan of Arc?  There were no formal schools in France at the time.  Put another way, could you name someone from before 1700 who was ''not'' homeschooled until college?  Just seems a little facetious to me.  K, back to the books.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 00:59, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point is not to say that someone succeeded by rejecting public school, but that someone succeeded from homeschooling.  The latter observation is true and meaningful regardless of whether public schools existed.  We don't care as much '''why''' someone was homeschooled as whether it was effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sure, I can think of people who lived before 1700 but were not homeschooled:  the illiterate, of whom there were many.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure, that's true.  But the point that others are making is that the tone of the article suggests that you're suggesting that they rejected public schools, or were part of the homeschooling &amp;quot;movement.&amp;quot;  Would you mind if I clarified it, to better express your point, or would you like to?  Perhaps something like, &amp;quot;Even before public schools were active, homeschooling produced many successful people worldwide.  Here are some examples&amp;quot;? -'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 01:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A previous version had such a statement - I think something like that should be included.  I would also argue that the statement &amp;quot;a disproportionate number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled&amp;quot; has not been cited or proved, and I'm not sure it's accurate or (from a historical perspective), even meaningful.  (See the Harvard discussion above, though of course college admittance is not a great measure of success in life - but that's a whole 'nother conversation.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The problem with your approach is that most of the people on the list did reject formal or public school, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think that's true for many of the historical figures.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the list, if it actually describes the education each person had, shows that there are a wide variety of approaches to education which can be successful.  This can be very useful in an age where educational standardization is being pushed - having all kids learn the same material in the same grade, etc.  It's also nice for homeschooled kids to see that they are not so much an oddity as part of a long line of people who did a significant amount of learning outside of school.  There's a reason you often see lists of successful minorities - it is very helpful to members of the minority group to havfe these role models, even if their lives aren't exactly parallel.  I agree that it's problematic to call it &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; before, say, the last 50-100 years, but &amp;quot;educated at home&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;educated outside of formal schools&amp;quot; usually fits.  At the same time, I think a long list of names without individualized information about their education is not particularly useful, and quite frankly lowers the standard of research and accuracy here.  Again, we are setting an example for the students, homeschooled and not, who we expect will use this information in their work.  If we expect them to present work that is well-researched and cited from credible sources which are themselves clearly well-researched, shouldn't we be doing the same?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In place of the list ''in the article'', how about tagging each person's biography page with [[:Category:Homeschooled]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
#Anyone educated before 1850 was probably not given &amp;quot;[[compulsory education]]&amp;quot; in the Mann or Dewey sense. In ''[[Little Women]]'' Mrs. March kept Amy home and had Jo teach her. Nothing unusual about that. We need an article on [[Primary education]] or [[History of education]] that gets into that. What proportion of children were educated, and how well? When and where? The one-room schoolroom, or a huge mega-school divided into grades by age? How about [[Educational reform]]s or &amp;quot;fads&amp;quot; like [[Whole language]] and its attack on [[phonics]], the [[New math]] and its ineffective ways of teaching [[arithmetic]]? (I'm tutoring some of my friends' kids, and it's a nightmare trying to counter the knuckleheaded strategies they mandate for doing &amp;quot;[[word problem]]s&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's enlightening to have the list in one easy-to-access place.  It's striking.  You might add your Little Women point also.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Arguably, the category would be easier to access than an article and would be dynamically updated as new biographies were added.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 14:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As I said last night, the point is not that these individuals rejected public school (though many did), the point is that they achieved based on homeschooling.  Why they homeschooled is a separate, and less important, issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I like the idea of a &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; category.  However, I also like the list we are beginning to create here, assuming that we are careful to include a brief description of each person's education.  It's very informative and inspiring to see the wide variety of ways these people were educated.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christopher Paolini ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], could you explain why you deleted Christopher Paolini from the list?  He is a modern homeschooler, a best-selling author of a YA book series, and was clearly homeschooled.  The list entry (copied below), was detailed and cited.  Isn't this the kind of thing we want in the list?  I haven't read his books -- perhaps there is an issue with their content I am unaware of?  I'm not trying to challenge this decision, I just want to understand it.  (Or perhaps it was a mistake?) --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the Inheritance Trilogy (Eragon, Eldest, and a third book yet unreleased). He was home-schooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Originally, it was a list of &amp;quot;High-achieving Christians who were educated at home&amp;quot; (well, actually it was &amp;quot;homeschooled Christians&amp;quot; but I proposed the title change to bypass issues about the meaning of the word &amp;quot;homeschooled.&amp;quot;) This was the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;amp;oldid=10078 original list]. Paolini was added later, and there was some issue about whether he was Christian. I don't know whether that's why Aschlafly didn't include him, or whether Aschlafly just wanted to go back to a list whose sincerity he trusts... some people had fun from time to time adding names of individuals educated at home who are better described as &amp;quot;notorious&amp;quot; than as &amp;quot;high-achieving.&amp;quot; [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The list could have come from [http://www.home4schoolgear.com/famoushomeschooler.html here] or [http://www.christianhomeschoolers.com/hs_famous_homeschoolers.html here] or [http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm here] or [http://www.itwillpass.com/facts_famous_homeschoolers.shtml here]. There's probably one source for all of them but none of them credit it, much less give references for the individuals named being educated at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've seen many of these lists over the years, almost none with explanations.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Of the few I fact-checked, some had problems. All of these Web lists, for example, list Franklin D. Roosevelt without comment, but Groton is not ''my'' idea of being educated at home. Conservapedia's article is currently adequately clear about Roosevelt's education. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:03, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes - exactly.  That's why I keep going on and on about how important it is to give a brief description of each person's education - it shows the Conservapedia reader/user what form the person's education took (leaving the *reader* to decide if it counts as &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; for the reader's purposes), and in researching the brief description, we are also validating the list. I think it's just way more useful if it has been annotated in this way.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference 6==&lt;br /&gt;
I don't understand reference 6 in the article.  What does it refer to? [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 11:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's supposed to say &amp;quot;''ibid.''&amp;quot;  I think there is a wiki markup that can be used to refer to a previously cited link, which is useful in case someone puts another footnote in between the 1st and 2nd cites, screwing up the &amp;quot;''ibid''&amp;quot; concept.  But I forget how to do it. [[User:Human|Human]] 11:59, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;id&amp;quot; is short for &amp;quot;ibid&amp;quot;.  It's supposed to refer to the preceding reference, though it possible another reference was inserted between the two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use the &amp;quot;name&amp;quot; feature of the ref tag. Format the first reference like this, with the actual reference text:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format subsequent references like this:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated instances of the same reference name show up in the text with the same number. In the references section itself, the entry will contain links back to all the places in the text where the named reference appeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Markup:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Result:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of wikis include Conservapedia&amp;lt;ref name=cp&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com Conservapedia], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the FoxPro wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fox.wikis.com FoxPro wiki], main page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the CaptainWiki sailing wiki&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://captainwiki.com/ CaptainWiki], Cruising guides and sailing blogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a general-purpose encyclopedia with an emphasis on the conservative point of view.&amp;lt;ref name=cp/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disproportionate?==&lt;br /&gt;
There have been two introductory sentences to our list of prominent homeschoolers:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, a disproportionate{{fact}} number of achievers have benefited from being homeschooled. Here is a growing list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some high-profile people have been educated at home, though it should be noted that prior to the 19th century most children worldwide were educated within their family. Here is a list of some of them:''  &lt;br /&gt;
:I think the first sentence is problematic because it makes a claim that is not supported by any kind of citation (''disproportionate'').  I also think it would be hard to prove such a claim, because people's education was so varied before the twentieth century.  For example, I don't mind including Mark Twain in our list of people educated outside of formal schooling, because I think he is an interesting case of someone who didn't have much of a traditional school-based education, yet went on to become a writer whose works are still in print a century later.  However, I think many people of his time had only a 5th grade education, so if we were going to seriously look at the numbers, I don't think we could count him as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;.  Can we work together here to come up with a sentence we can all agree on?  Here's my first attempt (below) - please feel free to use it as a starting point for creating something better.  Let's work on this here on the talk page until we reach consensus. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:47, 13 May 2007 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Throughout history, some prominent people have received some or all of their education outside of formal schooling.  (Note that prior to the 19th century, many children were educated at home.)  Here is a growing list of people whose educational backgrounds were quite different than today's norm.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling of Homeschooling==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] - Can I get some advice - I think you're probably the best person to ask.  The Williams article uses &amp;quot;''home-schoolers''&amp;quot;, which is largely rejected by the homeschooling community (at least in my experience).  Should it get a (sic), especially since the article here uses ''homeschoolers''?  (This whole spelling thing is a pet peeve of many homeschoolers.)  Oh, and nice job on the college paragraph - and a double super nice job on the Mothers Day article!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 19:49, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Re the &amp;quot;spelling thing:&amp;quot; it's an issue I was unaware of. What's disliked about the hyphen? For what it's worth, the American Heritage Dictionary says:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''homeschool'''&lt;br /&gt;
::VARIANT FORMS: or home-school&lt;br /&gt;
::VERB: Inflected forms: home·schooled, home·school·ing, home·schools&lt;br /&gt;
::TRANSITIVE VERB: to instruct (a pupil, for example) in an educational program outside of established schools, especially in the home.&lt;br /&gt;
::INTRANSITIVE VERB: To provide educational instruction in a homeschool.&lt;br /&gt;
::NOUN: A school operated outside established educational institutions, especially in a home.&lt;br /&gt;
::OTHER FORMS: homeschooler &lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.bartleby.com/61/30/H0253050.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their giving &amp;quot;home-school&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;variant&amp;quot; would justify a ''[sic]'', so let's do that. Unfortunately there's another question: is a homeschooler a ''teacher,'' as their definition suggests, and, if so, what is the right word for a homeschooled ''pupil?'' &lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, sure, for now let's just put in the [sic] without explanation... until someone feels like writing a section on terminology and usage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:37, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''What's disliked about the hyphen?''  OK - not sure if I can write this well enough to make sense, but here goes.  It's kind of like breastfeeding vs. breast feeding.  It's the difference between a noun modified by an adjective, vs. a noun with a separate meaning.  That is, breastfeeding is more than just feeding at the breast, more than just a different kind of feeding - it also provides antibodies to protect against disease, it has beneficial effects on mom's body, etc.  Thus it deserves a noun all to itself.  Same with homeschooling.  It's more/different than just schooling that happens at home.  Homeschooling includes opportunities and approaches to education that are dramatically different than what you'd find in school.  Homeschooling is also often integrated into family life, so much so that it is often impossible to differentiate between the two.  For example, reading a book for pleasure - for school kids, this is a &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; activity that has nothing to do with school.  For homeschoolers, it is both school and not-school, wrapped up in each other (though of course both sets of kids obviously learn from reading on their own).  In fact, homeschoolers talk about people doing &amp;quot;school at home&amp;quot;, which generally describes trying to re-create the school model in the home without taking advantage of any of the benefits unique to homeschooling.  It is not generally used in a positive context.  &amp;quot;Home schooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;home-schooling&amp;quot; is often seen in articles written *about* homeschoolers by someone else - many spell checkers will flag &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;, and many journalists will insist that their style guidelines don't allow &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  Nonetheless, almost everything written *by* homeschoolers uses the one-word form.  It's one of those &amp;quot;call members of a minority what they want to be called&amp;quot; issues.  (BTW - not trying to make a value judgment here - though I enjoy homeschooling, and it's been good for my kids, I think different kinds of schooling are appropriate for different kids &amp;amp; families - there is no &amp;quot;one best way&amp;quot; to educate children, IMHO.)&lt;br /&gt;
::As to who is the homeschooler, I would use &amp;quot;she is homeschooled&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooler&amp;quot; to refer to the student; &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she is a homeschooling mom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools her kids&amp;quot; to refer to the mom.  &amp;quot;She is a homeschooler&amp;quot; referring to the mom is less common, I think because mom can't homeschool without the kids, but I would hesitate to call it incorrect - I would prefer &amp;quot;she is homeschooling&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she homeschools&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;They are homeschoolers&amp;quot;, referring to the family, is appropriate.  I guess when you're referring to the students and teacher(s) collectively it's right to call them all homeschoolers, but not so much the teacher by herself.  (Excuse the sexist language here!)  &lt;br /&gt;
::Note that in some states there is language that comes from the laws in that state.  In some states, homeschoolers must be enrolled in some kind of &amp;quot;umbrella school&amp;quot; which provides oversight - technically, these are private school students.  In Britain, homeschoolers are &amp;quot;educated otherwise&amp;quot; (if I remember right), from a phrase in their law.  In Pennsylvania law there is no such thing as homeschooling - children are &amp;quot;home educated&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;privately tutored&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;enrolled in a public cyber-charter school&amp;quot; - this last one is very controversial, as most independent homeschoolers insist that students in schools run by the government are not homeschoolers, even if they do school at home.  (Got that?!  Public cyber-charter schools are essentially publicly-funded internet-based correspondence schools.)  The idea here is that we must be careful not to confuse, especially in the mind of the general public and the legislature, traditional self-funded homeschooling and publicly-funded school-at-home.  The concern is that such confusion could lead to more governmental oversight - if government money is being spent, then accountability (and control, and standardization) soon follows, and with accountability homeschoolers tend to be forced into doing things in a very school-at-home way, which many of us feel takes away the most effective parts of homeschooling.  But that's a whole 'nother can of worms.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Got it. Well articulated. The points about publicly-funded officially-supervised schooling at home is interesting. I think these topics ought to be touched on in the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:36, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that all the famous people home schooled are very old or even dead?  Hard to imagine Stephen Hawking being home schooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Homeschooling as a modern phenomenon has only been around for a short time.  As most people who become famous for Great Things do so later in life, it will be a while before the results of this Grand Experiment emerge.  In addition, many Christian homeschoolers aspire to paths that don't typically result in fame, such as missionary work, etc.  Still, point taken - we should add some modern folks.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 16:39, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Realizing that homeschooling is primarily an alternative to public schools. Most homeschooling parents homeschool their children because for whatever reason they are dissatisfied with the public schools. I think that it harms the credability of this website to smack the label of homeschooling on anyone who predates public schools as we now think of them; ''most'' people back then would fit the loose standard for &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; on this page. For example, Jesus is listed as &amp;quot;arguably homeschooled&amp;quot;. There is really can be no evidence for this and even if ther was his education would probably not fit our idea of homeschooling today--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:49, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daniel Webster - Homeschooled?  Or not so much?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not convinced that Daniel Webster can be described as &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot;, even though he got some college-prep tutoring.  Here's what I've found about his education, combined with what [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] has written.  FWIW, the Dartmouth site is the most extensive, with lots of useful quotes from primary sources; the Notable Names site ''(&amp;quot;updated as weather permits&amp;quot;)'' seems the least scholarly, but I'm not finding much contradiction.  There is a heck of a lot of schooling here, at a level way beyond most people of his time.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:39, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Daniel Webster]] (1782-1852), prominent U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, recognized as one of the greatest orators in history.  As the author of the first American dictionary, he is considered the father of the English language in America.  Born in Salisbury, N.H., he attended district schools&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biographical Directory of the United States Congress:  Daniel Webster[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=W000238]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a young lad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He attended [[Phillips-Exeter Academy]] for about nine months in 1794. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notable Names Database Weblog:  Daniel Webster[http://www.nndb.com/people/445/000024373/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Webster was then tutored by the Rev. Samuel Wood to prepare him to pass the rigorous oral exam required for entrance to Dartmouth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In August of 1797&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801:  The Road to Dartmouth[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, at the age of 16,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Webster And the War on the Second Bank of the United States, By Paul J. Rastatter[http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2004_winter_spring/webster.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he enrolled in Dartmouth College, from which he graduated in 1801.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/exhibit.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Why doesn't this prove that Daniel Webster was homeschooled for high school?  In addition, the passing reference about attending &amp;quot;district school&amp;quot; before that would not have amounted to much in the 1700s, particularly in New Hampshire.  Those schools were not full-time school like today, and he would likely have learned the basics at home.  The other links to Webster don't even mention the &amp;quot;district schools.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've been a bit confused about when he was at Exeter - looking into it further, according to a biography he wrote in 1829, he entered in May, 1796 and he left in Jan 1797.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE - Online Resource Library:  Daniel Webster, Autobiography, 1829[https://www.osv.org/learning/DocumentViewer.php?Action=View&amp;amp;DocID=1077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was with Rev. Woods for no more than 7 months - he started in Feb 1797 and by Aug 1797 he had entered Dartmouth.  As to the district schools, it sounds like his family went to great lengths to have him attend them.  From the same source:  ''My father seemed to have no higher object in the world, than to educate his children, to the full extent of his very limited ability. No means were within his reach, generally speaking but the small town schools. These were kept by teachers, sufficiently indifferent, in the several neighborhoods of the township, each a small part of the year. To these I was sent, with the other children.  When the school was in our neighborhood, it was easy to attend; when it removed to a more distant district* I followed it, still living at home…When it removed still further, my father sometimes boarded me out*, in a neighboring family, so that I could still be in the school.''  I don't think we can ignore this, even if he, like many &amp;quot;youngest kids&amp;quot;, learned to read from his mother or siblings at home.  I can see your point, but I think it's a stretch to include him.  Let's hear what other folks think.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:27, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The Phillips-Exeter dates look wrong.  People don't start high school in May at age 17.  Nor would it make sense for Rev. Woods to tutor Webster for only a few months.  There is at least a three year gap there to prepare for college, as one would expect, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:25, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He would have been about 14 (1796 minus 1782), which jives with a couple of other sources which mention his age but not the year.  The 1794 date comes from the Notable Names Database Weblog article, which doesn't look particularly scholarly and includes no citations.  We could work it out more accurately if we looked up his birthday.  [Why don't I do that!  He was born January 18, 1782, which would make him 14 in May of 1796 when he entered Exeter (according to the autobiography quote), and 15 (give or take a few days) when he left.  He would have started with Rev. Wood at 15, and been almost 16 (well, 15 1/2) by the time he began Dartmouth in Aug 1797.]  I agree that May sounds like an odd time to start school, but I believe the British system, on which Phillips-Exeter may have been modeled, has different terms (semesters) than we are used to.  14 is the right age for high school today, and I do believe Dartmouth as to the dates he was there.  Perhaps we can find more information to verify or refute the Exeter dates.  Don't forget that Rev. Woods had planned to have Webster for longer:  ''Mr. Wood put me upon Virgil and Tully; and I conceived a pleasure in the study of them, especially the latter, which rendered application no longer a task... In the spring I began the Greek grammar, and at midsummer Mr. Wood said to me: &amp;quot;I expected to keep you till next year, but I am tired of you, and I shall put you into college next month.''  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dartmouth:  Daniel Webster:  Class of 1801: &lt;br /&gt;
Scholarly Pursuits[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dwebster/1801/scholar.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He also said that he was ''miserably prepared, both in Latin and Greek'', which is not surprising if he only studied for a few months!  (Same source)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, here we go.  Phillips Exeter themselves put the date as May 14, 1796, age 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phillips Exeter Academy:  Academy Chronology[http://www.exeter.edu/libraries/4513_4622.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:59, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wright Brothers - Homeschooled?  Or not?==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says:  &lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[The Wright Brothers|Orville and Wilbur Wright]], inventors of the airplane.  They did attend some school, but also learned at home from their father, who was a conservative minister, and their mother, who was the top mathematician in her college class.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/family.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neither Wright Brother earned a high school diploma, let alone college, and Orville Wright left high school after his junior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.first-to-fly.com/History/Just%20the%20Facts/trivia.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking at the sources given, I saw that both brothers went to school, that Wilbur earned a high school diploma (but never picked up his certificate), and Orville left after 11th grade.  While their parents taught them some interesting things (as do all good parents), I didn't see anything that implied that this was ever in lieu of going to school.  While I'd love to claim these two as &amp;quot;one of us&amp;quot; (homeschoolers, that is), the sources given don't seem to give me any grounds to do so.  Am I missing something?  I'd like us to have a strong, well-researched list of people with interesting educational backgrounds.  I welcome everyone's thoughts.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:22, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
I have cleaned up the two lists of homeschoolers based on the discussions above.  I have removed the Wright Brothers and Daniel Webster - if further research and discussion in the sections above shows them to be homeschoolers, we can add them back in.  I have also moved two people from the first list to the second, because they didn't have any explanation of their education or any references.  Because of our experience with the Wrights and Webster, we must view anyone on a &amp;quot;Famous Homeschooler&amp;quot; list we find on the internet with skepticism - they ''may'' have been homeschooled, but we should be careful to document their actual education before adding them to the first list.  It would probably to be a good idea to change the paragraph introducing the second list to make it clear that these people have not been researched or verified as homeschoolers.  By the way, thanks to everyone who has contributed to this article - I think it is shaping up nicely!--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been researching Joan of Arc's education, and I'm not sure it qualifies as homeschooling, at least as we think of homeschooling today.  She was taught religion and domestic skills by her mother, as are most girls, then and now.  She could not read or write, and I found nothing about her going to school or being taught any academic skills.  So while (like most children of her time) she did not go to school, and while I have great respect for traditional women's skills and the way they have been passed from mother to daughter for centuries (regardless of whether the daughters also went to school or not), I don't think I would consider this to be &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; - it is, IMHO, &amp;quot;mothering&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;raising your daughter&amp;quot; - the kinds of things that most mothers do for their daughters.  Below are a few quotes.  Thoughts? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:07, 19 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. Joan would later say, &amp;quot;As for spinning and sewing, I fear no woman in Rouen.&amp;quot; And again, &amp;quot;It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''She never learned to read or write but was skilled in sewing and spinning...''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;It was from my mother that I learned the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, and the Credo&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;to sew linen fabrics and to spin wool, and when it comes to spinning and sewing I fear no woman...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Biography of Joan of Arc[http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is homeschooling.  There is no requirement that homeschooling include a particular curriculum.  Joan of Arc should be included.  It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.  I'll revert the deletion of her name, even using your cites above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''It is not true that most mothers teach religion, the Pater Noster, the Ave Maria, the Credo and skills to their public-schooled children.''  I'm not sure what you mean here - do you mean that most mothers don't teach religion at all?  Or that most mothers of public-schooled children don't?  I'm talking here of religious families.  If those mothers (and of course fathers) don't teach their children religion, who does?  I think that, in a devout home, most kids learn the Lord's Prayer etc. (or whatever prayers are appropriate for their religion) from their mother or their father - hearing their parents say them daily, during mealtime and bedtime prayers, etc.  They also hear it from other family members and in church.  It's woven into the fabric of their family life.  I think that's even more the case in Joan of Arc's time.  In a devout home, children learn these things even before they are of school age.  In addition, girls throughout history learned spinning and sewing because that was their job in the family - the same way children today learn to load the dishwasher or to mow the lawn.  Is it homeschooling?  I can see both sides of it, and if you feel strongly that Joan of Arc should be included, then that's OK with me.  But in terms of our list of famous homeschoolers, I don't think it makes sense to individually list all those people from earlier times who learned religion and basic life skills (and maybe even a trade) from their parents and never even had the opportunity to go to school.  Perhaps it would be best to address it by writing a paragraph explaining that learning by your parents' side was the norm for the vast majority of people in those days - going to school was only for the elite.  We could rename our list  &amp;quot;Prominent people of the Modern Era who were educated at home&amp;quot; - well, &amp;quot;of the modern era&amp;quot; isn't great, but I'm sure we could think of something better - &amp;quot;Of the last 350 years&amp;quot; perhaps. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:29, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  This isn't complex.  No, most parents of public-schooled children do NOT teach their children the things that Joan of Arc learned at home.  Were most children who went on to achievement homeschooled at the time of Joan of Arc?  I don't know, but that fact does not affect whether Joan of Arc was homeschooled.  She was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:53, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, by this logic you could include every human being prior to about 1700, and even most humans after 1700.  In Joan of Arc's time, there were no public primary schools, therefore nearly everyone was educated by their parents.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 14:42, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, that doesn't follow.  Not everyone who failed to attend a [[public school]] was homeschooled.  Ever heard of [[Plato's Academy]]?  That was a few years before 1700.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point of this entry is not to criticize [[public schools]] anyway.  But if you want to insert a ''supported'' statement that [[public schools]] did not exist before 1700, please go ahead and do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plato's academy was the equivalent of secondary and post secondary education, not primary education.  Children learned to read and write from their parents, and so it follows that if their parents couldn't read or write, then the children almost certainly wouldn't be able to either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even into Joan of Arc's time, formal education was the province of the noble classes and what little group schooling existed was conducted by the church, not the state.  Since most people were not members of a noble family, they would not have been educated in a group setting, but instead instructed by their parents.  It wasn't until the advent of state sponsored public schooling that formal education became more widespread.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I realize that your goal is to present homeschooling as superior to public schooling, and you think that by presenting these towering giants of history as homeschooled that it helps your case, but the truth is that what you call homeschooling was the de facto method of learning for the vast majority of humanity the world over, and the handful of great individuals that arose from it are a measure of statistics, not of the superiority of the home-school.  Certainly, if you're the child of a Bill Gates or a Richard Feynman you might get more at the foot of your parent than in an average public school, but if you're the son of Joe Ditchdigger or Jane Grocery Bagger then you're likely better off in a public school.  A parent who is not well educated themselves is unlikely to be able to instruct their children to become better educated than they are.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 15:56, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== George Washington Carver ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yet again, when researching someone on the &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list, I've come up with little support for the argument.  George Washington Carver, born a slave, didn't go to school until age 10, but I'm not sure I would call his education before this &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot;.  More accurately, his education was delayed until he could attend school.  The lack of schooling is '''not''' the same thing as homeschooling.  What do you all think?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:26, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''Carver was born a slave near Diamond, Missouri, during the American Civil War (1861-1865). Around age ten he left the farm where he was born and traveled through the Midwest doing odd jobs to support his education. Carver studied constantly and attended schools wherever possible, finally graduating from high school in Minneapolis, Kansas, in 1885. That same year he passed the entrance examination at Highland College in northeastern Kansas. But when school officials learned he was black, he was prevented from attending.  In 1891 Carver was admitted to the Iowa State College of Agricultural and Mechanical Arts (now Iowa State University) in Ames. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in 1894, becoming the first black to graduate from the college. After graduation, Carver was appointed to the faculty as an assistant botanist. While teaching, he pursued his master’s degree, studying fungus diseases and classification of plants. In 1896 he received his master’s degree. That year, at the invitation of American educator Booker T. Washington, Carver became the director of agricultural research at Tuskegee Institute, where he remained for the rest of his life.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSN Encarta Encyclopedia - George Washington Carver article[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761574196/Carver_George_Washington.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:''He began his formal education at the age of twelve, which required him to leave the home of his adopted parents. Schools segregated by race at that time with no school available for black students near Carver's home. He moved to Newton County in southwest Missouri, where he worked as a farm hand and studied in a one-room schoolhouse. He went on to attend Minneapolis High School in Kansas. College entrance was a struggle, again because of racial barriers. At the age of thirty, Carver gained acceptance to Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa, where he was the first black student. Carver had to study piano and art and the college did not offer science classes. Intent on a science career, he later transferred to Iowa Agricultural College (now Iowa State University) in 1891, where he gained a Bachelor of Science degree in 1894 and a Master of Science degree in bacterial botany and agriculture in 1897.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Washington Carver, By Mary Bellis[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa041897.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leonardo da Vinci==&lt;br /&gt;
Here is another from the Arguably Homeschooled list for whom I've been able to find little evidence of homeschooling.  Perhaps further searching will turn up more.  Until then, I suggest we take da Vinci off the list.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''In Vinci Leonardo went to school. Vasari told that teachers of Leonardo da Vinci were despaired about all the questions and doubts of Leonardo. Leonardo learned at school to write, to read and to calculate. Also he was taught in geometry and Latin. Later Leonardo tried to improve his knowledge in Latin, because he thought that he didn't learn enough at school in Latin. Perhaps this is the reason why Leonardo did his notes in Italian.  Leonardo lived in Vinci until 1466. With the age of 14 Leonardo moved to Florence where he began an apprenticeship in the workshop of Verrocchio.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leonardo da Vinci[http://www.kausal.com/leonardo/childhood.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Our &amp;quot;Arguably Homeschooled&amp;quot; list is proving to be very inaccurate.==&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand the logic of having the list in the article, I am finding so many people on the list to have educational backgrounds that I would not consider to be homeschooling that I think we need to reconsider.  I suggest we move the list back to the talk page - the level of error is just too high to consider this list credible. Once researched, people who are shown to actually have been educated at home can be put on the &amp;quot;Prominent people who were educated at home&amp;quot; list, along with an explanation of their education and citations showing the facts.  Thoughts?  Opinions? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:00, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed.  Some very basic fact checking shows that a number of the people on the list were clearly not homeschooled.  Both were added by Mr Schlafly.  Andy, are you just pulling these names from your nether regions, or did you bother to check if what you were posting was actually accurate?  I notice you've removed some of my additions, who were certainly homeschooled since they lived in countries without formal education systems.  Why was this done, Andy?  Because they weren't Christian?  I thought Non Christian Conservatives were welcome here...  that's what your front page says.  [[User:NonXtianConservative|NonXtianConservative]] 22:11, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Dropouts vs. Famous Homeschoolers==&lt;br /&gt;
This reference &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Education Reform.net - List of Successful Dropouts [http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, currently in the Arguably Homeschooled section, is a list of dropouts, not a list of homeschoolers.  While some overlap is possible, and a few people on the list are indeed arguably homeschooled, most are not.  I do not think we should be equating dropouts with homeschoolers.  I think we should keep the reference here on the talk page, to get ideas for adding to the list of Prominent People who were Educated at Home.  I think it may be a good idea to remove it from the Arguably Homeschooled section.  Thoughts?  Input?--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:40, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Henri Poincaré==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a bit confused about Poincare's education.  While I have found several references stating that his mother tutored him, it's unclear whether this was just during his illness with diphtheria.  It's unclear when he was ill, or how long he was ill.  He entered school at age 8 and stayed there 11 years, going on to higher education after that.  Most of the references I found seem to rely on (or copy) the entry from the Encyclopedia Britannica, which is not clear.  Personally, I'm not comfortable calling him &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; without further clarification of his education.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:47, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Henri was &amp;quot;... ambidextrous and was nearsighted; during his childhood he had poor muscular coordination and was seriously ill for a time with diphtheria. He received special instruction from his gifted mother and excelled in written composition while still in elementary school.&amp;quot;  In 1862 [when he would have been about 8] Henri entered the Lycée in Nancy (now renamed the Lycée Henri Poincaré in his honour). He spent eleven years at the Lycée and during this time he proved to be one of the top students in every topic he studied. Henri was described by his mathematics teacher as a &amp;quot;monster of mathematics&amp;quot; and he won first prizes in the concours général, a competition between the top pupils from all the Lycées across France.  Poincaré entered the École Polytechnique in 1873, graduating in 1875. He was well ahead of all the other students in mathematics but, perhaps not surprisingly given his poor coordination, performed no better than average in physical exercise and in art. Music was another of his interests but, although he enjoyed listening to it, his attempts to learn the piano while he was at the École Polytechnique were not successful. Poincaré read widely, beginning with popular science writings and progressing to more advanced texts. His memory was remarkable and he retained much from all the texts he read but not in the manner of learning by rote, rather by linking the ideas he was assimilating particularly in a visual way. His ability to visualise what he heard proved particularly useful when he attended lectures since his eyesight was so poor that he could not see the symbols properly that his lecturers were writing on the blackboard.  After graduating from the École Polytechnique, Poincaré continued his studies at the École des Mines.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jules Henri Poincaré[http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is completely clear that he was homeschooled at least until age 8.  The date of entry in the Lycee high school seems too early, and it seems unlikely he spent 11 years in high school.  Regardless, he was homeschooled in learning the fundamentals of reading and math, and likely learned far more from his &amp;quot;gifted&amp;quot; mother.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:49, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Citation needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled...''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], much as I, as a homeschooling mom, would love to believe this, we simply cannot state it in the article without backing it up with a citation.  Everything we post here must be true and verifiable.  We must always cite and give credit to our sources.  We must be careful not to post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry like this.  These are Conservapedia's rules, not mine, and they are good ones. Let's show our students that we are serious about the rules by leading by example - we must stick to the rules if we expect others to do so. Thus, we need a credible citation for this statement. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:59, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That sentence introduces the paragraph and list of examples that support it, with citations.  4 out of the top 4 modern mathematicians were homeschooled.  That's 100% of the smartest group of achievers.  The person considered the greatest president (Abraham Lincoln) was homeschooled.  That's 100% of the top.  The greatest female military leader was homeschooled.  That's 100%.  It's not just one citation that backs up the sentence, it is many citations and examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Hsmom, your repeated objections, like your objection above to the undisputed fact that Joan of Arc was homeschooled, are getting tiresome.  Add some content to the entry rather than object to the facts, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Joan of Arc ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it really accurate to say that Joan of arc was &amp;quot;homeschooled&amp;quot; in the sense of the word that this article is about. Not a lot of kids - and even fewer girls - of the lower classes got much schooling of ANY type during the Middle Ages. Most, if not all of children's education, what precious little of it there was for French peasants, would have been at home. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 17:40, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, so Joan of Arc and many others were homeschooled in her class and time period.  That doesn't detract from the point:  Joan of Arc was homeschooled and then became one of the greatest military leaders of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your criticism has been raised by others in the past, all of whom view this entry as tit-for-tat, homeschooling versus alternatives.  But that's not what this entry is about.  This entry simply proves that homeschooling has been extraordinarily successful in its own right, regardless of alternatives.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fair Inclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to add William Bonney (Billy the Kid) and John Wesley Hardin, two famous American outlaws, and they keep getting deleted. I don't understand why. Both are certainly prominent, and both are homeschooled at least to the same extent as inclusions like Lincoln, Twain, and Joan of Arc. Obviously they don't paint a rosy picture of homeschooling, but doesn't blocking their entry present only one side of the argument (the pro-homeschooling side)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Provide some evidence for your claims, as required by our [[rules]].  Homeschooled means schooled at home, not running away from home.  Obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:58, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't be a jerk, dude.  This site lists &amp;quot;prominent&amp;quot; home-schooled individuals, not all of them.  Also, this is not your site.  Why do you think it should play by your rules?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Many of the people on this list were not obviously schooled at home. Twain is a clear example. Lincoln read at home but was not &amp;quot;schooled&amp;quot; by anyone, and people like the Roosevelts and Shaw studied with professional tutors, clearly not an analogy for the parent-lead homeschooling of today. Bonney's school experience is essentially a direct parallel of Twain's, and Hardin was taught by his father, just like Mozart. If your complaint is truly a source issue, I'm happy to go dig up a biography or two, but short of that I can see no reason for not including these two. For most of history people didn't have anything like modern access to public schools, which means that for most of history bad people got their education in pretty much the same way as people like Joan of Arc. Just trying to be fair here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: So you're saying that Lincoln schooled himself at home???  Could be ... but that's still homeschooled.  Private tutors is also homeschooling, as many of us homeschoolers can attest.  You seem to be saying that Hardin and Mozart were taught by their fathers.  That's not homeschooling?  Of course it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm open to unbiased improvements to the article.  I don't know the details of Twain, for example.  I do know that 5 out of the top 5 mathematicians post-Napoleon were homeschooled, and there are few if any errors on this list.  If you can make unbiased improvements by adding information, please do.  If you can't believe the list, then perhaps you want to open your mind a bit first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:37, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reason for rollback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't insert {{fact}} when the statement is supported the sentences that follow it.  When in doubt, use this page to express your opinion rather than senseless inclusion of multiple {{fact}}--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:48, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, since you mention it, I was wondering why you removed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; from the statement saying Ansel Adams is the best photographer of the twentieth century. It's certainly a very bold and opinionated statement (maybe someone is more a fan of [[Alfred Stieglitz]]) and I figured it needed backing up.--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 00:22, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Downer&amp;diff=233484</id>
		<title>Alexander Downer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Downer&amp;diff=233484"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T03:59:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 233456 by Special:Contributions/SoccerGirl (User talk:SoccerGirl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Alexander Downer''' is the foreign minister of Australia. Downer was born in [[South Australia]] in 1951 and is a member of the [[Liberal Party of Australia]]. The Downer family have been involved in politics for over a century. A draft of the Australian constitution was created in the Downer family home prior to federation in 1901. His father was Sir Alexander Russell Downer and grandfather was Sir John William Downer. Downer was educated at Geelong Grammar School.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Downer, Alexander}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Australia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_III&amp;diff=233480</id>
		<title>Alexander III</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_III&amp;diff=233480"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T03:58:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 233459 by Special:Contributions/SoccerGirl (User talk:SoccerGirl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Alexander III''' (March 10th 1845-November 1st 1894) became [[Tsar]] of [[Russia]] in 1881. Though he is credited with the modernization of Russia, he used a secret police to cement his power and censored the press. Alexander III exiled all political dissidents to forced labor camps in [[Siberia]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Through a process known as [[Russification]], he forced everyone to speak [[Russian]] and oppressed ethnic minorities and made them live in segregated areas subject to &amp;quot;[[pogrom]]s&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Heads of state]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alec_Douglas-Home&amp;diff=233475</id>
		<title>Alec Douglas-Home</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alec_Douglas-Home&amp;diff=233475"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T03:58:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 233453 by Special:Contributions/SoccerGirl (User talk:SoccerGirl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sir Alexander Frederick Douglas-Home''', also known as '''Alec Douglas-Home''', the 14th Earl of Home, and Baron Home of the Hirsel, was [[Prime Minister]] of the [[United Kingdom]] from October 1963 to October 1964. His name &amp;quot;Home&amp;quot; is pronounced &amp;quot;Hume&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:UK Prime Ministers|Douglas-Home, Alec]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adverse_events&amp;diff=233467</id>
		<title>Adverse events</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adverse_events&amp;diff=233467"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T03:57:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 233442 by Special:Contributions/SoccerGirl (User talk:SoccerGirl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Adverse events are undesirable experiences occurring after [[immunization]] that may or may not be related to the [[vaccine]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/about/terms/glossary.htm#a&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feedback&amp;diff=233416</id>
		<title>Feedback</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feedback&amp;diff=233416"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T03:52:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;When a signal is looped back into a system, the resulting effect is called '''feedback'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback can be positive or negative, but these terms do not imply whether the feedback is wanted or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Positive feedback==&lt;br /&gt;
In general, feedback is positive when the reaction of the system goes in the same direction as the initial signal. The most likely best-known example for this is [[audio feedback]]. An example of a non-technical feedback loop is the spreading of a rumor in the mass media: One person makes a plausible claim and other sources repost it, causing yet more sources to post it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Negative feedback==&lt;br /&gt;
When the system reacts to a signal by going into the opposite direction, there is a negative feedback. For example, a thermostat reacts to temperature changes by countering the observed trend: When the temperature sinks under the lower border, it increases the temperature; and when the temperature is above the upper border, it reduces the temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electronics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chicago_White_Sox&amp;diff=233387</id>
		<title>Chicago White Sox</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chicago_White_Sox&amp;diff=233387"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T03:44:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:USCellular1.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
The ''' Chicago White Sox ''' are a [[Major League Baseball]] team in the [[American League]] Central Division. They play at [[Chicago]], IL at U.S. Cellular Field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Baltimore Orioles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grover Cleveland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/index.jsp?c_id=cws Chicago White Sox]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/clubhouse?team=CHW Chicago White Sox]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sports]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Baseball teams]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=232551</id>
		<title>Homeschooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homeschooling&amp;diff=232551"/>
		<updated>2007-07-14T22:44:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: /* Prominent people who were educated at home */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Homeschooling''' students get some or all of their [[education]] outside of traditional [[school]]s.  The general term &amp;quot;homeschooling&amp;quot; includes a wide range of educational options and philosophies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling [[parent]]s oversee their children's education, usually providing some of the instruction themselves.  In addition, they can mix-and-match other instructional approaches, including hiring a tutor; using a [[correspondence school]] (or the modern video- or [[computer]]-based equivalent); taking classes at local museums or nature centers; joining with other [[family|families]] to share teaching responsibilities in a co-op; and encouraging the student to self-instruct using library books, traditional textbooks or workbooks, knowledgeable mentor's and/or hands-on experiences.  Some homeschoolers also include local &amp;quot;after school&amp;quot; enrichment programs like scouts, 4-H, sports, [[music]] lessons, karate or dance classes, public library programs, and summer camps as part of their educational program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]], as of 2003, an estimated 1.1 million students - about 2.2% of children in grades K-12 - were homeschooled. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/estimated.asp] Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Families who homeschool do so for a number of reasons.  A 2001 study by the [[US Census Bureau]] found that the single largest reason that parents homeschool is that they feel they can give their children a better education at home. This accounted for 50% of the homeschool families; [[religion|religious]] reasons came in second at 33%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Home Schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics, by Kurt J. Bauman, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, August 2001, Working Paper Series No. 53 [http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Other frequently mentioned reasons include dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other schools, the ability to provide religious or moral instruction along with academics, the ability to control what the child is being taught, flexibility in meeting the needs of a child with special needs (such as a physical or mental health problem, a temporary illness, or giftedness), flexibility in scheduling family life, and concern about safety, drugs, and peer pressure at other schools.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 Statistical Analysis Report, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-042, Feb 2006&amp;gt;[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/TableDisplay.asp?TablePath=TablesHTML/table_4.asp] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Admissions departments at major [[college]]s are now familiar and comfortable with homeschooling, according to a 2004 [[Boston Globe]] article. The article quotes a [[Liberal Arts college|Williams College]] admission officer as saying &amp;quot;We read home-schoolers'[sic] applications just like any other application. They don't get any special consideration, but they're not [[discrimination|discriminated]] against, either. Their applications are interesting, and they've certainly done independent work their whole lives.&amp;quot; It notes that acceptance rate of homeschoolers at Williams is 20 percent,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/03/21/schoolhouse_rocked?mode=PF Schoolhouse rocked] &amp;quot;home schooling[sic] has gone main stream[sic], especially in Massachusetts. It's estimated that as many as 20,000 children here have abandoned test-crazy public schools and high-priced private schools for the comfort of the living room couch. But most surprising of all is that Harvard, BU, Brown, and other colleges are welcoming home-schoolers like all other students.&amp;quot; Source for Williams College admission officer's quote, 20% figure.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; virtually identical to its overall acceptance rate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-02-collegerates_x.htm College acceptance rates]: Williams, 19.2%. U. S. News and World Report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some US states, the law allows homeschooled students to participate in extracurricular activities at their local public schools.  20 states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming) in one way or another expressly allow equal access.  In most other states, participation is worked out on a case-by-case basis.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  State Laws Concerning Participation of Homeschool Students in Public School Activities [http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000000/00000048.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, some states, such as Alabama, are considering equal access legislation.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HSLDA:  Alabama - Legislation for Participation in Public School Activities[http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/al/200705010.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many states, school athletic associations dominated by public schools exclude homeschoolers from participation in athletics, even though they allow students at different charter schools to participate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, opting out of [[public school]]s is not new. When [[Thomas Edison]]'s public school teacher said he was &amp;quot;addled,&amp;quot; Edison's mother took him out of public school and taught him at home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Education at public school year-round from about ages 6 to 18 only became common in the 20th century due to compulsory education laws.  The first [[law]] requiring attendance at public school passed in [[Massachusetts]] in 1852; the second such law passed in [[Washington D.C.]] in 1864; and most states did not pass mandatory schooling laws until between 1870 and 1917.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/educ/CompulsoryEd.htm Compulsory Education], National Conference of State Legislatures: &amp;quot;More than 150 years have passed since Horace Mann helped Massachusetts establish a statewide system of education that eventually led to the requirement that all children attend public school.  In 1852, Massachusetts became the first state to pass compulsory school attendance laws, and by 1918, all states required children to receive an education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/kellmeyer/050428&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But even under compulsory education laws in the late 1800s, the school year was only twelve to twenty weeks long.  Very few stayed in school from ages 6 to 18.  For example, by 1900, only 6% of Americans had graduated from a formal high school.  Moreover, these students did not learn basic skills like reading in school; they learned them at home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An early call for homeschooling in the U.S. was by John Holt and his 1964 book ''How Children Fail.'' Holt was &amp;quot;a left-winger who regarded schools as instruments of the bureaucratic-industrial complex.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge, ''The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America.'' Penguin, 2004. pp. 190-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the movement was also catalyzed when social [[conservative]]s became alarmed at the 1962 [[U. S. Supreme Court]] ruling which banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truancy laws brought pioneering homeschoolers into conflict with local officials. The first [[New York Times]] story on &amp;quot;home schooling&amp;quot; appeared in 1974, and concerned two parents charged with &amp;quot;educational neglect&amp;quot; by the [[Westchester]] County Department of Social Services. Tests showed that they performed at or about grade level &amp;quot;except for one who is a little slow in reading,&amp;quot; and the parents received strong support from a state senator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Parents Accused in Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' July 28, 1974, p. 45&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the mid-1980s the ''Times'' was running articles with titles like &amp;quot;Schooling in the Home: A Growing Alternative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;There Are Benefits In Homeschooling,&amp;quot; and states were legalizing homeschooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Belluck, Pam (1998), &amp;quot;Life After Home Schooling,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,'' November 1, 1998, p. ED26: &amp;quot;Some 15 years after states began legalizing home schooling in earnest, these early graduates are starting to make their way in the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article said &amp;quot;It's not only [[Christian fundamentalists]] any more&amp;quot; and a 2003 article noted &amp;quot;Unhappy in Class, More Are Learning at Home.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This list of homeschoolers is pretty large and may deserve its own article. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prominent people who were educated at home ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Please note that this list is in alphabetical order.  If you add someone, please make sure you have put them in the right place alphabetically, you have included a brief description of who they are, you have briefly explained their education, and you have included a citation explaining their education.  If you do not have this information, please add your person to the list on the talk page instead. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, a remarkably high percentage of accomplished people were homeschooled, including all four of the greatest modern (post-[[Napoleon]]) mathematicians.  Here is a growing list of homeschooled achievers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ansel Adams]], (1902-1984), the finest photographer of the 20th century{{fact}}.  &amp;quot;At twelve, unable to stand the confinement and tedium of the classroom, he utterly disrupted his lessons with wild laughter and undisguised contempt for the inept ramblings of his teachers. His father decided that Ansel’s formal education was best ended. From that point forward, the boy was home-schooled in Greek, the English classics, algebra, and the glories of the ocean, inlets, and rocky beaches that surrounded their home very near San Francisco.&amp;quot;{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Adams]] (1735-1826), U.S. President, learned to read at home, and was then taught in the kitchen by a neighbor with a handful of children.  He matriculated to Harvard College at age 15.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Louisa May Alcott]] (1832-1888), the author of ''Little Women'' and other great works, was taught by her father.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clara Barton]] (1821-1912), pioneering nurse during the [[Civil War]], founder of the [[American Association of the International Red Cross]]. Barton was educated at home, and at 15 started teaching school. She later attended the Liberal Institute in Clinton, New York. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Dream Team: Clara Barton[http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/dreamteam/clarabarton.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clara Harlowe Barton, Source: &amp;quot;Historical Times Encyclopedia of the Civil War&amp;quot; edited by Patricia L. Faust&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.civilwarhome.com/bartonbio.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Breckinridge]] (1881-1965), pioneering American midwife and founder of Kentucky's Frontier Nursing Service.  Mary's father was a diplomat, and she was educated in America and abroad by private tutors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frontier Nursing Service[http://www.frontiernursing.org/History/MaryBreckinridge.shtm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Carnegie]] (1835-1919), the brilliant American businessman and philanthropist of the late 1800s, his father was a poor weaver and Andrew dropped out of elementary school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and had only five years of formal schooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/carnegiemedal/background.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] (1789-1857), one of the greatest mathematicians of all time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://james.fabpedigree.com/mathmen.htm#Cauchy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agatha Christie]] (1890-1976), best-selling English mystery writer.  Christie was educated at home by her mother, who encouraged her to write from a very early age. At sixteen she was sent to finishing school in Paris.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PBS Mystery Series &amp;quot;Miss Marple&amp;quot; site: Biography of Agatha Christie[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/mystery/marple/christie.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Edison]] (1804–1896), the most prolific inventor in the history of the world and the holder of 1093 patents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Erdos]] (1913–1996), the most prolific mathematician of the 20th century, was homeschooled by his mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benjamin Franklin]] (1706-1790), a leading [[Founding Father]] and prolific inventor and statesman, only attended part-time school from ages 8 to 10.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evariste Galois]] (1811–1832), among the brightest mathematicians ever and the founder of Galois groups and fields and Galois theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His life was tragically cut short at age 20 in a [[duel]], and his work was published posthumously.[scidiv.bcc.ctc.edu/Math/Galois.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Zac, Taylor, and Isaac Hanson, of the band [[Hanson]].  Educated at home by their mother, and later by a tutor.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hanson:  The All American Boys[http://www.drdrew.com/DrewLive/article.asp?id=1112]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hangin With Presents&lt;br /&gt;
Hanson[http://www.agirlsworld.com/rachel/hangin-with/hanson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Julia Ward Howe]] (1819–1910), abolitionist, writer, and women's rights activist. Julia was educated by tutors at home and in girls' schools until age 16. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Open Connections Program, Women Working 1800-1930, Harvard University Library:  Julia Ward Howe (1819-1910)[http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/people_howe.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joan of Arc]] (1412-1431), one of the greatest military leaders ever.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;As a child she was taught domestic skills as well as her religion by her mother. ... It was my mother alone who taught me the 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary' and the 'Creed;' and from none other was I taught my faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.stjoan-center.com/#bio A Short Biography of Saint Joan of Arc][http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08409c.htm New Advent - Catholic Encyclopedia - St. Joan of Arc][http://joan-of-arc.org/joanofarc_biography.html Biography of Joan of Arc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[C.S. Lewis]] (1898-1963), the author of the ''Chronicles of Narnia'' and other famous works, was homeschooled by his mother and a governess until age 10, and later sent to be taught by a tutor to prepare him for [[Oxford]].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abraham Lincoln]] (1809-1865), American president. &amp;quot;Though his [formal] education was limited to a few months in a 1-teacher school, Lincoln avidly read books such as the Bible, ''Pilgrim's Progress'' and Weemss ''Life of Washington''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.civilwarhome.com/lincolnbio.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Countess Augusta [[Ada Lovelace]] (1815-1852), a visionary programmer and namesake of the [[ADA]] programming language, was homeschooled by governesses and tutors hired by her mother.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benoit Mandelbrot]], Harvard mathematician considered the founder of fractal geometry, was homeschooled by his uncle beginning at the age of 12.{{citation}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yehudi Menuhin]] (1916-1999), noted violinist, was in school a grand total of only one day at age 6.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] (1756-1791), German composer. &amp;quot;He was educated by his father, Leopold Mozart, a violinist of high repute in the service of the archbishop of Salzburg.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christopher Paolini]] (1983-), the author of the best-selling [[Inheritance Trilogy]] ([[Eragon]], [[Eldest]], and a third book yet unreleased). He was homeschooled by his parents, through an accredited correspondence course from the American School in Chicago, Illinois, from which he graduated with his high school diploma at 15 years of age. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Book Browse Author Biography: Christopher Paolini[http://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm?author_number=934]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Patton]] (1885–1945), one of America's greatest generals.  He was homeschooled until age 11 based on his &amp;quot;father's theory of education&amp;quot; that &amp;quot;youthful mind should be led along a path that parallels the development of the mind of the race&amp;quot; by being read to by elders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pattonhq.com/unknown/chap01.html The Patton Society (&amp;quot;The Early Years&amp;quot;)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freeinfosociety.com/site.php?postnum=517&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Henri Poincaré]] (1854-1912), one of the greatest mathematicians ever and an original developer of the [[Theory of Relativity]], was taught at home by his mother due to a childhood illness (diphtheria).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Poincare.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Priestley]] (1733-1804), the father of modern chemistry and the discoverer of oxygen, dropped out of school as a teenager and privately learned  geometry, algebra and numerous languages.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernhard Riemann]] (1826-1866), a German recognized as the greatest modern mathematician.  He was taught at home by his father, a Lutheran minister, until he was ten.  After that he was tutored by a teacher from a local school until he entered the Lyceum in Hannover at 14.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland -- Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann, by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson[http://www-groups.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Riemann.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.andrews.edu/~calkins/math/biograph/199899/bioriema.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1882-1945), U.S. President.  He was educated by private tutors at home through age 14, then entered Groton, an elite private school in Massachusetts, in 1896. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers.  &amp;quot;Franklin D. Roosevelt.&amp;quot; Teaching Eleanor Roosevelt, ed. by Allida Black, June Hopkins, et. al. (Hyde Park, New York: Eleanor Roosevelt National Historic Site, 2003). &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/roosevelt-franklin.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1858–1919), U.S. President.  &amp;quot;Roosevelt never enrolled in a public school. He was mostly instructed by private tutors until he entered Harvard College in 1876.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://law.enotes.com/presidential-biography/theodore-roosevelt-administrations/education&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Bernard Shaw]] (1856-1950), author.  Tutored in the classics by a clerical uncle until he entered school at age 10.  Left school by age 15.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopedia of World Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary of Literary Biography on George Bernard Shaw[http://www.bookrags.com/biography/george-bernard-shaw-dlb/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Bernard Shaw, 1856-1950 Biographical Sketch[http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/research/fa/shaw.gb.bio.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Twain]] (real name was Samuel Clemens) (1835-1910), American author and satirist who said, &amp;quot;I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.&amp;quot;  Attended school through the 5th grade, where he &amp;quot;excelled only in spelling&amp;quot; and was frequently truant, then worked as a printer's apprentice for a local newspaper.  His mother said, &amp;quot;He was always a great boy for history, and could never get tired of that kind of reading; but he hadn't any use for schoolhouses and text books.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mark Twain House and Museum:  Biography of Samuel Clemens/Mark Twain [http://www.marktwainhouse.org/theman/bio.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Twain, by Archibald Henderson&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/6/8/7/6873/6873.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Wyeth]] (1917- ), American artist, was tutored at home until he was 18.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Homeschooling of Andrew Wyeth, A Conversation with the Artist, Gifted Children Monthly, May 1986, Vol 7 No. 5.[http://www.nfgcc.org/51.htm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Lloyd Wright]] (1867-1959), considered the finest architect ever, was homeschooled by his mother who dreamed that he would become an architect.  She used &amp;quot;Froebel's geometric blocks to entertain and educate her son&amp;quot; as his father led the family among various Baptist churches, where he preached.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/a/archs/wright/bio/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wright then attended high school but dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0942394/bio&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a number of prominent people have chosen to homeschool their children.  [[David Guterson]], author of the novel ''Snow Falling on Cedars'' (1994), which won the 1995 [[PEN/Faulkner Award]], also wrote ''Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes Sense'' (1992), an account of his family's homeschooling journey.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.randomhouse.com:  David Guterson [http://www.randomhouse.com/vintage/read/snow/guterson.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Actor and recording artist Will Smith and his wife actress Jada Pinikett Smith homeschool their children. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reader's Digest:  Will Power:  Will Smith is One Driven Guy[http://www.rd.com/content/will-smith-interview/1/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Roseanne Barr stated in an interview that she has started to homeschool her 11-year-old son.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reuters Interview - Roseanne Barr says age gives her a louder voice&lt;br /&gt;
[http://in.news.yahoo.com/070322/137/6dlba.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jimmy Wales, co-founder of [[Wikipedia]], also homeschools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reason.com/news/show/119689.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguably Homeschooled ==&lt;br /&gt;
Lists abound of famous homeschooled achievers, some more accurate than others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eadshome.com/Famoushomeschooled.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.education-reform.net/dropouts.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The following people have been found on such lists. Their educational background has not yet been researched by Conservapedia editors.  ['''Note: everyone is invited to find citations for these listed below and with the citations move them up to the category above.''']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Military'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stonewall Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Douglas MacArthur]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Inventors and Scientists'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Graham Bell]] (1847-1922), inventor of the telephone.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington Carver]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pierre Curie]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cyrus McCormick]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Louis Montesquieu]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Blaise Pascal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Booker T. Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leaders'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Adams|John Quincy Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[James Madison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Henry Harrison]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Tyler]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Clymer]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Livingston]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Mason]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Pickney III]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Wyeth]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patrick Henry]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Penn]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Clay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Jay]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Marshall]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Rutledge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Religious Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[William Cary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jonathan Edwards]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dwight L. Moody]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Newton]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Wesley]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brigham Young]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Writers'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hans Christian Andersen]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Robert Browning]] (1812-1889), a brilliant English poet. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pearl S. Buck]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Dickens]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bret Harte]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[C. S. Lewis]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sean O’Casey]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Artists and Social Figures'''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leonardo da Vinci]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Claude Monet]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ansel Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Burroughs]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Rogers Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Florence Nightingale]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeschooling in England and Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Education]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.robinsoncurriculum.com/view/rc/s31p54.htm Christian Children Must Have More Than A Fighting Chance] - Four reasons to homeschool your children, by [[Art Robinson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/famoushomeschoolers.htm] - List of homeschooled achievers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Mars_Volta&amp;diff=231091</id>
		<title>The Mars Volta</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Mars_Volta&amp;diff=231091"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T23:12:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''The Mars Volta''' is a progressive rock band formed after the break-up of [[At the Drive-In]]. They formed in 2001. Their first release was the Tremulant EP. Currently they have three studio albums. They are [[De-loused in the Comatorium]], [[Francis the Mute]], and [[Amputecture]]. The Mars Volta has two main members, Cedric Bixler-Zavala and Omar Rodriguez-Lopez.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bands|Mars Volta, The]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Doors&amp;diff=231086</id>
		<title>The Doors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Doors&amp;diff=231086"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T23:11:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Doors were a California based psychadelic rock group active durring the 1960's and 70's. Featuring Jim Morrison on vocals, Ray Manzarek on organ, John Densmore on drums and Robbie Krieger on guitar. The Doors were famous for their liberal politics on war, drugs and sex. Their self titled debut album &amp;quot;The Doors&amp;quot; was released in 1966 and became a success thanks largely due to their number 1 single &amp;quot;Light My Fire&amp;quot;. From there the Doors continued to release popular music often with a dark undertone. The group lost their singer Morrison when he died in 1971 but would release two albums afterword. Today the Doors reformed as The Doors Twenty First Century and continue to tour with only two original memebers (Densmore and Krieger).&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Engineer&amp;diff=231027</id>
		<title>Engineer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Engineer&amp;diff=231027"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T22:57:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Col5.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Engineer''', who has an engineering degree. Usually a person trained and skilled in the design, construction, and use of engines or machines, or in any of various branches of engineering. In U. S. and in Canada the title of &amp;quot;Professional Engineer&amp;quot; and often also titles indicating a specific branch of [[engineering]], such as &amp;quot;Civil Engineer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Mechanical Engineer&amp;quot; are restricted. In mainland [[Europe]] engineering is seen as comparable to other professions such as medicine and architecture. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In U. S. Army, Navy and Air Force, a person that is specially trained in engineering work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''According to the Merriam Webster's collegiate dictionary, engineering is defined as the application of science and mathematics by which the properties of matter and the sources of energy in nature are made useful to people.'' [http://www.nspe.org/media/mr1-faqs.asp What is engineering?] Frequently Asked Questions About Engineering. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major difference between an engineer and other types of designer is that an engineer is held responsibility for the success of his designs. An engineer who plans a bridge can lose his engineering license if the bridge collapses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/engineer engineer] Dictionary.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Professions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Engineer&amp;diff=231024</id>
		<title>Engineer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Engineer&amp;diff=231024"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T22:57:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Col5.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Engineer''', who has an engineering degree. Usually a person trained and skilled in the design, construction, and use of engines or machines, or in any of various branches of engineering. In U. S. and in Canada the title of &amp;quot;Professional Engineer&amp;quot; and often also titles indicating a specific branch of [[engineering]], such as &amp;quot;Civil Engineer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Mechanical Engineer&amp;quot; are restricted. In mainland [[Europe]] engineering is seen as comparable to other professions such as medicine and architecture. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In U. S. Army, Navy and Air Force, a person that is specially trained in engineering work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''According to the Merriam Webster's collegiate dictionary, engineering is defined as the application of science and mathematics by which the properties of matter and the sources of energy in nature are made useful to people.'' [http://www.nspe.org/media/mr1-faqs.asp What is engineering?] Frequently Asked Questions About Engineering. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major difference between an engineer and other types of designer is that an engineer is held responsibility for the success of his designs. An engineer who plans a bridge can lose his engineering license if the bridge collapses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/engineer engineer] Dictionary.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Categry:Professions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Conservaproject_Yugoslav_Wars&amp;diff=229808</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Conservaproject Yugoslav Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Conservaproject_Yugoslav_Wars&amp;diff=229808"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T05:15:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservaproject Yugoslav Wars''' is a group of editors who want to see more content on Conservapedia about the [[Breakup of Yugoslavia]], and the events that followed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of Members==&lt;br /&gt;
''Feel free to add your name to the list!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 14:52, 23 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 01:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 23:24, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
===Core Importance===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Breakup of Yugoslavia]] (political events of the breakup)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yugoslav Wars]] (military events of the breakup)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Top Importance===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bosnian War]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Croatian War of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kosovo War]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War in Slovenia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2001 Serbia conflict]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===High Importance===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2001 Macedonia conflict]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yugoslavia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bosnia and Herzegovina]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Croatia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slovenia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FYR Macedonia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Serbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Montenegro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kosovo]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slobodan Milošević]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid Importance===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Belgrade]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Zagreb]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Albanian]] (ethnic group)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bosnian]] (ethnic group)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Croat]] (ethnic group)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Serb]] (ethnic group)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bosniak]] (ethnic group)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bosnia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Herzegovina]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Army of Republika Srpska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Native_element&amp;diff=229804</id>
		<title>Native element</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Native_element&amp;diff=229804"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T05:07:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Native Elements''' are those [[elements]] that occur in the free, uncombined state, and include [[metallic]] elements ([[gold]], [[silver]]), [[semimetallic]] elements ([[arsenic]], [[antimony]]), and [[nonmetallic]] elements ([[carbon]], [[sulfur]]). The [[metals]] are more numerous, and because they are [[malleable]] and have a metallic appearance, they are readily recognized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chesterman, Charles W. ''The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Rocks and Minerals'', Alfred A. Knopf: New York (1987)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Dana's textbook of Mineralogy'' divides the Native Elements into the three sections:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metals'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amalgam]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Copper]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gold]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irodosmine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Iron]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lead]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mercury]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Platinum]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Silver]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Semimetals'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Antimony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arsenic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bismuth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tellurium]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Nonmetals'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Diamond]] - Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Graphite]] - Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sulfur]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dana, Edward S. and Ford, William E. ''Dana's Textbook of Mineralogy - Fourth Edition'', John Wiley and Sons: New York (1932)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Diet_of_Worms&amp;diff=229790</id>
		<title>Diet of Worms</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Diet_of_Worms&amp;diff=229790"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:53:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229678 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[Diet of Worms]] was a famous assembly in the town of Worms which declared [[Martin Luther]] a heretic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cosmic_Christ&amp;diff=229777</id>
		<title>Cosmic Christ</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cosmic_Christ&amp;diff=229777"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:51:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229667 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Cosmic Christ is a concept of Christ preferred by [[Paul]], in which “all things were created through Him and for Him.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Colossians 1:12-14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This view of Christ is slightly different from the [[Redemptive Christ]], in that the Cosmic Christ would have become man out of love for man and to perfect the universe, regardless of whether [[Adam]] had committed original sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not to be confused with [[pantheism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Basilica&amp;diff=229772</id>
		<title>Basilica</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Basilica&amp;diff=229772"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:51:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229641 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''basilica''' is a [[Christian]] structure designed for worship.  It consists of a lengthy, rectangular shape having an [[apse]] at one end.  It is divided by a row of columns and surrounded by an aisle.  Windows in the upper part of the central [[nave]] provide lighting.  The altar is within or before the apse that arches from the nave.  Its width is never greater than one-half its length.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The shape of the basilica resulted from the ancient conversion of pagan structures into Christian use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heart&amp;diff=229769</id>
		<title>Heart</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heart&amp;diff=229769"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:50:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''heart''' is an [[organ]] that pumps [[blood]] via the [[circulatory system]] to the rest of the body. The heart is a marvelously crafted [[muscle|muscular]] pump and in humans, the heart of an [[embryo]] begins beating 21 days after [[conception]]. According to the [[Bible]] the heart is the seat for our deepest emotions and wishes. Change in personality has been noted in Heart transplant survivors consistent with this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heart is situated inside the [[thorax]] in vertebrates and in human body is slightly to the left. Human heart consists of 4 main chambres, 2 [[atria]] and 2 [[ventricles]]. The right side of the heart receives blood from the body and pumps it to the lungs where it is oxygenated and returns to the left side of the heart. The left side of the heart pumps the oxygen carrying blood to the rest of the body. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anatomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Calvinism&amp;diff=229762</id>
		<title>Calvinism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Calvinism&amp;diff=229762"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:49:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229649 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Calvinism''' (also known as Reformed Theology) is a system in Christian theology that was first developed by 16th century Protestant theologian [[John Calvin]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is most often summed up by five points, often referred to by the acronym TULIP:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T'''otal Depravity - every person is born with a sinful nature since the fall of man in the [[Garden of Eden]].&lt;br /&gt;
*'''U'''nconditional Election - [[God]] chose every person whom He would save. This is also referred to as [[Predestination]].&lt;br /&gt;
*'''L'''imited Atonement - [[Jesus]] only died for those whom God chose for salvation.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''I'''rresistible Grace - Man has no free will over His eternal fate, and anybody whom God chooses for salvation cannot resist His call.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''P'''erserverance of the Saints - Once one is saved, they cannot lose their salvation and will perservere throughout their lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some persons do not hold to all five points, and refer to themselves by the number of &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; to which they adhere. For example, a number of people agree with all points except for Limited Atonement, and thus refer to themselves as &amp;quot;Four Point Calvinists&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The opposite of Calvinism is considered to be [[Arminianism]], which was named after Jacobus Arminius.  It should be noted here that neither John Calvin nor Jacobus Arminius truly came up with the theologies named after them, as the ideas contained within the respective beliefs have been debated upon even as far back as Paul in Romans 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;H3&amp;gt;Well Known Calvinists&amp;lt;/h3&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[John Calvin]]: http://www.ccel.org/c/calvin/?show=worksBy&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Charles Spurgeon]]: http://spurgeon.org/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jonathon Edwards]]: http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/edwards.html&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[John Piper]]: http://www.desiringgod.org/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Antichrist&amp;diff=229754</id>
		<title>Antichrist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Antichrist&amp;diff=229754"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:47:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229634 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The word '''Antichrist''' comes from the [[Greek]] αντί-χριστος (''anti''-''khristos''), meaning ''opposite of Christ''. The Greek word ''anti'' can also mean 'instead of' or &amp;quot;equal to, like&amp;quot; so that the phrase can also be interpreted as meaning ''in place of, or like,  Christ''. The term has a number of distinct uses in modern English. It can mean an extreme form of evil or evil incarnate. Some Christians believe that the use in John refers to a single being that will appear in the [[End Times]]. This view is most commonly found among [[Premillennialism|premillennialist Christians]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Antichrist in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
The following verses are the only verses which mention the Antichrist (KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I John 2:18	'as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now there are many antichrists'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I John 2:22	'Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieith the Father and the Son.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I John 4:3	'And every spirit that confesseth not that [[Jesus]] Christ is come in the flesh is not of [[God]]: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2 John 7:	'For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no other references to the term in the Bible. Neither the book of [[Daniel]] nor St John's [[Revelation]] mention the concept at all.  Based on this, many Christians argue that the Bible refers only to a ''generalized concept'' of Antichrist, applicable to anybody who is 'against Christ', not to a particular person. Moreover,  such 'antichrists' were already present in the world nearly two thousand years ago. Many major Christian denominations, such as the Catholic Church, have classically argued that these verses mainly prefigure the actual Antichrist and that one can see a single unifying Antichrist figure with the proper exegetical methods if one looks at Daniel and Revelations.[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01559a.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Cruden, A., ''Complete Concordance to the Old and New Testaments'' (Lutterworth, 1930)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Holy Bible'' (King James Version)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New English Bible'' (Oxford &amp;amp; Cambridge University Presses, 1970)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New Jerusalem Bible'' (Darton, Longman &amp;amp; Todd, 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peake, A.S., ''Commentary on the Bible'' (Nelson, 1962)&lt;br /&gt;
* Young, R., ''Analytical Concordance to the Holy Bible'' (Lutterworth, 1939)&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holy_Sepulchre&amp;diff=229750</id>
		<title>Holy Sepulchre</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holy_Sepulchre&amp;diff=229750"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:47:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229705 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Holy Sepulchre is rumored to be [[Jesus's]] burial cave.  Late in life, [[Christopher Columbus]] sought to win for Christianity control of that cave back from the [[Muslims]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henry_A._Wallace&amp;diff=229747</id>
		<title>Henry A. Wallace</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henry_A._Wallace&amp;diff=229747"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:47:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229702 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{President&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Henry wallace.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=33&lt;br /&gt;
|office=vice&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=January 20, 1941&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=January 20, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Democratic&lt;br /&gt;
|pres=Franklin D. Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=John N. Garner&lt;br /&gt;
|next=Harry S. Truman&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=October 7, 1888&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Orient, Iowa&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=November 18, 1965&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=Danbury, Connecticut&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Ilo Browne&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2= &lt;br /&gt;
|religion=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Henry Agard Wallace''' '''(1888 - 18 November 1965)''' was the second Vice President under [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] from 1941-1945.  He was not renominated as Roosevelt's running mate in 1944.  He ran independantly in the [[United States presidential election, 1948]], but lost to [[Harry Truman]].  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[Fandex]], Workman Publishing, 2002.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Wallace, Henry A.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:political people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harry_Truman&amp;diff=229745</id>
		<title>Harry Truman</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harry_Truman&amp;diff=229745"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:46:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229701 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{President|&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Harry S Truman&lt;br /&gt;
|image=HTruman.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=33&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Democratic&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=1945&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=1953&lt;br /&gt;
|vp=None&lt;br /&gt;
|vp_dates=1945-1949&lt;br /&gt;
|2vp=Alben Barkley&lt;br /&gt;
|2vp_dates=1940-1953&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Franklin D. Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
|next=Dwight D. Eisenhower&lt;br /&gt;
|seq2=34&lt;br /&gt;
|office2=vice&lt;br /&gt;
|party2=&lt;br /&gt;
|term2_start=April 12, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
|term2_end=January 20, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
|pres2=Franklin D. Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
|previous2=Henry A. Wallace&lt;br /&gt;
|next2=Alben W. Barkley&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=May 8, 1884&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Lamar&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=December 26, 1972&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=Kansas City&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Bess Wallace Truman&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2=&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Baptist&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Harry S Truman''' was the 33rd [[President]] of the [[United States]] and it was on his decision that the first [[atomic bomb]]s were dropped on the [[Japan|Japanese]] cities of [[Hiroshima]] and [[Nagasaki]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truman was born on May 8, 1884 in Lamar, [[Missouri]]. He attended public school in Independence, Missouri, graduating from high school in 1901.  Following a few brief jobs in the Kansas City area, he returned to help run the family farm in Grandview.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During [[World War I]], Truman went to [[France]] as a captain of artillery.  After returning home from the war, he married Elizabeth &amp;quot;Bess&amp;quot; Wallace and opened a men's clothing store in [[Kansas City]] with a wartime friend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1922, Truman was elected a judge in the Jackson County court, where his duties were administrative rather than judicial. Although he earned a reputation for being honest and efficient in managing county affairs, he was defeated for reelection in 1924. However, he was subsequently elected presiding judge in 1926, and reelected in 1930.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truman won election to the [[United States Senate]] in 1934, and during World War II gained national prominence for serving as chairman of the Senate Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program - referred to as the &amp;quot;Truman Committee&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.trumanlibrary.org/hst-bio.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He became Vice President for President [[Franklin Roosevelt|Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] (&amp;quot;FDR&amp;quot;) in 1944 and succeeded to the Presidency upon the death of FDR on April 12, 1945. Interestingly, Truman rarely met with Roosevelt during his tenure as Vice President &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/ht33.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was elected [[President of the United States of America]] (USA) in 1948 as a [[Democrat]]. During his term as President, he presided over the conclusion of [[World War II]] in both [[Europe]] and [[Japan]]. Truman's decision to use atomic weapons against the Japanese cities of [[Hiroshima]] and [[Nagasaki]] forced the unconditional Japanese surrender to conclude WWII. As a consequence, the United States canceled a planned invasion of the island nation which had been projected to cause 1,000,000 American and 10,000,000 Japanese casualties, and prevented the annexation of Japan's northern islands by the Soviet Union&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.afsc.org/newengland/pesp/DecisionToUseABomb.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/web/20050902-atom-bomb-hiroshima-nagasaki-enola.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Prior to Japan's surrender, [[Nazi]] German troops and their Axis allies surrendered in Europe. Truman proclaimed his [[Truman Doctrine]] on March 12, 1947 that was intended to thwart the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republic]]'s designs of expansion in the Near East by committing American aid and troops to that region. Truman also committed troops to the Korean Peninsula in 1950 to halt a [[Communist]] invasion of [[South Korea]]. American troops were part of a coalition of member nations of the newly formed [[United Nations]] (&amp;quot;UN&amp;quot;) in 1945. The USA had become a founding member of the newly established UN during Truman's presidency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Truman retired from politics at the conclusion of his presidential term and died on December 26, 1972 in his Independence, Missouri home. His Presidential library is located in Independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Middle Initial==&lt;br /&gt;
There is no period after his middle initial, because it doesn't stand for anything.  He was named with an &amp;quot;S&amp;quot; so that both his grandfathers could claim him as their namesake.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[Encyclopedia of Presidents, Harry S. Truman]], by Jim Hargrove, Children's Press, 1987.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/ht33.html Biography]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.trumanlibrary.org Presidential Library]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Truman, Harry}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=House_church&amp;diff=229744</id>
		<title>House church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=House_church&amp;diff=229744"/>
		<updated>2007-07-13T04:46:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Offeep: Undo revision 229706 by Special:Contributions/Stevecarson (User talk:Stevecarson)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''House Church''' may refer to the [[House Church Movement in the United Kingdom]] or to [[House Churches in China]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Christianity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Offeep</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>